ML16341D840: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403                                        Written Examination Grading                                      Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:  0 (.    <.. .... .. \:..            Date of Exam:          -r/ i.'-/I'-  Exam Level:    RO GsRo            5"1 Item Description                                                        Initials a          b      c
: 1.      Clean answer sheets copied before grading
                                                                                                          -v      e.    ~
: 2.        Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                    N ,. <-\...... ""'> "''> a <" d-<t...\ q__\- ~ ,_..,.        -"\/      ~zf M
: 3.        Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)                                                  ,y-    ~fL -i~
: 4.        Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail N o "._ *, u..<LA.\. ~ -, c..)..      -v        ~&#xa3;t.    ~L9B
: 5.        All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                  N '->    ~-*~' ~ "">        <.~~,,.._,"'~~\. ... "'        .-v ~ZE            ~
: 6.        Performance on missed questions checked for training
                                                                                                        .,,y
                                                                                                                  ~EE ~
deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                                                      Date
: a. Grader                                        I V~tob."b '{Atlt'-{                                      1/Lc./1 (,
                                                                                      \                        '
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)                    ~ -
                                                          "'_ ~ r_}'\ *~,~'tJ~~7 -2b-/(:,
                                                                  ~            ~            ~ '
: c. NRC Chief      Examiner(*)~~~~~~~ I ~                                                \J 1
                                                                                              ~<D.......6L Bft[JL,J I
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)                      R
_ ,h    :'1 ~  ~  LJC"\.t.    &#xa5;/dikv-                          ~l *~ l 1&
i      l
(*)      The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 22:41, 4 February 2020

DC Cook 2016 ES-403-1 Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist
ML16341D840
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A380 List:
References
Download: ML16341D840 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: 0 (. <.. .... .. \:.. Date of Exam: -r/ i.'-/I'- Exam Level: RO GsRo 5"1 Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
                                                                                                         -v      e.     ~
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented N ,. <-\...... ""'> "> a <" d-<t...\ q__\- ~ ,_..,. -"\/ ~zf M
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ,y- ~fL -i~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail N o "._ *, u..<LA.\. ~ -, c..).. -v ~£t. ~L9B
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N '-> ~-*~' ~ ""> <.~~,,.._,"'~~\. ... "' .-v ~ZE ~
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training
                                                                                                        .,,y
                                                                                                                 ~EE ~

deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader I V~tob."b '{Atlt'-{ 1/Lc./1 (,
                                                                                     \                         '
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~ -
                                                         "'_ ~ r_}'\ *~,~'tJ~~7 -2b-/(:,
                                                                  ~            ~            ~ '
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)~~~~~~~ I ~ \J 1
                                                                                              ~<D.......6L Bft[JL,J I
d. NRC Supervisor (*) R

_ ,h  :'1 ~ ~ LJC"\.t. ¥/dikv- ~l *~ l 1& i l (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}