ML20324A647: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
==Dear Mr. Helker,==
==Dear Mr. Helker,==


By letter dated November 13, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20318A287), Exelon Generation Company, LLC, (the licensee) submitted an exemption request for Peach Bottom Unit 2 and 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
By {{letter dated|date=November 13, 2020|text=letter dated November 13, 2020}} (ADAMS Accession No. ML20318A287), Exelon Generation Company, LLC, (the licensee) submitted an exemption request for Peach Bottom Unit 2 and 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 60 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review no later than December 31, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 60 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review no later than December 31, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

Latest revision as of 20:19, 7 March 2021

Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action: Peach Bottom One-time Exemption App. B Sect. VI.C.3.(I)(1) Force on Force (COVID-19)
ML20324A647
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/2020
From: Jennifer Tobin
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Bryan Hanson, David Helker
Exelon Nuclear
Tobin J
References
EPID L-2020-LLE-0192
Download: ML20324A647 (2)


Text

From: Tobin, Jennifer To: Helker, David P:(Exelon Nuclear)

Cc: Gropp Jr, Richard W:(Exelon Nuclear)

Subject:

Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action: Peach Bottom One-time Exemption App. B Sect. VI.C.3.(I)(1) Force on Force [COVID-19] (EPID No. L-2020-LLE-0192)

Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 11:23:00 AM

Dear Mr. Helker,

By letter dated November 13, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20318A287), Exelon Generation Company, LLC, (the licensee) submitted an exemption request for Peach Bottom Unit 2 and 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review no later than December 31, 2020. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Thanks,

-Jenny