ML19308E234

Notice of Appearance of RA Jablon on Behalf on City of Gainesville.Util Antitrust Conditions & Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19308E234
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	12/18/1973
From:	Jablon R GAINESVILLE, FL
To:
References
NUDOCS 8003240777
Download: ML19308E234 (6)

Text

.m F--

..-a, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

.BEFORE THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) '

) '

Florida Power Corporation )

s .

) AEC Docket No. 50-302A Crystal River No. 3 )

Nuclear Generating Unit )

. )

NOTICE OF APPEAR 7i'0_E_

Please enter my appearance in the above captioned case on behalf of the City of Gainesville.

Respectfully submitted, f Wl  :

. Robert A. Jablon Attorney for the City of Gainesville, Florida and Gainesville Utilities Department l

December 18, 19.73 Law offices Of:

Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Ave., N.W. l Washington, D.C. 20037  !

e

~

8003240 227 -

m

( +-

m '

• t. ,.' ..

.R t c S o .

• 4 i .

, .' ANTITRUST C0tIDITIONS FOR FLORIDA POWER CORPORATIOM, CRYSTAL RIVER NO. 3

\.

.l . Applicant will interconnect with and coordinate reserves by means of

~'the sale and exchange of emergency bulk power with any entity or entities in its service area

• engaging in or proposing to engage in electric bulk

.. power supply on terms that will provide for, Applicant's. costs (including a reasonable return) in connection therewith and allow the other parti-cipant(s) full access to the benefits of reserve coordination. .

. Explantory Notes:** . .

a. Interconnections will not b,e limited to low voltages when higher voltages are available from Applicant's installed facilities in -

• the area where interconnection is desired, when the proposed arrangement is found to be technically and economically feasible.

b. Emergency service agreements will not be limited to a fixed amount, but emergency service provided under such agreements will be furnished to the fullest extent available and desired where such supply does not impair service to the supplier's customers.

c. An example of the type of reserve sharing arrangement available to any participant and which v:ould provide " full access to the benefits of reserve coordination" would be one in which the .

following conditions would obtain:

D (1) The Applicant and each participant (s) shall provide to the other emergency power if and when available from its own generatica, or, through its transmission from the generation of others to the extent it can do so without disrupting service'to its o'.;n customers.

(2) The participant (s) to the reserve sharing arrangement shall, jointly with Applicant, establish from time to time the mini:aum reserves to be installed and/or purchased as necessary to maintain in total an adequate reliability of power supply on the interccnnected

. systemofApplicantandparticipant(s). The reserve responsihi'ity

~

• The use of'the term " service area" in no way indic'ates an assignrent

' or allocation of wholesale market areas. It is intended only as a rencral indication of an area within the State of Florida where Applicant provides some class of electric service.

• • In' order to clarify the commitments, certain explanatory notes have been added where necessary.

i i

95 TMn

m ,

.s

, _2_,

thus determined shall b'e calculated as a percentage of~ peak load. .

. . No participant (s) to the interconnection shall be required to maintain more than such perc'entage as a percentage of its peak

. load; provided that if the reserve requirements of Applicant are increased over and above the amount Applicant would be required

- to maintain without such intercon'nection then the .other parti-cipant(s) .shall be required to carry or provide *for as its reserve

• responsibility the . full amount in kilowatts of such increase.

, Under no circumstances will minimum spinning or operating reserve requirements exceed the installed reserve requirement.

d. Interconnection and coordination agreements'will . satisfy this -

condition if they do not embody restrictive provisions pertaining

~

to inter-system coordinatio'n. Industry practice as developed in .

• this area from time to time will satisfy this condition if it is ,

non-restrictive. .-

2. Applicant will purchase from or sell " bulk power" to any other entity

. or entities .in the aforesaid area. engaging in or proposing to engage in the generation of electric power in bulk, at its cost (including a reason-able return) when such transactions would serve' to reduce the overall costs ,

of new bulk power supply for itself or the other participant or participants to the transaction. This refers specifically to the opportunity to coordi-nate in the planning of new generation, transmission and associated -

. faciliti es. ,

ixplanatory Notes:

a. I't is not to be considered that this condition requires Applicant

to purchase or sell bulk power if it finds such purchase or sale unfeasible or its costs in connection with such purchase or sale would exceed its benefits therefrom. .

b. If Applicant engages in_ coordinated development of its bulk power supply system with that of any other bulk power supply system, by selling unit power at the cost of its new power supply, or engages in joint ventures with the same. result, Applicant shall not refuse )

proportional participation on a comparable basis from the same unit

- to any other entity in .its service area (see Commitment 1, supra) engaging in or proposing to engage in bulk power supply to the

, extent it is technically feasib.le to provide such unit power from J the unit or units in question.

3. Applicant will facilitate the exchange of bulk power by transmission over ,its system between or among two or more entities with which it is

~

l interconnected on terms which will fully compensate it' for the use of its system to the extent that subject arrangements reasonably can be accommodated j

. from a functional and technical standpoint. D ROB l

..i b & JC

'7

m. -

-l

• y 3-

--o.

Explanatory flotel: -

a. This condition' applies to entities with which applicant may be '

. interconnected in the future as well as those to which it is now interconnected.

b. Applicant is obligated under this condition to transmit bulk power for other entities on the terms stated above, and to

. include in its planning and construction programs sufficient transmission capacity as required therefor, provided that such other entities give Applicant sufficient advance notice as may be required to accommodate the arrangement from a functional and technical standpoint and that the other entities will be obligated to compensate Applicant fully for the use of its. system.

4. Appli cant will sell power in bulk to any entity in the aforesaid area now engaging in or proposing to engage in the retail distribution of

. electric power. .

5. It is recognized that the foregoing

• conditions are to be implemented in a manner consistent with the provisions of the Federal power Act and all rates, charges or practices in connection therewith are to be subject to the approval of regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over them.

4 e f

l e

• 1 l

D *%

. . vQ L~ IIIE . .

• d l

. _ _ . . . . . -. . . .._... w _ -

---

+

m e .

.- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION -

9 In the Matter of )

)

Florida Power Corporation )

) Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear )

Generating Plant ) .

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of Motion to Withdraw Intervention in the above captioned matter, have been served ~

on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class or air mail, postage prepaid, this 18th day of December, 1973:

Stanley A. Brandimore, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing 4 General Counsel Board Panel Florida Power Corporation U.S. Atomic Energy Commission St. Petersburg, Fla. 33733 Washington, D.C. 20545 Roy Snapp, Esquire Mr. Frank W. Karas, Chief Bechhoefer, Snapp & Trippe Public Proceedings Staff 1801 K Street, N.W. Office of the Secretary Suite 220 of the Commission Washington, D.C. 20006 U.S. At'omic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. '20545 Wallace Brand, Esquire Department of Justice Mr. Abraham Braitman Room 8107 , Star Building Chief, Office of Antitrust 1101 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. and Indemnity Washington, D.C. 20530 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 Joseph Rutberg, Esquire Regulatory Staff Counsel U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 I -

1 ALXdW$

l ' Robert Af Jablon i Law Offices Of:

Spiegel & McDiarmid 26 00 Virginia Ave. , N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037

m ~

' VERIFICATION DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SS:

Robert A. Jablon, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is an attorney for the City of Gainesville, Florida and Gainesville Utilities Department and that as such he has signed the foregoing Motion to withdraw Intervention for and on behalf of said party; that he is authorized by the City of Gainesville so to do; that he has read said Motion and is familiar with the contents thereof; and that the matters and things therein set forth are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

Robert Af Jablon Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of December, 1973

/

,4do c c e (

1. 4 L-;n /A, Not.ary Public -

v My Commission expires September 30, 1974

.