ML12235A954: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:25 AM To: rwalpol@entergy.com Cc: Prussman, Stephen G
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                         Pickett, Douglas Sent:                         Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:25 AM To:                           rwalpol@entergy.com Cc:                           Prussman, Stephen G


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Question on License Renewal Bob -
Question on License Renewal Bob -
I've been asked a couple questions regarding license renewal commitments. Section 1.6 of NUREG-1930 states the following:  
Ive been asked a couple questions regarding license renewal commitments. Section 1.6 of NUREG-1930 states the following:
 
1.6 Summary of Proposed License Conditions Following the staff's review of the LRA, including subsequent information and clarifications from the applicant, the staff identified three proposed license conditions.
1.6 Summary of Proposed License Conditions  
The first license condition requires the applicant to include the UFSAR supplement required by10 CFR 54.21(d) in the first UFSAR update required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) following the issuance of the renewed licenses.
 
The second license condition requires future activities described in the UFSAR supplement to be completed prior to the period of extended operation.
Following the staff's review of the LRA, including subsequent information and clarifications from the applicant, the staff identified three proposed license conditions.  
 
The first license condition requires the applicant to include the UFSAR supplement required by10 CFR 54.21(d) in the first UFSAR update required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) following the issuance of the renewed licenses.  
 
The second license condition requires future activities described in the UFSAR supplement to be completed prior to the period of extended operation.  
 
The third license condition requires that all capsules in the reactor vessel that are removed and tested meet the requirements of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 185-82 to the extent practicable for the configuration of the specimens in the capsule. Any changes to the capsule withdrawal schedule, including spare capsules, must be approved by the staff prior to implementation. All capsules placed in storage must be maintained for future insertion. Any changes to storage requirements must be approved by the staff, as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H.
The third license condition requires that all capsules in the reactor vessel that are removed and tested meet the requirements of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 185-82 to the extent practicable for the configuration of the specimens in the capsule. Any changes to the capsule withdrawal schedule, including spare capsules, must be approved by the staff prior to implementation. All capsules placed in storage must be maintained for future insertion. Any changes to storage requirements must be approved by the staff, as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H.
 
As indicated in the second license condition above, certain actions were to be completed prior to entering the period of extended operations. The questions Ive received were (1) is the licensee required to inform the NRC that the actions have been taken and (2) have we received any letters from the licensee in this regard.
As indicated in the second license condition above, certain actions were to be completed prior to entering the period of extended operations. The questions I've received were (1) is the licensee required to inform the NRC that the actions have been taken and (2) have we received any letters from the licensee in this regard.
My understanding is that when we issued the SER and NUREG-1930, we didnt anticipate that ASLB hearings might be ongoing and the license might not be renewed by the end of the original 40 years.
My understanding is that when we issued the SER and NUREG-1930, we didn't anticipate that ASLB hearings might be ongoing and the license might not be renewed by the end of the original 40 years.  
 
Could you let me know your understanding?
Could you let me know your understanding?
Thanks - Doug  
Thanks - Doug Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov 1
 
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov


Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3723   Mail Envelope Properties  (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20120822102500)
Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         3723 Mail Envelope Properties  (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20120822102500)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Question on License Renewal Sent Date:   8/22/2012 10:25:13 AM Received Date: 8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM From:   Pickett, Douglas Created By:   Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Prussman, Stephen G" <SPrussm@entergy.com>
Question on License Renewal Sent Date:           8/22/2012 10:25:13 AM Received Date:       8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM From:                 Pickett, Douglas Created By:           Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "rwalpol@entergy.com" <rwalpol@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2137     8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM
"Prussman, Stephen G" <SPrussm@entergy.com>
 
Tracking Status: None "rwalpol@entergy.com" <rwalpol@entergy.com>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                       2137                 8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 00:27, 12 November 2019

2012/08/22 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Question on License Renewal
ML12235A954
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/2012
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML12235A954 (2)
v • d • e


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:25 AM To: rwalpol@entergy.com Cc: Prussman, Stephen G

Subject:

Question on License Renewal Bob -

Ive been asked a couple questions regarding license renewal commitments. Section 1.6 of NUREG-1930 states the following:

1.6 Summary of Proposed License Conditions Following the staff's review of the LRA, including subsequent information and clarifications from the applicant, the staff identified three proposed license conditions.

The first license condition requires the applicant to include the UFSAR supplement required by10 CFR 54.21(d) in the first UFSAR update required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) following the issuance of the renewed licenses.

The second license condition requires future activities described in the UFSAR supplement to be completed prior to the period of extended operation.

The third license condition requires that all capsules in the reactor vessel that are removed and tested meet the requirements of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 185-82 to the extent practicable for the configuration of the specimens in the capsule. Any changes to the capsule withdrawal schedule, including spare capsules, must be approved by the staff prior to implementation. All capsules placed in storage must be maintained for future insertion. Any changes to storage requirements must be approved by the staff, as required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H.

As indicated in the second license condition above, certain actions were to be completed prior to entering the period of extended operations. The questions Ive received were (1) is the licensee required to inform the NRC that the actions have been taken and (2) have we received any letters from the licensee in this regard.

My understanding is that when we issued the SER and NUREG-1930, we didnt anticipate that ASLB hearings might be ongoing and the license might not be renewed by the end of the original 40 years.

Could you let me know your understanding?

Thanks - Doug Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3723 Mail Envelope Properties (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20120822102500)

Subject:

Question on License Renewal Sent Date: 8/22/2012 10:25:13 AM Received Date: 8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM From: Pickett, Douglas Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Prussman, Stephen G" <SPrussm@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "rwalpol@entergy.com" <rwalpol@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2137 8/22/2012 10:25:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12235A954&oldid=2096003"