ML063460072: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/17/2006 | | issue date = 11/17/2006 | ||
| title = Licensee Information in Support of 11/17/2006 Discussions Steam Generator Tube Inspections - Refueling Outage 14 | | title = Licensee Information in Support of 11/17/2006 Discussions Steam Generator Tube Inspections - Refueling Outage 14 | ||
| author name = Rosenblum R | | author name = Rosenblum R | ||
| author affiliation = Southern California Edison Co | | author affiliation = Southern California Edison Co | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SONGS Unit 3, Steam Generator Inspections 3C14 Update with the NRC November 17, 2006 SON GS Unit 3 Bac kground Two (2) steam generators | {{#Wiki_filter:SONGS Unit 3, Steam Generator Inspections 3C14 Update with the NRC November 17, 2006 | ||
-Supplied by Combustion | |||
* Bobbin ECT Inspection | SON GS Unit 3 Bac kground Two (2) steam generators | ||
-Complete 9 +Point ECT Inspection | - Supplied by Combustion EnginEIIF ýring | ||
-99% Complete* Secondary Side Visual Inspection | - High-Temp erature Mill Annealeoi (HTMA ) Alloy 600 Tubing | ||
-Complete e In-situ Testing -No candidate tubes identified | - 9350 tubes per SG when new | ||
* Plugging -To begin 11/1-8/2006 Note: Since exams are still in progress, all data and numbers in this presentation should be considered preliminary and subject to change.4 Discussion Points (DP)DP-1) Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle.Unit 3 has some reported extremely low-level primary-to-secondary leakage. It was discovered on June 2, 2006, and has remained stable at an estimated 2 x 1 0-5 gallons per day. This level of leakage is well below the threshold of detection gal/day) of SONGS Unit 3's normal monitoring instrumentation. | - Designated SG 88 & 89 | ||
The leakage was detected within the SONGS program for monitoring radioactive effluent paths of release to the environment which includes collection and measuring activity in a continuous charcoal filter sample on a weekly basis.Monitoring will resume following SONGS Unit 3 restart.5 Discussion Points (DP)DP-2) Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results.-No secondary side pressure tests were performed. | - SG88 - 8646 tubes in service, n0 sleeves | ||
- SG89,- 8699 tubes in service, r 0 sleeves Recent Exam Outages | |||
- Current Refueli ng Outage (3C1 4).1 8.1 EFPY | |||
- Prior Refueling Outage (3C9) 1 EFPY | |||
* Performed chemical cleanin( jof secondary side, full length of tubes 2 | |||
SONGS Steam Generator 3 | |||
Completion Status, as of 11/17/2006. | |||
* Bobbin ECT Inspection - Complete 9 +Point ECT Inspection - 99% Complete | |||
* Secondary Side Visual Inspection - Complete e In-situ Testing - No candidate tubes identified | |||
* Plugging - To begin 11/1-8/2006 Note: Since exams are still in progress, all data and numbers in this presentation should be considered preliminary and subject to change. | |||
4 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-1) Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle. | |||
Unit 3 has some reported extremely low-level primary-to-secondary leakage. It was discovered on June 2, 2006, and has remained stable at an estimated 2 x 1 0-5 gallons per day. This level of leakage is well below the threshold of detection (-*0.1 gal/day) of SONGS Unit 3's normal monitoring instrumentation. The leakage was detected within the SONGS program for monitoring radioactive effluent paths of release to the environment which includes collection and measuring activity in a continuous charcoal filter sample on a weekly basis. | |||
Monitoring will resume following SONGS Unit 3 restart. | |||
5 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-2) Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results. | |||
- No secondary side pressure tests were performed. | |||
DP-3) Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines. | DP-3) Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines. | ||
-No exceptions to the industry guidelines Were taken 6 Discussion Points (DP)DP-4) Description of Inspections Performed Bobbin Exam-Full Length Exam of In-Service Tubes (100%)Rotating Exams (+Point)-Hot Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSH-1 3.00")-Cold Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSC-13.00")-Rows 1-4 U-Bend Locations (100%)-Rows 5-10 U-Bend Locations (20%)-Special Interest Locations | - No exceptions to the industry guidelines Were taken 6 | ||
-3600 locations-Non-quantifiable bobbin indications (I-Codes)~- | |||
170 locations-Dents L 2 volts (100%) -725 locations-Dings > 4 volts (100%) -900 locations-Tube wear at supports (100%) -1800 locations 7 DP-5) Inspection Results SG88 SG89 TSH Circ, Axial, Volumetric 5 2 TSC Circ, Axial, Volumetric 0 0 Freespan Axial 0 0 Tube Support Axial 0 0 Tube Support Wear (>44% TW) 0 0 Tube Support Wear (Preventative) | Discussion Points (DP) | ||
-223 -8 Total Repairable Tubes~-10 8 Discussion Points (DP)DP-5) New Inspection Findings" During the 3R14 inspection, no damage mechanisms that were new to SONGS-3 were detected* All mechanisms were previously detected and included in the degradation assessment and the operational assessment. | DP-4) Description of Inspections Performed Bobbin Exam | ||
9 Discussion Points (DP)DP-6) Repair/Plugging Plans* Repair All indications exceeding Technical Specification repair criteria (>44% through wall)All crack-like Indications Quantified (Percent) | - Full Length Exam of In-Service Tubes (100%) | ||
Wear Indications | Rotating Exams (+Point) | ||
>25% At tube support locations Diagonal Bar Hot and Diagonal Bar Cold* >30% At all other support locations Circumferentially oriented indications will be stabilized 10 Discussion Points (DP)DP-7) In-situ Pressure Test and Tube Pull Plans e Utilizing latest EPRI and CEOG guidelines for candidate selection and testing* All tubes meeting criteria will be tested 0 No tubes have been selected to date this outage based on EPRI/CEOG screening criteria e No tube pulls are planned based on inspection results 11 Discussion Points (DP)DP-8) Schedule for SG Related Activities during Remainder of Current Outage* 11/17/06:* 11/18/06:* 11/20/06: | - Hot Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSH-1 3.00") | ||
Approximately 0.375 inches by 0.375 inches, 0.06 inch thickness. | - Cold Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSC-13.00") | ||
-Location: | - Rows 1-4 U-Bend Locations (100%) | ||
SG 89, Cold Leg TTS peripheral annulus o | - Rows 5-10 U-Bend Locations (20%) | ||
- Special Interest Locations - 3600 locations | |||
- Non-quantifiable bobbin indications (I-Codes)~- 170 locations | |||
- Dents L 2 volts (100%) - 725 locations | |||
- Dings > 4 volts (100%) - 900 locations | |||
- Tube wear at supports (100%) - 1800 locations 7 | |||
DP-5) Inspection Results SG88 SG89 TSH Circ, Axial, Volumetric 5 2 TSC Circ, Axial, Volumetric 0 0 Freespan Axial 0 0 Tube Support Axial 0 0 Tube Support Wear (>44% TW) 0 0 Tube Support Wear (Preventative) -223 -8 Total Repairable Tubes *228 ~-10 8 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-5) New Inspection Findings | |||
" During the 3R14 inspection, no damage mechanisms that were new to SONGS-3 were detected | |||
* All mechanisms were previously detected and included in the degradation assessment and the operational assessment. | |||
9 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-6) Repair/Plugging Plans | |||
* Repair All indications exceeding Technical Specification repair criteria (>44% through wall) | |||
All crack-like Indications Quantified (Percent) Wear Indications | |||
>25% At tube support locations Diagonal Bar Hot and Diagonal Bar Cold | |||
* >30% At all other support locations Circumferentially oriented indications will be stabilized 10 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-7) In-situ Pressure Test and Tube Pull Plans e Utilizing latest EPRI and CEOG guidelines for candidate selection and testing | |||
* All tubes meeting criteria will be tested 0 No tubes have been selected to date this outage based on EPRI/CEOG screening criteria e No tube pulls are planned based on inspection results 11 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-8) Schedule for SG Related Activities during Remainder of Current Outage | |||
* 11/17/06: Complete Eddy Current | |||
* 11/18/06: Complete Any In-Situ Testing | |||
* 11/20/06: Complete Repairs 12 | |||
Discu ssion Points (DP) | |||
DP-9) Discuss Loose Parts | |||
* What Inspections are performed to detect loose parts? | |||
- Secondary Side Visual Exam | |||
- 100% Bobbin Probe | |||
- 100% TSH with rotating +Point | |||
- 100% TSC with rotating +Point 13 | |||
Discussion Points (DP) | |||
DP-9) Discuss Loose Parts | |||
* A description'of any loose parts detected and their location within the SG ' | |||
- One loose part, small, non-magnetic, man-made, appears to be plastic. 'Found during visual inspection. Approximately 0.375 inches by 0.375 inches, 0.06 inch thickness. | |||
- Location: SG 89, Cold Leg TTS peripheral annulus o Ifthe loose parts were removed from the SG | |||
- Yes | |||
* Indications of the tube damage associated with the loose parts | |||
- None | |||
* Source or nature of the loose parts, if known | |||
- Unknown 14}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 23 November 2019
| ML063460072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/2006 |
| From: | Rosenblum R Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV |
| Kalynanam N, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1480 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML063450313 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC MD3204 | |
| Download: ML063460072 (14) | |
Text
SONGS Unit 3, Steam Generator Inspections 3C14 Update with the NRC November 17, 2006
SON GS Unit 3 Bac kground Two (2) steam generators
- Supplied by Combustion EnginEIIF ýring
- High-Temp erature Mill Annealeoi (HTMA ) Alloy 600 Tubing
- 9350 tubes per SG when new
- Designated SG 88 & 89
- SG88 - 8646 tubes in service, n0 sleeves
- SG89,- 8699 tubes in service, r 0 sleeves Recent Exam Outages
- Current Refueli ng Outage (3C1 4).1 8.1 EFPY
- Prior Refueling Outage (3C9) 1 EFPY
- Performed chemical cleanin( jof secondary side, full length of tubes 2
Completion Status, as of 11/17/2006.
- Secondary Side Visual Inspection - Complete e In-situ Testing - No candidate tubes identified
- Plugging - To begin 11/1-8/2006 Note: Since exams are still in progress, all data and numbers in this presentation should be considered preliminary and subject to change.
4
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-1) Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle.
Unit 3 has some reported extremely low-level primary-to-secondary leakage. It was discovered on June 2, 2006, and has remained stable at an estimated 2 x 1 0-5 gallons per day. This level of leakage is well below the threshold of detection (-*0.1 gal/day) of SONGS Unit 3's normal monitoring instrumentation. The leakage was detected within the SONGS program for monitoring radioactive effluent paths of release to the environment which includes collection and measuring activity in a continuous charcoal filter sample on a weekly basis.
Monitoring will resume following SONGS Unit 3 restart.
5
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-2) Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results.
- No secondary side pressure tests were performed.
DP-3) Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines.
- No exceptions to the industry guidelines Were taken 6
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-4) Description of Inspections Performed Bobbin Exam
- Full Length Exam of In-Service Tubes (100%)
Rotating Exams (+Point)
- Hot Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSH-1 3.00")
- Cold Leg top-of-tubesheet locations (100%) (Inspection to TSC-13.00")
- Rows 1-4 U-Bend Locations (100%)
- Rows 5-10 U-Bend Locations (20%)
- Special Interest Locations - 3600 locations
- Non-quantifiable bobbin indications (I-Codes)~- 170 locations
- Dents L 2 volts (100%) - 725 locations
- Dings > 4 volts (100%) - 900 locations
- Tube wear at supports (100%) - 1800 locations 7
DP-5) Inspection Results SG88 SG89 TSH Circ, Axial, Volumetric 5 2 TSC Circ, Axial, Volumetric 0 0 Freespan Axial 0 0 Tube Support Axial 0 0 Tube Support Wear (>44% TW) 0 0 Tube Support Wear (Preventative) -223 -8 Total Repairable Tubes *228 ~-10 8
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-5) New Inspection Findings
" During the 3R14 inspection, no damage mechanisms that were new to SONGS-3 were detected
- All mechanisms were previously detected and included in the degradation assessment and the operational assessment.
9
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-6) Repair/Plugging Plans
- Repair All indications exceeding Technical Specification repair criteria (>44% through wall)
All crack-like Indications Quantified (Percent) Wear Indications
>25% At tube support locations Diagonal Bar Hot and Diagonal Bar Cold
- >30% At all other support locations Circumferentially oriented indications will be stabilized 10
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-7) In-situ Pressure Test and Tube Pull Plans e Utilizing latest EPRI and CEOG guidelines for candidate selection and testing
- All tubes meeting criteria will be tested 0 No tubes have been selected to date this outage based on EPRI/CEOG screening criteria e No tube pulls are planned based on inspection results 11
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-8) Schedule for SG Related Activities during Remainder of Current Outage
- 11/17/06: Complete Eddy Current
- 11/18/06: Complete Any In-Situ Testing
- 11/20/06: Complete Repairs 12
Discu ssion Points (DP)
DP-9) Discuss Loose Parts
- What Inspections are performed to detect loose parts?
- Secondary Side Visual Exam
- 100% Bobbin Probe
- 100% TSH with rotating +Point
- 100% TSC with rotating +Point 13
Discussion Points (DP)
DP-9) Discuss Loose Parts
- A description'of any loose parts detected and their location within the SG '
- One loose part, small, non-magnetic, man-made, appears to be plastic. 'Found during visual inspection. Approximately 0.375 inches by 0.375 inches, 0.06 inch thickness.
- Location: SG 89, Cold Leg TTS peripheral annulus o Ifthe loose parts were removed from the SG
- Yes
- Indications of the tube damage associated with the loose parts
- None
- Source or nature of the loose parts, if known
- Unknown 14