ML062160194: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PSEG / Allegation Project Plan March 18 Management Meeting NRC approach-Region I managers to visit site early, including some staff interviews, then meeting preparations onsite. No briefing package.PSEG approach JLLetter to encourage some staff attendance | {{#Wiki_filter:PSEG / Allegation Project Plan March 18 Management Meeting NRC approach-Region I managers to visit site early, including some staff interviews, then meeting preparations onsite. No briefing package. | ||
PSEG approach JLLetter to encourage some staff attendance | |||
* Should it be transcribed? | * Should it be transcribed? | ||
No transcription, but given Lochbaum's videotaping, PSEG will audiotape and provide us a copy.New Jersey involvement? -ipoti, Toschet al to attend Out c t lic stak s ? -nfirm t whethe ill take public questions* Coordinate with OCA for Congressional contacts -as notified contacts of meeting; few questions or interest* Response Plan (Feb 27 Letter) review -separate file* T; Wspeak at meeting USA cover at meeting; report to be iss ril 2 Synergy survey -report onsite; no reps at meeting; o cover Initial review done by Marc | No transcription, but given Lochbaum's videotaping, PSEG will audiotape and provide us a copy. | ||
Holody's 3 voluntary precedents reviewed; Can not compel public disclosure; discussion with PSEG has continued* Concerns, comments & issues on response plan -Br. 3 has gathered.* Q & As and key message on allegation | New Jersey involvement? -ipoti, Toschet al to attend Out c t lic stak s? - | ||
-Br. 3 updating.* Understanding PSEG presentation | nfirm t whethe ill take public questions | ||
-PSEG plans to provide preliminary version* Meeting handouts -Br. 3 creating 40 feedback forms for handing out; slides are brief and do not merit handout.in accordance with the Freedom of InfOrmation Act, exemptions | * Coordinate with OCA for Congressional contacts - | ||
")?FOIA* f/? | as notified contacts of meeting; few questions or interest | ||
March 28 Demonstration | * Response Plan (Feb 27 Letter) review - separate file | ||
& Speech 0 NRC attendance | * T; Wspeak at meeting USA cover at meeting; report to be iss ril 2 Synergy survey - report onsite; no reps at meeting; o cover Ferdas Initial review done by Marc Detailed review - Dan, Mel, Ted done w/o March 8; Randy | ||
-None.0 Speech review -Neff to coordinate getting speech.* Commissioner TA briefing -Br. 3 arrange with EDO 0 Other prep actions -reassess after March 18 meeting, incl. Q&As Allegation Review* Status of interviews | * UCS - Synergy report publicly available? | ||
-summary on G:Br.3\ARB Docs\lnterview Summary" Transcript review as of March 5 -at least 5 man-weeks of effort remain 54 interviews done, 25 transcripts reviewed, 19 binned; DRP to pursue 3 man-weeks or more of add'l help.0 Binning -Target to be done by mid-April; on S:\Salem-HC SCWE" Status of civil action on discrimination | Holody's 3 voluntary precedents reviewed; Can not compel public disclosure; discussion with PSEG has continued | ||
-still in discovery process" Status letter to alleger -Status letter (180 days) due mid-April; any discussion of wrongdoing will be carefully addressed in letter so as to not jeopardize 01 investigation. | * Concerns, comments & issues on response plan - Br. 3 has gathered. | ||
01 will concur in letter." Specific technical issues within transcript | * Q & As and key message on allegation - Br. 3 updating. | ||
* Understanding PSEG presentation - PSEG plans to provide preliminary version | |||
May 20? Management Meeting \ Annual Assessment Meeting" Arrangements | * Meeting handouts - | ||
-probably day; Br. 3 to get tentative date" Check with Hub and NRR as to whether joint meeting is appropriate. | Br. 3 creating 40 feedback forms for handing out; slides are brief and do not merit handout. | ||
in accordance with the Freedom of InfOrmation Act, exemptions ")? | |||
FOIA* f/?* | |||
March 28 Demonstration & Speech 0 NRC attendance - None. | |||
0 Speech review - Neff to coordinate getting speech. | |||
* Commissioner TA briefing - Br. 3 arrange with EDO 0 Other prep actions - reassess after March 18 meeting, incl. Q&As Allegation Review | |||
* Status of interviews - summary on G:Br.3\ARB Docs\lnterview Summary | |||
" Transcript review as of March 5 - at least 5 man-weeks of effort remain 54 interviews done, 25 transcripts reviewed, 19 binned; DRP to pursue 3 man-weeks or more of add'l help. | |||
0 Binning - Target to be done by mid-April; on S:\Salem-HC SCWE | |||
" Status of civil action on discrimination - still in discovery process | |||
" Status letter to alleger - | |||
Status letter (180 days) due mid-April; any discussion of wrongdoing will be carefully addressed in letter so as to not jeopardize 01 investigation. | |||
01 will concur in letter. | |||
" Specific technical issues within transcript - | |||
Evaluate for allegation entry; some followup inspection may subsequently be done. Preliminary review to be done by next panel to address allegation process vulnerability. | |||
May 20? Management Meeting \ Annual Assessment Meeting | |||
" Arrangements - probably day; Br. 3 to get tentative date | |||
" Check with Hub and NRR as to whether joint meeting is appropriate. | |||
G:\Br.3Allegation SCWE\Project Plan March 16}} | G:\Br.3Allegation SCWE\Project Plan March 16}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:32, 23 November 2019
| ML062160194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/2006 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062160194 (2) | |
Text
PSEG / Allegation Project Plan March 18 Management Meeting NRC approach-Region I managers to visit site early, including some staff interviews, then meeting preparations onsite. No briefing package.
PSEG approach JLLetter to encourage some staff attendance
- Should it be transcribed?
No transcription, but given Lochbaum's videotaping, PSEG will audiotape and provide us a copy.
New Jersey involvement? -ipoti, Toschet al to attend Out c t lic stak s? -
nfirm t whethe ill take public questions
- Coordinate with OCA for Congressional contacts -
as notified contacts of meeting; few questions or interest
- Response Plan (Feb 27 Letter) review - separate file
- T; Wspeak at meeting USA cover at meeting; report to be iss ril 2 Synergy survey - report onsite; no reps at meeting; o cover Ferdas Initial review done by Marc Detailed review - Dan, Mel, Ted done w/o March 8; Randy
- UCS - Synergy report publicly available?
Holody's 3 voluntary precedents reviewed; Can not compel public disclosure; discussion with PSEG has continued
- Concerns, comments & issues on response plan - Br. 3 has gathered.
- Q & As and key message on allegation - Br. 3 updating.
- Meeting handouts -
Br. 3 creating 40 feedback forms for handing out; slides are brief and do not merit handout.
in accordance with the Freedom of InfOrmation Act, exemptions ")?
FOIA* f/?*
March 28 Demonstration & Speech 0 NRC attendance - None.
0 Speech review - Neff to coordinate getting speech.
- Commissioner TA briefing - Br. 3 arrange with EDO 0 Other prep actions - reassess after March 18 meeting, incl. Q&As Allegation Review
- Status of interviews - summary on G:Br.3\ARB Docs\lnterview Summary
" Transcript review as of March 5 - at least 5 man-weeks of effort remain 54 interviews done, 25 transcripts reviewed, 19 binned; DRP to pursue 3 man-weeks or more of add'l help.
0 Binning - Target to be done by mid-April; on S:\Salem-HC SCWE
" Status of civil action on discrimination - still in discovery process
" Status letter to alleger -
Status letter (180 days) due mid-April; any discussion of wrongdoing will be carefully addressed in letter so as to not jeopardize 01 investigation.
01 will concur in letter.
" Specific technical issues within transcript -
Evaluate for allegation entry; some followup inspection may subsequently be done. Preliminary review to be done by next panel to address allegation process vulnerability.
May 20? Management Meeting \ Annual Assessment Meeting
" Arrangements - probably day; Br. 3 to get tentative date
" Check with Hub and NRR as to whether joint meeting is appropriate.
G:\Br.3Allegation SCWE\Project Plan March 16