|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML062550168 | | | number = ML062550168 |
| | issue date = 09/01/2006 | | | issue date = 09/01/2006 |
| | title = 2006/09/01-Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission | | | title = Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission |
| | author name = McKeon D | | | author name = Mckeon D |
| | author affiliation = State of NJ, Ocean County Utilities Authority | | | author affiliation = State of NJ, Ocean County Utilities Authority |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Doris Mendiola-Oyster Crek EIS -Question on Strontium-90 emmissions Page 1 Doris Mendiola -Oyster Crek EIS -Question on Strontium emmissions Page 11 From: <DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj.us> | | {{#Wiki_filter:Strontium-90 emmissions Page 1 Mendiola-- Oyster Doris Mendiola Crek EIS Oyster Crek - |
| To: <oystercreekeis | | Question on EIS - Question on Strontium emmissions Page 11 6y'u7o4 From: <DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj.us> |
| @ nrc.gov>Date: 09/01/2006 3:49:0.1 PM | | To: <oystercreekeis @nrc.gov> |
| | Date: 09/01/2006 3:49:0.1 PM |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Oyster Crek EIS -Question on Strontium-90 emmissions As a follow-up to an earlier conversation with Michael Masnik: I have attached a chart that was provided to me by a resident of Ocean County. The chart notes that Oyster Creek had the second highest emission of Strontium-90 of twenty nuclear plants surveyed, from 2001 to 2003. The source listed is the NRC, but the web page listed at the bottom of the chart is not accessible. | | Oyster Crek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 emmissions As a follow-up to an earlier conversation with Michael Masnik: |
| Please comment on this information, as it appears to be inconsistent with information contained within the draft Environmental Impact Statement for Oyster Creek.(See attached file: Nuclear Emissions.pdf) | | I have attached a chart that was provided to me by a resident of Ocean County. The chart notes that Oyster Creek had the second highest emission of Strontium-90 of twenty nuclear plants surveyed, from 2001 to 2003. The source listed is the NRC, but the web page listed at the bottom (ZN m1 of the chart is not accessible. Please comment on this information, as it appears to be inconsistent with information contained within the draft .71 -o C: |
| David J. McKeon, Planning Director Ocean County Planning Department 129 Hooper Avenue P.O. Box 2191 Toms River, New Jersey 08754-2191 web address -www.planning.co.ocean.nj.us Ph.: 732-929-2054 Fax: 732-244-8396 CC: <AAvery@ co.ocean.nj.us>, <TAgliata | | Environmental Impact Statement for Oyster Creek. r__ |
| @co.ocean.nj.us> | | -Hn (See attached file: Nuclear Emissions.pdf) |
| 6y'u7o4.71 (ZN-o m1 C: r__-Hn=: _2ý -CAY-7 -,I-q U.S. NUCLEAR REACTORS WITH HIGHEST LEVELS OF AIRBORNE EMISSIONS OF RADIOACTIVE STRONTIUM-90, 2001-2003 (in Microcuries, one-millio'nth of a curie)Reactor (state) Sr-90 1. Fitzpatrick (NY) 661.2 2. Oyster Creek (N)593.2 3. Quad Cities 1 (IL) 93.5 4. LaSalle I (IL) 49.3 5. Salem I (NJ) 42.7 6. Susquehanna I (PA) 29.5 7. Dresden 2 (IL) 14.6 8. Brunswick I (NC) 9.3 9. Washington Nuclear (WA) 6.8 10. Duane Arnold (IA) 5A4 11. Cooper Station (NE) 5.2 12. Fermi 2(MI) 4.2 13. Kewaunee 1 (WI) 3.4 14. Pilgrim (MA) 3.3 15. St. Lucie I(FL) 3.2 16. St. Lucie 2 (FL) 3.0 17. Big Rock Point (MI) 2.2 18. Monticello I (MN) '.19. Clinton (IL) .*.. 1.9 .....20. HatchlI(OA) 1.-.9 Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory'omms-s~on,'
| | David J. McKeon, Planning Director Ocean County Planning Department 129 Hooper Avenue P.O. Box 2191 Toms River, New Jersey 08754-2191 web address - www.planning.co.ocean.nj.us Ph.: 732-929-2054 Fax: 732-244-8396 CC: <AAvery@ co.ocean.nj.us>, <TAgliata @co.ocean.nj.us> |
| available at vA.remefur1D 1ýýwýmýY c:\temp\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Pg Page 11 Mail Envelope Properties. | | =: _2ý - CAY-7 -,I-q |
| (44F788EC.2F70: | | |
| 20 :33520) | | U.S. NUCLEAR REACTORS WITH HIGHEST LEVELS OF AIRBORNE EMISSIONS OF RADIOACTIVE STRONTIUM-90, 2001-2003 (in Microcuries, one-millio'nth of a curie) |
| | Reactor (state) Sr-90 |
| | : 1. Fitzpatrick (NY) 661.2 |
| | : 2. Oyster Creek (N)593.2 |
| | : 3. Quad Cities 1 (IL) 93.5 |
| | : 4. LaSalle I (IL) 49.3 |
| | : 5. Salem I (NJ) 42.7 |
| | : 6. Susquehanna I (PA) 29.5 |
| | : 7. Dresden 2 (IL) 14.6 |
| | : 8. Brunswick I (NC) 9.3 |
| | : 9. Washington Nuclear (WA) 6.8 |
| | : 10. Duane Arnold (IA) 5A4 |
| | : 11. Cooper Station (NE) 5.2 |
| | : 12. Fermi 2(MI) 4.2 |
| | : 13. Kewaunee 1 (WI) 3.4 |
| | : 14. Pilgrim (MA) 3.3 |
| | : 15. St. Lucie I(FL) 3.2 |
| | : 16. St. Lucie 2 (FL) 3.0 |
| | : 17. Big Rock Point (MI) 2.2 |
| | : 18. Monticello I (MN) '. |
| | : 19. Clinton (IL) . *.. 1.9 . . ... |
| | : 20. HatchlI(OA) 1.-.9 Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory'omms-s~on,' available at vA.remefur1D 1ýýwýmýY |
| | |
| | c:\temp\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Pg Page 11 Mail Envelope Properties. (44F788EC.2F70: 20 :33520) |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Creation Date From: Created BY: Oyster Crek EIS -Question on Strontium-90 emmissions 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM<DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj*.us>
| | Oyster Crek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 emmissions Creation Date 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM From: <DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj*.us> |
| DM~cKeon @co.ocean.nj .us Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOOI OysterCreekEIS co.ocean.nj.us TAgliata CC AAvery CC Post Office TWGWPOO 1.HQGWDOO 1 Route nrc.gov co.ocean.nj .us Files MESSAGE Nuclear Emissions.pdf Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested: | | Created BY: DM~cKeon @co.ocean.nj .us Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOOI OysterCreekEIS co.ocean.nj.us TAgliata CC AAvery CC Post Office Route TWGWPOO 1.HQGWDOO 1 nrc.gov co.ocean.nj .us Files Size' Date & Time MESSAGE 807 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM Nuclear Emissions.pdf 348615 Mime.822 479323 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed |
| Return Notification: | |
| Concealed | |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Security: Size'807 348615 479323 None Standard No None No Standard Date & Time 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Sc:\temp\GW)OOOO1 .TMP Page 2 Block List is not enabled}} | | No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled |
| | |
| | Sc:\temp\GW)OOOO1 .TMP Page 2 Block List is not enabled}} |
Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance
Results
Other: ML052280187, ML060410476, ML060410481, ML060720127, ML060720129, ML060720130, ML061500190, ML061500192, ML061580022, ML062160029, ML062550158, ML062890168, ML062930088, ML070100418, ML070110360, ML070110371, ML071620386
|
MONTHYEARML0607201271992-08-31031 August 1992
Update of Alternate Cooling Water System Study for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Volume 1 Technical and Economic Evaluation
Project stage: Other
ML0607201291992-08-31031 August 1992
Update of Alternate Cooling Water System Study for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Volume 2 Environmental Effects and Cost Analyses
Project stage: Other
ML0522801872005-10-12012 October 2005
Enclosure 1: Figure 2-2 6-Mile Vicinity Map, Enclosure 2: Figure 2-3 Oyster Creek Generating Station Site Boundary
Project stage: Other
ML0534003822005-11-0101 November 2005
Environmental Scoping Meeting Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and National Environmental Policy Act, November 1, 2005
Project stage: Meeting
ML0534003712005-11-0101 November 2005
Official Transcript of Proceedings, NRC: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Plant Public Meeting: Evening Session, Toms River, Nj, Tuesday, November 1, 2005
Project stage: Meeting
ML0534003612005-11-0101 November 2005
Official Transcript of Proceedings - NRC, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Plant Public Meeting: Afternoon Session, Toms River, Nj, Tuesday, November 1, 2005
Project stage: Meeting
ML0531303872005-11-0909 November 2005
Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: RAI
ML0535401002005-12-19019 December 2005
- Summary of Conference Call with Amergen Energy Company, LLC (Amergen) to Discuss the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternative (SAMA) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: RAI
ML0601302382006-01-0909 January 2006
Oyster Creek, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Related to Severe Accident Management Alternatives (SAMA)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0604104762006-01-18018 January 2006
Letter to the Honorable Jon Corzine from New Jersey Dept of Environment Protection, Recommendation Against Further State Funding of the Radiation and Public Health Project Report on Strontium 90 and Oyster Creek Ngs
Project stage: Other
ML0604104812006-01-31031 January 2006
New Jersey Dept of Environmental Protection'S Review of the Radiation and Public Health Project'S Report on Strontium 90 and Baby Teeth of New Jersey Children with Cancer, as Relates to the Oyster Creek Ngs
Project stage: Other
ML0607201302006-03-0202 March 2006
Determination of Cooling Tower Availability for Oyster Creek Generating Station, Final Report
Project stage: Other
ML0606704802006-03-0505 March 2006
2006/03/05- Telecommunication with Amergen Energy Company, LLC, to Discuss Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to NRC Staff'S Review of the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternative (SAMA) Analysis in the Oyster Creek License Renewa
Project stage: RAI
ML0607201262006-03-0808 March 2006
2006/03/08-Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Environmental License Renewal Review for the Oyster Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0607603792006-03-15015 March 2006
Oyster Creek - Clarifications to Responses to NRC Request for Additional Information Related to Severe Accident Management Alternatives
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0615001922006-06-0909 June 2006
2006/06/09-Request Initiation of an Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0615602302006-06-0909 June 2006
Letter to C.N. Swenson: Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Draft Other
ML0615001902006-06-0909 June 2006
2006/06/09-Request Initiation of a Section 7 Consultation Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0621600292006-06-13013 June 2006
Letter from Ms. Dorothy Guzzo, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, Regarding Oyster Creek Ngs License Renewal
Project stage: Other
ML0615800222006-06-13013 June 2006
2006/06/13-Oyster Creek License Renewal Application Review (TAC No. MC7625) (HPO-J2004-7021)
Project stage: Other
ML0620604362006-07-0505 July 2006
Email from Dotty Reynolds Regarding Environmental Review of Oyster Creek
Project stage: Request
ML0622301292006-07-12012 July 2006
Powerpoint Presentation Associated with Oyster Creek Draft EIS Public Meetings
ML0622205262006-07-12012 July 2006
Transcript of Oyster Creek Dseis Meeting 07/12/2006, (Evening Session) Pp. 1-118
Project stage: Meeting
ML0622204582006-07-12012 July 2006
Transcript of Oyster Creek Dseis Meeting 07/12/2006, (Afternoon Session) Pp. 1-105
Project stage: Meeting
ML0620604432006-07-13013 July 2006
Email from Pat Crocker Regarding Environmental Review of Oyster Creek Ngs
Project stage: Request
ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006
2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey
Project stage: Request
ML0622301392006-08-10010 August 2006
2006/08/10-Summary of Public Meetings on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License License Renewal Review
ML0625501662006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (6) of Edith Gbur, Re Questions Regarding EIS
Project stage: Request
ML0625501582006-08-30030 August 2006
2006/08/30-Comment (3) of Michael J. Kennish on Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek
Project stage: Other
ML0625501682006-09-0101 September 2006
Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission
Project stage: Request
ML0626102342006-09-0707 September 2006
Comment (9) of Robert Scro on Behalf of Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program Opposing the Generic Environmental Impact Station for Oyster Creek,
Project stage: Request
ML0626104162006-09-0808 September 2006
Comment (10) of Raechelle Edwards on Behalf of Julia Lemense Huff Re Renewal of Oyster Creek License
Project stage: Request
ML0626102452006-09-12012 September 2006
Comment (19) of Edith Gbur Re Oyster Creek EIS
Project stage: Request
ML0628901682006-09-28028 September 2006
2006/09/28-NOAA - F. Gillespie - Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0629300882006-10-18018 October 2006
2006/10/18-Letter Received on October 16, 2006, Regarding the Essential Fish Habitat for License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (TAC #MC7625)
Project stage: Other
ML0701004182006-11-14014 November 2006
E-MAIL: (PA) Extension for Efh Consult Oyster Creek TAC MC7625
Project stage: Other
ML0633203462006-11-21021 November 2006
NOAA Biological Opinion for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Request
ML0633803662006-12-0404 December 2006
Email from William Maher, Exelon Corp., Non-rad Wastes at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Request
ML0701103602007-01-17017 January 2007
Notice of Availability of the Final Plant - Specific Supplement 28 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (Geis) Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0701103712007-01-17017 January 2007
Final Supplement 28 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal Nuclear Plants Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0701002342007-01-31031 January 2007
NUREG-1437, Vol. 1, Supp. 28, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Final Report - Main Report.
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML0701002582007-01-31031 January 2007
NUREG-1437, Vol. 2, Supp. 28, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML0716203862007-05-24024 May 2007
E-Mail: (PA) the Consolidated Record for Consistency Appeals Under the Coastal Zone Management Act (Czma)
Project stage: Other
2006-03-08
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19004A0752019-01-0303 January 2019
Comment of Janet Tauro on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19003A2422018-12-28028 December 2018
Comment of Donald Weigl on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18362A0952018-12-23023 December 2018
Comment of Gary Defranco of Trans Tech Industries on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18324A7762018-11-18018 November 2018
Comment (2) of Alfred Decker on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18302A2232018-10-29029 October 2018
Comment (1) of Brain Kube on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18255A0422018-09-12012 September 2018
Comment (3) of Ron Martyn on Behalf of Community Civic Affairs Group on Decommissioning Creek Nuclear of Exelon'S Oyster Generating Station
ML11264A0902011-09-13013 September 2011
Comment (8) of John Runyan, on Behalf of Self, on Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0720501772007-04-26026 April 2007
Local Area Personal Income
ML0706600532007-02-21021 February 2007
Comment (1) of John Filippelli on Behalf of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regarding Renewal of Operating License for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0630703242006-10-21021 October 2006
Comment (2) of Raymond Tierney, on Reactor Oversight Process as Described in Solicitation Letter #7590-01-P
ML0628605662006-09-15015 September 2006
2006/09/15-Comment (1) of J. Lipoti Supporting to the Proposed License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance LR-ISG-2006-03 for Preparing Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analyses
ML0626102482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (20) of Willie Decamp Regarding Waste Accumulation for Oyster Creek License Renewal
ML0626800332006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (23) of Richard Webster, on NUREG-1437:Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,Supplement 28, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Draft Report for Comment: Comment on Safety & Secu
ML0626504562006-09-14014 September 2006
Comment (22) of Mary Miazza, Opposing Relicensing of 35 Year Old Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626203482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (21) of Kenneth C. Koschek on License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626102442006-09-13013 September 2006
2006/09/13-Comment (18) of Jennifer Samson on Behalf of Clean Ocean Action and American Littoral Society on NUREG-1437: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Suppl, 28, Oyster Creek Draft Report for C
ML0626102452006-09-12012 September 2006
Comment (19) of Edith Gbur Re Oyster Creek EIS
ML0626102362006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (12) of Eugene Creamer on Nrc'S Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of License for Oyster Creek
ML0626103592006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (11) of Richard Webster, Resending EIS Comments
ML0626104162006-09-0808 September 2006
Comment (10) of Raechelle Edwards on Behalf of Julia Lemense Huff Re Renewal of Oyster Creek License
ML0626102422006-09-0707 September 2006
2006/09/07-Comment (16) of John Filippelli on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Oyster Creek. Recommends That the Final SEIS Address Opportunities for Pollution Prevention & Waste Recycling
ML0626102342006-09-0707 September 2006
Comment (9) of Robert Scro on Behalf of Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program Opposing the Generic Environmental Impact Station for Oyster Creek,
ML0625501632006-09-0606 September 2006
Comment (5) of Jessie Carr, Re Comments on Draft Supplement 28 to GEIS (NUREG-1437) Specific to Application for 20-Year License Extension for Oyster Creek Generating Station
ML0625501702006-09-0505 September 2006
Comment (8) of Tom D. Jones Voicing Concerns and Objections to Relicensing of Nuclear Power Plant in Lacey Township, Nj
ML0626102402006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (15) of Mary Mazza Opposing Relicensing Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant; So Much Technology for Safer Cleaner Energy Alternatives Are Now Available and During the Next 5 Years, More Will Be
ML0626102392006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (14) of Joan K. Rubin and Gail Marsh Saxer, League of Women Voters, on Nrc'S Draft Generic Environmental Impact Study for Re-Licensing of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. League Supports Recommendation by the State of Nj
ML0625501682006-09-0101 September 2006
Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission
ML0630001342006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (27) of Diane Lazinsky Regarding the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) for License Renewal at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 28)
ML0625501582006-08-30030 August 2006
2006/08/30-Comment (3) of Michael J. Kennish on Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek
ML0625501662006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (6) of Edith Gbur, Re Questions Regarding EIS
ML0625501612006-08-28028 August 2006
2006/08/28-Comment (4) of Michael P. Gallagher on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek, Dated June 2006
ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006
2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey
ML0620503092006-07-14014 July 2006
Comment (1) of Joseph Mangano on Renewal of Oyster Creek License for Another 20 Years. Urges NRC to Thoroughly Examine Potential Health Risks from Plant Using Available Data
ML0630001172006-07-13013 July 2006
Comment (26) of Pat Crocker Supporting License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Station
ML0630001062006-07-0505 July 2006
Comment (24) of Dotty Reynolds on Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Renewal Hearings
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0300204912002-12-16016 December 2002
Comment from Jill Lipoti on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)
2019-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
Strontium-90 emmissions Page 1 Mendiola-- Oyster Doris Mendiola Crek EIS Oyster Crek -
Question on EIS - Question on Strontium emmissions Page 11 6y'u7o4 From: <DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj.us>
To: <oystercreekeis @nrc.gov>
Date: 09/01/2006 3:49:0.1 PM
Subject:
Oyster Crek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 emmissions As a follow-up to an earlier conversation with Michael Masnik:
I have attached a chart that was provided to me by a resident of Ocean County. The chart notes that Oyster Creek had the second highest emission of Strontium-90 of twenty nuclear plants surveyed, from 2001 to 2003. The source listed is the NRC, but the web page listed at the bottom (ZN m1 of the chart is not accessible. Please comment on this information, as it appears to be inconsistent with information contained within the draft .71 -o C:
Environmental Impact Statement for Oyster Creek. r__
-Hn (See attached file: Nuclear Emissions.pdf)
David J. McKeon, Planning Director Ocean County Planning Department 129 Hooper Avenue P.O. Box 2191 Toms River, New Jersey 08754-2191 web address - www.planning.co.ocean.nj.us Ph.: 732-929-2054 Fax: 732-244-8396 CC: <AAvery@ co.ocean.nj.us>, <TAgliata @co.ocean.nj.us>
=: _2ý - CAY-7 -,I-q
U.S. NUCLEAR REACTORS WITH HIGHEST LEVELS OF AIRBORNE EMISSIONS OF RADIOACTIVE STRONTIUM-90, 2001-2003 (in Microcuries, one-millio'nth of a curie)
Reactor (state) Sr-90
- 1. Fitzpatrick (NY) 661.2
- 2. Oyster Creek (N)593.2
- 3. Quad Cities 1 (IL) 93.5
- 4. LaSalle I (IL) 49.3
- 5. Salem I (NJ) 42.7
- 6. Susquehanna I (PA) 29.5
- 7. Dresden 2 (IL) 14.6
- 8. Brunswick I (NC) 9.3
- 9. Washington Nuclear (WA) 6.8
- 10. Duane Arnold (IA) 5A4
- 11. Cooper Station (NE) 5.2
- 12. Fermi 2(MI) 4.2
- 13. Kewaunee 1 (WI) 3.4
- 14. Pilgrim (MA) 3.3
- 15. St. Lucie I(FL) 3.2
- 16. St. Lucie 2 (FL) 3.0
- 17. Big Rock Point (MI) 2.2
- 18. Monticello I (MN) '.
- 19. Clinton (IL) . *.. 1.9 . . ...
- 20. HatchlI(OA) 1.-.9 Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory'omms-s~on,' available at vA.remefur1D 1ýýwýmýY
c:\temp\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Pg Page 11 Mail Envelope Properties. (44F788EC.2F70: 20 :33520)
Subject:
Oyster Crek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 emmissions Creation Date 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM From: <DMcKeon @co.ocean.nj*.us>
Created BY: DM~cKeon @co.ocean.nj .us Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOOI OysterCreekEIS co.ocean.nj.us TAgliata CC AAvery CC Post Office Route TWGWPOO 1.HQGWDOO 1 nrc.gov co.ocean.nj .us Files Size' Date & Time MESSAGE 807 09/01/2006 3:48:37 PM Nuclear Emissions.pdf 348615 Mime.822 479323 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled
Sc:\temp\GW)OOOO1 .TMP Page 2 Block List is not enabled