|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19004A0752019-01-0303 January 2019
Comment of Janet Tauro on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19003A2422018-12-28028 December 2018
Comment of Donald Weigl on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18362A0952018-12-23023 December 2018
Comment of Gary Defranco of Trans Tech Industries on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18324A7762018-11-18018 November 2018
Comment (2) of Alfred Decker on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18302A2232018-10-29029 October 2018
Comment (1) of Brain Kube on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18255A0422018-09-12012 September 2018
Comment (3) of Ron Martyn on Behalf of Community Civic Affairs Group on Decommissioning Creek Nuclear of Exelon'S Oyster Generating Station
ML11264A0902011-09-13013 September 2011
Comment (8) of John Runyan, on Behalf of Self, on Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0720501772007-04-26026 April 2007
Local Area Personal Income
ML0706600532007-02-21021 February 2007
Comment (1) of John Filippelli on Behalf of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regarding Renewal of Operating License for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0630703242006-10-21021 October 2006
Comment (2) of Raymond Tierney, on Reactor Oversight Process as Described in Solicitation Letter #7590-01-P
ML0628605662006-09-15015 September 2006
2006/09/15-Comment (1) of J. Lipoti Supporting to the Proposed License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance LR-ISG-2006-03 for Preparing Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analyses
ML0626102482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (20) of Willie Decamp Regarding Waste Accumulation for Oyster Creek License Renewal
ML0626800332006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (23) of Richard Webster, on NUREG-1437:Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,Supplement 28, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Draft Report for Comment: Comment on Safety & Secu
ML0626504562006-09-14014 September 2006
Comment (22) of Mary Miazza, Opposing Relicensing of 35 Year Old Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626203482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (21) of Kenneth C. Koschek on License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626102442006-09-13013 September 2006
2006/09/13-Comment (18) of Jennifer Samson on Behalf of Clean Ocean Action and American Littoral Society on NUREG-1437: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Suppl, 28, Oyster Creek Draft Report for C
ML0626102452006-09-12012 September 2006
Comment (19) of Edith Gbur Re Oyster Creek EIS
ML0626102362006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (12) of Eugene Creamer on Nrc'S Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of License for Oyster Creek
ML0626103592006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (11) of Richard Webster, Resending EIS Comments
ML0626104162006-09-0808 September 2006
Comment (10) of Raechelle Edwards on Behalf of Julia Lemense Huff Re Renewal of Oyster Creek License
ML0626102422006-09-0707 September 2006
2006/09/07-Comment (16) of John Filippelli on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Oyster Creek. Recommends That the Final SEIS Address Opportunities for Pollution Prevention & Waste Recycling
ML0626102342006-09-0707 September 2006
Comment (9) of Robert Scro on Behalf of Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program Opposing the Generic Environmental Impact Station for Oyster Creek,
ML0625501632006-09-0606 September 2006
Comment (5) of Jessie Carr, Re Comments on Draft Supplement 28 to GEIS (NUREG-1437) Specific to Application for 20-Year License Extension for Oyster Creek Generating Station
ML0625501702006-09-0505 September 2006
Comment (8) of Tom D. Jones Voicing Concerns and Objections to Relicensing of Nuclear Power Plant in Lacey Township, Nj
ML0626102402006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (15) of Mary Mazza Opposing Relicensing Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant; So Much Technology for Safer Cleaner Energy Alternatives Are Now Available and During the Next 5 Years, More Will Be
ML0626102392006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (14) of Joan K. Rubin and Gail Marsh Saxer, League of Women Voters, on Nrc'S Draft Generic Environmental Impact Study for Re-Licensing of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. League Supports Recommendation by the State of Nj
ML0625501682006-09-0101 September 2006
Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission
ML0630001342006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (27) of Diane Lazinsky Regarding the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) for License Renewal at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 28)
ML0625501582006-08-30030 August 2006
2006/08/30-Comment (3) of Michael J. Kennish on Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek
ML0625501662006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (6) of Edith Gbur, Re Questions Regarding EIS
ML0625501612006-08-28028 August 2006
2006/08/28-Comment (4) of Michael P. Gallagher on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek, Dated June 2006
ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006
2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey
ML0620503092006-07-14014 July 2006
Comment (1) of Joseph Mangano on Renewal of Oyster Creek License for Another 20 Years. Urges NRC to Thoroughly Examine Potential Health Risks from Plant Using Available Data
ML0630001172006-07-13013 July 2006
Comment (26) of Pat Crocker Supporting License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Station
ML0630001062006-07-0505 July 2006
Comment (24) of Dotty Reynolds on Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Renewal Hearings
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0300204912002-12-16016 December 2002
Comment from Jill Lipoti on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)
2019-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES
, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 4k/f N: 21 DO rn
-T c-f, U-)
Ti" C-n-i 02.
b
'-<7.
/
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OCEAN COUNTY, NJ September 4, 2006 The League of Women Voters submits the following comments on the (NRC) Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Draft Generic Environmental Impact Study (GEIS) for the Re-Licensing of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station:
The use of 1970 data to analyze the cumulative effect of Oyster Creek operations on Barnegat Bay:
At the July 12, 2006 public hearing Professor Michael Kennish, a research professor at Rutgers University and an acknowledged authority on the ecology of Barnegat Bay, pointed out that no recent data on the cumulative effect by Oyster Creek on Barnegat Bay had been provided to the NRC. He also emphasized that the studies used by the NRC to evaluate the current situation were at least 30 years old, and though they were relevant at that time, they no longer gave a reasonable basis on which to assess the current status of Barnegat Bay. The League is deeply concerned not only about the lack of relevant viable data, but about the NRC's lack of insistence on obtaining this critical information.
It was also pointed out at this same hearing that the maps used in the draft report to Identify the Oyster Creek and Forked River had inaccuracies relating to the designations of the Oyster Creek and the South Branch of Forked River waterways.
Please provide the League with the NRC's reasons behind the decisions to use the obsolete 1970 data and the use of inaccurate maps. We would like your thoughts on how results based on incorrect information can be anything but incorrect.
- 2. The failure to analyze the effects of a nuclear accident or terrorist attack at Oyster Creek:
Failure to perform an in-depth study on the environmental impact of a severe accident when considering the risk in operating an aged nuclear plant with documented problems of corrosion of its drywell, the containment barrier necessary for protection of the public from the effects of radiological releases, for another 20 or more years is unacceptable.
The presumption that a terrorist attack and subsequent fuel pool fire would not affect the environment in a critical way is in contradiction to the warnings from scientists, many government agencies and the National Academy of Sciences.
- 3. The NRC's reliance on AmerGen for data that constitutes the substance of its draft report:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OCEAN COUNTY, NJ League of Women Voters Comments on NRC's GEIS September 4, 2006 Page 2 It has been documented by citizens and verified by NRC Engineers, that AmerGen has used flawed data for 10 years in estimating the status of a critical safety component, namely, the drywell liner. Further, its owner Exelon had not provided information to the NRC about its ten-year leak of tritium at its plant in Illinois.
- 4. Protection of drinking water in Ocean County, NJ:
The health and safety of the ecologically delicate Cohansey and Kirkland aquifers for present and future generations demand that a more viable and in-depth study of the extent of the "intrusion" of radionuclides into these aquifers be undertaken and documented as a part of this report and for the public record.
- 5. Cooling Towers:
The League supports the recommendation by the NJ Department of Environmental Protection that natural draft cooling towers should be installed at Oyster Creek. The NRC's acceptance of AmerGen's system using mechanical draft cooling towers, which consume more energy, is an incorrect response to an important problem.
In conclusion, the League of Women Voters looks forward to receiving the responses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to each of the above comments and calls for the NRC to conduct a public hearing before the final report is issued.
Respectfully submitted, Joan K. Rubin GailMarshSaxer Joan K. Rubin, Chair Gail Marsh Saxer, President LWV OC, Energy Committee LWV OC 124 Springfield Avenue Three Charlotteville Drive South Pine Beach, NJ 8741 Toms River, NJ 08757 (732) 914-8040 (732) 914-0154 1 irai~tenthwave.net gmsaxer@comcast.net