|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19004A0752019-01-0303 January 2019
Comment of Janet Tauro on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19003A2422018-12-28028 December 2018
Comment of Donald Weigl on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18362A0952018-12-23023 December 2018
Comment of Gary Defranco of Trans Tech Industries on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18324A7762018-11-18018 November 2018
Comment (2) of Alfred Decker on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18302A2232018-10-29029 October 2018
Comment (1) of Brain Kube on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18255A0422018-09-12012 September 2018
Comment (3) of Ron Martyn on Behalf of Community Civic Affairs Group on Decommissioning Creek Nuclear of Exelon'S Oyster Generating Station
ML11264A0902011-09-13013 September 2011
Comment (8) of John Runyan, on Behalf of Self, on Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0720501772007-04-26026 April 2007
Local Area Personal Income
ML0706600532007-02-21021 February 2007
Comment (1) of John Filippelli on Behalf of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regarding Renewal of Operating License for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0630703242006-10-21021 October 2006
Comment (2) of Raymond Tierney, on Reactor Oversight Process as Described in Solicitation Letter #7590-01-P
ML0628605662006-09-15015 September 2006
2006/09/15-Comment (1) of J. Lipoti Supporting to the Proposed License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance LR-ISG-2006-03 for Preparing Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analyses
ML0626102482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (20) of Willie Decamp Regarding Waste Accumulation for Oyster Creek License Renewal
ML0626800332006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (23) of Richard Webster, on NUREG-1437:Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,Supplement 28, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Draft Report for Comment: Comment on Safety & Secu
ML0626504562006-09-14014 September 2006
Comment (22) of Mary Miazza, Opposing Relicensing of 35 Year Old Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626203482006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Comment (21) of Kenneth C. Koschek on License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant
ML0626102442006-09-13013 September 2006
2006/09/13-Comment (18) of Jennifer Samson on Behalf of Clean Ocean Action and American Littoral Society on NUREG-1437: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Suppl, 28, Oyster Creek Draft Report for C
ML0626102452006-09-12012 September 2006
Comment (19) of Edith Gbur Re Oyster Creek EIS
ML0626102362006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (12) of Eugene Creamer on Nrc'S Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of License for Oyster Creek
ML0626103592006-09-11011 September 2006
Comment (11) of Richard Webster, Resending EIS Comments
ML0626104162006-09-0808 September 2006
Comment (10) of Raechelle Edwards on Behalf of Julia Lemense Huff Re Renewal of Oyster Creek License
ML0626102422006-09-0707 September 2006
2006/09/07-Comment (16) of John Filippelli on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Oyster Creek. Recommends That the Final SEIS Address Opportunities for Pollution Prevention & Waste Recycling
ML0626102342006-09-0707 September 2006
Comment (9) of Robert Scro on Behalf of Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program Opposing the Generic Environmental Impact Station for Oyster Creek,
ML0625501632006-09-0606 September 2006
Comment (5) of Jessie Carr, Re Comments on Draft Supplement 28 to GEIS (NUREG-1437) Specific to Application for 20-Year License Extension for Oyster Creek Generating Station
ML0625501702006-09-0505 September 2006
Comment (8) of Tom D. Jones Voicing Concerns and Objections to Relicensing of Nuclear Power Plant in Lacey Township, Nj
ML0626102402006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (15) of Mary Mazza Opposing Relicensing Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant; So Much Technology for Safer Cleaner Energy Alternatives Are Now Available and During the Next 5 Years, More Will Be
ML0626102392006-09-0404 September 2006
Comment (14) of Joan K. Rubin and Gail Marsh Saxer, League of Women Voters, on Nrc'S Draft Generic Environmental Impact Study for Re-Licensing of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. League Supports Recommendation by the State of Nj
ML0625501682006-09-0101 September 2006
Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission
ML0630001342006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (27) of Diane Lazinsky Regarding the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) for License Renewal at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 28)
ML0625501582006-08-30030 August 2006
2006/08/30-Comment (3) of Michael J. Kennish on Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek
ML0625501662006-08-30030 August 2006
Comment (6) of Edith Gbur, Re Questions Regarding EIS
ML0625501612006-08-28028 August 2006
2006/08/28-Comment (4) of Michael P. Gallagher on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek, Dated June 2006
ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006
2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey
ML0620503092006-07-14014 July 2006
Comment (1) of Joseph Mangano on Renewal of Oyster Creek License for Another 20 Years. Urges NRC to Thoroughly Examine Potential Health Risks from Plant Using Available Data
ML0630001172006-07-13013 July 2006
Comment (26) of Pat Crocker Supporting License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Station
ML0630001062006-07-0505 July 2006
Comment (24) of Dotty Reynolds on Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Renewal Hearings
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
ML0300204912002-12-16016 December 2002
Comment from Jill Lipoti on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)
2019-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
AmerGen SM Michael P. Gallagher, PE Vice President License Renewal Projects AmnerGen 200 Exelon Way KSA/2-E Kennett Square. PA 19348 2130-06-20387 August 28, 2006 Telephone 610.765.5958 www.exeloncorp.comi michaelp~gaflagher@exeloncorp.com An Exelon Company 10 CER 50 10 CER 51 10 CFR 54 611 ý' / 0 (,::,ýPI'Aeý -34ý6"9 Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T6-D59 Washington, DC 20555-0001 T1 FTn r-i ,JI C/:)Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
AmerGen Comments on the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, dated June 2006 The attached are AmerGen Energy Company, LLC's comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.If you have any questions, please contact Bill Maher at 610.765.5939.
Respectfully, Executed on
Enclosure:
Michael P. Gallagher-
ýVice President
-License Renewal AmerGen Energy Company, LLC AmerGen Comments on the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station cc: Regional Administrator, USNRC Region 1, w/o Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR -License Renewal, Safety, w/Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR -License Renewal, Environmental, w/ Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR -Project Manager, OCGS, w/o Enclosure USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, OCGS, w/o Enclosure Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, NJDEP, wlEnclosure 1 9, File No. 05040/-- -0i 13 AmerGen Comments on the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Page # / Line # What is in DEIS What it should be Why_______________changed to 2-8/13 -14 The low-flow axial The low head axial The dilution pumps pump design allows pump design allows are of a high flow for some for some design.impingement and impingement and entrainment entrainment survivability.
survivability 2-83/I18 -20 Revenues are used Revenues are used Funding for local by each taxing by each taxing and county entity to fund local entity to fund leea4 emergency and county aind eounty management emergency eimergeiie5 programs is funded management Management by a levy placed on programs, public pf-ega*mspublic AmerGen by NJ safety, local public safety, local public under the Radiation schools, local schools, local Protection Act, not government government through local taxing operations, local operations, local entities.road maintenance, road maintenance, and the local library and the local library____________
I_ system. Isystem. I__________
Page 1 of 3 AmerGen Comments on the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Page # / Line # What is in DEIS What it should be Why_______________changed to 4-25 /35 -37 This line is not The Conectiv line This line should be considered within should be included included in scope.the scope of license within the scope for It is Exelon's renewal because it analysis of impacts understanding that was not constructed for this proposed National for the specific action. Environmental purpose of Policy Act (NEPA)connecting the court cases and station to the grid at Council on the time of initial Environmental station licensing.
Quality guidelines indicate that scope should include connected actions, which include actions that will not proceed unless other actions are taken [40 CFR 1508.25(a)(ii)].
Operation of the new line is as much connected to Oyster Creek Generating Station operation as operation of the line currently considered
____ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ____ ___ _ _ ___ ___ ___ ___ in the DEIS.Page 2 of 3 AmerGen Comments on the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Page # / Line # What is in DEIS What it should be Why changed to 8-67 /37 -39 Consideration of a Recommend Consideration of new nuclear, deletion of sentence.
Advanced Nuclear generating plant to Reactor as an replace OCNGS alternative to the was not included in proposed project the AmerGen ER was considered in (AmerGen 2005). the AmerGen Environmental Report (See Section 7.2.1.4, Other Alternatives).
The criterion for further consideration for impacts was the reasonableness of the alternative.
In the case of Advanced Nuclear Reactor, it was judged to be extremely unlikely that this particular alternative would be licensed, constructed, and on-line in time for the expiration of the current operating license for Oyster____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ Creek.Page 3 of 3