ML042390144: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML042390144
| number = ML042390144
| issue date = 09/02/2004
| issue date = 09/02/2004
| title = 07/30/2004 Summary of Meeting with NEI to Discuss Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit (ESP) Template
| title = Summary of Meeting with NEI to Discuss Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit (ESP) Template
| author name = Sebrosky J M
| author name = Sebrosky J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RNRP
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RNRP
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = PROJ0689
| docket = PROJ0689
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Sebrosky J M, NRR/DRIP/RNRP, 415-1132
| contact person = Sebrosky J, NRR/DRIP/RNRP, 415-1132
| package number = ML042390141
| package number = ML042390141
| document type = Meeting Summary
| document type = Meeting Summary
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 2, 2004ORGANIZATION:Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
{{#Wiki_filter:September 2, 2004 ORGANIZATION:           Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF JULY 30, 2004, MEETING WITH NEI TO DISCUSSEMERGENCY PLANNING (EP) INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (ITAAC) AND DRAFT EARLY SITE PERMIT (ESP) TEMPLATEOn July 30, 2004, a meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)and NEI at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD. Staff from the Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) also participated in the meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss EP ITAAC and the draft ESP template. A list of meeting attendees is included as Attachment 1. The meeting agenda is provided as . NRC and NEI handouts were provided during the meeting. The handouts can be accessedthrough the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML042150056. This system provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the handouts located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov
OF JULY 30, 2004, MEETING WITH NEI TO DISCUSS EMERGENCY PLANNING (EP) INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (ITAAC) AND DRAFT EARLY SITE PERMIT (ESP) TEMPLATE On July 30, 2004, a meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and NEI at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD. Staff from the Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) also participated in the meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss EP ITAAC and the draft ESP template. A list of meeting attendees is included as Attachment 1. The meeting agenda is provided as .
.Highlights of the EP ITAAC Portion of the MeetingThe EP ITAAC portion of the meeting was a follow-on to a meeting held on June 2, 2004, and aworkshop held on April 27, 2004. The staff and NEI reached general agreement on the form and content for most areas that will require EP ITAAC. One area that was identified for additional discussions was how to address requirements in 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E that no later than 180 days prior to the scheduled issuance of an operating license the licensee must submit detailed emergency planning implementing procedures. NEI agreed to write a letter and provide proposals for addressing EP ITAAC that were discussed at the meeting. The staff agreed to revise its draft proposed EP ITAAC and to consider NEI's proposals that will be discussed in its letter. The staff expects to issue a revised version of its proposed EP ITAAC in a letter to NEI and other stakeholders sometime in September of 2004. Action items from the EP ITAAC portion of the meeting are provided below. The EP ITAAC numbers mentioned in the action items can be found in the staff's portion of the handout material from the meeting. ProposedEP ITAAC numberRevisionD.1.bThe staff and NEI will consider removing the phrase "and the set points are withinapplicable instrument range.
NRC and NEI handouts were provided during the meeting. The handouts can be accessed through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML042150056. This system provides text and image files of NRCs public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the handouts located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
"  The staff will also consider whether other proposedITAAC bound this proposed ITAAC. NEI will submit a proposal for how the EP elements in proposed EP ITAAC D.1.b are captured by other ITAAC.E.2The staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase "the COL applicant will identifyspecific capabilities/methods.
Highlights of the EP ITAAC Portion of the Meeting The EP ITAAC portion of the meeting was a follow-on to a meeting held on June 2, 2004, and a workshop held on April 27, 2004. The staff and NEI reached general agreement on the form and content for most areas that will require EP ITAAC. One area that was identified for additional discussions was how to address requirements in 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E that no later than 180 days prior to the scheduled issuance of an operating license the licensee must submit detailed emergency planning implementing procedures. NEI agreed to write a letter and provide proposals for addressing EP ITAAC that were discussed at the meeting. The staff agreed to revise its draft proposed EP ITAAC and to consider NEIs proposals that will be discussed in its letter. The staff expects to issue a revised version of its proposed EP ITAAC in a letter to NEI and other stakeholders sometime in September of 2004. Action items from the EP ITAAC portion of the meeting are provided below. The EP ITAAC numbers mentioned in the action items can be found in the staffs portion of the handout material from the meeting.
"E.6The staff and NEI will consider revising the proposed EP ITAAC to state that "Themeans for notifying and providing instruction to the public are demonstrated to meet design objectives.
"H.1.cThe staff and NEI agreed to consider replacing the phrase "The TSC has thesame radiological habitability as the control room under accident conditions
" withthe "The TSC has comparable habitability with the control room under accidentconditions.
"H.2.cThe staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase "the COL applicant will identifyspecific capabilities/methods.
"  NEI will consider sending additional information onthis proposed ITAACH.3.a andH.3.bThe staff will consider whether these ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAACN.1.f and H.2.d.J.10The staff will consider whether the proposed revision to ITAAC E.6 will bound thisITAAC.N.1.a andN.1.bThe staff will consider adding the word "onsite" to these ITAAC. The staff will alsoconsider adding the phrase, "the COL applicant will identify specific onsiteobjectives
" to EP ITAAC N.1.a.N.1.eNEI will provide proposed alternate wording for this ITAAC and consider howportions if not all of this proposed ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAAC N.1.a and N.1.b. The staff will consider NEI
's proposal.N.1.fNEI will consider adding a discussion in their letter for treatment of FEMAidentified deficiencies. Specifically, NEI believes that some deficiencies may not have to be resolved until the plant performs low power testing after the Commission makes its 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding. NEI believes the issue involves interpretation of 10 CFR 50.54(s). The staff agreed to review NEI
's discussion.X.1This proposed ITAAC would require an applicant to submit detailed implementingprocedure no less than 180 days prior to fuel load. NEI will provide information for why they believe this ITAAC is not needed given the  requirements of 10 CFR 52.83. The staff agreed to consider how EP implementing procedures should be captured under the 10 CFR Part 52 process. ProposedEP ITAAC numberRevisionGeneralNEI
's proposal will include a discussion of how a COL applicant will identifyspecific responsibilities and what information will be contained in the ITAAC and what information will be provided in the final safety analysis report. The staff will consider adding a qualifier to its proposed EP ITAAC that an applicant referencing a certified design may take credit for EP ITAAC that are already approved as part of the design certification process, and that these EP ITAAC would not have to be duplicated in the COL application.Highlights of Draft ESP Template Portion of the MeetingDuring the second part of the meeting, the meeting participants discussed comments made byNEI on the NRC staff
's draft ESP template. The draft template was sent to NEI and the threeESP applicants by letters dated June 22, 2004 (ML041400179 and ML041110012). NEI provided comments electronically (copy included in handouts), and they made additional comments verbally during the meeting.Regarding EP information in Table 1 of the draft ESP template, NEI questioned the level ofdetail needed to support an acceptable determination, reflected in Table 1, and they asked whether the staff can accept (with caveats) a major feature for which some individual criteria are not addressed. The staff indicated that examples from NEI would be helpful and that the staff would consider the question further. NEI also sought input on the difference between


"acceptable
Proposed  Revision EP ITAAC number D.1.b    The staff and NEI will consider removing the phrase and the set points are within applicable instrument range. The staff will also consider whether other proposed ITAAC bound this proposed ITAAC. NEI will submit a proposal for how the EP elements in proposed EP ITAAC D.1.b are captured by other ITAAC.
" and "reasonable assurance
E.2      The staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase the COL applicant will identify specific capabilities/methods.
" as applied to ESP reviews. The staff agreed toinvestigate the distinction.NEI also questioned applicability and usefulness of 10 CFR Part 21 in the ESP context. Thestaff referred to its letter dated June 22, 2004 (ML040430041), on the subject and indicated that either NEI or the ESP applicants could respond to the letter.Another comment addressed the item in the draft ESP template that calls for possible limits onthe number of times an ESP can be referenced in a license application. The staff stated that this item is a placeholder for resolution of Issue no. 1 in SECY-04-0103. NEI questioned whether an ESP is the appropriate location for a limitation of this type. Another discussion point was the staff
E.6      The staff and NEI will consider revising the proposed EP ITAAC to state that The means for notifying and providing instruction to the public are demonstrated to meet design objectives.
's proposed table in the draft ESP template which listsexample plant parameters that might appear in an ESP. The staff stated that parameters which are inputs to the safety analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the ESP, and that the issue of inclusion of plant parameters related to the environmental report in the ESP needs further discussion and consideration. Finally, the participants discussed "issue preclusion
H.1.c    The staff and NEI agreed to consider replacing the phrase The TSC has the same radiological habitability as the control room under accident conditions with the The TSC has comparable habitability with the control room under accident conditions.
" with respect to changes in plant parametervalues. The staff indicated that this issue also needs further discussion and consideration. Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:1.NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contendneed not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of "acceptability
H.2.c    The staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase the COL applicant will identify specific capabilities/methods. NEI will consider sending additional information on this proposed ITAAC H.3.a and The staff will consider whether these ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAAC H.3.b    N.1.f and H.2.d.
" on the relatedmajor feature.2.The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need notbe addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.3.The staff will consider the difference between "acceptable
J.10      The staff will consider whether the proposed revision to ITAAC E.6 will bound this ITAAC.
" and "reasonable assurance "related to EP requirements.4.The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, whichrefers to applying rules "now or hereafter in effect
N.1.a and The staff will consider adding the word onsite to these ITAAC. The staff will also N.1.b    consider adding the phrase, the COL applicant will identify specific onsite objectives to EP ITAAC N.1.a.
" to ESPs.5.The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations inSECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.6.The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.7.NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staff
N.1.e    NEI will provide proposed alternate wording for this ITAAC and consider how portions if not all of this proposed ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAAC N.1.a and N.1.b. The staff will consider NEIs proposal.
's July 22, 2004, letterwhich addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.8.The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in theESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.9.The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issuepreclusion./RA/Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project ManagerNew Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationProject No. 689 Attachments:1.List of attendees2.Agendacc w/ atts:  See next page  -4-Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:1.NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contendneed not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of "acceptability
N.1.f    NEI will consider adding a discussion in their letter for treatment of FEMA identified deficiencies. Specifically, NEI believes that some deficiencies may not have to be resolved until the plant performs low power testing after the Commission makes its 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding. NEI believes the issue involves interpretation of 10 CFR 50.54(s). The staff agreed to review NEIs discussion.
" on the relatedmajor feature.2.The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need notbe addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.3.The staff will consider the difference between "acceptable
X.1      This proposed ITAAC would require an applicant to submit detailed implementing procedure no less than 180 days prior to fuel load. NEI will provide information for why they believe this ITAAC is not needed given the requirements of 10 CFR 52.83. The staff agreed to consider how EP implementing procedures should be captured under the 10 CFR Part 52 process.
" and "reasonable assurance "related to EP requirements.4.The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, whichrefers to applying rules "now or hereafter in effect
" to ESPs.5.The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations inSECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.6.The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.7.NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staff
's July 22, 2004, letterwhich addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.8.The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in theESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.9.The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issuepreclusion./RA/Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project ManagerNew Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationProject No. 689 Attachments:1. List of attendees2. Agendacc w/ atts:  See next page ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML042390141-Package    *See previous concurrenceOFFICEPM:RNRPPM:RNRPNSIR/DPR/EPDSC:RNRPNAMEJSebroskyMScottBMusico*LDudesDATE8/27/048/30/048/27/048/30/04  -5-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Distribution for July 30, 2004, Meeting Summary dated September 2, 2004Hard CopyRNRP R/FJMSebrosky


LDudesE-MailPUBLICJDyer (RidsNrrOd)
Proposed      Revision EP ITAAC number General        NEIs proposal will include a discussion of how a COL applicant will identify specific responsibilities and what information will be contained in the ITAAC and what information will be provided in the final safety analysis report. The staff will consider adding a qualifier to its proposed EP ITAAC that an applicant referencing a certified design may take credit for EP ITAAC that are already approved as part of the design certification process, and that these EP ITAAC would not have to be duplicated in the COL application.
RBorchardt BSheron (RidsNrrAdpt)
Highlights of Draft ESP Template Portion of the Meeting During the second part of the meeting, the meeting participants discussed comments made by NEI on the NRC staffs draft ESP template. The draft template was sent to NEI and the three ESP applicants by letters dated June 22, 2004 (ML041400179 and ML041110012). NEI provided comments electronically (copy included in handouts), and they made additional comments verbally during the meeting.
FEltawila NRR/ADPT Secretary [RidsNrrAdpt]
Regarding EP information in Table 1 of the draft ESP template, NEI questioned the level of detail needed to support an acceptable determination, reflected in Table 1, and they asked whether the staff can accept (with caveats) a major feature for which some individual criteria are not addressed. The staff indicated that examples from NEI would be helpful and that the staff would consider the question further. NEI also sought input on the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance as applied to ESP reviews. The staff agreed to investigate the distinction.
RNRP Group DMatthews BBoger CCarpenter SRichards DCoe TQuay JHannon SWeerakkody EWeiss JWermiel FAkstulewicz MRubin WBateman ESullivan GBagchi SCoffin TChan ALund GImbro DTerao KManoly JCalvo EMarinos RJenkins TJKim, EDO MJohnson MReinhart CCasto RMcIntyre TFoley DThatcher SAlexander TMensah (NRR Communication Coord)
NEI also questioned applicability and usefulness of 10 CFR Part 21 in the ESP context. The staff referred to its letter dated June 22, 2004 (ML040430041), on the subject and indicated that either NEI or the ESP applicants could respond to the letter.
ACRS (RidsAcrsMailCenter)
Another comment addressed the item in the draft ESP template that calls for possible limits on the number of times an ESP can be referenced in a license application. The staff stated that this item is a placeholder for resolution of Issue no. 1 in SECY-04-0103. NEI questioned whether an ESP is the appropriate location for a limitation of this type.
OPA MEl-Zeftway MAAshley JBlake RGardner CPaulk LCampbell MItzkowitz, OGC RWeisman, OGC GMizuno, OGC TKenyon NIqbal PQualls DBarss BMusico DNelson, OEExternal e-mailbhupinder.singh@hq.doe.govtom.miller@hq.doe.gov Vanessa.Quinn@dhs.gov Kenneth.Wierman@dhs.gov James.Purvis@dhs.gov EP ITAAC and Draft Early Site Permit Template NEI MeetingJuly 30, 2004Attendance List NRC NEIWilliam BecknerNRR/DRIP/RNRPAdrian HeymerLaura DudesNRR/DRIP/RNRPRussell Bell Joe SebroskyNRR/DRIP/RNRPAlan Nelson Michael ScottNRR/DRIP/RNRP Nan GillesNRR/DRIP/RNRPOther Interested AttendeesRaj AnandNRR/DRIP/RNRPTom MundyExelonDan BarssNSIR/DRP/EPDEddie R GrantExelon Bruce MusicoNSIR/DRP/EPDCarl BergerEnergetics Mary Ann AshleyNRR/DIPM/IIPBGeorge ZinkeEntergy Gene ImbroNRR/DE/EMEBBen GeorgeSouthern Nuclear Kamal ManolyNRR/DE/EMEBSteve FrantzMorgan Lewis Kaz CampeNRR/DSSA/SPSBLane HaySERCH Bechtel Jay LeeNRR/DSSA/SPSBJenny WeilMcGraw Hill Thomas KenyonNRR/DRIP/RLEPJohn B. CostelloDominion Ken HeckNRR/DRIP/IIPB Bob WeismanOGC Brooke PooleOGCFEMAKenneth WeirmanJames H. PurvisAttachment 1 AgendaJuly 30, 2004, Meeting with NEI on Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit Template8:30 a.m.Introductory CommentsNRC/NEI8:45 a.m.Discussion of NEI
Another discussion point was the staffs proposed table in the draft ESP template which lists example plant parameters that might appear in an ESP. The staff stated that parameters which are inputs to the safety analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the ESP, and that the issue of inclusion of plant parameters related to the environmental report in the ESP needs further discussion and consideration.
's proposed EP ITAACNEI/NRC9:45 a.m.Discussion of NRC
Finally, the participants discussed issue preclusion with respect to changes in plant parameter values. The staff indicated that this issue also needs further discussion and consideration.
's proposed EP ITAACNRC11:00 a.m.Public Comment on EP ITAAC 11:15 a.m.Discussion of draft early site permit template. Template isavailable in ADAMS under Accession Number ML041110012NRC/NEI11:50 a.m.Public Comment regarding template12:00 p.m.AdjournAttachment 2 September 3, 2004Combination List:cc:Mr. Charles BrinkmanWestinghouse Electric Co.
Washington Operations 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy., Suite 330 Rockville, MD 20852Mr. David Lochbaum, Nuclear Safety EngineerUnion of Concerned Scientists 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-3919Mr. Paul GunterNuclear Information & Resource Service


1424 16 th Street, NW, Suite 404Washington, DC 20036Mr. James RiccioGreenpeace 702 H Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001Mr. Adrian HeymerNuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708Mr. George Alan ZinkeProject Manager Nuclear Business Development Entergy Nuclear M-ECH-683 1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213Mr. Thomas P. MillerU.S. Department of Energy NE-20, Rm. A286 Headquarters-Germantown 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290Ms. Marilyn KrayVice President, Special Projects Exelon Generation 200 Exelon Way, KSA3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348Mr. Laurence ParmeManager, GT-MHR Safety & 
Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:
: 1.      NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contend need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
: 2.      The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
: 3.      The staff will consider the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance related to EP requirements.
: 4.      The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, which refers to applying rules now or hereafter in effect to ESPs.
: 5.     The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations in SECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.
: 6.     The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per 10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.
: 7.     NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staffs July 22, 2004, letter which addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.
: 8.     The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in the ESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.
: 9.      The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issue preclusion.
                                              /RA/
Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager New Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 Attachments: 1. List of attendees
: 2. Agenda cc w/ atts: See next page


Licensing General Atomics Company P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, CA  92186-5608Mr. Joseph D. HegnerLead Engineer - Licensing Dominion Generation Early Site Permitting Project 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Mr. Edward L. QuinnMDM Services Corporations Utility Operations Division 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 205 Laguna Nigual, CA  92677Ms. Lynn Connor Doc-Search Associates 2211 sw 1 ST Ave - #1502Portland, OR 97201Mr. Paul LeventhalNuclear Control Institute 1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036Mr. James F. Mallay, DirectorRegulatory Affairs FRAMATOME, ANP 3315 Old Forest Road Lynchburg, VA 24501Ms. Patricia CampbellWinston & Strawn 1400 L St., NW Washington, DC  20005Mr. W. Edward CumminsAP600 and AP1000 Projects Westinghouse Electric Company P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA  15230-0355  -2-September 3, 2004Dr. Robert E. GambleEngineering Manager, ESBWR GE Nuclear Energy 175 Curtner Avenue, MC 365 San Jose, CA 95125Mr. Jack W. RoeSCIENTECH, INC.
Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:
910 Clopper Road Gaithersburg, MD 20878Mr. Stephen P. FrantzMorgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC  20004Mr. Gary Wright, ManagerOffice of Nuclear Facility Safety Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, IL 62704Mr. Brendan HoffmanResearch Associate on Nuclear Energy Public Citizens Critical Mass Energy and Environmental Program 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC  20003Mr. Tom Clements6703 Gude Avenue Takoma Park, MD  20912Mr. Lionel BattyNuclear Business Team Graftech 12300 Snow Road Parma, Ohio 44130Mr. Ian M. GrantCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street, Station B P.O. Box 1046 Ottawa, Ontario
: 1.     NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contend need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
: 2.     The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
: 3.     The staff will consider the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance related to EP requirements.
: 4.     The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, which refers to applying rules now or hereafter in effect to ESPs.
: 5.     The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations in SECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.
: 6.     The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per 10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.
: 7.     NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staffs July 22, 2004, letter which addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.
: 8.     The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in the ESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.
: 9.     The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issue preclusion.
                                        /RA/
Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager New Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 Attachments: 1. List of attendees
: 2. Agenda cc w/ atts: See next page ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML042390141-Package *See previous concurrence OFFICE PM:RNRP              PM:RNRP          NSIR/DPR/EPD          SC:RNRP NAME JSebrosky              MScott          BMusico*              LDudes DATE      8/27/04          8/30/04          8/27/04                8/30/04


K1P 5S9Mr. Edward F. Sproat, IIIVice President - Int
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
'l ProjectsExelon Generation 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348Mr. Glenn ArchinoffLicensing Manager AECL Technologies Inc.
481 North Frederick Avenue Suite 405 Gaithersburg, MD 20877Dr. Regis A. MatzieSenior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Westinghouse Electric Company 2000 Day Hill Road Windsor, CT 06095-0500Mr. Ed Wallace, General ManagerProjects PBMR Pty LTD PO Box 9396 Centurion 0046 Republic of South AfricaMr. Dobie McArthurDirector, Washington Operations General Atomics 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20006Mr. Russell BellNuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708Vanessa E. Quinn, ChiefRadiological Emergency Preparedness


Section Nuclear & Chemical Hazards Branch Federal Emergency Management Agency/DHS 500 C Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20472}}
Distribution for July 30, 2004, Meeting Summary dated September 2, 2004 Hard Copy RNRP R/F JMSebrosky LDudes E-Mail                                            RMcIntyre PUBLIC                                            TFoley JDyer (RidsNrrOd)                                DThatcher RBorchardt                                        SAlexander BSheron (RidsNrrAdpt)                            TMensah (NRR Communication Coord)
FEltawila                                        ACRS (RidsAcrsMailCenter)
NRR/ADPT Secretary [RidsNrrAdpt]                  OPA RNRP Group                                        MEl-Zeftway DMatthews                                        MAAshley BBoger                                            JBlake CCarpenter                                        RGardner SRichards                                        CPaulk DCoe                                              LCampbell TQuay                                            MItzkowitz, OGC JHannon                                          RWeisman, OGC SWeerakkody                                      GMizuno, OGC EWeiss                                            TKenyon JWermiel                                          NIqbal FAkstulewicz                                      PQualls MRubin                                            DBarss WBateman                                          BMusico ESullivan                                        DNelson, OE GBagchi SCoffin                                          External e-mail TChan                                            bhupinder.singh@hq.doe.gov ALund                                            tom.miller@hq.doe.gov GImbro                                            Vanessa.Quinn@dhs.gov DTerao                                            Kenneth.Wierman@dhs.gov KManoly                                          James.Purvis@dhs.gov JCalvo EMarinos RJenkins TJKim, EDO MJohnson MReinhart CCasto
 
EP ITAAC and Draft Early Site Permit Template NEI Meeting July 30, 2004 Attendance List NRC                                      NEI William Beckner NRR/DRIP/RNRP            Adrian Heymer Laura Dudes      NRR/DRIP/RNRP            Russell Bell Joe Sebrosky    NRR/DRIP/RNRP            Alan Nelson Michael Scott    NRR/DRIP/RNRP Nan Gilles      NRR/DRIP/RNRP            Other Interested Attendees Raj Anand        NRR/DRIP/RNRP            Tom Mundy        Exelon Dan Barss        NSIR/DRP/EPD            Eddie R Grant    Exelon Bruce Musico    NSIR/DRP/EPD            Carl Berger      Energetics Mary Ann Ashley NRR/DIPM/IIPB            George Zinke    Entergy Gene Imbro      NRR/DE/EMEB              Ben George      Southern Nuclear Kamal Manoly    NRR/DE/EMEB              Steve Frantz    Morgan Lewis Kaz Campe        NRR/DSSA/SPSB            Lane Hay        SERCH Bechtel Jay Lee          NRR/DSSA/SPSB            Jenny Weil      McGraw Hill Thomas Kenyon NRR/DRIP/RLEP              John B. Costello Dominion Ken Heck        NRR/DRIP/IIPB Bob Weisman      OGC Brooke Poole    OGC FEMA Kenneth Weirman James H. Purvis Attachment 1
 
Agenda July 30, 2004, Meeting with NEI on Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit Template 8:30 a.m.      Introductory Comments                                          NRC/NEI 8:45 a.m.      Discussion of NEIs proposed EP ITAAC                          NEI/NRC 9:45 a.m.      Discussion of NRCs proposed EP ITAAC                          NRC 11:00 a.m. Public Comment on EP ITAAC 11:15 a.m. Discussion of draft early site permit template. Template is    NRC/NEI available in ADAMS under Accession Number ML041110012 11:50 a.m. Public Comment regarding template 12:00 p.m. Adjourn Attachment 2
 
Combination List:                                Mr. Laurence Parme Manager, GT-MHR Safety &
cc:  Mr. Charles Brinkman                        Licensing Westinghouse Electric Co.                  General Atomics Company Washington Operations                      P.O. Box 85608 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy., Suite 330            San Diego, CA 92186-5608 Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. Joseph D. Hegner Mr. David Lochbaum, Nuclear Safety Engineer Lead Engineer - Licensing Union of Concerned Scientists              Dominion Generation 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 600                Early Site Permitting Project Washington, DC 20006-3919                  5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Mr. Paul Gunter Nuclear Information & Resource Service      Mr. Edward L. Quinn 1424 16th Street, NW, Suite 404            MDM Services Corporations Washington, DC 20036                        Utility Operations Division 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 205 Mr. James Riccio                            Laguna Nigual, CA 92677 Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW, Suite 300                Ms. Lynn Connor Washington, DC 20001                        Doc-Search Associates 2211 sw 1ST Ave - #1502 Mr. Adrian Heymer                          Portland, OR 97201 Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400                                  Mr. Paul Leventhal 1776 I Street, NW                          Nuclear Control Institute Washington, DC 20006-3708                  1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 410 Mr. George Alan Zinke                      Washington, DC 20036 Project Manager Nuclear Business Development                Mr. James F. Mallay, Director Entergy Nuclear                            Regulatory Affairs M-ECH-683                                  FRAMATOME, ANP 1340 Echelon Parkway                        3315 Old Forest Road Jackson, MS 39213                          Lynchburg, VA 24501 Mr. Thomas P. Miller                        Ms. Patricia Campbell U.S. Department of Energy                  Winston & Strawn NE-20, Rm. A286                            1400 L St., NW Headquarters-Germantown                    Washington, DC 20005 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290                  Mr. W. Edward Cummins AP600 and AP1000 Projects Ms. Marilyn Kray                            Westinghouse Electric Company Vice President, Special Projects            P.O. Box 355 Exelon Generation                          Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355 200 Exelon Way, KSA3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348 September 3, 2004
 
Dr. Robert E. Gamble                      Mr. Glenn Archinoff Engineering Manager, ESBWR                Licensing Manager GE Nuclear Energy                        AECL Technologies Inc.
175 Curtner Avenue, MC 365                481 North Frederick Avenue San Jose, CA 95125                        Suite 405 Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Mr. Jack W. Roe SCIENTECH, INC.                          Dr. Regis A. Matzie 910 Clopper Road                          Senior Vice President and Gaithersburg, MD 20878                    Chief Technology Officer Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Stephen P. Frantz                    2000 Day Hill Road Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP            Windsor, CT 06095-0500 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004                      Mr. Ed Wallace, General Manager Projects Mr. Gary Wright, Manager                  PBMR Pty LTD Office of Nuclear Facility Safety        PO Box 9396 Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety    Centurion 0046 1035 Outer Park Drive                    Republic of South Africa Springfield, IL 62704 Mr. Dobie McArthur Mr. Brendan Hoffman                      Director, Washington Operations Research Associate on Nuclear Energy      General Atomics Public Citizens Critical Mass Energy      1899 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW and Environmental Program              Suite 300 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE              Washington, DC 20006 Washington, DC 20003 Mr. Russell Bell Mr. Tom Clements                          Nuclear Energy Institute 6703 Gude Avenue                          Suite 400 Takoma Park, MD 20912                    1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Lionel Batty Nuclear Business Team                    Vanessa E. Quinn, Chief Graftech                                  Radiological Emergency Preparedness 12300 Snow Road                          Section Parma, Ohio 44130                        Nuclear & Chemical Hazards Branch Federal Emergency Management Mr. Ian M. Grant                          Agency/DHS Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission        500 C Street, SW 280 Slater Street, Station B              Washington, D.C. 20472 P.O. Box 1046 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 Mr. Edward F. Sproat, III Vice President - Intl Projects Exelon Generation 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 September 3, 2004}}

Latest revision as of 01:56, 24 December 2019

Summary of Meeting with NEI to Discuss Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit (ESP) Template
ML042390144
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 09/02/2004
From: Joseph Sebrosky
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RNRP
To:
Nuclear Energy Institute
Sebrosky J, NRR/DRIP/RNRP, 415-1132
Shared Package
ML042390141 List:
References
Download: ML042390144 (10)
v • d • e


Text

September 2, 2004 ORGANIZATION: Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF JULY 30, 2004, MEETING WITH NEI TO DISCUSS EMERGENCY PLANNING (EP) INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (ITAAC) AND DRAFT EARLY SITE PERMIT (ESP) TEMPLATE On July 30, 2004, a meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and NEI at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD. Staff from the Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) also participated in the meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss EP ITAAC and the draft ESP template. A list of meeting attendees is included as Attachment 1. The meeting agenda is provided as .

NRC and NEI handouts were provided during the meeting. The handouts can be accessed through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML042150056. This system provides text and image files of NRCs public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the handouts located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.

Highlights of the EP ITAAC Portion of the Meeting The EP ITAAC portion of the meeting was a follow-on to a meeting held on June 2, 2004, and a workshop held on April 27, 2004. The staff and NEI reached general agreement on the form and content for most areas that will require EP ITAAC. One area that was identified for additional discussions was how to address requirements in 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E that no later than 180 days prior to the scheduled issuance of an operating license the licensee must submit detailed emergency planning implementing procedures. NEI agreed to write a letter and provide proposals for addressing EP ITAAC that were discussed at the meeting. The staff agreed to revise its draft proposed EP ITAAC and to consider NEIs proposals that will be discussed in its letter. The staff expects to issue a revised version of its proposed EP ITAAC in a letter to NEI and other stakeholders sometime in September of 2004. Action items from the EP ITAAC portion of the meeting are provided below. The EP ITAAC numbers mentioned in the action items can be found in the staffs portion of the handout material from the meeting.

Proposed Revision EP ITAAC number D.1.b The staff and NEI will consider removing the phrase and the set points are within applicable instrument range. The staff will also consider whether other proposed ITAAC bound this proposed ITAAC. NEI will submit a proposal for how the EP elements in proposed EP ITAAC D.1.b are captured by other ITAAC.

E.2 The staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase the COL applicant will identify specific capabilities/methods.

E.6 The staff and NEI will consider revising the proposed EP ITAAC to state that The means for notifying and providing instruction to the public are demonstrated to meet design objectives.

H.1.c The staff and NEI agreed to consider replacing the phrase The TSC has the same radiological habitability as the control room under accident conditions with the The TSC has comparable habitability with the control room under accident conditions.

H.2.c The staff and NEI will consider adding the phrase the COL applicant will identify specific capabilities/methods. NEI will consider sending additional information on this proposed ITAAC H.3.a and The staff will consider whether these ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAAC H.3.b N.1.f and H.2.d.

J.10 The staff will consider whether the proposed revision to ITAAC E.6 will bound this ITAAC.

N.1.a and The staff will consider adding the word onsite to these ITAAC. The staff will also N.1.b consider adding the phrase, the COL applicant will identify specific onsite objectives to EP ITAAC N.1.a.

N.1.e NEI will provide proposed alternate wording for this ITAAC and consider how portions if not all of this proposed ITAAC are bounded by proposed EP ITAAC N.1.a and N.1.b. The staff will consider NEIs proposal.

N.1.f NEI will consider adding a discussion in their letter for treatment of FEMA identified deficiencies. Specifically, NEI believes that some deficiencies may not have to be resolved until the plant performs low power testing after the Commission makes its 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding. NEI believes the issue involves interpretation of 10 CFR 50.54(s). The staff agreed to review NEIs discussion.

X.1 This proposed ITAAC would require an applicant to submit detailed implementing procedure no less than 180 days prior to fuel load. NEI will provide information for why they believe this ITAAC is not needed given the requirements of 10 CFR 52.83. The staff agreed to consider how EP implementing procedures should be captured under the 10 CFR Part 52 process.

Proposed Revision EP ITAAC number General NEIs proposal will include a discussion of how a COL applicant will identify specific responsibilities and what information will be contained in the ITAAC and what information will be provided in the final safety analysis report. The staff will consider adding a qualifier to its proposed EP ITAAC that an applicant referencing a certified design may take credit for EP ITAAC that are already approved as part of the design certification process, and that these EP ITAAC would not have to be duplicated in the COL application.

Highlights of Draft ESP Template Portion of the Meeting During the second part of the meeting, the meeting participants discussed comments made by NEI on the NRC staffs draft ESP template. The draft template was sent to NEI and the three ESP applicants by letters dated June 22, 2004 (ML041400179 and ML041110012). NEI provided comments electronically (copy included in handouts), and they made additional comments verbally during the meeting.

Regarding EP information in Table 1 of the draft ESP template, NEI questioned the level of detail needed to support an acceptable determination, reflected in Table 1, and they asked whether the staff can accept (with caveats) a major feature for which some individual criteria are not addressed. The staff indicated that examples from NEI would be helpful and that the staff would consider the question further. NEI also sought input on the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance as applied to ESP reviews. The staff agreed to investigate the distinction.

NEI also questioned applicability and usefulness of 10 CFR Part 21 in the ESP context. The staff referred to its letter dated June 22, 2004 (ML040430041), on the subject and indicated that either NEI or the ESP applicants could respond to the letter.

Another comment addressed the item in the draft ESP template that calls for possible limits on the number of times an ESP can be referenced in a license application. The staff stated that this item is a placeholder for resolution of Issue no. 1 in SECY-04-0103. NEI questioned whether an ESP is the appropriate location for a limitation of this type.

Another discussion point was the staffs proposed table in the draft ESP template which lists example plant parameters that might appear in an ESP. The staff stated that parameters which are inputs to the safety analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the ESP, and that the issue of inclusion of plant parameters related to the environmental report in the ESP needs further discussion and consideration.

Finally, the participants discussed issue preclusion with respect to changes in plant parameter values. The staff indicated that this issue also needs further discussion and consideration.

Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:

1. NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contend need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
2. The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
3. The staff will consider the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance related to EP requirements.
4. The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, which refers to applying rules now or hereafter in effect to ESPs.
5. The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations in SECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.
6. The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per 10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.
7. NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staffs July 22, 2004, letter which addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.
8. The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in the ESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.
9. The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issue preclusion.

/RA/

Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager New Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 Attachments: 1. List of attendees

2. Agenda cc w/ atts: See next page

Actions for ESP template portion of meeting:

1. NEI and ESP applicants will attempt to develop examples of EP criteria they contend need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
2. The NRC staff will internally discuss the question of whether various EP criteria need not be addressed, while still allowing a staff finding of acceptability on the related major feature.
3. The staff will consider the difference between acceptable and reasonable assurance related to EP requirements.
4. The staff will consider the appropriateness of language in the draft template, which refers to applying rules now or hereafter in effect to ESPs.
5. The staff will consider, in conjunction with resolution of integrated risk considerations in SECY-04-0103, the practicality and usefulness of specifying limits on the number of times an ESP may be referenced in a license application.
6. The staff will consider the question of the need for immediate notification, per 10 CFR Part 21, and in general, how best to apply 10 CFR Part 21 to ESPs.
7. NEI and the ESP applicants will consider commenting on the staffs July 22, 2004, letter which addresses Part 21 applicability to ESPs.
8. The staff will further consider the need for, value of, and language for inclusion in the ESP of plant parameters related to the environmental report.
9. The staff will consider the impact changes in plant parameter values will have on issue preclusion.

/RA/

Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager New Reactors Section New, Research and Test Reactors Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 Attachments: 1. List of attendees

2. Agenda cc w/ atts: See next page ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML042390141-Package *See previous concurrence OFFICE PM:RNRP PM:RNRP NSIR/DPR/EPD SC:RNRP NAME JSebrosky MScott BMusico* LDudes DATE 8/27/04 8/30/04 8/27/04 8/30/04

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Distribution for July 30, 2004, Meeting Summary dated September 2, 2004 Hard Copy RNRP R/F JMSebrosky LDudes E-Mail RMcIntyre PUBLIC TFoley JDyer (RidsNrrOd) DThatcher RBorchardt SAlexander BSheron (RidsNrrAdpt) TMensah (NRR Communication Coord)

FEltawila ACRS (RidsAcrsMailCenter)

NRR/ADPT Secretary [RidsNrrAdpt] OPA RNRP Group MEl-Zeftway DMatthews MAAshley BBoger JBlake CCarpenter RGardner SRichards CPaulk DCoe LCampbell TQuay MItzkowitz, OGC JHannon RWeisman, OGC SWeerakkody GMizuno, OGC EWeiss TKenyon JWermiel NIqbal FAkstulewicz PQualls MRubin DBarss WBateman BMusico ESullivan DNelson, OE GBagchi SCoffin External e-mail TChan bhupinder.singh@hq.doe.gov ALund tom.miller@hq.doe.gov GImbro Vanessa.Quinn@dhs.gov DTerao Kenneth.Wierman@dhs.gov KManoly James.Purvis@dhs.gov JCalvo EMarinos RJenkins TJKim, EDO MJohnson MReinhart CCasto

EP ITAAC and Draft Early Site Permit Template NEI Meeting July 30, 2004 Attendance List NRC NEI William Beckner NRR/DRIP/RNRP Adrian Heymer Laura Dudes NRR/DRIP/RNRP Russell Bell Joe Sebrosky NRR/DRIP/RNRP Alan Nelson Michael Scott NRR/DRIP/RNRP Nan Gilles NRR/DRIP/RNRP Other Interested Attendees Raj Anand NRR/DRIP/RNRP Tom Mundy Exelon Dan Barss NSIR/DRP/EPD Eddie R Grant Exelon Bruce Musico NSIR/DRP/EPD Carl Berger Energetics Mary Ann Ashley NRR/DIPM/IIPB George Zinke Entergy Gene Imbro NRR/DE/EMEB Ben George Southern Nuclear Kamal Manoly NRR/DE/EMEB Steve Frantz Morgan Lewis Kaz Campe NRR/DSSA/SPSB Lane Hay SERCH Bechtel Jay Lee NRR/DSSA/SPSB Jenny Weil McGraw Hill Thomas Kenyon NRR/DRIP/RLEP John B. Costello Dominion Ken Heck NRR/DRIP/IIPB Bob Weisman OGC Brooke Poole OGC FEMA Kenneth Weirman James H. Purvis Attachment 1

Agenda July 30, 2004, Meeting with NEI on Emergency Planning (EP) Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) and Draft Early Site Permit Template 8:30 a.m. Introductory Comments NRC/NEI 8:45 a.m. Discussion of NEIs proposed EP ITAAC NEI/NRC 9:45 a.m. Discussion of NRCs proposed EP ITAAC NRC 11:00 a.m. Public Comment on EP ITAAC 11:15 a.m. Discussion of draft early site permit template. Template is NRC/NEI available in ADAMS under Accession Number ML041110012 11:50 a.m. Public Comment regarding template 12:00 p.m. Adjourn Attachment 2

Combination List: Mr. Laurence Parme Manager, GT-MHR Safety &

cc: Mr. Charles Brinkman Licensing Westinghouse Electric Co. General Atomics Company Washington Operations P.O. Box 85608 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy., Suite 330 San Diego, CA 92186-5608 Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. Joseph D. Hegner Mr. David Lochbaum, Nuclear Safety Engineer Lead Engineer - Licensing Union of Concerned Scientists Dominion Generation 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 600 Early Site Permitting Project Washington, DC 20006-3919 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Mr. Paul Gunter Nuclear Information & Resource Service Mr. Edward L. Quinn 1424 16th Street, NW, Suite 404 MDM Services Corporations Washington, DC 20036 Utility Operations Division 28202 Cabot Road, Suite 205 Mr. James Riccio Laguna Nigual, CA 92677 Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW, Suite 300 Ms. Lynn Connor Washington, DC 20001 Doc-Search Associates 2211 sw 1ST Ave - #1502 Mr. Adrian Heymer Portland, OR 97201 Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 Mr. Paul Leventhal 1776 I Street, NW Nuclear Control Institute Washington, DC 20006-3708 1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 410 Mr. George Alan Zinke Washington, DC 20036 Project Manager Nuclear Business Development Mr. James F. Mallay, Director Entergy Nuclear Regulatory Affairs M-ECH-683 FRAMATOME, ANP 1340 Echelon Parkway 3315 Old Forest Road Jackson, MS 39213 Lynchburg, VA 24501 Mr. Thomas P. Miller Ms. Patricia Campbell U.S. Department of Energy Winston & Strawn NE-20, Rm. A286 1400 L St., NW Headquarters-Germantown Washington, DC 20005 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Mr. W. Edward Cummins AP600 and AP1000 Projects Ms. Marilyn Kray Westinghouse Electric Company Vice President, Special Projects P.O. Box 355 Exelon Generation Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355 200 Exelon Way, KSA3-E Kennett Square, PA 19348 September 3, 2004

Dr. Robert E. Gamble Mr. Glenn Archinoff Engineering Manager, ESBWR Licensing Manager GE Nuclear Energy AECL Technologies Inc.

175 Curtner Avenue, MC 365 481 North Frederick Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Suite 405 Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Mr. Jack W. Roe SCIENTECH, INC. Dr. Regis A. Matzie 910 Clopper Road Senior Vice President and Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Chief Technology Officer Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Stephen P. Frantz 2000 Day Hill Road Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP Windsor, CT 06095-0500 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Ed Wallace, General Manager Projects Mr. Gary Wright, Manager PBMR Pty LTD Office of Nuclear Facility Safety PO Box 9396 Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety Centurion 0046 1035 Outer Park Drive Republic of South Africa Springfield, IL 62704 Mr. Dobie McArthur Mr. Brendan Hoffman Director, Washington Operations Research Associate on Nuclear Energy General Atomics Public Citizens Critical Mass Energy 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW and Environmental Program Suite 300 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20006 Washington, DC 20003 Mr. Russell Bell Mr. Tom Clements Nuclear Energy Institute 6703 Gude Avenue Suite 400 Takoma Park, MD 20912 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Lionel Batty Nuclear Business Team Vanessa E. Quinn, Chief Graftech Radiological Emergency Preparedness 12300 Snow Road Section Parma, Ohio 44130 Nuclear & Chemical Hazards Branch Federal Emergency Management Mr. Ian M. Grant Agency/DHS Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 500 C Street, SW 280 Slater Street, Station B Washington, D.C. 20472 P.O. Box 1046 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 Mr. Edward F. Sproat, III Vice President - Intl Projects Exelon Generation 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 September 3, 2004

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML042390144&oldid=2294061"