ML16341D840: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1  
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written E xamination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 . Facility:
. Facility:
0 (. <.. ...... \:.. Date of Exam: -r/ i. '-/I'-Exam Level: RO GsRo 5"1 Item Description I nitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading -v e**. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented N ,. <-\.... .. ""'> "''> a <" ,_..,. -"\/ M 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ,y-L 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80 , as applicable , +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail -v N o"._ *, u..<LA.\. c..).. 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N '-> ... "' .-v 6. Performance on missed questions checked for t r aining deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of .,,y questions missed by half or more of the applicants . Date Printed Name/Signature  
0 (. <.. ...... \:.. Date of Exam: -r/ i. '-/I'-Exam Level: RO GsRo 5"1 Item Description Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading -v e**. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented N ,. <-\.... .. ""'> "''> a <" ,_..,. -"\/ M 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)  
,y-L 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable
, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail -v No"._ *, u..<LA.\. c..).. 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N '-> ... "' .-v 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of .,,y questions missed by half or more of the applicants  
. Date Printed Name/Signature  
: a. Grader I  
: a. Grader I  
'{Atlt'-{
'{Atlt'-{
1/Lc./1 (, \ ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) "'_ r_}'\  
1/Lc./1 (, \ ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) "'_ r_}'\  
-'
-'
Bft[JL, c. NRC Chief I \J 1 I J d. NRC Supervisor (*) R _,h :'1 LJC"\.t. &#xa5;/dikv-i l (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
B f t[JL, c. NRC Chief I \J 1 I J d. NRC Superv i sor (*) R _, h :'1 L JC"\.t. &#xa5;/dikv-i l (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Revision as of 03:49, 8 July 2018

DC Cook 2016 ES-403-1 Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist
ML16341D840
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A380 List:
References
Download: ML16341D840 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written E xamination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 . Facility: 0 (. <.. ...... \:.. Date of Exam: -r/ i. '-/I'-Exam Level: RO GsRo 5"1 Item Description I nitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading -v e**. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented N ,. <-\.... .. ""'> "> a <" ,_..,. -"\/ M 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ,y-L 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80 , as applicable , +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail -v N o"._ *, u..<LA.\. c..).. 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N '-> ... "' .-v 6. Performance on missed questions checked for t r aining deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of .,,y questions missed by half or more of the applicants . Date Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader I

'{Atlt'-{ 1/Lc./1 (, \ ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) "'_ r_}'\ -' B f t[JL, c. NRC Chief I \J 1 I J d. NRC Superv i sor (*) R _, h :'1 L JC"\.t. ¥/dikv-i l (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}