|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY1REGULATYINFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9910190254 DOC.DATE: | | {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY 1 REGULAT Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9910190254 DOC.DATE: 99/10/12 NOTARIZED: |
| 99/10/12NOTARIZED: | | YES DOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50;3)6 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH NAA'4E AUTHOR AFFILIATION RENCHECK,M.W. |
| YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550;3)6DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTHNAA'4EAUTHORAFFILIATION RENCHECK,M.W.
| | Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana 8 Michigan Ele.RECIP.Ni4KE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Records Management Branch (Document Control Desk) |
| IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana8MichiganEle.RECIP.Ni4KE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION RecordsManagement Branch(Document ControlDesk)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| Application foramendstolicensesDPR-585DPR-74,revisingTSSurveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d forsprayadditivesystorelocatedetailsassociated withacceptance criteria5testparameters toassociated TSBases.DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOO1DCOPIESRECEIVED: | | Application for amends to licenses DPR-58 5 DPR-74, revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for spray additive sys to relocate details associated with acceptance criteria 5 test parameters to associated TS Bases.DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOO 1D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR i ENCL I SIZE:+TITLE: OR Submittal: |
| LTRiENCLISIZE:+TITLE:ORSubmittal:
| | General Distribution NOTES: E RECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME BARNHILL,E SC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 0 INTERNA 0 NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/RP EXTERNAL: NOAC 1 1 1 1 1 0 NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRC PDR ,1 1 1'1 1 1 D U'E NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECiPIENTS: |
| GeneralDistribution NOTES:ERECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME BARNHILL,E SCCOPIESLTTRENCL1111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME STANG,JCOPIESLTTRENCL110INTERNA0NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/RPEXTERNAL:
| | PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.'TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATIONS CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF.COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 10 ENCL' a t W Indiana h'lichigan |
| NOAC111110NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRCPDR,111'111DU'ENOTETOALL"RIDS"RECiPIENTS:
| | , Power Company Cook wcdear Rant One Cock Race Bridgnen, Ml 49106 6164666901 INQIAlM NICNIGQN POWlM October 12, 1999 C 1099-07 10 CFR 50.90 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST SPRAY ADDITIVE SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 10 CFR50.90, Indiana Michigan Power Company (1&M), the Licensee for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP)Units 1 and 2, proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications (T/S), of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74.I&M proposes to revise T/S Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for the spray additive system to relocate the details associated with the acceptance criteria and test parameters to the associated T/S Bases.Additionally, certain administrative text format changes're also being proposed.I&M requests approval of this request by December 10, 1999, to support activities associated with the restart of Unit 2.I&M is adopting the approach, established in NUREG-1431,"Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants, Specifications," Revision 1, for the associated requirement. |
| PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE.'TO HAVEYOURNAMEORORGANIZATION REMOVEDFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSORREDUCETHENUMBEROFCOPIESRECEIVEDBYYOUORYOURORGANIZATIONS CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK(DCD)ONEXTENSION 415-2083TOTALNUMBEROF.COPIESREQUIRED:
| | Relocating the information to the T/S Bases permits the values to be controlled under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.I&M has identified that such a change may be needed to permit implementation of a plant modification that improves the testing capability for the containment spray pumps.FR pl The existing plant design does not permit testing the containment spray pumps at the design flow rate and results in operation of the pumps at significantly reduced flow, resulting in increased pump vibration levels.Completion of the modification will provide improved testing capability by permitting testing at the design flow rate.However, this modification is also expected to preclude establishing the currently specified containment spray pump discharge pressure test point and may affect the currently specified test acceptance criteria.This amendment will permit timely modifications of the relocated parameters under the provisions of 10 C ('rr9'iOi90254 99iOi2 PDR ADQCK 050003i5 p PDR AEPr America's Energi'arlner |
| LTTR10ENCL' atW Indianah'lichigan
| |
| ,PowerCompanyCookwcdearRantOneCockRaceBridgnen, Ml491066164666901 INQIAlMNICNIGQNPOWlMOctober12,1999C1099-0710CFR50.90DocketNos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission ATTN:DocumentControlDeskMailStop0-P1-17Washington, DC20555-0001 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUESTSPRAYADDITIVESYSTEMSURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT Pursuantto10CFR50.90, IndianaMichiganPowerCompany(1&M),theLicenseeforDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CNP)Units1and2,proposestoamendAppendixA,Technical Specifications (T/S),ofFacilityOperating LicensesDPR-58andDPR-74.I&MproposestoreviseT/SSurveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d forthesprayadditivesystemtorelocatethedetailsassociated withtheacceptance criteriaandtestparameters totheassociated T/SBases.Additionally, certainadministrative textformatchanges're alsobeingproposed. | |
| I&MrequestsapprovalofthisrequestbyDecember10,1999,tosupportactivities associated withtherestartofUnit2.I&Misadoptingtheapproach, established inNUREG-1431, "Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants,Specifications," | |
| Revision1,fortheassociated requirement.
| |
| Relocating theinformation totheT/SBasespermitsthevaluestobecontrolled undertheprovisions of10CFR50.59.I&Mhasidentified thatsuchachangemaybeneededtopermitimplementation ofaplantmodification thatimprovesthetestingcapability forthecontainment spraypumps.FRplTheexistingplantdesigndoesnotpermittestingthecontainment spraypumpsatthedesignflowrateandresultsinoperation ofthepumpsatsignificantly reducedflow,resulting inincreased pumpvibration levels.Completion ofthemodification willprovideimprovedtestingcapability bypermitting testingatthedesignflowrate.However,thismodification isalsoexpectedtoprecludeestablishing thecurrently specified containment spraypumpdischarge pressuretestpointandmayaffectthecurrently specified testacceptance criteria. | |
| Thisamendment willpermittimelymodifications oftherelocated parameters undertheprovisions of10C('rr9'iOi90254 99iOi2PDRADQCK050003i5pPDRAEPrAmerica's Energi'arlner
| |
|
| |
|
| U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission | | U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
| 'Page2C1099-0750.59.Ifthisamendment requestisapproved, ISLAMrequestsa30-dayimplementation periodfromthedateofissuance. | | 'Page 2 C1099-07 50.59.If this amendment request is approved, ISLAM requests a 30-day implementation period from the date of issuance.Attachment 1 provides a description and safety analysis to support the proposed changes.Attachments2A and 2B provide marked-up T/S pages for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively. |
| Attachment 1providesadescription andsafetyanalysistosupporttheproposedchanges.Attachments2A and2Bprovidemarked-up T/SpagesforUnit1andUnit2,respectively. | | Attachments 3A and 3B provide the proposed T/S pages with the changes incorporated for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively. |
| Attachments 3Aand3BprovidetheproposedT/Spageswiththechangesincorporated forUnit1andUnit2,respectively. | | Attachment 4 describes the evaluation performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.92(c), which concludes that no significant hazard is involved.Attachment5 provides the environmental assessment. |
| Attachment 4describes theevaluation performed inaccordance with10CFR50.92(c), | | One previous submittal, AEP:NRC:433Q dated December 3, 1998, affects Unit 2 T/S page 3/4 6-12 that is submitted in this request.The previous submittal deletes an obsolete footnote associated with certain 18-month surveillance requirements that were delayed until a refueling outage scheduled to begin in August, 1994.The T/S pages in attachments 2B and 3B do not reflect the cliange proposed in the previous submittal. |
| whichconcludes thatnosignificant hazardisinvolved.
| | I&M will coordinate changes to the pages with the NRC Project Manager to ensure proper T/S page control when the associated license amendment requests are approved.No commitments are identified in this submittal. |
| Attachment5 providestheenvironmental assessment. | | Copies of this letter and its attachments are being transmitted to the Michigan Public Service Commission and Michigan Department of Public Health, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91.Should you have any questions, please contact Mr.Robert C.Godley, Director of Regulatory Affairs, at (616)466-2698.Sincerely, SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME P;~/Michael W.Rencheck Vice President Nuclear Engineering THI=DAYO Notary ub c 1999 PATRJCJA A.EDDJE>dms Attachments My Commission Expires 8YCRQgg 8Y Cggfgg~~g@OC5}Q op, gg r 3NU9.A NJl)A'N@ON fu~~34~5Nl%l'@%5%M~~"~~'At&5W ggs+Q<g~a'I U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
| Oneprevioussubmittal, AEP:NRC:433Q datedDecember3,1998,affectsUnit2T/Spage3/46-12thatissubmitted inthisrequest.Theprevioussubmittal deletesanobsoletefootnoteassociated withcertain18-monthsurveillance requirements thatweredelayeduntilarefueling outagescheduled tobegininAugust,1994.TheT/Spagesinattachments 2Band3Bdonotreflectthecliangeproposedintheprevioussubmittal.
| | 'age3 C1 099-07 J.E.Dyer,'/attachments MDEQ-DW 2 RPD, w/attachments NRC Resident Inspector, w/attachments R.Whale, w/attachments ATTACHMENT 1 TO C1099-07 DESCRIPTION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES A.Summary of the Proposed Changes Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), the Licensee for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP)Units 1 and 2, proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications (T/S), of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74.I&M proposes to revise T/S Surveillance Requirement (SR)4.6.2.2.d for the spray additive system to relocate the details associated with the acceptance criteria and test parameters to the associated T/S Bases.Additionally, certain administrative text format changes are also being proposed.The proposed changes are described in detail in Section E of this attachment. |
| I&Mwillcoordinate changestothepageswiththeNRCProjectManagertoensureproperT/Spagecontrolwhentheassociated licenseamendment requestsareapproved. | | T/S pages that are marked to show the proposed changes are provided in Attachments 2A and 2B for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively. |
| Nocommitments areidentified inthissubmittal.
| | Note that these pages may r'eflect formatting that differs slightly from the current pages.These format changes are intended to improve appearance and are not intended to introduce other changes.The proposed T/S pages, with the changes incorporated, are provided in Attachments 3A and 3B for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively. |
| Copiesofthisletteranditsattachments arebeingtransmitted totheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth,inaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91.Shouldyouhaveanyquestions, pleasecontactMr.RobertC.Godley,DirectorofRegulatory Affairs,at(616)466-2698.
| | B.Description of the Current Requirements I T/S SR 4.6.2.2.d requires that at least once every 5 years, the water fiow from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray system (CTS)be verified to be greater than or equal to 20 gallons per minute (gpm)and less than or equal to 50 gpm.This surveillance requires this test to be performed when the spray pump is operating on recirculation with a pump discharge header pressure greater than or equal to 255 pounds per square inch gauge (psig).C.Bases for the Current Requirements The purpose of the spray additive system flow rate SR 4.6.2.2.d is to ensure that the correct pH level is established in the borated water solution provided by the CTS.This surveillance requirement provides assurance that the correct amount of sodium hydroxide will be metered into the flow path upon CTS initiation. |
| Sincerely, SWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBED BEFOREMEP;~/MichaelW.RencheckVicePresident NuclearEngineering THI=DAYONotaryubc1999PATRJCJAA.EDDJE>dmsAttachments MyCommission Expires8YCRQgg8YCggfgg~~g@OC5}Qop,gg r3NU9.ANJl)A'N@ONfu~~34~5Nl%l'@%5%M~~"~~'At&5W ggs+Q<g~a | | Proper pH is important for post-accident iodine scrubbing by the CTS and for minimizing corrosion effects on components within the containment. |
| 'I U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission | | The values for the test parameters and acceptance criteria are based on hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the necessary post-accident containment spray pH levels.D.Need for Revision of the Requirement Attachment 1 to C1099-07 Page 2 Current plant design does not permit testing the containment spray pumps at the design flow rate.The flow capability during testing js limited by the size of the piping providing the fiowpath during recirculation. |
| 'age3C1099-07J.E.Dyer,'/attachments MDEQ-DW2RPD,w/attachments NRCResidentInspector, w/attachments R.Whale,w/attachments ATTACHMENT 1TOC1099-07DESCRIPTION ANDSAFETYANALYSISFORTHEPROPOSEDCHANGESA.SummaryoftheProposedChangesIndianaMichiganPowerCompany(I&M),theLicenseeforDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CNP)Units1and2,proposestoamendAppendixA,Technical Specifications (T/S),ofFacilityOperating LicensesDPR-58andDPR-74.I&MproposestoreviseT/SSurveillance Requirement (SR)4.6.2.2.d forthesprayadditivesystemtorelocatethedetailsassociated withtheacceptance criteriaandtestparameters totheassociated T/SBases.Additionally, certainadministrative textformatchangesarealsobeingproposed. | | This limitation requires operating the pumps under low flow conditions and results in increased levels of pump vibration during the test.Operating the pumps in this manner is undesirable because it can result in pump vibration exceeding the ASME code limitation, and can potentially contribute to long term degradation of the containment spray pumps.To correct this condition, a plant modification is being implemented to provide increased flow capability for the containment spray pumps when they are operated for testing in recirculation. |
| Theproposedchangesaredescribed indetailinSectionEofthisattachment.
| | This modification affects the hydraulic characteristic of the flow path that is used when the pumps are operated for testing purposes.The modification permits the pumps to be tested at design flow rates and is intended to eliminate the undesirable pump vibration associated with pump testing at reduced flow.This modification is expected to preclude establishing the current T/S required test condition for the containment spray pump's discharge pressure of greater than or equal to 255 psig without requiring substantial throttling of the pumps fiow.Throttling the pumps to achieve the specified discharge pressure negates the benefit of the modification that provides design flow rate test capability. |
| T/SpagesthataremarkedtoshowtheproposedchangesareprovidedinAttachments 2Aand2BforUnit1andUnit2,respectively. | | Reanalysis of the effects of the spray additive system on the containment sump's pH under post-accident conditions is also being performed to resolve other containment issues unrelated to the modification. |
| Notethatthesepagesmayr'eflectformatting thatdiffersslightlyfromthecurrentpages.Theseformatchangesareintendedtoimproveappearance andarenotintendedtointroduce otherchanges.TheproposedT/Spages,withthechangesincorporated, areprovidedinAttachments 3Aand3BforUnit1andUnit2,respectively.
| | The initial evaluation indicates that an increased maximum flow rate from the spray additive tank to the containment spray flowpath may be necessary. |
| B.Description oftheCurrentRequirements IT/SSR4.6.2.2.d requiresthatatleastonceevery5years,thewaterfiowfromthesprayadditivetanktestlinetoeachcontainment spraysystem(CTS)beverifiedtobegreaterthanorequalto20gallonsperminute(gpm)andlessthanorequalto50gpm.Thissurveillance requiresthistesttobeperformed whenthespraypumpisoperating onrecirculation withapumpdischarge headerpressuregreaterthanorequalto255poundspersquareinchgauge(psig).C.BasesfortheCurrentRequirements ThepurposeofthesprayadditivesystemflowrateSR4.6.2.2.d istoensurethatthecorrectpHlevelisestablished intheboratedwatersolutionprovidedbytheCTS.Thissurveillance requirement providesassurance thatthecorrectamountofsodiumhydroxide willbemeteredintotheflowpathuponCTSinitiation. | | Relocation of the test parameters from the T/S to the associated T/S Bases permits timely revision of these parameters, as required, upon completion of the analyses and calculations. |
| ProperpHisimportant forpost-accident iodinescrubbing bytheCTSandforminimizing corrosion effectsoncomponents withinthecontainment.
| | E.Description of the Proposed Changes IAM proposes to relocate the test parameters and the acceptance criteria from T/S SR 4.6.2.2.d to the associated T/S Bases.The revised surveillance requirement specifies demonstrating the spray additive system is operable,"...by verifying the flow rate from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray system with the spray pump operating on recirculation." Editorial changes are made in the relocated paragraph for clarity and for grammatical completeness. |
| Thevaluesforthetestparameters andacceptance criteriaarebasedonhydraulic characteristics ofthepipingsystemandthenecessary post-accident containment spraypHlevels.D.NeedforRevisionoftheRequirement Attachment 1toC1099-07Page2Currentplantdesigndoesnotpermittestingthecontainment spraypumpsatthedesignflowrate.Theflowcapability duringtestingjslimitedbythesizeofthepipingproviding thefiowpathduringrecirculation.
| | I&M is also proposing certain format changes affecting each page include minor differences in margins and text spacing due to variations in word processing and reprographic technologies. |
| Thislimitation requiresoperating thepumpsunderlowflowconditions andresultsinincreased levelsofpumpvibration duringthetest.Operating thepumpsinthismannerisundesirable becauseitcanresultinpumpvibration exceeding theASMEcodelimitation, andcanpotentially contribute tolongtermdegradation ofthecontainment spraypumps.Tocorrectthiscondition, aplantmodification isbeingimplemented toprovideincreased flowcapability forthecontainment spraypumpswhentheyareoperatedfortestinginrecirculation.
| | In addition there are specific format changes affecting the Unit 2 bases page B 3/4 6-3.These specific changes include (1)the use of a different font which also results in altered spacing of the text on the page and content for each line of text, (2)the use of horizontal bars to separate the footer and header from the body of the page, (3)the addition of numerical annotation (i.e., 3/4 and 3/4.6 in the header text lines), (4)the removal of underlining from the two lines of header text, (5)the reversal of sequence and deletion of a blank line between the'wo lines of header |
| Thismodification affectsthehydraulic characteristic oftheflowpaththatisusedwhenthepumpsareoperatedfortestingpurposes.
| | ~y~j h'W Attachment 1 to C1099-07 Page 3 text, (6)the removal of spaces immediately preceding and following the hyphen in the footer text,"COOK NUCLEAR PLANT-UNIT 2," (7)the addition of the word"Page" prior to the page number, and (8)the removal of the word"NO." following the word"AMENDMENT" and prior to the historical and current amendment numbers.F.Bases for the Proposed Changes The relocation of details associated with SR 4.6.2.2.d is appropriate because these details are not required to be in the T/S to provide adequate protection of the public health and safety and the T/S still retains the requirement for system operability. |
| Themodification permitsthepumpstobetestedatdesignflowratesandisintendedtoeliminate theundesirable pumpvibration associated withpumptestingatreducedflow.Thismodification isexpectedtoprecludeestablishing thecurrentT/Srequiredtestcondition forthecontainment spraypump'sdischarge pressureofgreaterthanorequalto255psigwithoutrequiring substantial throttling ofthepumpsfiow.Throttling thepumpstoachievethespecified discharge pressurenegatesthebenefitofthemodification thatprovidesdesignflowratetestcapability.
| | Only the location of the requirement is changed (T/S Bases versus the T/S).The control of changes to these testing details is also modified since changes to the T/S require NRC approval while the T/S Bases may be modified in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.This approach provides an effective level of regulatory control and provides for a more appropriate change control process.Changes to the T/S Bases are controlled by the provisions of the 10CFR50.59,"Changes, Tests and Experiments." This revised SR is consistent with the associated requirement, SR 3.6.7.5, in NUREG-1431,"Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse.'Plants, Specifications," Revision 1.SR 3.6.7.5 specifies neither a.discharge pressure, test value nor any acceptance criteria.The Improved'Standard Technical Specification (ISTS)were developed by the associated Owner's Groups and>>have been accepted by the NRC for use by licensees in conversion to the ISTS.The changes in format of the text on each page are administrative and do not result in any change in the actual requirements. |
| Reanalysis oftheeffectsofthesprayadditivesystemonthecontainment sump'spHunderpost-accidentconditions isalsobeingperformed toresolveothercontainment issuesunrelated tothemodification. | | G.Impact on Previous Submittals One previous submittal, AEP:NRC:433Q dated December 3, 1998, affects Unit 2 T/S page 3/4 6-12 that is submitted in this request.The previous submittal deletes an obsolete footnote associated with certain 18-month surveillance requirements that were delayed until a refueling outage scheduled to begin in August, 1994.The T/S pages in attachments 2B and 3B do not reflect the change proposed in the previous submittal. |
| Theinitialevaluation indicates thatanincreased maximumflowratefromthesprayadditivetanktothecontainment sprayflowpathmaybenecessary.
| | IAM will coordinate changes to the pages with the NRC Project Manager to ensure proper T/S page control when the associated license amendment requests are approved.}} |
| Relocation ofthetestparameters fromtheT/Stotheassociated T/SBasespermitstimelyrevisionoftheseparameters, asrequired, uponcompletion oftheanalysesandcalculations. | |
| E.Description oftheProposedChangesIAMproposestorelocatethetestparameters andtheacceptance criteriafromT/SSR4.6.2.2.d totheassociated T/SBases.Therevisedsurveillance requirement specifies demonstrating thesprayadditivesystemisoperable, | |
| "...byverifying theflowratefromthesprayadditivetanktestlinetoeachcontainment spraysystemwiththespraypumpoperating onrecirculation." | |
| Editorial changesaremadeintherelocated paragraph forclarityandforgrammatical completeness. | |
| I&Misalsoproposing certainformatchangesaffecting eachpageincludeminordifferences inmarginsandtextspacingduetovariations inwordprocessing andreprographic technologies. | |
| Inadditiontherearespecificformatchangesaffecting theUnit2basespageB3/46-3.Thesespecificchangesinclude(1)theuseofadifferent fontwhichalsoresultsinalteredspacingofthetextonthepageandcontentforeachlineoftext,(2)theuseofhorizontal barstoseparatethefooterandheaderfromthebodyofthepage,(3)theadditionofnumerical annotation (i.e.,3/4and3/4.6intheheadertextlines),(4)theremovalofunderlining fromthetwolinesofheadertext,(5)thereversalofsequenceanddeletionofablanklinebetweenthe'wolinesofheader
| |
| ~y~jh'W Attachment 1toC1099-07Page3text,(6)theremovalofspacesimmediately preceding andfollowing thehypheninthefootertext,"COOKNUCLEARPLANT-UNIT 2,"(7)theadditionoftheword"Page"priortothepagenumber,and(8)theremovaloftheword"NO."following theword"AMENDMENT" andpriortothehistorical andcurrentamendment numbers.F.BasesfortheProposedChangesTherelocation ofdetailsassociated withSR4.6.2.2.d isappropriate becausethesedetailsarenotrequiredtobeintheT/Stoprovideadequateprotection ofthepublichealthandsafetyandtheT/Sstillretainstherequirement forsystemoperability. | |
| Onlythelocationoftherequirement ischanged(T/SBasesversustheT/S).ThecontrolofchangestothesetestingdetailsisalsomodifiedsincechangestotheT/SrequireNRCapprovalwhiletheT/SBasesmaybemodifiedinaccordance withtheprovisions of10CFR50.59.Thisapproachprovidesaneffective levelofregulatory controlandprovidesforamoreappropriate changecontrolprocess.ChangestotheT/SBasesarecontrolled bytheprovisions ofthe10CFR50.59, "Changes, TestsandExperiments."
| |
| ThisrevisedSRisconsistent withtheassociated requirement, SR3.6.7.5,inNUREG-1431, "Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse.'Plants, Specifications,"
| |
| Revision1.SR3.6.7.5specifies neithera.discharge
| |
| : pressure, testvaluenoranyacceptance criteria.
| |
| TheImproved'StandardTechnical Specification (ISTS)weredeveloped bytheassociated Owner'sGroupsand>>havebeenacceptedbytheNRCforusebylicensees inconversion totheISTS.Thechangesinformatofthetextoneachpageareadministrative anddonotresultinanychangeintheactualrequirements.
| |
| G.ImpactonPreviousSubmittals Oneprevioussubmittal, AEP:NRC:433Q datedDecember3,1998,affectsUnit2T/Spage3/46-12thatissubmitted inthisrequest.Theprevioussubmittal deletesanobsoletefootnoteassociated withcertain18-monthsurveillance requirements thatweredelayeduntilarefueling outagescheduled tobegininAugust,1994.TheT/Spagesinattachments 2Band3Bdonotreflectthechangeproposedintheprevioussubmittal. | |
| IAMwillcoordinate changestothepageswiththeNRCProjectManagertoensureproperT/Spagecontrolwhentheassociated licenseamendment requestsareapproved.}}
| |
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARML17335A5551999-10-12012 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for Spray Additive Sys to Relocate Details Associated with Acceptance Criteria & Test Parameters to Associated TS Bases ML17335A5591999-10-11011 October 1999 Supplement to Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,replacing Correct TS Pages Inadvertently Included in 990923 Submittal.Attached Pages Also Include Appropriate Administrative Changes ML17335A5411999-10-0101 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Containment Recirculation Sump Water Inventory.Calculation & non-proprietary WCAP-15302 Rept Also Encl ML17326A1571999-09-23023 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,involving Movement of Loads in Excess of Design Basis Seismic Capability of Auxiliary Bldg Load Handling Equipment & Structures ML17326A1421999-09-17017 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,to Allow Credit of Rod Cluster Control Assemblies for Cold Leg Large Break LOCA Subcriticality.Ts Pages & non-proprietary Versions of WCAP-15246 Encl.Proprietary Version Withheld ML17326A1161999-09-10010 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.4.7,TS Tables 4.4-3,3.4-1 & TS Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.2 Re RCS & Gas Storage Tank Sampling ML17326A0921999-08-17017 August 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,to Change TS 3/4.4.5 & Bases for TS 3/4.4.5,3/4.4.6.2 & 3/4.4.8 to Remove voltage-based Repair Criteria,F* Repair Criteria & Sleeving Methodologies from Unit 1 TS & Clarify Bases Sections ML17325B6041999-05-21021 May 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Limitations of Positive Reactivity Additions in Several TS Action Statements ML17325B5511999-04-19019 April 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 3/4.8.1.2, Electrical Power Systems & Associated Bases to Provide one-time Extension of 18-month Surveillance Interval for Specific SRs ML17335A3661998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,adding TS for Distributed Ignition Sys ML17335A3631998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,revising TS 3/4.7.7, Sealed Source Contamination & Associated Bases to Address Testing Requirements for Fission Detectors ML17335A3591998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,making Administrative Changes to Remove Obsolete Info,To Provide Consistency Between Units 1 & 2,to Provide Consistency with Std Tech Specs,To Provide Clarification & to Correct Typos ML17335A3561998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 4.6.5.1, Ice Condenser,Ice Bed & Associated Bases to Reflect Max Ice Condenser Flow Channel Blockage Assumed in Accident Analyses ML17335A2631998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Containment Sys Bases 3/4.6.1.4 Re Internal Pressure & 3/4.6.1.5 Re Air Temp ML17335A2761998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,placing Tighter Restrictions on Amount of Time RWST Water Level Instrumentation Can Be Out of Svc Before Compensatory Actions Are Required ML17335A2671998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 3.4.1.3, RCS - Shutdown & Associated Bases to Provide Separate Requirements for Modes 4 & 5 with Loops Filled & Mode 5 with Loops Not Filled ML17335A2311998-09-14014 September 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing Runout Limits for Safety Injection Pump to 675 Gpm Unless Pump Is Specifically Tested to Higher Flow Rate Not Exceeding 700 Gpm ML17335A1901998-08-28028 August 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,requesting Extension of SG Surveillance,Which TSs Require to Be Performed on or Before 990408,until End of Current Refuel Cycle Currently Scheduled for Mar 2000.W/assessment of SG Degradation & TSs ML17334A7471998-06-10010 June 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-54 & DPR-78,changing Implementation Date to Reduce Boric Acid Concentration in Boric Acid Storage Sys.Attachment 1 to Ltr Contains Description of Proposed Change & Justification for Change ML17334B7011998-03-0303 March 1998 Application for Amends to TS for Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Removing Word Immediately from Unit 1 Hydrogen Recombiner Surveillance Requirement 4.6.4.2.b.4 & Revising Plants TS 3/4.6.4 Bases ML17334B6561997-10-0808 October 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-78,changing TSs 3/4.6.5 & 3/4.5.5 to Increase Both Minimum Required Ice Mass Per Ice Basket & Total Minimum Required Ice Mass. Proprietary Summary of Sump Inventory Calculations,Encl ML17333B0431997-09-19019 September 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting Requirement for Automatic Valve Closure Feature on RHR Sys Suction from RCS ML17333A9831997-08-11011 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,allowing Filling of ECCS Accumulators W/O Declaring ECCS Equipment Inoperable ML17335A2101997-08-0101 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting Wording When Secondary Steam Supply Pressure Is Greater than 310 Psig from TS ML17333A8281997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Modifying TS 4.7.5.1.e.2 Which Describes Control Room Ventilation Sys Autostart Functions ML17333A8311997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing Grammatical Correction to Wording of Unit 2 TS 3.4.8,Action a for Modes 1,2 & 3 & Returning Frequency Requirement to TS 4.7.1.2.c & 4.7.1.2.d That Was Inadvertently Deleted ML17333A7121996-12-20020 December 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Requesting Rev of Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp Frequency ML17334B5941996-07-11011 July 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS to Support Operation of Unit 2 at Increased Core Rated Thermal Power of 3,588 Mwt.Rev 1 to WCAP-14489, ...Unit 2 3,600 Mwt Uprating Program Licensing Rept Encl ML17334B5901996-06-19019 June 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,addressing Applicable Requirements of NRC GL 95-05, Voltage-Based Repair Criteria for Repair of Westinghouse SG Tubes Affected by Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking. ML17334B5891996-06-11011 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,removing TSs Certain Requirements for Administrative Controls,Related to QA Requirements,Per Administrative Ltr 96-05 ML17333A4201996-04-0808 April 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,moving TS 4.0.4 Exemption Statement for MSSVs Into Section 4.7.1.1 ML17333A3551996-03-12012 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-74,removing TSs Re Shutdown & Control Rod Position Indication While in Modes 3, 4 & 5 ML17334B5751996-02-29029 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS to Reduce Boric Acid Concentration in Boric Acid Storage Sys from Approx 12 Percent to Approx 4 Percent by Weight. Technical Rept Presenting Justificaion for Changes Encl ML17334B5741996-02-26026 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 5.6.2 to Increase Current Limit on Nominal Fuel Assembly Enrichment for New,Westinghouse - Fabricated Fuel Stored in New Fuel Storage Racks ML17333A3201996-02-22022 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Remove Requirement That Operations Superintendent Must Hold or Have Held Sol at Plant or Similar Reactor ML17333A3151996-02-22022 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying Table 4.8-1,DG Test Schedule by Ref Rg 1.9,Rev 3 Rather than Rg 1.108,Rev 1 Criteria for Determination of Valid DG Test ML17333A2641996-01-12012 January 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS Section 4.4.11 to Eliminate SR Demonstrating Operability of Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer PORVs & Block Valves ML17333A2391995-12-19019 December 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 3/4.6.1.2,3/4.6.1.3,3/4.6.1.6 & 3/4.6.1.6 to Require Types A,B & C Tests (Overall Integrated & Local Containment Leakage Rate) to Be Performed Per 10CFR50,App J Option B ML17332B0111995-11-10010 November 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Ts,By Modifying Surveillance Testing of EDG During Refueling & Normal Operations ML17332A9971995-10-20020 October 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Add Exemption to TS 4.0.4 in Surveillance Requirements for MSIV ML17332A9111995-08-0606 August 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,informing That Licensee Has 45 Days from Date of Issuance to Implement Amend Unless Otherwise Specified ML17334B5561995-08-0404 August 1995 Application for Exigent Amend to License DPR-58,modifying TS 4.4.5.4 & 4.4.5.5 for Repair of Hybrid Expansion Joint Sleeved SG Tubes.Proprietary W Rept WCAP-14446, Repair...Of Hybrid Expansion Joint...Tubes Encl.W Rept Withheld ML17332A8271995-06-30030 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing TS Section 5.3.1 to Allow Fuel Reconstitution,Per GL 90-02, Suppl 1 ML17334B5501995-06-20020 June 1995 License Amend Request to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,to Remove Requirements for Fire Protection Systems from Licenses & Guidance in GL 86-10,GL 88-12 & GL 93-07 ML17332A7991995-06-15015 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 4.8.1.1.2.e.7 to Reduce Duration of Surveillance Testing for EDGs During Refueling Operations from 24 H to 8 H ML17334B5481995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74.Amends Would Support Operation of Unit 1 at SG Tube Plugging Levels Up to 30%,make One Unit 1 TS More Nearly Like Corresponding Unit 2 TS & Maintain Consistency of Unit 2 Criteria ML17334B5461995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying Tech Specs 3/4.3.1 (Reactor Trip Sys Instrumentation) & 3/4.3.2 (ESFAS Instrumentation) & Bases to Relocate Tables of Response Time Limits to Ufsar,Per GL 93-08 ML17332A7661995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74.Amends Would Incorporate Cycle & Burnup Dependent Peaking Factor Penalty ML17332A7741995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 5.3.1 to Allow Fuel Reconstitution,Per GL 90-02,Suppl 1 ML17332A7771995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS Table 4.3-2 to Change Main Steam Line Isolation Valve Manual Actuation Sys Surveillance Frequency from Monthly to Quarterly 1999-09-23
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML17335A5551999-10-12012 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for Spray Additive Sys to Relocate Details Associated with Acceptance Criteria & Test Parameters to Associated TS Bases ML17335A5591999-10-11011 October 1999 Supplement to Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,replacing Correct TS Pages Inadvertently Included in 990923 Submittal.Attached Pages Also Include Appropriate Administrative Changes ML17335A5411999-10-0101 October 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Containment Recirculation Sump Water Inventory.Calculation & non-proprietary WCAP-15302 Rept Also Encl ML17326A1571999-09-23023 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,involving Movement of Loads in Excess of Design Basis Seismic Capability of Auxiliary Bldg Load Handling Equipment & Structures ML17326A1421999-09-17017 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,to Allow Credit of Rod Cluster Control Assemblies for Cold Leg Large Break LOCA Subcriticality.Ts Pages & non-proprietary Versions of WCAP-15246 Encl.Proprietary Version Withheld ML17326A1161999-09-10010 September 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.4.7,TS Tables 4.4-3,3.4-1 & TS Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.2 Re RCS & Gas Storage Tank Sampling ML17326A0921999-08-17017 August 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,to Change TS 3/4.4.5 & Bases for TS 3/4.4.5,3/4.4.6.2 & 3/4.4.8 to Remove voltage-based Repair Criteria,F* Repair Criteria & Sleeving Methodologies from Unit 1 TS & Clarify Bases Sections ML17325B6041999-05-21021 May 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Limitations of Positive Reactivity Additions in Several TS Action Statements ML17325B5511999-04-19019 April 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 3/4.8.1.2, Electrical Power Systems & Associated Bases to Provide one-time Extension of 18-month Surveillance Interval for Specific SRs ML17335A3661998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,adding TS for Distributed Ignition Sys ML17335A3631998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,revising TS 3/4.7.7, Sealed Source Contamination & Associated Bases to Address Testing Requirements for Fission Detectors ML17335A3591998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,making Administrative Changes to Remove Obsolete Info,To Provide Consistency Between Units 1 & 2,to Provide Consistency with Std Tech Specs,To Provide Clarification & to Correct Typos ML17335A3561998-12-0303 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 4.6.5.1, Ice Condenser,Ice Bed & Associated Bases to Reflect Max Ice Condenser Flow Channel Blockage Assumed in Accident Analyses ML17335A2631998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS Containment Sys Bases 3/4.6.1.4 Re Internal Pressure & 3/4.6.1.5 Re Air Temp ML17335A2761998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,placing Tighter Restrictions on Amount of Time RWST Water Level Instrumentation Can Be Out of Svc Before Compensatory Actions Are Required ML17335A2671998-10-0808 October 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 3.4.1.3, RCS - Shutdown & Associated Bases to Provide Separate Requirements for Modes 4 & 5 with Loops Filled & Mode 5 with Loops Not Filled ML17335A2311998-09-14014 September 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing Runout Limits for Safety Injection Pump to 675 Gpm Unless Pump Is Specifically Tested to Higher Flow Rate Not Exceeding 700 Gpm ML17335A1901998-08-28028 August 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,requesting Extension of SG Surveillance,Which TSs Require to Be Performed on or Before 990408,until End of Current Refuel Cycle Currently Scheduled for Mar 2000.W/assessment of SG Degradation & TSs ML17334A7471998-06-10010 June 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-54 & DPR-78,changing Implementation Date to Reduce Boric Acid Concentration in Boric Acid Storage Sys.Attachment 1 to Ltr Contains Description of Proposed Change & Justification for Change ML17334B7011998-03-0303 March 1998 Application for Amends to TS for Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Removing Word Immediately from Unit 1 Hydrogen Recombiner Surveillance Requirement 4.6.4.2.b.4 & Revising Plants TS 3/4.6.4 Bases ML17334B6561997-10-0808 October 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-78,changing TSs 3/4.6.5 & 3/4.5.5 to Increase Both Minimum Required Ice Mass Per Ice Basket & Total Minimum Required Ice Mass. Proprietary Summary of Sump Inventory Calculations,Encl ML17333B0431997-09-19019 September 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting Requirement for Automatic Valve Closure Feature on RHR Sys Suction from RCS ML17333A9831997-08-11011 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,allowing Filling of ECCS Accumulators W/O Declaring ECCS Equipment Inoperable ML17335A2101997-08-0101 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting Wording When Secondary Steam Supply Pressure Is Greater than 310 Psig from TS ML17333A8281997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Modifying TS 4.7.5.1.e.2 Which Describes Control Room Ventilation Sys Autostart Functions ML17333A8311997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing Grammatical Correction to Wording of Unit 2 TS 3.4.8,Action a for Modes 1,2 & 3 & Returning Frequency Requirement to TS 4.7.1.2.c & 4.7.1.2.d That Was Inadvertently Deleted ML17333A7121996-12-20020 December 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74, Requesting Rev of Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp Frequency ML17334B5941996-07-11011 July 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS to Support Operation of Unit 2 at Increased Core Rated Thermal Power of 3,588 Mwt.Rev 1 to WCAP-14489, ...Unit 2 3,600 Mwt Uprating Program Licensing Rept Encl ML17334B5901996-06-19019 June 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-58,addressing Applicable Requirements of NRC GL 95-05, Voltage-Based Repair Criteria for Repair of Westinghouse SG Tubes Affected by Outside Diameter Stress Corrosion Cracking. ML17334B5891996-06-11011 June 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,removing TSs Certain Requirements for Administrative Controls,Related to QA Requirements,Per Administrative Ltr 96-05 ML17333A4201996-04-0808 April 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,moving TS 4.0.4 Exemption Statement for MSSVs Into Section 4.7.1.1 ML17333A3551996-03-12012 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-74,removing TSs Re Shutdown & Control Rod Position Indication While in Modes 3, 4 & 5 ML17334B5751996-02-29029 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS to Reduce Boric Acid Concentration in Boric Acid Storage Sys from Approx 12 Percent to Approx 4 Percent by Weight. Technical Rept Presenting Justificaion for Changes Encl ML17334B5741996-02-26026 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 5.6.2 to Increase Current Limit on Nominal Fuel Assembly Enrichment for New,Westinghouse - Fabricated Fuel Stored in New Fuel Storage Racks ML17333A3201996-02-22022 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Remove Requirement That Operations Superintendent Must Hold or Have Held Sol at Plant or Similar Reactor ML17333A3151996-02-22022 February 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying Table 4.8-1,DG Test Schedule by Ref Rg 1.9,Rev 3 Rather than Rg 1.108,Rev 1 Criteria for Determination of Valid DG Test ML17333A2641996-01-12012 January 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS Section 4.4.11 to Eliminate SR Demonstrating Operability of Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer PORVs & Block Valves ML17333A2391995-12-19019 December 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 3/4.6.1.2,3/4.6.1.3,3/4.6.1.6 & 3/4.6.1.6 to Require Types A,B & C Tests (Overall Integrated & Local Containment Leakage Rate) to Be Performed Per 10CFR50,App J Option B ML17332B0111995-11-10010 November 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Ts,By Modifying Surveillance Testing of EDG During Refueling & Normal Operations ML17332A9971995-10-20020 October 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,proposing to Add Exemption to TS 4.0.4 in Surveillance Requirements for MSIV ML17332A9111995-08-0606 August 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,informing That Licensee Has 45 Days from Date of Issuance to Implement Amend Unless Otherwise Specified ML17334B5561995-08-0404 August 1995 Application for Exigent Amend to License DPR-58,modifying TS 4.4.5.4 & 4.4.5.5 for Repair of Hybrid Expansion Joint Sleeved SG Tubes.Proprietary W Rept WCAP-14446, Repair...Of Hybrid Expansion Joint...Tubes Encl.W Rept Withheld ML17332A8271995-06-30030 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,changing TS Section 5.3.1 to Allow Fuel Reconstitution,Per GL 90-02, Suppl 1 ML17334B5501995-06-20020 June 1995 License Amend Request to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,to Remove Requirements for Fire Protection Systems from Licenses & Guidance in GL 86-10,GL 88-12 & GL 93-07 ML17332A7991995-06-15015 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising TS 4.8.1.1.2.e.7 to Reduce Duration of Surveillance Testing for EDGs During Refueling Operations from 24 H to 8 H ML17334B5481995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74.Amends Would Support Operation of Unit 1 at SG Tube Plugging Levels Up to 30%,make One Unit 1 TS More Nearly Like Corresponding Unit 2 TS & Maintain Consistency of Unit 2 Criteria ML17334B5461995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying Tech Specs 3/4.3.1 (Reactor Trip Sys Instrumentation) & 3/4.3.2 (ESFAS Instrumentation) & Bases to Relocate Tables of Response Time Limits to Ufsar,Per GL 93-08 ML17332A7661995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74.Amends Would Incorporate Cycle & Burnup Dependent Peaking Factor Penalty ML17332A7741995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS 5.3.1 to Allow Fuel Reconstitution,Per GL 90-02,Suppl 1 ML17332A7771995-05-25025 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,modifying TS Table 4.3-2 to Change Main Steam Line Isolation Valve Manual Actuation Sys Surveillance Frequency from Monthly to Quarterly 1999-09-23
[Table view] |
Text
CATEGORY 1 REGULAT Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9910190254 DOC.DATE: 99/10/12 NOTARIZED:
YES DOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50;3)6 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH NAA'4E AUTHOR AFFILIATION RENCHECK,M.W.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana 8 Michigan Ele.RECIP.Ni4KE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Records Management Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Application for amends to licenses DPR-58 5 DPR-74, revising TS Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for spray additive sys to relocate details associated with acceptance criteria 5 test parameters to associated TS Bases.DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOO 1D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR i ENCL I SIZE:+TITLE: OR Submittal:
General Distribution NOTES: E RECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME BARNHILL,E SC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 0 INTERNA 0 NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/RP EXTERNAL: NOAC 1 1 1 1 1 0 NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRC PDR ,1 1 1'1 1 1 D U'E NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECiPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.'TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATIONS CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF.COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 10 ENCL' a t W Indiana h'lichigan
, Power Company Cook wcdear Rant One Cock Race Bridgnen, Ml 49106 6164666901 INQIAlM NICNIGQN POWlM October 12, 1999 C 1099-07 10 CFR 50.90 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop 0-P1-17 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST SPRAY ADDITIVE SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 10 CFR50.90, Indiana Michigan Power Company (1&M), the Licensee for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP)Units 1 and 2, proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications (T/S), of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74.I&M proposes to revise T/S Surveillance Requirement 4.6.2.2.d for the spray additive system to relocate the details associated with the acceptance criteria and test parameters to the associated T/S Bases.Additionally, certain administrative text format changes're also being proposed.I&M requests approval of this request by December 10, 1999, to support activities associated with the restart of Unit 2.I&M is adopting the approach, established in NUREG-1431,"Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants, Specifications," Revision 1, for the associated requirement.
Relocating the information to the T/S Bases permits the values to be controlled under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.I&M has identified that such a change may be needed to permit implementation of a plant modification that improves the testing capability for the containment spray pumps.FR pl The existing plant design does not permit testing the containment spray pumps at the design flow rate and results in operation of the pumps at significantly reduced flow, resulting in increased pump vibration levels.Completion of the modification will provide improved testing capability by permitting testing at the design flow rate.However, this modification is also expected to preclude establishing the currently specified containment spray pump discharge pressure test point and may affect the currently specified test acceptance criteria.This amendment will permit timely modifications of the relocated parameters under the provisions of 10 C ('rr9'iOi90254 99iOi2 PDR ADQCK 050003i5 p PDR AEPr America's Energi'arlner
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'Page 2 C1099-07 50.59.If this amendment request is approved, ISLAM requests a 30-day implementation period from the date of issuance.Attachment 1 provides a description and safety analysis to support the proposed changes.Attachments2A and 2B provide marked-up T/S pages for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively.
Attachments 3A and 3B provide the proposed T/S pages with the changes incorporated for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively.
Attachment 4 describes the evaluation performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.92(c), which concludes that no significant hazard is involved.Attachment5 provides the environmental assessment.
One previous submittal, AEP:NRC:433Q dated December 3, 1998, affects Unit 2 T/S page 3/4 6-12 that is submitted in this request.The previous submittal deletes an obsolete footnote associated with certain 18-month surveillance requirements that were delayed until a refueling outage scheduled to begin in August, 1994.The T/S pages in attachments 2B and 3B do not reflect the cliange proposed in the previous submittal.
I&M will coordinate changes to the pages with the NRC Project Manager to ensure proper T/S page control when the associated license amendment requests are approved.No commitments are identified in this submittal.
Copies of this letter and its attachments are being transmitted to the Michigan Public Service Commission and Michigan Department of Public Health, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91.Should you have any questions, please contact Mr.Robert C.Godley, Director of Regulatory Affairs, at (616)466-2698.Sincerely, SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME P;~/Michael W.Rencheck Vice President Nuclear Engineering THI=DAYO Notary ub c 1999 PATRJCJA A.EDDJE>dms Attachments My Commission Expires 8YCRQgg 8Y Cggfgg~~g@OC5}Q op, gg r 3NU9.A NJl)A'N@ON fu~~34~5Nl%l'@%5%M~~"~~'At&5W ggs+Q<g~a'I U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'age3 C1 099-07 J.E.Dyer,'/attachments MDEQ-DW 2 RPD, w/attachments NRC Resident Inspector, w/attachments R.Whale, w/attachments ATTACHMENT 1 TO C1099-07 DESCRIPTION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES A.Summary of the Proposed Changes Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), the Licensee for Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP)Units 1 and 2, proposes to amend Appendix A, Technical Specifications (T/S), of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74.I&M proposes to revise T/S Surveillance Requirement (SR)4.6.2.2.d for the spray additive system to relocate the details associated with the acceptance criteria and test parameters to the associated T/S Bases.Additionally, certain administrative text format changes are also being proposed.The proposed changes are described in detail in Section E of this attachment.
T/S pages that are marked to show the proposed changes are provided in Attachments 2A and 2B for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively.
Note that these pages may r'eflect formatting that differs slightly from the current pages.These format changes are intended to improve appearance and are not intended to introduce other changes.The proposed T/S pages, with the changes incorporated, are provided in Attachments 3A and 3B for Unit 1 and Unit 2, respectively.
B.Description of the Current Requirements I T/S SR 4.6.2.2.d requires that at least once every 5 years, the water fiow from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray system (CTS)be verified to be greater than or equal to 20 gallons per minute (gpm)and less than or equal to 50 gpm.This surveillance requires this test to be performed when the spray pump is operating on recirculation with a pump discharge header pressure greater than or equal to 255 pounds per square inch gauge (psig).C.Bases for the Current Requirements The purpose of the spray additive system flow rate SR 4.6.2.2.d is to ensure that the correct pH level is established in the borated water solution provided by the CTS.This surveillance requirement provides assurance that the correct amount of sodium hydroxide will be metered into the flow path upon CTS initiation.
Proper pH is important for post-accident iodine scrubbing by the CTS and for minimizing corrosion effects on components within the containment.
The values for the test parameters and acceptance criteria are based on hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the necessary post-accident containment spray pH levels.D.Need for Revision of the Requirement Attachment 1 to C1099-07 Page 2 Current plant design does not permit testing the containment spray pumps at the design flow rate.The flow capability during testing js limited by the size of the piping providing the fiowpath during recirculation.
This limitation requires operating the pumps under low flow conditions and results in increased levels of pump vibration during the test.Operating the pumps in this manner is undesirable because it can result in pump vibration exceeding the ASME code limitation, and can potentially contribute to long term degradation of the containment spray pumps.To correct this condition, a plant modification is being implemented to provide increased flow capability for the containment spray pumps when they are operated for testing in recirculation.
This modification affects the hydraulic characteristic of the flow path that is used when the pumps are operated for testing purposes.The modification permits the pumps to be tested at design flow rates and is intended to eliminate the undesirable pump vibration associated with pump testing at reduced flow.This modification is expected to preclude establishing the current T/S required test condition for the containment spray pump's discharge pressure of greater than or equal to 255 psig without requiring substantial throttling of the pumps fiow.Throttling the pumps to achieve the specified discharge pressure negates the benefit of the modification that provides design flow rate test capability.
Reanalysis of the effects of the spray additive system on the containment sump's pH under post-accident conditions is also being performed to resolve other containment issues unrelated to the modification.
The initial evaluation indicates that an increased maximum flow rate from the spray additive tank to the containment spray flowpath may be necessary.
Relocation of the test parameters from the T/S to the associated T/S Bases permits timely revision of these parameters, as required, upon completion of the analyses and calculations.
E.Description of the Proposed Changes IAM proposes to relocate the test parameters and the acceptance criteria from T/S SR 4.6.2.2.d to the associated T/S Bases.The revised surveillance requirement specifies demonstrating the spray additive system is operable,"...by verifying the flow rate from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray system with the spray pump operating on recirculation." Editorial changes are made in the relocated paragraph for clarity and for grammatical completeness.
I&M is also proposing certain format changes affecting each page include minor differences in margins and text spacing due to variations in word processing and reprographic technologies.
In addition there are specific format changes affecting the Unit 2 bases page B 3/4 6-3.These specific changes include (1)the use of a different font which also results in altered spacing of the text on the page and content for each line of text, (2)the use of horizontal bars to separate the footer and header from the body of the page, (3)the addition of numerical annotation (i.e., 3/4 and 3/4.6 in the header text lines), (4)the removal of underlining from the two lines of header text, (5)the reversal of sequence and deletion of a blank line between the'wo lines of header
~y~j h'W Attachment 1 to C1099-07 Page 3 text, (6)the removal of spaces immediately preceding and following the hyphen in the footer text,"COOK NUCLEAR PLANT-UNIT 2," (7)the addition of the word"Page" prior to the page number, and (8)the removal of the word"NO." following the word"AMENDMENT" and prior to the historical and current amendment numbers.F.Bases for the Proposed Changes The relocation of details associated with SR 4.6.2.2.d is appropriate because these details are not required to be in the T/S to provide adequate protection of the public health and safety and the T/S still retains the requirement for system operability.
Only the location of the requirement is changed (T/S Bases versus the T/S).The control of changes to these testing details is also modified since changes to the T/S require NRC approval while the T/S Bases may be modified in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59.This approach provides an effective level of regulatory control and provides for a more appropriate change control process.Changes to the T/S Bases are controlled by the provisions of the 10CFR50.59,"Changes, Tests and Experiments." This revised SR is consistent with the associated requirement, SR 3.6.7.5, in NUREG-1431,"Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse.'Plants, Specifications," Revision 1.SR 3.6.7.5 specifies neither a.discharge pressure, test value nor any acceptance criteria.The Improved'Standard Technical Specification (ISTS)were developed by the associated Owner's Groups and>>have been accepted by the NRC for use by licensees in conversion to the ISTS.The changes in format of the text on each page are administrative and do not result in any change in the actual requirements.
G.Impact on Previous Submittals One previous submittal, AEP:NRC:433Q dated December 3, 1998, affects Unit 2 T/S page 3/4 6-12 that is submitted in this request.The previous submittal deletes an obsolete footnote associated with certain 18-month surveillance requirements that were delayed until a refueling outage scheduled to begin in August, 1994.The T/S pages in attachments 2B and 3B do not reflect the change proposed in the previous submittal.
IAM will coordinate changes to the pages with the NRC Project Manager to ensure proper T/S page control when the associated license amendment requests are approved.