ML16168A173: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1IPRenewal NPEmailsFrom:Louie, Richard <rlouie@entergy.com>Sent:Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:36 AMTo:Wentzel, MichaelCc:Walpole, Robert W
{{#Wiki_filter:1IPRenewal NPEmails From:Louie, Richard <rlouie@entergy.com>
Sent:Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:36 AM To:Wentzel, Michael Cc:Walpole, Robert W


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference CallMike, Please consider revising the following two sentences in the first paragraph of the draft summary.
[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference CallMike, Please consider revising the following two sentences in the first paragraph of the draft summary.  
Revise:  In response, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the operating experience that could constitute recurring internal corrosion, including enhancing review procedures to ensure that responses to NRC staff requests for additional information have fully considered all potentially applicable operating experience. To:
 
We briefly discussed program procedures; however, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the degradation identified in operating experience that could be attributed to the effects of aging. Revise:
Revise:  In response, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the operating experience that could constitute recurring internal corrosion, including enhancing review procedures to ensure that responses to NRC staff requests for additional information have fully considered all potentially applicable operating experience.
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to assess the effectiveness of Entergy's changes.
To:
We briefly discussed program procedures; however, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the degradation identified in operating experience that could be attributed to the effects of aging.
Revise:
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to assess the effectiveness of Entergy's changes.  
 
To:
To:
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to discuss the status of any potential corrective actions.
The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to discuss the status of any potential corrective actions.  
: Thanks,  
: Thanks,  


Line 29: Line 34:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call
Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  
: Rich, Attached is a draft summary of our May 10 phone call. Please review and let me know if you have any comments.
: Rich, Attached is a draft summary of our May 10 phone call. Please review and let me know if you have any comments.  
: Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel 2Project Manager NRR/DLR/RERP (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier:  IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:  6762  Mail Envelope Properties  (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B16DFC56E)  
: Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel 2Project Manager NRR/DLR/RERP (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier:  IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:  6762  Mail Envelope Properties  (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B16DFC56E)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
   [External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  Sent Date:  6/16/2016 10:36:03 AM  Received Date:  6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM From:    Louie, Richard Created By:  rlouie@entergy.com Recipients:    "Walpole, Robert W" <rwalpol@entergy.com>
   [External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call  Sent Date:  6/16/2016 10:36:03 AM  Received Date:  6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM From:    Louie, Richard Created By:  rlouie@entergy.com Recipients:    "Walpole, Robert W" <rwalpol@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None  "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None  "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:  JDCXMETSP002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1465      6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None Post Office:  JDCXMETSP002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com
 
Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1465      6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 06:44, 30 June 2018

2016/06/16 Indian Point Lr Hearing - [External_Sender] Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call
ML16168A173
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/2016
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML16168A173 (3)
v • d • e


Text

1IPRenewal NPEmails From:Louie, Richard <rlouie@entergy.com>

Sent:Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:36 AM To:Wentzel, Michael Cc:Walpole, Robert W

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference CallMike, Please consider revising the following two sentences in the first paragraph of the draft summary.

Revise: In response, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the operating experience that could constitute recurring internal corrosion, including enhancing review procedures to ensure that responses to NRC staff requests for additional information have fully considered all potentially applicable operating experience.

To:

We briefly discussed program procedures; however, Entergy stated that they would give broader consideration of the degradation identified in operating experience that could be attributed to the effects of aging.

Revise:

The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to assess the effectiveness of Entergy's changes.

To:

The NRC staff and Entergy agreed to have a follow-up phone call in approximately 3 months to discuss the status of any potential corrective actions.

Thanks,

Rich From: Wentzel, Michael [1] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:54 PM To: Louie, Richard

Subject:

Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call

Rich, Attached is a draft summary of our May 10 phone call. Please review and let me know if you have any comments.
Thanks, Mike Michael Wentzel 2Project Manager NRR/DLR/RERP (301) 415-6459 michael.wentzel@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 6762 Mail Envelope Properties (CB159DC717B797428E92782CE3B5F40B16DFC56E)

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Draft Summary of the May 10, 2016, Conference Call Sent Date: 6/16/2016 10:36:03 AM Received Date: 6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM From: Louie, Richard Created By: rlouie@entergy.com Recipients: "Walpole, Robert W" <rwalpol@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: JDCXMETSP002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1465 6/16/2016 10:36:09 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16168A173&oldid=764208"