ML17212B501: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORRMATIONDI'STRIBUTION,(RIDS)AOGESSXONNBR;82P4130083DOC,DA'TE:82/09<<<<<<'09NOTARIZED'OFACIL50335'Sbs'Lucre'Planti,Unlitii'Flor'ida'Power-8L'ight<<Cos'AUTH~NPMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONUHRIGtR~E~'Florida<<Power8"Li,ght:Co~RE<<CIP~NAME,RECXPIENTAFFIL'IRTIONEISENHUTDiD.G,-.Divisionof'LicensingDOCKET.005000335
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR RMATIONDI'STRIBUTION, (RIDS)AOGESSXON NBR;82P4130083 DOC,DA'TE:
82/09<<<<<<'09 NOTARIZED'O FACIL50335'Sbs'Lucre'Planti,Unlitii'Flor'ida'Power-8L'ight<<Cos'AUTH
~NPMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONUHRIGtR~E~'Florida<<Power8"Li,ght:Co
~RE<<CIP~NAME,RECXPIENT AFFIL'IRTION EISENHUTDi D.G,-.Division of'Licensing DOCKET.005000335


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Application>toamendL)cense.DPR67'consistingofchariqesto'-Tech.Speos,godifying:.timelimitfrom10-.daysto30daysforsubmittalofBeechDune.surveyr<<esqtls~DI'STRISUTIONCODE:AGO<<S>COPIESRECEIVED:UTR.J"ENCL:JSIZE:er~<<TI<<TLE:GeneralDistri'butionforafber-IssuanoeofOperatingLicenseNOTES;RECIPIENT'DiCODE/NAMEORB03BC01INTERNAL:,ELDNRR/DHFSDEPY08RABEGFL00<<COPIESL'TTRENCL13131011011RECIPXENTID'CODE/NAM<<E""IE,.06NRR/DL.DERNRR/DSI/RABRGN2COPIESL7TRENCLfi11EXTERNAL:ACRS09NRCPDR'02NTIS10101111LPDRNSXC0305'TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED!LTTR35ENCL33 04II4gHkkCS>>k'>>llI+~H''iigHilIi'kIy'IH~IIIIH)>>f.II>>)IH~)"Hii>F'fI>>0'H'IIIH~p,j~0Ii,SkHIH yi(lib~ifA~<AFLORIDAPOWER&LIGHTCOMPANYApril9,1982L-82-140OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationAttention:Mr.Darrel1G.Eisenhut,DirectorDivisionofLicensingU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionWashington,D.C.20555
Application
>toamendL)cense.DPR67'consisting ofchariqesto'-Tech.Speos, godifying:.time limitfrom10-.daysto30daysforsubmittal ofBeechDune.surveyr<<esqtls~DI'STRISUTION CODE:AGO<<S>COPIESRECEIVED:UTR
.J"ENCL:JSIZE:er~<<TI<<TLE:GeneralDistri'butionforafber-Issuanoe ofOperating LicenseNOTES;RECIPIENT
'DiCODE/NAME ORB03BC01INTERNAL:,ELD NRR/DHFSDEPY08RABEGFL00<<COPIESL'TTRENCL13131011011RECIPXENTID'CODE/NAM<<E
""IE,.06NRR/DL.DER NRR/DSI/RAB RGN2COPIESL7TRENCLfi11EXTERNAL:
ACRS09NRCPDR'02NTIS10101111LPDRNSXC0305'TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED!
LTTR35ENCL33 04II4gHkkCS>>k'>>llI+~H''iigHilIi'kIy'IH~IIIIH)>>f.II>>)IH~)"Hii>F'fI>>0'H'IIIH~p,j~0Ii,SkHIH yi(lib~ifA~<AFLORIDAPOWER&LIGHTCOMPANYApril9,1982L-82-140OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation Attention:
Mr.Darrel1G.Eisenhut, DirectorDivisionofLicensing U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555


==DearMr.Eisenhut:==
==DearMr.Eisenhut:==
Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedAmendmenttoFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67:BeachDuneSurveReortInaccordancewith10CFR5550.90and50.30FloridaPower8Light(FPL)herewithsubmitsthreeoriginalsand40copiesofarequesttoAppendixAtoOperatingLicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1.TheamendmentsareshownontheattachedTechnicalSpecificationpagesbearingthedateofthisletterinthelowerrighthandcorner.ThisrequestmodifiesthetimelimitofAppendixATechnicalSpecification4.7.6.1.1from10daysto30dayswithinwhichtheBeachDuneSurveyresultsmustbesubmittedtotheCommissionaftercompletionofthesurvey.Duetologisticssuchastraveltime,dataanalysis,typingandmailingtime,itisextremelydifficulttomeetthe10dayreportingrequirement.Theresultsofthesesurveys,whichwereinitiatedin1976,haveindicatedthattherehasbeennosignificantchangeonthebeachorintheduneprofilesduringthelastfiveyears.Onthatbasis,theredoesnotseemtobecauseforsuchanextremelevelofconcernaswouldbeindicatedbythe10dayrequirement.SincewepresentlyhaveoutstandingseveralTechnicalSpecificationproposals,itisrequestedthatthisminorchangebeconsideredwithourrequestofOctober27,1980(L-80-354)./oolS//~8204130083',820409;.',~,')PDR,ADOCK.05000335'',P'""...,"PDRPEOPLE...SERVINGPEOPLE  
 
~~0~\~0 Mr.DarrellG.EisenhutPageTwoTheproposedamendmentshavebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroup,theCompanyEnvironmentalReviewGroup,andtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Theyhavedeterminedthattheproposedamendmentsareadministrativeinnatureandwillresultinnoadverseeffectsontheenvironment.Verytrulyyours,gdRobertE.UhrigVicePresidentAdvancedSystem8TechnologyREU/GJK/gaAttachmentscc:J.P.O'Reilly,DirectorRegionIIHaroldReis,Esquire e.hc'-}}
Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedAmendment toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67:BeachDuneSurveReortInaccordance with10CFR5550.90and50.30FloridaPower8Light(FPL)herewithsubmitsthreeoriginals and40copiesofarequesttoAppendixAtoOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1.Theamendments areshownontheattachedTechnical Specification pagesbearingthedateofthisletterinthelowerrighthandcorner.ThisrequestmodifiesthetimelimitofAppendixATechnical Specification 4.7.6.1.1 from10daysto30dayswithinwhichtheBeachDuneSurveyresultsmustbesubmitted totheCommission aftercompletion ofthesurvey.Duetologistics suchastraveltime,dataanalysis, typingandmailingtime,itisextremely difficult tomeetthe10dayreporting requirement.
Theresultsofthesesurveys,whichwereinitiated in1976,haveindicated thattherehasbeennosignificant changeonthebeachorintheduneprofilesduringthelastfiveyears.Onthatbasis,theredoesnotseemtobecauseforsuchanextremelevelofconcernaswouldbeindicated bythe10dayrequirement.
Sincewepresently haveoutstanding severalTechnical Specification proposals, itisrequested thatthisminorchangebeconsidered withourrequestofOctober27,1980(L-80-354).
/oolS//~8204130083
',820409;.',
~,')PDR,ADOCK.05000335
'',P'""...,"PDRPEOPLE...
SERVINGPEOPLE  
~~0~\~0 Mr.DarrellG.
EisenhutPageTwoTheproposedamendments havebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroup,theCompanyEnvironmental ReviewGroup,andtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Theyhavedetermined thattheproposedamendments areadministrative innatureandwillresultinnoadverseeffectsontheenvironment.
Verytrulyyours,gdRobertE.UhrigVicePresident AdvancedSystem8Technology REU/GJK/ga Attachments cc:J.P.O'Reilly, DirectorRegionIIHaroldReis,Esquire e.hc'-}}

Revision as of 16:48, 29 June 2018

Application to Amend License DPR-67 Consisting of Changes to Tech Specs Modifying Time Limit from 10 Days to 30 Days for Submittal of Beach Dune Survey Results
ML17212B501
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/1982
From: UHRIG R E
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: EISENHUT D G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17212B502 List:
References
L-82-140, NUDOCS 8204130083
Download: ML17212B501 (6)


Text

REGULATOR RMATIONDI'STRIBUTION, (RIDS)AOGESSXON NBR;82P4130083 DOC,DA'TE:

82/09<<<<<<'09 NOTARIZED'O FACIL50335'Sbs'Lucre'Planti,Unlitii'Flor'ida'Power-8L'ight<<Cos'AUTH

~NPMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONUHRIGtR~E~'Florida<<Power8"Li,ght:Co

~RE<<CIP~NAME,RECXPIENT AFFIL'IRTION EISENHUTDi D.G,-.Division of'Licensing DOCKET.005000335

SUBJECT:

Application

>toamendL)cense.DPR67'consisting ofchariqesto'-Tech.Speos, godifying:.time limitfrom10-.daysto30daysforsubmittal ofBeechDune.surveyr<<esqtls~DI'STRISUTION CODE:AGO<COPIESRECEIVED:UTR

.J"ENCL:JSIZE:er~<<TI<<TLE:GeneralDistri'butionforafber-Issuanoe ofOperating LicenseNOTES;RECIPIENT

'DiCODE/NAME ORB03BC01INTERNAL:,ELD NRR/DHFSDEPY08RABEGFL00<<COPIESL'TTRENCL13131011011RECIPXENTID'CODE/NAM<<E

""IE,.06NRR/DL.DER NRR/DSI/RAB RGN2COPIESL7TRENCLfi11EXTERNAL:

ACRS09NRCPDR'02NTIS10101111LPDRNSXC0305'TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED!

LTTR35ENCL33 04II4gHkkCS>>k'>>llI+~HiigHilIi'kIy'IH~IIIIH)>>f.II>>)IH~)"Hii>F'fI>>0'H'IIIH~p,j~0Ii,SkHIH yi(lib~ifA~<AFLORIDAPOWER&LIGHTCOMPANYApril9,1982L-82-140OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation Attention:

Mr.Darrel1G.Eisenhut, DirectorDivisionofLicensing U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555

DearMr.Eisenhut:

Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedAmendment toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67:BeachDuneSurveReortInaccordance with10CFR5550.90and50.30FloridaPower8Light(FPL)herewithsubmitsthreeoriginals and40copiesofarequesttoAppendixAtoOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1.Theamendments areshownontheattachedTechnical Specification pagesbearingthedateofthisletterinthelowerrighthandcorner.ThisrequestmodifiesthetimelimitofAppendixATechnical Specification 4.7.6.1.1 from10daysto30dayswithinwhichtheBeachDuneSurveyresultsmustbesubmitted totheCommission aftercompletion ofthesurvey.Duetologistics suchastraveltime,dataanalysis, typingandmailingtime,itisextremely difficult tomeetthe10dayreporting requirement.

Theresultsofthesesurveys,whichwereinitiated in1976,haveindicated thattherehasbeennosignificant changeonthebeachorintheduneprofilesduringthelastfiveyears.Onthatbasis,theredoesnotseemtobecauseforsuchanextremelevelofconcernaswouldbeindicated bythe10dayrequirement.

Sincewepresently haveoutstanding severalTechnical Specification proposals, itisrequested thatthisminorchangebeconsidered withourrequestofOctober27,1980(L-80-354).

/oolS//~8204130083

',820409;.',

~,')PDR,ADOCK.05000335

,P'""...,"PDRPEOPLE...

SERVINGPEOPLE

~~0~\~0 Mr.DarrellG.

EisenhutPageTwoTheproposedamendments havebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroup,theCompanyEnvironmental ReviewGroup,andtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Theyhavedetermined thattheproposedamendments areadministrative innatureandwillresultinnoadverseeffectsontheenvironment.

Verytrulyyours,gdRobertE.UhrigVicePresident AdvancedSystem8Technology REU/GJK/ga Attachments cc:J.P.O'Reilly, DirectorRegionIIHaroldReis,Esquire e.hc'-