ML18018B051: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Regulatory FileCy.Pgs,.',.<g ggWd-A>0./~JgwR~lvsdwNr946~Environmental Pre-perational SurveyNineMilePoint(ggg[lJToII[gPIIIIt'yIflI~lIililf)NINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARSTATIONUNITNO.1'NIAGARAMOHAWKPOWERCORPORATION | ||
: SYRACUSE, NEWYORK2S4 IIIIIl ENVIRONMENTAL PRE-OPERATIONAL SURVEYNINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARSTATIONNIAGARAMOHAWKPOWERCORPORATION | |||
: December, 1969 | |||
TABLEOFCONTENTSIntroduction Pre-Operational'urvey | |||
-LandProgramA.B.ProgramDevelopment ProgramOperation andResultsRadioanalysis ofAquaticSamples-LakeProgramAppendixA-SummaryofLakeOntarioecological studiesrelativetotheNineMilePointNuclearPowerStationAppendixB-.Ecological BenthicStudy,August,1968AppendixC-FishDistribution Study,June,1968 | |||
Environmental Pre-Operational Survey-NineMilePointI.Introduction Thisreportsummarizes the.preoperational | |||
III II,Pre- | 'environmental surveysconducted inthevicinityof'theNineMilePointNuclearStationNo.1byNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation. | ||
I c~d.e. | Surveyresultsandotherpertinent dataarepresented forboththelandandlake(underwater) programsasdescribed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(VolumeII,AppendixD). | ||
I4~>I L2. | III II,Pre-0erational Surve-LandProramA.ProramDevelomentElevenenvironmental stationsweresetbpin1968inaccordance withtheplansspecified intheNineMilePointNuclearStationFinalSafetyAnalysisReport-AppendixD,pageD-26.Thelocations ofthefiveon-site,andsixoff-sitemonitoring stationsareillustrated inFigures1and2,respectively. | ||
peal OFF- | Allstationsareequippedwithanairsamplingpump,arainandsnowfalloutcollector, andadosimeter (filmbadge)forintegrated dosereadings, inaddi:tion, eachoftheon-sitestationsandtheSectorCoff-sitestationincludearecording gammaradiation monitor.Figure3isaphotograph ofatypicalon-sitestationanditsassociated equipment. | ||
Thesestationswereoperatedintermittently forapproximately 18months.Thefollowing objectives wererealizedduringthisperiod:1.Thelocations selectedwerefoundtobeaccessible inallweatherconditions. | |||
2.Noradiation anomalies wereobservedatanyofthelocations, sononeofthestationshadtobemoved.3.Theequipment wasoperatedundervaryingweatherconditions andoperatedasdesignedwiththefollowing exceptions: | |||
a~b.Theelapsedtimemetersontwooftheairsamplersweredamagedbythevibration ofthepump.Alltheelapsedtimemetersweremovedfromamountingonthepumptoamountingonthebaseplate.Noadditional problemshavebeenencountered inovertenmonthsofoperation. | |||
Thesoftrubberhosesusedtoconnecttheairsampleholderstothepumpsdeveloped cracksafteroneyearofoperation. | |||
Thesehoseswerereplacedwithharder-wall hoseswhichperformed satisfactorily. | |||
I c~d.e.Thecellulose membranefiltersusedforcollecting airsamplesprovedtobetoofragileandwerefrequently brokenwhenchangingsamplesonwindydays.Glassfiberfilterswithacomparable efficiency weresubstituted andhaveeliminat'ed thehandlingproblem.Theprecipitation collectors werecollecting morepre-cipitation thancouldbeaccounted forbytheonesquarefootopeningonthecabinet.Itwasrealizedthatsomeofthewaterstrikingthetopofthemonitorboxwasdraini'ng intotheprecipitation device.Siliconerubberwasusedtobuildadamaroundtheprecipitation collector openings.andinthesubsequent sevenmonthsofoperation, thesedeviceshaveoperatedsatisfactorily. | |||
Radiation levelsweresolowthattherecorders onthegammamonitorsweredrivingdownscale.Topreventdamagetotherecorders, smallCs-137"bugs"wereinstalled inthedetectors tomakethemindicateslightlyupscale(between0;Oland0.02mR/hr),Thedoorlatchesonthecabinetsbrokefrequently andwerereplacedwithsturdierlatches.4.Personnel weretrainedinservicing theequipment inthemonitoring stations.B.ProramerationandResultsDuringthemonthsofAugustandSeptember, 1969,thestationswereoperatedcontinuously andthesampleswereanalyzed. | |||
Thisprogramaccomplished thefollowing: | |||
a)b)Reiterated thatnoradiation anomalies wereobservedatanyofthestations. | |||
Trainedpersonnel intheroutineanalysisoftheenvironmental samples.Resultsoftheanalysesperformed duringthepre-operational periodaresummarized below.Filmbadges(sealedwithdessicant topreventexposuretomoisture) wereinstalled onallelevenmonitoring stationsinJanuaryof1968.Thesebadgeshavebeenchangedmonthlyandhaveallshownstatistically insignificant (lessthan10mR)exposures foreachmonthlyperiod. | |||
I4~>I L2.GammaMonitorsThecontinuously recording gammamonitorswereoperated. | |||
Thechartsshowtlittlevariation fromtheexpected"bugged"background levels.Severalofthemonitorsdiddevelopelectronic problemsduringthisperiodandindicated upscaleLreadings. | |||
Thesemalfunctioning monitorswererepairedassoonasthecondition Lwasobserved. | |||
Withtheexception oftheseobviousmalfunctions, themonitorsindicated theradiation levelsshowninTablel.(Radiation levelsareinmR/hr)TableID-1On-SiteSectorsD-20f-SiteSector*0.0120.0120.0120.0120@0120.012Max.AugustAvg.t"Bued"Bkd.Max.0.0150.03Avg.0:0120.012"Bued"Bkd.0.0120.0120.0.0150.0150.0250.0150.0150.030.0150.0150.00.0160.0150.50.050.020.00.030.020.0160.016'.0160.0160.0160.0163.PreciitationSlestThemonitoring stationsareequippedwithaprecipitation collector whichhasaone-square footopening., | |||
Theinteriorofthestationisheatedtopreventithecollected precipitation fromfreezinginwinter.Precipitation iscollected ivoraone-month periodandthenbroughttothelabforanalysis. | |||
Thegrossbetaresultsforthreemonthsarepresented inTable2.(Activities areinunitsofTable2MonthOn-SiteSectorsD-1D-2EGOff-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2EFGtJulyAugustSetember5.413.40.22.214.01.0437812915.114.422.71.60.70.38.15.25.120.210.310.52.418.114.613.415.45.05.11.42.21.11.0 11I'IJ'lE1:I1~I'ITI4C Gammaspectrums wererunontypicalprecipitation samplesduringthisperiod.Therewerenodiscernible peaks.4.AirSamlesAirsampleswerecollected atatypicalflowrateof2cfmandweretchangedonaweeklybasis.Thegrossbetaactivitydetected24hoursafterthesampleswereremovedisshowninTable3.(Activities areinunitsof10uCi/cc.)Table3D-1On-SiteSectorsD-2EFGOff-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2EFt7/28-8/48/4-8/11E8/11-8/18 8/18-8/258/25-9/29/2-9/8i9/8-9/159/15-9/22 9/22-9/29 4,14.24.33.64.3~5.24.54.13.13.13.42.93.64.13.83.93.13.43'3.02.6---2.02.42.83.03.02.32.3---2.92.51.3---1.51.43.84.12.64.13.32.73.12.81.42.93.52.33.03.22.52.52,51.63.54.24.62.54.44.74.24.82.74.03.4---3.31.73.14.64.65.43.84.14.24.44.33.03.73.83.74.83.32.83.33.73.53.02.92.93.23.93.42.52.12.01.91.51.4Forcomparison,. | |||
thesamplestakeninthe45weeksofsamplingpriortoAugustof1969showedthatinwetorwinterweeks,thegrossbetaactivityrangedfrom0.4to1.0X10uCi/cc,whileindryerweather,theactivityocurredover-13arangeof1.5X10to5.0X10uCi/cc.Forfurthercomparison, thesectortaveragesforthis45-weekperiodarepresented inTable4.(Activities areinunitsof1013uCi/cc.') | |||
Table4I1.28D-21.81On-SiteSectorsEF1.621701.62Off-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2E1.541.831.771.91FG1.501.84 IIIIIIII Itisinteresting tonotethattheStateofNewYorkDepartment ofPublicHealthdetectedaveragegrossbetaactivities of0.9X10to2.0X1013uCi/ccin-13different locations inNewYorkStateduringtheyearof1968.1Gammaspectrums wererunontypicalairsamplesduringthetwo-month period.Thesespectrums shownoclearlydiscernible peaksexceptwhenthesixoff-sitesampleswereanalyzedasagroup.Thisanalysisshowedtracequantities ofmembersoftheuraniumdecayseries.Duringthetwo-month period,homogenized storemilkwaspurchased andthetechnicians trainedintheanalysisofmilkforgrossbeta,strontium andiodine.Rawmilksampleswerenotobtainedduringthistwo-month period,butwereobtainedthroughtheStateDepartment ofPublicHealthinOctoberandNovember. | |||
ThesampleswerefromfourfarmsaroundtheNineMilePointsite.Theresultsoftheseanalysesarepresented inTableS.(Activities areinunitsofpCi/1.)Table5October,1970November, 1970GrossBeta1)IodineStrontium GrossBeta1IodineStrontium 1.61X10169X101.72X101.55X10(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)1.55X10NotDetectable 301.87X10NotDetectable 251.61X10NotDetectable 61.24X10NotDetectable 151)Includesbetafromnaturally occurring K-40.2)Sampleslostwhenrawmilkcoagulated onionexchangecolumns.Chemicalformofionexchangeresinschangedtoovercomeproblem.From:"Environmental Radioactivity inNewYorkState-1968",dated7-14-692Spikedtestsampleswereusedtorefinetheanalytical procedures IIIIIIIIII TheStateDepartment ofPublicHealthhasbeensamplingmilkfromthesesamefarmsforapproximately 2years.Theiraverageresultsfortheyearof1968are3presented inTable6.(Activities areinunitsofpCi/1.)Table6FarmIodine-131Strontium-90 | |||
¹1¹2¹3¹4NotDetectable NotDetectable NotDetectable NotDetectable 13141612III.Radioanal sisofAuaticSles-LakePror'amInJune,1969,asurveywasconducted toobservefishpopulation andobserveunderwater growthofftheNineMilePointshoreline.. | |||
Sevenspecimens offishwereS'ollected inconjunction withthefishnet"population" survey.Thenetsweresetoutneartheeasternboundaryofthesiteinalineperpendicular totheshore.Theshallowest netwaslocatedatadepthofabouttenfeet,fiftyfeetoutfromshorewhilethedeepestnetwaspositioned 700feetfromshoreatadepthof30feet.Mostofthefishobtainedwerefromtheshallownet.Thesamplespecimens werefrozenandshippedtoEberlineInstrumentation Corporation forradioanalysis. | |||
Resultsarepresented inTable7.TheJuneLakebottomsurveyindicated thegreatestabundance ofalgae(primarily cladophora) occurredatadepthofabouttenfeet.Acomposite samplewascollected fromtwelvelocations locatedabout1,000feetapartalongtheten-footdepthcontourandparalleltotheshoreline. | |||
Thissamplewasevaluated byradio-analysisalongwithspecimens ofclams(mussels) andgammarus(freshwatershrimp)collected fromsimilarlocations. | |||
Sampleresultsarealsotabluated inTable7.Duetoinsufficient sampleweightandlowradioactivity ofthegammarus, thissamplewasanalyzedforgrossbetaactivityonly.3From:"Environmental Radioactivity inNewYorkState-1968",dated7-14-69 IIIIII Table7NineMilePointAquaticSamples-June,1969ResultsofRadioanalysis byEberlineInst.Corp.SleWeightgms)Picocuries Ciersle(d)SpeciesWetDryGrossBetaCs137SCoZnGrossGammaNorthernPikeNorthernBrownBullhead2170482481.105950+30435+1272+10,.-438+244.2+2.1..77+60.0+9.6,164+100.0+2.19.5+2.1492+5398+10SmallMouthBassWhitePerchYellowPerchNorthernRedhorseSucker385273200973906649225135+6144+5355+1836+17.8+1.00.0+4.5325+98+2105+2746+3102+574+70.0+1.80.0+1.83.9+1.32.0+1.300+1015+090.0+4.56.8+4.S151+17.125+14100+11183+20Pomolobus(Alewives) 398.534+21.6+0.117+40,0+0.22.0+0.922+2Clams*AlgaeGammarus68918200.0833636155+1813*0.53+0.22 58+70.2+0.01* | |||
167+1518+7105+7167+182.41+0.12* | |||
0.03+0.02* | |||
0.07+0.02* | |||
35.6+5.9* | |||
"NoteAlgaeresultsareinpCi/gm(dry)ratherthanpCi/sample. | |||
peal OFF-SITEMONITORIN GSTATIONLOCATIONS 4~4PULASKI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~';':j("': | |||
MEXICOQge44eeo105MILESGRAPHICSCALEB4404~tA~~~SITEo0~~~~OSWEGO04>:4440~1~400p0444044oMONITORSTATIONFigure2 I(",('I ON-SITEMONITORING STATIONLOCATIONS | |||
~e~0/5~0QD.'C@Yb?ProposedJamesA.Fitzpatrick f4~o!D2NuclearPowerPlantI~(QQJt~guc(eaLi0~cPE0rC'rJ/a'Ogr~armrf\zBjIIg.-ti0/,,+llxfvltl~'I)''Q),. | |||
r'g0pIlI'Io'y,I;if,'P'IQIi1jp(i0el~0'cIq~y0~fgv~at~lOltlYCOINCI'-JFigure1 MMWWWWWWWWMWWWWW Figure3l.Precipitation Collector Recording GammaRadiation MonitorAirSamplingPumpAirSampleFilterg)rl | |||
APPENDIXASENARYOFLAKEONTARIOECOLOGICAL STUDIESRELATIVETOTHENINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARPONERSTATION III Summaryofecological andecologically relatedstudiesinLakeOntarioofftheNineMilePointNuclearPowerStationA.GeneralThefirstecologically orientedstudieswerebegunintheSpringof1963.Aswithanyecologically orientedstudies,thefirsteffortsweredirectedtowardestablishing thephysicalbackground forecological considerations. | |||
IIIIIII | Gradually thesestudiesramifiedandeventually involvedaprimarystudyontheecologyofthebenthicorganisms whichmightbeaffectedbythethermaldischarge. | ||
IWI 9. | Thestudiescarriedoutin1963-64wereconcerned withthestudyofthecurrentsinthelakeandanestimateofthediffusion anddilutionfactorofthedischarge plumeitself.Inall,almost120cruisedayswerespentinthistwo-yearperiodonthisandotheraspectsofthestudy.Becauseofthemanyaspectsofthisstudy,thevariousphasesaretreatedseparately below.1.Diffusion StudiesBecauseoftheclosesimilarity inseveralaspectsbetweentheexpectedthermaldischarge andtheflowoftheOswegoRiver,theeffluentoftheriverwasusedasadiffusion model.Therivercarriesasubstantial chlorideconcentration whichwaseasilymeasuredbytitration methodsaboardtheboat.Theboatcourseplancouldthusbemodifiedasthedayprogressed andthedirection andextentoftheriver'seffluenttracedoutintothelake.Itwasalsopossibletodetermine themovementofthewateralongtheshoreoftheNineMilePointpromontory, the:diffusion characteristics inthatarea,andotherfeaturessuchasupwelling. | ||
IIIIIIIIII | Thisbasicmethodwassupplemented byestablishing aseriesofstationsalongtheboat'scourseandcollecting severalwater IIIIIIII samplesatpre-determined depthsforchlorideanalysisandtemperature measure-ment.Capturedroguetechniques wereusedtoestablish thedirection andspeedofthewatercurrentatthesurfaceandata20-footdepth.Themostmeaningful ofthesecurrentpatternsusingboththechloridediffusion comparison andtemperature profileswerepresented inAppendixB,Limnology, NineMilePoint,NuclearStationPreliminary HazardsSummaryReport,VolumeII.Ingeneral,thesestudiesindicated highdiffusion ratesintheshallowareasofthelakeandanalmostconstantcurrentmovementinthearea.2.CurrentMeterStudiesSupplemental totheabove,twopermanent currentmeterswereanchoredin35and55feetofwateroffthewesternendofthepromontory torecordcurrentvelocities ataboutthe25and45footdepthsoveraperiodofseveralmonths,Inboththeabovestudiestherewasclosecorrelation madetothewindpatternsandthecalms.Direction ofcurrentflowanddurationofcurrentsofvariousspeedswerecalculated. | ||
Thepercentage ofcalmsisestimated asbeinglow,whilethedistribu-tionofeastandwestcurrentsisaboutequal.Thiscurrentdatawasalsousedtocalculate diffusion parameters. | |||
3.TemeratureStudiesInadditiontotakingthetemperature ofthewaterofeachofthesamplescollected, bathythermograph recordsweremadeataseriesofstationsthroughout thefirsttwoyearsofstudy.Theprimaryuseoftheserecordings wastorecordthegradualchangeindepthofthethermocline throughtout theseason.Itwasfoundthatthroughout theearlysummer,theisotherms slopedownwardtowardtheeastwithdeepmixingtakingplaceinAugust,loweringthesurfacetemperature | |||
. | |||
IIIIIII Thisstudyalsosuppliedmaterialtoaidincalculating dilution. | |||
4.Theoretical StudofInitialDilutionoftheEffluentThedilutionfactorsresulting fromturbulent mixingofthedischarge oftheeffluent, theeffectoftherisingoftheplumetothesurfacefroma15-footdepthandtheeffectofmixingduetocurrentsresulting fromdensitybalanceintheenvironment werecalculated and/orotherwise studied.Itwascalculated that2Xto2.5Xdilutionwouldbeachieved. | |||
Modelstudieslaterindicated dilutionofabout3Xdueinpartbytheinducedcircula-tionbytheentrainment ofbottomwaterandtheriseandspreadofthewarmerwater.Thedilutioncalculations werereportedinAppendixB,Limnology, NineMilePointNuclearStationFinalSafetyAnalysisReport,VolumeII.5,DisersionStudiesDuring1963-1964,about1,200driftcardswerereleasedintheareaoffNineMilePoint.Ofthese,about600(morethanhalf)werereturnedwiththerequested information. | |||
Thestudyindicated thattheeffluentfromthestationmightbedispersed asfarwestasRochester (62miles)andasfarnortheast asCapeSt.Vincent(28miles).Presumably, somecardswentdowntheSt.LawrenceRiver.Dispersion appearstobewidespread whichwouldresultinlargedilutions. | |||
6.PlanktonStudiesDuring1964planktonsampleswerecollected overa5-monthperiodinthesummeratthreepre-determined points,twoalongthepromontory andoneoutintheopenlake.Itwasconcluded fromtheveryerraticresultsinthesesamplesthattheareaofftheNineMilePointpromontory isoneofconsiderable changegoingfromperiodsofsomeconcentration ofplanktonwithon-shorewindstoperiodsofalmostcompleteabsenceoftheplanktonintheareabyoff-shore windsor II\II upwellings, particularly inthatareaattheeasternendofthepromontory. | |||
Theinformation fromthestudywasinteresting fromanacademicpointofviewastotheseasonaldistribution ofthelargerzooplankton butofverylittleapplicable value.7.Seiches,Tides,andWavesTheseparameters wereexaminedprimarily onahistorical andtheoretical basis.Someseichesandinternalwaveeffectswereobserveddirectlybutappeartobeofratherinfrequent ocurrence althoughtheinternalwavesmay"beofparticular violenceattimes.Inanycase,theydonotappeartoplayanymajorrolerelatedtotheecologyexceptinmodifying surfacetemperature condition inlatesummer.Tidesarealmostnon-existent,. | |||
Waveactivitydoesplayamajorroleintheecologyofthearea.Almoste.alltheareaisheavilyscouredandkeptreasonably freeofsandandsilt.Wavebyabrasionandbreakingoffofthelongerstrands.8.Fathometric StudiesAprogramofevaluation oftheaquaticpopulation wasbeguninthesummerof1968.Toevaluatethefishpopulation, aseriesoftransects usingarecording finelinefathometer wasmadeoftheNineMilePointpromontory at100-footinter-vals.Thetransducer ofthefathometer scansaSarcdirectlyundertheboat0astheboatmovesalong.Fromthisscanthenumberoffishper1,000feetwas2calculated, Fishspeciesweredetermined bynetting.Inall,theareaissparcelyinhabited byanyfishusefulcommercially orforsportsfishing.Theonlyrealconcentration offishwasobservedatadepthof60-80feet.Repeatedattemptstoidentifythesefishindeeperwaterfailed.Inanyevent,theywouldnotbeaffectedbythedischarge. | |||
IWI 9.EcoloicalBenthicStudiesAlongthesametransects indicated above,samplesofbottomalgawerecollected overuniformareas(25x25cm.)ataseriesofdepthsto20feet,themaximumdepthoftheattachedalgalgrowth.Thesesampleswereanalyzedformembersofeachmajorbiological speciespresent.Thebiological materialappearedtobefairlysparceoratleastlessabundantthaninotherareasofthelake,Thesurveyedlakebottomarea,lessthan20feetindepth,liesinanarrowbandvaryingupto500feetwidealongtheshore.Greatestalgalconcentration appearsatthe10-footdepthsinceinshallower waterthelongeralgalstrandstendtobreakoff.Theeffluentmayraisethetemperature ofthenear-shore waterbyasmuchas56Finashallowlayerrapidlydecreasing intemperature totheeastorwestascarriedbythecurrent.-Sucharisewouldnotappeartohavemucheffectonthegeneralbenthicpopulation sincethebottomareaaffectedwouldbequitelimited.Inanycase,watertemperatures above65Fwouldprobablydepressthe*""relations ofthisalgaisbeingcarriedoutunderthesupervision ofDr.J.F.Storr,University ofBuffaloBiologyDepartment. | |||
B.SummaryThestudieswereextensive andplannedsoastoexploreavarietyofphysicalandbiological factors.Thethetotalpictureoftheecologyoftheareaisonewhichisheavilywaveswept,keepingthebottomgenerally freeofrubbleexceptatspecificdepths(nearshore)andareas.Formuchoftheareatothe20-footdepththereisexposedflatbedrockandlittlesand,particularly intheareaclosetotheNineMilePointNuclearstationdischarge. | |||
Itisnotknownasanareaforsportsfishing,nordothereappeartobeconcentrations ofanyvaluablespecies.Thenear-shore area,closetothestation,maybemoderately influenced bythethermaldischarge. | |||
Thisaffectwilldiminishrapidlywithdistanceandwill IIIII probablynotbeobservedinthenear-shore areabeyondthelimitsofthepromon-tory.Thisisduetothefactthatthemajorcurrentsobservedflowedeitherparallelto,orlakewardintheareaandthesecurrentscontinued outintotheopenlake,attheeastandwestboundaries ofthepromontory. | |||
Insummary,theregionisoneoflessthanaveragebenthicgrowth.Theeffectofthethermalinputuponthebiotaisexpectedtoberestricted toarelatively limitedarea.Benthicandfathometric studiesareplannedinthepost-operational periodtoattempttomeasuretheactualeffectofthethermaldischarge. | |||
IIIIIIIIII APPENDIXBECOLOGICAL BENTHICSTUDYOFFNINEMILEPOINTpLAKEONTARIOAUGUSTA1968 IIIIII JOHNF.STORR,P}I.D.Contultant inOceanography andLimnology 51MzAvowLsADarvzBvFF~m,NmrY0RK142263)ec.15,1969.Mr.R.clancy,Manager,Environment-Engineering, N1agaraMohawkPowerOorp.,300ZrieBlvd.,liest,Syracuse, N.Y.1320$.CRZ:ZOOLOGIC'ZNTHIO STUDYOPPNINEMILEPOINT,LAKEONTARIO,AUGUST12-16,1968.IPURPOSE:OP STUDY:ThiswastheinitialbenthicstudymadeintheNineMilePointareatoestablish abiological background inthepre-operational periods.Therehad.beenaprevioussurveyin'.-theregionofaverygeneralnatureconsisting ofaseriesofexploratory dives.Thishadestabl1shed, thattheareawasgenerally wavesweptandthebottom,exceptin.lessthan'0'fwateralmostentirelyclearofrockrubbleofanykind,withverylittlebenthiclifepresent.Thisstudywasdirectedtowardaquantitative evaluation ofwhatwaspres-ent.II~PROQEDURE:L.P1eld1fork.4seriesoftransect"lines wereestablished fromtheshoreout1ntothelake.Sincetheprimarypur-poseofthetransects wasforpurposesofcomparison, theyweretobeofapermanent natureandalongthesetransects allofthevariousecological studiesweretobecarriedout.Inallninetransects wereestablished withseveralnotbeingused1nthebenthicstudyatthistime.Thoselabelledwithaprefixof$fweretothewestofthedis-charge;thosewiththeprefixZ,eastofthedischarge. | |||
W-3waslocated,about5,000'est ofthedischarge andabout3,000'rom M-2-M-2throughV-3were1,000'part withZ-1beingfusteastoftheactualdischarge structure asnoactualecological workcould,bedoneintheimmediate areaofthestructure whichwasundercon-struction. | |||
E-6usestheso-called easterntargetastheshorebase.Thistargetwasused.intheearlyecological lakestudies(196$-64)asalocationpointfortheboatwork.4 IIII Itismorethanamileeastofthedischarge. | |||
W-3islocateCinsuchapositionthatitisbasedontheSW-NEorientelshorethatisthewesternsileoftheMine$Q.leX'ointPromontory. | |||
Itwasfounlthatcurrentsflowingwestward. | |||
normallyflowparalleltothealmostEF-3orienteCnorthernshoreofthepromontory anCthusthesecurrentsactuallyflowoutintotheopenlakeattheHNcornerofthepromontory. | |||
TheM-3transectwas,therefore, established. | |||
asabaselinecomparison transeotforthestudy.Z-6isamileeastofthedischarge anditwasbelieved, thatthistransectwouldbeinanareainwhiohtheeffectofthethermaleffluentwould.notbegreatand.this,then,wastheeasternbase-line transect. | |||
Thestudiesin1969contemplat-eCamuchwiderscopeoperation and,thebase-line transectwasestablished. | |||
inMexicoBaya.milefurthereast.Znwork1ngthetransects forthebenthicsurvey,aseriesof3sampleswastakenrecovering allthebiological materialina25X25cm.areawitheachsample.Poursamplingsta-tionswere.users alongeachtransectat5',10',15',and,20'he20'.epthmarkedthelimitornear-limit ofanyattach-eCplantgrowth,andwasalsofelttobebeyondthed.epthofanylikelytemperature effect.Thesamplingcanbed.escribed. | |||
asselective sincetheareaclosetoshoreinsomelocations ispartially coveredby'arious sizedpiecesofrock.Thisheterogeneous hab-itatcould.notbesamplersaccurately toyield,aquantitative sampleforcomparative values.Sampleareas,therefore, tithi*I1hiht'h11hasapreference. | |||
Thisalgaistheonlyattachedonepres-entinlargeamountsalthoughasubspeciesmay'ccur1nparticular ecolog1cal niches,butwasnotfoundtooccurinhi1ttM.hh~ht.111thnumberoforganisms fromvariousphylaand.sotheentiresamplerepresents averygood,cross-section of'hebenthicfloraand,fauna.Variations intheconcentration oftheorganisms pres>>entisCueinlargeparttothephysicalstructure ofthebottom,theslopeofthebottom,(whichdetermines inpartthewaveeffect)anCthedepthwhichregulates boththeeffectofthewaveactivityanCthelightintensity. | |||
Al-thoughthesamplesweretakenfromflatrockmaterial, theroughness ofthesurrounding bottomalsoplaysama)orrole1nwaveeffectsothatvariations occurCuetothisrough-nessfactor. | |||
B. | B.Laboratory StuC1es.Inthelaboratory, thesamplesvere1nC1viC-ually'eparated intoplantanCanimalmaterial. | ||
IIIIIII Table1sBenthicSurveyData- | Theplantmaterialwasthenthoroughly drieCanCweighed,, | ||
IIIIIII Table1:BenthicSurveyData- | thenashed.,and.theorganicveightCetermined.. | ||
Asthisprogramprogress-ltfdthtthlf~ldhh,tht particles ofsiltvereembeddeCorsocloselysurround.ed. | |||
by'hehair>>like materialthatafractionoftheinorganics couldnotbeseparateC fromthealga.XCCitional vashingofthealgavoulChaveresulteCintheremovaloflargeamountsofalgalmaterial. | |||
Theorganicweightcontentisthusused,forcomparing algalconcentrations althoughbothCryweightand.ashweightarealsogiveninthetable,(Table2).IIIRESULTSMD3ISQUSSIOH: | |||
TheCataarepresented. | |||
intables3anC2and.graphically illustrated inPigures3;4i.l'JBy'theAugustperiod.theamountofalgalmaterialvould.beexpected. | |||
toCecline,whiletheanimallifewoulCbeontht.fhlg,~d,hltdfttCuringthemaximumlightperioCinJunewhenboththelightintensity anCnumberofhoursofillumination areattheirgreatest. | |||
Temperature atthistimeformostoftheJuneperioCisbetveen55PanC60oP.Theoptimumtemperature forgrowthappearstobeinthemiC60'swithhighertem-peratures causingslowingofgrowth.Bothlightand.tem-peraturewouldplayma)orrolesonthelessening amountofgrowthfounCinAugust.InaCdition, observations havehftltth~hg,tlhthtfcyclesCuringthesummerinwhichthestrandsofalgaleng-thentoamaximumthenbreaksoff,asortofself-mowing process.ThisvoulChappenirregularly and.atnofixed,time,althoughtherevoulCtenCtobeperiodswhichvoulCsuggestcycliceffect.little,ifany,algalgrowthoccurr-eCatthe20'epthand.inthesecasesnosamplevastaken(markeCM.S.T.ontables342).Benthicanimals,ontheotherhand.,aregustintotheperioCofactivereproCuction,in June,laggingbehind.theplantgrowthasonewould.expectsincethisplantgrovthisthebasicsourceoffood..The,variousanimalsfoundinthe*hlghth'hit f,lpt,ffood..Thisgrazingmayalsoberesponsible forsomed.eclineinthetotalalgalgrovthfound..Overtheentire.rangeofthetransects thealgalgrovthisfairlyuniformly CistributeC withoneexception III atthe$5'epthatE-"2vhenmorethandoubletheamountofgrowthispresentthanatanyothersimilardepth,andatV>>3vherethealgalgrovth1sconsistently less.Itwouldnovappearthatthecomparison transects, V-3maynotbeasimportant asoncethought.'he ecologyofN-'5isd1fferent thantheremainder ofthetransects andwillvaryconsiderably duetoparticular vinddirections. | |||
OnlytheareaalongtheZineK.lePointPromontory villhaveacon-sistentecologythroughout theseasonanditmaywellbethatany'ffect ontheecologyimposedbythethermaldis-chargevillhavetobeacomputed. | |||
onebased,onthechangesfoundatthevarioustransects. | |||
Sincetheentirestudy1,sonedesignedforcomparison, theredoesnotseemtobeanythinginparticular thatneedstobecommented onordiscussed. | |||
atth1stime.Norcananyconclusions bebased.uponthisonestudywhichrelatestotheparticular purposeofthestudy.Thestudy,initself,vasrevealing andtheveryconsistent results(forabio-logicalsituation) verevi,thinacceptable lind.tsandwillprovidecomparative material. | |||
Theresultspresented, areonlythebasicstatistical results,vh1letheoriginal. | |||
datavillbeessential intheoverallanalysisinthepre-oper-ationalperiod. | |||
IIIIIII Table1sBenthicSurveyData-Comparison ofTransects OswegoAugust,1968transectno,5<M3organicno.ofnoof.no,ofvgt.(gms)-snailssnailssnails(0.Lioplax)(0,Bethnia)(G,Physa)N,S,T,no.ofno.ofamphipods insect(G.Gammarus) larvae(GTendipes) | |||
Miscellaneous E24,213o913,822,842,860373279247177352flatworms (G.Dugesia)E6~312512,502,681,8100019zJ>61721861591952flatworms (G,Dugesia)1flatworm(0,Dugesia) | |||
IIIIIII Table1:BenthicSurveyData-Comparison ofTransects (cont)OswegoAugust,1968transectorganicno.wgt.(gms)no,ofno,ofsnailssnails(G.Lioplax)(G,Bethnia)no,ofsnails(G.Physa)nogofno,ofamphipods | |||
.insect(G,Gammarus) larvae(Q,Tendipes) misce11meous 15>~30~64o632,25000035'3flatworms (Q..Dugesia)1,12.96032.52020<E3N,S~T,N,S,TN,S,TN,ST,0040(01flatworm(G,Dugesia)E6N,S,T, IIIIII Table2:BenthicSurveyData-AlgaeDry,Ash,andOrganic>feightsOswegoAugust1968sampledepthgl10t15'0'.transectno~algaedrywgt.(gms)+H.S.T.4.514.243173.40.362.802.742932.502'1.75.862.981.71.95M.S.T.H.S.T.N.S.T.N.S.T.N.S.T.algaeashwgt.(gms)~30.80~42~23~05~29~25.25.69~41F03~12~23~19.5913.08organicwgt.(gms)4.213.913.822.842.86~312.512.492.681.812.40~30.63~631.791'2.82+M.S.T.nosampletaken=noalgagrowth. | |||
20//0rr2il5IOE65W2WIREACTORIIlE25000IQC4NWEMILEPOINTECOLOGICALSURVEYALGALDISTRIBUTION(ORGANICWTINGMS)AUGUST,I968. | 20//0rr2il5IOE65W2WIREACTORIIlE25000IQC4NWEMILEPOINTECOLOGICALSURVEYALGALDISTRIBUTION(ORGANICWTINGMS)AUGUST,I968. | ||
/ | / | ||
Figure2:Organicweightofalgaesamplein'ramsvs. | Figure2:Organicweightofalgaesamplein'ramsvs.depthalongecological transects NineRileFoint,L.Ontario August14,19680E2eIO8000al5AEl20Organic~eightofalgaeingrams IIII MWWWWWWW0Figure3:NumberofGammarus(freshwatershrimp)vs.depthalongecological transects NineYiilePoint,L.OntarioAustlt1960E0oIO0AAE2l520IOO200300400NumberofGammarus(freshwatershrimp) | ||
III | III | ||
~~~~~~~ | ~~~~~~~ | ||
II | II APPENDIXCFISHDISTRIBUTION STUDYNINEMlLEPOINTpLAKEONTARIOJULY,1968 IIItIII JOHNF.STORR,Ph.D.Consultan! | ||
~ | inOecanograPhy andLimnology 51MmmmLsADaevaBvFFALO,NswYORK14226Dec.15,1969.Mr.R.Clancy,Manager,Environment-Engineering, NiagaraMohawkPowerCorp.,300ErieBlvd.,Vest,Syracuse, NewYork13202.RE:PISHDISTRIBUTION STUDY,NINEMILEPOINT,JULY27,1968.PurposeofStudy.Thiswasthefirststudymadeofthefishd1str1bution intheareausingarecording fathometer. | ||
IIIII NineNilePointFishDistributi~ | Itsprimarypurposewastotrytodeterm1ne thequantityoffishpresentintheareabythisparticular method.Lssuch,themethod,andtheprocessing ofthedatais'somewhat uniqueand,atth1spo1ntwasexperimental. | ||
4numberofsimilarsurveyshasrefinedthetechnique andtheoriginalfathometric recordings werenotprocessed indetailuntilrecently. | |||
Itwouldappearthatthemethodology isfairlyexactandtheresultsveryclosetoactuality. | |||
Since,however,wearedealingwithfishwhichareprobablyinconstantmotiontheresultscanonlygivethegeneralpatternofdistribution forthedayand,periodCuringwhichthefathometrics weredone.Itmustberealizedthatasecondsetoffathometrics takenevenafewminuteslaterwouldgiveasomewhatdifferent pattern.Thefishcountstakenfromthefathometric tracingsandmathematically ad)ust-ed,arepresented intable1.Thedatafortotalfishcountispresented inPigure1anCbecauseofthemethodused,givesafairlyaccuratepictureofthisCistribut1on 1nagraphicform.B.Method.Pi,eldstudy.Themethodusedingathering thebasicdatawasbyusingaRossPineL1neRecording Pathometer. | |||
Thi,sinstrument sendsoutahighfrequency pulseat108kcthroughthetransducer headwhichisinarackinthewateroverthesideofthe16~'oat.Thetransducer alsoreceivestheechofroma5arcand.thisechoisrecordedelectrographically onastripchart.Everyob)ectfrommassesofplanktonand,smallfish3-4inchesinsizeandthebottomcontourisrecorded. | |||
Relativefishsizeisalsoreoorded. | |||
andfromexper1ence thebelow6"andabove6"sizehasbeenseparated. | |||
Muchwilldepend.uponthe IIIII | |||
~02wexpertise oftheindividual readingthetracings. | |||
SomevorkhasyettobeConetorefinetheinterpretation ofthetrac-ings,sothatsomeerror,parti,cularly inidentifying allthesmallerfish,doesoccur.Pishabove6"inlengthCog1veaveryrecognizable trace.Inmakingthesetracingsthe0'50'epthrangeis'e-cordedonthestripchart.Tracingsveremadefroma4'5'uttoa50'rmoredepthalongeachoftheoriginalecolog-icaltransects described indetai.linthereportontheben-thicstudies.Inall,9transects vereruncoveringashorelengthofabouttvomileswiththecentral7transects onlyabout1000'part (Fig.1).Boatspeedvasbetv'een2-3mph.2.Laboratory analysis. | |||
Sincethetransducer wasscanninganarcofabout5,thefishcounttakenfromthetracingshadtobetreatedmathemat-icallytogive.auniformresult.1neo$]ectivewastocalcu-latetheapproximate numberper1000ftinevery200'is-tanceofthetransect. | |||
assumingthatthevidthofthebottomscanned.ata50',depth is5'1de,itvasassumed,thatallfishcountedalonga200~distanceinthe40'o50'epthvouldequalthetotalnumberoffishin1000ft2.Successively abovethisareaallfi,shcountedina200'istance veremul-tipl1edbyfactorsasfollovs:30'40'1.2520'$0'1.6610~-2o'2.50'10'5Inthedepthsclosertothesurfacethefishcounted,arebeingmultipli,ed byaweighted, factorwhichtendstoskewtheresult.Hevertheless theresultstobewithinanacceptable rangeand.inallofthestudi,esmade,givecloselycomparable results.Cediscussion. | |||
Theresultspresented inthetableand.figurearebelievedtobequiteaccurateforwaterdepths15'rmoreindepth.Intheshallower watertheareaofthescanisprobablysome-whatlimiting. | |||
Thusthechanceofobtaining atraceofafishinthisshallower waterbecomesless.Alsothereissomeprobability that1nveryshallowvaterthatfishvould.tendtomoveawayfromtheboatastheboatapproaches. | |||
Onthetablethenumberoffishlargerthan6"isalso IIIIIIIII indicated. | |||
Th1saveragesoutsothatabout60$ofthefisharerecordedarelargerthan6".Thesmallerminnowwouldpro-bablynotberecordedbythefathometer. | |||
Intheshallowwater,however,nofishcouldbeobservedand,thewaterwasclearenoughtoseefishiftheywerepres-ent.4considerable numberofdivesweremadeinthisareaaswell,andnofishwereobserved, 1nshallowwaterclosetoshoreduringtheday.Laterstudiescarriedoutovera24hourperiodshowedthatasmanyfishweretobenettedinshallowwateratnightasatthe15'nd30'epthsatthebottom.alsothe24hourfathometric studiedindicatethatinsomeareasand1nsomedepths,asmanyast0timesthenumberoffishwillberecorded. | |||
Thisisnotageneralrulebutoververyfavorable bottomwherephysicalconditions suchascurrent,bottomroughness,.and bottomprofileareofacombination preferred. | |||
bythef1shthatsuchconcentrations canoccur.Comparing theresultsofthisparticular studytothatofotherareas,thenumberoffishpresentisnotgreat.Infact,thenumberoffishpresent1nthelayerbetween60'-80'ff ofthisareais30to40Xthisconcentration atthistimeofday'eThespeciesoffishpresentintheareainshallowwaterhasdetermined laterbyfishnetstudies.Ingreatestabun-dancearethealewives. | |||
Yellowperchoutnumberalltheotherbottomfishcaughtinthenetbyafactorof2Xto5X.afewwh1teperchwerecaughtanganumberofm1nnows(E~otroissp.)Inaweek'snettingwithfive6'125'xperimental nets,lessthananaverageoftofeachperdayoftheredsucker,rockbass,carp,brownbullhead, whitebass,andci,sco,weretakeninwaterdepthsfromshoreto30'..4fewsmeltwerealsocaught.Onespecimen, ofeachofafewotherspecieswasalsotaken.Itwouldappearfromallofthebackground information available, bothfromactualworkatthesiteandscientific reportthatthedischarge willnotaffectthenormalmove-mentof'anyofthefishpresent.Ifanything, morefishvillbeattracted totheareabothbecauseoftheaddedheatandmodification and.changeinwatermovement. | |||
IIIII NineNilePointFishDistributi~n Study(asnumberoffishper1,000ft)July27,1968DepthW->>3:W--2T+L+TLW-1TLE-1TLE-2E-3TLTLE-4TLE-5TLE-6TL0-20070002QO-4002055400<<600221020600-80092100800-100072401000-1200 298201200-1400 172321400-1600 81001600-1800 51800-2000 002000-2200 2200005222977522000000002022222262136X610000000000020500,00025013820034227018112425071300000000000302191611347452177122000050104129ll67'74172231121154023683070.402200-2400 00Totalfish10828278102518'32465419936018863819285goffishgreaterthan6"oftotal36/+Ttotalfishcounted+L~onlyfishover6"long72%62/3(g IIIII 40-30Q2020IOIO20-20IO0IOE4ESE6El'(REACTOR~~~IE2500'ClOlNINEMILEPOINTFISHDISTRIBUTIONSTUDY<ASNUMBEROFFISHPERl)000FT)JULY27)I968IFlG.I Ik}} |
Revision as of 04:44, 29 June 2018
ML18018B051 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nine Mile Point |
Issue date: | 12/31/1969 |
From: | Niagara Mohawk Power Corp |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
Download: ML18018B051 (78) | |
Text
Regulatory FileCy.Pgs,.',.<g ggWd-A>0./~JgwR~lvsdwNr946~Environmental Pre-perational SurveyNineMilePoint(ggg[lJToII[gPIIIIt'yIflI~lIililf)NINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARSTATIONUNITNO.1'NIAGARAMOHAWKPOWERCORPORATION
- SYRACUSE, NEWYORK2S4 IIIIIl ENVIRONMENTAL PRE-OPERATIONAL SURVEYNINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARSTATIONNIAGARAMOHAWKPOWERCORPORATION
- December, 1969
TABLEOFCONTENTSIntroduction Pre-Operational'urvey
-LandProgramA.B.ProgramDevelopment ProgramOperation andResultsRadioanalysis ofAquaticSamples-LakeProgramAppendixA-SummaryofLakeOntarioecological studiesrelativetotheNineMilePointNuclearPowerStationAppendixB-.Ecological BenthicStudy,August,1968AppendixC-FishDistribution Study,June,1968
Environmental Pre-Operational Survey-NineMilePointI.Introduction Thisreportsummarizes the.preoperational
'environmental surveysconducted inthevicinityof'theNineMilePointNuclearStationNo.1byNiagaraMohawkPowerCorporation.
Surveyresultsandotherpertinent dataarepresented forboththelandandlake(underwater) programsasdescribed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(VolumeII,AppendixD).
III II,Pre-0erational Surve-LandProramA.ProramDevelomentElevenenvironmental stationsweresetbpin1968inaccordance withtheplansspecified intheNineMilePointNuclearStationFinalSafetyAnalysisReport-AppendixD,pageD-26.Thelocations ofthefiveon-site,andsixoff-sitemonitoring stationsareillustrated inFigures1and2,respectively.
Allstationsareequippedwithanairsamplingpump,arainandsnowfalloutcollector, andadosimeter (filmbadge)forintegrated dosereadings, inaddi:tion, eachoftheon-sitestationsandtheSectorCoff-sitestationincludearecording gammaradiation monitor.Figure3isaphotograph ofatypicalon-sitestationanditsassociated equipment.
Thesestationswereoperatedintermittently forapproximately 18months.Thefollowing objectives wererealizedduringthisperiod:1.Thelocations selectedwerefoundtobeaccessible inallweatherconditions.
2.Noradiation anomalies wereobservedatanyofthelocations, sononeofthestationshadtobemoved.3.Theequipment wasoperatedundervaryingweatherconditions andoperatedasdesignedwiththefollowing exceptions:
a~b.Theelapsedtimemetersontwooftheairsamplersweredamagedbythevibration ofthepump.Alltheelapsedtimemetersweremovedfromamountingonthepumptoamountingonthebaseplate.Noadditional problemshavebeenencountered inovertenmonthsofoperation.
Thesoftrubberhosesusedtoconnecttheairsampleholderstothepumpsdeveloped cracksafteroneyearofoperation.
Thesehoseswerereplacedwithharder-wall hoseswhichperformed satisfactorily.
I c~d.e.Thecellulose membranefiltersusedforcollecting airsamplesprovedtobetoofragileandwerefrequently brokenwhenchangingsamplesonwindydays.Glassfiberfilterswithacomparable efficiency weresubstituted andhaveeliminat'ed thehandlingproblem.Theprecipitation collectors werecollecting morepre-cipitation thancouldbeaccounted forbytheonesquarefootopeningonthecabinet.Itwasrealizedthatsomeofthewaterstrikingthetopofthemonitorboxwasdraini'ng intotheprecipitation device.Siliconerubberwasusedtobuildadamaroundtheprecipitation collector openings.andinthesubsequent sevenmonthsofoperation, thesedeviceshaveoperatedsatisfactorily.
Radiation levelsweresolowthattherecorders onthegammamonitorsweredrivingdownscale.Topreventdamagetotherecorders, smallCs-137"bugs"wereinstalled inthedetectors tomakethemindicateslightlyupscale(between0;Oland0.02mR/hr),Thedoorlatchesonthecabinetsbrokefrequently andwerereplacedwithsturdierlatches.4.Personnel weretrainedinservicing theequipment inthemonitoring stations.B.ProramerationandResultsDuringthemonthsofAugustandSeptember, 1969,thestationswereoperatedcontinuously andthesampleswereanalyzed.
Thisprogramaccomplished thefollowing:
a)b)Reiterated thatnoradiation anomalies wereobservedatanyofthestations.
Trainedpersonnel intheroutineanalysisoftheenvironmental samples.Resultsoftheanalysesperformed duringthepre-operational periodaresummarized below.Filmbadges(sealedwithdessicant topreventexposuretomoisture) wereinstalled onallelevenmonitoring stationsinJanuaryof1968.Thesebadgeshavebeenchangedmonthlyandhaveallshownstatistically insignificant (lessthan10mR)exposures foreachmonthlyperiod.
I4~>I L2.GammaMonitorsThecontinuously recording gammamonitorswereoperated.
Thechartsshowtlittlevariation fromtheexpected"bugged"background levels.Severalofthemonitorsdiddevelopelectronic problemsduringthisperiodandindicated upscaleLreadings.
Thesemalfunctioning monitorswererepairedassoonasthecondition Lwasobserved.
Withtheexception oftheseobviousmalfunctions, themonitorsindicated theradiation levelsshowninTablel.(Radiation levelsareinmR/hr)TableID-1On-SiteSectorsD-20f-SiteSector*0.0120.0120.0120.0120@0120.012Max.AugustAvg.t"Bued"Bkd.Max.0.0150.03Avg.0:0120.012"Bued"Bkd.0.0120.0120.0.0150.0150.0250.0150.0150.030.0150.0150.00.0160.0150.50.050.020.00.030.020.0160.016'.0160.0160.0160.0163.PreciitationSlestThemonitoring stationsareequippedwithaprecipitation collector whichhasaone-square footopening.,
Theinteriorofthestationisheatedtopreventithecollected precipitation fromfreezinginwinter.Precipitation iscollected ivoraone-month periodandthenbroughttothelabforanalysis.
Thegrossbetaresultsforthreemonthsarepresented inTable2.(Activities areinunitsofTable2MonthOn-SiteSectorsD-1D-2EGOff-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2EFGtJulyAugustSetember5.413.40.22.214.01.0437812915.114.422.71.60.70.38.15.25.120.210.310.52.418.114.613.415.45.05.11.42.21.11.0 11I'IJ'lE1:I1~I'ITI4C Gammaspectrums wererunontypicalprecipitation samplesduringthisperiod.Therewerenodiscernible peaks.4.AirSamlesAirsampleswerecollected atatypicalflowrateof2cfmandweretchangedonaweeklybasis.Thegrossbetaactivitydetected24hoursafterthesampleswereremovedisshowninTable3.(Activities areinunitsof10uCi/cc.)Table3D-1On-SiteSectorsD-2EFGOff-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2EFt7/28-8/48/4-8/11E8/11-8/18 8/18-8/258/25-9/29/2-9/8i9/8-9/159/15-9/22 9/22-9/29 4,14.24.33.64.3~5.24.54.13.13.13.42.93.64.13.83.93.13.43'3.02.6---2.02.42.83.03.02.32.3---2.92.51.3---1.51.43.84.12.64.13.32.73.12.81.42.93.52.33.03.22.52.52,51.63.54.24.62.54.44.74.24.82.74.03.4---3.31.73.14.64.65.43.84.14.24.44.33.03.73.83.74.83.32.83.33.73.53.02.92.93.23.93.42.52.12.01.91.51.4Forcomparison,.
thesamplestakeninthe45weeksofsamplingpriortoAugustof1969showedthatinwetorwinterweeks,thegrossbetaactivityrangedfrom0.4to1.0X10uCi/cc,whileindryerweather,theactivityocurredover-13arangeof1.5X10to5.0X10uCi/cc.Forfurthercomparison, thesectortaveragesforthis45-weekperiodarepresented inTable4.(Activities areinunitsof1013uCi/cc.')
Table4I1.28D-21.81On-SiteSectorsEF1.621701.62Off-SiteSectorsCD-1D-2E1.541.831.771.91FG1.501.84 IIIIIIII Itisinteresting tonotethattheStateofNewYorkDepartment ofPublicHealthdetectedaveragegrossbetaactivities of0.9X10to2.0X1013uCi/ccin-13different locations inNewYorkStateduringtheyearof1968.1Gammaspectrums wererunontypicalairsamplesduringthetwo-month period.Thesespectrums shownoclearlydiscernible peaksexceptwhenthesixoff-sitesampleswereanalyzedasagroup.Thisanalysisshowedtracequantities ofmembersoftheuraniumdecayseries.Duringthetwo-month period,homogenized storemilkwaspurchased andthetechnicians trainedintheanalysisofmilkforgrossbeta,strontium andiodine.Rawmilksampleswerenotobtainedduringthistwo-month period,butwereobtainedthroughtheStateDepartment ofPublicHealthinOctoberandNovember.
ThesampleswerefromfourfarmsaroundtheNineMilePointsite.Theresultsoftheseanalysesarepresented inTableS.(Activities areinunitsofpCi/1.)Table5October,1970November, 1970GrossBeta1)IodineStrontium GrossBeta1IodineStrontium 1.61X10169X101.72X101.55X10(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)1.55X10NotDetectable 301.87X10NotDetectable 251.61X10NotDetectable 61.24X10NotDetectable 151)Includesbetafromnaturally occurring K-40.2)Sampleslostwhenrawmilkcoagulated onionexchangecolumns.Chemicalformofionexchangeresinschangedtoovercomeproblem.From:"Environmental Radioactivity inNewYorkState-1968",dated7-14-692Spikedtestsampleswereusedtorefinetheanalytical procedures IIIIIIIIII TheStateDepartment ofPublicHealthhasbeensamplingmilkfromthesesamefarmsforapproximately 2years.Theiraverageresultsfortheyearof1968are3presented inTable6.(Activities areinunitsofpCi/1.)Table6FarmIodine-131Strontium-90
¹1¹2¹3¹4NotDetectable NotDetectable NotDetectable NotDetectable 13141612III.Radioanal sisofAuaticSles-LakePror'amInJune,1969,asurveywasconducted toobservefishpopulation andobserveunderwater growthofftheNineMilePointshoreline..
Sevenspecimens offishwereS'ollected inconjunction withthefishnet"population" survey.Thenetsweresetoutneartheeasternboundaryofthesiteinalineperpendicular totheshore.Theshallowest netwaslocatedatadepthofabouttenfeet,fiftyfeetoutfromshorewhilethedeepestnetwaspositioned 700feetfromshoreatadepthof30feet.Mostofthefishobtainedwerefromtheshallownet.Thesamplespecimens werefrozenandshippedtoEberlineInstrumentation Corporation forradioanalysis.
Resultsarepresented inTable7.TheJuneLakebottomsurveyindicated thegreatestabundance ofalgae(primarily cladophora) occurredatadepthofabouttenfeet.Acomposite samplewascollected fromtwelvelocations locatedabout1,000feetapartalongtheten-footdepthcontourandparalleltotheshoreline.
Thissamplewasevaluated byradio-analysisalongwithspecimens ofclams(mussels) andgammarus(freshwatershrimp)collected fromsimilarlocations.
Sampleresultsarealsotabluated inTable7.Duetoinsufficient sampleweightandlowradioactivity ofthegammarus, thissamplewasanalyzedforgrossbetaactivityonly.3From:"Environmental Radioactivity inNewYorkState-1968",dated7-14-69 IIIIII Table7NineMilePointAquaticSamples-June,1969ResultsofRadioanalysis byEberlineInst.Corp.SleWeightgms)Picocuries Ciersle(d)SpeciesWetDryGrossBetaCs137SCoZnGrossGammaNorthernPikeNorthernBrownBullhead2170482481.105950+30435+1272+10,.-438+244.2+2.1..77+60.0+9.6,164+100.0+2.19.5+2.1492+5398+10SmallMouthBassWhitePerchYellowPerchNorthernRedhorseSucker385273200973906649225135+6144+5355+1836+17.8+1.00.0+4.5325+98+2105+2746+3102+574+70.0+1.80.0+1.83.9+1.32.0+1.300+1015+090.0+4.56.8+4.S151+17.125+14100+11183+20Pomolobus(Alewives) 398.534+21.6+0.117+40,0+0.22.0+0.922+2Clams*AlgaeGammarus68918200.0833636155+1813*0.53+0.22 58+70.2+0.01*
167+1518+7105+7167+182.41+0.12*
0.03+0.02*
0.07+0.02*
35.6+5.9*
"NoteAlgaeresultsareinpCi/gm(dry)ratherthanpCi/sample.
peal OFF-SITEMONITORIN GSTATIONLOCATIONS 4~4PULASKI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~';':j("':
MEXICOQge44eeo105MILESGRAPHICSCALEB4404~tA~~~SITEo0~~~~OSWEGO04>:4440~1~400p0444044oMONITORSTATIONFigure2 I(",('I ON-SITEMONITORING STATIONLOCATIONS
~e~0/5~0QD.'C@Yb?ProposedJamesA.Fitzpatrick f4~o!D2NuclearPowerPlantI~(QQJt~guc(eaLi0~cPE0rC'rJ/a'Ogr~armrf\zBjIIg.-ti0/,,+llxfvltl~'I)Q),.
r'g0pIlI'Io'y,I;if,'P'IQIi1jp(i0el~0'cIq~y0~fgv~at~lOltlYCOINCI'-JFigure1 MMWWWWWWWWMWWWWW Figure3l.Precipitation Collector Recording GammaRadiation MonitorAirSamplingPumpAirSampleFilterg)rl
APPENDIXASENARYOFLAKEONTARIOECOLOGICAL STUDIESRELATIVETOTHENINEMILEPOINTNUCLEARPONERSTATION III Summaryofecological andecologically relatedstudiesinLakeOntarioofftheNineMilePointNuclearPowerStationA.GeneralThefirstecologically orientedstudieswerebegunintheSpringof1963.Aswithanyecologically orientedstudies,thefirsteffortsweredirectedtowardestablishing thephysicalbackground forecological considerations.
Gradually thesestudiesramifiedandeventually involvedaprimarystudyontheecologyofthebenthicorganisms whichmightbeaffectedbythethermaldischarge.
Thestudiescarriedoutin1963-64wereconcerned withthestudyofthecurrentsinthelakeandanestimateofthediffusion anddilutionfactorofthedischarge plumeitself.Inall,almost120cruisedayswerespentinthistwo-yearperiodonthisandotheraspectsofthestudy.Becauseofthemanyaspectsofthisstudy,thevariousphasesaretreatedseparately below.1.Diffusion StudiesBecauseoftheclosesimilarity inseveralaspectsbetweentheexpectedthermaldischarge andtheflowoftheOswegoRiver,theeffluentoftheriverwasusedasadiffusion model.Therivercarriesasubstantial chlorideconcentration whichwaseasilymeasuredbytitration methodsaboardtheboat.Theboatcourseplancouldthusbemodifiedasthedayprogressed andthedirection andextentoftheriver'seffluenttracedoutintothelake.Itwasalsopossibletodetermine themovementofthewateralongtheshoreoftheNineMilePointpromontory, the:diffusion characteristics inthatarea,andotherfeaturessuchasupwelling.
Thisbasicmethodwassupplemented byestablishing aseriesofstationsalongtheboat'scourseandcollecting severalwater IIIIIIII samplesatpre-determined depthsforchlorideanalysisandtemperature measure-ment.Capturedroguetechniques wereusedtoestablish thedirection andspeedofthewatercurrentatthesurfaceandata20-footdepth.Themostmeaningful ofthesecurrentpatternsusingboththechloridediffusion comparison andtemperature profileswerepresented inAppendixB,Limnology, NineMilePoint,NuclearStationPreliminary HazardsSummaryReport,VolumeII.Ingeneral,thesestudiesindicated highdiffusion ratesintheshallowareasofthelakeandanalmostconstantcurrentmovementinthearea.2.CurrentMeterStudiesSupplemental totheabove,twopermanent currentmeterswereanchoredin35and55feetofwateroffthewesternendofthepromontory torecordcurrentvelocities ataboutthe25and45footdepthsoveraperiodofseveralmonths,Inboththeabovestudiestherewasclosecorrelation madetothewindpatternsandthecalms.Direction ofcurrentflowanddurationofcurrentsofvariousspeedswerecalculated.
Thepercentage ofcalmsisestimated asbeinglow,whilethedistribu-tionofeastandwestcurrentsisaboutequal.Thiscurrentdatawasalsousedtocalculate diffusion parameters.
3.TemeratureStudiesInadditiontotakingthetemperature ofthewaterofeachofthesamplescollected, bathythermograph recordsweremadeataseriesofstationsthroughout thefirsttwoyearsofstudy.Theprimaryuseoftheserecordings wastorecordthegradualchangeindepthofthethermocline throughtout theseason.Itwasfoundthatthroughout theearlysummer,theisotherms slopedownwardtowardtheeastwithdeepmixingtakingplaceinAugust,loweringthesurfacetemperature
.
IIIIIII Thisstudyalsosuppliedmaterialtoaidincalculating dilution.
4.Theoretical StudofInitialDilutionoftheEffluentThedilutionfactorsresulting fromturbulent mixingofthedischarge oftheeffluent, theeffectoftherisingoftheplumetothesurfacefroma15-footdepthandtheeffectofmixingduetocurrentsresulting fromdensitybalanceintheenvironment werecalculated and/orotherwise studied.Itwascalculated that2Xto2.5Xdilutionwouldbeachieved.
Modelstudieslaterindicated dilutionofabout3Xdueinpartbytheinducedcircula-tionbytheentrainment ofbottomwaterandtheriseandspreadofthewarmerwater.Thedilutioncalculations werereportedinAppendixB,Limnology, NineMilePointNuclearStationFinalSafetyAnalysisReport,VolumeII.5,DisersionStudiesDuring1963-1964,about1,200driftcardswerereleasedintheareaoffNineMilePoint.Ofthese,about600(morethanhalf)werereturnedwiththerequested information.
Thestudyindicated thattheeffluentfromthestationmightbedispersed asfarwestasRochester (62miles)andasfarnortheast asCapeSt.Vincent(28miles).Presumably, somecardswentdowntheSt.LawrenceRiver.Dispersion appearstobewidespread whichwouldresultinlargedilutions.
6.PlanktonStudiesDuring1964planktonsampleswerecollected overa5-monthperiodinthesummeratthreepre-determined points,twoalongthepromontory andoneoutintheopenlake.Itwasconcluded fromtheveryerraticresultsinthesesamplesthattheareaofftheNineMilePointpromontory isoneofconsiderable changegoingfromperiodsofsomeconcentration ofplanktonwithon-shorewindstoperiodsofalmostcompleteabsenceoftheplanktonintheareabyoff-shore windsor II\II upwellings, particularly inthatareaattheeasternendofthepromontory.
Theinformation fromthestudywasinteresting fromanacademicpointofviewastotheseasonaldistribution ofthelargerzooplankton butofverylittleapplicable value.7.Seiches,Tides,andWavesTheseparameters wereexaminedprimarily onahistorical andtheoretical basis.Someseichesandinternalwaveeffectswereobserveddirectlybutappeartobeofratherinfrequent ocurrence althoughtheinternalwavesmay"beofparticular violenceattimes.Inanycase,theydonotappeartoplayanymajorrolerelatedtotheecologyexceptinmodifying surfacetemperature condition inlatesummer.Tidesarealmostnon-existent,.
Waveactivitydoesplayamajorroleintheecologyofthearea.Almoste.alltheareaisheavilyscouredandkeptreasonably freeofsandandsilt.Wavebyabrasionandbreakingoffofthelongerstrands.8.Fathometric StudiesAprogramofevaluation oftheaquaticpopulation wasbeguninthesummerof1968.Toevaluatethefishpopulation, aseriesoftransects usingarecording finelinefathometer wasmadeoftheNineMilePointpromontory at100-footinter-vals.Thetransducer ofthefathometer scansaSarcdirectlyundertheboat0astheboatmovesalong.Fromthisscanthenumberoffishper1,000feetwas2calculated, Fishspeciesweredetermined bynetting.Inall,theareaissparcelyinhabited byanyfishusefulcommercially orforsportsfishing.Theonlyrealconcentration offishwasobservedatadepthof60-80feet.Repeatedattemptstoidentifythesefishindeeperwaterfailed.Inanyevent,theywouldnotbeaffectedbythedischarge.
IWI 9.EcoloicalBenthicStudiesAlongthesametransects indicated above,samplesofbottomalgawerecollected overuniformareas(25x25cm.)ataseriesofdepthsto20feet,themaximumdepthoftheattachedalgalgrowth.Thesesampleswereanalyzedformembersofeachmajorbiological speciespresent.Thebiological materialappearedtobefairlysparceoratleastlessabundantthaninotherareasofthelake,Thesurveyedlakebottomarea,lessthan20feetindepth,liesinanarrowbandvaryingupto500feetwidealongtheshore.Greatestalgalconcentration appearsatthe10-footdepthsinceinshallower waterthelongeralgalstrandstendtobreakoff.Theeffluentmayraisethetemperature ofthenear-shore waterbyasmuchas56Finashallowlayerrapidlydecreasing intemperature totheeastorwestascarriedbythecurrent.-Sucharisewouldnotappeartohavemucheffectonthegeneralbenthicpopulation sincethebottomareaaffectedwouldbequitelimited.Inanycase,watertemperatures above65Fwouldprobablydepressthe*""relations ofthisalgaisbeingcarriedoutunderthesupervision ofDr.J.F.Storr,University ofBuffaloBiologyDepartment.
B.SummaryThestudieswereextensive andplannedsoastoexploreavarietyofphysicalandbiological factors.Thethetotalpictureoftheecologyoftheareaisonewhichisheavilywaveswept,keepingthebottomgenerally freeofrubbleexceptatspecificdepths(nearshore)andareas.Formuchoftheareatothe20-footdepththereisexposedflatbedrockandlittlesand,particularly intheareaclosetotheNineMilePointNuclearstationdischarge.
Itisnotknownasanareaforsportsfishing,nordothereappeartobeconcentrations ofanyvaluablespecies.Thenear-shore area,closetothestation,maybemoderately influenced bythethermaldischarge.
Thisaffectwilldiminishrapidlywithdistanceandwill IIIII probablynotbeobservedinthenear-shore areabeyondthelimitsofthepromon-tory.Thisisduetothefactthatthemajorcurrentsobservedflowedeitherparallelto,orlakewardintheareaandthesecurrentscontinued outintotheopenlake,attheeastandwestboundaries ofthepromontory.
Insummary,theregionisoneoflessthanaveragebenthicgrowth.Theeffectofthethermalinputuponthebiotaisexpectedtoberestricted toarelatively limitedarea.Benthicandfathometric studiesareplannedinthepost-operational periodtoattempttomeasuretheactualeffectofthethermaldischarge.
IIIIIIIIII APPENDIXBECOLOGICAL BENTHICSTUDYOFFNINEMILEPOINTpLAKEONTARIOAUGUSTA1968 IIIIII JOHNF.STORR,P}I.D.Contultant inOceanography andLimnology 51MzAvowLsADarvzBvFF~m,NmrY0RK142263)ec.15,1969.Mr.R.clancy,Manager,Environment-Engineering, N1agaraMohawkPowerOorp.,300ZrieBlvd.,liest,Syracuse, N.Y.1320$.CRZ:ZOOLOGIC'ZNTHIO STUDYOPPNINEMILEPOINT,LAKEONTARIO,AUGUST12-16,1968.IPURPOSE:OP STUDY:ThiswastheinitialbenthicstudymadeintheNineMilePointareatoestablish abiological background inthepre-operational periods.Therehad.beenaprevioussurveyin'.-theregionofaverygeneralnatureconsisting ofaseriesofexploratory dives.Thishadestabl1shed, thattheareawasgenerally wavesweptandthebottom,exceptin.lessthan'0'fwateralmostentirelyclearofrockrubbleofanykind,withverylittlebenthiclifepresent.Thisstudywasdirectedtowardaquantitative evaluation ofwhatwaspres-ent.II~PROQEDURE:L.P1eld1fork.4seriesoftransect"lines wereestablished fromtheshoreout1ntothelake.Sincetheprimarypur-poseofthetransects wasforpurposesofcomparison, theyweretobeofapermanent natureandalongthesetransects allofthevariousecological studiesweretobecarriedout.Inallninetransects wereestablished withseveralnotbeingused1nthebenthicstudyatthistime.Thoselabelledwithaprefixof$fweretothewestofthedis-charge;thosewiththeprefixZ,eastofthedischarge.
W-3waslocated,about5,000'est ofthedischarge andabout3,000'rom M-2-M-2throughV-3were1,000'part withZ-1beingfusteastoftheactualdischarge structure asnoactualecological workcould,bedoneintheimmediate areaofthestructure whichwasundercon-struction.
E-6usestheso-called easterntargetastheshorebase.Thistargetwasused.intheearlyecological lakestudies(196$-64)asalocationpointfortheboatwork.4 IIII Itismorethanamileeastofthedischarge.
W-3islocateCinsuchapositionthatitisbasedontheSW-NEorientelshorethatisthewesternsileoftheMine$Q.leX'ointPromontory.
Itwasfounlthatcurrentsflowingwestward.
normallyflowparalleltothealmostEF-3orienteCnorthernshoreofthepromontory anCthusthesecurrentsactuallyflowoutintotheopenlakeattheHNcornerofthepromontory.
TheM-3transectwas,therefore, established.
asabaselinecomparison transeotforthestudy.Z-6isamileeastofthedischarge anditwasbelieved, thatthistransectwouldbeinanareainwhiohtheeffectofthethermaleffluentwould.notbegreatand.this,then,wastheeasternbase-line transect.
Thestudiesin1969contemplat-eCamuchwiderscopeoperation and,thebase-line transectwasestablished.
inMexicoBaya.milefurthereast.Znwork1ngthetransects forthebenthicsurvey,aseriesof3sampleswastakenrecovering allthebiological materialina25X25cm.areawitheachsample.Poursamplingsta-tionswere.users alongeachtransectat5',10',15',and,20'he20'.epthmarkedthelimitornear-limit ofanyattach-eCplantgrowth,andwasalsofelttobebeyondthed.epthofanylikelytemperature effect.Thesamplingcanbed.escribed.
asselective sincetheareaclosetoshoreinsomelocations ispartially coveredby'arious sizedpiecesofrock.Thisheterogeneous hab-itatcould.notbesamplersaccurately toyield,aquantitative sampleforcomparative values.Sampleareas,therefore, tithi*I1hiht'h11hasapreference.
Thisalgaistheonlyattachedonepres-entinlargeamountsalthoughasubspeciesmay'ccur1nparticular ecolog1cal niches,butwasnotfoundtooccurinhi1ttM.hh~ht.111thnumberoforganisms fromvariousphylaand.sotheentiresamplerepresents averygood,cross-section of'hebenthicfloraand,fauna.Variations intheconcentration oftheorganisms pres>>entisCueinlargeparttothephysicalstructure ofthebottom,theslopeofthebottom,(whichdetermines inpartthewaveeffect)anCthedepthwhichregulates boththeeffectofthewaveactivityanCthelightintensity.
Al-thoughthesamplesweretakenfromflatrockmaterial, theroughness ofthesurrounding bottomalsoplaysama)orrole1nwaveeffectsothatvariations occurCuetothisrough-nessfactor.
B.Laboratory StuC1es.Inthelaboratory, thesamplesvere1nC1viC-ually'eparated intoplantanCanimalmaterial.
Theplantmaterialwasthenthoroughly drieCanCweighed,,
thenashed.,and.theorganicveightCetermined..
Asthisprogramprogress-ltfdthtthlf~ldhh,tht particles ofsiltvereembeddeCorsocloselysurround.ed.
by'hehair>>like materialthatafractionoftheinorganics couldnotbeseparateC fromthealga.XCCitional vashingofthealgavoulChaveresulteCintheremovaloflargeamountsofalgalmaterial.
Theorganicweightcontentisthusused,forcomparing algalconcentrations althoughbothCryweightand.ashweightarealsogiveninthetable,(Table2).IIIRESULTSMD3ISQUSSIOH:
TheCataarepresented.
intables3anC2and.graphically illustrated inPigures3;4i.l'JBy'theAugustperiod.theamountofalgalmaterialvould.beexpected.
toCecline,whiletheanimallifewoulCbeontht.fhlg,~d,hltdfttCuringthemaximumlightperioCinJunewhenboththelightintensity anCnumberofhoursofillumination areattheirgreatest.
Temperature atthistimeformostoftheJuneperioCisbetveen55PanC60oP.Theoptimumtemperature forgrowthappearstobeinthemiC60'swithhighertem-peratures causingslowingofgrowth.Bothlightand.tem-peraturewouldplayma)orrolesonthelessening amountofgrowthfounCinAugust.InaCdition, observations havehftltth~hg,tlhthtfcyclesCuringthesummerinwhichthestrandsofalgaleng-thentoamaximumthenbreaksoff,asortofself-mowing process.ThisvoulChappenirregularly and.atnofixed,time,althoughtherevoulCtenCtobeperiodswhichvoulCsuggestcycliceffect.little,ifany,algalgrowthoccurr-eCatthe20'epthand.inthesecasesnosamplevastaken(markeCM.S.T.ontables342).Benthicanimals,ontheotherhand.,aregustintotheperioCofactivereproCuction,in June,laggingbehind.theplantgrowthasonewould.expectsincethisplantgrovthisthebasicsourceoffood..The,variousanimalsfoundinthe*hlghth'hit f,lpt,ffood..Thisgrazingmayalsoberesponsible forsomed.eclineinthetotalalgalgrovthfound..Overtheentire.rangeofthetransects thealgalgrovthisfairlyuniformly CistributeC withoneexception III atthe$5'epthatE-"2vhenmorethandoubletheamountofgrowthispresentthanatanyothersimilardepth,andatV>>3vherethealgalgrovth1sconsistently less.Itwouldnovappearthatthecomparison transects, V-3maynotbeasimportant asoncethought.'he ecologyofN-'5isd1fferent thantheremainder ofthetransects andwillvaryconsiderably duetoparticular vinddirections.
OnlytheareaalongtheZineK.lePointPromontory villhaveacon-sistentecologythroughout theseasonanditmaywellbethatany'ffect ontheecologyimposedbythethermaldis-chargevillhavetobeacomputed.
onebased,onthechangesfoundatthevarioustransects.
Sincetheentirestudy1,sonedesignedforcomparison, theredoesnotseemtobeanythinginparticular thatneedstobecommented onordiscussed.
atth1stime.Norcananyconclusions bebased.uponthisonestudywhichrelatestotheparticular purposeofthestudy.Thestudy,initself,vasrevealing andtheveryconsistent results(forabio-logicalsituation) verevi,thinacceptable lind.tsandwillprovidecomparative material.
Theresultspresented, areonlythebasicstatistical results,vh1letheoriginal.
datavillbeessential intheoverallanalysisinthepre-oper-ationalperiod.
IIIIIII Table1sBenthicSurveyData-Comparison ofTransects OswegoAugust,1968transectno,5<M3organicno.ofnoof.no,ofvgt.(gms)-snailssnailssnails(0.Lioplax)(0,Bethnia)(G,Physa)N,S,T,no.ofno.ofamphipods insect(G.Gammarus) larvae(GTendipes)
Miscellaneous E24,213o913,822,842,860373279247177352flatworms (G.Dugesia)E6~312512,502,681,8100019zJ>61721861591952flatworms (G,Dugesia)1flatworm(0,Dugesia)
IIIIIII Table1:BenthicSurveyData-Comparison ofTransects (cont)OswegoAugust,1968transectorganicno.wgt.(gms)no,ofno,ofsnailssnails(G.Lioplax)(G,Bethnia)no,ofsnails(G.Physa)nogofno,ofamphipods
.insect(G,Gammarus) larvae(Q,Tendipes) misce11meous 15>~30~64o632,25000035'3flatworms (Q..Dugesia)1,12.96032.52020<E3N,S~T,N,S,TN,S,TN,ST,0040(01flatworm(G,Dugesia)E6N,S,T, IIIIII Table2:BenthicSurveyData-AlgaeDry,Ash,andOrganic>feightsOswegoAugust1968sampledepthgl10t15'0'.transectno~algaedrywgt.(gms)+H.S.T.4.514.243173.40.362.802.742932.502'1.75.862.981.71.95M.S.T.H.S.T.N.S.T.N.S.T.N.S.T.algaeashwgt.(gms)~30.80~42~23~05~29~25.25.69~41F03~12~23~19.5913.08organicwgt.(gms)4.213.913.822.842.86~312.512.492.681.812.40~30.63~631.791'2.82+M.S.T.nosampletaken=noalgagrowth.
20//0rr2il5IOE65W2WIREACTORIIlE25000IQC4NWEMILEPOINTECOLOGICALSURVEYALGALDISTRIBUTION(ORGANICWTINGMS)AUGUST,I968.
/
Figure2:Organicweightofalgaesamplein'ramsvs.depthalongecological transects NineRileFoint,L.Ontario August14,19680E2eIO8000al5AEl20Organic~eightofalgaeingrams IIII MWWWWWWW0Figure3:NumberofGammarus(freshwatershrimp)vs.depthalongecological transects NineYiilePoint,L.OntarioAustlt1960E0oIO0AAE2l520IOO200300400NumberofGammarus(freshwatershrimp)
III
~~~~~~~
II APPENDIXCFISHDISTRIBUTION STUDYNINEMlLEPOINTpLAKEONTARIOJULY,1968 IIItIII JOHNF.STORR,Ph.D.Consultan!
inOecanograPhy andLimnology 51MmmmLsADaevaBvFFALO,NswYORK14226Dec.15,1969.Mr.R.Clancy,Manager,Environment-Engineering, NiagaraMohawkPowerCorp.,300ErieBlvd.,Vest,Syracuse, NewYork13202.RE:PISHDISTRIBUTION STUDY,NINEMILEPOINT,JULY27,1968.PurposeofStudy.Thiswasthefirststudymadeofthefishd1str1bution intheareausingarecording fathometer.
Itsprimarypurposewastotrytodeterm1ne thequantityoffishpresentintheareabythisparticular method.Lssuch,themethod,andtheprocessing ofthedatais'somewhat uniqueand,atth1spo1ntwasexperimental.
4numberofsimilarsurveyshasrefinedthetechnique andtheoriginalfathometric recordings werenotprocessed indetailuntilrecently.
Itwouldappearthatthemethodology isfairlyexactandtheresultsveryclosetoactuality.
Since,however,wearedealingwithfishwhichareprobablyinconstantmotiontheresultscanonlygivethegeneralpatternofdistribution forthedayand,periodCuringwhichthefathometrics weredone.Itmustberealizedthatasecondsetoffathometrics takenevenafewminuteslaterwouldgiveasomewhatdifferent pattern.Thefishcountstakenfromthefathometric tracingsandmathematically ad)ust-ed,arepresented intable1.Thedatafortotalfishcountispresented inPigure1anCbecauseofthemethodused,givesafairlyaccuratepictureofthisCistribut1on 1nagraphicform.B.Method.Pi,eldstudy.Themethodusedingathering thebasicdatawasbyusingaRossPineL1neRecording Pathometer.
Thi,sinstrument sendsoutahighfrequency pulseat108kcthroughthetransducer headwhichisinarackinthewateroverthesideofthe16~'oat.Thetransducer alsoreceivestheechofroma5arcand.thisechoisrecordedelectrographically onastripchart.Everyob)ectfrommassesofplanktonand,smallfish3-4inchesinsizeandthebottomcontourisrecorded.
Relativefishsizeisalsoreoorded.
andfromexper1ence thebelow6"andabove6"sizehasbeenseparated.
Muchwilldepend.uponthe IIIII
~02wexpertise oftheindividual readingthetracings.
SomevorkhasyettobeConetorefinetheinterpretation ofthetrac-ings,sothatsomeerror,parti,cularly inidentifying allthesmallerfish,doesoccur.Pishabove6"inlengthCog1veaveryrecognizable trace.Inmakingthesetracingsthe0'50'epthrangeis'e-cordedonthestripchart.Tracingsveremadefroma4'5'uttoa50'rmoredepthalongeachoftheoriginalecolog-icaltransects described indetai.linthereportontheben-thicstudies.Inall,9transects vereruncoveringashorelengthofabouttvomileswiththecentral7transects onlyabout1000'part (Fig.1).Boatspeedvasbetv'een2-3mph.2.Laboratory analysis.
Sincethetransducer wasscanninganarcofabout5,thefishcounttakenfromthetracingshadtobetreatedmathemat-icallytogive.auniformresult.1neo$]ectivewastocalcu-latetheapproximate numberper1000ftinevery200'is-tanceofthetransect.
assumingthatthevidthofthebottomscanned.ata50',depth is5'1de,itvasassumed,thatallfishcountedalonga200~distanceinthe40'o50'epthvouldequalthetotalnumberoffishin1000ft2.Successively abovethisareaallfi,shcountedina200'istance veremul-tipl1edbyfactorsasfollovs:30'40'1.2520'$0'1.6610~-2o'2.50'10'5Inthedepthsclosertothesurfacethefishcounted,arebeingmultipli,ed byaweighted, factorwhichtendstoskewtheresult.Hevertheless theresultstobewithinanacceptable rangeand.inallofthestudi,esmade,givecloselycomparable results.Cediscussion.
Theresultspresented inthetableand.figurearebelievedtobequiteaccurateforwaterdepths15'rmoreindepth.Intheshallower watertheareaofthescanisprobablysome-whatlimiting.
Thusthechanceofobtaining atraceofafishinthisshallower waterbecomesless.Alsothereissomeprobability that1nveryshallowvaterthatfishvould.tendtomoveawayfromtheboatastheboatapproaches.
Onthetablethenumberoffishlargerthan6"isalso IIIIIIIII indicated.
Th1saveragesoutsothatabout60$ofthefisharerecordedarelargerthan6".Thesmallerminnowwouldpro-bablynotberecordedbythefathometer.
Intheshallowwater,however,nofishcouldbeobservedand,thewaterwasclearenoughtoseefishiftheywerepres-ent.4considerable numberofdivesweremadeinthisareaaswell,andnofishwereobserved, 1nshallowwaterclosetoshoreduringtheday.Laterstudiescarriedoutovera24hourperiodshowedthatasmanyfishweretobenettedinshallowwateratnightasatthe15'nd30'epthsatthebottom.alsothe24hourfathometric studiedindicatethatinsomeareasand1nsomedepths,asmanyast0timesthenumberoffishwillberecorded.
Thisisnotageneralrulebutoververyfavorable bottomwherephysicalconditions suchascurrent,bottomroughness,.and bottomprofileareofacombination preferred.
bythef1shthatsuchconcentrations canoccur.Comparing theresultsofthisparticular studytothatofotherareas,thenumberoffishpresentisnotgreat.Infact,thenumberoffishpresent1nthelayerbetween60'-80'ff ofthisareais30to40Xthisconcentration atthistimeofday'eThespeciesoffishpresentintheareainshallowwaterhasdetermined laterbyfishnetstudies.Ingreatestabun-dancearethealewives.
Yellowperchoutnumberalltheotherbottomfishcaughtinthenetbyafactorof2Xto5X.afewwh1teperchwerecaughtanganumberofm1nnows(E~otroissp.)Inaweek'snettingwithfive6'125'xperimental nets,lessthananaverageoftofeachperdayoftheredsucker,rockbass,carp,brownbullhead, whitebass,andci,sco,weretakeninwaterdepthsfromshoreto30'..4fewsmeltwerealsocaught.Onespecimen, ofeachofafewotherspecieswasalsotaken.Itwouldappearfromallofthebackground information available, bothfromactualworkatthesiteandscientific reportthatthedischarge willnotaffectthenormalmove-mentof'anyofthefishpresent.Ifanything, morefishvillbeattracted totheareabothbecauseoftheaddedheatandmodification and.changeinwatermovement.
IIIII NineNilePointFishDistributi~n Study(asnumberoffishper1,000ft)July27,1968DepthW->>3:W--2T+L+TLW-1TLE-1TLE-2E-3TLTLE-4TLE-5TLE-6TL0-20070002QO-4002055400<<600221020600-80092100800-100072401000-1200 298201200-1400 172321400-1600 81001600-1800 51800-2000 002000-2200 2200005222977522000000002022222262136X610000000000020500,00025013820034227018112425071300000000000302191611347452177122000050104129ll67'74172231121154023683070.402200-2400 00Totalfish10828278102518'32465419936018863819285goffishgreaterthan6"oftotal36/+Ttotalfishcounted+L~onlyfishover6"long72%62/3(g IIIII 40-30Q2020IOIO20-20IO0IOE4ESE6El'(REACTOR~~~IE2500'ClOlNINEMILEPOINTFISHDISTRIBUTIONSTUDY<ASNUMBEROFFISHPERl)000FT)JULY27)I968IFlG.I Ik