ML18018B065
| ML18018B065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point, FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 09/03/1975 |
| From: | Niagara Mohawk Power Corp |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18018B065 (74) | |
Text
&u~s ~X >'>am uVj. ~
NINE f LILE POINT NUCLEAR STAl ION UNIT Pl DPR-63 DOCKET NO, 50-220 ENVIR%%TTAL REPORT JANupw 1, 1975 JUNE 30, 1975 9
SEP3 tgpG~ 2
. S* hVClRAR RKCUlATOR COMMlSS Oll Qofl ~40
I.
INTRODUCTION This report is submitted in accordance with Section S.6.1 of Appendix B
It includes data collected as required by both DPR-63 and DPR-59(the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant).
Since both the Nine Mile Point and James A. FitzPatrick Plant share a
common site, there is a common environmental monitoring program.
II.
DESCRIPTIOiN AND SUIL~1ARY The required sample collection and analysis schedule is listed in Tables 1 and 2 for NMP and Tables lA and 2A for JAF.
The locations of the sampling stations are shown in Figures 1,
2 and 3.
A quarterly summary of the data giving the averages for the various media is included at the end of this text.
III.
ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Lakc~Prc ram Table 3 lists the results of the Aquatic samples taken from Lake Ontario at the 3 sampling locations (i.e.,
- JAF, NMP and Oswego Steam Plant).
Ia 1.
Bottom Sediments The bottom sediment samples showed a trace of activity with the maximum being 1.1 +0.3 pCi/g Cs137 in the JAF sample.
This is a higher level than the control sample at Oswego Steam Plant but if one considers the uncertainty of the control
+
1 pCi/g, this value does not appear to be significant.
2.
Periphyton There is a significant level of activity found in the periphyton samples at both NiMP and JAF as compared to the Oswego Steam Plant samples.
The highest level is the iNMP sample Cs 137 level which is a factor oF 36 above the control value (36 pCi/g vs 0
+ 1).
Cs
- 134, Co 60 and M>>
Srl were also de'tected in these samples.
Because this media is not consumed by humans, no dose estimate can be made based on this data.
ANAI.YSIS Ol I!NV1I<ONi~1I!Y,'I'ALDATA (continued)
Lake Program (continued)
I'ish The fish samples collected in June did not show any signi-ficant level of activity.
In order to obtain a grc;lter level of sensitivity, a composite sample of all three species collected (Perch, Bass and Suckers) was made, thus giving a large sample volume.
In future, only like species will be composited into samples.
hfol lusks Only a single mollusk sample (clams) was analyzed during this report period.
It did sho>>
a small amount of Ihl S4 (0.4
+ 0.2 pCi/g).
This sample was collected at NMP; a
JAF sample and a Oswego Steam Plant sample could not be obtained; no clams were available.
S.
Gammarus No samples were collected because none of this species cou1d be found at any of the three sampling locations.
Lake Water Table 4 lists the results of the lake water samples.
The February and i~iarch city water sample appears to have been contaminated in the counting laboratory.
Some of the analysis (H-3
, Sr 89, Sr 90) is sent out for analysis and is not available for this report.
It will be included in a supple-mental rcport.
Land Program Tables 5
through 16 list the results of ]and samples analyzed for the reporting period.
Air particulates Tables 5 and 6 give the results of the air particulate air sample gross beta analysis for the six (6) off-site monitoring stations (Table 5) and the nine (9) on-site stations (Table 6)
~
Average gross beta activ.ities for the off-site stations during the 1st and 2nd quarters
>>'ere 0.110 and 0.124 pCi/llr respectively.
The on-site stations averaged 0.094 and 0.093 for the 1st and 2nd quarters respectively.
If one considers the. down wind off-site sampling stations as controls for the on-site stations, then the following samples could be considered significant (i.e.
activity >2X control).
STATION G on site D2 on site E on site F on "site G on site E on site DATE 1-16-75 2-5-75 2-5-75 2-5-75.
2-26-75 5-7-75 ACTIVITY LEVEI, Ci/m3
.267
+.026 145
+.015
,135
+.013
.237
+.024
.144
+.014
.106
+.009 CONTROI. I.EVEI, Ci/lll
.102
+.010
.063
+.010
.064
+.008
.053
+
F 010
.059
+.005
.044
+.004
h I
III. 'ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMLNTAL DATA (continued)
Land Program (cont inued)
("ontinued)
STATION DATE ACTIVITY LEVEL
>Ci/m3 CONTROL LEVL'L iCi/m3 D2 on site G on site F on site G on site 5-21-75 6-18-75 7-2-75 7-2-75
.156
+.014
.243
+.022
.155
+.012
.133
+.013
.064
+.006
.110
+
.010
.051
+
.005
.052
+.005 2.
Tables 7 and 8 give the results of the precipitation (rain water) sample gross beta analysis for the six (6) off-site stations (Table 7) and the nine (9) on-site stations.
The average gross beta activity for the off-site samples during the 1st and 2nd quarters were 33.4 pCi/m2/month and 24.1 pCi/m2/month respectively.
The average gross beta activity for the on-site stations for the 1st and 2nd quarters was 30.5 pCi/m2/month and 19,5 pCi/m2/month respectively.
The samples listed below were considered significantly higher (i.e. activity >2X Control) than their corresponding down-wind control station.
STATION DATE ACTIVITY LEVEL Ci/m2/mo CONTROL LEVEL Ci/m2/mo Dl on site Dl on site F
on site G
on site G
on site H
on site I
on site March 1975 May 1975 March 1975 March 1975 Juno 1975
'arch 1975 March 1975 28.0
+ 3.0 40.5
+ 4.2 37.8
+ 3.8 36.1
+ 3.6 21.0
+ 2.5 25,1
+ 2.3 33.8
+ 3.2 9.9
+ l.l 17.7
+ 1.8 9.9
+ 1.5 10.7
+ 1.9 8.4
+ 1.4 9.9
+ 1.1 9.9
+ 1.1 TLD Table 9 gives the environmental TLD dosimeter readings for the 1st and 2nd quarters as an average of 5 individual TLD chips located at each station.
The average for the on-site dosimeters 24 mrem/qtr and 30 mrem/qtr for the 1st and 2nd quarter respectively.
The TLD's located at the east and west site boundary averaged 13 nrem/qtr and 14 mrem/qtr for the 1st and 2nd quarters respectively while the off-site stations averaged 16 mrem/qtr and 17 mrem/qtr respectively.
If one consi.ders that the off-site station represents normal background levels (i.e.,
17 mrem/qtr) then those listed below show readings greater than 25".o above this background.
C I
III.
ANAI,YSIS OI'NVIRONhlENTAL DATA (continued)
Land Program (continued) 3.
~
Continued
~Bad o No.
Location mrem/qt:r Jan-March A vari 1-June 3
5 17 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 D-1 on site D-2 on site E on site Progress Center East Yard JAF lt'est Yard Pole 53 E.
Bndy H On Site Lite Pole N JAF Lite Pole Nl",JAF N Fence E JAl' Fence Mid E JAF N Fence Hid l<
NMP N Fence
à NMP NMP/JAF Twin Pole 21.1
+ 9.8 22.3
+ 4.8 21.9
+ 4.8 25.1
+ 6.8 25.3
+ 8.2 22.7
+ 7.4 23.3
+ 5.2 28.1
+ 9.0 46.7
+ 15.1 S7.7
+ 14. 6 24.1
+ 7.0 35.6
+ 12.9 23 '
+
8.7 22.4
+
8.S 24.2
+
9.S 27.2
+ 18.9 20.8
+ 11.5 31.0
+ 10.9 33.6
+
7.9 38.0
+
9.3 Sl.9
+
12 '
54.0
+ 12.5 86.4
+ 16.9 30.6
+
9.3 There is probably three unrelated sources of radiation which could affect any and/or all of the above l)st:orage of radioactive waste at ib~lP, 2) the NMP gaseous release from the stack and the JAF turbine shine.
Badges 31 and 32 are located near the Nh1P Radwaste Building and are probably "seeing" the loading of high level waste trucks and t:hey would be expected to be consistently higher than other on-site TLD readings.
Badges 29 and 30 are probably influenced by the JAF N-16 gamma radiation or "Turbine Shine", other badges may also be affected by this "shine" but these two badges located along the JAF North fence are the most prominent.
The other on-site TLD's are probably affected most:ly by the gaseous release from the hlh1P stack which was approximately 0.05 Ci/sec during this report period.
Radiation Monitors Table 10 gives the minimum, maximum and average reading of each of the continuous radiation monitors.
Both the on-site monitors and the off-site monit:or averaged 37 mrem/qtr during the 1st quarter while the off-site monitor read,il mrem/qtr during the 2nd quarter and during the same time t:hc on-site monitor averaged 50 mrcm/qtr.
All of these monitors are spiked with a small radiation source in order to ensure on-scale positive readings.
4>>
slz
ANALYSIS OI'NVIRONMENTAI. DATA (continued)
Land Program (continued)
DATE 4,
(Continued)
Some of the morc significant reading occurred on Jan.
13 and Jan 30 at thc J on-.site station and on Junc 23 at the I on site station.
During those period, it appears that those stations werc under the influence of the NMP stack plume.
A check of themeteorological conditions and relcasc rates during these times show that tl>cse stations werc directly down-wind from thc NMP stack.
METLOROI.OGICAL CONDITION STATION READINGS mr/hr NhlP RELLASE IU Sp Dir Turb. Class RATE Jan 13 Jan 30 June 23 J
J I
On Site On Site On Site 0.50 0.50 0'0
.046Ci/sec 23 285 II
.023Ci/sec 10 295 III
.OSOCi/scc 9
290-IV S.
The above monitorreadings lasted for a period of loss than 2 hrs and were probably occurring because the plumo was directly over thedetector.
The JAF release during this time were extremely low (i.e,
< 0.001 Ci/sec) and would not have influonced those readings.
Airborne I'able 11 and 12 gives the results of the airborne Iodine 131 measurements.
There do not appear to bc any significant readings alcove normal background for these samples.
Milk Tables 13 and 14 give the results of the milk analysis.
Table 13 lists the I 131 results for the four (4) sample locations none of which are considered to bc above normal background and they are all less than the required sensitivity of 0.5 pCi/1.
'able 14 lists the results of the Sr 90 and gamma emitter analysis.
There is no indication of any above normal roading.
The levels of Cs 137 and Sr 90 dotected can be attributed to weapons fall out. Table 15 1ists tho Spring 1975 dairy cow census.
7.
Other Land Sam>les Table 16 lists the rosults of soil, pasture grass and eggs.
Tho locations of these samples aro listed on Figurc 1
None of thc activity in the samples is considcrcd to bc above local backgrounds.
I 1
QUARTERI.Y ENYIRONMENTAL SAMPI.E SIIMMARY Medium/Sam le/Location Nuclide Jan-March A april-June Airborne Particulates On-Site Samples Q
D.2 F
G IlI J
K Gross Beta (pCi/m3)
.101
.116
.123
.129
.144
.026
.05
.0 (pCi/m3)
.115
.112
.124 5
.044 9
Off-Site Samples Dl D2 E
1'
.092
.106
~ 106 109
. 124
.124
.123
.1 9
. 135
.133 Iodines On-Site Samples Dl D
E F
G liI J
K Gross Iodine (pCi/m )
3
.002
.006
.005
.001
.002
.001
.002 (pCi/m )
. 001
.000
.002
.IH Off-Site Samples C
Dl D2 E
F G
.001
. 001
.002
.001
.002
.002
. 004
1
hl".<labium/Sam 1o/Location Waterborne Nucl ide hao-hlnrcll A )ri I -Junc Surface Precipitation On-Site Stations Dl D2 E
F G
HI J
K Gross Beta (pCi/m2/mo) 32.6 26.1 27.9 30.3 25.4 34.1 25.9
- 23. 2 (pCi/m /mo) 25.7 16.7 21.4 18.1 26.2 15.7 19.5 17.5 14.3 Off Site Stations C
Dl D2 E
F G
Gross Beta 48.0 27.0 36.5 37.7 24.8 26.3 3S.R 17.7 23
~ 2 19.4 19.7 18.9 Surface Lake Water (pCi/1 )
a (pCi/1 )
M1P JAF OS1U Gross Beta H3
- Sr89, Sr Gross Beta H3 Sr 9, Sr Gross Beta fl3 Sr89 Sr90 482 0.0, 0.0 19 124 22 18 NOTE:
For other sample data see tables that follow (i.e. Fish, Soil, Pasture
- Grass, etc.)
A-7
~
r
I hlcdium/Sam )1c/Location Nuclide Jan-h1arch A ri l-Junc In!est ion Milk Sample 01 Milk Sample
>J2 Sr.-90 I-131 K-40 Cs-137 Sr-90 I-131 K-40 Cs-137 (pCi/1) 4.8
~
0.0 1326 27 0.0 1677 27 hiilk Sample JJ3 Sr-90 I-131 K-40 Cs-137 0.0 1681 hlilk Sample J14 Sr-90 I-131 K-40 Cs-137 5.9 0.0 1673 Direct Radiation Continuous Monitors (Ghl)
Off. Site On Site Dl D2 E
r.
G 13I J
K (mxcm/qtr) 37 50 43 28 32 28 60 (mrem/qtr) 71 32 60 43 45 80 60 TLD Off Site Site Boundary On Site 13 17 30
~
l
JirilvvtoJJJJUJJrrI SCALE OF MILES Rainbow Shores LEG~MD tnterstate.
U.S. B State Highways...
County Roads.............
Town Roads..............
County Lfnos.
Town Lines.
City g Village Lines......
Railroads..
ONTARIO 0 Seikirk i
Srerv PIJC Latitude~ N.
tongtude 76'30'W.
at 0$~> County Btdg., Oswego, N.Y.
Land Area 968 Square miles IllbCI C Ramona Beech
/IIyt/ 3A Nine tuiu"~ Pot tuextco Pant Mexico Bay Beach Lake trow g3 44so"o wIev Warxer Shore Oaks Pleasant Hickorv Point Grove Oemster Beech Bvrrnrfa Suer cri e
Texas VIWI tx I Jell ii ~
~e
/Arttiur
'els Nr<<i$~
o I
Pvttpe~t
~Jlstlu
~4, gl OS+EGO S
Ivrvlll a Y~ I Hernmaod's Corners P
~ate B
A N
IIC NeW
'4 Haven CO 4 nl VIIC
~e r
S Wp JI South New Haven Cornel Bridge
~<.
Toll Gate wn4 Ic A
V E
N cculnvtc
~I.
ii tl riy Qer 3
tie
/
I I re E
~ Jew I Igli ivlnls
~
d iiLI JIC C-X sc
/4Or fnli', Vettey g
Oswego Center
~
~
UI II secrvilr..
3 z"'0 3
e
~
CI rl p
vclice ggviy<< irc,+&IIoc Or Its lbnd PJJJldrr And scn>
o II
/
N~ VotneyI/
J IJJJVJI /
C.
goyim's Ccrners I.
I CIIItll Ie
~IVI
~<<uv II Verniitiotl Vi'euwood r
8
~IC Muncer~
FIGORE I
MILK 6 LAND SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FIGURE 2
I.OCATION Ol'NVIRONMENTALMONITORS JAF-ihi~IP 1.0CAT ION OF I!NVIRONS MONITORS f
(( I(('>(((( r i0
r r
i
/
r R
rr r
rr i
I r
/
J
~J JJa
(
('
2 I
(q J
s
/r C
Qo 0 I PULASKI OS(('EGO Qo G
Qo
'O I
MEX I CO D,
l I
0 MILES OFFSITE MONITORS
J Nr
~
~
)
)
TABLE 1 SAYiPLE COLLECTION PAD A!BLYSIS SITE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON'l~i-"NTAL NONITORIHG PROGRAM)
A.
LAKE PROGRAM YiEDIA At'IALYSIS FREOUE~CY('-)
LOCATIONS(2) l.
Fish 2.
thl 1 usks 3..
Gammarus 4.
8ottom Sediments 5.
Peri phyton 6.
Lake Mater
- GeLi, GeLi, GeLi
~gSr It gO~q gO GB, GSA or GeLi 3H, 8gsr, Osr GeLi, ~gSr Im gOSr GeLi, 8gSr dm gOSr 2/vr 2/yr 2/yr 2/yr 2/yr il Come.
(jtr.
Corno.
2 otlslte 2 onslte 2 onsl e
2 onsite 2 onslte 3(3) o>>fs.t~
o;l's>>te 1 '5fisi e
1 of=s ite 1
0>> fslte Notes:
(1)
'2)
(3)
(~)
(5)
Programi continued for at least three years after the sta.tun o
'am s A. 'F-t=. atrick nuclear Pc'::e.
?lant.
Onsite locations samples collected in the vicinity of discharges, offsite samples collected at a distance of at least five mi',es from site.
The tnree
'.ake water samples to include Nine Nile Point U<<it 1 in.ake wat"r, vam-'s A. Fit= a<<ick intake water, and Oswego City water.
Samples of items 1 throuqn 5 collected in soriing, summer and fall when available.
GeLi analysis will have a
VDL of 3 times o of back"round based on a 400 r.iinute count on a
55 cc CeLi system.
TABLF.
A SA!O'LE COLLECTIO'l AXD AMP'.YSIS VIP-JAF SITE HADIOLOGICAL'EiWIROXMNTAL~I!OiXXTORDlG PROGiUA MEDIA 1.
Fish 2.
ieiollusks 3.
Ganmarus 4.
Bottom Sediments 5.
Periphyton 6.
Lake Mater ZWALVSIS (5)
- GeLi, S"
Sr GeLi Sr Sr
- GeLi,
~ Sr Sr
- GeLi, Sr
& ~ Sr GeI" G3, GSA or GeLi 3F FREQVESCV(4) 3/yr 3/yr 3/yr 3/yr 3/yr h Comp.
Qtr.
Comp.
LOCA TONS 2 ons te or Js te One<tee ORES 'c' onsi'tc l offs'te 2 onsi"e oz fsite 2 o..site 4 or. s" te 3(3)
Metee:
'l)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Program continued for at least three years after the startup of JAPNPP.
Onsite locations samples collected in the vicinity of N~P and:A'ischarges, o 'fsite samples collected at a distance of at least five m.les from site.
The throe la!ce water samples to include l':~I intake water SAF intake water and Oswego City water.
Samples of items l through 5 collected in spring, sum...er and f ell when available.
Geii analysis will have a I~EL of 3 ti,.es o of background based on a 400 minute count on a 55 cc CaLi system.
J
TABLE 2 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SITE RAOIOLOGICAL ENVI RONMENTAL YO.IITORING PROGRAIM B.
LAND PROGRAM(1)
I<EDIA AIIALYSIS
~RBRUENCY NO.
OF LOCATIONS LOCATIONS 1.
Air Parti cul ates GB GSA M
Y Corno.<<).
At least 10 9 onsite 6 offsit 2.
Soil
- GSA, Sr Every 3 years 9 onsite 0 o <si.e 3.
TLD 4.
Radiation Monitors 5.
Airborne - I131 6.
Yii 1 f:
7.
Human Food Crops 8.
YIeat, Poultry, Eggs Gamma Dose Qtr.
Gamma Dose C
GSA I
90 M
- GSA, Sr M Com<p.
GSA, 131I A
GSA Edible Portions SA 10 At least 10 4(7) 14 onsite 9 onsite 9 onsite (8)
(8)
(8) 6 o~~s e
1 offsite 6 offsite Notes:
(Continued)
(6)
Onsite samples counted together, offsite counted together, (7)
Frequency applied only during grazing season.
(8)
Samples. to be collected from farms within a 10-mile radius of radionuclides.
any high count samples counted separately.
having the highest potential concentrations Abbrevi ations:
M Comp. - Yonthly composite of weekly or bi-weekly samnles CB - Gross beta analysis Gef.i -
Gamma spectral analysis on a GeLi system (quantitative)
CSA -
Gamma sf>ectral analysis on a Nal system (quanti f.<itive)
A Annually H - lfonf;ly t~i - Monthly C - Continuous fill - f) i-weekly (al ternlto 'As, )
(ff;r. - Quar(.('.i ly SA - Semi<anno<> l.ly
B ~
LAIRD PROGRA,f TABLF. 2A SA!O'LE COLLECTIOiN A'iVD ANALYSIS h~P-JAP SITE RADIOLOGICAL EVGBOX~AENTAL ~ifONITORING PROGPd&f MEDIA l.
Air Particulates 2.
Precipitation ANALYSIS GB GSA GB GSA FRE~U"-"MCY iJ "I Co
.(2) iNO.
OF LOCATIOiNS At least 10 At least 10 LOCATIONS 9 onsite 6 offs'te 9 ons.tc 6 offs'te 3.
TLD 4.
Radiation Monitors 5.
Airborne - I-3~
6.
Milk 7.
Pasture Grass 8.
Human Food Crops 9.
Soil Gamma dose Gamma dos e
'SA Ij GSA, 9oSr GSA" GSA, 90Sr GSA, 90Sr Qtr.
H i'f Comp.
A 20 10 At least 10 4 (3) 4 (3) 14 or.site 9 onsi"e 9 onsi te (4)
(4)
(4)
(4) 0 oz'ite 1 ofzs" te 6 ozzsite Notes:
(1)
Program continued for at least three years after startup of J~DIAIPP.
(2)
Onsite samples counted together, offsite counted together, ny high count samples cour.ted separately.
(3)
Frequency applied only during grazing season.
(4)
Samples to be collected from farms within a 10-mile radius naving the highest potential concentrations of radionuclid s.
Abbreviations:
GB
- Gross beta analysis GeLi G mrna spectral analysis GSA Gamma spectral analysis M
'rlcelcly M
Montlrly H Comp. - Monthly composite of:
on a GeLi system (quantitative) on a Nai system (cluai titative) weekly or. bi-weekly samples C
8'h Qtr.
SA A
Continuous wec cly (alternate weeks)
Quar" crly Semi an nUally Arurually
Vr a
TABLE 3
AQUATIC SAMPLES FROM LAKE ONTARIO BOTTOhl SEDIMENTS pCi/g (linet l'i'eight) (1) amma emitters C LLECTION SiTE COLLECTION DATE Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Others*
'ine Mile Point 20' 40'-14-75 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.02 0.4
+ 0.3 0.7
+ 0.2 0.4
+ 0.3 0.0
+
1 FitzPatrick 20B 40'-14-75 0.0
+ O.l 0.0
+ 0.02 0.9
+ 0.3 1.1
+ 0.3 0.7
+ 0.3 0.0 +,1 swego Steam 20i 5 40i 5-14-75 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.02 0
~0+1 0.0+
1 0.0+1, 0 ~0+1 PERIPHYTON (1)
Ci/g (Net Weight)
'OLLECTION SITE
'ine hlile Point 1'itzPatrick swego Steam COLLECTlON DATE S-6-75 5-6,S-75 5-6-75 Cs 134
,23+
1 19 2
0.0+
1 Cs 137 36 +-3 31+3 0.0+
1 Co60 ll+1
+ ]
0.0
+
1 3
2+1 Others*
0.0+
1 0.0
+
1 0.0+
1 (1)
Analytical uncertainties are at the 2o (95'o confidence) level.
All uncertainties based on the dominant analytical uncertainty which is usually the counting error.
The spectrum is computer scanned from'4 20 to ~ 2000 KeV.
Specifically included in the gamma analysis are Ce-144, Cr-51, Ba-l,a-140, Cs-134, Cs-137, Zr-iNb-95, Co-SS, Co-60, ihfn-54, Zn-6...
Naturally occurring gamma emitters such as K-40 and Ra daughters are frequently detected but not listed here.
r C
~
4
TABLE 3 (continued)
AQUATIC SAhPLES (Continued)
FISH (Com osite Sam les of 3 S ecies) pCi/g (Wet)
COLLECTION SITE Nine Mile Point FitzPatrick Oswego Steam COLLECTION DATE 6-10-75 6-10-75 6-19-75 Sr SS 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ O.l 0.0
+ 0.1 Sr 90 0.06
+ 0.1 0.05
+ 0.1 0.08
+ O.l amma emitters 0.0+
1 0.0 1
0
~0+
1 OLLECTION SITE ine Mile Point itzPatrick mego Steam 5 COLLECTION DATE 5-14-75 (No Samples Available)
MOLLUSKS Sr S9 0.0
+ 0.1 pCi/g (Net)
Sr.
90 0.06
+ 0.02 gamma emitter Mn-S4 0.4
+ 0.2 Others 0.0
+
1 GAh1MARUS No samples available at an> of the three sar..pling locations.
TABLE 4 LAKE ONTARIO ly'ATER SAhP LES Ci/1 DATE Jan.
'75 gross beta Feb.
'75 gross beta March'75 April'75 May
'75 gross beta gross beta gross beta June
'75 gross beta CITY 1'/ATER 18+2 85=:
7" 160
+ 10*
16+
3 6+2 33 3
NhlP 13
+ 3 22+5 21+
5 8+4 15
+ 4 JAF 6 +'2 18+
2 32+4 26+2
'74
+
16+2 1st qtr.
Sr 89 Sr 90 H3 0.0
+ 4.0 0.0+ 4.0 482
+ 80 2nd'qtr.
Sr 89 Sr 90 H3 3.0
+ 1.9 0.0
+ 2.~
124
+ 44 Sample believed to be inadvertantly contaminated in counting laboratory.
Sample data not available at time of report.
l"illbe reported in supplimental report.
TABLE 5 ilMP/JAF SITE ENVIROihMEilTAL AIRBORi/E PARTICULATE SAMPLES OFF-SITE STATIO'AS GROSS BETA ACTIVITY PCi/M DATE COLLECTED Dl Dg G
1-8-75 1-16-75 1-22-75 1-29-75 2-5-75 2-12-75 2-19-75 2-26-75 3-6-75 3-12-75 3-19-75
~-26-15
.049
+.005
.062
+.006
.147
+.013
.019
+.004
.076
+.007
.100
+.008
.068
+.006
.10S
+.008
.088
+.007
.111
+.012 Out of Service
.119
+.010
.081
+.007
.095
+.008
.122
+.011
.092
+.009
.076
+.007
.138
+.Oll
.084
+.009
.080
+.009
.091
.009
.084
+.008
.138
+.013
.122
+.012
.100
+.010
.121
+.012
.063
+.007
.064
+.008
.110
+.001
.103
+.009
.067
+.006
.066
+.006
.085
+.008
.113
+.009
.100
+.009
.137
+.012
.139
+.Oll
.153
+.012
.113
+.010
.095
+.010
.162
+.013
.145
+.013
.124
+.010
.114
+.010
.135
+.012
.064..005
.103
+.009
.094
+.010
.090
+.Oll
.140
+.015
.140
+.016
.142
+.017
.053
+.010
.102
+.010
.076
+.008
.138
+.013
.096
+.009
.181
+.017
.170
+.016
.146
+.014
.086
+.009
.102
+..010
.140
~.014 137
.014 057
+.008
.109
+.009
.081
+.008
.059
+.005
.121
+
.011
.283
+.025
.164
+
.01S 135
+.013
C J
ENVIRONMENTAL AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLES (Continued)
OFF-SITE STATIOiNS DATE COLLECTED Dq D2 4-2-75 4-9-75 4-16-75 4-23-75 4-30-75 5-7-75 5-14-75 5-21-75 5-28-75 6-4-75 6-11-75 6-18-75 6-25-75 7-2-75
.162
+.013
.09S
+.008
.212
+.017
.195
+.015 127
+.010
.111
+.088
.015
+.002
~ 201
+.016
.079
+.006
.072
+.006 107
+.008
.060
+.005
.077
+.006
.087
+.007
.120
+.010
.087
+.007
.210
+.016
.191
+.01S
.120
+.009
.100
+.008
.016
+.002
.234
+.018
.112
+.009
.077
+.006
.100
+.008
.037
+.003
.207
+.016
.105
+ ;008
.136
+.011
.150
+.013 089
+.008
.099
.009
.224
+.018
.220
+.018
.129
+.011
.061
+.005
.202
+.017
.19S
+.016
.123
+.011 044
+
004
.017
+.002
.019
+.002
.064
+.006
.245
+
~ 020
.107
+.008
~ 109
+.009
.075
+.006
.085
+.007
.123
+.010
.14S
+.012
.039
+.004
.073
+
.007
.229
+.018
.242
+.020
.093
+.008
.100
+.009
.144
+.014
.100
+.011
.208
+.019
.203
+.019
.133
+.014
.148
+.014
.01S
+.003
.216
+.017
.105
+.008
.084
+.007
.1S2
+.012
.041
+.004
-294
+.023
.051
+.005
.157
+.014
.100
+.010 213
+.019
.202
+.018 124
+
.012
.190
+.016
.015
+.002
.236
+.021
.101
+.009
.087
+.008
.097
+.009
.1,10
+.010
.198
+.017
.052
+
.005
~'
I II ~
II II I
I I I II I
I
~
)
lt
P, TAI)l.li6 (cont inur>I)
I'.8'(> I ROQIILiTAI AI RBORNI' AR'I' CI)LAT SA>II I.l'!S (Con t innriI)
OX-Sl I'I'. ST>'>'I'10 IS DATE COLLECTED DI Dp 4-2-75 4-9-75 4-16-75 4-23 75 4-30-75 5-7-75 5-14-75 5-21-75 5-28-75 G-4-75 6-11-75 6-18-75
.'127
. 010
.OS9 '007
.190 '015
.185 '014
.i20
.010
.09G
.007
.017
.002
.ISZ '014
.072
.006
.096
+.008
.050 -'001
.OII
.OOI
.12) 'Oll
.088
.009
.185 '016
.166 '015
. I 'I I. '
013
.100 '009
.012
.OOZ
.15i(>
.Oil
.099 '009
.101 '009
.t)51 '0'>
t)>t) ')08 1261 01.1
. 116
.Ol I 202 4 017
..192 '017
.IZZ '011
.106 '009
.012 '()nz
. ISO
.016
. 09(> i
. 0()8
.Iln
.009
.055 '006
.072 '007
~ 13G -.Ol I
. 195
. 019
.17.i
+.Ol.l
~ I.i.i
+
. 0 I I
. 090 -
. 007
.Ol I 'Ooz
. 155
.012
.105
~
.011
.190
.OIS 187 4
01
.13.i 'Ol )
Ot)8 not)
.013 '003
. IG7
+.002 0'>i '0
.072
~.006
.087
+.007
. 05iZ
+
.001
.056
+.005
- on.l
.no9
. 050
. 0(16
. Z.I3 0'>i
.12S
.013
.170
.012
.128
.010
~ Ot)2
~
.008
.ISI
~.Ol.l 171
+
Ol I I"i
+
nlo
.089
.007
.010
+
.001
.129
.010
.071 '006
.of>4 -
.On5 03>)
. t)03 Ol')
+
001
.03S
.001
.031'
.003
.019
+
.OOI
.021
.Ooz 012
. On i
.060
.005
.002
.001
.O.i5..on.i
.OZI
.Ot)z
.nsz..oo(
.018
+.002
.Oi..on
.nnoi
~
.Ons
.080
.00,
.165 'Oil
. I ln '01 In I 1
(Io')
. D.in
+
. On.i
. On. '01 06) 006
. 05.i '
(l(l.l 058 'n i
. 0 '9
. IIn.i
.017 '002
.05S '005
. 012
. 00 'I
.015 '004
.osz.
.on7
. I). ') -'05i
.() 15 'On'I
. 007 '01
.I)71 '00(i
.032
~
.003
.031 '003
. (II 8 Ooz
.(II(t '002 6-25-75 7-"-75
.201
+.016
. I 17 '
(II 2
. 193 '(II.
.077 'Ot)8
. IZI O.nil
. 189
. 002
.168 '013 155 '()Iz I i')
~
Ol i I ii 01 i
.033
.003
. IZS '010
.119 '()11
. 0(>.i
. 005
.0 2 '00<>
. It)t) ':On!I
.083..(I(I.
Ont <it'rrrirr
TABLE 7 RAIN 'i~'ATER GROSS BETA ACTIVITY (pCi/m /hfo)
OFF SITE MONTH JANUARY FEBRUA'RY hfARCH APRIL MAY JUNE 63.4
+ 4.9 50.0
+ 4.5 30.6
+ 3.4 7&-1
-+ 6.1 84+ 1.1 19.6
+ 2.0 36.7
+ 2.9 34.4
+ 3.2 9.9
+ 1.1 SAMPLE LOST 17.7
+ 1.8 SAMPLE LOST Dp 40.5
+ 3.7 47.0
+ 4.6 21.9
+ 2.9 30.0
+ 2.7 27.2
+ 2.5 12.3
+ 1.8 57.6
+ 5.2 37 '
+ 3.8 17.7
+ 2.7 27.1
+ 2:1 19.0
+ 2.0 12.2
+ 1.7 36.7
+ 3.2 27.9
+ 2.4 9.9
+ 1.5 21.7
+ 1.7 13.5
+ 1.7 24.1
+ 2.6 28.6
+ 3 0
39.5
+ 4.2 10.7
+ 1.9 21.7-+
1.9 26.7
+ 3.2 4
+
1 4
h)0."TH D}
Dz TABLE 8 RAIht NATER GROSS BETA ACTIUITY (pCi/m /Mo)
Oil SITE F
34.4
+ 3. 2
- 18. 0+ 2. 0 15.1+ 2.1 10.2+ 5.8 50.5 + 5.6 23.1
+ 2.1 37 3+3./
2.0 19.6+ 2.1 FEB 35.5 + 3.0 35.8 + 3.5 43.3+ 4.4 42.9+ 4.1 43.4 + 4.6 27.9 + 2.7 '1.2+3.1 r
~58+~
4
~94~>
0 MARCH APRIL hlAY I
JUiME 28.0+ 3.0 15.5+ 1.4 40.5+ 4.2 24.5+ 2.6 12.1+ 1.1 32.1 3.5 5.9+ 0.9 25.2+ 2.6
- 21.0+ 1.9 31.8-3.5 r
I 11.4+ 1.8 37.8+ 3.8 20.5+ 1.6 15.7-+ 1.8 SAMPLE LOST 36.1+ 3.6 25.1 + 2.3 29.1-+..5 21.0+ 2.5 i 14.8+ 2.0 17.4+ 2.0 28.5 + 2.6 14.9 + 1.2 r
- 33.8 r
'. 19.0 f 24.7
, 14.8
+ 1.5
+ 2.9
+ 1.9 1.2 9 2+0 8
- 26. 5-+
i 10.9+
i 3.0 r
I 1:5 '2.5-1.1 24.0+ 2.3 r, 20.5+ 2.2
TABLE 9 ENVIIIONb1I'.Fl'Al. TI.D DOS IMl".I'I!R READINGS
'I'otal Dose i.n mRcm
+
2o BADGE NO.
I.OCAT1ON JAN TIIIN i~IARCII APRI I, 'I'IIIUI.IUNI!
10 12 13 14 15 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 D-I On Site D-2 On Site E On Site F On Site G On Site C OfE Site D-1 OH Site D-2 Oil Site E Off Site F Off: Site G Off. Site S.lf.
Oswego Polo Sl, N.
Boundary Polo 66, N.
Boundary Progress Center.,
East Yd.
Progress Ccntcr, Picnic Area Pole 9, East Boundary JAF 4'cst Yard Pole 67, East Boundary Pole 53, East Boundary II On Site I On Site J
On Site 21.1
+ 9.8 18.9
+ 9.0 13.7
+ 5.0 14.3
+
4.8'4.7
+ 7.6 18.1
+ 7.8 17.3
+ 6.2 15.3
+ 3.6 16.1
+ 6.2 13.5 ~'.2 15.1
+ 8.6 16.3
+ 6.4 14.3
+ 7.2 12.5
+ 10.6 19.5
+ 6.4 17.7
+ 6.6 13.7
+ 2.6 22.3
+ 4.8 14.9
+ 7.0 21.9
+ 4.8 25.1
+ 6.8 18.1
+ 8.2 LOST 35.6
+ 12.9 23.4
+
8.7 22.4
+
8.5 21.0
+
9.1 16.4
+
7.3 17.8
+
8.3 18.0
+
6.7 16.0
+
4.9 14.4
+
6.9 15.8
+
8.5 19.8
+
8.5 14.4
+
5.5 12.2
+
8.9 14.8
+
5.3 24.2
+
9.5 20.6
+
9.3 14.6
+ 15.3 27.2
+ 18.9 16.0
+ 10.5 13.8
+ 12.5 20.8
+ 11.5 19
~ 0+
7
~ 3 16.6
+ 12.5 A-25
1
'I'Al<1,1:.
I: NO.
f.OCAIlOV JAN TIIRU MARCII APRl I. 'I'IIIUI JIINI!
26 27 28 30 31 32 33 I'n Site Lite Pole (N) JAF Lite Pole (Nli') JAF N.
Fence (E) JAF N.
Fence (Mid E) JAF N.
Fence (hfid I)')
NMP N.
Fence (N)
NMP NMP/JAI: (Twin Po'1e) 17.1
+ 7.0 25.3
+ 8.2 22.7
+ 7.4 23.3
+ 5.2 28.1
+ 9.0 d6.7
+ 15.?
57.7
+
14 6
24.1
+ 7.0 18.2
+
6.3 31.0
+ 10.9 33.6
+
7.9 38.0
+
9.3 51.8
+ 12.?
54.0
+ 12.5 86.4
+ 16.9 30.6
+
9.3 A-26
TABf.fl 10 COb",f'INUOIJS RADIATION 610NITOIKNTAL AIRBORN CffARCOAL CARTRIDGE SAMPLES IODINE ACTIVITY DATE COLLECTED Dl OFF-SITE STATIONS pCi/m D2 G
1-8-75 1-16-75 1-22-75 1-29-75 2-5-75 2-12-75 2-19-75 2-26-75 3-6-75 3-12-75 3-19-75 3-26-75
.003
+.008
.000
+.009
.000
+.007
.001
+.008
.000
+.005
.002
+.006
.000
+.006
.000
+.010
.001
+.009
.000
+.020 Out of Service
.000
+.009
.000
+
~ 006
.000
+.006
.000
+.006
.002
+.009
.001
+.005
.001
+.007
.000
+.004
.000
+.008
.004
+.008
.000
+
~ 006 001 005
.003
+.009
.000
+.010
.000
+.010
.000
+.009
.010
+.009
.005
+.009
.001
+.007
.001
+.008
.000
+.008
~ 003
+..007
.004
+.008
.004
+.009
.000
+.010
.000
+.011
.000
+.012
.003
+.010 F 000
+.020
.005
+.010
.001
+.009
.000
+.009
.000
+.010
.005
+.020
.000
+.010
.000
+.010
.000
+.020
.000
+.020
.000
+.020
.000
+
.010
.000
+.020
.010
+.010
.010
+.010
.000
+.010
.000
+.020
.004
+.009
.000
+
~ 010
.000
+.010
.000
+.012 004
+..014
.000
+.020
.000
+.010
..000
+.010
.004 -.010
.000
+.010
.000
+.010
.000
+
~ 009
.007
+
~ 010
.008
+.010
.QCO
+.010
.000
+.020
1
TABLE 12 (continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL AIREORN CHARCOAL CARTRIDGE (Continued)
OFF-SITE STATIONS DATE COLLECTED C
Dl F
4-2-75 4-9-75 4-16-75 4-23-75 4-30-75 5-7-7S 5-14-75
.001
+.007
.00
+.01
.00
+
.O2
.003
+.008
.00
+.01
.000
+.009 019
+
021
.000
+.006
.000
+
.OG8
.00
+.02
.000
+.006
.002
+.005
.00
+.02
.00
+.01
.003
+
.009
.003
+.008 F 01
+.02
.003
+.008
.01
+.02
.Gl
+.02
.Co -'+.02
.000
+.009
.006
+.010
.00
+.03
.00
+.01
.Ol
+.02
.00
+.03
.00
+.01
.oo.
.oa
.Ol
+.02
.00
+.03
.00
+
~ 04
.03
+.02
.01
+.02
.01
.04
.00
+
.01
.001
+.010
.Ol
+
.04
.Ol
+.03
.01
+.02
.00
+.04
.00
+.02 5-21-7S
.03
+.03
.Ol
+
02
.01
+.02
.Ol +.02
.Ol
+.Ol
.00
+.03 5-28-75 6-4-75 0.0
+ 3.5 0.0
+ 2.5 0.0
+ 2.8 0.0
+ 2.3 0.0
+ 3.8 0.0
+ 3.1 0.0
+ 5.2 o.o
+ 4.1 0.0
+ 4.5 0.0
+ 3.0 0.0
+ 6.2 0.0
+ 5.0 6-11-75 6-18-75 6-25-75 7-2-75 0.00
+ 0.78 0.0
+ 1.1 0.00
+ 0.2S 0.00
+ 0.79 0.00
+ 0.78 0.0
+ 1.0 0.00
+ 0.23 0.00
+ 0.53 0.0
+ 1.0 0.0
+ 1.3 0.00
+ 0.32 O.CG 0.69 0.0
+ 1.6 0.0
+ 1.9 0.00+ 0.54 0.0
+ 1.0 o.o
+ a.2 0.00+ 0.67 0.00+ 0.38 0.00+ 0.68 O.G
+ 1.9 0.00
+ 0.59 0.00
+ 0.7G o.o
+ a.2
ff
TABLE 13 EbWIRONMENTAL MILK SAMPLE ANALYSIS I'~
Ci/liter (at time of sam lin )
COLLECTION DATE SAMPLE LOCATION 82 lk4 4-29-75 5-7-75 5-13-75 5-20-75 5-27-75 6-3-75 6-10-75 6-17-75 6-24-75 0.14
+ 0.10 0.12
+ 0.14 0.35
+ 0.27 0.1
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.2 0.1
+ 0.2 0.15
+ O.ll 0
1
+ 0 1
0.27
+ 0.21 0.0
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.2 0.27
+ 0.19 0.0
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.2 0.07
+ 0.09 0.0
+ O.l 0.0
+ 0.2 00
+ 0.2 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.2 0.19
+ 0.22 0.1
-~ 0.1 0.1
+ O.l 0.33
+ 0.25 0.0
+ 0.?
0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
+ 0.3 0.0
+ 0.1 0.0
~ 0.2 O.l
+ 0.2
0 s
TABLE 14 ENVIRONMENTAL i~lILK SAMPLE ANALYSIS GAP%A ISOTOPIC AND STRONTIUM-90 IN MONTHLY MILK COMPOSITES COLLECTION SITE Jl 3 COLLECTION DATE April May June April May June
. April May June April May June K-40 1210
+ 160 1455
+ 185 1313
+ 285 1410
+ 210 1890
+ 210 1730
+ 250 1590
+ 195 1785
+ 190 1670
+ 260 1480
+ 190 2000
+ 200 1540
+ 351 Ci/1 Cs-137 31+
8 23+
10 27+
12 29+
10 17+
10 36+
13 ll +
9 23+
8 13+
8 23+
10 19+
8 5
Sr-90 4.9
+ 2.0 7.4
+ 3.1 2.3
+ 1.0 3.2
+ 2.0 4.5
+ 2.2 6.9
+ 1.0 2.8
+ 1.0 4.5
+ 2.2 3.0
+ 2.0 8.1
+ 2.0 3.9
+ 2.7 5.8
+ 3.1 Others*
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10.
<10 The spectrum is computer scanned from ~ 20 to ~ 2000 KeV.
Data listed as "<" are at the 3a level, others are 2 o.
Specifically included in the gamma analysis are Ce-144, Cr-51, Ba-La-140, Cs-134, Cs-137, Zr=Nb-95, Co-59, Mn-54, Zn-65.
Naturally occurring gamma emitters such as K-40 and Ra daughters are frequently detected but not listed here.
4 1k I,
TABLE 15 MILKINGDAIRY CATTLE lUithin a 10 Mile Radins of NMP/.JA1'ite TOiUN NO. Ol'AIRY CATTLE Oswego Scriba New Haven Richland Volney Palermo
'exico 31 180 253 150 45 635 A-35
4
<r
TABLI! 1()
LAND SAWPI.ES Strontium-90 and Gamma Isotopic An:ilysisoF Sails Collection Site Collection Date Sr-90 ~i/
Ol Cs-137 Gamma Emitters*
If 1 II 2 I 5 06-17-7S 06-17-75 06-17-75 0.26
+.Ol 0.04
+
.01 0.06
+.01 0.9
+ 0.3 0.0+
1 0.0
+
1 0.0
+
I 0.0+
1 0.0" I
Gamma Isotopic Analysis of Pasture Grass Collection Site Collection Date Cs-137 Ci/
Dr wei ht Gamma
- Emit, ters'f 1
ft2 N3 ff4 06-24-75 06-24-75 06-'24-75 06-24-75 0.4
+.2 0.4
+.2 0.4
+
.1 0.3
+
.1 0.0+
1 0.0
+
1 Ce-144
- 0. 9+.4 Othe> s 0. 0+1 0.0
+
1 Gamma Isotopic Analysis of Chicken Eggs Collection Site Collection Date Cs-137 Gamma Emit ters'"'I 5
II6 II7 05-27-75 05-27-75 05-27-7S 0
~ 0+
1 0.0+
1 0.0+
1 0.0
+
1 0.0+
1 0.0+
1 (1)
Analytical uncertainties are at thc 2o'95~~ confidence level.
All uncertainties based oii the dominant analytical uncertainty which is usually the counting error.
- The spectrum is computer scanned from 20 to 2000 I'cV.
Specifically included in the gannna analyses are Ce-144, Cr-51, Ba-La-liIO, Cs-131, Cs-137, Zr-ihb-95, Co-SS, Co-60, i~in-54, Zn-65.
Naturall1 occurring gamma emitters such as K-40 and Ra daughters arc frequently detcctcd but not listed 'here.
1