ML20238D408: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:e September 3,1987 j
e                                                                                                 ;
j MEMORANDUM FOR:
September 3,1987                             j j
George Kalman, Project Manager Project Directorate - V Division of Reactor Projects - III j
MEMORANDUM FOR:       George Kalman, Project Manager Project Directorate - V Division of Reactor Projects - III                                 j IV, V and Special Projects FROM:                 Ashok Thadani, Assistant Director                                     I for Systems                                                       !
IV, V and Special Projects FROM:
Division of Engineering and Systems Technology
Ashok Thadani, Assistant Director I
for Systems Division of Engineering and Systems Technology


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
RANCHO SECO - ELECTRICAL SEPARATION POSITIONS (REGULATORY           ) l GUIDE 1.75 - PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS)
RANCHO SECO - ELECTRICAL SEPARATION POSITIONS (REGULATORY
During its review of proposed License Amendment 147 for Rancho Seco, the staff             {
)
requested SMUD (the licensee) to describe how the design and installation of               j the new TDI diesel generators and associated electrical equipment met the.
GUIDE 1.75 - PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS) l During its review of proposed License Amendment 147 for Rancho Seco, the staff
{
requested SMUD (the licensee) to describe how the design and installation of j
the new TDI diesel generators and associated electrical equipment met the.
positions in RG 1.75.
positions in RG 1.75.
On June 2 and 3, 1987, the staff met with representatives of the licensee to discuss RG 1.75 compliance. At these meetings, the licensee identified speci-fic areas at Rancho Seco where the positions of RG 1.75 regarding physical separation were not met. For these areas, the license proposed to demonstrate by analysis and/or test that the installed cable / wire configurations are accep-table. The licensee's approach for demonstrating acceptability was discussed               ,
On June 2 and 3, 1987, the staff met with representatives of the licensee to discuss RG 1.75 compliance.
in detail at these meetings.                                                             !
At these meetings, the licensee identified speci-fic areas at Rancho Seco where the positions of RG 1.75 regarding physical separation were not met.
At the conclusion of the meetings, the staff had agreed in principle with the licensee's approach. It was recommended that the licensee document their approach and submit it to the NRC for review and evaluation.       On June 26, 1987,     ;
For these areas, the license proposed to demonstrate by analysis and/or test that the installed cable / wire configurations are accep-table.
the licensee formally submitted Engineering Report ERPT-E0220, which details               l the licensee's approach for demonstrating compliance with RG 1.75, for NRC review. The report was submitted under cover of SMUD letter, serial GCA87-212 dated June 26, 1987.                                                                       ]
The licensee's approach for demonstrating acceptability was discussed in detail at these meetings.
Enclosed is the staff evaluation of Engineering Report ERPT-E0220.       The staff finds the licensee's approach to be acceptable, subject to an audit of the ,
At the conclusion of the meetings, the staff had agreed in principle with the licensee's approach.
actual installations by NRC staff.
It was recommended that the licensee document their approach and submit it to the NRC for review and evaluation.
l l5l Ashok Thadani, Assistant Oirector               ;
On June 26, 1987, the licensee formally submitted Engineering Report ERPT-E0220, which details l
for Systems                                   l Division of Engineering and System Technology Distribution:
the licensee's approach for demonstrating compliance with RG 1.75, for NRC review.
The report was submitted under cover of SMUD letter, serial GCA87-212 dated June 26, 1987.
]
Enclosed is the staff evaluation of Engineering Report ERPT-E0220.
The staff finds the licensee's approach to be acceptable, subject to an audit of the actual installations by NRC staff.
l l5l Ashok Thadani, Assistant Oirector for Systems l
Division of Engineering and System Technology Distribution:
Docket File.
Docket File.
        'NRC'PDh'"
'NRC'PDh'"
PD4 Reacing File ETomlinsoa J.Calvo                                                                                     ,
PD4 Reacing File ETomlinsoa J.Calvo P.Noonan A. Thadani G. Knighton (R dy M
P.Noonan A. Thadani (R dy G. Knighton PD4               PD4   M          SAD l         ETo inson         JACalvo         AThad 11 8&4/87           8/7c/87           $/ 3 /87 8709110159 870903 PDR   ADDCK 05000312 1     P                   PDR l                                                                     -
PD4 PD4 SAD l
                                                                                                    ;}}
ETo inson JACalvo AThad 11 8&4/87 8/7c/87
$/ 3 /87 8709110159 870903 PDR ADDCK 05000312 1
P PDR l
;}}

Latest revision as of 05:41, 2 December 2024

Forwards Staff Evaluation of Engineering Rept ERPT-E0220 Re Reactor Regulation of Util Approach to Compliance W/Reg Guide 1.75 for New Diesel Generator Installation at Plant. Licensee Approach Acceptable
ML20238D408
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 09/03/1987
From: Thadani A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kalman G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20238D411 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.075, RTR-REGGD-1.075 NUDOCS 8709110159
Download: ML20238D408 (1)


Text

e September 3,1987 j

j MEMORANDUM FOR:

George Kalman, Project Manager Project Directorate - V Division of Reactor Projects - III j

IV, V and Special Projects FROM:

Ashok Thadani, Assistant Director I

for Systems Division of Engineering and Systems Technology

SUBJECT:

RANCHO SECO - ELECTRICAL SEPARATION POSITIONS (REGULATORY

)

GUIDE 1.75 - PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS) l During its review of proposed License Amendment 147 for Rancho Seco, the staff

{

requested SMUD (the licensee) to describe how the design and installation of j

the new TDI diesel generators and associated electrical equipment met the.

positions in RG 1.75.

On June 2 and 3, 1987, the staff met with representatives of the licensee to discuss RG 1.75 compliance.

At these meetings, the licensee identified speci-fic areas at Rancho Seco where the positions of RG 1.75 regarding physical separation were not met.

For these areas, the license proposed to demonstrate by analysis and/or test that the installed cable / wire configurations are accep-table.

The licensee's approach for demonstrating acceptability was discussed in detail at these meetings.

At the conclusion of the meetings, the staff had agreed in principle with the licensee's approach.

It was recommended that the licensee document their approach and submit it to the NRC for review and evaluation.

On June 26, 1987, the licensee formally submitted Engineering Report ERPT-E0220, which details l

the licensee's approach for demonstrating compliance with RG 1.75, for NRC review.

The report was submitted under cover of SMUD letter, serial GCA87-212 dated June 26, 1987.

]

Enclosed is the staff evaluation of Engineering Report ERPT-E0220.

The staff finds the licensee's approach to be acceptable, subject to an audit of the actual installations by NRC staff.

l l5l Ashok Thadani, Assistant Oirector for Systems l

Division of Engineering and System Technology Distribution:

Docket File.

'NRC'PDh'"

PD4 Reacing File ETomlinsoa J.Calvo P.Noonan A. Thadani G. Knighton (R dy M

PD4 PD4 SAD l

ETo inson JACalvo AThad 11 8&4/87 8/7c/87

$/ 3 /87 8709110159 870903 PDR ADDCK 05000312 1

P PDR l