ML21354A122: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message
                            <kwautomail@phone2action.com>
<kwautomail@phone2action.com>
Sent:                       Sunday, December 19, 2021 11:45 AM To:                         PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2021 11:45 AM To: PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 24: Line 24:


==Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,==
==Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,==
Thank you for accepting my comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the renewal of the Point Beach nuclear plant. The DEIS failed to properly consider some important considerations.


Thank you for accepting my comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the renewal of the Point Beach nuclear plant. The DEIS failed to properly consider some important considerations.
First, the DEIS did not properly consider the impacts of a potential accident. Contamination from radioactivity of Lake Michigan?s freshwater could be devastating for those who get their drinking water from Lake Michigan and those who recreate on or near the lake. This includes those who use Point Beach State Park to swim, fish, boat, and more. The impacts could be large and the DEIS didn?t properly study the environmental, health, and economic impacts of a potential spill.
First, the DEIS did not properly consider the impacts of a potential accident. Contamination from radioactivity of Lake Michigan?s freshwater could be devastating for those who get their drinking water from Lake Michigan and those who recreate on or near the lake. This includes those who use Point Beach State Park to swim, fish, boat, and more. The impacts could be large and the DEIS didn?t properly study the environmental, health, and economic impacts of a potential spill.
Climate change is already wreaking havoc on our communities and we know that we need to work hard to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but that it?s too late to stop all damage. However, the DEIS uses outdated data when looking at the impacts of climate change, including updated data about lakeshore levels.
Climate change is already wreaking havoc on our communities and we know that we need to work hard to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but that it?s too late to stop all damage. However, the DEIS uses outdated data when looking at the impacts of climate change, including updated data about lakeshore levels.
Finally, the DEIS didn?t fully consider all of the impacts of extending the Point Beach license, including the short-term impacts. The data related to thermal pollution and the inability for the screens to properly stop fish and smaller life like phytoplankton from being killed. Over time, heating Lake Michigan to unnatural levels and killing of fish and smaller life could lead to ecological changes that need to be more properly considered and reviewed in the DEIS.
Finally, the DEIS didn?t fully consider all of the impacts of extending the Point Beach license, including the short-term impacts. The data related to thermal pollution and the inability for the screens to properly stop fish and smaller life like phytoplankton from being killed. Over time, heating Lake Michigan to unnatural levels and killing of fish and smaller life could lead to ecological changes that need to be more properly considered and reviewed in the DEIS.
The EIS needs to be updated to include these concerns and up-to-date information before any permitting process moves forward.
The EIS needs to be updated to include these concerns and up-to-date information before any permitting process moves forward.
Sincerely, Anna Hollis 824 River Rd Pittsboro, NC 27312 annasjunk3@gmail.com (910) 523-0834 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at core.help@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5500.


Federal Register Notice:       86FR62220 Comment Number:               112 Mail Envelope Properties   (F-0OXN5XRLKpMbFJmG9VKw)
Sincerely,
 
Anna Hollis 824 River Rd Pittsboro, NC 27312 annasjunk3@gmail.com (910) 523-0834
 
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at core.help@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5500.
 
Federal Register Notice: 86FR62220 Comment Number: 112
 
Mail Envelope Properties (F-0OXN5XRLKpMbFJmG9VKw)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS Sent Date:           12/19/2021 11:45:08 AM Received Date:       12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM From:                 Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message Created By:           kwautomail@phone2action.com Recipients:
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS Sent Date: 12/19/2021 11:45:08 AM Received Date: 12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM From: Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message
 
Created By: kwautomail@phone2action.com
 
Recipients:
"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov>
"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:         ismtpd0148p1mdw1.sendgrid.net Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       2018                   12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM Options Priority:                     Normal Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:}}
Tracking Status: None
 
Post Office: ismtpd0148p1mdw1.sendgrid.net
 
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2018 12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM
 
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}}

Latest revision as of 03:11, 19 November 2024

Comment (112) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS
ML21354A122
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/19/2021
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
NRC/NMSS
References
86FR62220
Download: ML21354A122 (2)


Text

From: Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message

<kwautomail@phone2action.com>

Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2021 11:45 AM To: PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS

Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Thank you for accepting my comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the renewal of the Point Beach nuclear plant. The DEIS failed to properly consider some important considerations.

First, the DEIS did not properly consider the impacts of a potential accident. Contamination from radioactivity of Lake Michigan?s freshwater could be devastating for those who get their drinking water from Lake Michigan and those who recreate on or near the lake. This includes those who use Point Beach State Park to swim, fish, boat, and more. The impacts could be large and the DEIS didn?t properly study the environmental, health, and economic impacts of a potential spill.

Climate change is already wreaking havoc on our communities and we know that we need to work hard to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but that it?s too late to stop all damage. However, the DEIS uses outdated data when looking at the impacts of climate change, including updated data about lakeshore levels.

Finally, the DEIS didn?t fully consider all of the impacts of extending the Point Beach license, including the short-term impacts. The data related to thermal pollution and the inability for the screens to properly stop fish and smaller life like phytoplankton from being killed. Over time, heating Lake Michigan to unnatural levels and killing of fish and smaller life could lead to ecological changes that need to be more properly considered and reviewed in the DEIS.

The EIS needs to be updated to include these concerns and up-to-date information before any permitting process moves forward.

Sincerely,

Anna Hollis 824 River Rd Pittsboro, NC 27312 annasjunk3@gmail.com (910) 523-0834

This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at core.help@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5500.

Federal Register Notice: 86FR62220 Comment Number: 112

Mail Envelope Properties (F-0OXN5XRLKpMbFJmG9VKw)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS Sent Date: 12/19/2021 11:45:08 AM Received Date: 12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM From: Anna Hollis (annasjunk3@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message

Created By: kwautomail@phone2action.com

Recipients:

"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office: ismtpd0148p1mdw1.sendgrid.net

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2018 12/19/2021 11:45:21 AM

Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: