ML22003A086: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Tamara Mccready (stevenmccready@roadrunner.com) Sent You a Personal Message <kwautomail@phone2action.com> | ||
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 12:17 PM To: PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource | |||
==Subject:== | |||
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS | |||
==Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,== | |||
Thank you for accepting my comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the renewal of the Point Beach nuclear plant. The DEIS failed to properly consider some important considerations. | |||
First, the DEIS did not properly consider the impacts of a potential accident. Contamination from radioactivity of Lake Michigan?s freshwater could be devastating for those who get their drinking water from Lake Michigan and those who recreate on or near the lake. This includes those who use Point Beach State Park to swim, fish, boat, and more. The impacts could be large and the DEIS didn?t properly study the environmental, health, and economic impacts of a potential spill. | |||
Climate change is already wreaking havoc on our communities and we know that we need to work hard to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but that it?s too late to stop all damage. However, the DEIS uses outdated data when looking at the impacts of climate change, including updated data about lakeshore levels. | |||
Finally, the DEIS didn?t fully consider all of the impacts of extending the Point Beach license, including the short-term impacts. The data related to thermal pollution and the inability for the screens to properly stop fish and smaller life like phytoplankton from being killed. Over time, heating Lake Michigan to unnatural levels and killing of fish and smaller life could lead to ecological changes that need to be more properly considered and reviewed in the DEIS. | |||
The EIS needs to be updated to include these concerns and up-to-date information before any permitting process moves forward. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Tamara Mccready 6278 Cynthia St Simi Valley, CA 93063 stevenmccready@roadrunner.com (805) 791-9064 | |||
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at core.help@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5500. | |||
Federal Register Notice: 86FR62220 Comment Number: 140 | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (nZrJ6TqfQlO5FU0o54Sh4g) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS Sent Date: 12/23/2021 12:16:31 PM Received Date: 12/23/2021 12:16:36 PM From: Tamara Mccready (stevenmccready@roadrunner.com) Sent You a Personal Message | |||
Created By: kwautomail@phone2action.com | |||
Recipients: | |||
"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None | |||
Post Office: ismtpd0182p1iad2.sendgrid.net | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2036 12/23/2021 12:16:36 PM | |||
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:34, 19 November 2024
| ML22003A086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/2021 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| NRC/NMSS | |
| References | |
| 86FR62220 | |
| Download: ML22003A086 (2) | |
Text
From: Tamara Mccready (stevenmccready@roadrunner.com) Sent You a Personal Message <kwautomail@phone2action.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 12:17 PM To: PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Thank you for accepting my comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the renewal of the Point Beach nuclear plant. The DEIS failed to properly consider some important considerations.
First, the DEIS did not properly consider the impacts of a potential accident. Contamination from radioactivity of Lake Michigan?s freshwater could be devastating for those who get their drinking water from Lake Michigan and those who recreate on or near the lake. This includes those who use Point Beach State Park to swim, fish, boat, and more. The impacts could be large and the DEIS didn?t properly study the environmental, health, and economic impacts of a potential spill.
Climate change is already wreaking havoc on our communities and we know that we need to work hard to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but that it?s too late to stop all damage. However, the DEIS uses outdated data when looking at the impacts of climate change, including updated data about lakeshore levels.
Finally, the DEIS didn?t fully consider all of the impacts of extending the Point Beach license, including the short-term impacts. The data related to thermal pollution and the inability for the screens to properly stop fish and smaller life like phytoplankton from being killed. Over time, heating Lake Michigan to unnatural levels and killing of fish and smaller life could lead to ecological changes that need to be more properly considered and reviewed in the DEIS.
The EIS needs to be updated to include these concerns and up-to-date information before any permitting process moves forward.
Sincerely,
Tamara Mccready 6278 Cynthia St Simi Valley, CA 93063 stevenmccready@roadrunner.com (805) 791-9064
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at core.help@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5500.
Federal Register Notice: 86FR62220 Comment Number: 140
Mail Envelope Properties (nZrJ6TqfQlO5FU0o54Sh4g)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Concerns about Point Beach EIS Sent Date: 12/23/2021 12:16:31 PM Received Date: 12/23/2021 12:16:36 PM From: Tamara Mccready (stevenmccready@roadrunner.com) Sent You a Personal Message
Created By: kwautomail@phone2action.com
Recipients:
"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
Post Office: ismtpd0182p1iad2.sendgrid.net
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2036 12/23/2021 12:16:36 PM
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: