ML23191A016: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:NRC Public Meeting on Risk-Informed Process for Evaluations Andrew Mauer Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs Victoria Anderson Technical Advisor, Engineering and Risk July 11, 2023 | ||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute | |||
Overview RIPE process was approved by the NRC in January 2021 RIPE process was used successfully in in January 2022 The risk thresholds were initially set very low Order of magnitude below NRCs definition of very low safety significance issues within the Reactor Oversight Process The time is right to review the risk screening metrics, especially given that NRC will be reviewing any licensing action under RIPE NEIs {{letter dated|date=April 19, 2023|text=April 19, 2023 letter}} recommended adjustments to the RIPE risk thresholds | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 2 | |||
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should be Adjusted Current thresholds in Section 2 of TSG-DORL-2021-01 are unnecessarily low The issue contributes less than 1E-7/year to core damage frequency (CDF) | |||
The issue contributes less than 1E-8/year to large early release frequency (LERF) | |||
NEI recommends the following adjustments: | |||
The issue contributes less than 5E-7/year to core damage frequency (CDF) | |||
The issue contributes less than 5E-8/year to large early release frequency (LERF) | |||
These adjusted risk thresholds are one half of the very small change acceptance guidelines given in RG 1.174 (1E-7/year change in CDF, 1E-8/year change in LERF) | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 3 | |||
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should be Adjusted This is the region in which a detailed Delta CDF Thresholds (per reactor year) quantitative assessment of the base 1.20E-06 values of CDF and LERF is not 1.00E-06 necessary for RG 1.174 applications, 1.00E-06 indicating that the NRC finds such changes to be acceptably low in risk 8.00E-07 Additional Margin provided the other principles are met 6.00E-07 5.00E-07 4.00E-07 2.00E-07 1.00E-07 0.00E+00 Current RIPE Proposed New Ripe RG 1.174 Very Small | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 4 | |||
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should not be Pass/Fail A bright line approach to risk thresholds is inconsistent with NRCs risk-informed decision making philosophy Section 2.5 of RG 1.174, states, In the context of integrated decision making, the acceptance guidelines should not be interpreted as being overly prescriptive. They are intended to give a numerical indication of what is considered acceptable. The lines between the regions are intentionally blurry to indicate that the NRC has discretion when making licensing decisions involving the risk acceptance guidelines | |||
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 5}} |
Latest revision as of 10:23, 17 July 2023
ML23191A016 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
Issue date: | 07/11/2023 |
From: | Anderson V, Mauer A Nuclear Energy Institute |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
Download: ML23191A016 (1) | |
Text
NRC Public Meeting on Risk-Informed Process for Evaluations Andrew Mauer Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs Victoria Anderson Technical Advisor, Engineering and Risk July 11, 2023
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute
Overview RIPE process was approved by the NRC in January 2021 RIPE process was used successfully in in January 2022 The risk thresholds were initially set very low Order of magnitude below NRCs definition of very low safety significance issues within the Reactor Oversight Process The time is right to review the risk screening metrics, especially given that NRC will be reviewing any licensing action under RIPE NEIs April 19, 2023 letter recommended adjustments to the RIPE risk thresholds
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 2
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should be Adjusted Current thresholds in Section 2 of TSG-DORL-2021-01 are unnecessarily low The issue contributes less than 1E-7/year to core damage frequency (CDF)
The issue contributes less than 1E-8/year to large early release frequency (LERF)
NEI recommends the following adjustments:
The issue contributes less than 5E-7/year to core damage frequency (CDF)
The issue contributes less than 5E-8/year to large early release frequency (LERF)
These adjusted risk thresholds are one half of the very small change acceptance guidelines given in RG 1.174 (1E-7/year change in CDF, 1E-8/year change in LERF)
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 3
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should be Adjusted This is the region in which a detailed Delta CDF Thresholds (per reactor year) quantitative assessment of the base 1.20E-06 values of CDF and LERF is not 1.00E-06 necessary for RG 1.174 applications, 1.00E-06 indicating that the NRC finds such changes to be acceptably low in risk 8.00E-07 Additional Margin provided the other principles are met 6.00E-07 5.00E-07 4.00E-07 2.00E-07 1.00E-07 0.00E+00 Current RIPE Proposed New Ripe RG 1.174 Very Small
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 4
RIPE Risk Thresholds Should not be Pass/Fail A bright line approach to risk thresholds is inconsistent with NRCs risk-informed decision making philosophy Section 2.5 of RG 1.174, states, In the context of integrated decision making, the acceptance guidelines should not be interpreted as being overly prescriptive. They are intended to give a numerical indication of what is considered acceptable. The lines between the regions are intentionally blurry to indicate that the NRC has discretion when making licensing decisions involving the risk acceptance guidelines
©2023 Nuclear Energy Institute 5