05000482/FIN-2016004-01: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71153
| Inspection procedure = IP 71153
| Inspector = D Dodson, F Thomas, G Pick, J O,'Donnell M, Langelier M, Phalen N, Taylor R, Kopriv
| Inspector = D Dodson, F Thomas, G Pick, J O, 'Donnellm Langelier, M Phalen, N Taylor, R Kopriva
| CCA = P.5
| CCA = P.5
| INPO aspect = CL.1
| INPO aspect = CL.1
| description =  Green. The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of Technical Specification 5.4.1.a, for the licensees failure to adequately develop and adjust preventive maintenance activities in accordance with Procedure AP 16B-003, Planning and Scheduling Preventive Maintenance, Revision 5. Specifically, the licensee did not create a preventive maintenance task for emergency diesel generator excitation system diodes, which resulted in degradation of the excitation system diodes in emergency diesel generator B. The licensee restored compliance by establishing preventive maintenance tasks 49286, 49287, 49288, and 49289, which refurbish the power rectifier assemblies and replace the diodes on a 12-year replacement frequency. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Condition Report 88665.  The failure to adequately develop and adjust emergency diesel generator excitation system diode preventive maintenance activities in accordance with Procedure AP 16B-003, Planning and Scheduling Preventive Maintenance, was a performance deficiency. This finding is more than minor because it is associated with the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The inspectors evaluated the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power, issued June 19, 2012. In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, Mitigating Systems Screening Questions, this finding was not a deficiency affecting the design or qualification of a mitigating structure, system, or component that maintained its operability or functionality; the finding did not represent a loss of system and/or function; the finding did not represent an actual loss of function of at least a single train for greater than its Technical Specification allowed outage time; and the finding did not represent an actual loss of function of one or more non-Technical Specification trains of equipment designated as high safety-significant. Therefore, the finding was of very low safety significance (Green). This finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of problem identification and resolution, operating experience, because the organization did not systematically and effectively evaluate relevant internal and external operating experience in a timely manner. This issue is indicative of current performance because the station did not  take any formal corrective actions to address the stations failure to adequately consider operating experience [P.5]  
| description =  Green. The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of Technical Specification 5.4.1.a, for the licensees failure to adequately develop and adjust preventive maintenance activities in accordance with Procedure AP 16B-003, Planning and Scheduling Preventive Maintenance, Revision 5. Specifically, the licensee did not create a preventive maintenance task for emergency diesel generator excitation system diodes, which resulted in degradation of the excitation system diodes in emergency diesel generator B. The licensee restored compliance by establishing preventive maintenance tasks 49286, 49287, 49288, and 49289, which refurbish the power rectifier assemblies and replace the diodes on a 12-year replacement frequency. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Condition Report 88665.  The failure to adequately develop and adjust emergency diesel generator excitation system diode preventive maintenance activities in accordance with Procedure AP 16B-003, Planning and Scheduling Preventive Maintenance, was a performance deficiency. This finding is more than minor because it is associated with the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The inspectors evaluated the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power, issued June 19, 2012. In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, Mitigating Systems Screening Questions, this finding was not a deficiency affecting the design or qualification of a mitigating structure, system, or component that maintained its operability or functionality; the finding did not represent a loss of system and/or function; the finding did not represent an actual loss of function of at least a single train for greater than its Technical Specification allowed outage time; and the finding did not represent an actual loss of function of one or more non-Technical Specification trains of equipment designated as high safety-significant. Therefore, the finding was of very low safety significance (Green). This finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of problem identification and resolution, operating experience, because the organization did not systematically and effectively evaluate relevant internal and external operating experience in a timely manner. This issue is indicative of current performance because the station did not  take any formal corrective actions to address the stations failure to adequately consider operating experience [P.5]  
}}
}}

Revision as of 19:55, 20 February 2018

01
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Report IR 05000482/2016004 Section 4OA3
Date counted Dec 31, 2016 (2016Q4)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Mitigating Systems
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71153
Inspectors (proximate) D Dodson
F Thomas
G Pick
J O
'Donnellm Langelier
M Phalen
N Taylor
R Kopriva
Violation of: Technical Specification - Procedures
CCA P.5, Operating Experience
INPO aspect CL.1
'