05000275/FIN-2009003-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| significance = Severity level IV | | significance = Severity level IV | ||
| cornerstone = Mitigating Systems | | cornerstone = Mitigating Systems | ||
| violation of = | | violation of = | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| CCA = P.2 | | CCA = P.2 | ||
| INPO aspect = PI.2 | | INPO aspect = PI.2 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a noncited violation of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1) after Pacific Gas and Electric failed to submit a required licensee event report within 60 days after discovery of a condition prohibited by technical specifications. The licensee failed to correctly evaluate the March 18, 2009, failure of the Unit 2 control rod demand position indicators for reportability. The inspectors concluded that the failure of control rod position indicators was a condition prohibited by Technical Specification 3.17, Rod Position Indication. This finding is greater than minor because the NRC relies on licensees to identify and report conditions or events meeting the criteria specified in the regulations in order to perform its regulatory function. This finding affected the mitigating systems cornerstone. Because this issue affected the NRC\'s ability to perform its regulatory function, it was evaluated with the traditional enforcement process. Consistent with the guidance in Section IV.A.3 and Supplement I, Paragraph D.4, of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this finding was determined to be a Severity Level IV, noncited violation. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Notification 50242153. This finding has a crosscutting aspect in the area of problem identification and resolution associated with the corrective action program component because the licensee failed to thoroughly evaluate the failure of the Unit 2 control rod demand position indicators for reportability [P.1(c)](Section 40A2 | | description = The inspectors identified a noncited violation of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1) after Pacific Gas and Electric failed to submit a required licensee event report within 60 days after discovery of a condition prohibited by technical specifications. The licensee failed to correctly evaluate the March 18, 2009, failure of the Unit 2 control rod demand position indicators for reportability. The inspectors concluded that the failure of control rod position indicators was a condition prohibited by Technical Specification 3.17, Rod Position Indication. This finding is greater than minor because the NRC relies on licensees to identify and report conditions or events meeting the criteria specified in the regulations in order to perform its regulatory function. This finding affected the mitigating systems cornerstone. Because this issue affected the NRC\\\'s ability to perform its regulatory function, it was evaluated with the traditional enforcement process. Consistent with the guidance in Section IV.A.3 and Supplement I, Paragraph D.4, of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this finding was determined to be a Severity Level IV, noncited violation. The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as Notification 50242153. This finding has a crosscutting aspect in the area of problem identification and resolution associated with the corrective action program component because the licensee failed to thoroughly evaluate the failure of the Unit 2 control rod demand position indicators for reportability [P.1(c)](Section 40A2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:48, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000275/2009003 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2009 (2009Q2) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | G Guerra M Brown M Peck V Gaddy |
| CCA | P.2, Evaluation |
| INPO aspect | PI.2 |
| ' | |