ML19308B225: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_. _ _ _ _ __ | {{#Wiki_filter:_. _ _ _ _ __ | ||
W l.s. - | W l.s. - | ||
&L . | &L . | ||
. Cw di IWi1DE3 ,, l t | . Cw di IWi1DE3 ,, l t | ||
Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
l (OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION ) 50-270 | l (OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION ) 50-270 | ||
) S0-287 - | ) S0-287 - | ||
UNITS 1, 2 and 3) ) . 'l 0f | UNITS 1, 2 and 3) ) . 'l 0f | ||
\gg)1 | \gg)1 | ||
: c. SUPPLEMENT TO' ' 6, ., ' | : c. SUPPLEMENT TO' ' 6, ., ' | ||
INTERVENORS' EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION OF | INTERVENORS' EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION OF | ||
((@..([.!)h | |||
.cd, | .cd, | ||
' ( 1 ' . '.- - | ' ( 1 ' . '.- - | ||
Line 71: | Line 69: | ||
l .. ., ' | l .. ., ' | ||
l , , | l , , | ||
ONITED STATES OF AMERICA . | ONITED STATES OF AMERICA . | ||
t, | t, | ||
Line 77: | Line 74: | ||
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION | ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION | ||
/- | /- | ||
I I | I I | ||
IN THE MATTER OF . | IN THE MATTER OF . | ||
Line 88: | Line 84: | ||
UNITS.1, 2 and 3 ) i | UNITS.1, 2 and 3 ) i | ||
: ., SUPPLEMENT TO . | : ., SUPPLEMENT TO . | ||
INTERVENORS' EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION . | |||
INTERVENORS' | |||
EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION . | |||
OF . . | OF . . | ||
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD - | ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD - | ||
AND " | AND " | ||
. REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT , | . REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT , | ||
The Intervenors, Cities of Statesville, High Point, Lexington, Monroe, Shelby, and Albemarle and Towns of . i i | The Intervenors, Cities of Statesville, High Point, Lexington, Monroe, Shelby, and Albemarle and Towns of . i i | ||
Line 102: | Line 93: | ||
\ | \ | ||
Decision of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and Request for Oral Argument " filed November 21, 1967, by the addition there , . | Decision of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and Request for Oral Argument " filed November 21, 1967, by the addition there , . | ||
to of the following-paragraphs for insortion therein at the l places indicated, and request oral argument thereon, as. , , | to of the following-paragraphs for insortion therein at the l places indicated, and request oral argument thereon, as. , , | ||
l, . | l, . | ||
Line 119: | Line 109: | ||
~ | ~ | ||
l ,. . | l ,. . | ||
I t . | I t . | ||
. _ ____---.__z____ _..__i_,,_ ;_ _ , , _ _ _ , | . _ ____---.__z____ _..__i_,,_ ;_ _ , , _ _ _ , | ||
.s | .s | ||
Line 130: | Line 118: | ||
I SUPPLEMENT A TO GROUNDS FOE INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 1 (To be inserted on p. 8 of Intervenors ' Exceptions afte. ; i the words "The grounds for this exception...are:" | I SUPPLEMENT A TO GROUNDS FOE INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 1 (To be inserted on p. 8 of Intervenors ' Exceptions afte. ; i the words "The grounds for this exception...are:" | ||
!l | !l | ||
. l The Board's attempt to treat the "proj ect" rather / l than the " reactors" as the " utilization facility" to be ;i licensed is unauthorized by law and contrary to law. The . ill utilization facility involved is the reactor, and not , | |||
. l The Board's attempt to treat the "proj ect" rather / l than the " reactors" as the " utilization facility" to be ;i | |||
licensed is unauthorized by law and contrary to law. The . ill utilization facility involved is the reactor, and not , | |||
1 | 1 | ||
. the entire Oconee Nuclear Station, or any part thereof, . | . the entire Oconee Nuclear Station, or any part thereof, . | ||
Line 162: | Line 147: | ||
I | I | ||
. ., ~. s s -- . | . ., ~. s s -- . | ||
SUPPLEMENT B TO GROUNDS FOR INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 6 ! | SUPPLEMENT B TO GROUNDS FOR INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 6 ! | ||
(For insertion following page 15 of Intervenors' Exceptions.) . | (For insertion following page 15 of Intervenors' Exceptions.) . | ||
Line 176: | Line 160: | ||
energy for coinmercial use except such energy as may be | energy for coinmercial use except such energy as may be | ||
, produced by the Commission incident to the operation of - | , produced by the Commission incident to the operation of - | ||
. !research and development facilities of the , Commission, or i | . !research and development facilities of the , Commission, or i | ||
of production facilities o'f the Commission." Similarl.y, . | of production facilities o'f the Commission." Similarl.y, . | ||
Line 183: | Line 166: | ||
the "use" of any utilization facility only under Section 103, *. | the "use" of any utilization facility only under Section 103, *. | ||
and has not expressly nor by implication authorized the i , | and has not expressly nor by implication authorized the i , | ||
licensing of the "use" of any utilization facility under i l | licensing of the "use" of any utilization facility under i l Section 104. So, Co,ngress, under the doctrine of exeressio l unius exclusio alterius, by expressly requiring the licensing of " commercial" utilization facilities under Section , 103 of 1 . . | ||
Section 104. So, Co,ngress, under the doctrine of exeressio l unius exclusio alterius, by expressly requiring the licensing of " commercial" utilization facilities under Section , 103 of 1 . . | |||
I . - , | I . - , | ||
. l | . l | ||
Line 199: | Line 180: | ||
t | t | ||
.. i under Section 104.of the Act. . l. | .. i under Section 104.of the Act. . l. | ||
i | i I | ||
E t | |||
t | |||
.e | .e | ||
, .E 9 | , .E 9 | ||
Line 222: | Line 201: | ||
, l ;' , * . | , l ;' , * . | ||
' 5 I , | ' 5 I , | ||
. g | . g 1 | ||
a . | |||
i . .. , | i . .. , | ||
4 *4 | 4 *4 | ||
Line 244: | Line 222: | ||
+ | + | ||
as herein supplemented, , | as herein supplemented, , | ||
h'!!EREFORE the Intervonors pray thaMhc Commission sus- | h'!!EREFORE the Intervonors pray thaMhc Commission sus- | ||
* tain each and all of the abovo listed exceptions; and, as to each . | |||
tain each and all of the abovo listed exceptions; and, as to each . | |||
, , j and all, overrule the Board; and that the Commission dismiss the application of Duke Power Company as unjurisdictionally submitted . - | , , j and all, overrule the Board; and that the Commission dismiss the application of Duke Power Company as unjurisdictionally submitted . - | ||
under Section 104(b) of the Act; and direct the resubmission of an '' ' | under Section 104(b) of the Act; and direct the resubmission of an '' ' | ||
Line 254: | Line 231: | ||
* these exceptions'an'd this appeal from the Board to the Commiss h a. - | * these exceptions'an'd this appeal from the Board to the Commiss h a. - | ||
.. . r Respectfully Submittod, 1 City of Shelby . | .. . r Respectfully Submittod, 1 City of Shelby . | ||
l City of Statesville , | l City of Statesville , | ||
City of High Point - | City of High Point - | ||
Line 267: | Line 243: | ||
. North Carolina ..' . | . North Carolina ..' . | ||
- -' BY: . | - -' BY: . | ||
#/t .h _ . . | #/t .h _ . . | ||
I | I | ||
Line 290: | Line 265: | ||
- .Their Attornoys . | - .Their Attornoys . | ||
. . e , | . . e , | ||
i | i | ||
( , . . | ( , . . |
Latest revision as of 08:21, 16 March 2020
ML19308B225 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oconee |
Issue date: | 11/22/1967 |
From: | Harris J, Reeder S, Tally J PIEDMONT CITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA |
To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
References | |
NUDOCS 7912160139 | |
Download: ML19308B225 (6) | |
Text
_. _ _ _ _ __
W l.s. -
&L .
. Cw di IWi1DE3 ,, l t
P80D. & UTIL, EAC.704,f,2,70,gf'/
/ . .
s'
. ./ .
. M.:a -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 1
'. *))
IN Tile MAe A6R OF -
s[y.,-[ #y , l DUKE POWER COMPANY ) -
) DOCKET *NOS. 50-269*
l (OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION ) 50-270
) S0-287 -
UNITS 1, 2 and 3) ) . 'l 0f
\gg)1
- c. SUPPLEMENT TO' ' 6, ., '
INTERVENORS' EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION OF
((@..([.!)h
.cd,
' ( 1 ' . '.- -
a-
[ .
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD AND N[N l*
REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT i' 'N .-
Cities of Statesville,'lligh Point, Lexington, '
Monroe, Shelby, and Albemarle, and tho & S Towns'of Cornelius, Drexel, Granite Falls, D00IEIID Newton, and Lincolnton, all in North Carolina, gj, 151EC A Intervenors b
NOV221967 >
h Off!Cs af fte Sa Ct;;ry 'b
- 13:ls PrGC:tCags.
unca-Jack R. IIstris ega .
Suite-207 '
i Stimpson-Wagner Building ,
Statesville, North Carolina *' .
~
J. O. Tally, Jr. .
P. O. Drawer 1660
- ~
Fayetteville, North Carolina ,
Spencer W. Reeder
_,- Spencer Building .
St. Michaels,' Maryland
. .- Attorneys for Intervenors
~
November 22, 1967 -
ink $ I6013h:
- f. .
m -
l .. ., '
l , ,
ONITED STATES OF AMERICA .
t,
/
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
/-
I I
IN THE MATTER OF .
,) .
)
DUKE POWER COMPAN'l ) Docket Nos. 50-269 :
) 50-270 :
50-287 (OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION ) '
)
UNITS.1, 2 and 3 ) i
- ., SUPPLEMENT TO .
INTERVENORS' EXCEPTIONS TO INITIAL DECISION .
OF . .
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD -
AND "
. REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ,
The Intervenors, Cities of Statesville, High Point, Lexington, Monroe, Shelby, and Albemarle and Towns of . i i
Cornelius, Drexel, Granite Falls, Newton, and Lincolnton, l-all in North Carolina, hereby, in apt time, supplement the t' grounds for their "Intervenors' Exceptions to Initial '
\
Decision of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and Request for Oral Argument " filed November 21, 1967, by the addition there , .
to of the following-paragraphs for insortion therein at the l places indicated, and request oral argument thereon, as. , ,
l, .
l .followss' ,
l
.. . , ., . l l
l l .
i '
i
/
l .,
i.
1
'O E f
. . 6
~
l ,. .
I t .
. _ ____---.__z____ _..__i_,,_ ;_ _ , , _ _ _ ,
.s
~
i f ;
4 i
I SUPPLEMENT A TO GROUNDS FOE INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 1 (To be inserted on p. 8 of Intervenors ' Exceptions afte. ; i the words "The grounds for this exception...are:"
!l
. l The Board's attempt to treat the "proj ect" rather / l than the " reactors" as the " utilization facility" to be ;i licensed is unauthorized by law and contrary to law. The . ill utilization facility involved is the reactor, and not ,
1
. the entire Oconee Nuclear Station, or any part thereof, .
other than the reactor. Section 11 cc of the Act de-fines " utilization facility" as "any equipment or device except an atomic weapon, determined by rule of the ccm- .i I,
mission to be capable of making use of special nuclear
, material. . . ; or (2) any important ccmponent part es- '
pecially designed for such equipment or device as, deter-
_ mined by the, Commission." But, by the Commission's Rules .
and Regulations,10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.2(b), the T '
l term " utilization facility" is limited to "any nuclear ,
I reactor other than one designed or used primarily for the. )
'l The Commissio'n has
/ formation of plutonium or U-233." - .
Y .
,f
< never even determined that any ccmponent .part 'of the re- ,.
actor especially designed for such equipment is capable '
i j
of making use o: speciaA nuclear material and therefore t . .
l "a utilization facility" within the meaning of Sec.11 cc (2) of the Act, supra. Therefore,.the, Board's attempt to treat the " project" rather than the " reactor" as the"uti- .l lization facility" to be licensed is unauthorized by law ,.
and contrary to law. ,
- i 6 ,
- i
. b
- - - - -- . .. r . . . - - ~ . - ._.,,s,.. .m. .% . . ., - .
i .
I
. ., ~. s s -- .
SUPPLEMENT B TO GROUNDS FOR INTERVENORS' EXCEPTION 6 !
(For insertion following page 15 of Intervenors' Exceptions.) .
The Board's extension of the statutory definition of .
l "Research and Development" goes so far that if applied to
. l the research and development activities which the Commission j is authorized to conduct in its own utilization facilities ,
j i.
. or by contract with others under Section 31 of the Act, it .
i.
would justify the building of the Oconee Nuclear Station by ; .'
I the commission. But Section 44 of the.Act expressly forbids .
the " Commission to engage in the . sale or distribution of -
energy for coinmercial use except such energy as may be
, produced by the Commission incident to the operation of -
. !research and development facilities of the , Commission, or i
of production facilities o'f the Commission." Similarl.y, .
the Congress by simultaneous amendment of Sections 101 and ;
103 (P.L. 84-1006, 7 Stat. 1069, Sections 11 and 12) has i forbidden the "use" of any utilization facility without a license, has authorized by express words the J.icensing of .
the "use" of any utilization facility only under Section 103, *.
and has not expressly nor by implication authorized the i ,
licensing of the "use" of any utilization facility under i l Section 104. So, Co,ngress, under the doctrine of exeressio l unius exclusio alterius, by expressly requiring the licensing of " commercial" utilization facilities under Section , 103 of 1 . .
I . - ,
. l
,==
( * = = %-
- m-+ =--,,-e -- - -. . , - -e --
l
s.
i f
e ,
I the Act has prohibited the licensing of utilization facilities for commercial use by " noncommercial" license !
t
.. i under Section 104.of the Act. . l.
i I
E t
.e
, .E 9
. ~ ;
i . .
. t o
i y .
., I
- , , , s .
'1
(
g 1, . ;. - . . .
s s ,. , . .
t 1s * . r $ .
~
. . .n i
..'t*<* _
o
, l ;' , * .
' 5 I ,
. g 1
a .
i . .. ,
4 *4
- , ,/
. . o e
.L *
,- e
'[+ .
.. 6.
. g
- . ' . . 2.
- r q . '
y ,
. N e.go qgepegy, ee, .g.es .+av.**- .s'e'* .n o me."-*- em .W" eM*"**""*--- " - --
k'
1 I .. .
j - . ;
+
as herein supplemented, ,
h'!!EREFORE the Intervonors pray thaMhc Commission sus-
- tain each and all of the abovo listed exceptions; and, as to each .
, , j and all, overrule the Board; and that the Commission dismiss the application of Duke Power Company as unjurisdictionally submitted . -
under Section 104(b) of the Act; and direct the resubmission of an '
I .
application by Duko, if Duko so wishes, undoi Section 103 of tho .
Act; and that the Commission allow and order oral argument upon
- these exceptions'an'd this appeal from the Board to the Commiss h a. -
.. . r Respectfully Submittod, 1 City of Shelby .
l City of Statesville ,
City of High Point -
City of Lexington .
.. City of Monroe
- City of Albemarlo '
Town of Cornelius .
Town of Drexo1 '
. Town of Granito Falls .
Town of Newton -
Town of Lincolaton, . .
. North Carolina ..' .
- -' BY: .
- /t .h _ . .
I
- (Jack R. liarris Suite 207, Stimps.on-Wagner Building esville.,A' orth
' ,_' 'l
... arolina.'
l
( { /
. j ^ . ) L . N .s @ M & .,, ;
Jy% Tally, Jr./f -
,i
p'. 0 ' '
~....-
- ga'j.Drawcr'1630 yotteville, North Caro 1 S a
- i , _. .
M.w.au ! . j GAA -
<- Sppncor W. Reeder V *
' , .. (
,- , Spencer Building . ..
- 6t. Michac,1s, Marylan,d"-
' 5 22 November 1967
- .Their Attornoys .
. . e ,
i
( , . .
s I
{......-..-...==i=s=-------
V, . . .
~
" - - ~ ~