ML20010C073: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
iv | iv | ||
HAELETON GNVIRONMINTAL CCl2NC2O | HAELETON GNVIRONMINTAL CCl2NC2O LIST OF FIGURES Ng. Caption Page 1.1 Missouri River in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station .... 7 2.1 Water quality sampling locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 .......... 19 | ||
LIST OF FIGURES Ng. Caption Page 1.1 Missouri River in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station .... 7 2.1 Water quality sampling locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 .......... 19 | |||
< 2.2 Missouri River and its major tributaries from Gavins Poi nt Dam to Cooper Nuclea r Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | < 2.2 Missouri River and its major tributaries from Gavins Poi nt Dam to Cooper Nuclea r Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | ||
; 2.3 Missouri River discharge at Nebraska City, Nebraska, and Gavins Point Daa, and daily precipitation near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.4 Mean water temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxygen l | ; 2.3 Missouri River discharge at Nebraska City, Nebraska, and Gavins Point Daa, and daily precipitation near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.4 Mean water temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxygen l | ||
Line 91: | Line 89: | ||
! 2.6 Mean turbidity and total suspended solids concentration 1 | ! 2.6 Mean turbidity and total suspended solids concentration 1 | ||
in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Ja nua ry-December 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24 t 7.7 Mean levels of selected ions in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 , | in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Ja nua ry-December 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24 t 7.7 Mean levels of selected ions in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 , | ||
) 2.8 Mean iron, manganese, and calcium concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 ............................................... 26 j | ) 2.8 Mean iron, manganese, and calcium concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 ............................................... 26 j | ||
2.9 Mean ammonia, nitrate and organic nitrogen concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, J a nu a ry-Decembe r 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 i | 2.9 Mean ammonia, nitrate and organic nitrogen concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, J a nu a ry-Decembe r 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 i | ||
Line 177: | Line 174: | ||
50% operating level, Cooper Nuclear Station has generally operated at power l | 50% operating level, Cooper Nuclear Station has generally operated at power l | ||
levels in excess of 80% capacity. | levels in excess of 80% capacity. | ||
l | l The channelized Missouri River in the vicinity of the Station (Figure f 1.1) is confined to a relatively narrow, gradually winding channel about ^# 600 to 800 f t wide (183-244 m). The river banks are stabilind by a seriec rock revetments, wing dams, and trail dikes at the extremeties of the river bends. Backwater areas, sloughs, and islands are absent in the study area. | ||
The channelized Missouri River in the vicinity of the Station (Figure f 1.1) is confined to a relatively narrow, gradually winding channel about ^# 600 to 800 f t wide (183-244 m). The river banks are stabilind by a seriec rock revetments, wing dams, and trail dikes at the extremeties of the river bends. Backwater areas, sloughs, and islands are absent in the study area. | |||
These physical characteristics of the channelized Missouri River restrict the diversity of habitat and have influenced the design and scope of studies conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station. Major Missouri River tributaries in the general vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station include the Nishnabotna River 9.5 miles upstream and the Little Nemaha 4.7 miles downstream of the Station. | These physical characteristics of the channelized Missouri River restrict the diversity of habitat and have influenced the design and scope of studies conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station. Major Missouri River tributaries in the general vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station include the Nishnabotna River 9.5 miles upstream and the Little Nemaha 4.7 miles downstream of the Station. | ||
Discharges from upstream impoundments regulate the river flow near Cooper Nuclear S+ation. Except during periods of heavy stormwater runoff, more than 90% of the flow passing the Station generally originates from Gavins Point Dam (about 275 miles upstream). Discharge rates from Gavins Point Dam range from <20000 cfs in winter to >32000 cfs from spring through autumn. Larger water releases during the latter periods serve to produce hydroelectric power and to maintain downstream navigation. Considerable year-to-year variation exists in upstream discharges despite the regulated fl ow. Hydrological characteristics of the Missouri River such as volume and fluctuations in flow and contributions to the flow from tributaries and surface runoff have influenced the physical, chemical, and biological data collected at Cooper Nuclear Station. | Discharges from upstream impoundments regulate the river flow near Cooper Nuclear S+ation. Except during periods of heavy stormwater runoff, more than 90% of the flow passing the Station generally originates from Gavins Point Dam (about 275 miles upstream). Discharge rates from Gavins Point Dam range from <20000 cfs in winter to >32000 cfs from spring through autumn. Larger water releases during the latter periods serve to produce hydroelectric power and to maintain downstream navigation. Considerable year-to-year variation exists in upstream discharges despite the regulated fl ow. Hydrological characteristics of the Missouri River such as volume and fluctuations in flow and contributions to the flow from tributaries and surface runoff have influenced the physical, chemical, and biological data collected at Cooper Nuclear Station. | ||
Line 316: | Line 311: | ||
Water quality sampling dates from March through October coincided with or immediately followed periods of local rainfall. River flow was increasing on sampling dates in March and from July through October. River flow increased significantly (50000 cfs) two days prior to the Farch sampling date and remained above 90000 cfs for a week following sampling. The increase in flow was caused by high inflows from tributary sources. Increased flows during this period resulted in concomitant increases in the concentrations of total suspended solids, trace metals, nutrients, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, and turbidity. | Water quality sampling dates from March through October coincided with or immediately followed periods of local rainfall. River flow was increasing on sampling dates in March and from July through October. River flow increased significantly (50000 cfs) two days prior to the Farch sampling date and remained above 90000 cfs for a week following sampling. The increase in flow was caused by high inflows from tributary sources. Increased flows during this period resulted in concomitant increases in the concentrations of total suspended solids, trace metals, nutrients, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, and turbidity. | ||
B. Effects of Station Operation on Missouri River Water Quality Station operating conditions on the dates when water quality sampling was conducted are presented in Table 2.10. The percentage of Missouri River water utilized in the once-through cooling system varied from <1% on 20 March to 4% on 23 January. The plant was shut down on 24 April and 22 May sampling dates. Excluding these dates, turbine capacity ranged from 81.3% on 20 March to 99.1% on 23 January. Discharge temperatures ranged from ll.1C (51.9F) on 13 November to 34.1C (93.4F) on 24 July. Excluding April and May, temperature increases above ambient (AT) ranged from 5.lC (9.2F) on 15 August to 16.5C (29.7F) on 23 January. | B. Effects of Station Operation on Missouri River Water Quality Station operating conditions on the dates when water quality sampling was conducted are presented in Table 2.10. The percentage of Missouri River water utilized in the once-through cooling system varied from <1% on 20 March to 4% on 23 January. The plant was shut down on 24 April and 22 May sampling dates. Excluding these dates, turbine capacity ranged from 81.3% on 20 March to 99.1% on 23 January. Discharge temperatures ranged from ll.1C (51.9F) on 13 November to 34.1C (93.4F) on 24 July. Excluding April and May, temperature increases above ambient (AT) ranged from 5.lC (9.2F) on 15 August to 16.5C (29.7F) on 23 January. | ||
Nebraska Water Quality Standards and the ETS criteria on the | Nebraska Water Quality Standards and the ETS criteria on the | ||
: allowable changes or absolute values for specific water quality parameters are described in Table 2.4. Of the parameters listed in the NWQS and ETS, temperature was affected most by Station operation (Figure 2.5). Increases in temperature at the edge of the allowable mixing zone (RM 530) ranged from 0.0C on 15 August to 2.0C (3F) on 23 January. On all sampling dates the 11 | : allowable changes or absolute values for specific water quality parameters are described in Table 2.4. Of the parameters listed in the NWQS and ETS, temperature was affected most by Station operation (Figure 2.5). Increases in temperature at the edge of the allowable mixing zone (RM 530) ranged from 0.0C on 15 August to 2.0C (3F) on 23 January. On all sampling dates the 11 | ||
Line 469: | Line 463: | ||
HAZL"ITON CNVIRONM2NTAL CClZNC33 I | HAZL"ITON CNVIRONM2NTAL CClZNC33 I | ||
MI N NE SOTA SOUTH DAKOTA I | MI N NE SOTA SOUTH DAKOTA I LEWIS 8 CLARK ' | ||
LEWIS 8 CLARK ' | |||
*h | *h | ||
_LAKE' | _LAKE' | ||
Line 588: | Line 580: | ||
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 11 3 OXYGEN SATURATION s25 10 3 10 4 10 3 10 0 - 7 - ilf T I ! | JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 11 3 OXYGEN SATURATION s25 10 3 10 4 10 3 10 0 - 7 - ilf T I ! | ||
l J 90- l ;! | l J 90- l ;! | ||
,h t | ,h t | ||
h .' 3 7 Y ff 80- ! 'i ? | h .' 3 7 Y ff 80- ! 'i ? | ||
Line 697: | Line 688: | ||
o JAN FEB WAR APR WAY JU JUL AUS E _ | o JAN FEB WAR APR WAY JU JUL AUS E _ | ||
SEP OCT NoV DEC 07" AWMONIA | SEP OCT NoV DEC 07" AWMONIA | ||
: 0. 6 - | : 0. 6 - | ||
p | p | ||
Line 738: | Line 728: | ||
f I / l oce- ', 2 f6 i f.' 1 e ! L4 E /i B 5 s | f I / l oce- ', 2 f6 i f.' 1 e ! L4 E /i B 5 s | ||
] if 1 | ] if 1 | ||
! T' V ' | ! T' V ' | ||
it ; | it ; | ||
Line 753: | Line 742: | ||
h' L l l,1 % , h, f? | h' L l l,1 % , h, f? | ||
004~ 2 M j f0e / lJ, i 1 g W ? ? | 004~ 2 M j f0e / lJ, i 1 g W ? ? | ||
y , | y , | ||
ljs k N i gb s , .' > '! | ljs k N i gb s , .' > '! | ||
Line 782: | Line 770: | ||
= n s 20 - r ;J , | = n s 20 - r ;J , | ||
? | ? | ||
(( U S Ei g 0 | |||
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLM JUL AUG SEP OCT HOV DEC ' | JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLM JUL AUG SEP OCT HOV DEC ' | ||
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND S- h d | BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND S- h d | ||
Line 1,023: | Line 1,011: | ||
River locations and the discharge canal were dominated by green algae ar d 47 | River locations and the discharge canal were dominated by green algae ar d 47 | ||
HAZLOTON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENC | HAZLOTON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENC)) | ||
blue-green algae, respectively, when diatoms composed less than 50% of total biovolune. The midsummer and early autumi decline in the relative abundance of diatoms, coincident with increases in creen and blue-green algal popula-tions, followed the typical pattern of seasonal succession for algal communi-ties in tenperate climates (Smith 1950). A similar temporal pattern occurred in previous studies. The major ef fect of Station operation on overall composi-tion of periphyton has been to favor development of blue-green algae in the j warmer than ambient waters of the discharge canal. Only occasionally during late summer has this ef fect been detectable at downstream river locations. | blue-green algae, respectively, when diatoms composed less than 50% of total biovolune. The midsummer and early autumi decline in the relative abundance of diatoms, coincident with increases in creen and blue-green algal popula-tions, followed the typical pattern of seasonal succession for algal communi-ties in tenperate climates (Smith 1950). A similar temporal pattern occurred in previous studies. The major ef fect of Station operation on overall composi-tion of periphyton has been to favor development of blue-green algae in the j warmer than ambient waters of the discharge canal. Only occasionally during late summer has this ef fect been detectable at downstream river locations. | ||
Specific algal taxa that frequently were dominant (composed 10% or nore of total density or biovolume) in both 1979 and previous years included Biddul-phia laevis, Gomphonema angustatun (=Gomphonema sp. previously?), Go_mphonena pirvuliinTYavIculiluzonensTs','WaviculiTrTpunctata v. schizonemoides f=h. gra--- | Specific algal taxa that frequently were dominant (composed 10% or nore of total density or biovolume) in both 1979 and previous years included Biddul-phia laevis, Gomphonema angustatun (=Gomphonema sp. previously?), Go_mphonena pirvuliinTYavIculiluzonensTs','WaviculiTrTpunctata v. schizonemoides f=h. gra--- | ||
Line 1,135: | Line 1,123: | ||
_ _. Lg. ..g __ - | _ _. Lg. ..g __ - | ||
- 5 | - 5 | ||
~' | ~'(( _.53] ] ] [~~~~] T2T ~ , _ 5_14_ _ _ 3.1 s_ _0C't'0'.E_____.T.l-_ --.- | ||
L oc a ti on i _ _. | L oc a ti on i _ _. | ||
5a p11n1 __ | 5a p11n1 __ | ||
Line 1,407: | Line 1,395: | ||
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl' INCUS | HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl' INCUS | ||
/ | / | ||
LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND W AT E R QUALITY STUDIES f' i 534i -o | LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND W AT E R QUALITY STUDIES f' i 534i -o i Physical Measurements - 534, | ||
i Physical Measurements - 534, | |||
~ | ~ | ||
and Limited Che'aical Intake, d | and Limited Che'aical Intake, d | ||
Line 1,492: | Line 1,478: | ||
' / | ' / | ||
iooo - | iooo - | ||
I o f' E = E I d - | I o f' E = E I d - | ||
= i = | = i = | ||
Line 1,772: | Line 1,757: | ||
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCB Table 4.1. (continued) 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 197ff~ | 1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCB Table 4.1. (continued) 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 197ff~ | ||
~T A B A ~ lT' B A ~lf T ' 'T A~ if ]A | ~T A B A ~ lT' B A ~lf T ' 'T A~ if ]A)) | ||
Taxon , | Taxon , | ||
Diptera + + | Diptera + + | ||
Line 2,031: | Line 2,016: | ||
CTi1TeTtion Ec aTi oT-- ~~ ~~~-~~ ~~~ fe a s o~naT | CTi1TeTtion Ec aTi oT-- ~~ ~~~-~~ ~~~ fe a s o~naT | ||
~ | ~ | ||
._ . _D_a ty. _ , _ , _ , ___ , _ _ _ _ , , , _ _Rj{ p_4]_ | ._ . _D_a ty. _ , _ , _ , ___ , _ _ _ _ , , , _ _Rj{ p_4]_)){}{2_))]f]53~0][]}Rli T21f _, J1ea n , , | ||
21 June 1973 2.26b 2.75 2.16 2.23 2.27 25 June 1974 1.27 1.72 2.16 1.50 1.66 10 July 1975 2.63 1.32 1.50 1.27 1.60 6 August 1976 2.62 2.70 2.50 2.91 2.57 , | 21 June 1973 2.26b 2.75 2.16 2.23 2.27 25 June 1974 1.27 1.72 2.16 1.50 1.66 10 July 1975 2.63 1.32 1.50 1.27 1.60 6 August 1976 2.62 2.70 2.50 2.91 2.57 , | ||
22 June 1977 1.60 0.75 1.68 1.31 1.33 l 26 June 1978 3.10 2.57 3.22 2.86 2.94 27 June 1979 2.59 2.45 2.73 1.79 2.39 24 Auqust 1973 1.46 1.97 1.95 1.45 1.76 13 August 1974 1.92 1.98 2.13 2.46 2.12 28 August 1975 1.82 1.57 1.85 _c 1.75 23 September 1976 2.01 2.44 2.33 2.16 2.36 11 August 1977 2.73 2.59 2.39 1.59 2.33 15 August 1978 2.26 1.64 2.57 1.91 2.10 9 August 1979 1.37 1.23 2.87 2.46 1.98 18 October 1973 - | 22 June 1977 1.60 0.75 1.68 1.31 1.33 l 26 June 1978 3.10 2.57 3.22 2.86 2.94 27 June 1979 2.59 2.45 2.73 1.79 2.39 24 Auqust 1973 1.46 1.97 1.95 1.45 1.76 13 August 1974 1.92 1.98 2.13 2.46 2.12 28 August 1975 1.82 1.57 1.85 _c 1.75 23 September 1976 2.01 2.44 2.33 2.16 2.36 11 August 1977 2.73 2.59 2.39 1.59 2.33 15 August 1978 2.26 1.64 2.57 1.91 2.10 9 August 1979 1.37 1.23 2.87 2.46 1.98 18 October 1973 - | ||
Line 2,352: | Line 2,337: | ||
103 I | 103 I | ||
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENC | HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENC)) | ||
Table 5.3. Number and relative abundance of fish collected by seining in the Missouri River near Cooper Nucleaf Station, 1973-79. | Table 5.3. Number and relative abundance of fish collected by seining in the Missouri River near Cooper Nucleaf Station, 1973-79. | ||
1973 IW4 IW5 IWI 1977 1978 197 F Species No. I ho. % ko. % Vo. 1 No. 1 No. % No. L I Shovelnose sturgeon 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - | 1973 IW4 IW5 IWI 1977 1978 197 F Species No. I ho. % ko. % Vo. 1 No. 1 No. % No. L I Shovelnose sturgeon 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - | ||
Line 2,606: | Line 2,591: | ||
- - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~' | - - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~' | ||
Ao. oI Ttomachs Nn~taTnTni W o^d Perc'ent oT To't'aT Yo M | Ao. oI Ttomachs Nn~taTnTni W o^d Perc'ent oT To't'aT Yo M | ||
_._. . Species _ _ _117 | _._. . Species _ _ _117))7f_197J TCL ))7TJ_108]TG Major Food _ Items IV71~1W4 797F T971))EF)78 1J73 l Goldeye 15 28 58 119 102 51 51 Terrestrial insects 31.9 49.6 56.5 56.6 16.2 58.2 27.5 Aquatic insects 7.4 2.4 23.7 4.2 4.2 1.8 5.0 Cladwera 19.5 0.8 0 8.0 0.1 0.6 0 I Plant fragments 2.5 31.3 8.5 21.7 7.0 16.7 11.0 > | ||
Unrecognizable 33.9 6.7 10.8 4.5 64.5 4.0 8.8 Channel catfish 2 11 4 8 14 9 14 Fish 0 40.3 20.3 0 77.1 45.3 5.4 h Terrestrial insects 15.6 Ta 1.8 43.8 18.2 0 0.4 O Aquatic insects 0 0 0 3.5 0.7 1.8 0.8 7 Filamentous algae 0 27.1 0 41.7 0 26.5 0.8 l Plant fragments 18.8 1.5 0 5.6 0 0 11.7 M Unrecognizable 62.5 27.7 76.9 5.6 0 24.1 40.9 2 8C White crappie 22 13 2 5 13 4 6 Fish a!.9 80.6 100.0 40.0 75.6 57.1 93.7 3 Aquatic insects 0 0 0 0 14.6 0 6.2 O a Copepoda 0 1.5 0 20.0 0 7.1 0 2 g' | Unrecognizable 33.9 6.7 10.8 4.5 64.5 4.0 8.8 Channel catfish 2 11 4 8 14 9 14 Fish 0 40.3 20.3 0 77.1 45.3 5.4 h Terrestrial insects 15.6 Ta 1.8 43.8 18.2 0 0.4 O Aquatic insects 0 0 0 3.5 0.7 1.8 0.8 7 Filamentous algae 0 27.1 0 41.7 0 26.5 0.8 l Plant fragments 18.8 1.5 0 5.6 0 0 11.7 M Unrecognizable 62.5 27.7 76.9 5.6 0 24.1 40.9 2 8C White crappie 22 13 2 5 13 4 6 Fish a!.9 80.6 100.0 40.0 75.6 57.1 93.7 3 Aquatic insects 0 0 0 0 14.6 0 6.2 O a Copepoda 0 1.5 0 20.0 0 7.1 0 2 g' | ||
cladocera 4.3 17.9 0 40.0 0 35.7 0 g Black crappie 25 11 1 10 2 14 1 Fish Terresterial insects Cooepoda 69.5 0 | cladocera 4.3 17.9 0 40.0 0 35.7 0 g Black crappie 25 11 1 10 2 14 1 Fish Terresterial insects Cooepoda 69.5 0 | ||
Line 2,758: | Line 2,743: | ||
W m ~ _ | W m ~ _ | ||
1 | 1 Table 6.2. Dencity and rel?tive abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River near the intake structure (Location 1) of Co3per Nucle 2: Station, May - July 1979. | ||
Table 6.2. Dencity and rel?tive abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River near the intake structure (Location 1) of Co3per Nucle 2: Station, May - July 1979. | |||
i | i | ||
^~ | ^~ | ||
Line 2,863: | Line 2,846: | ||
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCT:3 T.ible 6. 3. (continued) 7..... | HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCT:3 T.ible 6. 3. (continued) 7..... | ||
~~ | ~~ | ||
T | T | ||
~ | ~ | ||
Line 2,985: | Line 2,967: | ||
II a =2. et. vv. O 804. W4. St. 84. El OCS 15,1959 A 79. W2. ,,. | II a =2. et. vv. O 804. W4. St. 84. El OCS 15,1959 A 79. W2. ,,. | ||
. ... 1 4. .. ... | . ... 1 4. .. ... | ||
b4. 103. 09 eb. to. ll I408 II,ty19 WS. | b4. 103. 09 eb. to. ll I408 II,ty19 WS. | ||
a A | a A | ||
Line 3,532: | Line 3,513: | ||
Table A.l. (continued) | Table A.l. (continued) | ||
) | ) | ||
uMGAhtC hlTWuGr..s.TUTAL ( M8u s.1 5A M P l. & M s; I, o C A T 1O N 5 | uMGAhtC hlTWuGr..s.TUTAL ( M8u s.1 5A M P l. & M s; I, o C A T 1O N 5 til5Cala hGE S32 S 60 SJW 5 A MI'L 8 eeG M k ib.It Al t. S34 t h1 Ant. | ||
til5Cala hGE S32 S 60 SJW 5 A MI'L 8 eeG M k ib.It Al t. S34 t h1 Ant. | |||
U A l t. | U A l t. | ||
U.J4 0.j2 9.42 Jah Ji,898W A c.JS u.45 0.44 o | U.J4 0.j2 9.42 Jah Ji,898W A c.JS u.45 0.44 o | ||
Line 3,635: | Line 3,614: | ||
_ ~ , . , . | _ ~ , . , . | ||
l | l i Table A.I. (continued) teal.the 'sT A L CULI Flekse (wa/200 s seL I | ||
i Table A.I. (continued) teal.the 'sT A L CULI Flekse (wa/200 s seL I | |||
&A R PL I >G L0CA 7 ION 5 sapPLikG Sie p t.F t.l C Al t la7Ast DiscuaNCE SJ2 Siv S2e i | &A R PL I >G L0CA 7 ION 5 sapPLikG Sie p t.F t.l C Al t la7Ast DiscuaNCE SJ2 Siv S2e i | ||
bait dAh 41.1979 A J000 4200 JJ00 p DJUO. 5100. 1700 I the is.1979 A 4790 16000. 3100, b 4600 13000. 4800 mak 40.9979 A IS0000 130U00 Ihv000 N b 170000 18w000 170000 app J4,'a979 A 44000 S2000 J60000 b 47900 390000 g | bait dAh 41.1979 A J000 4200 JJ00 p DJUO. 5100. 1700 I the is.1979 A 4790 16000. 3100, b 4600 13000. 4800 mak 40.9979 A IS0000 130U00 Ihv000 N b 170000 18w000 170000 app J4,'a979 A 44000 S2000 J60000 b 47900 390000 g | ||
Line 3,694: | Line 3,671: | ||
. .c | . .c | ||
. . . t | . . . t | ||
.s.~ | .s.~ | ||
1- .... | 1- .... | ||
Line 3,703: | Line 3,679: | ||
i . . | i . . | ||
: . . .e . . . | : . . .e . . . | ||
.c.u . ,. ,.. . | .c.u . ,. ,.. . | ||
.. e... .. | .. e... .. | ||
Line 3,840: | Line 3,815: | ||
.j I | .j I | ||
R N ! A ft t, pl5CII A NGt: SJ2 S10 $28 b a m F 1. 6 M. H t.Pl.j f A i t. Sjt t,416 | R N ! A ft t, pl5CII A NGt: SJ2 S10 $28 b a m F 1. 6 M. H t.Pl.j f A i t. Sjt t,416 | ||
<U.UI jam 2A,1979 A H (0.01 | <U.UI jam 2A,1979 A H (0.01 teb 13,597# A | ||
teb 13,597# A | |||
<0.03 ,j 19 | <0.03 ,j 19 | ||
<0.01 i | <0.01 i | ||
Line 4,020: | Line 3,993: | ||
MAILETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCCNCC' Table A.2. Meteorological conditions _ observed during water quality surveys. l in the Missouri River, near the Cooper Nuclear Station, January l to December 1979. H Wind Air Temperature Relative Cloud l Speed Dry Bulb Wet Bulbs ' Humidity Cover Date Time (mph) Direction ( C) ( C) -(%) (%) | MAILETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCCNCC' Table A.2. Meteorological conditions _ observed during water quality surveys. l in the Missouri River, near the Cooper Nuclear Station, January l to December 1979. H Wind Air Temperature Relative Cloud l Speed Dry Bulb Wet Bulbs ' Humidity Cover Date Time (mph) Direction ( C) ( C) -(%) (%) | ||
23 Jan 1045 15-25 N 22 32 11 0 13 Feb 1045 0-5 S 26 31 <5 100 20 Mar 1045 8 N 42 39.5 83 20 24 Apr -1105 3-4 SE 63 62 95 100 22 May 1045 5-7 SW 66 61 75 15 17 Jun 1015 10-15 SE 78 72 75 'O 24 Jul 1000 5-10 W 69 69 100 0 15 Aug 1145 10-15 SW 60 62 <5 100 18 Sep 1010 2-5 N 73 66 71 0 23 Oct 930 3-5 N 32 38 <5 0 13 Nov 955 8-10 SW 33 32 93 0 5 Dec 950 20 N 47 45 89 0 t | 23 Jan 1045 15-25 N 22 32 11 0 13 Feb 1045 0-5 S 26 31 <5 100 20 Mar 1045 8 N 42 39.5 83 20 24 Apr -1105 3-4 SE 63 62 95 100 22 May 1045 5-7 SW 66 61 75 15 17 Jun 1015 10-15 SE 78 72 75 'O 24 Jul 1000 5-10 W 69 69 100 0 15 Aug 1145 10-15 SW 60 62 <5 100 18 Sep 1010 2-5 N 73 66 71 0 23 Oct 930 3-5 N 32 38 <5 0 13 Nov 955 8-10 SW 33 32 93 0 5 Dec 950 20 N 47 45 89 0 t | ||
: i. ( | : i. ( | ||
l' i | l' i | ||
Line 4,928: | Line 4,900: | ||
i,.. | i,.. | ||
..................., ... ... .. ,.. ,,,,, . . . . , , , . . i,,,.. | ..................., ... ... .. ,.. ,,,,, . . . . , , , . . i,,,.. | ||
1 | 1 I | ||
A-93 l l | |||
l l | l l | ||
4 l | 4 l | ||
Line 5,346: | Line 5,317: | ||
.n,o,....... | .n,o,....... | ||
. ... . . . . . . . . .. . ... .i .. | . ... . . . . . . . . .. . ... .i .. | ||
,u co ,.,u. | ,u co ,.,u. | ||
-...... .... . . i ,, ... .., n., | -...... .... . . i ,, ... .., n., | ||
Line 5,618: | Line 5,588: | ||
PC L I Ptt ' hb e (4.8.) hjadtaa8 ITPt 1 0 v e. 1.2 4.8 47.8 f ulak Cul#0*u. ;3at e e la 124 2 a.. t 15.0 1w6.3 C t h a f oP40= uc a t balst ef tf ALO Ctea tcra4ca gust 3 v 9 6 1.2 6.3 27.1 1etal etermoa av v 34 529 .96.e lee.) 11b.8 FCf at SPLClas la 44Cd Der le 3 10 4 | PC L I Ptt ' hb e (4.8.) hjadtaa8 ITPt 1 0 v e. 1.2 4.8 47.8 f ulak Cul#0*u. ;3at e e la 124 2 a.. t 15.0 1w6.3 C t h a f oP40= uc a t balst ef tf ALO Ctea tcra4ca gust 3 v 9 6 1.2 6.3 27.1 1etal etermoa av v 34 529 .96.e lee.) 11b.8 FCf at SPLClas la 44Cd Der le 3 10 4 | ||
4 | 4 | ||
,1. , , <> | ,1. , , <> | ||
I | I |
Latest revision as of 11:06, 15 March 2020
ML20010C073 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cooper |
Issue date: | 04/04/1980 |
From: | Lewis H, Reetz S HAZLETON LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20010C067 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8108190091 | |
Download: ML20010C073 (290) | |
Text
THE EVALUATION 0:, THERMAL EF:ECTS IN THE MISSOURI RIVER NEAR COOPER NUCLEAR STATIO LOPERATIONAL PHASE)
January - December 1979
.x.
fit I1
~
, A Q
- t A1'::~' s - ~ 'y }'1$ [ ' O .Ky -' ' ! * 's".
- -=~--
_ % wm m
.g. .
g --
t;~;4t< &
.. w .;. p .: 4 e r : @ i:Msi~ - --
-- ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
d'N$ C 4 Ait*D ( [42."Q,'W- -
~$ .-
- R -
+... , , -
.':;., p " py, .,.,
.; [
. 'c~ m , $'tg j 1 p(.C=&. f ggggi suc LE AR Sw, c -
,e, J <-
~
.- b : -y * .,
f.e .
- g. . f,
- . -+ - '
, pqg; i i
.= - _-ex ;
.t.
l -
N }.~ ;
~
. . eq .
u . .A ' '
us I' '
{ ., , ,
- +
v,y N '
~
& s x ,n s~ ps. -
w nal' ,Q s' ' 'ss *
.v. x; Prepared F0r: NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 8903 i HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CORPORATION 1500 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTHBROOK. ILLIN0IS 60062 010eicoovi 010529 PDR ADOCh 05000298 G PDR )
@ HAZEON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO APC AATION 4010 NORTHWEST 397H STAEET,OLOG.1374 LINCOLN.NE 68524 PHONE (402) 470-2411 REPORT TO NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT COLUMBUS, NEBRASKA THE EVALUATION OF THERMAL EFFECTS IN THE MISSOURI RIVER NEAR COOPER NUCL!I.R STATION (OPERATIONAL PHASE)
JANUARY - DECEMBER 1979 PROJECT NO. 8903 PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES f
Approved by: , f#/
St'even D. Reetz, Project Manager" Nv n ~~
H6 ward S. Leviispryfec~t. Director i April 1980 l l
l
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Ploe PREFACE ................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ........................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................ vii 1 INTRODUCTION Steven D. Reetz ......................................... 1 2 WATER QUALITY EVALUATION Robert D. Todd .......................................... 8 3 PERIPHYTON Ro n a l d J . Bo c k el ma n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4 AQUATIC MACR 0 INVERTEBRATES AND BENTHIC ORGANISMS Kenneth R. Bazata ....................................... 60 5 FISH POPULATION AND DISTRIBUTION STUDY Ronald G. King .......................................... 92 6 FISH LARVAE DISTRIBUTION Ro n a l d G . K i n g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Appendices A WATER QUALITY EVALUATION .................................. A-1 B PERIPHYTON ................................................ A-44 C AQUATIC MACR 0 INVERTEBRATES AND BENTHIC ORGANISMS .......... A-86 D FISH POPULATION AND DISTRIBUTION STUDY .................... A-121 ii
HAZLETON ENVIRONMTNTAL CCl"NC]'3 PREFACE s
This report presents results of studies conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station during its sixth year of operation. The studies were designed to assess the effects of operation on the aquatic environment of the Missouri River. Studies were conducted in compliance with Appendix B to the Atomic Energy Commission operating license DPR-46 (Environmental Technical Specifi-cations) for Nebraska Public Power District's Cooper Nuclear Station (Docket No. 50-298).
The staff of Hazleton Environmental Sciences conducted the studies and prepared this report. Steven D. Reetz, Biologist, and Howard S. Lewis, Director, Lincoln, Neisraska Laboratory, served as Project Manager and Project Director, respectively, and were responsible for the critical review of this manuscript.
ii1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ACKNOWLEDG11ENTS As Project Manager and Project Director of the long-term studies at Cooper Nuclear Station, we would like to extend cur appreciation to the individuals who have contibuted to the study program. Many individuals within the Haz!eton Environmental Sciences staf f have been involved in data acquisition, statistical analyses, and preparation of this and previous manuscripts. Water quality and fish stomach and scale analyses, computer applications, and cartography.have been the responsibility of several staff members at the Northbrook, Illinois Regional Laboratory. The remainir.g portions of the study program were conducted by personnel at the Lincoln Nebraska Regional Laboratory. Special thanks go to the authors who were responsible for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
They have had the most important role in studies conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station.
We would also like to acknowledge the cooperation and rupport of Nebraska Public Power District personnel within the Environmental Af fairs Division and at Cooper Nuclear Station. Eric N. Sloth, Director of Environ-mental Af fairs, was instrumental in the formulatica* of the original study design and has continued to be involved in the ei - emental program. L.
John Cooper, Envronmental Manager, has also been tivo'ved in the study program since its inception and since 1974 has been the principal representa-tive of the District in all ratters concerning environmental studies at Cooper Nuclear Station. Their questions, com.nents, and cri ticisms have been appreciated. Uc extend our thanks to Joseph L. CItta, Jr. and A. Clement Morgan of the Environmental Affairs Division and to personnel at Cooper Nuclear Station for their courteous cooperation in providing information and access throughout the study.
iv
HAELETON GNVIRONMINTAL CCl2NC2O LIST OF FIGURES Ng. Caption Page 1.1 Missouri River in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station .... 7 2.1 Water quality sampling locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 .......... 19
< 2.2 Missouri River and its major tributaries from Gavins Poi nt Dam to Cooper Nuclea r Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
- 2.3 Missouri River discharge at Nebraska City, Nebraska, and Gavins Point Daa, and daily precipitation near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.4 Mean water temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxygen l
saturation in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear St at ion , Ja nua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
} 2.5 Specific conductance and total dissolved solids in the
! Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-l December 1979 . . . . . . . ...................................... 23
! 2.6 Mean turbidity and total suspended solids concentration 1
in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Ja nua ry-December 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24 t 7.7 Mean levels of selected ions in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Janua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ,
) 2.8 Mean iron, manganese, and calcium concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 ............................................... 26 j
2.9 Mean ammonia, nitrate and organic nitrogen concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, J a nu a ry-Decembe r 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 i
]
- 2.10 Mean total phosphorus and soluble orthophosphate concen- 1 trations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear 1' St at io n , Ja nua ry-Decembe r 19 79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
- 2.11 Mean concentrations of biochemical oxygen demand, l chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon in the ,
' Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, J a n u a ry -D ecemb e r 19 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 i
3.1 Peripnyton sampling locations in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 v
-ma- -.n - -.---,-nr --aw. - . , - - --n-g a --y .mg ,g -
g y r - , -
r.,--------,--v -. aa.
I I
HAELETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCSENCES LIST OF FICURES (continued)
Caption Page No.
4.1 Macroinvertebrate and benthos sampling locations in the 69 -
vici ni ty of Cooper Nur,l ear Station, 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.' Yearly mean diversity indices calculated from artificial substrate and Ponar samples collected in the Missouri 70 River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ..................
4.3 Tubtficid densities from Ponar samples collected in the 71 Missouri River near Cooper Nv". lear Station, 1973-79 .........
5.1 Fish sampling locations ir, the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979 ........................... 104 5.2 Length-frequency distribution of river carpsucker and carp collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River 105 near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ........................
5.3 Length-frequency distribution of freshwater drum, gizzard shad, and goldeye collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ......... 106 6.1 Fish larvae sampling locations in the Missouri River 127 near Coope r Nuclear Station, 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 f
1 I
1 i
0 n
1 l
vi t
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE'3 LIST OF TABLES Caption Page No.
Physical measurements and instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.1 2.2 Chemical analyses performed on water samples collected at the four primary sampling locations (RM 534, intake, 31 di scharge canal , and RM 530) in the Ilissouri River . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Analytical methods with references, preservation techniques 32 a n d de tec t i o n l i mi ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4 Water Quality Standards of the State of Nebraska (1976) and Environmental Technical Specifications of the Cooper Nuclear Station applicable to the Missouri River . .. . . .. ... .. 35 2.5 Monthly minimum, maximum, and mean concentration of
' general water quality constituents in the Missouri River 36 near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . .
2.6 Monthly minimum, maximum and mean concentrations of aquatic nutrients in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuc lea r Station, Ja nua ry-December 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.7 Monthly minimum, maximum and nean concentrations of selected indicators of industrial and municipal contaminat;on in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear S ta ti o n , J a nu a ry-Decembe r 197 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 2.8 Monthly minimum, maximum, and mean concentrations of selected trace metals in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclea r Station, Janua ry-Decenbe r 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2.9 Comparison of data for selected water quality parameters from corresponding sampling periods during preoperational and operational status of Cooper Nuclear Station, 1971-79..................................................... 41 2.10 Summary of operating data, Cooper Nuclear Station.
J a nu a ry -Decemb e r 19 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.1 Number of algal taxa and percent of total taxa by division in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1972-79 ............................................ 53 3.2 Density and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Coope r Nuclear Station, June - November 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 vii
Hays eTON CNVIRONMENTAL. CCl2NCCO LIST OF TABLES (continued)
) Page No. Captien 3.3 Percent contributions of Bacillariophyta (diatoms),
Chlorophyta (green alge) and Cyanophyta (blue-green '
algae) to total density and total biovolume of periphyton algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June - Novamber 1979 ..... 55 3.4 Periphytic algal taxa composing at least 10's of total density or total biovolume in periphyton samples collec?.e4 from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cocper Nuclear Station, June - November 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 f 3.5 Diversity, evenness, and number of algal taxa in periphyton I collected from artificial substrates in the Misscuri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June-November 1979 . . . .. . . . . .. .. 5/
2 3.6 Mean biomass production (mg/m per day + 95% confidence ,
e interval) of periphyton collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June-November 1979 ............................................... 58 2
3.7 Mean biomass production (mg/m per day - ash-free dry weight) at periphyton sampling locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1972-79 .................. 59 4.1 Summary of macroinvertebrate occurrence in benthic (B) and aufwuchs ( A) samples from the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................. 72 4.2 Densities of selected macroinvertebrate families colonizing artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear St.'. ion, 1973-79 .................................... 78 4.3 Significant dif ferences (p < 0.05) in the density of abundant aufwuchs macroinvertebrates among locations sampled in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,1979............................................... 80 4.4 Aufwuchs macroinvertebrate diversity indices calculated from artificial substrate collections in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79. Data from 1973-74 based on Hilsenhoff artificial substrates and 1975-79 da ta f rom mul tipl e pl a te sampl e rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.5 Densities, percent abundance and diversity indices of ;
selected macroinvertebrate families colonizing artificial i substrates in the discharge canal of Cooper Nuclear )
Station, 1977-79 ............................................ 82 viii t
m
HAZLETON CNVMONMENTAL CCCNCOO !
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
No. Caption Page_
4.6 Significant differences (p 10.05) in the density of abundant aufwuchs macroinvertebrates between discharge canal and river locations sampled in the Missouri River near Coope r Nucl ea r Station , 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.7 Benthic densities (nc./m 2) calculated from Ponar dredge samples collected from sediments in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................. 85 4.8 Benthic macroinvertebrate diversity indices calculated from Ponar dredge samples collected from sediments in the
! Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ......... 86 2
4.9 Selected benthic organisms (numbers /n ) collected with ;
the Ponar dredge from sediments in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................. 87 4.10 Total organic carbon (v.g/kg) and texture of sediments sampled with Ponar dredge from the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................. 91 5.1 Checklist of fish collected in the Missouri River near j Cooper Nuclear Station during preoperational and 4
operational monitoring studies, 1970-79 ..................... 107 4 5.2 Number and relative abundance of fish collected by electroshocking in the fiissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 .................................... 108 5.3 Number and relative abundance of fish collected by I seining in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................................ 109 5.4 Seasonal catch-per-unit-effort of fish collected by electroshocking in the liissouri Rive r near Cooper 4
Nuclear Station, May-November 19,3 .......................... 110
, 5.5 Summary of average catch-per-unit-ef fort of fish i collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ........................ 111 1
5.6 Comparison of the monthly average catch-per-unit-ef fort
- by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 .................................... 112 I
3 ix l
I 1
HAT'.CTON ENVIRONMENTAL. SCCNCT3 i
l l LIST OF TABLES. (t atinued) l No. Caption P_3 5.7- Average CPE of fish collected by.electroshocking in the Missouri- River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November '
1979 ........................................................ 113 5.8 Surface water temperature ( C) at fish sampling locationsin the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear S ta ti on , May-Novembe r 19 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 5.9 Numbers of fish collected by seining in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979 ........ 115 5.10 Number of fish collected by seining in the Missouri
~ River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979 . . . . . . . . 116 5.11 Age and size distribution of selected fish collected in the Missouri ..iver near Cooper Nuclear Station, May - N ov emb e r 19 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 5.12 Mean total length (mm) by age grcup of freshwater drum collected from the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................................ 118 5.13 Relative importance of major food items found in stomachs of selected game fish collected in the Missouri Riier near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 .................. 119 6.1 Summary of mean fish larvae densities in the itissouri River near the intake structurc (Location 1) of Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ............................. 128 6.2 Density and relative abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River near the intake structure (Location 1) of Cooper Nuclear Station, May - Jul y 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 6.3 Density and relative abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River at transect locations near Cooper Nuc lear Station , 15 flay-25 July 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 6.4 Sumnary of the species composition and abundance of fish larvae collected along a transect in the Missouri
. River near Cooper Nuclear Station,15 May-25 July 1979 ...... 133 6.5 Cross-channel distribution of fish larvae in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 3 0 Ma y - 2 5 J u l y 1 9 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 X
4 u__
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL EOlllNCZ]
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
Npf, Caption Pa_g_e.
6.6 Summary of mean seasonal larval fish densities along the cutting bank (Location 1) and filling bank (Location 2) of the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79 ..................................................... 135 6.7 Summary of cooling water use and entrainment rates of larval fish through Cooper Nuclear Station, 30 May -
2 5 J u l y 19 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 1
xi
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCZ'J Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION By Steven D. Reetz l
l l
l l
i
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Cooper Nuclear Station is located on the Lower Brownville Bend of the Missouri River (RM 532.5) in Nemaha County, Nebraska. The Station, owned and operated by Nebraska Public Power District, utilizes a boiling water reactor and steam turbine generator to produce 778 MW (net) of electrical power. The Station's once-through gooling system is designed to discharge excess heat at the rate of 5.6 x 10 BTU /hr under conditions of maximum reactor load. Temperature increases across the condensers are variable and depend on the mode of operation. Excluding periods when a portion of the cooling water is recirculated for ice control or when a circulating water pump is shut down, maximum AT is 10C (18F). Normal operation during winter months includes recirculation which results in higher LT's. Water from the Missouri River is diverted through the intake structure at a maximum rate of 1450 cfs and discharged downstream of the Station via a 1000 ft long canal.
The portion of Missouri River flow diverted for cooling rarely exceeds 4% of the total flow.
Fuel loading at Cooper Nuclear Station was initiated on 21 January 1974 and was followed by a series of start-up testing procedures. The first self-sustaining nuclear reaction occurred on 21 February 1974. Commercial operation began on 1 July 1974 following a series of safety and operational testing procedures. Ext pt during scheduled spring or fall shutdowns and the period from 26 April to 31 October 1975 when the Station was restricted to l
50% operating level, Cooper Nuclear Station has generally operated at power l
levels in excess of 80% capacity.
l The channelized Missouri River in the vicinity of the Station (Figure f 1.1) is confined to a relatively narrow, gradually winding channel about ^# 600 to 800 f t wide (183-244 m). The river banks are stabilind by a seriec rock revetments, wing dams, and trail dikes at the extremeties of the river bends. Backwater areas, sloughs, and islands are absent in the study area.
These physical characteristics of the channelized Missouri River restrict the diversity of habitat and have influenced the design and scope of studies conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station. Major Missouri River tributaries in the general vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station include the Nishnabotna River 9.5 miles upstream and the Little Nemaha 4.7 miles downstream of the Station.
Discharges from upstream impoundments regulate the river flow near Cooper Nuclear S+ation. Except during periods of heavy stormwater runoff, more than 90% of the flow passing the Station generally originates from Gavins Point Dam (about 275 miles upstream). Discharge rates from Gavins Point Dam range from <20000 cfs in winter to >32000 cfs from spring through autumn. Larger water releases during the latter periods serve to produce hydroelectric power and to maintain downstream navigation. Considerable year-to-year variation exists in upstream discharges despite the regulated fl ow. Hydrological characteristics of the Missouri River such as volume and fluctuations in flow and contributions to the flow from tributaries and surface runoff have influenced the physical, chemical, and biological data collected at Cooper Nuclear Station.
Environmental studies were initiated to assess the impact on the aquatic biota of the Missouri River from the heated water discharges of Cooper Nuclear s Station. A preliminary survey was conducted in 1969 (Industrial BIO-TEST {
l 2
1
HA2LETON CNVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Laboratories, Inc.1969) to aid in the design of a preoperational study program. A quarterly sampling program conducted in 1970 and 1971 (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. 1971,1972) formed the basis for more comprehen-sive preoperational studies in 1972 and 1973 (Industrial BIO-TEST Labora-tories, Inc. 1973,1975a).
During preoperational studies from 1969 to 1973 extensive baseline data were gathered on water quality and the phytoplankton, zooplankton, periphyton, macroinvertebrate, and fish populations in the Missouri River near the Station. These data were used in the development of monitoring criteria for the biological and chemical portions of the Environmental Technical Specifica-tions (Nebraska Public Power District 1974) and as a basis for comparison with data collected after the Station became operational.
Phytcplankton and zooplankton entrainment studies were conducted at the North Omaha Power Station in 1972 (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc.
1973) to predict the potential effects of condenser passage at Cooper Nuclear Station. Entrair < m studies at Cooper Nuclear Station were initiated in 1973 to document tne mechanical effects of condenser passage on phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fish larvae prior to themal exchange across the condensers (Reetz et al .1975). Operational studies in 1974 (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc.1975b) and 1975 through 1978 (NALC0 Environmental Sciences 1976, 1977, 1978; Hazleton Environmental Sciences 1979) and 1979 were conducted in accordance with the criteria established in the Enviro.vnental Technical Specifications (Nebraska Public Power District 1974). These studies were designed to determine the size and configuration of the thennal plume and the impact of the thennal effluent and the operation of the intake structure on water quality and the biotic components of the Missouri River ecosystem.
The operational study program at Cooper Nuclear Station has been evaluated throughout its duration and changes in field and laboratory metho-dology and scope of work have been made when appropriate. Major changes ocurring in the operational program are described below.
- 1. Effective prior to the 1976 monitoring year sampling at the location furthest downstream (RM 526) of Cooper Nuclear Station was discontinued. Sampling of phytoplankton and zooplankton at RM 528 was also discontinued. These changes were based on the absence of detectable effects and the more rapid than predicted mixing of the Station's thermal effluent.
( 2. Periphyton and macroinvertebrate sampling in the discharge canal i
~ were added to the study in 1976 and 1977, respectively. Sampling in the discharge canal was designed to document near field effects of Station operation.
- 3. Effective January 1978 fish entrapment monitoring was discontinued and fish impingement studies were reduced from 5 hr per week to 2 hr per month. More intensive sampling is required when impingement rates exceed 90 fish /hr. T1ese changes were based on the adequate documentation of the effects of the intake structure under existing conditions.
3
HAZLOTON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENC23 i i
I l
4 Phytoplankton and zooplankton investigations including entrainment studies were discontinued following the June 1978 collection
~
period. Elimination of these aspects of the study dulted from the documentation of the relatively minor effecte of Cooper Nuclear l Station on tiissouri River plankton populationr.
- 5. Effective flarch 1979 themal plune monitoring requirements were i discontinued. Adverse river conditions prevented the conducting of l
' scheduled plume surveys in January and February 1979. Deletion of thermal plune monitoring from the study plan was justified primarily by the thorough documentation of plume characteristics under a '
wide variety of Station operating and river flow conditions.
- 6. Effective December 1979 all remaining aspects of. the themal ef fects study including water quality. surveys, periphyton, macro-invertebrates and benthic organisms, adult and juvenile fish and fish larvae were deleted from the monitoring program. A detailed discussion of these aspects of the thermal ef fects study is con-tained in this report.
All reductions to the Cooper Nuclear Station thennal ef fects study were approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission following their review of justifications. These justifications summarized Station effects and docu-mented the absence of appreciable harm to the I1issouri River ecosystem.
-(
4
- _. _ - _ _ _ . _ . = - _ _ _ _ _ _
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES References Cited _
Hazleton Environmental Sciences.1979. The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase),
January-December 1978. (Project No. 8903). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 222 pp._ + 8 appendices.
Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc.1969. Preliminary environmental (thermal effects) survey of the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, Brownville, Nebraska. (IBT No. W7744). Report to Nebraska Public Power Distict,. Columbus, Nebr. 25 pp. + 4 appendices.
. 1971. Preoperational environmental monitoring (thermal) of tEiYissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1970-March 1971.
(IBT No. W8977). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 85 pp. + appendix.
. 1972. Preoperational environmental monitoring (thermal) of thellTssouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1971-March 1972.
(IBT No. W8977). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 61 pp. + appendix.
~
. 1973. The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River
< near Cooper Nuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1972-March 1973. (IBT No. 64301700). Report to Nebraska Public Power Dstrict, Columbus, Nebr. 148 pp. + appendix.
. 1975a. The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1973-March 1974. (IBT No. 64303322). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 252 pp. + 8 appendices.
. 1975b. The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1974. (IBT No. 64304909). Report to Nebraska Public Pow?e District, Columbus, Nebr. 262 pp. + 9 appendices.
NALCO Environmental Sciences. 1976. The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (0perational Phase),
January-December 1975. (Project No. 5501-06419). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 261 pp. + 9 appendices.
. 1977. The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River <
near Yooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase) January-December 1976. l (Project No. 5501-07666). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, !
Columbus, Nebr. 245 pp. + 9 appendices. l
. 1979. The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River near Tooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase) January-December 1977 (Project No. 5501-08776). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 265 pp. + 9 appendices.
5 1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCllINC2'3 _
Nebraska Public Power District, 1974. Erivironmental Technical Specifications:
Appendix B to Operating License No. DPR-46 for the Cooper Nuclear Station. Atomic Energy Comm. Docket No. 50-298.
Rcetz, S. D. , D. L. Wetzel, and D. E. Patuiski . 1975.4 Studies on the nechanical effects of condenser passace. Pages 217-252 in The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River near Cooper HucTear 2tation (Preoperational Phase) April 1973-March 1974. (IBT No. 64303322).
Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power Distrct, Columbus, Nebr.
(
(
6
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL OCl3NCEC LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND f WATER QUAllTY STUOlES 53 -o , Lil Physical Measurements - 534,
- - l and Limited Chemical Intake.
~ Analyses Discharge, d
N 1
532,530,
.., l / 528 Additional Chemical - 534, 74 Analyses Intake, 1 -j ,
Discharge, o.533 530 Y
-
- BIOLOGY 2
COOP Periphyton, Aquatic - 534,532, 0 N EAR [ 4 Macroinvertebra tes , 530,528
- STATION y and Benthos of3cyjggg , 32 Fish Study - 534,532,
" ~
530 (Nebraska and -
~_ shoreline 53h at each di location) s
+ Fish Larvae - Intake, c
2 ,4 530'[,0 TOPOGR APHIC LEGEND
, o 526 River Mile and Sampling Location NE Rip Rap - Wing Dom Levee e Training Dike
.329 528 h ,
if p 5 0
8' 0 . o .
' 526 -
l o .
527 - .
.h 2$ 1 .* .. ,o
. . i ..
SCALE IN MILES o os i 2 l
Figure 1.1. Mi:souri River in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station.
7
l l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENLSES
! l I
I l
Chapter 2 i WATER QUALITY EVALUATION By I
i Robert D. Todd I
l 1
1 l
5 I
8
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I. Introduction Water quality studies in th Missouri River rear the Cooper Nuclear Station have been conducted since 1970 (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, I nc. 1971, 1972, 1973 ; Bowling 1975; Kantz et al.1975; Byrnes 1976, 1977, 1978; Todd 1979). Studies were designed to establish baseline Missouri River water quality and to assess the effects of Station operation on selected water quality parameters.
The major objectives of the study were:
- 1. To assess the effects of the Station's thermal discharge on Missouri River water quality during 1979; and
- 2. To provide additional data on the water quality of the Missouri River.
II. Field and Analytical Procedures A. Sampling Frequency, Locations, and Parameters Monthly water samples were collected in conjunction with the aquatic biology sampling at three locations during 1979 (Figure 2.1):
- intake, discharge, and at river mile (RM) 530, which is the downstream edge of the Station's mixing zone. Three additional locations were sampled from May through November
- RM 534 upstream of the Station's intake, RM 532 immediately below the discharge canal outlet, and RM 528 downstream of the Station's allowable mixing zone.
Hydrological and meterological measurements were taken during the 1979 sampling program and are listed in Table 2.1. Water quality para-meters measured during the same time period are presented in Table 2.2.
B. Sampling Procedures Duplicate water samples were collected near the surface at each
-location using a 6-liter Van Dorn type sampler. Following collection, samples were transferred to appropriate containers, preserved, placed in insulated containers, packed in ice, and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. Meteorological measurements were taken once during each monthly i
sampling period. Current velocity was measured at each location during each l
monthly sampling period. The instrumentation and methodology used in measuring meteorological and hydrological parameters and the precision of measurement are presented in Table 2.1.
j C. Analytical Procedures Field measurements were taken for water temperature and total resi-dual chlorine. Total alkalinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity were measured immediately upon return to the Lincoln, Nebraska Regional Labor-atory. Biochemical oxygen demand and enteric bacteria analyses were conducted at the Lincoln Regicnal Laboratory or: sanples collected from September i
9 I
HAZLOTON CNVIRONMENTAL CCIZNCE?3 through December 1979. The remaining analyses were conducted at the North-brook, Illinois Regional Laboratory. A list of parameters measured from sanples collected at the primary sampling locations (Rf1534, intake, dis-charge, RM 530) is provided in Table 2.2. Basic water quality and nutrient data were collected from flay through Novenber at Ri1532 and 528 in conjunc-tion with oiological sanpling (Table 2.2).
Sanple analyses were perfonned in accordance with procedures outlined in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
~ -
( A.P.H. A. etTT976)' and Chiriic~aTTriilys'iT~oTifater and kfi5tEs-~(UTT.-
Envi ron. Prot. Agency 1974,~T979T.~ ~TnalftTcaT pr~6ciduT6s~, Tncliiding refer-ences, detection limits, and preservation techniques for all water quality parameters, are listed in Table 2.3. Quality assurance procedures followed by Hazleton Environmental Sciences' water chemistry personnel were in accor-dance with recommendations of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1972, 1979).
l III. Results and Discussion l The results of the 1979 water quality progran will be discussed with l respect to previous baseline data, surface water hydrology, and the effects of Station operation. Where appropriate, concentrations of speci fic water quality constituents will be discussed with respect to Nebraska Water Quality Standards (NUQS) ana i.he requirenents of the Cooper Nuclear Station's Environ-nental Technical Specifications (ETS) (llebraska Public Power District 1974).
Nebraska Water Quality Standards and ETS applicable to tFe water quality investigation at Cooper fluclear Station are listed in 'able 2.4.
Uater quality, physical, and meterological data collected during the 1979 sampling program are tabulated in Appendix A. Monthly mean, mi ninun, and naximun concentrations for each parameter neasured during 1979 are listed in Tables 2.5 through 2.8. Table 2.9 contains a sunmary of selected water i qudli ty pardneten neasured in May, July, and Octcber (1971-19) during both preope ra ti o<, ( 1971 -73 ) and operational (1974-79) years.
- 1. Su_r_f a_ce Wa te,r ,Hyd_rol ogy ,
Water flowing past the Station ('Ut 532.5) is derived primarily f ron 3 releases of impounded water fron Lewis and Clark Lake (Rf1808). Tributaries below Lewis and Clark Lake provide additional flow to the river as do waste-water discharges and surf ace runof f. Itajor tributaries to the flissouri River upstrean of the Station include the Little Sioux River in Iowa, the Hi>nna-botna River in Missouri, and the Platte River in liebraska (Figure 2.2). Flow in these tributaries primarily results from stornwater or snowmelt runof f.
Water released from Lewis and Clark Lake takes fron four to five days to reach the Station (Byrnes 1976). Variatien in travel time is dependent upon the volume of water in the river (flissouri River Interagency Connittee 1969).
Releases during 1979 ranged between 7500 to 23000 cfs from January to llarch and f ron 20000 to 41000 cfs during April through December. Mean monthly flow f rom January to June 1979 at Yankton, South Dakota, approximately 5.2 niles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, was higher than for the sane period in 1978. t Fron -July through December 1970 flissouri River flow at Yankton was generally above 35000 cf s, but was well below the flow recorded during this sane period I
l 10 i
4 HAZLETON ENVIRONfwENTAL SCIENCES in 1978. River flow at the Station during this period ranged from 38000 to 52000 cfs (Figure 2.3). Peak flow in the study area corresponded with heavy precipitation in March. Precipitation in May, June, July and from September through November near the Station site had less effect on Missouri River flow. Higher releases and storns of a nore local nature are probable reasons for this difference.
Flow is impcrtant in determining instream Missouri River water quality. Surface runoff of ten degrades the water quality as indicated by higher concentrations of total suspended solids and increased organic loading (Delfino and .Byrnes 1975; Byrnes 1976, 1977). Significant surface runoff usually occurs in the spring after periods of heavy rainfall. Precipitation 4
in the southeast region of Nebraska near the Station averages 88.9 cm and
- generally occurs during the spring months (Nebr, Soil and Water Conservation Comm. 1971 ) . The mean annual runoff for this Fortion of the Missouri River Basin is between 10 and 15 cm per year (Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Committee 1969).
Curing prior years 90% or more of the water passing the Station, with the exception of spring runo'f periods, was derived from water released from Lewis and Clark Lake (Byrnes 1977). During 1979 releases were responsible for 51 to 87% of the water flowint past the Station.
Water quality sampling dates from March through October coincided with or immediately followed periods of local rainfall. River flow was increasing on sampling dates in March and from July through October. River flow increased significantly (50000 cfs) two days prior to the Farch sampling date and remained above 90000 cfs for a week following sampling. The increase in flow was caused by high inflows from tributary sources. Increased flows during this period resulted in concomitant increases in the concentrations of total suspended solids, trace metals, nutrients, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, and turbidity.
B. Effects of Station Operation on Missouri River Water Quality Station operating conditions on the dates when water quality sampling was conducted are presented in Table 2.10. The percentage of Missouri River water utilized in the once-through cooling system varied from <1% on 20 March to 4% on 23 January. The plant was shut down on 24 April and 22 May sampling dates. Excluding these dates, turbine capacity ranged from 81.3% on 20 March to 99.1% on 23 January. Discharge temperatures ranged from ll.1C (51.9F) on 13 November to 34.1C (93.4F) on 24 July. Excluding April and May, temperature increases above ambient (AT) ranged from 5.lC (9.2F) on 15 August to 16.5C (29.7F) on 23 January.
Nebraska Water Quality Standards and the ETS criteria on the
- allowable changes or absolute values for specific water quality parameters are described in Table 2.4. Of the parameters listed in the NWQS and ETS, temperature was affected most by Station operation (Figure 2.5). Increases in temperature at the edge of the allowable mixing zone (RM 530) ranged from 0.0C on 15 August to 2.0C (3F) on 23 January. On all sampling dates the 11
- I
(
- - .- . - ~
' HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES temperatare at Ri1530 was below the maximum allowable increases based on NWQS (2.8C [s.0F]) and LTS (2.8C [5.0F] summer and 5.6C [10.0F] winter).
Dissolved oxygen (D.O.) concentrations showed no significant change' due to Station operation -(Figure 2.5). . Concentrations were con-sistently _ above the NWQS criterion of 5.0~ mg/l on all sanpling dates in 1979.
tiaximun downstream reduction in D.0. concentration. at Ri1530 was 1.4 mg on 5 '
December 1979. Oxygen saturation levels were higher in the discharge canal than at the intake on-all sampling dates when the Station was operating. As in previous years this increase is attributable to the inverse relationship of oxygen solubility with temperature.
No significant change was noted in other water quality parameters between intake and discharge locations. Fecal coliform densities and total suspended solids and turbidity levels followed the same general pattern as in previous years. Fecal coliform bacteria densities and phenol concentrations, exceeded NWQS and ETS criteria. Fecal coliform densities exceeded the 200 organisms /100 mi limit in all but two samples collected ( Appendix A, Table A.1). Phenol concentrations were greater than the HUQS criterion of 0.001 ng/l at all locations from February through April and again fron September through December. Fecal coliform and phenol concentrations in excess of the NWQS criterion have been reported in previous studies and do not appear to be affected by Station operation.
A seasonal summary of preoperational (1971-73) and operational (1974-79) water quality monitoring data for upstream (Rt1534) and downstream (Rt1530) sampling locations is presented in Table 2.9. Concentrations of indicator parameters in 1979 were within ranges established during the preoperational studies. Temporal variation in concentrations of the selected indicator parameters has been considerable; however, concentrations upstream and downstream of the Station have been similar. This similarity indicates that operation of the Station has had no noticeable ef fects upon itissouri River water quality.
C. Ilissouri River Water Quality As in previous years, tenporal variability in water quality during 1979 was significantly more noticeable than spatial variablity. Sampling dates in liarch through llay and again in July and October were preceded by local rainf all and subsequent runof f (Figure 2.4). These runof f events contributed to the variation in water quality constituents. The most signi-L ficant change in river flow and subsequent water quality was noted in 11 arch and was a result of peak runoff conditions.
- l. General Water Quality Parameters Table 2.5 provides a sunmary of the concentrations of general water quality constituents measured in 1979. Concentrations of selected
[ paraneters at four sampling locations (RM 534, intake, discharge, and Rit 530) '.
are compared in Figures 2.5 through 2.9. With the exception of water tempera-ture and precent oxygen saturation, spatial variations in the cone rations of general water quality parameters were small. Total suspende m ids, turbidity, potasslun, manganese and total iron concentrations were highest i
12 i.
,. , - - - - - 7 - . . - .# , . .
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES duri r periods of rainfall and runoff in March, April and July. The concen-tratit,as of nitrates, ammonia, total organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble orthophosphate, total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, and biochemical oxygen demand also increased following periods of heavy surface runoff (Figures 2.10 through 2.12). Similar increases in the above consti-
! tuents were noted in other water bodies by Harms et al. (1974) and in the Missouri River by Byrnes (1976,1977). Specific conductance and total dis-solved solids (TDS) concentrations were generally stable from April through December 1979. Increased flows in March resulted in a significant decline in the levels of both TDS and conductivity to below 270 mg/l and 400 mhos, respectively (Figure 2.6). Sulfate, sodium, and calcium concentrations varied with time during 1979. Concentrations of these constituents were lowest during March when river flow was highest (Figures 2.8 and 2.9). The range in concentration of both total alkalinity and pH values was generally stable throughout 1979 and reflected the high buffering capacity of the Missouri River. True color and threshold odor values were highest in March (Table 2.5). Higher threshold odor values in January, March, April, and July reflected the effects of runof f on Missouri River water quality (Table 2.5).
- 2. Aquatic Nutrients Nutrient concentrations during 1979 followed seasonal trends similar to those in previous studies (Table 2.9). Peak concentrations of ammonia, 0.72 mg/1; nitrite, 0.87 mg/1; and soluble orthophosphate, 0.028 mg/l occurred during March 1979 (Table 2.6). These peaks immediately followed an extended period of rainfall which caused high river flows and high loadings of nutrients and organic materials. With the exception of soluble orthophosphate and silica, nutrient concentrations were generally higher in 1979 than those reported in 1978 (Todd 1979); however concen-trations were within ranges reported previously (Bowling 1975; Byrnes 1976, 1977, 1978). Peak concentrations of aquatic nutrients, with the exception of silica, appear to be related to periods of peak runof f.
- 3. Indicators of Industrial and Municipal Contamination Concentrations of indicators of organic loading and bacterial contanination were highest during periods of peak river flow or local rainfall events. A summary of industrial and municipal contaminants is provided in Table 2.7. A comparison of previous data (Table 2.9) indicates that concen-trations of total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were higher in 1979 than in 1978. Total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria densities were generally lower in 1979 than in 1978. Concentration of these ,
parameters however were wi thin ranges reported previously by Byrnes (1976, 1 1977). Fecal coliform and streptococcus densities and biochemical oxygen demand were highest in July, a period during which heavy local rainfall occurred (Figure 2.4 and Table 2.7). Both temporal and spatial variability was observed in the concentrations of TOC, COD, and BOD in 1979 (Figure 2.12). ,
Spatial variation of these constituents was particularly evident during April l and July. Concentrations at RM 530 versus intake were higher in April and lower in July. These difference are attributable to spatial variability in I rivei water quality rather than Station effects.
13
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCl%NCEE The NWQS criterion for fecal coliform bacteria of 200 organisms /
100 n1 was exceeded in all but two samples during 1979. - The NWQS criterion is based on the geometric mean of samples taken on five consecutive days (Nebraska Department of Environmental Control 1976) Although consecutive samples were not taken, data collected from 1970 through 1979 in this portion of the flissouri River indicate that this water quality criterion is seldon 4 met. Phenol concentrations were in excess of NWQS criterion in all samples collected during 1979 excluding those taken in January and from May through August. Peak concentrations in both 1978 and 1979 occurred in October and November. flethylene blue-active substances were generally below the detection limit of 0.025 mg/1.
- 4. Trace fletals Concentrations of trace metals were generally within ranges previously reported by Byrnes (1977,1978). Considerable temporal variability was observed in metals concentrations during 1979; peak concentrations of lead (16 mg/1) and zinc (270 mg/1) were recorded during periods of high river flow in March (Table 2.8) liercury levels during 1979 exceeded the U. S.
Environnental Protection Agency (1976) water quality criterion of 0.05 mg/l on all sanpling dates (Table 2.8); peak concentrations were recorded in October. Similar mercury concentrations were reported by Byrnes (1977, 1978) and Todd (1979). The U.S. Geological Survey (1976) reported mercury levels within the same range near 0naha and Plattsnouth, Nebraska. Minor _
spatial differences in mercury and other trace metal concentrations during 1979 reflected variability in river water quality.
IV. Summary and Conclusions
- 1. Water quality in the flissouri River was not adversely affected by
'he operation of the Cooper Nuclear Station.
- 2. Local precipitation and associated surface runof f during April and July 1979 resulted in peak concentrations of suspended solids, metals, nutrients, turbidity, and organic matter.
- 3. Water temperature and percent oxygen saturation were affected by Station operation. flaxinun AT increase in tenperature at the edge of the mixing zone (Ri1530) was within the NWQS and ETS limitations.
- 4. Mercury levels exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's water quality criterion on all sampling dates; however, concentrations were not af fected by Station operation.
- 5. Fecal coliforn densities and phenol concentrations generally exceeded the NWQS criteria.
- 6. The water quality of the Missouri River showed considerable temporal variation in 1979 as in previous studies. Water quality consti tuents were af fected primarily by surf ace water runof f.
t i
14
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES V. References Cited American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF). 1976. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14 ed. Am. Public
> Health Assoc. , Washington, D. C. 1193 pp.
Bowling, T. J. 1975. Water quality evaluation. Pages 5-18 in The evalua-tion of themal effects in the Missouri River near Cooperluclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1974. (IBT No. 64304909). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
Byrnes, D. J. 1976. Water quality evaluation. Pages 5-60 in The evaluation of themal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper NucTiar Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1975. (Project No. 5501-06419).
Report by NALC0 Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
. 1977. Water quality evaluation. Pages 7-45 in The evaluation of themal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper NucTear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1976. (Project No. 5501-07666).
Report by NALCO Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
. 1978. Water quality evaluation. Pages 7-43 in The evaluation of themal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper NucTear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1977. (Project No. 5501-08776).
Report by NALC0 Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
Delfino, J. J. , and D. J. Byrnes. 1976. The influence of hydrological condi-tions on dissolved and suspended constituents in the Missouri River.
Air Soil Water Pollut. 5:157-168.
Fishman, M. J. , and M. R. Midgett. 1968. Extraction techniques for the determination of cobalt, nickel, and lead in freshwater by atomic absorb-tion. Pages 230-236 in R. F. Gould, ed. Trace inorganics in water.
Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D. C.
Harms, L. L. , J. N. Dornbush, and J. R. Andersen. 1974. Physical and chemi-cal quality of agricultural runoff. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.
46:2460-2470.
Powe, L. H. III, and C. W. Holley. 1969. Comparisons of mercury (111) chloride and sulfuric acid as preservatives for nif rogen forms in water samples. Envi ron. Sci . Technol . 3:478-481.
Hydrolab Corporation. 1973. Instructions for operating the Hydrolab Surveyor Model 60_in-situ water quality analyzer. Austin, Tex. 146 pp.
i 15
HAZLETON QNVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Hynes, H.-B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. - University of Toronto
' Press, Toronto. 555 pp.
Industrial ~ BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. 1971. Preoperational environmental monitoring (thermal) of the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1970-March 1971. (IBT No. W8977). Report to Nebraska Public
, Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 85 pp. + appendix. {
~
. '1972. Preoperational environmental monitoring (thermal) of the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1971-March 1972.
(IBT No. W8977). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 61 pp. + appendix. ,
1973. The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1972-March 1973.
(IBT No. 64301700). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 148 pr. + appendices.
Kantz, K. W. , J. R. Salkowski, and J. E. Hawley. 1975. Water quality evaluation. Pages 26-85 in The evaluation of thermal effects in the flissouri River near CoopeTNuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1973-flarch 1974. (IBT No. 64303322). ?.eport by Industrial BIO-TEST
- Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraika Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
Millipore Corporation. 1973. Biological analysis of water and wastewater.
l LAf1 3020/P. Bedford, Mass. 89 pp.
Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Committee. 1969. Comprehensive framework study '
- Missouri River Basin. Vol. 1. U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 274 pp.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Control. 1976. Water quality standards for surface waters of the state. Nebraska Department of Environmental Control, Lincoln. Nebr. 53 pp.
, Nebraska Natural Resources Ccomission. 1976. Nemaha River Basin water quality management plan. Lincoln, Nebr. 247 pp.
Nebraska Public Power District. 1974. Environmental technical specifica-tions. Appendix B to Operating License No. DPR-46 for the Cooper Nuclear Station. Atonic Energy Comm. Docket No. 50-298. 84 pp.
- i. Nebraska Soil and Water Conservation Commission. 1971. Report on the f ramework study. State Water Plan Publ. No.101. Lincoln, Nebr.
268 pp.
0ceanography International Corporation. 1974a. Preliminary operating procedures manual for the direct injection module OIC Model 05-24B HR.
f College Station. Tex. 36 pp.
t
. l!'74b . The total carbon system operating procedures. (
_Col_ _lege Stat;on, Tex. 42 pp.
16
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ort 1 Research, Inc. 1970. Instruction manual. Cambridge, Mass. n.p.
Peri;n-Elmer Corporation. 1968. Analytical methods for atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Norwalk, Conn. n.p.
4 . 1972. Perkin-Elmer analytical methods for flameless atomic absorpt' Ton spectroscopy wih the heated graphite atomizer HGA-72.
Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer & Co. GmbH, Uberlingen, Federal Republi of Ge rma ny. 13 pp.
Ryden, J. C. , J. K. Syers, and R. F. Harris. 1972. Sorption of organic phosphate by laboratory ware. Implications in environmental phosphorus techniques. Analyst 97:903-908.
Strickland, J. D. H. , and T. R. Parsons. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analyses. 2nd ed. Fish. Res. Board Can. Bull. 167. 310 pp.
Taylor, R. H. , R. H Bordner, and P. V. Scarpiro. 1973. Delayed-i ncubation membrane filter test for fecal coliforms. Appl . Microbiol . 25(3):353-368.
Technicon Industrial Systems. 1974. Technicon auto-analyzer II continuous-flow analytical instrument manual. Techn. Publ. No. VA4-017 OC00. n.p.
Thomas, R. F., and R. L. Booth. 1973. Sensitive electrode measurement of ammonia in water and wastes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7:523-526.
Todd, R. D. 1979. Water quality evaluation. Pages 7-47 in The evaluation of thermal effects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1978. (Project No. 8903).
Reported by Hazleton Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
U. S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
1978. Climatological data Nebraska. Vol. 83. Nat. Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin. Environmental Data Service, Asherville, N. C. n.p.
U. S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. 1976. Water resources data for Nebraska water year 1975. Report NE-75-1. 469 pp.
U. S. Envi ronmental Protect 'on Agency. 1972. Handbook for analytical quality control in water and wastewater laboratories. Analytical Quality Control Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio. 98 pp.
. 1974. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes.
-"-~0TTice Technol . Transfer, Washington, D. C. 298 pp. l
. 1976. Quality criteria for water. U. S. Government Bookstore, l Kansas City, Missouri. 256 pp. j i
I 17
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1979. llandbook for analytical quality control in water and wastewater laboratories. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, n.p.
~
. 1979. liethods for chemical analysis for water and wastes.
friv'170niental 11onitoring and Support i.aboratories, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4 n.p.
Williams, L. G. , J. C. Joyce, and J. T. Monk, Jr. 1973. Stream velocity ef fects on the heavy-metal concentrations. Am. Water Works Assoc.
65:275-279.
\
s o 18
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl2NC23 LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND L WATER QUALITY STUDIES 534: :o ' l Physical Measurements - 534, P !- and Limited Chemical Intake.
3 '
N Analyses Discharge,
" 532,530,
. :. , 528
.- Additional Chemical - 534,
.: _c Analyses Intake, N -l. , Discharge, o 533 530 f '
BIOLOGY COOPER '
d NUCLEAR [ 4 Periphyton, Aquatic - 534,532,
, STATION f. Macroinvertebrates, 530,528 .
0/scuenar . .
,.532 and Benthos j -p'. c g C ,
Fish Study - 534,532, 530 (Nebr.is ka and -
Missouri sh-;-
shore'ine at eacn
_,M location) d Fish Larvae - Intake,
.. c,0 2,4 530 p TOPOGR APHIC LEGEND
~
o 526 River Mile and Sampling Location N Rip Ros - Wing Dom Levee A Training Dike
. ~52 9 528 .
!525.
- y p ' %# ~
I 0 g , ,
aS ,
O -
o
- 526 .
l '
527 - -
',553l.
, J.,. .,a SCALE IN MILES O 05 1 2 Figure 2.1. Water quality sampling locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
19
HAZL"ITON CNVIRONM2NTAL CClZNC33 I
MI N NE SOTA SOUTH DAKOTA I LEWIS 8 CLARK '
- h
_LAKE'
_i Yonkton i
GAVINS POINT DAM
- s s 3 h d, ICwA
.c.
m N E BR ASMA T 4
pivfd Omoho %\
l iae
, / y$'
hi l' Nebrosko City ,, , , _ ,, ,,
COOPER NUCLE AR STATION Ml 8 80t!RI KANSAS I
h l1 N
SC AL E * -- -
O 10 20 30 40 60 100 L
Figure 2.2. iiissouri River ar.d its major tributaries from Gavins Point Dam to Cooper Nuclea: Station.
- 20
!ll Jl ID mhz ;;;z$l]Ozf 2 >r R0]L aU L
S 7
0 7
5 6
0 6
nOS 5
4 0
4 6
3 0
3 5
2 m6 5 4 3 2
8 O
s e
S e
. o E
e sC eE T to.n A i D D me e
. m s
G N
I s e
L a y P eV M . sO i
l A oNs i
a S
o d s
d 4 e r
n
. a o
sT ,
sc m iO a m
D s
t s n r i o
sP o
. eE P .
iS 9 _
e s7 n9 s i1 _.
v ar n Ge b
o dm sG ne
. t aU ac mA e
,D s
a -
ky
. s sr aa o ru
, rL bn r
eU ea F
i mJ NJ o , ,
yn n ,
s r
t o ii aN Ct a
oU at
, cJ kS s
e ar ra
. s r be e.
. o sY Nc u
sA tN -
oM a J i s
s ee r
i gp s ro
_ . a ao hC Jo sR c sP sr ia 1
eA de is n r
I en 9I s vo ii
- . . o Rt 5 uR iA it a
.c W ri up l e oi
_s sc e se
_o ir l B Mp
. e. E i
l eF .
s 3 l
2 b e
. _r o e
, N r
_ 6A u J g e i
_6 F
. S T y S 6
0 6 - 0 5
5 4
0 4
5 3
0 3
5 2 ms S 4 3 z :
O E o E,!= hgz* ~ $-
i N#
7
{l
HAZLETON GNVIRONMENTAL CCIENC23 7 9
/ RM 534 Intoke Discharge ,
RM 530
/ L WATER TEMPERATURE 30 -
I C 20 - 0 [ ! I ] 5 a '! -
5 ? :!
1
- 7 l T
~
io .
[, d i j, i 7 I 5
0 f, ' $ [ , l l, / L 0 "' ' ^ '
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NoV DEC 1979 15 - DISSOLVED OXYGEN n .r 'm l
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 11 3 OXYGEN SATURATION s25 10 3 10 4 10 3 10 0 - 7 - ilf T I !
l J 90- l ;!
,h t
h .' 3 7 Y ff 80- ! 'i ?
}" [k ,
7
{ / th 7 j / i] ij g .. f ,
!1 -
- / p / {
N p
~
10-U N ' '
N / N l A U $ 0 7 l l! 4) / 4 d 16 y
- i M.
/ !h % / l$ I'j 4
/ 'l f
/
lh If 3g i a m i H $ R /s ? j 1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 Fiqure 2.4 flea i water temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxygen 3aturatica in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-Decmeber 1979.
22
1 HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCIENCCS RM 534 Irvohe Dischoge RM530 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE 800- 3 g
on !
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OC7 NOV DEC 1979 700' TO TAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 600-9u' atiIi11 0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL 1979 AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC i
Figure 2.5. Specific conductance and total dissolved solids in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
)
23
I I
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCI'INCEO l I
1 l 7 i
s
/ RM S34 Inicke Dischorge
- a l RM 550 TOTAL SUSPENDE0 SOLIDS 1780 1985 l g q 1670 [ '25 700- 1
.G o.
600- U
- e a
500-
< /
,,,,, 400-o i
l ( .
"3 E 3o0 l r
'n i i;
% l l
200-
{ , [ 7 h
_1 ,
JAN FE8 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUO SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 350- TUR810lTY 300-250 -
200-g l l
M !
z .30 j 7
a 10 0 - 7 .. p l So- j?
l l ', E } E .
^
.M g __. l JAN FEB MAR APR WAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV OEC 1979 figure 2.6. Mean turbidity and total suspended solids concentration in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1 January-December 1979.
(
24
HAZLETON GNVIRONMENTAL CCl2NC23 RM534 Intoke Dischorge RM530 200 SULFATE 4.m JAN FEB Al.llYl' ll MAR APR e
MAY JUN JUL AUG 1979 SEP OCT NOV DEC SODIUM 70 - '
.- , m ;
o IID JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 i is POTASSIUM 12 - pj ly:< ii 80 -
f.f.!
I h!
5 e- h '
g E .
LLild-l JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 3 hts JUL AUG S(P OCT NOV DEC Figure 2.7. Mean levels of selected ions in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
25
l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC3D i RM 534 inhake Dischorge RM 530 11 3
, loo -
I CALCIUM
- 80- p l 40 J ' 1 JAN FEB MAR APR M nY JU UL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC i
0.4 -
5 MANGANESE y ?
- o. 3 - $ , ![
- j :'.' j9 S s o o.2 - { h I
- o. ' -
g J JAN m
f 9 I j j h7 FEB MAR APR
/ U MAY J i.' '
C U i
l 35 40 ^4 6.5 66 g 7.2
~ "
5.0 -
f j
G g h
If !-
i 4.0 - $ l[
{
5, s o- b
. h bI! n c'
E j h !
] !'5 @ y [
2.0 - $ h 3 b 3 '
l.0- ) j jj g g l [
, B c -
?: 9 i v g A .ArJ 3 l$ $ f < E R mm I JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1979 Fiqure 2.8. Mean iron, tranganese, and calcium concentrations in the Missouri '
River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
t 26
HAZLETON CNVIRONM2NTAL CCl2NC";O RM S34 Intehe Dischorge RMS30 4.55 455 >45 5.35 4.3 OMGANIC NITROGEN l 2.0 - i s.5 - p 9
- o. . _ _ _ _
JAN FEB WAR AR MAY JUN JUL AUG $EP Nov 2.1 s.65 ,
NITRATE g,,f n i.5 - q ,
l .o - ,
o JAN FEB WAR APR WAY JU JUL AUS E _
- 0. 6 -
p
- o. 5 - jj 11N G4-s M
[ o.3- bb 0
0.2 - ,.c F. j% .
0.1 - I j
'l g [ % 53 DSI .A c -- N JAN FEB WAR APR MAY Ju. AUG SEP OCT NOV DE l Figure 2.9. Mean ammonia, nitrate and organic nitrogen concentrations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-b December 1979.
27
HAZLGTON CNVIRONMENTAL CCl3NCE3 i
RM S34 Intoke Dischorge RM530
'6 I.e5 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS .e4 i
o.5 -
f.92 u
i i
i O.04- .
- -3 0.03-E 0.02 - f ks .
0.Ol-
- p '
/m11-; r y ' , .
r,, , P y t ; I i' l
- 1 ; , a
"; J l
0-JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AU3 SEP OCT NOV OEC 1979
! :6 Oil-y* o -t"'f . 45 SOLUBLE ORTHOPHOSPHK/E 1
e %,)./
t O.10 - -
,T =
1 l
+
[r
?
/J ,
~
0.09 -
I k[,
i /
~
f I / l oce- ', 2 f6 i f.' 1 e ! L4 E /i B 5 s
] if 1
! T' V '
it ;
/
- G97- N. ji ', l ;i , f. 3 '
E S h. 4 p.i hl r1 .' s d 0.06- I [r
,(. h .[i lh $
8 n
'.3 g /
,j 9 j
~ 0.05 ' N ' '
- n. ,
O h !
h' L l l,1 % , h, f?
004~ 2 M j f0e / lJ, i 1 g W ? ?
y ,
ljs k N i gb s , .' > '!
0.03- ,I lj
) N % h 1'.s i
9 pp: Mt $ f
'; s s ,
f.
, 3 , t e s ,
a
[ g ;
G02' ) .5 l f M: l ,; / j n r j [ y l Y , '5
$ 'N f h
" J
' -id i
o.oi JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB AR PR MAY 1979
(
Figure 2.10. Mean total phosphorus and soluble orthophosphate concen-trations in the Missouri Rivec near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979. (
i 28
HAZLETON GNVIRONMINTAL CCICNC"20 RM 534 Insoke Discherge RM530 TOTAL ORGANIC CARSON 40-
'i; 30 - 'I
- l
) 20- .!;;
! C lo - N a 0- - - -
JAN FEB MAR APR - MAY Jtm JUL - AUG SEP OCT DEC 130835 CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND o.5 40-g l **' \
?
= n s 20 - r ;J ,
?
(( U S Ei g 0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLM JUL AUG SEP OCT HOV DEC '
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND S- h d
O 4- ! o N
l2 JAN FEB MAR APR_ MAY JUN _ JUL _ AUG _ SEP OCT NOV DEC l
Figure 2.11, Mean concentrations of biochemical oxygen demand, chemical l
oxygen demand and total organic carbon in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
29 l
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCENC2]
Tabic 2.1. Physical measurements and instrumentation.
lieasurement Instrument . asurement Air temperature Bendix Psychrometer ~
+0.5 C wet and dry bulb Model 566 or Taylor '
Sling Psychrometer Cloud cover Field Observer Relative humidi ty Calcuiated +1%
Wind veloci ty Field Observer and Direction Dwyer Wind tieter +3 mph Current velocity General Oceanics Digi tal -+0.1 n/sec Flowmeter fodel 2031-2035
(
(
0 30 l
Man mTON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEa Table 2.2. Chemical analyses performed on water samples collected at the four primary sampling locations (RM 534, intake, discharge canal, and RM 530) in the Missouri River.
General Water Quality,
- Temperature True color
- Dissolved oxygen Threshold odor
- 0xygen saturation Calciun :
- pH Potassium Alkalini ty Sodium Residue, filtrable Chloride (Total dissolved solids) Fluoride Specific conductance Sulfate Residue, nonfiltrable, Iron (Total suspended solids) Manganese
- Turbidi ty Aquatic Nutrients
- Ammonia
- Soluble orthophosphate
- Nitrate
- Total phosphorus
- Nitrite
- Soluble silica Total organic nitrogen Indicators of Industrial and Municipal Contamination <
Total coliform bacteria Total chlorine a Fecal coliform bacteria Methylene blue-active substances i
Fecal streptococci bacteria Total organic carbon Biochemical oxygen demand (5-day) Phenols Chemical oxygen demand Trace Metals Cadmium Mercury Copper Zinc Lead
- Analyses which were performed on water samples collected at RM 532 and RM 528, May through October 1979.
a Discharge canal only.
l l
s 31 4 !
i
1 1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCENC]
l Table 2.3. Analytical methods with references, preservation techniques and detection limits. I Preactwatnon lie t er t ion l'a r sate f e l_ M_cthad . j erhnlife Rf feff_nre Jimit Alli a llni r s , total 'le t b>d 102 Pefrigeration A.P.H.A. et al. I sp /1-04(O g 19 7 ti A~e .n t . (.as diffusion Hg C l.., . Tbia.es and Booth 0. 01 og / l- N e l e( t r od e refrigeration 1961; Howe and Hallev 1969 Me t hod l ' 't H E ( 1. $ , A . P . H. A. et al. 0. 01 mg 'l -N refripcration 19 7f, ; Howe an.)
Hollev 1969 A.it oan.s t v re r L'.S.I.P.A. 1974 0.01 myll-N Hgi ty, tolerimetric phenate tefrtgrration Howe and Hollev me t hni 1964 i.ttria fr.al Met hod 4MR N.a ,57 0g, A.P.H.A. et Al. 0 OrganI#m98 e l l t f r- sterile lmttle, 1976 100 ml refrf eratton De l aved in( uba t ion Na ,5 ,0 Tavior et al. O organim=/ )
me t ho 1 sterll!.h,ttle. 19M 100 el /
reftircratinn c . rtria, fe,41 Me t hod 4098 h.a J ,0 g , A.P.H A. et al. O crg4ntums!
stretta 1 s t e r I I .* l'o t t l e . 1976 100 mi retrAgrratlon inc i a . e d insub.6 t t on Es;5_.n g . Ma llipos e Corp. O organt.es/
se t ho.! et e.r t l e bottle, 1971 100 #1 reftigeratton teria total Mr t h.nl 40M A Lej%j0 . A.P.H.A. et 41. O organ 1=m*'
- lifatm etertle ottle. 1 ; ;,, 100 ml.
refrig.ratton Me t hod 4MC Naysj 0), A. P . it . A. et al, O organises/
sterlie tui t t l e . Ig e ml refrlyeratton a b. n t < .31 Method 219 ke(rigeration A.P.H.A. et al. 0.5 en/l iri d r.i md ( 5-d.a v ) 197#
(
. ie At ois i r absorptlosi ll%0 g Perkin-f.1mer 0.01 egfl d i r ec t asrit at ion forp. 19681 At <etr ahoorption HNa g Flutean and 0.8 ig/l s he lat icn Midgett 19M
(
Atomic ab*or pt ion Perkin Elect 0.02 La/l HNO' t'o r p . 19724 graphite ar catier At om n r actorrtlan HNO 3 Trrbjo-flmer 2 (g/l al ii rr i :s u p i t .e t i on t or i . l 48.81 1 in , low level meth. l Prfrir.tatton F.%.) l' , A . 11.1 top, *l
'i 197, fti Me t hod !!?> Anne r eg a t t ed A.F.H.A. et al. 1976 U. % FF 'l As.t oa ria l v r e r None required l' . 5. l' . P . A . 1974 0.1 es!!
l 't i n. tetil and Me t h.sd 114 8 Meaniared in t he A.P.H.A. et al. 0.01 eg e l
' t. e field 1976 f.t. tror a m* Method !!M None requierd A.P.M.A. et al. I unit v ete"' 1976
> u t .su e , a r e .. i f i c HsJrolah ServcVet NasurcJ in e l r_ u Hvdrolah Corp. 197) I t.mho /(m Met hod 1** Kmc required A.F.H.A. et a l .19 7t, 1 pahoh m I
( - . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __
32
- 1
1 l
l l
l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 2.3. (continued)
Preservation Detection Pa r ame t rr Met hod Technique Reference lieit Atomic absorption HNO 3 Perkin-Elser 0.01 og/l Copper direct aspiration Corp. 1968 Atomic absorption Fishman and 0.1 pg/l HNO3 chelation Mid get t 1968 Atomic absorption HNO3 Perkin-Elmer 0,2 bg/l graphite atomiser Corp 1972a Fluor 8' Specific ton electrode None required Orion Research Inc 0.01 sg/l 1970 lion Atomic absorption HNO 3 Perkin-Elser 0.03 og/l direct aspiration Corr. 1968 Atomic absorption HNO 3 Fis W n and 1 98/1 chelation Midgett 1968 Atomic absorption HNO3 Perkin-Elmer 0.5 ug/l graphite atostrer Corp. 1972a Lead Ateele absorption HNO3 Perkin-Elmer 0.1 ug/l direct aspiration Corp. 1968 Atomic absorption Fishman and I bg/l HNO, chelation Midgett 1968 Atomic abs >rpt ion HNO 3
Perkin-Elser 1 kg/l graphite at omizer Corp.1972a Magnesium Atomic absorption HNO3 Perkin-Elmer 1 93/1 direct aspiration Corp. 1968 Manganese Atomic absorption Perkin-Elmer 0.01 mg/l HNc3 direct as pir a t ion Corp. 1968 Atomic absorption HNO 3 Fishman and 1 bs/1 c helat ion Midgett 1968 Atomic absorption HNO3 Perkin-Elmer 0.1 kg/l graphite atomirer Corp. 1972a Mercury Flameless etcunic absorpt ion HNO 3 U.S.E.P.A. 1974 0.05 ug/l Met hylene blue- Method 159 Refrigeration A.P.H.A. et al. 0.025 mg/l active substances 1976 Nit rat e Method 213C Hgtl y. A.P.H.A. et al . 1976 ; 0.01 mg/1-N re f rirerat ion Howe and Halley 1969 Autoanalyzer cadmium Hgc13, 12. 5. E .P. A. 1974; 0.01 ag/1-N reduction refriseration Howe and Holley 1969 Nit rit e Methm 11.6. HgC1 , Strickland and 0.1 pg/1-N 7
refrigeration Parsons 1972; Howe and Holley 1964 Odar, t hreshold Method 136 Ref r isterat ion A.P.H.A. et al .19 76 -
Organic c arten. Method 138A HC1, A.P.H.A. et al. 19763 1 86 I total refrigeration Oc ean . Int. Corp. i (1974) a.h l l
Oc ean. Int. Analyzer HCL. Ocean. Inter. Corp. 0.2 mg/l wet oxidation refriceration (1974) b i 1
Organic nitrogen. Met hod s 13 5 t hen 132C HgC12 , A.P.H.A. et al.1976 ; 0.01 ag/l I total refrigeration Howe and Holley 1969 i l
1 I
33
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 2.3. (continued)
Preservation Detesalon r.,r amer a r methnd Te< hn Ique Referenee Ifnit or t h.ghosph,*t e, Method !!.l. Filtration, Strickland and Parsons I og/1-P l
refrigeration 1972; Ryden et al. 1972 soluble Measu r ed Hydrolab Corp. 0.1 mg/l exvg e% Hyd rolab Surveyor, or d i s sol ved oxygen analyzer, methafs in altu A.P .H. A. et a! .19 76 218F and 2188 i
Met hod 218B Meanur ed in t he field A.P.H.A. et al . 1976 0.1 mg/l A.P.P.A. et al Empressed as o= vr e n Calculat ed metWJ -
218B 1976 percent ut ur at am Measursd in, situ Hydrolib Corp. 1973 0.1 pH PH Hydro 1=b Surveyor Met hod 144A Measured in t he field A.P.H.A et al. 1976 0.1 pH
~ 4 env i r. Methods 2228 then 222C Cus0 6, H 3 PO4 , A.P.H.A. et al. 1976 i sg/l reftigeration N. m e required A.P.H.A. et al . 19 76 ; I bg/1-P hosr vras, total Met Md 223C t hen method 11.1. St rickland and Parsons 1972 At te1r absorpt ion Perkin-Elmer 5 &A/1
- .t a s s i ae HNo) dirert a sp ir at ion Corp. 1968 besidm . f ilt rable Nt hod 1488 None required A.P.H. A. et al .19 4 2 og/l (t nt al d issalved solids) r s td ue nanfiltrable werbod 14BC None requirco A.P.H.A. et al . 1976 1 ag/l s t ot.nl sopended salids)
Met hod !$1C F ilt ra' ion A.P.H.A. et al. 1976 0.01 mg/1-5102
~ t l u a. saluble Aut oanaly re r Filtro*lon Technicon Industrial 0.01 eg/1-5102 met hod 105-71 W Systems 1974 Pe r kin-Elmer 2 kg/l
- s. flue At omic absorption HNO3 direct aspiration Corp. 1968 Method 1 %C Eme required A.P.H.A. et al .1976 5 mg/l alfate
(
tut oa nal y s er Mne required Technicon Industrial 1 mg/l et Ws 118-71 W System 1974
. m; c t s t u r. Hvd sstab Surveyor, or Measured in sit u Hydrolab Corp. 197); 0.1 C Whi t na .- Thermomet er , A.P.H.A. et al. 1976 met hod 152 c
. r t 1,! !! s H.ach Turbidimeter, None required A.P.H. A. et al .1976 0.1 N.T.t'.
met hoJ 16 LA t' Atomic absorption HNO 3 Perkin-Elmer 0.01 mg/l dites t .nspiratlon Corp. 19AR At ost ic absorpt ton HNO3 Fichman ind 1 pg/l chelarSon Midgett 1968 At omic absorp t ion HNO3 Perk.+ Elmer 0.1 L.g/l I
graphit e at omirer Corp M7h 34
Table 2.4. Water Quality Standards of the State of Nebraska (1976) and Environmental Technical Specifications of the Cooper Nuclear Station applicable to the Missouri River.
Water Quality Standards Environmental Frntection tenditions Fnvironnental Technical Specifications h!3mr Mebras M pepattaenJ_ol fnvirennental Control Coope Q qlear Stat _I_on l
W eer temperature The temperature of the receiving water shall not be increased Flant operation will be coutrolled to prevent the thermal plume by a total of more than SF (2.PC) from natural. For wara issuing from the plant exceeding SF (2.8C) AT in summertime and waters the maximum limit is 90F (32.2C). 10F (5.5C) eT in wintertime outside a mining zone downstream of the discharge canal. Flant operation also will be controlled to prevent the SF (2.8C) isotherm trou exceeding a width of 1/3 of the river and a distance 7500 feet f rom the discharge canal outlet. In addition. the thermal patterns created by N station cperation will be controlled so that the temperature N outside the eining zone will not exceed 90F (32.2C) as a result I of station operation.
Oxygen, dissolved Shall not be lower than 5 mg/l in warm waters. O pH Shall be a41ntained between 6.5 and 8.5 with a maximum total The hydrogen ton content in the discharge canal is to be Z
change of 0.5 pH unit from the value in the receiving waters. mafntained between 6.5 and 9.0 pH units. No single unit of g discharge to change the water in the discharge canal more than 0.5 pH unit.
h Chlorine, total The concentration of total residual chlorine f ree all combined n
sources in the discharge canal shall not be greater than 0.1 s=g/1. O Ammonta Asmonta nitrogen concentrations shall not exceed 1.0 mg/1.
7 Solide, A point source dinharge shall not increase the total m total dissolved dissolved solida concentration of the receiving stream by {
more than 10% and in no case shall the total dissolved solids of a stream exceed 750 mg/1.
g=
Conductance. specifle A point source discherge shall not inc rease the conductivit y 1. onductivity of the receiving water shall not increase by E of the receiving water by more than 10% and in no case shall more than 101 as a result of plant discharges.
the corhiuctivit y exceed 900 alt roehos per rentimeter at 25C. O m
Suspen. fed colloidal None f rom wastewater sources which will permit ob ject ionable Turbidity from westewater shall not impart more than a 101 Z or settleable solide depesition or be deleterious for the designated uses. In increase to the water in the discharge canal, g no case shall turbidity caused by wastewater impart more than a 10% increase in turbidity to the receiving water.
Fecal toliform Fecal coliform organisms shall not exceed a geometric mean organisms of 200 per 100 milliliters, nor equal or exceed 400 per 100 milliliter in more than 10% of the samples.
Taste and odor Concentrations of s ho ta, es shall be less than the amount producing substances which would degra.c 3e waar quality f or the designated uses.
Toute and deleterious None alone or in combination with other substances of substances wastes in concentrations of such nature so as to render the receiving water unsafe or unsultable for the assigned beneficial uses.
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 1
Table 2.5. Monthly minimum, maximum, and mean concentrations of general water quality constituents in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
_ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - _ ~ - - - - . _ _ _
sov~ Tc vearly [
_f a,rame_ter_ __ _ , _ _Jan1]eL_Ma r_ffrTNyZJ(n ~ 7wl~KfC.TefZ 6ct '
6 6 6 6 6 3 57 3 3 6 6 ater tem erature n 3 3 21.5 25.0 25.0 20.0 11.7 3.6 1.2 L.u K) rin 0.0 0.1 3.5 14.7 16.8 14.6 16.0 17.3 30.2 34.1 31.1 30.3 22.2 11.b 17.5 34 .1 man 16.5 15 14.6 mean 6.2 5.11 7.5 15.2 17.1 23.3 27.1 26.0 22.1 13.P 5.0 7.2 l
6 11 12 12 1? 12 11 Il 6 112 inea, dissolved n 6 6 6 7.? 5.5 5.3 6.3 7.1 8.6 11.1 11.5 5.3 byl) mn 11.0 lu.3 6.9 7.8 12.5 tr.5 12.3 11.H 7.5 8.6 9.4 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.8 10.4 11.7 mai e.9 11.3 7.1 8.2 8.4 5.6 6.5 6.h 7.5 9.1 11.4 12.6 mean 11.7 12 12 12 12 11 12 6 112 Osy y n saturation p 6 6 6 6 11 82 hu 52 77 82 62 65 77 8U 79 64 85 52 I ) min ha 97 9u 97 91 101 104 ti3 125 125 maa 113 104 75 87 77 83 85 B7 68 90 99 b5 meas % 88 60 f!?
6 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 112 tw n 6 6 6 7.6 7.5 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.0 8.3 7.9 8.1 6.0 1.3 fuests) min 7.3 7.5 7.4 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.3 8.4 8.2 8.2 8.1 5.5 N
7.6 7.6 7.8 7.7 d.1 8.3 8.3 3.2 8.3 6.1 8.1 e.0 b.V mean 6 6 6 12 12 12 11 12 12 12 6 113 t n 6 Alkaltnity.3)otal min 175 106 172 172 165 166 194 204 189 218 2v5 Iv6 (rTICa3 171 160 176 181 178 2v8 220 194 221 210 2/J na n 176 11 3 1 81 111 176 174 171 172 202 211 192 21 9 2V 7 1o2 mea 9 173 177 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 b 6 6 6 tb Solics, total dissolved n 458 458 46u 4)6 522 450 516 51 4 255 9r1) min 536 517 25 5 4 36 (27 53J 268 460 47 5 470 $2J $21 538 5c2 S34 549 (27 man 450 466 464 433 511 528 479 523 532 4e4 mean 546 520 262 n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 b M Totta , total 1590 150 105 130 196 45 58 87 39 54 1 susceMed img!1) m1 e 1 2 103 319u nas 35 10 2050 3190 15b 178 300u 105 112 116 76 H.5 1823 740 141 155 1204 72 4b IJ1 65 75 37*
nean 13 6 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 b bb Conductance, specif tc n 6 6 6 min 750 7bJ 350 650 71 0 710 700 770 750 760 75J 79J 35v I rhes /cm) 780 79J NJ t 5.
nas 85J 790 36 0 teu 750 723 74J 62J 760 mean 610 775 36 5 670 735 718 726 704 752 769 7n9 e45 73) 6 6 1/ 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 113 T urM 11 t y n 6 5 mi n Zu IU 5J 66 6t 6J 71 50 25 18 le 20 Iv
( "i .1. u ) 3t, %
man BJ 28 170 200 9" 100 9au 77 45 25 25 159 112 7h 76 292 (5 30 30 21 22 bJ mean 45 21 4
6 6 6 8 8 6 6 8 8 8 6 +-
Lolcr. trve n 6 6 8 8 7 6 4 .
(wattst min 13 2 67 15 7 7 16 8 13 8 9 6 9 4 it nas 14 3 72 P 8 8 10 8 9 7 6 4 14 nean 13 2 69 16 6 8 8 8 6 8 8 e b bt C a' c t e n 6 6 6 3a 79 7e 69 61 72 58 62 76 75 .it M'l) ni n 62 56 l '
(6 14J 74 74 73 67 7e 7e I4-l a. 61 45 7 <$ 7U 95 72 tb 72 70 65 77 77 7L
' u sn 64 56 43 77 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 e b eb 4 ct usM n b 6 6 6.3 4.9 9.1 8.0 6.8 7.4 6.8 6.4 6.J b.1 5.3 4.9 f r:0 ) min it 6.9 6.5 6.5 5.7 29 man 7.0 5.2 18 2v 8.3 7.5 13 7.1 l
mean 6.5 5.1 17 14 8.1 7.3 10.0 7.0 6.6 6.2 6.3 5.5 12 l 8 6 6 86
' bti c
- 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 6' 67 18 48 47 57 56 63 63 67 5b b8 to 92'1) mi n 7s 70 19 52 51 61 54 65 69 72 57 7v 15 ma n 50 56 59 53 64 67 70 57 b4 59 re nn 7/ 64 13 36
HAZLEYON ENVIRONM2NTAL CCCNCF3 l
Table 2.5. (continued)
Month Parameter Jan Feb Mae Apr May _ Jun Jul Auq Sep Oct how Dec Vearly Chloride n 6 6 6 6 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 (eg/1) mi n 25 21 11 16 '8 18 17 18 16 18 16 15 11 man 35 22 12 17 19 18 19 24 17 27 19 16 35 mean 29 22 12 17 18 18 18 20 16 20 16 15 18 Flouride n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 (m9/1) min 0.56 0.45 0.22 0.41 0.38 0.50 0.40 0.46 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.42 0.22 man 0.66 0.45 0.24 0.46 0.40 0.52 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.66 mean 0.60 0.45 0.23 0.43 0.39 0.51 0.43 0.48 0.49 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.46 Sulfate n 6 6 6 6 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 66 (m9/1) min 190 200 45 140 170 170 200 230 200 200 170 190 '5 maa 190 200 51 150 170 190 220 240 230 210 180 190 24 mean 190 200 48 147 170 185 204 U1 206 206 174 190 179 fron n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 (mg/1) atn 0.13 0.14 61 0.40 4.5 2.5 6.8 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.6 0.13 man 0.59 0.31 80 64 5. 2 7.1 40 3.3 3.8 3.3 3.6 3.4 80 mean 0.34 0.24 68 15 4.8 5.1 25 2.7 3.1 2.9 2.8 1.7 11.0 Maganese n 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 66 (mg!!) min 0.013 0.015 1.4 0.29 0.23 0.13 0.35 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.13 0.094 0.013 man 0.071 0.031 2.0 2.7 0.29 0.35 2.6 0.24 0.22 0.16 0.19 0.11 2.7 mean 0.034 0.025 1.7 0.7 0.26 0.27 1.3 0.18 0.19 0.14 0.16 0.10 0.43 Gdor, threshold n 6 6 6 6 8 7 8 8 7 7 7 6 82 (nuncer) min <1 (1 (1 (1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 (1 (1 (1 <1 man (1 1 2 1 (1 1 (1 <1 (1 1 (1 1 2 mean <1 <1 1. <1 (1 1 (1 (1 <1 1 (1 <1 1
) 37
f ll HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC3]
Table 2.6. Monthly mininum, maximum and mean concentrations of aquatic nutrients in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
Month Yearly Jul ha Sep Oct how Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Paravter
- f. 8 8 8 6 86 n 6 6 6 6 8 8 Amonia f L.01 (0.01 0.02 0.05 0.10 <0.01 (mg/1) mi n 0.10 0.18 0.61 0.04 0.01 (0.01 (0.01 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.72 0.21 0.72 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.03 man 0.26 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.!! 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.66 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.02 i I mean 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 8 8 8 Nitrate n 6 0.21 0.23 0.90 0.40 1.9 1.2 0.21 min 0.39 0.44 1.5 1.9 1.4 0.60 2.5 (mg/1-h) 1.1 0.53 0.26 0.96 0.43 2.2 1.3 man 0.41 0.50 1.8 2.5 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.5 0.75 0.35 0.25 0.93 0.41 2.0 mean 0.40 0.46 1.6 2.2 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 8 8 8 Nitrite n 6 6 0.004 (mg/1-N) min 0.005 0.005 0.031 0.030 0.016 0.007 0.004 0.006 0.010 0.007 0.014 0.007 0.040 man 0.008 0.007 0.087 0.040 0.017 0.017 0.011 0.007 0.011 0.008 0.016 0.006 0.016 mean 0.006 0.006 0.068 0.032 0.017 0.011 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.007 0.015 0.008 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 Organic nitro 9en, n 1.1 0.59 0.64 0.60 0.47 0.44 0.32 0.32 0.40 4.2 1.2 1.0 0.71 total (m9/1-N) mi n 5.4 0.74 0.81 0.76 0.92 0.14 5.7 0.48 0.45 4.7 5.7 1.3 1.1 man 3.2 0.66 0.70 0.68 0.63 0.32 1.29 mean 0.39 0.41 4.4 2.0 1.2 0.9 8 8 8 8 6 86 n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 Orthophosphate. 016 soluble min 0.088 0.080 0.092 0.11 0.090 0.016 0.028 0.029 0.069 0.063 0.083 0.060 7 (mg/1-P) man 0.12 0.40 0.28 0.13 0.11 0.051 0.088 0.091 0.081 0.077 0.096 0.078 0..
mean 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.039 0.047 0.049 0.078 0.066 0.088 0.066 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 8 8 Phosphorus, total n 6 0.10 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.081 0.048 (mg/1-P) mi n 0.11 0.048 0.75 0.12 0.19 0.097 0.15 1.9 0.14 0.21 0.23 0.37 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.22 0.93 ra n 0.15 0.095 1.9 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.35 0.28 mean 0.13 0.083 1. 2 0.12 0.20 0.18 0.24 0.14 8 8 8 8 6 86 n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 Silica. soluble 9.6 14 10 8.6 8.4 8.2 9.9 8.9 13 11 8.2 (mg/1-510 ) ein 15 14 11 17 man 15 15 10 15 12 9.3 9.0 8.6 12 11 17 8.4 10.0 9.6 14 11 11 mean 15 15 9.9 15 11 9.0 8.9 38
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 2.7. Monthly minimum, maximum and ctan concentrations of selected indicators of industrial and municipal contamination in the Missouri Riv0r near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-Dece<oer 1979.
Month Parawter Jan Feb Par Apr Man Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct hov Dec Vearly Bacteria. total n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 collform ein 3000 3100 110000 44000 14 % 0 50000 87000 14000 17000 67000 53000 6300 3000 (no/100 ml) man 8200 16000 170000 390000 100000 110000 150000 29000 44000 97000 100000 14000 390000 mean 4967 7583 14833 173833 29375 58875 33125 26875 32375 85000 54333 9117 44191 Bacteria fecal n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 coliform min 380 130 1400 200 750 2000 2000 1200 1200 1400 2400 390 130 (no/100 ml) man 880 1500 3200 1500 1800 3200 3100 1900 2200 2900 7300 1500 7300 mean 615 650 2567 833 1222 2462 2350 1500 1525 2100 4300 1000 1760 Bacteria fecal n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 streptococci mi n 57 110 2500 160 110 600 2400 240 90 2400 1500 1500 57 (no/100 ml) man 100 200 4/v0 3400 340 1300 12000 560 110 2800 6500 2400 12000 mean 77 152 3433 805 216 862 60R8 372 99 2575 3125 1850 1638 Biochemical onygen n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 demand (5 ey) min 1.0 0.7 5.9 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.9 1.6 1.4 2.4 1.0 1.8 0.7 (mg/1) max 1.2 1.2 6.5 5.7 2.5 2.8 4.7 2.1 1.8 3.8 1. 6 3.1 6.5 sean 1.0 1.0 6.1 3.1 2.1 2.3 3.9 1.8 1.6 3.3 1.4 2.4 2.5 Chemical oxygen n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 demand min 7 8 130 27 15 16 23 13 17 14 14 14 7 (mg/1) man 9 10 140 87 18 23 110 18 22 20 16 22 140 meen 7.5 9 132 38 16 20 59 15 19 17 16 17 30 Organic carbon. total n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 (m9/1) min 3.8 3.8 45 13 6.9 7.8 8.1 4.6 5.6 3.9 5.8 5.7 3.8 man 5.1 5.5 59 55 9.0 14 39 8.3 7.2 7. 2 9.1 6.4 59 mean 4.3 4.6 55 22 7. 7 10.0 24 6.3 8.4 5.1 7.2 6.2 13 Methylene blue n 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 B6 activating-substances ein (0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 (0-025 <0.025 <0.025 (0.025 <0.025 (mg/1) man 0.04 0.01 <0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 (0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 mean 0.04 <0.025 (0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 (0.025 <0.025 <0.025 Phenols n 5 5 5 6 3 5 6 7 7 7 6 6 73 (mg/1) min <0.001 0.002 (0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 (0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003 (0.001 man 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.007 0.007 0.005 0.007 mean (0.001 0.003 0.002 0.003 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.003 Chlorine. total n 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 24 (mg/1) min <0.01 (0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 <0.01 (0.01 man <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 mean (0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (0.01 (0.01 (0.01 <0.01 (0.01 (0 01 (0.01
\
39 I 1
1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 2.8. Monthly minimum, maximum, and mean concentrations of selected trace metals in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
Month Jun Jul Auo Sep Oct %v Det teacIJ Parameter Ja7 Feb Mar Apr N4r 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 6 8 8 Cadefum n 0.51 0.38 0.08 0 05 (0.02 0.37 <0.02 ein (0.02 0.15 2.1 <0.02 0.28 0.34 (mg/1) 0 22 2.8 11 0.75 0.95 3.1 0.82 0.45 0.29 (0.02 2.3 11 man 0.27 0.24 0.16 (0.02 1.5 1.0 0.12 0 19 2.5 3.3 0.47 0.54 1.3 0.54 mean 8 8 8 8 8 6 66 6 6 6 8 8 Copper n 6 5.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 22 (0.5 (eg/1) min 1.7 4.6 32 0.5 5.0 5.5 13 75 75 18 9.0 12 19 35 man 4.7 10 43 62 15.0 26 16 7.6 12 37 9 7.7 8.3 11 28 mean 3.1 6.4 37 16 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 n 6 6 6 6 8 8 Lead 2 1 (1 1 1 (1 (1 (eg!1) ein (1 (I 9 <1 1 1 16 3 4 12 3 2 5 2 1 man <1 2.0 16 <1 3.8 1.8 (1 3.3 20 12 <1 2.2 2.8 4.9 2 1.3 mean <1 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 6 8 8 Mertu ry n 0.26 0.27 (0.02 (0.02 (eg/1) min 0.38 <0.2 0.2J (0.02 (0.02 <0.02 (0.02 (0.02 (0.02 0.45 1.9 0.85 0.94 2.8 0.91 0.24 1.3 0.78 0.61 2.8 0.54 0.96 ma n 0.70 0.33 11 0.49 0.52 0.61 sean 0.70 0.22 0.81 0.45 0.40 12 0.36 8 8 8 8 8 6 86 6 6 6 6 8 8 linc n 15 28 29 19 8.0 14 16 25 <0.1
(*9/1 ) ein 0.3 <0.1 700 26 28 73 41 270 3.5 270 220 52 58 230 45 24 man 37 33 53 43 113 28 18 20 33 mean 10 19 243 65 24 40 t
Table 2.9. Comparison of data for selected water quality parameters from corresponding sampling periods during preoperational and operational status of Ccoper Nuclear Station, 1971-79.a,b,c
~
Preoperational Data _
Operational Data l'pstream Dmms t ream Upstream Downstream Parameter Year .Ny Julv October Hav Ju Q October Year Fay July October %y July October Water 1971 14.9 24.0 16.0 14.9 24.0 16.5 1974d 27.8 13.4 28.1 14.8 1972 16.7 24.3 12.1 16.6 f y temperature 24.6 12.0 1975 -
23.9 13.6 24.4 13.7 p (C) 1973 15.3 26.1 17.1 14.9 25.9 16.9 1976 17.6 25.5 9.4 17.7 26.2 10.9 1974d _e 20,0 N 1977 23,4 25,9 13.8 21.9 26.5 15.2 r-1978 18.8 24.2 11.3 19.4 24.9 12.0 D1 1979 17.3 2 5. n 11.7 17.0 26.2 12.2 d Dissolved 1971 10.4 7.0 8.7 10.0 10.0 8.9 1974d 7.3 8.7 7.2 8.9 0 oxygen 1972 7. 9 5.3 9.7 7.8 5.3 10.3 1975 8.2 6.6 9.1 7.6 6.5 7.7 Z (mg/1) 1973 7.8 6.4 7.5 8.0 6.4 7.3 1976 6.4 9.7 9.5 1974d e 6.4 6.9 6.4 m 4.8 1977 6.1 5.5 9.2 5.4 9.1 1978 7.6 5.9 9.6 6.6 7.8 5.9 9.7 2
at, 1979 7.9 5.6 H.6 8.1 7.1 9.1 --
$ Oxygen 1971 102 82 87 98 118 92 1974d .
91 83 90 85 I u t ura t ion 1972 82 62 92 80 0 l 62 95 1975 -
79 88 -
79 74 (t) 1973 76 52 77 78 52 75 1976 68 -
85 73 -
87 2 Irf4d _e 52 1977 70 68 89 76 68 91 $
1978 83 72 88 85 72 90 RI '
pli 8.2 1979 83 69 79 84 86 90 Z 1 71 8.3 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.1 19744 8.3 8.1 8.0 8.3 8.0 4 1972 8.0 7.7 8.2 8.2 8.8 8.1 1975 7.8 8.2 8.2 7.8 8.4 8.3 D 1971 8.0 8.2 7.6 7. 9 8.2 7.6 1976 7. 3 8.2 8.0 7.4 8.2 8.0 I 19741 e 7.7 7.9
'.0 1977 8.0 7.7 7.9 8.1 M 1978 6 8.1 8.2 8.6 8.1 8.2 0 1979 8.2 8.1 8.0 8.2 8.3 8.1 Rl Allo 11 nit y, 1971 150 150 142 150 162 149 1974d 160 total 1972 171 152 157 172 145 160 1975 167 171 161 158 164 Z 166 174 170 160 O (mg/1-CACO3 ) 1973 168 172 182 163 174 179 1975 159 155 158 158 159 158 m 1974d .e 198 1977 140 144 162 142 15G 163 W 1978 17. 131 156 171 130 152 1979 173 175 191 372 168 192 Turbldt y8 1971 37 50 42 37 41 42 1974d 51 24 53 27 (N.T.U.) 1972 74 178 32 76 94 35 1975 120 54 63 110 59 17 1973 195 73 99 205 71 108 1976 295 21 23 295 23 52 1974d _e 350 1977 525 300 64 510 425 40 1978 50 185 35 48 190 35 1979 94 790 35 78 82 35 1
Table 2.9. (continued)
Preoper at innal Dat a Operational Data l'ps t ream Downstream 11stteam DownStteam Parameter Year Ny July Getober Mey 7 Julv October ~ Year May July October by July October Potassium 1971 6.5 5.8 5.0 ' ' -' 1974d 6.1 5.3 5.9 5.4 (mg/1) 1972 8.0 15 6.1 -' -' -' 1975 7.7 5.3 4.6 7.7 5.3 4.7 1973 11 7.0 11 10 7.0 10 1976 8.2 5.0 5.1 8.3 4.8 5.0 1974 d # N 30 1977 14 9.6 6.1 14 9.4 6.1 g-1978 7.1 9.3 5.6 1.3 10.0 5.4 pl 1979 d H.2 13 6.3 B.1 7.4 6.1 d Chotoride 1971 16.0 13.5 13.8 -C -C -C 1974 15.4 17.3 15.9 17.8 0 (mx/1) 1972 15.0 12.3 13.5 C c _c 1975 17.5 12.3 13.9 17.4 13.5 14.5 Z 1973 !?.2 17.0 17.1 17.1 16.8 17.1 1976 18.1 14.2 16.4 18.9 15.0 16.3 g 1974d .e 11.0 1977 14 15 21 14 15 21 1978 19 19 13 19 21 13 7
19 4
A ' 1979 d 18 18 18 18 18 -
Sulfate 1971 140 238 177 -' -' 1974 203 210 203 207 I (mg/1) 1972 100 176 183 -' -' -' 1975 166 265 198 160 250 190 0 1973 120
_e 201 121 105 202 105 1976 165 189 192 165 189 193 2 1974d 110 1977 130 170 1978 170 160 1R0 190 130 160 170 $
170 160 ISO m Ar..e n i a 1971 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.11 0.11 1979 1974 d 170 235 0.01 21 0 0.05 170 21 5 205 2 0.01 0.07 (mg/1-N) 1972 0.09 0.04 0.07 0.0R 0.09 0.07 1975 0.06 <0.01 0.01 0.03 <0.01 0.01 4>
1973 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.01 0.06 1976 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 I 1974d e 0.06 1977 0.02 0.05 <0.01 0.02 0.02 <0.01 W 1978 0.02 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.01 0 1979 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.02 <0.01 0.03 m Nitrate 1971 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.21 1974 d 0.37 0.22 U.30 0.J3 (mg/1-N) 1972 0.73 0.70 0.24 0.29 1975 1.9 0.41 2
0.75 0.80 0.13 1.8 0.40 0.14 g 1973 1.3 1.2 0.67 1.3 1.2 1.1 1976 0.59 0.11 0.14 0.56 0.10 0.14 m 1974d _e 1.6 0.56 0.43 1977 0.28 0.54 0.42 0.23 M 1978 0.30 0.34 0.40 0.27 0.35 0.37 1 979 1.5 0.51 0. *.1 1.4 0.23 0.41 o r ho- 19M 0.062 0.046 0.065 0.049 0.042 0.059 1974 d 0.038 0.059 0.035 0.049 ps. .sphat e. 1972 0.969 0.030 0.04/ 0.089 0.048 0.043 1975 0.092 0.070 0.028 0.095 0.048 0.028 solu.le 1973 0.19 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.10 1976 0.076 0.035 0.051 0.082 0.028 0.045 (mg/1-h' '
1974 O.23 1977 0.049 0.062 0.065 0.069 0.062 0.062 1978 0.059 0.049 0.045 0.056 0.067 0.067 1979 0 10s 0.oin 0. 071 0.100 0.0 0 0.06i
Table 2.9. (continued)
Preoperational D.ita Operational Data Downstteam Upstream Downstream ups t re.im Paav Julv October Year May July Oc t obe r_ May July October Pa rnaie t e r Year M.g Julv October Silica 1971 10 8.0 8.7 -* -* -' 1974 d 7,4 4,4 7,4 4,4 7.8 9.5 12 R.0 9.7 1975 14 7.5 8.1 13 7.7 8.1 I soluble 1972 12 y
i B.? 12 10 11 1976 9.1 6.5 9.4 9.2 6.5 9.4 (mg/1-SIGy) 1973 12 9.7 l
- 9.2 1977 12 8.8 13 12 8.7 13 N 1974 7.5 9.2 F 1978 8.9 8.5 9.3 9.3 1979 10.5 8.8 9.1 11.5 9.0 10.3 E d 1800 2900 22000 1700 d Bacteria. 1971 1100 16000 9900 1000 15000 6000 1800 1974 1975 1700 1200 4200 92000 810 3500 0 ,
fecal 1972 15000 15000 6200 20000 17000 2 20000 2200 % 00 M76 2%00 WO WO N000 %0 0 00 1973 6% 11000 coliform 1974 d -' 67000 1977 25000 20000 750 23000 12000 4400 m (No/100ml) 1978 400 8550 4600 760 9750 8750 2 1979d 1275 3050 2600 945 2150 2750 (,
2.2 3.8 7.6 2.6 1974 2.5 3.0 2.2 3.0 Biocneric al 1971 3.3 3.0 2.4 4.2 1975 2.3 1.6 1.6 2.5 2.2 1.6
$ oxygen demand 1972 1973 3.0 3.4 6.5 2.2 2.9 3.6 6.4 2.4
- 3. 0 4.1 1976 4.7 1.2 2.6 4.5 1.0 2.6 '
5.5 1977 2.9 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.6 3.2 (mg/1) 1974 d _e 5.2 2.3 1.1 $
1978 4.0 2.2 1.0
?1 4.7 3.4 2.3 3.0 3.5 E 1979 3 14 16 25 14 1974' 15 20 300 15 21 Z Chemical 1971 25 20 orygen 1972 20 160 12 ' ' ' 1975 31 15 17 31 13 18 j j 26 29 1976 69 16 12 67 14 11 p demand 1973 43 23 31 110 1977 98 51 7.0 93 39 7.2 (mg/1) 1974 8 300 1978 21 33 10 21 37 11 E 1979d 15 110 18 18 23 18 0 1.9 1.7 -' -' -* 1974 1.5 0.45 39 1.1 0.61 m 1971 0.75 Z Iron 1972 3.7 102 1.5 -' -' -* 1975 7.5 0.80 0.80 7.5 0.85 0.91 (mg/1) 0.94 0.52 0.77 0 1973 10.8 2.1 3.5 13 2.2 3.3 1976 19 o.61 16 1977 13 12 1.2 13 10 1.1 M 1974 d _e 39 16.5 W 1978 3.0 13.5 1.5 3.8 1.3 1979 4.7 2.8 2.8 5.1 7.2 3.1 a All values are means.
b Data from Locations 5 and 14 in 1970,1971; Locations R!i 534 and 528 in 1972,1973; and Locations R!i 534 and 530 in 1974, 1979.
c 1971 values are single samples, and the May and July 1972 values as indicated and all remaining values are means of duplicate samples.
O Cooper Nuclear Station operational in July 1974.
e Not determined according to study plan.
f Unable to determine.
9 Turbidity prior to fiay 1975 measured in JTU.
Table 2.10. Sunnary of operating data, Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979.
Turbine Intake Discharge ~CIiTcha r Cooling Water C65iling Water Use Date Capacity ('t) Temp. ('C) Temp. (*C) Canal AT(geC) Flow (cfs) ('; Total River Flow) 23 Jan 99.1 0.0 16.5 16.5 838 4 13 Feb 92.0 0.1 14.6 14.5 878 3 20 tiar 81.3 3.5 15.0 11.5 979 1 24 Apr 00.0 14.8 16.0 1.2 0 0 I 22 flay 00.0 17.2 17.3 0.1 1450-8/1087.5 '.6 3/2 >
17 Jun 98.4 21.1 30.2 9.1 1450 3 %
24 Jul 96.7 25.1 34.1 9.0 1450 3 m 15 Aug 98.6 25.0 31.1 5.1 1450 3 y 18 Sep 90.3 20.1 30.3 10.2 1087.5 2 Z 23 Oct 92.4 11.7 22.2 10.5 1450-8/1087.5-16 3/2 m 13 tMy Not 3.6 11.1 7.5 1450-16/725-8 3/1 2 Available 5
$ 5 Dec 98.7 1.2 17.5 16.3 838 2 y z
{Z N
r M
9 m
Z n
m W
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES Chapter 3 PERIPHYTON By Ronald J. Bockelman i
1 45
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNC23
- 1. Introduction Preoperational baseline data on periphyton abundance. species composi-tion, community structure, and biomass production in the I1issouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station were collected in 192 and 1973 (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc.1973; Andersen and Reetz i975). Data on the effects of operation of Cooper Nuclear Station on the downstream periphyton connunity have been gathered since 1974 (Farrell 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979).
The results of past studies have indicated that diatons (Bacillariophyta) dominated the periphyton community in the itissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station. Green (Chlorophyta) and blue-green (Cyanophyta) algae were only occasionally abundant. Ilowever, field observations suggested that these divisions may be more important on natural substrates.
The first two years of operational data indicated no major changes in downstrean periphyton community structure. Sone di f ferences in bionass production between locations may have been temperature related; however, most of the variability detected in the periphyton connunity of the flissouri River was attributed to natural regulators such as river flow and turbidity.
During the third year of operation, the discharge canal was sampled for periphytic algae. Havicula luzonensis was a dominant sunmer component in the discharge canal while the periMiyton community at other locations was pri-narily dominated by Navicula trip ~unctata var. schizoneucides. Opera tional
~
studies were continued Tn7979"to further assess the efTects of Station operation on the downstream periphyton community.
I'. Fiel d and Analy_ti_ca_1 P_roce_du_re_s_
Periphytic algae were collected fron vertically positioned artificial substrates oriented parallel to the current and held by floating platfoms.
Each pigtforn held six plexiglas plates (22 x 11 cm) with an exposed area of 0.017 m on each side available for periphyton colonization; therefore,12 sanples could be collected from each platf om. One or two platfoms were placed behind a suitable wingdam near each of four sampling locations (Figure 3.1 ) . An additional sampler was placed at the mouth of the discharge canal.
f1onthly collections were made af ter approximately 28 days of colonization. 4 Samples were analyzed for biomass (ash-free weight), species composition, density, biovolune, and diversity. A Ryan continuous temperature reccrder was placed near each sampling platfom except the discharge canal location.
Periphyton biomass samples were processed in accordance with Standard -
flethods ( A.P.H. A. et al .1976). Bionass production wgs reported as ciiTligrams oT isli'f ree dry weight per square meter per day (ng/m per day). An analysis of variance and Tukey's or Schef fe's multiple range test (Schef fe 1959; Steel and Torrie 1960) were used to test for significant differences ;
(p < 0.05) in biomass production between locations within a sampling period. l Trijilicate samples were collected and combined to fom one composite which was then used for algal identification and biovolume deteminations. A separate composite sample was used for diaton and nongdiaton analyses.
Samples were preserved at the time of collection in il preservative (ficyer 1971). Diaton sanples were cleaned using a boiling concentrated nitric acid / potassium dichromate treatment (Hohn and Helleman 1963). The samples 46
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNCT3 were allowed to settle and the supernatant decanted at 24 hr intervals until the pH was > 6. Af ter the concentration of the sample was adjusted to a recorded voTume, a 0.1 ml subsample was nounted in Hyrax mounting medium.
All volumeg were kept constant within a sampling period. A recorded area up to 16.2 mm cf each slide was examined under phase contrast at 1250X nagni fication. One slide was examined from each composite. Each diaton
! frustule was counted as one individual.
Samples for non-diaton analysis were blended for less than 30 sec to insure unifornity and adjusted to a recorded volume. Wet mounts were prepared and examined under light field illumination at 500X magnification. Volume and area exarnned for non-diatom analyses were equivalent to those used for corresponding diaton analyses. Filamentous algae were reported as 10 um lengths and nonfilamentous algae were counted in one cell units. All algal identifications were made to the lowest positive taxonomic level with the aid of appropriate keys.
Algal abundapce was expressed as number of individuals per square centineter (no./cm ). Biovolune of all algal species was determined using the nethods of Cowell (}960) and Hohn (1969) and reported as microliters per square decimeter (ul/dm ). Shannon's (1948) diversity index to log base 2 and evenness indices (Zar 1968) were calculated monthly.
III. Results and Discussion During 1979, 169 algal taxa representing 40 genera and 5 taxonomic divisions were identified in periphyton samples collected from the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Table 3.1 and Appendix B). The general composition of the conmunity was similar to that observed in previous years.
Diatons (Bacillariophyta) composed more than 80% of the taxa observed in 1979. while green algae (Chlorophyta) and blue-green algae (Cyanophyta) conposed approximately 10 and 5% of the total taxa, respectively.
Tojal densities of periphytic algae ranged fron' 421,169 to 9,098,010 uni ts/cm during 1979 to 28,300,629 units /cm{) Table 3.2) and previously reported werein within this the range portion ofof values the (145 liissouri River. Spatial and temporal differences generally were less pronounced during 1979 than during previous years and were much less pronounced than thosgobservedduring1978. Total biovolumes ranged from 14.3 to 2,305.5 ul/dn during 1979 and from 0.01 to 60,939.0 ul/dn during previous years.
In nost nonths biovolunes were greater in 1979 than in years prior to 1978.
Biovolumes have exhibited considerable spatial and temporal variability during all years. Total periphyton densities or biovolumes have not demon-strated a consistent tren
- relative to the Station's thennal effluent.
Diatons numerically dominated (composed more than 50t of total den-sities) the periphyton community at each river location in all months except August (Table 3.3). Green algae were never numerically dominant during 1979, and blue-green algae were dominant only in August at Rf1534, RM 530, a id in the di scha, ge canal . In terms of biovolune, diatoms were dominant (conposed more than 50% of total bioviolume) at all locations sampled in June and Novenber, and at two or more river locations in July, September and October.
River locations and the discharge canal were dominated by green algae ar d 47
HAZLOTON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENC))
blue-green algae, respectively, when diatoms composed less than 50% of total biovolune. The midsummer and early autumi decline in the relative abundance of diatoms, coincident with increases in creen and blue-green algal popula-tions, followed the typical pattern of seasonal succession for algal communi-ties in tenperate climates (Smith 1950). A similar temporal pattern occurred in previous studies. The major ef fect of Station operation on overall composi-tion of periphyton has been to favor development of blue-green algae in the j warmer than ambient waters of the discharge canal. Only occasionally during late summer has this ef fect been detectable at downstream river locations.
Specific algal taxa that frequently were dominant (composed 10% or nore of total density or biovolume) in both 1979 and previous years included Biddul-phia laevis, Gomphonema angustatun (=Gomphonema sp. previously?), Go_mphonena pirvuliinTYavIculiluzonensTs','WaviculiTrTpunctata v. schizonemoides f=h. gra---
(iToTiei =T. heuflir iT, Tladophora glineFatTT=~Cadophora sp.l, and Lyjn bya-
~
ifiqYeTiT (= lyngbya sp. previous'IT?)~.7a~xa that occasionally were dominant in T977Tnd in earl 1Er studies included Cccconeis p~lacentula v. eug~lypta,
~
Diatona vulgare, and Gomphanema olivaceun (Table T.4 and Appendix Bl.
ifitzscliia dilsjata_ has' not been dominant in the !!issouri River since 1974 but was dominant at all river locations in June 1979. Stigeccionium sp. was of ten a dominant prior to 1979 but was never dominant difr1ng'T977. The temperature optina and predicted effects nf temperature changes for nost of these taxa have been described by Farrell (1973,1979).
The dominance of fl. luzonensis in the warm waters of the discharge
~
v Canal probably reflected itTYia Temperature optimum which became a compe-titive advantage over other taxa. -flavicula tripunctata v.schizonemo_ ides was
~
a dominant diaton over a wide range of water temperatures. Thi diatoms Diatoma vulJ are and Gonphonema olivaceum were abundant in fall following a decrease in water tenperatures, and Biddulphia laevis was generally doninant in the ilissouri River during late summer.' Trie seasonal abundance of Clado-phora lomerata was related to its life cycle which is regulated primarily'by viitir; g~Wierature te (Kishler 1967; Taf t 1975). The abundance of Lyngbya _
di_g,ue t i_i, probably was related to the occurrence of Cladop_ hora because these two algae of ten occur together (Prescott 19621. glome _ra,ta The major effect of Station operation on dominant perihytic algae was the development of large populations of II. luzonensis in the discharge canal. The fact that this species was doninant oiily once in t"e Ilissouri River since 1972 (July 1977 at Rt1532) indicated the very loca 1. -d ef fect of thernal discharges from the Station on the periphyton community.
During 1979 diversity and evenness of periphyton ranged from 2.17 to 4.64 and from 0.42 to 0.80, respectively (Table 3.5). Diversity and evenness values generally were greater in magnitude, but less variable spatially and temporally, in 1979 than in previous years. Values usually were greater at river locations than in the discharge canal, which of ten was doninatcd by large numbers of flavicula luzonensis.
Bionass production ranged from 62.59 to 1425.67 mg/m2 per day (ash-f ree dry weight) during 1979 (Table 3.6). As in 1978, mean biomass production was greatest at Ri1530 (Table 3.7). Statistical analyses of the 1979 data revealed that production at Rt1532 (immediately downstream from the Station discharge) was signi ficantly di fferent (p < 0.05) trom the control 48
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNCT location (Ri1534) only in July (Appendix B). Significant differences between R;1532 and Rf1534 were not noted in pre-operational studies. In operational years production was significantly greater at RM 532 than at Ril 534 in July 1975, August 1976, and September 1976. Producticn was significantly less at R!i 532 than at Rtt 534 in July 1974 and June 1978, in addition to July 1979. There was no consistent, statistically significant ef fect of Station operation on periphyton bionass in the tiissouri River.
IV. Summary and Conclusions
- 1. All measurements of the periphytan community in 1979 yielded results that were within the range of values previously reported for the flissouri River near Cooper fluclear Station.
- 2. Diatoms continued to numerically dominate the periphyton community at all locations, while green algae and bl'Je-green algae occasionally dominated periphyton biovolume at river locations and in the discharge canal, respectively.
- 3. Since 1974, najor ef fects of Station operation were development of large populations of flavicula lur.onensis in the discharge canal and sporadic, s+atistically significant diTferences in biomass production at Rt1532.
- 4. Changes that occurred in periphyton at Rt1532 since 1974 were relatively minor in comparison to natural fluctuations that have been ob-served at the control location (RM 534). Operation of Cooper 14uclear Station had no biologically important ef fects on the liissouri River periphyton connunity.
49
r-HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAt. CCCNCL.d V. References Cited American Public Health Association ( APHA), American Water Works Association
( AWWA), and Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF). 1976. Standard nethods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th ed. An. Public Health Assoc., Washington, D. C. 1193 pp.
Andersen, D. L., and S. D. Reetz. 1975. Artificial substrate and benthos studies. Pages 119-150 ~in The evaluation of themal ef f ects in the flissouri R',ver near CoopeF Nulcear St 4 tion (Preoperational Phase), April 1973-flarch 1974. (IBT tio. 64303322). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laborato"ics, Inc. for Nebraska Publii. Power District, Colunbus, Nebr.
Cowell, B. L. 1960. A quantitative stud," of winter plankton of Urschel's Qua rry. Ohio J. Sci . 60:183-191.
Farrell, J. R. 1975. Periphyton. Pages80-115 in The evaluation of themal of fects in the ilissouri River near Cooper Nucl~e~ar Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1974. (IBT Na. 64304909). Report by Industrial B10-TEST Laboratories Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
~
. 1976. Periphyton. Pages94-112 in The evaluation of themal ef fe~c'ts' ~ln the ilissouri River near Cooper NucTear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1975. (Project No. 5501-06419). Report by flALCO Environnental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr.
. 1977. Periphyton. Pages83-106 in The evaluation of themal
" 'etTe~cYs~'in the flissouri River near Cooper Nticlear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1976. (Project No. 5501-07666). Report by NALCO Environnental Sciences for Hebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr.
. l' '8. Pe ri phy ton. Pages H9-109 in The evaluation of themal effecYs in th '"ssouri River near Cooper Huclear Station (Operational
~~
Phase), Januar, 'cember 1977. (Project No. 5501-08776). Report by NALCO Environnens Sciences for Hebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
. 1979. Perip ton. Pages 67-86 in The evaluation of themal
~ ~e ffe'cYsi n the fli ssouri ver near Cooper fliic~ lear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 78. (Project No. 5501-08903). Report by Hazleton Environnental Sci ;es for Nebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr.
Hohn, fl. H. 1969. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of plankton diatons.
9ull. Ohio Biol. Sury. 3:1-211.
~ '. a nd J . Hel l e rna n. 1963. The taxonony and structure of diaton
' pop'ulaTions from three castern North American rivers using three sampling nethods. Trans. An. "icrosc. Soc. 82(3):250-329.
50
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCENCD Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. 1913. The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Pre-operational Phase), April 1972-tiarch 1973. (IBT No. 64301700). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 148 pp +
appendices.
Kishler, W. J. 1967. A quantitative study of Clado Kuetzing in the island region of western LakeiT.~ Tr_phora glomerata (L.)
h.S. Thesfs,~0hio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 58 pp.
fieye r, R . L . 1971. A study of phytoplankton dynanics in Lake Fayetteville as a means of assessing water quality. Arkansas Water Resour. Res.
Center, Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville. Publ. 10, 58 pp.
Scheffe, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
New York. 477 pp.
Shannon, C. E. 1948. A nathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27:379-423, 623-656.
l Smith, G. M. 1959. The freshwater algae of the United States. McGraw-Hill l Book Co. , New York. 719 pp.
Steel, R. G. D. , and J. H. Torrie. 1960. Principles and procedures of I statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co. , Inc. , New York. 481 pp. l l
Taft, C. E. 1975. History of Cladophora in the Great Lakes. Pages 9-16 in H. Shear ated D. E. Konasewich, eds.Cadophora in the Great Lakes.
Tnternational Joint Commission, Windsor, ~Dntario.
Zar, J. H. 1968. Computer calculation of information theoretic measures of diversi ty. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 61:217-21 9.
4 k
l 51
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCGNCC3 LIMN 0 LOGICAL LEGEND f
534 T o y l WATER QUALITY STUOlES Physical Measurenents - 534, f !
and Limited Chemical Intake, d
N Analyses Discharge, 1
532,530,
/ 528
~
Acidi tional Chemical - 534,
- - Analyses Intake, 1 J , Discharge, o 533 530
- IN TA M
- BtOLOGY 2
NUCLEAR - 4 Periphyton, Aquatic - 534,532, STATION y Macroinvertebrates, 530,528 e
O/scuA nar 532 and Benthos
[ Fish Study - 534,532, 530 7
(Nebraska and Missouri increline
/ 55' at each t location)
Fish larvae - Intake, 2,4 530' TOPOGR APHIC LEGEND
- i o526 River Mile and Sampling Locato)
N Rip Rap - Wing Dom 4 329 Levee e Training Oike 528 . ,- 5 2 5 -
A g
-0
\ M ,
52' 526'
~
52 fM - '
.52
.i.l , . .i>_ . ,
SCALE IN MILES o 05 6 2 Fiqure 3.1. Periphyton sampling locations in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979. 0 l 52 i
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 3.1. Number of algal taxa and percent of total taxa by division in periphyton samples coitected from artificial substrates in the tiissouri River near Cooper fluclear Station, 1972-79.
~
~
f lifti (fa cTl'1 all opgt[ C h l o ro pYy~t[Cy[a n~6 l Year Yo. ., No. % Ho. % Total No. of Sanf es_
1972 165 91.2 6 3.3 10 5.5 181 21 1973 83 84.7 9 9.2 6 6.1 98 25 1974 133 85.3 16 10.3 7 4.5 156 22 1975 70 86.4 8 9.9 3 3.7 81 12 1976 87 82.9 13 12.4 5 4.8 105 16 a
1977 74 83.1 10 11.2 4 4.5 89 25 l
l 1978 51 78.5 11 16.9 3 4.6 65 21 b
1979 140 82.8 17 10.1 10 5.9 169 26 8
One rhodophyte included in total.
One chrysophyte and one cryptophyte included in total.
I l
l l
53
Table 3.2. Density and biovolu e of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Mis 5ouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June - November 1979.
g,., gg ,-
- I. g g g -- ---
_.,.g_
_ _. Lg. ..g __ -
- 5
~'(( _.53] ] ] [~~~~] T2T ~ , _ 5_14_ _ _ 3.1 s_ _0C't'0'.E_____.T.l-_ --.-
L oc a ti on i _ _.
5a p11n1 __
_Da_te_ __ __- 'T_3{ _ _ _ ~ Iis[~ ~ 5 3l '_[ .
69.1 116.1 64.6 251.5 116.4 9,093,010 4,470.566 3,152,921 5.85a,8U3 13 June 4.917,620 576.4 56 .3 1,427,427 331.1 48.9 14.3 4A3.135 2,004,7 R 4 1.992,137 3.661,751 I la July 58.9 920.8 2,303.5 514.0 4,952.930 5.372.534 6.89A u17 779.413 29 4.4 >
23 Au wst 3.770.574 1,130.9 102.8 N 2.Le8,218 583.9 1.134.4 509.1 r 3,R 5'),9 53 2,227,423 6.358,813 1 A Sep te+.e r 2.632.334 5,796,e61 -a 669.4 465.1 354.8 1,u19.5 -
3,576.455 4,264,699 4.837.826 23 October
- 421,169 - 256.5 - - 19.3 h
- 7,705.E49 -
m 20 wereer --- - -
2 5
21 a Samplino platform lost.
- o g Z K
m Z
-4 D
r Ul E
m Z
n m
Ul
Table 3.3. Percent contribution of Bacillariophyta (diatoms), Chlorophyta (green algae) and Cyanophyta (blue-green algae) to total density and total biovolume of periphyton algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June - November 1979.
" ~
h c i_1_l a rj ophy ta , _ ,Ch l_o_rophy ta _ , _ ,Cya ncphy tq _, , _ _ _ _ _
location loca tion Location samp1_ing Da_te_,_ ] M i ] ijs ~532 ] 53Q;;;52T-___ 53C ~ Ms ~ 5JF T3C T28 53 C ' Dis ~ ' ~ 532 ' HT-'- 52fr Density:
13 June 94.3 87.0 94.8 98.5 98.4 5.7 7.9 3.2 0.9 1.6 0.0 5.1 2.0 0.6 0.0 y 18 July 68.5 59.0 73.5 52.6 83.5 14.0 0.2 0.1 22.5 3.3 17.5 40.9 26.3 24.7 13.2 p 23 Auqust 39.9 35.2 46.3 20.4 35.0 9.5 0.0 16.5 21.5'35.4 50.6 64.8 37.2 58.a 29.6 N 18 September 61.7 47.9 61.H 81.7 52.6 17.3 8.7 4.4 14.6 5.2 21.0 43.4 33.8 3.5 42.3 r 23 October 100.0 77.4 83.5 83.1 -d 0.0 0.1 0.0 15.6 - 0.0 22.5 M.5 1.4 - m 0.0 29.6 36.0 -4 64.0 - -
20 November - 70.4 - - - 0.0 - - -
0 >
Riovolume:
2 m 1 95.8 92.2 95.8 99.8 99.7 4.2 2.3 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.0 5.5 3.7 0.0 0.0 7 (
13 June 18 July 7.8 39.4 97.1 5.8 95.6 91.7 0.0 0.1 93.9 3.3 0.5 60.5 2.9 0.3 1.1 <
23 August 31.8 24.4 9.2 2.2 18.6 64.3 0.0 89.7 97.1 81.3 3.9 75.5 1.1 0.7 0.1 -
m 0.3 1.6 1.1 2.5 3 m 18 September d5.0 14.0 98.0 61.4 93.3 14.7 84.2 0.9 38.6 4.2 0.0 D
100.0 99.1 98.6 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.6 - 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.1 .
23 October -
1.4 2 20 November -
73.0 - -
98.6 - 0.0 - -
0.0 -
27.0 - -
E
___________ _ __ _ _ _. __ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
m Z
a Sampling plattorm lost. >
r (II O
m Z
n m
til I
Table 3.4. Periphytic aigal taxa composing at least 10% of total density or total biovolume in periphyton sarples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June - Nove-ber 1979.
Location
~~ T3 ' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - --~-
Sa~olinj Date 7 i s' ' -'-~ ~ ~ ' 537 MT - ~ ~~ --- T2T -~
13 June Gomphonema parvulum Navicula luzonensis~-' Navicula pelliculosa Gonphonema parvulum Nitzschia dissipata h tzschTi dI~ssIFiti kivicuTa heufTe71 alea RTtzschTa d1sSIpiti G6inphonema parvuluh RitzchTi NItzschia y~dissipata
~-
Nitzschia fonticola
~
Na vi cu fa- ~heu fTeri NavicuTaleufleri Com~phMeRi'blI'vaceun @ h We'm Ts WcTivatum GomphoTena subc1avatum 18 July Gomphonema angustatum Navicula luzonen".is
~
Navicula tripunctata Gomphonema angustatum Navicula triyunctata NitzTc~hTi finticola tyn3bya aertigi~neoT var. schizoneino fdis~ C6iTiphonema arvulum var. schizonemoldes N ClTdopEfa~gTdifrita Eierulea ~ -
~~ -
triphora yeneta CTaTopWFa g ~6merati Lygby~a diguetii r-
[ynpyi[dhuetti Qn b {diguetti EnyfaTiguetii
~
Lyngbya dhuetii Pt
-talothrix spp. M 0
23 August Gomphonema angustatum Navicula luzonensis Navicula tripunctata Gomphonema angustatum Biddulphia laevis
~
Z CalothiliTpp. var. schizonein6Tdis~- i.Tadophora glomerata Cladophora glomrata m BTdduly@lili CTadTp lieiis'glomerata hbya diguetiiSpi rogy ra , spp. LyngbyTTigueth [fryy_T dTgue tII-~ g Lyngbya diguerii L.yngb.ya diguetii 4 18 Septet er Gomphonema anjuttatun Navicula luzonensis Gonp~honema angustatum Navicula tripunctata Cocconets placentula I BTdd Wp-'hI3 Taev s Ee'dogonium spp, havicula trIpuncta' 3
-~
var. schizonemoITeT var. euglypta 0
- ~
CTidophora gTosirata Cyjby~a di' 3 uetii var. schizonemo E s- BidduTFhlalaevis Gonphonema angustatum Z Qnibygdiguetit_ BiddulRTa Taevil Cladophora glomerata BiddughTi laevi s $
[yngbya,diguetTi- LyngbyaTSuetii_ m
-b Z 23 October Navicula tripunctata Navicula luzone!.-is Navicula tripunctata Navict.la tripunctata -4 D
~
var. 5Hizonein6TdeT' Didiughia TaevTs-'-- var. scliizonem7o des var. schizonesoi' des BidduTpliia Taevis [fngby~a dijuetit Nitzschia T~onticola BiddurpTiia laeiis-- I BTdduTyyfa laevis Dedogonium spp.
(t>
Lynj_bya diguetii Cladophora glomerata O M
20 Ncvember - Navicula tripunctata - -
Gomphonema olivaceum Z war, schizonemoides DTatoma vulgae g OscilTitorTa a3ardhli PlTclinema notatum m UI a
Navicula heufleri and Navicula tripunctata v. schizonenoides are probably the same taxon in this study.
Sampling platfom lost.
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 3.5. Diversity, evenness,b and number of algal taxa in periphyton collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June-November 1979.
3amplTng Location Date 534 Dis ST2---- ~T10 ~~ 5 Diversi ty:
13 June 4.27 4.34 3.81 4.02 3.92 18 July 3.68 2.89 3.23 3.58 3.32 23 August 3.14 2.24 3.25 2.17 3.06 18 September 3.89 3.10 3.54 4.62 3.05 23 October 3.55 2.64 3.67 3.14 _c 20 Novenber -
3.24 - -
2.47 4
Evenness:
13 June 0.76 0.79 0.72 0.74 0.72 18 July 0.72 0.56 0.62 0.68 0.62 23 August 0.60 0.50 0.63 0.42 0.59 18 September 0.70 0.61 0.63 0.30 0.61 23 October 0.68 0.51 0.67 0.58 -
20 November -
0.56 - -
0.50 No. of taxa:
i 13 June 50 44 39 44 44 18 July 34 36 37 38 40 23 August 37 22 35 37 37 18 September 47 34 48 55 32 23 October 37 36 44 44 -
20 November -
54 - -
30 d
b Shannon (1948) using log base 2.
c Zar (1968).
Sanpling platfem lost.
57
?
Table 3.6. flean bionass production (ng/n' per day + 95; confidence interval) of periphyton collected from artificial substrates in the !!issou'ri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, June-
~
November 1979.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fa~nflTnf' Location
.._Date ____l-] ] 15'3~4' ~~~~'~~~~-~~~-~ P f - _ ]~6TO _ _ ]_ _-8 i2T - ~~
13 June 497.90 + 84.46 248.02 + 266.19 598.48 + 114.44 527.51 + 329.64 7 18 July 277.28 + 34.02 88.49 + 80.10 362.02 + 64.72 101.43 + 30.61 N m
23 August 283.85 + 55.62 262.90 +_ 59.97 449.59 + 88.64 244.74 + 66.36 y Z
18 Septenber 529.76 + 155.29 586.39 + 124.56 1425.67 + 526.17 292.49 + 331.21 m Z
23 October 476.23 + 63.45 513.98 + 90.33 694.42 + 127.84 -a g
- D
$ 20 November - - -
62.59 + 43.91 @
I E
a Sanpling platform lost. $
r fn 9
m Z
n m
fB
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2
Table 3.7. flean biomass production (mg/m per day - ash-free dry weight) at periphyton sampling locations in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station. 1972-79.
1972 278.17(5)a 290.96(4) 225.68(5) 281.99(4) 109.30(1) 1973 145.79(4) 194.49(6) 198.80(6) 152.63(4) 120.49(5) 1974 159.06(4) 409.57(5) 531.89(6) 428.30(6) 255.52(2) 1975 149.27(2) 188.53(1) 122.91(2) 182.61(5) 56.71(1) 1976 287.93(5) 354.96(5) 272.80(2) 134.48(4) -b 1977 88.44(4) 225.97(3) 105.70(6) 58.42(5) -
1978 454.13(5) 14.81(1) 786.92(3) 400.42(3) -
1979 413.00(5) 339.96(5) 706.04(5) 245.75(5) -
Y 265.82(34) 291.15(30) 366.55(35) 235.59(36) 142.17(9)
Number in parentheses () indicates the number of months used to calculate the mean.
b Location Rf1526 was eliminated from the sampling program in 1976.
i 59
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Chapter 4 AQUATIC MACROINVERTECRATES AND BENTit!C ORGANISMS By Kenneth R. Bazata f
60
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIZNCE I. Introduction The flissouri River is a large, turbid river with a low standing crop of nacroinvertebrate organisms when compared to other river systems (fiunger et al. 1974). Berner (1951) hypothesized that the relatively low numbers of benthic organisms in the channelized Missouri River were the result of shif ting substratum, siltat'on, fluctuations in water level, swif t current, and the absence of aquatic vegetation. Of the two rajor types of macro-inver tebrate habitats found in the tlissouri River, Oligochaeta and Chironomidae were the primary occupants of the mud botton (florris et al.1968, Wolf et al .
1972) whereas Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Chironomidae were the major colonizers of the rocky channel nodification structures (Nord and Schmulbach 1973).
In 1972 a series of studies was initiated to provide information on the composition and abundance of macroinvertebrates in the Ilissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station. The results of these studies have be?n repor ted by Andersen (1975,1976,1977 ), Andersen and Reetz (1975), and Bazata (1978, 1979). Objectives of the 1979 nacroinvertebrate study were:
- 1. To monitor the macroinvertebrate component of the aufwuchs community by means of suspended multiple plate samplers;
- 2. To monitor the macroinvertebrate component of the benthic community by means of Ponar dredge collections; and
- 3. To identify and evaluate any ef fects of the operation of Cooper Nuclear Station on the macroinvertebrate component of the flissouri River ecosystem.
II. Field and Analytical Procedures Multiple plate artificial substrates similar to those described by Hester and Dendy (1962) and later nodified by Fullner (1971) were used to sample the nacroinvertebrate component of the aufwuchs community. Each sampler consisted of nine circular hardboard plates (6.3 cm in diameter) ,
mounted on a 9.2 cm bolt. Spacers separated the plates by distances varying !
fron 0.3 to 1.3 cm. Microhabitats were treated by the varied pigte spacing; however, the total exposed surf ace area was maintained at 512 cm for each sanpler. Four sanplers were suspended from a float approximately 0.5 m below the water surface and anchored in the lee of channelization structures near river miles (RM) 534, 532, 530, and 528 (Figure 4.1). In addition to the four river locations, samplers were also placed in the discharge canal.
Collections were nade on 27 June, 9 August, and 3 October 1979, af ter coloniza-tion periods of 42, 43, and 54 days, respectively. When retrieved, the samplers were immediavely placed in individual polyethylene bags, partially filled with water, and preserved with a rose bengal-formalin solution (Masson and Yevich 1967). Af ter a 24-hr exposure to the staining solution, the i samplers were disassembled and cleaned in the laboratory using a water spray !
and nylon bristled brush. Dislodged material was washed into a no. 30 U. S.
Standard mesh (0.595 mm) sieve and preserved in 70% ethanol for later analysis.
61
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Benthic macroinvertebrate_ populations were sampled with Ponar grabs -
taken in triplicate. Collections were made at the four river locations on the same dates as the artificial substrate collections. Approximp.ely 200 nl of.sedinent-were removed from each replicate for visual characterization of
' texture and laboratory analysis of total organic carbon content by oxidation-
'(Slack 1965). The remaining portion of each-sample was rinsed through a nc.
30 U. S. Standard mesh (0.595 mm) sieve, and the material retained on the screen was subsequently stained, processed, and preserved using nethods described above.
_Macroinvertebrates in each sample were manually separated from the
. debris under 10X magnification and id ntified to the lowest-positive taxon using app]priate taxonomic references and microscopic techniques. Densi ti es -
(numbers /m ) were calculated for each replicate sample.
Diversity indices for all samples s:cre calculated using Shannon's equation (1948), log base 2. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analy Jis of variance by ranks (Siegel 1956) followed by a multiple comparison procedure (fliller 1966) was per'ormed on tne abundance of selected common taxa, higher taxonomic groups, total densities, and diversity indices to test for differences among locations.
III. Results_and Discussion A. Multip_le Plate Sampler Collections
- 1. River liile Locations A total of 90 taxa of macroinvertebrates was collected fran the nultiple plate samplers during 1979. Taxa were similar to those reported during previous monitoring studies (Table 4.1), with members of the Hydro- ('
psychidae, Caenidae, and Chironomidae being nost abundant (Table 4.2).
Detailed macroinvertebrate data from the 1979 collections are presented in Appendix C, Table C.1.
Hydropsychidae were nunerically prominent during all three collectiops with their highest abundance occurring at Ril 534 in ' August (20,000/m ). Hydropsychidae are typically found in abundance in most ge nidwestern rivers (Ross 1944). Hydropsychid populations were primart ;y ia flava. Nord and com;)osed Schnulbachof(19731 flydrop,syche
~~
f risoni, in~stuihes on aH.portToli orris, and Potamy'olirilfiver between of thelhss Gavins Point Dan and Sioux City, Iowa, found that H. orris was more abundant in areas of swif ter current. In the flississippi RTver, H. orris was abundant where a fast current was consistently present and a soli'd, sflFfree substrate was available (Frenling 1960). Fremling also found that P. flava prefers a habitat with slightly slower current, in general, caddisTly densities d were lowest in the spring and increased throughout the year.
Chironomidae was the most diverse family collected from the aufwuchs accounting for 24 taxa. ChironoM ds represented from 4 to 26% of the mean total macroinvertebrate abundance (Table 4.2). _Polyyedilum, Rheotan --
tarsus, and Thienenannimya Group were the most abundant chironocids at71~y~
r 62
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES sampling sites during all three collections. Chironomid densities were lowest in June and higher during subsegrent collections. This trend follows the life history patterns as described by Hynes (1970). Chironomid abundance is low in spring and early summer following emergence, increases in late summer and autumn as eggs hatch, and declines during the winter period when little recruitment occurs.
The Ephemeroptera consisted primarily of the families Caenidae, Baetidae, and Heptageniidae (Table 4.2). Caenidae (primarily Caenis) was the numerically dominant mayfly family in the June and August collections, with Caenis densities being highest in August.. In contrast to previous years, Caenis did not have a major energence between the June and August collections.
Ei~fe history studies by Burks (1953) and Leonard and Leonard (1962) indicated that adult aerial emergence occurs from May through August. Caenis densities in October were low, indicating adult emergence between the August and October collections. Baetidae (primarily Baetis and Isonychia) and Hepta-geniidae (primarily Stenonema and Heptagenia) showed a trend of increasing densities in August and decreasing densities in the October collections. The increase and decline in densities can also be attributed to adult emergence and hatching (Edmunds et al. 1976).
Oligochaeta present on the multiple plates consisted primarily of the family Naididae; Nais behningi was the principal taxon present.
~
Haidid populations were highest in~A'ugust.
Abundances of selected common taxa and the total density of all organisms from each location were statistically tested for differences I between locations. Only six differences were found on the three sanpling dates. On 27 June, innature and total hydropsychid populations were signifi-cantly greater (p < 0.05) at RM 532 than at RM 534 (Table 4.3). Hydropsyche
~
, orris and Pot _amyia flava populations were greater on 9 August at RM 534 l
~Yan"at t RM T3D a_n~d 537,~~respectively. On 3 October the density of Stenonema~~ ;
integrun was significantly greater at RM 532 than at RM 528 and totliil
~~
benThTc density was greater at RM 534 than at RM 532. Since operational studies were initiated in 1974, no consistent upstream versus downstream trends in macroinvertebrate populations have been apr,arent. The random dif ferences that have occurred have therefore been attributed to natural variation.
Diversity indices ranged f rom 2.15 in June to 3.43 in October, both occurring at RM 532 (Figure 4.2, Table 4.4). The diversity 'ndices were similar to those reported in previous years. No significant differences were found among locations.
- 2. Discharge Canal _
Multiple plate samplers were placed in the discharge canal to determine the near field ef fects of Station operation. Diversity indices ind taxa present were similar to those at other river locations; however, densities varied greatly from the river locations (Tcble 4.5; Appendix C, Table C.2). Total density in the discharge canal was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in June and lower in August. Although not significant, total density i
63
[.
HAZLETON GNVIRONM2NTAL CCCNC30 in October was generally lower than those_ at the other river locations.
Higher densities in the discharge canal .in 1977 and 1978 generally suggested that the stable flow of the discharge canal rather than heated water was a major factor in determining:macroinvertebrate densities (Bazata 1978, 1979).
The densities in the discharge canal in August and October 1979 were contrary to this trend. The decrease in density in August and October 1979 may indicate some thernal effect on the macroinvertebrates. Several studies have been conducted on the effects of heated water on aquatic macroinvertebrates (Craven and Brown 1970; Proffitt 1973; Massengill 1976).- Generally, the results indicated that macroinvertebrate production was unaffected or slightly stimulated by thermal discharges during the fall, winter, and spring nonths. However, during the summer, macroinvertebrate densities were reduced when discharge temperatures approached or exceeded tolerance levels of the resident populations.
B. Ponar Dredge _ Collections A total of 57 taxa was found in the Ponar sanples collected during the 1979 study (Table 4.1). Oligochaeta and Chironocidae numerically dominated the fauna. Benthic densities were lowest in June, increased during subsequent collections, and were within the seasonal ranges established during previous studies (Table 4.7). Diversity indices varied from 1.23 to 2.87, both occurring in August (Table 4.8); and were also within the ranges established during previous studies. Detailed benthic data from the 1979 collections are presented in Appendix C, Tables C.3.
Oligochaeta, primarily Tubificidae, nunerically dominated the benthic fauna. The two most numerous identifiable tubificids collected from the sediments were Limnodrilus cervix and L. hoffmeisteri, although immature tubificids without capilliforn chaetse weH numerically dominant throughout the study (Table 4.9). In contrast to previous years, the family Naididae was not numerically important in 379. Peak naidid density occurred at RM 530 .t in October when Dero digitata represented 4% of the mean total density.
During previous monitoring years, tubificid densities were .
usually higher at locations downstream of the Station discharge and highest !
at RM 530. This trend was also apparent in 1979, except in June when tubificid density at RM 530 was the lowest of the four river locations (Figure 4.3). The downstream increase. has been related to current velocity, organic enrichment, and stability of the substrate, and not to the heated discharge of the Station ( Andersen 1977, Bazata 1978, 1979). The assemblage of tubificids encountered (Table 4.1) and the high total organic content of the sediments (Table 4.10) indicated the presence of substantial organic enrichment in the areas behind the channel maintaining structures. Although a number of factors affect the distribution and abundance of oligochaetes in aquatic systems, substrate type is one of the most important (Maciorowski et l al. 1977). Hard packed clay sediments at RM 530 in June may have limited benthic production. Substrate type at other locations consisted of a more favorable sand / muck mixture.
Chironoaidae was represented by 17 taxa in the Ponar collections with Chironomus, Cryptochironomus, and Polyyedilum being most common. -The i
64
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCENC C chironomid assemblage was generally indicative of an organically enriched habitat; however, the relatively low densities encountered during most sampling periods indicated that substrate instability may have limited population development.
No significant differences (p 10.05) in total densities of individual taxa or total benthos among locations were found on the three collect 1cn dates. The similarity in species composition and abundance among locations indicates no stress from Station operation.
The Missouri River aufwuchs and benthic macroinvertebrate communities have not been adversely affected by Station operation. The composition and density of macroinvertebrates in the study area are represen-tative of the limited habitats found in a large channelized river that receives considerable organic enrichment. Macroinvertebrate production in the discharge canal during 1979 appears to have been inhibited by the heated water of the Station in August and October. This effect has not been documented in previous monitoring studies at the Station.
IV. Summary and Conclusions
- 1. Species composition and densities of aufwuchs and benthic cocmunities sampled near Cooper Nuclear Station in 1979 were similar to those in previous studies.
- 2. Aufwuchs samples were dominated by Caenis in June, liydropsyche and C_aenis in August, and Hydropsyche in October. Benthic samples wera primarily composed of immature tubificidae without capilliform chaetae, with the most numerous identifiable taxa being Limnodrilus cervix and L. hoffmeisteri.
- 3. Although a few significant differences (p 10.0E; in the abundances of selected aufwuchs taxa among river locations were identified, they were attributed to natural variation rather than to effects of Station operation.
No significant differences were found between the benthic locations.
- 4. Macroinvertebrate density in the discharge canal was higher in June and lower than at the river locations in August and October. These differences may be indicative of a nea: field thermal effect.
- 5. Nesults of operational studies conducted since 1974 indicate that heated w;ter from Cooper Nuclear Station has not adversely affected aquatic macroin ertebrate populations in the Missouri River near the Station.
65
HAZLETON ENVIRONM!NTAL. CCIHNC'3G V._ References Cit _ed Andersen, D.-L. 1975. Aquatic macroinvertebrate and benthic organisms.
Pages 116-137 in The evaluation of thermal of fects in the 111ssouri River near CooWr Nuclear Station-(Operational Phase), January-December 1974. (IBT No. 64304909). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus,
-Nebr.
. 1976. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and benthic organisms.
PageslT3-144 in The evaluation of thermal effects in the itissouri River near_ CooWr . Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1975. (Project Na. 5501-06419). Report by NALCO Environmental Sciences for Hebraska Pubiic Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
. 1977. Aquatic macroinvertebrate and benthic organisms.
Tig~isTG7-139 in The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the flissouri River near CooWr Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1975. (Project No. 5501-07666). Report by NALC0 Environmental Sciences for hebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
, and S. D. Reetz. 1975. Artificial substrates and benthos s tu'ifes'.' Pages 119-150 in The evaluation of thermal effects in the tiissouri River near CoopiF Nucles Station (Preoperational Phase) April i 1973-March 1974. (IBT No. 64303322). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Pt.blic Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
i Bazata, K. R. 1978. Aquatic macroiavertebrate' and benthic organisms.
Pages 110-146 in The evaluation of thermal effects in the itissouri River near Cooper NuiiTear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1977.
(Project No. 5501-08776). Report by NALC0 Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. (
i
. 1979. A'1uatic nacroinvertebrates and benthc organisms.
f ~~Va'g'is TI-ll8 in 'he evaluation of thermal of fects in the flissouri l River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December ,
1978. (Project No. 8903). Report by llazleton Environnental Sciences a
for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
Berner, L. ft. 1951. Limnology of the lower flissouri River. Ecology
- 32 (1):1-12.
Black, C. L. 1965. flethods of soil analysis, Vol. II. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Vol. 9, Series in Agronony, Itadison, Wis. 1527 pp.
Burks, B. O. 1953. The nayflies or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Ill . Nat.
j llist. Sury. Bull. 26. 216 pp.
i Craven, R. E. , and B. E. Brown. 1970. Power plant heated discharge water and benthos in Boomer Lake, Payne County, Oklahoma. J. Kans. Entomol.
i Soc. 43:122-128.
66 k'
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL SCIENCT3 Edmunds, G. F., S. L. Jen and L. Berner. 1976. The mayflies of North and Central America. u.oversity of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
330 pp.
Frenling, C. R. 1960. Biology and possible controlof nuisance caddisflies of the upper llississippi River. Icwa State Univ., Agric. Home Econ.
Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 483:856-879.
Fullner, R. W. 1971. A comparison of macroinvertebrates collected by basket and modified multiple-plate samplers. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 43(3):494-499.
Hester, F. I. , and J. S. Dendy. 1962. A nultiple-plate sampler for aquatic macroinvertebrates. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 91(4):420-421.
Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 555 pp.
Leonard, J. W. , and F. A. Leonard. 1962. Layflies of Ilichigan trout streams. Cranbrook Inst. Sci. Bull. No. 43. 139 pp.
Haciorowski, A. F., E. E. Benfield, and A. C. Hendricks. 1977. Species composition, distribution, and abundance of oligohaetes in the Kanawha River, West Virginia. Hydrobiologia 54:81-91.
Itason, W. T., and P. P. Yevich. 1967. The use of phloxine B and rose bengal stains to facilitate sorting centhic samples. Trans. Am. !!icrosc. Soc.
86(2):221-223.
flassengill, R. R. 1976. Bent'ii' f auna: 1965-1967 versus 1968-1972. Pages 39-53 in D. lierriman and L. 7 pe, eds. The Connecticut River ecology I
study: The impact of a nucle. >ower plant. Am. Fish Soc. Monogr.
No. 1.
' tiller, R. C. 1966. Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 272 pp.
Morri s. L. A. , R. N. Langemeier, T. R. Russell , and A. Wi tt. 1968. Effects of main sten inpoundnents and channelization upon the limnology of the flissouri River, Nebraska. Trans. An. Fish. Soc. 97:380-388.
!!unger, P. R. , et al . 1974. A baseline study of the flissouri River:
Rulo, Nebraska to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Vol. III. A report by Univ. of Missouri for Dep. of the Army, Kansas City Dist. , Corps of Engineers, pp. 519-528.
Nord, A. E. , and J. C. Schmulbach. 1973. A comparison of the macro-invertebrate aufwuchs in the ui. *1bilized and stabilized flissouri River. Proc. S. D. Acad. Sci. 52:127-139.
67
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENO3]
Prof fi tt, M. A. 1973. Effects of heated discharge on fish and inverte-brates of White River at Petersburg, Indiana. Indiana Univ. Water Resour. Res. Cen;'r, Report of Invest. No. 6. 123 pp.
Ross, H. H. 1944. The caddisflies, or Trichoptera, of Illinois. Ill.
Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 23:1-326.
Shannon, C. E. 1943. A mathematical theory of communicatioi. Bell Systen Tech. J. 27:379-423, 623-656.
Siegel, S. 1956. Non-parametric statistics for behavioral .ciences.
ficGraw Hill Book Co. , itew York. 312 p:).
Wol f, J. , J. f1cilahon, and Sr.11. Diggins. 1972. Comparison of benthic organisms in semi-natural and channelized portions of the 11issou i River. Proc. S. D. Acat. Sci . 51 :160-167.
l l
68
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl' INCUS
/
LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND W AT E R QUALITY STUDIES f' i 534i -o i Physical Measurements - 534,
~
and Limited Che'aical Intake, d
N Analyses Discharje,
~i' 5 32 ,5 ~,J ,
.o -
52F Additional Chemical - 534 f: - s Analyses Intak d , Di scha rge ,
i
]do4533 530 i iNTA k i .- BIOLOGY 2
COOPER d
NUCLEAR [ .
4 Periphyton, Aquatic - 534,532, e STATION f Macroinvertebrates, 530,528 o/scuAesc 532 and Benthos
-- v Fish Study - 534,532, ol 530 -
(Nebraska and Missouri 5c- shoreline at each A
-Y location)
N 0+ Fish Larvae - Intake, 2,4 530 [,0 TO POGR APHIC LEGEND o 526 River Mile and Sampling Location
- ' A Rip Rap
, - Wing Dam 529 Levee e Training Oike 528 __2525;
' 'n
- g RI
'4&'~
y S '
52'6' ,
c ;;..
527 2 3 1_, , , _ ,,, ,,
ii3 ii SCALE IN MILES o 05 1 2 Figure 4.1. Macroinvertebrate and benthos sampling locations in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station,1979.
69
r HAZLETr:tJ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
. 1973
... -. l974
. - - - - -. 19 7 5
. -_ .. - _ -, ig7s
. .- . _ . - . .* 19 7 7
.oooooooooo* 1978 4.0
. - - - . 1979
"' 7 :.:= ='
8 ,
30 -
' v: . . =. -"" f:W~.. ~ % :s- *,
w x
- , g6 .
- 0 * % --
O g[ ' 0,,o a z
y 20 --
s AR TIFICI AL SUBSTRATES sn E
ld O t.0 RM 534 RM 532 RM 530 RM 528 z LOCATION
<t ld s 3.0 -
(
PONARS
'I
> ob
{ :sy,;-
- -[ - A~~
$ 20 - S .g('._# $, #~i
~
..h.
s sg s . s.. 1 N I N
l N.
I IO l RM 534 RM 532 RM 530 RM 528 l LOC ATION l i
l l
Fiqure 4.2. Yearly mean diversity indices calculated from artificial substrate and Ponar samples collected in the Missouri l River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
t I
j s 70
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENC2S TUBIFICIDAE DENSITY E A RLY SUMMER ,
4000{
3000 2000 -
r
[
2 _:
1000 -
f l O ,
< A - ! ' -
RM 534 "532 530 528 DISCHARGE 1973 70'.no - LATE SUMMER 6000 -
19 74 5000 -
l 4000 - 1975 3000 -
t 7 2000 -
,.. /
1976
/ / !
' /
iooo -
I o f' E = E I d -
i
RM 534 "
532 53o 528 DISCHARGE 1978 7000 M ID AUTU M N sooo-5000 -
4000 -
3000 -
2000 - 7
/
icoo - -
/ ! -
/ t o- I -- E bj , --
! =
534 .- 532 C30 528 DISCHARGE Figure 4.3. Tubificid densities from Ponar samples collected in the Missouri River near Cooper *!uclear Station, 1973-79.
71
HAZLETON ENVnRONMENTAL SCIENCO Table 4.1. Summary of nacroinvertebrate occurrence in benthic (B) and aufwucha (A)a samples from the tiissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
1473 1974 7 975 19N- 1977 1978 ~ ~ 19C Taxon B A~ B A 7 A ~ FA~ B A B A TA~
Nematoda Unidentified Nematoda + + + + + + + + + + + +
Aphasmidia Enoplida Dorylamidae
+
Nyglolaimus sp. Cobb Cnidarta Hydrozoa Hydroidea Clavidae Cordfl _ophora lacustris + + + + + + + + + +
ATima n Hydrida e Hydr a sp. Linnaeus + + + + + + + + + + +
PlaiyneTminthes Turbella ri a Tricladida Planariidae Unidentified Planariidae +
Dugesia sp. Girard + + + + + + + +
R habdocoel a Unidentified Rhabdocoela +
Nenertina Enop.a Hoplanemertini Pros toma tidae Prostoma rubrum (Leidy) +
B ry oioa~
Unidentified Bryozca +
Ectoproc ta Phylatolaemata Fredericel11dae Fredricella sultana (8umenbach)
+ + + + +
PusteTlidae Hy,alinella punctata (Hancock) .
Entoprocta C Unidentified Entoprocta +
Urnatellidae
- Jrnitella gracilis leidy + + + + + + +
Annel fda Oligochaeta Plesiopora Aeolosoma tidae Aeolosoma sp. Ehrneberg + +
A'. travancorense Aiyer +
E n'chy tFa'eida e Unidentified Enchytracidae + + + + + + + + + + +
Naididae Aulop'horus furcatus (Muller) + + + +
~ ~
+
Britt sl~aka Uniden~tata
~ ~
aiter"cifapharius(Gruithuisen) + + +
C Dero'di hac to}si ta ta'~ (Hulled D."dorsalif rerronniere
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
+ + + +
+
+
Nais sp. (Muller) + + + + + + + + + +
N.~harbata Muller + + + +
N. behifriqi Michaelsen + + + + + + + + +
N. tieth $cri Michaelsen + + + + + + + + +
- k. Ei>ranu~n'if Piquet + + + + + +
h .' el i n' + +
k.' sir@leiPiquet guts Muller
~
+
l
+
l Mi idiriab~lli s
+ !
$NI.doi}i~s se}rpentina (Muller) + + 72 L
HAZLETON "J NVIRONMENTAL SCIENC.TJ Table 4.1. (continued) 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Taxon B A B A 1 A 7 A 7 A B A B A
+ + + + + + + + +
Paranais frici Hrabe s
+ +
Pristina foreli (Piquet) + P. aequiseta B6urne + f
+
K Tdrensis Sperber +
+ + +
E lonaiseta Ehrenberg +
+ + + +
E deidyl Smith E osborni Walton + + + +
+
E sima +
+
STavina appendiculata d'Udeken 5tyTarTa lacustris (Linnaeus) + + + + + t-Tubificidae + + Aulodrilus limnobius Bretscher +
+ + +
A. piguetf Kowalewski + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
Eranchiura sowerby1 Beddard +
+ + + + +
gIl odrilus tenpTetoni (Southern) + + + + Linnodrilus cervix Brinkhurst + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
L. claparedianus Ratzel + C hof fmeisteri Claparede + + + + + + + + + + C spiralis Eisen +
+ +
C _udeFeMianus Claparede + + + + +
+
Tu~bTfex tubifex (Muller) Innature w/o cap. chaetae + + + + + + + + + + + + + Inmature w/ cap. chaetae + + + + + + + + + + + Prosopora Branchicbdellidae
+
Cambarincola macrodonta Ellis Hi ru di nea Rhynchobdellida Glossiphoniidae Unidentified Glossiphoniidae + Helebdella elongata (Castle) -
+
PisEicoTidae Myzobdella moorei (Meyer) + Pharyngotidellida Erpobdellidae Unidentified Erpobdellidae + +
+ + +
Dina (flooreobdella) nicrostona ficore +
+
EbobifeHa triannulata Wore Arthropoda Cru stacea Isopoda Asellidae Asellus sp. Hillaire + + + + + + +
~~
K.~fstermedius Forbes
+
A6p'h t pidi - ~ ~~- Talitridae
+ + + + + + + + +
Hyalella azteca (Saussure) + G3mmarid3e
+
Cran 3cnym sp. Bate Gannarus sp. Fabricius + + Decapoda Astacidae Unidentified Astacidae + Orconectes sp. Cope + + Arachiida Acarina
'nidentified Hydracarina + + + + + + +
1ro .ta Thysanura Japygidae
+
Japy sp.
+
Collemu bola + i 73
f HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENCJ_] Table 4.1. (continued) 1975 1976 7 977 1978 1979 1973 1974 B A B A B A B A B A B A Taxon B A Isotomidae + Isotoma sp. Bourlet + Isotonurus palustris (Muller) Ephemeroptera + Unidentified Ephemeroptera Ephemeridae
- E horon sp. + +
+ . album ($ay) + + + + + +
WesigeriIa sp. Walsh + + + + + + + + hBiribit'a (Serville) + + + Fin ~ta + P 7 i'genia ttiTErasp. Walsh Cae'nidae + + + Brachycercus sp. Curtis + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
Caenis sp. 5tephens + + + +
+ + + + + + + + +
TFif5ythodes sp. Ulmer Hept)geniidae + + + + + + + L'nidentified Heptageniidae + + +
+ +
Anepeorus sp. ficDunnough + + +
+
Heptalenia sp. Walsh + +
+
H. diabi Ta Burk5 + + + + + + + K. elegantula Eaton + + + + + + +
+
5te'nonema sp. Travel
+
E areslurks + + + + + + + + + + + + E integrum (McDunnough) + C interiunctatum (Say) + +
- 3. tripunctatum (Banks)
Baetidae *
+
Unidentified Baetidae + + Ameletus sp. Erton + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
Baetis s'p. Leach + + + + + + +
+
lsonychia sp. Eaton + I. aurea Traver + I~ sadleri Traver Odoiia ta Gomphidae + Unidentified Gomphidae + + '
+ + + + + + + + +
Comohus sp. Leach LTb'elTuli dae + + Didymops sp. RamDurs + heurocordulia molesta (Walsh) + 5o'mTticMora sp. Selys Coenagrionidae + + + Unidentified Coenagrionidae + + + + + + Arqia sp. Ramburs
+
En}llayma praevarum (Hagen) + Ischnura perparva delys Pieceptera
/
Nemouridae + Taenicpteryx sp. Pictet Per16didie + Neoperla sp. + + + + + Isoperla sp. Pe'rl i da e + Perlesta sp. Banks + + + + +
+ + +
F.~placIda (Hagen) Pt'eronarcIdae + + Pterona_rcys sp. Newman
+
P. pictetti Hagen Hemiptera Corimidae + + + + Unidentified Corixidae Pleidae +
+
Unidentified Pleidae h 74 I
[ HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCl2NCZ3 Table 4.1. (continued) 1971 1970 1975 1976 1977 77eT 1374 ~ Taxon 7T B A B A B A B A B A TI
+
Megaloptera
+
Unidentified Megaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus Latreille + Tric'hoptera Rhyacophidae Rhyacophila sn. Pictet + Polycentropodidae
+ +
Unidentified Polycentropodidae + +
+ + +
Cyrnellus sp. Banks +
+
C. fratefnus (Banks) + liiureclipsis sp. McLachlan + + + + + + + + + Hydropsychidae Unidentified Hydropsychidae + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
Cheunatopsyche sp. Wa11engen
+ + + + + +
Hydropsyche sp. Pictet H. bette W Ross + E Cuani D oss + + +
+ + + + + +
E frisoni Ross + + + + + + + + E orris Ross + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
E simulans Ross + Fo~ tan:<ia flava (Hagen) + + + + + + + + + + + + + Hydreptilidae Unidentified Hydroptilidae + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
Aaraylea sp. Curtis C rnulffpunctata Curtis + Wdroptila sp. + + + hayatrichia sp. Mosely + + + + + + + M. ayama Rosely
+ + + +
ITiotrTchia sp. Morton + + + + [xFthVa~sp. Eaton + + Leptoceridae Ceraclea sp. Stevens + C tiFsT-'punctatus (Vorhies) + C. transversus {Nagen) + fiptocella sp. Banks + + + + L. candiTi Hagen + + + + + + l C iiiarina Ross + + + + + Ectopsych'e Candida + + + Oecetis sp. Mc Ec~hTan + +
- 0. cinerascens (Hagen) +
Coleoptera Dytiscidae Unidentified Dytiscidae + + +
+
JD tiscus sp. Linnaeus Laccophilus sp. Leach + HydrophilFdie Unidentified Hydrophilidae +
,Beresus sp. Leach +
Hydrochus sp. Leach + StaiihyTinida e Unidentified Staphyinidae + Helodidae Unidentified Helodidae + Elnidae Unidentified Einidae + + Duniraphia sp. Sanderson + + + + + 5tenilniT sp. Dufour + + + HJt'eroiirTdae
~Heterocerus sp. +
Lehi~dop tera Unidentified Lepidoptera + lh 75
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCB Table 4.1. (continued) 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 197ff~
~T A B A ~ lT' B A ~lf T ' 'T A~ if ]A))
Taxon , Diptera + + Unidentified Diptera Psychodidae + Pericoma sp. Walker SGuliidie + + + + + + + + Unidentified Simultidae + Simulium sp. t ChironomTdae + + Ablabesmyia sp. Johannsen + + +
+ +
A~'m'aWecIii (Walley)
+
A7 monilis (Linnaeus) + + + + + + + Chirononus sp. (Meigen) . + + + +
+ +
CIadotanytarsus sp. Kief fer
+
CITn6tanypus (ss) (inguis (Loew) Coelotanypus sp. Kietfer + + +
+ + + + +
fricoypussp.(Wulp) + C. bicinctus + C Tss) fuscus gr. +
+ +
C Yremmulus group (Linnaeus) C trianniilitus Macq. + + + +
+ +
C issl trifascia + C 'vTirriensis + C [Tsocladius) sylvestris + F TITE Tadtus) sp. + + + +
+ + + + + +
C_ryplarina C. b (Townes)tochironomus sp. (Kief f er) +
+ + +
C HT~gitiius Malloch
+ +
C fulvus Johannsen + C ponderosus (Sublette) + + + Cryptotendipes Lenz + + near Denicryptochironomus sp. + +
+ +
near D. monstrsus (Chernovskit) near D Folli (Kirpitshenko) + near D TabM otzkii (Goetghebuer) +
+ + + + + + +
Dicrofin'dipes sp. Kieffer , D. modestus7 ay +
+
EnfachTronomus sp. Kieffer +
+ +
TidTeTferiMli sp. To ynenann
+ + + +
ClyptVt'inid'ipTs~ sp. Kief f er C. (ssT sp. kef f er + + +
+ +
h IFhytotendipes) sp. Goetghebeuer + + + + HarnTsch'a sp. (Kief f er) + +
+ + +
Kfd'robaenus sp. Brundin labrundfnia pilosella (Loew) +
+ + + + + + + + +
larsia sp. Fittkau +
+ ~
- l. decolorata (Malloch)
Microchironomus sp. Kief fer + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + +
HTcropsectra sp. Kieffer + + + + + + KaTocladfus'sp. Kief f er + + + + +
+ +
E anderseni Saether + + + (TrtEiclidiui (ss) sp. (Wulp) + + + + Pa~r~achTr~o~no~rius sp. Len2 +
+ +
PT abortTvuTTMalloch) P. ectinatella (Dendy & Sublette) + + +
+
Farac adoniln' p. Harnisch
+ + + + + +
_lla sp. Len: + Pir~aTsu tWFor +
+
PaFalTiffeFiPla sp. (Thienenann) +
+
Fa~riphaenocladius Thienemann
+ + +
Faratanytarsus sp. Kief fer + + Pir^itenbes near connectens Lipina 76
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCZ] Table 4.1. (continued) 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Taxon B A '~ B A B A B A B A B A B A Polypedilum (ss) sp. P. (ss) "convictum" gr. (Walker) + + + + + + + . + + + + + + E TsiT "illionense" type + + E TiisT 1aetum (HeTgen) + E IssT "scalaenum" gr. (Schrank) + ++ + + + + + + + E TiiT " simulans gr. Townes + ++ + + + + + + + + Fro Tadius sp. Skuse ++ + + + + + + F. (P.) bellus (Loew) + + Fsectrccladius sp. (Kief fer) + + Pseudochironomus Malloch + + Fseudosmittia sp. + near Pseu'cTosmittia Goetghebur +
,Rheocricotopus sp. (Thieneoann + + + + +
5 Harnisch) Rheotanytarsus sp. Bause + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + Robackia claviger (Townes) + Smittia sp. Holmgren + 5~tenochirononus sp. Kieffer + + + + + + + + Wy us sp. + + T. (sil neopunctipennis Sublette + + + + T~ TisT punctipennis Meigen + E TiiI stellatus Coquillett + + + Tanytarsus sp. Wulp + + + + + + + + + + + + Thienemanniella sp. Kief fer + + + + Thienemannimyia group Fittkau + + + + +' + + + + + + Trissocladius sp. (Kieffer) + + TerIochTronomus ( Anceus) sp. Roback + + + X. ( A.I taenionotus (Say) + + Ceratopogonidae Unidentified Ceratopogonidae + + + + + + + + + + + + Dolichopodidae Unidentified Dolichopodidae + + + Empididae Unidentified Empididae + + + + Hemerodromia sp. Meigen + + + + + + + + + + Ephydri dae + l Neoscatella sp. Malloch + + T3pdlTTae Unidentified Tipulidae + + Hexatoma sp. Latreille + ) Nu SHdie-Unidentified Muscidae + + Unidentified Anthomyiidae + Mollusca Gastropoda Pulmonata Phy sidae
?hysa sp. Draparnaud + + + + +
Pelecypoda Heterodonta Sphaertidae Sphaerium sp. Scopoli + + + + + + Total 40 121 56 127 56 82 68 87 49 82 55 71 57 90 0 1972-74 from Hilsenhoff artificial substrates, 1975-79 from multiplate plate samplers. I 77
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCCNCD Table 4.2. Densities of selected macroinvertebrate families colonizing artificial substrates in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear S ta tion , 1973-79. Mean Density RM 534 EM 532 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1977 Samplin9 Date/ Family 1973 1974 26 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 10 Jul 75 - 6 Aug 76 ETun 77 - 26 Jun 78 2T Tun 79 115 50 525 54 453 - 5 - 20 105 Hydridae 2129 50 - 10 0 0 10 0 52 - 0 - 0 0 Planaridae 0 0 - 5 575 35 285 118 276 - 210 - 705 650 Hidtdee 18 2 - 425 478 14 2730 46320 56 5 2190 1624 257 - 3840 - 11470 23815 Caenidae - 1355 165 205
*ep t agent i da e 162 1 - 1450 830 55 105 75 16 - -
1870 2660 5 70 160 46 - 1970 - 135 1110 8aetidae 45 1 - 25 0 45 0 61 16 140 - 20 0 Psychomy t idae 63 0 - 9 10025 8415 350 165 135 249 - 1660 - 2355 15560 Hydropsychidag 1 - 6620 635 1545 65 20 - 1555 3520 60 785 77 326 - - Chironomidae Total Rock basket (no./ gasket) 3980 225 2386 1893 18225 63385 1165 4580 - 10200 - 15705 43570 Multiplate (no./nd ) - 27 Aug 73 - 13 Au 74 2TTug 75 - 2TTep e IT Tog 77 - 15 Aug 78 329 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 - 140 0 - 0 Fydridae 12 24 Planaridae 102 442 30 65 0 0 20 219 1190 - 0 0 - 13 4 18 10 1780 35 25 480 10 33 - 1290 545 - 10 7 Naididae 510 1165 7240 Caenidae 466 130 1710 460 315 1005 8305 1723 513 - - 89 865 1635 520 390 820 175 69 - 2125 665 - 1233 Hep ta gent idae 406 Baetidae 50 28 1135 835 680 245 4500 339 72 - 48 5 1135 - 3880 166 560 5 0 680 40 329 179 - 65 0 - 153 Psychomytidae 401 9147 Hydropsychidae 242 254 2650 16360 2975 915 19795 3279 484 - 3035 10070 - Chironomidae 902 1838 1395 11265 54 0 305 5030 1598 3594 - 16955 2350 - 7680 Total Rock basket (no./ basket) 2632 3068 8052 6452 Multiplate (no./m ) 8950 32905 5140 3595 39125 - 25585 16110 - 29613 22 Oc t 13 - 1 Oc t 74 IGif7ATToT75 Vit 77 - 10 lit 73
~
{
'T CFt 79 187 30 5 15 47 - 152 - 235 - 15 6v Hydridae 1 40 0 5 52 5 0 45 0 - 581 - 0 -
Planacidae - 3390 447 utdtdae 13 48 100 1895 - 620 1427 - 32 - 3235 - 0 160 1474 - 19 - 5 - 280 446 Caenidae 2 143 55 - hep t a ge n t idae 117 86 640 2410 - 2585 3420 - 210 - 2075 - 1445 1574 0 150 20 - 340 1793 - 4 - U - 875 174 Baetidae 1 70 5 73 Psych ry11dae 6 106 385 0 - 190 87 - 97 - - Hydropsychtiae 6 274 2695 3050 - 3175 15601 - 56 - 2695 - 28005 2294 Cntronomidae 49 2394 1735 4165 - 11065 23440 - 181 . - 8765 - 17515 4133 Tctal Roth bask et (no./ basket) 269 3412 3202 Nit tplate (no./n2) 6280 11850 - 18630 48160 - 17830 - 51960 9567 l l l l
\
l 78
}
HAZLETOc4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 4.2. (continued) Mean DenTity RM 530 RlfTl8
,Sasiplin9 Date/Faelly 7 973 1974 1975 197 M i 1978 1979 C W4 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 26 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 WJul 75 - 6 Aug 73 27 Jun 77 - 26 Jun 78 F Jun 79 Hydridae 36 653 27 5 - - 16 20 - 254 55 - 15 - 2305 Planaridae 3 4 0 5 - - 0 - 30 15 - 0 - O haididae 4 35 433 255 - - 230 - 1105 1005 - 2385 - 200 Caentose 379 179 7713 2625 - - 4775 -
1024 39770 - 31855 - 2635 Heptagenttdee 20 14 174 1625 - - 265 - 10 830 - 325 - 275 Baetida 98 24 554 2175 - - 390 - 28 4565 - 1300 - 205 Psychomy lidae 62 13 60 25 - - 75 - 14 1835 - 0 - 75 Hydropsychidae 48 16 4147 7755 - - 3510 - 333 2850 - 16360 - 2895 Chironomidae 20 172 733 3005 - - 890 - 492 6055 - 2555 - 570 Total Rock basket (no./ basket) 702 1145 - 3473 N1tiplate (no./m 2) 14087 17660 - - 12335 57355 - 55465 - 9510 27 Au 73 - 13 Au174 75 Tu 15 - 2TTep 76 IT7u ADPu8 Wug 79 Hydri dae 18 14 0 10 0 0 0 7 42 0 7 0 - 0 Planar 164e 32 72 5 10 5 10 0 182 597 20 47 0 - 10
'atdidae 4 26 20 2040 240 25 115 7 88 35 3800 1480 - 120 .senidae BC 36 240 415 440 895 9875 786 1629 520 560 1687 - 1965 Hep tageniidae 99 18 730 2005 540 430 1105 336 119 520 1327 427 - 550 Baetidae 2 3 1540 990 935 710 3000 236 248 1700 327 1307 - 2210 Psycbonytidae 5 14 0 5 0 75 36 0 272 167 180 7 67 -
O
- f. Hy drcosychidae 3 0 7490 11755 4305 3715 4495 1231 3814 10990 933 9680 - 104J5 7 *itronomidae 183 294 335 12685 2210 45 4000 1290 12765 310 11560 2893 -
1680 Total Rock basket (no./ gasket) 458 56 5 4377 19749 e N1tiplate (no./m') 10510 30710 8820 6610 23025 14320 18667 17820 - 17000 1 22 Oct 7 3 - 1 Oct 74 WCit 75 - 15 ko776 TC t 77 - 10 Wt 78 T5ci 77 Hydridae 0 51 35 - 0 - 0 0 6 25 - 0 - 0 Fla naridae 54 57 15 - 0 - 0 34 40 5 35 - 0 - 0 haididae 29 209 150 - 680 - 1247 18 98 620 - 49 - 2340 Caenidae 4 4 20 - 205 - 587 7 58 195 - 0 - 540 Pertaientidae 44 26 675 - 1135 - 2473 170 3 1785 - 220 - 2186 Baetidae 0 0 110 - 170 - 833 2 0 550 - 375 - 1120 P sy c ho*'yl i da e 62 0 20 - 0 - 27 46 39 100 - 50 - 7 Hydrop sych t dae 50 0 3425 - 8E45 - 12806 30 990 14330 - 7980 - 17447 C oi ronmi dae 125 133 1005 - 6945 - 22227 82 4990 1700 - 1690 - 9793 Total Rock basket (no./ basket) 427 523 439 7178 t%1tiplate 5495 - 18175 - 41413 19605 - 10915 - 33853 79
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCZ] Table 4.3. Significant dif ferences (p ~< 0.05) in the density of abundant aufwuchs macroinvertebrates among locations sampled in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,1979. 11acroi nvertebrates 27 Jiin'e-~ ~~ ~~~ 9 Au g u s t To~ctober t Stenonena inteorun 532>528 Total liydropsychidae 532>534 Innature Hydropsychidae 532>534 Hydr _of_syche orris 534>530 Fotanyia Tla~va 534>532 Total Benthos 534>532 l l l 80
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 4.4. Aufwuchs macroinvertebrate diversity indices calculated from artificial substrate collections in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973- 79.a Data fron 1973-74 based on Hilsenhoff artificial substrates and 1975-79 data fron multiple plate samplers. Collection Location Seasonal
~ ~ ~~~~ W Date RM T34 - ~ ~Rll T37 RhiT30 RM Mean 22 June 1973 2.00 b 2.32 2.75 c 2.36 25 June 1974 2.21 3.36 2.65 3.12 2.84 10 July 1975 - -
1.78 2.30 2.19 6 August 1976 3.28 3.87 3.22 - 3.18 22 June 1977 1.87 - - 2.36 2.12 26 June 1978 2.49 1.84 - - 2.17 27 June 1979 3.14 2.15 3.03 3.16 2.87 27 August 1973 3.60 3.32 3.30 3.41 3.40 13 August 1974 2.85 3.00 3.47 2.63 2.99 28 August 1975 3.52 - 2.52 2.70 2.91 23 September 1976 3.30 2.96 3.31 3.22 3.20 11 August 1977 3.24 3.24 3.44 3.62 3.37 15 August 1978 3.18 - 3.29 - 3.24 9 August 1979 3.28 3.28 3.10 2.95 3.15 22 October 1973 3.18 - 3.83 3.45 3.49 1 October 1974 2.66 2.71 3.34 2.20 2.65 16 October 1975 3.57 - 2.91 2.80 3.09 15 Novenber 1976 3.58 3.70 - - 3.64 6 October 1977 - - 3.17 2.90 3.08 10 October 1978 3.07 3.06 - - 3.06 3 Octobor 1979 3.21 3.43 2.94 3.06 3.16 1973 nean 2.92 2.81 3.29 3.43 1974 mean 2.55 3.02 3.09 2.74 1975 mean 3.54 - 2.62 2.52 1976 nean 3.39 3.23 3.26 3.22 1977 nean 2.56 3.25 3.28 2.90 1978 nean 2.91 2.45 3.29 - 1979 nean 3.21 2.95 3.02 3.06 0 b Shannon (1948), log base 2. Mean of 4 replicates. c Samplers lost. 81
l l Table ".5. Densities, percent abundance and diversity indices of selected macroinvertebrate families ! colonizing artificial substrates in the discharge canal of Cooper Nuclear Station, 1977-79. 27 June Il~~ August E Tctober 26 June 1 D ugust 10 October Mean tiean f. Kean % Mean % % an % Hean T Family _ Deni ty Aburdance Density Ab2ndance Density __ Abundance Density Abundance Densi ty Abundance DensityAundance Naididae 960 2 1 1 7815 34 515 2 30 <1 7745 22 Caenidae 36543 66 2570 16 150 <1 20695 82 7570 49 295 1 Heptageniidae 780 1 920 6 1540 7 65 <1 680 4 2820 8 Baetidae 1275 2 1460 9 25 <1 90 <1 530 3 600 2 Hydropsychidae 8190 15 8275 52 2145 9 1790 7 3645 24 12665 36 I Chironomidae 6640 12 2515 16 11150 48 1585 6 2685 18 10785 31 > 23070 25215 15380 35250 N Total 55240 16025 r Diversity Index ?.17 3.22 2.83 1.46 2.83 3.31 h O Nunter of Species 41 30 52 36 34 50 m Z m O Z O E m i 01 9 m Z n I m Ul l l l
1 Table 4.5. (continued) 9 August 3 October Mean liean '
, !!ean 'a
__ Family Density Abundance Density Abundance Density Abundance Naididae 11935 14.5 65 1.6 1700 9.4 y Caenidae 50665 61.6 390 9.6 240 1.3 D Heptageniidae 105 0.1 435 10.8 2220 12.4 % Baetidae 725 0.8 625 15.5 540 3.0 m Hydropsychi dae 9350 11.4 1585 39.4 4380 24.3 y Chrionomidae 8615 10.5 835 20.7 8240 45.6 z Total 32265 4025 18060 m Z Diversity Index 3.16 3.58 -3 5 Il m 0 , Humber of Species 65 34 32 g m Z a r Not calculated, UI O m Z n m Ul
HAZLE1JN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 4.6. Significant dif ferences (p ,<,0 05) in the density of abundant , aufwuchs macroinvertebrates between discharge canal and river locations sampled in the lijssouri River ncar Cooper Nuclear S ta tion , 1979. _ __ _ . _ q. _
~ '
Ma_c_r_o_i nverte, bra tes__ _ _ _____27 J une
~9_'Kugust -__]3 Tfctober~a-- ~' ,
Hydra _ sp. 528) Dis Total Oligochaeta Dis >528 Total Haididae Dis >528 1315_behninji Dis >528 Caenis sp.
~~
Dis >534 ljo'nych,ia sp. 530> Dis Total Hydropsychidae Dis >534 534> Dis Hydr _opyyche f risoni Dis >534 534>0is Total Chirononidae Dis >528 folyp_edilum convictun 534> Dis Total Denthos Dis >534 534> Dis Diversity Dis >528 d Hot calculated, only one replicate taken. ( 84
H \ZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES J iable 4.7. Benthic densities (no./m2) calculated from Ponar dredge sanples collected from sedinents in th'e itissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79. Lccation Seasonal Col 1ection Date RMTJ4-~~~-~ ~~MIT37 RF5i3F~~7F576 itean 21 June 1973 315 8 124 296 579 329 25 June 1974 1133 464 622 302 632 10 July 1975 440 1618 127 106 537 6 August 1976 536 4325 5223 3005 3287 22 June 1977 416 2003 4822 517 1814 26 June 1978 1046 3370 4101 5979 3624 l 27 June 1979 592 529 491 535 537 1 24 tagust 1973 265 704 932 832 084 13 August 1974 2494 1625 5564 2084 2942 28 August 1975 372 2646 2690 44 1438 23 September 1976 428 2155 4731 6640 3489 11 Auguet 1977 340 599 2029 781 937 15 August 1978 1537 208 1046 359 788 9 August 1979 101 132 1314 1304 713 18 Cctober 1973 12 221 321 56 153 1 Oc tober 1974 416 1612 3533 1844 1852 16 October 1975 857 1254 2236 176 1131 15 November 1976 605 5172 14496 1594 5467 6 October 1977 1008 334 1468 680 873 10 October 1978 743 882 359 391 594 3 October 1979 724 1745 6281 995 2436 1973 mean 198 353 519 491 1974 mean 1355 1241 3257 1419 1975 nean 559 1849 1693 110 1976 nean 523 3903 8150 3746 1977 mean 588 979 2606 660 10'8 mean :.109 1487 1835 2243 1979 mean 472 802 2495 945 A flean of three replicates. t Ob
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 4.8. Benthic macroinvertebrate diversity indices a calculated fron Ponar dredge sanples collected fron sedinents in the tiissouri River near Cooper fluclear Station, 1973-79. CTi1TeTtion Ec aTi oT-- ~~ ~~~-~~ ~~~ fe a s o~naT
~
._ . _D_a ty. _ , _ , _ , ___ , _ _ _ _ , , , _ _Rj{ p_4]_)){}{2_))]f]53~0][]}Rli T21f _, J1ea n , , 21 June 1973 2.26b 2.75 2.16 2.23 2.27 25 June 1974 1.27 1.72 2.16 1.50 1.66 10 July 1975 2.63 1.32 1.50 1.27 1.60 6 August 1976 2.62 2.70 2.50 2.91 2.57 , 22 June 1977 1.60 0.75 1.68 1.31 1.33 l 26 June 1978 3.10 2.57 3.22 2.86 2.94 27 June 1979 2.59 2.45 2.73 1.79 2.39 24 Auqust 1973 1.46 1.97 1.95 1.45 1.76 13 August 1974 1.92 1.98 2.13 2.46 2.12 28 August 1975 1.82 1.57 1.85 _c 1.75 23 September 1976 2.01 2.44 2.33 2.16 2.36 11 August 1977 2.73 2.59 2.39 1.59 2.33 15 August 1978 2.26 1.64 2.57 1.91 2.10 9 August 1979 1.37 1.23 2.87 2.46 1.98 18 October 1973 - 1.25 1.41 1.58 1.38 1 October 1974 1.65 2.04 1.86 2.14 1.94 16 October 1975 2.31 2.80 2.19 1.30 2.22 15 October 19/6 2.37 2.49 2.52 2.58 2.49 6 October 1977 2.19 2.01 2.42 2.29 2.23 10 October 1978 1.97 1.96 2.33 1.75 2.00 3 October 1979 2.07 2.61 2.62 1.98 2.32 1973 nean 2.06 1.87 1.84 1.80 19 74 mean 1.61 1,91 2.05 2.03 1975 cman 2.09 1.90 1.95 1.23 1976 nean 2.33 2.40 2.45 2.55 1977 nean 2.17 1.78 2.16 1.73 197a nean 2.44 2.06 2.71 2.17 1979 nean 2.01 2.10 2.74 2.08 Shannon (194H), 109 base 2.
,flean of three replicates. ' Insuf ficient sanple size.
( 86
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCliNCZ3 Table 4.9. Selected benthic organisms (numbers /m 2 ) collected with the Ponar { dredge from sediments in the fiissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Sta tion , 1973-79. Meaa humber of Organisms per Square Meter 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Sampj_t nMa te/Ta s a _ RM 53i 21 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 1U jut 75 - 6AX 76 WJK77 - 25~Jun 75 27~Jun 73 8 6 0 0 Limnodrtius cervin 0 13 38 38 0 44 25 6 0 0 44 E. il aT47edi anus C hMTmFiRFrF 19 44 57 J2 63 2 107 C iideTem' Tanu s 25 6 0 13 0 0 19 Oth'c7 Tubl f fildae 82 214 252 302 265 434 189 (tncludes intetures) Chircnomus sp. 44 743 0 0 0 38 19 Other Chironomidae 38 51 6 50 13 101 164 Other tasa 102 13 62 95 57 353 50 Total benthos 315 1133 440 536 416 1046 592 24 Auj 73 - 13 Au L74 2R Auj 7ET23 fip 76 11~A.uf77 J ITTuf78 -_---- L. cervts 39 227 13 0 6 132 13 L'.~ cla6aredianus 13 13 0 32 0 i? O C h6fImFist'eri- 38 555 25 44 38 258 19 E. Jdd emia~niis ' O 6 13 6 44 0 0 Other Tubific fdae 177 1474 252 271 175 844 50 Chiron mus sp. 0 132 0 6 6 13 0 5ther- ' Chi r onomi da e 6 51 32 38 12 239 0 Other tana 6 32 37 31 55 31 19 Total bcrthos 265 2494 372 428 340 1537 101 4 1H Oct 73 - 1 Oc t 74 1FOc t 7s~-~~15 Ei76
' C Oc t 77 -~ 10 Dc_t' 75- -
3_ __ L. rervt 0 0 19 6 82 76 0 l'. (.1 6arenlanus 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 L . baf f mei sterT 0 0 M 57 44 76 57 L. u sYsmiarius- 0 6 0 19 57 0 25 Othe'r Tubificidae 6 334 630 202 743 509 535 (htronomus sp. 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Othe r Cht renomdae 0 32 63 0 13 44 50 Other tana 0 44 57 120 69 38 57 Total benthos 6 416 857 605 1008 743 724 87
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC] Table 4.9. (continued)
~~' - ~
Mcan Eber oF6fganisms per Square Meter 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 54mpi tn1 Datef f ana ,_1973 1974
'"L531 21 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 76 10~ ~J ul'7E~~ tau ~f~78 2FJun~77776~Jun I.71'5]?~ ~
1077 850 139 19 19 315 Linnodrtius cervia 6 0 19 13 94 13 l~ H ag dedianus~~~ 0 6 107 0 636 44 151 C h~offne ntcrT~ 0 51 6
~
0 6 50 0 0 L'.' Udereniinui 6 2180 1027 1796 283 Othir Tub ~Ificidae 25 44 1127 (includes inmatures) 239 0 441 13 0 19 Chironomus sp. 6 19 101 13 170 101 O thir~ C hi r ononi d a e 19 95 0 410 69 535 44 Other tana 7b 13 464 lbl6 4325 2003 3370 529 Total benthos 124 73 - 13 Aug 74 24 2A'Aug 1l'74ug Aug' 77~" 75~ 6'Au 73 - --
~2TLp['76 yAg7_q -
756 321 19 0 9 t, c+rvii 97 309 0 19 38 0 6 19
- 1. -lapaicdianus 0 309 183 157 32 6 38 L'. ho ffrw iT t e ri 69 57 76 19 0 9 LT udekenian'u? 19 6 409 1531 1399 133 25 57 Other Tutiificidae 397 466 6 19 19 0 0 Chironcnus sp. 95 57 13 74 82 0 Uther Chirononidar 32 108 37 132 278 83 0 Other ta o 0 19 1625 2C46 2155 599 208 132 Total benthos 704 IH oct 13 - 1 Oct 74 lE Oc t 75 ~-~ Whi~i 76
_(J Cs t g.
. 77 ~ ~ 10 Oc t. 7_ E -
0 334 38 44 151 L. tarvia 13 101 0 0 0 44 0 0 19 l'.~ c % pa'redtanus 1? I 19 290 32 38 l' r e f f nc i s tWi 6 107 0 32 25 38 13 l . adriemianis 63 13 712 1335 139 1292 554 2294 233 Other Tuta l f i c i die 0 0 b3 0 0 6 Charenonus w. 0 13 88 50 0 13 13 Ot her' C hi ronomi dae 0 612 2059 19 75 57 Otter taia 0 107 16*? 1254 5172 334 882 1745 tot al tientbos 221
HAZLETON ENVIRONMZNTAL CCENOZ] Table 4.9. (continued) Mean humber of Organisms per Square Meter Sarpling Date/ Taxa 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 R!! 530 21 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 ID7uT75 - 6 fulT6 77 7un 77 - 2C Jun 78 E JinT Limnodrilus cervix 6 32 32 460 353 82 0 L'.~cl a p a redi a r.u s 19 19 0 19 13 25 0 E- hi5fTheTitert 25 107 13 233 422 353 6 L. ud*Terifa~nus~ 19 0 0 32 0 0 13 1959 32 Othe7TubTricTdae 76 202 76 3181 2514 (includes immatures) Chironomus sp. 32 176 0 813 964 189 0 UtWer Clifronomidae 0 82 6 107 13 391 69 Other tana '14 6 0 378 25 1102 371 Total bentbos 296 622 127 5223 4322 4101 491 24 Auj 73 - 13 Auj 74 7Guq 75T'2TTep76 ITATUT1 Dug 76 TLR{ L. cervia 239 693 643 554 397 50 123 l.' ' claiisredianus 0 13 88 0 0 25 9 I.. h5ffncisteri 132 475 183 101 214 50 132 L~.~ uderenianus 32 101 57 82 13 0 0 Othsr TEtiificldae 422 4051 1644 3440 1223 535 868 Chironomus sp. 32 25 6 208 113 0 19 UtWir Chironomidae 76 38 51 18 19 139 75 other tais 0 152 12 327 4a 246 88 Total benthos 32 5564 2690 4731 2029 1046 1314 IB Oct 13 - 1 Oct 74 K Fc tF ~ ~15Tdv' 76 T..) . 0c t' 7T_a_ .0_ _OcT_7 5_ _ l L. c ervix 19 107 63 660 126 13 599 l .' clipare,11 anus 0 6 0 44 0 0 6
~
L.~ N ffsistiri' 19 290 151 548 94 0 86 L. udeienianui~ 6 51 19 139 19 0 19 Other' TJbific~idae 246 2394 1808 4125 1115 239 5084 Chtre v us sp. 0 624 6 1795 0 6 6 Oti+r Chironamidae 19 38 63 246 6 44 57 Other tasa 13 19 129 6919 108 57 422 tot sl denthos 321 3533 2236 14496 1468 359 6281 89
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC] Table 4.9. (continued) Mean hamber of Organisms per Square Meter / 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Samp1tng Date/ Taxa RM 528 21 Jun 73 - 25 Jun 74 10 ~ jut 75 - 6 Bru 7 6 2T'Jun77776 Jun78 77 Jun T 0 265 76 32 13 Limnodrilus cervix 25 57 6 l~~~cl apTre di a nus 6 19 0 107 6 19 6 63 6 208 164 391 25 l~ h'of TnieTs tTr F~ 38 0 0 164 0 0 6 L. udelemTanus 403 50 1834 252 2778 176 Other TublficTdae 132 (includes immatures) 6 6 126 6 Chironomus sp. O O O 63 6 19 385 6 926 284 O t he~r ThTr'onomi da e Other taxa 44 26 31 36 0 1708 19 585 302 106 3005 517 5979 635 Total benthos 74 24 2A Aug 73 - 13 Tep Au27U~23 Aug 76 IT Aug F I5 Au 78 19] Aug 79 --~ ~j--- 4 L. cervix 290 410 0 410 227 0 246 6 '.3 0 183 0 0 76
- l. U Ga~r~edianas 113 LT biif f meTsTe~rT- 63 346 0 643 145 32 l! iideremia~niis'- 13 76 0 82 6 0 94 422 800 32 5147 352 56 718 OtheT TubTficfdae C hi ronnmu s sp. 6 95 0 6 6 0 0 44 6 7 31 57 19 OthirThTronomid ae 32 Other taxa 0 277 6 163 13 214 38 Total benthos 832 2084 44 6640 781 359 1304 18 Oct 73 - 1 Oct 74 16 Oct 75- 15TiiI76 6 Oc t' 77 - . . 10. ~.0._c t7B L. cervta 6 233 0 76 57 6 82 l'.' cls;ist edianus 0 6 0 32 0 0 6 li hoffmilsterF' O 183 6 164 57 6 13 l'. udelemlanui 0 25 0 107 38 0 6 712 403 328 851 l Other Tub 1ficidae 32 1222 145 Chironomus sp. 0 51 0 88 6 0 0 Other Chironomidae 6 19 19 12 0 32 25 Oth*r tana 13 101 6 404 119 19 12 Total benthos 59 1844 176 1594 680 391 995 90 f 1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENC 23 Table 4.10. Total organic carbon (mg/kg) and texture of sediments sampled with Ponar dredge from the Missouri River near Cooper fluclear Station, 1973-79. _ -.___ _ _ _ __-- _ -- - - _ --- --- - Collection ~ 1H~T34 RWT32 MT30 -~78T2F Seasenal Date TOC Texture TOC Texture TOC Texture Mean Texture Mean 21 Jun 73 6500 silt 1277 sand 11000 clay 1633 clay 5102 25 Jun 74 14000 clay 1566- clay 13000 clay 7767 silt 12606 10 Jul 75 4283 silt 5867 silt / clay 11233 clay /stit 5200 silt 6646 6 Aug 76 6433 silt 12667 clay 11667 clay 6633 silt 9350 22 Jun 77 11700 clay 9500 clay / muck 18000 clay / muck 4500 muck / silt 10925 26 Jun 78 13667 claj/ muck 12333 clay / muck 14000 clay / muck 10266 clay / muck 12566 27 Jun 79 10333 sa nd/muc k 7300 sand /meck 130u0 clay 7333 sand / muck 9492 24 Aug 73 1733 sand 11000 clay 12333 clay 5467 silt 7633 13 Aug 74 10233 clay 20667 muck 12667 clay 9867 clay /stit 13358 28 Aug 75 8517 sil t/c lay 7067 silt 10733 clay 657 sand 6743 23 Sep 76 7683 silt 8500 silt 13166 clay 5533 silt 8721 11 Aug 77 8567 clay 7667 city / puck 14667 clay / muck 5333 muck / silt 9058 15 Aug 78 6933 cl ay / muck 15333 clay / muck 14333 clay / muck 5633 sand / muck 10225 9 Aug 79 3100 sand 7800 clay / muck 16667 clay / muck 10200 muck 9442 16 Oct 73 783 sand 9467 silt 8033 slit 7667 silt 6538 1 Oct 74 1300 sand 3967 silt / sand 13333 clay 10000 clay 7150 16 Oct 75 3267 slit 11000 clay 5800 silt / clay 5933 silt / clay 6500 15 Nov 76 8783 slit 7967 silt 11667 clay 4400 silt / sand 8550 6 Oct 77 9567 clay / muck 8567 clay / muck 6433 clay / sand 6800 clay / muck 7309 10 Oct 78 4233 sand / muck 6900 sand / muck 5033 sand / muck 900 sand / muck 4267 3 Oct 79 10333 sand / muck 9600 muck 12666 sand / muck 4333 sand 9233 1973 nean 3006 7248 10456 4939 1974 nean 8511 13433 13000 9/11 1975 nean 5356 7978 9256 3930 19 76 me a n 7633 9711 12167 5662 1977 mean 9444 8578 13033 5544 19 78 re a n 8278 11078 11122 5600 1979 rean 1922 8233 14111 7289 91
\
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES . l l l 1 Chapter 5 FISH POPULATION AND DISTRIBUTION STUDY By Ronald G. King l l l t 1 i 92 l l l
HAZLETON CNVIRONMINTAL CCCNCT3 I. l Introduc_ti on_ Fishes of the liissouri River near Cooper !Juclear Station have been stu.:ied since 1970 to document potential ef fects of impingement, larval fish entrainnent, and thermal additions on the adult fish coanunity. Preoperational data were collected from 1970 through 1973 to characterize the fish community in the vicinity of the Station (Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc.1971, 1972, 1973; Patuiski 1975). This study follows five years of operational studies (Szmania and Johnson 1975; Szmania 1976; Bliss 1977,1978; King 1979) designed to evaluate ef fects of Station operation on the flissouri River fi she ry. The objectives of the operational study were to determine:
- 1. Species composition and relative abundance of the local f'sh community;
- 2. Spatial and temporal distribution of fish within the study area; 3 Age, size distribution, and food habits of selected species; and
- 4. Movements of fish within the study area.
II. F i e_l d_a n_d_A n a ly t i c a l P ro c e d u re s A. Samp_li_ng_ Locations Adult and juvenile fish were collected from seven locations in the flissouri River near Cooper fiuclear Station (Figure 5.1). Six locations consisted of five channel modification structures (wing and/or trail dikes). Locations with similar habitat were selected but inherent differences existed among locations due to type and condition of the channel modification struc-tures. Outside these structures, the current was swif t and the substrate was scoured. In caln areas behind the structures, the botton consisted of sand and silt that had been deposited by eddy currents. In addition to the collections on the flissouri River, electroshocking was conducted in the discharge canal. The 21000 f t (305 m) long canal has a rock shoreline, sand and silt botton, noderate current velocity, and relatively shallow depth (1-2 n). B. Sanp_ ling nethods Fish sanples were collected monthly fron flay through !Jovember 1979 by electroshocking and seining. Three locations were not sampled in June due to equipment f ailure and high river flow precluded seining at one location in July and two locations in September. A three-phase 230 volt A.C. boat-mounted boom shocker was used at all locations to sample shallow water areas innediately downstream from each channel rodi fication structure. Each location was sampled for approxi-mately 30 nin and enconpassed approximately 800 m of shoreline. Fish I collected in the Station's discharge canal were treated separately to I 93
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENChS characterize the area of naximum thernal influence. Surf ace water temnerature was reasured at each location prior to electroshocking. A seine, 7.6 m long,1.8 m deep, with 0.6 cm Ace nesh was used to collect juvenile and forage fish along sandbars formed behind wing dikes. During each sampling period, one to four bauls were made per location. C. .D_a ta. _C,o l l ec t i,o n Fish collected by electroshocking were identified, neasured (total length in nn), and weighed (91 in the field. Electroshackin; data were converted to catch per unit ef fort (CPE), defined as fish collected per 30 nin of electroshocking, by species and sanpling location. Fish collected by seining were identified and measured either in the field or in the laboratory. Fish returned to the laboratory were preserved in 101 fonaalin. Sca'le and stomach samples were obtained f rom a representative number of selected game species. Scale inpressions were nade on plastic (cellulose acetate) slides and the number of annuli was determined with the aid of a microprojector. Stomach sanples were preserved in 95't> ethanol and individually exanined using a binocular dissecting scope. Food itens in the stomachs were identified to the lowest positive taxonomic level, enumerated, and measured to the nearest U.1 ml by water displacement. To determine fish movements, selected fish of suitable size and physical condition were tagged with a numbered anchor tag and released alive at the collection location. Ui th the exception of the genus Hybognathu.s, described by Pfleiger (1971), scientific and common nanes follow _ed Bailey (1970). Data sumnaries of the number and size distribution of fish collected by electroshocking and seining, CPE for electroshocking, and food habits are presented in Appendix D, Tables D.1 through D.a. III. Res_ults and Discussion _ A. Species _ Composi,ti_on and_ Relative Abundance Approximately 2000 iish of 39 species were collected by electro-shocking and seining during the 1979 study. The numerical catch was dor.inated by 25 species which were also common during previous studies (Table 5.1). Largenouth bass and bluegill were the only common species previously Collected that were not taken in 1979. Although these two species have been taken consistently since 1973, their nume. ical catch declined significa'itly in 1975 (Table 5.2). The remaining 14 species included two that were previously unreported (stonecat and Johnny darter) and 12 that have been unconmon or rare (Table 5.1). Stonecats and Johnny darters ha !c been reported in the vicinity of the Station by the Nebraska Gane and Parks Connission (Hesse and Wallace 1978). The occurrence of rain 5ow smelt for the second consecutive year is related to discharges f rom Lewis vid Clark Lake, approxinately 275 niles upstrean. Rainbow smelt were stocked in Lake Sakakawea, a painsten reservoir on the flissouri River, in 1971 and have successfully reproduced 1 94 f
HAZLOTON CNVIRCNb JENTAL CCl2NC2O (Berard 1978). Adult rainbow smelt were taken from Lake Oahe in 1974 and apparently migrated further downstream to Lewis and Clark Lake by 1977 or 1978.
- 1. Electroshocking The 1979 annual catch was the lowest for the 1973-79 study period (Table 5.2). Predoninant species caught by electroshocking included carp, gizzard shad, river carpsucker, goldeye, and freshwater drum which collectively accounted for 85.4% of the total catch. These species have comprised from 75 to 89% of the annual ca tch since 1973. Annual cat.ches Nye declined since 1976 prinarily due to fluctuations in catch rates of the five predoninant species (Table 5.2). Catches in 1978 and 19/9 declined below the 1973 preoperational level. This decline resulted f rom lower numbers of gizzard shad, carp, and river carpsucker.
Gane fish; including channel catfisti, flathead catfish, white crappie, black crappie, sauger, and freshuater drum, comprised 12.7% of the total electroshocking catch. Game fish catches have ranged from 10.9% of the total catch in 1976 to 24.9% in 1973 (Table 5.2). Major changes ; the abundance of game fish have included a decline in centrachid catch since 1973 and fluctuations in sauger Catches (Table 5.2). Lower catches of centrdchids were associated with habitat changes within the study area resulting fron a general deterioration of the channel modi fication structures and the notching progran initiated in 1976 by the U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers. Three struc-tures in the study area that had quiescent pools were notched, creating flowing water habitat behind then. The low catch rates of centrachids since 1975 reflect a reduction in desirable habitat for these species (Table 5.2). Low centrachid catches in 1975 were attributed to high river flow which greatly reduced sampling ef ficiency (Szmania 1976). Catches of sauger have progressively declined since 1977. Sauner previously declined trom 1973 throuqh 1976 and increased in 1977 to the 1973 preope*dtional level. The reduction in saugar catch was more severe in 1978-79 than during the 1974-76 period.
- 2. $_eining The 19/9 seine catch included 1239 fish of 27 species (Table 5.3). Predominant species included the silver chub, river shiner, channel i catfish, enerald shiner, red shiner, and treshwater drun which collectively l con;)rised nearly 84; of the total catch. Cyprinids conprised only 69? of the l catcn in 1979 conpared to nore than bOS in previous ye'rr.. The lower relative
( abundance of minnows in 1979 was due to the higher catch of channel catfish l and freshwater drun which comprised nearly 23? of the total catch. Pre-viously, only cyprinids comprised 101 or iore of the total catch (Table 5.3). Comparisons of anaual seine data indicate wide variations in the nunerical catch and relative abundance of the preda iinant species (Table 5.3). Species contributinq to these yearly fluctuations prinarily include western silvery minnow, plains ninnou, silver chub, enerald shiner, river shiner, red shiner,
, and sand shiner.
95
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCIENCEO Factors other than spawning success contributing to the wide annual variation in seine haul collections probably include schooling behavior and rivor flow. Schooling behavior of the cyprinids causes uneven spatial distributions which bias seine data. High river flows and associated silta-tion have prevented equal seining ef fort among years and have limited seine efficiency. The highest seine catch occurred in 1974 when average river flow was the lowest (37600 cf s), whereis the lowest catch occurred in 1975 when river flow averaged $9000 cf s. High flows from 1975 through 1979 occasionally reduced the numbor f seine collections and therefore contributed to lower t,4al catches. The annual seine catch, adjusted to number of fish per collection, has declined fron 86 to 106 in 1973-74 to it-53 fish per collec-tion from 1975-79. This decline can be attributed in part to lower efficiency since the effective area sampled decreased with increased water level. In addition, seining f requently followed periods of high flow that resulted in heavy silt deposition creating di f f icult seining conditions. These conditions were particularlf prevalent in 1975,1978, and 1979 when river flows averaged over 50000 cf s. Young-of-the-year (YOY) river carpsucker, quillback, channel catfish, white bass, sauger, and f reshwater drum occurred in the fall col-lections. Channel catfish and freshwater drum YOY were nore abundant than in previous years indicating good spawning success. Game fish comprised 25% of the srine catch in 1979 which is the highest occurrence of game fish in the annual catch during the 1973-79 study. For the second consecutive year YOY qizzard shad were not collected by seining. Gizzard shad have occurred in low numbers in the seine collections since 1973 but have remained connon in the electroshocking catch (Table 5.2). The pelagic schooling behavior of YOY gizzard shad reduces their catchability by seining. C. Temporal and Spctial Distribution i
- 1. E l ec_t r_o s_h_oa i ng Total catch per unit ef fort (CPE) exhibited only slight variation during the 1979 study. Catch rates were similar fron May through August and increased in September and Octobu when YOY gizzard shad became susceptible to electroshocking. November catches decreased primarily due to the absence of gizzard shad. Species other than gizzard shad contributing to fluctuations in total catch rates included goldeye, carp. river carpsucker, and fresba ter drun. Catch rates in previous years have generally been high in May and Ju"e, declined in the sunmer, and increased in the fall. Lowe r catch rates of gizzard shad, carp, and river carpsucker resulted in the low total catch recorded in May and June 1979 (Table 5.4).
The Low catch rates in 1979 were primarily attributed to high ' river f low. River flow during the 1975,1978, and 1979 surveys averaged over 50000 cf s and the three lowest total annual catches occurred during these years. High flow inundates wing and trail dikes and occasionally shoreline areas. Species which nornally inhabited these areas are either displaced or 96 I
HAZLOTON ONVIADNMENTAL SCIENCES less susceptible to collt: tion. Total CPE has declined since the highest catch rates were recorded in 1976. Prior to 1978, catch rates were similar to or higher than the 1973 preoperational data. The high CPE in 1976 resulted from large catches of gizzard shad and carp (Table 5.5). The low catches in 1978 and 1979 resulted primarily from a sharp decline in river carpsucker catch rates. This decline has apparently been widespread in the Missouri River since sinilar findings were reported near Nebraska City (RM 556) and Fort Calhoun Station (RM 646) by Onaha Pu!)1ic Power District (unpublished data). River carpsuckers were apparently affected by the severe winter conditions which caused ice jams and flooding in March 1978. Collections during April 1978 near Hebraska City yielied many nature river carpsuckers that were severely bruised, presumably caused by ice action following breakup of the ice jams. Monthly catch rates were compared statistically using assump-tions made for similar tests of the 1978 data (King 1979). Significant (p < 0.05) differences in the total nonthly CPE among years occurred during
~
May through August 1979 (Table 5.6). Dif ferences among years were generally due to variation in the catch of gizzard shad, carp, and river carpsuckers. Catch rates during this period were only significantly lower than those from one or two prior years, and July was the only month that the 1979 CPE was significantly lower than the preoperational CPE in 1973 (iable 5.6). The highest nonthly CPE recorded for centrachids (17.8) during the 1973-79 study period occurred in July 1973. This catch accounted for 20% of all centrachids caught by electroshocking during the 1973-79 study perf 'd. Unusually high catch rates of carp, river carpsucker, aad gizzard shad resulted in the other significantly higher rates in 1975 and 19i6. The 1979 catcn rates were generally within previously established ranges although average CPE's of gizzard shad, river carpsucker, and freshwater drum were slightly lower than those previously recorded (Table 5.5). Annual catch rate was hignest in the discharge canal and similar among the six river locations during the 1979 study (Table 5.7). Lower catches in the discharge canal occurred in August when water temperature was 33.2C (Table 5.8) and in September when the Station was shutdown. The nonthly maximum CPE at the river locations average only 2.5 times higher than the lowest CPE. Similar variations among locations have been recorded during previous studies (Table 5.5). The mean annual CPE's at the six river locations were similar and varied fran 66 to 80% less than the annual CPE for the discharge canal . Catch rates at the species level generally indicated no spatial dif ferences other than those in the discharge canal. Higher catch rates in the discharge canal resulted fran an apparent attraction of gizzard shad and carp which accounted for 66t of the ca tc h. Other species which occurrei nore frequently in the discharge canal included longnose gar, shortnose gar, channel catfish, flathead catfish, and f reshwater drun. Catch data collected since 1975 suggest that some species are thermally attracted to the discharge canal during periods of low ambient temperatures in the river. This apparent attraction has been inconsistent anong years as suggested by the fall data collected during periods of Station shutdown (King 1979). Greater ef ficiency and the morc favorable physical characteristics of the discharge canal may have contributed to 97
r HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES higher CPE in the canal. Warmer water temperatures and shallow depth (1-2 m) increases the efficiency of electroshocking ia the canal. Furthermore, the depth of the canal apparently does not change significantly with varying river flows because of siltation, whereas depth at the river locations is markedly influenced by river flow. Low smbient temperatures is late fall normally result in fish migrations from shoreline areas to deeper water. In ) the Missouri River the holes behind wing and trail dikes provide this deep water habitat which cannot be electroshockcd as efficiently as in the dis-charge canal .
- 2. SeininS The seine catch exhibited only slight temporal and spatial variation during the 1979 study period. The largest catch occurred in August when nearly 90% of the Y0Y freshwater drum and 46% of the silver chubs were taken (Table 5.9). Low catches in June and September resulted from decreased ef fort and high river flow. Although the predominant cyprinid species fluctuated greatly from May through November no seasonal trends were apparent (Table 5.9). Seasonal differences were primarily due to recruitment of YOY fishes to the seine catch. Monthly variations in the seine catch were slight considering that schooling behavior of the predominant cyprinids greatly affects the catch.
Spatial differences in the seine catches were also slight (Table 5.10). The predominant species were collected at all locations and there was no indication that any species were attracted to or avoided the heated locations (532N and 530N). Temperature elevations at Locations 532fl and 530N were generally less than 2C (3.6F) above ambient (Table 5.8) which is generally too small a difference to expect fishes to exhibit avoidance-attraction behavior. Water temperatures at 532N in May and June were 4.2 to 8.0C (7.2 to 14.4F) above ambient, respectively, but no avoidance or attraction ' of fi@ was indicated ( Appendix D, Table D.2). Spatial differences in the seine data have been inconsHtent on a monthly basis throughout the 1973-79 study period. In 1979, each location had tne highest monthly catch during at least one sampling period. Locations that have had both the highest and the lowest total annual seine catch since 1973 include 534N, 534M, 532N, and 532M. Annual dif ferences among locations are probably related to the ef fect that river flow has on seining ef ficiency. C. Age and Size Distribution Scale samples were taken from six species to determine age and size distribution (Table 5.11). Sample size was too small to characterize age structure for all species except freshwater drum. Freshwater drum were represented by five age groups, witn age groups I and IV being the strongest. These age groups represent the 1978 and 1975 year classes. Strong year classes have been previously identified for 1975 but not for 1978. Excluding the 0 age group, growth rates for freshwater drum in 1979 were similar to previous years (Table 5.12). The 0 age group grew slower in 1979 than in 1978. 98 t
HAZLETON GNVIRONM3NTAL ECINC2D Comparisons of length-frequency distributions among years' for the five predoninant species in the electroshocking catch indicate annual shif ts in size oistribctions for all five species (Figures 5.2 and 5.3). Catches of river carpsucker included a higher frequency of fish less than 300 nn than previously reported suggesting a young population that may be increasing from the decline in 1978. The carp catch also included a higher percentage of smaller fish than were caught since 1976 but the size distribu-tion of the 19/9 catch was similar to those from 1973 through 1975 (Figure 5.2). Annual variations in length-frequency distribution for gizzard shad, goldeye, and freshwater drum were greater. than those for carp and river I carpsucker. Catches of gizzard shad in 1978 and 1979 included an unusually l low number of fish longer than 275 mm (Figure 5.3). The annual catch was generally dominated by YOY gizzard shad except in 1977 when approximately 75% of the fish were longer than 275 mm. Length-frequency distributions of. freshwater drum exhibited annual variations that are related to the strong year class in 1975 (Figure 5.3). This strong year class contributed to the greater number of fish longer than 200 mm from 1976 through 1979. The even size distribution since 1975 suggests a stable population in the vicinity of the Station. Goldeye size distribution shif ted to larger fish from 1975 through 1977, followed by an increased frequency of smaller fish in 1978 and 1979. The length-frequency data indicate that operation of Cooper Nuclear Station has not adversely affected the size distribution of the predominant species. Although there have been variations in occurrence of brood stock, the operational catch data indicate no decline in year class strength when compared to the preoperational data. Differences among years in length-frequency distributions were procably related to recruitment success, growth rate', and gear ef ficiency, the latter being influenced by river flow. D. Food Habits 1 Stomach contents fron eight species were analyzed to document food habits. A total of 134 stomachs was exanined of which 95 contained food i tems. Approximately 50% of the stomachs were from goireye and 23% from freshwater drum ( Appendix D, Table D.3). Hojor food itens included fish, and aquatic and terrestrial insects. Terrestrial insects comprised 40-49% by volume of the food items in goldeye stomachs except in November when rodent and fish remains accounted for 90% by volume. Aquatic insects and fish were important food items in stomachs of all species examined, Aquatic insects which appeared as food items included 25 taxa with caddisflies and mayflies occurring most frequently. Fish occurring as food items included gizzard shad, rainbow smelt, cyprinids. and freshwater drum. Major food items in the diet of individual species were generally similar to those in previous studies (Table 5.13). Variability in the relative importance of the major food items was due to large food items, including crayfish, frogs, and rodents, which biased stonach content volumes. Goldeye stomach contents varied the most from previous years with fish and rodent remains accounting for 43% of the total volume. 99
--:---____-__._~.________._--.--__~.--_-__-
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCCNCE3 Stomach content data indicat e that fishes in the Missouri River were opportunistic feeders wi th sea".onal shil ts in f ood items related to availability. Results of environmental monitoring studies in the vicinity of the Station indicate that Station operation has not altered the abundance, composition, or distribution of the plankton, periphyton, macroinvertebrates, or forage fish which are utilized as food items. Based on these findings and , the results of the stomach content analyses, Station operation has not affected the food habits of fishes in the vicinity of the Station. E. Fish Movement A total of 85 carp was tagged fron itay to November 1979 to determine novements in the vicinity of the Station. Carp has been the principal species tagged in previous studies. No tagged fish were recaptured in 1979. Low recapture rates have been reported in previous studies with approximately , a 4% return rate of all fish tagged from 1973 through 1978. Returns have previously been reported by both sport and commercial fishermen and by sampling. Limited returns have provided inconclusive data on fish movements in the vicinity of the Station. Based on previous returns and thermal plume configuration, the plune apparently does not present a physical barrier to fish novement. IV. Sunnary and Conclusions
- 1. A total of 759 fish was collected by electroshocking with gizzard shad, goldeye, carp, river carpsucker and f reshwater drun comprising 85.4% of the total catch. These species have comprised 75 to 85$ of the total electro-shocking catch since 1973.
- 2. Game fish comprised 12.8% of the electroshocking catch in 1979 which was similar to the 1976 catch (10.9;) but significantly lower than the '
1973 catch (24.9L). The decline of centrachid game fish since 1974 has been related to a general deterioration of the channel codification structures. and to the U. S. Arny Corps of Engineers' notching program, which have decreased the favorable habi tat for centrachid species.
- 3. Predominant species collected by seining included silver chub, emerald shiner, river shiner, red shiner, channel catfish, and freshwater drum. The numerical catch increased over the 1978 catch which was the lowest for the 1973-79 study period. High river flows and siltation contributed to the low catches during 1979.
- 4. Electroshocking catch rates were the lowest for the 1973-79 study period. Lower catch rates of qizzard shad and freshwater drum accounted for the majority of the reduction from the 19/8 catch.
- 5. tionthly catch rates among years were generally not statistically (p > 0.05) di f ferent. Dif ferences did occur between two or three years for flay, June, July and August but no trend indicating a declining catch rate was evident.
100 (
HAZLGTON GNVIRONM2NTAL CCl3NC32)
- 6. Catch rates in the discharge canal varied from 66 to 80% higher than at the six river locations. Higher catch rates in the canal were most apparent for gizzard shad, carp, and catfish.
- 7. Catch data collected since 1975 generally indicate thermal attrac-tion of fishes when discharge temperatures are below 34C (93.2F). However, the avoidance-attraction response of fish has been inconsistent and greater gear ef ficiency and more favorable physical characteristics of the discharge canal are probable reasons for the higher catch rates in the canal.
- 8. Seining data collected from 1973-79 generally indicated that Station operation has had no impact on the distribution or abundance of forage and YOY fishes.
- 9. Length-frequency data for the five predominant species from the electroshocking catch indicated that operation of the Station has not adversely affected the size d!stribution of these fish populations.
- 10. Food habits of selected species indicated fish were opportunistic feeders and that they have utilized similar food items during both preopera-tional and operational periods.
- 11. No tagged fish were recovered in 1979. Limited returns from previous studies suggest that the thermal plume does not prevent fish movement in the vicinity of the Station.
I 101
}
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES l V. P;cf,erences _Ci_te_d_ Bailey, R. II. , chai rman. 1970. A list of connon and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. An. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 6. 150 pp. B e ra rd , E . E . 1978. The influence of smelt on the walleye population in Lake Sakakawea. Project No. F-2-R-25, Study VI, Jobs VI-A and VI-B. Job completion Rep. florth Dakota State Game and Fish Dep. , Bismarck. 27 pp. Bli ss, Q. P. 1976. Fish population and eistribution study. Pages 147-179 in The evaluation of thernal cf fects in the flissouri River near Cooper fiu~c' lear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1977. (Project No. 5501-08776). Report by NALCO Environnental Sciences for flebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
~ . 1977. Fish population and distribution study. Pages 140-163 'in The evaluation of thermal ef fec ts in the flissouir River near Coope7 Muclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1976.
(Project No. 5501-07666). Report by NALCO Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, flebr. Hesse L., and C. Wallace. 1976. The ef fects of cooling water discharges f ron Fort Calhoun and Cooper Nuclear Station on the fishes of the fli ssouri River. Nebraska Game and Parks Conn. , Lincoln. 378 pp. Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. 19/s. Preoperational nonitoring ( thennal ) of the f1issouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1970-!1 arch 1971. (IBT No. W8977). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. 85 pp. + 4 appendices.
. 1972. Preoperational environnental nonitoring (thermal) of the !!issouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, April 1971-flarch 1972.
(IBT No. 48977). Report to Nebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr. 61 pp. + 5 appendices.
. 1973. The evaluation of thernal ef fccts in the flissouri
- River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1972-flarch 1973. (IHT No. 64301700). Report to Nebraska Public Power Di s tri c t. Columbu s, Nebr. 148 pp. + 6 appendices.
King, R. G. 1979. Fish population and di stribution study. Pages 119-151 in The evaluation of thernal ef fects in the flissouri River near Cooper l % clear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1977. (Project ( No. 8903). Report by Hazleton Lnvi ror. iental Scier.ces for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. Patulski, D. r.. 1975. Fish populations a'id li fe history study. Pages 151-216 in The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the flissouri River
~
near Cooper Nuclear Station (Preoperational Phase), April 1973-t-larch 1471 ([BT No. 64304909). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. f or NeDraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr. t l 102
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pfleiger, W. L. 197;. A distributional study of hissouri fishes. Univ. Kans. flus. Nat. Hist. Publ. 20(3):225-570. Szna ni a , D. C. 1976. Fish population and distribution study Pages 145-174
.in The evaluation of thennal ef fects in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-December 1975. (Project No. 5501-06419). Report by NALC0 Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus. Nebr. , and D. L. Johnson. 1975. Fish population and distribution
_ _ _study. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _Pages 138-166 in The evaluation of thennal ef fects in the fiissouri River near Coliper Nuclear Station (0perational Phase), January-December 1974. (IBT No. 64304909). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. c 103
I HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCl274C30 t
- Ij , g.-534 / -
NEBRASKA 534N< MISSOURI N
~ >534 M d b 533 - -o- /
N %, COOPER - NUCLEAR 7532M S TATION yd , 532 532N LEGEND le-OOO River Mile .q
~
N Rap Rap , Wing Dom ,e l1 1 '
'L3.1 T rail Dike ,
53ON lM .- , .' 530 M 529
/
figure 5.1. Fish sampling locations in the vicinity of Cooper Nuclear Station, t May-November 1979. 104 L__ . __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___ ______ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . .
River corpsucks Corp 1979 n=130 1979 n* 217 85 - 85 - f d ! h M g
-M b- -
_ 1978 n:135 f5 1978 7 7 n: 2!7 j
~ > > m - M- h 35 _ 1977 n:520 85 1977 n:276 7:MhEl %
o n=520 IE o 1976
, H dMm n: 556 E
a at 15 - 1976 15 - Z 8 5
$ 30 - 30 -
U0~e b / g { e 5-
-- f f1 e s S 3 35 - 1975 n=384 $ is- 1975 n: 264 l -Ma b ~
rAE - 5 b h b_ - - R 1974 n:260 15 - 1974 n:397 g 85 - O h_ O M - g J 15 - 1973 n= 515 15 - 1973 n=342
~
mx/5MMM saasssasanassses sessassateessanssenes LENGTH CLASS (mm) LENGTH CL ASS (mm) Figure 5.2. Length-frequency distribution of river carpsucker and carp collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
1 HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCl'INCOO Freshwater drum Gizzord shod Goldeye 40-g3 1979 n : 127 3g 1979 n-45 Q: j y; 1979 n:98 l" - 77 15- f 5/$ 15 - p 0* M M- - O A o"- 3 R 30-15 -
!978 n:78 $~
15 - 7 1978 n:287 25 1978 n:99 15 - r P T 1 b- h- - h serJ b. - 30- 50- 30 - g 1977 n:86 g- 1977 n:264 25 - 1977 n:195 p is- 16 - y 15 - 7 $ o
~
L o h 5 o h 3 ps_ 30 -- so - 25 - 1976 n:95 30- 1976 n:444 25 - 20 - 25-1976 n:225 20 -
*\o 15 - / 20 - 8 15 -
10 - ' g) ' 16 - 10 - U [^E7 ld - 80 ~I ~ 3 w U U 30- 3 30- 3 30-f 1975 n:83 O w g- 1975 n:280 1975 n:91 a i5 - 4 k u 15 - ' 15 - XX W - o A k 20- I9 74 n n:66 20- 1974 n:282 20 - 1974 n=71 15 -- m I: IS - 15 - M M hm n b -- m P2 1973 n: 71 1973 n:280 1973 n:lO4
- b. % b b- .
15 -? , 0: 15 - n 15 - 10 ... ' - '- p 77 10 - 99 3 30 - 3
]
MNh $ dE d d'h _-
@~ as Ed d7 OEEEEEEEkN!E@6@$ M8EEEEEE$MS$$$$ OE8EEEE$UE@$$
LENGTH CL ASS (mm) LENGTH CLASS (mm) LENGTH CLASS (mm) Iinure 5.3. Lenqth-frequency distribution of freshwater drum, gizzard shad, and coldeye collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79. 106
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 5.1. Checklist of fish collected in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station during preoperational and operational monitoring studies, 1970-79.
. - .. .- - g ......g--.-..... .___ . g ._ - ._.-__ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ -
Longnose gar Shovelnose sturgeon flooneye Shortnose gar Paddlefish Rainbow smelt Gizzard shad American ee. Goldfish Goldeye Skipjack herring Sturgeon chub Ca rp Northern pike Suckermouth minnow Western silvery ninnow Speckled chub Creek chub Plains ninnow Bigmouth shiner White sucker Flathead chub Quillback Golden redhorse Silver chub Blue sucker Stonecat Enerald shiner Black bullhead Yellow bullhead River shiner Green sunfish Brown bullhead Red shiner Orangespotted sunfish Plains killifish Sand shiner Walleye White perch Fathead ninnow Punpkinseed River carpsucker Smallmouth bass Smallmouth buff alo Spotted bass Bigmouth buf falo Johnny darter Shorthead redhorse Yellow perch Channel catfish Flathead catfish White bass Bluegill Largemouth bass White crappie Black crappie Sauger Freshwater drum d Classified as common if caught during 7-10 study years; ur, common if caught in low nunbers during 3-7 study years; and rare if caught during 1 or 2 study years. l 107
HAZLETON CNVIRONM2NTAL CCINCCO l 1 l l Table 5.2. fiumber and r21ative abundance of fish collected t'y electro-shocking in the Missouri River near Cooper fluclear Station, 1973-79. ho. h0. _ SpcCles N'O .~ .- f4 0'.~ ~I NO. s NO. I i . fra . Shovelnose sturqeon 0 - 0 - 0 - 7 0.3 14 0.9 3 0.3 2 U.3 Faddlefith 1 (U 1 0 - 1 <U.1 0 - 1 <0.1 1 U.1 u - Longnese qar 3 0.2 2 0.1 5 U.4 8 0.4 12 U.8 5 U.5 7 U.4 Shortnose gar 29 1.6 3U 2.1 13 1.0 23 1.1 18 1.2 24 2.5 7 v .9 American eel 0 - 0 - 3 0.2 0 - 2 0.1 1 U.1 0 - Skipjuk he r ri rt1 0 - 2 0.1 0 - 6 0.3 6 0.4 0 - 1 U.1 bizzird shad 3L5 17.1 2H4 20.0 312 24.2 47J 23.2 299 19.2 287 29.9 159 2s.9 Goldeye 104 5.8 17 5.4 91 7.1 224 10.6 197 12.7 103 10.6 96 12.9 Fairbos smelt 0 - U - 0 - 0 - 0 - 5 0.5 3 U.4 f.crthern Pik e 4 0.2 5 0.4 0 - 2 0.1 1 <U.1 0 - 2 U.3 Carp 331 18.6 311 27.5 260 20.2 557 26.4 2 7 t> 17.7 217 21.7 217 2 6 . t, Goldfish U - U - U - 1 <U.1 0 - 0 - U - Silvery minnow 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 U.1 0 - Stiver (hun 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 4 0.2 0 - 2 U.3 Cre<k chub 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - U - Enc rald shiner 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - U - 0 - 6 U.8 f>1ue such e r 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 2 0.1 3 0.3 4 U.5
?t ver carpsacker 525 29.5 207 18.8 387 3J.0 519 24.6 467 30.0 135 14.7 13v 17.1 r,v i l b ic k u -
1 (0.1 3 0.2 5 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.1 3 0.4 sm11muuth buf f alo 12 0.7 20 1.4 10 U.8 15 0.7 7 0.4 2 0.2 4 0.5 t?iq%>uth buffalo 24 1.3 8 0.6 17 1.3 20 U.9 5 0.3 12 1.4 14 1.8 becrtnead redhorse 2 0.1 1 <u.1 2 U.1 6 0.4 4 0.2 1 U.1 1 0.1 stor< c a t 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 U.1 Bl nk bullhead 15 U.8 U - U - 3 0.1 U U.0 0 - 0 - Channel utfish 20 1.1 39 2.7 17 1.3 24 1.1 45 2.9 24 2.5 29 3.8 51athe r1 catf t sh 12 U.7 e U.6 9 U.7 7 0.3 22 1.4 11 1.1 14 1.8 Lhite ba u 11 0.f i Ifs 1.3 20 1. *, 25 1.2 15 1.0 lb 1.9 1 U.1 Green sunfish 8 U.4 7 U.5 0 - 3 0.1 1 <0.1 0 - 1 U.1 Purrbtv.eed ? U.1 0 - U - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - orancespotted sunf t sh 1 <0.1 2 t.1 1 <0.1 1 <0.1 1 <U.1 0 - U - Lluegill 58 3.3 24 2.0 3 U.2 3 0.1 1 <u.1 0 - 0 - fluevil-green sunfish 0 - U - U - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - hybrti t ballreuth bau 2 U.1 0 - U - 0 - 0 - U - U - tarce % th ba u 53 3.0 4J 2.H 4 c.3 te U.3 2 U.1 1 v.1 0 - vite <.enrie 5H 3.3 41 2.9 4 0.3 16 0.6 11 0.7 5 0.5 3 v.e tlub c ra p pi e 73 4.1 45 3.2 9 L.7 14 0.7 2 0.1 14 1.5 3 v.4 Tcllow perth U - U - 1 <U.1 0 - 0 - 0 - u - N er 62 2.4 39 2.7 24 2.2 29 1.4 52 3.3 12 1.2 / u.3 i re; s.a te r dru, 75 4.2 t0 4.6 86 6.8 96 4.5 H6 5.5 76 6.1 45 5.9
'etal 1M1 14M 12M9 2113 15 5t> 964 754
( 103 I
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENC)) Table 5.3. Number and relative abundance of fish collected by seining in the Missouri River near Cooper Nucleaf Station, 1973-79. 1973 IW4 IW5 IWI 1977 1978 197 F Species No. I ho. % ko. % Vo. 1 No. 1 No. % No. L I Shovelnose sturgeon 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - Shortnose gar 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - Skipjsch herring 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - Girrard shed 170 5.2 6 0.1 7 1.2 85 7.0 17 0.8 0 - 0 - Goldeye 0 - 0 - 1 0.2 0 - 1 <0.1 2 0.3 0 - Rainbow smelt 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 59 7.9 18 1.5 Northern pike 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Ca rp 0 - 0 - 2 0.3 2 0.2 2 0.1 3 0.4 1 <0.1 Stivery minnow 1476 44.9 827 18.6 -a - - - - - - - - Western silvery minnow - - 128 2.9 7 1.2 106 8.7 412 18.4 4 0.5 7 0.6 Plains minnow - - 1055 23.7 52 9.1 58 4.7 293 13.1 37 5.0 33 2.7 5peckled cnub 5 0.1 8 0.2 3 0.5 5 0.4 2 0.1 0 - 5 0.4 Sturgeon chub 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - Flatheid chub 25 0.8 26 0.6 4 0.7 10 0.8 16 0.7 0 - 7 9.6 Silver chub 70 2.1 142 3.2 20 3.5 211 17.3 194 8.7 51 6.9 258 20.8 Emerald shtner 38 1 11.6 818 18.4 229 39.8 232 19.0 83 3.7 112 15.1 153 12.4 River shiner 160 4.9 690 15.5 81 14.1 260 21.3 955 42.7 235 31.6 194 15.7 Bigmouth shiner 0 - 2 <0.1 10 1.7 5 0.4 0 - 3 0.4 0 - Red shiner 420 12.8 396 8.9 83 14.4 05 7.0 80 3.6 115 15.5 144 11.6 Sand shiner 281 8.6 160 3.6 31 5.4 12 1.0 - 61 8.2 47 3.8 i Suckermouth minnow 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 4 0.5 3 0.2 ' Fathead minnow 98 3.0 16 0.4 2 0.3 4 0.3 1 <0.1 2 0.3 2 0.2 Cyprinidae 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Carpoides sp. 0 - 0 - 4 0.7 0 - 0 - 0 - 2 0.2 Rfver carpsucker 94 2.9 119 2.7 4 0.7 32 2.6 27 1.2 14 1.9 30 2.4 Out11back 0 - 1 <0.1 1 0.1 18 1.5 0 - 1 0.1 1 <0.1 White sutker 0 - 2 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 3 0.2 Ictiebus sp. 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 1.2 5mallsuth buffalo 0 - 9 0.2 0 - 21 1.7 8 0.3 0 - 1 <0.1 Bigmouth buffalo 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - J - Shorthead redhorse 1 0.1 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - Stonecat 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 Black Su11 head 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 6 Channel cetfish 40 1.2 24 0.5 14 2.4 31 2.5 62 2,8 31 4.2 164 13.2 Flathead catfish 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 0.1 1 <0.1 khite perch 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - White bass 24 0.7 8 0.2 9 1.6 26 2.1 25 2.0 1 0.1 8 0.6 Green sunfish 0 - 0 - U - 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 1 <0.1 Orangespotted sunfish 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 <0.1 0 - 1 <0.1 Bluegill 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 4 0.3 0 0.1 1 0.1 0 - Largemouth bass 0 - 0 - 0 - 2 0.2 0 - 0 - 0 - White crappie 9 0.3 4 0.1 1 0.1 2 0.2 4 0.2 3 0.4 6 0.5 Black crappic 6 0.2 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 <0.1 Johnny darter 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 (0.1 Sauger 3 <0.1 1 <0.1 6 1.0 2 0.2 3 <0.1 . 1 0.1 6 0.5 Walleye 0 - 1 <0.1 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - F reshwater drum 17 0.5 4 0.1 4 0.7 7 0.6 46 2.1 2 0.3 1;4 10.0 Total 3284 4450 575 1222 2236 74 3 1239 n 109
1 Tanic 5.". Seasonal catch-per-unit-ef fort of fisn Collected by ejectrosh0Cking in the *Iissouri 2iver cear Cceper Nuclear St3 tion. "ay-!.ovenber 1979 NSCj F1_ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ -_ _ UM_ _ jpe__} July Tu~iust-~ Teptember TTciober-~~ fiveriie f r' CPE 5novelnose sturgeon 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 <0.1 Longncse gar 0 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0 0 0.2 I Shortnose gar 0.3 0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0 0 0.2 > Skipjack terrino 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 <0.1 % Gizzard shad 0.2 U.7 0.5 0.3 7.0 18.2 0 3.8 m Goldeye 4.0 0.7 2.2 2.3 1.3 3.0 3.2 2.4 y Raincos smi t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 <0.1 z Northern pike 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 <0.1 m Carp 3.0 2.7 7.5 3.2 7.0 9.3 4.8 5.4 Z Silver chub 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 <0.1 5 0.2 0.5 0 0.2 3 - ' Eneral d shiner 0 0.7 0 0 E Blue sucker 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 <0.1 h P.iver carpsacker 0.8 0.3 3.0 0.7 4.8 5.0 7.2 3.1 g Quillback 9 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.? <0.1 m 0 0 0.2 0.3 <0.1 Z Snallmuth buf f alo 0 0 0 Bignouth buffalo 0.7 1.0 0 0 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.3 > 0 0.2 0 <0.1 I Shorthead redhorse 0 0 0 0 Stonecat 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 <0.1 $ Channel catfish 0.2 0 0.3 0 2.0 1.8 0.5 0.7 g Flathead catfish 0.5 0.3 0.8 U.2 0.7 0 0 0.4 Z White bass 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 <0.1 r Green sunfish 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 <0.1 $
'Jhi te crappie 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 <0.1 Black crappie 0 0.3 0.3 0 0 0 0 <0.1 Sauger 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 <0.1 Freshwater drun 2.2 0.3 0.2 1.2 1.2 2.0 0.7 1.1 Total CPE 11.8 8.0 16.5 9.2 25.5 41.7 17.8 18.2 8
tiunber of fish collected per 30 nin of electorshocking. O - - - - . . . _ _ _.m___ p
HAZL70N CNVIRONMZNTAL CCCNC D Table 5.5. Sunmry of average catch per uni t effort of fish collected by electroshocking in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, l 1973-79a, y- .g- g Spec es Year 534N $ 34'i Canal 532A 532?1 53DN 530t1 Nanner gj_ Gt: ard Shad 1973 5.7 10.0 - 16.5 1.3 11.3 6.0 3VS 7.3 1974 2.5 11.7 - 17.0 1.3 12.8 2.0 2e4 6.8 1975 3.1 ?.9 54 .0 7.4 6.0 11.2 3.2 312 8.2 1976 12.2 19.9 21.6 12.7 3.0 14.7 3.7 49'J 12.5 1977 2.3 11.1 4.7 10.5 9.7 la.3 0.7 299 7.0 1978 8.4 3.3 67.3 1.5 3.3 2.9 0.4 287 6.5 1979 1.5 3.3 29.0 5.8 2.8 3.9 0.1 159 3.6 C ,1 deg 1973 1.5 1.7 - 4.5 2.8 2.5 4.3 104 2.5 1974 1.5 0.8 - 3.2 4.9 0.8 1.7 77 1.6 1975 2.7 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.8 3.6 2.0 91 2.4 1976 5.6 9.1 2.0 3.9 3.5 4.7 6.0 224 5.u 1977 5.4 6.6 1.3 4.1 5.9 2.6 4.6 197 4.4 1978 2.4 2.3 0.9 1.5 3.1 1.4 4.0 103 2.4 1979 1.2 2.2 2.5 1.5 3.5 3.3 3.1 98 2.4 Ca r;i 1973 5.7 10.0 - 15.0 6.0 9.7 8.8 331 7.9 1974 5.7 18.7 - 18.8 8.5 7.2 6.3 391 9.3 1975 3.2 7.7 24.0 5.7 4.3 6.2 6.2 260 6.8 1976 10.9 11.6 43.6 15.5 6.8 10.7 13.2 557 16.0 1977 6.0 6.0 17.1 6.2 5.6 6.4 5.6 276 7.6 1978 2.6 2.9 24.4 6.2 4.1 6.0 3.1 217 5.2 1979 5.3 6.5 12.5 4.7 5.5 5.4 4.0 217 5.2 Giver carpsxker 1973 8.8 17.5 - 25.0 8.7 13.2 14.3 525 12.5 1974 4.5 10.3 - 11.8 4.0 7.7 6.2 267 b.4 1975 7.7 7.6 16.4 9.7 7.8 15.1 9.4 387 lu.2 1976 12.8 16.1 15.2 16.4 10.2 11.3 7.8 519 12.8 1977 8.9 21.6 4.3 14.1 10.2 13.1 1.4 467 10.5 1473 3.9 3.3 7.7 3.2 2.9 2.4 2.1 135 3.2 1977 5.2 3.2 5.0 1.3 3.6 3.4 2.4 130 3.1 FresN44ter drum 1973 1.2 0.8 - 3.8 2.8 2.0 1.8 75 1.5
) 1974 2.5 3.5 -
2.5 1.2 0.8 0.5 66 1.6 1975 3.0 3.3 0.9 04 2.2 2.8 2.1 8S 2.3 1976 2.4 1.5 4.8 2.J 4.2 2.4 U.7 96 2.0 1477 2.4 1.9 1.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.7 66 2.0 197H 0.7 2.7 3.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 0.9 7a 1.9 1979 0.2 0.6 3.5 0.6 2.3 0.6 1.6 45 1.1 Total D1 1973 25.0 42.3 - 83.0 25.1 43.3 35.7 1781 42.4 1974 18.7 48.3 - 69.7 19.7 31.3 15.6 1423 33.9 1975 71.2 25.0 107.5 31.7 25.6 44.1 24.1 1289 30.6 1976 49.3 66.2 IL .i 59.3 29.6 48.4 33.4 2113 55.2 1977 28.9 53.4 52.s 43.9 38.0 39.6 15.7 1556 35.8 lo 7ti 18.6 17.3 124.3 17.6 16.3 18.9 11.6 964 16.2 1074 14.7 16.7 03.0 17.8 21.3 18.9 12.9 759 16.2 6 Number of fish per 30 min of electroshocking. , 1 l l 1Il r
Table 5.6. Concarison of the nonthly average catch-per-unit-ef f ort by electroshocking in the Missouri liver near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
~~- ~~' --~-~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fy e riie~ ~C Pl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AN0Yi Results - ~ ~ Tu'k'ey*S li~ul t i pl e
_ pont,h_._ _ _ _13_73{;1197C ~1197171W6~~T977 T97tT~ T979 fha tB~~~59FiTi ca5ce___ Comparison May 52.2 44.0 46.3 79.9 52.3 26.8 11.8 4.61 p 1 0.05 1976>1979 June 27.5 33.0 36.6 47.3 23.6 13.5 8.0 5.12 p 1 0.05 1975,1976>1979 7 July 54.5 22.0 38.6 40.2 24.9 11.2 16.5 5.02 p 1 0.05 1973>1974, 1978,1979 N m August 30.8 32.8 14.3 60.5 40.4 14.8 9.2 6.50 p 1 0.05 1976>1975, 1978,1979 y Z September 35.8 24.5 35.5 41.9 52.1 34.3 25.5 0.96 NS - m Z October 51.7 37.7 28.1 37.2 51.4 36.5 41.7 0.2a NS - 5 D November 43.2 43.2 38.8 48.8 30.0 23.5 17.8 0.66 NS - O } Z
^ Tabular F ratio f or 95< confidence interval equal to 2.39. m il e
In 9 m Z n m (Il
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCCNC2'3 Table 5.7. Aserage CPE of fish collected by elect.roshocking in ghe flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May-November 1979 Species 534N 534M Canal 532N 532ti 530N 530M Shovelnose sturgeon 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Longnose gar 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Shortnose gar 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 Skipjack herring 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gizzard shad 1.5 3.3 29.0 5.8 2.8 3.9 0.1 Goldeye 1.2 2.2 2.5 1.5 3.5 3.? 3.1 Rainbow smelt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 l'orthern pike 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 Carp 5.3 6.5 12.5 4.7 5.5 5.4 4.0 Silver chub 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Emerald shiner 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 Blue sucker 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 River carpsucker 5.2 3.2 5.0 1.3 3.8 3.4 2.4 Quillback 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 Smallmouth buf f alo 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 J.0 0.4 0.0 Bignouth buf falo 0.0 1.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 Shorthead redhorse 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Stonecat 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Channel catfish 0.5 0.5 4.0 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.3 Flathead catfish U.3 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 White bass 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green sunfish 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 White crappie 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 Black crappie 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 4 Sauger 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Freshwater drum 0.2 0.8 3.5 0.6 2.3 0.6 1.6 Total CPE 14.7 18.7 63,0 17.8 21.3 18.9 12.9 d Nunber of fish collected per 30 min of electroshocking. 113
Table 5.B. Surface water tenperature (UC) at fish sampling locationsin the !!issouri River near Cooper Murlear Station, May-Novencer 1979. Location 15 !!ay 26 June 18 July _ 23 August 13 September 25 October 29 Novencer 534?: 13.8 -3 26.6 24.1 22.9 11.5 7.5 534tt 14.6 - 26.6 24.1 23.0 11.5 7.5 I Oischarge canal ?1.8(8.0)b - 35.3(8.7) 33.2 (9.1) 23.2 21.5(10.0) 7.5 N r c 18.0(4.2) 28.c(8.2) 27.5(0.9) 26.5(1.4) 23.2 13.0(1.5) 7.5 0 532N 0 532M 14.9 - 26.6 24.2 23.3 11.5 7.5 f2 530N 15.6(1.8) 21.5 27.2(0.6) 25.3(1.2) 23.3 12.5(1.0) 7.5 g
- D 26.1 24.5 23.3 11.0 7.5 0 l 14.9 19.8 Z g 53011 i 5 l
.. .. .........---... ------- ---- .-....--. . . . - - - - - - - - - - - . . . - . . . . . - - - - . . . . . m 1 Z
l a Not sanpled. y j Temperature elevation above ambient ( .1 t). r c ul fleasured approximately 800 m downstream of the discharge canal. , 9 l m Z n m ul
t _. Table 5.9. 'Junbers of fish collected by seining in the !!issouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, itay-Novenber 1979. Species ___
!!ay( 6 )a June (3) July (5) August (6) September (4) October (6) November (6)
Rainbow smelt 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cap 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Western silvery minno4 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 Plains ninnow 1 6 10 5 0 8 3 Speckled chub 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 j Flathead chub 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 N Silver chub 47 3 1 119 1 51 36 y Lperald shiner 59 12 4 3 11 35 29 4 River shiner 27 4 45 37 13 35 33 0 Red shiner 7 19 80 6 12 13 7 2 Sand shiner 11 0 22 6 1 7 0 $ Suckermouth ninnov: 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 c: Fathead minnow 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 i d Car 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
- Uiii~poides11back sp. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Z
River carpsucker 8 0 2 16 0 4 0 h White sucker 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 z Ictiobus sp. 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 g Smallmouth buffalo 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Stonecat 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Black callhead 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Channel catfish 83 3 5 56 14 3 0 m 2 I Flathead catfish 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11hite bass 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 m Green sunfish 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 m Orangespotted sunfish 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 White crappie 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 Black crappie 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnny darter 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Sauger 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 Freshwater drum 5 0 5 111 3 0 0 Total 281 50 194 383 56 160 115 I
' Number of locations seined in parentheses.
RETON ENyggnNMENTAL SCIENCES Table 5.10. Hunber of fish collected by seining in the flisgouri River near Cooper fluclear Station l lay-November 1979 Location species 63~4)f T3~4}f - ~~~T32)T-- TI21f-~T3DiT~~~TIolf Rainbow smelt 9 4 0 3 0 2 Carp 0 1 0 0 0 0 Western silvery minnow 2 1 0 0 3 1 Plains ninnow 4 10 3 1 15 0 Speckled chub 0 2 2 0 0 1 Flathead chub 4 0 0 1 1 1 Silver chub 51 47 31 62 30 37 Emerald shiner 25 12 10 11 48 47 River shiner 32 36 11 23 69 23 Red shiner 9 53 6 21 34 21 Sand shiner 7 6 7 6 15 6 Suckernouth minnow 2 1 0 0 0 0 Fathead minnow 0 1 0 1 0 0 Carpoides sp. 0 0 1 0 1 0 R i viir' Ya'rpsucke r 6 5 9 4 6 0 Quillback 1 0 0 0 0 0 Unite sucker 1 0 0 2 0 0 Ictiobus sp. 0 1 0 10 4 0 in~allWoiith bu f f alo 0 0 0 1 0 0 Stonecat 0 1 0 0 0 0 Black bullhead 0 1 0 0 0 0 Channel catfish 70 12 15 25 25 17 Flathead catfish 0 0 0 0 0 1 White bass 0 3 1 3 1 0 Green sunfish 0 0 1 0 0 0 < Orangespotted sunfish 0 1 0 0 0 0 llhite crappie 3 2 . 0 0 0 Black crappie 0 0 0 1 0 0 Johnny darter 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Sauger 1 0 0 3 2 0 Freshwater det!n 3 38 24 32 13 14 Total 231 237 122 210 267 171 " Locations 534N, 534:1, and 532f1 not sampled in June; location S32N not sanpled in July; locations 532N, 532!), and 530!1 not sampled in Septenber. 116 L
Table 5.11. Age and size distribution of selected fish collected in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May - November 1979. Ae9 Mean Total Length (mm) Total l Species Group May June July August September October November Number Northern pike III - - 522(1)a 484(1) --- - - 2 White bass I - - 232(1) - - - - 1 y N White crappie I 101(2) - - 165(2) 174(1) - 170(1) 6 m II 177(2) - - 201(1) - - - 3 y VI - - - 245(1) - - - 1 Z Black crappie II - - 167(2) - - - 2 $ Sauger 0 - - - 157(3) - - - 3 3
% I 189(2) - - - - 0 2
VI 480(1) - - - - - 1 fm Freshwater drum 0 - - - 108(1) 112(1) 118(4) - 6 E I 149(6) - - 240(3) 242(4) 253(1) - 14 y II 193(2) - 205(2) 244(1) - 288(2) - 7 r IV 315(4) - - 302(4) 338(4) 332(1) 13 UI V 346(4) - - - 335(1) 398(1) - 6 9 m Z n a m Sample size in parentheses. m
\
hAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCITNCB Table 5.12. Mean total length (m) by age group of freshwater drum collected from the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79.
~ Age Year TotaT Sampling 7eriod Group Collected j umber lay June July _ Afpst September October hovember 35(15)a 7gg9) 97(j4) jj$gj3) i3gg3)
Freshwater drum 0 1973 54 - - 23 45(1) 79(2) - 112(17) 13U(3) 1974 - - 1975 53 - - - 115(1) 118(10) 123(21) 138(21) 1978 12 - - - - 147(1) 152(10) 145(1) 1979 6 - - - 108(l) 112(l) 118(4) - 1973 12 - 140(3) 185(1) - 220(3) 240(1) 231( 4) 1 1974 8 130(1) 165(1) - - - - 223(6) 1975 4 - 135(1) 175(2) - - 170(1) - 1976 27 120(1) 180(1) 175(4) - 206(4) 210(11) 208(6) 1977 5 - - 168(2) 245(1) - 142(1) 172(1) 1978 8 170(1) 182(4) 140(1) - - 266(2) - 1979 14 149(6) - - 240(3) 242(4) 253(1) - 11 1973 10 - 223(6) - - 280(1) 295(1) 260(2) 1974 5 215(1) 205!)) - 265(2) 280(1) - - 1975 8 21 3(3) 248(2) 2 30(1 ) - 290(1) - 270(1) 1976 6 - - 230(1) - 240(1) 248(2) 240(2) 1977 17 - 218(3) 260(3) 265(1) 264(5) 278(4) 255(1) 1978 2 267(2) - - - - - 1979 7 193(2) - 205(2) 244(1) - 288(2) - III 1973 2 - - 268(2) - - - - 1974 11 ](2) - - - 323(3) 299(4) 300(2) 1975 5 20(1) 270(1) 325(1) - 310(1) - 325(1) 1976 9 270(1) - - - 270(3) 295(3) 320(2) 1977 7 - - - - 298(2) 328(1) 295(4) 1978 8 - 253(1) 290f3) - 320(1) 325(3) - 1979 0 - - - - - IV 1973 0 - - - - 1974 3 - - - - - - 323(3) 1975 7 318(2) 327(3) 330(1) - - 345(1) - 1976 13 320(1) 345(1) - - 355(1) 325(4) 415(6) 1977 11 - 360(1) - 344(2) 328(1) 348(1) 336(6) , 1978 9 - 273(1) - 335(1) 324(4) 334(3) - 1979 13 31 5( 4 ) - - 30 2(4) - 338(4) 332(1) y 1973 0 - - - - - 1974 1 - - - - - 350(1) - 1975 1 - - - - 360(1) - - 1976 6 - - - - 305(2) 340(1) 400(3) 1977 6 - - - 344(3) 390(1) 372(2) - 1978 5 399(2) 306(1) - - 370(2) - - 1979 6 34 6(4) - - - 335(1) 398(1) - VI 1973 0 - - - - - 1974 2 - - - 405(1) - - 460(1) 1975 0 - - - - - 1976 0 - - - - 1977 0 - - - - - 1978 2 - 310(1) - 36 7(1 ) - - 1979 0 - - - - . d Sanple size in parentheses. 118
Table 5.13. Pelative importance of najor food itens found in stomachs of selected gace fish collected in the Missouri River near Cc0per fiuclear Station, 1973-79. l
- - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~'
Ao. oI Ttomachs Nn~taTnTni W o^d Perc'ent oT To't'aT Yo M _._. . Species _ _ _117))7f_197J TCL ))7TJ_108]TG Major Food _ Items IV71~1W4 797F T971))EF)78 1J73 l Goldeye 15 28 58 119 102 51 51 Terrestrial insects 31.9 49.6 56.5 56.6 16.2 58.2 27.5 Aquatic insects 7.4 2.4 23.7 4.2 4.2 1.8 5.0 Cladwera 19.5 0.8 0 8.0 0.1 0.6 0 I Plant fragments 2.5 31.3 8.5 21.7 7.0 16.7 11.0 > Unrecognizable 33.9 6.7 10.8 4.5 64.5 4.0 8.8 Channel catfish 2 11 4 8 14 9 14 Fish 0 40.3 20.3 0 77.1 45.3 5.4 h Terrestrial insects 15.6 Ta 1.8 43.8 18.2 0 0.4 O Aquatic insects 0 0 0 3.5 0.7 1.8 0.8 7 Filamentous algae 0 27.1 0 41.7 0 26.5 0.8 l Plant fragments 18.8 1.5 0 5.6 0 0 11.7 M Unrecognizable 62.5 27.7 76.9 5.6 0 24.1 40.9 2 8C White crappie 22 13 2 5 13 4 6 Fish a!.9 80.6 100.0 40.0 75.6 57.1 93.7 3 Aquatic insects 0 0 0 0 14.6 0 6.2 O a Copepoda 0 1.5 0 20.0 0 7.1 0 2 g' cladocera 4.3 17.9 0 40.0 0 35.7 0 g Black crappie 25 11 1 10 2 14 1 Fish Terresterial insects Cooepoda 69.5 0 9.5 0 0 0 10.6 50.0 100.0 21.2 0 11.5 100.0 40.0 0 0 T 0 U 0 f Cladocera T ) 8.2 35.8 0 67.3 0 30.0 0 r-Aquatic insects T T 0 0 0 T 101.0 g Sauger Fisn O 13 6 5 2 12 3 0 100.0 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 - g Freshwater drum 16 3 9 17 16 33 29 Fish 60.9 0 3.0 25.0 45.8 16.2 48.5 2 Aquatic insects 18.9 T 30.0 45.0 28.2 22.5 18.2 U Crayfish 0 88.9 0 12.5 10.5 0 4.8 Earthworms 0 0 66.6 17.5 6.1 47.2 28.5 h Unrecognizable 0 11.1 0 0 1.5 10.6 0 a T<0.05.
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I Chapter 6 FISH LARVAE DISTRIBUTION by Ronald G. King 120
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEC3 I* 3 0_t r,oduc ti_o,n_ Ichthyoplankton in the !!issouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station were studied fron 15 flay through 25 July 1979 to determine entrainment rates of drif ting larval fish. Previous fish larvae studies at Cooper Nuclear Station have included horizontal distribution and survival studies of larvae subjected te condenser and plume entrainment (Reetz et al.1975; Patulski 1975a,b; Coon 1976; Bliss 1977). Het-induced mortality, conmonly associated with the collection of viable larvae for entrainment studies (llcGroddy and Wynan 1977; Cada and Hergenrader 1978), has prevented an accurate evaluation of entrainnent losses at Cooper Nuclear Station. Net-induced mortality resulting f ron high current velocities frequently caused intake mortalities to exceed those in the discharge; therefore, the entrainment study was discontinued in 197' sd entrainment losses have subsequently been estinated with the horizonta', distribution data (Kinq 1978a,1979). II. F i e l d_ a n_d An a ly_t i c a_1_P r_o c_e d u r_e s_ Larval fish samples were collected with a 0.75 m diameter, no. O nesh (.571 nn) nitex plankton net equipped with a flowneter attached in the net nouth to determine the volume of water sanpled. Sanples consisted of vertically integrated replicates taken fron 1 m above the botton to the surface. The net was lowered by means of a 31 kg (68 lb) cable depressor with each sample representing equivalent volunes of water from botton, mid, and surf ace depths. Sanples were concentrated with a no. 30 U. S. Standard nesh (0.595 nm) sieve and preserved with 10% fornalin immediately following collection. Duplicate sanples were collected weekly at Locations 1, 4, and 2, which represented cutting bank, mid-channel, and filling bank habi tats, respectively (Figure 6.1). The preserved samples were returned to the laboratory where the fish larvae were separated f rom the debris and fixed with 4% formalin for later i de n ti f i ca ti on. Identifications were made to the lowest positive taxonomic level using available literature and keys including flay and Gasaway (1967), Nelson (1968), and Hogue et al. (1976). The total length of at least 15 individuals of each taxon in a sanple was neasured to the nearest 0.1 m. Densities were e3 pressed as the number of larvae per 100 cubic meters of water (no./100 m ). Statistical di ff erences (p < 0.05) anong transect locations were tested wi th a one-way ANOVA and TEkey's nultiple comparison procedure. Ill. R e su_I ts a nd_ _D i_sc u s_s_i o_n A. S p ec i e s Comp o s i_t i_o n_ _a n_d_ _Abu n da_nc_e Fish larvae subjected to entrainnent at Cooper Nuclear Station primarily included freshwater drm, Ca+ostonidae, and Cyprinidae which collectively accounted for 95.11 of the larvae sampled in 1979. Annually, these taxa have comprised 75 to 98% of the larval fish collected near the Station (Table 6.1). Other taxa which have consistently been encountered in the drif t since 1973 include gizzard shad, goldeye, carp,
, 121
HAZLETON ONVIRONMENTAL CCCNC3:3 white bass, and Stizostedion sp. Factors contributing to.the high relative-abundance in the drift or Treshwater drum, catostomids, and cyprinids include
~
spawning habits, egg and larval characteristics, and major upstream sources. Pelagic spawning habits and semi-buoyancy of eggs and early prolarvae (Davis 1959; Nelson et al.1967) make the early life stages of freshwater drum especially susceptible to drif t. Other fishes that are either-random or pelagic spawners whose larvae connonly occurred in the drif t included goldeye, carp, and catostomids. Conversely, fishes that are either nest builders or
-randon spawners that lay adhesive and/or demersal eggs, such as white bass, sunfish, sauger/waileye, and cattish, occurred only sporadically. Upstream t sources of the dominant taxa were identified during a 1978 study from Gavins Point Dam (Rll 808) to R!i 411, located near Weston, Missouri (Omaha Public Power District, unpublished data). This study, which documented downstream changes in the ichthoplankton, demonstrated that the unchannelized Missouri River above Sioux City, Iowa (RM 737) was the primary source of freshwater drum larvae in the drif t near Cooper Nuclear Station. Additionally, the study results indicated that the Platte River contributes sufficient numbers of larval catostomids and cyprinids to alter the species composition of the Missouri River drif t near Cooper Nuclear Station.
Larval fish occurred in all collections made between 15 May and 25 July 1979. Densities of larval fish were lowest la llay and peaked in July when freshwater drum and cyprinid larvac3were most abundant (Table 6.2). Larval densities remaingd below 50/100 n through mid-Jun9 and increased to a naximum of 1165/100 m in early July (Tabie 6.3). Fish larvae abundance followed similar trends during previous years althou3b the date of peak abundance has varied from the third week in June through early July. Taxa other than freshwater drum generally did not exhibit a definite peak in abundance because of an extended spawning season (carp), numerous species within a taxon (catostomids and cyprinids), low abundance or sporadic occurreace. Peak larval abundance in the flissouri River has generally coincided with the peak in larval freshwater drun abundance. In 1979, cyrpinid larvae contri-buted significantly (39.7%) to the peak density (Table 6.3). Larval fish densities in 1979 were approximately 3.5 times higher than in 1978 when the lowest densities were recorded since 1974 (Table 6.1). ( Although the mean density along the cutting bank was lower than in 1976 and 1977 (Table 6.1), high densities at Location 2 along the filling bank (Table 6.3) makes the abundance of drif ting larval fish in 1979 tue highest during the 1973-79 study period. Year-to-year variability in the abundance of - iarval fish is probably related to spawning success which can ve influenced by weather. water temperatures, and river conditions (including silt load, turbidi ty, and river flow). High river flows in 1975 and 1978 may have af fected larval abundance (King 1979). However, higher densities occurred in 1979 despite similar river flow which averaged between 51000-53000 cfs during the 1975,1978 and 1979 larval fish seasons, suggesting that f actors other than river flow contributed to the high spawning success in 1979. B. 0,1 s,t r_i b_u t_i o n, The cross-channel distribution of larval fish was determined from nid-May through July to estimate the total nunber of larvae passing the Station. ' Larvae densities along the filling bank (Location 2) averaged 122 (
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENCE'3 approximately 2.5 times higher than along the cutting banx (Location 1) and 7 times higher than at the mid-channel location (Table 6.4). Species composi-
- tion and relative abundance of larvae at the transect locations were generally similar although differences were apparent for the dominant taxa. Freshwater drun nade up approximately 105 more of the larvae along the cutting bank compared to the other two locations and cyprinid larvae including carp were substantially more abundant along the filling bank (Table 6.4). The high censity of freshwater drum and cyrpinids along the filling bank resulted in a lower relative abundance of catostooid larvae although catostonid densities were similar among locations. The occurrence of less abundant taxa was usually too sporadic to document horizontal distribution patterns (Tables 6.3 and 6.4).
Variations among transect locatiens were tested statistically on nine da tes (Table 6.5). Significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed on only
~
four occasions with densities along the filling bank being significantly higher than at locations 1 and 4 on three <tates. Horizontal distribution of larval fish has varied throughout the 1973- 79 s tudy. Higher densities along the filling bank were recorded in 1973 while mean larval densities were similar between locations in 1974, 1975, and 1978 (Table 6.6). In 1976 and 1977 cutting bank densities were 2 to 3 tires higher than along the cu; ting bank. l Higher densities along the cutting bank have been attributed to hydraulic f actors that tend to concentrate drif ting particles (Harrow et al. 1975). It was hypothesized that thesc hydraulic f actors are more ef fective at concentrating larvac along the cutting bank during low flow when the channel nodification structures are presunably more ef ficient. There was no cor-relation between flow and horizontal distribution when individual dates were subjected to regression analysis; however, a general relationship was sug-gested when comparing seasonal means (Table 6.6). Cutting bank densities were higher than those along the filling bank in 1976 and 1977 when flows were lowest. Low flow also occurred in 1974, but the data were not com-parable because of reduced sampling ef fort that year. River flows averaged over 44000 cf s during the other study years and densities were generally similar between locations or higher along the filling bank. C 1ny5t_ Entrainment rates of larval fish at the Station ranged from U.8 to 6.52 (Table 6.7). An estimated 3.3L of the ichthyonlankton passing the Station were entrained in 1979. Entrainnent rates were esticated fron channel configuration, cooling water usage and horizontal distribution da ta. The Station utilized 2.0 to 3.07, of the river flow fron 30 May through
?5 July while operating at 83.4 to 98.4?. of rated capacity (Table 6.7).
Horizontal distribution of larval f ish strongly influenced the estimated entra innent rates. Rates ranqed f ron 5.0 to 6.SS on three occasions when nid-channel densities were substantially lower than along the cutting and tilling banks (lable 6.4). Entrainment r'tes were lower than the ra te of cooling wa'er use on five dates when either the filling bank densities were substantially higher than at both the cutting bank and mid-channel locations or when horizontal distribution was uniforn. 123 1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 3 Entrainment rates in 1979 were similar to those estimated in 1978 hut were approximately 50; lower than the 1977 rates. The 1978 and 1979 rates are considered more accurate since the vertically integrated samples provided tore accurate numerical estimates of the total larvae passing the Station than did the 1977 data which were based on surface samples (King 1979). Entrainnent losses were probably less than the estimatei entrain-nent rates since previous studies at Cooper Nuclear Station (Rectz et al.
- 1975; Patulski 1975a,b; Coon 1976; Bliss 1977) and upstream at Fort Calhoun Station (King 1978b) have shown that fish larvae can survive condenser passage. Critical discharge temperatures of 30 to 36C (86-97F) occurred during the larval fish season but short exposure times apparently prevent 100% entrainnent nortali ty.
There has been no impact on the adult fish populations near Cooper Nuclear Station due to entrainment losses (Chapter 5). Contributions from downstream spawning areas (Omaha Public Power District, unpublished data) may of fset entrainment losses. The overall impact of entrainment losses on the fish community depends on the eventual fate of larvae in the drif t. The 1978 larval fish recruitment study (0naba Public Power District, unpublis1ed data) suggests that the adult fish community near Cooper Nuclear Station may depend on recruitment from major upstrean spawning areas. The stress caused by high current velocity, turbulent flow, and the associated silt and sand loads would lower survival of drif ting larval fish which may be a major factor limiting fish nroduction in the channelized llissouri River. IV. Summary and_C_onclusions
- 1. Larval fish collected in 1979 were dominated by freshwater drum, Cyprinidae, and Catostonidae whicn collectively comprised 95.1% of the larvae collected.
- 2. Fish larvae abundance progressively increased from mid-Fay, reached peak densities in early July and decreased rapidly by mid-July.
- 3. Larval fish abundance in 1979 followed seasonal trends similar to those established in previous studies. Mean densities near the Station's intake structure were approximately twice as high as in 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1978 but were lower than in 1976 and 1977.
- 4. Densities along the filling bank opposite the Station were the highest recorded during the 1973-79 study perioJ. These high densities were in contrast to the horizontal distribution pattern generally documented in previous studies.
- 5. The seasonal horizontal distriu.cion patterns were generally related to mean river flow but no correlation was apparent when individual dates were tested.
- 6. An estimated 3.3% of the larval fish passing the Station were entrained in 1979 based on horizontal distribution, percent of river water used for cooling, and the channel configuration.
124
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENCCO V. Ref,eren,ce_s C_i te,d_ Pli ss, Q. P. 1977. Fish larvae entrainner t and distribution. Pages 209-225 in The evaluation of thernal of fects in the itissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase) Jar,ury-December 1976. (Project No. 5501-07666). Report by NALCO Environmental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. Cada , G. F. , and G. L. Hergenrader. 1978. An assessment of sampling nortality of larval fishes. ~rans. An. Fish. Soc. 107(2):269-274. 6 ,, D. fl. 19/6. Fish larvae entrainnent and distribution studies. Pages 224-239 in The evaluation of thennal et fects in the flissouri River near Cooper ifu~c~ lear Station (Operational Phose) January-December 1975. (Proj ect No. 5501 -06419) . Report by NALCO Environnental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. Davis, C. C. 1959. A planktonic fish egg from fresh water. Limncl. Oceanogr. 4(3):352-355. Harrow, L. G. , I . Cherko, and A. B. Schlesinger. 1915. Seasonal and distri-butional patterns of ichthyoplankton in the flissouri River. Envi ronnental Series Bull. No.1. Onaba Public Power District, Omaha, Nebr. 19 pp. Hogue, J. J. dr. , R. llallus and L. ". Kay. 1976. Preliminary guide to the identification nf larval fishes in the Tennessee River. Tech. Note B19, Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tenn. King, R. G. 1979. Fish larvae di stribution. Pages 190-207 in The evaluation of thermal ef fects in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station
~
(Operat:onal Phasa). January-December 1978. (Project No. 8903). Report by Hazleton Environnental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr. 19 7 M . Fish larve di stribution. Pages ?29-243 _in_ The evaluation of thennal efIects in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station (Operational Phase), January-Decenber 1977. (Project No. 5501-08776). Report by NALCO Environnental Sciences for Nebraska Public Power District, Coluruu s, Nebr.
. 19 /bb. Entrainment of t1issouri River fish larvae through Fort Calhoun' Station. Pages 45-56 in L. D. Jensen, ed. Fourth national workshop ~
on entrainnent and inningenent. Ecological Analysts, Inc., Melville, N.Y. flay , E . B. , and C. R. Gasaway. 1967. A prelininary key to the identification of larval fishes of Oklahona, with particular reference to Canton Reservoir, including a selected bibliography. Okla. Dep. Wildl. Conserv. Fish. Res. Lab. Bul l . No. 5. 42 pp. , "c u rod dy , P . fl . , a nd R . L . Wyna n . 1977. Lfficiency of nets and a new device 3 f or sanplin11 livinq fish larvae. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:571-574. 125 t
MAELETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Nelson, M. R. -1968. Embryo and larval characteristics of sauger, walleye and their reciprocal hybrids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97(2):167-174.
. R. E. Seifert, and P. W. Swedberg. 1967. Studies of the early. ~~~T1Te hts' tory of reservoir fishes. Pages 374-385 in Reservoir Fishery Resources Symposium, Southern Division. Am. FishT Soc. Univ. Georgia Press, Athens.
Patuiski, D. E. 1975a. Fish population and life history study. Pages 151-216 in The evaluation of themal ef fects in the Missouri River near i Cooper Niiclear Station (Precperational Phase) April 1973-tiarch 1974. (IBT No. 64303322). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr.
. 1975b. Fish larvae entrainment and distribution studies. ~~Va'g'e's'Tl'8-236 in The evaluation of themal ef fects in the ilissouri River near Cooper NucTear Station (Operational Phase) January-December 1974.
(IBT No. 64304909). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories, Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Columbus, Nebr. Reetz, S. D., D. L. Weitzel, and D. E. Patulski. 1975. Studies on the mechanical effects of condenser passage. Pages 217-252 in The evaluation of themal of fects in the Missouri River near Cooper NucTear Station (Preoperational Phase) April 1973-liarch 1974. (IBT No. 64303322). Report by Industrial BIO-TEST Laboratories. Inc. for Nebraska Public Power District, Colunbus, Nebr. i = 126 >
HAZLGTON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 3 LIMNOLOGICAL LEGEND WATER QUALITY ST'..slES 534i o
.. , j l Physical Measurements - 534, and Limited Chemical Intake, N Analyses Discharge, ~ ' 532,530, 528 Additional Chemical - 53",
Analyses
'I Intake, o 533 Di scha rge, 530 NNTA k =
2 BIOLOGY COOPER NUCLEAR [ 4 Periphyton, Aquatic - 534,532,
, STATION y Ma c ro i nvertebra tes , 530,528 C/SCNA Rar 532 and Benthos
[/ + Fish Study - 534,532, 630 1 (Nebraska and Missouri
/ 33, shoreline l
A at each s location)
+
fish Larvae - Intake , go 2 ,4 530 pI TO POGR APHIC .~GEND o 526 River Mile and Somphng Location 4 N Rip Rap - Wing Darn j 529 Levee e Training Dike k 528
%ga .
_._:525.
*n 8l 'd &
s g
.. o - . 52 52
_23 _ , , . , SCALE IN MILES O 05 1 4 2 Fiqure 6.1. Fish larvae samplinq locations in the Missouri niver near Cooper Nuclear Station, 1979. 127
Table 6.1. Sumary of reen fiso larvae densities in the Missouri River near the intake structure (Location 1) of Cooper Nuclear Station, 1973-79. i ~ ~ 1973 1974 '197s '~~1976 ~~~071 ~ TW4 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~474~ 1 No.flud & - f40.flud n I Y tio.'/100' W4'".- ho.~/Rnf~ nil
~
Tana Ni./100 n . tid.'iluu nf . f.o .~/1'uu' m i ~i Scaphirhynchus sp. U.0 0.0 0.0 UO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 5.1 U.6 1.6 u.1 0.2 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.5 <0.1 0.1 U.2 U.2 Cihir-(T h M ' U.1 U.1 U3 U.9 U.S 0.8 I U.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 U.5 .1 U.6 U.6 Gol dey e 3.1 6.6 0.4 0.4 1.9 1.1 2.0 6.9 1.0 1.0 D Carp 1.2 2.8 1.3 3.8 Cyprinidae 6.4 14.4 4.6 13.3 5.1 10.6 4.8 4,6 6.4 3.6 0.8 2.9 lu.o 10.6 h 0.7 15.3 44.8 17.1 35.7 18.2 17.6 34.0 19.5 3.1 lu.9 lu.E 10.5 m Catostonidae 0.3 y Cyp ri ni dae-C atostoni da e 0.0 U.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 Ict41uridae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 <u.1 U.1 <u.1 <u.1 O Brook Stick leback 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 <u.1 <0.1 0.0 U." Z 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 <0.1 <u.a Morone sp. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 (u.1 <0.1 m Fo'rioiTs sp. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 l~ep~oWii sp. tentFichi dae 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 0.0 (0.1 <U.1 U.0 0.0 $ 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 <0.1 cu.1 0.0 0.0 33 Percidae <0.1 0
$ Stizostedion sp. 0.7 1.6 0.6 1.7 1.1 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 U.2 <U.1 <0.1 <0.1 Co Freshwater drun 31.2 70.2 11.1 32.6 13.9 29.0 78.0 75.5 126.9 72.7 16.8 59.5 74.0 74.0 Z Unidentified 1.8 4.2 0.4 1.3 6.4 13.5 U.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 2.5 9.0 2.2 2.2 g m
Total 44.3 34.2 47.8 143.2 174.6 28.3 99.6 g r M O m Z n m W m ~ _
1 Table 6.2. Dencity and rel?tive abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River near the intake structure (Location 1) of Co3per Nucle 2: Station, May - July 1979. i
^~
Nv.~/IDO'ni " No. /l OJ ~m i ~ 3 No.flOJ mf~~ 1~~~ hio~.71 UU' M ' '!. io UlDU od ~ T Gizzard shid 0 - 0 - U 0 - U.7 1.6 Lvideye 0 - 5.3 28.6 2.2 5.8 0 - 0 - Carp 0.7 100.0 U.9 4.8 U.7 1.4 0 - 3.7 '7.8 I - C yp ri ni d.ie 0 - U - 1.5 3.8 1.2 9.5 3.0 b.2 > 5.3 28.6 30.7 78.8 10.1 60.9 7.4 15.6 N Catostomidae 0 - Lepomis sp. O - U - U.7 1.9 U - U - h 5tizoitedion sp. 0 - 0.9 4.8 0 - 0 - U - 4 Frfshwate7 drum C - 0 - 0 - 1.2 9.5 29.7 62.5 g Unidentified 0 - 6.2 13.3 2.9 7.7 0 - 3.0 6.2 g 38.3 12.5 47.5 M Total U.7 18.7 Z g 23 0 __ . g . ,. ______g. - _ - - . _.___ _ - . .. __ ____. ___ _ . . fi6. /IDO F ~ ~~ ~~~
~
N6.' fib ~0 R ~~ Y N5.'/l uU m ~ ~ T- Nol71UO T - ' 1 No'.71ud'n-~ Y g m Gizzard shad 0 - 0.7 0.7 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Gol deye 0.7 U.7 0 3.0 2.7 U U.7 0.1 0 - 0 h p Ca rp 0.7 0.7 0 - - Cyprinidae 64.8 68.1 12.0 11.6 13.9 2.1 8.7 34.6 0.8 25.0 t-Catostomidae 22.1 23.2 14.R 13.7 12.5 1.9 1.0 3.8 U.H 25 3 g White sucker U.7 0.7 0 - o - U - U - g Channel catfish U.0 0.0 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.8 25.0 - White bass 0 - U - U.7 U.1 0 - u - d. Fr:shwater drum 3.4 3.6 71.8 66.4 bl4.6 95.1 14.5 51.7 0 - 3.4 3.6 5.2 4.8 0 - 1.0 3.8 U.H 25.0 0 Uri1entifird m 647.3 25.1 3.3 E Total 95.2 108.1
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ~3 Table 6.3. Density and relative abundance of larval fish in the Missouri River at transect locations near Cooper Nuclear Station, 15 May-25 July,1979. Taxa /Date
~
ffo'.~/160 ri3 % tio.fl00 m3 r FT6 /RTo i 3 ' T 5 flay 1979 Carp 0.7 100. 0.0 - 0.0 - Catostomidae 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.7 50.0 Unidentified 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.7 50.0 Total 0.7 0.0 - 1.5 30 May 1979 [oTdeye 5.3 28.5 11.0 52.0 5.4 25.9 Carp 0.9 4.8 0.0 - 3.1 14.8 Cyprini dae 0.0 - 0.0 - 3.1 14.8 Ca tos tomi da e 5.3 28.5 5.1 24.0 5.4 25.9 Pomoxis sp.~ 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 3.7 StTids~tedion sp 0.9 4.8 0.0 - 0.0 - FrisWiter drun 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 3.7 Uni r.an ti fi ed 6.2 33.1 5.1 24.0 2.3 11.1 Total 18.7 21.2 20.8 6 June 1979 Col ~diy~e 2.2 5.8 4.7 17.6 2.8 4.0 Ca rp 0.7 1.9 0.8 2.9 6.4 9.0 Cyprinidae 1.5 3.8 0.0 - 0.7 1.0 Ca tos tonidae 30.2 78.8 19.6 73.5 56.0 80.0 Ponoxis sp. 0.0 - 0.8 2.9 0.7 1.0 1.eponTs~ sp 0.7 1.9 0.0 - 0.0 - S~t U'o s~t'edi o n sp
~ - ~
0.0 - 0.0 - 0.7 1.0 Irds~hiia~ter drum 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.7 1.0 Unidentified 3.7 9.8 0.8 2.9 2.0 3.0 Total 38.3 26.7 70.0 13 June 1979 CoTdiy~e~~~~~ 0.0 - 1.6 10.0 0.0 -
)
Carp 0.0 - 1.6 10.0 2.5 33.3 l Cyprinidae 1.2 9.5 0.0 - 0.6 8.3 , Catostonidae 10.1 81.0 7.3 45.0 3.8 50.0 1 Freshwater drun 1.2 9.5 0.0 - 0.6 8.3 Uni denti fi ed 0.0 - 5.7 35.0 0.0 - l Total 12.5 16.3 7.6 130
I HAZLETON E'NVIRONM2NTAL CCIENC':3 Table 6.3. (continued)
~~
Taxa /Date fio.~/llitT WI " Y lio'.7100 di ' ~ s tio~/TOTn T 7 20 June l'379 6iTzirTshid 0.7 1.6 0.0 - 0.0 - Gol deye 0.0 - 1.0 9.1 0.8 1.6 Carp 3.7 .8 1.0 9.1 6.1 12.9 Cyprinidae 3.0 6.2 0.0 - 6.8 14.5 Catostonidae 7.5 15.6 3.1 27.3 14.4 30.6 Freshwater drun 29.7 62.5 4.2 36.4 18.2 38.7 Unidentified 3.0 6.2 2.1 18.2 0.8 1.6 Total 47.5 11.5 47.1 2/ June 1979 G i z zai r d 'sliid 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 0.9 Goldeye 0.7 0.7 0.0 - 0.0 - Carp 0.7 0.7 0.9 7.1 0.0 - Cyprinidae 64.8 68.1 4.5 35.7 61.5 75.0 Catostonidae 22.1 23.2 6.3 50.0 10.6 13.0 Unite sucker 0.7 0.7 0.0 - 0.0 - Freshwater drun 3.4 3.6 0.9 7.1 3.0 3.7 Unidentified 3.4 3.6 0.0 - 6.1 7.4 Total 95.2 12.6 82.0 4 July 1979 GiYz~dr~d ~sifid 0.7 0.7 0.0 - 2.4 0.2 Carp 3.0 2.7 0.0 - 1.6 0.1 Cyprinidae 12.6 11.6 12.2 25.3 462.8 39.7 Catos toni dae 14.8 13.7 5.1 9.8 0 O.8 F reshwater drun 71.8 66.4 30.6 58.8 670.. 57.6 Unidentified 5.2 4.8 4.1 7.8 18.7 1.6 Total 108.1 52.0 1165.4 11 July 1979
~
iTiziard 'sh'id 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.6 0.1 Carp 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.5 1.9 0.2 Lyprinidae 13.9 2.1 1.8 1.0 50.2 5.9 Catostonidae 12.5 1.9 6.2 3.4 12.7 1.5 White bass 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.0 - Freshwater drun 619.6 95.7 173.6 93.7 784.2 92.2 lini den ti f i ed 0.0 - 1.8 1.0 0.6 0.1 lotal 647.3 185.2 850.2 1 31
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCT:3 T.ible 6. 3. (continued) 7.....
~~
T
~
Iaxa/Date Ifo~. /100 'm 3~~ ifo.71TJU rif "~C trot /1'00~ nf ~ T - 18 July ~ 1979 0.0 0.0 - 3.4 1.4 Ci~ziird sh'id - 0.3 Carp 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 Cyprinidae 8.7 34.6 2.7 15.8 88.9 36.5 Catostonidae 1.0 3.8 0.0 - 11.7 4.8 White bass 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 0.3 14.5 57.7 11.8 68.4 129.2 53.1 Freshwater drun Unidentified 1.0 3.8 2.7 15.8 8.4 3.4 Total 25.1 17.2 24 3.2 25 July 1979
~~
Carp ~~
~~
0.0 - 0.0 - 3.0 4.9 Cyprinidae 0.8 25.0 0.0 - 31.6 51.8 Catostonidae 0.8 25.0 1.5 40.0 9.8 16.1 Channel catfish 0.8 25.0 0.7 20.0 0.0 - Ictaluriade 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.8 1.2 Freshwater drun 0.0 - 1.5 40.0 15.8 25.9 Unidentified 0.8 25.0 0.0 - 0.0 - Total 3.3 3.7 61.0 l l 132
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 6.4 Sunnary of the species composition and abundance of fish larvae collected along a transect in the 'tisgouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,15 flay-25 July 1979. Taxa No./100 n3 % No./100 n3 % No./100 m3 3 Gizzard shad 0.2 0.2 0.0 - 0.7 0.3 Goldeye 0.8 0.8 1.8 5.2 0.9 0.4 Carp 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.4 2.5 1.0 Cyprinidae 10.6 10.6 2.1 6.1 70.6 27.7 White sucker <0.1 <0.1 0.0 - 0.0 - Ca tos tonidae 10.4 10.4 5.4 15.6 12.6 4.9 Channel catfish <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.0 - Ictaluridae 0.0 - 0.0 -
<0.1 <0.1 White bass <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 Ponoxis sp. 0.0 - <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 LeiforiiY sp. <0.1 <0.1 0.0 -
0.0 -
$tifo^stedion sp. <0.1 <0.1 0.0 - <0.1 <0.1 Fr~e W a~ter drun 74.0 74.0 22.3 64.4 162.3 63.7 Unidentified 2.3 2.3 2.2 6.4 4.0 1.6 Total 99.6 34.6 254.8 Abundance represents a mean density.
133 l
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENC7JJ Table 6.5. Cross-channel distribution of fish larvae in the itissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 30 May-25 July 1979.
~ ~~~~ ' Den ~sTtf~(no./100 m3) ~ One-way ATTOYA Tukey's Ifultiple
____D, ate _________
-~~
2 _F -Ratio Comparison ( l___~~~~4 _ _ , 30 May 1979 18.7 21.2 20.8 0.09 NS a 6 June 1979 38.3 26.7 70.0 10.97 2>1,4 13 June 1979 12.5 16.3 7.6 0.83 NS 20 June 1979 47.5 11.5 47.1 1.14 HS 27 June 1979 95.2 12.6 82.0 2.35 NS a 4 July 1973 108.1 52.0 1165.4 ll2.65 2>1,4 a 11 July 1979 647.3 185.2 850.2 20.67 1,2>4 a 18 July 1979 25.1 17.2 243.2 807.23 2>1>4 25 July 1979 3.3 3.7 61.0 8.19 HS d Signi ficant at 0.05 probabili ty level . 5 134 <
HAZLETON ENVIRONM !NTAL SCIENCES Tcble 6.6. Sunnary of rnean seasonal larval fish densities along the cutting bank (Location 1) and filling bank (Location 2) of the tiissouri River near Ccoper Nuclear Station, 1573-79. ___q. Year L~o~c'a^t'i o~nl To~c~a~tTiK Y Riyer F1ow (cfs) 1973 44 70 46392 1974 34 25 40267 1975 47 33 53100 1976 103 38 43911 1977 175 54 38430 l 1978 54 50 50942 1979 100 255 51200 a Average river flow on collection dates. l 135 4
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 6.7. Summary of cooling water use and entrainment rates of larval fish through Cooper Nuclear Station, 30 May - 25 July 1979. Percent 6f
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
Total Larval f Operating No. Pumps in River Cooling Water Assemblage Date Level (%) ._0yeration Fl ow(c f s) (% Flow) Entrained 30 flay 83.9 3 54000 2.0 1.8 6 June 83.4 3 51400 2.1 2.3 13 June 98.4 4 54000 2.7 2.4 20 June 92.5 4 56200 2.6 5.0 27 June 88.4 4 52400 2.8 6.5 4 July 84.0 4 52000 2.8 1.3 11 July 96.3 4 48000 3.0 5.1 18 July 92.6 4 48000 3.0 1.4 25 July 93.1 4 45200 3.2 0.8 136 e
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES APPENDIX A WATER QUALITY EVALUATION v A-1
Table A.l. Water quality data, Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1979. TD.me4P Alukt. IC) 5 A M P 1. I W G LUL A Y IUN 5 lata 5E p isceia u GD. SJ2 SJO SJe 5 4 6 0's. l me; eet PLIC Af t SJ4 e.a l t. a 0.0000 le.S 2.0 JAh 48.8979 I st 14.6 U.6 0.1 t > es ll.tv79 .A m
).9 3.5 15.0 . mar J an . l w i v A 6s 16.0 14.7 14.5 9 At 44.49dv A 17.0 36.s Z
17.2 17.A 17.2 5 Mau 42.1919 a 17.3
, 22.t 28.S 8 28.8 IU.J 22.S Jesse 59.tw7v A 21.#
N n 34.1 26.4 26.2 25.9 . aus 25.0 25.1
. ell, 2 4.19 3 7 A It 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 !!.1 air 4 l * , t 'e l v A 25.0 m
lo.J 20.3 20.9 20.7 5 ses* su.tviv A 20.0 20.1 9 ' 12.5 12.2 1242 11.7 JJ.2 UCs 44.1979 A 11.7 e.
),B ).h 3.6 3.0 St.h 4.0 5 mise is.8489 A a
II*h 3*U 1.2
, pet 4,1919 A M
l
- , Table A.l. (continued)
URVbtN,DISSULtLD ( MG / 3.) 5A N ta L I n s; 3. O C & T ION 5 letAhL DibCHANGL SJ2 SJO SJW 54*1~LIhG He.'LICAlt %J4 u a g e. Jan 4J,1919 A 14.3 ll.u 12.J 12.0 ll.u 12.2 66 1 tre 16,1979 A 13.7 lu.J 18.6 a 31.5 lu.S 18.7 nap 2u,89,9 a 7.2 f.S 6.9 o ?.8 7.1 7.0 Arn 44,8974 A 7.9 4.4 4.4 o v.w v.6 s.1 II 8.1 8.3 7.9 Mlh5thG t.2 9.3 nAl 4J.1979 A n 7.a u.S u.S 3.2 p.0 9.4 2
> a S.9 6.J 4.7 7.1 1.0 6.5 8 Jun tv,4wiv '# e 5.5 6.5 6.4 6.9 6.6 7.0 J t8 h J4,8979 A 6.0 6.8 6.6 6.6 7.J 7.0 b 5.J 6.0 6.7 6.6 6.9 6.9 7.1 6.6 6.4 6.9 7.2 6.J a t. 14.8979 A 7.4 6.4 e 7.2 6.6 6.6 6.7 5tP 84,1979 A 7.6 7.7 7.S F.5 7.6 7.6 El n 7.4 7.6 1.J 1.6 7.0 7.S f)
UCI 45,8479 A S.6 9.9 9.0 9.9 9.2 9.0 y H MISSING 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.4 g 11.7 St.4 11.7 5 mus ll,8979 A 31.) II.2 II.4 gg . p ll.1 II.J 11.5 18.6 ll.J ll.S btC A $2.J $5.9 14.5 4.89f9 M 32.* 11.W 11.8
Table A.l . (continued) I tialbts,54Tuwailum (U 5A W 6L inG LUCA T 1on& pisCHAMGL 5 12 $10 Sat SA=PLING pt e't.lC A s t $34 tWramt Watt D4. 11). ag, JAh g),3979 A es. e eJ. Ilj.
- 80. 102. 98.
'tb 11.1979 A
- 88. 104. W1.
M
- 54. 75. 52.
9AN Ju,lg39 A S3. H St. 78.
- 77. W6. St.
(Pu J4,1979 A 80.
#9. St.
W E es. es. v6 ;g
.A. 22.iv7, A .s. .7.
WW. 99. 86 83. 97. q[ a 92. .
- 11. 90. 83. 82. 79.
JUw 64,8979 A 62. w 3" sh. 09 1). 50. Sh b 61. 74. Z s,ib ,4...,, A II. 7,. ... .>. 91. .,. 3;
- 97. Bl. St. 86. gg
- H 65. 74.
93 89. 77 AUG 11,1979 A W7 51. WW. e WS. 48. 98. 92. 91. 78. V 96 SS. hFr 44.3979 A 94. b6 101. 40. e6 es. et. II a =2. et. vv. O 804. W4. St. 84. El OCS 15,1959 A 79. W2. ,,.
. ... 1 4. .. ...
b4. 103. 09 eb. to. ll I408 II,ty19 WS. a A v4, ts. 10J. ev. us. mi. gg
- 47. ids. 85.
UFL S.lV$9 A 87. u Wu. 124. I 1 l l
..m. s-- . t v - W
.. ~. ._. -
l Table A.1. (continued) Pil
& A R P l. I a% 1. O C A 1 I l) h 5 $ 4.*PI. a m*; > > P l. l C A l l- %)4 t h f e n t. plSCH4kGt: $32 S30 SJD I;4 l e ........................,..................................................................................... I JAu W),5vfy A 7.4 7.7 7.8 e 7.) 7.7 7.6 een iI,4979 A 7.4 7.m 7S q H 7.6 7.6 e 7.7 O
Man 2delvi9 A 7.6 7.9 7.7 Z h 7.9 7.7 7.7 ll t.0 7.m 7.6 Z A P's J4.89fw A ( h 7.6 7 . *J 7.1 =
>I 3 dad 47,8979 A d.2 m.1 N.1 N.2 9.7 3.5 U
- ts 0.2 u.8 e.1 MIS 5inG MI551NG 5.8 2 JUh 19, 198I9 A N.I S.) n.4 9.4 m.) 3.3 l
g H W.3 W.) 8.2 b.) 5.4 S.) l J H l. Jd.,lviv A N.5 u.d h.2 9.) 5.4 p.S p 8.I m-2 a.2 u.) e.2 0.5 p AuG I4,89#v A a.) ..J 8.3 t.J 5.) 0.0 E
. u.2 v.) n.) s.) W.) s.l 9 m
S t.r IW,1179 A B.3 0.3 #.4 m.) 5.) A.4
, n 8.) u.4 4.4 9.3 8.4 8.3 M
UCI 29,8979 A u.2 W.I p.2 R.8 8.2 W.2 g h 7.9 u.2 #.2 0.2 8.8 9.1 mow I4.1919 A R.I t.1 H.S u.8 8.8 8.3 n 8.8 m.1 W.2 m.3 m.1 0.8 UtC 5,8979 4 W.O 9.0 0.0 h D.0 9.1 0.0
Table A.1. (continued) AbhALINITI.TOfAl. l>G/ L.63Cis 9 3 3A ePL1 m e. LUC A T I U 8e 3 D i stM a h Gt. SJ2 $30 SJe ( ban e Llh . ht Pl s C A tr. $34 Inf art; 172. 174. 17). Jan 44.tviv a lit. 17J. lit. O teu 11,39#1 4 luO, 176. 177 e leu. 17S. 175. A 196 182. 112. man Jo.lvsv Ilj.
> 109. 113.
176. 372. E A 174. A rti 24,8979 o tel. 180. 174 I 174 5 mas 44,8979 174. 172. 174. 173. 17). 3 ; p e A n 17J. 174. 370. 174. 172. 273. g m tul. 17J. Inv. 369. 169. 1688 Jua 39,4919 A u 169. law. 177 165, 169. $ 171. e 17*. 178. 172. 172. 169 2 166. JuL J4,8979 A e 173 170. 176. 173 165. 149. J00. 194. 204 292. f" ano 14.4979 A 200. 2J2. 281. 20s. g b tv6, 296 2v2. Jof. 20.. Tus. 220. 284. O see s.,89: 4 A 20s. 204 206 288. 285. E u 20s. 2J4.
'90 192. 159 192. 192. 194 001 41,1979 A W > 192. 192. l*0. 192. 192. 192.
W 288. 221. 219.' 285 .'19 helt 19.1989 A 255. 239. 220. b 219 218. 219 2.8 ok t* S.lS79 f JUU. JOS. 207. p 207. 210. 207. 1 i I i
.E _._
Table A.1. (continued) MPSIDUL.flLTHAbtL ImG/Lt 3A > P3 t > e; 3. O C A 1 Ion 3 Sf4 {NSAEL DISCHANGL 532 SJU S2e S a m t s t hs; HLFLl(Alt past 6JJ. SS6. S67 Joh 43,3974 A 3[ o 621. to4. Sv.. 4 $30. Slu. S22 tep 31,8w#9 h SJ2. 520. Slf. dam an,3979 a 26e. 260. ,, 2SS. p 204. 264 264 4J6. 460. 4S4 II Art 44,1v7v A p eje. 4St. 4St. ]p 468. 4%4. 471 ! mal #2,1979 A D 464. 41$. 458. 4ht. 460
~ ]l 2D 8
N 470. 430. 462. JUw twel97w A 467. 4Su, p 4b0. 464. thm. 472. 405, JUb 44,8979 A 4 & 's . 520. b 466. 4WH. 4N4. 4WS. AUh 44,1974 A SO4 496. Ste. $25. . o $06. 522. 512. Ste. W 52s. Siu. $24 r3 6tv 1 ,8979 A $2e. h SAS. 322. 52s. $22 ll 476. 450. 452. euw. UC1 23.1974 A SO2 gg p 498. 464. Sb2. 60s IJ,8v79 A S23 . 522. 524. Sle. H 534 %22. 524. $16 DLC S,lvis A Ste. 530. S29 u SJ6 Ste. $4s.
Table A.l. (continued) Cunt)UCTAmCLehrtCit!C (htLku.MHuS/(m)
..... ................................................-w-......................................................
3A M P t, 3 N C l. O C ATIuN 5 hahp6tkG nt&LitAlt 534 th1AaL Dl5CnANGE 532 330 $2e past Jah 49.1979 A 92u. 790. 750. p uJ0. 79c. 950. tte ll,lVI9 A 790. 770 760. H 100. 179 740. Mak 40,1w79 A 360. 170. J60. gg a JWO. 370. J50. APM /4.Iviv A 6Sb. 6WO. bu0. 2 p 670. 670 670. ]$ - 3r 0 CO 719 720 753. NAl 22.1979 A 740. 740. es 7J0. 740. 140 720 m Jun 19,ft19 A 720. 180. 730. b 720 720. 720. 720. 700 740. 7J0. 740. JUL J4.1979 A 740 I" B 710. 130. 723. l W Aug 14,g979 A 7g0. s20. elo. 770. 770. [] 8 770. 520. 610. gg 700. 75u. 750, SLP IWelvi9 A 750. 7bO. " b 760. 730. 16u. A 170 EI ' UC7 43,59#9 A 160. 770. 7se. b 760. 7W0. The. 779. huv 83,1979 A 190. 190. 790. 790. b 790 790. 79u. 790. 900. 190. 800, b64 S.19fy A b 790. b00 199.
Table A.l. (continued) htstbut NUht!LTuabLE l>G/L) l
............................................................... .............................................. l 5 A M PL 1 mG LUCA T1ON 5 SJ4 (NTAnt bl5CHAMGE S32 SJe SJW 4Aava-lhG N*Pb!Calt bast Jan af,8viv A 4. 6 2 7. .
n 1. W. 3S.
- 7. 10. 6 tth is,lviv A p W. 2. W.
MAM JU,897W A 1920. 1770 1920. p 20SU. 1790. ISVU. 244, 350. 249 Ark 24,1v7v A J i 9 u.d J1t. E' h 2do. Mas 2J,8979 A 122. 146. 146 14W. 3* b 105. 144. 142. 154. s c Juh 19,1979 A 164. 162. 159 140 h 170. ISv. ISS. 138. JUL d4,8979 A 1000. 12 u se . 867. 294. p 2140. 1370. 4th. 196 l AUG 14,9979 A $05. 73. $$. 4S. n 15. 103. 55. 64. 5FF Stel97p A 99. 95. 112. 112. 100. 88. 104. p SS. R IIC1 23,9979 A 92. !!J. 97. 402. l e 136. 101. ele 196 u R nut 13,8979 A 64. I6. 39. 76 E o 74. St. 6S. 64. DEC 5,897w A lui. 65. 12
$4. SS. 70 s /
Table A.l. (continued) tuh uibit t th.T.u.}
..................................n...........................................................................
5A R PL1N t. bUCA T lum 3 5 A P P L I h.; r t PE.8 C A l t. SA4 18* T A k t. p l .WH A b Gt. S32 SAS 520 balt Jan 43,897v A 20. Jg. 50. o 29. 40. wo. fte 13,8419 a 23, 25. NOT SthT n 18. 28. 10. AAp Ju,397w a l#U. 160. 140. D 160. 160 ISU. 100. be. 100. APs 14.tvlw A 1Ip. 200.0 95 E 8 Z mal 4J,191w A 90. 90. kU. 71. D4. 69. {. 3* e 99. 10. hu. 64 IJ. 6S. s a OS, 12. 74. 17 93. 60 C3 Jun 19,l9#9 A H 97. 69. bu. 68 100. 61. Jun J4,8979 A 6to. 340. 200. 230 75. 11. e 900 350. 260. 240 59. 73. AUG I4,1979 A 55. 65. 14 50 73. 60. B 65. 70. 77. 55, 70 63. SEP Ip.1979 A el. al. 4U. 30 J5. 28
- 35. 43. 25 u 45 AS. 43.
b E UC1 23,1979 A JS. J2. lH. 10. 36. al. n 36 29, 20 34. 35. St. Mil t !A,l9Iw A 22. 21. 22. 20. IM. 22. $ 4 25. 18. 25. 20. Wu. 20. 5 DEC 5,1979 A 20. 22. 22. e 28c 25. 24. l
i
/ i Table A.l . (cc.itinued)
Ct st,0N , T H U L (UhlTb) 5A se PL1 h ti LUCA T IUh 3 4 Amt b le.s. Mt.PL I C A f t. 534 t hT A n t. D15Ces a n t;L S32 530 S28 l ts A 16. l Jan J1,1979 A 33. I I, 13. e 13. 13. 14 : Fin 81.198# A 2. 3. 3. 6 2. 1. 2. eAW Ju,s979 A 49. 72. 69. b 10. 69 67. Arm J4,8vi9 A 16. 15. 15. g h 85. 16. 16. g hAl JJ,8979 A O. 7. 7. 8. 5
> 8. 7 7. 3. >s Jun 19,1979 A 6. 5. 8. 7.
JUL Je,1979 A i1
- 10. 10 B.
v. p 12. 10. lu. . l A b s. 84,1979 A 0 W. f. 5. p l p 8. W. W. 8 W stF In,p979 a 9 W. 9. 9. Q H 9. 9. 9 9. g UC1 '43.6979 A U. W. 7. 7. p 7. S. 7. 7. M wut is 1979 A e. 8. p. s. N p 8 8. 9. 9 utt 5,3979 4 4. f. 4. H 4. 4 4.
Table A.l . (contined) CALC 1sm.ru1AL tmb/bl 5A M P I, t 5. f. LuCA T I O se S p t scet a uch, SJ2 SJO S2s 5 A n Pl.s hs: u t et.t s Al t. 534 IntAaE lobst
- 44. b4 64 jaw ,3,1979 A 65 o 64. 62. .
A 60. 56. S6. ft.e IJ.19#w 60. It bl. $9. Jg. 44. 43. mak su,3viv A h 4S. 41. 4$. h6. 79. APM J4,8979 A VI. 140.0 ut. E p v4. Z MAI 22,147v A 77. 77. 79. 76. $ H 78. 77. 77. 70.
->a
- 10. 73. 69 a Jun 19.1979 A 72.
- 73. II. -
N 10 74. I h 6,. 66. ... 69. J. ,4..,79 A 70. e bl. 66. 66. AUG I4.1979 A 72. 12. 72. 7J. p 72. 72. 74 19. StP 34.197V A 73. 71. 58. 7J.
- 71. E u 78. 12. 72. E UC1 48,1989 A 66. 62. 64 66.
66 H 67. 66 64. huv 13,8979 A 77. Ph. 7 6. . /6 S. a 77. 76. 77. 76. DEC 4,8979 A 75. '# 7 . . 74.
- 78. 77 78 0
I
t i Table A.1. (continued) l FutAh5194,fu14L (MG/t.) 5 A N PL!W G LUC & T IO# 3
........................................~......................................v.......
s a a r e. s w(. p.:pL3Cait $34 thfant. DISCHANGt $32 $30 S2h en a n t
.............................................................................................................. 3t vna e4,9979 A h.4 h.4 7.0 M 6.3 6.4 6.S tte 18,1v79 A S.2 5.1 .I a S.1 4.9 S.1 M4h 24.1979 A It. t7. 17.
4 i.. no. i.. si APN J4,1179 A V.7 9.1 20 . H 9.8 19. 0 20 3 a
> any g?,3939 A g.2 g.g 3.3 g.3 U e
h W.2 0.0 9.1 0.2 $$ w"" J t'h 19,1979 A 7.5 7.5 7.4 6.3 h 7.5 7.5 7.2 6.9 l Jub J4,3w?9 4 33, 9.) 10 7.5 i o 13. 9.7 9.8 7.4 r= neG 34,t419 a 7.0 7.8 6.9 6.s II 4 o 7.e 6.e 7.1 7.o [] - a s>< in sviv a 6.6 6.5 6.9 6.7 gg a 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.5 g3 m 1 UCI Ji,5vl4 A 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.1 ll P 6.4 6.3 6.J 6.1
. ....... . 6., 6., 6., 6., l P. 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.3 pt C 5,8979 $ S.% 5.5 5.5 n 5.7 5.6 S.) ~ . _ . _ . _ - . . _ . - - - _ - _ - -_-- _ ._
Table A.I. (continued) LuulUM,1oTAL (MG/L) 3A M P 1 IaG L0CA 1 1 Il N 5 l >T Ak t' D15C8t ANCt. 532 SJO SJW 5 Ane t.t hG HPPl.it'aTt SJ4 Loa 's e. Gl. fl. TS. JAk 41,1979 A TS. I et 70. 71. To. 67. or. een is,iv79 A 67. e 70. 67.
- 14. , 9. le.
so a p 40,8979 A lu. 19 IG. Q et Z i 48. 49. S2. E APH J4,99#9 A 49. to 49. S2. Z nAl 'st,1W79 A $9. 47. SN. S'. 5
- 48. SU. 59.
h Se.
"d J ure tw,1979 A 59 $9. 60. S7. g el. SS. St. # n $7.
St. SW. 59. E J ul. 44,8979 A $7. S6. St. 59 . h St.
- 64. 63. .
A08 14,1479 A 6%. 64.
- 65. 6S. I" o 65. 64.
E A 6a. 6j. 64. 69 g
==
S t. V lb,8979 69. n 69. 65. 6R. E
- 67. 69 70. Z UC1 21,8viv A 11.
- 11. 70 O H 72. 11. e S7. S7. Sh E Mov ie,197v A $7.
$6. $7. $7.
u 57.
- 65. 69 6W.
UtC S,1979 A
- 09. 69.
p 70.
-- ~ _ _
s -- Table A.I. (continued) CHLuklDL SMG/L)
&A M PL 1 M G buCA T I U M S !a1Agt Sl2 SJO 520 S a m ps. s m. MichgCATL hj4 U S S(h A NGP:
bAtt JU. 25. J5. JAN sJ,1979 A Jo, 25. b 31. I
- 22. 22. i ttb IJ,1979 A 22. I
- 22. 22. 21.
o
- 13. St. 12.
saw so,197v A II. n IJ. 12. 16. APr 44,397V A 17. 17. p 17. 17. 17. gl
- 18. 18. Z.
4 19 it. MA: 22.tw#9 A lu. 19. St. n 1s, 33 3, s
" A la, lu. Sw. le. O Jun tv.i9sv 18. 1s. ]P '" p le. lu.
- 19. 19. St.
JUL se,1979 A 19. II Su. 19. lu. o 17.
- 19. 19. 18.
mus 14,1979 A 19 u sp. 24. 20. 19. I"
- 17. 86 16. ll .
StP 16,8979 A p lb.
- 17. 16. 16. ()
16. m JI. 19. 18. UC's 23.997V A 20. 2J. 19. 18. gg p 19. 16. a
- 16. 16. gg nov is,1979 A 19 16.
e 86. 16 16. lb. IS. Ib. 000 %,l979 A 16 r IS. 16.
~ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Table A.1. (continued) t i.Uuk I U t. ( m t.p L ) 6A se P L 1 se G g,O C a T I u w r. h e.rt.g s At t gJ4 In t Ant, g, ISCH ANGt. SJ2 $30 Stu sang s s g.i; tea a t 0.6h . U.50 0.60 Jah Js,tw?W A 0.60 g es 0.60 0.56 U.45 6.4% 0.45 t i es t5,8979 A 0.43 0.45 0.45 e 0.23 0.2) U.23 mA> Wu,897v a 0.22 0 2J 0.24 p U.48 v.43 0.45 A l' k 44,1979 A 0.46 E I as O.44 0.48 Z I mat 21.1979 4 0.40 0.Su 0.JW 0. 9.39 5 o 0.to 0.JW 0.39 U.Su o.S0 0.52 y Jun 89,8979 A p 0.52 0.SU 0.S2 U.S2 U.50 0.44 0.44 0.46 g JUL J4,1979 A 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.46 b l U.46 U.49 U.50 ( A U I, 34,8979 A 0.48 f 0.4b 0.4k 0.48 b U.4h 0.49 W g l i MP 16,3979 A 0.49 U.SU O.S0 U.49 n.60 0.49 p 0.50 A 0.4J 0.4) 0.42 004 4J,1979 A 0.4J 0.4J 0.43 0.42 e 0.43 hue 13,1979 A 0.43 0.41 0.4) 0.43 3 0.43 U.43 0.4) h 0.43 0.44 0.42 0.42 DEC S,8979 A 0.42 h U.42 0.42
- . _ _ _ - x- _
y ,....,,
Table A.l . (continucx1) 5dLFAIE (ph/LI 5A MPL 1W6 L II C A T i il NS jaH6 Lewd H. l*l,8 C a t t ble thTAKE UINCHANGL S32 SJO SJs past Jaw 40,1989 A IVO. 190 190. e 140. 19u. 190 gg (t > !s,8ssy A 400. 2004 2U9. a Juu. 200 200 mAM Ja,1979 A 45. 49 St. p 45. 49. 47. APN Je,8979 A ISO. ISO. 140. n 850. ISu. 140. ER 2 MAS JJ,19sy 170. 170, 170. A e. 179. 170 179. 170 170. ([ 2, 3B da Jun 19,19dv A leu. Sto. 1vu. 190 ll
- d. ,
'J u rio. 190. 190. 190. JUL 24.1979 A 209. 200. 200 250 P 200. 200. 20u. 220. AUG 14.tviv A 230. 230. 210. 274 . . p 240. 2J0. 280. 230. 200 O 6f t' la,lvly A 200 220. 200, h 200 230. 200 200. !! e UCI Js.19fy a 2so. 2U0 Jto. 200 ] to 230 25U. JUU. 250. g E how 8),1479 A 170. 170. luo. 170. ll u 170. 170. luu. leu. UFC %,19Sv A 190. 190. 190 p 190. 190. 190
Table A.1. (continued) thun,1u1Ab (#4/L)
$A M P L1mG b0CA Y IOh 5 s a nrole; u s.Ps.5 " A f t. 534 thTAKE DISCHANGL SJ2 ble 528 bate Jaw 43,8979 A u.31 0.2b U.S6 -
e 6.14 0.35 0.59 ][ 0.20 0.J1 0.26
&#H 13.1939 A 0.21 o 0.14 0.30 MAN 20,3979 A 6l. 67 72.
p 70. 68. Oa. APh 24,tviv A 9.5 6.7 0.50 be. O 10. II 0.40 p Z mai 22,1979 A 4.7 S.2 4.7 ' ,1 ll 32 u 4.5 4.7 4.S h.i e a 2.7 ao Jttp 19,8979 A 7.4 b.5 S.i e 4.7 5.6 5.J 2.S JuL k4,8979 A 40. 27. 24. 7.7 0 40 29, 22. 6.9 AHG 14,8979 A 2.3 J.2 2.S 2.7 ' n 3.3 J.J 2.6 2.5 Jtr sk,3979 A 2.6 J.4 J.6 2.9 H 2.4 J.7 2.J J.9 M D01 2J,1979 A 2.4 2.0 2.5 J.0 u J.) J.! 2.6 J.) est, 13,1979 A 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.s II e 3.6 2.4 3.0 J.0 ut.C h,3979 A 4.2 .2.J 2.0 u 4.4 1.9 1.6
HA2LETON CNVIRONMENTALs SCCNCE3 0 e e 8 0 0 4 5 0 8 0 0 0 ea 0 0 0 *e 0 0 9 A e 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0- 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 E 8 9 3 8 d o e o e e e o e o e e e e o e
- e e 3 3 as e e o e e es me se se se se se **
- at so 3 ' se as 0 4 A 3 ee me se se se se se se se se se a=
0 0 0 WW W W v vv vV VV Vw vV VV WW WE VV e 8 0 S 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 4-0 0 0 0 W1 0 fe 0 0 S A 0 0 E D A 8 0 8 0 8 30 0 0 0 0
* ** 0 0 9 9 0 0 to 0 0 0 8 8 8 4 6 e s 0 0 8 'J G i 0 0 J G eCea 0 9 0 K 9 8 JG 4 0 e o e e e e o e e e o e o e e e o e e 0 = a e e e o e o se se se as se se =* es 0 9 's I en se se se se en se se se en se se se se se se 4 'J $ 4 5 V V Vv Vv V VW W Vv VV VV VW Wv VW f 4 = 8 0 8 9 3 0
+ 0 0 0 1 *w 5 =0 0 0
& 9 0 8 a 4 m) 0 0 & 0 0 0 & 4 30 8 3 0 0 e a eE O e w 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 9 d 8 E .2 0 r3 8 s 0 1 0 4 0 e e o e e e e E e e e e e ea e e e o e e 3 0 .
0 0 se 0 .o se se se rv e o se =e se == WW ea se se se se se se 3 en se .e se VW
.e se W
s2 8 8 2 0 WW W WW 4 Yw VV Vs W G G ** 9 3 $ 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 S M 9 0 0 e 9 0 $ i 2 0 0 0 i O 0 4 0 O 8 8 4 I, O O O O 0 0 I l e 0 e 2 I ^ 4 0
- 0 el e e o e o e e o e e .og e e 13 # 0
- 0 we se se se se em se em - se me 3 se se q) 0 9 d' 8 vv vv vv vv vv vz yv s 0 e
0 a 0 e a C 0 g a
'e 0 0 e 4J B e I c 0 0 0 o :
V u , , , e es 0 0 4 0 0 44 0 G = 0 43 4 C 4 S 43 4S 41 43 4 3 43 4 T. 4S 4 S 0 J e F 0 P. e
- I 'L 0 i
4 0 e 2 0 e 8 7 ? % P S S S P S S P I g 8 4 em = ew *= cm e. S. a == == r= == =m l 0 0 3 > > > > > > > >
"43 0 'J 0 .r. .e. .e= .e .- == = =
e
. = -a.te = = = = = = . .
f0 0
=.
- a= e av p w e e 9 ,A p 0 ., O w .e w w , .e - - %
I A4 0 ae > ".J n2 9 2 E E E = 2 J 9 L. e e 2 3- 3 ee (J
- a; B 4 9 e e 1 4 e
- 5 9 a E 4 E ") "3 4 73 3 .E 3 l.
1 i ' A-19 a g
. - - ~ _ , - _ ._ _. ., , _ . . _ . . -.
HAELL 'Did CNVlftONMENTAL SCl*~NCE3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N so me se me ao se .e me 9 es to re 0 0 0 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO a ea e e e e o e e e o e o e e o e e 0 au 6 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 0 0 A 0 W v v 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 se as se me se se M ee 8st
- ee se so O as ce ? AA Pe re 9O OO se se 0 0 0
. ee $. m m ao se e OO OS OO OO OO OO o e 0 0 9 0 e e e e e e o e e e e e o e e o e e e o OO 0 I sa 0 e e OO OO O9 OO OO O3 OO OO 0 0 de eOO OO OO vv v 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 a, .o .e .e .e se .e ce mm 34 0 0 0 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 0 WP 4 N 0 e.e e e e e o e e o e e o e e em 0 OO OO O3 OO OO O3 OO # 2 0 A 0 W vv v 8 0 0 8 30 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 t 0 0 0 0 he 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 "s 0 0 0 0 a; I e20 'J e ee w me ee e as es me =e .e== ee et ce m Po in me 3 0 0 2 e 33 OO J3 03 OD O3 se se 0 .30 e e "e ** * * = & 6 O3 03 O3 e e o e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e 0 0 = 0 e e 33 3O 33 OO OO 30 0 W 0 C3 O2 OO 3O SO 30 0 yv v 0J0 4 0 9 0 am 0 0 2 0 Q I e 0 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 e3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 E O 8 a= 0 0 0 E O e0 0 se se se M et ce A et ae as 3 0 0 0 al eMe aS ee ee re et se se OO O3 33 OO e* se .0 I 14 0 is 0 .N M == N ee O3 O2 OO OO e o e o e e e e e a e e a e e e e e e o e e s 0 0 g 0 e o OO 3O O3 OO OO SO U 9 ** I 33 OD O te OO OD 33 E 4 S
0 E I V WW w 0 0 =e 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 me 0 0 0 E 9 0 0 3 0 0 0 E 9 0 0 E O e e d 0 0 0 0 0 0 M se SS 99 se se @@ m su% es M 0 0 0 SS DO O2 O3 OO O ** OO 0 0
- 0 e e o e * * *
- e o e
- 0
- 0 e o e
I e# 8 OO OC 3O OO O3 OO OO 8 0 0 W v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e : e 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
.,C. 0 . I 4 e c 0 s 0 e& 4 & 4 a ea 4m ea em ea es e2 a&
0 0 = 0 ea Q 0 .2 0
- l t 0 - 0 8 0 P P S *
- 0 0 7 P S 9 > >
==
p. S
- p. c. se me 8 0 = e. a. == e.
p S S S P e 0 0 F > P
.P = -e = *= .S. S. . .Se = .P 0 0 em a- == < 0 0 .d ==*0 I e * *e e
3 e 9 s e o 9 e e e 3 se o e e Je
== M ag me N se so N me @ 0 J cm 0 % 1 pe 0 de e e m 2 2 J h Pe
- p 9
.L a8 5 3 .X >
E
. = = = . o : *s. )
0 8
= . a o a y a 4 00 = = > > ,
f A-20'
. s.
Y
Table A.l . (continued) se l1 H AT A. ( M G/ L-88 ) 3 A m P 1. I se G l. IJ G J T IO# I
.............................................cs.............:.............................
e AMPl.8 a*; Nt Pl.!C Alt SJ4 t h T A k l. DisCHAMGt. S32 SSU S2W past Jad 49,1939 A U.4U U.4% 0.39 U.48 n v.J9 U.45 > tto 89,1971 A 0.44 w.ib U.44 a U.su 0.45 0.44 man Ju,8979 A 1.5 1.h 1.6 0 is 1.S 1.0 1.6 g APm 44,8979 A 2.S 2.1 2.2 M is 2.) 1.9 2.8 Z
==
mas 44,IVJW A l.S 4.4 S.S 1.5 1.4 1.7 b l.S 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 8.6
.J u n 39,197d u.it 0.6) 0.60 0.Ju 2 ] A et e 65 0.64 1.1 U.54 U.74 0.6% 0.69 U 9) {
Ju t, J4.l979 A 0.49 0.40 0.J7 0.37 0.22 0.21 a 0.SJ 0.40 u.J6 0.)b O.24 0.21 AUG 14,1919 A 0.2b 0.2) 0.2% 0.2S 0.26 0.2S f 0.26 U.26 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.2S 8 5 stP l as ,19 7 9 A 0.9U 0.90 0.92 0.9) 0.92 0.9S h n 0.92 0.92 U.9J 0.94 0.94 0.96 El UCK J),1979 A 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.44 et 0.4) 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.42 g O' NOW ljelv79 A 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 H 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 Utx Sel9sv 4 1.2 1.2 1.2 H 1.2 8.2 1.2 l I l l
- HAELETON ENVif4DNMENTAL SCOENCEO 9 0 0 $ 0 $ ** 4e == 3 m em Ae e
pm 9 > 9= i E g me se 3 ee 33 33 =e se 3*,. se e 9 0 3O OO OO OO OO 33 3O 0 4S 0 e e e e e e o e e e o e e en 6 OO 3O OO OO OO OO e eA 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 8 0 e e 4 0 0 0 $ l 0 0 0 0 0 0 O em 4 9e em 96 Ae 9m > OO ** 9m AA 9 9m 6 6 0 4e AA O rm OO **== OO ==== OO 0 33 Oo es ** sm = = = = == O O3 0 0 3O OO OO 3O 3O OO 3O OO 8 8 0 0 0O OO O3 OO e e e e e e e e o e o e e e e e e e e e e e e o e 8 6 m OO 3O (T O 9O OO OO OO 3O OO 8 9 A 0 DO O3 OO 8 9 9 8 9 0 9 0 0 6 0 0 8 8 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S ** em Pm e se ed 44 03 4 4 #
== ee O so OO 3O ===* OO T == .A.
B $ 9 OO OQ OO OO 3O OO OO 0 Wb e M 9 e e e o e e e e
- e
- e *
- 6 0 ** e OO O3 OO OO OO O 3 9 A 0 OO OO t 8 0 euo e s e
0 0m 4 8 0 9 9 9 to 9 9 9 0 0 94 8 9 0 0 e eU0 0 0 9 mi 8 e* 0 3 $ LJ 0 99 P= pm ** es em O 4 rm > p* de ee OO
.A A Se OO g 4 1 # 36. S Cm
- as * * * = = = = SO 3 3 33 ==== 3C D3 S3 33 3O OO O3 33 33 33 33 j
0 .40 4 0 3O OO e e e e e e e e o e e e - g E 8 e o e o e e e o e e e e 0 I E U t C3 OO 33 00 33 3O S3 30 33 OO 3c 30 9 2ea e e I es e 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 8 e se e a 0 0 9 a .3 e 4 9 9 9 9 48 8 8 4 9 l 0 $ 9 9 a= 0 0 44 i 2 0 944 0AA AA NA =e N hh *A ea ee OO 3 P=
===*
3e 30 8 3O 3O a3 *"4 =* es O == 33 33 se == 3O e t 8 M 30 33 30 3O OO
=3 9 JS e is e 3 .4 OO OO 3O OO 33 30 e o e e e e o e e e e e e o e e o e o e e s % 0 4 4 0 e e OO 3O OO OO O3 '.7 0 0 >= 0 OO OO OO 93 99 OO OO K e 9 3 0 =s 8 2 M $
0 0 0 W 9 8 8 em 9 0 0
= 8 8 8 2 6 8 4 em I I B se 6 3 4 4 0 0 0 $ e 8 pm % 3 ** em ao e@ O3 2 pm ed 3O ===e 33 ====
4 9
=e se OO *e==
OO 0 OO OO 9O OD DO 0 t e t e e o e e e Oe O. e e e e e g est 3 3 9 A 4 93 CO O f5 3O OO OO 33 9 0 0 t t 0 9 9 0 0
^ f G G "O O e 0 e a 0 e = l l c , . ,
va e se 4 4J e at I 1 c 6 v 8 8 2 4 C 4 C. 4 2 4 C 4 & 49 4& 4E 43 I a ** 8 eE 4 & g e .= s U S s e v I es e 0 *b 4 0 P P S P P P P P P t # P P em en == .P. ==
* = pm e. = am P.
g 8 == P P > P"" 8 P P P P 7 7 P P 4 ao - == se == m e. .P. m .= ==
- e U # m o e o e e o e a e o
( 0 9 4 4 0
- 9 e e
3 9 N m e N e m 2 e e
.4 et m
A g g amJe 9 4 m % I L4 0 C E S ** T ** *) L **
- V F 0 A 3$ I
- O L 3 a O *
.O e ee a e G.
I e 9 1> . s e z >
- 4 o 3 4 3 en a=.
p ( A-22
Table A.l. (continued)
)
uMGAhtC hlTWuGr..s.TUTAL ( M8u s.1 5A M P l. & M s; I, o C A T 1O N 5 til5Cala hGE S32 S 60 SJW 5 A MI'L 8 eeG M k ib.It Al t. S34 t h1 Ant. U A l t. U.J4 0.j2 9.42 Jah Ji,898W A c.JS u.45 0.44 o 9.45 U.40 0.41 f t.n 11,84l9 A H U.41 0.40 0.40 4.6 4.J 4.4 MAN 40,8919 A 4.S 4.4 4.1 m 1.7 1.2 1.S g-A Ps4 e- :979 A p 1.4 S.7 0 3.S g MAf 42,8979 A 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 5 e 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 3 3= 8 to 0.98 1.1 0.42 0.79 JUh IV,1979 A LJ H U.94 0.94 U.94 0.71 Job 44,1979 A S.4 4.e 2.0 1.8 J.6 2.U 1.1 n S.J A ut. 14,1979 A 0.63 U.10 U.70 0.59 e 0.66 0.67 0.74 0.65 W 0.65 0.67 0.66 0.71 0 St? 14,1989 A m 0.64 0.1A 0.67 0.01 g 0.7) 0.61 U.60 UCI '48.lw7v A 0.76 n.72 0.64 g
- e 0.66 U.69 teur II,19sw A 0.49 0.60 0.92 0.58 u 0.47 U.7) 0.74 0.49 S,898V A U.JW 0.44 0.2h ut.1 n 0.34 U.Je 0.31
Table A.1. (continued) Ov7HbPse03FH Af t,$dLUMLt l ee G# L.P l S A mF l. I 4 as L f t l' A T ION A In1AaL Ul50 a>GL t32 Flo $2b .
.S A me* L i n G sf e & bl C At t $34 .......................................................................................=.=e.......=
valg jab 42.tviv A U.0Vm e.uvy U.uus U.82 U.092 U.10 F 0.uut U.4U 0.084 D El* 14,4479 A 0.09J U.047 is U.0W0 U.Uv2 0.17 sa As. 2*e,8 v 7 9 A U.lu U.12 I U.li 0.25 0.32 APh 44.tv19 A U.!! #.11 U.IJ E U.SJ u.12 Z 3 0.10 0.U90 O.10 0.UW4 U 099 U.lt U.0V0 5-Mag '42.1979 A O.096 0.10 0.30 8 U.lt U.UWA
> U.042 0.01w U.050 0.042 s 0.039 U.0SI 0.039 0.03d 0.041 is) Jt8ee ! *1 4474 A U.e47 e 0.086 0.046 Jh v.UWU 0.060 U.040 0.038 Jail 24.1979 A 0.044 0.0iG U.uSe 0.USS U.041 0.0Je B 0.03% U.042 U.040 0.029 0.046 0.034 0.049 Adu 14,197V A U 049 U.039 J.04% 0.0S4 0.U45 B 0.048 U.098 4.08) 5 0.082 U.Udu 0.072 0.on2 h
6EP 16.1979 A 0.079 U.U69 0.076 U.077 as 0.07 :e U.UW1 U.000 - a 0.076 0.064 U.U67 0.077 U.u6J U.066 OC) JA,8971 A 0.044 0.U66 0.064 6.007 n U.UeS 0.Ub7 0.092 0.007 0.0su g U.094 U.UNJ U.U#1 0.00W seu s al,1439 A 0.087 U.veh 0.096 U.085 h 0.090 U.Ue5 0.07s 5,1979 A 0.066 UFL 0.060 0.U'l M U.ub4 1 O-
HAELETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCENCS3 1 1 t 0 4 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 M i 0 0 03 MS O9 9e S *e 9m 33 0 0 m 6 m es se O M en se se se f4 se == MM 0 0 r% g e o e e o e o e o e e o e e 0 0 m I OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +- 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 8 0 e e 0 0 0 9 0 me 0 S 0 &A 8 9e ee e Pe 9 se e ee O9 O == Pm e e Me 0 0 0 8 e p me se OO > me se es ce e se e.
. es se .e se MM se se se e.e se O e e o e e o e e e e o e e e e e e o e o r 0 0m i e o e e 0 0 A 0 OO OO O == 0O OO OO OO O3 OO OO OO 33 t 0 0 3
0 0 0 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 OO se P se
- F* a pe OS 99 MM M se 'M N se se en om M se se so 0 WP. 8 Pe 6 o e * * * *
- e 0 $ 'm 0 o e e e e e 0 &8 A 4 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO O $ 0 4
0 30 0 0 e e 0 se 0 0 0 0 0 1 O kt 0 e e e 0 4 0 $
'. 8 0 U0 0
e al 0 8 0 I j m a= 0 Q5 3 0 e em a se P= 3 >M eM ? 9 O E A 9 ==
- a NM 'P S se se es P*
S el 0 e 0 se se OO ef se se se se me se MM en am M se ao es == M ** S 0 2 0 e e e e o e e o e o e e e e o e o e o e o e o e 0 0 0 W G OO OO **** OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 9 'J B v* 0 0 0 se 0
== 0 F 0 0 0 % e 0 0 0 0 as 0 0 4 0 9 9 % 4 .a 0 g U 0 0 0 1 0 h0 e ew 0 0 8 8 E 4 0 J $ 0 0 4 0 4 0 $ aM ** 0 9 al 9 '4== a9 M9 93 9O ** 3 e to a' == *
- 7 Pr
- en MM M == == se == M =="4 as ad me em D 0 y) I d 4 se me OO 3P *e se se ==
e e
- p. 0 0 e 9 e o e e e o e o e o e e e o e e o e e o e o
- 0 0 c= 0 00 3O == se OO OO 3O OO OO OO OO OO 33 n 0 0 K 8 3 0 I *e 0 1 e 0 e q
o S e e 2 0 0 0
& 0 1 0 W 8 0 0 D I 5 0 K 0 0 0 % 9 0 0 I 4 0 8 8 0 ** O OO MO N9 Oe d "9 OS 0 eW $ M Pe N Pe ** m os se ce ee == M M es 3 0 am e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e 0 B m 0 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 8 0 8 A 0 8 0 g O O e as : ; ;
a . 0 0 C 0 0
- e e p 6 m 0 g so S E 8 4 I O 8 w e er s ea ea U 0 -e ees 4t am ea er a2 ea ea ea v I J 0 0 L 5 0 al 0 0 E S
- 8 9 9 2 P S S P S P & D P P F 0 am r= M r= P=
,9o re m se yo e 0 $ m re 0 9 @ S S P P P q e 0
- 0 .F. 9.e e, .P. e. .Se .S. -e - - -
8 A 0
- 89 m e
@ $ -A 0
- 84 3 e f% P e e 3
*e se M *e N == N ** ** '4 **
P"" 8 JP 0 O E %d 0 maea = 4 x = z .a o a, ,e . ;J g 0 as 9 as a, 4 A 4 O O 2
- O O e p 8 0 3 0 "3 e. E 4 E "3 *)
- 4 3 4 3 I-A-25
Table A.1. (continued) SILICA,sutuuLL gnG/L ste:J3 i 34M PL 1N G 8. O C A r I O as 3 l j INTank DISCHA>GL 512 SJO SJu ht>PLI*G M* FLIL ATL Sa4 l belt Jan 43,5,15 a 33, 35. IS.
- 85. IS.
h Ib. lb. 84, 14. eth li,191d A IS. 15. p SS. 9.9 9.9 4 10. hak 49.3v19 19 9.6 4 9.8 Ib. 34. APM J4.19fy A IS.
- 15. 34. E h IS.
- 31. 33. 33. 12. 33.
man J2,193v A 13. II. II. I1. II. II. H to. 9.7 9.0 g.9 e e.e 0.8 v.s fu Jun 19.9979 A 9.4 u.6 B.9 9.1 9.0 O d 9.A v.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 JHL 48,1979 a p.s 3.4 9.o 9.0 v.0 9.0 9.0 h m.8 9.6 5.4 3.4 e.4 0.2 W.J AUb 14,8939 A b d.4 8.4 3.6 e.) g,4 3.3 St. 10 II. O sEP 84.1979 a 10. 9.9 lo.
- 12. 10 12. h e to. 10. 10.
a W.7 9.1 9.5 v.6 9.5 l UC1 49,8919 A 9.) 9.3 9.S 81. 9.S l H S.9 9.1 R l
- 13. 16 I3 I3. I4 g
#s04 48.I919 A 8J. 13. 15.
- 14. 13. 41. 15.
w St. 33. Ut1 S,89#9 A St.
- 18. II. 18.
b
-- - - -- ~ --
_ ~ , . , . l i Table A.I. (continued) teal.the 'sT A L CULI Flekse (wa/200 s seL I
&A R PL I >G L0CA 7 ION 5 sapPLikG Sie p t.F t.l C Al t la7Ast DiscuaNCE SJ2 Siv S2e i
bait dAh 41.1979 A J000 4200 JJ00 p DJUO. 5100. 1700 I the is.1979 A 4790 16000. 3100, b 4600 13000. 4800 mak 40.9979 A IS0000 130U00 Ihv000 N b 170000 18w000 170000 app J4,'a979 A 44000 S2000 J60000 b 47900 390000 g 190000 g MAI 4#,8979 4 25000 3400 . 100000
>>U0..
18000. 15000. b b 24 0a. l. 00 s a,n Jun IV, viv A 180000 SUucu. 7Uu00 0 P0 N b 90000 77000 7JUGO. OttJo-930 to. Z JtIL 4'4.897s A 330000 IS0000 110000. 97000 b 3400UO. 140000, 140000. 57000. ' AUG 14.1979 A 28000 29000 J4000 14000. b 29000 29000. 26000. 26000 sl y In,ls ty A 44000 25000 O 40000. J0000. O b 44000 17000 2700U. 32000 g UCT 4),1979 A 93000 74000 WSu00 97000. b VJ000 67000 W9000. 31000 g i huv ! ),,19 79 A 07000 30000. e7090 52000.
> 93000, 70000 100000. 53000 Ot l Selw79 A 6300 10U00 34M40 b 6700 11000. 67@r.
Table A.1. (continued) M ACit k! A.D t.C AL l'ubit bWm (ab/!wo M81 sA aF1 1N C b es C A T I Oh 8 IDTAAt DISCHAPCE SJ2 bJe ........... SJ8 6 AM Ll et. ktPIICAtt Sie 4 Ast Jan 4),1979 A SSO. eso. SSO. 7SO. J00. .
> Sto. $$00. Ilu.
teu 19,8979 A SWO. t$0. 160. In 6WO. 1400. 2000, 3000. MA> 40.1979 A 2e00 2200. J200. u 800. 1000. AFM 44,1979 A 160 El 200 IS00. 8 900. 2 Sup0 3400 =$0. 3100 g mal 44,8979 A 1700 700, b 150 14bo. 7, e 2400 2000 2200. DJ Joh 19,1979 A J100 2200. J2uo. 2500 2800. 03 b 2200 2000 f Job J4,1979 J000. 2000 A 2100 2J00 2800 a J100 1200 1700 1900. AUG I4,8979 A !)0O. 3900 3400 5200 1400 b EI 2J00. 1300 ' st P IW,1979 a 1600. IJUO. 1600 (f e 1200 159 *) . !J00 a 2900 5600 R$0u. 2600 2 UC1 JJ,8979 A 3000 2900 e '
/ J00 1400 A 7J00. 4000 3%00 2400 ll Mtv I J,19 79 4300. 6300. 3000 n 2000.
950. 560 Dt:0 S,1979 A 1200 1S00. 1800. f b J90.
. . _ _ . _ . . - . ._ __. . _-. __. . ~
HAzLETON CNVlftONfWIENTAL SC8ENCE3 f .
. e e i .. . .~
o-
. .. .. .. n . . . . ..,.
- e. -, --
nn
- ~ ~ .. .- . nn . .c . . . t .s.~
1- ....
.o. .
2 . .
= .
1 .. . i . .
- . . .e . . .
.c.u . ,. ,.. . .. e... ..
4
- 3. - e- . ,.
o .
.. a ....x e. ...
4 r
- x. .
m ,. . -
- n. -- . .
4 .n ,, c.
- u.. .
u .- v a . < =, 2 .. . . s e. a . . . a .. . s . .s. . .
. . . = = 3 . . .... a. .
o -
. ., 4~ . . - , , - , .. ,. . e . ,o ., .n 4 .
v a . - . s . . a .
- v. . .
. . 3. . . . =. =. ~- -.
c, n m. o . . o s ! l c !.
. a e
o v ... .a . z.
- 2 . . s .c . .
o . -2 . , . , . n ., ., , - a....a , - . - - .
.o a a a a -
s - = u
,o . .a .. a .z .h .- 3 . J.
a v o O a a p . e .s w a . s > > va I A-29 _ - - , r~, - , - , e, , - - - - - . . . , ~ m. ,y------ ,.--. .
( 1
- . Table A.l . (continued)
I i ' stuCHtmtCAL 01tGEN btm440 1Sou A T ) t nG/t ) 3A erL I aG LuL A i 3p as 4AmrLt.4 k t,FI,1 C A r t SJ4 ImTApt USSCHapCL SJ2 Ss0 525 UA
.....st . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j Jew as,8979 A 1.0 1.0 8.0 ; e 10 1.2 1.1 t>E 49,1974 A 0.9 3.J 0.5 n 4.1 0.7 1.0 non 4d,897v A 6.1 S.7 6.2 h S.9 6.0 6.S S Arw J4,3979 A 2.S 2.4 2.7 I n 2.4 S.60 2.9 { f Mat 42,3979 A 2.1 2.3 1,W 2.8 La a 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.S O JUa 49,1979 A p 2.4 2.2 7.J 1.6 2.2 { g 2.s 2.3 2.4 JUL 44,1979 A 4.7 4.1 4.0 3.2 h 4.7 4.0 J.S 2.9 A sf 6 84,1979 A 2.0 1.9 1.6 2.0 n 1.6 1.4 2.1 8.8
.< am,1974 A l.4 1.6 1.u l.4 9 a 1.6 8.8 l.) 1.7 OCf "),4979 J A ).7 2.4 3.1 3.9 3 m s.2 2.s s.s s.s M hoe It,8979 A 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.6 m 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.6 utC S.t979 A 2.9 1.h 2.S b 3.1 1.5 2.4 A_-
Table A.1. (continued) CetLMIC AL DA VGLee UEF Ant. ( m6/ l,3 5 A nP b i N G BOCA T IU N & pl5CHAPit S32 450 S25 S A aPs.l NG H P.PI,l t' ATt Sie im1AKE UAl . A 1. i. e, sA. Ji.ivr9 p 7. 7. V. g
%. 9. 10 &Pn 8S.1979 ~
A p 9. A. 9. 130. 130 lJU. nan 28.84fw A 130. I30. 140. to 34 APH 24,1979 A 31. 27. M
- 30. 11 7 . O 29.
B Z
- A 16. 16. 10. 15. (
ee A I 42,1989 H l *> . Ib. I7. I8. j
- 22. 16 d Jun 19,197v A 28. 22.
Ib. H 23, 21e 20 6U. 44. 23. JIlb J4.1979 A 180.
- 52. 47. 24.
H 110.
- 16. B l. 14. )
AUG 14,3979 A 14.
- 13. 18. 17 ["
h IS. 5 st ed lu,1979 A 19. le. 2 63 22. g
==
- 14. 17. iv.
o 19. M UC1 43.1979 A 17. 14. 31. St. l
- 19. Ab. 10 U h 20. M
- 16. 14. 16. E MOV 83.19#9 A 16.
o 16. IS. Ib. 15.
- 21. 15. IS.
utC 5,1979 A
'2 2. IS. 14.
b
Table A.l. (continued) UkGA>lC CAWpuN,TurAL (m4/t.) SA h P t, a n G t, U C A 1 IQN $ IN1ARL DISCHANGE Sj2 SJO 52u hA=PLanG MF6 LICAf t, %)4 1 UAs* 3.8 4.3 S.! JAh J f , 5 *J J V A 4.m J.4 3.9 u 4.b d A J.8 4.6 O t e m i s,1w?9 s.S 4.s
. 4.4 2 St. 59 S). g NAM av.1979 A S6 4S.
n St. 14.
$9. 1).
APb 29.1979 A SS. 0 15. a 15. W s n.U 7.8 7.S 9.0 g +j N MAI d2,1979 A 7.3 H 4.9 7.5 73 m
- 84. 4.4 10.
JIlh 19,4979 A 7.N 9.5 9.S 12. II. b 37, 19. 27. W.3 JUL 49,1979 4
- 24. 29. 8.1 p 39. W 7.5 6.) O AUb 84,1919 A
.h 6.1 4.6 6.1 b.6 S.7 0.3 g 70 S.0 See sh,1979 A 7.2 6.4 S.O b 7.1 6.0 6.0 M 4.9 E
4.0 1.2 S.J UC1 2),8979 A 4.9 e 4.6 5.7 3.9 7.4 9.1 6.) West 15,3979 A 4.0 6.9 U.S S.8 H 7.) 6.0 7.8 6.1 Utt S,5979 A 6.0 n 6.4 S.#
Table A.l. (continued)
.1 I
1 CHLU")hE,1UTAL (m4/L)
&A m P 1. t > e. L. OC& T ION 5 .j I
R N ! A ft t, pl5CII A NGt: SJ2 S10 $28 b a m F 1. 6 M. H t.Pl.j f A i t. Sjt t,416
<U.UI jam 2A,1979 A H (0.01 teb 13,597# A <0.03 ,j 19 <0.01 i
Maw 20,197# 40.01 ' A 40.01 g e APM 24,1979 <0.ul A (0.01 2 n
> <o.01 M
mar 21,3v7, 4 tt <0.01 JUN 19,1979 A
<0.01 =
n (0.01 i 1 JLfL 44,1979 A 40.01 p 40.01
<0.01 @
A l,s, 14,8979 a s <0.01 g A 40.01 SfF IWel979 M (0.Ut E UC's e),1979 A
<0.01 O es <0.01 nov 13,6979 4 <0.G1 n 40.08 DPC S,lVI9 A <0.01 h (0.01-
R Tabl e A. l . (continued) - P14Lh003 (Md/L) 5 A N P t. A N G t. O C A 1 i is N 5 S A p+ L 1 M, et Fl.lC Af t S34 twiAnE blSCHAkGE SJ2 530 S til past I Jah 43,3979 A U. jut <0.001 okukkh e (U.UUI (U.uol 'O.001 f t.O 4J,897W A ).002 0.003 SkUEth e 0.002 0.003 U.003 NA> 40,1y79 A BHUkEN 0.UUJ (U.0US H U.002 0.00J 0.003 Z APk 44,8v79 A U.UU2 U.002 0.003 $ is 0.003 0.00h 0.003 g i 3* i O w NAl J2,1979 A 40.005 <0.001 <U.001 0.001 g 65 h 40.001 (0.001 <U.001 <0.001 Juh 19,1979 A <0.001 0 ',U I <U.001 <0.U01 o llh u n t'h 40.001 It k uk t.N D M Uk l.M JUL 24,1979 A <0.003 40.001 <0.001 0.001 P e phor6a suonLM o.UU2 <0.001 F W Auh st.1979 A p h un t.h 0.005 <0.001 0.001 Q h <0.001 0.002 <0.001 40.001 g St F 4W,8949 A U.002 0.004 U.U01 0.004 h 'd.nU4 WHOPEN 0.003 0.002 uCT 23,3979 A U.UU7 BNumLh U.UU7 0.007 E le 0.005 0.003 0.001 U.00S ' Nih 49,1979 A U.003 0.007 e.UDS 0.003 h 0.007 0.005 l Mullt.N bHOkkN ULO S.8979 A 0.004 U.003 0.00$ n 0.004 0.UUS 0.UC4
^
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _
Table A.1. (continued) atTHILLwL mLUE.ACT3tt subsTANCLS tmG/h) 5 A mPbi M G L0CA T 1 ON 6
&&aFLikG M6 PLICA 1L 534 INTAKL utoCHAFCE 532 539 528 4JAlt lam d9,1979 A 0.04 0.09 40.02S b 0.04 0.03 <0.025 t.a 43,1989 A 40.02S <C.025 40.02S n 0.0J <0.u25 40.02S *Ah 40,8979 A 40.02S <0.02S 40.025 to 40.U45 <0.025 (0.02S Avi. 24,89r9 A <u.02S co.u25 <o.025 m a <o.o25 <o.025 <0.02S Z MAi 22,3979 A 40.025 (U.045 <u.025 <0.02S 33 h <0.025 (0.02S <0.0J5 40.025 I i 0 $ J une te,3979 A <0.025 (0.0JS (U.uJS <0.025 2.
H <0.025 (U.02S co.u25 (0.02S { Jill Jtelvi9 A 40.02S 40.0J5 <0.025 (0.025 o <0.04S 40.025 <0.025 (0.025 A llt. 14,3979 A <0.02% 40.0J5 <0.0J5 (0.025 H <0.02S 40.025 <u.025 <c.025 W SDP IN,1919 A <0.025 40.025 <0.025 <U.645 h ) h <0.025 40.odh <0.uJS <0.02S Hl 1 Z UC's tJ,lV29 A <0.025 <0 UJS <0.025 (0.92S g H (0.02S 40.015 40.025 40.025 g seO W 8j,19IV A (U.U25 40.025 (0.025 <r.025 e <u.025 <u.023 <0.02S <0.025 .i Utt S,191') A 40.uJS 40.u25 40.02S H 40.025 <0.02S 40.025 l I l i u
- _ _ mm.__
+ .. . .. .
l Table A.I. '(continu'ed) 1
- l CAba!Um Tu1AL. (micuu.G/LI 5A h le 1, 3 hG 1. O C A T ION &
~......................................................................................
DiSCet A WGt. 531 530 548 5 Asel-L iteG k t i l. it A t t. 534 I N1 A A t. titl e 0.27 0.05 0.05 JAn 21,1939 A 0.07 H 0.14 <0.02 0.21 0.36 0.22 reu IJ,1919 A 0.22 u 0.lt 0.15 2.4 2.1 .9 MAM 40,8979 A 2.7 p 2.6 2.J 0.1S <0.02 0.49 E APF J4,8979 A 0 1.0 tt (0.02 11. Z 0.J6 0.49 0.13 4 mat 22.1979 A 0.J2 0.75 H U.34 0.JW o.47 0.JW o.38 0.45 y W J us. 19,8979 4 0.95 =
- 0.62 4.34 0.34 h 0.82 .
1.8 U.51 M Jul. 24,3919 a J.! 5.0 0.86 0.70 u 2.1 3.0 0.45 U.47 ) Aub 49,89'#9 4 0.W2 0.39 0.69 0.SW 0.35 I" re o,49 E g O. Su ss . 4 M u.35
- ,t i 3 h , I 9 A 's t. u.15 tr. j s E '
U.94 0-$2 u 'I n S e. 0.10 4. l t o.it U( e / t . I 's t '# A U.19 u.e % is 0. J'A U.Ii u.Il
<u.ut (u.0/ ou.uk $ .v e s 6 3, l'e f v A <u.04 ep.us o <u.ug to.uJ < n . as t 2.1 l.7 1.4 1.t t 5,1979 A 1.0 b 0.lf 1.4
Table A.1. (continued) CuPPt.k.1oTAL In CNet-G/LI 5 A nPLI a G L0CA T ION 5 fl 4
- Fo d % NtFLICATE. 534 INTAkt Ol5 CHANGE S32 S30 S28 ve n t.
................................................................ ............................................. g Ja, as,19fy A l.7 2.2 4,7 g B 2.9 2.9 4.2 i i
l t r e ! J ,19 8 9 A S.s 7.2 S.1 1 n 4.6 10. S.4 1 0'
. , .ivi, A u. 36. 22. Z p 4). 35. 34.
M A s t- 44.9979 A 2.0 2.5 <0.5 2 P 1. 62. 0 12. C 6 4 l
=as n ,ivi9 A 6.0 7.S s.o 6.0 3 i i
3 e 5.0 IS. 6.0 7.0 O l W K-o f.a. 39.1979 A 8.0 13. 13. S.5 $ e 26. 14. 12. 4.0 3 J i' L 44.8979 A 71. JJ. 30 IS. n 75. 33. 29. 13. f* Atu. 14,1979 A 5.0 te. a.0 7.0 g n 6.0 IU. II. 1.0 g See sh,tviv A 7.0 1.0 9.0 e.0 E e 1.0 7.S e.0 e.0 tit i 49,19,9 A 1.0 7.0 P.0 9.5 E o 9.0 6.0 e.0 tJ. S waiv I ,t ,19 7 4 A e.0 9.0 18. 10. p 10 49. II. 9.0 ptL 5,8979 A 22. J5. 26 u 29. 2t. 29.
Table A.l . (continued) . .: . LLAb.1UTAL (mlCNU.G/L) 5 A M P 1, I h 4 LUCA 1 1U h 5 I n i A n t- U t bCll AMGl. S32 SJU S'J u 3 A p& l l a.4 Mt Pl.lC At t. S34 e A)t (l. 48. Jas. se,1w79 A
<l. <l. 48. I n
- 2. 2. 2.
ten lj,191w A 3. p 48. 3. 10. d p a se J es ,197 v a 13. 13. O
- 12. W.
n 16. Z. (1. <l. <!. g. Arp 44,8979 A o <l. <l. (l. g J. 5. se a t JJ.1979 A 2. 2. as 2. 3. 2. 3. s 14,1979 A 3. J. 3. 3. g (J J u s. 2, p 3, 4, 3, 03 m 9 J. J. 2. JuL J4,197v A 2. b 12. 3. S. AUt l<,l9#9 a 2. 2. 1. 2.
- 2. J. 2.
si 2. W
- 2. 1. O st l' l '. . s 9 7 9 A b
<l.
1. 1.
- 48. l. 2. g
- 3. 2. 4.
DCI 23.1979 A 5. S. S. g b 5. 1. 2. I 1. I huv 53.1979 A 2. 1. 2. H 2. 2. 2.
<l. g, UtC h.8979 A <l. <l. <l. <l.
o I
Table A.1. (continued) m Abb A hl.St',1U1 A L I M I C H U.G/1.) 9.... 5 anPL1>G LucaT ION 5 5AmPLIhb M EPL I C al t. SJ4 th1ARL DIsCHAHGL 5J2 S30 SJu DA)F JAn 49,897V A lb. 20. it. D 1J. 22. 63. .I 6tp IJ,1v79
- 28. Al. 25 b 15. 27. 29 N
PAk e0,1979 a 14ev. 1500 2bu0 4 H 1900. 1600. 2000. Q Z APH J4,8979 A J00. 290. 450. 420 M
> Jeu. 2700.0 Z
Mal /2,1979 A 270. 2Wu. 230 290. ( H 200. 250. 250. 290. I"* 3= O w J o e. 89,3919 A JSO. 290 310. 130 7 M3 9 330. 380. 300. 130 - JUL 44,1979 A 2600, 18U0. 950 330. E e 2600 BJUU. Abb. J70 Aub 14,1919 A ISO. luo. 220. 150 ) b 200 140. 210. 150 f" W SDF Ikel97W A 140 240. 210 150. g b 150 220. 160. 210. M OCs JS,1979 m 820. IJ0. 110 150. Z es a60. ISu. I30. 150. O E s.U t 18.1979 A tho. 840. 130. 160. W H $90 140 170. 110. OLC 4,9979 A leu. Blo. 94. p 180. 95. 97. D v -.-
a
]
Table A.I. (continued) s.* btLb i e (8 8 A L 4 et I C8 '.G/ l.)
- , a n p 8. ! . t. bu0A T s o se s 5&MFLING HLPL1 Calf g g4 ) h g'a k t 18 t h Cs4 A Hf.P .%JJ $JD $2W UAIL
...................... .................................................................................==*...
Jan 23.1979 A O.57 v.9u v.?S D U.h6 0.98 U.38 FF8 13.1979 A 6.2u <n.1 to.2 e <0.2 v.d4 <b.2 NAM 20,4979 A U.99 u./) 8.J B U.7V U.4% l.J APM 24,9979 A <U2 delh U.J) e u.3J <n.2 v.1v E Z nas sJ,1y?9 u.30 o.68 c.bl ( A o u.Ju <n.7 0.27 y co.2 v.64 < ta . s 0.42 0' S'. O Jun 19,1979 A y 40.4 U.77 <n.2 2.s 2 U.M U.$4 <D.7 0.29 Jilk 24.8979 A 0.39 0.29 cu.2 av.2 8 AUG 84,8979 A u.74 <f.2 es.01 v.78 ):
, 0.96 v.,f es . 8 % 0.S$ f 0.4S 0.2 0.2 0.49 _
8 8.P SW.8979 A U.27 ( 0. 2 0.7) U.27 - 8 M UC1 28,8v79 A I*I **" I** I*' l.S 0.26 0.$5 8.J
- E 0 . 83 9 u.d u.59 0.3p S NOW IJ,8979 A 0.27 0. 8. 6 u.*5 U.27 8
<u.2 <0.2 U.40 UIC 5.1979 A O.21 (0.2 p.94 8
t9
Table A.1. (continued) ZINC,10TAL (MICHU.G/I.) b A > P L1 M c LoCA r3 oh 5 samPI,e>G heFE.lCA76 534 i N1 Aht, + j hCpt ANGk. 5J2 $j0 529 tr al e. JA> 21,1**19 A 2.5 4.1 9.1
,s 0.3 9.s 37. g ttu 11,1979 4 (0.1 2.3 0.9
- J.% 2.0 0.9 MAH Jo,1979 A 200. 250. 2SU. .q p 270. 220 270 O APM 24,8979 A 3W. 26, 38. 'Z H JI. 220. a 46 E Z
mal 22,1979 A 52. 23. JJ. 23 ( e 15. St. 17. 22. 3"" y JUm 19,8979 A St. 30. S4 ,,, O l A e 45. J8. 2m. SS. 2 E l J ul. 44,8979 A 230. 95. 91. J4 .g i b 220. 120. u4 29 ! AHG 14,8979 A 45. 28. 22. 19 ) ) u t9 29. IV. 43 f ; J s t.P se,1979 A s.0 86. 15. 24 O l h tu. 23. 19. 21. O m UCT 43.1479 A 24. IV. 29 14 Z B 19. 19. 24 15. hus 15,1979 A 20. 73. 16. 16 g b 20. 66. 17. 16 bt C S 1979 A JJ. 39, 25. s so. st. AI. a Data suspect; bottom sediment disturbed during sampling.
MAILETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCCNCC' Table A.2. Meteorological conditions _ observed during water quality surveys. l in the Missouri River, near the Cooper Nuclear Station, January l to December 1979. H Wind Air Temperature Relative Cloud l Speed Dry Bulb Wet Bulbs ' Humidity Cover Date Time (mph) Direction ( C) ( C) -(%) (%) 23 Jan 1045 15-25 N 22 32 11 0 13 Feb 1045 0-5 S 26 31 <5 100 20 Mar 1045 8 N 42 39.5 83 20 24 Apr -1105 3-4 SE 63 62 95 100 22 May 1045 5-7 SW 66 61 75 15 17 Jun 1015 10-15 SE 78 72 75 'O 24 Jul 1000 5-10 W 69 69 100 0 15 Aug 1145 10-15 SW 60 62 <5 100 18 Sep 1010 2-5 N 73 66 71 0 23 Oct 930 3-5 N 32 38 <5 0 13 Nov 955 8-10 SW 33 32 93 0 5 Dec 950 20 N 47 45 89 0 t
- i. (
l' i l A-42 ,
r r HAZLEYON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table A.3. Current velocities recorded during water quality surveys in the . Missouri River near the Cooper Nuclear Station, January - December 1979. (meters /second) Location Date 534 Intak Discharge 532 530 528 a _b _b _b 23 Jan - _a _a 13 Feb -a _b _b _a _b _a a -a 20 Mar - 3.0 0.4 j,7 _a 24 Apr -' O.7 0 -a 1.3 -a 22 May 1.4 1.4 0.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 17 Jun 1.9 1.7 0.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 24 Jul 1.2 1.1 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.8 15 Aug 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.1 18 Sep 1.3 1.2 0.5 1.3 1.3 1.8 23 Oct 1.6 1.6 0.6 1.6 1.5 2.0 13 Nov 1.8 1.6 0.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 a 2.0 a 5 Dec 0.8 1.6 a a Location not sampled. River frozen; ne flows taken.
~
A-43
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I APPENDIX B PERIPHYTON
\ )
A-44
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCENCD Table B.l. Periphytic algal taxa Collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,13 June - 20 November 1979. cAClbLAMIOPHYTA ACHNANTHt5 HONY EAlbuA GNUm0s HAUCalAhA V. huhtkA1A schuLZ LAhCLDLA1A bHLH155uh LANCEULATA %. DuntA GNUhua LtmMLHMAhhl Hub 7Lb7 alhuT1551mA nuETZING SPP. AMPHIPnUHA LHHthbERG OkhATA bAILLY EPP. APPHURA EHkENHLNG N0hMAh! HAethHUNST uv4 Lib V. PLDICULUS MutTZING PEHPUSILLA GNUhon vENETA KULTZlhG ASTEH10hELLA HASSALL FOMMOSA HASSALL BACILLARIA GMLLIN PAR *DOXA Ghtblh b1LDULPHIA GHAY LALVIS LNHL*bENG CAL 0mLIS CLEVE BACILLUM (GNUhum) MLHL5CHEUphkY LEmisli PATMICE COCCONEIS EHNEhbENG PEDICULUS EHHLhuthG PLACEhTULA V. EUGLYPTA (LNHLhbENG) CLLVE PLACENTULA V. L1hLA1A (LHNLNbtHG) VAN HLUHK CYCLOTELLA ,, Af0mus HUSTLDT FUTZINGIANA THkAITEb
#ENLGMIhlANA EULT11hG OPERCULATA (AGAHDH) EUETZlhG P5EUDOSTELLIGENA hubfEDT CYMBELLA AGARbH AfflN15 ELLT11hG hlhuTA HIL5L LX hAHLhMONST PHOSTRATA V. AULNsmALD11 (HABN.) H L i r.Y.H blAfumA DE CANDOLLE AnCLPS (LHHLhuthc) Gkuhah VULGAhE BONY FMAGILAMIA L1hGoYL WHEVISThlATA V. IhFLATA (PAhTOC5Ln) HusTFDT CAPUClhA DESMAZILhts CunhTHuths (LMMENbEkG) GHuhua C0n5fHuths V. blNUDIS (EHhLNBLhG) Gkuhuh l Coa 57huths V. VEh1LH (ENHLhbtMG) Ghumba l Ch0TunEN515 EITTON I LLPT05fAUNOh (LHNEmbEhG) hb5TEDT l PimhATA EhMLNDERG VAUCMERIAE (nUETZ1hG)PETLhbth ;
l l A-45 i .
l i HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.1. (Continued) 40kPH0 NEMA AGA>DH At t int kutTZahG AnGUbfATum (kutTZINb) HAbthMUHbT bHACILL LHHLhbtHG Gnuhumil PATMICK 1hSTAbL15 HUNN & HELLtHMAh Ot1VACCUP (LfhGbYL) EULTZ1hG PAHWULUM EUETZ1hG
$UBCLAVATOM GHuh0m SPV.
G1HOSIGMA SCALPH01DLS (H*MEhMUNST) CLLbt MELOSINA AGANDH Amo!GUA (GNUN0m) O. muLLLk GHAhULATA -(tnHEhhtpG) R Abt's ITALICA (LHHLhoLkG) EUE111hG VAH14h5 C.A. AGANDH hAVICULA 80pY ACCom0DA HUSTLDT AHVLNSIS HUSTLOT ATODUS (NAEGEL1) GRUNun m1CONICA PATHICK CAHAL15 PATHICK CAPITATA LHHEhetHG CHYPfuCEPHALA KULTZ1hG CHYPTOCLPHALA V. VLhETA (kUL1Z1NG) GNUhun DECUSSIS OSTHUP EX1GUA V. CAPITATA PATHICE HEUFLERI CHuh0m INTEGHA (b. SH1TH) HALFS LANCLOLATA (AGAhDH) EUETZ1hG LUZONEhSIS HUSTEDT MINIMA GNUN0s minusCULA GHumos muTICA EULTZ1hG MUTICA V. THOPICA HUSTEDT MUTICA W. Uh0ULATA (HILSE) Gkunum h0THA mALLACL PELLICULOSA (bMLBISSch) HILSE PUPULA EutTZING PIGaAFA Mut1Z1hG HAD1054 v. PANVA mALLACt MADIOSA V. TEhELLA (hkEpthbOh) GNUhun MMINCHUCkPHALA EULTZ1hG SALINARUm v'. IN TEk ar.DI A (GHuhoa) CLEvE SLCHETA v. APACULATA PATH!Cn StamETv.CA PATHICk tehtHA HUSTLOT Tn!PuhCTATA (u.f. MULLtH) bOky TH! PUNCTATA V. SCHIZONEmu1Dt.S (VAN MtOHCA)PA v1H100LA (nULTZ1hG) nutillhG t>EhD WAh Hturc Win 10ubA t. AVEhACtA (optbihbon LA Gebhua) VIHIDULA V. HOSitLLA1A ( n u1 Z I h G't ) CLLwE SvP. I A-46
HAZLCTON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.l. (Continued) h!TZ5CH1A' MA55ALL ACICULAH15 m. iMITH ACUTA HU5ftat tMPHiplA GNUNUm AgGUSTATA (n. Sh!TH) GR4Nba APICULA1A (GHEGOHY) Ghuh0m nACATA HUSTEUT CAPITLLLATA MUSTEDT 01551PATA (nUETZlhG) GNUhus D1551PATA V. MEDIA (HAhTZ) CLEVL-GNUNOW t!LIFORMIS (s. 5MITH) MUSTLOT FunTICULA GNUN0s FRU5tuLUM nUETZlhG GMACILIS 4AhfZbCH MURGARICL GRUN0s IGh0hATA nRA556L nUTZINGIANA HILSL L1=EAH15 m. SMITH 0 VAL 15 ARh0TT PALEA (EUETZING) u. dAITH PALEACEA Ghumum PUNCTATA w. SMITH WOMANA GNUN0s SIGNUIDEA (ENHEhBEHG) n. SMITH STAGN0 Hum HaftmHONST SuuCAPITELLATA HUSTEDT SunLINEAHIS HU51EDT THYeL10NELLA V. LEVIDENSIS (s. SM11H) GNUN0m THV8L10NELLA V. SUUSAbihA G :nus THY 8L10hELLA V. VICTORIAE GHunUd SPP. HMOICOSPHENIA GNUN0s CUHVATA (EULTZlhG) GRuhow g NHOPALODIA 0. kULLER GibpA V. VENTRIC04A (EHREhbEhG) GRuaus SPP. SKtLETuMENA GHLWILLE P0fAM05 (eEBER) HA5LE STLPHAN0015CUS ASTRAEA (EHhtmuENG) GkUN0m AdTHAEA V. >1huTULA (EUETZING) Ghuhos HAL*16 Chit GNU 4um thW151TATUS MOMN AND HELLLHMAN mlNUTus GNUh0m EX PLEVE AND MULLLH TEhuIS MUSTEDT bukIMLLLA TUMPim ANGUST4 FUETZ1hG OVALIS BHE81550m SPP. sYhtDNA L H H P. h b t H G ACUS mutTZ1hG PA51CICULA1A (A4AkDM) AU111nu PULCHELLA HALT 3 LA EULTZlhG MumPE%$ AUETLING 1HALA551031MA CLEVE tLUVIA!!LIS MUSTEDT PstuDunAhA (MUST.) HAbwL & HLIMUAL UhlDEnftf!ED CLaTHICS A-47
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.l. (Continued) i CHLOHOPHYTA ACT1hASTHun LACERHLim HANT45tH11 AMEISTMODE5NUS CONDA FALCATUS (CONDA) MALF5 CLADOPHORA RUETZinG GLOMLRATA (L.) KULT'1hG 4 COLLASTHun NALGLLI IN EULTZING mICh0Pokum MALGLLI th A. bHAUh UEDOC0m104 LINK SPP. - uuCYSTIS NAEGELI 1> A. BRAUN I PUSILLA HANSGIRG SPP. bONGE1 SCLNLDE5mus MEYEh AsunDA45 (KIRCH.) CHODAT Dip 0RPHUS (TUMP1h) KUETZ1hG QUADRICAUDA (TUNPIN) mREB1550h . 5?P. SPIRD4fsA L1hK SPP. STIGEOCLONIUM KUETZ1hG FILAMENTS BASAL CELLS UNIDtmt!FIED FILAMENTOUS GRLLN GHitt CUCC010 CHkY5uPH1TA (nkumuL1hA C1thn0sSk1 SPP. CYAhurnr1A CALOTHM11 AGAkbH SvP. LYhGOVA #GARDH ALMudistu-LALPULtA (kut1Z1ht) GCh0ht 01GULT11 G0Munt lh HAM 101 SPP. USCILLAIONIA AuARUH11 GUp0hT SUNSHEVIS SCHm1DLL PHORM101Um EUETZ1hG Ythut (MthtGN1hl) GQMUNT PLLC10mtmA 1hukET NOTATUM SCHMIDLE um!DLatir1ED 8LUL-GdLEh t1LAMLhT OLuL=GRt(h COCCOID h15CELLANEOUS CRIPfum0hAS LHkEbbERG SPP. A-4 8
HA2LETON CNVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCJES Table B.2. Idantif4ation, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,13 June 1979. Location 534 WPAN 0m175 h). A N 09 5 tJ kill.U M k. n.Cun-usu . cr. . A l.nu.n . s s o ..
.47 8;ll.a. AN I OPHV T A q.a.mpno F re e p A,e vilLHm 125MH73. 75.h 16.7 l it . se - a. I I / bCH I A pl$AIPATA illh4b. 14.6 14.H l b . t*
nis/.% HIA P AIJ ACF A 317647 b.S 2.J 2.5 At 086 A's1 lt S L. A *dC > til. A T A 7352'44 4.M 2.h 2.9 4.4'F & Hilm > P A AP.e bST ATism 199999 4.0 hel b.9 f.1 I / .iC#41 A P Al,6 A 1WBil)$. J.H 4.3 4.W M ll P.t A. delle t SCOs$ MjNutil5 l')h470 l.h 1.0 1.1 Area 14.l.t>s *leufts,$1MA lb47pS. 3.3 0.h U.7 a s e e H Aeetlul3CH:n S ta W I AIT A TUS IS2941 J.1 1.2 1.4
- s t /SCH l a stor e s.d. 148tih. 2.9 u.4 u.5
> > 4t.ll.4 W l a CH ea rHistNS v. v b.N T F H 44817 1.9 f . t' 'l.1 ,nvlCubA 8+t lit t. Fee l h/352 3.7 3.H 4.3 e.s eensu.* aia of,1 W eChu u 7 4 5 h le . 1.4 3.u 1. 3
- t. I I /.ht'el l A 18 % A l,18 SWk?4 I.2 0.1 U.S
- I s s. h t .s t A SukC A P i tt;i.l. AT A $ *4 h ? 3 l.7 /.1 2.4 t o. ni. i t. A w l A C a reer t 'a A *Wh73 , l.J 2.4 1.1 kII/bCHIA ACirHtAWIS S *8 H 2 3 1.J l.0 1.1 etis.ArptA S se s. . S a4 M 7 3 1.2 ts . h U.7 C i n e.n i e. t l. A a t et e.H i ta l A = A 4tO5M. l.0 1.5 1.#
t i t t.f e s t i,1, A Ol * > Cul. A T A 35294 U.7 o.2 ts . 2
- e. luiettA e s** l I Cot,4 35244 U.7 p.I u.1 s.a s I CHl. A I llZtret.'t515 352'84 U.7 0.7 u.2 h a v a t ilL A SPP. JS244 U.I Hel U.1 bleen4=nelsrD5 H A'8 7 7.brn i t 15294 U.i H.4 d.4 A' Pulse A f.siesk A ! 24%79 U.5 n.) 0.3 s.orernetw6 m A 1%88 Ant,13 29529 H.S U . ts U.9 h' that.it.AptA v A HCMt P l a t. 25579 U.S 0.5 0.S
...-....,b.A ci .. A n. f i alS24 U.s n.= u.4 1
se l 4 /brHI A A"P48 8 H l 4 21574 U.S 't . 3 57 . 3
- e. A v irul A ACa'temt 1 A ll7h4 U.2 U.D U.1
- t. f i Zaf te l 4 A P lt.til> A1 A Il7h4 U.2 0.1 0 . 18 s e t.eHanotil 6CDs AS l H A). A V, mihuTULA 81764 u.2 n . se U.9
.. a l /dce l a eenkd A h l C A 11764 U.? 1.u 1.1 e96.mtla karts.t.HM i1764 U.2 u.S U.6 ALH.Ae19t3 SPP. 11764 U.2 er.U U.O h i s Zbt:HIA (;Narli t s 11764, u.J 0.2 0.2 = 4 61 r.11,4 vle luus.A v. AVFesACFA 187h4 U./ 7.0 2.2 ee A v lCUL A rh y t1UltPH Al. A 1 1 f f> 4 , 18 . 2 0.2 U.3 A( H e44 t alt 5 F A lbit A 11764 U.? u.O 0.1 A *. I' t h l e t e t t,l.4 t'Ose retlS A 187h4 11 . 2 U.% 0.6 es a v icell,4 f. A >Ce tit. A T A 11764 U.2 u.h U.7 h a t e'n a sop l 8Cu ai estkAtA Il7h4 u.2 7.1 to . O rire 161 Fl.l A P$t til*US1 P Lt.lC.D iv A tilb4 te . 2 U.D U,0 e.o=e tense n e SunCL Av41 pm llih4 U.7 /.y 2.3 t u l A s, et Al ll t. A W itiPH t T A 4hl%27u. 44.9 p5.4 45.0
( s.t.elb ut to V T 4 A( p e.t tT3muh telmowPHP6 94111 1.9 1.5 0.h l L.a l ut es t l F' l > H PILA =Lhipus (;Mtth 795Nh. .4 2.7 J.I poisdfis powGe1 470$w. 8.u u.A u.4 Ask l5 t wnDe s=us P Al.C AlliS 470%M. l.0 ** . e s u.u bi t : 6 pt ann.% Apogpaws 23S29. U.S n.0 0.0-iteral. OploboPu1 A Ju?tSO. b.7 3.7 4.2 lle F Al, Pt.w l pp y yne. 4437h20 100.0 M9.3 100.0 A-49
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCENCB Table B.2. (continued) Discharge \ atAh im i rs se t A r til u u l1Lu p t m!Cwo-4 8 /Lu.C84 % l /Su.tia. inno s' t'l l 6. A w liiPis t l A P. a v i t 'll. A l.tlll. > r s t s 12470$9 15.3 5.h 4 . 11
- 0. a v I t 14 8. A N t a. t I > 6, I 104Ju$M, 12 . Is d ia $ 18 . te a l 't /.SCH I A t'e).e l l Lill. A 97h470, 12.0 2.h 1.3 e t e l e is t. A $e 1 *l150 9 L 4 51647'). 1.1 3.6 3.1
$ 4 l l i ti , t) . h U.S u,$ % a w lt ut. A A l pie n s t.1 s t CI.l. A Pt i 1 I C'il.O." A 44tl76 4.2 U.2 U.2 s i e r e n. i ns > p. e P A w v u l,u n lH S M se 2, J te 4.8 3.5 a.II/hCHIA P A l.* A / te 2 )$ 2. J.5 6.l 5.5 6 . A s. I I. A > l A C A 6'IsC I '* A 224579 2.7 9.I 11 . 0 e.. .r t H U P. 6 > A A t, a,0.N i e l lia 7317h4 2.h h.% 5.b ee l I / .'.C H I A A 8 Ple l ta l A 141lTh. l.I 1.H I.5 i t i t ol t l.L a v36 uosi.s l > l.1,5 Gt e# A liph47, 1.4 0. se u.7 p .e ni. i t- A w l 4 Cei.56kvF.ws V. v t.P 7 t H 117h47 1.4 1.2 1.1 'J B () 5CH I A PAlpartA 94117 3.2 0.7 (p . h .. I e / .sC H I A h o le . h1351. 1.U U.9 U.b >> .ll.A=15 U A uf Ht.k l A t JubMM. u.9 1.4 1.2 . s e r.. A n'.p l sciis m i s u l es 705wh. u.9 u.4 u.4 .s t e s e a s.* o l dC o ?. "As173rull Supp l. o.7 u.h U.5
( s t re e t > 61, A S t .e t t.H l H I AI- A 4 7 0 S If . Ub 1.5 1.8
- e. 4 W l( ul, A A(Cis *a e. A 470%M. U.h U.4 f) . 3
.4 i e e.d C,41 & 4. o 8 ANA 47pSM. U.h u.I U1 ,
- P e a t* A Pse + '* A -s l 4%294 U.I U.5 u.4 4 v j rt'n,4 A 6. u t 'd.s l 5 45494. 4.4 ".1 u.1 si d l Ces s, A (pelloCilHAlA JS/94, u.4 ft. F U . tv A s l ( 181. 4 f 6e l PHP'fi A I A v. ha 112,t s h t.s.lj l D t.$ l$/94, u.4 l.) 1.0 t .i * . e.'s . e > a 1 f 51 A b t. ! % 35494 U.4 1./ 1.1
> > A 4. l l. A ce l a (kiillHet MS I S )$294 O.4 leh 1.4 4 .1t/NCHIA A( I rlit. A h l.% 35294 U.S U.h U.5 .sl66Manesul5Cb3 16.v l 51T Albs 3%794 U.4 U.) U.2 .. .t e t i p 1. 4 &v. 3%/94 U.4 IP . I u.I A s t h i s t '* r t 1, A tubM'SA 2l579 U.S 1.0 U.4 r % 1,e ah t l N 6. A C l l.l H k 25%29 U.s I.U U.9 a 6 eu.h A y>=>1A ? I S J 'a . u.J H.W U.1 11164 U.I 4.0 U.O .oti>let*>*A Ol'lA4HS
- e. t 4 /.. L H I A lat Al.lO llih4 U.I U.O U.U t e d .* e t.1 A " I ve ta l A IIIh4 H.1 0.2 U.2
's .. g t A :$ l e 'S i ld A r.'. > hlH UI A N A 19764 U.1 0.9 4.0 117h4 u.I p.5 U.S e l e / SCH l .. t' ll. I t uh
- l 5 i t , t A l. et A r il.l. A k lorH V T A 70941u1, h7.0 IU7.1 94.7 e 6 5 o-* * 'i s 1 A
.i eit 1 It Ieis e.li r > N 0 0C t.t i l l' 44111h. 4.2 1.4 1.2
- n. s t N t i s d r 6 , 2H13%2 l.5 l.3 1.1 r n l .. a w ol 6 .s = u s t A l r A l p s 215t9 u.I o.u u.u l o t A i, ret opivn gT A h470S7 7.9 1.7 4.3 t g P. . .. e. I 1 A J p..perlota= I t .aur 14 l es S M . 6.u o.H U.1
.e t 18 A t i.p l A e t. A > OH l l $ 2'I4 51. l.D 4.) 3 . t*
i 35/94 u.4 1.4 3.J C A t.o l .sv f a $rt. 4 4 t th t. 5.1 h.1 5.S j l u l A l. C D At s' PHI T A I
, o t A l. I, H,1oh 1.is m i. iou.o ii .. iHU.O A-50
HazLETON ENVmONMENTAL SCIENCES
. Table B.2. '(continued)
Location 532 at A ss UNITS set Aas 141UVlit Umt. selCRU. 8 /5U . C88 t I./ Su. lem . % 1 A n an. har*ls.#,&& la Ph W1 A hatlCHL4 P hl.L I CU LtJS A 15h47pb. 26.7 1.1 1.J tlyh(HIA P AlA A 752941. 12.9 17.0 20.8 plakhrhl4 UthSil'A14 576470 9 . 14 !!.9 14.0 s.s
- 6 hoh m *. A P A w v ubp se Sih470 9.8 7.7 9.1
- s. l l y stu t A pal >ACv4 S U 5 H ie J . W.6 3.S 4.2 f.e *= F H t's. P h 4 Af f;HST A tuas 224529 3.4 6.9 U.!
t.e * = 6 He ih t p A til,I v Art U8' 211764 3 . 8- 11 . 9 'IU.b ,
- e. 4 e l f ul.a nv.t.t l.t a. I th47o5 2.M 1.6 9.0 {
t.f>5' Hah 88Disrteh mihutus 141176 2.4 U.N l.D l 616p pAkistel5COS l.4V1517A7U5 129438. 2.2 1.0 1.2 } satet ite4Fe A tit lAMOS 70$NN. 1.2 U.2 0.5 i cwt l.(,It l.La Fsp ituuSTF t.LIGEN A fuSPN. 1.2 U.5 U.6 ! s.t v irug. A Ave'kUS S M is 2 ) . 1.0 U.S 0.0 A h l t k l a s'.p l.1,4 t i.M ht'5 A 4705H. U.H 2.0 2.) wll/$ CHIA kumAnA 470%. U.M Q.1 U.2 s.ll7hCHIA A Citu t. A W l a 47058 U . t. n.> U.9 te l tl' ht*M I A Sl'kC A PI f tl,1.414 55244 88. h I.3 1.5 t>nt.itAwjA CAPICle,A 35294 4. ts 1.5 1.7 4 e t s tel t i,L A OF P p(H1, AT A J5Jg4 u.h 4.2 U.J C l e t e i t s-L A .t
- t t..e lla l A % A 23529 U.4 0.7 U.9 I til i ght e l 4 a s W A 1. t h 23529 U.4 0.0 0.1 h a . l Cu t, A 1klFUPCTATA V. SCHlZONLMulDFS 23529 U.4 H.8 1
CybettLA Attl%IS 25529 U.4 1.3 1.5 e.. .n s l.aih t m A t h51 Ahlel5 23529 u.4 U.# l.0 t b A s. I I. A h l 4 ( UkS Tkl,thb V. v>hltk 21529 U.4 n.2 U.J n A v lCteta St(W6 ( A v. APICul.ATA IIFh4 U.2 0.2 0,J
= A v i tut,4 1piruhCrATA 197h4 u.2 8.6 1.9 b e at tiv a kiint t ha 117h4 u.2 0.1 p.1 h e e rsCeel s AplCtiL A I A !!?h4 u.2 U.F U.s h a u l tna.4 4tt ainin A 19764 0./ u.U U.1 un s t ros. A pl%1s4 117h4 V.J U.O u.1 As l e t+ A v e se
- 1 A 11764 U.2 0.4 U.5 Hantrn.WH6hlA CerN W AT A Il7h4 b.2 U . If U.9 h i l / bt b l a p ilh l l Cub A Il7h4. U.J U.O U.o N A v lClet,4 S F 65 Il7h4 U./ U.o U.O l
10848. It Al l t.6. A p ittl'M Y T A 5%S292). 94.8 91.0 95.h j i Let ,*ol'p l1 A A N et i b l > 46, $
- t'.% P A1.C Alllh 14117h. 2.4 U.2 U.3 heebtletShut 8liAPhlCAUDA 4JUSW. u.H U.2 U.3 tein A1 Chl.IJ h e sl*** I1 A lHW254 3.2 t' . i U.b I4AhnopVIA te5C ll,6. A l tu l a A L. A h CH i l 94197 l.h 4.H ).b PHesb e l ta l D* I t NI.t 2 9 5 25a . u4 U.o v.ts le.f Al, CIA *DPMVTA Illh4h. 2.0 3.1 3.I 14,14L ttHIPHt?HN $WSHMUS. 140.u H 4 . 8, t u tt . U A-51 s
HAZLETON ENVIRONb1 ENTAL SCIENCES Table B.2. (continued) location 530 f 46AN U ed t f 5 PtAh t+ 1 D Vill,t s m e e l f ee l)* 5 / b') . C M . % I,/ htJ . D M , t
A*' l l e A se l e tvH Y B A i.oal eto #6pA l' A b W H L,H M /4?O5MF. 2I.1 12.9 13.5
- p. I 1/ ht'H I A 41558PA$A 8/J1$O9 14.0 2.s . 6 IU.4 p d t e b e. t: v> ilt f ' u t l u 5 le h / . f.d 32.7 13.0 s i .. 6 su b.t n A A hi. 4ST A f tsM huiM41 t' . F IM.i 1.4 8 l l / hCe6 f A p al.) A %4'7019 b4 12.4 4.9 t w Ai,l t A w l A t*t re 4S i p ist i.5 v. vt%TtN 4l1 f t 4 4.5 4.I lei
' l t r h A h dt. 5,%C PS M g hljl HS tl172%. l.4 l.N U.I wee /htHIA P Al_r Art. A 244117 3.J 2.1 0 . 48 . s t en a s,oo t si l.s t h y l % l T a l t:3 294117. l./ 2.4 0.9 e ti . A e r ot 5 1. A
- t: p oi. A ( A 21 % d b . 2.4 2.4 1.0
..s + to si n. 6 4 1 ++C l. A v A t u a /IShwh. /.4 18*. 9 14.7 r u rt eet r i.e A PSP OlHIS Tt t.l.l Gtif A i11/S4 l.5 p.9 U.4 t 6 I t hr tl l A wi >> A re A I3F/%4 1% u4 U/ ' eat lC'l.A l l ip / i t' t **h l S 137/54 l.S is . h b.J C tll ill > l.l A
- P ' e b H i le l A 8e A VMU l9 1.1 Sol 1./
.1 1/.SCH l 4 tib Al.l h 7444). 0.9 U.J 0. t8 roll'bCe8lA / b r 4* . 7M4)l. u . '8 0.4 ti . 9 >>l.OblPA V A 6. l A d S *t h 71 D.h 14./ 4.b A*.4>>tle Pl1.A t t ete P f '5 A SMh/j. u.h /.5 I.O ..I1/NCHIA 3DHCA5llte.l,AIA S '4 M / l , 0.b 2.0 ne l' sit /htHAA > I I l F I'h >'l h S 'd H 2 I . O.h 2.I l.I . I I / St'u l A t e .', I l Cos. A S M 64 ) 4 d.h H./ 48 . 18 sete* .r e stild( t 3 e4 A *.175CH l j SMp/J. u.h O . P. U./
A-P*owA miw=Ael 19185. .s . 4 u.S v./
,es)3tHl4 t.hACal15 t '# /15 u.4 0.1 n.)
se l l 4>CH I A H H Fe t. A le l ( A l'# /1 % . 'P . 4 6.) 8.3 ( til a t s** A v eil.e; A W F 19/IS. H.4 14.1 S.h re a v l CHl.4 & l l ' P H .% l 'e l l b . u.4 H.O D.O
- e. e l ( til. A 1. A h t t e 'L A I A 3921$. O.4 2.1 U . L' t.i + P tes su t > A t.h At ll.r l'#285, p.4 1.5 0 . t.
e .. . e r ,H a *
- A eil.t v At t um 49/1$. O.4 1,# U./
HIl/SCHlh A s* 6'el l H l 4 34/lS. d.4 0.5 ts .1 t**hilAula C A *' lit l d A 69/15 u.4 1.h U.b
- e. l l / hCu l e w irHl.Apth 19215. U.4 0.7 0.3
.le/drqla h i e.* u l ti> A 146u7 u/ 10.3 4.1 A r
- e A s a n t a 3. A m r t ol, A r A v. huplA 198,07 u.2 0.1 u.0 Soes t a. b l t, A A
- t.HS1 A Svh07 O.2 1.7 U.5 t e r+ > e t. A At>lets 19607 u.1 1.0 U4 e n v i t sit. A Arroviir A l '# h o f . 0.2 0.1 U.3
. . v i i 1. L. A tavpaid&PHA1.4 W, WthtiA 19ho7. ii . / 0.2 0.u
- t. i ...s i.e,A Igol4 1 sho 7 a.t 9.4 u./
r n .. A.1.., s > 4 e e.H A ':t07 U.2 u,1 0.8 lu t AI. Het t i l. AW itiPH V I A 44 '4 b 4 7 5 6 4t.$t 258.o 49.> retorionvta n + 1 i > l l e s t is t.t. t l N risrColo 76.4 91 o.+ u.I u.I g o t Al. cHt.owntH i t A 7 p 4 51 u.4 3.5 u.I i g A s.fiv'il i A p or t= A l p i t.9 69 06 SMM24 H.h H.2 0.0 41s t al. CIAaDPHVIA $ s116 2 9. U.h U.2 U.0 t o t A t, Pr ee l rMI Teig 909 se g l o , tou.n 251.5 lub.u A-52
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.2. (continued)
~ Location 528 r
u t. A h U8elTS h e. A h 1910 V O L.U h t. MICHU= usu.C=. s t.i s u . u = . i 1asseN kaf'll.i. A w lif 9H g 1 A hil/hCHIA filb51 >' A F A 3400000 J1.3 2 tt . H 2 4 . 11 s.t ..m no= > w A P A H y ul.ts H
$29411. II.8 7 . 88 b.U se l l 25CH i # P AIS A 421529 navlCuba wtuel.>pl 9.5 9.h 8.2 141176 7.h I S . te 13.6 M a t PH ahol+ 15Ch.% lh%251TA1US 199999 . lkt' As..Hel5 Cit $ MlmdfU$
4.S l.6 1.4 17b47D. je9 -I.O H.9 se l l / 6t u l A pal > Aft 4 18 7h 37, 2.6 0 . 18 U.i. aP t.ie n.ig *+ a A M.ud i a t uas a l143t pl 4 t i Lit lIN h t $
!!1647 2.6 3.6 1.1 lllh47, 2.h 5.3 4.h 6 h Aails. Aul a Cos S ikert N5 V. W F.fet t k I H 5 M le ? . 2.4 1.1 U.9 - t,s e e r onb o a St.pt 1. A V a ttim 7 95 5m ,
A P. f
- a llis t. I.I. A S uk ast ed A l.h 12.1 10.4 549'73 1.3 2.5 2.1
- 3 01.0 l > I,l,4 mt .et Gh t h l A% 4 47USN. 3.1 1.5 1.3 C t r l .e l l > 8.1. 4 Ob* tsDOS it Lt.j L) N A 4IU$N, 1.1 0.1 UJ viis3rulA 6. star 4 PI T t.l.i.4T A 47pgu. 1.1 utty.M atIA A C I Ct61. A h l M 1.7 1.5 e a v l Ct.g. A fir P .
470%w. 1.1 u.n U.7 470$h. 1.1 U.2 U.1
.e n w i c ul.4 ACCH *ODA 15244 U.M 0.3 U.2 as A d litsl.4 M A f.1 % 4 h is m V. (4lFkPEDIA 35294 U.M l.h 1.4 %Il1.sCHIA Llh>A>IS JS294 U.H W.0 w a d lCHi, A 14 8d( 6 0(. A f 4 h.9 35294 U . te l.9 1.6 .dll'h(nIAt 1,8 W A l,i n 15244 U . t' 'U.O U.0 1 H4 e,shles Ik 1 98t uhuts Ah A 3%J94 U.m u.I U.I i.. . g o n. in * > A est. I n t.C >.b* 24%29 U.S l.U U.9 u t v i s .n.4 hesina 23529 u.S h a v lC el,4 a f si> Ha 4.3 U.A I
21579 U.5 U.o. U.O i,ieteeH.n.t k a shArila 21$29 U.S u.9 U.7 t es .s. a s. A m l 4 t'wo10ht= sis 25S29 U.5 1.1 0.9
- e. i t ysl es i a spe.
24$29 U.S 0.3 U.2 see resanopises 3 16,4015 llih4 Aris' A 1 Np 3 e.a %C*.ni, A T A v. DHHIA U.t 0.5 U.4 Il7h4 0.3 U.O H.0 r e .a nt l.l 4 P>ubikATA V. AutH5mALull Il f h4 U.3 1.2 1.0 se a v i tis L A v i k li,0 6,4 V. A V t:pe ACF A ll7h4 Q.5 2.0 1.I e.a v s l ut.4 a se t t as s i s ll7h4 U.J 4.0 U.0
- h. 61.6 q u a.> ..a P+ s t a mels ll7h4 U.) U.0 0.0
*.a v e rist,a SF C>
- 1 A V. A P I CUI. A T A 11764 D.J 0.2 0.2 havirtal.4 rh y t10CF PH AI. A v. Vt ut TA C t M.b l.1, A AttImlb il7h4 u.) 0.1 U.I
- . lt e'6e 4 8.eu.1;it.4es 451 N A t A W. hlNH1DLA ll7hA. U.) U.6 U.S Il7h4 U.) U.h U.i p e a 't e .* A A t C P > .5 I17h4 H.I 0.2 U.2
- s. l a s.firH I A 6e HkG A d l C 4 197h4 U.S 1.0 0.9
$ 6 5 en a hul'a bCU'i HANT7bCHI! 11764 U.3 U.1 0.1 itel Al. P Af i t.l. Adi til'HY 1 A 4499979 9W.4 lib.I 99.7 i's.ivuorn t r a a
td
- t bt.Asles OlsolkPHus 4705H. 1.1 U.3 U.2 A u fsehop>5=t.3 t'a LC A Tus 23529 U.S u.U U.O lei r A t. C++1.Os.esPH y f A 70$N7 l.h H.) 0.3 total, v>wlynf10% 4470Shb. l u u . et 11h.4 100.0 A-53
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCIZNC33 Tabl.: B.3. Identification, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 July 1979. Location 534 I 4 ,, oeils . A r. .it. v ne.ou
= l L h et* . iso.ch. . . i. J .s . . .. . s 4 's A A 9 4 844('ll.t. Alv $ 61Pel) $ A e.uares s4 r.p. A A* Gust 4 Inh 4h4705. JA.) 11.4 4.n AlIJotula t e h. I llui. A IV9474 l u . Il u.I' (s . J Aa n= A.e l ut.s s. A NCr ist. A1 A 15'e ti t i, n.u l.2 u.4 i..s e.rnum e ,e A P A w d is t.d
- 14tlJf. l.J J.9 3.u n a e llus.4 e.se/use .s t $ 14 tith, f.I 0 . ** u./
M aill( *3.el8e'> *4 t A (10t* v AI A $ h 84 06 2 . 2.9 3.4 3.I wil4bt.ulA nO*Ah4 4l11h. J.I 4.J U.o a t n A s's ar,a
- A I t.u a 19nts 1 l.9 h.J 88 . 9 As st ese A AsunOb lih47 0.4 0.o U . ts (e LCua.t 18 P L AC P. l u t. A v. tHGI.VPIA I1641. d.9 v.5 U.1 i n t l eit e t.t. A 4t ,s.HlhlAhA 11%47 u.9 U.) te . O httLSLHIA A
- 6 n t ee l A l i f e.4 vn u.4 h.!
A *i nisa A l't h e b.s t i.e. A 18164 *n 0. t' O.u n a v itui. A t w i n'ont' 3 41 A V, .sCMllJn t mul 6Jt S tl/h4 u.* 4.9 18. ) A
- 6'Hes= 4 t> mb l A 9 tp aJ ) . u.s uJ U.0
; n e.4 t. l e> a t
- A 601A*OS the3 u.4 0.o u.u m A e l C**s. A re s.L I LilLD5 A 7W4 5 u.* u.u u.u a s t.a ts g r e.g A Aluroo SgM2. u.3 n . ea 0.9 A v 3 Cu t. A misseA 19JA. u.2 p.o - ts . u
.. s e v o A w.n l i.s. L t. a l ntfl us I ght . u.9 0.n u.u t.t.=e e..th e n a A p e l a p 19 a's . v.! u.I u.1 5 4 e l(o t, A t le u.e lC A 3 9 h t. . u.i u.o u.as
(:LI.uttt.t.A u6'e > Cui. A I A 3%hu. u.3 0.n u . t.
.s e t un ua.la nd ahlrht a v. nis.H1HLA 19no. u.1 0.1 u.u afei4A I 4> 8 s. A vCr ol A t A .. liutt l A 19nu. u.I h.h u.u nl14st est A pih.stPAla 19.*4 u.l v.9 U . t*
(
- i. A . t C bl. A SPP. 19hu. 4,1 0.0 U.u t es t 4 s. M At'l Lt. Au lul ul l a likthwo. hn.S 23.S F . is t'les ei> e#6'n y e A
.i s i t.6 8 'C o.ssa lien Plt.AnthTh IJ4411 h.1 4.5 U . as t e. Ai.ne .e sw a e.g.u *6. A1 A 9Jlgh. 4.o JPU.9 90.u hi t t.e ut i.iew t o= p a b 4 L t & t.t.N $1448. 2.7 Jh u.u .se e.# e .se shus Aetai%ts a na 1960 u.I U.u u.9 A4 e l5 8 wape :.*D5 FAlLAIHN twhu. u.I u.o es . u i t s s' 4 8 Cut-us40t H V T A 7 7 6e 4 J ee . 14.0 7th.u vl.)
4 y awe.l 61 i A 4.1 t.to A I,Ia.ut i I I lu197I. I4.) 1.0 p.J tsat.11,l. A t ren 1 A stui teet t e 15 4 5 u 9 es . J.t 0.h D.J , 4 4,1 A 6 O s A s.t l*P f l A 149019 17.5 l.h O.5 l u l a t. P F 6* l PM i llin 149713). Suu.0 jul.l Lud.O i l A-54 1 l l _ . - - - . - _ - . _ _ . . - -~
r MAILETON ENVIRONMENTAL SC8ENCES Table B.3. (continued) Discharge at Ah UhlT3 P t A's H j tivisbum*.
#4 j ( kt)++
ei5n.C ; s nasu.on. s 1 AIflea H AC j 6,#,, AM illP H I I A n A v itui. A 1.IsEb9t aS L S 147h470 40.3 h.S 13.3 hil(5 CHIA t t aa l lCul, A 1 IJ $54 J.h 0.4 0.9 C e t t.u l e.l.a. A
- t,'et e;H 14 B A N A 124S29 3.4 0.9 3.4 r = A s. I I. A > l A nuevidfselAIA v. j h t i, A T A 4 l0541. /.I 1. '8 Jet
- e. A e lCest. A l>ltishCIAEA W. bCh i t.8814t MulOhb 'JS D N 2. 1.5 4.5 8.4 billbCHIA PALLA 4511b. 1.1 0.h ,1. 2
.se t.l t l u%).m A l'6#1 A MOS Jh2th. l.0 4.2 U4
( T L s o l't l,L A AleMb5 34215. l.o u.) 9.6 mil /SCHIA pHPAaA */ U h b . U.e 0.1 U.J t das. l a. Aw l a (tstah l kbt.*S 17647 u.S u1 u.J A v l Ce' t,4 HICe, lCA leiuS. u.4 v.0 E8. 2 s.. .. p ev e t m A r A s. v ef Lum 14Fo5 u., p.3 u.b t.. .* e o.c am e n A .Nis nC4. A W A llt'. 118h4 0.8 1.U l.9
- l. r t e.u l t i l, A let t NCbt. A1 A ll7h4 U.3 U.S D.I h i l t.ht n t A A84*Hi bl A st M 21 48 . 4 t) . I te . b h Fe l'H Averte,I.st od a l k u l lJ M 44eJ. o.2 U . s8 88 . 1 g a t i L *el. A CH V l I tJL t.Pn A L A 44*41 9.2 U.! 48 . 2 4t H'. A s 1.f t.a I; A lt.H A Shhl. u.2 48 . 1 01
. A e l Cut, A Sep. SmH/. u./ U.o si . u
( s L t. ell t LL. A Ch> Ill/H.516.[,1,l t.t.W A /94). O.o d.0 0.0 e.s v l C ul. A ABUNUS 2941. U . .e u.4 4.0 1, 4 8 e s..,1,5 s.t .j Si l J '# 4 3 u . es u.J to . t>
;. i t l'd. A sea sl# I 6C b.4 ASINAtA v. uth01ULA 2948. o . 6e O.J 48 . 3 a v l( OI. A et PNA 2941. d . e8 4 . 18 9.D se A e t ( d L A P i m i se A gygl. u.u (s . u Oo h i t e'et a m.)H i bCUS .8 4 4 f ZhCle l l 1948. u.u 0.0 u.a ' h l l L50pe t A I)V a l.15 1941. U.o 0.0 0.4 f ee Al, A55 I ts5 t ** A # 6ts t ! A T il.l b 2948. U.o 0.4 0.9 (4. A L A % lita l h a p$t t,Ishe. A se A 794). u.0 4.9 U.O a p e.ub l > A i s ALig' A f991. o.o 0.2 U.4 f t14 AI. H A C il.a. An t hPH T T A 2tSNbl2, % V . es 89.) 39.4 l l
L'Hl.la.UPH f 8 A A un t h i'N41st S915 PAG.CAIHb 2945, l' . O D.4 U.u ot e.e.t.lat 5sallh .% O P . 2941. 0.9 U.O U.o f u l A 1, C HLU6.QPHI T A $NH2 U.2 d.u U.O (' V Af.09 4 i e A
< 0. e ..t.h q A a tp ut.I t > U=C A p pul4 A 60SNH2. Ih.S 12.0 24.S t,9 %.p T A s* l eiot.T i l 4hl7h4 Id.h I.5 3.0 e al.e e l H> l a .Ne'6 4 0tf D 2 3. 11.4 lb.8 12.9 es.% II,6. A l tak t e hu r ts p p. v l 3 20 $ N 16 U.= U.) U.h s u l A s. Cf Ant >Ph v l A 14970%7 iu.9 29.h n9.5 s ee s A.. PtmaPallum Anbl7St. luu.o 4N.# leu.u A-55
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.3. (continued) location 530 t
- t. A > uults >>.A+ p l o v ul.it > >
.n o= . / .% a . C . . = i./ s.> . n . . s 5 m At# e P A f'l l 3. A > 4 t svu y 1 A t.e.= 6 ut e r > f A
- 4 pol A 1 tem IlShkh. 15.1 7.P I.I
- s. '=, n. en e t a P a w t ui.u.e 7.47254, ll.n 4.9 t, .
- i p u t t es. A . s e t e . s t a. Ib 9hule. dea U.4 U.0
.. i l /. h t H I A t e+ 3 8 ( sel.a 7450%. J.7 u./ U . 48 e t F
- A 4 I n t.o 1.s.#.L e t il. A 1 A 7 u b li b . J.5 is . 's u.b w..e . l t shrn *
- f A ( up v n1 A 49147, 4.1 4.h U.4 e i t /he'Hl A h e r* A A A 44317 J.! u./ U.o n i s / M es l a A*Pul ti k gillh. 4.u 1.3 0.4 h a s t ( 'It. 4 l h !) ht t'1 A 1 A V. tru t k linet mullJP h 14tu?. 1. ts 1.4 u/
., A v l C'e l. A A l ue* uN l i e. 4 7 u.w 0.0 0.9 e t L e u t e t t. A * > = t e.H i e l A '# A l i ti 41 u.9 o . .I u . ts e ot t ie de l a. P t A L't ro l u t, A W. t ilbl.V P1 A Illh4 O.b 0.1 u.4 i.e m en. it '
- F A ..h sa t i.a W A t t. . JH43, u.4 p.h U.!
At p ~ A e l * > .%
- A l hel A IH4j. u.4 u . ') u t" N A e lt ut. A 4 8 tma ing). u.4 u.O u.O
- e. A w l C 14 4 5 6 f.s. l till.tsh A 7p4s. u.l .i . ie 0,0 h A b B (. " 4 4 > s t l ut t 6'h Al. A 39/1. V./ u . '8 U.u AIi/h(niA pAe6A(rA 39)I, es J u.h u.u t.s e d i's,. s = 0 d a t.b l8'.s is t i lif f t . 0.2 u.l u.o
. A v 4 4 u s. A st e. 39ys, u./ a.u n.u
- . e t e'ee a r el e l bru S ASfkAtA W Mihli l le [, A 19 Aen, u.) H.i ts.u t i t s.0 i e 4.1.a 0 5 > 9 00.4s t e.t. I t,t ** A 19nv. v.I u,u n.u H i tated t.V'e l A l. A P W l h [ 9 P. u . u. II.) 2.I A t' n .. . . l ai t ?. MAuthlAha V. en 85 t h A '( A 19 t.u , op g u,y 4 tp A*>uuna P6 h e b t. l L I. 4 10o0, u.1 u.u u . t.
- c. l I s. ares l A wa l.> A 14%u. O.1 H.u n.u se 1 i t hCet I A t i t I t s illa t h 19hu. u.I t' . 2 u.u 8
. A t i t . 6 4. A te t t ene ll' A l '# a u . u.3 0.0 u.u A . l'eu en A v > ne l A 19hu. u.1 ts . e s u.u s i l / .'sC u l A utboIP4fA 19mu. u.I u.u u.u a ftlistel.l,A - a t # P' O h 19 h te , u.I D . 87 u.J f t. t Al. te At i t.i Ald llet u t F A lu56M4h. 5 2. t5 13.3 S . 14 Chi.t.e t h're i f a d e li 6. iCI.un t u m M A 3 A s, t e s,13 19%u7h. 9 . si ** 1 1.7
- c. s . . . .u . .e . 6. A i.l.ps e.H A t A 1 h o s '# / , 9.o Slu.3 94.b d e a t e M l.i.e l ua t I I. A it e. To luS*H. 3.5 1.1 0.e i , u 1 & s e .4.. . e t t e.f ruki.> 1921. u.1 0.1 n.u
- u. .( v 2. s i s u ten t l.l. A 19hu. O.1 l) . u 4.9 e n t as, t us.s tk uPn y1 A 45J919 /J.S S4L.4 43.9 i C y A s.os ov i A
- 1. . ..i.n s a op.ut1i8 4 '# e.u 14 a s. 7 4.8 p.3 1
totAh ova %htHflA $wo u l e. . /s.1 1.h U.s
- 6 si > l.1 A .> s u.%
t h v e l . id b* A ,% $8 P. 89/3 o.J ') .1 U.O t t. l a l, a l at' e t,s = n t hu;. 99Ja. u.4 ".1 L'. I t # l A l. rt i. I Ph i lith /uu97k4 100.4 $ 7 ti . 4 100.0 A-56
A MAILETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCENCED Table B.3. (continued) Location 532 es 6 A ss 116. B TS F t. A h te t ilW ttL'skt alC u-eisu.tm. s I.i.%u.u . s I a 44) e i At'I s.l. Ast ltippe f T A aAvitui.4 eMilOhCIATA W. SCHl10s.tmulDL$ leiegt?. Ju.e 1u.9 Jh,1 A .a r au p* A ventla 4.e d u i . 14.4 1.o es . 4 I l t.ht'ee l n t e es r t l'lif. A J i te h5 f.2 0.1 u.= t.um 6 pu t.e A Ahe.ust A ruk i n *sg i . J.9 ts . 5 J.J. 8 l t a.u l t f l. A a t h e e.M i g l A fd 4 11541. 2.M t' . / 1.5
- e. I I /,3 ret l A ' re.= A n a 124Sk. 2.n 8: . 0 0.5 N a
- l rui, A 1.s t / f a # t. % 15 ll9th. J.5 H.! D.4 81thCHIA pl5.%IPalA FSu3. l.h u.I 3.4 m i s /Sret e A Pal.r A 7041. 1.$ 0.5 u.I
** l l s.SCee 3 4 A*6HlHIA 7041 1.5 ne/ l.h be t t e tirs> p A P.f'l A 6enh fuel. l.5 U.4 U.S 6 elo .eu*.6.se A F A P W Hl O bl %4lh. 3.1 O.I es . H N A v l(est.4 ot t.t.l CbbeeS A kJt). u . '8 fl . 0 88. V a v s tbl,4 p i riste l C A 3749 d.# fi . U n.1 4 s (l l e l.l. A Alt'kdb 7 7 t. h . u . f. ft.u 4.8 .e m u l us t, A e'k W P l ot > PH Al. A /thh, u.1 0.0 u.J n t p e. A .. B u t.b b e' P . / l h e, . u.1 U.4 u3 A t si e A .. s i.e .3 L. A *Cr ut. A T A /thh, u.4 es . u u.I > > Au f l. A 8 4 4 ( L ...% I n d t h b 2thh. u.4 u.U u.8 .. e ,1 r.,1,4 ASumus I t,14 es . I se.u u.o r.si e s C6a,4 APP. Ib24 u.! te . u v.o t e. n e. I I. A n j A v A pC**t w l A t I ts w J . es . 2 u.u u.3 C t Cl.el1 P I.L A e 6
- MLde.4 F A los1 v./ ts . O u.o a A e f( 08 4 wAlLuSA W. S t.h r 1.1.4 luhJ. u.J t. . e3 p.H h a v l C6sg.a A p e sa t.1 m l L A lues, v.J u.u u.5 uAvetuba esellCA v. TruPILA lith i . u.J se . u *s . 4 s.Ada(dLA st=lMA lod). V.4 u.o o.v a t M 'e A '.1 " e t. > > l t.4 A $41. O.1 4.u O . t#
- s. nee'61ut tm A Abt.Cl. A W ATDa $41 d.1 n.o u.J vou n.he a A A t
- l a r. Sol. e.1 te.u u.h h i t PH Ahlsta lhCO3 A$ 19t A L A W. M l ls D T h L A S41. u.! 4.0 u.J m i llbt' ell A t e v a l. l b S41 U.! 0.u u.h r V p M e l.h 4 At>$4th S.41. O.1 al . H u./
Lelut.488)les* CtwawlCS 541. O.1 0.u u.O
- t. t t f et i t t.l. A Pb> Uutsh (tLt.lGLMA %41, tf .1 vO u.0 In t AI. stat i t,a, A m itit tell A IS$3nh. 73.5 33.9 97.1 tlHl.tte llt' te f l A ~
dC r it..itMa p.% bFP.
$41. 4.1 U . ts u.l lul AB. (*>'t.ukuPH) 1 A S4]. u.! u.u 88 . 8 FI A mi.Fe t i A O f te.H W A is it.H6 t i l i t 7 / et te . 20.3 u.4 4.9 l u l al, t i A 98.Ptif l A 427/148i. 2n.) 48 . 4 J.V lis t AI. Ft p l e' H s i uk 4 kill 5 t ou.te 94.3 luo.u I
A-57
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIL'NCO Table 8.3. (continued) location 528 l i e t. A es liq l l'$ s t A .e H l u v u t.u m e M 3 C as u= e / fs.s . f' r . g 1./ MJ . l >M . % iAtoa ? M A t i l I. A 6. li s t'es t l a Pu./
- e. a v it ul,4 g o. ll Jht t a l A d. dCu l / use t
- h l l h t e, . 4 3. .n 4$./
l /14 's u . h ** 1. *r 4.4 t ee ab l 6. A 31 a e.> e. e l te l p l e 1 A v. l a t i. A S M S. 2 ) , 4.1 u.9 l . t> ( i t s.is t e . :, A -t .l on t il A .a 49019 l.4 u.4 u.1 a e..at lat a i A .r t i,1. A 1 A 17254 J . e, u.H l.4 i,u = 6 u .f . , 4 s* A w t i' La s
- p. 4 e i t e.a. , I u s.s , .t s.3 4 3 3 5 4 *e 4 1.3 u./ u.J AlJ#2 J.J u./ u.I t m .iu l e a l a ( u = s t h o t.i. F.
a r m 6- 4 were1A '4411. s 2.1 0.h 8.1 i,. n.r ee s . e a A se t.o. lib l 41 u p /l$/4 l.u u.n 8.u
- ,s e t-t s o .t . A f u l a mi,s glShn, 1.5 p.I u./
h s. e l Cul A a t. , I1715 l.o u.u u.o
;,16 6 n A %uu s .. Cess a l .u l u.4 ellh4 u.h u.l u.J 11lb4 u.n 0.u u . 6, se l l /aCu t e t ie .l ll uL A u.u n o it ut.a e e t.L l t ut,ub A Bllhe, ts . n El . u =li/5tuIA SPI . I1764, u . .e u.t U.S 9 te t e j . u,I u,j u , P. .. s a /,M c I a #.IHluj&
- e. e s / taf'te l A b liet a 'e A 9 m u l, u.7 H.S u.I a l a /.oC a t A 8 Al e A fn4J. u.3 u.) 0.4 a fi t l# s e t Le ul>>Lht,AfA In41. v.5 't . ss u.n a u t i.t. s e. . i. a plu uh in 4 3. uS u.I u.s
.,a e l uu. A 6Auso A v. I t e.e L t. A SnwJ. u.t u.o u1 u, I s.es . e t l e.n C t e > 1 t s %nwt. u, .s a u.o $4.=2. u.e u./ u.I
( ut rel .t l3 el Ace s ta l.e v. t ut.l.l P1 A u., u./
.4vituba t p s e is Ct.e uel.4 Seng, u.i sah4 u.t u.5 v.4 n l I /. A C e l e li s .3:.16' a i a n a v lC u e.a e 1 e l e. A $9/3. u.I vu u.o 1929 0.3 u./ u.,
s t.u s t uhs nt h i a Cut < v a t a et ie= A
- s ut r. p a l t;n A Ignu. u.I u.o u . t. '
lwhu. d.I u.I u.I i..w e ,s. . e e A e.> UI.o* I I
. i t en.4He,l M esa 1 v i h i t a ll..s 89hu. u.l u.o v.t p>nni, suis 6 l:et Al a 19au. u.I u.o 0.1 APo.. l e s. .,' u s i l . s, a 19nu. u.I n.H u.o h A t i t s e t. % > 4 4 ' l l ',. A v. l' A p v A tyhu, 0.8 H.se u.u $ 9 t. u . u.) u.! u.4 e m e ll at.es 1. A
- t e t tl.a l A 19hu. u.I o.I u.n i.oal H.% e r A A t e i .t hI a / bltoI n a..s.d 5 l A I a l 95.u . u.I u.u u . 88
,58 b te l 88 t fod t h 19hu. Hel u.I 43 . 2 Ale /btHlA l u s Al. ta p a l l l. A h l ut D* t l A 1892194 M9.% 5).9 9 5. e5 tutokt. Phi 1a 383;/. f.4 3.h J.>
3 s t s.t ut 1.4.s t i.t tadnL t p t,i,3 d i t s.t ut t,e e r. l u e t I L A se t.u l h 15 bun. 4.1 u.s u5 4lu%=. J.I 1.9 3.J lu t Al. t'ni usu.6 H V B 1 Cyat.ePuIBA
- 4. v ie t.u t A u t a.ut i l l I n st / t g . I S. ) u.m 1.1
(~ t A n{.p'u V T A lad /45 15.2 te . h 1.1 lu t Al. j u l AI. l t W I Pu t luia 1l/7177 luu.o gh 3 luu.o A-58
HAELETON CNVIRONMENTAL. EC0ENCES Table B.4. Identification, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 August 1979. Location 534 g t. A N d.stf3 mt Am HlHVtal,le> A n i t b e ta e /t.is .Ca . A 1./ Sea . im . 6 B A stah es&f* ll l.4 N litPHI T A e.up e H'en e = A As.t.ss5T A t ttp %70Shb. I J . es le .1 lete u l i d..%C H f 4 t e n.18 Cue, A 314 7p* . se . ) 1.) U.4 unuttuseheuta conva1A 149117 ei . ** 19.7 *> . o
= A v s traba luf60Ncts A v . sch t goht.mu1Dt.5 es t e,4 ) , l.1 e./ 1.4 t,ohPe.u :na PAkvoLum bus / s. 1.o 1.4 u.5 m i ll.hC it t a AatHlhl4 4994. l.6 3 . te u.A C ttlesut la >* le f t Hl.I*S 470%s. 1.2 %.4 J.V se t s /.ht n t A p.e= A A 47u$s. s.J 0.J 0.9 Arne a.e l n) .4 f.a f;t in. A F A 24411 u.s u.J U.D s ees tte*P lh Pi. ACr u ldLA v. t.uGl.tPTA /ubMh. Q.3 u.4 U.! .e a v l ChlA e,U 'enet a.i t h 17h47 u.4 0.u b . ta e f a's.o t r e.l. A = > % > s..v i u l A % s lletJ. 9.5 U./ u.o A* PateW A b t l.* l a .
197h4 O.3 0.2 U . I' staan.pLv.lla t. A P.w i s Shul, e, . J 57.4 17.9
- h. e t.t l u .e
- A 6o14%us S u ss ) . u.2 u.u v.C t v t Lu s t.a.s.a *,Pt ht ill,4 Y A 54h/. 0.2 0.0 u.u o.v it ut.4 haco (C4 2941. se . o it . u v.o es a v i tist. A PeWeel. A J ') 4 ) . u.d u.7 0.1 C e t t.ill e 4 4. A vb> t.t'US T P t.l. t v.t W A 1946. o.o u.u Qu t.V ee na l t.
- A .it A L.vw u t D* o 24*l. v . t. u.6 u.J a *vHus. A P t h P4-d il.I, A 1448 's . u fe . tl D.8 6 p .e Ai. ll A s. 8 A Cas ts1 put.m6 v . H i relaulb 1945 u.o it . se 0.9 se a k ituba w n s t CkoC6 FH al, A 1943. o.a it .1 0.o ml14,5CHla pal.P.AC6 A 2441 V.4 b.0 O.u ty pe r we be e,m A t.uACibe 1941. u.9 es . *. U.2 4 e.i6 poneE 4 se+e u =He t i 2948. d.o u.o ts . te 4.s t vHe s= >:p A $uRCLAWAtpe 2941. U.0 0.8 U.!
hlitalHIA Son L l = e.aw a b 2941. v.d u.J 0.1 4; V t e.u l t l.l. A A lomead 2941 u.0 0.o te . u lulAh partl.I.ANIHPHTTA ISUJ9)l. 14.* 43.7 11.6 Cel.us.0PM f f a s i l 6t e *Ct.,te e
. l u b t il.4mthTb JU5ck2. 4.5 4.9 1.1 C l. Ai'a u H.ts. A e.Loast M 4 g a l u si 4 / l . 2.9 Int.9 hl.a I d i l ut or t.t h l op at a h a l, C D.s,l.5 41176 4.1 7.9 U.h I dCt,;.r t.t thus wij Aun IC Auli4 1948 o.u u.I u.I lu t a s, Cut,iant'en g t A 45RhJ2. v.5 IM9.3 64.J C 3 amitPHI i A
- s. t .**.se t A 181646 t i l IS744tl. 41.9 4.n 1.b s.v t.b y 4 A P %ssb i tst H=C A t kdl.6 A lefm/jS. 5.u 4.2 1.4 e s.%t,, l L4. A l t sk i a AG %I'It t i Ib e ite. J.O 1.5 is . 4 t' A L,,s t hh l A LFP. b4fo%. 1.7 I.h 9.5 lul Al. CIA 4HPMetA I g u s te 2 8. Su.h *3.4 3.9 lul A L l't.W I Pn f sIIN 37Io%74. luU.o 294.1 IUU.O A-59
I l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCENCZ'] Table B.4. (continued) Discharge
* > A t. 11. I FM M f '. Gi l l . b ill.it P. P e I C aill=
g / hia . C ta . % 1. / !.*J . 83 '8 %
,p i A a e t 'a ta AC 11.E.4 > lle6'at V I A
- 4. a , s c a l. A l o s s. sp is.t e $ t r34 5 p 9 tt , 31.2 f.f 13.1
- r. A y I ( + s t . a Iw16u=t.1alA V. $C et l Z e u.t n u l l,t..s 519ul. 1.1 J.4 5.i e; s i. I e s e r_ e.l A > e = t t.e* 1 a.1 A s. A / 14 ')" . 58. h O.I Deb i,. i. e .e s . . . a s p u n g,i.e-. / 4 S ? 's . o . 's H.h I.u t = ai. ll a n t e t > e v i;. l e I n t A v. la.6LalA 1 ** *. " 1 u.s u.4 U.7
. I e / .4 r4 i A 6 Aa.e e Iiind. u./ u.t is . 4 I I ,305. e a ei e At A 3Ithe. u./ u.I b.6 qe e . . . I e , A '. I A f t e t a v..e 4.% 8 s 7H49. u./ 1.l . t e e u A M et t s M t S e ne 17 f.t ee l l th4). ** . / 0.8 0.1 nee d. .W ei l a p i a . l l t.o'.4 Fe4). te . / u.h U.!
( e t t e s t e l t.a e16 kt'est a l A 69/l. u.o u.u u . se
, a . i t iin. a a t t 8,.o0 4 49/l. o.n 4.0 u.o . 4 a / ..t n l A A t i t. as t. A ne l b l9/1. u.u u.4 4.1 .. s e 6 a n .i't,l e.f u % A h l e= A D A W. =lNblULA 49/l. ".o u.5 n.>
- e 8.. h a s. 4 a.> a .. u ?.4 e a 49/I. u.u oi v.4 e .d e e. i t A = 14 t t *.a l ee v > P .s 19/1 te . H 0.9 e s .1 t o t A l. hasfl.LAmit4HIBA 114*thW. 64./ 14.I 14.4
( HI 14 60,6 n I i 4 st l .. . .t Jo m o.s til w ow t Hta b 09/l. it . o es .1 U.n li s l AI. ( las t. bis & n f t e 49/8. u.o u.8 U.u (' y a nne.e e e A tal.ulHwil h 6 t' . l i ts / l G S . /4.5 SS.9 **.h I. p .e f a 8- li.l t i I i i145u9h. /f.J 1.9 te . n uwl Dr .. I I e l o s, a l .u t - t.h t. p h LiiCi tslu f/9411. h.7 J.9 5.0 1, e m t.t* I A A * > ut. l = > Ii*L A 6 5 0 l > A 4ID58 l.o 1.u 1.e 4.ht i s,6, A t ilw l 4 ' A t. A b i H i t 295A9 u . *J U.t 0 . 'D si.l A s. r e n . tern t ra .t / v i s e l . **.m 44.5 75.5 495?9 4t , tou.o S h . se l u u , t, tu r a s. F t k l e' ** v a i N
)
A-60 (
7 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.4. (continued) location 532 ut an Uml15 M F A re tellivol ukt. Icho.
./su.c . s l e.%u . i. . i 8 14 A ,.. *4 A ( l 1.s. A te ll'I'te a 4 A Apelfiel,A t h il u'.L f A I A V. blit t lDN L # tillit 5 9 9 8. b i h . I le . S hl.2 6.6 s,t a'l Hlirs b esA 4 A n s til.pm th4JtJ. f./ 4. .e f.u A > Pseu . A t & r.e l a s
illh47 S.9 h.? U.7 h t t / 5CH l a D Ufe l llbi,a 2%Awul. 4.J 1.1 0.1 i.o m p et % > > A A S t.I'$ l A f b m 14%uww. J.i J.4 u.J e.1 f t hL H l 4 W e s
- A s. A 4 35 u l9 1.4 u.h U.I h A D I ti l l. A 1,u /.i. .e a 5 3 5 9 lit 7 1.H D.5 0.8 r i t e.u l t t,L A tehtGHthlAAA 23529 u.4 u.3 u.y alltoLHIA t al e A 19 6 u ^# . U.4 U.4 88 . '8 m i t thlee s A A*>ninIA I S t. n h . v.J h.3 U.0 a t h
- A s t h >. .% t. A.C> ol. A1 A 35bec. u.3 u.I b.u t oti ts t id Pt.40 6 % f t.L A V, t ut.l.f i l A 15 bah, u.) 0.9 u . t>
4 t it vL A > l( i.h t ( A llib4 H.~/ U if U.O k o t irall. A > H t hCbbCP P14 Al A 70s4 5 u.) se . 4 te.t:
*AtlCHLA s l ie l .* ? /H43, h.1 u.U E1. D L e t' t.Il l > l.1 A l'h* b )Dh1 P a l. l G& l' A in44 L, . 3 b . 83 b.u l.4f/SCHIA Id.nhb A1 A f le 4 ) , u.1 p.2 at . I
- p. a b s t. u l . A t h l 6 8 44 t.t H a l A Fe4 4 u.1 1.u u . t.
u n A
- I n. 8 . A lt O A isis, 9.1 e.. o u.o t ell eil t s.t A t 'l > > C as t, A T A 7his. te .1 h . 88 U . a*
d e r re a iet,l hl t h 3* l .e b i le S JM4). u.I u.h v.h p o r t. i t A w l a ro'ah l h ott.. th43 u.) 6.9 U.b m> Lo' f w A t.> A s. O l, A B A jv/l. p . es p.4 U.u
= A v illet. A ed A ss i t *A A U. 16 h > Lt. A 4971. u.D U.O b.u dit PieAhiehlhti.% A b l 6f a t A u. sa l h es i tal. A Jytt, u.o u.S u.!
na v lt ol. A A:opub 4979. u.o p.u u.o A PHu=A o v A l. ) .9 v. Pe l lCUL.dS 8428 U . ti u.u o -# ielIlhCHIA 4 al L Al t. A 3921. u.h d.u b.o 1 H f Al. 4444$LI % Ihl'l'dIA 24Nh/m4 4p.) 15 4 . 4 9.'/ t '6 1.l e* 06 ed i 1 A e6 I k teu t h A hti . S h u te n ) . v.S 1 1 % . e, n k . a. blie.&ueIta lv* t i l. A d 6 h T *6 18112$. 5.s f5 b.n
.. e i t. r i et t .t .* l t. > M a li A l. t t 8.8..% SPw/3. l.1 1.J an.4 M t F t.ht %=8 5 b 6'6 . 69/l. u." u.o u.u i t' I 4 8. ( bl.t ab OPN B 1 A *s k h 4 7 2 Jh.5 4/6.4 6.1. 7
( l m e.e 6 r. fA
- 1. s .. .. t t A D i q.ht I l l l i t. O l > 4 I? m %.I h.h g, e me.e. s A A e wlet. a t.t ti-t. A t le til t.a le s 3 3 9. s. 4 4.1 b . at D.' L ll i. A l tie l d Ahapt'H i t 549(,1. S e t' h.M u.o itsl Al (' g a s.g p n g i n 19999934, St,) lo,o 1.6 l u f A l. l' DJ I Pt. e a l'l* Sills 44 l uu . I' '# su . qe I O u .ti
)
A-Ci
HAZLETON ENVCONMENTAL CCCNCE] Table B.4 (continued) location 530 eq t A re en lt h htAh fil u v ul.14 M t lCret= e/bu e rP. 4 L / 5 J . U *8 1 1 mane P e r j i ., A b t u& n t i e O f5 t.s e
- O H L t t
- A S he,D51 % J up M l H '3 M W . 1 / . 85 $ 4 . f*
e,e .it .so . p A 6 A> v6 4. nest 1 7 / *> 4 9. J . 'J 4./ O./ p ot s t o.it'er s. t A (uheA1A l b l ta k er . 1. *i 8* .1 u.A 30 0t i g g.h t e8(s l ut.b b/Il$. u.4 j.9 u.s
.eav6CHLA t e ll uset l A l a d.
t.u
$wMsJ. p.w l.1 s;ot t eiet I b r e A t t e. l H L A V. t.ut.l I F I A /$44u. as . 4 U./ U.o At sh8 A a l eet h L A fst i tsl. A l A es . p a.1 1/.ht H l A t e % ) ll tet, A '/ lb / 98, ee 4 t e .1 .'.ne Ht l, A v A l um 4 5fi esh . u./ l.h b.O
- t. o* e os ta t e n U.u 197/%, u.? 9.9 re l l /..sl.n l d A
- 6 H l 'i l A C a t e 1 161 I. A s t a t t.H l ee l A h 4 lllh4 48. / u.) U.H l ee t ) , e. 1 H9 4.b h 4 P 6 H AF'*b I M tsh
- l h H 1115 i .e . 4 e e.* o. t .e a e . . .l> o. l j % h ei / . ...o I, . / u . a.
39/1. o.1 U.% 0 . 88 ( t ( t t sf.t I b 6
- 4 f t H 4 b *i
^
4421- 8t .1 u.b u.o
.. I i lht o 8 I & A 4
- ACt A e, . o A
- l' N' H' A et 9* l a g,jl. ii . a U.er
- s ni ei 6 an A ap e l t l ie , o . s . t. o . .e u . de t..
19hu. u.p jl.h u.e niin tti.) n t A 3ArWih e 9.0
.e P o l Cul. A p l+; ts 4 :CA 19hD. U.u D.o 196u. u.u u." u.u #4 4 b e f i.e. A .sl**elal0A .. l s t br e* I A I Ok eiPA1A 19Av. u.o u.l O.0 w t. w l l; n i. A t h s l ot;t vet A L. A l9mt. d.o u.o u.e ,( H l. A 's 4 ** t h &Alb4A $9hy. U.es 4.0 U.H a a M o e.e :i l t. A t.WA*ULA 3 196u, es.o u.I U . t>
lynu, o . se is . u u.f 6 s' v C 4.s e e r e L t. e tt ht est A1 A r v L Lee l b s t. A t he e.aiya t t LI. l e,p .8 A 19 e.u . u.o u.o te.o
- t. A b 4 L o t. A 1.es / t,1t ;. t h l is m a a . u.o u . e, u.u 158 h U . u.o u.U b.0
' $ 6 At l t. A *' I t t im.% l k t't hb 19 6 t. . u.d es . 4 9. te 4est n.h ki6ANA 14018/l. /U.4 $9.9 2./ tulA4 eat ill. Ak si.6 h V I A t ht ts>t d ee r i A 113%/9a. 19.4 /73/.I 46.4 e t e t..'n oe A e.l e o't > A1 A l '/ l S h n . 1.n /.9 H.1
. l l e r ot t.ot to e ll a mt =1'i 1.1 u.o .tas.r.40to lo* e A F AI. ' t i t.5 15,6o 7 v . .l 44/t. u.i D.9 0.9 A s > I bi w oe.t s- t h t Air t. l o S 3( r.t.t e e s wish ov Aeik it Atson l 'e h u . o . 's u.1 u.o I I H / l'an. 1 1. *> 7/sh./ 's 1.1 f o l A r. t hl e *>i+M i l A Chhysedni8a t h a t.* IL l h a .' 0 6 19 *' U . u.y o.u ti . o lis t Ai. t_ p v ..t el H i l a 19mp. u.y u.u u.o 6VAu tt1lA $4.d Il.O U.5 9 I 58 0 l '8 5.
- 1. ) .e b e e A D i t.t > l i f 4.) Ai, d f A A D ei e. s h t ti-C a t h til t A ltmh/1 J.l 9.7 U./
4idSP. '> . t 1./ e l ( al o t o.i l a ;I P. 4 0 D % k as p . 59.9 1 % . na u.l fulAl t t At tli Hila hw4 dell, lun.o flu).S Sun.u 101A0 PtmlPavioh ~ A-62
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.4. (continued) Location 528 m y A ss Ot'l f 6 =>Au te l d t O I. tim t. hlC80 e/bo.ra. t a, s > 63. 0 4 % o IAAare
> A f' I 1. 6 A > l e. l' H % 1 &
i.o. e nu=. m A attpseAtom hu24u. M . it 1.1 u./
- e. Avl (*'s.A t w i lJ e (. s A T A v . bCH l *4UN t atJ ll>>.M 45415 5.1 J.I l'.5 e alt t is=e I S tel, A L ). el ul. A v . t ttt.l.ll*l A 31)74 4.4 u.7 'J . !
At es= A a l up 4 4. A b t e t i t, A T A thift. 4.J u.1 0.0 6.s tm 6'Hilh e h 4 .AntuLdm th/49 4.1 98 . 4 U . tf se suJ i t ube8MF.la tuMDAIA 15lbh. l.9 u . 'd b.2 selithCHIA S t *t. j j Lul, A l uM ll. 1.4 U.o u.H h.gestuLA t,u i us.t ..h : 5 lu/98. 1.E t e .1 v.h
.. l s,oiH. Pet t A eAnwth v749 l.3 esi.4 l i . ta AvseuwA e v>=*i. se l 14 l.o u./ U.u {
- t. . > n.se & h A s ta.( AvA1um 44ie. u.A u.5 u.I t w a t. a s, A f a A t eia N t a ut.hs 4mi4 u.h it . 0 u .13 e e< A . l l. A s i a reetsblHIATA v. I n t i, A B A till, u.h U . :s de . h
.e a v i t ee l. A s -s j a A IJ91. v . 's u.o u.u LI.v e t s.4- A n *
- t.H I N j a A 21hh. u.j u.O h.u I1ebCdlA ko.AmA ilhh. u.3 u. s. is . t*
,. i s s.aC a l A APlatelA th/4 0.2 u.u u.b hetIL'll.A t h Il O tit. $ P H A [ $ l et / 4, u,/ u.u h.u htashentA F A s., & th;4 ..J o ,, o 0.9 eaaAhCnlA ** a g e A t > s. 104j. u.1 u.H O.0 l u m s A .s h ils.il > A PLOvlAlILIS b il U.u b.o D e ts hu m i p t s.t. A See. 548 u . f' O.u u.u A v i t sit, % A g o,* ub 541. u.u u.u u.u j e l l s. AC n g A t a g ..t. III
- t.l.0 A d. bl,H S A l. l s. A $41. u.u 0.1 0.u a r* D'H i e8W .16; A t lk .. A 6 A 541. u .16 18 . 4 88. u e6A e lts:1, A e. A p l e S A v. t e l.p t.a. A %41 u.u u.o t' . o w a y llut, A P i t.> A >. 3 541 u.0 ts . u U.O t A t o .. > t n at i t,L ua 541 u.u u.u t.u sii r os t i.* A hC A a,t'a u t tit s $11. u.u u.I u.b t v t. t o l e s.I, A 6'b t 'u u:. it i.I. i t.t w A 541 u.u u.u u.u tel6460d)A ellb510' A 1 A 541. U.O i> . u u.o
( t t t.s t i e t,0 A ', l o m it s Set. v.u u.u O.u tulAu u 4 t i l,0. A W 18'l'HI T A 11143). 35.u '35.4 I M . t> rug- .m v,g
..oe A i.t.itr& k A T A #495 e o. 17.0 4th.5 Hl.u h t li.c ot s.it lisa > s s, A p >.4 7.5 '8749 l.3 n.2 0.0 S t a t.t oC t.ut. l o = pAaAL tti,s.h d'49 1.8 0.5 u.I ne t o n.o'. l u m de P. . al. 1.u u.1 u.1 t u r & e, oituhosntaA 77%241, l'. 4 4lp,o wl.3 0yaho6'utiA e.v M.H v A u s e.ut i e I '/lul44, 29.n u.# uI t es t A L. O s a te n g n i a ?lut44, 29.h o,; o.1 t o s A t. Pe te l tv e low 7 F 9 4 l i. . luu.o 334.e low.u
() A-63
/ HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNC"3 Table B.5. Ident.ification, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 September 1979. Location 534 4EAN UNITS MEAN BIOVOLUmE MIC#0* e,su.Cm. s teso.0=, s T A Xilh o MACll.1,AplOPHVTA GOmi'h0NP m A A N GUST A Tlim 173529 14.2 4.7 0.8 Nil 25CHl4 FuhTICULA 244tif. 9.) 0.5 0.0 mAbirDLA TRIFHhCTATA J. SCHlZUhfmu!DLS 191176 7.3 9.9 1.6 Arpp ah1 Hts I, A NrFul. AT A 17h470. 6.7 1.4 0.2 HMiner:35PH6NBA CUkWATA 1)S294 5.1 5.3 0.9 foCrewh15 l'l ACLhTUI.A V. & UG!,T PT A 102941. l.9 2.1 0.4 pkAGI!.Aula MkEJI51HIATA V. INFLATA h%294 J.? 2.2 0.4 Hil>l'uLPHI A LatVIS 49999 1.4 460.h 78.9 a;nmpMose> M A P A M V UI,Um 32)S2. 1.2 1.1 0.2 STitilAh0DISCH5 lNVISITA1U5 21529. 0.9 0.4 0.0 h A f lCHl.4 1.UZU% t N515 20598. U.N 0.1 0.0 C Y Cl lit tl.L A MvhEGHIh1ANA 14 7 ti$ . u6 0.2 0.0 NIlZSCHIA kHM*mA 14705. 0.6 0.8 0.0 N A v it:UL A SYumF1RICA 19764 U.4 U.S 0.0 AMF640p A VP h6 T A 11764 U.4 0.2 u.0 CDCCDht15 PLACFNTUI.A V. LlhEATA Ml 23. U.) 1.6 0.3 SkaGIt.ANIA CkuTON62mSis a823. 0.3 0.2 U.0 Ns1ZSCHIA P Al.E A 9423. 0.3 0.1 0.0 hlT75 CHIA AMPHlHIA RM23. 0.J 0.1 0.0 rtirrn* tis PtntCULOS 9823. U.3 1.4 0.2 StePHah0015CUS HamTZ5CHll MR92. 0.2 0.1 0.0 WI17ArHIA ROTZlhCIANA %882. U.2 0.0 0.0 CVrt pT Fl.l. A PsruDOSTFB,1,1GEW A %#92. 0.2 0.0 0.0 STDPHAhopl5CUS dlNHTUS $8A2. 0.2 0.0 0.0 hlT23rHl4 ACICUI,Apl3 %282. U.2 0.1 0.0 NAvirULA P M t hCHOCD;PH 41. A %982. 0.2 0.h U.1 NITZSCHIA RACATA 5882. 0.2 0.2 0.0 AMPMDMA P F IIPUM I LL A 5882. 0.2 0.0 0.0 pW4Gil,Aula CDm3THHph8 5882. 0.2 0.1 0.0 mAvlCHLA R100=1CA 2941. 0.1 0.0 0.0 hAvlCULA ATHmHS J941 0.1 0.0 0.0 H v J rut, A rWYpf0CEPHALA 1941 0.1 0.0 0.4 kvar *Unla SPP. 2941, 0.1 1.5 0.3 up brir.l p A cp 4 Nyt,AT A 2941 U.1 0.0 0.0 hl17ACHl4 T H Y el l uhl.l.L A V. VICTuptAE 2948. U.1 0.6 0.1 h l T 7 5t:HIA C A P I'7 El,L A T A 7941. 0.1 0.1 0.0 Se 4 W I CH1, A PUPDl,4 2441 0.1 0.1 0.0 ptl.6 tom >mA POTAMUS 2941. U.1 0.0 0.0 ArH=ANTHFS 4ElGHA 2941 0.8 0.0 0.0 N'W8r004 mlhlmA 2941 0.1 0.0 0.0 C Al.UND IS P e r il.l.H M 2941. 0.1 0.1 0.0 NI1Z5 CHIA SPP. 29A1. 0.1 0.1 0.0 Telf al, M AC il.L ANIDPH f f A th2451). 61.7 496.4 45.0 ret.uworky f A Si lct oCl,ow t up FILAmthT5 232352 e.8 5.6 1.0
$11 CLOCI,be lu p RASAL CPbl.5 lbl647 6.4 7.3 1.2 CI At'fiPHOW A Cl,OutaATA 49999. 1.9 73.0 12.5 ACTlhAhlkum Ha%f15Chil 9982 0.2 0.1 0.0 fulAL CHLokOPHTTA 455890 17.3 H5.9 14.7 ryAnnPMTr4 0.3 152941 21.0 1.6 1.Y NCH f A D lcut.T i l 952941, 21.0 1.6 0.)
7H741 CTam0PHffA 4 2h17334 100.0 5R3.9 100.0 fufAL PtRIPMTTON A-64
l HATS NTON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.S. (continued) Discharge attu UNITS MEAN 910'f 0LUpt atC#0-8/SO.CM. t L/80.0M. % TAAU4 HAf f f.LAk 'OPHVT4 NAVlfutA l.HZHtFhSIS .95902). 30.u 11.4 1.0 havlCULA TPIPO4CTATA V. LCH I E04 t.8019ES 411764 9.6 30.5 2.7
>>AGILAMIA CONSfpuths 88215 l.4 0.9 0.0 816PH4h0 DISCUS INVISITATUS 52041. 0.R 0.9 0.0 DWactl.ANIA MWEVISTklATA V. IkFLATA 52941 0.A 1.3 0.1 hlT28 CHIA Pal.EA 4117h. 0.6 0.7 0.1 alTZACHIA ppNf1 COLA 41176 0.6 0.0 0.9 CYCL,0f t 8,1, A UPEPCULAT A 21529 0.4 0.1 0.0 STLPHANnDISCUS MINUTHM 23529 0.4 0.1 0.0 NAVICULA WMYNCHOCEPHaf.4 17647 0.3 1.9 0.2 CVLI,0TLI.I.A mF4FGHINIANA 17647 0.3 0.2 U.0 HIDDul,PH I A LAEVIS 11764 0.2 109.4 9.6 MR 6 8.t 10N EP A POTAMOS 11764 0.2 0.1 0.0 plTZSCHlA PONANA 11764 0.2 0.0 0.0 GuaPHOLEMA AhGUSTATwH ll7A4 0.2 0.5 0.0 N A V I CHl. A CAPITATA 5892 0.0 0.1 0.0 UNIDE=Tititn CtNTHICS 5882 0.0 0.0 0.0 klTZ3 CHIA PUNCTATA 5882 0.0 0.2 0.0 blTZSCHIA PALELCEA 5802 0.0 0.0 0.0 h A V lt hl. A CN Y Pinct.PH A t.4 5892 0.0 0.0 0.0 NAVICULA DF CtiSSI A 5942. 0.0 0.2 0.0 ACHNANTHt.S LemmENDAhkl 59a2 0.0 0.0 0.0 GYkDAIG44 ECAlPNulDPS 5882, 0.0 1.0 0.0 NAvlCOLA StapET91CA 5882. 0.0 U.3 0.0 mlTZSCHIA pHTZl4GIANA SOS 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 GnePHnmEMA PARVULUM 5942 0.0 0,2 0.0 NAVICULA SPP, 5082 0.0 0.0 0.0 total nACILLARIOPHITa 3047048 47.9 159.1 14.0 Ch t,IINOPH Y T 4 U*DH60N4Up SPP. 547058 8.6 954.7 84.2 SCt ht0k SMHS uh ADNIC AUDA 5092 0.0 0.2 0.0 10 T Al. CHLO90PHITA %52940 8.7 954.9 94.2 CVAh0PHVTA LYmGNVA DIGutTt! 1152941. 21.3 3.9 0.J Cal.HTMWlX SPP. 541176 W.5 11.6 1.0 UhlPt*TIFIEf5 Rt.UE=GWiFN COCCUID %H99W2 8.0 1.1 0.8 1.ThGHVA AFNUGlhtO*CADRULt8 235244, 3.T ?.0 0.3 l.YNGMVA MPP. 121%29 l.9 0.9 0.0 TUTAL CY A h0F41 T A 2758922 43.4 20.5 1.8 TOTAL. PtplPHTTUN 63%9810 100.0 1134.4 100.0 i
0 4-65
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENCE3 Table B.5. (continued) location 532
/
mEAN U4175 MFAh R10VOLupf plCPO-e/50.CN. i LiSO.0=. i TAAOh MACII.hAWlOPHITA i;nmpunh6un ANGu5fATHM 737254 19.1 9.4 1.8 NavlCULA 1plPukCTATA W. SCHI EDh EM0!!)ES 960784 14.6 27.9 5.5 el17hCHIA FuhTl9nt A 149019 J.9 0.3 0.0 AMPl40W A VFNFTA 14SO98 3.8 2.6 0.5 P F AGil, Akl a 00457NuthS 105882. 2.I 1.0 0.2 convHoht>A P A h v u t,U M 1m431, 2.0 2.7 0.5 kl125 CHIA ADPMIMl& 677AM. 1.6 1.0 0.2 elonULPHIA l.A>VIS 470%8 1.2 43).5 85.1 cn=PunhoNA AFFlhE 43117 1.1 9.0 1.8 (v rl u f F t.I. A m64tGHINIANA 39295 1.0 0.4 0.0 hl1250HIA NOMANA 35294 0.9 0.1 0.0 COrruqFIB Pl. A CF N TU L A V. EUCLTPTA 39294 0.9 0,7 0.1 bTtPHAhnplSCUS JNvistTATUS 313T2 0.8 0.5 0.1 b* tl4 70> Lea PHT Am05 31372. 0.8 0.3 0.0 N AVICpt A IIIZDhtNSIS 31372 U.a 0.2 0.0 ACHmANTHES 1. A NCFOL A T A 27450, 0.7 0.2 0.0 M11Z80HIA P Al# A 23529 0.6 0.4 0.0 57tPHAh0Dl50uS MINUTUS 23529 0.6 0.3 0.1 havlCHLA StamETRICA 19607 0.5 0.8 0.2 CY Cl 0Ti l.L A A1GPUS 156ph. 0.4 0.3 0.0 N A v lCHI, A plNina $1744 0.3 0.0 0.0 hlTZ5 CHIA ArlCULAN15 117h4 0.3 0.2 0.0 Cicl.n1 D I.L A OProCULATA 117h4 0.3 0.1 0.0 516PHANODISCH4 HamTESCHIl 18744 0.3 0.2 0.0 havlCHl.a CNVPToftPHala 11764 0.3 0.2 0.0 C Y t t,0 f t l.1,4 PSFUDOSTFLt.lGD P A 1943 0.2 0.1 0.0 hlTZ5 CHIA AU1EINSIANA 1843 0.2 0.0 0.0 att.lsIPA VAp!AN5 7843 0.2 3.1 0.6 Nuulfp5PHfMIA CHRWATA 7843 0.2 0.3 0.1 A>PkopA hnumAh! 1921. 0.1 0.0 0.0 rorrustl5 Pl. Art =TULA V. LlhFATA 1921 U.1 0.7 0.1 j N I T.*.5CH I A C A P il t.LL AT A 3921. 0.1 0.2 0.0 i mt l,us lN A Gb a h ul. AT A 3921 U.1 0.1 0.0 mlTZ5 CHIA FlblPOPhls 1921 u.1 0.2 0.0 A>PHOWA Pt h PHallt. A l*21. 0.1 0.0 0.0 H A C I Ll. AW ' A PARADUNA 3921. 0.1 0.3 0.1 ArknA%THF5 1A90EUI,ATA V. DUHIA 3921 0.1 0.0 0.0 hlT2SClel A paraTA 1928. U.1 0.2 0.0 l hlT25 CHIA STAGNONUP 3921 0.1 0.6 0.1 httZ5 CHIA 1 p y al. l u A t t,L A V. VICTURIAE 3921. 0.1 0.8 U.1 hifl& CHIA SPP. 3921 0.1 0.0 0.0 701AL H4 CILI ANIUPHTT A 2180372 61.9 499.0 99.0 CHLuh0PNVT4 511t.p uCf.uhlum f lL Akt hT5 183725. 3.0 2.7 0.5 6110tOCLOhlum R A541, Ct;LLS 4l137 1.1 1.9 0.4 Amb s hibupF 5mHS F AI.C ATHS 7943 0.2 0.0 0.0 , ArthtDF34HS OUAHNICAUDA 3921. U.S 0.1 0.0 l l Int Al. (Wl,Op0PNVTA 169676 4.4 4.7 0.9 (tah0PH)TA LVhbHVA DIGHET!! 1207843. 11.4 3.5 U.7 , 05 CILI.Afon t A AGARDNil 78411 2.0 1.6 0.3 CALOTWRIX SPP. 19696. 0.4 0.3 0.0 0 TOTAL CTA40PHYTA IIH1960 33.8 5.4 1.1 TOTAL PFplPHTTON 3p5n958, 100.0 509.1 100.0 A-66 q
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.S. (continued) Location 530 AEAN UNITS MEAN 910VOLdpE klCRO-8/80.CM. 4 L/80.Ds. g lasum R A C ll.L Ak ibPHY T A havlCULA Tylkp>CTATA V. SCHIEUNLnUIDES 384235. 17.4 19.3 1.7 t l' V Cl.U T t l,1, A PtNtGHINIANA 125490 5.6 l.4 0.1 STt PH ANOlaf 5C05 MINUTDs 178568 5.5 1.6 0.1 INAGilAWIA CONstputNS 10990). 4.9 1.1 0.0 C V CLilit t.l. A 4Tnpus v2552 3.7 0.6 0.1 51 t PN A mHD I SCli3 thVl517ATUS 78431 3.5 1.3 0.5 comppott>. AhnuSTATum 18431. *5
. 1.0 0.0 Hit'0HLPHIA 1.AEyls 70589 3.2 650.2 57.5 cow 0HostpA PAuvubum 7n5N8 3.2 2.4 0.2 h!TZ5 CHIA FONTICCLA 70598 J.2 0.2 0.0 DhAGIL4WIA spEVISTRIATA v. ThFLATA 62745 7.9 1.6 0.1 Hktht4TIFIED CFNTRICS 39215 1.8 0.2 0.0 hlTZ8CHis nUTEINGIA4A 39215. 1.9 0.2 0.0 C V CI.016.5,1. A UPERCUI.ATA 39215 1.8 0.2 0.0 wA%ICHL4 f.UZnNFNSIS 35294, 1.h 0.2 0.0 SkAGALAkin I,tPTOSTAnn0N 1.4 i
18372 0.4 0.0 ! ACHN ANTHt S LANCEOt. AT A 31372 l.4 0.2 0.0 ) HIT 25 CHIA SPP. J1372. 1.4 0.6 0.1 bl1ZhCHIA P 41.E A 27450, 1.2 0.4 0.0 bl1XSCHIA NnM4NA 21450 1.2 0.1 0.0 Cnf CO h b.15 PLACFNTULA V. EUGl.YPTA 27450, 1.2 0.6 0.1 AmpHURA vtNtTA 23529 1.1 0.4 0.0 Mit?' CHIA CAPITELLATA 19607 0.9 1.0 0.0 SFPLETONSMA POTA40s 15606 0.7 0.1 0.0 kHotCO3PHfMIA CURVATA 15606 0.7 0.6 0.1 wa v lCUI.4 mihlNA 18764 0.5 0.0 0.0 hlTZ5 CHIA AuPHIH1A 18764 0.5 0.2 0.0 h!TZ6 CHIA A CI Cul. A N IS 11744 0.5 0.2 0.0 hAv!CHLA SPP. 11744 0.5 0.0 0.0 CnCC04tl5 PFDICULUS 7W43 0.4 1.2 0.1 S1hPDWA tA31CICULATA 7A43 0.4 0.3 0.0 MP Lh51N A CathuLATA 7843 0.6 0.2 0.0 C T CI HT LI.L 4 F5pHDn5fFLLICEHA 7843. U.4 bHNIN>LLA DV Al,lS 0.1 0.0 PR43 0.4 0.9 0.0 NITZ5 CHIA plLIP0HM18 7843. 0.4 0.5 0.0 kAvlCHLA SYa>ETNICA 3921 0.2 0.2 0.0 A"PHIPhnkA SWP. 1921. 0.2 1.0 0.0 STPPMANUDISCl3 HANTZ5CHl! 1921 0.2 0.0 0.0 l NITZSCH14 F N t'ST ULU M 3921. 0.2 0.0 0.0 4t LOS IP A A mulGif A 3921 0.2 0.2 0.0 ST6PH4%00lSCles ASTRALA V. MIhuTULA 3921 0.4 0.3 0.0
> A dirug.4 vlRipub4 V, RUAftLI.ATA 0.2 1921 0.3 0.0 b l TZ5 CHI A TWYkl.!Hh).l.L4 W. 1.F.V I D F N 515 5921 0.2 0.6 0.0 NITl5 CHIA 1,thFAH15 3921 0.2 0.9 0.0 hlT25 CHIA PALFACEA 3421. 0.2 0.0 0.0 kAblCHLA mutlCA 3921 0.2 0.1 0.0 NITZSCHIA APICHLATA 1921 U.2 0.2 0.0 N A W ICul. A CNYPTOCEPHAl.A 3921 0.2 0.1 0.0 NAvlCHLA ruPul,A 3921 0.2 0.2 0.0 NAdlCHLA INTFGRA 1921 0.2 0.4 0.C Ni f ESCHI A bl5SIFATA 3921 0.2 0.1 0.0 TOTAL H A CI LL A R 10PleT T A 18195P2 St.7 694.1 61.4 CHLOktiPHTT A Cf.APOPHONA CL0mERATA 298039 13.4 435.3 38.5 STIGEnCLithium R AS AL Cf LLS 27450 1.2 1.2 0.1 Ana l5TWODFS"lis F AI,C ATUS 1971. 0.2 0.0 0.0 T OT A l, 14.9 CHLOH0!'H T T A 329410 436.5 38.6 CtanOPHYTA L1 ht.HT A IllCUFTI! 74431. 3.5 0.2 0.0 tnt AI. CTA40PHTTA 72431 3.5 0.2 0.0 1UTAL PENIPHTTON 2227423 100.0 1130.9 100.0 A-67
HAZLETON CNV.RONMENTAL CCGNC2'3 Table B.5. (continued) Location 528 i NEAN UNITS MEAN 810VOLUMP arCa0-eeso.C=. i Liso.o . i 74:00 H A Cll.l. Ab lllPHT T A ClicroNFIS PLACENTHLA V. LUGLIPTA 1h6666 17.6 7.6 7.J GO*PHf*6MA ANGHSTATHm 280192 13.4 3.6 3.5 ACH%ANTHFS l.ANCFulATA InI960 4.9 0.9 0.4 N A v lCul. A TkiPHkCTATA V. SCH1Z0hEMUIDLS 4l837 2.1 2.1 2.1 AMPMuwA V P N F.T s 37254 1.9 0.7 0.6 tWAGilAMIA hr>VISTklATA V. I h F I, A T A 35294 1.7 0.9 0.9 pl1Z6 CHIA FuhTICOLA 3till. 1.h 0.0 0.0 h A v icul. A LutbN>N313 29488 1.4 0.2 U.2 t'h8PH'htka PAWVULHM 29411. 1.4 1.0 1.0 kdfilCH5PHt hl A CHHWATA 25490 1.2 1.0 1.0 4 4 W I CIII. A hlNIMA 24%29 1.1 0.2 0.1 Coffet%EIS PLACFNTULA V. LlNPA1A 21569 1.0 4.0 3.8 sitrHahoulsCh% thW151TA10A 5480). 0.5 0.2 0.2 NfT75 CHIA humANA 9803. 0.5 0.0 0.0 n!DDtiLPHIA LALVIS 7843 0.4 12.2 70.3 p p AGil.Ak t A Clin 57H HE N S 5482. 0.3 0.1 0.1 C V r t.f)T F LI.4 AfhuuS 5802 G.J 0.0 0.0 CvC8 UlVI LA MthPGHINIANA 98A2 U.3 0.0 0.0 ACH'e A %1 dk:S t h tGU A 1921 0.2 0.0 0.0 A
- l ds4 4 Pt kPHS I LI. A 1971 0.2 0.0 0.0 h a w iruf. A SFP. 3921. 0.2 0.0 0.0
>68.H5tWA VANJAh5 1960 0.0 0.0 0.7 h A v lCUI.A e M i n CpHCt PH e t. A 1940 0.0 0.2 0.2 m A V ICtll. A v !p t bithe V. NHS1FLI,ATA 1960 U.0 0.2 0.2 kl148rHsA S PI' . 1960 0.0 0.0 0.0 hil160HIA P A tE A 1940 0.0 0.0 0.0 Att PH AhHlst SCUS H ANT 2.5Chil 1960 0.0 0.0 0.0 haw lCHLA Cp f rTCCF.PH AI. A 1960 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tie ( Ali RACll,LARIOPPTTA In9A023 52.6 96.0 93.J CHl.OHOPHVT A STit.)Drf.ph!UM bA5AL CPLI.5 90196 4.J 3.9 3.8 MT le;9 urt.ON I UM FILAMehr5 17647 0.0 0.4 0.4 T n T A t. CHl.0PHPHY T A 10784). 5.2 4.1 4.2 ryAhoPHyTA t,thGPYA DIGHETil 431372. 39.8 2.4 2.3 HNilit hT i t i t U Hl.UE=Gktt:N CUCCOID S0980 2.4 0.1 0.8 TOT Al. CVA4nPHVTA 892352 42.3 2.5 2.5 TOTAI Ptk!PHITUN 20pp21H. 1n0.0 102.8 100.0 s
A-68
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENCES Table B.6. Identification, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 October 1979. Location 534 mEAN 01h178 mFA4 B10 VOLUME MIC80= 8/80.CM. 4 L/5J.D4 l 1A$ne M ACll a. Ad lHPHV f 4 h 4 W I C u t,4 1hlPilh(fATA V. SCHIZUhEmulDF5 1492153 41.4 76.6 18.4 t h At.lbawl A pkr.wlstMIATA V. I ht i, AT A 148176 9.5 9.1 1.4 GuaPHo4*ea ahcusIATUm 194117 S.4 4.9 U.7 t.Hm PHUh t m A PARVubuM th2352. S.1 4.9 0.7 punglLAula Cusstnuths 135294 3.8 1.0 0.1 ACHsA41HP3 L A 4(t'OL A T A 129411. 3.6 0.9 0.1 A=Ph0wA V6=*TA 123529. 3.5 2.6 0.4 haut(HSPHPhlA CUkkATA 121529, 3.S 7.6 1.1 hlfZ5 CHIA POhTICULA 100000 2.8 U.3 0.0 mil 45CM1A P alt A 70$98 2.0 1.6 0.2 elenlut.t dl a L Ar.v ls SA82J. 1.6 523.9 76.3 sttynahubl5CuS ImWISITatus Sus 23 1.6 8.2 u.2 DIAf0*4 u p bG A k t. 52941 1.5 19.9 2.b ONilithTitito Cth! Nits $2941. l.S 9.2 0.0 attenAhoul5CDs NAhTZ5Chil 470$8 1.3 0.h U.0 NAvlLULA LuZOethSIS 470Sd. 1.3 0.4 0.1 A t h 4 4 = T h t.8 =laufl551>A title. 1.2 0.3 0.0 NifZ5 CHIA bib 5fCA14 3%294 1.0 U.9 0.1 allT&CMIA hullth61A%A 29411 0.8 0.8 U.0 CH(Cultih vtDICHLU5 29411. U.d h.6 1.0 t.r eppuh t h A Ot.I W Actum 294l1. 0.8 0.9 u.! CVClOtti.La 470=45 29411. u.s 0.2 U.U NITZ5 CHIA wumAMA 29411. 0.d 0.2 0.0 6aLLIfHataa 641APUS 17e47 0.S 0.2 0.0 af t edAhopI5Ct 3 alhuTUS 17647 U.S n.1 0.0 hild6CalA IGhukATA $7647 0.S U.S 0.0 4 C tCI,0f t bl. A pretGHIhlA4A 17647 0.5 0.4 0.0 CUCCohtl5 PLACthiULA V. EUGI,fP1A 17647 0.5 0.5 0.0 cvCoultLLA CPFhCULATA lif64 0.3 0.1 0.0 p AL I Lt. Awl A PawsouaA 18764 U.) 2.1 0.3 C Kl.b l t i.L a Ph> L'005T F LI,1GFN A $9a2, 0.2 0.0 0.0 44WICOLA mlal*A Sen2 0.2 0.0 0.0 blTT5(Hl4 5UHCAPlftLLATA $#92 0.2 0.2 0.0 5t h61sk A P Hl.CH t.L L A sum 2 0.2 1.4 0.2 hAvit'v0A >4pluS4 V. 1FmtLLA $882. 0.2 0.1 0.0 bl125 CHIA pal.6.ACt.A $892. 0.2 0.0 0.0
# A b icut, A SPF. 5082. 0.2 0.0 0.0 Td f Al, HACILLAklOPHTTA 3$76455, 100.0 669.4 100.0 1 p T A t, l'tu!PHvtom 3%76455 100.0 669.4 100.0 t
A-69
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl2NC30 Table B.6. (coritinued) Discharge i HEAP Uh1TS mFAp Plf'V OLU M L 410110= t/5u.Ch. t 1./ 5 ta . D N . % iA304 k ACll.L A W lHPHVT 4 h A v l s;ul. A IU106tN515 2117 t.4 7 49.7 16.1 J.S hill 4CHl4 e len t if tet. A 317b47 I.4 0.4 0.2 re a v l CilL A Twlb t'hCI AI A S. SCHlZONEMUIDL5 270Sh9 6.J P4.b 3.0
>>At.lLAWIA tumbleuth5 10000U. J.J U.T 0.2 t h a t. l s, A b l A t+>>vlalHIATA b. thtLATA 76470 1.4 2.0 0.4 Heunge. Peta l. A t.V 15 41056 1.1 439.2 90.1 S e t FH Ahatel5Cis5 thWI51TArus JS294 U.h U.7 0.2 arm 4 A**1He 5 #AlGUA 29411. U.7 0.3 0.1 HII76 THIA Is t hSI t' A T A 29411. 0.7 0.7 U.2 L YCl Of t bO A > > h t t.H I N I A h A 29411. 0.7 Del U.2 hil/5CHl4 b OP Af4 A 29411 U.7 U.2 0.U Nill 5 CHIA P A B.t A 17647. u.4 u.4 b.O espiht1196Irle Cet.1NICS I1647 0.4 0.1 U.b i.oas e .co4 *' p A ANGu&lATup 17h47 0.4 0.4 U.S WII/5 CHIA It.huk A1 A 18764 0.) 0.J 0.0 A A v ituba Ch v PtoCt.PH AL A 117h4 0.3 0.2 0.0 C f t f ui t.t.1,4 lit't 4*CUL AT A 31764 O.3 0.3 0.0 he t e.> t tJat a 4 POTAMOS 18764 0.3 D.1 0.0 mil /5 CHIA I)V al I b 187h4 Q.3 0.0 0.0 m A v i t.uL A ** I t t:41( A !!764 U.3 0.0 u.u hl145 CHIA A C ) CllL Ale l 5 117b4 u.) 0.1 0 . 88 C y t:I ult Lt. A P5tbuu%TtLLIb>HA 11764, u.) 0.0 U.o 5 f t.t et s 4'9015Cb3 M A 417 5CH 11 117h4 u.J 0,1 0.u t,OmPnume n A PAktuLum ll7h4. b.) 0.3 0.0 CALuntl5 >ACILLum 5682. U.1 0.2 0.0 Ates4 A
- TMt5 f, A MCt ut. A T A V. DUM1A 5t#2. 0.1 0.8 U.b so l l t5CD8 B A 1 N ) MI. l De t.l.L A W. 1.F.V IDt N51b SNR2. U.1 0.$ 0.1 ;
< PH Aholil5CI'h alkutus $6R2. 0.1 0.0 0.0 hAvlCuLA mullCA Skm2. U.1 0.2 0.0 AfNtp=A Al es5 S h it 2, U.1 3.0 0.2 hit /5rulA Fil.ItuNdl5 %>N2, 0.1 U.4 0.0 kHelt oSPht ml4 CukV AT A $842 9.1 0.4 0.0 t
f ul AI. se ACILL AFIOPNV T A 129994S. 77.4 460.9 99.1 Cpt,0WuPHIIA A sh l 5 f kHilt &*lls t 41.C A f t:5 - %pa2. 0.1 0.0 0.0 101A1 ( Mt.DktePH V I A Skt 2. O.1 U.0 0.0 Cy A% eys43 e A 1.1 4.H f A DIGut i l l M70 Sag. 20.4 2.5 U.S 05CII.I. A lue. l A At: A k DHl l 7h41D. leM le4 b.J 11764 U.J 0.3 0.1 rAl.OlHhla SPP. s til A L CIANHPHVTA 95Ns22, 22.5 4.2 0.9 luf AI. Ptulehilow 42646h9 100.0 465.1 100.0 i A-70
HA:rLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCl NCE3 Table B.6. (continued) Location 532 I mLam UNITS PEAh u!Uv0LUnt MICRU= s/8U.cn. 9 L/Su.Un, S TAsug MAC!bbAhlHFHTIA NAvlCOLA 1plPHkCTATA V. SCH120Nt4UIDES lh7R431. 34.9 h6.J 24.S hlTZ5 CHIA tudt! COLA Sul9h0 10.4 1.5 U.4 pn.assca enthl4 CUNvATA 211764 4.4 13.1 3.I Goepwont p A 4=Gu5 f Af tta 203921, 9.2 S.1 1.4 s,oarnon e.p A PAhvubum 19huis. 4.1 S.2 1.5 u h e l CUI. A LutoaFasts 164705. J.4 1.J U.4 t w Aull. Aul a Cs,hst kut.h5 12$49h. 2.6 U.9 0.3 Amenown vehe.1A 199?9J. 2.3 2.3 0.7 I hAvildLA mihlwa sh274 l.h U.2 0.1 h i s t.5CH l 4 humanA Jh4Jt. l.h 0.S U.! millbCHIA PAL *.A 62745 1.3 1.4 0.4 ALHkAhlHtS LANCt.ULATA 470$w. 3.0 0.3 U.0 5frenAmuul5Cb5 t h d ! SIT Altl3 39215 0.8 0.0 0.2 51tPnAnoolhCUS *1401U3 392th. 0.g 0.J 0.0 udapt4Titiro Ct'hTHICS 39215 V.8 0.1 0.0 milA5 CHIA Ol5SIPAIA 39215. 0.0 1.0 0.3 Cvt l.u f tl.1, A >>4tGHlhlAuA 39215 0.8 1.0 0.3 SitPundoolStu.h HAblZ5CHij 31372 0.7 U.4 0.1 alIZACHIA tlLitORMIS 38372 0.7 2.1 0.b h ipl*Df +HJ A LAEtis 2)S29 U.S 209.h $9.1 Sa r la l'O%t = A PO1AmuS 23S29 0.5 0.2 0.0 uomendhe.pa GwACILt. 21S29 0.5 0.9 0.3 mil 46 CHIA SueC A Pi t ti.L AT A 24529 U.S 0.1 0.2 C T Cbu tti.L A P6Fuo0$f>LLIGtWA IS686 0.J 0,0 0.0 GnarnuntaA SPP. ISth6 0.3 3.0 0.8 Cu(Comel5 vl. ActmTUL A V. l.INEATA ISbtb. 0.J 4. 3 0.9 milZ8 CHIA IGh0pATA 15696 U.3 0.4 0.1 nAvicol.a pMinChuCePNALA 13686 0.1 0.0 0.2 tNAGibentA phtvl5fMIATA v. IhtLATA ISh86 0.3 0,4 0.1 NAvlCHLA A T upils 7H43 0.2 0.0 0.0 navlCHLA C.NVP100tPMALA 7m4J. 0.2 0.2 0.0 sbklwe.bl.A flV AI.15 7A43. 0.2 0.6 U.2 me LliblW A 6HANULATA 7e43. 0.2 0.5 0.1 pdntALooth GlHRA v. WFNTktcuSA 7t43 0.2 2.3 0.7 l m A W ICHl. A 5Vamf1kICA 1h43 0.2 U.) 0.0 l D N AGil AWla Pl4hATA 7W43 0.2 0.1 0.9 A=PHOWA Pt k rus t Lt. A 7b43 U.2 0.0 0.0 C ALhat.l s M ACll. Lum 7643. 0.2 0.2 U.1 w A v lCol.4 *UllCA v. UNDULATA 7W43. 0.2 U.2 0.0 e At ll.l. A H I A PAwADUhA 7h43. 0.2 1.4 0.4 N 8. f 45f H l 4 EWilleGIANA 7843. 0.2 p.U 0.0 navicul.A APP. 784J. U.2 0.0 0.0 TdfAL MAllLLAWlOPNVTA 401%hTD. 8J.S 149.1 98.6 CyAhoPHv7A LikGHTA DIGuttil f.18 764 12.7 1.# U.5 ONttie.AfbplA AGARDHil lHnJ92 l.9 J.! 0.9 To t al. OsAe0PnVTA 79215h. 16.5 S.1 1.4 TOTAL. PtWIPMff0h 4#01926. 100.0 354.5 100.0 ) A-71
HAZLETON CNVIRONMENTAL CCCNCD Table B.6. (continued) Location R0 ( N t. A N Uh!TS ptAN RI O VllLU P E lCeo-usu.ca. S laso.oa. S 14Buh ee AC ll.l. Aes luPHY T A w A W I Oil. A ThlPithCTATA V. McH12nntuull't.s 24h47nh. St.2 IS3.3 15.0 t t As.li.A> la o.4s Fput hs 29h039, 5.1 7.2 u2 blit.NCHIA WOt al A 14117b. 2.4 0.9 0.0 t h a t. ll. A ie t h bbt.wlbiplATA W. Ihti,ATA 133333 2.3 'J.b U.3 i;o.es Hism e.p A AhGb81Arnh 12%490 2.2 3.1 0.J
.% l > Pe AhDDIM(U% lhel5lTATUS lei 9 eu j . 1.9 2.4 0.2 nilZACHIA P tih110t.1 A 109603 1.9 81 . 3 0.0 AmPHOWA 46h>lA 94117. l.h 2.0 U.2 M*90lLUhPet h l A CuktATA 19431. 1.4 4.9 0.5 t.9mpnf % A P A w tui.t h 7 n $ n te . 1.2 1.9 U.J Slt FetahdDIM DA P ! N u I H's t' 2 7 4 5 1.1 0.5 0.1 hirdnAasDlbCDS HAhTZ6CHil 54901. 0.9 0.7 0.0 v e t er .e l l p l b st (.thlulC$ 544hl. 0.9 0.2 U.U mill 5 CHIA Plb5IPAFA S4901. U.9 1.9 0.1 CYllHitLLA > > h t t;e. 5 m ] A h 4 47DSU. U.W l.2 U.1 all/hCHIA pattA 1921%. U.7 U.4 0.0 nAWICOLA f.H/ae%> h 515 34215 u.7 0.3 0.0 nl1ASCHIA p u 17.9 % 14h A 41372. U.S u.! U.O al12SCHIA > 18 li t* *!b 31372. b.S J.1 0.2 Su t t4 FOut *' A PHTAhus 24S?9 O.4 0.2 0.U ulAFO=A Wei.6Akt 21529 U.4 h.4 0 . 08 e l De*UI.P'8 t A l. At t in 24529 0.4 2hw.h 2U.6 a.ume*eH mpmA St e, 2jS29 O4 4.5 0.4 AC ha 4 41 dt 5 8A4(tDLA1A 20S24 U.* U.2 U.L Gomrisiuse p A e l.s v &C6 uk 3 % Ab. u.J 0.4 U.0 millbCHIA $npCAPIIt.lLATA 1%hnh. v.) U.4 0.te C V C I.el f t.l.l. A kUT7thCIAh4 $$hA6 0.3 U.2 0.0 4 n a v i c ut. A etelmA IShah. 0.J U.U C.0 (UCCOst Ib FLACPhf01A V. IdGL1PTA l .t 6 M 6 U.3 0.4 0.0 es A v lCHl.4 Ch f t liiCD PHel. A 7843 0.1 n.2 U.o H A CI LI. A m t ) P Aw a t'O s 4 7b43. U.! 1.4 0.1
- t. v a us t s.= A M Al,Pulilot s 7843. v.1 1.7 0.2 h i l /.5CH I A A*PHidlA 7843. 0.1 0.1 0.0
= 4 v i cul.4 bAplH5A v. T t h >' t.L A 7p43. 0.1 0.0 0.9 hl1/5 CHIA A*GUhlATA 78843. U.! U! 0.0 h a v !Cu t.4 plb>AtA 7e43. U.1 0,5 0.0 m i l / 5( H l A bldbilAIA V. #tDIA 7b43. 0.1 U.4 0.u v L t.u l t t l. A Pdt beuS16 8.l lGt W A Fe43. 0.1 0.0 0.0 C tt s.ul t i L A Alomos 7e43. 0.1 0.1 0.0 f oi al. H ACil.i. AW lHPHT T A 448$673. 313.1 410.7 4U.3 eHl.uwvPHVIA oppot.uhlue S f' P . $64705, 9.7 2Sh.9 25.2 a:1 A**uPHON A ClU**FAfA 421Sbb. S.S 347.H 34.1 C*Ir L A NI Nur ' l C h ul'Oh li m I S 6 08 h . 0.3 1.a 0.2 lie f Al. (Hi tiksfPh1 T A 9019S9. 15.6 606.5 59.b
()AwbPHIIA bN il't wi l t it D Hl.Ot *Gb t F4 F I L A h t ee l h/745, 1.1 1.2 u.1
- f. t **I.t* f A plG0 bill ISh*b. U.3 88. " U.U i
TOI Ale CIA %UPHilA 7b431. 1.4 1.3 U.I IOTAt. Ptklvhiton S1960hl. 100.0 10lM.5 10U.0 A-72
+
HAELSTON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Tcble B.7. Identification, abundance, and biovolume of periphytic algae collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 20 November 1979. Discharge utAN U417S MFAN MlU W OLUMit MICRU= 8/50.C4 t t/50.04 4 TAAos HACl4f.AkllePHVIA hAvlCHLA TklPuhlf4fA V. SCH l ZUN E 40107.5 27US992 35.1 121.0 47.1 hl126 CHIA ul3&lPATA 341176 4.4 6.2 2.4 a l T A.Wes l A P474h4 141176 4.4 J.0 1.2 6 h A*. l L A .814 ShtVIAr4tATA V. INtLATA 270Shu. J.S S.0 2.0 ml12sCHlA P Al.p A 2470St. 3.2 4.) 1.7 twAGil.AwlA t ied 5 T N u t.h 5 152941. J.U U.S U.S
*I1ZACHIA SFP. 10S942. 1.4 9.7 0.7 C : 08.u 191.1.4 *twp6HimlANA 94117. 3.2 J.6 8.4 Ci t ho te.1,L A Al..pos W21S2 1.1 0.9 0.J P W At.ll. A d l A l'twhA1A 70$94 U.9 0.9 0.J u.lo*=fl>Itu CratWICS 70568 U.4 fi . 2 U.0 Se. . t w e l.l. A O D A L.15 SAb23. U.N S.O 2.2 .%1 t. 7 g a.edts l 5005 M A le T 2 SC#e l l 4 7uSts. U.6 0.6 0.2 havlCHLA ALCa.at D A 470SW. U.6 1.3 0.5 allthCHIA Catiltb.ATA l 470SB. 0.6 1.7 U.7 na v it 8b A CN) P e t>CILPH A L A 47USW, U.6 l.S 0.6 1114& CHIA Ns'eC api t t i l, A J A 470Sh. 0.6 1.2 U.S nia/50MIA millZimGIAh4 41058 0.6 0. .I 0.1 d i p e n A mesul5015 thW151tATUM 97bSN. 0.6 U.S 0.2 hillbCHIA li.hoh A14 4#USW. u.6 1.6 0.e
( W t 8..J t t i.f. A .$.% > l.t'OS T p'L L I Gt. e8 4 JS294 0.5 0.2 0.0 m a e l CHl.4 k Hve.Onntp PHAs,A Ig294 u.S 1.) 0.5 hab it erL A se l s l n a 15291 u.S 0 . ts 0.0 n A v lCul. A APP. SS294 U.S 0.0 U.0 h A v l t.eL A > AstIDA A V. I t hf t,L A JIS29 0.) 0.3 0.1 IslAsv=4 W Hl.t. A p p 21$29 U.) 6.9 J.7 4 h A v lCol, A symmefulCA 11764 0.2 0.5 0.2 A = P*.ow A ut.w . A u f 11764 0.2 0.2 0.0 mil /SCHl4 APICULAfA 18764 0.2 0.6 0.2 al145 CHIA Llhpawin 18764 0.2 3.4 1.5 A *8PHO*8 A Hv al.15 W. Pt.ls t LHLHS 11764 U.2 1.5 U.6
= A d ICHI. A pHFICA V. unhubalA 117h4 0.2 0.4 0.1 mlf/J.CMIA At ICul, Ak la 11744 U.2 0.1 0.0 h l145ull A 1ky MLlo%I.L A V. l.)VIDEN515 18764 0.2 0.9 0.3 aCH444tHts e,A=CrubA1A v. Dupla 11764 0.2 0.0 0.U st i ll5CH I A 19Uh6 AN !( A 18764 0.2 U.S 0.3 hAvlCOLA "HilCA V. 1 N n.* t C A 11764 0.2 0.$ 0.2 t wei.ls. A e l a CHuruht=515 18764 U.2 U.) 0.1 t.o> P.cou m A ut,l t Att.us 18764 0.2 0.S 0.J .St e pM Ah.sO I 5CbM fLw0I5 11744. 0.2 1.2 0.5 > A v ! L u a. A twilIshCT AT A 11764 0.2 1# U.7 me l tf alH A AmalGUA ll?A4 0.2 1.4 0.5 hAvitHLA CN f P181C t.PH A L A V. vthtis 18764 U.J 0.1 0.0 hil45 CHIA eACATA !!764 0.2 0.) 0.1 Arl'HOMA PtNOUMILLA 187h4 U.2 0.0 U.U h A v stall A tAlnUA W. CAPIFATA 18764 0.2 0.6 0.2 mAvlCoLA St C h r.1 A v. An*ICut.41A 197h4 J.2 0.2 0.0 t h at.la.4.e l a v 4UCHt N A AS 117h4 0.2 0.3 0.1 mAvleubA Luto=L=315 l l 7e- 4 0.J 0 . 88 0.0 4t H'4 A at d> $ t. A ert ist, A T A 13764 U.2 0.2 0.0 g.,,mynoese n a P A> w Hl.dm 16764 0.1 0.! 0.1 AqPdowA vthgTA Illh4 U.2 0.1 0.0 hillMCHIA SubtlCULA !!764 0.2 0.0 U.0 f.e l a l. e A(li t, A d lliPH1 f A S423497 70.4 1A7.1 73.0 ftAmoPHfTA OSCll.1, A f tsp l a AG4WDHi g 22h2)S2. 29.6 49.4 27.0 T u f A I. C) A *t>PHil A 22s2)S2 27.6 09.4 27.0 luTAa. PtWIPHffue 7705049 100.0 254.S 100.0 A-73. _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Man sTON ENVIRONMENTAF.. SCIENCES Table B.7. (continued) location 528 Mt.Am Uh!TS mi A tt H1*JVOLupe MICWU= 8/50.CM. % L/54.DM. t I A nt64 H Aril 1.*N IflPH d i 4 4.Up6 Heih8;m A esi.4 % ACP U4 1b76A9 I't . b 6.7 14.9 e*Ialo*A VI:la; A W) 37791. 9.0 $1.0 $1.2 hAel(oLA AltenU5 9310 d.2 0.0 U.I
>>a63bAnla *6vl5?HIATA W. I h t l. A T A 18 7 '* J . J.! U.2 U.W m A v itus. A s t l L i t ut, tis A d215. 2.H 0.0 0.0 hitt5CntA elShl> A T A 6S12. l.6 0.1 U.6 h A v lCajb a in 16.shC I AT A V, FCHl ZO%f Mull)D S 5477. l.J u.2 1.J AltihCHIA Pal.e A lbl3. 0.9 0.0 0.J a li ?5Chl a pt.r aha lhli. 0.9 0.0 C.2 t w A .II. Aula ( 0 5 t hht m3 77111 U.? 0. t* 0.0 al14hlNIA tul.tsCuba 27)a. 0.7 0,0 0.0 h a v l Cas L A Sr6 2190 U.S 0.0 0.0
- a. A W I C ul. A $A8$4AWH" V. 1419.id 88t lil A 1643. 0.A 0.1 0.3 h f > 6 H A NDie l bf 415 t h w l511 A llia lee). 0.4 0.0 0.0 twAnte.AnlA C A rl<!w A 1641. U.4 0.1 0.3 n a v lCiis. A viruglCA 1095. U.J 0.0 0.0 Ste> l u t Lt. A eiv Al.15 1095 0.3 0.8 U.S
= A v i t u i, A v t h inut, A l u taS . U.) 0.1 0.W sell /5 CHI A $i'bC A 6 l it l l. AT A 1095. v.) 0.0 0.1 l e st Co >.15 l's. ACt NT HL A V, 3,lJGl.Y P1 A 1095 0.3 0.0 0.2 kl17 5018 A ArblA S47 0.1 0.0 0.0 h a v l( Hl. A CA%Al.15 $47 0.1 U.U U.O A*PHOWA l't h Pbs t l.L A $47 0.1 0.0 0.0 p A t.31. A u l 4 v&utmediat $47 G.! Es . O O.0 t h AGII. Ali j A PlhhalA S47 0.1 0.0 0.0 .%f > PH4h8ebidfus H Ab f150Hi t 547 U.I 0.0 0.U l
SU h l N F LI, A A Nr.a5 T A 547 0.1 n.0 0.1 S47 0.1 0.0 0.1 L i l l.te l t.l.L A atsti.HablA>A 0.1 ' t.iteretem p p A AwGU5141pm S47 0.1 0.0 14 141 6* A( II.l. A W it'6 H1 t h 7h44SS. 64.0 19.0 9b.6 C1 A 4"P8iV I A G l.p r}lthF m A P iel A10* 1S1714 36.0 U.) 1.4 151714 36.0 0.3 1.4 to t As. r t A %t 6'H V I A IliT A L Pe k l6 H fitlN 421169 100.0 19.3 100.0 A-74
)1
HA2LETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.8. Replicate values and descriptive statistics for biomass production (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,13 June 1979. (MG/ M2/DAT) LOCATION 534 1 4C1.8 534 2 397.8 514 3 412.6
%34 4 568.1 534 5 538.5 534 6 588.6 532 1 440.8 1 532 2 117.8 532 3 98.6 532 4 334.9 532 5 -1.0 532 6 -1.0 530 1 549.9 530 2 762.3 530 3 623.9 I 530 4 642.8 530 5 433.5 l 530 6 578.5 528 1 175.5 528 2 336.1 528 3 803.1 528 4 730.8 528 5 =1.0 528 6 502.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS l HIDMASS PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY)
STATION N ME A;J RANGE SE CONFIDENCE INTENVAL UPPER LOWER Sie 6 497.90 397.8 = 588.6 32.8521 582.36 413.43 532 4 248.02 98.6 = 440.8 83.6521 514.21 =18.16 530 6 594.48 433.5 = 762.3 44.5096 712.92 444.05 S?? 5 527.51 175.5 - 803.1 ilm.7444 857.15 197.88 A-75
i i HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNC~lO Table B.9. Statistical analysis of biomass production data (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the flissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,13 June 1979.
~ )
Ah& LYSIS OF VARIANCE B104485 PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY) NUMBER OF VAEIABLES e 1 DUMMER OF LEVEI.S IN FIH57 VARIABLE a 4 GPAND mEAN a 486.09 SUM OF MEAN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SQUARES SQUARE F RATI(1 PPOBABALITY SIG STAf!ONS 3 311907.0002 1039r.9,0000 3.86 0.028
- HESIDUAL 17 457788.0000 26928.7100 total 20 769695.0000 CFt.L MEANS
.474Tl0N MEAN N $14 497.8967 6 532 248.0240 4 %30 598.4ut9 6 S28 527.5346 5 MEAN $*ATIONS DIFFERENCFS *SD 530 - 532 e 350.4570* 328.0247( 6, 4) 530 334 e 100.9852 293.3943( 6, 6) %30 * %29 e 70.9673 307.714)( 6, %)
528 = 432 e 279.4s97 340.893)( %, 4) 528 = 534 s 29.6179 307.714)( 5, 6) l 534 - 532 a 249.W7te 328.0247( 6, 4)
/
A-76
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC3S -
- Table B.10. Replicate ' lues and descriptive statistics for biomass production (ash-free dry weight) in periphvton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 July 1980.
(NG/ N2/0AT) LOCATION
'534 1 257.6 534 2 262.0 534 3 325.0 534 4 312.1 534 5 255.1 534 h 251.8 532 1 17.5 532 2 23.4 532 3 198.0 532 4 97.6 532 5 41.2 532 6 16*.4 530 1 276.1 510 2 383.0 530 1 389.1 530 4 419.8 8.30 5 411.9 530 6 293.1 528 1 144.7 529 2 90.9 / 528 .1 90.7 l 529 4 70.1 l 528 5 129.4 522 6 92.8 l DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS M10 MASS PRODUCTION tug / M2/DAT)'
STATION N hEAN WANGE SE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL UPPER I.UWER 534 6 277.29 251.8 - 325.0 13.2322 311.30 243.26 532 4 8P 49 17.5
- 199.0 31.1544 169.59 8.39 540 6 362.02 276.1
- 419.5 25.1744 426.74 297.29 520 6 101.43 70.1 - 144.7 11.9040 137.04 70.82 A-77
- HAELETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl2NO3'3
. +
Table B.ll. Statistical analysis of biomass production data (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 July 1979. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
^
BIO
- ASS PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY) .8
'h0MBFH OF VARIABLES e 1 NUMPFP OF LEVELS IN FIRST VARIABf.E s 4 CWAND 4EAN e 207,10 SUN OF MEAN SOUNCE OF VARIATION DF SQUANES SQUAME F PATIO PROBABILITY SIG < 0.001
- STATIONS ] J2495$.1003 100318.4000 37.59 PESIDuaL 20 57614.0000 2PA1.7000 TOTAL 23 362589.1000 CELL MEAN5 STATION MEAN N z S34 277.278) 6 532 98.4082 6 510 362.0178 6 529 101.410) 6 STATInNS MEAN DIFFERENCES S30 = S32 e 273.5295
- 530 = 528 e 260.5874
- 5)0 = SJ4 e 94.7195 534 = 532 e 18P.7901
- i Sie - 528 e 175.9490
- l l
528 - 512 e 12.9421 l w a 86.r4&O 4 b
( HazLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.12. Replicate values and descriptive statistics for bicmss production (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collecte.1 from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 August 1979. (MG/ M2/DAT) LOCATIDN 534 1 267.3 534 2 241.6 534 3 272.9 534 4 224.7 534 5 350.7 4 534 6 345.9 532 I 264.2 512 2 260.9 532 3 162.7 532 4 252.9 532 5 313.6 532 6 323.0 530 1 530.7 530 2 365-7 510 3 417.3 530 4 573.2 530 5 435.4 530 6 375.3 528 1 207.0 y 52n ; 177.5 520 3 299.0 528 4 171.2 529 5 26R.9 528 6 -1.0 D'8CRIPTIVE STAT 1871C8 B104435 PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY) STATION N NEAN RANGE 3F CONFIDENCE INTERVAL UPPER LOWER 534 6 203.05 224.7 = 350.7 21.5963 339.37 229.32 532 6 262.90 162.7 - 323.0 23.1228 322.87 202.94 530 6 449.59 365.7 = 573.2 34.476s 538.23 360.95 520 5 244.74 171.2 - 299.0 23.9046 311.10 178.30 A-79
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCl!NCE3 Table B.13. Statistical analysis of biomass production data (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 August 1979. ANALYS!$ OF VARIANCE B104 ASS PRODUCTICN (MG/ M2/ DAY) humpKR OF VARIABLES a 1 NU*BER OF LEVEL,S IN FINST VAW148LE a 4 GPAND MEAN e 313.12 SUM OF PEAN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SQUARES SQUARE F RATIO PROBABILITT SIG 155401.0000 51800.3100 12.72 < 0.001
- STATIONS 3 NF5100AL 19 77399.0000 4073.6320 TOTAL 22 232000.0000 CELL MFANS STATION MEAh N 4 514 283.8459 6 532 262.9026 6 530 449.5940 6 52R 244.7419 5 MEAN STATIONS blFFERENCES SSD 530 - 524 = 204.8500* 118.3638( 6, 5) 530 - 532 = 186.6914* 112.8555( 6, 6) 540 - 534 a 165.7480* 112.5555( A. 6) 534 - 528 = 39.1020 110.3438( 6, 5) 514 - 532 e 20.9414 112.8555( 6 6) 532 = 528
- 18.1586 110.3638( 6, 5)
A-80
I HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.14. Replicate values and descriptive statistics for biomass production (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 September 1979. (MG/ M2/DA7) LOCATION 534 1 601.8 534 2 553.6 534 3 417.9 954 4 314.7 534 5 549.8 534 6 740,7 532 1 518.4
%32 2 h96.2 532 3 559.7 532 4 465.6 l 532 5 511.1 '
532 6 767.4 590 t 1270.6 l 530 2 1843.2 530 3 2189.8 530 4 807.2 530
- 1286.6 530 6 1156.6 528 1 124.2
; $28 2 176.9 528 3 136.4 524 4 177.8 528 5 205.9 528 6 953.7 CESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS B104 ASS PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY)
STATION N MEAN PANGE SE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL Al*PER I.0WER 534 6 529.76 314.7 - 740.7 60.4012 6s5.05 374.47 532 6 586.39 465.6 = 767.4 48.4459 710.95 461.84 530 6 1425.67 807.2 = 2189.8 204.6549 1951.84 899.51 528 6 292.49 144.2 - 933.7 128.8234 623.70 38.71 A-81
HA2LETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCCNCOO Table B.15. Statistical analysis of biomass production data (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station,18 September 1979. ANALTSIS OF VARIANCE BIOMASS PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/ DAY) NUMBER OF VARIA8!E'S s 1 NU'mER OF LF.VELS IM FIkST VARIABLE a 4 GRAND MEAN e 104.58 SUM OF MEAN SOURCE OF WARIAT10N DF SQUARES SOU4HE F RATIO PROBABILITV SIG 1469509.0000 15.18 < 0.001
- STATIONS 3 4405529.0000 PE51t>UAL 20 1934239.0000 96711.9400 TOTAL 23 6119767.0000 CELL MFANS STATION MEAN N 4 544 529.7595 6 532 996.393) 6
%)0 1421.6730 6 %29 292.4946 6 i
STATIONS NEAN DIFFERENCES 510 - 529 a 1111.1780 *
%)0 = 534 A95.9111
- M10 = %)2 s p19,279)
- 532 = 429 a 29).9997 532 = 534 s S6.6339 534 - 529 e 217.2649 w e 502.5049
/ A-82 s 1 l
HAZLEYON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table B.16. Replicate values and descriptive statistics for biomass production (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 October 1979. (MG/ m2/DAI) LOCATION 510 1 731.1 530 2 854.1
%30 3 532.4 530 4 696.1 510 5 576.1 %30 4 774.6 532 1 446.6 532 2 397.1 532 3 60R.7 532 4 548.1 532 9 4Rf.9 532 6 601.5 534 1 388.4 534 2 527.1 534 3 452.8 534 4 477.2 534 5 452.8 534 6 559.2 4
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTIC 8 BT04455 PRODUCTION (MG/ 42/04Y) STATION N MEAN RANGE SE : CONFIDENCE INTERVAL UPPER LOWEN Sto 6 694.42 532.4 = J56.1 49.7212 822.24 566.59 532 6 513.98 397.1 = 008.7 35.1337 604.31 423.65 514 6 476.23 388.4 = 599.2 24.6786 5'9.60 412.78 A-83 i
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES lable B.17. Statistical analysis of biomass production data (ash-free dry weight) in_ periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, 23 October 1979. I ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE R104AS8 PRODUCTION (MG/ M2/DAV) Nu=RER OF VARIABLE 3 s 1 hudREP OF IAVELS IN FIRST VARIABLE a 3 fpAND hrAh a 561.94 SUN OF MEAN SOURCE OF WAMIATION DF SQUARES SQUANE F RATIO PROBASILITT SIG
$1595.5000 9.45 0.002
- STATIONS 2 163191.0000 PFSIDUAL 15 129468.0000 8611.1990 TOTAL 17 292659.0000 CELL MEANS j
STATinN mRN N 510 694.8246 6 532 51).9919 6 534 476.2200 6 i STATIONS MEAN DIFFERENCES 530 - 534 s 71R.1965
- 530
- 532 = 1M0.4426
- 537
- 534 = 37.7539
>a 119.347S i
A-84 1 1
7 HAELETON ENVlftONMENTAL SCIIENCES Table B.18. Replicate values and descriptive statistics for biomass production (ash-free dry weight) in periphyton samples collected from artificial substrates in the Missouri River rear Cooper Nuclear Station, 20 November 1979. (pG/ m2/04!) LOC AT itle S28 I f2.6 528 2 10J.2 S2n i 111.3 528 4 40.1 S2d S 22.9 S28 h 14.9 DLSCHIPTIVE STATISTICS 81uMA53 PNobuCTiuN ( M(./ #2/DAT) STAft0N N PL4h NANGL St CONFIDEhCE I N Tt:NVAL UPPER Luse:m SJN 6 h2.59 14.9 = 1I1.1 I7.0800 106.50 18.68 A-85
r HAZLETON ENVIAONMENTAl. SCIENCES I APPENDIX C AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES AND BENTHIC ORGANISMS A-86
MAELETON ENVistONMikNTAL SCIENCES l Table C.l . Abundance and percent occurrence of aufwuchs macroinvertebrates collected on multiple plate artificial substrates in the Missouri Fiiver near Cooper Nuclear Station. 27 June 1979
..........r...... D..
ti
.6, Si2 c ... . .Si, . C. ..<. C .S.C2 . . . . .t C . .,...
C......-
- e. .D.. . .I. .b... .. i, 2. , t,.. ii., 2. .. ..,..
PL.t.t 3.. tL.I.T.E.
.... .LL. C..L .. ..t . . l . .. .. .....P. . . . . ... .., .... .... .t.. ... ..i...,,,se. ..... . . . t . ... ..t 29.. ..., . ..t.u . .
C& l . 0C .. t .t . P.L .. l,O, , PO..
. .C . ,t .....n.,.t. g.C. ..t ... . . . . D. ... b.. it.,
1.i...
......f.C.... i b
ist.
.t.
2.,
,2., .S..
o, . .P 9
.i , t ... . a... . ,.. ,...
P .. .... ...C . .t.,Pt.ii.. .
.i . s. . ...
t..
... ...t .a P i 6...
i ..... .i.. ..:. 4. .. .. it
.P...n........ . . . . . .. ... t.. .t., .. . ..i.ir.. it .2 2. i. ,.S. .2 ..., ..... . . . . ,o.... i . . ,C.,iL6i..... .. i. att. ... ..... ,,...
u .. .i.r.st. 6 ....o .... . .i . S. ... t .. iD.. 30s. .... icio.t ,, i ii . .... S., 1,.. t,.. t01 6 OL469Ca.tt. ,3 AJ Ba in 53.. 12.. 2 4.s ..... y 1.*be.b.. C...f C 4. '
.* r . l POf'.
T. LIT.I..t pr. . s . I t. ..l . e St.. 3...(1.Libt. .IttC. j kD.t.st. ..Pfl e. t. E P t.e d0rf t.. . 2 . . l.. .2 1... al.. ] L P#tt..t..f..i6 I E ,
.P. I 3 3 2 29. ... ... I,.i !
C.tr.0. e.l .. 0 !
!.t.i. .P. 5 .3 392 4. 19... ...e d. 7.9 .P. to . It t d... 4.. .4
- 41. . t. 189.8 f l.t
.. P1.C0p T T.0.#t.
utP1. 43. t.t... s 3 3 . l . Sn. pt .t .6.G..l. l. .P. t 5 tv. o. 92 4..... .l $.. e.'
.P. .t 2 w .I ht. 8.2 .J.3 149..
P. t11.1. 0..t e.
- 8. .f. a.. ..tfle.e 3 . J 3 .s.
.I .I so.w e..d 4.o.IC .P. . . 8 6 5 3.e 83.5 PheCLPTk.#.3.
P.9Elb..
.,e3PtPit.toL
- f. PL.C3.. B . t i ... 3.1 49.. .#.d Co.8586 4 a . . . S. .1 9.. 89.5
..... lbt.
LOF f .il at h CC. f . 8..t b . 8 . ,. ..I s.. 45.9 etG.F.W LOP Se 1 60t IColo.t I. 7 C.uoP T.E .1.ta. . . 9 J4 ..I
.rp#QF.TCd1D.t .& 2 1 83 ..I it9e.) 99..t1 Cee .TU..h .P. . S. ..I 3,..
C.t . 10P.f T Cat F.P. 3
. . 2 to. .3 .....
6 l.. Itot Os 3 F.. .u.t et..dP.0vstC.E. ht.s.0P.f tet C.od l. P.P. .d 2 .I 1
,.S.
3
..b 3.2 .2.4 i39.9 .t g.
P.T.09.yCagall. ph.t. 96... . . . . 1,. . . 49.6 41.1
. 3. 8.t. 3.. 98 2 8 9.8 70f ab #f t 'ot 1Cm8.. 4 1 A-87
l riAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.1. (continued) 27 June 1979
....................i, v.c .
- c. .... .t. ...i., ... . c.
...,, .. ... ... i,..
si. ..s...c......c. ..i.cci s. . . t...os. .....
- c. . . ... .. ...
c............
. .i ... ....
c..o,i.....
.. . . 1, . ..,. .o .i i. ., ti,..c.i6..iso. 66. .. ...........c..... ,, i <,...ici.. . i ., ...
6., . u. i . . .i
,cs,. .t .c.. ... 1 ,.
i o 3 ..< .... ...
.,.. 6..... ...... .. . ..c..... ,..oc.. . ... . . . . ..... 3.i .... ..w ..... ... .,t....i... . . . . . .. ... ... i,.. ....i. . . ... .
i, i,
..c. .......i.ii. ,c6.o icu re,.ii ...
- i. is
>> .i.i c. ... oi ro c.c.s.... .... o.o i ... .6 . i c. i .c,.. . .,
i. e i o i,.. 3.., io, .6 c, . .c. i o.. .. .. ,. 2 ,... i... ..... ..... c ... . . o.,... a ., <c..ic,. u. ... . . . , ,. ... .. i,..
..,. . 11, i,. .., ... J...
6.ii]i r.. ,i ipi.fi ED .*s ib iL .E L..... . . d . i., ... id, .t... ... 0 ...,.= ....,e fdf.L .. 1Hu. ... 101.L .,4ci.S i...C.., i. 4. .. dd i 1 A-88
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I J, Table Col . (continued) 27 June 1979
)
90
.......b.uc h i a n............ 8.....................................
Der & 9tt e see C eer e g[2 342 $12 Sl3 et**/ A'9 Sd Ce &w La 64 C e sw Ca ad e t &a C w.e 4.) CtsiseIa orLeslas elbeb!Dla Chaeleat theafLOPowen La(gstese e e &
- etL6tDat e t D8 8 SP. 4 S 4 05 B*S* %.I 'I*' 088'"
aosk616e usI64Castia fLa&lCross tatoffeallpat ht19es18F)($ getelleaalbot e e J w Sw 9.0 4W.W 8t.* ma tel0at aata stanteG8 15 di is ee *6b. 3.3 14*.* 83*** mala St. 3 la S 17 Stw. b.* 60.4 d43.3 10faL page..gt le Je 28 s1 690 B.S l#D e $10.8 10Tak LLI.WCastia le se It S7 e64 5.% 57e.4 S**.s aeteeseben Catasatta 856PLes astLLivat attiLb8 AP. p 1 e w h. G.w b.9 19.w amaCentwo aCse19a beleselleits streaCaessa i 1 e e 39 w.0 St.A 34.$ itet6la SubLt 4e01.4 k61f'tailtifu COLLt.eGLa y a 0 0 S. b.6 S.4 13.. L>***tWVFTtme to .ge&LaF l s.wmos aLebe e 1 0 s av. W.o as.* #s. I etaattels Sr. I e b e 3 d.0 S.G 43.f Casaltsa f6etta Sr. 252 S>e# e7A 2d17 38 43 Se.A esee.h s'edaf.* Tel;0Affnuot& &P. 4 le 4 av AIO. w.4 bl.4 led.e etefakfbl{Jan valdentifttD herfabr*81 pat e i e is et, v.2 te.e gas.3 1 elPlathpla 4LaGabikke $ 9 $ b je. W.V 23.h ]).I
< euntea InitGewe 6 le e 4 vv. 0.d om.8 240.J eattlest earl 6 av. t ib2 2 162 Ilbb. 2.% Stv.l 1&Ot'Cela St. I G 0 6 S. d.0 9.9 8 vve.,A al.
PLaLCPThe4 fast 1 Gat ctegesta pg&tlea It 13 2A II Ju . 6.1 3$.e gle.g
) felfedf tten als poy&f f e tt at leeafvet engeleasCalcat 24e 7be 82D 104J 1416%. 2?.e 4341.3 4 Ata s.$
ChfwaalwratCet he. 2 3 2 1 14 b.2 4Jes is.# et DodFSICeE Leet? Al A0 4A tw 719 1.4 ve.o swe.u esfeQF$ffet felbutt e4 112 ted led JDib, b.b 34b.2 till.3 Pulastle g wava e g 13 1k.A 4 343 0.4 dJw.w a 7013L o f bauP5tCP I3at 33* Del S49 843b asbes. AS.e eseJ.D issel.4 elvel 9tiL 5 L at wtIdestit3CD of0mOFijLIDat b W ! 2 AS. G.d e.e sw.s T 4 9 A-89
l H.'u:LETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.1. (continued) 27 June 1979 4 LuCat10. $14 mai 1 es7 a set C ety u 31; 382 bli %Is
- tai # 63
&& Co av Go av Os au Ce 6.
- e et t u .e I.a aG6aitaa 47 e i e d 13 w.e v.o so.g Lar14amluat te C abravCat Campics e e d e av. 4. fs i t . e- Jg.e OaCafie 47. 6 0 8 4 S. 4.6 S.w 14.w 6lef.pa
&ies t ll'a l beI0amfielth &labLipet e 1 9 av 4.9 lo.3 og.s ColevedeIDat L.leotweleet CaleGovese 6P. I W W # %. bob %.b 43.8 P0&tP&DILbo (4.4.8 (westClue TIFT it eG de se &wav s.4 #be.e ess.4 &GLt#talbke St. PbFs w 2 a 2 sw v.4 80.w Al.a entwf astl as&u& ar. I t 3 b tv. C,4 4%.s ed.)
61140CalP0egava &P. 0 & 6 6 3 e.0 %.w 13.4 Taeffa#4J& SP. t 4 7 e ow 6.2 24.s Te.* 16erPowlsat felteimasetetta Gpour 3 T ll e lez. v.J 43.S Is=.e bk180ftaDistat CPIC0f0Pu8 elfthCfD& 2 0 e il tw3 J.d Sted lo t.w ChlCCTOFws 1858 SF. 9 1 8 w Iw. 4.4 9.4 le.e eseGChaCIWS &P. 3 e 3 #S. 4.w 19.W of.1 Telteteethl&Lks &P. l i e .I. IL. O f. D.e le o 101ab Colewkweluat 14 of 1s Ils 15 3 J.h saf.8 avid.e ter!Oscat st age 0Dhee l e SP. I 9 8 e lui. 3.J 8 tee ide., lufat st=1=us tot led! Isly 3 eel 43319 19s .e 1 485.7 soley.d TLfab SPECILS lb tate eer 27 Al 27 21
- oeGae.685 80dow evt eht Cccolte A-90
- -a- , - - . - - = , - - - - -an - , - . ,
em
}
j M6 NWME MEEEE
'3phC,' h.Mt M i
i# UUO l$/$ g-Lucasa 9 ear a per e
...ve.
ser C
...3.,.....................................
ete b bli 94k 687 als sta=/ Se Ce Se Ce 66 C# .et b6 CW 64 s n 64 Coiraaga (66e 45
+tCeLICa >ssetssta Claeldat C0s@tbOPnges LaCb8re.S '
EIDefeat t e a w e39pa 87 43 64 317 304 lesw. 33.3 Bes.* toer.. 4.atL30s bL4bdCastle PL6440rGaa , teCetfeat! Gat Waf Gatf 5f 869 46Cm31matstat 0 8 e taat! Oak 1 S. v.0 3.0 43.e
#a35 Sin *Ie68 5
- hat 8 SP. t e et. w.7 47.7 8.u.I 1 & le 1 PAI&f&as L0e615474 4 6 3*t. l.8 DI.9 led.2 4 s S. 0.c 3.6 83.9
, 10 fab majoltaa 11 a *d e 1 ase. 3.9 nom., } s'.3 e I )
-?Olah CLawuCoasta gg a to a . sg. 3,, go,e gen.
I I ses soenea [ 1644 Leone C14.op et.. l ; i f ree.tel.paa te.oeu 46.ve
, e a 4 ,9 L,. s..e p(BaGthla SP, Car n ipse 9 4 I 3 3 Jg, .., gg g 3.,3 Cat elt 5>. 33A dvd e0J 3ve
, te lL38tl.9064 SP. t test. 37.1 ties.. A f tw. * - t in 4 . Isv. 1.8 , ma rlast al ses.9 44.3 te. v t
' bh30 kalif 14W otPf abam43&at 4 1 In attPtohUS AP. 2 14w. l.3 31.4 tes.w 1 e 1 e 6.y otPf4Gitta tLEGat1&ba e lu. t.t 3e.4 Stamostra 8attGpbe 2 B e 83. 6.3 17.0 94.8 t 4 4 tattiban 4 66 6.m 6.4 se #
estTIS SP- la le 24 55 899 3.9 83.4 lee.t 8&OttCa3a SP. I 1 4 AD. PLtfuPTLAa 1 0.8 ab.h 47.7 PsGLleet PEDLasta PLaC&ba 12 38 76 it!CenPtte& d2 875 8.0 43.7 let.t Pa ?C owes tloat ! etkatCLIP516 SP. 2 4 e 13 slowers tCn 30= $ 3 0.6 JB.w we.9 letatutt atDeopettagpat we 7e les 3s3 asst. ga.e so%.e Ise7.6 Cat uea tera f tet &P. t 0 8 St. D.4 es)e0Pa Cas coags 1 23.4 1%.2
? e B3 3 333 l.8 39.9 13e.4
- e; 39J#81Cet 9 816G4 8 42 49 64 Se . vet. 1.9 94.6 d6 8. 3 j TOT AL DfL80PetCulbaa' 889 #2e lee 193 Stie. se.t oli.w 4Atl.S hf DnCPTILleat helDantifl(D etDooptiblus4 e Swas tLia 37, D 1 1 av. 8.9 $.o la.4 e , w e 9 b6 4.w In.e LtPinCEnggat atC10PSIC=4 CaeviDa 3 4 e 3 St. o.4 6.e OSCt116 6P. It.*
8 3 y e to. 6.9 $.0 to.4 A-91 i
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.le (continued)
?7 June 1979 i l
L %3W
.................OCATIUt eDP e WhF e NDP C #e r W $4I $$J S13 %3d M 84# 0%
46 CP Sw Cm Sw Ca tw Ce 64
- 4 Se tube 3 1 W 4 80t # 1 3 f a4 0 J G S j DD. 0.4 liet 4dev wit t e .4 agewhaDas bolstefif it0 Sie0Lig4t 1 0 3 da 30 6.0 S.e ae.*
Co!>vecalest (mInGscattat D AC801te01 Pts SP. 3 o u o S. u.4 S.e 83. PbLtPEb4 Lee (S.S.) CwhelClwa ster to se 23 22 49%. 3.0 Al.w D*.* P66tPhDSLue (5.&.) &asukana TIPS v v 6 3 1 6.h %.w As.* PL6tPt036km 57 Phta 0 e 2 3 lb. e.1 s.e av.s wee Gf aat taa&wa &c. O w a a St. v.3 t.e st . t eneofangfamads &P. Pura 6 6 e i b. G.0 S.v as.b
&Itewtalousw*b8 67 e 0 w a S. 0.0 S.v 44.*
T&4 t f am&J3 SP. 2 ) Ik J et, b.6 eb.h 34W.9
%&htPO91446 1misetaamalaf3& hs.ab p $ g -g g 44u 3.e 95.3 Ave.d 988=006468Anat ChaC010*ba eIClefft& 0 e 4 9 so. L.4 49.6 e s.t CDICGTGFuS (5.4.3 1s3FeaC36 G , a n 3. 0.9 S.9 13.*
C.ICJfC#wn (852 SP. b o I w %. 0.9 S.h 13.3 ea6JCL40Aw5 Sr. 4 9 J J et. 9.4 &f.B be.9 1,gastsattstLLs &P. 0 2 3 3 ab, b.d b.s do.k 10T&6 CalmdedelDat je J, is es hyv, 7.7 7w3.e see.v peritIGAf Pe *t #bC6 sala SP. 0 3 4 w 43 w.2 te.w ev.d IOleh ettf*La eli SWF Wev 6be id8JS. 194.0 alw>.e 7330.a 1L14L &Pe Cit A th e st a ete 23 J7 33 sw
- OsbeklesS *bbau auf auf Cww.f t s.
( l l A-92 u
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 3 Table C.l. (continued) 27 June 1979 \
.,,....,c. . . . . . . , . , . . . ., , , .c o.,. ., . ..c. .c. c. . . . . .. ... . .. .. .. .. .... .. i., ... .. . . . . .... i ii. , .... ......4., . . ....c.... ... . . . . .......~. . s .i,..
- i. . ,. , ... ... . ..,. . i s....
,e,,,....... i, , i. . .... ... .... ..... , , , , , , . . . . . . . . i, , i. . .... ... .... ..... . . , ,~ . . . .. ... . . . .
c....... ii,
, i i ,. .....m,....... . . . . ... ... io.. .... .... . i i, . . .,. . , ..i .i.i . ,
i,..
..................., ... ... .. ,.. ,,,,, . . . . , , , . . i,,,..
1 I A-93 l l l l 4 l
t HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.1. (continued) 27 June 1979 (
- a. , , ~ ,,.
.,. . . . . .. , c .,,.--. . .. .. , . .., o. < .,i,c. .. . .. c. <-,,.............,ro...c.,,,. ., i.,.. .. .n. . . .. .... .. ... .. .i,.. ....<o........
n...~.... ... ... ... ... . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , , , ii......no....,... .. ,. ,, ,.
...............,.,n,.s.
t
- t 1
I 1 l A-94
I P T MAELETON ENVBptONMENTAL COCNCE3 i i i Table C.1. (continued) E . 9 August 1979
- w. n. ..
.... .. ...e..u...... .
ii, , C. C.
.i> .. C. .,C. . .., . .. t.... ... , ,..t....... .... 6.....
f 8..
.C.t. ....u.. &.&...PC ..r.t ..C.i 0,,. ,....... .ri,4.. .C.ii.. 4,.. .. ... .. 6. , 3 .. ..- .... . . . .. .i.,..
i, ..
..6......- . 2. 2. .. .... i., i,.., ..,..
vons onwC..u. . ,, ,. .. .... i., ..... ..... C... .C . T.Li 1
. ... C., .a ,... .t. l ..g.... u. .n i t. . . 3 . .. ... ... i,..
C.. C.. 4 ...a .. ,,,
.. .. i co.. . ..... . . ...... . . . ..., . ,.
i ..,, ..... ....
...,... .. r......... ...,......i. ... ... i.is.... .i. ..... 9 ... ... . ii ,i i. . .. . ... ... ... .a. .,. .i ..u..c....u ...
i ., i ., >>... i# .,r,iC.. , .i . .
.e.. .. .. 6 o ...i. ... . . .. . i,, ,. . ... ....a .i...
m 4 68.f. ,L.C..A 1 iC r i . . .
, . r C .J,f E. . S. ... ... is.* .,8.C64r .I b 0 .fC.8...
fiiP E. . ... . . J . ... ... d... #fe. i.. (.. fd..,.fD.0,.3C.49..
. 2., i., i,2 .g J.0,. .tchg f D . f C.E ... . il d., . 2.. i.i . , .w ...s..
G. .. 5
.d. .tn.0,,.rC E4..L.. ,.i. . . .i f W ... . .s.t.t .
93.,. .7 .I W,..
.9 .i .i i . .
td 0 3 0eo,. E 30 to 3.93 .v. ,w....
') .'".. .... . , ).. . .. . 2 2.. ... 2.,.
ii. 5. 1
,g t. 2. i. 2# 2. ,1..ff..fl 66.t ,.,. . 2: 3 .. 3t .l .. . . . fd..,6 . i.,.2.
i n.t i t.i ii.
... ..3 fdf.L .tD.....C.i0..
e . e.I ... idy.t
... 94. ..., i.ig 191,3 .... g...) ..d..
- 3. 0,f
..,.id 0,fblD.. ,,
fJC.. D.. lit. . . . . . g. d.. ... .3.9
.&CTO, f C.E C...l.. . i . ... ... 3.. l...
I A-95
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE'S Table C.l. (continued) 9 August 1979
- .u o. ,,e mar e al# # Dtr 4 pik u 312 342 312 sik atm4# c*s
- 6. Ca &w .e aw C o aw C. Se
- t 4L v 2 y e tv. .8.6 Iw.w ta .es ...
s.: 4tC1wrStLas &P. Pbte < Pb&tCabfpuPdeltal Ue!D& 9 1 3D 889 9 1 w k S. W.9 3.v 5%.* bittthe Snouricat **.,
**Ipser188tp 84*db50at 0 4 y a 43 0.J 19.9 Colo0ecelgat C# Reded.]est ,. 9.D D.* ;5.9 Calmoso*wa 67 G G 8 w o g 2 13. t.0 t.o s 1. 3 secuCPat( fr a SP. 3 F06BPheleve 16.6.) C0h.lClu* Ts&E 91 129 le 121 2119 b.4 2**.S #Jt.
4 % . ,. e le. 6.u ik w j PGbtPawlben 14.6.) SCALattb4 13th C w 2 6.* 8e LTP PO.C0,4 SP. e 016v e4 8 5 5,kPa ,k, n ,I e ii. u.1 ,,S. v. 9.0
*.i ife., ,e,.*.i j i . s. .
4 3 e the 2 s .* l PUPS 4. ,2
,3 ., i.e.,
kat0.f at.tf ae&b,& SP.
,a.e . 0 i, i e,0. .. e.,4. S q . e,,....6w& w&&F. S . , ,. . w 0 0.. .. ....
14b1PQultak p.0 1,.= I Langla 3D. b 0 9 i S. t.e 1mitassaealetta Group 7 1 e le &W4 0.3 30.9 led.w up140 Chaps e L? Ca lC 0 tePW '. 'InCfue e 2
- 1 15 e.w v.t A9.5
- t. a ) 56. u e 2 ... 0.6 su.6 si.e CDIC0f0Ph. b 49.4 maeuCb40 8 v5 SP. 6 8 1
- Ik. G.e 9.e baEOCMICOTutta SP. v 3 1 w av. v.g S.e le.e tul ab Calkwevelbat d42 24v all dwa twsw. 12.9 404.4 4 7u.s (keafuPGGe0Dat vtI0am117 8tu Ctp AfuP9GUnipat e v v 1 S. b.9 S.b 19.5 9mPlugwat e sg. 6.3 g g ,-. 14..
thlvf eT1FIED toelh194t 2 3 g ea6t e tt a PtLaCIPb04 i at64=obomafa l sp ...a a t e !.! 0..s t. ... ,. ... ,.w ,,..
. U , .
J
,e,a, ..e,.<, ,,,. .... .... 2... ...... ,.w.. ,e,a.e *=we.. I I
TC18b SPsCit8 th taCa ogr 23 AJ li as I ( 1 1 l l ( A-96
\
l j
3 MAELETON ENVIftONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.l e_ (continued) 9 August 1979 D.,
. . .. 6of.t,4...
- e. , e ,t,
.ti,. ...,C .tP,. ...., ., .Si, . C. .6 .ti. C. .93C. ..
- 4 ,a L.. ..a PhattetLaletat6 fueseLhases feettselba PbasselaDel OkGtSla SP. J O v SA. v.6 83.4 kl.e anseLl&&
G&tbOLa&dfa r&&SAGPCea , calbigat tala eteeleG4 13 e t 8FJ. set 44.1 Ste.1 PhtSTlea 9 @mabt i O 4 3 w.9 e.7 44.# Petallta bueGl&kla e a v 7 0.0 6.1 so.8 10 fab malvigat la 3 3 567 s.e to.3 dwe.w 701ak ObibuCastfa in 7 3 507 6.e 4e.B 4*e.v setwe0 Papa It6tCla apseptuoritua , Cathlgak Caenta 57 47v Ist A se evet. 23.5 tillev ***t.d TelCDet140048 SP. 9 IS 31 41J. e.w es.l 360.w mtP146tel194C - Seeafvet attt46 tallest 83 6 e leg. e.t to.) die.e SLFouessa lettstve es 46 J2 luis. 8.4 Swe.3 18vv.8 8ttt04 tea 47 l 8 I sb. 6.s e.0 e.= eettikat eagfla SP. 3Ji 834 lie 81'#. *e ses.3 21*t.e IbwetCala 4D. DW d' Ad 8*** I'I . I 883*3 I' 8
- 8 FL4CLPThen Phtbleat PipLtSt a thaC10s 0 0 1 7 G.* *.i 28 f telCWOfftwa Pattooefil0ag stumfCblPS18 &P. D 1) 9 Ste. Get 95.J Js*.9 h t er'.Pa t Ca t b at lpealW86 at$tGP&ICN1046 382 A7 at 48vd. 1.1 4734.8 643w.4 CathmatuP4fCat SP. 10 A e lei. e.S 48.7 led.8 sto oUPSTCpt wes!S 39 JD 19 438 let ete? 816.*
htoweratCat tal& bel Jsp Je7 dtt tiet. 39.6 n=3.8 diew.f p10eoP8tCns Slestate 2 9 4 sv. e.g 38.5 e,.) atDebPSICat SP. Pura 36 83 3e set. 1.) eb.6 sel.e Pkfaella Fbata il 9 l9 sww. 1.9 el.1 ded.9 IJiaL ptpburat(plDat e44 JA2 Ave 9843 &#.0 899i.% #Re*.E L& P13CIWI& ak htCf0P8tCWC CamplDa i e 0 . e.w e.l. de.1 Olpttea 44*vblDat Dnipih14fitD &lmWL! bat # b 1 1 W.* *.3 **.8 Caleot0elgat (playouala at b&lP1 bit =0lP'E SP. I e e 7 e.0 e.1 so.8 elCpwPstCres gr. e e 6 es. 4.3 46.m tal.s POLIPs016ve 85.5.4 CueelCThe t urt 123 Il et leev. e.A 486.7 late.. PChtPtolkee 85.8.1 SCabatewa 1176 3 9 2 48 v.9 85.s ti.* PLbtWL881bke 47 Phra 6 d 3 t i. 6.5 87.3 Ste ? petWT4ettasava 8P. 38e lee ave 4eew. St.P avta.h else.* a Puya 3 3 3 e6, 6.5 138.3 l ent.0..f ae.
- v. e, st caa staeawn a.p.
l.on0.. P. 1 4 w.. ae., i taeglaeage 67 Se 31 39 ews. 8.7 IJA.e 58%.* 16euttmaba SP. PwPa 3 3 s et. 6.2 la.a 93.* Sentrovatat friseteatelatta 6euer 29 y &. def. e., e7.7 434.8 un g noC&aull est es*DCha0lus 6P. l . 34 '. e.a it.9 Sa6.. th'.dColCul0Pla SP. 4 0 & ev. e.e 43.5 ev.8 10faL (n!kd6kelDat $44 til Asi
#see. 49.* Sees.) **18.*
tapir 10at velefallflge t*P198 vat s e e ev. e.J es d BDe.# futat ethth04 20ed leve Ides 49,83. 169.0 9942.e asete.e Tblab athCl&& le tac 4 htP at JJ lo e A-97 i I l i
HazLETON ENVWitONMENTAL SCBENC S Table.C.1. (continued) 9 August 1979. w .
....... .... ...C.ar o.. . ..... ...................................... .., a . . . .. P C . . , . ,i3 ..a., .w C. .i3 &w c. . i>C.
S 4 ir.C &... . .. tu ,...4.. a .a .a , ObibuC est la PLa a.l 0.Pum a a.C.. ....ios. ..C. ..a.,64. . . . . .. ... ... ....
.a.no...ii, ai. .... .. , , . 4 .... .. 3... .Si. ... i... . . . ..ai 6a..C.E.i
- i. ..>0..ian. . . .. .. ..
3 236 .ai.i.a. . , si . iii. ... .... i,4..
,osa6 061..C.aira . . .. 4 .... .., .... iis.,
abameOt004 AmtsCta tretatsoFigea C C. as .t.I 0at69 .. 4.i 4 ... ..... ii., ...... ....a
.P. . i, i. 2. . .. 4 .... ,i...
i . 1.Pi.iC.O.. nii.a
.oSt.
4peatbhg ggPf8CatllDat 33 7 gg 36 33g. g,g () 4 g)g.#
##FIh*4tla &P. 3 9 w $ a6 e.0 84.8 44.4 41P604tes latgGous et 44 39 el osv. J.t len.1 tyv.i 818 w . " ' . 87 3 g 3 4 33 g,g 3# 3 34.3 sak130aa satTIS Sr. gg is g, 93 Seeb. 7.s $18.4 SDs.)
Ibuaf CNIa 8F. De b1 43 et list. 6.3 360.0 sy s.e PtECCPTtsa Pa8&IGas
- 5%. 8.8 *** 88.*
Pastesta Phac 808 8 8 4 3 TesCporftea . P6tCovay33 sag ht#4tCLIPS15 SP. 3 47 31 34 8*v. l.6 118.# '**.8 ptLp0PatCmICan 38eafbet alvporatC880at el 43 48 et tutt. 4.* 3#9.0 e t i. 8
- Cpt gealwPS f Cat Sr. b 89 9 34 dlb. #.' 8**S
- l* 8 m306DP33 Cpg teault 4 8 e 4 449. b.S 88 9 $*S.B ates0*stCat Poisomi 113 lov tal 149 448W. 86.7 387.* **8.5 mY0edrSICat SP. PbFA le Il 9 It 445 8.0 e6.e e4.4 Putangle Phase la at $6 89 stw. 1.4 GI.b 843.8 Pctaagga PLava kgra e 2 w 0 &w. 9.w 18.9 81.*
T018L mI0mlPaI(h808b s4J dde 3to dl8 ,449%. IV.S 332.# 444.d Lt P10 Cit t 0 46 ag.*
*tCTutstCat CanDiCa 4 e e 3 Ek. e.w Av.e maCTb6 5 t Cat EP. Pura b 0 t v S. 6.9 S.w As.*
6tCk186 6P. I v 1 9 Iw. 0.4 tot to.4
- s. v.e ns., (
Put.tCkt u i .inesaf euruole Posi neCa.s.wrDe s sa. . e i e s.. LLLt0Pftta EL*lGa6 belpetttritp LLp10at akDLTS I W 4
- h. 8.n t.w ls.s piritta tel>06 ton L OL6 Confun w eltak
#8C9pPhtC1pa $P. 2 w 1 3 23 gel 9.6 39.9 FebprE0thee 15.5.3 CtseflCide Ttte to le se 32 ote. 3.1 so.e etf.8 PW&lFtda bue 8 6.5.1 &C 46at ebe slet ) 3 3A 4 tut. 0.3 SA.4 le e.t t&Lfrtbibee SP. PDra 3 0 3 s st. G.1 33.0 tw.a #ptdlaella=&ue &#. 133 fp tti til 3etw. le.F Adt.e avee..
entdia*3f assba Sr. vera e e a 3 st. e.1 35.6 es.f 81840Calepoke95 &P. 6 I l D lb. 0.9 b.6 84.4 fa9Bfa#8da er. 19 9 23 de 369 8.e .7." 483.8 taetta*Swa $P. Pbta R 6 3 9 46, 6.3 48.4 69.8 toegrowinat Lasala SP. 6 9 8 8 lb. 4.0 9.9 lo.* f*1&ttetettella 6#uvP la Il 21 2e eht. 1.t blot 888.3 e 3 9.9 b.4 lb.* 1stkea attistia GkOUP Phra m 4 U & 4ema 60CL40aleat saeockactus SP. I t L l av, t.9 6.o 9.e 4' DatuC8tC0for48 87 t 0 e s S. 6.0 n.d 15. * - 70f a6 Cpinumwel0as see 324 234 23 4www. 17.4 Sea.1 Ift..I t*P8030at f ettettfif!LD taptb5 pat 1 3 L .e .#. 6.6 e.% h*.s tbtab estf ab6 vee 973 $3ee Beek dawdv. let e die 3.8 o #* 8.5 1Ctah SPECitS lb 49Ce Dtr av 34 se de A-98 ' 4
\
Maza.ETON ENVIRONMSNTak. SCf5NCES - e Table Col. -(continued) 9 August 1979 s C.sw. ,,,
..e,. ...,C . . .
t....,...
... C. .si, ,i, . C. .si . Ce .C. . . . . ., ,u....t......
s, e. n u.e n neu
,u0.ct.ia . .. s.. u. . .. , . . . . . ... ... ..., . . . .e.. ...
D&l.CCastI. F.L.8 3 nroe.
.ipiu. .. t... . . -i . . . ii,. .., .... io,..
P. ...... 0.... . . . . ..e t.. .... 10, .6 .. . 0.. i. i. . . ino. ..> e.. .. .. -s e . .... .., .... it...
,0s .6 06 ce..... .. i.
a s .., .,0 i.&....
& Pat et,put.T&D a m ..,
C a. u. ... C. 3e. i. ., e
... i .i.: ,,e,,..
I
..i..,.<0. 0... .P. . t i . ...u...ir. ..i . ... 6.. ... , e e , e, ... .. , i,... ..,i....i. .... ... .. i. , i, ,,
e i.i . a...
..i .... .e..
ii.h
....e, . .l .....o 0..... t.., . . . . . .l .
i.0m,. iie . i. , .
,. >> ist.. . .. . .e ..
- e. . , .e C. ... >> .
i, 3. i. ... .. PPeakIb LkCuP1 $ t.s a Plekkala P&4C10s 9 e A e- 13 G.e 4).w ed.I SBACh0Pitsa .
#3960P5ECpl9es 314 el 130 w Je#b. 34.6 8119.7 ased.1 50eafves #fDeCPhiCel0 4 9 w 9.. 4.S te.9 180.8 7
Cetus 47urttC#4 Sr. Il 849 4.6 94.6 a m:060fettet Ce#15 49 *b So 3m MIDuCP6tCat fa180t! ell 3At J60 See beat. 89.5 .388.e 4 us.t 85.F e e e tv. 0.9 *B., Skt.4
#10DoratCat SteWheth 3 etDmDeSICat SP. P.F4 e 19 e & lab. Del 46.6 44J.*
Pg1&stia Fb444 et 79 4e Il lebt. S.T 194.9 #81.8 fGT.h .'T0movettn39.t saa 6e0 334 Int toest. 68.7 413e.b ofte.. Pbtittats0PuGIDAE 13.* be 50Eef8F &bW w e W I b. 0.e $.5
, Olrikea e 39 9.4 tr sl.e Welkto 2 e o aseb610.llFIED 6 b871kb. # # e v 43 e.0 Bt.u of.8 wtibteftf Ce86060*le.at t p 68eUL80.k telegnuale.E (p.s.) C0st gClen 1TFt 839 As as 6 4 tit. 0.8 936.4 4 tad.*
FGLTPtbibu.9 40 8, 24 4 tuw. 8.b 281.8 ##e.9 WhkDTahlt 46W& &P. 2 e t e St. 0.0 9.6 4..s Ts..Ita.8&b3 T st? m69 SP. 3 e w & e ab. 6.1 S.6 lo.* 1.atropie.6 ar. yvy. Taitete.eelef14 Coubt 8 6 e v .. v.w t.. 33.9 belmutL&9%8h.k G 15 8+.* Bt.u 47.1 CpILD19ect elfleCTdS J & W tC01G k # 9 e ab. w.I 86.6 si.e v e . S. ..o tem AS.T Ce.edCL.ebe 4 Old5 SP. (Sal 87 3 w v to 6.. t.. 11.* DhEWC#8Cb10Pb6 AP. U & age 14 ad le snev. v., 14o.? ,se..s 101.b Cutodecala.t 8**l080&h n, 9.e s..S belDan33F3tp tpPIDae.t 2 e e Lt. b.9 10 tab stet 4d6 Blle e#3 fel All 11996 19w.0 93A,.R Stete.1 tbla6 GrECIh5 la tac 4 Dar 26 le le it 4 0 1 4 A-99
I i f I l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.l. (continued) 3 October 1979 4... . . . . .
. ..,,...,c co. ..i. ,
- c. .. c . . c. . . . .
, , . 4. ... .... >>.4 ......u..... .. . . . . . . . . , < , . . . . . . . 4 >>. ... ..., .it.,
i
................. 4 ., , . . . . ... >>>.. . . . . .
F l.a 3 4..WH .4 ett'Lmp aSilstat 0-. j t. . f i f f . 0 4 D fH.e.&ud 41 & Dae # 3 e B.*.. 9.# B B.3 97.4 hel die se S Woes *ds .*s e b.( 41wa a 5 2 St. S. l 6.7 38.7 f t Su SF t 2 1 IG. 9.9 B l .% 49.I
*sts es .e t e t B e 1 U.* 4.7 2. 7 a c t s t. e I w;I et 90 3g 3 g au. 3.4 393.4 B 6 91. P D a t s .me s ar.. e s 4 3 8 60 e. 9 f t.t 49.9 et.6 eale lt 3 ? 3 ##. D.4 39.6 1 81.% .,a. p.9 lt 3 6 4 Fi4* t t G $ 3 99 4.P 89.9 %).4 pelpilta 4 8 4 9 3 e 7 0.9 6.7 AD.1 Stef f ab8va t be l ot e t a t a e 3 e ?. e.G 6.7 dt.7 f if th tegelost 94 315 4% 3427 3.0 430.1 B e9 2. 7 1.*l8 trione pa ts,. g g j e g e s g as e g repe ? C AFlot lFUm.. t 9 6 7 0.9 t,1 39.1 1"? 8 t. TwDif tCIbe6 3 9 0 7 e.9 4.1 A D .1 T"let sabebut.6614 gb 387 43 g e s t. 3.o egg,e 3933,3
- e. s ..i .p as t 4 6,he Ie st er 4 5na ve tee o r gr a tu espetradins 4 3 4 e 3, g,3 33,3 31.4 t e6 ene 6 8t.ltop a te e a C se e t s.ae f a* t it 68 mg um se 3301 d.S 293.4 013.9 te tt oe f f meia- % le 37 395 0.6 61.5 IS*.a
*s e t a... e l a p a.f s tv .
- p. rt a .e mi se at $2 11 61 1340, d.m 121.1 528.4
.I e,e.i . ve.. . * * . ea vi is iset. a. i .e.e s (
sv. .o. .. i .i e r.. . ra ao se sis. i.e s e i.* 4ea.t.a. S i t e ** *
- S*. $$ 2 4 548 8.3 8*.* I41.8 aos t euee
** 346 5.. e2 te? et 17e0 3.S 240.9 li n g.s 45%v0=14 && . 3 S e 99 9.2 17.S 79.e ye e t note es pt a; 8 4E #48 bI O Pbef5b& 4 $$ 3 $$8 4.3 s,9 B BS,9 e
i A-100 )
HazLETON ENVIRONNNENTaL SCIENCEO
- Table C.1.. (continued) 3.0ctober 1979 . .n.~,c..
e <- a.
.. . n e ..s., . . ... .. .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . , . . . . .., i i. , u.. . . . ..c...
n.. nn.
..- . . .n. ,,., .n.... ..n... ,.....c..... . n. ., .. .. . n.
n..
.. n ..... n.o.. ....n....
n.
- n. ., n.... .
...........c..e,...
n ,
. .u.... . . .,. .....,
n n.....
. ... n. 4, .. ..
n..n..
.o. n..., u.. ..
i c............... c.<.......,c.,.<,..
. . .in - .n. . u... ..n..... .. . .. n. ...n...~i.. .... . . . . . .n u.... ..., .. .. s n n... ...-....... ... ..... .. , ,, n.. ... .... .....
w .. , n .. .... .n., . . . . . ..... .n... . . . . ,
,s.... .P.f l. . B...C.... .. .. a. . e...... ,laas.. , Cue... . .
s A-101 _____m. . _ . _ _
MAzutTON CNVNtONMENTAR. SCIENCE 7 Table C.1. (continued) 3 October 1979 a 3 ec.. . .,e. . . ._. 0
. ,. . , , . .f., , 3 .,. 63 .e ce .e ce .n.e. . e, . .. c. ,.e,i s, .. c.
cel.
. .se,. . .a .t.a a.
- e. e e.. ..
el e.e 4 ... . . . .. . . . .. 3... .9. 4
,,e....e.a..o.. . ... a.,aaa 1.,,a.. .f t.se , 8,a, . . . 9 9.. ... ... ...t.. I ' #9 eal8tr a ba4te el ts ge t st aatwee e e 3 93 0.6 89.3 Bla.t -
a.noe 4lbas( & 30le&ja FL453 teen ea tt.da se spe.asrs.nesas D ueta stes 8 3 9 ge. 9. 3 4.) d9.9 malt #.seles.B 73 It 3% 438 4. 3 b3.9 3df.I eats vae ga*8916 9 3 0 7 e.e 4.1 38.9
*e 611ae a.16 haI4tegata 3 0 e 7 0. 9 6.9 30.9 f eif at. m a g t.g ,as 24 80 ft 447 4.1 44.7 t o'.1 T4161. 6,6 8wateat ta 14 88 lb 447 4.9 40.1 989.9 am t sereew s BaseCla tems ap esepts sa t me s tpas f ac e? 4 se. Il 3% to 413 4.5 63.8 334.e t a -(1m S tect'0 8 St. w 3 8 3). 9.3 6.7 3D.9 sept a set seat go.af ter we ptactel tpag e 39 39 369 8.9 let.3 % 3 3.e se etsSeet s sp. e 3 3 31 0.8 88.5 $7.4 Blow *ma lettG60* et t 39 900 89.0 344.3 579.6 sitemwt.a 69 3 Os 99 337 I.e BG4.5 458.8 eas t teet eac t BS se. 83 0 4 341 3.1 39.I R3%.4 . A**e fiel s se, e e 3 1 6.0 e.1 29.1 4ew .a e a .palean c,e.eyegg ge, g g a 3, g,e 6.7 dt.T 16t(edF19 6 F 6E f ess* ? ile af se eme t 6395 t 5 be . t 8 4 13 4.9 29.1 tal.e agepaarattelt a#
- 1 9 083 3.3 es g 3ee.,
sees eve.coas tfogner 3 Tes e.t esetst p* pr. a le*a e o 9 1 e.9 4.1 - 30.1 mpf* Derf %5f he t* D I S 9 8 L B B. Get 4.7 28.7 ete*eP95tfee feels fgFa e e t 7 9.9 S.7 76.7 ogneepascef tensoel 834 et lie 3 s t i. 33.4 348.4 8984.3 a n noopn e t ** 49. Fet t 3 9 9 h G.e 6.7 78.1 totaatta 96 ass e a e 4 ee 0.9 6.9 ott te es f ates$ela st,a7 4 m le.smee t
- at 3 I I 38 Det 9.9 9.4 fpasst.aett a tptfef > 6eet'M&S eso**IDb 8,7a Sp. G e e v. 9.e 4.0 9. se
$ 9 307 $ .% I4.9 $4I.4 Pts &tF9elbee 4 8.6.) Ceset$ff t's llr4 S ee 6.7 3D.T puttatalbe* 8 4.8.5 Statef ees tvet e e t 7 pgsst ro w t hem at. eppa e e t 93 e. t 6.1 39.7 morpt ant t esta.s sp. 3e9 Sp les este. 3g.t 994.7 3093.4 esepenes teepe s sp. pet. 3B 83 36 ee ?. 4.3 838.o Sta.e testraenos so. 34 34 ' 35. es t. S. B 4. e do. 3 toestasses sp. pePa 3 3 4 St. 0.9 29.0 825.4 s ettFiebleak Leesta 68 4 4 8 49, 9.4 30.9 Stet tes t ep e aan t u 89 34 SS Gee. Set 94.3 .59e.1 Esteest beellens t a bevet e e 3 T. 9.e 6.T 3e.1 ma.sottantes ma *m'heyle* pme. p. Pest a e 9 4 9 e.G 9.9 f.9 1"T a l te les.eos g e a t gag g33 gg3 gg gg, gg,3 gggg,g gggg,,
g orget .. e 6 41*e 4 8D 189 f ePleIgat 3% 7 le 307 3.3 194. e 449.e 10144 etete.eas gol Set 444 9467 S te.9 B 2 59.4 b lo g .e Idf ab SFkt ith 8h Lafe DD P 34 go 39 A-102
7 HazLaTON SPO#IftONMENTAL SCIENCES-
-Table'C.) (cantinued) 3 October /9.
u.
.. ,,, .c. n. .. ..
e.
.i><. . . u e. ., i. ,
c......
....n..,.,n.. n , o u.. ... ..... ...., . ....gp . < . , . .9 . . ............n... . . . n. ... n.. .....
- c. .. ... .. ... . . . - . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...., ...n.., ..m......, .. .. .. n... ... n.. . n... ......c..... .. u .. n... ... n .. . .n.a !
a.......
- u. . . .. . n
.i
.. ,, . . . . ... . n.. . ... ........4... . ..n. . i , ... ... u.. .i , .... . .... .....
p.......... i ,,
. .., n. , u .. ... .n..,.
n.....
.t.... .n,o,....... . ... . . . . . . . . .. . ... .i .. ,u co ,.,u. -...... .... . . i ,, ... .., n., ,s..... ..............e... . n .. ..n..... . ......n.,n. ...c..... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . n. ... n., n..,
n u...
....n...... . . u. . . . . .. . . . . n. .n. .
- n. u.
.n. . . .,. n .
- n. ..
..n... .. . . . . u ... .u. ... ., . . n. , .. . . ... . . . .. . . , . . , . . , , . , , . . . ,. ... .., n .,
m,.... .
. . . . . . c . i n . . . .. .. n ., . . . . . . . ..... ...., ..m.......... ..., . , .,
o..,.. ,,..o.,..
, ii.
i., i.,,..... . . ...
.. n,,... ... .., n., ,c . u. ... .n.. .., <. .,. .n. . . ... .. ...c.......,o.e.n. . . c. ..... . i.n.. . ... . . . u. ..
- n. .. .i..
.m......- .., . . . ,,, nn,. . u., n,... n...., ....n... ......n...m.... ,, .. ,. ,,.. . . . n,.. n,..
m .. i,n ..o .n. ...n. ........... ..n.,
,.....,,c.......... ,, ,, ,,
4 A-103
- HAELETON CNVlftONMENTAL SCCNCE',
Table C.1. (ccatinued)- 3 October-1979 e.u,,,c.. . . . . . . ..
. .. c.. . . ..c..
c.
.. . - e .. , .. , i. . .... ... .... ,.,.. .. .m........ . . . ~ . . .. ..< . . . ......e.u... ...m..... ,,, .. .. n... ... . . . . . . . . . . ............ ....c.,,6... . . . .. ... ... ... .....c,... . . . .. ... ... ... ..m..,..... ... .. .. ..... ... . . . . . . . n. . . ....., ..........c.... . . . ... . . . .... in.. ...c.........
c... ...... i.
. ......n... ... . . ... ., n. . .... .......m...
n..,.. ..
.u........ .. ,i .. ..... .. ..... . . . < .., . , . . . . . ..,,c...... . . i n. .. . ... . . . ... . . .<,. .... ,6.ci.. . . . ... . . . .... ..... ...t.... ..,..<s....... . . . ,. ... ... .... , ........,<... e... ......u.....
i., ... .., ..... n.... ......
. , , .n. ...
_ .u .... n... n....
... .., ... n.n. . .i.., .. ... . n. . . 3
- n. . ... .n...,
.. i i. ... ... .m, . ., .e.. .. .. .. . , . . . , . . . . . . .. . . . ... ...
c........
<............6... . ............c...<,..,,,,
n. ii. .. n i .n..
..... n. , . , . o. . .. . .. .. ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .. . . . . . . n, .,., .. .,. .. .u... , . . . i.....
n..u.
. . . . . . . m. . . . . . . . . . . co . . . . n. e.. .... ........,..c.,.. ....o.....,.,. . .i .n. . ...,. i n. . . .
n...., i n.
...c.i........ ... .n n, u. . . . . . . . . . . . . n i .. . . ...n.... ......n.......... . . . ... ... .... u,., ...m.... n.. ,.o ..n n.u. ..... . . . . . u..... ..,,.....c,......c..., .. .. ,. ,
4 A-104 < i
s MAm.ETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.2e Abundance and percent occurrence of aufwuchs macroinvertebrates collecten on multiplate plate artificial substrates in the discharge canal of Cooper Nuclear Station. 27 June 1979
.. .. ....... ea,s.............. ...... ..............................
str a t r e* 5 otp C Pe r to att til 633 933 mtses .et ed to 64 La Su Ca 64 Ca 64 a 4 && tw et 4 88 Cassaela a:Dow1444
- powebikta
#549fvat ettes 47 ) 9 8 w d4 v.9 t?.3 St.l ersa10ba WetbteT*fitD tae&tWD4 3 e e e S. 9.4 S.4 ab.9 s e t Ge'obCT S besaftoblbst utsafttba GhaCILIS e e G e a nnE ks t,a OL t ***L aa r l a PLs 5 8 6*ue s thCettwafgoat talWsellf j&b hec =IIDattget e 4 y e de. W.9' ab.G t t.D sa&Oldas CastTpGaatte GlastowPaus 6 0 # e 84 4.0 lu.6 A3.e eala btmelebl et 68 %e 492 s196 f t .I 3102.9 pita.a seIS 68tfaCelet b '93 I' d St atte, 8.9 6ee.$ sete.w sala C0sekel8 0 .4
- b ev. 6.6 sl.e 69.#
*ala $P. 11 Its t1 se 1896 I.e offet 8989.9 Pht& tina Sles 6 es 3 = 48%. W.2 1e3.9 tat.J SWTab ealplust et 9A2 ese sbu livsb. 14.3 avet.t laeas.*
TJf ah OLibuteasta ob vie ete the laubb. 3e.5 Avad.4 Bde.v.i ast**OPDwa CDb.al a emppgvaaC E o laL81Aspot elebthba alTICa 0 e i e S. v.e 9.e 83.9 abatetlCa 8Caelea btE084flDjEk olboaCadjte y j 1 2 dt. 6.0 s.3 da.4 letaCla tPethfSQPitea valDEeTIFIEC &PeteLedditta 6 0 4 8 3#. 9.8 S.e 88.e Cath 30aE Catel8 SP. 990 tese 2323 5463 btase. 99.4 3dlde.4 total.3 TmICuttThout8 SP. e 84 33 83 seb. 4.4 395.1 4ed.e atPtaGEstSpaC L*lothfit ttu htef amatBIsag 3 e o e it, v.s dt.w 19.9 mkplaghala passaata 9 9 w 3 9. 0.0 b.= st.w
#4PfaGth$a ELEGa4Tbba 2 0 e e le. G.e 66.6 ...e stPfa64tle &P. t 2 ) e St. 0.0 Jb.6 #w.s SIthOtasa It?tb89# $ # 3 g St. o.0 86.6 kl.e i pu15046 !
4 tematett 88tTICat e to 31 Fw bek. o.7 dit.J ele.1 DAPTIS SP. 13 w w e lat. 4.8 319.6 det.* 4606FCala SP. t e 4 0 39 v.0 43.s eb.7 tLkCCPTrea S t*L60.lda atJP eba t&P. e 9 v 3 9 6.6 S.e Sted
' Plot:0 6 pteLg&'s FLaC4ka 4 de 29 de esp. 4.5 ee.s s e l . *e 4*ICPOW$toa Dbited*f81Dat hf WetChifa!5 SP. t 4 9 4 dh. p . e. go.g o s.*
A-105
HA2LETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.2. (continued) 27 June 1979
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Loca. > . ..a ,,, a e., C e., w 12 .a. t. ,. si, si, e..., ..., .C. a C. 6 Co .. C. .. . . .< C w ., ... ,s...wf&,C i .i Ime41gPL ArpthP6f tn&0at 199 2s4 &76 del **o9 S.* Sil.1 leve.S Ce& deaf wv&tfet &r. D le le le de* 4.8 at.* 444.5 of0*LPatCat Oph&S J9 14 le 35 e.' b.D tt.e die.d atDdOP&tC t Opela rura e 5 w I ,. 0.w 2s.e es.#
etC#0P&? Cat 3616044 213 let til Jte Ju*w. 4.a 2dl.2 psesoralCat SlowLama 9 w w a S. w.w b.e 7es3 '. *4
*t DeGr$ICat 67. w I 6 w 3 v.4 S.w B).*
elkeLP&TCat Sr. P9Pa & v 0 14 eb. G.6 a.w av .w Pbfamila PLata 4 w J 19 149 0.2 so.o 147.5 1Dfah k3GBQrattelbst 4%4 D2% sob bdt DJ36 11.4 446.e 3 WD $. 8 agDadyT3L30&g aw eef684 &P. 2 0 y n Av. v.0 st.w st.e a rDowPf1La &P. b u J a dt. 6.0 39.w of.s eararpitaga SP, w 3 & s 63 w.0 d).* Ib.4 LatTOCLpI0ak LtPf0CtLha 67 D 1 0 0 5. 0.4 36 14.w Girtlea L*IklellP*th b3Prasa 0 0 w 3 4 G.6 S.9 is.e
&&nbtloat SteJLawa 67 g i 4 e Ib. c.W t.e le .
C*Baut0P1 bat Chasegungaat Cb f pf DCa tech 6a96 Se, 6 w 1 6 5 0.0 S.L is.* j Dafm018hkBPLS SF. v 0 8 v b. 7.0 S.6 43.* J e4C90PatCTea &P. G 2 3 w AS. 0.0 d).* 7%.. FLLIPkD3Lue lLLlhGittap 4 tw 4 le let. 6.i v7.4 Sta.w PLLIPedibW* (6.6. 3 Cbes!CTuo lite 82 JJ4 les 493 JA4'. 4.0 667.3 a1/4.3 FLLIPt01Los SP. Pura 4 & e eb. b.I e.2 de
*stufsattaa&wn &p. S, 3, 34 37 gou, e,i 3,3,g 3 .. .,
w 41th0 cpi #0edeW& SP. 4 e l 11 Sww v.R 43.3 Re..# 1aetissab& SP. 17 194 ee b5 anew. l.3 332.e al4J.t fassfasswa 47 PwPa # U 4 & D. 6.# t.D 3%.* 14etPOUlaag Lasale &#, e e 3 0 43 c.1 an.J vs.= folgenaaengegla .pduP 21 ed 39 43 85%. G.w vv.. Alf.3 4 s1 *uChao 8 3=as i telCOTD#Wa titleCf wa v 45 to av se%. v.4 100.3 sal.* CelCJf 0 Pea ( 3&aChawaval Sr. O e A J 95 W.w d i. w lo.s CDICGIG#ta SP. Pera D b d 4 ew b.b dv,. t s.e Ce l C ut0P: ' 'a&D SP. k di le is 41w. v.e det.S Ill.* esewChagawa &P. 20 vu fe tel leta. see.4 Ales.4
&&tobQ&e181&& SP. v e a e et. .Is.d .e JJ.4 gul.w **f0C88CUTOPut &F. v 2 w 2 du. web 41.5 se.#
Iml&tteatejgLLS SP. 2 W G d twe 4.0 1k.6 al.e 101a. Cu lPC6.J6 & Dat age 3*S set bs3 etit. 39.$ dubs.e e)3 8.e CetafCPGuhJual welbest1Pito Capa1WPbwohlbst 9 2 1 J dt. 0.0 v.e A..) a se g p ggas wh tDEeIJ P AEG E8tip.Jat w th 4 14). O.'t et.t &Ds.e Wh10e.Ilt akd Emploiv at Pura G 2
- w lb. 6.0 30.w si.e
#LesuchmJssa aP. 7 u , w an. 0.w #3., tas.*
IbIaL ethT4bb RI)W 1438 $*Il Alif 4dde%. Stu.w dSdbl.u ebe.d.. Tctah SPEC 1' .o taCa se P d6 en 43 48.
- b86ael PU9hD DUE edi Cbbmitu l
A-106 l
MAER.ETON ENVNIONMENTAL SCIENCES Table Ce2. (continued) 9 August 1979-w,5~ ...
, , , . 6,. .... .t.,.
Si2 98, 98,
&w Co w Co Ce .tiw Ce .6.. . , . , t at tw.
t a.. att. tit. 06 8 wwC esa 8 4 k ba ll dPQa t selblwat awkw&AQsda FWm(afwa j g e D 89 b.4 49.E o f. J - tal& sanelowl 6 4 4 4 e4 1.d 86.4 ts.w Pklat asa FestLS 8 6 0 6 be bel S.h 83.4 oballSbatle gel &talata e e 8 v 3 w.1 5.6 It.o TJTab balpleat 4 4 4 2 es. l.6 t.e av.D 107ab ChampCastia e e 3 2 et. 1.6 9.e sw.t atteottoge AmeCatIwe acastea 6hl&se11Fato mI0maraelta e 8 8 8 St. 0.4 b.e 8t.* SettCla SPet te SJPite a CatalDat CateIS 87 2b In 24 19 sew. 9.4 29.e "s a .1 telC4W1febDtt 57 4 V A 9 46 9.J 19.W 48.e etD14watil&at 86eefket htPi t.(a l 4 G a t O 6 8 9 Dw. 8.9 29.4 #8.3 parfaGaeta 47 g 3 9 0 lb. d.4 9.6 J's . 3 4f e 'ketta t hit 469e 17 l) s2 le de6 4.9 e2.9 208.1 eatlla.. eaPTIS 57 D# 2e 29 31 #Dw. 14.9 b3.9 88P.* S&OhfChas b). ) I $ ) )). p.g $.g gg,) a68Cn0Pitaa P4TC m0* f t lf.86 tava sC&lPalm SP. 1 & 4
- Aw- v.3 88.4 bt.B have0PatCatbat Besafeda afweUPatCelpaa 31 le e J99 in tot FD.D 2ee.a CatheafGretCet 67, 0 04 alt g g
1 w St. w.2 n.o 4e.4 e 39 4 Ste. 3.3 esr,kedre
.wPs t Cat t et raiso 1 a3.a 93.J
- s. 4. P, so ten. 37.4 lee.w sal.3 I
.v0ea,6rCat stevLans v at0h0PSICed 87 2 + e 86 v.a le.e el.e l 9 4 8 w to wel n.W lt.e Pufsatta e bata It 83 2A 2e 9.1 atw. et.) 898.4 Tdfab afpuJP5fCulcas e7 et 98 fe 3v.e Iset. llJ.e se2.4 Lt.PidC h e l be SP.
tCfDP&tCat s 79Pa 0 .e Puk ICE
- T6070Dicat 0 I t. 0.3 n.s St.w eeIb&*TIF $6 0 0 % e 1 6. e.d S.e 8e.4 STFILWa Stew 6that HolbteflPltp 63awt& pat e
/
Cal 60edelvah i & I 49, e.t e.4 se.e tela w ooeleat 6&TPFwlE*GIPES 6P. 3 v v b t. t.1 9.8 St.' alrowt&tCita 67 t 8 8 e 13 h.4 s.4 19.9 , P&L 3 Pa D i b J e (3.3.1 C0nylCgwp tyrk n be8UfaeI3aR&b5 &P. t t 4 BW9 2.b bei se.W
$7 49 Id it Gle, thei 94.8 194.1 Sleet <elmutuose SP. 8 8 9 e tw. e.2 ba le.*
IA9tl4#6de 57, 21 lanIFUWiest 8 4 9 e. . S.2 78.3 448.8 tamale.6P. teleta a.elefla newer 8 1 3 & dw. b.b tow W.= 4 9 A 49 by obet 94.0 961duthaulbsat osedL&selva SP. e e 2 e sw. e.1 1w.8 se.e , latab Cel#U.4880am ** te la le eas. J0.7 98.e 29).I Ca
- af wPw0eub at Whlvtalitate Cheafvew galpet e e taPleapat i w D. e.I S.w A9.5 welDtef tfith t*P&Llbst S e e I D. 0.8 bw 89.9 rutab statuch 287 Ret its 20e 4929 369.# lolet toe.e 70146 SPtCitS !s taCm htP 23 de Ad St A-107
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CEENCZ] Table C.2. (continued) 3 October 1979 Discharge REP A 512 NO./ i 50 CM SQ M % Nematoda Unidantified Nematoda 14 280 1.6 Anneli da , 011gochaeta Plesiopora Naididae Aalophorus furcatus 1 20 0.1 Nais behningi 77 1540 8.5 7 Nais bretscheri 1 20 0.1 Bratislavia unidentata 6 120 0.7 Total Naididae 85 1700 9.4 J Arthropoda Arachnida Unidentified Acarina 1 20 0.1 Insecta Epheneroptera Caenidae Caenis sp. 12 240 1.3 Tricorythodes sp. 8 160 0.9 Heptageniidae Immature Heptagenitose 61 1220 6.8 Heptagania sp. 8 160 0.9 Stenonena integrum 37 740 4.1 Stenonema sp. 5 100 0.6 Baetidae Baetis sp. 25 500 2.8 Isonychia sp. 2 40 0.2 Plecoptera Pe rlidae Perlesta pistida 1 20 0.1 Trichoptera t P sychomyi idae Neuroclipsis sp. 1 20 0.1 Hydropsychidae Imature Hydropsychidae 27 5^0 3.0 Cneumatopsyche sp. 2 40 0.2 Hydropsyche orris 14 280 1.6 Hydropsyche frisoni 174 3480 19.3 Hydropsyche pupa 2 40 0.2 Dipte a Chironomidae Polypedilum (s.s.) convictum type 38 760 4.2 Polypedilum sp. pupa 1 20 J.1 Rheotanytarsus sp. 272 5440 30.1 kheotanytarsus sp. pupa 34 680 3.8 Tanytarsus sp 31 620 3.4 Tanytarsus sp. pupa 4 80 0.4 (hienemannimyia Group 20 400 2.2 Cricotopus bicinctus 1 20 0.1 Nanocladius sp. 10 200 1.1 Rheocricotopus sp. I 20 0.1 { Total Chironomidae 412 8240 45.6 Empidae i Untiantified Empididae 12 240 1.0 Total Benthos 903 18060 A-108
e eaza.ETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. Abundanc6 and percent occurrence of benthic macroinvertebrates collected with Ponar dredge in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station. 27 June 1979
.. . ... 6.c . w.. ..,c ... ... .... ~,
co.,...i. ,
- c. a c. . c. . ..
...~..x.... u. .w ,.. .
c.. ...
..i.., . ... . i . ... 4.i ... .... ..m...... . . . i,. ... . ... o.i ...i,ic.i m..... . . .. . . .. ...6.,i&.61,...... . .. ,i, .. ... . ,..., c ,66:r ... o. i .i it . . ..i ... vi, . .... ... . 6.. ...,6..... . ., i i >> .
ti. .. ...a 6 . . i s.. c.6., .. . . . ... 6 . ... ... .. . .... ..... i
.i...... .....
3.,.....,
,.i., .. ,ici... . i, .. >>.. .... ..... o 3.. ... 6 6 ..c..... . i, .. 3, . . .. ..... ..... ....c... .w. ,6....m....6....... ,..b,....
C
.6 6.. ... . ,6.cio. . . . .. ... ... >>.. ..C. . i m. E..i .. .w .,i,i . co... ... . . .. i. ... >>. .... . .., >>.i . .... ....m.6 .
C.f.0.
- c. .... 0. ..E...
c :.. . >>. ... ... ii.i c.,.,..,.......
- c. .... .
,..c.i .. . ..... . ... .i c.. ..... . i,.. ... ... ..c..i. .........u..m. . i. <31 .i.. >>.. i.i..
i
. ... ... v.i . u... m .m.. . i
- o. .. ... . . . ... ... .... ..... )
..nc.... .i .... .. . ...., . . . .. i.: ... >>.. .. 6 c.i......... . . i, .... .... .... .....
e...,o, . ..
+ .. i u. . . . .. ... ... a,.i ...c.i...i m .. co. ., .. m b i.... fite . 6C ..d i . . .. i.: .3 >>..
ro . ....... i >> .. .... ..... >>... ii.... 10,.6...C... . ..c. .e, . i. i. 1 I l l l l l A-109
l , 1 1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 27 June 1979 e
$32 .... ........bOC.a ...f l............................................
um
,,, . e. . D,C ,3a .3. ,,0 .ta.i ..,
av Ca 49 Ce og te 64 m t && CCat let 4 anne 68ta ut ! wet **t t a thantoptes matbibat 13.7 toesta&& penC3 3 e J 23. 4.6 36.? Tdlab halbaWat B W & Jh. 4.e 86.1 18.7
! Lao 9 9 4 l.J 4.3 4I*l 1.ewelp & 6 st. h f l. i tu t oella m. C AFlt b!D bens 1 unava.14elaw Amm. alfowel CaraLLlewees 23 e se 271. St.d v2.8 3'. ? . A awLwWeakwa rabutti 4 4 & e. 1.J 4.3 87.3 bleeuveikva t o es t a 0 & IV. 8.e 89.9 47.0 Lleeuwe lbb& Chapane.us gapuS 1 g 13. d.4 a.3 d7.?
E le=Ove lsk& nop e nt &&l tel 2 4 A 44 e.4 4.3 27.8 sleevue 86et bctasolands a u 9 6 1.4 6.) 47.1 fu1&L ivolt itivat av v t- 166 65.0 144.6 es3.2 101a6 boleuCasela 3B w 2d t= 1 74.s ide.1 436.8 amin.vveva inteC1a trea=.yueftma er=tatelkat
>,ngaw tela $311gComa 1 e U 4 1.2 6.3 d1.1 Cae.swas seat =fCa=Cha 4F. w e I t. l.J 6.3 .7.1 w&etasa Celer.o e t Wat C a g evese g e n e.
Coimb.beva &P. 2 0 3 39, 3.6 30.0 47.0 C e t t f 0C a. t OhC.b6 &P . 3 e b 3e. 1.1 de 9 124.2
>&enl&Cm!& &P. t 0 4 2t, 4.9 JS.2 10s.4 PasaLault heOeelt LLa SP. O b i 19 A.6 1.9 #1.3 WuLtPaw3Lue (&.S.) C'Jef ACf oe itet 3 0 0 6 f.2 6.3 d7.1 WLitraD3bwe 46.8.) aCaLateve fies n v g 6 a.2 6.5 ' 7.1 d
PC L I Ptt ' hb e (4.8.) hjadtaa8 ITPt 1 0 v e. 1.2 4.8 47.8 f ulak Cul#0*u. ;3at e e la 124 2 a.. t 15.0 1w6.3 C t h a f oP40= uc a t balst ef tf ALO Ctea tcra4ca gust 3 v 9 6 1.2 6.3 27.1 1etal etermoa av v 34 529 .96.e lee.) 11b.8 FCf at SPLClas la 44Cd Der le 3 10 4 4
,1. , , <>
I
HazLETON ENVmONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 1 27 June 1979
. in as.i..63 .... . . ............ .6, . . . . .., c
- 93. 93. >. ,, .,
co.,.. i. , C. .n c. c. ..a. . .4 Ctatakea sneeksua avv e ytyta mevelusa espea sp. 1 0 1 83. 3.6 6.3 27.8 ametLB6a uk BwoCeat t a FLaatoposa talDBwas paeanata Fm3Cl 8 4 4 13. 3.6 6.3 27 Total ealgspas a 6 4 13, 3.6 6.3 31.8 ter4FRCapar estuteftfl&D top. 11pDwf CarlLLIF0mma 3 1 8 32. 6.4 32.4 54.3 LaseuCFP.W8 huf tet 49ttet 9 1 3 6, 8.3 6.3 31.5 kg.aDes&Lua putaanlatus i G I la. 3.4 4.8 37.8 total f ugle 8CIDat 4 2 ) te. 16.3 82.6 54.3 T0 fat OLIGocnaria b 3 a e3. 43.6 46.7 11.7 seleeUP4a CautleCta SSurses abeL!! Pat a4&LLua &# t 4 8 8 4 I.8 4.3 37*3 BessCis SP*.ef sor team t e=a es&& pas tenusue he a it e 1 Ste. JA.4 194.9 498.2 ntsaGth8e &c. 1 8 e IA. Jet 6.3 87.1 pttleGttaa tie I G 69 89 f Cassipat
& 48.8 lif.8 smaChasteCUS SP. 4 e 2 35 7.? 38.0 93.9 Castit &#. 7 e A ble Lt.t 39.3 449.3 1stCuntia00La 6P, e 0 1*aCh0P?tes 1 6 l.8 6.3 27.1 Lar10Castwak L&DfDCtLha &P. 1 0 0 4 5.A 4.3 21.1 CULT 0Pftsa +
46elDaa WaluteflFIFL ELelDat aJWL18 1 e d 6, 1.3 6.3 37.8 battaea - Ca8ecmpagpat (n a muodolt at Cp f Pt **minuaceda SP. 9 2.6 maanB4Cass 67 2 e IJ. 13.6 64.2 I e 1 w 6 1.4 6.3 11.1 PbbtPtoiLwe 84.4.5 SCaLattva IIPE S e 2 33 J.* 32.6 64.2 learfan&de ar. 3 0 0 4. 8.3 e.3 31.1 Bantruegnet l
**pChaplwa SP. j 9 . O t. a.a 4.3 27.8 '
f atteteassamfla GuubP e 1 4 St. a.e 80.9 47.9 wotavChaelleet osedLLaondh $r. 1 0 0 6. 1.3 0.3 11.1 luf=L Cal #0*valDat 2 t 4 49 le.1 St.9 gg.y TufaL etataba 4, g ,g g,1. Bee.e ..s.s 963.3 ILlak 6rstits at tace sky g4 y gg A-111
g HazLETON ENVlftONMENTaL SC4ENCES e
- Table C.3. (continued) 27 Julie 1979 t,3 8
...... .. bOC. a.t!Os. . .... .. ... .. ............ ..
St* a utP G DEF C 330 SSL tat stant 06 Sw C# 6e i s 60 Ce se a t th Cuat sof a==astwa 06 8.oC*aL T a FLaatodona watcivaa O O te. 3.b 10.0 Pl.3 taeanals teaC4 3' 3 0 0 *1 s.b is.e 64 3 tef ab talk & bat l f eelFICleat 3G J B 114 34.9 308.4 440.3 WhtWittlf!Ep 1Ds. efibuki Car 1Lb&FD&a& L3emova s6es Cteegs 3 0 0 13. 3.4- 87.6 St.2 0 0 8 0, sei e.3 37.3 63*=dJeaww5 Charaecostaeus 4.1 86.7 78.1 3 8 0 3.. bl**enolb4S 90f f en&3that v 0 6 1.3 e.3 17.3 63*eopolkb8 90estettae* & ) 3e 4 e 337 43.4 1.3.7 918.3 j Tatab fustr3430sk Tetsh b63G0Casata 30 4 e 346, 43.9 R$1.6 4tJ.3 assa,6yJha A=SaCla wirftsa Ca l put Je lka t 1 e C n g eonge s t at
- 0 4 0 6 F.1 6.3 31.1 Calebtwave ar. 41.0 CeVrIGCal#060*w5 &#. 3 0 4 St. det &#.5 name veelCetPTOCm!Pw edags Dr. 1 0 0 4 1.3 4.3 27.8 ma**tsCasa er. 23 1 1 195 30.9 834.5 934.0 papataustesvenattta Sr. t 0 0 33 a.9 38.5 1A3.5 rubt PaDabu* (6.6.5 43 8W68e5 f t pg 3 0 0 e. 3.3 c.3 27.3 3aespositat teaCLapiJa sp. 3 1 e 25 4.7 16.7 . 14.7 10f ab C#8hyhye[0a6 36 9 3 390 56.1 lev.7 Ble.4 1dia& e6*fhb4 64 13 e 946 409.9 430.3 84t%.1 10faL SPECit6 le tac # Stp 11 3 e f
( i A-ll2
HAZLET")N ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 9 August 1979
........... boCaf504............34...................... . ...
Str a par e tar C lse gse tee staa/ .et AG Cp as Ca SG Cs se a 4 SE CGer auf
, an.t6Isa W64ovCmatIe F Lt S i nrum a futifACataa belpatI! PIED Imp. ettnoba CAPILLItha*& 7 8 9 44 43.7 44.8 88#.0 abbObelLd5 LlmbbelWS 6 9 & D. 4.2 4.3 27.3 LlamuDonLea Castia 6 0 J 13 14.3 83.6 be.2 LletLwhn.wa muetst!&ftp3 3 0 0 19 10.7 10.9 08.3 10166 Teste IClpat 30 e J 52 08.3 64.0 249.9 70186 bblkpCoatia Ib e J d2. St.2 St.$ 249.9 ARimouPOka 3 4&t01 a tPatetuurItMa CastIDat StaCatCamCub 8P. 0 0 1 6 4.3 4.3 27.1 Catt38 SF. & G 9 t. 3.3 4.) 47.8 j a ACanv7the stuportsCn! Cat Pbtaerla p haea 9 0 4 6 h.3 6.3 31.1 retab .ter. . ii . . .. . ..... .... .....
TgtaL SPacits la gace htp 3 0 4 h f 4 A-ll3
I HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continted) 9 August 1979 LO SA
.... ..........C..a 18 0 s..........2................es...............
Otr 4 per o mar C 530 nau $3e stant .ht 69 Ch hw Ce &w C s &d e t 58 Cuer lef anteL1La v61.M eatta FLtalurw.a fumaractuat untolettfith lee, elindet cap &L61FLama t t 97 4J.9 37.0 es9.3 Lienovel663 Ct6Dia 1 e W. 7.5 9.4 140.1 6 4.htwe shwa Chavant D& 4 ahkn 2 9 19 84.4 19.9 340.8 Lleesch tben pCD Fen taltb3 3 1 35 de.6 38.6 340.t Lieooveissa och skolangs e n 9 7.1 9.4 &dk.a 1ClaL Tbf!P AC ALat Il 3 133. 800.9 15.4 9e0.4 Twf ab GL4hotmatta 33 s tid. 194.0 75.6 940.6 10 Tat enefawa in a lad. 190.0 13.6 940.4 TLlab 4FtCith la ta(n 6&P O 4 8 A-ll4
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C. 3. (continued) 9 August 1979 LO S
...... ........C.A T I O h. ..........AS .6,a P., C ,,0 .t,,,.. >>0 . ..C. .. C. .0 C. .A, . .. Co.,.. 3 ,
j aantwica T bkI m0C # at t a VLnblorona maltipaa D4pu 03*1747a 1 A so. 2.9 88.9 24..I Paeanals Fe&C1 8 9 9 W.7 9.4 840.8 191ab ea1010at 2 3 47 J.s 9.4 139.8 fuelFICIGar khistaltFito loa. elTn Cat 3LLIFO*aa v 1 9 v.7 9.4 820.1 bmI0tatif3&d Ism, elinuuf Cap 4LLIF6mma 2e tu evt. SA.2 347.9 2441.6 asbwCog6gs gla*btlWS 4 IJ 151 al.S 76.6 *69.e ILT00a36v3 fe sPLETCh4 0 1 9 9.1 9.4 adw.8 63 *.00#4605 Ch#s!B 3 le 12A. v.4 e4.3 440.5 Lla*00plLv5 ChaPa94&tlabb6 4 8 9 0.7 9.4 830.8 Llet0088sb5 pCf f ellaitti 6 e 333 Sw.! 40.9 340.1 Totat Twelp 4Cabat 39 at tile. 46.A 396.9 be43.9 TOT AL CLIwCCestf a 43 e4 3:33 et.9 4k6.3 ties.3 a= 3 =.0>09a 368ttia a Pat he p0rit sa EP*a. .sdat SasaGamla SP. 3 0 9 0.7 9.4 BJk.3 Capelpaa Catsas Sr. s 0 9 0.' 9.4 829.1 teaCaopftba atbeeP&ICnICat enlof e11t a t0 pTGhuP&ICmIDar 4 1 9 0.1 9.4 12u.B 03 rites C n 190h 0 e 1944 < tassOncognat Cpleunwah6 67 0 2 19 8.4 10.9 340.1 C6 f pf uCat e0nos95 er. 0 1 9 0.7 9.4 Ed9.8 elCobratCita SP. O t 9 0.7 9.4 138.1 j an g rowle at PeJCLaD195 6P. 3 I 38 3.9 18.9 24b.3 i f atreue 6f dLLatk5 2 0 19 1.4 88.9 344.5 101ab ChihunueIDat b b 94 T.J 0.0 0.0 tap 3Dabat valuaz itt stb ter16tont t 0 9 0.7 9.4 330.8 TGfaL stataus 4W 99 !)le. 50s.e 387.4 49d2.9 f TCTab 6PLCita Ih taCn stP 18 as e i A-ll5
1 HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) - 9 August 1979 LOC 41806
....................... 928 ............. =*=.****************** -
olr A abr t NEP C E DA0 SSG SA # 'tas/
.el &W CB SG Ca Se ta av e 4 && Cunt 197 annen3ca 06 8 tsUC da t I a plt &loyJun e futaf(Cgoet 89ttesve uniktailette lae, oltmuvf Car 4LLifsema se too. .. 2 *vv99e0.0 39 l.4 9,99veh.0 '9styste avouenstua Lis*C#fwa 3 19 8.s tv9twe0.0 #9*99935 e6aeCaldes Soetpeft i LiseJwk!bb5 Clot !B lj 240 le.e tevv9ee 0 sww vtte ---
4 ,6 D e Dv99960.0 *tettyve Lleedbalbwe Chepattutgasus 4 ll), e.. Dvv99e0.0 *tuvette ListGJ# 1kuS WOP t eslSIkel 7.2 vv9vved.0 '9syvene i blen0ghttb8 WDEstelanw& S 94 1J186 Tuolt!C1L&& ## II 'I*' '" ' TOTAL CL140CoatT6 4e Id4I* '8*3 99999ee.0 #9999998 a ominnetcoa _ l*4tCla b!p le sa belotaf sp ito Cipf twa 2 39 2.9 9999se0.0 89999twe C a l y nnon g w a t 4 to t ruu s saa PavChab!04 Sr. I 19 1.4 99999e0.0 #9999998 ggtah Cp!wu*O*1 Cat B I'* I'4 99999s4.0 e999,tps
]
10taL et h'i ns3 ev 1804 10W.9 9t99900.0 e9999pte TLlak ArtC it h in taCm st ? 9 9 9 m M
'N A-116 3
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 3 October 1979
=An ...................a.......3 htP 4 REF 4 ELP C Sie tsu SAC mEAhr .0t hw C# 40 Ca 30 Ce av e t SE C0er Inf aans6&pa 4
Lett.a rt mee Ia cheS!JFbma twelrlf twat unabth11FILp In. 0 8 8 13 I.7 4.3 47.8 walbenflFilD lae. .tinov7 31e taFALLIFL>sh CarlLL8pba .s 34 27 22 bit. 79.4 64.6 234.5 a w LQ0elLwa bisevelun 1 0 & la. 1.7 6.3 A7.1 688609s4693 nyppettattui 1 2 0 97 7.5 26.9 144.2 LI=nowethwa v0tsko14ews 3 1 0 26 3.4 16.7 71.7 TJTak Ivetr1Cipat 37 31 30 417 e3.2 43.3 177.0 30f ah LLIGotaatia 31 38 30 637 St.2 41.3 177.5 uo IO&=1 8rI& D 2 3 0 32 4.3 86.7 78.7 a k I nst POD A I n hC 14 tentBENOP!kha Cattivat Canals 17 t 0 0 e. 0.9 4.3 47.3 enallvat estith $P. 1 0 0 4 0.9 6.3 27.3 1.ICacPTtha e t p>0P5 5 Ca l D e t. afne nrbsCat entboel 3 . O t. 0.9 6.3 27.8 ettaesla pLava sjelena 1 0 0 6 6.D 6.3 47.1 ( = l ee +=c a l pa t salobowsisat C e t r iot ale Joveva &F. v i 0 6 0.9 4.3 27.8 rki tetulwa 15.6.3 CuatlC19e tyFL 3 0 1 29 J.h 86.7 78.7
*kttet63 bum SP. Phea 1 0 9 *atufantramaua 67 3 o 4 0.9 4.3 27.3 9 13 3.1 12.6 64.3 TJ1st CeamunoplDat e i a 60 7.0 31.6 136.4 79 fab etsinua el 35 38 724 800.0 803.8 443.6 lbfaL SFLCl&& le kaCe pty gg g g I
l 4 A-117
S
=
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES J Table C.3. (cottinued) 3 October 1979 bucatlos 53 e... .... ...... . ......e.2 . ....ee..e . ee.eoeeoee.....ee..e may a atP e ate C 130 530 $30 mtani .us 60 Ca 50 Cs 50 Ca ad a 4 at Conf let annt Liba 06 8i.4% =at f a .. PLa&l0Pues malttuas Fakanals felt 3 0 0 3 e. 0.4 6.3 27.1 TOTAL *tidtbat e 0 1 4. 0.4 4.3 47.1 twelpACAdag belpth18 DIED Iso, .lge CariL6&rGees 2 1 0 19 3.1 10.9 47.0 bh10kefif1LD las. elieuwt CaPALL160 mas 14 44 19 1266 7J.6 len.6 141.5 " autocelhus Llanumavs 2 g 2 32 1.6 6.3 37.8 a6LG0albu6 Pabwkil 3 1 0 13 0.7 4.3 27.1 ILIbue8Lua IterLifont e 0 1 6 0.4 m.3 27.8 LimhCDw1LuS Cemets 9 e 9 151 8.7 10.9 el.3 LlamogelLug CLapantgggasus 3 g g 39 1,1 0.0 9.0 LI*hdb88Lua #067 mal &Tt#1 10 t t 132 7.o 2e.9 124.3 , LImabDelbue 40ttis&a4WS A 2 0 32. 1.8 16.7 71.7 1014b TWe tFICIDat 102 et te attv. v3.7 3J8.6 Dbl.4 TCial bLlwGCoatf a 142 et 99 1676 90.0 224.1 toe.v aminebeeLa testria LPas se pOpla s a treneseguas me aabass a St. 0 2 8 19 1.1 10.9 47.0 bn= ara 6sevelvat ser*wn Sr. 0 8 0 6 0.4 4.3 27.8 ' Inn.*09tsee R WIE*GPatC=10at ates0FatCat Falscht 0 0 3 4 0.4 5.3 27.8 ., kirf t ha tam 1Libilt 1ED DIPit aa u 0 t 6 *
.a t.3 27.1 Cramsooniost C>4e voumlegg Catanaveva Sr. 0 1 0 6 0.4 6.3 27.8 Pu gPEDILee (4.4.) Cuat1CTsp ffet 0 2 0 13 fr . 7 12,e be.2 _
101ab Catscovalvat 0 3 0 16, 1.5 te.9 et.3 Ca m a f oei.cocc at bh80tal &FitD CkpaloPQvCm!wat t 1 0 13. 0.7 6.3 27.8 rota6 . 1 o. ie. 72 iO2 i?4.. i00.0 i92.3 .47.3 veras .. Clia i. t aC. . , , il i. i
=
A-ll8 2 5 - E
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 3 October 1979 LO 9
.... ........C.afibe. ... ..30........................ ........
mEF & par 3 Str C 580 liv 538 aEans 05 40 Ca se Cs se Cs 5. a 4 58 C0hp ge{ 4*.e.gra usisvCnangs FLt23 0rus a eaJDICat a w LwP nt'm e h D9eCafuS 1 0 0 6 W.1 6.3 21.1 utsu 04G!Tafa 10 20 12 266 4.3 57.7 2eDet eats esp 8ae1615 3 0 0 6 e.1 6.3 47.1 TClab mald3&at 32 30 12 277. 4.4 60.4 246.9 TwoIFICavat vetwastapItu gee. ette Cart 6hlFbena b e 3 19 0.3 18.9 St.3 b6 tDa =18 Fatu t em. *ITausf cap &LL8tump5 260 27s 226 esta. 74.6 2se.I 1239.9 e6LCDalkdb &# s=LS Lb5 1 4 3 82. e.t 32.6 94.2 as.oos1LuS PIsott! a 20 3 395. A.8 99.3 419.2 e.aecelwas 60.testi 3 1 1 25 4.4 6.3 47.3 Lsenobhabus Capels 4e J4 Bt SWW. 9.3 370.4 1AA.9 Lle*00* I6es Chayant&tg aeva 1 0 0 4. k.B 4.3 37.5 L 3.*vce ggys ag6 p ag garte t 2 3 9 30 1.4 41.3 I??.s elemodesebs batsteaanw& 3 0 0 49 v.3 18.9 81.3 10146 tutae gCiv a t 323 3A7 260 5796 92.3 443.0 8943.9 TutaL wtsGutmatia A st 33 272 eu?). ve.1 eal.4 4074.3 a*1ambe00m 3*&tCta ePats**urtama eeatatea ae
.esactosa se, 3 3 3 gg. 0.3 0.0 0.0 estilbat eaalla SF. 0 1 2 19 0.3 10.9 47.0 1mlCoueltas asTpOPSsf>1Das a r Dabra t Cof benen 3 0 0 6 9.1 6.3 27.3 albebP&ffat t>1&uel 4 1 1 74 1.2 32.7 440.9 Pblas t i. FLa* 0 1 0 6 c.1 6.3 27.3 WIe le ma (pleL=0=1Dat (pasCaum3*as Lejeombava.66 FGblFa0lL9 t 0 0 6 G.3 e.) 27.1 t5.5.) CLaVIClum Tutt 5 2 4 44, 6.7 16.7 71.1 F6tuu0Caleonessa SP. 0 0 1 6 0.4 6.3 47.1 obt0fangfaa&w& &F. 1 0 0 6 0,1 6.3 27.1 Iwlat Cnascous3 Cat 3 3 g g), g.0 36.7 78.7 C .a ib..
n a 109s.u.s.0D at
. ito Ctaaro,aoc.iott 0 3 0 ... 0.. i. 9 .i.3
) ierno .t.i.ca 344 m ,0... 2.i 62. . io. 0 ,iet.4 tavaL 8vtCzas in tace esp 37 33 33 A-119
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table C.3. (continued) 3 October 1979 boC4f10e b2e
. tP.a .. . t.,. .c . a., ..t SG Ca 6w Ca 50 Ce 6w a t SE Cunt Int asakkita we l4LC uat t a rLt h! OPup a Ton 1FIC16at 22 1A 25 179 II.5 304.2 3804.8 un1&EnlifttD !Ps. .timbbT CaPALLltGhe& 4 0 32 3.2 22.1 97.7 aktobstkda b!**cm164 3 2 2 2 44 4.4 6.3 21.1 avt00a1Lws Ph 4:11 3 31 e ed. e.d e3.9 179.1 Llan0Go!Lua Ca.bla i e 6 6. 00 6.3 21.1 Lle=4welbu5 CLayantDe latta 0.5 J'3.1 1 9 BA. 1.J bleaCCp1Lv5 motf at&54Lo! 1 0 m. v.6 6.3 27.1 W 5 Llam4DdILuh LDhatalame&
2b ta 30 9te. to.2 490.3 11<1.6 191aL TkS&F ACacat 2v wJ su the. vs.4 400.1 1'48.6 futak CLICOCasata amte,oroom ItSaCia sPatofmurftma Pt Pl at.t h ! ! W a t 1 0 0 4. 0.6 6.5 27.1 41 gnu.tse lhttL60s 18 ACaortas a a:DeurstCalDat 0 1 0 6. 0.6 6.3 27.1 at0*urSICat Omm15 biettaa Ca8>=40saLak C e s *Labe l= &e
& 9 J 19 l9 15.9 31.5 CpTPibCalw0hoew& &r. g,, g,g 39,g g g g g, PbLtrtb!Lbe 46.8.) CJet1Cloa 3fet T0lah CalmondalDat 0 9 4 2b. 2.b 29.2 593.4 lutaL stefac6 30 to le 995. 300.0 391.2 les).4 197a6 SPECit $ In 4&Ce Pap 7 ) g A-120
t HAZLETON ENVIRONMENT #.L SCIENCES APPENDIX D FISH P0FULATION AND DISTRIBUTION STUDY t b A-121
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.l. Species composition, abundance, and size distribution of fish collected by electroshocking at locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May - November 1979. Total Length (mm) Wet #t (91 Sampling CPE Mean Range Mean Range Date location Species 6.0 331 - 320 - 15 May 534N Goldeye 3.0 401 325-445 1027 400-1400 Carp 1.0 196 - 100 - River carpaceker 1.0 130 - 20 - Channel catfish Total No. Fish 6 No. Species 4 Total CPE 6.0 181 167-195 45 35-55 534M Goldeye 2.0 1.0 490 - 1450 - Carp 1.0 140 - 30 - Freshwater drum Total No. Fish 4 1.o. Species 3 Total CPE 4.0 Shortnose gar 3.0 632 - 760 - Discharge Goldeye 9.0 310 '92-369 283 60-440
'enal Carp 6.0 381 302-460 870 340-1400 River carpsucker 3.0 409 - 750 -
Bigmoutt. buf f alo 9.0 553 407-640 3120 1010-4830 3.0 400 600 - Flathead catfish - Frashwater drum 12.0 205 150-352 167 30-560 Total No. Fish 15 No. Species 7 al CPE 45.0 532N shortnose gar 1.5 623 - 780 - Golicye 4.5 329 310-340 320 ':. ... Carp 1.5 254 - 440 - Total No. Fish 5 No. Species 3 Total CPE 7.5 532M Goldeye 3.0 221 181-281 88 45-160 Carp 4.0 359 214-510 940 170-1840 River carpsucker 1.0 301 - 390 - Freshwat er drum 4.0 213 152-315 136 35-360 Total No. Fish 12 No. Species 4 Total CPE 12.0 530N Girrard shai 1.0 191 - 55 - Goldeye 9.0 305 175-355 261 40-440 Carp 2.0 430 373-489 1125 750-15c0 Bignouth buffalo 1.0 640 - 4040 - flathead catfish 1.0 265 - 180 - Total No. Fish 14 No. Species 5 Total CPE 14.0 530M Goldeye 3.0 290 174-360 247 30-400 Carp 5.0 386 190-572 1026 100-2450 River carpsucker 2.0 380 345-415 760 520-1000 - Flathead catf tsh 1.0 338 - 440 - Freshwater drun 4.0 292 135-355 38 1 25-540 Total No. Fish 15 No. Species 5 Total CPE 15.0
.'t June 5349 1et sampled $34M 1et sampled DLacharge 1bt sampled Canal A-122
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.l . (continued)
<*pling ,
total Length ( sun ) wei ght to) Cate 16 cation Species CPE Mean Range _P ea n Rsnge 2E June 532N M ngnose gar 1.5 495 - 350 - ( cc.ntinued ) Bigmouth buffalo 1.5 745 - 5620 - Black crappie 1.5 147 - 30 - Green sanfish 1.5 91 - 25 - Freshwater drum 1.5 233 - 150 - Total No. Fish 5 No. Species 5 Total CPE 7.5 532M Not sampled 530N Gizzard shad 1.0 292 - 210 - Carp 4.0 388 326-455 1020 560-1830 Emerald shiner 2.0 66 65-68 - - Bigmouth buffalo 1.0 $30 - 2430 - Total No. Fish 8 No. Species 4 Total CPE 8.0 530M Gizzard shad 1.0 305 - 270 - Goldeye 2.0 342 329-356 360 340-380 Carp 4.0 389 310-438 947 400-1380 River carpsucker 1.0 344 - 580 - Bigmouth buffalo 1.0 629 - 4410 - Stonecat 1.0 128 - 20 - Flathead catfish 1.0 324 - 400 - Total No. Fish 11 No. Species 7 Total CPE 11.0 1d July 534N M ngnose gar 1.0 507 - 260 - Carp 7.0 311 240-506 881 230-1990 River carpsucker 1.0 342 - 440 - Flathead catfish 1.0 145 - 33 - Total No. Fish 10 No. Species 4 Total CFE 10.0 5349 shortnose gar 1.0 523 - 480 - j Gizzard shad '.0 267 - 100 - Goldeye 2.0 336 335-337 335 300-370 Carp 5.0 317 223-505 614 150 '860 River carpsucker 1.0 403 - 960 - Whit e bass 1. 3 232 - 148 - TotL? No. Fish 11 No. Species 6 Total CPE 11.0 Disc ha r g e Longnose gar 3.0 532 - 340 ? Canal Carp 21.0 289 216-506 423 152-1620 River cerf sucker 3.0 276 - 220 - Flathea t catfish 9.0 227 149-276 136 34-21? Total No. Fish 12 No. Species 4 Total CPE 36.0 532N longnose gar 1.5 607 - 380 - Carp 9.0 291 236-440 397 100-1120 River carpsucker 1.5 334 = 5'O - Flathead catfish 1.5 272 - 80 - 54uger 1.5 'oe - 1000 - Total No. Fish 10 No. Species 5 Total CPE 15.0 t A-123 4
A HAZLETON ENVirtONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.l. (continued) Total Lengt h (mm) Weigh t f es) Sampling Range CFE Mean Ra ng e Pean Date location Species 316 315-318 295 200-310 16 July 532M Gizzard shad 2.0 320 - Goldeye 1.0 327 - ( continued) 950 - Northern pike f.0 522 - 4.e 328 270-460 642 290-15ec 3 Carp 1.0 511 - 1150 - Blue sucker 5.0 239 136-345 222 32-440 River carpsucker 364 306-422 427 200-575 Charsnel catfish 2.0
- 70 -
Black crappie 1.0 175 ' Total No. Fish 17 No. Species 8 Total CFE 17.0 1.0 335 - 260 -
$3CN Go3deye 10.0 369 200-578 921 110-2710 Carp River carpsucker 5.0 323 244-409 492 220-840 1.0 205 - 110 -
Freshwater drum Total No. Fish 17 No. Species 4 Total CPE 17.0 Goldeye 9.0 344 311-375 366 280-480
$30M 6.0 350 236-461 692 210-130n Carp 1.0 87 - 6 -
Silver chub Blue sucker 1.0 510 - 1125 - River carpsucker 4.0 191 86-394 215 8-770 Black crappie 1.0 160 - 60 - Total No. Fish 22 No. Species 6 Total CPE 22.0
- 534N Shovelnose sturgeon 1.0 511 - 395 -
23 August , Longnose gar 1.0 650 - 570 - Go14 eye 2.3 372 267-378 500 490-510 Carp 4.0 360 304-485 755 400-16e0 Total No. Fish 8 N^. S pec ies 4 Total CFE 8.0 534M Shovelnose sturgeon 1.0 503 - 400 - Shortnose gar 1.0 660 - 930 - Goldeye 3.0 331 312-343 330 260-390 Carp 3.0 403 316-562 1187 450-2606 River carps'.cker 4.0 339 297-375 520 360-A6? White crapp t e 1.0 245 - 230 - Total No. Fish 13 No. Spec.es 6 Total CF* 13.0 La sc harge longnose c,ar 3.C 652 - 620 - Carel Flathead catfish 3.0 277 - 200 - Freshwater drum 6.0 165 86-244 102 5-200 Total No. Fish 4 No. Spo-les 3 Total CFE 12.0 350 319-372 390 270-480 m 532N Goldeye 4.5 Carp 6.0 337 " 9-422 570 320-1000 Total No. Fish 7 No. Species 2 g Total CFE 10.5 532M uoldeye 2.0 322 314-331 340 280-400 Carp 5.0 36 4 265-469 90 6 280-1960 Sauger 1.0 117 - 10 - 2.0 239 236-243 'O 160-163 Freshwater drum Total No. fish to No. Species 4 Total CFE 10.0 A-124
m HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 0.1. (continued) \ - Sampling , total Length ( re ) Wet et (q) Date incation Species CPE Mean Range Mean Ra nge 23 August $30N Gizzard shad 2.0 214 112-317 165 10-320 (continued) Goldeye 4.0 264 100-363 247 10-420 Northern pike 1.0 484 - 650 - Carp 2.0 457 431-483 1310 1100-1520 Freshwater drum 1.0 240 - 160 - Total No. Fish to No. Species 5 Total CPE 10.0 ' 530M Carp 1.0 326 - 450 - Freshwater drum 2.0 301 302-303 335 320-350 7"tal No. Fish 3 . tev . Species 2 Total CPE 3.0 13 Septenber 534N Gitaard shad 7.0 125 94-168 22 8-42 - Goldeye 2.0 323 299-347 310 260-360 Carp 7.0 456 243-525 1486 250-2070 Jtiver carpsucker 9.0 290 168-375 388 56-720 channel catfish 2.0 404 393-415 5's 460-730 Flathead catfish 1.0 18 5 - 62 - Total No. Fish 28 - No. Species 6 Total CPE 28.0 534M G1::ard shad 7.0 119 76-139 20 5-30
'oldeye 1.0 320 -
270 - -- Carp 8.0 463 329-558 1409 510-2260 Blue sucker 1.0 544 - 1500 - River carpaucirer 6.0 221 115-330 216 22-510 Bigmouth buffalo 1.0 594 - 3290 - Freshwater drum 3.0 218 100-335 218 13-510 Total No. Fish 27 No. Species 7 E Total CPE 27.0 Di scha rge Carp 6.0 34 5 325-366 605 490-720 Canal channel ca. fish '5.0 464 361-610 1160 320-2300 Flathead catfish 3.C 450 - 1800 - Total No. Fish 8 No. species 3 Total CPE 24.0
$32N longnose gar 1.5 526 -
250 - Shortnose e r 3.0 495 469-521 420 300-540 Gizzard a sac 18.0 127 71-316 49 7-3,0 Carp 3.0 327 290-364 510 360-660 River can psucker 1.5 413 - 100 - Total 7o. Fish 18 No. Species 5 Total CPE 27.0 - 532M Gizzard shed 5.0 143 B9-168 36 10-54 Goldeye 1.0 353 - 360 - Carp 6.0 503 320-620 2015 510-3510 Emerald shiner 1.0 88 - 7 - River carpsucker 6.0 18 1 103-408 167 15-820 Channel catfish 5.0 429 412-462 698 600-940 Flathead catfish 2.0 213 194-232 12 5 90-160 Freshwater drum 1.0 243 - 172 - Total No. Fish 27 No. Specien 8 Total CPE 27.0 - w i A-125 [ s
. +
1 4 k: J HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - 4 4
~: g[=
- . e Table D.1. (continued) s -E q .
t Sa pling htal lenq t h mM W. i pit ag) , I.ocation Species CPE 4 Mean Ninge Pesn u:.gr (
- ate
$3CN Stortnose gar 1.0 475 - 300 -
13 set temter 7-7v ( cor.t i nued ) Carzard shat 11.0 166 R7-335 Ilt Goldcye 2.0 297 241-353 2%0 83-42 . s Carp 9.0 414 314-502 1074 410-181, , . F1ver carp suc ker 7.0 238 70-353 316 4-%in White crappie 1.0 174 - (9 - . I Freshwater drum 1.0 112 - 18 - l mtal m. Fish 32 No. Species 7 ' 9-Mtal CFE 32.0 530M C41deye 2.J 226 322-330 31 0 3 N- 3. g carr 8.0 455 323-070 13 M 440-417 - y Blue packer 1.0 501 - 980 - T r eshwater dr.m 2.0 253 252-255 215 .1 -2. f. 3* ' Total m . rast. 13 ,
'* ' ~ ?30. Species 4 z, Wtal Crt 13.0 i ,je # ~- 's 0;tc t.er 534?: cazzard shai 2.3 150 139-162 38 30-46 a Ideye 1.0 153 - - -
Carp 7.0 425 318-550 1026 430-2323 : a F.1ve r carpsucker 5.0 291 154-368 406 50-820 Freshwater drum 1.0 253 - 200 - P tal No. Fish 16 No. Si+c l e s 5 Total CFE 16.0 534M G122ar l shad 12 ' 154 12'-182 42 24-62 Goldey) 5. 0 305 355-379 503 430-500 Cart 14.0 429 315-555 1264 463-262' . f1ver carrsucker P. 251 (5-419 3?0 1NMD - Ou 111 ta c k 1.0 103 - 63 - Pigmouth Luffalo 3.t 452 3)3-518 152' 923-2 Char.nel catfish 3.0 341 327-3t3 32' 22'-40 : f . Freshwater drun 1.0 307 - t60 -
% tal N. Fish 47 ,.,
1'< ' W. 51+c l e s A h.al CT E 47.O _p.,4..q ' , , , . Discnarge Skiplack herring 3.' 37C - 4A0 -
. - 6 p Canal Garrard shad 174. 14] 02-356 46 5-55 Cart 27.3 44 392-575 17ft- 900-272' F1Ver C Ar) SJ:ker 3. 7H - <10 -
Channal catfis' 9 54J 419-t e4 lf7J t+0-2953 Total W fitn 72 . 5 w O S[eries , To t.d l CFE 21 t> . 7 ,
. 4
- q s 't
.t i
- i .9
. 4 A-126 4 .
k D .
't
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC ES Table D.l. (continued) Sampling Total Length (ee) weight (g) Date location Species CPE, Mean Range Mean Pange 25 October 532N Gizes-d shad 22.5 141 105,-171 34 15-75 (continued) Goldeye 1.5 363 - 440 - Carp 12.0 481 395-617 1761 960-3400 favor carpsucker 3.0 229 89-369 360 10-710 smallmouth buffalo 1.5 126 - 30 - Channel catfish 1.5 312 - 250 - Freshwater drum 1.5 115 - 18 - Total No. Fish 29 No. Species 7 Total CPE 43.5 532M Gizzard shad 10.0 159 127-183 45 20-60 Goldeye 7.0 293 163-386 303 40-640 Carp 10.0 478 336-539 1751 600-2450 Emerald shiner 3.0 63 54-76 - - River carpsucker 3.0 217 92-376 297 10-800 Bigmouth buffalo 1.0 610 - 3450 - Freshwater drum 5.0 169 94-398 150 10-680 Total No. Fish 39 No. Species 7 Total CPE 39.0 53CN Giraard shad 12.0 141 106-191 34 20-70 Goldeye 1.0 355 - 470 - Carp 6.0 396 294-492 1070 380-1800 Silver chub 1.0 112 - 10 - River carpsacker 7.0 225 146-365 238 60-650 guillback 1.0 197 - 120 - Smallmouth buffalo 1.0 290 - 400 - Channel catfish 2.0 269 168-370 229 38-420 Freshwater drum 1.0 112 - 10 - Total No. Fish 32 No. Species 9 Total CPE 32.0 530M Goldeye 3.0 315 271-350 300 200-400 Carp 2.0 460 451-470 1560 1520-1600 Riv er cr ars ac k e r 4.0 271 163-361 4'2 60-700 Shorthead redhorse 1.0 224 - 120 - Channel catfish 2.0 345 343-348 400 - Freshwater drum 3.0 285 256-310 313 220-420 Total No. Fish 15 No. Species 6 Total CPE 15.0 20 Novster 5344 Goldeye 1.0 340 - 360 - Carp 4.0 520 477-585 2260 1550-3260 River carpsacker 15.0 164 137-200 60 35-1 C 5 Total No. Fiso 20 No. Species 3 Total CPE 20.0 5349 Ca rp 8.0 459 310-553 1546 450-2450 Bigneuth buffalo 2.0 453 450-456 1355 1300-1410 lbtal No. Fish 10 No. Species 2 Total CFE 10.0 Ci sc ha rg e Geldeye 6.0 377 368-387 515 500-530 Canal Carp 15.0 460 342-571 1552 530-2780 River carpeucker 21.0 182 121-242 94 20-210 Freshwater drum 3.0 332 - 500 - Total No. Fish 15 I No. Species 4 Total CPE 45.0 h A-127
~
r HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.1. (continued) weif t 'g) Sampling _ Total Lecath (m) Mean parce CPE Mean Range Date location Species 450 - 1380 - 532N Carp 1.5 20 November 11a 106-131 River carpsacker 3.0 (continued) 1.5 301 - 410 20-650 Quillback 295 137-396 357 - Channel catfish 4.5 170 - 60 - Wite crappie 1.5 77 - <10 - Freshwater drum 1.5 Total No. Fish 9 No. Species 6 Total CFE 13.5 2.0 76 75-77 (10 532M Rainbow smelt 406 150-500 7.0 369 262-380
% 1deye 1520 500-232 4.0 449 313-537 Carp 41 10-100 8.0 122 74-193 Riv er carpsucker <10 -
2.0 77 62-93 Freshwater drum Total No. Fish 23 No. Species 5 Total CrE 23.0 84 - <10 - 530N Rainbow smelt 1.0 280 74-384 362 45-600 Goldeye 6.0 424 311-504 1262 480-1900 Carp 5.0 171 94-242 96 10-220 River carpsacker 5.0 147 146-149 40 35-45 Smallmouth buf f alo 2.0 Total No. Fish 19 pecies 5
. CPE 19.0 185-382 253 5 > 510 3.0 2 7 f. $30M Goldeye 2130 1410-2853 2.0 55 465-565 Carp 118 100-157 River carpsucker 6.0 195 172-222 *btal th. Fish 11 *b . Species 3 Total CTE 11.0 Number of fish collected by 30 min of electroshocking.
b Not applicable, c Mechanical failure prevented sampling. A-128 l
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.2. Species composition, abundance, and size distribution of fish collected by seining at locations in the Missouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May - November 1979. Percent Total Length (mm) Date Sampling Incation Species Number Occurrence Mean Range 15 May 534N Rainbow smelt 9 8.5 86 58-104 Western silvery minnow 1 0.9 56 - Plains minnow 1 0.9 93 - Silver chub 13 12.3 62 54-72 Emerald shiner 14 12.3 54 43-65 River shir.er 6 5.6 46 37-53 Red shiner 1 0.9 44 - Sand shiner 1 0.9 39 - River carpsucker 5 4.7 79 64-92 Channel catfish 52 49.1 56 46-74 White crappie 3 2.8 124 100-171 Total No. 106 No. Species 11 534M Rainbow smelt 4 10.8 85 72-94 Speckled chub 1 2.7 42 - Silver chub 11 29.7 63 52-84 Emerald shiner 7 18.9 63 50-78 Red Shiner 1 2.7 39 - River carpsucker 1 2.7 78 - Stonecat 1 2.7 109 - Black bullhead 1 2.7 107 - Channel catfish 8 21.6 67 55-77 Orangespotted sunfish 1 2.7 46 - Freshwater drum 1 2.7 155 - Total No. 37 No. Species 11 532N Speckled chub 2 15.4 39 31-48 Silver chub 4 30.8 66 59-82 Emerald shiner 1 7.7 58 Red shiner 1 7.7 52 - Sand shiner 3 23.1 42 36-47 Channel catfish 2 15.4 64 63-65 Total No. 13 No. Species 6 532M Rainbow smelt 2 3.6 89 84-95 Silver chub 15 27.3 58 40-67 Emerald shiner 8 14.5 61 54-67 River shiner 7 12.7 50 42-58 Red shiner 3 5.5 47 39-56 Sand shir.er 3 5.5 40 39-41 River carpsucker 2 3.6 73 72-74 Smallmouth buffalo 1 1.8 64 - Channel catfish 9 16.4 60 54-72 Black crappie 1 1.8 112 - Saugnr 2 3.6 189 182-196 Freshwater drum 2 3.6 150 146-155 Total No. 55 No. Species 12 A-129
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 7 Table D.2. (continued) -
-m Percent Total Length (mm)
Species Nurtber Occurrence Mean Range Date Sampling Location 530N Silver chub 1 4.8 49 - 15 May (continued) Emerald shiner 4 19.0 52 43-61 River shiner 3 14.3 47 44-48 Sand stiner 1 4.8 JO - _ .] Channel catfish 10 47.6 56 45-92 Sauger 1 4.8 480 - Freshwater drum 1 4.8 137 - Total No. 21 No. Species 7 530M Rainbow smelt 2 4.1 89 81-97 g Silver chub 3 6.1 65 59-74 Fmerald shiner 25 51.0 60 52-72 River shiner 11 22.4 46 41-58 Red shiner 1 2.0 47 - Sand shiner 3 6.1 42 41-43 Flathead catfish 1 2.0 231 - 66-98 Channel catfish 2 4.1 82 Freshwater drum 1 2.0 171 - Total No. 49 No. Species 9 a 26 June 534N Not Sampled _ 534M Not Sampled" 2 532N F ser shiner 2 33.3 55 54-57 I d shiner 4 66.6 38 37-42 Total C . 6 - No. Cpecies 2 532M tbt Sampled" 530N Western silvery minnow 2 86 85 -87 Plains minnow 6 48 31 -61 Emerald shiner 11 60 56 -67 River shiner 1 60 - Total No. 20 No. Species 4 53v ' Western silvery minnow 1 4.0 103 - S'Iver chub 3 12.0 74 65-84 Emerald shiner 1 4.0 66 - 4.0 58 - River shiner Red shiner 15 1 60.0 37 25-54 __" Sand shiner 1 4.0 37 - Channel catfish 3 12.0 94 77-115 mm Total No. 25 No. Species 7 1H July 534N Flathead chub 1 12.5 40 - River shiner 2 25.0 55 47-63 Red shiner 1 12.5 47 - Sand shiner 1 12.5 51 - River carpsucker 1 12.5 89 - Freshwater drum 2 25.0 27 23-32 Total No. 8 No. Speles 6 A-130 -
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.2. (continued) Percent Total Length (mm) Date Sampling Location Species Number Occurrence Mea n Range 18 July 534M Carp 1 1.1 57 - (continued) Plains minnow 10 10.6 43 33-71 River shiner 31 33.0 55 38-65 Red shiner 40 42.5 44 37-58 Sand shiner 5 5.3 37 31-55 Fathead minnow 1 1.1 49 - River carpsucker 1 1.1 103 - Ictiobus sp. 1 1.1 33 - Channel catfish 3 3.2 37 33-42 Freshwater drum 1 1.1 33 - Total No. 94 No. Species 10 532N Not seined due to river condition 532M Silver chub 1 2.6 33 - Fmerald shiner 1 2.6 53 - River shiner 3 7.9 37 36-39 Red shiner 16 42.1 42 38-49 Sand shiner 3 7.9 47 43-51 Fathead minnow 1 2.6 32 - Cyprinidae 1 2.6 25 - Ictiobus sp. 10 26.3 35 27-48 Freshwater drum 2 5.3 25 23-26 Total No. 38 No. Species 9 530N Plains minnow 20 1 63 - Emerald shiner 2 4.0 57 67-68 River shiner 7 '. 4. 0 58 52-63 Red shir.er 23 46.0 44 33-55 Sand shiner 12 24.0 29 25-36 Carpoides sp. 1 2.0 3L - Ict io bu e_ sp. 3 6.0 36 34-39 Channel catfish 1 2.0 36 - ) Total No. 50 No. Species 8 530M Emerald shiner 25.0 1 68 - River shiner 2 50.0 37 35-40 Channel catfish 1 25.0 45 - Total No. 4 No. Species 3 23 August 534N Flathead chub 7.5 3 64 58-69 Silver chub 18 45.0 52 33-62 Emerald shiner 1 2.5 47 - River shiner 5 12.5 39 30-58 Red shiner 1 2.5 45 - Sand shiner 1 2.5 32 - White sucker 1 2.5 49 - Channel catfis'- 7 17.5 45 40-50 Sauger 1 2.5 160 - Johnny darter 1 2.5 42 - Freshwater drum 1 2.5 30 - htal No. 40 No. Species 11 A-131
HAZLETON ENVIAONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.2. (continued) Percent Total Length (mm) f Fa nge I Date Sampling Location Species Number Occurrence Nan i 1 23 August 534M Silver chub 19 29.2 46 36-60 l l continued) Emerald shiner 1 1.5 35 - River shiner 2 3.0 38 36-39 Riv er -arpsucker 3 4.6 33 30-37 htite F .s 3 4.6 67 42-90 ht i t e, cr.ppie 2 3.0 185 170-201 Freshwater drum 31 53.8 46 28-110 Total No. 6) No. Species 7 532N Plains minnow 2 2.7 37 35-40 Silver chub 14 18.9 47 38-62 Emerald shiner 1 S.4 40 - River shiner 7 9.5 35 30-40 Red shiner 1 1.4 35 - Sand shiner 4 5.4 35 33-37 River carpaucker 6 8.1 39 33-46 Carpoides sp. I 1.4 32 - Chat,nel catfish 11 14.9 45 38-62 Nhlte bass 1 1.4 90 - White crappie 1 1.4 160 - Green sunfish 1 1.4 41 - Freshwater drum 24 32.4 42 27-79 Total No. 74 No. Species 13 532M Plains minnow 1 41 - Flathead chub 1 55 - Silver chub 37 49 41-60 River shiner 10 38 34-64 Red shiner 2 47 46-48 River carpsucker 2 51 37-6C htite sucker 2 57 57-58 Channel catfish 16 44 39-49 htite bass 3 81 75-91 Sauger 1 162 - Freshwater drum 27 44 27-108 Total No. 102 No. Species 11 530N Plains minnow 2 3.2 36 32-40 Silver chub 20 32.2 50 41-7C River shiner 10 16.1 41 31-42 Red shiner 1 1.6 54 - River carpsucker 5 8.1 47 36-66 Channel catfish 11 17.7 48 38-53 White bass 1 1.6 75 Sauger 1 1.6 146 - Freshwater drum 11 17.7 55 31-79 Total No. 62 No. Speles 9 530M Silver chub 11 27.5 57 47-68 River shiner 3 7.5 36 34-38 Red shiner 1 2.5 52 - Sand shiner 1 2.5 40 - Channel catfish 11 27.5 58 45-67 Freshwater drum 13 32.5 48 37-65 Total No. 40 No. Species A-132
HAZLETON ENVIRONMnJTAL SCIENCES Table D.2. (continued) Percent Total Length (mm) Date Sampl!
- 3 location Species Number Occurrence Mea n Ra nge 13 September 53IN Dnerald shiner 7 35.0 63 39-78 River shiner 2 10.0 51 32-70 Charmel catfish 11 55.0 74 59-98 Total No. 20 No. Species 3 534M Dnerald shiner 1 6.2 73 -
River shiner 2 12.5 35 33-38 Red shiner 12 75.0 54 44-63 Channel catfish 1 6.2 54 - htal No. 16 No. Species 4 532N Silver chub 2 6.2 51 50-52 Dnerald shiner 4 12.5 56 40-82 River shiner 12 37.5 43 37-50 Red shiner 2 6.2 49 46-53 Channel catfish 12 37.5 66 53-87 Total No. 32 No. Species 5 532M Not seined due to river condition 530N Silver chub 1 5.9 64 - Emerald shiner 3 17.6 40 37-42 River shiner 9 52.9 48 37-65 Sand shiner 1 5.9 36 - Ictiobus sp. 1 5.9 41 - Charmel catfish 2 11.8 62 60-65 Total No. 17 No. Species 6 530M Not seined due to i river condition 25 October 534N Plains minnow 2 6.9 50 49-52 Silver chub 3 10.3 60 56-64 h erald shiner 2 6.9 52 50-52 River shiner 12 41.4 45 37-56 Red shiner 6 20.7 47 38-56 Sand shiner 4 13.8 41 38-43 Total No. 29 No. Species 6 534M Silver chub 8 66.7 57 50-75 Emerald shiner 1 8.3 52 - Sand shiner 1 8.3 36 - Suckermouth minnow 1 8.3 52 - Freshwater drum 1 8.3 89 - Total No. 12 No. Species. 5 A-133
r
)
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table 0.2. (continued) Percent h tal Length (mm) Date Sa'npling location Species Number Occurrence Mean Range 25 October 532N Silver chub 11 47.3 69 55-87 (continued) Emerald shiner 5 21.7 56 43-65 River shiner , 2 8.7 40 39-41 River carpsucker 3 13.0 78 67-96 c' Channel catfish 2 8.7 55 53-57 Total No. 23 No. Species 5 532M Silver chub 5 80.0 65 58-76 Freshwater drum 1 20.0 88 - Total No. 6 No. Species 2 530N P' nins minnow 6 14.6 60 54-76 F Iver chub 6 14.6 59 51-62 Emerald shiner 7 17.1 53 48-65 River shiner 15 36.6 44 39-53 Red shiner 3 7.3 51 47-53 Sand shiner 1 2.4 44 - River carpsucker 1 2.4 62 - Channel catfish 1 2.4 95 - Freshwater drum 1 2.4 94 - Total No. 41 No. Species 9 530M Speckled chub 1 47 - Flathead chub 1 68 - Silver chub 18 73 57-114 Emerald shiner 20 57 46-86 River shiner 6 44 35-49 Red shiner 4 58 52-61 Sand shiner 1 2.0 25 - Total No. 51 No. Species 7 A 20 November 534N Western silvery minnow 1 3.6 E6 - Plains minnow 1 3.6 62 - Silver chub 17 60.7 65 59-85 Emerald shiner 1 3.6 44 - River shirer 5 17.9 41 36-45 Suckermouth minnow 2 7.1 48 46-51 Quillback 1 3.6 98 - h tal No. 28 No. Species 7 534M Silver chub 9 69.2 62 55-86 Speckled chub 1 7.7 42 - Emerald shiner 2 15.4 71 58-84 River shiner 1 7.7 39 - Total No. 13 No. Species 4 A-134 L
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.2. (continued) Percent htal Length (mm) Date Sampling location Species Number Occurrence Mean Range 20 Novesnber 532N Plains minnow 1 16.7 66 - (continued) Silver chub 2 33.3 86 86-87 Emerald shiner 3 50.0 47 44-53 htal No. 6 No. Species 3 332M Rainbow smelt 1 10.C 68 - Silver chub 4 40.0 55 50-61 Emerald shiner 2 20.0 46 45-47 River shiner 3 30.0 40 39-43 -- Total No. 10 No. Species 4 , 530 N Plains minnow 1 1.8 56 - Silver chub 2 3.6 69 68-71 Flathead chub 1 1.8 45 - g Emerald shiner 21 37.5 46 40-53 River shiner 24 42.9 43 35-48 Red shiner 7 12.5 42 37-56 - Total No. 56 No. Species 6 530M Silver chub 2 100.0 63 55-71 Total No. 2 No. Species 1 F M a A-135
e . . . . . HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.3. Relative importance of food items found in the stomachs of selected fish collected in the tiissouri River near Cooper Nuclear Station, May - November 1979. ho. Stomachs Volume 5pecies (Range of total Enamined Percent Percent leng*h) With Food Empty Food items Occurre nce m1 of Total 1Uel. Goloeye 14 6 Terrestrial .nsect: .10)0 50.0 3.9 43.3 (167-370 m) Plant f ragnents 35.7 1.0 11.1 Fish remains Rainbow smelt (1) 7,1 3.2 35.5 Unidentified (1) 7.1 0. 2.2 Chironomme (1) 7.1 - <0.1 Hydropsychidae (1) 7.1 - <0.1 Corixidae (4) 28.6 - <0.1 Heptageniidae (7) 35.7 - <0.1 Hexagenia so. (1) 7.1 - <0.1 Tro M a sp. (6) 42.8 - <0.1 Usrecogntrable 14.3 0.7 7.8 Freshwater drum 8 5 LumbricMae (9) 50.0 4.7 95.9 (135-355 m) Odonata ( Arisopteral Gomphus sp. til 12.5 0.1 2.0 HeftlienTidae t19) 25.0 0.1 2.0 Amphipoda (1) 12.5 <0.1 Isoperla sp. (3) 25.0 - <0.1 ErliTiae (1) 12.5 -
<0.1 Chironomidae (38) 37.5 - <0.1 Ceratopogonidae (2) 12.5 - <0.1 2f, June No stomachs collected.
18 July Gol deye 4 0 Terrestrial insects (20) 50.0 3.1 49.2 (322-375 m) Pit nt f ragments 50.0 1.9 30.2 Unrecognizable 50.0 1.3 20.6 Flathead catfish 1 1 Crayfish (2) 100.0 1.2 100.0 (255 272 m) Heptageniidae (2) 100.0 -
<0.1 White bass 0 - -
(232 m) Black crappie 1 1 Odonata ( Anisootera) (1) 100.0 0.1 100.0 (160-175 mni Corimidae (1) 100.0 - <0.1 Siphlonuridae Isonychia sp. (1) 100.0 - <0.1 Ephe~me rTdae Ephoron sp. (1) 100.0 -
<0.1 Fish remains Unidentified (1) 100.0 - <0.1 Sauger 0 1 - - -
(486 m) Freshwater drum 1 0 E pheme ridae (205 m) Ephoron sp. (26) 100.0 1.4 100.0 HeptagenTidae (4) 100.0 - <0.1 Caentidae Caenis sp. (1) 100.0 - <0.1 Tricoptera (1) 100.0 - <0.1 23 39Lst Gol deye 8 6 Fish remains (10t>-378 m) Unidentified (1) 12.5 3.5 44.9 Terrestrial insects (5) 62.5 3.0 38.5 Plant f ragnents 25.0 0.8 10.3 Hydropsychidae (1) 12.5 - <0.1 Unrecognizable 25.0 0.5 6.4 1 A-136
HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CCIENCES Table 0.3. (contin"ed) 5pecies No. Stomachs Volume (Range of total Examined Percent Percent length) With Food Empty Foot items Occurrence al of Total 23 A6 gust (continued) White crappie 4 0 Fish remains (160 245 m) Unidentified (4) 100.0 0.2 100.0 Epheneropters (1) 25.0 - -0.1 Corixidae (5) 100.0 - <0.1 Chironomidae (6) 50.0 - <0.1 Sauge r 0 1 - - (117 m) Freshwater drum 5 1 Fish remains (236-303 m) Gizzard shad (1) 20.0 0.4 17.4 Freshwater drum (1) 20.0 1.1 47.8 Unidentif f eo (1) 20.0 0.5 21.7 Crayfish (1) 20.0 0.1 4.3 Heptagentidae (18) 80.0 0.1 4.3 Hydropsychiidae (9) 40.0 0.1 4.3 Caenidae Caenis sp. (8) 60.0 - <0.1 TrTcorythodes sp. (3) 20.0 - <0.1 Siphlonuridae (5) 40.0 - <0.1 Isenychia sp. (1) 20.0 - <0.1 ChTronomidae (4) 20.0 - <0.1 Leptoceridae (1) 20.0 - <0.1 Cladophora 20.0 - <0.1 13 September Gol deye 7 1 Terrestrial insects (51) 85.7 4.1 41.4 (241-353 m) Plant fragments 85.7 1.6 16.2 Unrecognizable 57.1 1.6 16.2 Frog remains (1) 14.3 1.5 15.1 Ephemeroptera (13) 28.6 0.8 8.1 Hydropsychidae (15) 57.1 0.2 a.0 Ephemeridae (4) 14.3 - <0.1 Peanta enia sp. (2) 14.3 0.1 1.0 Silp lonurTda~e 14.3 - <0.1 Isonychia sp. t!) 14.3 - <0.1 Heptageniidae (1) 14.3 - <0.1 Channe catfish 2 3 Bryozos ( 361-4 36 m) Plumetella sp. 50.0 0.8 57.1 Plant fragments 50.0 0.4 28.6 Hydropsychidae (16) 50.0 0.2 14.3 Caenidae Caents sp. (1) 50.0 - <0.1 Heptagentidae (1) 50.0 - <0.1 Sipl onaridae Isonychia sp. (1) 50.0 - 0.1 Psychodidae (2) 50.0 - <0.1 Flathead catfish 2 1 Crayfish (2) 100.0 2.4 100.0 (185-232 m) White crapple 1 0 Fish remains (174 m) minnow (3) 100.0 1.0 100,0 Freshwater drum 5 1 Crayfish (2) 20.0 0.7 46.7 (112-335 m) Odonata (1) 20.0 0.4 26.7 Megaloptera (1) 20.0 0.3 20.0 Heptagentidae (13) 40.0 0.1 6.7 Baetidae (3) 20.0 - <0.1 Siphlonuridae Isonychia sp. (1) 20.0 - <0.1 HydropsMTdae (4) 60.0 - <0.1 Ct.ironomidae (1) 20.0 - <0.1 i A-137
i HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - Table D.3. (continued) _- Volume 5pecies No. Stomachs Percent Percent _ (Dange of total laamined With Food Empty Food items Occurrence el of Total -
, Angth) 25 October --
0 Terrestrial insects (49) 57.1 1.5 40.5 Goldeye 7 1.1 29.7 Plant fragments 71.4 (163-386 rm) 0.7 18.9 Unrecognizable 28.6 Cortmidae (29) 71.4 0.2 5.4 Megaloptera (1) 14.3 0.1 2.7 Siphlonuridae Isonychia sp. (5) 42.9 0.1 2.7
- 14.3 - <0.1 >
'e~tTdae TI) .phemeridae (2) 14.3 <0.1 Heptagen11dae (2) 14.3 - <0.1 j 14.3 - <0.1 _
hotonectidae (1) Hydropsychiidae (6) 42.9 - <0.1 Hydrophilidae (1) 14.3 - <0.1 Unrecognizable 60.0 10.5 51.0
- eannel catfish 10 1 10.0 3.0 14.6 (168-665 m) Frog remains (1) ,
Plant f ragments 40.0 2.6 12.6 f Bry ozoa Plumetella p. 20.0 2.6 12.6 -- Fish 7eKaIns~ - Unidentified (2) 20.0 1.4 6.8 Algae 10.0 0.2 1.0 Terrestrial insects (5) 30.0 0.1 0.5 Hydropsychiidae (15) 40.0 0.1 0.5 5tphionuridae Isonychia sp. (5) 20.0 G.1 0.5 EpIemerTd7 (1) 10.0 - <0.1 Pentagenia sp. (2) 20.0 - <0.1
<0.1 Co'rTxTda e-[5) 30.0 -
Chironomidae (5) 30.0 - <0.1 10.0 <0.1 5 Ceratopogonidae (1) - Tipulidae (1) 10.0 - <0.1
==
Psychodidae (9) 20.0 - <0.1 Hydrophilidae (1) 10.0 - <0.1 m -- hematomorpha (1) 10.0 - <0.1 F resnwater drum 6 4 Fish remains k Freshwater drum (1) 16.7 6.0 92.3 - (112-396 m) .d Perlidae Acroneuria sp. (1) 16.7 0.2 3.1 StphTiiniiridae Isonychia sp. (2) 16.7 0.1 1.5 .' 4
~
HeEtafenTTdae (8) 16.7 0.1 1.5 Baetidae (1) 16.7 - <0.1 _z - Corinidee (3) 50.0 - <0.1 Hydropsychidae (1) 16.7 - <0.1 ] m ith?!MT _ n Go19ye 11 4 Ephemeridae ( 74-3f* 7 mi Pentagenia sp. (13) 54.5 0.3 1.5 iTesagenTa sp. (1) 9.1 0.1 0.5 51'hTenu~rTdae p 1sony~schia sp. (1) 9.1 - <U.1 HeptageniTda~e (21) 45.5 0.3 1.5 Corixidae (53) 36.4 0.4 2.0 Odonsta (1) 9.1 - <0.1 Hydropsychiidae (22) 18.2 0.2 1.0 Fish remains - Minnow (1) 9.1 1.6 8.0 4.5 22.4 = Unidentified (2) 9.' Terrestrial insects (3) 27.3 0.4 2.0 Rodent (1) 9.1 12.0 59.7 Unrecognizable 18.2 0.3 1.5 2 - M
.m A-138 L-- -- - - - - - - - -i----- --------mm-- --------mensi- -- -
I l l HAZLETON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Table D.3. (continued) Species No. Stomachs Volume
; Range of total Examined Percent Fercent length) With Food Empty Food Items Occurrence el of Total d annel catfish 2 1 Plecoptera (1) 50.0 - <0.1 (137-396 mm) Ephemerida e Pentagenia sp. (4) 50.0 0.1 2.7 Baetidae (2) 50.0 - <0.1 Corimidae (1) 50.0 - <0.1 Hydropsychidae (8) 50.0 0.1 2.7 Frog remains (1) 50.0 3.5 94.6 alte crappie 1 0 Heptageniidae (2) 100.0 - <0.1 (170 m) Corimidae (3) 100.0 - <0.1 Notonectidae (8) 100.0 0.1 25.0 Fish remains Unidentified (1) 100.0 0.3 75.0 rreshwater drum 0 1 - - - -
(332 m) a Number of individuals. Trace. A -139 ____ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}