ML051520398: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 Prepared By: Date: L 2Q. t m! 5 ct#Eilgmeer  
{{#Wiki_filter:MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 Prepared By:                                   Date: L m! t 2Q. 5 ct#Eilgmeer - Signature Printed Name Reviewed By:                                   Date:
-Signature Printed Name Reviewed By: Date: FSS S* tignature Printed Name Reviewed By: (Q: K Date: ar Independent Review -Signature Approved By: #a Date: S;// ?:9 Aftyennten.-~tn Signature Printed Nabl Approved By: k Date: VPn N0e/-S. MO -Signature de14 Printed Name Revision 0 MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 A. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION FR-0200 Yard East Survey Unit 4 was located under a portion of the Turbine Building footprint.
FSS S*         tignature Printed Name Reviewed By: (Q:         K                     Date:         ar Independent Review - Signature Approved By:     #a                             Date: S;// ?:9 Aftyennten.-~tn         Signature Printed Nabl Approved By:     k               N0e            Date:   VPn
The area was previously surveyed as part of FB-0500 Survey Units 1 and 3. The 1363 m 2 area was bordered on the north by FR-0200 Survey Unit 5, on the west by FR-01 1I Survey Unit 18, on the south by FR-0200 Survey Unit 3, and on the east by FR-0200 Survey Unit 9. This survey unit is approximately centered near coordinates 624065E and 407515N using the Maine State Coordinate System (West Zone) NAD 1927. The location of the survey unit in relation to the Service Building and the surrounding FR-0200 and FR-01 II survey units is shown on map FRO200-4 REF (Attachment 1).Survey Unit 4 is an area composed primarily of soil and backfill, and is relatively flat.B. SURVEY UNIT DESIGN INFORMATION Survey Unit 4 was originally classified per the LTP Revision 4 as a Class 3 survey unit, but was reclassified to Class 1 given its history during decommissioning activities (i.e., located within the expanded Restricted Area boundary).
                            /-S. MO - Signature               de14 Printed Name Revision 0
 
MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 A. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION FR-0200 Yard East Survey Unit 4 was located under a portion of the Turbine Building footprint. The area was previously surveyed as part of FB-0500 Survey Units 1 and 3. The 1363 m2 area was bordered on the north by FR-0200 Survey Unit 5, on the west by FR-01 1I Survey Unit 18, on the south by FR-0200 Survey Unit 3, and on the east by FR-0200 Survey Unit 9. This survey unit is approximately centered near coordinates 624065E and 407515N using the Maine State Coordinate System (West Zone) NAD 1927. The location of the survey unit in relation to the Service Building and the surrounding FR-0200 and FR-01 II survey units is shown on map FRO200-4 REF (Attachment 1).
Survey Unit 4 is an area composed primarily of soil and backfill, and is relatively flat.
B. SURVEY UNIT DESIGN INFORMATION Survey Unit 4 was originally classified per the LTP Revision 4 as a Class 3 survey unit, but was reclassified to Class 1 given its history during decommissioning activities (i.e., located within the expanded Restricted Area boundary).
The survey unit design parameters are shown in Table 1. Given a relative shift of 1.5, eighteen direct measurements would be required for the Sign Test, but 40 were prescribed as a conservative measure. Because the measurement locations were based on a systematic square grid with a random start point, the N=40 design led to a survey unit map with 42 locations which are illustrated on map FRO200-4b (Attachment 1). Direct measurements (soil samples) were collected from required locations and analyzed with laboratory gamma spectroscopy instrumentation.
The survey unit design parameters are shown in Table 1. Given a relative shift of 1.5, eighteen direct measurements would be required for the Sign Test, but 40 were prescribed as a conservative measure. Because the measurement locations were based on a systematic square grid with a random start point, the N=40 design led to a survey unit map with 42 locations which are illustrated on map FRO200-4b (Attachment 1). Direct measurements (soil samples) were collected from required locations and analyzed with laboratory gamma spectroscopy instrumentation.
In accordance with the LTP, scans covering 100% of the 1363 m 2 area were required for the Class 1 survey unit. This was accomplished by use of an in situ gamma spectroscopy detector (ISOCS) configured at a 3-meter distance from the surface to obtain overlapping 28-m 2 fields of view. The ISOCS detector was positioned perpendicular to the surface.Locations of the 69 survey scans are shown on map FRO200-4a and 4c (Attachment 1).The ISOCS scans were configured to ensure 100% scan coverage of all exposed surfaces within Survey Unit 4. The survey instruments used are listed by model and serial number in Attachment 2 (Table 2-1). Scan MDCs are also listed in Attachment 2 (Table 2-2) and are compared to the DCGL, the investigation level, and the DCGLEmC. The scan MDC is less than the scan investigation level, thus providing high confidence (95% or higher) that an elevated area would be detected in the scanning process. Further, since the investigation level was always less than the design DCGLEMc, no EMC sample size adjustment was necessary.
In accordance with the LTP, scans covering 100% of the 1363 m2 area were required for the Class 1 survey unit. This was accomplished by use of an in situ gamma spectroscopy detector (ISOCS) configured at a 3-meter distance from the surface to obtain overlapping 28-m2 fields of view. The ISOCS detector was positioned perpendicular to the surface.
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 2 of 20 TABLE I SURVEY UNIT DESIGN PARAMETERS Survey Unit Design Criteria Basis Area 1363 m 2  Class 1, <2,000 m2 Based on an LBGR of 2.1 pCi/g, Number of Direct 18 (40 used) sigma' of 1.33 pCi/g, and a relative Measurements Required shift of 1.5.Type I = Type H = 0.05 Sample Area 34 m 2  1363 m 2/ 40 = 34 m 2 Sample Grid Spacing 5.8 m (34)1t2 Scan Grid Area ISOCS scan at 3 meters See Section B Area Factor 1.7 Class 1 Area, LTP Table 6-12 Scan Area 1363 M 2  Class I Area- 100%.1.0pCi/gCs-137 ISOCS investigation levels with Scan Investigation Level 0.36 pCi/g Co-60 detector at 3-meter height 0.36 ~i/g o-60(Reference 3).DCGL 4.2 pCi/g Cs-137 DCGL applied to surface soils only.1.5 pCilg Co-60 (Reference 1)7.0 pCi/g Cs-137 DCGL x Area Factor for Class I DesignDCGLEMc 2.5 pCilg Co-60 survey unit, per LTP Section 5.6.3 C. SURVEY RESULTS A total of 42 direct measurements were performed in Survey Unit 4. Two samples contained detectable Cs-137 with levels of activity greater than the MDA but below the DCGL. One sample (S032) contained detectable Co-60 activity above the MDA but below the DCGL.All other measurements were below the MDA. The results are presented in Table 2. No investigations were necessary as a result of the direct measurements.
Locations of the 69 survey scans are shown on map FRO200-4a and 4c (Attachment 1).
ISOCS gamma scans were performed at 69 locations using an investigation level of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 and 0.36 pCilg Co-60. The gamma scans were performed for a sufficient count time to achieve a Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) of approximately 16% of the DCGL. All identified scan activity levels and MDAs were below the investigation levels. Therefore, no investigation surveys were performed as a result of the scan surveys.ISOCS scan S069 was added during the course of the survey in order to cover soil exposed from excavating around a Circ Water pipe manway opening. The scan was not intended to survey the pipe itself which was previously surveyed as FD-0500 Survey Unit 2.LTP Revision 4, Table 5-lC for RCA Yard West, RO 100 (conservative)
The ISOCS scans were configured to ensure 100% scan coverage of all exposed surfaces within Survey Unit 4. The survey instruments used are listed by model and serial number in Attachment 2 (Table 2-1). Scan MDCs are also listed in Attachment 2 (Table 2-2) and are compared to the DCGL, the investigation level, and the DCGLEmC. The scan MDC is less than the scan investigation level, thus providing high confidence (95% or higher) that an elevated area would be detected in the scanning process. Further, since the investigation level was always less than the design DCGLEMc, no EMC sample size adjustment was necessary.
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 3 of 20 TABLE 2*_ DIRECT MEASUREMENTS Sample Number Cs-137 (pCi/g) Uncertainty Co-60 (pcilg) Uncertainty Unitized Value_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (pC ilg) V _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FRO200041SOO1
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 2 of 20
< 4.48E-02 l_< 4.25E-02 3.90E-02 FR0200041S002  
 
< 4.86E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.64E-02 FR0200041S003  
TABLE I SURVEY UNIT DESIGN PARAMETERS Survey Unit                   Design Criteria                           Basis Area                             1363 m2                      Class 1, <2,000 m2 Based on an LBGR of 2.1 pCi/g, Number of Direct                 18 (40 used)                 sigma' of 1.33 pCi/g, and a relative Measurements Required                                           shift of 1.5.
< 4.68E-02 < 4.2SE-02 3.95E-02 FR0200041S004  
Type I = Type H= 0.05 Sample Area                       34 m2                          1363 m2 / 40 = 34 m2 Sample Grid Spacing               5.8 m                         (34)1t2 Scan Grid Area                   ISOCS scan at 3 meters       See Section B Area Factor                       1.7                           Class 1 Area, LTP Table 6-12 Scan Area                         1363 M2                      Class I Area- 100%
< 4.75E-02 __< 5.33E-02 4.68E-02 FR0200041S005  
                                  .1.0pCi/gCs-137               ISOCS investigation levels with Scan Investigation Level         0.36 pCi/g Co-60             detector at 3-meter height 0.36 o-60(Reference
< 5.77E-02 < 6._1 OE-02 5.44E-02 FR0200041S006  
                                                ~i/g                          3).
< 4.90E-02 < 442E402 4.1 1E-02 FR0200041S007  
DCGL                             4.2 pCi/g Cs-137               DCGL applied to surface soils only.
< 4.55E-02 < 4.51E-02 4.09E-02 FR0200041S008  
1.5 pCilg Co-60               (Reference 1) 7.0 pCi/g Cs-137               DCGL x Area Factor for Class I DesignDCGLEMc                   2.5 pCilg Co-60               survey unit, per LTP Section 5.6.3 C. SURVEY RESULTS A total of 42 direct measurements were performed in Survey Unit 4. Two samples contained detectable Cs-137 with levels of activity greater than the MDA but below the DCGL. One sample (S032) contained detectable Co-60 activity above the MDA but below the DCGL.
< 4.77E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.62E-02 FR0200041S009  
All other measurements were below the MDA. The results are presented in Table 2. No investigations were necessary as a result of the direct measurements.
< 4.23E-02 < 4.89E-02 4.27E-02 FRO200041SO10  
ISOCS gamma scans were performed at 69 locations using an investigation level of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 and 0.36 pCilg Co-60. The gamma scans were performed for a sufficient count time to achieve a Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) of approximately 16% of the DCGL. All identified scan activity levels and MDAs were below the investigation levels. Therefore, no investigation surveys were performed as a result of the scan surveys.
< 4.56E-02 < 4.82E-02 4.30E-02 FRO200041SOII  
ISOCS scan S069 was added during the course of the survey in order to cover soil exposed from excavating around a Circ Water pipe manway opening. The scan was not intended to survey the pipe itself which was previously surveyed as FD-0500 Survey Unit 2.
< 3.68E-02 < 4.38E-02 3.80E-02 FR0200041S012  
LTP Revision 4, Table 5-lC for RCA Yard West, RO 100 (conservative)
< 6.61E-02 < 6.49E-02 5.90E-02 FR0200041SO13  
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 3 of 20
< 4.05E-02 < 4.27E-02 3.8 lE-02 FR0200041SO14  
 
< 4.95E-02 < 5.09E-02 _ 4.57E-02 FR0200041SO15  
TABLE 2
< 3.90E-02 < 4.19E-02 3.72E-02 FR0200041S016  
                      *_                   DIRECT       MEASUREMENTS Sample Number             Cs-137 (pCi/g)       Uncertainty         Co-60 (pcilg)     Uncertainty   Unitized Value
< 4.75E-02 < 5.62E-02 4.88E-02 FR0200041S017  
_ __ _ __ _   _ _   _   _   _ _ _     (pC ilg)                                 V     _  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
< 4.41E-02 < 4.95E-02 4.35E-02 FR0200041SO18  
FRO200041SOO1          <         4.48E-02                   l_<         4.25E-02                     3.90E-02 FR0200041S002           <         4.86E-02                         <       5.22E-02                     4.64E-02 FR0200041S003           <         4.68E-02                         <       4.2SE-02                     3.95E-02 FR0200041S004           <         4.75E-02   __<                         5.33E-02                     4.68E-02 FR0200041S005           <         5.77E-02                         <       6._1 OE-02                   5.44E-02 FR0200041S006           <         4.90E-02                         <       442E402                       4.1 1E-02 FR0200041S007           <         4.55E-02                         <       4.51E-02                     4.09E-02 FR0200041S008           <         4.77E-02                         <       5.22E-02                     4.62E-02 FR0200041S009           <         4.23E-02                         <       4.89E-02                     4.27E-02 FRO200041SO10           <         4.56E-02                         <       4.82E-02                     4.30E-02 FRO200041SOII           <         3.68E-02                         <       4.38E-02                     3.80E-02 FR0200041S012           <         6.61E-02                         <       6.49E-02                     5.90E-02 FR0200041SO13           <         4.05E-02                         <       4.27E-02                     3.8 lE-02 FR0200041SO14           <         4.95E-02                         <       5.09E-02           _         4.57E-02 FR0200041SO15           <         3.90E-02                         <       4.19E-02                     3.72E-02 FR0200041S016           <         4.75E-02                         <       5.62E-02                     4.88E-02 FR0200041S017           <         4.41E-02                         <       4.95E-02                     4.35E-02 FR0200041SO18           <         4.87E-02                         <       5.01E-02                     4.SOE.02 FR0200041SO19           <         4.55E-02                         <       4.59E-02                     4.14E-02 FR0200041S020           <         5.24E-02                         <       5.51 E-02                     4.92E-02 FR0200041S021           <         4.22E-02                         <       4.45E-02                     3.97E-02 FR0200041S022           <         5.36E-02                         <       5.86E-02                     5.18E-02 FR0200041S023           <         5.05E-02                         <       5.22E-02                     4.68E-02 FR0200041S024                     2.11E-O1       4.55E-02         <       7.39E-02                     9.94E-02 FR0200041S025           <         4.29E-02                         <       4.53E-02                     4.04E-02 FR0200041S026           <         5.06E-02                         <       5.16E-02                     4.64E-02 FR0200041S027           <         3.78E-02                         <     4.96E.02                       4.21E-02 FR0200041S028           <         5.32E-02                         <       6.28E-02                     5.45E-02 FR0200041S029           <         5.41E-02                         <     4.78E-02                       4A7E-02
< 4.87E-02 < 5.01E-02 4.SOE.02 FR0200041SO19  
-FR0200041S030           <         4.30E-02                         <       4.80E-02                     4.22E-02 FR0200041S031           <         5.1OE-02                         <       5.45E-02                     4.85E-02 FR0200041S032           <         5.13E-02                                 1.70E-01   2.72E-02         1.26E-41 FR0200041S033                     S.58E-02       3.13E-02         <       8.71E-02                     7.14E-02 FR0200041S034           <         3.80E-02                         <     4.94E-02                       4.20E-02 FR0200041S035           <         4.48E-02                         <     4.92E-02                       4.35E-02 FR0200041S036           <         5.30E-02                         <       5.57E-02                     4.98E-02 FR0200041S037           <         4.53E-02                         <     4.94E-02                       4.37E-02 FR0200041S038           <         3.74E-02                         <     4.24E-02                       3.72E-02 FR0200041S039           <         4.99E-02                         <       5.61E-02                     4.93E-02 FR0200041S040           <         4.14E-02                         <     4.22E-02                       3.80E-02 FR0200041S041           <       4.10E-02                         <     4.65E-02                       4.08E-02 FR0200041S042           <         5.32E.02                         <       5.29E-02                     4.79E-02 Mean                   5.1 IE-02                               5.43E-02                           4.84E-02 Median                   4.75E-02                               4.96E-02                           4.42E-02 Standard Deviation           2.60E-02                               2.03E-02                           1.62E-02 Range           3.68E-02 to 2.1 lE-OI                     4.19E-02 to 1.70E401             3.72E-02 to 1.26E-41
< 4.55E-02 < 4.59E-02 4.14E-02 FR0200041S020  
                          "<" indicates MDA value. Bold indicates positive detection value FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 4 of 20
< 5.24E-02 < 5.51 E-02 4.92E-02 FR0200041S021  
 
< 4.22E-02 < 4.45E-02 3.97E-02 FR0200041S022  
D. SURVEY UNIT INVESTIGATIONS PERFORMED AND RESULTS Based on the scan results, no investigations were required.
< 5.36E-02 < 5.86E-02 5.18E-02 FR0200041S023  
E. SURVEY UNIT DATA ASSESSMENT An analysis of the direct sample measurement results, including the mean, median, standard deviation, and sample result range, is provided in Table 2. Positively detected values are bolded in the table. Of the 42 soil samples collected, two identified Cs-137 activity below the DCGL value of 4.2 pCi/g and one sample identified Co-60 activity below the DCGL value of 1.5 pCi/g. All other values were below the MDA. Identified sample activities or Minimum Detectable Activities are listed in Table 2. The mean and median activities were less than the DCGLs for Cs-137 and Co-60. The average of the unity measurements was 0.048 indicating that the direct measurements averaged 4.8% of the DCGL limit.
< 5.05E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.68E-02 FR0200041S024 2.11E-O1 4.55E-02 < 7.39E-02 9.94E-02 FR0200041S025  
For illustrative purposes, as indicated in LTP Section 5.9.3, a simplified general retrospective dose estimate can be calculated from the average residual contamination level by subtracting the mean fallout Cs-137 value (0.19 pCi/g) 2 for disturbed soil from the survey unit sample mean activity (0.051 pCi/g). This would equate to an annual dose rate of 0.0 mrem/year.
< 4.29E-02 < 4.53E-02 4.04E-02 FR0200041S026  
Taking into account the average residual contamination for Co-60, the annual dose rate would equate to 0.36 mrem/yrW. Also, for purposes of demonstrating compliance with the radiological criteria for license termination and the enhanced State of Maine criteria, background activity was not subtracted from the sample analysis activity values.
< 5.06E-02 < 5.16E-02 4.64E-02 FR0200041S027  
F. ADDITIONAL DATA EVALUATION Attachment 4 provides additional data evaluation associated with this Survey Unit, including relevant statistical information. Based on survey unit direct measurement data, this attachment provides the Sign Test Summary, Quantile Plot, Histogram, and Retrospective Power Curve.
< 3.78E-02 < 4.96E.02 4.21E-02 FR0200041S028  
: 1. The Sign Test Summary provides an overall summary of design input (Table 1) and resulting calculated values used to determine the required number (N) of direct measurements (per LTP Section 5.4.2). The Sign Test Summary is a separate statistical analysis that also calculates the mean, median, and standard deviation of the direct measurements.
< 5.32E-02 < 6.28E-02 5.45E-02 FR0200041S029  
The critical value and the result of the Sign Test are provided in the Sign Test Summary table, as well as a listing of the key release criteria. The direct measurements clearly pass the sign test. The subject release criteria have been satisfied. In addition, the sample standard deviation is smaller than the design sigma; therefore no additional samples were required.
< 5.41E-02 < 4.78E-02 4A7E-02-FR0200041S030  
2   See Attachment E to Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8 (Reference 2).
< 4.30E-02 < 4.80E-02 4.22E-02 FR0200041S031  
3   This annual dose isbased on LTP Section 6.7, which shows the contaminated soil contribution (for soils contaminated at the DCGL) to be 10 mrcm/y. Therefore the annual Co-60 dose rate (using the Co-60 DCGL of 1.5 pCifg outside the original RA and the mean Co-60 direct activity value of 0.0543 pCilg) would equate to nnualDose Rate=10(               43) 0.36mrem/y.
< 5.1OE-02 < 5.45E-02 4.85E-02 FR0200041S032  
< 5.13E-02 1.70E-01 2.72E-02 1.26E-41 FR0200041S033 S.58E-02 3.13E-02 < 8.71E-02 7.14E-02 FR0200041S034  
< 3.80E-02 < 4.94E-02 4.20E-02 FR0200041S035  
< 4.48E-02 < 4.92E-02 4.35E-02 FR0200041S036  
< 5.30E-02 < 5.57E-02 4.98E-02 FR0200041S037  
< 4.53E-02 < 4.94E-02 4.37E-02 FR0200041S038  
< 3.74E-02 < 4.24E-02 3.72E-02 FR0200041S039  
< 4.99E-02 < 5.61E-02 4.93E-02 FR0200041S040  
< 4.14E-02 < 4.22E-02 3.80E-02 FR0200041S041  
< 4.10E-02 < 4.65E-02 4.08E-02 FR0200041S042  
< 5.32E.02 < 5.29E-02 4.79E-02 Mean 5.1 IE-02 5.43E-02 4.84E-02 Median 4.75E-02 4.96E-02 4.42E-02 Standard Deviation 2.60E-02 2.03E-02 1.62E-02 Range 3.68E-02 to 2.1 lE-OI 4.19E-02 to 1.70E401 3.72E-02 to 1.26E-41"<" indicates MDA value. Bold indicates positive detection value FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 4 of 20 D. SURVEY UNIT INVESTIGATIONS PERFORMED AND RESULTS Based on the scan results, no investigations were required.E. SURVEY UNIT DATA ASSESSMENT An analysis of the direct sample measurement results, including the mean, median, standard deviation, and sample result range, is provided in Table 2. Positively detected values are bolded in the table. Of the 42 soil samples collected, two identified Cs-137 activity below the DCGL value of 4.2 pCi/g and one sample identified Co-60 activity below the DCGL value of 1.5 pCi/g. All other values were below the MDA. Identified sample activities or Minimum Detectable Activities are listed in Table 2. The mean and median activities were less than the DCGLs for Cs-137 and Co-60. The average of the unity measurements was 0.048 indicating that the direct measurements averaged 4.8% of the DCGL limit.For illustrative purposes, as indicated in LTP Section 5.9.3, a simplified general retrospective dose estimate can be calculated from the average residual contamination level by subtracting the mean fallout Cs-137 value (0.19 pCi/g)2 for disturbed soil from the survey unit sample mean activity (0.051 pCi/g). This would equate to an annual dose rate of 0.0 mrem/year.
Taking into account the average residual contamination for Co-60, the annual dose rate would equate to 0.36 mrem/yrW.
Also, for purposes of demonstrating compliance with the radiological criteria for license termination and the enhanced State of Maine criteria, background activity was not subtracted from the sample analysis activity values.F. ADDITIONAL DATA EVALUATION Attachment 4 provides additional data evaluation associated with this Survey Unit, including relevant statistical information.
Based on survey unit direct measurement data, this attachment provides the Sign Test Summary, Quantile Plot, Histogram, and Retrospective Power Curve.1. The Sign Test Summary provides an overall summary of design input (Table 1) and resulting calculated values used to determine the required number (N) of direct measurements (per LTP Section 5.4.2). The Sign Test Summary is a separate statistical analysis that also calculates the mean, median, and standard deviation of the direct measurements.
The critical value and the result of the Sign Test are provided in the Sign Test Summary table, as well as a listing of the key release criteria.
The direct measurements clearly pass the sign test. The subject release criteria have been satisfied.
In addition, the sample standard deviation is smaller than the design sigma; therefore no additional samples were required.2 See Attachment E to Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8 (Reference 2).3 This annual dose is based on LTP Section 6.7, which shows the contaminated soil contribution (for soils contaminated at the DCGL) to be 10 mrcm/y. Therefore the annual Co-60 dose rate (using the Co-60 DCGL of 1.5 pCifg outside the original RA and the mean Co-60 direct activity value of 0.0543 pCilg) would equate to nnual Dose Rate= 10( 43) 0.36mrem/y.
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 5 of 20
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 5 of 20
: 2. The Quantile Plot was generated from the unity data listed in Table 2. The data set and plot are consistent with expectations for a Class 1 survey unit. All of the measurements are below the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g (Cs-137) and 1.5 pCi/g (Co-60) for land outside the original Restricted Area where only surface soil contamination is present.3. A Histogram Plot was also developed.
: 2. The Quantile Plot was generated from the unity data listed in Table 2. The data set and plot are consistent with expectations for a Class 1 survey unit. All of the measurements are below the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g (Cs-137) and 1.5 pCi/g (Co-60) for land outside the original Restricted Area where only surface soil contamination is present.
This plot shows a log-normal distribution with two outliers.4. A Retrospective Power Curve was constructed, based on FSS results. The curve shows that this survey unit having a mean residual activity at a small fraction of the DCGL has a high probability
: 3. A Histogram Plot was also developed. This plot shows a log-normal distribution with two outliers.
("power")
: 4. A Retrospective Power Curve was constructed, based on FSS results. The curve shows that this survey unit having a mean residual activity at a small fraction of the DCGL has a high probability ("power") of meeting the release criteria. Thus, it can be concluded that the direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
of meeting the release criteria.
G. CHANGES IN INITIAL SURVEY UNIT ASSUMPTIONS ON EXTENT OF RESIDUAL ACTIVITY The survey was designed as a Class I land survey area; the FSS results were consistent with that classification. The direct measurement sample standard deviation was less than the design sigma. Thus, a sufficient number of sample measurements were taken and no additional measurements were required.
Thus, it can be concluded that the direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.G. CHANGES IN INITIAL SURVEY UNIT ASSUMPTIONS ON EXTENT OF RESIDUAL ACTIVITY The survey was designed as a Class I land survey area; the FSS results were consistent with that classification.
H. LTP CHANGES SUBSEQUENT TO SURVEY UNIT FSS The FSS of Survey Unit 4 was designed, performed, and evaluated in the April 2005- May 2005 time frarne. The design was performed to the criteria of the LTP Revision 4 (Reference 1). No subsequent LTP changes with potential impact to this survey unit need to be evaluated.
The direct measurement sample standard deviation was less than the design sigma. Thus, a sufficient number of sample measurements were taken and no additional measurements were required.H. LTP CHANGES SUBSEQUENT TO SURVEY UNIT FSS The FSS of Survey Unit 4 was designed, performed, and evaluated in the April 2005- May 2005 time frarne. The design was performed to the criteria of the LTP Revision 4 (Reference 1). No subsequent LTP changes with potential impact to this survey unit need to be evaluated.
I. CONCLUSION The FSS of this survey unit was designed based on the LTP designation as a Class I area.
I. CONCLUSION The FSS of this survey unit was designed based on the LTP designation as a Class I area.The survey design parameters are presented in Table 1. The required number of direct measurements was determined for the Sign Test in accordance with the LTP. As presented in Table 2, all direct measurements were less than the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g Cs-I 37 and 1.5 pCi/g Co-60. There were no investigations required based on the direct measurements.
The survey design parameters are presented in Table 1. The required number of direct measurements was determined for the Sign Test in accordance with the LTP. As presented in Table 2, all direct measurements were less than the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g Cs-I 37 and 1.5 pCi/g Co-60. There were no investigations required based on the direct measurements.
A Sign Test Summary analysis demonstrated that the Sign Test criteria were satisfied.
A Sign Test Summary analysis demonstrated that the Sign Test criteria were satisfied. The direct measurement sigma was determined to be less than that used for design, thus indicating that a sufficient number of samples was taken.
The direct measurement sigma was determined to be less than that used for design, thus indicating that a sufficient number of samples was taken.The Retrospective Power Curve shown in Attachment 4 confirmed that sufficient samples were taken to support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and the data quality objectives were met. Attachment 4 also revealed that direct measurement data represented essentially a log-normal distribution with two outliers.FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 6 of 20 The scan survey design for this survey unit was developed in accordance with the LTP Revision 4 (Reference
The Retrospective Power Curve shown in Attachment 4 confirmed that sufficient samples were taken to support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and the data quality objectives were met. Attachment 4 also revealed that direct measurement data represented essentially a log-normal distribution with two outliers.
: 1) with significant aspects of the design discussed in Section B and Table 1. ISOCS scans performed at a distance of 3 meters in a systematic grid pattern throughout the survey unit did not identify activity above the scan investigation levels of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-l 37 and 0.36 pCi/g Co-60. Therefore, no investigations were required as a result of the scan process.It is concluded that FR-0200 Survey Unit 4 meets the release criteria of IOCFR20.1402 and the State of Maine enhanced criteria.J. REFERENCES
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 6 of 20
: 1. Maine Yankee License Termination Plan, Revision 4, February 28, 2005 provided by Maine Yankee letter to the NRC, MN-05-0lO 2. Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8, FSS Data Processing and Reporting, Attachment E, Approach for Dealing With Background Radioactivity for Maine Yankee Final Status Surveys 3. Maine Yankee Calculation No. EC-003-04, Use of Canberra In Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS) for FSS Surveys FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 7 of 20 Attachment I Survey Unit Maps FR.0200-04, Revision 0 Page 8 of 20 Maine Yankee Imap ID #: FRO200-4 REF Decmmissioning Team IMaine Yankee Decommissioning Project Survey Form Date: 4(21/05 Survey Type: 0 Characterization E Turnover 9 Final Status Survey Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4 Reference Map-J----- \ I I FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 9 of 20 FRO200 SU4 Total Survey Unit Area = 1363 sq-m Maine Yankee M aine YakeDcmisoin rjcu Fr Map ID #: FRO200-4a Decommissioning Team Maine Yankee Decommissioning Project Survey Form Date: 23105 Survey Type: O Characterization i Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRQ200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S001 -S068 624,018.2 E 407,588.71-S-
 
\ Soo 0 Vxo// ~so I S ~9tOdtC Z A~rts.Typical ISOCS Spacing (Maximum) aine Yankee M ...Map ID #: FRO2004b Decommissioning Team Maine Yankee Decommissionig ProjectSurvey Form Date: 1/11105 Survey Type: 0 Characterization 0 Turnover 1 Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils Direct Points S001 -S042 624,135.2 E 407,563.3 N FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page I I of 20 Surface Area = 1363 sq-m N = 40 L= 5.8m Surface Area = 1363 sq-rn N40 L5.8m Maine Yankee D Map ID #: FRO200-4c Decommissioninai Team IMaine Yankee Decommissioning Project Survey Form IDate: 4126105 Survey Type: a Characterization 0 Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S069 I 624,018.2 E 407,588.7Ne"N, tn^A Qo I, 0 623,992.0 E 407,468.8 N SN N FR.0200.04, Revision 0 Page 12 of 20 Attachment 2 Survey Unit Instrumentation FR-0200 04, Revision 0 Page 13 of2O TABLE 2-1 INSTRUMENT INFORMATION ISOCS Detectors (Field Measurements)
The scan survey design for this survey unit was developed in accordance with the LTP Revision 4 (Reference 1) with significant aspects of the design discussed in Section B and Table 1. ISOCS scans performed at a distance of 3 meters in a systematic grid pattern throughout the survey unit did not identify activity above the scan investigation levels of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-l 37 and 0.36 pCi/g Co-60. Therefore, no investigations were required as a result of the scan process.
Detector No. MDC (pCi/g)7607 0.1 toO.35 7780 0.15 to 0.30 7897 0.10 to 0.31 HPGe Detectors (Laboratory Analysis)Detector No. MDC (pCi/g)S-S-I 0.04 to 0.09 FSS2 0.04 to 0.06 TABLE 2-2 INSTRUMENT SCAN MDC, DCGL, INVESTIGATION LEVEL AND DCGLENIC Parameter Instrument:
It is concluded that FR-0200 Survey Unit 4 meets the release criteria of IOCFR20.1402 and the State of Maine enhanced criteria.
ISOCS Comments Scan MDC 0.16 to 0.35 pCilg Cs-i 37 16% DCGL 0.10 to 0.24 p 1/g Co-60 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _4.2 pCilg Cs-137 Approved DCGL for land DCGL 1.5pCi/gCo-60 areas inside the Restricted 1.5 pCilg Co-60 tArea, (Reference 1)Investigation Level 1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 (ISOCS @ 3 m) 0.36 pCilg Co-60 (Reference 3)7.0 pCig Cs-137 DCGL x Area Factor for Design DCGLENIC 2.5 pCi/g Co-60 Class 1 survey unit, per LTP 2.5 pilg o-60Section 5.6.3 FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 14 of 20 Attachment 3 Investigation Table (None Required)FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 15 of 20 Attachment 4 Statistical Data FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 16 of 20 Survey Package FRO200 Unit 4 UNITY Soil Sign Test Summary Survey Package: FRO200 Survey Unit: 04 Evaluator:
J. REFERENCES
Andy Olsen .DCGL,: 1.OOE+Oo Unity DOGLmffiC:
: 1. Maine Yankee License Termination Plan, Revision 4, February 28, 2005 provided by Maine Yankee letter to the NRC, MN-05-0lO
1.70E+00 AF = 1.7 LBGR: 5.00E-01 Sigma: 3.20E-01 (1.33 pCVg /4.2 pCVg)Type I error: 0.05 Type 11 error: 0.05 Nuclide: UNITY Soll Type: N/A!,,-,w OWN Zes 1.645 Zag: .645 Sign p: 0.933193 Calculated Relative Shift: 1.5 Relative Shift Used: 1.5 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift is >3 N-Value: 15 N-Value+20O%
: 2. Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8, FSS Data Processing and Reporting, Attachment E, Approach for Dealing With Background Radioactivity for Maine Yankee Final Status Surveys
18 Number of Samples: 42 Median: 4.42E-02 Mean: 4.84E-02 Net Sample Standard Deviation:
: 3. Maine Yankee Calculation No. EC-003-04, Use of Canberra In Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS) for FSS Surveys FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 7 of 20
1.62E-02 Total Standard Deviation:
 
1.62E-02 Sum of samples and reference Maximum: 1.26E-01_Adjusted N Value: 42 S+ Value: 42 Critical Value: 26 Sign test results: Pass Sufficient samples collected:
Attachment I Survey Unit Maps FR.0200-04, Revision 0 Page 8 of 20
Pass X Maximum value <DCGL,: Pass Median value <DCGL,,: Pass Mean value <DCGL,: Pass Maximum value <DCGL,,T,:
 
Pass Total Standard Deviation  
Maine Yankee                                                                           Imap ID#: FRO200-4 REF Decmmissioning Team         IMaine Yankee Decommissioning ProjectSurvey Form Date: 4(21/05 Survey Type: 0 Characterization E Turnover 9 Final Status Survey Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4 Reference Map
<=Sigma: Pass Criteria comparison results Pass The survey unit passes all conditions:I Pass Survey Unit Passes FRC200-SU4-SoiISign-UNITY.xls 515/0s 8:46 AM FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 17 of 20 FRO200 SU-4 Quantile Plot 0.14.-, C, o- t 0 ;00 I-N CE._0._5._0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0** .* Activity (unitized)
                  - J-----                                           \           I I
-Median (unitized)
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 9 of 20 FRO200 SU4 Total Survey Unit Area = 1363 sq-m
_. .. -.- i 0 25 50 75 100 Percent One-Sample T-Test Report Page/Date/Time 2 5/5/05 8:47:19 AM Database Variable C2 Plots Section Histogram of FR-0200, SU-4 35 r) 26 C.5 E co o E z 9'0.fI 0 020 0.050 0O.80 0.110 0.140 Activity (unitized)
 
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 19 of 20 One-Sample T-Test Power Analysis Page/Date/rime 2 515/05 8:48:24 AM Chart Section 1.0 *0.84 Retrospective Power Curve X 0l a-0.6]-0.4-I 0.2+/-I 0.0 L 0.I I l To 0'2 0.4 0'6 Survey Unit Mean (unitized) 0:8 1.0 FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 20 of 20}}
Maine Yankee       M         aine YakeDcmisoin                       rjcu           Fr       Map ID#:FRO200-4a Decommissioning Team Maine Yankee DecommissioningProjectSurvey Form                               Date: 23105 Survey Type: O Characterization     i Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRQ200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S001 - S068 624,018.2 E 407,588.71-S-
                                          \ 0 Vxo/
Soo
                                        /       ~so I       S     Z
                                                                  ~9tOdtC   A~rts.
Typical ISOCS Spacing (Maximum)
 
aine Yankee             M                         .                                       Map ID#:FRO2004b Decommissioning Team         Maine Yankee DecommissionigProjectSurvey Form                     Date: 1/11105 Survey Type: 0 Characterization 0 Turnover 1 Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils Direct Points S001 - S042 624,135.2 E 407,563.3 N FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page I I of 20 Surface Area = 1363 sq-m             N = 40     L= 5.8m Surface Area   = 1363 sq-rn         N40       L5.8m
 
Maine Yankee                           D                                                 Map ID#: FRO200-4c Decommissioninai Team IMaine Yankee DecommissioningProject Survey Form IDate: 4126105 Survey Type: a Characterization 0 Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S069 624,018.2 E                                                                                   I 407,588.7Ne "N, tn^
A Qo I,0 623,992.0E 407,468.8 N SN   N FR.0200.04, Revision 0 Page 12 of 20
 
Attachment 2 Survey Unit Instrumentation FR-0200 04, Revision 0 Page 13 of2O
 
TABLE 2-1 INSTRUMENT INFORMATION ISOCS Detectors (Field Measurements)
Detector No.                     MDC (pCi/g) 7607                           0.1 toO.35 7780                           0.15 to 0.30 7897                           0.10 to 0.31 HPGe Detectors (Laboratory Analysis)
Detector No.                     MDC (pCi/g)
S-S-I                       0.04 to 0.09 FSS2                           0.04 to 0.06 TABLE 2-2 INSTRUMENT SCAN MDC, DCGL, INVESTIGATION LEVEL AND DCGLENIC Parameter               Instrument: ISOCS                           Comments Scan MDC             0.16 to 0.35 pCilg Cs-i 37           16% DCGL 0.10 to 0.24 p 1/g Co-60           _  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4.2 pCilg Cs-137             Approved DCGL for land DCGL                       1.5pCi/gCo-60               areas inside the Restricted 1.5 pCilg Co-60             tArea, (Reference 1)
Investigation Level               1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 (ISOCS @ 3 m)                 0.36 pCilg Co-60             (Reference 3) 7.0 pCig Cs-137             DCGL x Area Factor for Design DCGLENIC                 2.5 pCi/g Co-60             Class 1 survey unit, per LTP 2.5 pilg o-60Section 5.6.3 FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 14 of 20
 
Attachment 3 Investigation Table (None Required)
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 15 of 20
 
Attachment 4 Statistical Data FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 16 of 20
 
Survey Package FRO200 Unit 4 UNITY Soil Sign Test Summary Survey Package:             FRO200 Survey Unit:                 04 Evaluator:     Andy Olsen                                   .
DCGL,:         1.OOE+Oo Unity DOGLmffiC:       1.70E+00 AF = 1.7 LBGR:         5.00E-01 Sigma:         3.20E-01 (1.33 pCVg /4.2 pCVg)
Type I error:             0.05 Type 11error:             0.05 Nuclide:           UNITY Soll Type:             N/A
                        !,,-,w                                             OWN Zes             1.645 Zag:             .645 Sign p:       0.933193 Calculated Relative Shift:                 1.5 Relative Shift Used:                 1.5 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift is >3 N-Value:               15 N-Value+20O%                   18 Number of Samples:                   42 Median:         4.42E-02 Mean:         4.84E-02 Net Sample Standard Deviation:             1.62E-02 Total Standard Deviation:           1.62E-02 Sum of samples and reference Maximum:           1.26E-01_
Adjusted N Value:                 42 S+ Value:                 42 Critical Value:               26 Sign test results:             Pass Sufficient samples collected:               Pass                                     X Maximum value <DCGL,:                   Pass Median value <DCGL,,:                 Pass Mean value <DCGL,:                 Pass Maximum value <DCGL,,T,:                   Pass Total Standard Deviation <=Sigma:                   Pass Criteria comparison results               Pass The survey unit passes all conditions:I                 Pass Survey Unit Passes FRC200-SU4-SoiISign-UNITY.xls                                                                                   515/0s 8:46 AM FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 17 of 20
 
FRO200 SU-4 Quantile Plot 0.14 00 I-0.12 N
0.1
        ._0 0.08
* Activity (unitized)
.- ,  C, o- t 5  0.06                      -  Median (unitized) 0 ;    CE
_. ..-.- i
        ._  0.04          ** .
0.02 0
0  25   50   75 100 Percent
 
One-Sample T-Test Report Page/Date/Time         2     5/5/05 8:47:19 AM Database Variable               C2 Plots Section Histogram of FR-0200, SU-4 35 fI r) 26 C.5 E
co o
E z     9' 0.
0 020   0.050       0O.80       0.110 0.140 Activity (unitized)
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 19 of 20
 
One-Sample T-Test Power Analysis Page/Date/rime   2 515/05 8:48:24 AM Chart Section Retrospective Power Curve 1.0
* X 0.84 0.6]-
0l a-0.4-I 0.2+/-
I 0.0 L           I              l 0.ITo  0'2       0.4       0'6       0:8        1.0 Survey Unit Mean (unitized)
FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 20 of 20}}

Latest revision as of 19:50, 14 March 2020

Final Status Survey Release Record FR-0200 Yard East Survey Unit 4
ML051520398
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 05/17/2005
From: Madison G, Olsen C, Packer J, Pillsbury G, Tozzie R
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co
To:
NRC/FSME
References
FR-0200-04, Rev 0
Download: ML051520398 (20)
v • d • e


Text

MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 Prepared By: Date: L m! t 2Q. 5 ct#Eilgmeer - Signature Printed Name Reviewed By: Date:

FSS S* tignature Printed Name Reviewed By: (Q: K Date: ar Independent Review - Signature Approved By: #a Date: S;// ?:9 Aftyennten.-~tn Signature Printed Nabl Approved By: k N0e Date: VPn

/-S. MO - Signature de14 Printed Name Revision 0

MAINE YANKEE FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD FR-0200 YARD EAST SURVEY UNIT 4 A. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION FR-0200 Yard East Survey Unit 4 was located under a portion of the Turbine Building footprint. The area was previously surveyed as part of FB-0500 Survey Units 1 and 3. The 1363 m2 area was bordered on the north by FR-0200 Survey Unit 5, on the west by FR-01 1I Survey Unit 18, on the south by FR-0200 Survey Unit 3, and on the east by FR-0200 Survey Unit 9. This survey unit is approximately centered near coordinates 624065E and 407515N using the Maine State Coordinate System (West Zone) NAD 1927. The location of the survey unit in relation to the Service Building and the surrounding FR-0200 and FR-01 II survey units is shown on map FRO200-4 REF (Attachment 1).

Survey Unit 4 is an area composed primarily of soil and backfill, and is relatively flat.

B. SURVEY UNIT DESIGN INFORMATION Survey Unit 4 was originally classified per the LTP Revision 4 as a Class 3 survey unit, but was reclassified to Class 1 given its history during decommissioning activities (i.e., located within the expanded Restricted Area boundary).

The survey unit design parameters are shown in Table 1. Given a relative shift of 1.5, eighteen direct measurements would be required for the Sign Test, but 40 were prescribed as a conservative measure. Because the measurement locations were based on a systematic square grid with a random start point, the N=40 design led to a survey unit map with 42 locations which are illustrated on map FRO200-4b (Attachment 1). Direct measurements (soil samples) were collected from required locations and analyzed with laboratory gamma spectroscopy instrumentation.

In accordance with the LTP, scans covering 100% of the 1363 m2 area were required for the Class 1 survey unit. This was accomplished by use of an in situ gamma spectroscopy detector (ISOCS) configured at a 3-meter distance from the surface to obtain overlapping 28-m2 fields of view. The ISOCS detector was positioned perpendicular to the surface.

Locations of the 69 survey scans are shown on map FRO200-4a and 4c (Attachment 1).

The ISOCS scans were configured to ensure 100% scan coverage of all exposed surfaces within Survey Unit 4. The survey instruments used are listed by model and serial number in Attachment 2 (Table 2-1). Scan MDCs are also listed in Attachment 2 (Table 2-2) and are compared to the DCGL, the investigation level, and the DCGLEmC. The scan MDC is less than the scan investigation level, thus providing high confidence (95% or higher) that an elevated area would be detected in the scanning process. Further, since the investigation level was always less than the design DCGLEMc, no EMC sample size adjustment was necessary.

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 2 of 20

TABLE I SURVEY UNIT DESIGN PARAMETERS Survey Unit Design Criteria Basis Area 1363 m2 Class 1, <2,000 m2 Based on an LBGR of 2.1 pCi/g, Number of Direct 18 (40 used) sigma' of 1.33 pCi/g, and a relative Measurements Required shift of 1.5.

Type I = Type H= 0.05 Sample Area 34 m2 1363 m2 / 40 = 34 m2 Sample Grid Spacing 5.8 m (34)1t2 Scan Grid Area ISOCS scan at 3 meters See Section B Area Factor 1.7 Class 1 Area, LTP Table 6-12 Scan Area 1363 M2 Class I Area- 100%

.1.0pCi/gCs-137 ISOCS investigation levels with Scan Investigation Level 0.36 pCi/g Co-60 detector at 3-meter height 0.36 o-60(Reference

~i/g 3).

DCGL 4.2 pCi/g Cs-137 DCGL applied to surface soils only.

1.5 pCilg Co-60 (Reference 1) 7.0 pCi/g Cs-137 DCGL x Area Factor for Class I DesignDCGLEMc 2.5 pCilg Co-60 survey unit, per LTP Section 5.6.3 C. SURVEY RESULTS A total of 42 direct measurements were performed in Survey Unit 4. Two samples contained detectable Cs-137 with levels of activity greater than the MDA but below the DCGL. One sample (S032) contained detectable Co-60 activity above the MDA but below the DCGL.

All other measurements were below the MDA. The results are presented in Table 2. No investigations were necessary as a result of the direct measurements.

ISOCS gamma scans were performed at 69 locations using an investigation level of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 and 0.36 pCilg Co-60. The gamma scans were performed for a sufficient count time to achieve a Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) of approximately 16% of the DCGL. All identified scan activity levels and MDAs were below the investigation levels. Therefore, no investigation surveys were performed as a result of the scan surveys.

ISOCS scan S069 was added during the course of the survey in order to cover soil exposed from excavating around a Circ Water pipe manway opening. The scan was not intended to survey the pipe itself which was previously surveyed as FD-0500 Survey Unit 2.

LTP Revision 4, Table 5-lC for RCA Yard West, RO 100 (conservative)

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 3 of 20

TABLE 2

  • _ DIRECT MEASUREMENTS Sample Number Cs-137 (pCi/g) Uncertainty Co-60 (pcilg) Uncertainty Unitized Value

_ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (pC ilg) V _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FRO200041SOO1 < 4.48E-02 l_< 4.25E-02 3.90E-02 FR0200041S002 < 4.86E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.64E-02 FR0200041S003 < 4.68E-02 < 4.2SE-02 3.95E-02 FR0200041S004 < 4.75E-02 __< 5.33E-02 4.68E-02 FR0200041S005 < 5.77E-02 < 6._1 OE-02 5.44E-02 FR0200041S006 < 4.90E-02 < 442E402 4.1 1E-02 FR0200041S007 < 4.55E-02 < 4.51E-02 4.09E-02 FR0200041S008 < 4.77E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.62E-02 FR0200041S009 < 4.23E-02 < 4.89E-02 4.27E-02 FRO200041SO10 < 4.56E-02 < 4.82E-02 4.30E-02 FRO200041SOII < 3.68E-02 < 4.38E-02 3.80E-02 FR0200041S012 < 6.61E-02 < 6.49E-02 5.90E-02 FR0200041SO13 < 4.05E-02 < 4.27E-02 3.8 lE-02 FR0200041SO14 < 4.95E-02 < 5.09E-02 _ 4.57E-02 FR0200041SO15 < 3.90E-02 < 4.19E-02 3.72E-02 FR0200041S016 < 4.75E-02 < 5.62E-02 4.88E-02 FR0200041S017 < 4.41E-02 < 4.95E-02 4.35E-02 FR0200041SO18 < 4.87E-02 < 5.01E-02 4.SOE.02 FR0200041SO19 < 4.55E-02 < 4.59E-02 4.14E-02 FR0200041S020 < 5.24E-02 < 5.51 E-02 4.92E-02 FR0200041S021 < 4.22E-02 < 4.45E-02 3.97E-02 FR0200041S022 < 5.36E-02 < 5.86E-02 5.18E-02 FR0200041S023 < 5.05E-02 < 5.22E-02 4.68E-02 FR0200041S024 2.11E-O1 4.55E-02 < 7.39E-02 9.94E-02 FR0200041S025 < 4.29E-02 < 4.53E-02 4.04E-02 FR0200041S026 < 5.06E-02 < 5.16E-02 4.64E-02 FR0200041S027 < 3.78E-02 < 4.96E.02 4.21E-02 FR0200041S028 < 5.32E-02 < 6.28E-02 5.45E-02 FR0200041S029 < 5.41E-02 < 4.78E-02 4A7E-02

-FR0200041S030 < 4.30E-02 < 4.80E-02 4.22E-02 FR0200041S031 < 5.1OE-02 < 5.45E-02 4.85E-02 FR0200041S032 < 5.13E-02 1.70E-01 2.72E-02 1.26E-41 FR0200041S033 S.58E-02 3.13E-02 < 8.71E-02 7.14E-02 FR0200041S034 < 3.80E-02 < 4.94E-02 4.20E-02 FR0200041S035 < 4.48E-02 < 4.92E-02 4.35E-02 FR0200041S036 < 5.30E-02 < 5.57E-02 4.98E-02 FR0200041S037 < 4.53E-02 < 4.94E-02 4.37E-02 FR0200041S038 < 3.74E-02 < 4.24E-02 3.72E-02 FR0200041S039 < 4.99E-02 < 5.61E-02 4.93E-02 FR0200041S040 < 4.14E-02 < 4.22E-02 3.80E-02 FR0200041S041 < 4.10E-02 < 4.65E-02 4.08E-02 FR0200041S042 < 5.32E.02 < 5.29E-02 4.79E-02 Mean 5.1 IE-02 5.43E-02 4.84E-02 Median 4.75E-02 4.96E-02 4.42E-02 Standard Deviation 2.60E-02 2.03E-02 1.62E-02 Range 3.68E-02 to 2.1 lE-OI 4.19E-02 to 1.70E401 3.72E-02 to 1.26E-41

"<" indicates MDA value. Bold indicates positive detection value FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 4 of 20

D. SURVEY UNIT INVESTIGATIONS PERFORMED AND RESULTS Based on the scan results, no investigations were required.

E. SURVEY UNIT DATA ASSESSMENT An analysis of the direct sample measurement results, including the mean, median, standard deviation, and sample result range, is provided in Table 2. Positively detected values are bolded in the table. Of the 42 soil samples collected, two identified Cs-137 activity below the DCGL value of 4.2 pCi/g and one sample identified Co-60 activity below the DCGL value of 1.5 pCi/g. All other values were below the MDA. Identified sample activities or Minimum Detectable Activities are listed in Table 2. The mean and median activities were less than the DCGLs for Cs-137 and Co-60. The average of the unity measurements was 0.048 indicating that the direct measurements averaged 4.8% of the DCGL limit.

For illustrative purposes, as indicated in LTP Section 5.9.3, a simplified general retrospective dose estimate can be calculated from the average residual contamination level by subtracting the mean fallout Cs-137 value (0.19 pCi/g) 2 for disturbed soil from the survey unit sample mean activity (0.051 pCi/g). This would equate to an annual dose rate of 0.0 mrem/year.

Taking into account the average residual contamination for Co-60, the annual dose rate would equate to 0.36 mrem/yrW. Also, for purposes of demonstrating compliance with the radiological criteria for license termination and the enhanced State of Maine criteria, background activity was not subtracted from the sample analysis activity values.

F. ADDITIONAL DATA EVALUATION Attachment 4 provides additional data evaluation associated with this Survey Unit, including relevant statistical information. Based on survey unit direct measurement data, this attachment provides the Sign Test Summary, Quantile Plot, Histogram, and Retrospective Power Curve.

1. The Sign Test Summary provides an overall summary of design input (Table 1) and resulting calculated values used to determine the required number (N) of direct measurements (per LTP Section 5.4.2). The Sign Test Summary is a separate statistical analysis that also calculates the mean, median, and standard deviation of the direct measurements.

The critical value and the result of the Sign Test are provided in the Sign Test Summary table, as well as a listing of the key release criteria. The direct measurements clearly pass the sign test. The subject release criteria have been satisfied. In addition, the sample standard deviation is smaller than the design sigma; therefore no additional samples were required.

2 See Attachment E to Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8 (Reference 2).

3 This annual dose isbased on LTP Section 6.7, which shows the contaminated soil contribution (for soils contaminated at the DCGL) to be 10 mrcm/y. Therefore the annual Co-60 dose rate (using the Co-60 DCGL of 1.5 pCifg outside the original RA and the mean Co-60 direct activity value of 0.0543 pCilg) would equate to nnualDose Rate=10( 43) 0.36mrem/y.

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 5 of 20

2. The Quantile Plot was generated from the unity data listed in Table 2. The data set and plot are consistent with expectations for a Class 1 survey unit. All of the measurements are below the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g (Cs-137) and 1.5 pCi/g (Co-60) for land outside the original Restricted Area where only surface soil contamination is present.
3. A Histogram Plot was also developed. This plot shows a log-normal distribution with two outliers.
4. A Retrospective Power Curve was constructed, based on FSS results. The curve shows that this survey unit having a mean residual activity at a small fraction of the DCGL has a high probability ("power") of meeting the release criteria. Thus, it can be concluded that the direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.

G. CHANGES IN INITIAL SURVEY UNIT ASSUMPTIONS ON EXTENT OF RESIDUAL ACTIVITY The survey was designed as a Class I land survey area; the FSS results were consistent with that classification. The direct measurement sample standard deviation was less than the design sigma. Thus, a sufficient number of sample measurements were taken and no additional measurements were required.

H. LTP CHANGES SUBSEQUENT TO SURVEY UNIT FSS The FSS of Survey Unit 4 was designed, performed, and evaluated in the April 2005- May 2005 time frarne. The design was performed to the criteria of the LTP Revision 4 (Reference 1). No subsequent LTP changes with potential impact to this survey unit need to be evaluated.

I. CONCLUSION The FSS of this survey unit was designed based on the LTP designation as a Class I area.

The survey design parameters are presented in Table 1. The required number of direct measurements was determined for the Sign Test in accordance with the LTP. As presented in Table 2, all direct measurements were less than the DCGLs of 4.2 pCi/g Cs-I 37 and 1.5 pCi/g Co-60. There were no investigations required based on the direct measurements.

A Sign Test Summary analysis demonstrated that the Sign Test criteria were satisfied. The direct measurement sigma was determined to be less than that used for design, thus indicating that a sufficient number of samples was taken.

The Retrospective Power Curve shown in Attachment 4 confirmed that sufficient samples were taken to support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and the data quality objectives were met. Attachment 4 also revealed that direct measurement data represented essentially a log-normal distribution with two outliers.

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 6 of 20

The scan survey design for this survey unit was developed in accordance with the LTP Revision 4 (Reference 1) with significant aspects of the design discussed in Section B and Table 1. ISOCS scans performed at a distance of 3 meters in a systematic grid pattern throughout the survey unit did not identify activity above the scan investigation levels of 1.0 pCi/g Cs-l 37 and 0.36 pCi/g Co-60. Therefore, no investigations were required as a result of the scan process.

It is concluded that FR-0200 Survey Unit 4 meets the release criteria of IOCFR20.1402 and the State of Maine enhanced criteria.

J. REFERENCES

1. Maine Yankee License Termination Plan, Revision 4, February 28, 2005 provided by Maine Yankee letter to the NRC, MN-05-0lO
2. Maine Yankee Procedure PMP 6.7.8, FSS Data Processing and Reporting, Attachment E, Approach for Dealing With Background Radioactivity for Maine Yankee Final Status Surveys
3. Maine Yankee Calculation No. EC-003-04, Use of Canberra In Situ Object Counting System (ISOCS) for FSS Surveys FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 7 of 20

Attachment I Survey Unit Maps FR.0200-04, Revision 0 Page 8 of 20

Maine Yankee Imap ID#: FRO200-4 REF Decmmissioning Team IMaine Yankee Decommissioning ProjectSurvey Form Date: 4(21/05 Survey Type: 0 Characterization E Turnover 9 Final Status Survey Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4 Reference Map

- J----- \ I I

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 9 of 20 FRO200 SU4 Total Survey Unit Area = 1363 sq-m

Maine Yankee M aine YakeDcmisoin rjcu Fr Map ID#:FRO200-4a Decommissioning Team Maine Yankee DecommissioningProjectSurvey Form Date: 23105 Survey Type: O Characterization i Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRQ200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S001 - S068 624,018.2 E 407,588.71-S-

\ 0 Vxo/

Soo

/ ~so I S Z

~9tOdtC A~rts.

Typical ISOCS Spacing (Maximum)

aine Yankee M . Map ID#:FRO2004b Decommissioning Team Maine Yankee DecommissionigProjectSurvey Form Date: 1/11105 Survey Type: 0 Characterization 0 Turnover 1 Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils Direct Points S001 - S042 624,135.2 E 407,563.3 N FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page I I of 20 Surface Area = 1363 sq-m N = 40 L= 5.8m Surface Area = 1363 sq-rn N40 L5.8m

Maine Yankee D Map ID#: FRO200-4c Decommissioninai Team IMaine Yankee DecommissioningProject Survey Form IDate: 4126105 Survey Type: a Characterization 0 Turnover X Final Status Survey I Survey Area Name: Yard East Soils Final Status Survey FRO200 SU4: Yard East Soils ISOCS Scans S069 624,018.2 E I 407,588.7Ne "N, tn^

A Qo I,0 623,992.0E 407,468.8 N SN N FR.0200.04, Revision 0 Page 12 of 20

Attachment 2 Survey Unit Instrumentation FR-0200 04, Revision 0 Page 13 of2O

TABLE 2-1 INSTRUMENT INFORMATION ISOCS Detectors (Field Measurements)

Detector No. MDC (pCi/g) 7607 0.1 toO.35 7780 0.15 to 0.30 7897 0.10 to 0.31 HPGe Detectors (Laboratory Analysis)

Detector No. MDC (pCi/g)

S-S-I 0.04 to 0.09 FSS2 0.04 to 0.06 TABLE 2-2 INSTRUMENT SCAN MDC, DCGL, INVESTIGATION LEVEL AND DCGLENIC Parameter Instrument: ISOCS Comments Scan MDC 0.16 to 0.35 pCilg Cs-i 37 16% DCGL 0.10 to 0.24 p 1/g Co-60 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4.2 pCilg Cs-137 Approved DCGL for land DCGL 1.5pCi/gCo-60 areas inside the Restricted 1.5 pCilg Co-60 tArea, (Reference 1)

Investigation Level 1.0 pCi/g Cs-137 (ISOCS @ 3 m) 0.36 pCilg Co-60 (Reference 3) 7.0 pCig Cs-137 DCGL x Area Factor for Design DCGLENIC 2.5 pCi/g Co-60 Class 1 survey unit, per LTP 2.5 pilg o-60Section 5.6.3 FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 14 of 20

Attachment 3 Investigation Table (None Required)

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 15 of 20

Attachment 4 Statistical Data FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 16 of 20

Survey Package FRO200 Unit 4 UNITY Soil Sign Test Summary Survey Package: FRO200 Survey Unit: 04 Evaluator: Andy Olsen .

DCGL,: 1.OOE+Oo Unity DOGLmffiC: 1.70E+00 AF = 1.7 LBGR: 5.00E-01 Sigma: 3.20E-01 (1.33 pCVg /4.2 pCVg)

Type I error: 0.05 Type 11error: 0.05 Nuclide: UNITY Soll Type: N/A

!,,-,w OWN Zes 1.645 Zag: .645 Sign p: 0.933193 Calculated Relative Shift: 1.5 Relative Shift Used: 1.5 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift is >3 N-Value: 15 N-Value+20O% 18 Number of Samples: 42 Median: 4.42E-02 Mean: 4.84E-02 Net Sample Standard Deviation: 1.62E-02 Total Standard Deviation: 1.62E-02 Sum of samples and reference Maximum: 1.26E-01_

Adjusted N Value: 42 S+ Value: 42 Critical Value: 26 Sign test results: Pass Sufficient samples collected: Pass X Maximum value <DCGL,: Pass Median value <DCGL,,: Pass Mean value <DCGL,: Pass Maximum value <DCGL,,T,: Pass Total Standard Deviation <=Sigma: Pass Criteria comparison results Pass The survey unit passes all conditions:I Pass Survey Unit Passes FRC200-SU4-SoiISign-UNITY.xls 515/0s 8:46 AM FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 17 of 20

FRO200 SU-4 Quantile Plot 0.14 00 I-0.12 N

0.1

._0 0.08

  • Activity (unitized)

.- , C, o- t 5 0.06 - Median (unitized) 0 ; CE

_. ..-.- i

._ 0.04 ** .

0.02 0

0 25 50 75 100 Percent

One-Sample T-Test Report Page/Date/Time 2 5/5/05 8:47:19 AM Database Variable C2 Plots Section Histogram of FR-0200, SU-4 35 fI r) 26 C.5 E

co o

E z 9' 0.

0 020 0.050 0O.80 0.110 0.140 Activity (unitized)

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 19 of 20

One-Sample T-Test Power Analysis Page/Date/rime 2 515/05 8:48:24 AM Chart Section Retrospective Power Curve 1.0

  • X 0.84 0.6]-

0l a-0.4-I 0.2+/-

I 0.0 L I l 0.ITo 0'2 0.4 0'6 0:8 1.0 Survey Unit Mean (unitized)

FR-0200-04, Revision 0 Page 20 of 20

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML051520398&oldid=2592798"