ML052010288: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 41: Line 41:
ES-201, Page 24 of 27
ES-201, Page 24 of 27


ES-201                                  Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                    Form ES-201-2 Facility:                                                                                  Date of Examination:  M
ES-201                                  Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                    Form ES-201-2 Facility:                                                                                  Date of Examination:  M Item 1.
-
Item
-
1.
w R
w R
I T
I T
Line 95: Line 91:
date of my signature. Iagree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboul lhese examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. Iunderstand that Iam not to Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to bo adminlstered these licensing examinatlono from this date until completlon of examlnatloh sdmlnldratlon, except a8 specltically noted below alhd authorized b y the NRC. Furthermore, Iam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented In the facillty Ilcensees            .
date of my signature. Iagree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboul lhese examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. Iunderstand that Iam not to Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to bo adminlstered these licensing examinatlono from this date until completlon of examlnatloh sdmlnldratlon, except a8 specltically noted below alhd authorized b y the NRC. Furthermore, Iam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented In the facillty Ilcensees            .
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations a d o r an enforcement s c b n againsl me or the facility Licensee. Iwill immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any Micalions or suggestions th.1 tMWMtWWsecurHymayhaVebeencompromlsed.                                                                          I
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations a d o r an enforcement s c b n againsl me or the facility Licensee. Iwill immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any Micalions or suggestions th.1 tMWMtWWsecurHymayhaVebeencompromlsed.                                                                          I
: 2.      post-Ex*rton
: 2.      post-Ex*rton To the beust of my knowledge, Idid not diwlge Lo any unaulharizedpersons any information concerning the NRC llcenelng examkratiane admlnletered. .
                                                                                                                                          ..
To the beust of my knowledge, Idid not diwlge Lo any unaulharizedpersons any information concerning the NRC llcenelng examkratiane admlnletered. .
durlng the week(s) of SC!+.l ok. From the date that Ientered inlo this security agreement until the completion of e x a m i n a h edminlatralbn, I did n0t instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as epeclhlly noted below and aulhbrized by Ihe NRC.
durlng the week(s) of SC!+.l ok. From the date that Ientered inlo this security agreement until the completion of e x a m i n a h edminlatralbn, I did n0t instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as epeclhlly noted below and aulhbrized by Ihe NRC.
       . fmrulEoN(UIIE                                                                                  . DATE      @MSATUREm DATE NOTE MOTES: 1. This note indicates that the individual was personally briefed as to hislher responsiblllties in complying with this security agreement.
       . fmrulEoN(UIIE                                                                                  . DATE      @MSATUREm DATE NOTE MOTES: 1. This note indicates that the individual was personally briefed as to hislher responsiblllties in complying with this security agreement.
Line 106: Line 100:
date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboul these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to bs administered these licensing examinations from this date until completlon of eXaminatlOh rdminlstration, except 8s cpeclfically noted bslow a d authorlzed by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facillty4censee's            .
date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboul these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to bs administered these licensing examinations from this date until completlon of eXaminatlOh rdminlstration, except 8s cpeclfically noted bslow a d authorlzed by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facillty4censee's            .
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examlnatbns and/or an enforcement action againsl me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any lndicalbns or suggestlons that examination security may have been compromised.                                                                I
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examlnatbns and/or an enforcement action againsl me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any lndicalbns or suggestlons that examination security may have been compromised.                                                                I
: 2.      Post-Examinatiq
: 2.      Post-Examinatiq To the best of my kno        e, I did not divulge lo any unauthorized persons any informationconcerning the NRC Uoensing examhatione admlniatered . .
                                                                                                                                          ..
To the best of my kno        e, I did not divulge lo any unauthorized persons any informationconcerning the NRC Uoensing examhatione admlniatered . .
                                      .
durkrgthe week(8) d m d h F m tha date that Ienkred Inlothis security agreement mt# thscomplettonofexembialbn sdm/nbbatbn. I dld instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as s p d f k d ~
durkrgthe week(8) d m d h F m tha date that Ienkred Inlothis security agreement mt# thscomplettonofexembialbn sdm/nbbatbn. I dld instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as s p d f k d ~
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
Line 143: Line 134:
: 3. Simulator Crlteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-3014 and a copy is attached.
: 3. Simulator Crlteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-3014 and a copy is attached.
I Date
I Date
                                                                                                                      %
: a. Author
: a. Author
: b. Facility Reviewer(')
: b. Facility Reviewer(')
Line 157: Line 147:
: 2.          The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
: 2.          The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
3.
0
0 Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event 0        the symptomskues that will be visible to the ccew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
                .
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
                ..
0        the symptomskues that will be visible to the ccew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
: 4.          No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.. pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
: 4.          No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.. pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
: 5.        The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
: 5.        The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
Line 192: Line 178:
Reactivity                        3                2 SRO-I          Normal                                                                                                        **
Reactivity                        3                2 SRO-I          Normal                                                                                                        **
1                                                5            1*
1                                                5            1*
Major                                                                                                8      ** I 2
Major                                                                                                8      ** I 2 Instructions:
--
Instructions:
: 1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not applicableb for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (BOP) positions: Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
: 1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not applicableb for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (BOP) positions: Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
Line 204: Line 188:
* J D h
* J D h
* l m t (  /
* l m t (  /
--.
NRC Reviewer:                T o m fcsq/      5 U2 Draft Submittal                                        26 of 27                      NUREG-1021, Revision 9 4/21/2005 12:32 PM
NRC Reviewer:                T o m fcsq/      5 U2 Draft Submittal                                        26 of 27                      NUREG-1021, Revision 9 4/21/2005 12:32 PM


Line 235: Line 218:
Unit 2 Draft Submittal                        4/2 1/2005                            NUREG-I021 Revision 9
Unit 2 Draft Submittal                        4/2 1/2005                            NUREG-I021 Revision 9


ES-301                          COMPETENCIES CHECKLIST                        FORM ES-301-6
ES-301                          COMPETENCIES CHECKLIST                        FORM ES-301-6 I Facility: Nine Mile Point 2      Date of Exam: May 2,2005              Operating Test: SRO-I Applicants Corn petencies SRO Instant 3                            SRO Instant SCENARIO                              SCENARIO Notes:
--
I Facility: Nine Mile Point 2      Date of Exam: May 2,2005              Operating Test: SRO-I Applicants Corn petencies SRO Instant 3                            SRO Instant SCENARIO                              SCENARIO Notes:
(1 )      Includes Tech Spec compliance for an RO (2)      Optional for an SRO-U (3)      Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
(1 )      Includes Tech Spec compliance for an RO (2)      Optional for an SRO-U (3)      Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Line 264: Line 245:
   ** See Form 401-6 for SRO Level Examanition NUREG 1021 Rev 9 ES-401 Final Exam Submittal
   ** See Form 401-6 for SRO Level Examanition NUREG 1021 Rev 9 ES-401 Final Exam Submittal


ES-401                        WRITTEN EXAMINATION QUALITY CHECKLIST                        FORM ES-401-6
ES-401                        WRITTEN EXAMINATION QUALITY CHECKLIST                        FORM ES-401-6 X          the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started the examinations were developed independently the licensee certifies that there is no duplication other (explain)
--.-
X          the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started the examinations were developed independently the licensee certifies that there is no duplication other (explain)
Bank      Modified    New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual            2125      0125      23/25 question distribution(s). at right 8%        0%        92%
Bank      Modified    New percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual            2125      0125      23/25 question distribution(s). at right 8%        0%        92%
7    Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam (including 10 new questions)                Memory            CIA are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if                6/25          19/25 the randomly selected WAS support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual ROlSRO                  24%            76%
7    Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam (including 10 new questions)                Memory            CIA are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if                6/25          19/25 the randomly selected WAS support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual ROlSRO                  24%            76%
Line 280: Line 259:
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading                            & w./4
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading                            & w./4
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                          hJC&\      J@      w      NPI
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented                                          hJC&\      J@      w      NPI
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
.-
(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
: 4.      Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail                @      %+/        ff
: 4.      Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail                @      %+/        ff
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified                                                        $A      PJIP  db
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified                                                        $A      PJIP  db

Latest revision as of 18:39, 14 March 2020

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML052010288
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2005
From: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
To: Conte R
Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
Download: ML052010288 (18)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1

~ ~~

Facility: Nfl F3- Date of Examination:

Examinations Developed by: / NRC (circle one) LA I

Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 I 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1.a; C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 1-90] [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2. ES-201-3.

ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-3014, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l: C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-2014 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoringhitten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

!J Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: M Item 1.

w R

I T

T E

~ ~~ ~

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2.

S M

I

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number b

U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the citeria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)

(4) the number of new or m o d i tasks meets or exceeds the minimums speuried on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power. emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. -22
b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

C. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

_ea

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a. Author &,d/d
b. Facility Reviewer r)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column .c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ATT HMENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION ECURITY AGREEMENT w / z. *L r5-207 Examination Securlty Agreement Form ES-201-3

~/Y 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail @  %+/ ff
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified $A PJIP db
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of auestions missed bv half or more of the aoolicants I Printed NameSignature Date

/I a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Ten D 6 I I l d. NRC Supervisor (*)

W

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading FOITI ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Item Description a b l c are justified 4b

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Date
a. Grader
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 7cbn F(5t-1
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewets signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML052010288&oldid=2591890"