ML052010288

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML052010288
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	05/02/2005
From:	Todd Fish Operations Branch I
To:	Conte R Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
Download: ML052010288 (18)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1

~ ~~

Facility: Nfl F3- Date of Examination:

Examinations Developed by: / NRC (circle one) LA I

Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 I 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1.a; C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 1-90] [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2. ES-201-3.

ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-3014, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l: C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-2014 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoringhitten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

!J Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: M Item 1.

w R

I T

T E

~ ~~ ~

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2.

S M

I

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number b

U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the citeria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)

(4) the number of new or m o d i tasks meets or exceeds the minimums speuried on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power. emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. -22

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

C. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

_ea

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

a. Author &,d/d

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column .c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ATT HMENT 6: NRC EXAMINATION ECURITY AGREEMENT w / z. *L r5-207 Examination Securlty Agreement Form ES-201-3

~/Y 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail @  %+/ ff

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified $A PJIP db

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of auestions missed bv half or more of the aoolicants I Printed NameSignature Date

/I a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Ten D 6 I I l d. NRC Supervisor (*)

W

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading FOITI ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Item Description a b l c are justified 4b

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Date

a. Grader

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 7cbn F(5t-1

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewets signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5