ML082750593: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML082750593 | | number = ML082750593 | ||
| issue date = 09/05/2008 | | issue date = 09/05/2008 | ||
| title = | | title = 09-Public Forms | ||
| author name = Larson B | | author name = Larson B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:OBDI 202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS E r I I Chief: I Brian T. Larson Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:OBDI 202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS E | ||
AN 1 Date of Written Exam: | r I I Chief: I Brian T. Larson Facility: AN 1 Date of Written Exam: 9/5/2008 Operating Test Developed By: NRC I LA produces / 5 C signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5) 11 8/29/2008 IProctoring/written exam admin guidelines reviewed w/facility I ?/J/dp I &z I - 1 1 I/ 9/1/2008 lExam material to exam team 1 1 11/7/2008 lRef Marl Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals I I I R Replaces NUREG-1021. Revision 9. Supp 1 Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 | ||
9/5/2008 Operating Test Developed By: NRC I LA produces / | |||
ES-201 Form ES-201-2 Facility: ANO-Unit 1 Date of Examination: 9/5/2008 Item Task Description a | |||
ANO-Unit 1 Date of Examination: | 1. | ||
9/5/2008 | w R | ||
: a. Author b Facility Reviewer | I T | ||
(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner | T c. Assess whether the outline over-emD E | ||
(#) d. NRC Supervisor | - N 2. | ||
ES-401 Written Examination Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit I Date of Exam: | S I | ||
9-8-08 Exam Level: RO SRO I 5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: - the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or - the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or - the examinations were developed independently; or - the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or - X other (explain) | M U | ||
: Audit exam has not been developed at this time. Exam team will insure no duplication. I I I 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest a. Author | L A | ||
: b. Facility Reviewer | T 0 | ||
(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner | R 3. | ||
(#) d. NRC Regional Supervisor | W I its specified on the form T | ||
* The facility | nimums specified on the form RCA tasks meet the criteria 4 | ||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column | : a. Author b Facility Reviewer (*) | ||
ES-304 uality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 Date of Examination: | : c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) | ||
9-8-08 Operating Test NL I. General Criteria | : d. NRC Supervisor | ||
: a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.9.. | - . II | ||
10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). | |||
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. | ES-401 Written Examination Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit I Date of Exam: 9-8-08 Exam Level: RO SRO I | ||
: | Initial I | ||
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. | : 5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | ||
: | - the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or | ||
- | - the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or | ||
- the examinations were developed independently; or | |||
: | - the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or | ||
/ Signgtwe | - X other (explain) :Audit exam has not been developed at this time. Exam team will insure no duplication. | ||
(#) NOTE | I I I I | ||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests Date of Exam: 9!t1i2008 Scenario Numbers: I i 2 / 3 Onerating Pest No.: 213108-3 1 The initial conditions aie realistic, in that some equipment and/or ins~umenta~ion may be out of seivice but it does not cue the operators into expected events The scenarios consist mostly of related events Each event description consists of e 0 + e | : 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest Date | ||
: a. Author | |||
ANO-I Unit I Date of Exam: | : b. Facility Reviewer (*) | ||
9/5/2008 Exam Le> el: RO SRO Item Description | : c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) | ||
: 1. | : d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note: | ||
: 3. | * The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations. | ||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameISignature | # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required. | ||
(*) d. NRC Supervisor | |||
(*) (*) The facility | ES-304 uality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 Date of Examination: 9-8-08 Operating Test NL iber: 2008-1 Initials I. General Criteria | ||
: a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.9.. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). | |||
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination. | |||
: c. 0 The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) | |||
: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. | |||
: e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. | |||
: 2. Walk-Through Criteria a. | |||
--Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | |||
initial conditions | |||
-- initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | |||
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | |||
- system response and other examiner cues | |||
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | |||
- criteria for successful completion of the task | |||
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards | |||
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | |||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. | |||
Printed Name / Signgtwe Date a Author b Facility Reviewerr) c NRC Chief Examiner (#) | |||
NOTE | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests | |||
Date of Exam: 9!t1i2008 Scenario Numbers: I i 2 / 3 Onerating Pest No.:213108-3 1 The initial conditions aie realistic, in that some equipment and/or ins~umenta~ion may be out of seivice but it does not cue the operators into expected events 2 The scenarios consist mostly of related events 3 Each event description consists of e the point in the sccnario wnen it is lo be inrtiated 0 the ~ialfunction(s~ that are entered io initiate the event | |||
+ the symptomsicues that will be visible to the crew e the expected operator actions (by shift position) a the event terniinatiori point (if applicable) 4 No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e g , pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario witnout a credible precedinq incident such as a seismic event 6 i n gtiming of events is reasonable and aiiows the e~aminat~on S e ~ ~ i e ~ &anu teain to obtaiii complete evaluation results commensurate wiih the scenario obiectives 7 If time compression techniques are used tne scenario summary cleariy so irtdicaies Opeiators have sufficieit time to carry out expected activities without mdue time constraints I Cues are qiven 10 Every operator MI/be evaluated using at least one new or si~niftcantlymodified scenario All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D 5 of ES-301 ed, as verified w n g Form ES-301-6 | |||
ES-403 Written Examjnatjon Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ANO-I Unit I Date of Exam: 9/5/2008 Exam Le>el: RO SRO Initials Item Description ~ | |||
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading | |||
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | |||
: 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) | |||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail | |||
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified | |||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants I I Printed NameISignature Date | |||
: a. Grader | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor (*) | |||
(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. | |||
t-: | |||
Z 4 | |||
cf m | |||
2 9 | |||
LL LL LL | |||
.-c E | |||
2 W | |||
?$ | |||
$5 cu 0 | |||
m m | |||
0 0 | |||
cu Iz m | |||
0 0 | |||
0 m | |||
0 a, | |||
s2 Urn o m | |||
=Jm zrl | |||
% X l- E# | |||
$at- 2 -J a | |||
m 0 | |||
0 cu co 0 | |||
m 0 | |||
0 m | |||
0 0 | |||
N m | |||
0 b | |||
-m c | |||
c g | |||
0 B | |||
Y 0 | |||
3 B | |||
0 v) hi 0 | |||
(5: | |||
a, u) m L: | |||
n. | |||
.J a | |||
P | |||
go 25 3 | |||
L v) | |||
E E m -1 | |||
' 0 2" | |||
a i | |||
v) hi W | |||
0 0 | |||
8 m | |||
r a | |||
c 1 | |||
corr, z | |||
I?0 Lu K | |||
w J | |||
4 t-m 0 | |||
3 e w | |||
.-0 2 Y | |||
m | |||
.-C 2 0 | |||
Em W t-u;' | |||
X e | |||
zrr 21 a}} |
Latest revision as of 20:58, 12 March 2020
ML082750593 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Arkansas Nuclear |
Issue date: | 09/05/2008 |
From: | Brian Larson NRC Region 4 |
To: | |
References | |
Download: ML082750593 (11) | |
Text
OBDI 202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS E
r I I Chief: I Brian T. Larson Facility: AN 1 Date of Written Exam: 9/5/2008 Operating Test Developed By: NRC I LA produces / 5 C signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5) 11 8/29/2008 IProctoring/written exam admin guidelines reviewed w/facility I ?/J/dp I &z I - 1 1 I/ 9/1/2008 lExam material to exam team 1 1 11/7/2008 lRef Marl Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals I I I R Replaces NUREG-1021. Revision 9. Supp 1 Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1
ES-201 Form ES-201-2 Facility: ANO-Unit 1 Date of Examination: 9/5/2008 Item Task Description a
1.
w R
I T
T c. Assess whether the outline over-emD E
- N 2.
S I
M U
L A
T 0
R 3.
W I its specified on the form T
nimums specified on the form RCA tasks meet the criteria 4
- a. Author b Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor
- . II
ES-401 Written Examination Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit I Date of Exam: 9-8-08 Exam Level: RO SRO I
Initial I
- 5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
- the examinations were developed independently; or
- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
- X other (explain) :Audit exam has not been developed at this time. Exam team will insure no duplication.
I I I I
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest Date
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
- The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-304 uality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1 Date of Examination: 9-8-08 Operating Test NL iber: 2008-1 Initials I. General Criteria
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.9.. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
- c. 0 The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a.
--Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions
-- initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name / Signgtwe Date a Author b Facility Reviewerr) c NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NOTE
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests
Date of Exam: 9!t1i2008 Scenario Numbers: I i 2 / 3 Onerating Pest No.:213108-3 1 The initial conditions aie realistic, in that some equipment and/or ins~umenta~ion may be out of seivice but it does not cue the operators into expected events 2 The scenarios consist mostly of related events 3 Each event description consists of e the point in the sccnario wnen it is lo be inrtiated 0 the ~ialfunction(s~ that are entered io initiate the event
+ the symptomsicues that will be visible to the crew e the expected operator actions (by shift position) a the event terniinatiori point (if applicable) 4 No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e g , pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario witnout a credible precedinq incident such as a seismic event 6 i n gtiming of events is reasonable and aiiows the e~aminat~on S e ~ ~ i e ~ &anu teain to obtaiii complete evaluation results commensurate wiih the scenario obiectives 7 If time compression techniques are used tne scenario summary cleariy so irtdicaies Opeiators have sufficieit time to carry out expected activities without mdue time constraints I Cues are qiven 10 Every operator MI/be evaluated using at least one new or si~niftcantlymodified scenario All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D 5 of ES-301 ed, as verified w n g Form ES-301-6
ES-403 Written Examjnatjon Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ANO-I Unit I Date of Exam: 9/5/2008 Exam Le>el: RO SRO Initials Item Description ~
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants I I Printed NameISignature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
t-:
Z 4
cf m
2 9
.-c E
2 W
?$
$5 cu 0
m m
0 0
cu Iz m
0 0
0 m
0 a,
s2 Urn o m
=Jm zrl
% X l- E#
$at- 2 -J a
m 0
0 cu co 0
m 0
0 m
0 0
N m
0 b
-m c
c g
0 B
Y 0
3 B
0 v) hi 0
(5:
a, u) m L:
n.
.J a
P
go 25 3
L v)
E E m -1
' 0 2"
a i
v) hi W
0 0
8 m
r a
c 1
corr, z
I?0 Lu K
w J
4 t-m 0
3 e w
.-0 2 Y
m
.-C 2 0
Em W t-u;'
X e
zrr 21 a