ML17352A615: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17352A615
| number = ML17352A615
| issue date = 12/15/2017
| issue date = 12/15/2017
| title = and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-LL-2017R-0143)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-LL-2017R-0143)
| author name = Kuntz R F
| author name = Kuntz R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII
| addressee name = Sueper L L
| addressee name = Sueper L
| addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
| addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
| docket = 05000263, 05000282, 05000306
| docket = 05000263, 05000282, 05000306
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:01 PM To: Sueper, Leonard L.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From:                               Kuntz, Robert Sent:                               Friday, December 15, 2017 1:01 PM To:                                 Sueper, Leonard L.


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0143)
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0143)
Mr. Sueper, By letter dated November 29, 2017, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a relief request for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 to adopt American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-513-4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Mr. Sueper, By letter dated November 29, 2017, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a relief request for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 to adopt American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-513-4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.  
Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::120 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.  
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Robert F. Kuntz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3  
Robert F. Kuntz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1


Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_DMPS Email Number:         55 Mail Envelope Properties     (BN6PR09MB22763E9EDED8BF3C19C0DB4E990B0)
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 55   Mail Envelope Properties   (BN6PR09MB22763E9EDED8BF3C19C0DB4E990B0)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0143)
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID:
Sent Date:   12/15/2017 1:00:33 PM Received Date: 12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM From:   Kuntz, Robert Created By:   Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov  
L-2017-LLR-0143)
 
Sent Date:             12/15/2017 1:00:33 PM Received Date:         12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM From:                 Kuntz, Robert Created By:           Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:
Recipients:     "Sueper, Leonard L." <Leonard.Sueper@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:   BN6PR09MB2276.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
"Sueper, Leonard L." <Leonard.Sueper@xenuclear.com>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           BN6PR09MB2276.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files                         Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                       2389                     12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2389     12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM
Recipients Received:}}
 
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 12:46, 8 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-LL-2017R-0143)
ML17352A615
Person / Time
Site: Monticello, Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2017
From: Robert Kuntz
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Sueper L
Northern States Power Company, Minnesota
References
L-LL-2017R-0143
Download: ML17352A615 (2)


Text

NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 1:01 PM To: Sueper, Leonard L.

Subject:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID: L-2017-LLR-0143)

Mr. Sueper, By letter dated November 29, 2017, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a relief request for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 to adopt American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-513-4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

Based on the information provided in your submittal the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours5 days <br />0.714 weeks <br />0.164 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Robert F. Kuntz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 55 Mail Envelope Properties (BN6PR09MB22763E9EDED8BF3C19C0DB4E990B0)

Subject:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Relief Request Re: Adoption of Code Case N-513-4 (EPID:

L-2017-LLR-0143)

Sent Date: 12/15/2017 1:00:33 PM Received Date: 12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM From: Kuntz, Robert Created By: Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Sueper, Leonard L." <Leonard.Sueper@xenuclear.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN6PR09MB2276.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2389 12/15/2017 1:00:34 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: