ML16145A244: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16145A244 | | number = ML16145A244 | ||
| issue date = 03/31/2015 | | issue date = 03/31/2015 | ||
| title = | | title = Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1) | ||
| author name = Fuller B | | author name = Fuller B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | | document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | ||
| page count = 14 | | page count = 14 | ||
| project = TAC:U01904 | |||
| stage = Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: HoPE Ctaa:t<. ZOIS Date of Examination: 2/zs/zo1s v ' | ||
HoPE Ctaa:t<. | Developed by: Written - FacilityJ8] NRCD II Operating - Facility~ NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials | ||
ZOIS Date of Examination: | -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf"" | ||
2/zs/zo1s v ' Developed by: Written -FacilityJ8] | -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) | ||
NRCD II Operating | ~ | ||
- | -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF | ||
NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) | -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF | ||
Examiner's Initials | [-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F | ||
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf"" -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF [-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and | {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) | ||
BJF | |||
supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), | {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} rsr- | ||
and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; | {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form Bf' ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) | ||
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) asF | |||
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. | -14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) eDlt | ||
[Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28 ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: | -14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) N/A BF | ||
Date of Examination: | -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) BF | ||
Item 1. w | -7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) BF | ||
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) n | ||
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) | |||
\3~ | |||
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified | -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) | ||
E>f"' | |||
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | * Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. | ||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ( 4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | [Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. | ||
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form | ES-201, Page 25 of 28 | ||
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | |||
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. | ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: | ||
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | Initials Item Task Description a b* c# | ||
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | 1. | ||
."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH | w | ||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | : a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. | ||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) | 5., t}('I;' gr R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. )r) ~< Bf T | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor v | : c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t7( fSf T )J E | ||
: d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | |||
N f;/) l;Y£' 8f | |||
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. | : 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover th~ required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients. | ||
I understand that I am not to instruct, | s~ ~( .Br= | ||
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number | |||
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. | ~ | ||
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, | T at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | ||
s, gF 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. | |||
Dtrv (\) 15, 2. 'i4tlvJl> | )I &F" l~K | ||
/11 /'< | : 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | ||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks Sf7 !,<'K w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) | |||
4./-i-VJ?'?"):z' | (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. | ||
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified IC' ja'K' (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations v9 8F | |||
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent davs. | |||
: 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. | |||
G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | |||
E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. | |||
. | E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. | ||
. | A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | ||
. | L | ||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | |||
,. ,...., P/rioted..!')lame/SiQllature Date | |||
: a. Author ."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH ..41....~ J-.U~.-. I )-ill ,It </ | |||
= | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor v | |||
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | |||
. ** ,, --1 3>-L{-/) | * Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28 | ||
(of( (!) | |||
. | ILOT 2015 NRC SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRG licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | |||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG. | |||
* ';,,';;j_+/- | PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE | ||
: 1. s*nv~~ Dtrv (\) 15, | |||
: 2. 'i4tlvJl> /11 /'<1t..J IS | |||
'- | - r--- | ||
CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | c...a..,,..,..,, s:-'~";v-3. | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February | 4./-i-VJ?'?"):z' | ||
& March 2015 as of the date of my signature. | { 5. 1Uq1h@ K&Fffi | ||
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. | /i rr*-- *~ - - r-*----n1 | ||
I understand that I am not to instruct, | ,,'? * / | ||
r"!frl,.C | |||
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. | ~,,,-t£,~c,, ~e..-/:, .. _ ,$71"//(>".JH:F@<.C.1/~~ ,~--j74.$'x-*;-e ,?t{y,:u:;._. | ||
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ~. "" | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February | ~~ - | ||
& March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, | *1uq11~ | ||
, 0/,.;~~?;14i;t_~,,; | |||
' | - ' ~ | ||
P"Vl-3-t-t:> | ~--- | ||
i<<,J-n<hl | ~ tt;:;' * | ||
/LO | : 6. 1.. * .Mte.i.i t . 6 e . .... - - , * - - - - 1~*3U*/ _ _ __ | ||
* 4. :TerlMv k. siZO .. , ..... ,-5. | : 7. ti\. Ck Nt- ~ S ~A\."):°" Cr-1 ~ D* o. 4~ :1:..:i..:uC t 8. P.W\,i~ \} o.\~ 'H 61'. | ||
'1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?- | * JO '3 f t.!J.r 10~4ir:<< | ||
,J: 5C{\ | J.+f ,;fil~ P~ 1. ... ,,,-tic fl.- ~:r | ||
5;;,,,<l.- | ~~~ ";)~l<*. | ||
/ = ,. """ ** '""'P" " -.* - | '{- 9. :e."' _ 10 I 0- v111L,J~"*" . ** ~ ,, --1 ,;c;;;;sc;~ 3>-L{-/) __ | ||
k* e R o. 13._ | tlf::£ VLv | ||
, eo | ==== | ||
~ 11. 'CJ BuR k £ | |||
'f 12.14. ttAfJft- --- ~ /I ~ ~ ,,_ __'!.::+/-~ | |||
[>pi_ 8"" L ()....__ | /VAc<OPrToO<~ | ||
:; -If-IS,_. | /,L'-'O 1\ 13. r £µ6EL !VC<2' lf>-#A'I..- . I ~c__ | ||
- | 114. Gwf:NN K~l'J US "\*! ... ;;;,,,_.,,_ >-<;r_ _ | ||
Z-1 L -I':> | 'f. 15. (. /lbry hlo ~ ;~t;:'( *';,,';;j_+/- ,'(~;:-- | ||
~3JA__ ~ | |||
(<tf'1 | NOTES: | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February | f<o. /If.>~ Ops l'J-C..~-~ ,vb.'"""-~ | ||
& March 2015 as of the date of my signature. | t'7 ? Q, ct,\c.-\..... eo ~"'? + <'C.. '"" l ~~ '-/ 19!1> )('l/f '> | ||
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. | |||
I understand that I am not to instruct, | CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | |||
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. | : 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted .below and authorized by the NRC. | ||
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE Y 1. CR.Al(r /Yl\~(i.101 5((() \. {,~.., ' t f U \\({,/JL( P"Vl- ~L (L~J;--- 3-t-t:> _ _ | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February | i 2. _jo/\Jfl.NA,IJ EJt-f... ~o | ||
& March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, | : 3. *n-&.cr< i<<,J-n<hl /LO '~ * | ||
~ 4;,,,.,~* ~ ~4;1,/i11r ' 0~~~ | |||
-rr 2. "!/H-..K | : 4. :TerlMv k. siZO ..,..... ,- | ||
,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t | : 5. ../;J; i.Ro , A 6 ]) | ||
* *vtfWC ~ | |||
'O \ ...:i l'tcl<AM s I \ s 4. | r..u | ||
- - -- * -6 7.J~ LJ~ ~ M | |||
7afZ.. ?2/1/;r 5. M*l<t S.M -=====--===== | : 8. ff II.A "/Z. 1 ~r~ ~ ~ | ||
: | : 9. e.JL. 11 ~1f". ~Jrl1.uLA-rvtl- '1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?- ~ ~~-Ao; 10./11.~ ~ O\M | ||
'f- 11.-;vlQritt ,J: 5C{\ 4\0~ 5;;,,,<l.- / = ,. " " " * * .,~ '""'P" " - .* - _ _ _ __ | |||
: 12. '"4~ k* e tel~dl R o. | |||
13._ ~-C<<-"'1 , eo -------- | |||
: 14. E 'St>lt"$ | |||
: 15. £. L.. rev o..., tl.o | |||
/l..o ~ | |||
~-(~-/? | |||
---- | ""Z | ||
------ | [>pi_ 8"" L ()....__ | ||
------ | 3:!1-*.- __ | ||
-------- | :; -If-IS,_. - | ||
------ | 3~t-tl NOTESr\ On | ||
(((,. k. "'* JS* ... ~ <....~ SM. | |||
Hope Creek Generatinq Station Date of Examination: | ~17 Z-1 L -I':> 7'(--t~- | ||
2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials | I), JQh"' /(reµ, UV fl.. 0 | ||
: 1. General Criteria a b* c# a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with | |||
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. | 8) 2015~~~y | ||
(see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within | (<tf'1 ILOT AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
------a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | : 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. | |||
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY Slt-¥'JATV~E (1) DATE NOTE | |||
: 1. {1J c.4-feli/ ~of+/-w4V~ ~ L/'-- ~-y., -rr | |||
: 2. "!/H-..K 4'l~ ,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t --~/d. ~}.*rr__ | |||
-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | : 3. -r\ "" c. f\'"T' B\...At?'O \ ...:i ~ l'tcl<AM s ~ I \s | ||
£.f -system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | : 4. "S-rEV't:?)V.~t,e& ::lr-$-uev(.. 7afZ.. a~ ?2/1/;r | ||
: 5. M*l<t ~ | |||
-restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | : 6. C!Jl,l,s ,a.-i14AYY S.M ~t -=====--===== | ||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance | _ _i_,..._:s.,_tt._"~-*---------- _ __,..__.~.,_____,._ _ _ _ _ ~-'-r=- | ||
..Y!lll~-- | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria | : 7. JCA #OZ-~ 5 o;.J /NS/l'?(.IC7Z'~ ~ --,FkW'-H--+---o-- | ||
------The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with | : 8. -----rx;b=gtc.cc1' l.fL l~ Hf{ ~ | ||
Printed Name I Signature Date a. Author Sn.u£.,v | : 9. Si tM..Yl~-UT> _X_\#:>~~~~rnr~------- -~~--_,__ ________ | ||
,/, | : 10. ------ --------------------------------- ---- | ||
11._________ ------ | |||
: b. ... 11-,...dlL | 12._________ ------ | ||
13. | |||
11-LiaL '4- | 14. | ||
15.-------- ------ | |||
..X,Q a H I,[_/_ | NOTES: ----- | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | |||
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Hope Creek Generatinq Station Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | : 1. General Criteria a b* c# | ||
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: | : a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplinq requirements (e.q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~::o ~~ gF | ||
Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: | : b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. ~p ~" B~ | ||
1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF 3. Each event description consists of SD | : c. The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F | ||
: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. ,7:. ~J( SF | |||
: e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desiqnated license level. >1 di( SF | |||
: 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- -- | |||
a. | |||
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | |||
initial conditions SP initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific | |||
. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | |||
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature £.f | |||
- system response and other examiner cues | |||
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | |||
- criteria for successful completion of the task &F | |||
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards | |||
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | |||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~ | |||
outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified <<" SF on those forms and Form ES-201-2. | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -- | |||
-;;.? | |||
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copv is attached. | |||
tK f>C° Printed Name I Signature Date | |||
: a. Author Sn.u£.,v o_e_rJ~1J I(~ Q..e.~ l1--[b1~ | |||
,/, ...._ _,, | |||
~----- | |||
' ./. d' | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) , ... 11-,...dlL ,.Af,,-,~.J#[,'!. ...~ | |||
1z./n.J14 | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Or\CU'l Ft;L.LefZ-/~: ~;A~_,~f!bt 11-LiaL '4-tUJ/~ci~...X,Q a I | |||
H I,[_/_ 12fc8'h4 | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor ~ALn I / | |||
NOTE: | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. | |||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | |||
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# | |||
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* ~ | |||
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF | |||
: 3. Each event description consists of SD | |||
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated | * the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated | ||
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event | * the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event | ||
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew | * the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 6~ | ||
* the expected operator actions (by shift position) | * the expected operator actions (by shift position) ~K | ||
* the event termination point (if applicable) | * the event termination point (if applicable) | ||
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario | : 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. S') ,X/( SF | ||
: 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. s.. ') (;(..(' &F | |||
s.. ') (;(..(' &F 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ;(.t . .' f>F | : 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~/) ;(.t..' f>F | ||
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. | : 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | ||
.( D ,;r'...t. | Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. | ||
Cues are given. .( D ,;r'...t. Sf | |||
<; ') £'1(1( 6F 9. The scenarios have been validated. | : 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. <; ') £'1(1( 6F | ||
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), | : 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. <; ") | ||
any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated | rif'I( 'SF | ||
<; ") 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | : 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | ||
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. s. I) r)(K SF | |||
.S') | : 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). )~ | ||
: 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf" ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: | pt.c* 6f" | ||
Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 | : 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). .S') ,;(/( f>F | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | : 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .s~ cf.I( ~f Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -- | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component | : 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 I 5 I 7 I 7 SJ.> ,K.( Bf | ||
{l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | : 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 3 I 3 5:> ""..( e,f' | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | : 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 S,9 1~r t,F | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix | : 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SD ;(,( e,F | ||
: 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1 I 3 I 3 }') cY~* ~{.:'" | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I c | : 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | : 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf" | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component | |||
{l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E I 0 | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | c s A B s A B s A B s A B L M | ||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: | u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | ||
Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I c s | N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | E R0#1 RX 1 1 1 1 0 | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | ~ NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,7 9 D 2,7 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0 | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,7 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 1 1 1 1 0 | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,6 2,7 9 D 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0 | ||
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,6 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions: | ||
Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: | : 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | ||
2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 | and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | ||
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | : 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | ||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
2 | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 | |||
~lty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | |||
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | |||
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | |||
E RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #1 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 3,4,6,7 3,4,7 11 4 4 2 | |||
~ | |||
2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2,3 4 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I #2 3,4,6, 3,6 10 4 4 2 | |||
~ | |||
l/C 7 2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #3 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,5,7, | |||
~ l/C 13 4 4 2 3,4,6,7 3,4,6,7 8 | |||
SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #4 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,6, 3,4,5,7, | |||
~ 1/C 3,6 7 8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2 2 0 2 2 Instructions: | |||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | |||
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | |||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | |||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | |||
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | |||
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | |||
E RO RX 2 2 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 3.4,5,7, 4,5,7 D l/C 8 3,5 ,8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 6 2 2 1 D TS 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 Instructions: | |||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | |||
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | |||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | |||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ | |||
SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Operate Control 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 7 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Boards (2) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Communicate 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 7 5,6 5,6,7 6 7 6 5,6 5,6,7 and Interact 8 8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) | |||
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) | |||
Notes: | |||
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. | |||
(2) Optional for an SRO-U. | |||
(3) Only applicable to SROs. | |||
Instructions: | |||
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | |||
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SR0-11 ~ SRO-I~ ~ SRO-I~ ~ SR0-11: ~ | |||
SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 7 7 4,7 7 4,7 7 7 5,6,7 7 5,6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 1,2,4 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,4 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 6 5,7 7 7 5,6,7 6 5,7 5,6,7 Use Procedures (1) | |||
Operate Control 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 6 5,7 6 Boards (2) | |||
Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 4,5,7 5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 5,7 4,5,7 and Interact 7 7 Demonstrate 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 4,7 5,7 4,7 5,7 6,7 5,7 6,7 Supervisory Ability (3) | |||
Comply With and 3,4 2,3 3 2,3 3,4 2 3 2 Use Tech. Specs. (3) | |||
Notes: | |||
( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. | |||
(2) Optional for an SRO-U. | |||
(3) Only applicable to SROs. | |||
Instructions: | |||
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | ||
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: | |||
Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c# 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. | ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c# | ||
c., f) ,1.K u: 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. | : 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. c., f) ,1.K u: | ||
: 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. | |||
SD l;(J( 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 <;..') ,<I( sr: 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions | : b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. SD l;(J( SF | ||
: 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | : 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 <;..') | ||
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or _the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _other (explain) | ,<I( | ||
sr: | |||
: 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); | : 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). SF | ||
enter the actual RO I SRO-only | : 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | ||
s) at right. Sr) 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ | X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or | ||
analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter | _the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or | ||
( () BF 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; | _ the examinations were developed independently; or | ||
_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or | |||
/ i J..-1 'l-t lj b. Facility Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner | _other (explain) | ||
(#) | IS.D 'r:f1<.' BF | ||
* The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations. | : 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New ~K' from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution( s) at right. | ||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | 49 I 15 1I 1 25 I 9 Sr) BF | ||
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO 1. | : 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right. <:,() ~K SF | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature | : 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers KK or aid in the elimination of distractors. ( () BF | ||
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) | : 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. SD ~K gf | ||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner | : 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the auidelines in ES Appendix B. s.o ~< BF i.z~ | ||
(*) d. NRC Supervisor(*) | : 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and aarees with the value on the cover sheet. ~I) BF Printed Name I Signature Date | ||
: a. Author ..>n:.0uv Q~l.JNj!) / ~~ ~ i J..-1 'l-t lj | |||
'~ | |||
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: | '2~~ | ||
HoPE Ctaa:t<. | : b. Facility Reviewer(*) | ||
ZOIS Date of Examination: | c. | ||
2/zs/zo1s v ' Developed by: Written -FacilityJ8] | d. | ||
NRCD II Operating | NRC Chief Examiner (#) | ||
- | NRC Regional Supervisor ll[18]_1'A 4 | ||
NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) | Note: | ||
Examiner's Initials | * The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations. | ||
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf"" -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF [-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and | # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | ||
supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), | ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO Initials Item Description a b c | ||
and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; | : 1. Clean answer sheets copied before Si> BF | ||
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | |||
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. | : 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check > 25% of examinations | ||
[Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28 ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: | : 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail | ||
Date of Examination: | : 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified | ||
Item 1. w | : 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity SD /r 5F of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date | ||
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | : a. Grader 1-4-1") | ||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~1 ~1 1 ~ | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) -a)Slf5 | |||
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified | : d. NRC Supervisor(*) !~/rs | ||
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are required. | |||
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | ES-403, Page 6 of 6 | ||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ( 4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form | ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: HoPE Ctaa:t<. ZOIS Date of Examination: 2/zs/zo1s v ' | ||
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | Developed by: Written - FacilityJ8] NRCD II Operating - Facility~ NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials | ||
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. | -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf"" | ||
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) | ||
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | ~ | ||
."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH | -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF | ||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF | ||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) | [-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor v | {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) | ||
BJF | |||
{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} rsr- | |||
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form Bf' ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) | |||
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) asF | |||
: | -14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) eDlt | ||
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) N/A BF | |||
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) BF | |||
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) BF | |||
: | -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) n | ||
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) | |||
/ | \3~ | ||
: | -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) | ||
E>f"' | |||
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. | |||
: 7. ti\. Ck Nt-S | [Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. | ||
ES-201, Page 25 of 28 | |||
'f. | |||
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: | |||
Initials Item Task Description a b* c# | |||
1. | |||
. | w | ||
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. | |||
, | 5., t}('I;' gr R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. )r) ~< Bf T | ||
: c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t7( fSf T )J E | |||
: d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | |||
N f;/) l;Y£' 8f | |||
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover th~ required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients. | |||
' | s~ ~( .Br= | ||
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number | |||
~ | |||
. * | u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A | ||
T at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | |||
s, gF 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. | |||
. | )I &F" l~K | ||
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | |||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks Sf7 !,<'K w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) | |||
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. | |||
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified IC' ja'K' (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations v9 8F | |||
'-/ 19!1> )('l/f '> | : c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent davs. | ||
CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | : 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February | G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | ||
& March 2015 as of the date of my signature. | E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. | ||
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. | E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. | ||
I understand that I am not to instruct, | A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | ||
L | |||
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. | : f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | ||
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ,. ,...., P/rioted..!')lame/SiQllature Date | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February | : a. Author ."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH ..41....~ J-.U~.-. I )-ill ,It </ | ||
& March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, | = | ||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
' | : c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) | ||
P"Vl-3-t-t:> | : d. NRC Supervisor v | ||
i<<,J-n<hl | Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | ||
/LO | * Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28 | ||
'1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?-O\M 'f-11.-;vlQritt | (of( (!) | ||
,J: 5C{\ | ILOT 2015 NRC SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
5;;,,,<l.- | : 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRG licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ||
/ = ,. """ ** '""'P" " -.* - | : 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG. | ||
k* e R o. 13._ | PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE | ||
, eo | : 1. s*nv~~ Dtrv (\) 15, | ||
: 2. 'i4tlvJl> /11 /'<1t..J IS | |||
- r--- | |||
[>pi_ 8"" L ()....__ | c...a..,,..,..,, s:-'~";v-3. | ||
: | 4./-i-VJ?'?"):z' | ||
- | { 5. 1Uq1h@ K&Fffi | ||
Z-1 L -I':> | /i rr*-- *~ - - r-*----n1 | ||
,,'? * / | |||
( | r"!frl,.C | ||
: 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February | ~,,,-t£,~c,, ~e..-/:, .. _ ,$71"//(>".JH:F@<.C.1/~~ ,~--j74.$'x-*;-e ,?t{y,:u:;._. | ||
& March 2015 as of the date of my signature. | ~. "" | ||
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. | ~~ - | ||
I understand that I am not to instruct, | *1uq11~ | ||
, 0/,.;~~?;14i;t_~,,; | |||
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. | - ' ~ | ||
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ~--- | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February | ~ tt;:;' * | ||
& March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, | : 6. 1.. * .Mte.i.i t . 6 e . .... - - , * - - - - 1~*3U*/ _ _ __ | ||
: 7. ti\. Ck Nt- ~ S ~A\."):°" Cr-1 ~ D* o. 4~ :1:..:i..:uC t 8. P.W\,i~ \} o.\~ 'H 61'. | |||
-rr 2. "!/H-..K | * JO '3 f t.!J.r 10~4ir:<< | ||
,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t | J.+f ,;fil~ P~ 1. ... ,,,-tic fl.- ~:r | ||
~~~ ";)~l<*. | |||
'O \ ...:i l'tcl<AM s I \ s 4. | '{- 9. :e."' _ 10 I 0- v111L,J~"*" . ** ~ ,, --1 ,;c;;;;sc;~ 3>-L{-/) __ | ||
tlf::£ VLv | |||
7afZ.. ?2/1/;r 5. M*l<t S.M -=====--===== | ==== | ||
: | ~ 11. 'CJ BuR k £ | ||
'f 12.14. ttAfJft- --- ~ /I ~ ~ ,,_ __'!.::+/-~ | |||
/VAc<OPrToO<~ | |||
/,L'-'O 1\ 13. r £µ6EL !VC<2' lf>-#A'I..- . I ~c__ | |||
114. Gwf:NN K~l'J US "\*! ... ;;;,,,_.,,_ >-<;r_ _ | |||
'f. 15. (. /lbry hlo ~ ;~t;:'( *';,,';;j_+/- ,'(~;:-- | |||
~3JA__ ~ | |||
NOTES: | |||
---- | f<o. /If.>~ Ops l'J-C..~-~ ,vb.'"""-~ | ||
------ | t'7 ? Q, ct,\c.-\..... eo ~"'? + <'C.. '"" l ~~ '-/ 19!1> )('l/f '> | ||
------ | |||
-------- | CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
------ | : 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ||
: 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted .below and authorized by the NRC. | |||
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE Y 1. CR.Al(r /Yl\~(i.101 5((() \. {,~.., ' t f U \\({,/JL( P"Vl- ~L (L~J;--- 3-t-t:> _ _ | |||
2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials | i 2. _jo/\Jfl.NA,IJ EJt-f... ~o | ||
: 1. General Criteria a b* c# a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with | : 3. *n-&.cr< i<<,J-n<hl /LO '~ * | ||
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. c. The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). | ~ 4;,,,.,~* ~ ~4;1,/i11r ' 0~~~ | ||
(see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within | : 4. :TerlMv k. siZO ..,..... ,- | ||
------a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | : 5. ../;J; i.Ro , A 6 ]) | ||
* *vtfWC ~ | |||
r..u | |||
- - -- * -6 7.J~ LJ~ ~ M | |||
: 8. ff II.A "/Z. 1 ~r~ ~ ~ | |||
-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | : 9. e.JL. 11 ~1f". ~Jrl1.uLA-rvtl- '1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?- ~ ~~-Ao; 10./11.~ ~ O\M | ||
£.f -system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | 'f- 11.-;vlQritt ,J: 5C{\ 4\0~ 5;;,,,<l.- / = ,. " " " * * .,~ '""'P" " - .* - _ _ _ __ | ||
: 12. '"4~ k* e tel~dl R o. | |||
-restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | 13._ ~-C<<-"'1 , eo -------- | ||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance | : 14. E 'St>lt"$ | ||
: 15. £. L.. rev o..., tl.o | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria | /l..o ~ | ||
------The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with | ~-(~-/? | ||
Printed Name I Signature Date a. Author Sn.u£.,v | ""Z | ||
,/, | [>pi_ 8"" L ()....__ | ||
3:!1-*.- __ | |||
: b. ... 11-,...dlL | :; -If-IS,_. - | ||
3~t-tl NOTESr\ On | |||
11-LiaL '4- | (((,. k. "'* JS* ... ~ <....~ SM. | ||
~17 Z-1 L -I':> 7'(--t~- | |||
..X,Q a H I,[_/_ | I), JQh"' /(reµ, UV fl.. 0 | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | |||
8) 2015~~~y | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | (<tf'1 ILOT AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 | ||
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: | : 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. | ||
Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: | : 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. | ||
1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF 3. Each event description consists of SD | PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY Slt-¥'JATV~E (1) DATE NOTE | ||
: 1. {1J c.4-feli/ ~of+/-w4V~ ~ L/'-- ~-y., -rr | |||
: 2. "!/H-..K 4'l~ ,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t --~/d. ~}.*rr__ | |||
: 3. -r\ "" c. f\'"T' B\...At?'O \ ...:i ~ l'tcl<AM s ~ I \s | |||
: 4. "S-rEV't:?)V.~t,e& ::lr-$-uev(.. 7afZ.. a~ ?2/1/;r | |||
: 5. M*l<t ~ | |||
: 6. C!Jl,l,s ,a.-i14AYY S.M ~t -=====--===== | |||
_ _i_,..._:s.,_tt._"~-*---------- _ __,..__.~.,_____,._ _ _ _ _ ~-'-r=- | |||
..Y!lll~-- | |||
: 7. JCA #OZ-~ 5 o;.J /NS/l'?(.IC7Z'~ ~ --,FkW'-H--+---o-- | |||
: 8. -----rx;b=gtc.cc1' l.fL l~ Hf{ ~ | |||
: 9. Si tM..Yl~-UT> _X_\#:>~~~~rnr~------- -~~--_,__ ________ | |||
: 10. ------ --------------------------------- ---- | |||
11._________ ------ | |||
12._________ ------ | |||
13. | |||
14. | |||
15.-------- ------ | |||
NOTES: ----- | |||
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Hope Creek Generatinq Station Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials | |||
: 1. General Criteria a b* c# | |||
: a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplinq requirements (e.q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~::o ~~ gF | |||
: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. ~p ~" B~ | |||
: c. The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F | |||
: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. ,7:. ~J( SF | |||
: e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desiqnated license level. >1 di( SF | |||
: 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- -- | |||
a. | |||
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | |||
initial conditions SP initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific | |||
. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | |||
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature £.f | |||
- system response and other examiner cues | |||
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | |||
- criteria for successful completion of the task &F | |||
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards | |||
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | |||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~ | |||
outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified <<" SF on those forms and Form ES-201-2. | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -- | |||
-;;.? | |||
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copv is attached. | |||
tK f>C° Printed Name I Signature Date | |||
: a. Author Sn.u£.,v o_e_rJ~1J I(~ Q..e.~ l1--[b1~ | |||
,/, ...._ _,, | |||
~----- | |||
' ./. d' | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) , ... 11-,...dlL ,.Af,,-,~.J#[,'!. ...~ | |||
1z./n.J14 | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Or\CU'l Ft;L.LefZ-/~: ~;A~_,~f!bt 11-LiaL '4-tUJ/~ci~...X,Q a I | |||
H I,[_/_ 12fc8'h4 | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor ~ALn I / | |||
NOTE: | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. | |||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | |||
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# | |||
: 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* ~ | |||
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF | |||
: 3. Each event description consists of SD | |||
* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated | * the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated | ||
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event | * the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event | ||
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew | * the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 6~ | ||
* the expected operator actions (by shift position) | * the expected operator actions (by shift position) ~K | ||
* the event termination point (if applicable) | * the event termination point (if applicable) | ||
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario | : 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. S') ,X/( SF | ||
: 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. s.. ') (;(..(' &F | |||
s.. ') (;(..(' &F 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ;(.t . .' f>F | : 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~/) ;(.t..' f>F | ||
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. | : 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | ||
.( D ,;r'...t. | Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. | ||
Cues are given. .( D ,;r'...t. Sf | |||
<; ') £'1(1( 6F 9. The scenarios have been validated. | : 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. <; ') £'1(1( 6F | ||
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), | : 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. <; ") | ||
any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated | rif'I( 'SF | ||
<; ") 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | : 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | ||
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. s. I) r)(K SF | |||
.S') 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. cf.I( Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes ------1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 I 5 I 7 I 7 SJ.> ,K.( Bf 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 3 I 3 5:> ""..( e,f' 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 S,9 t,F 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SD ;(,( e,F 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1 I 3 I 3 }') | : 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). )~ | ||
: 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf" ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: | pt.c* 6f" | ||
Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 | : 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). .S') ,;(/( f>F | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | : 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .s~ cf.I( ~f Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -- | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component | : 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 I 5 I 7 I 7 SJ.> ,K.( Bf | ||
{l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | : 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 3 I 3 5:> ""..( e,f' | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | : 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 S,9 1~r t,F | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix | : 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SD ;(,( e,F | ||
: 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1 I 3 I 3 }') cY~* ~{.:'" | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I c | : 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | : 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf" | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component | |||
{l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E I 0 | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | c s A B s A B s A B s A B L M | ||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: | u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | ||
Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I c s | N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | ||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. | E R0#1 RX 1 1 1 1 0 | ||
ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. | ~ NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,7 9 D 2,7 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0 | ||
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,7 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 1 1 1 1 0 | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,6 2,7 9 D 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0 | ||
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: | ~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,6 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions: | ||
Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: | : 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | ||
2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 | and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | ||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | |||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 | |||
~lty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | |||
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | |||
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | |||
E RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #1 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 3,4,6,7 3,4,7 11 4 4 2 | |||
~ | |||
2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2,3 4 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I #2 3,4,6, 3,6 10 4 4 2 | |||
~ | |||
l/C 7 2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #3 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,5,7, | |||
~ l/C 13 4 4 2 3,4,6,7 3,4,6,7 8 | |||
SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D | |||
SRO-I #4 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,6, 3,4,5,7, | |||
~ 1/C 3,6 7 8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2 2 0 2 2 Instructions: | |||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | |||
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | |||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | |||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I | |||
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) | |||
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T | |||
E RO RX 2 2 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 3.4,5,7, 4,5,7 D l/C 8 3,5 ,8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 6 2 2 1 D TS 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 Instructions: | |||
: 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" | |||
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position. | |||
: 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis. | |||
: 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. | |||
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ | |||
SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Operate Control 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 7 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Boards (2) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Communicate 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 7 5,6 5,6,7 6 7 6 5,6 5,6,7 and Interact 8 8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) | |||
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) | |||
Notes: | |||
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. | |||
(2) Optional for an SRO-U. | |||
(3) Only applicable to SROs. | |||
Instructions: | |||
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | ||
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: | |||
Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c# 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. | ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SR0-11 ~ SRO-I~ ~ SRO-I~ ~ SR0-11: ~ | ||
c., f) ,1.K u: 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. | SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 7 7 4,7 7 4,7 7 7 5,6,7 7 5,6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 1,2,4 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,4 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 6 5,7 7 7 5,6,7 6 5,7 5,6,7 Use Procedures (1) | ||
Operate Control 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 6 5,7 6 Boards (2) | |||
SD l;(J( 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 <;..') ,<I( sr: 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions | Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 4,5,7 5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 5,7 4,5,7 and Interact 7 7 Demonstrate 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 4,7 5,7 4,7 5,7 6,7 5,7 6,7 Supervisory Ability (3) | ||
: 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | Comply With and 3,4 2,3 3 2,3 3,4 2 3 2 Use Tech. Specs. (3) | ||
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or _the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _other (explain) | Notes: | ||
( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. | |||
: 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); | (2) Optional for an SRO-U. | ||
enter the actual RO I SRO-only | (3) Only applicable to SROs. | ||
s) at right. Sr) 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ | Instructions: | ||
analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter | Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. | ||
( () BF 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; | |||
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c# | |||
/ i J..-1 'l-t lj b. Facility Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner | : 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. c., f) ,1.K u: | ||
(#) | : 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. | ||
* The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations. | : b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. SD l;(J( SF | ||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | : 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 <;..') | ||
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO 1. | ,<I( | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature | sr: | ||
: a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) | : 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). SF | ||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner | : 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: | ||
(*) d. NRC Supervisor(*) | X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or | ||
_the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or | |||
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are required. | _ the examinations were developed independently; or | ||
_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or | |||
_other (explain) | |||
IS.D 'r:f1<.' BF | |||
: 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New ~K' from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution( s) at right. | |||
49 I 15 1I 1 25 I 9 Sr) BF | |||
: 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right. <:,() ~K SF | |||
: 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers KK or aid in the elimination of distractors. ( () BF | |||
: 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. SD ~K gf | |||
: 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the auidelines in ES Appendix B. s.o ~< BF i.z~ | |||
: 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and aarees with the value on the cover sheet. ~I) BF Printed Name I Signature Date | |||
: a. Author ..>n:.0uv Q~l.JNj!) / ~~ ~ i J..-1 'l-t lj | |||
'~ | |||
'2~~ | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
c. | |||
d. | |||
NRC Chief Examiner (#) | |||
NRC Regional Supervisor ll[18]_1'A 4 | |||
Note: | |||
* The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations. | |||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. | |||
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO Initials Item Description a b c | |||
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before Si> BF | |||
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | |||
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check > 25% of examinations | |||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail | |||
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified | |||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity SD /r 5F of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date | |||
: a. Grader 1-4-1") | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~1 ~1 1 ~ | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) -a)Slf5 | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor(*) !~/rs | |||
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are required. | |||
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}} | ES-403, Page 6 of 6}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 29 February 2020
| ML16145A244 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/2015 |
| From: | Brian Fuller Operations Branch I |
| To: | Suzanne Dennis Public Service Enterprise Group |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14254A267 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01904 | |
| Download: ML16145A244 (14) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: HoPE Ctaa:t<. ZOIS Date of Examination: 2/zs/zo1s v '
Developed by: Written - FacilityJ8] NRCD II Operating - Facility~ NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf""
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
~
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF
[-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F
{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
BJF
{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} rsr-
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form Bf' ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) asF
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) eDlt
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) N/A BF
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) BF
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) BF
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) n
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
\3~
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
E>f"'
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:
Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
1.
w
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
5., t}('I;' gr R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. )r) ~< Bf T
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t7( fSf T )J E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N f;/) l;Y£' 8f
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover th~ required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients.
s~ ~( .Br=
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number
~
u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A
T at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
s, gF 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
)I &F" l~K
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks Sf7 !,<'K w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified IC' ja'K' (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations v9 8F
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent davs.
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
L
,. ,...., P/rioted..!')lame/SiQllature Date
- a. Author ."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH ..41....~ J-.U~.-. I )-ill ,It </
=
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
- d. NRC Supervisor v
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28
(of( (!)
ILOT 2015 NRC SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRG licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE
- 1. s*nv~~ Dtrv (\) 15,
- 2. 'i4tlvJl> /11 /'<1t..J IS
- r---
c...a..,,..,..,, s:-'~";v-3.
4./-i-VJ?'?"):z'
{ 5. 1Uq1h@ K&Fffi
/i rr*-- *~ - - r-*----n1
,,'? * /
r"!frl,.C
~,,,-t£,~c,, ~e..-/:, .. _ ,$71"//(>".JH:F@<.C.1/~~ ,~--j74.$'x-*;-e ,?t{y,:u:;._.
~. ""
~~ -
- 1uq11~
, 0/,.;~~?;14i;t_~,,;
- ' ~
~---
~ tt;:;' *
- 6. 1.. * .Mte.i.i t . 6 e . .... - - , * - - - - 1~*3U*/ _ _ __
- 7. ti\. Ck Nt- ~ S ~A\."):°" Cr-1 ~ D* o. 4~ :1:..:i..:uC t 8. P.W\,i~ \} o.\~ 'H 61'.
- JO '3 f t.!J.r 10~4ir:<<
J.+f ,;fil~ P~ 1. ... ,,,-tic fl.- ~:r
~~~ ";)~l<*.
'{- 9. :e."' _ 10 I 0- v111L,J~"*" . ** ~ ,, --1 ,;c;;;;sc;~ 3>-L{-/) __
tlf::£ VLv
==
~ 11. 'CJ BuR k £
'f 12.14. ttAfJft- --- ~ /I ~ ~ ,,_ __'!.::+/-~
/VAc<OPrToO<~
/,L'-'O 1\ 13. r £µ6EL !VC<2' lf>-#A'I..- . I ~c__
114. Gwf:NN K~l'J US "\*! ... ;;;,,,_.,,_ >-<;r_ _
'f. 15. (. /lbry hlo ~ ;~t;:'( *';,,';;j_+/- ,'(~;:--
~3JA__ ~
NOTES:
f<o. /If.>~ Ops l'J-C..~-~ ,vb.'"""-~
t'7 ? Q, ct,\c.-\..... eo ~"'? + <'C.. '"" l ~~ '-/ 19!1> )('l/f '>
CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted .below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE Y 1. CR.Al(r /Yl\~(i.101 5((() \. {,~.., ' t f U \\({,/JL( P"Vl- ~L (L~J;--- 3-t-t:> _ _
i 2. _jo/\Jfl.NA,IJ EJt-f... ~o
- 3. *n-&.cr< i<<,J-n<hl /LO '~ *
~ 4;,,,.,~* ~ ~4;1,/i11r ' 0~~~
- 4. :TerlMv k. siZO ..,..... ,-
- 5. ../;J; i.Ro , A 6 ])
- *vtfWC ~
r..u
- - -- * -6 7.J~ LJ~ ~ M
- 8. ff II.A "/Z. 1 ~r~ ~ ~
- 9. e.JL. 11 ~1f". ~Jrl1.uLA-rvtl- '1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?- ~ ~~-Ao; 10./11.~ ~ O\M
'f- 11.-;vlQritt ,J: 5C{\ 4\0~ 5;;,,,<l.- / = ,. " " " * * .,~ '""'P" " - .* - _ _ _ __
- 12. '"4~ k* e tel~dl R o.
13._ ~-C<<-"'1 , eo --------
- 14. E 'St>lt"$
- 15. £. L.. rev o..., tl.o
/l..o ~
~-(~-/?
""Z
[>pi_ 8"" L ()....__
3:!1-*.- __
- -If-IS,_. -
3~t-tl NOTESr\ On
(((,. k. "'* JS* ... ~ <....~ SM.
~17 Z-1 L -I':> 7'(--t~-
I), JQh"' /(reµ, UV fl.. 0
8) 2015~~~y
(<tf'1 ILOT AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY Slt-¥'JATV~E (1) DATE NOTE
- 1. {1J c.4-feli/ ~of+/-w4V~ ~ L/'-- ~-y., -rr
- 2. "!/H-..K 4'l~ ,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t --~/d. ~}.*rr__
- 3. -r\ "" c. f\'"T' B\...At?'O \ ...:i ~ l'tcl<AM s ~ I \s
- 4. "S-rEV't:?)V.~t,e& ::lr-$-uev(.. 7afZ.. a~ ?2/1/;r
- 5. M*l<t ~
- 6. C!Jl,l,s ,a.-i14AYY S.M ~t -=====--=====
_ _i_,..._:s.,_tt._"~-*---------- _ __,..__.~.,_____,._ _ _ _ _ ~-'-r=-
..Y!lll~--
- 7. JCA #OZ-~ 5 o;.J /NS/l'?(.IC7Z'~ ~ --,FkW'-H--+---o--
- 8. -----rx;b=gtc.cc1' l.fL l~ Hf{ ~
- 9. Si tM..Yl~-UT> _X_\#:>~~~~rnr~------- -~~--_,__ ________
- 10. ------ --------------------------------- ----
11._________ ------
12._________ ------
13.
14.
15.-------- ------
NOTES: -----
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Hope Creek Generatinq Station Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplinq requirements (e.q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~::o ~~ gF
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. ~p ~" B~
- c. The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. ,7:. ~J( SF
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desiqnated license level. >1 di( SF
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- --
a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions SP initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature £.f
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task &F
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~
outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified <<" SF on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --
-;;.?
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copv is attached.
tK f>C° Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author Sn.u£.,v o_e_rJ~1J I(~ Q..e.~ l1--[b1~
,/, ...._ _,,
~-----
' ./. d'
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) , ... 11-,...dlL ,.Af,,-,~.J#[,'!. ...~
1z./n.J14
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Or\CU'l Ft;L.LefZ-/~: ~;A~_,~f!bt 11-LiaL '4-tUJ/~ci~...X,Q a I
H I,[_/_ 12fc8'h4
- d. NRC Supervisor ~ALn I /
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* ~
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF
- 3. Each event description consists of SD
- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 6~
- the expected operator actions (by shift position) ~K
- the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. S') ,X/( SF
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. s.. ') (;(..(' &F
- 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~/) ;(.t..' f>F
- 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given. .( D ,;r'...t. Sf
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. <; ') £'1(1( 6F
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. <; ")
rif'I( 'SF
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. s. I) r)(K SF
- 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). )~
pt.c* 6f"
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). .S') ,;(/( f>F
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .s~ cf.I( ~f Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 I 5 I 7 I 7 SJ.> ,K.( Bf
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 3 I 3 5:> ""..( e,f'
- 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 S,9 1~r t,F
- 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SD ;(,( e,F
- 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1 I 3 I 3 }') cY~* ~{.:'"
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F
- 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf"
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E I 0
L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
c s A B s A B s A B s A B L M
u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E R0#1 RX 1 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,7 9 D 2,7 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,7 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 1 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,6 2,7 9 D 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,6 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
~lty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #1 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 3,4,6,7 3,4,7 11 4 4 2
~
2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2,3 4 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I #2 3,4,6, 3,6 10 4 4 2
~
l/C 7 2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #3 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,5,7,
~ l/C 13 4 4 2 3,4,6,7 3,4,6,7 8
SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #4 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,6, 3,4,5,7,
~ 1/C 3,6 7 8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2 2 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E RO RX 2 2 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 3.4,5,7, 4,5,7 D l/C 8 3,5 ,8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 6 2 2 1 D TS 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~
SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Operate Control 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 7 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Boards (2) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Communicate 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 7 5,6 5,6,7 6 7 6 5,6 5,6,7 and Interact 8 8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SR0-11 ~ SRO-I~ ~ SRO-I~ ~ SR0-11: ~
SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 7 7 4,7 7 4,7 7 7 5,6,7 7 5,6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 1,2,4 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,4 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 6 5,7 7 7 5,6,7 6 5,7 5,6,7 Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 6 5,7 6 Boards (2)
Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 4,5,7 5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 5,7 4,5,7 and Interact 7 7 Demonstrate 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 4,7 5,7 4,7 5,7 6,7 5,7 6,7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and 3,4 2,3 3 2,3 3,4 2 3 2 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. c., f) ,1.K u:
- 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. SD l;(J( SF
,<I(
sr:
- 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). SF
- 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
_the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
_ the examinations were developed independently; or
_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
_other (explain)
IS.D 'r:f1<.' BF
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New ~K' from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution( s) at right.
49 I 15 1I 1 25 I 9 Sr) BF
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right. <:,() ~K SF
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers KK or aid in the elimination of distractors. ( () BF
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. SD ~K gf
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the auidelines in ES Appendix B. s.o ~< BF i.z~
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and aarees with the value on the cover sheet. ~I) BF Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author ..>n:.0uv Q~l.JNj!) / ~~ ~ i J..-1 'l-t lj
'~
'2~~
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
d.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NRC Regional Supervisor ll[18]_1'A 4
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO Initials Item Description a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before Si> BF
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check > 25% of examinations
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity SD /r 5F of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader 1-4-1")
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~1 ~1 1 ~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) -a)Slf5
- d. NRC Supervisor(*) !~/rs
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: HoPE Ctaa:t<. ZOIS Date of Examination: 2/zs/zo1s v '
Developed by: Written - FacilityJ8] NRCD II Operating - Facility~ NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) B'Jf""
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
~
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) srF
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) BJF
[-90) [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)) BJ""F
{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
BJF
{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} rsr-
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form Bf' ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) asF
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) eDlt
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) N/A BF
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) BF
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) BF
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) n
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
\3~
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
E>f"'
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only) {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:
Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
1.
w
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
5., t}('I;' gr R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. )r) ~< Bf T
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. t7( fSf T )J E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N f;/) l;Y£' 8f
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover th~ required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients.
s~ ~( .Br=
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number
~
u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A
T at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
s, gF 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
)I &F" l~K
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks Sf7 !,<'K w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
( 1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified IC' ja'K' (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations v9 8F
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent davs.
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
L
,. ,...., P/rioted..!')lame/SiQllature Date
- a. Author ."'i*>Ji.rv n!:/VrJH ..41....~ J-.U~.-. I )-ill ,It </
=
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
- d. NRC Supervisor v
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28
(of( (!)
ILOT 2015 NRC SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRG licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE
- 1. s*nv~~ Dtrv (\) 15,
- 2. 'i4tlvJl> /11 /'<1t..J IS
- r---
c...a..,,..,..,, s:-'~";v-3.
4./-i-VJ?'?"):z'
{ 5. 1Uq1h@ K&Fffi
/i rr*-- *~ - - r-*----n1
,,'? * /
r"!frl,.C
~,,,-t£,~c,, ~e..-/:, .. _ ,$71"//(>".JH:F@<.C.1/~~ ,~--j74.$'x-*;-e ,?t{y,:u:;._.
~. ""
~~ -
- 1uq11~
, 0/,.;~~?;14i;t_~,,;
- ' ~
~---
~ tt;:;' *
- 6. 1.. * .Mte.i.i t . 6 e . .... - - , * - - - - 1~*3U*/ _ _ __
- 7. ti\. Ck Nt- ~ S ~A\."):°" Cr-1 ~ D* o. 4~ :1:..:i..:uC t 8. P.W\,i~ \} o.\~ 'H 61'.
- JO '3 f t.!J.r 10~4ir:<<
J.+f ,;fil~ P~ 1. ... ,,,-tic fl.- ~:r
~~~ ";)~l<*.
'{- 9. :e."' _ 10 I 0- v111L,J~"*" . ** ~ ,, --1 ,;c;;;;sc;~ 3>-L{-/) __
tlf::£ VLv
==
~ 11. 'CJ BuR k £
'f 12.14. ttAfJft- --- ~ /I ~ ~ ,,_ __'!.::+/-~
/VAc<OPrToO<~
/,L'-'O 1\ 13. r £µ6EL !VC<2' lf>-#A'I..- . I ~c__
114. Gwf:NN K~l'J US "\*! ... ;;;,,,_.,,_ >-<;r_ _
'f. 15. (. /lbry hlo ~ ;~t;:'( *';,,';;j_+/- ,'(~;:--
~3JA__ ~
NOTES:
f<o. /If.>~ Ops l'J-C..~-~ ,vb.'"""-~
t'7 ? Q, ct,\c.-\..... eo ~"'? + <'C.. '"" l ~~ '-/ 19!1> )('l/f '>
CcJfY CJ ILOT 2015 SECURITY AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted .below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE Y 1. CR.Al(r /Yl\~(i.101 5((() \. {,~.., ' t f U \\({,/JL( P"Vl- ~L (L~J;--- 3-t-t:> _ _
i 2. _jo/\Jfl.NA,IJ EJt-f... ~o
- 3. *n-&.cr< i<<,J-n<hl /LO '~ *
~ 4;,,,.,~* ~ ~4;1,/i11r ' 0~~~
- 4. :TerlMv k. siZO ..,..... ,-
- 5. ../;J; i.Ro , A 6 ])
- *vtfWC ~
r..u
- - -- * -6 7.J~ LJ~ ~ M
- 8. ff II.A "/Z. 1 ~r~ ~ ~
- 9. e.JL. 11 ~1f". ~Jrl1.uLA-rvtl- '1-dgt4J/,v 11-TiJ?- ~ ~~-Ao; 10./11.~ ~ O\M
'f- 11.-;vlQritt ,J: 5C{\ 4\0~ 5;;,,,<l.- / = ,. " " " * * .,~ '""'P" " - .* - _ _ _ __
- 12. '"4~ k* e tel~dl R o.
13._ ~-C<<-"'1 , eo --------
- 14. E 'St>lt"$
- 15. £. L.. rev o..., tl.o
/l..o ~
~-(~-/?
""Z
[>pi_ 8"" L ()....__
3:!1-*.- __
- -If-IS,_. -
3~t-tl NOTESr\ On
(((,. k. "'* JS* ... ~ <....~ SM.
~17 Z-1 L -I':> 7'(--t~-
I), JQh"' /(reµ, UV fl.. 0
8) 2015~~~y
(<tf'1 ILOT AGREEMENT ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of February & March 2015 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of tl1e examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of February & March 2015. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY Slt-¥'JATV~E (1) DATE NOTE
- 1. {1J c.4-feli/ ~of+/-w4V~ ~ L/'-- ~-y., -rr
- 2. "!/H-..K 4'l~ ,.'/"'s V?vc,w=t --~/d. ~}.*rr__
- 3. -r\ "" c. f\'"T' B\...At?'O \ ...:i ~ l'tcl<AM s ~ I \s
- 4. "S-rEV't:?)V.~t,e& ::lr-$-uev(.. 7afZ.. a~ ?2/1/;r
- 5. M*l<t ~
- 6. C!Jl,l,s ,a.-i14AYY S.M ~t -=====--=====
_ _i_,..._:s.,_tt._"~-*---------- _ __,..__.~.,_____,._ _ _ _ _ ~-'-r=-
..Y!lll~--
- 7. JCA #OZ-~ 5 o;.J /NS/l'?(.IC7Z'~ ~ --,FkW'-H--+---o--
- 8. -----rx;b=gtc.cc1' l.fL l~ Hf{ ~
- 9. Si tM..Yl~-UT> _X_\#:>~~~~rnr~------- -~~--_,__ ________
- 10. ------ --------------------------------- ----
11._________ ------
12._________ ------
13.
14.
15.-------- ------
NOTES: -----
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Hope Creek Generatinq Station Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test Number: 1 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplinq requirements (e.q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~::o ~~ gF
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. ~p ~" B~
- c. The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 5':> ltt. Jl f>F
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. ,7:. ~J( SF
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desiqnated license level. >1 di( SF
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- --
a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions SP initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature £.f
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task &F
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through ~
outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified <<" SF on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --
-;;.?
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copv is attached.
tK f>C° Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author Sn.u£.,v o_e_rJ~1J I(~ Q..e.~ l1--[b1~
,/, ...._ _,,
~-----
' ./. d'
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) , ... 11-,...dlL ,.Af,,-,~.J#[,'!. ...~
1z./n.J14
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Or\CU'l Ft;L.LefZ-/~: ~;A~_,~f!bt 11-LiaL '4-tUJ/~ci~...X,Q a I
H I,[_/_ 12fc8'h4
- d. NRC Supervisor ~ALn I /
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 II Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. SI) ,:X;:* ~
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. S> d1<" SF
- 3. Each event description consists of SD
- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 6~
- the expected operator actions (by shift position) ~K
- the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. S') ,X/( SF
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. s.. ') (;(..(' &F
- 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~/) ;(.t..' f>F
- 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given. .( D ,;r'...t. Sf
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. <; ') £'1(1( 6F
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. <; ")
rif'I( 'SF
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. s. I) r)(K SF
- 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). )~
pt.c* 6f"
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). .S') ,;(/( f>F
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .s~ cf.I( ~f Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5 I 5 I 7 I 7 SJ.> ,K.( Bf
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 3 I 3 5:> ""..( e,f'
- 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 S,9 1~r t,F
- 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SD ;(,( e,F
- 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1 I 3 I 3 }') cY~* ~{.:'"
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 5-J."> 51<' 6F
- 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 4 I 4 I 5 _5.£) o(K Bf"
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E I 0
L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
c s A B s A B s A B s A B L M
u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E R0#1 RX 1 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,7 9 D 2,7 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,7 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 1 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 2,3,5,7, l/C 4,6 2,7 9 D 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RO#~ RX 2 1 1 1 0
~ NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4,6 1,5,6 4,5 7 4 4 2 D MAJ 5 4 6 3 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
~lty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #1 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 3,4,6,7 3,4,7 11 4 4 2
~
2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2,3 4 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I #2 3,4,6, 3,6 10 4 4 2
~
l/C 7 2,5,6,7 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 4 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2,3 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #3 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,5,7,
~ l/C 13 4 4 2 3,4,6,7 3,4,6,7 8
SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3,4 2 3 0 2 2 RO RX 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 D
SRO-I #4 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 3,4,6, 3,4,5,7,
~ 1/C 3,6 7 8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 5 5 6 3 2 2 1 D TS 3 2 2 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-0-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component {l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facilty: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios p v SPARE 2 3 4 T M p E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I
M c s A B s A B s A B s A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p p R I u T
E RO RX 2 2 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 3.4,5,7, 4,5,7 D l/C 8 3,5 ,8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 6 6 2 2 1 D TS 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 D NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 4 4 2 D MAJ 2 2 1 SRO-U D TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS R01 ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~ RO~ ~
SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 4,5,7 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,7 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 4,5,6 1,2,4, 2,3,5, 4,5,6 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 7 6,7,8 6 6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 1,4,7 5,6,7, 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Use Procedures (1) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Operate Control 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,4,5, 2,4,5, 7 7 7 6 6,7 6 7 6 6 6,7 Boards (2) 8 8 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Communicate 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 1,4,5, 1,2,4, 5,6,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 7 5,6 5,6,7 6 7 6 5,6 5,6,7 and Interact 8 8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Hope Creek GS Date of Examination: 2/23/15 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SR0-11 ~ SRO-I~ ~ SRO-I~ ~ SR0-11: ~
SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 1,2,3, 3,4,5, 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 3,5,6 3,4,5, 2,3,4, 7 7 4,7 7 4,7 7 7 5,6,7 7 5,6,7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 1,2,4 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,4 3,4,5, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 7 7 6 5,7 7 7 5,6,7 6 5,7 5,6,7 Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 6 5,7 6 Boards (2)
Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 3,5,6 4,5,6, 4,5,7 5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 4,6,7 4,5,7 5,7 4,5,7 and Interact 7 7 Demonstrate 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 2,3,5, 5,7 4,7 5,7 4,7 5,7 6,7 5,7 6,7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and 3,4 2,3 3 2,3 3,4 2 3 2 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/23/15 Exam Level: ROX SROX Initial Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technicallv accurate and applicable to the facility. c., f) ,1.K u:
- 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. SD l;(J( SF
,<I(
sr:
- 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). SF
- 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
_the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
_ the examinations were developed independently; or
_the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
_other (explain)
IS.D 'r:f1<.' BF
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New ~K' from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution( s) at right.
49 I 15 1I 1 25 I 9 Sr) BF
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 32 I 6 43 I 19 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right. <:,() ~K SF
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers KK or aid in the elimination of distractors. ( () BF
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. SD ~K gf
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the auidelines in ES Appendix B. s.o ~< BF i.z~
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and aarees with the value on the cover sheet. ~I) BF Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author ..>n:.0uv Q~l.JNj!) / ~~ ~ i J..-1 'l-t lj
'~
'2~~
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
d.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NRC Regional Supervisor ll[18]_1'A 4
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO[] SRO Initials Item Description a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before Si> BF
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check > 25% of examinations
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity SD /r 5F of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader 1-4-1")
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~1 ~1 1 ~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) -a)Slf5
- d. NRC Supervisor(*) !~/rs
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6