ML113330734: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML113330734 | | number = ML113330734 | ||
| issue date = 09/22/2011 | | issue date = 09/22/2011 | ||
| title = | | title = NRC Comments on Draft Licensee-Developed Exam (Written) (Folder 2) | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000272, 05000311 | | docket = 05000272, 05000311 | ||
| license number = DPR-070, DPR-075 | | license number = DPR-070, DPR-075 | ||
| contact person = JACKSON D | | contact person = JACKSON D RGN-I/DRS/OB/610-337-5306 | ||
| case reference number = TAC U01830 | | case reference number = TAC U01830 | ||
| package number = ML110030673 | | package number = ML110030673 | ||
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | | document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | ||
| page count = 8 | | page count = 8 | ||
| project = TAC:U01830 | |||
| stage = Draft Other | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Creel. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 1 F N U Overlap with SRO #16. replaced question. | |||
Modified Choices C and D to enhance discriminatory value. | |||
2 H N E Added additional information to justification section. | |||
Recategorized as memory level, not higher order. | |||
3 F X N U Modified stem and distracters to make distracters credible. | |||
Modified stem, added information relating to A TWS condition to 4 H B E enhance credibility of the 'two-pump' choices. Modified choices to improve discriminatory value. | |||
(Draft 0#18) 5 M N E Question replaced because of overlap with tested knowledge in Questions 29 and 56. | |||
(Draft Q#5) 6 F B E Minor distractor wording change. Changed value in distractor to improve plausibility. Added to justification to explain why motor temp may not be increasing with 10 flow alarm. | |||
(Draft Q#6) 7 F B E Replaced one implausible distractor, reordered choices. | |||
(Draft 0#7) 8 H B E Removed "references provided" statement from the stem. Modified choice values to prevent overlap between choices. | |||
(Draft 0#8) | |||
Reworded several choices to improve plausibility and eliminate overlap with Q#20. | |||
9 F N E This question matches KIA for applying system limits because the heat up of seal injection to 225°F in 5.3 minutes is a system limitation as documented in a loss of CCW calculation and in the Technical Basis Document for S2.0P-AB.CC-0001. | |||
Page 1 | |||
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back 0= SRO B/M/N utE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (Draft 0#9) 10 F B E Removed "hotter" and "cooler" from Choices BID. Unnecessary, could be confusing and could cue the correct answer. | |||
(Draft 0#10) 11 F N E Changed running pump in the stem to enhance distractor credibility. | |||
Reordered answer choices. | |||
(Draft 0#11) 12 H B E Removed unnecessary, leading information ("since it is not being discriminated out") from both Choice C and Choice D. | |||
13 H B S (Draft 0#12) | |||
(Draft 0#13) 14 M N E Fixed typo in Choice D. Modified wording in Choices A and B for symmetry. Corrected reference page number. | |||
15 H N S (Draft 0#14) | |||
(Draft 0#15) 16 H N E Replaced O. Too many GFE level questions on test. | |||
(Draft 0#16) 17 F X N U Modified choices to ensure each choice is mutually exclusive of the corresponding choice. | |||
(Draft 0#17) 18 H 3.0 N E Minor editorial changes in distracters. | |||
Page 2 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD Q# (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO BIMtN utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 19 H B S 20 F N S Modified Choice C to prevent overlap with Q#9 (Draft Q#8). | |||
21 F B E Replaced one non-credible distractor. Reordered choices. | |||
22 H B S Reclassified as higher cognitive level question. | |||
23 M B U Low LOD. Replaced question. | |||
24 H B S H B S Added to justification to explain that lockout switch is plausible 25 because it is a Unit difference. | |||
26 F N S 27 F N S Reclassified as a lower cognitive level question. | |||
Corrected minor typo in stam. | |||
28 H N E Added "initial" to stem question. | |||
Modified wording of generator MW choice to make clearly wrong. | |||
Minor stem wording change. | |||
29 H N S Added to justification to elaborate on why Choice A is wrong. | |||
30 H B S 31 H X X B U Weak KIA match and limited operational validity. Replaced Q. | |||
32 H N S Added to question justification to explain the KIA match. | |||
33 H N S Fixed typos in justification section. | |||
34 H N S 35 F M S 36 H B S Page 3 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES*401*9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only Modified conditions in stem to remove the leak and replace with 37 H B E different fault. Changed to address the overlap between 0#37 and 0#3. | |||
H X B E Added transmitter O/S in stem to improve distractor plausibility and 38 increase LOD. | |||
39 F B S 40 F N S | |||
* 41 H B S Minor distractor wording change, rearranged choices. | |||
* 42 H B S 43 H N S 44 H N S 45 H B S 46 F B S 47 F N S 48 F X B U Collection of TruelFalse statements. Rewrote Q to fix psychometric flaw. | |||
49 H N S Too many GFE level Qs on RO exam. Replaced with new Q. | |||
50 F N E Modified stem to make more operationally valid. | |||
51 H N S 52 F N U Low LOD based on initial reactor trip EOP immediate action, practiced many times in simulator scenarios. Question replaced. | |||
53 F N E Added "lAW ... " to stem. | |||
* 54 H N E Rewrote question and distracters to improve plausibility of choices. | |||
55 H N S Page 4 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD 0# (FtH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #t Back- 0= SRO B/M/N utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 56 H B S 57 F B S 58 H N S I I | |||
F B S Corrected typo in justification section. Modified justification for 59 correct answer to explain TS. | |||
F N E Replaced distractor containing 2R1A because discriminatory value 60 reduced by 0#61. Reordered choices. | |||
61 H N S 62 H M S 63 H B S 64 H B E Replaced one implausible distractor. Reordered choices. | |||
65 F B E Modified stem and one distractor to improve distractor plausibility. | |||
66 F N E Modified stem to enhance distractor plausibility. | |||
67 F N S 68 H N S Facility confirmed this is expected RO level knowledge. | |||
H B E Modified justification to align with key answer. Reduced total pri to 69 sec leakage in stem to ensure per-generator value is within limits. | |||
70 H B S . | |||
SRO 0#22 helps to answer this question. However, RO exam is ! | |||
71 H B S collected before SRO exam distributed to applicants. Therefore, no i need for change to SRO 0#22. I Removed "the" from Choice C. Added to "Unit 1 trips" choice, to 72 H B E provide information for assessment that emergency not in progress. | |||
Reordered choices. | |||
73 F B S Page 5 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only F B E Modified a distractor to remove leading information. Replaced one 74 distractor with a plausible incorrect choice. | |||
75 F X N U Modified stem. Replaced ChOices Band D with plausible distracters. | |||
(SRO#1) 76 H M E Deleted mode information from the stem. | |||
(SRO #2) 77 H N E Provided RCS temperature and pressure parameters, vice plant mode, in the stem. | |||
(SRO #3) 78 H N E Modified the choice wording to ensure question requires procedure knowledge to answer correctly. | |||
(SRO #4) 79 H N E Changed Choice C from "2FR" to "1 FR" to align with the designated unit Improved stem clarity by changing to " ... and which would require ._."_ | |||
80 H N S (SRO#5) | |||
(SRO#6) | |||
If "O/S" means out of service, which could be interpreted as inoperable, then Choice C is not credible since it wouldn't change 81 H N E conditions. Perhaps better to state 22 RHR pump is in standby. | |||
Choice D could be argued as a second correct answer, based on assumption that the channel is inoperable because of its audible function. | |||
82 H B S (SRO#7) 83 H N s (SRO#8) 84 H N S (SRO#9) | |||
(SRO #10) 85 H B E Rewrote stem and distrac!ers to better test procedure knowledge. | |||
Page 6 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (SRO #11) (DRAFT SRO #12) 86 H X N E Replaced Choice A distractor. Added explanation of KIA match. | |||
87 H N S (SRO #12) (DRAFT SRO #13) | |||
._-. ~.---~ | |||
(SRO #13) (DRAFT SRO #14) 88 H X N U Minor stem wording change. Reworded Choice A to eliminate the 2 00 correct answer. | |||
(SRO #14) (DRAFT SRO #15) 89 H X N U KA mismatch. KA is for ESF AS. Question tests RPS. Wrote new question to same KA. | |||
(SRO #15) (DRAFT SRO #16) 90 H B E Fixed typos. Minor stem rewording. Reworded distracters for clarity and to improve discriminatory value. | |||
(SRO #16) (DRAFT SRO #11) 91 H X N U Not SRO only. Replaced Q. | |||
(SRO #17) 92 H N E Minor wording changes in Choices C and D. | |||
93 H M S (SRO #18) | |||
(SRO#19) 94 H X B U Could be answered with system knowledge only. Replaced question. i (SRO #20) 95 H X B U Not SRO-only. Can be answered with basic GFE knowledge. | |||
Replaced question. | |||
96 H B S (SRO #21) | |||
Page 7 | |||
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 | |||
: 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. | |||
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N utE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (SRO#22) | |||
Minor stem wording change to ensure all choices are supported by the question. | |||
97 H B E This question contains information that could help to eliminate two distracters on RO 0#71 by narrowing the annual PSE&G limit to between 1900 and 2350 mR. However. RO exam is collected before SRO exam distributed to applicants. Therefore, no need for change. | |||
(SRO#23) 98 H B E Rewarded stem and choices to improve distractor plausibility. | |||
(SRO#24) 99 H X B E Rewrote stem conditions and choices to enhance discriminatory value of distracters. | |||
100 H N S (SRO #25) | |||
Page 8}} |
Latest revision as of 20:02, 6 February 2020
ML113330734 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem |
Issue date: | 09/22/2011 |
From: | NRC Region 1 |
To: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
JACKSON D RGN-I/DRS/OB/610-337-5306 | |
Shared Package | |
ML110030673 | List: |
References | |
TAC U01830 | |
Download: ML113330734 (8) | |
Text
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Creel. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 1 F N U Overlap with SRO #16. replaced question.
Modified Choices C and D to enhance discriminatory value.
2 H N E Added additional information to justification section.
Recategorized as memory level, not higher order.
3 F X N U Modified stem and distracters to make distracters credible.
Modified stem, added information relating to A TWS condition to 4 H B E enhance credibility of the 'two-pump' choices. Modified choices to improve discriminatory value.
(Draft 0#18) 5 M N E Question replaced because of overlap with tested knowledge in Questions 29 and 56.
(Draft Q#5) 6 F B E Minor distractor wording change. Changed value in distractor to improve plausibility. Added to justification to explain why motor temp may not be increasing with 10 flow alarm.
(Draft Q#6) 7 F B E Replaced one implausible distractor, reordered choices.
(Draft 0#7) 8 H B E Removed "references provided" statement from the stem. Modified choice values to prevent overlap between choices.
(Draft 0#8)
Reworded several choices to improve plausibility and eliminate overlap with Q#20.
9 F N E This question matches KIA for applying system limits because the heat up of seal injection to 225°F in 5.3 minutes is a system limitation as documented in a loss of CCW calculation and in the Technical Basis Document for S2.0P-AB.CC-0001.
Page 1
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back 0= SRO B/M/N utE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (Draft 0#9) 10 F B E Removed "hotter" and "cooler" from Choices BID. Unnecessary, could be confusing and could cue the correct answer.
(Draft 0#10) 11 F N E Changed running pump in the stem to enhance distractor credibility.
Reordered answer choices.
(Draft 0#11) 12 H B E Removed unnecessary, leading information ("since it is not being discriminated out") from both Choice C and Choice D.
13 H B S (Draft 0#12)
(Draft 0#13) 14 M N E Fixed typo in Choice D. Modified wording in Choices A and B for symmetry. Corrected reference page number.
15 H N S (Draft 0#14)
(Draft 0#15) 16 H N E Replaced O. Too many GFE level questions on test.
(Draft 0#16) 17 F X N U Modified choices to ensure each choice is mutually exclusive of the corresponding choice.
(Draft 0#17) 18 H 3.0 N E Minor editorial changes in distracters.
Page 2
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD Q# (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO BIMtN utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 19 H B S 20 F N S Modified Choice C to prevent overlap with Q#9 (Draft Q#8).
21 F B E Replaced one non-credible distractor. Reordered choices.
22 H B S Reclassified as higher cognitive level question.
23 M B U Low LOD. Replaced question.
24 H B S H B S Added to justification to explain that lockout switch is plausible 25 because it is a Unit difference.
26 F N S 27 F N S Reclassified as a lower cognitive level question.
Corrected minor typo in stam.
28 H N E Added "initial" to stem question.
Modified wording of generator MW choice to make clearly wrong.
Minor stem wording change.
29 H N S Added to justification to elaborate on why Choice A is wrong.
30 H B S 31 H X X B U Weak KIA match and limited operational validity. Replaced Q.
32 H N S Added to question justification to explain the KIA match.
33 H N S Fixed typos in justification section.
34 H N S 35 F M S 36 H B S Page 3
ES-401 2 Form ES*401*9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N UlE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only Modified conditions in stem to remove the leak and replace with 37 H B E different fault. Changed to address the overlap between 0#37 and 0#3.
H X B E Added transmitter O/S in stem to improve distractor plausibility and 38 increase LOD.
39 F B S 40 F N S
- 41 H B S Minor distractor wording change, rearranged choices.
- 42 H B S 43 H N S 44 H N S 45 H B S 46 F B S 47 F N S 48 F X B U Collection of TruelFalse statements. Rewrote Q to fix psychometric flaw.
49 H N S Too many GFE level Qs on RO exam. Replaced with new Q.
50 F N E Modified stem to make more operationally valid.
51 H N S 52 F N U Low LOD based on initial reactor trip EOP immediate action, practiced many times in simulator scenarios. Question replaced.
53 F N E Added "lAW ... " to stem.
- 54 H N E Rewrote question and distracters to improve plausibility of choices.
55 H N S Page 4
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD 0# (FtH) (1-5) Stem Cues TtF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #t Back- 0= SRO B/M/N utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only 56 H B S 57 F B S 58 H N S I I
F B S Corrected typo in justification section. Modified justification for 59 correct answer to explain TS.
F N E Replaced distractor containing 2R1A because discriminatory value 60 reduced by 0#61. Reordered choices.
61 H N S 62 H M S 63 H B S 64 H B E Replaced one implausible distractor. Reordered choices.
65 F B E Modified stem and one distractor to improve distractor plausibility.
66 F N E Modified stem to enhance distractor plausibility.
67 F N S 68 H N S Facility confirmed this is expected RO level knowledge.
H B E Modified justification to align with key answer. Reduced total pri to 69 sec leakage in stem to ensure per-generator value is within limits.
70 H B S .
SRO 0#22 helps to answer this question. However, RO exam is !
71 H B S collected before SRO exam distributed to applicants. Therefore, no i need for change to SRO 0#22. I Removed "the" from Choice C. Added to "Unit 1 trips" choice, to 72 H B E provide information for assessment that emergency not in progress.
Reordered choices.
73 F B S Page 5
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N utEtS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only F B E Modified a distractor to remove leading information. Replaced one 74 distractor with a plausible incorrect choice.
75 F X N U Modified stem. Replaced ChOices Band D with plausible distracters.
(SRO#1) 76 H M E Deleted mode information from the stem.
(SRO #2) 77 H N E Provided RCS temperature and pressure parameters, vice plant mode, in the stem.
(SRO #3) 78 H N E Modified the choice wording to ensure question requires procedure knowledge to answer correctly.
(SRO #4) 79 H N E Changed Choice C from "2FR" to "1 FR" to align with the designated unit Improved stem clarity by changing to " ... and which would require ._."_
80 H N S (SRO#5)
(SRO#6)
If "O/S" means out of service, which could be interpreted as inoperable, then Choice C is not credible since it wouldn't change 81 H N E conditions. Perhaps better to state 22 RHR pump is in standby.
Choice D could be argued as a second correct answer, based on assumption that the channel is inoperable because of its audible function.
82 H B S (SRO#7) 83 H N s (SRO#8) 84 H N S (SRO#9)
(SRO #10) 85 H B E Rewrote stem and distrac!ers to better test procedure knowledge.
Page 6
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (SRO #11) (DRAFT SRO #12) 86 H X N E Replaced Choice A distractor. Added explanation of KIA match.
87 H N S (SRO #12) (DRAFT SRO #13)
._-. ~.---~
(SRO #13) (DRAFT SRO #14) 88 H X N U Minor stem wording change. Reworded Choice A to eliminate the 2 00 correct answer.
(SRO #14) (DRAFT SRO #15) 89 H X N U KA mismatch. KA is for ESF AS. Question tests RPS. Wrote new question to same KA.
(SRO #15) (DRAFT SRO #16) 90 H B E Fixed typos. Minor stem rewording. Reworded distracters for clarity and to improve discriminatory value.
(SRO #16) (DRAFT SRO #11) 91 H X N U Not SRO only. Replaced Q.
(SRO #17) 92 H N E Minor wording changes in Choices C and D.
93 H M S (SRO #18)
(SRO#19) 94 H X B U Could be answered with system knowledge only. Replaced question. i (SRO #20) 95 H X B U Not SRO-only. Can be answered with basic GFE knowledge.
Replaced question.
96 H B S (SRO #21)
Page 7
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
LOK LOD Q# (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N utE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only (SRO#22)
Minor stem wording change to ensure all choices are supported by the question.
97 H B E This question contains information that could help to eliminate two distracters on RO 0#71 by narrowing the annual PSE&G limit to between 1900 and 2350 mR. However. RO exam is collected before SRO exam distributed to applicants. Therefore, no need for change.
(SRO#23) 98 H B E Rewarded stem and choices to improve distractor plausibility.
(SRO#24) 99 H X B E Rewrote stem conditions and choices to enhance discriminatory value of distracters.
100 H N S (SRO #25)
Page 8