ML22207B834

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Form ES-201-2 (Folder 1)
ML22207B834
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/2022
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Joseph Demarshall
Operations Branch I
Shared Package
ML21020A061 List:
References
EPID: L-2022-OLL-0002
Download: ML22207B834 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 F acility: Salem Date of Ex amination: 2/14/2022 Initials Item Task Description a b* c**

. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropri ate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. R ,J f

1. a w

R I

b. Assess whether the outline was system atically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropri ately sampled.

u

(( IJ -

"" t/:8 T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T E cl. Assess whether th e justific ations for deselected or rejected KIA st atements are appropriate . R w fiJ N

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify th at the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of s

norm a l evolutions, instrument and component fa ilures, technic al specifications, and major transients.

R I

b. Assess whether there are enough scena rio sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M

/J u mix of applic ants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rot ation .!:lchedule L without compromising ex am integrity, and ensure that each applic ant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the LJ A

T applicants' audit test(s), and tha t scenarios will not b e repea ted on subsequent days.

u jJ 0 c. To the extent possible, assess wh ether the outline(s) conforms with the qualit ative and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Oper ating Test,"' of ES-301 (including R

overl ap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteri a specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed

/iJ among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A L

(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

(3) No tasks are duplicated from th e applicant's audit test(s).

R. LI (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0

u G

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) The t asks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

Q. u ()'

H (3) No more th an one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examin ations.

C. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

Cl

4. a . Assess whether pl ant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individua l plant examina tion insights) are covered in the appropriate ex am sections. fl., IJ J!;*

(?... 1,J l&J G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

u ttJJ E

N f<. u JJ

c. Ensure th at KIA importance r atings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among ex am sections and the last two NRC exams.

(<. \) #

  • A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of covera ge.
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). {c. V -PJ.

P a e/Sig Da

'/?vJ -1cr-2, I*""' u.ar1.1r a . Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*) /.,,,,J/->> - LJ:i -Jd ..ll

-J.o.re,,,0/, li'M.tLc,,l Al/4",.,. g J,") ct"1<-lJ ihdt. roJ J ... ek'/) J 1_,,fJ,L \ r

c. NRC's Chief Exa miner (#) ,
d. NRC Supervisor

./

112"7

  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared exa mination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initia ls items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-201, Page 30 of 32