ML14328A763: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/06/2015 | | issue date = 03/06/2015 | ||
| title = 2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | | title = 2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | ||
| author name = | | author name = Mcneil D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: PBNP 2015 NRC Exam Date of Examination: February 23, 2015 Item | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: PBNP 2015 NRC Exam Date of Examination: February 23, 2015 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# | ||
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines}} | : 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fi t(s ) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . ---~\lf r-~-1: | ||
w ~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~--- . | |||
~J 1"-- ~ | |||
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled . | |||
T T c. Assess whether the outline over--emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~ "f\- ~\II.\ | |||
E N d. Assess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate . | |||
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, b, 1'-' 1 s and major transients. ~t-<lik * ~ | |||
*--*----'~--------*----..- - --*- -*- - - - - - - -- -----------1-'---t---t-----ll I | |||
M b . Assess whether there are enougt1 scenario sets (and spares ) to test the projected num ber u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromisi ng exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | |||
0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s ) with the qualitative R | |||
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. | |||
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2: | |||
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from tile last two NRC examinations is within the limil<> specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) | |||
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form . | |||
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1: | |||
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the lasttwo NRC licensing examinations | |||
: c. Determine if there are enougt1 different outlines to test the projected number and rnix D tCA.r '(\--' d~A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. f--l r*-----~--~~------------------~~----~--~--------+-*---+----+----- | |||
: 4. a. Assess wllether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights ) are covered \tlc.\ 'f\--*' ~ | |||
in the appropriate exam sectio_n_s_._ __ _____ _ ________________________J:--+--+--r---il G | |||
E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. tu4 ~, c\t.irt r-------*------------------~~-~~~-------------- | |||
N E ___£_~nsure~-~I<IA in:portance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at__l_e_a_s_t__2_._5_.------1~""-'-'--.+-~ --11 | |||
--+-~--.-.i'\. | |||
R A | |||
d . Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. | |||
~-----------'--'-----'----'----'------'---...!:..---'----'-~---'----'----'----'----'------- *-----------*-,_- | |||
~1.\. -"'I"*\.; Jw-L e. Check the entire exam fo_r _b__ al_a__n_ | |||
c_e__ | |||
of_ c_o_v_e_ra"""''g-e_._ _____________________ -+rtL | |||
___I~-+--1'-'-+-~--tA--11 | |||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | |||
------ ~ 1'--' """ I a . A uthor Randall Amundson FTI\lted);Jame/.Signature.. | |||
'\( * ~.... f J.. ,. _.l. - | |||
Qate I Jru~'-'JJ"( | |||
I | |||
: b. Fac1il ty Reviewer (*) Tom Larson/ ' J .A ;;;_--./_ .. 10/~ci/N . | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1>eH AAL~e.'\ ./ .Jt,uf?.Hl/~ / tf/iti/t.J.~I | |||
: d. NRC Supe1visor /.h-.u.n *tlikrs-1>>1 ~~~X/'""'- ;lh::i--/j_j f ""\/ v " ~- | |||
1 Note: # lndepent1ent NRC reviewer irubal items 1n Column "c": ch1r;f exammer concurrence reqUired. | |||
b _ .. ... | |||
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines .~}} |
Latest revision as of 16:27, 5 February 2020
ML14328A763 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Point Beach |
Issue date: | 03/06/2015 |
From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML14328A659 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML14328A763 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: PBNP 2015 NRC Exam Date of Examination: February 23, 2015 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fi t(s ) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . ---~\lf r-~-1:
w ~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~--- .
~J 1"-- ~
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled .
T T c. Assess whether the outline over--emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~ "f\- ~\II.\
E N d. Assess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate .
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, b, 1'-' 1 s and major transients. ~t-<lik * ~
- --*----'~--------*----..- - --*- -*- - - - - - - -- -----------1-'---t---t-----ll I
M b . Assess whether there are enougt1 scenario sets (and spares ) to test the projected num ber u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromisi ng exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s ) with the qualitative R
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from tile last two NRC examinations is within the limil<> specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form .
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the lasttwo NRC licensing examinations
- c. Determine if there are enougt1 different outlines to test the projected number and rnix D tCA.r '(\--' d~A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. f--l r*-----~--~~------------------~~----~--~--------+-*---+----+-----
- 4. a. Assess wllether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights ) are covered \tlc.\ 'f\--*' ~
in the appropriate exam sectio_n_s_._ __ _____ _ ________________________J:--+--+--r---il G
E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. tu4 ~, c\t.irt r-------*------------------~~-~~~--------------
N E ___£_~nsure~-~I<IA in:portance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at__l_e_a_s_t__2_._5_.------1~""-'-'--.+-~ --11
--+-~--.-.i'\.
R A
d . Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
~-----------'--'-----'----'----'------'---...!:..---'----'-~---'----'----'----'----'------- *-----------*-,_-
~1.\. -"'I"*\.; Jw-L e. Check the entire exam fo_r _b__ al_a__n_
c_e__
of_ c_o_v_e_ra"""g-e_._ _____________________ -+rtL
___I~-+--1'-'-+-~--tA--11
~ 1'--' """ I a . A uthor Randall Amundson FTI\lted);Jame/.Signature..
'\( * ~.... f J.. ,. _.l. -
Qate I Jru~'-'JJ"(
I
- b. Fac1il ty Reviewer (*) Tom Larson/ ' J .A ;;;_--./_ .. 10/~ci/N .
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1>eH AAL~e.'\ ./ .Jt,uf?.Hl/~ / tf/iti/t.J.~I
- d. NRC Supe1visor /.h-.u.n *tlikrs-1>>1 ~~~X/'""'- ;lh::i--/j_j f ""\/ v " ~-
1 Note: # lndepent1ent NRC reviewer irubal items 1n Column "c": ch1r;f exammer concurrence reqUired.
b _ .. ...
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines .~