ML14328A763: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Fa c il ity: PB NP 20 1 5 NRC Exam Date o f Exam ina tion: Febru ary 23 , 2015 It e m 1. w R I T T E N 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T Initial s Task Description a b* c# ---. a. Verify tha t th e ou tl i ne(s) fi t(s) th e a pp ro pri a t e model, in a cco rd a n ce w ith ES-401. b. A ssess whether the outl in e was syste m atica lly and randomly pr e par e d in a c co rd ance wi th Section D.1 o f ES-40 1 a nd wh e th e r a ll KIA ca tegori es a r e ap p ro priat e l y sa mpled. c. Assess whe th e r t he outline over--e mph asizes a n y syste m s, evol ution s, o r generic t o p i cs. d. Ass es s wh e th er the j u stif i cations for de se l ec ted o r r e j ec t ed KIA st ate ments are appr o priat e. 1"--"f\-
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                       Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                               Form ES-201-2 Facility: PBNP 2015 NRC Exam                                                                             Date of Examination: February 23, 2015 Initials Item                                                          Task Description a   b*     c#
: a. U s in g F o rm ES-3 01-5 , ver ify th at th e proposed scenar io se t s cover the requir e d numb e r of no rm al e voluti o ns, in s trument a nd compo n e nt failur es , t ec hn ical s p ec ifi ca ti o ns , b , 1'-' 1 a nd major tr a n s i e nts. *  
: 1.     a. Verify that the outline(s) fi t(s ) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 .                       ---~\lf r-~-1:
.. ----*--*--------------------1-'---t---t-----l l b. As sess wh e th e r th e re a r e e nougt1 sce n a ri o se t s (a nd s pare s) t o t es t th e pr ojec t e d nu m b e r and mix o f ap plicants in accor d a n ce with the e xp ec t ed c r e w compos iti o n and rotat i on sche dul e wi th ou t compromisi ng exam integrity , and ens ur e th at eac h applicant can be tested us i ng a t l east on e new or significantly modified scenario , that no sce nario s are duplicated fro m the app li cants' audit t es t(s). and t h at scena rios will not be r epea t ed on subsequ e nt days. c. To th e ex t e nt po s sible, assess wh et h er th e outline(s) conform(s) with th e qualitative a nd qu a ntitative c rit e ria s p ec ifi e d o n Form ES-30 1-4 and descri be d in Appendi x D. a. V e rify th a t th e sys t ems w a lk-thr o u g h o utlin e me e t s th e criteria s p ec ified on Form E S-3 01-2: (1) th e ou tlin e(s) co nt a in(s) th e r eq uired numb e r of cont r o l room a nd in-pl a nt t as ks distributed a m o ng the safety fun c tions a s speci f i e d on th e form (2) ta sk r epe titi o n from tile l as t two NR C exa minations is within the limil<> specified on th e f orm (3) no ta sks are dupli ca ted from th e ap pli ca nts' audit te s t(s) ( 4) the number of n e w or m odi fied task s m eets or exceeds th e minimum s spec ifi ed o n th e f o rm (5) th e number o f a lt e rnat e path , l ow-power , emerge nc y, and RCA t as ks meet the criter i a o n th e form. b. V e rify t h at th e a dmini s tr a ti ve ou tlin e m ee t s th e cri t e ri a spec ifi e d on Form ES-3 01-1: (1) th e ta s k s a r e distribut e d a m o ng th e topi cs as s p ec if i ed o n th e f orm (2) a t l eas t one t as k i s n e w o r s ignific a ntly m od ifi ed (3) no mor e than one t as k i s r e p ea t e d f rom t h e la s ttwo NR C l icensing exam in a ti o n s c. Dete r mine if there are e n ougt 1 different o utl i n e s to test the pr o j ec t e d numb e r and rni x D tCA.r '(\--' o f a p pl i cants a nd ensu r e tha t n o items are d upli ca t ed o n s u bseq u ent da ys. f--l 4. G E N E R A L a. A ssess wlleth e r p l an t-s p e c ifi c pr i or i ti e s (in c lud i ng PRA a nd IPE in sig ht s) a r e covere d \tlc.\ 'f\--*' in th e appropriat e exam se ct i o_n_s_. __________________________________
w    ~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~---                                                              .
J:--+--+--r---i l b. Assess w h et h e r th e 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.4 5 samp l i n g i s approp ri a t e. tu4 c\t.irt in:p o rt ance ratings (excep t for p l an t-spec ifi c priorities) a r e at __ l_e_a_s_t __ 2_._5_. d. Ch e ck for dup l ication a nd ov e r l a p among exam sectio n s.  
                                                                                                                                      ~J 1"-- ~
"'I"\.; Jw-
R        b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I            Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled .
-*-,.,, __ e. Check th e ent i r e exam f o_r _b __ a l_a __ n_c_e __ of_c_o_v_e_ra"""'g'-e_. ______________________
T T        c. Assess whether the outline over--emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.                            ~ "f\- ~\II.\
-+rtL ___ ------1'--' """ I f. A ssess wh e th er the exam f i t s the app r opr iat e job l eve l (RO or SR O). a. A u tho r Randall Amunds on '\( * .... f J.. ,. _.l. -
E N        d. Assess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate .
FTI\l t ed);J ame/.S ignatur e.. Qate I I T om L a r so n/ 'J .A ;;;_--./_  
: 2.      a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications,                               b,     1'-' 1 s            and major transients.                                                                                             ~t-<lik *       ~
.. . b. F ac 1 il t y Rev i ewer (*) c. N RC Chief E xa mi ner(#) d. NRC Supe 1 viso r /.h-.u.n*tlikrs-1>>1  
            *--*----'~--------*----..- - --*- -*-                                           - - - - - - -- -----------1-'---t---t-----ll I
;lh::i--/j_j f ""\/ v " 1>eH ./
M        b . Assess whether there are enougt1 scenario sets (and spares ) to test the projected num ber u            and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L            without compromisi ng exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A            at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T            from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
/ .------------------------.. -----------------------1 N o t e: # l ndepent1en t N RC r e vi e w er ir ubal i tems 1 n Co l umn "c": ch1r;f exam m er concurrence r e qUired. b _ .. ...
0      c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s ) with the qualitative R
* Not app l icab l e f or N RC-p r epared examina ti o n o utlin es}}
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
: 3.      a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w                  distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I            (2) task repetition from tile last two NRC examinations is within the limil<> specified on the form T            (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form .
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the lasttwo NRC licensing examinations
: c. Determine if there are enougt1 different outlines to test the projected number and rnix                          D tCA.r '(\--'   d~A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                                         f--l r*-----~--~~------------------~~----~--~--------+-*---+----+-----
: 4.     a. Assess wllether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights ) are covered                          \tlc.\ 'f\--*' ~
in the appropriate exam sectio_n_s_._ __ _____ _ ________________________J:--+--+--r---il G
E      b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                             tu4     ~, c\t.irt r-------*------------------~~-~~~--------------
N E      ___&#xa3;_~nsure~-~I<IA in:portance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at__l_e_a_s_t__2_._5_.------1~""-'-'--.+-~                --11
                                                                                                                                                --+-~--.-.i'\.
R A
d . Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
            ~-----------'--'-----'----'----'------'---...!:..---'----'-~---'----'----'----'----'------- *-----------*-,_-
                                                                                                                                    ~1.\. -"'I"*\.;   Jw-L      e. Check the entire exam fo_r _b__    al_a__n_
c_e__
of_ c_o_v_e_ra"""''g-e_._ _____________________                      -+rtL
___I~-+--1'-'-+-~--tA--11
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
                                                                                                                ------              ~ 1'--' """ I a . A uthor                                Randall Amundson FTI\lted);Jame/.Signature..
                                                                                    '\( * ~.... f J.. ,. _.l.   -
Qate I Jru~'-'JJ"(
I
: b. Fac1il ty Reviewer (*)                    Tom Larson/ ' J .A                         ;;;_--./_                       ..               10/~ci/N .
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)                   1>eH  AAL~e.'\        ./    .Jt,uf?.Hl/~ /                                                  tf/iti/t.J.~I
: d. NRC Supe1visor                        /.h-.u.n *tlikrs-1>>1                       ~~~X/'""'-                                            ;lh::i--/j_j f ""\/       v           "                           ~-
1 Note:                     # lndepent1ent NRC reviewer irubal items 1n Column "c": ch1r;f exammer concurrence reqUired.
b _ ..             ...
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines                                                                            .~}}

Latest revision as of 16:27, 5 February 2020

2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML14328A763
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/06/2015
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML14328A659 List:
References
Download: ML14328A763 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: PBNP 2015 NRC Exam Date of Examination: February 23, 2015 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fi t(s ) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . ---~\lf r-~-1:

w ~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~--- .

~J 1"-- ~

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled .

T T c. Assess whether the outline over--emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~ "f\- ~\II.\

E N d. Assess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate .

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, b, 1'-' 1 s and major transients. ~t-<lik * ~
  • --*----'~--------*----..- - --*- -*- - - - - - - -- -----------1-'---t---t-----ll I

M b . Assess whether there are enougt1 scenario sets (and spares ) to test the projected num ber u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromisi ng exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s ) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from tile last two NRC examinations is within the limil<> specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form .

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the lasttwo NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enougt1 different outlines to test the projected number and rnix D tCA.r '(\--' d~A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. f--l r*-----~--~~------------------~~----~--~--------+-*---+----+-----
4. a. Assess wllether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights ) are covered \tlc.\ 'f\--*' ~

in the appropriate exam sectio_n_s_._ __ _____ _ ________________________J:--+--+--r---il G

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. tu4 ~, c\t.irt r-------*------------------~~-~~~--------------

N E ___£_~nsure~-~I<IA in:portance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at__l_e_a_s_t__2_._5_.------1~""-'-'--.+-~ --11

--+-~--.-.i'\.

R A

d . Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

~-----------'--'-----'----'----'------'---...!:..---'----'-~---'----'----'----'----'------- *-----------*-,_-

~1.\. -"'I"*\.; Jw-L e. Check the entire exam fo_r _b__ al_a__n_

c_e__

of_ c_o_v_e_ra"""g-e_._ _____________________ -+rtL

___I~-+--1'-'-+-~--tA--11

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

~ 1'--' """ I a . A uthor Randall Amundson FTI\lted);Jame/.Signature..

'\( * ~.... f J.. ,. _.l. -

Qate I Jru~'-'JJ"(

I

b. Fac1il ty Reviewer (*) Tom Larson/ ' J .A  ;;;_--./_ .. 10/~ci/N .
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1>eH AAL~e.'\ ./ .Jt,uf?.Hl/~ / tf/iti/t.J.~I
d. NRC Supe1visor /.h-.u.n *tlikrs-1>>1 ~~~X/'""'- ;lh::i--/j_j f ""\/ v " ~-

1 Note: # lndepent1ent NRC reviewer irubal items 1n Column "c": ch1r;f exammer concurrence reqUired.

b _ .. ...

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines .~
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14328A763&oldid=2450733"