ML18096A623: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
,r- 9204160043 920409 I PDR ADOCK 05000311 p PDR | ,r- 9204160043 920409 I PDR ADOCK 05000311 p PDR | ||
RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.l.10 of the Salem Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications. | |||
The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 7 shall be: | The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 7 shall be: | ||
: 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods: | : 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods: | ||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
32 F (z) < ( 2 * ] (K( z )]. f or P > 0 . 5 and , | 32 F (z) < ( 2 * ] (K( z )]. f or P > 0 . 5 and , | ||
Q p FQ(z) ~ (4.64] (K(z)J for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banlcs C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974. | Q p FQ(z) ~ (4.64] (K(z)J for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banlcs C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974. | ||
Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the I..OCA analysis are met, along w~th the ECCS acceptance criteria of | Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the I..OCA analysis are met, along w~th the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10CFR.50.46. | ||
*T See Figure 1 for a plot of (FQ PRel] versus Axial. Core Height. | *T See Figure 1 for a plot of (FQ PRel] versus Axial. Core Height. | ||
2 of 3 | 2 of 3 | ||
**-'* ' ._,' L 2.... | |||
**-'* ' ._,' L | |||
I I I r 11 6, 2. 321 i I I ! | I I I r 11 6, 2. 321 i I I ! | ||
I ! | I ! | ||
- I 1 I I 1 ~ | - I 1 I I 1 ~ | ||
......... .._ I ! | ......... .._ I ! | ||
Line 58: | Line 52: | ||
I ll I | I ll I | ||
' c I c c c ... | ' c I c c c ... | ||
.. r"l*C C ape CJ I M CJ C CCC cc | .. r"l*C C ape CJ I M CJ C CCC cc | ||
' I I | ' I I | ||
Line 78: | Line 71: | ||
i I | i I | ||
~' | ~' | ||
I I i I | I I i I | ||
I I : | I I : | ||
I 12, 1.5 I I ! | I 12, 1.5 I I ! | ||
: I i ! | : I i ! | ||
1.4 | 1.4 i I I | ||
i I I | |||
!' I I i c I I I | !' I I i c I I I | ||
! I .. | ! I .. | ||
1.2 I | 1.2 I | ||
~ | ~ | ||
i | i i I I .1 I I I 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE 1£ IGHT (FEET) | ||
i I I .1 | |||
I I I 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE 1£ IGHT (FEET) | |||
FICUU 1 MAXIMUM (FQT | FICUU 1 MAXIMUM (FQT | ||
* Pael J VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3}} | * Pael J VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3}} |
Latest revision as of 06:35, 3 February 2020
ML18096A623 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 01/10/1992 |
From: | Green L, Wiley R WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML18096A622 | List: |
References | |
CDC-92-014, CDC-92-14, NUDOCS 9204160043 | |
Download: ML18096A623 (3) | |
Text
- CDC-92-014 Ref. 1: CDC-91-307 2: PNG-92-005 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT EVALUATION FOR SALEM UNIT 2 CYCLE 7 REDESIGN L. Green Core Design C Date:
(J.O. W-~
VERIFIER: R.. A. Wiley ( )
Core Design C Date: /-/o-'f~
1 of 3
c::- -------------,--,,
,r- 9204160043 920409 I PDR ADOCK 05000311 p PDR
RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.l.10 of the Salem Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.
The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 7 shall be:
- 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods:
_RTP r--xy -< 2.26 for all core elevations ',INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).
- 2. For all unrodded planes:
1-TP < 1.68 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points xy -
1 through 61, inclusive).
These F (z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xy channel factor FQ(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:
32 F (z) < ( 2 * ] (K( z )]. f or P > 0 . 5 and ,
Q p FQ(z) ~ (4.64] (K(z)J for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banlcs C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974.
Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the I..OCA analysis are met, along w~th the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10CFR.50.46.
- T See Figure 1 for a plot of (FQ PRel] versus Axial. Core Height.
2 of 3
- -'* ' ._,' L 2....
I I I r 11 6, 2. 321 i I I !
I !
- I 1 I I 1 ~
......... .._ I !
I CIC I I ~
- 2. 2
~
~
,, . r I \ 10.8,2. 181 I
I ll I
' c I c c c ...
.. r"l*C C ape CJ I M CJ C CCC cc
' I I
2.0 ;
.... ~
i I
- - :I ,.,
-- I I I I I
I I I
~
! i !
I
- I
- ~
--:.1. 8 Cl
~
! I
. a i ! ' \
- I ! ' \
i I
~'
I I i I
I I :
I 12, 1.5 I I !
- I i !
1.4 i I I
!' I I i c I I I
! I ..
1.2 I
~
i i I I .1 I I I 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE 1£ IGHT (FEET)
FICUU 1 MAXIMUM (FQT
- Pael J VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3