ML18096A623

Nonproprietary Version of CDC-92-014, Peaking Factor Limit Rept Evaluation for Salem Unit 2 Cycle 7 Redesign.

ML18096A623
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	01/10/1992
From:	Green L, Wiley R WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML18096A622	List: ML18096A621 ML18096A623
References
CDC-92-014, CDC-92-14, NUDOCS 9204160043
Download: ML18096A623 (3)

Text

• CDC-92-014 Ref. 1: CDC-91-307 2: PNG-92-005 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT EVALUATION FOR SALEM UNIT 2 CYCLE 7 REDESIGN L. Green Core Design C Date:

(J.O. W-~

VERIFIER: R.. A. Wiley ( )

Core Design C Date: /-/o-'f~

1 of 3

---

c::- -------------,--,,

,r- 9204160043 920409 I PDR ADOCK 05000311 p PDR

RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.l.10 of the Salem Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 7 shall be:

1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods:

_RTP r--xy -< 2.26 for all core elevations ',INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).

2. For all unrodded planes:

1-TP < 1.68 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points xy -

1 through 61, inclusive).

These F (z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xy channel factor FQ(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:

32 F (z) < ( 2 * ] (K( z )]. f or P > 0 . 5 and ,

Q p FQ(z) ~ (4.64] (K(z)J for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banlcs C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974.

Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the I..OCA analysis are met, along w~th the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10CFR.50.46.

• T See Figure 1 for a plot of (FQ PRel] versus Axial. Core Height.

2 of 3

• • -'* ' ._,' L 2....

I I I r 11 6, 2. 321 i I I  !

I  !

- I 1 I I 1 ~

......... .._ I  !

I CIC I I ~

2. 2

~

~

,, . r I \ 10.8,2. 181 I

I ll I

' c I c c c ...

.. r"l*C C ape CJ I M CJ C CCC cc

' I I

2.0  ;

.... ~

i I

• - :I ,.,

-- I I I I I

I I I

~

! i  !

I

I

~

--:.1. 8 Cl

~

! I

. a i  ! ' \

I  ! ' \

i I

~'

I I i I

I I  :

I 12, 1.5 I I  !

I i  !

1.4 i I I

!' I I i c I I I

! I ..

1.2 I

~

i i I I .1 I I I 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE 1£ IGHT (FEET)

FICUU 1 MAXIMUM (FQT

• Pael J VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3