ML18102A259: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/30/1996 | | issue date = 06/30/1996 | ||
| title = Monthly Operating Rept for June 1996 for Salem Generating Station Unit 1.W/960715 Ltr | | title = Monthly Operating Rept for June 1996 for Salem Generating Station Unit 1.W/960715 Ltr | ||
| author name = | | author name = Garchow D, Heller R, Phillips R | ||
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY | | author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:e Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 | {{#Wiki_filter:e PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit July 15, 1996 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9 ..J.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating report for the month of June is being sent to you. | ||
339-2735 Month June 1996 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl I L | Sincerely yours, David F. Garchow General Manager - | ||
339-2735 Operating Status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting Period June 1996 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason N A 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical | Salem Operations RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19046 | ||
- | ------- - --- - - --- - - - - - --- \ | ||
9607230182 960630 PDR ADOCK 05000272 R PDR The power is in your hands. | |||
95-2168 REV. 6/94 | |||
H-Other (Explain) | AVE, DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e Docket No. : 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 07/10/96 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Month June 1996 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl I | ||
L | |||
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-272 Date: 07/10/96 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Operating Status | |||
The | : 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes | ||
: 2. Reporting Period June 1996 | |||
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC | : 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 | ||
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 | |||
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 | |||
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 | |||
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 | |||
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason N A | |||
: 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A | |||
: 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any NA This Month Year to Date Cumulative | |||
: 12. Hours in Reporting Period 720 4367 166584 | |||
: 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 0 104380.5 | |||
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0 | |||
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 0 100388.3 | |||
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0 | |||
: 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 318062229.2 | |||
: 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 105301000 | |||
: 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -2430 -13621 10191292 | |||
: 19. Unit Service Factor 0 0 60.3 | |||
: 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 0 60.3 | |||
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 0 54.4 | |||
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 0 53.9 | |||
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 100 23.8 | |||
: 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) | |||
Forced outage. | |||
: 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: | |||
To be determined. | |||
8-l-7.R2 L | |||
UNIT SHUTDOYN AND POYER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH June 1996 DOCKET NO. 50-272 UNIT NAME Salem #1 DATE 07/10/96 COMPLETED BY Robert Phillips TELEPHONE 609-339-2735 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION Dmm EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION NO. DATE TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 4092 06-01-96 F 720 F c 4 ---------- HJ 2422 Nuclear Steam Generator Systems. | |||
1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161) | |||
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain) | |||
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS | |||
* DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: JUNE 1996 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 CONTACT: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | |||
: 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) lEC-3476, Pkg. 1 "Annular Steel Framing Modifications" Rev. 0 - This change modifies annular steel columns in ten (10) locations by bracing the columns to the crane wall. The surface mounted channels were modified by the addition of drilled in concrete anchors, to reduce their span length. The implementation of this change ensures that the annular steel columns and surface mounted channel member stresses remain within their design allowables, as specified in the design criteria. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-156) | |||
: 2. Temporary Modifications (TMOD) 96-019 "Temporary Chilled Water for the CAAC Air Conditioning Units" Rev. 0 - DCP lEC-3505, Pkg. 7 provides design enhancements which will improve the Chilled Water system performance, and reliability. During the implementation of this DCP the Unit 1 Chilled Water system will be shutdown. This TMOD enables the Control Room, Unit 1 Electrical Equipment Room, Unit I Data Logging Room and Unit I Relay Room environments to remain within their design temperature limits during the DCP implementation phase. The Chilled Water system has no Technical Specification requirements. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 96-081) | |||
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS | |||
* DOCKET NO: 50-272 N.IONTH:JUNE1996 UNIT NAN.IE: SALEN.I I CONTACT: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 | |||
: 3. Evaluations S-C-SW-N.ISE-085 9 "Service Water and Component Cooling EOP Alignment Issues" (Westinghouse SECL-96-043) - This evaluation modifies the emergency operating procedures (EOP's), along with some non EOP procedures, to support resolution of Service Water (SW) and Component Cooling (CC) EOP alignment issues. The procedure changes to resolve SW & CC alignment concerns during an accident will ensure the SW and CC system flows and temperatures are within their design limits, along with ensuring sufficient flow to components cooled by SW and CC. This ensures the safety parameters of the interfacing system will not be adversely impacted and will also remain within their design limits. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 96-074) | |||
S-C-FHB-MDC-1616 "Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Radiological Evaluation" Rev. 0 - This evaluation reconciles differences between calculation S-C-FHV-MDC-1616, the Licensing Report submitted in License Change Request 93-02 (Fuel Handling Accident Reanalysis Following Spent Fuel Pool High Density Rack N.lodification), and the NRC's evaluation in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for Amendments 151 and 131. | |||
Calculation S-C-FHV-MDC-1616 remains well within the Guidelines of NUREG-0800, and the calculation results essentially equal the NRC staff analysis of 13. 2 rem at the exclusion area boundary. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. | |||
(SORC 96-0~5) | |||
REFUELING INFORMATION | |||
* DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: JUNE 1996 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 CONTACT: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 MONTH : JUNE 1996 Refueling information has changed from last month: YES _._. NO . X . | |||
Scheduled date for next refueling: (to be determined) | |||
Scheduled date for restart following refueling: (to be determined) | Scheduled date for restart following refueling: (to be determined) | ||
: a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required? | : a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required? | ||
YES. | YES. .NO~.-~ | ||
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE . X . b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee? | NOT DETERMINED TO DATE . X . | ||
YES. .NO. X . If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined) | : b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee? | ||
Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: . n/a Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | YES. .NO. X . | ||
If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined) | |||
Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: . n/a Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | |||
Number of Fuel Assemblies: | Number of Fuel Assemblies: | ||
: a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | : a. Incore 0 | ||
Future spent fuel storage capacity: | : b. In Spent Fuel Storage 989 Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2008 L__ - | ||
Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
-UNIT I JUNE 1996 SALEMUNITNO. | - UNIT I JUNE 1996 SALEMUNITNO. I The Unit is in a refueling and Steam Generator replacement outage and remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory | ||
I The Unit is in a refueling and Steam Generator replacement outage and remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory action letter from the NRC, the Unit will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions: | ' - action letter from the NRC, the Unit will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions: | ||
* Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues | * Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues | ||
* After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate in a safe, event free manner " After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review}} | * After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate in a safe, event free manner | ||
" After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review}} |
Latest revision as of 05:30, 3 February 2020
ML18102A259 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/30/1996 |
From: | Garchow D, Heller R, Phillips R Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
NUDOCS 9607230182 | |
Download: ML18102A259 (8) | |
Text
e PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit July 15, 1996 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9 ..J.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating report for the month of June is being sent to you.
Sincerely yours, David F. Garchow General Manager -
Salem Operations RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19046
- --- - - --- - - - - - --- \
9607230182 960630 PDR ADOCK 05000272 R PDR The power is in your hands.
95-2168 REV. 6/94
AVE, DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e Docket No. : 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 07/10/96 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Month June 1996 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl I
L
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-272 Date: 07/10/96 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Operating Status
- 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes
- 2. Reporting Period June 1996
- 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
- 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
- 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
- 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
- 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106
- 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason N A
- 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A
- 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any NA This Month Year to Date Cumulative
- 12. Hours in Reporting Period 720 4367 166584
- 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 0 104380.5
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 0 100388.3
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 318062229.2
- 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 105301000
- 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -2430 -13621 10191292
- 19. Unit Service Factor 0 0 60.3
- 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 0 60.3
- 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 0 54.4
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 0 53.9
- 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 100 23.8
- 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)
Forced outage.
- 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:
To be determined.
8-l-7.R2 L
UNIT SHUTDOYN AND POYER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH June 1996 DOCKET NO. 50-272 UNIT NAME Salem #1 DATE 07/10/96 COMPLETED BY Robert Phillips TELEPHONE 609-339-2735 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION Dmm EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION NO. DATE TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 4092 06-01-96 F 720 F c 4 ---------- HJ 2422 Nuclear Steam Generator Systems.
1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161)
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS
- DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: JUNE 1996 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 CONTACT: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
- 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) lEC-3476, Pkg. 1 "Annular Steel Framing Modifications" Rev. 0 - This change modifies annular steel columns in ten (10) locations by bracing the columns to the crane wall. The surface mounted channels were modified by the addition of drilled in concrete anchors, to reduce their span length. The implementation of this change ensures that the annular steel columns and surface mounted channel member stresses remain within their design allowables, as specified in the design criteria. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-156)
- 2. Temporary Modifications (TMOD)96-019 "Temporary Chilled Water for the CAAC Air Conditioning Units" Rev. 0 - DCP lEC-3505, Pkg. 7 provides design enhancements which will improve the Chilled Water system performance, and reliability. During the implementation of this DCP the Unit 1 Chilled Water system will be shutdown. This TMOD enables the Control Room, Unit 1 Electrical Equipment Room, Unit I Data Logging Room and Unit I Relay Room environments to remain within their design temperature limits during the DCP implementation phase. The Chilled Water system has no Technical Specification requirements. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 96-081)
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS
- DOCKET NO: 50-272 N.IONTH:JUNE1996 UNIT NAN.IE: SALEN.I I CONTACT: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162
- 3. Evaluations S-C-SW-N.ISE-085 9 "Service Water and Component Cooling EOP Alignment Issues" (Westinghouse SECL-96-043) - This evaluation modifies the emergency operating procedures (EOP's), along with some non EOP procedures, to support resolution of Service Water (SW) and Component Cooling (CC) EOP alignment issues. The procedure changes to resolve SW & CC alignment concerns during an accident will ensure the SW and CC system flows and temperatures are within their design limits, along with ensuring sufficient flow to components cooled by SW and CC. This ensures the safety parameters of the interfacing system will not be adversely impacted and will also remain within their design limits. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 96-074)
S-C-FHB-MDC-1616 "Fuel Handling Accident Analysis Radiological Evaluation" Rev. 0 - This evaluation reconciles differences between calculation S-C-FHV-MDC-1616, the Licensing Report submitted in License Change Request 93-02 (Fuel Handling Accident Reanalysis Following Spent Fuel Pool High Density Rack N.lodification), and the NRC's evaluation in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for Amendments 151 and 131.
Calculation S-C-FHV-MDC-1616 remains well within the Guidelines of NUREG-0800, and the calculation results essentially equal the NRC staff analysis of 13. 2 rem at the exclusion area boundary. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 96-0~5)
REFUELING INFORMATION
- DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: JUNE 1996 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 CONTACT: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 MONTH : JUNE 1996 Refueling information has changed from last month: YES _._. NO . X .
Scheduled date for next refueling: (to be determined)
Scheduled date for restart following refueling: (to be determined)
- a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
YES. .NO~.-~
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE . X .
- b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
YES. .NO. X .
If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined)
Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: . n/a Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
Number of Fuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore 0
- b. In Spent Fuel Storage 989 Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2008 L__ -
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
- UNIT I JUNE 1996 SALEMUNITNO. I The Unit is in a refueling and Steam Generator replacement outage and remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory
' - action letter from the NRC, the Unit will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions:
- Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues
- After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate in a safe, event free manner
" After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review