|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 02/15/2007 | | | issue date = 02/15/2007 |
| | title = Draft RAI Re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment | | | title = Draft RAI Re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment |
| | author name = Tam P S | | | author name = Tam P |
| | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| | addressee name = Scarpello M, Simpson S, Steinmetz K | | | addressee name = Scarpello M, Simpson S, Steinmetz K |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:From: Peter TamTo:Keith Steinmetz; Michael Scarpello; Sue SimpsonDate: 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM | | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Peter Tam To: Keith Steinmetz; Michael Scarpello; Sue Simpson Date: 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment (TACMD3159 & MD3160)Keith: | | D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment (TAC MD3159 & MD3160) |
| By application dated 9/15/06, you requested an amendment to revise the D. C. Cook TSs toallow reactor trip system (RTS) and engineered safety feature actuation system (ESFAS) instrumentation to be tested in bypass. The staff has performed a review of the application, and has determined that insufficient information was provided as described below.The most notable omission was the lack of information on the changes to the RTS and ESFASsystems to include the bypass capability. Page 5 of the submittal, titled Technical Analysis, states that: "Hardware changes necessary to be made to the NIS and Foxboro analog/digital protection system to facilitate testing in bypass will be implemented in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59." Standard Review Plan, Chapter 7, states that the review should include an evaluation of the protection system design against the requirements of ANSI/IEEE Std 279, or Reg. Guide 1.153, which endorses IEEE Std. 603, depending upon the applicant/licensees commitment regarding design criteria. The RTS review should address all topics identified as applicable by Table 7-1. Major design considerations that should be emphasized in the review of the RTS are: Design basis Single failure criterion Quality of components and modules Independence Defense-in-depth and diversity System testing and inoperable surveillance Use of digital systemsSame requirements are also applicable to ESFAS instrumentation. The application does notprovide information showing how the bypass system capability meets all of the above guidance. Also, the application does not state that you have done the failure mode and effects analysis todetermine if the failure of bypass system will not have any impact on accident analyses, or would not create new potential accidents. The current DC Cook licensing basis does not include any mass addition transients or accidents. As such, a change in the ESFAS or RTS system that creates the possibility for an inadvertent injection of water into the reactor coolant system (such as the inadvertent start of a charging pump), would require the licensing basis to include mass addition transients in the DC Cook licensing basis. If the licensing basis did notinclude these transients, neither the licensee nor the NRC could conclude that the proposed change poses no safety concern. There was no discussion on the brand and type of system, or the method used for the qualification of this system.Please call me to set up a conference call to discuss the above with our reviewer Hukam Garg. This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. It does notformally request for additional information, and it does not convey a formal NRC staff position.CC:Hukam Garg; John Nakoski; William BennettMail Envelope Properties(45D450DA.478 : 12 : 35330) | | Keith: |
| | By application dated 9/15/06, you requested an amendment to revise the D. C. Cook TSs to allow reactor trip system (RTS) and engineered safety feature actuation system (ESFAS) instrumentation to be tested in bypass. The staff has performed a review of the application, and has determined that insufficient information was provided as described below. |
| | The most notable omission was the lack of information on the changes to the RTS and ESFAS systems to include the bypass capability. Page 5 of the submittal, titled Technical Analysis, states that: "Hardware changes necessary to be made to the NIS and Foxboro analog/digital protection system to facilitate testing in bypass will be implemented in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59." Standard Review Plan, Chapter 7, states that the review should include an evaluation of the protection system design against the requirements of ANSI/IEEE Std 279, or Reg. Guide 1.153, which endorses IEEE Std. 603, depending upon the applicant/licensees commitment regarding design criteria. The RTS review should address all topics identified as applicable by Table 7-1. Major design considerations that should be emphasized in the review of the RTS are: |
| | Design basis Single failure criterion Quality of components and modules Independence Defense-in-depth and diversity System testing and inoperable surveillance Use of digital systems Same requirements are also applicable to ESFAS instrumentation. The application does not provide information showing how the bypass system capability meets all of the above guidance. |
| | Also, the application does not state that you have done the failure mode and effects analysis to determine if the failure of bypass system will not have any impact on accident analyses, or would not create new potential accidents. The current DC Cook licensing basis does not include any mass addition transients or accidents. As such, a change in the ESFAS or RTS system that creates the possibility for an inadvertent injection of water into the reactor coolant system (such as the inadvertent start of a charging pump), would require the licensing basis to include mass addition transients in the DC Cook licensing basis. If the licensing basis did not include these transients, neither the licensee nor the NRC could conclude that the proposed change poses no safety concern. There was no discussion on the brand and type of system, or the method used for the qualification of this system. |
| | Please call me to set up a conference call to discuss the above with our reviewer Hukam Garg. |
| | This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. It does not formally request for additional information, and it does not convey a formal NRC staff position. |
| | CC: Hukam Garg; John Nakoski; William Bennett Mail Envelope Properties (45D450DA.478 : 12 : 35330) |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment(TAC MD3159 & MD3160) | | D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment (TAC MD3159 & MD3160) |
| Creation Date02/15/2007 7:23:54 AMFrom: Peter TamCreated By:PST@nrc.govRecipientsActionDate & Timeaep.comTransferred02/15/2007 7:24:37 | | Creation Date 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM From: Peter Tam Created By: PST@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time aep.com Transferred 02/15/2007 7:24:37 AM kasteinmetz (Keith Steinmetz) mkscarpello (Michael Scarpello) sdsimpson (Sue Simpson) nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM WTB1 CC (William Bennett) Opened 02/15/2007 7:24:34 AM nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM HCG CC (Hukam Garg) Opened 02/15/2007 8:37:12 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:05 AM JAN1 CC (John Nakoski) Opened 02/15/2007 7:33:20 AM Post Office Delivered Route aep.com OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:05 AM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5276 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed |
| | |
| AM kasteinmetz (Keith Steinmetz) mkscarpello (Michael Scarpello) sdsimpson (Sue Simpson)nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01Delivered02/15/2007 7:24:04 | |
| | |
| AM WTB1 CC (William Bennett)Opened02/15/2007 7:24:34 | |
| | |
| AMnrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01Delivered02/15/2007 7:24:04
| |
| | |
| AM HCG CC (Hukam Garg)Opened02/15/2007 8:37:12 | |
| | |
| AMnrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01Delivered02/15/2007 7:24:05
| |
| | |
| AM JAN1 CC (John Nakoski)Opened02/15/2007 7:33:20 | |
| | |
| AMPost Office DeliveredRouteaep.com OWGWPO01.HQGWDO0102/15/2007 7:24:04 AMnrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO0102/15/2007 7:24:04 AMnrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO0102/15/2007 7:24:05 AMnrc.govFilesSizeDate & Time MESSAGE527602/15/2007 7:23:54 AMOptions Auto Delete:
| |
| No Expiration Date: | |
| None Notify Recipients: | |
| Yes Priority:Standard ReplyRequested: | |
| No Return Notification: | |
| None Concealed | |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| | | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened}} |
| No Security:Standard To Be Delivered:Immediate Status Tracking:Delivered & Opened}} | |
Letter Sequence Draft RAI |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0704601592007-02-15015 February 2007
Draft RAI Re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0716505082007-06-18018 June 2007
Request for Additional Information Proposed Amendment on Bypass Test Capability of Certain Instrumentation
Project stage: RAI
ML0722002602007-07-25025 July 2007
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change to Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0729006352007-10-0909 October 2007
Partial Withdrawal Regarding Technical Specification Change to Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation
Project stage: Other
ML0735204032007-12-17017 December 2007
Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment RTS and ESFAS Bypass Testing Capability
Project stage: Approval
ML0732312272007-12-17017 December 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment RTS and ESFAS Bypass Testing Capability
Project stage: Approval
2007-02-15
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23361A1022023-12-21021 December 2023
Security Rule Exemption Request - ISFSI Docket No. Reference
ML23321A1222023-11-17017 November 2023
NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI - D.C. Cook 1 & 2 - License Amendment Request Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation
ML23052A1502023-02-21021 February 2023
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation
ML22307A2532022-11-0303 November 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Verbal Authorization of Relief Request ISIR-5-06 Regarding Alternative to N-729-6 for RPV Head Visual Examination
ML22122A0902022-04-29029 April 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Consistent with TSTF-554, Revision 1
ML22250A6712022-02-16016 February 2022
Outline Submittal Notification Email DC-Cook 2022
ML21341A6252021-12-0707 December 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Consistent with TSTF-577, Revision 1
ML21307A3352021-11-0303 November 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Final RAI - License Amendment Request Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation
ML21236A0262021-08-23023 August 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Regarding Changes to Reactor Vessel Heatup and Cooldown Curves and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System Requirements
ML21140A3052021-05-20020 May 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI - D.C. Cook 1 & 2 - Relief Request ISIR-4-11, Impractical Examinations for the Fourth 10-Year ISI Interval
ML21113A2812021-04-23023 April 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation
ML21089A0222021-03-24024 March 2021
DC Cook Power Operated Valves (POV) Preliminary Request for Information
ML21082A0262021-03-22022 March 2021
Acceptance of Relief Request ISIR-4-11, Impractical Examinations for the Fourth 10-Year ISI Interval
ML21049A2682021-02-16016 February 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Final RAI - License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension Containment Type a ILRT
ML21026A3472021-01-26026 January 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI - D.C. Cook 1 & 2 - Relief Request REL-PP2 for Pump and Valve IST Fifth 10-year Interval
ML21008A4742021-01-0808 January 2021
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension Containment Type a ILRT
ML20366A1012020-12-31031 December 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request for One-Time Deferral of Steam Generator Inspection
ML20316A0152020-11-0606 November 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Relief Request REL-PP2 for Pump and Valve IST Fifth 10-year Interval
ML20318A0202020-10-16016 October 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Regarding Public Comment on D.C. Cook, Unit 1 Request for Relief from Nozzle Inspections, Code Case N-729
ML20318A0192020-10-15015 October 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Supplemental Public Comment on D.C. Cook, Unit 1 Request for Relief from Nozzle Inspections, Code Case N-729
ML20289A7122020-10-15015 October 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 1 - Verbal Authorization of Relief Request ISIR-5-04 Regarding Alternative to N-729-6 for RPV Head Visual Examination
ML20290A4252020-10-15015 October 2020
Verbal Authorization of Relief Request ISIR-5-04 Regarding Alternative to N-729-6 for RPV Head Visual Examination
ML20318A0182020-10-0909 October 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Public Comment on D.C. Cook, Unit 1 Request for Relief from Nozzle Inspections, Code Case N-729
ML20289A1192020-10-0909 October 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Relief Request for Alternative to N-729-4 for RPV Head Visual Examination
ML20181A4122020-06-29029 June 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI - D.C. Cook 1 - One-Time Extension, Containment Type a ILRT Frequency
ML20149K6272020-05-28028 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment and Exemptions Regarding UFSAR 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) Update Schedule (Epids: L-2020-LLA-0100, L-2020-LLE-0052, L-2020-LLE-0053)
ML20149K4332020-05-26026 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Consistent with TSTF-567, Revision 1
ML20141L8112020-05-20020 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Relief Request Regarding Impracticality for Inservice Inspection for Certain Welds
ML20141L6062020-05-20020 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Consistent with TSTF-541, Revision 2
ML20136A5162020-05-15015 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Consistent with TSTF-412, Revision 3
ML20133J9662020-05-11011 May 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of License Amendment Regarding Changes to Reactor Vessel Heatup and Cooldown Curves and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System Requirements
ML20232B4562020-04-27027 April 2020
Request for Supporting Information for the D.C. Cook SPRA Audit Review - Fragility Questions
ML20232B4432020-03-25025 March 2020
Request for Supporting Information for the D.C. Cook SPRA Audit Review - Plant Response Model Questions
ML19345F9382019-12-0909 December 2019
D.C. Cook 50.54(f) SPRA Submittal - Completeness Review Done and Path Forward
ML19333B8042019-11-29029 November 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Adopt TSTF-569 (L-2019-LLA-0248)
ML19309F9212019-11-0505 November 2019
Request for Eportal Access for Audit Review of the DC Cook SPRA Supporting Documents
ML19270E7372019-09-26026 September 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Adopt TSTF-421, Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Inspection Program
ML19207A4642019-07-26026 July 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Delete Diesel Generator Load Test Resistor Banks
ML19204A0962019-07-23023 July 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Related to Unit 2 Leak Before Break Analysis and Deletion of Containment Humidity Monitors for Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML19211C3032019-07-0303 July 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 & 2 - Request for Additional Information Related to LAR to Address NSAL-15-1
ML19175A3032019-06-24024 June 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Revise Battery Monitoring and Maintenance TS
ML19092A4802019-04-0202 April 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Adopt TSTF-563
ML19092A4792019-04-0202 April 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Address Issues Identified in Westinghouse Document NSAL-15-1
ML19084A0002019-03-20020 March 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Resubmitted: Draft Request for Additional Information DC Cook Unit 1 - Leak-Before-Break LAR
ML19072A1432019-03-12012 March 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Resubmitted: Draft Request for Additional Information DC Cook Unit 1 - Leak-Before-Break LAR
ML19011A1382019-01-11011 January 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Revise Environmental Technical Specifications (L-2018-LLA-0570)
ML19011A3512019-01-11011 January 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information DC Cook Unit 1 Leak Before Break Amendment
ML19009A5402019-01-0909 January 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Revise Battery Monitoring and Maintenance TS
ML18313A0802018-11-0808 November 2018
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - RAI for RPV Threads in Flange Alternative
ML18275A0532018-10-0101 October 2018
NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review for LAR to Revise Battery Monitoring and Maintenance TS
2023-02-21
[Table view] |
Text
From: Peter Tam To: Keith Steinmetz; Michael Scarpello; Sue Simpson Date: 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM
Subject:
D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment (TAC MD3159 & MD3160)
Keith:
By application dated 9/15/06, you requested an amendment to revise the D. C. Cook TSs to allow reactor trip system (RTS) and engineered safety feature actuation system (ESFAS) instrumentation to be tested in bypass. The staff has performed a review of the application, and has determined that insufficient information was provided as described below.
The most notable omission was the lack of information on the changes to the RTS and ESFAS systems to include the bypass capability. Page 5 of the submittal, titled Technical Analysis, states that: "Hardware changes necessary to be made to the NIS and Foxboro analog/digital protection system to facilitate testing in bypass will be implemented in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59." Standard Review Plan, Chapter 7, states that the review should include an evaluation of the protection system design against the requirements of ANSI/IEEE Std 279, or Reg. Guide 1.153, which endorses IEEE Std. 603, depending upon the applicant/licensees commitment regarding design criteria. The RTS review should address all topics identified as applicable by Table 7-1. Major design considerations that should be emphasized in the review of the RTS are:
Design basis Single failure criterion Quality of components and modules Independence Defense-in-depth and diversity System testing and inoperable surveillance Use of digital systems Same requirements are also applicable to ESFAS instrumentation. The application does not provide information showing how the bypass system capability meets all of the above guidance.
Also, the application does not state that you have done the failure mode and effects analysis to determine if the failure of bypass system will not have any impact on accident analyses, or would not create new potential accidents. The current DC Cook licensing basis does not include any mass addition transients or accidents. As such, a change in the ESFAS or RTS system that creates the possibility for an inadvertent injection of water into the reactor coolant system (such as the inadvertent start of a charging pump), would require the licensing basis to include mass addition transients in the DC Cook licensing basis. If the licensing basis did not include these transients, neither the licensee nor the NRC could conclude that the proposed change poses no safety concern. There was no discussion on the brand and type of system, or the method used for the qualification of this system.
Please call me to set up a conference call to discuss the above with our reviewer Hukam Garg.
This e-mail aims solely to prepare you and others for the proposed conference call. It does not formally request for additional information, and it does not convey a formal NRC staff position.
CC: Hukam Garg; John Nakoski; William Bennett Mail Envelope Properties (45D450DA.478 : 12 : 35330)
Subject:
D.C. Cook - Draft RAI re. RTS and ESFAS Instrumentation Amendment (TAC MD3159 & MD3160)
Creation Date 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM From: Peter Tam Created By: PST@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time aep.com Transferred 02/15/2007 7:24:37 AM kasteinmetz (Keith Steinmetz) mkscarpello (Michael Scarpello) sdsimpson (Sue Simpson) nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM WTB1 CC (William Bennett) Opened 02/15/2007 7:24:34 AM nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM HCG CC (Hukam Garg) Opened 02/15/2007 8:37:12 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 Delivered 02/15/2007 7:24:05 AM JAN1 CC (John Nakoski) Opened 02/15/2007 7:33:20 AM Post Office Delivered Route aep.com OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:04 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 02/15/2007 7:24:05 AM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5276 02/15/2007 7:23:54 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
