ML110600304: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/16/2011
| issue date = 02/16/2011
| title = Colorado Historical Society, Letter Dtd 02/16/2011, Request for a Section 106 Review Under Nhpa for USGS Triga Reactor, Lakewood, Co
| title = Colorado Historical Society, Letter Dtd 02/16/2011, Request for a Section 106 Review Under Nhpa for USGS Triga Reactor, Lakewood, Co
| author name = Nichols E C
| author name = Nichols E
| author affiliation = State of CO, Historical Society
| author affiliation = State of CO, Historical Society
| addressee name = Dwyer J C
| addressee name = Dwyer J
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DNMS/CRDB
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DNMS/CRDB
| docket = 05000274
| docket = 05000274
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:February 16, 2011 James DVlyer, Chief N Commercial and R&D Branch .. Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Request for a Section 106 Review under the National Historic Preservation Act for the US Geological Survey Triga Reactor in Lakewood, CO (CHS #58952)  
{{#Wiki_filter:February 16, 2011 James DVlyer, Chief Commercial and R&D Branch                                                                     N..
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Request for a Section 106 Review under the National Historic Preservation Act for the US Geological Survey Triga Reactor in Lakewood, CO (CHS #58952)


==Dear Mr. Dwyer:==
==Dear Mr. Dwyer:==
Thank you for your correspondence dated January 26, 2011 and received by our office on February 7, 2011 regarding the review of the above-mentioned project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106). After review of the provided material, we do not object to the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed project. We also concur with the recommended finding of no adverse effect [36 CFR 800.5(b)]
 
under Section 106 for the proposed project. If unidentified archaeological resources are discovered during construction, work must be interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register criteria, 36 CRF 6004, in consultation with this office. We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting parties. Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings.
Thank you for your correspondence dated January 26, 2011 and received by our office on February 7, 2011 regarding the review of the above-mentioned project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106).
After review of the provided material, we do not object to the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed project. We also concur with the recommended finding of no adverse effect [36 CFR 800.5(b)] under Section 106 for the proposed project.
If unidentified archaeological resources are discovered during construction, work must be interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register criteria, 36 CRF 6004, in consultation with this office.
We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting parties. Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings.
Please note that our compliance letter does not end the 30-day review period provided to other consulting parties. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Amy Pallante, our Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-4678.
Please note that our compliance letter does not end the 30-day review period provided to other consulting parties. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Amy Pallante, our Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-4678.
Edward C. Wtate Historic Preservation NMSSlRGN1 THE COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY elVI c CEN TE R PLAZA 1560 BROADWAY SUITE 400 DE NVE R CO LORADO 80202 www.historycolorado.org}}
Edward C. Nichols Wtate Historic Preservation Officer NMSSlRGN1   MATERIALS~002 THE   COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY elVI c CEN TE R PLAZA     1560   BROADWAY       SUITE   400   DE NVE R     CO LORADO     80202     www.historycolorado.org}}

Latest revision as of 02:44, 13 November 2019

Colorado Historical Society, Letter Dtd 02/16/2011, Request for a Section 106 Review Under Nhpa for USGS Triga Reactor, Lakewood, Co
ML110600304
Person / Time
Site: U.S. Geological Survey
Issue date: 02/16/2011
From: Nichols E
State of CO, Historical Society
To: Dwyer J
NRC/RGN-I/DNMS/CRDB
References
Download: ML110600304 (1)


Text

February 16, 2011 James DVlyer, Chief Commercial and R&D Branch N..

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Request for a Section 106 Review under the National Historic Preservation Act for the US Geological Survey Triga Reactor in Lakewood, CO (CHS #58952)

Dear Mr. Dwyer:

Thank you for your correspondence dated January 26, 2011 and received by our office on February 7, 2011 regarding the review of the above-mentioned project under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106).

After review of the provided material, we do not object to the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed project. We also concur with the recommended finding of no adverse effect [36 CFR 800.5(b)] under Section 106 for the proposed project.

If unidentified archaeological resources are discovered during construction, work must be interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register criteria, 36 CRF 6004, in consultation with this office.

We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting parties. Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings.

Please note that our compliance letter does not end the 30-day review period provided to other consulting parties. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Amy Pallante, our Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-4678.

Edward C. Nichols Wtate Historic Preservation Officer NMSSlRGN1 MATERIALS~002 THE COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY elVI c CEN TE R PLAZA 1560 BROADWAY SUITE 400 DE NVE R CO LORADO 80202 www.historycolorado.org