ML11098A006: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11098A006
| number = ML11098A006
| issue date = 04/08/2011
| issue date = 04/08/2011
| title = Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1 - Acceptance of Relief Request RR-01 Dated March 28 2011 TAC ME5966
| title = Acceptance of Relief Request RR-01 Dated March 28 2011 TAC ME5966
| author name = Martin R E
| author name = Martin R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Ajluni M J, Stringfellow N J
| addressee name = Ajluni M, Stringfellow N
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000348
| docket = 05000348
| license number = NPF-002
| license number = NPF-002
| contact person = Martin R E
| contact person = Martin R
| case reference number = TAC ME5966, NL-11-0463
| case reference number = TAC ME5966, NL-11-0463
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:ME5966
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                      Martin, Robert Sent:                      Friday, April 08, 2011 8:12 AM To:                        Ajluni, Mark J.; Stringfellow, N. Jack Cc:                        Boyle, Patrick; Lingam, Siva; Kulesa, Gloria; Cumblidge, Stephen
==Subject:==
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated March 28, 2011, TAC ME5966 By letter dated March 28, 2011, SNC submitted a relief request (NL-11-0463), for the Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Proposed Relief Request for the Fourth ISI Interval, FNP-ISI-RR-
: 01. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}

Latest revision as of 01:06, 13 November 2019

Acceptance of Relief Request RR-01 Dated March 28 2011 TAC ME5966
ML11098A006
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2011
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Ajluni M, Stringfellow N
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Martin R
References
TAC ME5966, NL-11-0463
Download: ML11098A006 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Martin, Robert Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 8:12 AM To: Ajluni, Mark J.; Stringfellow, N. Jack Cc: Boyle, Patrick; Lingam, Siva; Kulesa, Gloria; Cumblidge, Stephen

Subject:

Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated March 28, 2011, TAC ME5966 By letter dated March 28, 2011, SNC submitted a relief request (NL-11-0463), for the Joseph M.

Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Proposed Relief Request for the Fourth ISI Interval, FNP-ISI-RR-

01. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11098A006&oldid=2119223"