ML11321A198: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/03/2011
| issue date = 11/03/2011
| title = Letter from Thomas P. Rielly, Vista 360, to Edward L. Williamson, OGC, Regarding Zion Nuclear Power Station Decommissioning Trust Fund
| title = Letter from Thomas P. Rielly, Vista 360, to Edward L. Williamson, OGC, Regarding Zion Nuclear Power Station Decommissioning Trust Fund
| author name = Rielly T P
| author name = Rielly T
| author affiliation = Vista 360
| author affiliation = Vista 360
| addressee name = Williamson E L
| addressee name = Williamson E
| addressee affiliation = NRC/OGC
| addressee affiliation = NRC/OGC
| docket = 05000295, 05000304
| docket = 05000295, 05000304
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:o0 649 INNSBRUCK B LERTYILE, ILINOIS ý60048T690SCý sta 36 TEL: 847-680-o670
{{#Wiki_filter:sta 36      o0   649 INNSBRUCK TEL: 847-680-o670 LERTYILE, B            ILINOISý60048T690SCý
-FAX: 847-681-194o
                                      - FAX: 847-681-194o
* E-MAIL: TR649@SB1GLOBALL.NET Wednesday, November 3, 2011 Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel for Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001 Subject : Zion Nuclear Power Station Docket 50-295 License No DPR-48  
* E-MAIL: TR649@SB1GLOBALL.NET Wednesday, November 3, 2011 Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel for Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001 Subject : Zion Nuclear Power Station Docket 50-295 License No DPR-48


==Dear Mr. Williamson,==
==Dear Mr. Williamson,==
Thank you for your recap and sense of direction as covered in your letter to us dated October 28, 2011. We will take the opportunity of reviewing the cited references provided in order to better acquaint our organization with the regulatory details contained in your summary.While we appreciate the outlined pathway in your letter of how the dedicated trust funds migrate from place to place and the descriptive words "held by" and "holder of" related to the operable dedicated trust funds, it isn't clear to us who these funds belong to?Is it the rate payers or in the present context the current licensee, a non-utility?Being a local stakeholder and having significant engagement in the Decommissioning process since 2007, we question the wisdom of the NRC regulations that might inform the public two years after the fact in biennial reports that significant amendment changes might have taken place in trust fund agreements or that the NRC subjectively made no objection.
 
Unfortunately, we did not see in the NRC system any notification by the licensee to the NRC as you cite by regulatory reference that they intended to appoint (move to) a trustee/ asset management elsewhere or that there were any proposed called out amendment changes to the previously standing trust agreements.
Thank you for your recap and sense of direction as covered in your letter to us dated October 28, 2011. We will take the opportunity of reviewing the cited references provided in order to better acquaint our organization with the regulatory details contained in your summary.
We have noted other notifications of draw downs of capital budgeted project matters based on the 30 day notice regulation.
While we appreciate the outlined pathway in your letter of how the dedicated trust funds migrate from place to place and the descriptive words "held by" and "holder of" related to the operable dedicated trust funds, it isn't clear to us who these funds belong to?
As perspective, during the NRC Decommissioning  
Is it the rate payers or in the present context the current licensee, a non-utility?
& License Transfer review period the then licensee (Exelon Generation LLC ) and the now present licensee (Zion Solutions LLC) indicated that the proposed decommissioning model as presented should be considered from a public perspective as a positive economic development prospect for the local economy. We concur and suggest as the capital funding of Trust Funds accumulated in the trust came from local rate paying sources entirely that economic development expenditures should remain in the local economy as a fundamental directive.
Being a local stakeholder and having significant engagement in the Decommissioning process since 2007, we question the wisdom of the NRC regulations that might inform the public two years after the fact in biennial reports that significant amendment changes might have taken place in trust fund agreements or that the NRC subjectively made no objection. Unfortunately, we did not see in the NRC system any notification by the licensee to the NRC as you cite by regulatory reference that they intended to appoint (move to) a trustee/ asset management elsewhere or that there were any proposed called out amendment changes to the previously standing trust agreements. We have noted other notifications of draw downs of capital budgeted project matters based on the 30 day notice regulation.
We find this isn't the case and up to 18 people lost their jobs or were marginalized by the dismissal of a local institution in moving trust assets/management  
As perspective, during the NRC Decommissioning & License Transfer review period the then licensee (Exelon Generation LLC ) and the now present licensee (Zion Solutions LLC) indicated that the proposed decommissioning model as presented should be considered from a public perspective as a positive economic development prospect for the local economy. We concur and suggest as the capital funding of Trust Funds accumulated in the trust came from local rate paying sources entirely that economic development expenditures should remain in the local economy as a fundamental directive. We find this isn't the case and up to 18 people lost their jobs or were marginalized by the dismissal of a local institution in moving trust assets/
/ administration to New York from Chicago.Social Purpose Driven Leadership It is clear that administrative control probably meets the test as being independent and also we gather as you indicate by your letter that the NRC made no objections (reading between the lines) and that no changes were made to the Trust Agreements other than minor changes. As the current licensee has represented at a recent publicly held meeting that these changes were made at the recommendation of outside investment management and as such and based on the logic of your letter that we are communicating about an apples to apples transfer, we can only conclude that the costs of the transaction do not fall in the category of radiological decommissioning costs nor are they ordinary administrative costs as they are redundant and unnecessary.
management / administration to New York from Chicago.
We are passing this view on for review and future consideration not with the idea of initiating corresponding debate.A declarative answer addressing who owns the Decommissioning Trust balances the rate payers or the non-utility licensee would be appreciated.
Social Purpose Driven Leadership
Thank you Sincerely Thomas P. Rielly Executive Principal Enclosed NRC letter dated October 28, 2011 Vista 3600 OFFICE OF GENERAL CO 0 UNITED STATES r 2NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 THE UNSEL October 28, 2011 Tom Reilly, Executive Principal Vista 3600 649 Innsbruck Liberty, IL 60048  
 
It is clear that administrative control probably meets the test as being independent and also we gather as you indicate by your letter that the NRC made no objections (reading between the lines) and that no changes were made to the Trust Agreements other than minor changes. As the current licensee has represented at a recent publicly held meeting that these changes were made at the recommendation of outside investment management and as such and based on the logic of your letter that we are communicating about an apples to apples transfer, we can only conclude that the costs of the transaction do not fall in the category of radiological decommissioning costs nor are they ordinary administrative costs as they are redundant and unnecessary. We are passing this view on for review and future consideration not with the idea of initiating corresponding debate.
A declarative answer addressing who owns the Decommissioning Trust balances the rate payers or the non-utility licensee would be appreciated.
Thank you Sincerely Thomas P. Rielly Executive Principal Enclosed NRC letter dated October 28, 2011 Vista 3600
 
0 r
2NUCLEAR UNITED STATES REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL CO UNSEL October 28, 2011 Tom Reilly, Executive Principal Vista 3600 649 Innsbruck Liberty, IL 60048


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION  
ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION


==Dear Mr. Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. Reilly:==
I am responding to your letter of September 2, 2011, wherein you requested information regarding the Zion nuclear power plant's decommissioning trust funds. You asked: 1. Who owns the Decommissioning Trust Fund balances, the rate-payers or the utility (licensee)?
 
I am responding to your letter of September 2, 2011, wherein you requested information regarding the Zion nuclear power plant's decommissioning trust funds. You asked:
: 1. Who owns the Decommissioning Trust Fund balances, the rate-payers or the utility (licensee)?
: 2. What legal authority does the current and new licensee, Zion Solutions LLC (not a public utility) have in unilaterally appointing and empowering a new trustee and then conveying Decommissioning Trust Fund balances accordingly?
: 2. What legal authority does the current and new licensee, Zion Solutions LLC (not a public utility) have in unilaterally appointing and empowering a new trustee and then conveying Decommissioning Trust Fund balances accordingly?
When the operating licenses for Zion Units 1 and 2 were transferred to Zion Solutions, the dedicated decommission trust funds were also conveyed.
When the operating licenses for Zion Units 1 and 2 were transferred to Zion Solutions, the dedicated decommission trust funds were also conveyed. Prior to the transfer, the funds were held by Exelon, the former owner of Zion. Now the trust funds are held by Zion Solutions.
Prior to the transfer, the funds were held by Exelon, the former owner of Zion. Now the trust funds are held by Zion Solutions.
However, NRC regulations place limitations on the use of the decommissioning funds. The restrictions include a requirement that the funds be held outside the administrative control of the licensee, and a prohibition against use of the funds for anything other than radiological decommissioning and ordinary administrative costs. These and other restrictions may be found in 10 C.F.R. (Code of Federal Regulations) §§ 50.75 and 50.82. There is also a regulatory guide, RG 1.159, that gives guidance regarding decommissioning funding. The current version of the regulatory guide, which will be updated, can be found on the NRC website.
However, NRC regulations place limitations on the use of the decommissioning funds. The restrictions include a requirement that the funds be held outside the administrative control of the licensee, and a prohibition against use of the funds for anything other than radiological decommissioning and ordinary administrative costs. These and other restrictions may be found in 10 C.F.R. (Code of Federal Regulations)  
The holder of the decommissioning trust funds is permitted to change the .trustee, but, under NRC regulations, a licensee that is not an electric utility as defined in 10 C.F.R. § 50.2 must notify the NRC in writing 30 working days prior to the change. In addition, the change cannot be made over NRC objection. See 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(h)(iii). Furthermore, any amendments to the trust agreement, other than minor changes, must be reported in the biennial decommissioning funding report.
§§ 50.75 and 50.82. There is also a regulatory guide, RG 1.159, that gives guidance regarding decommissioning funding. The current version of the regulatory guide, which will be updated, can be found on the NRC website.The holder of the decommissioning trust funds is permitted to change the .trustee, but, under NRC regulations, a licensee that is not an electric utility as defined in 10 C.F.R. § 50.2 must notify the NRC in writing 30 working days prior to the change. In addition, the change cannot be made over NRC objection.
 
See 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(h)(iii).
T. Reilly                                   If you have any additional questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this agency.
Furthermore, any amendments to the trust agreement, other than minor changes, must be reported in the biennial decommissioning funding report.
Sincerely, Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel For Operating Reactors Office of the General Counsel Docket No. 50-295 License No. DPR-48}}
T. Reilly If you have any additional questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this agency.Sincerely, Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel For Operating Reactors Office of the General Counsel Docket No. 50-295 License No. DPR-48}}

Latest revision as of 12:48, 12 November 2019

Letter from Thomas P. Rielly, Vista 360, to Edward L. Williamson, OGC, Regarding Zion Nuclear Power Station Decommissioning Trust Fund
ML11321A198
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/2011
From: Rielly T
Vista 360
To: Williamson E
NRC/OGC
References
Download: ML11321A198 (4)


Text

sta 36 o0 649 INNSBRUCK TEL: 847-680-o670 LERTYILE, B ILINOISý60048T690SCý

- FAX: 847-681-194o

  • E-MAIL: TR649@SB1GLOBALL.NET Wednesday, November 3, 2011 Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel for Operating Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001 Subject : Zion Nuclear Power Station Docket 50-295 License No DPR-48

Dear Mr. Williamson,

Thank you for your recap and sense of direction as covered in your letter to us dated October 28, 2011. We will take the opportunity of reviewing the cited references provided in order to better acquaint our organization with the regulatory details contained in your summary.

While we appreciate the outlined pathway in your letter of how the dedicated trust funds migrate from place to place and the descriptive words "held by" and "holder of" related to the operable dedicated trust funds, it isn't clear to us who these funds belong to?

Is it the rate payers or in the present context the current licensee, a non-utility?

Being a local stakeholder and having significant engagement in the Decommissioning process since 2007, we question the wisdom of the NRC regulations that might inform the public two years after the fact in biennial reports that significant amendment changes might have taken place in trust fund agreements or that the NRC subjectively made no objection. Unfortunately, we did not see in the NRC system any notification by the licensee to the NRC as you cite by regulatory reference that they intended to appoint (move to) a trustee/ asset management elsewhere or that there were any proposed called out amendment changes to the previously standing trust agreements. We have noted other notifications of draw downs of capital budgeted project matters based on the 30 day notice regulation.

As perspective, during the NRC Decommissioning & License Transfer review period the then licensee (Exelon Generation LLC ) and the now present licensee (Zion Solutions LLC) indicated that the proposed decommissioning model as presented should be considered from a public perspective as a positive economic development prospect for the local economy. We concur and suggest as the capital funding of Trust Funds accumulated in the trust came from local rate paying sources entirely that economic development expenditures should remain in the local economy as a fundamental directive. We find this isn't the case and up to 18 people lost their jobs or were marginalized by the dismissal of a local institution in moving trust assets/

management / administration to New York from Chicago.

Social Purpose Driven Leadership

It is clear that administrative control probably meets the test as being independent and also we gather as you indicate by your letter that the NRC made no objections (reading between the lines) and that no changes were made to the Trust Agreements other than minor changes. As the current licensee has represented at a recent publicly held meeting that these changes were made at the recommendation of outside investment management and as such and based on the logic of your letter that we are communicating about an apples to apples transfer, we can only conclude that the costs of the transaction do not fall in the category of radiological decommissioning costs nor are they ordinary administrative costs as they are redundant and unnecessary. We are passing this view on for review and future consideration not with the idea of initiating corresponding debate.

A declarative answer addressing who owns the Decommissioning Trust balances the rate payers or the non-utility licensee would be appreciated.

Thank you Sincerely Thomas P. Rielly Executive Principal Enclosed NRC letter dated October 28, 2011 Vista 3600

0 r

2NUCLEAR UNITED STATES REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL CO UNSEL October 28, 2011 Tom Reilly, Executive Principal Vista 3600 649 Innsbruck Liberty, IL 60048

SUBJECT:

ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Dear Mr. Reilly:

I am responding to your letter of September 2, 2011, wherein you requested information regarding the Zion nuclear power plant's decommissioning trust funds. You asked:

1. Who owns the Decommissioning Trust Fund balances, the rate-payers or the utility (licensee)?
2. What legal authority does the current and new licensee, Zion Solutions LLC (not a public utility) have in unilaterally appointing and empowering a new trustee and then conveying Decommissioning Trust Fund balances accordingly?

When the operating licenses for Zion Units 1 and 2 were transferred to Zion Solutions, the dedicated decommission trust funds were also conveyed. Prior to the transfer, the funds were held by Exelon, the former owner of Zion. Now the trust funds are held by Zion Solutions.

However, NRC regulations place limitations on the use of the decommissioning funds. The restrictions include a requirement that the funds be held outside the administrative control of the licensee, and a prohibition against use of the funds for anything other than radiological decommissioning and ordinary administrative costs. These and other restrictions may be found in 10 C.F.R. (Code of Federal Regulations) §§ 50.75 and 50.82. There is also a regulatory guide, RG 1.159, that gives guidance regarding decommissioning funding. The current version of the regulatory guide, which will be updated, can be found on the NRC website.

The holder of the decommissioning trust funds is permitted to change the .trustee, but, under NRC regulations, a licensee that is not an electric utility as defined in 10 C.F.R. § 50.2 must notify the NRC in writing 30 working days prior to the change. In addition, the change cannot be made over NRC objection. See 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(h)(iii). Furthermore, any amendments to the trust agreement, other than minor changes, must be reported in the biennial decommissioning funding report.

T. Reilly If you have any additional questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this agency.

Sincerely, Edward L. Williamson Assistant General Counsel For Operating Reactors Office of the General Counsel Docket No. 50-295 License No. DPR-48