ML12332A179: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12332A179
| number = ML12332A179
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| title = Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 - Power Point Presentation by Entergy at the November 26, 2012 Meeting (TAC No. ME9706.)
| title = Power Point Presentation by Entergy at the November 26, 2012 Meeting (TAC No. ME9706.)
| author name = Bice D B
| author name = Bice D
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| author affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| addressee name = Kalyanam N K
| addressee name = Kalyanam N
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| docket = 05000368
| docket = 05000368
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationNRC Public Meeting -November 26, 2012In advance of the AN O-2 re-submittal of its NFPA 805 application and as a follow-up to a public meeting held on October 9, 2012, Entergy requested an additional public meeting with the NRC in order to ensuregapswhichresultedinnon
{{#Wiki_filter:ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application NRC Public Meeting - November 26, 2012 In advance of the ANO-2 re-submittal of its NFPA 805 application and as a follow-up to a public meeting held on October 9, 2012, Entergy requested an additional public meeting with the NRC in order to ensure gaps which resulted in non-acceptance non acceptance of the previous ANO ANO-2 2 License Amendment Request (LAR) will be resolved appropriately.
-acceptanceofthepreviousANO
Agenda
-2 ensure gaps which resulted in non acceptance of the previous ANO 2 License Amendment Request (LAR) will be resolved appropriately.
: 1. Entergys proposed resolution to each of the previously identified gaps 2
Agenda1.Entergy's proposed resolution to each of the previously identified gaps 2Opendiscussion(followingeachresolutionpresentation) 2.Open discussion (following each resolution presentation)
: 2. Open discussion (following each resolution presentation)
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application*Variances from Deterministic Re q uirements (VFDRs) have been Issue #1 -Transition Riskq()identified and mapped to the respective probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) modeled equipment in order to determine the compliant case core damage frequency (CDF) and large early release frequency (LERF) for all scenarios in Fire Area G (including control room non-abandonment scenarios)
*TheVFDRsaddressthefollowingSafetyFunctions:
The VFDRs address the following Safety Functions:-Reactor Coolant System Pressure Control-Inventory-Decay Heat Removal
-Vital Auxiliaries -Electrical


-VitalAuxiliaries
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk
-ServiceWaterVital Auxiliaries Service Water-Vital Auxiliaries -Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #1 -Transition Risk (continued)*The Variant Case was calculated for these same scenarios by failing the equipment affected by fire and crediting a new Auxiliary Fdt(AFW)difitihihititdb (continued)
* Variances from Deterministic Requirements q            ((VFDRs)) have been identified and mapped to the respective probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) modeled equipment in order to determine the compliant case core damage frequency (CDF) and large early release frequency (LERF) for all scenarios in Fire Area G (including control room non-abandonment scenarios)
F ee d wa t er (AFW) pump mo difi ca ti on w hi c h i s no t i mpac t e d b y a fire in Fire Area G*The Com pliant Case was calculated b y settin g the e q ui p ment pygqpcredited for shutdown for a fire in Fire Area G to its random failure probability; no credit was taken for the new AFW pump
* The VFDRs address the following Safety Functions:
*DeltariskresultsfortheControlRoomAnalysis(resultshavenot
  - Reactor Coolant System Pressure Control
*Delta risk results for the Control Room Analysis (results have not yet been certified):-CDF   -(-7.40E-05/yr)-LERF -(-2.68E-06/yr)
   - Inventory
ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #1 -Transition Risk (continued)(continued)
  - Decay Heat Removal
OPEN DISCUSSION ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #2 -Sensitivity Analysis on the use of UnapprovedMethods Unapproved Methods Ufdthd(iltillftdl
  - Vital Auxiliaries - Electrical
*U se o f unapprove d me th o d s (i.e. e l ec t r i ca l pane l f ac t ors an d l ong term manual non-suppression probabilities) have been removed
  - Vital Auxiliaries - Service Water
  - Vital Auxiliaries - Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning


and replaced with approved methodologies*Detailed fire modeling has been performed on the affected areas*Use of new ignition frequencies from FAQ 08-0048 "Fire Ignition Frequency"wereapplied Frequency were applied ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #2 -Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)*The Sensitivity Analysis addresses:MltiCttAli/HtGL(MCA/HGL)ili
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk (continued)
-M u lti-C ompar t men t A na l ys i s / H o t G as L ayer (MCA/HGL) screen i ng ana l ys i s-Calculates new CDF/LERF values
* The Variant Case was calculated for these same scenarios by failing the equipment affected by fire and crediting a new Auxiliary F d t (AFW) pump modification Feedwater                    difi ti which hi h is i nott impacted i    t d by b a fire in Fire Area G
-Calculates new delta CDF/LERF values*Focused Scope Peer Review is near completion
* The Compliant p    Case was calculated by  y setting g the equipment q p credited for shutdown for a fire in Fire Area G to its random failure probability; no credit was taken for the new AFW pump
*ResultsoftheSensitivityAnalysis(resultshavenotyetbeencertified):
* Delta risk results for the Control Room Analysis (results have not yet been certified):
Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (results have not yet been certified):-New CDF -5.10E-05/yr (Fire CDF only, excludes internal events and other external events)
  - CDF - (-7.40E-05/yr)
*PreviouslysubmittedCDF
  - LERF - (-2.68E-06/yr)
-64E-05/yr(FireCDFonly)-New LERF -1.08E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)
 
Previously submitted CDF 6.4E 05/yr (Fire CDF only)*Previously submitted LERF -1.4E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk (continued)
ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #2 -Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)*Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (continued):-New Delta CDF   -(-4.28E-04/yr)-New Delta LERF -(-1.26E-05/yr)-MCA/HGL Analysis*New Scenarios with a larger zone of influence were developed and quantified after not screening-2109-U-B/C/D/E/F/G-2154-E*Sensitivity Analysis will become the Model of Record after submittal and prior to transition to NFPA-805 is complete ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #2 -Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)
OPEN DISCUSSION
OPEN DISCUSSION ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #3 -New Results could precipitate furtherchangestotheplantorPRA further changes to the plant or PRA *Two new Modifications proposed:-Incipient detection for Panel 2C75 in 2154-E (Fire Area B-4)-The Reactor Coolant System (RCS) head vent valves to preclude spuriousoperationinFireArea2199
 
-G(FireAreaG) spurious operation in Fire Area 2199 G (Fire Area G)*No new Recoveries were identified*No other changes to the Fire PRA model are anticipated ANO-2 NFPA 805 ApplicationIssue #3 -New Results could precipitate furtherchangestotheplantorPRA (continued) further changes to the plant or PRA OPEN DISCUSSION}}
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods
* U Use off unapprovedd methods th d (i (i.e. electrical l t i l panell ffactors t    and d llong term manual non-suppression probabilities) have been removed and replaced with approved methodologies
* Detailed fire modeling has been performed on the affected areas
* Use of new ignition frequencies from FAQ 08-0048 Fire Ignition Frequency were applied Frequency
 
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)
* The Sensitivity Analysis addresses:
  - Multi-Compartment M lti C       t     t Analysis A l i / HotH tG Gas Layer L     (MCA/HGL) screening i analysis l i
  - Calculates new CDF/LERF values
  - Calculates new delta CDF/LERF values
* Focused Scope Peer Review is near completion
* Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (results have not yet been certified):
  - New CDF - 5.10E-05/yr (Fire CDF only, excludes internal events and other external events)
* Previously submitted CDF - 6.4E 6 4E-05/yr 05/yr (Fire CDF only)
  - New LERF - 1.08E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)
* Previously submitted LERF - 1.4E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)
 
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)
* Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (continued):
  - New Delta CDF - (-4.28E-04/yr)
  - New Delta LERF - (-1.26E-05/yr)
  - MCA/HGL Analysis
* New Scenarios with a larger zone of influence were developed and quantified after not screening
      - 2109-U-B/C/D/E/F/G
      - 2154-E
* Sensitivity Analysis will become the Model of Record after submittal and prior to transition to NFPA-805 is complete
 
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)
OPEN DISCUSSION
 
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #3 - New Results could precipitate further changes to the plant or PRA
* Two new Modifications proposed:
  - Incipient detection for Panel 2C75 in 2154-E (Fire Area B-4)
  - The Reactor Coolant System (RCS) head vent valves to preclude spurious operation in Fire Area 2199-G 2199 G (Fire Area G)
* No new Recoveries were identified
* No other changes to the Fire PRA model are anticipated
 
ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #3 - New Results could precipitate further changes to the plant or PRA (continued)
OPEN DISCUSSION}}

Latest revision as of 20:45, 11 November 2019

Power Point Presentation by Entergy at the November 26, 2012 Meeting (TAC No. ME9706.)
ML12332A179
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: David Bice
Entergy Operations
To: Kalyanam N
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Kalyanam N
Shared Package
ML12332A172 List:
References
TAC ME9706
Download: ML12332A179 (10)


Text

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application NRC Public Meeting - November 26, 2012 In advance of the ANO-2 re-submittal of its NFPA 805 application and as a follow-up to a public meeting held on October 9, 2012, Entergy requested an additional public meeting with the NRC in order to ensure gaps which resulted in non-acceptance non acceptance of the previous ANO ANO-2 2 License Amendment Request (LAR) will be resolved appropriately.

Agenda

1. Entergys proposed resolution to each of the previously identified gaps 2
2. Open discussion (following each resolution presentation)

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk

  • Variances from Deterministic Requirements q ((VFDRs)) have been identified and mapped to the respective probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) modeled equipment in order to determine the compliant case core damage frequency (CDF) and large early release frequency (LERF) for all scenarios in Fire Area G (including control room non-abandonment scenarios)
  • The VFDRs address the following Safety Functions:

- Reactor Coolant System Pressure Control

- Inventory

- Decay Heat Removal

- Vital Auxiliaries - Electrical

- Vital Auxiliaries - Service Water

- Vital Auxiliaries - Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk (continued)

  • The Variant Case was calculated for these same scenarios by failing the equipment affected by fire and crediting a new Auxiliary F d t (AFW) pump modification Feedwater difi ti which hi h is i nott impacted i t d by b a fire in Fire Area G
  • The Compliant p Case was calculated by y setting g the equipment q p credited for shutdown for a fire in Fire Area G to its random failure probability; no credit was taken for the new AFW pump
  • Delta risk results for the Control Room Analysis (results have not yet been certified):

- CDF - (-7.40E-05/yr)

- LERF - (-2.68E-06/yr)

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #1 - Transition Risk (continued)

OPEN DISCUSSION

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods

  • U Use off unapprovedd methods th d (i (i.e. electrical l t i l panell ffactors t and d llong term manual non-suppression probabilities) have been removed and replaced with approved methodologies
  • Detailed fire modeling has been performed on the affected areas
  • Use of new ignition frequencies from FAQ 08-0048 Fire Ignition Frequency were applied Frequency

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)

  • The Sensitivity Analysis addresses:

- Multi-Compartment M lti C t t Analysis A l i / HotH tG Gas Layer L (MCA/HGL) screening i analysis l i

- Calculates new CDF/LERF values

- Calculates new delta CDF/LERF values

  • Focused Scope Peer Review is near completion
  • Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (results have not yet been certified):

- New CDF - 5.10E-05/yr (Fire CDF only, excludes internal events and other external events)

  • Previously submitted CDF - 6.4E 6 4E-05/yr 05/yr (Fire CDF only)

- New LERF - 1.08E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)

  • Previously submitted LERF - 1.4E-06/yr (Fire LERF only)

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)

  • Results of the Sensitivity Analysis (continued):

- New Delta CDF - (-4.28E-04/yr)

- New Delta LERF - (-1.26E-05/yr)

- MCA/HGL Analysis

  • New Scenarios with a larger zone of influence were developed and quantified after not screening

- 2109-U-B/C/D/E/F/G

- 2154-E

  • Sensitivity Analysis will become the Model of Record after submittal and prior to transition to NFPA-805 is complete

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #2 - Sensitivity Analysis on the use of Unapproved Methods (continued)

OPEN DISCUSSION

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #3 - New Results could precipitate further changes to the plant or PRA

  • Two new Modifications proposed:

- Incipient detection for Panel 2C75 in 2154-E (Fire Area B-4)

- The Reactor Coolant System (RCS) head vent valves to preclude spurious operation in Fire Area 2199-G 2199 G (Fire Area G)

  • No new Recoveries were identified
  • No other changes to the Fire PRA model are anticipated

ANO-2 NFPA 805 Application Issue #3 - New Results could precipitate further changes to the plant or PRA (continued)

OPEN DISCUSSION