|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 03/11/2013 | | | issue date = 03/11/2013 |
| | title = Extension Request - Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, Required Response 2, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report | | | title = Extension Request - Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, Required Response 2, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report |
| | author name = Kaegi G T | | | author name = Kaegi G |
| | author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC | | | author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Exelon Generation 10 CFR 50.54(f) | | {{#Wiki_filter:1 Exelon Generation 10 CFR 50.54(f) 10 RS-1 3-079 March 11, 2013 March U.S. Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Desk Washington, DC Washington, DC 20555 20555 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Dresden Station, Units 2 and 33 Renewed Facility Operating Renewed Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and and 50-249 50-249 |
| RS-1 3-079 March 11, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249 | |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Extension Request - Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information , Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, Required Response 2, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report | | Extension Request -- Response Extension Responseto toMarch March 12,12,2012, 2012, Request Requestfor forInformation Information Enclosure 2, Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding,Flooding, Required ResponseResponse2,2,Flooding Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report Report |
|
| |
|
| ==References:== | | ==References:== |
| | : 1. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Request Information Pursuant Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code Code of of Federal Federal 50.54(f) Regarding Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 2.1,2.3, and 9.3, 9.3, ofof the the Near-Term Near-Term Force Review Task Force Review of of Insights Insights from from the Fukushima FukushimaDai-ichi Dai-ichi Accident, dated dated March March 12, 12, 2012 |
| | : 2. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Prioritization PrioritizationofofResponse Response Due DatesDates for for Request Requestfor forInformation Information Pursuant Pursuant to Title Title 10 10 of of the the Code Code of of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendations Recommendations 2.1 2.1 of of the the Near-Term Near-Term Task TaskForce ForceReview Reviewof of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated May May 11, 2012 2012 |
| | : 3. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Supplemental Information Related to Request Supplemental Information Requestfor for Information Information Pursuant Pursuanttoto Title 10 of Title 10 of the the Code Code ofof Federal Regulations 50.54(f) 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Flooding HazardHazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 2.1 of of the the Near-Term Near-Term Task Task Force ForceReview Reviewof of Insights Insights from from the Fukushima Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 1, 2013 2013 |
| | : 4. Letter fromfrom Exelon Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), to U.S. Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission, "180-day Response to NRC Request Request for Information Information Pursuant to Pursuant to 10 10 CFR CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of RecommendationRecommendation 2.3 2.3 ofof the the Near-Term Near-Term Task Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", dated November November 27, 27, 2012 (RS-12-168) |
| | On March March 12,12, 2012, the NRC NRC issued issued Reference Reference11totorequest requestinformation information associated associatedwith withNear-Near-Term Task Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 for Flooding. |
| | 2.1 for One of Flooding. One of the the required required responses responses in in this letter directed licensees letter directed licenseestotosubmit submitaaHazard HazardReevaluation ReevaluationReport, Report,including includingthe theinterim interim plan requested in Item action plan Item 1.d of Reference 1, 1, Enclosure Enclosure 2, 2, ifif appropriate. |
| | appropriate. On On MayMay 11,11, 2012, 2012, the NRC NRC issued issuedthetheprioritization plan developed prioritization plan developed by bythe theNRC NRCand andresultant resultantFlooding FloodingHazard Hazard |
|
| |
|
| 1.NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2.NRC Letter, Prioritization of Response Due Dates for Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated May 11, 2012 3.NRC Letter, Supplemental Information Related to Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 1, 2013 4.Letter from Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "180-day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", dated November 27, 2012 (RS-12-168)
| | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. |
| On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to request information associated with Near-Term Task Force (NTTF)Recommendation 2.1 for Flooding. One of the required responses in this letter directed licensees to submit a Hazard Reevaluation Report, including the interim action plan requested in Item 1.d of Reference 1, Enclosure 2, if appropriate. On May 11, 2012, the NRC issued the prioritization plan developed by the NRC and resultant Flooding Hazard 1 Exelon Generation 10 CFR 50.54(f) March 11, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249
| | Flood Hazard Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, March 2013 11,2013 Page 2 Reevaluation due Reevaluation due dates for all all sites. |
| | sites. Reference Reference2,2,Enclosure Enclosure11identified identified the Dresden Dresden NuclearNuclear Station, Units Power Station, Units 22 and and 3 (DNPS) |
| | (DNPS) site site as aa Category Category 11 Site Site requiring requiring a Flooding Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report submittal due date date of of March March 12, 12, 2013. |
| | 2013. |
| | The purpose of of this letter is to to request an an extension extension to to the the scheduled scheduledsubmittal submittaldate datefor forthe the DNPS Flooding DNPS Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Report to May May 10, 2013. EGC EGCisisperforming performing aadetaileddetailed2D 2D model of model of the the flooding flooding hazard hazard forfor the the DNPS DNPS site, site, and additional time is required to complete the DNPS 2D DNPS 2D model, model, and the verification verification and and validation validation of of the the calculation calculation assumptions, assumptions, input input data, and results. This This request requestforforextension extensionaddresses addressesthe theNRCNRCstaffstaffpositions positionsprovided providedin in Reference 3. |
| | This extension request is justified on the following basis: basis: |
| | * As recognized in the NRC's March As March 2012 50.54(f) 50.54(f) letter, the current regulatory approach approach and the the resultant resultant plant plant capabilities capabilities provide provide confidence confidence that thatan anaccident accidentwith with consequences similar consequences similarto tothe theFukushima Fukushimaaccidentaccidentisisunlikely unlikelyto tooccur occurininthetheUnited United States, andand that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk topublic that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk to public health and safety. Therefore, Therefore, the theduration duration of of this extension requestrequest hashasno noimpact impact on on safe plant operation. |
| | * The DNPS DNPS recently recently completed completedwalkdownswalkdownswhich whichverified verifieditsitscurrent currentflooding floodinglicensing licensing basis (Reference (Reference 4). 4). The TheDNPSDNPScurrentcurrentlicensing licensing basis basisisisbeing being met. |
| | met. Therefore, Therefore,DNPS DNPS is protected from from current current design design basis flood events. |
| | * The events events being being analyzed analyzed in in the the DNPS DNPS Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Reevaluation are are beyond beyondthe the plant's design and licensing licensing basis. Therefore, Therefore, the the reevaluation reevaluation results based based on on beyond design basis basis events events do donotnot constitute constitute an an operability operability concern. This This isis consistent consistent with the with the NRC NRC supplemental supplemental information letter dated information letter dated March March 1,2013 1, 2013 (Reference 3). 3). |
| | * The reevaluated reevaluated flooding flooding hazard hazard(Probable (ProbableMaximum MaximumFlood Flood(PMF)) |
| | (PMF)) isisaavery verylow low probabilityevent, probability event, and and the the time time frame frame represented represented by the extension request request would would resultresult in an insignificant in contribution to insignificant contribution to the the overall overall risk. |
| | risk. The PMFPMF event event at at DNPS DNPSisis considered to have have aavery very lowlow likelihood likelihood of of occurrence. |
| | occurrence. The water water surface surface elevation elevation (WSE) was (WSE) was estimated to to be be below below 513 513 ft. |
| | ft. with with a return period of 1000 years, which which demonstrates demonstrates considerable considerablemargin marginfrom from the the plant plant grade gradeof of 517 517 ft. |
| | ft. and and even even moremorefrom from the design design basis basisPMFPMF WSE WSE of of 528 528 ftft (with wind-generated waves). |
| | (with wind-generated waves). The The data dataisis consistent consistent with with a recent recent Army Army Corps of of Engineers Engineers (ALOE)(ACOE) study that supports supports the the conclusion that the frequency frequency of of occurrence occurrence of of the the PMF PMF at at the the DNPS DNPS site siteisisvery verylow.low. |
| | Furthermore, the frequency estimates Furthermore, estimates used usedin in this this ACOE ACOE analysis were were expressed expressedinin terms of of `annual |
| | 'annual exceedance exceedanceprobability'. |
| | probability'. While historical records While historical records indicate that instantaneous instantaneous annual annual peak peakflowsflows frequently frequently occur in in the spring months, annual peaks peaks from the summer and early from the early fall months are also included fall months included in the estimate. This Thiswouldwould result in the exceedance in the exceedance probability probability for for the the requested extension extension period period being being eveneven lessless when compared to the annual exceedance. exceedance. |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:==
| | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Flood Report March 11, 2013 11,2013 Page 3 |
| Extension Request -Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, Required Response 2, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report
| | * The following floodhazard following flood hazardmitigation mitigationinterim interimactions actionshave havebeen been taken taken at the DNPS site beyond those required by the current design basis: |
| | | Enhanced river river and and rainfall rainfall forecasting information information in flood flood emergency emergency procedures Installed river level markers to support enhancements to procedures Installed permanent floodflood barriers to protect the isolation condenser condenser makeup makeup pump building Mobilized floatable Mobilized floatable platform platform to to raise raise diesel driven driven pump pump Acquired Aqua Dam (portable dam) to protect Acquired protect power power block block toto elevation elevation 523 523ft. |
| ==References:==
| | ft. |
| : 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1,2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2. NRC Letter, Prioritization of Response Due Dates for Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated May 11, 2012 3. NRC Letter, Supplemental Information Related to Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 1, 2013 4. Letter from Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "180-day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", dated November 27, 2012 (RS-12-168)
| | MSL These actions These actionsprovide provideaasufficient sufficientlevel level of of flood flood hazard hazard protection protectionfor for the theperiod periodofofthe the extension request. No Noadditional additionalflood flood hazard hazard mitigation mitigation or protection actions beyond those identified those identified above are warranted for for the period of the extension request. request. |
| On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to request information associated with Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 for Flooding.
| | Based on the above determinations, determinations, EGCEGC has has concluded concluded that that the the requested requestedextension extensiontotothethe scheduled submittal date for submittal date for the DNPS Flooding ON PS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report does not impact does not impact safe plant plant operation or represent represent an an undue undueriskrisktoto public public health health and and safety. |
| One of the required responses in this letter directed licensees to submit a Hazard Reevaluation Report, including the interim action plan requested in Item 1.d of Reference 1, Enclosure 2, if appropriate.
| | safety.Accordingly, Accordingly, EGC EGC requests NRC requests NRC approval to extend the the scheduled scheduledsubmittal submittal datedatefor for the theDNPS DNPS Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Report to to May May 10, 2013. |
| On May 11, 2012, the NRC issued the prioritization plan developed by the NRC and resultant Flooding Hazard 1 Exelon Generation 10 CFR 50.54(f) March 11, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249
| | 2013. |
| | | A list of regulatory commitments contained in this letter is provided in A in Enclosure Enclosure 1. 1. |
| ==Subject:==
| | If you regarding this you have any questions regarding this submittal, submittal, please please contact Ron Gaston at contact Ron (630) 657-3359. |
| Extension Request -Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, Required Response 2, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report
| | II declare declare under penalty penalty of of perjury perjury that the foregoing foregoing is is true true and andcorrect. |
| | | correct.Executed Executedon onthe the11th 11 th day of March 2013. |
| ==References:==
| | Respectfully submitted, Glen T. Kaegi Director -- Licensing & Regulatory Director Regul* tory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, Company, LLC LLC |
| : 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1,2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2. NRC Letter, Prioritization of Response Due Dates for Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated May 11, 2012 3. NRC Letter, Supplemental Information Related to Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 1, 2013 4. Letter from Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "180-day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", dated November 27, 2012 (RS-12-168)
| |
| On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to request information associated with Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 for Flooding.
| |
| One of the required responses in this letter directed licensees to submit a Hazard Reevaluation Report, including the interim action plan requested in Item 1.d of Reference 1, Enclosure 2, if appropriate.
| |
| On May 11, 2012, the NRC issued the prioritization plan developed by the NRC and resultant Flooding Hazard U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, 2013 Page 2 Reevaluation due dates for all sites. Reference 2, Enclosure 1 identified the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (DNPS) site as a Category 1 Site requiring a Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report submittal due date of March 12, 2013.
| |
| The purpose of this letter is to request an extension to the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. EGC is performing a detailed 2D model of the flooding hazard for the DNPS site, and additional time is required to complete the
| |
| | |
| DNPS 2D model, and the verification and validation of the calculation assumptions, input data, and results. This request for extension addresses the NRC staff positions provided in Reference 3.
| |
| This extension request is justified on the following basis:As recognized in the NRC's March 2012 50.54(f) letter, the current regulatory approach and the resultant plant capabilities provide confidence that an accident with consequences similar to the Fukushima accident is unlikely to occur in the United States, and that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk to public
| |
| | |
| health and safety. Therefore, the duration of this extension request has no impact on safe plant operation.The DNPS recently completed walkdowns which verified its current flooding licensing basis (Reference 4). The DNPS current licensing basis is being met. Therefore, DNPS is protected from current design basis flood events.
| |
| The events being analyzed in the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation are beyond the plant's design and licensing basis. Therefore, the reevaluation results based on beyond design basis events do not constitute an operability concern. This is consistent with the NRC supplemental information letter dated March 1, 2013 (Reference 3).
| |
| The reevaluated flooding hazard (Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)) is a very low probability event, and the time frame represented by the extension request would result in an insignificant contribution to the overall risk. The PMF event at DNPS is considered to have a very low likelihood of occurrence. The water surface elevation (WSE) was estimated to be below 513 ft. with a return period of 1000 years, which demonstrates considerable margin from the plant grade of 517 ft. and even more from the design basis PMF WSE of 528 ft (with wind-generated waves). The data is consistent with a recent Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE) study that supports the conclusion that the frequency of occurrence of the PMF at the DNPS site is very low.
| |
| Furthermore, the frequency estimates used in this ACOE analysis were expressed in terms of `annual exceedance probability'.
| |
| While historical records indicate that instantaneous annual peak flows frequently occur in the spring months, annual peaks from the summer and early fall months are also included in the estimate. This would result in the exceedance probability for the requested extension period being even less when compared to the annual exceedance.
| |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 2 Reevaluation due dates for all sites. Reference 2, Enclosure 1 identified the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (DNPS) site as a Category 1 Site requiring a Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report submittal due date of March 12, 2013. The purpose of this letter is to request an extension to the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. EGC is performing a detailed 2D model of the flooding hazard for the DNPS site, and additional time is required to complete the DNPS 2D model, and the verification and validation of the calculation assumptions, input data, and results. This request for extension addresses the NRC staff positions provided in Reference
| |
| : 3. This extension request is justified on the following basis:
| |
| * As recognized in the NRC's March 2012 50.54(f) letter, the current regulatory approach and the resultant plant capabilities provide confidence that an accident with consequences similar to the Fukushima accident is unlikely to occur in the United States, and that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk to public health and safety. Therefore, the duration of this extension request has no impact on safe plant operation.
| |
| * The DNPS recently completed walkdowns which verified its current flooding licensing basis (Reference 4). The DNPS current licensing basis is being met. Therefore, DNPS is protected from current design basis flood events.
| |
| * The events being analyzed in the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation are beyond the plant's design and licensing basis. Therefore, the reevaluation results based on beyond design basis events do not constitute an operability concern. This is consistent with the NRC supplemental information letter dated March 1,2013 (Reference 3).
| |
| * The reevaluated flooding hazard (Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)) is a very low probability event, and the time frame represented by the extension request would result in an insignificant contribution to the overall risk. The PMF event at DNPS is considered to have a very low likelihood of occurrence. | |
| The water surface elevation (WSE) was estimated to be below 513 ft. with a return period of 1000 years, which demonstrates considerable margin from the plant grade of 517 ft. and even more from the design basis PMF WSE of 528 ft (with wind-generated waves). The data is consistent with a recent Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) study that supports the conclusion that the frequency of occurrence of the PMF at the DNPS site is very low. Furthermore, the frequency estimates used in this ACOE analysis were expressed in terms of 'annual exceedance probability'.
| |
| While historical records indicate that instantaneous annual peak flows frequently occur in the spring months, annual peaks from the summer and early fall months are also included in the estimate.
| |
| This would result in the exceedance probability for the requested extension period being even less when compared to the annual exceedance.
| |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 2 Reevaluation due dates for all sites. Reference 2, Enclosure 1 identified the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (DNPS) site as a Category 1 Site requiring a Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report submittal due date of March 12, 2013. The purpose of this letter is to request an extension to the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. EGC is performing a detailed 2D model of the flooding hazard for the DNPS site, and additional time is required to complete the DNPS 2D model, and the verification and validation of the calculation assumptions, input data, and results. This request for extension addresses the NRC staff positions provided in Reference
| |
| : 3. This extension request is justified on the following basis:
| |
| * As recognized in the NRC's March 2012 50.54(f) letter, the current regulatory approach and the resultant plant capabilities provide confidence that an accident with consequences similar to the Fukushima accident is unlikely to occur in the United States, and that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk to public health and safety. Therefore, the duration of this extension request has no impact on safe plant operation.
| |
| * The DNPS recently completed walkdowns which verified its current flooding licensing basis (Reference 4). The DNPS current licensing basis is being met. Therefore, DNPS is protected from current design basis flood events.
| |
| * The events being analyzed in the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation are beyond the plant's design and licensing basis. Therefore, the reevaluation results based on beyond design basis events do not constitute an operability concern. This is consistent with the NRC supplemental information letter dated March 1,2013 (Reference 3).
| |
| * The reevaluated flooding hazard (Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)) is a very low probability event, and the time frame represented by the extension request would result in an insignificant contribution to the overall risk. The PMF event at DNPS is considered to have a very low likelihood of occurrence.
| |
| The water surface elevation (WSE) was estimated to be below 513 ft. with a return period of 1000 years, which demonstrates considerable margin from the plant grade of 517 ft. and even more from the design basis PMF WSE of 528 ft (with wind-generated waves). The data is consistent with a recent Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) study that supports the conclusion that the frequency of occurrence of the PMF at the DNPS site is very low. Furthermore, the frequency estimates used in this ACOE analysis were expressed in terms of 'annual exceedance probability'.
| |
| While historical records indicate that instantaneous annual peak flows frequently occur in the spring months, annual peaks from the summer and early fall months are also included in the estimate.
| |
| This would result in the exceedance probability for the requested extension period being even less when compared to the annual exceedance.
| |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, 2013 Page 3 The following flood hazard mitigation interim actions have been taken at the DNPS site beyond those required by the current design basis:
| |
| Enhanced river and rainfall forecasting information in flood emergency procedures Installed river level markers to support enhancements to procedures Installed permanent flood barriers to protect the isolation condenser makeup pump building Mobilized floatable platform to raise diesel driven pump Acquired Aqua Dam (portable dam) to protect power block to elevation 523 ft. | |
| MSL These actions provide a sufficient level of flood hazard protection for the period of the extension request. No additional flood hazard mitigation or protection actions beyond those identified above are warranted for the period of the extension request. | |
| Based on the above determinations, EGC has concluded that the requested extension to the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report does not impact | |
| | |
| safe plant operation or represent an undue risk to public health and safety. Accordingly, EGC requests NRC approval to extend the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. | |
| A list of regulatory commitments contained in this letter is provided in Enclosure 1. | |
| If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ron Gaston at (630) 657-3359. | |
| I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 11th day of March 2013.
| |
| Respectfully submitted, Glen T. Kaegi Director - Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosure:== | | ==Enclosure:== |
| | : 1. Summary of Regulatory Commitments Commitments |
|
| |
|
| 1.Summary of Regulatory Commitments U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 3
| | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Flood March 11, March 2013 11,2013 Page 4 cc: Director, Office Director, Officeof of Nuclear Nuclear Reactor Reactor Regulation Regional Administrator Administrator -- NRC NRC Region RegionIII III NRC Senior NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden DresdenNuclear NuclearPower PowerStation Station NRC Project NRC Project Manager, NRR - Dresden Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Station Station Ms. Jessica Ms. Jessica A. |
| * The following flood hazard mitigation interim actions have been taken at the DNPS site beyond those required by the current design basis: Enhanced river and rainfall forecasting information in flood emergency procedures Installed river level markers to support enhancements to procedures Installed permanent flood barriers to protect the isolation condenser makeup pump building Mobilized floatable platform to raise diesel driven pump Acquired Aqua Dam (portable dam) to protect power block to elevation 523 ft. MSL These actions provide a sufficient level of flood hazard protection for the period of the extension request. No additional flood hazard mitigation or protection actions beyond those identified above are warranted for the period of the extension request. Based on the above determinations, EGC has concluded that the requested extension to the scheduled submittal date for the ON PS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report does not impact safe plant operation or represent an undue risk to public health and safety. Accordingly, EGC requests NRC approval to extend the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. A list of regulatory commitments contained in this letter is provided in Enclosure
| | A. Kratchman, Kratchman,NRR/JLD/PMB, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRCNRC Mr. Eric Mr. Eric E. |
| : 1. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ron Gaston at (630) 657-3359.
| | E. Bowman, NRR/DPR/PGCB, NRC NRC or or Ms. |
| I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 11 th day of March 2013. Respectfully submitted, Glen T. Kaegi Director -Licensing
| | Ms. Eileen Eileen M. |
| & Regul* tory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC
| | M. McKenna, McKenna, NRO/DSRAlBPTS, NRO/DSRA/BPTS, NRC NRC Illinois Emergency Illinois Emergency Management Management Agency Agency --Division Division of Nuclear Safety Safety |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosure:==
| | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. |
| : 1. Summary of Regulatory Commitments U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 3
| | Flood Hazard Flood Hazard Reevaluation Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 March 11, 2013 Page 11 Enclosure 11 Enclosure REGULATORY COMMITMENTS |
| * The following flood hazard mitigation interim actions have been taken at the DNPS site beyond those required by the current design basis: Enhanced river and rainfall forecasting information in flood emergency procedures Installed river level markers to support enhancements to procedures Installed permanent flood barriers to protect the isolation condenser makeup pump building Mobilized floatable platform to raise diesel driven pump Acquired Aqua Dam (portable dam) to protect power block to elevation 523 ft. MSL These actions provide a sufficient level of flood hazard protection for the period of the extension request. No additional flood hazard mitigation or protection actions beyond those identified above are warranted for the period of the extension request. Based on the above determinations, EGC has concluded that the requested extension to the scheduled submittal date for the ON PS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report does not impact safe plant operation or represent an undue risk to public health and safety. Accordingly, EGC requests NRC approval to extend the scheduled submittal date for the DNPS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report to May 10, 2013. A list of regulatory commitments contained in this letter is provided in Enclosure
| |
| : 1. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ron Gaston at (630) 657-3359.
| |
| I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 11 th day of March 2013. Respectfully submitted, Glen T. Kaegi Director -Licensing
| |
| & Regul* tory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC
| |
| | |
| ==Enclosure:==
| |
| : 1. Summary of Regulatory Commitments U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, 2013 Page 4 cc:Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
| | |
| Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Project Manager, NRR - Dresden Nuclear Power Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC
| |
| | |
| Mr. Eric E. Bowman, NRR/DPR/PGCB, NRC or Ms. Eileen M. McKenna, NRO/DSRA/BPTS, NRC Illinois Emergency Management Agency - Division of Nuclear Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 4 cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Regional Administrator
| |
| -NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector
| |
| -Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Project Manager, NRR -Dresden Nuclear Power Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Eric E. Bowman, NRR/DPR/PGCB, NRC or Ms. Eileen M. McKenna, NRO/DSRAlBPTS, NRC Illinois Emergency Management Agency -Division of Nuclear Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 4 cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Regional Administrator
| |
| -NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector
| |
| -Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Project Manager, NRR -Dresden Nuclear Power Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Eric E. Bowman, NRR/DPR/PGCB, NRC or Ms. Eileen M. McKenna, NRO/DSRAlBPTS, NRC Illinois Emergency Management Agency -Division of Nuclear Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, 2013 Page 1 Enclosure 1
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies commitments made in this document. (Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions. They are described to the NRC for the NRC's information and are not regulatory commitments.)
| |
| COMMITTED COMMITMENT TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC"OUTAGE" (Yes/No)(Yes/No)Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and May 10, 2013 Yes No 3 will submit the Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report, including interim action plan, requested in Item 1.d of Enclosure 2 of NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012.
| |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 1 Enclosure 1
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies commitments made in this document. (Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions. They are described to the NRC for the NRC's information and are not regulatory commitments.)
| |
| COMMITTED COMMITMENT TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC "OUTAGE" (Yes/No) (Yes/No) Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and May 10, 2013 Yes No 3 will submit the Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report, including interim action plan, requested in Item 1.d of Enclosure 2 of NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 Page 1 Enclosure 1
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUMMARY== | | ==SUMMARY== |
| OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies commitments made in this document. (Any other actions discussed in the submittal represent intended or planned actions. They are described to the NRC for the NRC's information and are not regulatory commitments.) | | OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies following table identifiescommitments commitmentsmademade ininthis thisdocument. |
| COMMITTED COMMITMENT TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC "OUTAGE" (Yes/No) (Yes/No) Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and May 10, 2013 Yes No 3 will submit the Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report, including interim action plan, requested in Item 1.d of Enclosure 2 of NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012.}} | | document. (Any (Any other actions discussed discussed in in the the submittal submittal represent represent intended intended oror planned planned actions. They are actions. They are described described to to the the NRC NRC for for the NRC's information information and are are not not regulatory regulatory commitments.) |
| | commitments.) |
| | COMMITTED COMMITMENT TYPE TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC PROGRAMMATIC "OUTAGE" (Yes/No) (Yes/No) |
| | Dresden Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Station, Units Units 2 and May May 10, 2013 Yes No 3 will submit the Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report, including interim action plan, requested in Item 1.d of Enclosure Enclosure 2 of NRC Letter, Request Request for Information Information Pursuant to Title 1010 of of the Code Code ofof Federal Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights Insights from the Fukushima Fukushima Dai-ichi Dai-ichi Accident, Accident, dated dated March 12, 2012.}} |
|
---|
Category:Letter type:RS
MONTHYEARRS-23-121, Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program2023-11-30030 November 2023 Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program RS-23-119, Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information2023-11-10010 November 2023 Supplemental Information Letter for Part 73 Exemption Request - Responses to Request for Confirmatory Information RS-23-107, Relief Request I5R-22, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval2023-11-0808 November 2023 Relief Request I5R-22, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-23-102, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-10-16016 October 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation RS-23-097, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2023-10-12012 October 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans RS-23-071, Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR2023-08-30030 August 2023 Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR RS-23-080, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs2023-08-30030 August 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs RS-23-077, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-16016 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations RS-23-078, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times2023-06-16016 June 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times RS-23-042, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2023-05-25025 May 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling RS-23-070, Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel2023-05-16016 May 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel RS-23-057, Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel2023-04-17017 April 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel RS-23-049, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2023-03-23023 March 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations RS-23-041, Response to Request for Additional Information for Alternative Request RV-23H2023-03-14014 March 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information for Alternative Request RV-23H RS-23-045, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Submittal of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Reports for 2022 Per 10 CFR 26.717(c) & 10 CFR 26.2032023-02-28028 February 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Submittal of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Reports for 2022 Per 10 CFR 26.717(c) & 10 CFR 26.203 RS-23-003, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Summary of Changes to Quality Assurance Topical Report, NO-AA-10, and Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, NO-DC-102023-01-31031 January 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Summary of Changes to Quality Assurance Topical Report, NO-AA-10, and Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, NO-DC-10 RS-23-004, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel License Amendment Request2023-01-23023 January 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel License Amendment Request RS-22-126, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Request to Use Provisions of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI2022-11-30030 November 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Request to Use Provisions of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI RS-22-121, Notice of Intent to Pursue Subsequent License Renewal Applications2022-11-0909 November 2022 Notice of Intent to Pursue Subsequent License Renewal Applications RS-22-117, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies2022-11-0303 November 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request Regarding New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies RS-22-116, Submittal of Relief Requests Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval2022-11-0101 November 2022 Submittal of Relief Requests Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval RS-22-115, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2022-10-19019 October 2022 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors RS-22-092, Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration2022-10-0303 October 2022 Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration RS-22-066, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times2022-08-25025 August 2022 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scram Times RS-22-065, License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel2022-08-18018 August 2022 License Amendment Request Regarding Transition to GNF3 Fuel RS-22-093, Advisement of Leadership Changes for Constellation Energy Generation, LLC and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2022-08-18018 August 2022 Advisement of Leadership Changes for Constellation Energy Generation, LLC and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans RS-22-101, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Relief Request I6R-01 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval2022-08-10010 August 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Relief Request I6R-01 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-22-099, Submittal of Upcoming Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Requests I6R-09 and I6R-102022-07-19019 July 2022 Submittal of Upcoming Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Requests I6R-09 and I6R-10 RS-22-082, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 112022-06-22022 June 2022 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 11 RS-22-080, Withdrawal and Proposed Alternative I6R-08 Associated with Code Case N-921 for Sixth Inservice Inspection Intervals2022-06-0909 June 2022 Withdrawal and Proposed Alternative I6R-08 Associated with Code Case N-921 for Sixth Inservice Inspection Intervals RS-22-064, License Amendment Request Regarding New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies with Proposed Change to Technical Specifications Section 4.3.12022-06-0808 June 2022 License Amendment Request Regarding New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies with Proposed Change to Technical Specifications Section 4.3.1 RS-22-051, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Update to Correspondence Addressees and Service Lists2022-04-12012 April 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Update to Correspondence Addressees and Service Lists RS-22-049, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Supplemental Information to Correct Typographical Errors in Constellation'S Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541 Revision 2, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for2022-04-0404 April 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Supplemental Information to Correct Typographical Errors in Constellation'S Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541 Revision 2, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for V RS-22-046, Relief Requests Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval2022-03-25025 March 2022 Relief Requests Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-22-045, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-25025 March 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations RS-22-042, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Shutdown Reactors2022-03-23023 March 2022 Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Shutdown Reactors RS-22-027, Constellation, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541 Revision 2, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated2022-02-23023 February 2022 Constellation, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541 Revision 2, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated P RS-22-023, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Executed Trust Fund Agreement Amendment and Subordinate Trust Agreement2022-02-23023 February 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Executed Trust Fund Agreement Amendment and Subordinate Trust Agreement RS-22-019, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Update to Correspondence Addressees and Service Lists2022-02-16016 February 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Update to Correspondence Addressees and Service Lists RS-22-015, Notification of Completion of License Transfer and Request to Continue Processing Pending NRC Actions Previously Requested by Exelon Generation Company, LLC2022-02-0101 February 2022 Notification of Completion of License Transfer and Request to Continue Processing Pending NRC Actions Previously Requested by Exelon Generation Company, LLC RS-21-009, Proposed Relief Request Associated with Code Case N-9212022-01-18018 January 2022 Proposed Relief Request Associated with Code Case N-921 RS-22-004, Supplement to Application to Adopt TSTF-554, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements2022-01-0404 January 2022 Supplement to Application to Adopt TSTF-554, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements RS-21-121, Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements and Master Terms2021-12-15015 December 2021 Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements and Master Terms RS-21-114, Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b)2021-10-28028 October 2021 Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) RS-21-110, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2021-10-19019 October 2021 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors RS-21-103, Updated Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations for Byron Station and Dresden Nuclear Power Station2021-09-28028 September 2021 Updated Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations for Byron Station and Dresden Nuclear Power Station RS-21-097, Withdrawal of Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and Previously Submitted Licensing Actions in Support of Decommissioning2021-09-15015 September 2021 Withdrawal of Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and Previously Submitted Licensing Actions in Support of Decommissioning RS-21-091, Implementation of Insider Threat Program Requirements Associated with the Voluntary Security Clearance Program and Advisement of Leadership Changes2021-09-13013 September 2021 Implementation of Insider Threat Program Requirements Associated with the Voluntary Security Clearance Program and Advisement of Leadership Changes RS-21-086, Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E2021-08-23023 August 2021 Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E RS-21-078, Response to Request for Additional Information for Application to Revise Technical Specification to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements, and TSTF-583-T, TSTF-582 Diesel2021-08-19019 August 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information for Application to Revise Technical Specification to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements, and TSTF-583-T, TSTF-582 Diesel 2023-08-30
[Table view] |
Text
1 Exelon Generation 10 CFR 50.54(f) 10 RS-1 3-079 March 11, 2013 March U.S. Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Desk Washington, DC Washington, DC 20555 20555 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Dresden Station, Units 2 and 33 Renewed Facility Operating Renewed Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and and 50-249 50-249
Subject:
Extension Request -- Response Extension Responseto toMarch March 12,12,2012, 2012, Request Requestfor forInformation Information Enclosure 2, Enclosure 2, Recommendation 2.1, Flooding,Flooding, Required ResponseResponse2,2,Flooding Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report Report
References:
- 1. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Request Information Pursuant Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code Code of of Federal Federal 50.54(f) Regarding Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 2.1,2.3, and 9.3, 9.3, ofof the the Near-Term Near-Term Force Review Task Force Review of of Insights Insights from from the Fukushima FukushimaDai-ichi Dai-ichi Accident, dated dated March March 12, 12, 2012
- 2. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Prioritization PrioritizationofofResponse Response Due DatesDates for for Request Requestfor forInformation Information Pursuant Pursuant to Title Title 10 10 of of the the Code Code of of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendations Recommendations 2.1 2.1 of of the the Near-Term Near-Term Task TaskForce ForceReview Reviewof of Insights From the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated May May 11, 2012 2012
- 3. NRC NRC Letter, Letter, Supplemental Information Related to Request Supplemental Information Requestfor for Information Information Pursuant Pursuanttoto Title 10 of Title 10 of the the Code Code ofof Federal Regulations 50.54(f) 50.54(f) Regarding Flooding Flooding HazardHazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 2.1 of of the the Near-Term Near-Term Task Task Force ForceReview Reviewof of Insights Insights from from the Fukushima Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 1, 2013 2013
- 4. Letter fromfrom Exelon Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), to U.S. Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission, "180-day Response to NRC Request Request for Information Information Pursuant to Pursuant to 10 10 CFR CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of RecommendationRecommendation 2.3 2.3 ofof the the Near-Term Near-Term Task Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", dated November November 27, 27, 2012 (RS-12-168)
On March March 12,12, 2012, the NRC NRC issued issued Reference Reference11totorequest requestinformation information associated associatedwith withNear-Near-Term Task Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 for Flooding.
2.1 for One of Flooding. One of the the required required responses responses in in this letter directed licensees letter directed licenseestotosubmit submitaaHazard HazardReevaluation ReevaluationReport, Report,including includingthe theinterim interim plan requested in Item action plan Item 1.d of Reference 1, 1, Enclosure Enclosure 2, 2, ifif appropriate.
appropriate. On On MayMay 11,11, 2012, 2012, the NRC NRC issued issuedthetheprioritization plan developed prioritization plan developed by bythe theNRC NRCand andresultant resultantFlooding FloodingHazard Hazard
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.
Flood Hazard Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report March 11, March 2013 11,2013 Page 2 Reevaluation due Reevaluation due dates for all all sites.
sites. Reference Reference2,2,Enclosure Enclosure11identified identified the Dresden Dresden NuclearNuclear Station, Units Power Station, Units 22 and and 3 (DNPS)
(DNPS) site site as aa Category Category 11 Site Site requiring requiring a Flooding Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report submittal due date date of of March March 12, 12, 2013.
2013.
The purpose of of this letter is to to request an an extension extension to to the the scheduled scheduledsubmittal submittaldate datefor forthe the DNPS Flooding DNPS Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Report to May May 10, 2013. EGC EGCisisperforming performing aadetaileddetailed2D 2D model of model of the the flooding flooding hazard hazard forfor the the DNPS DNPS site, site, and additional time is required to complete the DNPS 2D DNPS 2D model, model, and the verification verification and and validation validation of of the the calculation calculation assumptions, assumptions, input input data, and results. This This request requestforforextension extensionaddresses addressesthe theNRCNRCstaffstaffpositions positionsprovided providedin in Reference 3.
This extension request is justified on the following basis: basis:
- As recognized in the NRC's March As March 2012 50.54(f) 50.54(f) letter, the current regulatory approach approach and the the resultant resultant plant plant capabilities capabilities provide provide confidence confidence that thatan anaccident accidentwith with consequences similar consequences similarto tothe theFukushima Fukushimaaccidentaccidentisisunlikely unlikelyto tooccur occurininthetheUnited United States, andand that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk topublic that continued plant operation does not pose an imminent risk to public health and safety. Therefore, Therefore, the theduration duration of of this extension requestrequest hashasno noimpact impact on on safe plant operation.
- The DNPS DNPS recently recently completed completedwalkdownswalkdownswhich whichverified verifieditsitscurrent currentflooding floodinglicensing licensing basis (Reference (Reference 4). 4). The TheDNPSDNPScurrentcurrentlicensing licensing basis basisisisbeing being met.
met. Therefore, Therefore,DNPS DNPS is protected from from current current design design basis flood events.
- The events events being being analyzed analyzed in in the the DNPS DNPS Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Reevaluation are are beyond beyondthe the plant's design and licensing licensing basis. Therefore, Therefore, the the reevaluation reevaluation results based based on on beyond design basis basis events events do donotnot constitute constitute an an operability operability concern. This This isis consistent consistent with the with the NRC NRC supplemental supplemental information letter dated information letter dated March March 1,2013 1, 2013 (Reference 3). 3).
- The reevaluated reevaluated flooding flooding hazard hazard(Probable (ProbableMaximum MaximumFlood Flood(PMF))
(PMF)) isisaavery verylow low probabilityevent, probability event, and and the the time time frame frame represented represented by the extension request request would would resultresult in an insignificant in contribution to insignificant contribution to the the overall overall risk.
risk. The PMFPMF event event at at DNPS DNPSisis considered to have have aavery very lowlow likelihood likelihood of of occurrence.
occurrence. The water water surface surface elevation elevation (WSE) was (WSE) was estimated to to be be below below 513 513 ft.
ft. with with a return period of 1000 years, which which demonstrates demonstrates considerable considerablemargin marginfrom from the the plant plant grade gradeof of 517 517 ft.
ft. and and even even moremorefrom from the design design basis basisPMFPMF WSE WSE of of 528 528 ftft (with wind-generated waves).
(with wind-generated waves). The The data dataisis consistent consistent with with a recent recent Army Army Corps of of Engineers Engineers (ALOE)(ACOE) study that supports supports the the conclusion that the frequency frequency of of occurrence occurrence of of the the PMF PMF at at the the DNPS DNPS site siteisisvery verylow.low.
Furthermore, the frequency estimates Furthermore, estimates used usedin in this this ACOE ACOE analysis were were expressed expressedinin terms of of `annual
'annual exceedance exceedanceprobability'.
probability'. While historical records While historical records indicate that instantaneous instantaneous annual annual peak peakflowsflows frequently frequently occur in in the spring months, annual peaks peaks from the summer and early from the early fall months are also included fall months included in the estimate. This Thiswouldwould result in the exceedance in the exceedance probability probability for for the the requested extension extension period period being being eveneven lessless when compared to the annual exceedance. exceedance.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Flood Report March 11, 2013 11,2013 Page 3
- The following floodhazard following flood hazardmitigation mitigationinterim interimactions actionshave havebeen been taken taken at the DNPS site beyond those required by the current design basis:
Enhanced river river and and rainfall rainfall forecasting information information in flood flood emergency emergency procedures Installed river level markers to support enhancements to procedures Installed permanent floodflood barriers to protect the isolation condenser condenser makeup makeup pump building Mobilized floatable Mobilized floatable platform platform to to raise raise diesel driven driven pump pump Acquired Aqua Dam (portable dam) to protect Acquired protect power power block block toto elevation elevation 523 523ft.
ft.
MSL These actions These actionsprovide provideaasufficient sufficientlevel level of of flood flood hazard hazard protection protectionfor for the theperiod periodofofthe the extension request. No Noadditional additionalflood flood hazard hazard mitigation mitigation or protection actions beyond those identified those identified above are warranted for for the period of the extension request. request.
Based on the above determinations, determinations, EGCEGC has has concluded concluded that that the the requested requestedextension extensiontotothethe scheduled submittal date for submittal date for the DNPS Flooding ON PS Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report does not impact does not impact safe plant plant operation or represent represent an an undue undueriskrisktoto public public health health and and safety.
safety.Accordingly, Accordingly, EGC EGC requests NRC requests NRC approval to extend the the scheduled scheduledsubmittal submittal datedatefor for the theDNPS DNPS Flooding Flooding Hazard Hazard Reevaluation Report to to May May 10, 2013.
2013.
A list of regulatory commitments contained in this letter is provided in A in Enclosure Enclosure 1. 1.
If you regarding this you have any questions regarding this submittal, submittal, please please contact Ron Gaston at contact Ron (630) 657-3359.
II declare declare under penalty penalty of of perjury perjury that the foregoing foregoing is is true true and andcorrect.
correct.Executed Executedon onthe the11th 11 th day of March 2013.
Respectfully submitted, Glen T. Kaegi Director -- Licensing & Regulatory Director Regul* tory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, Company, LLC LLC
Enclosure:
- 1. Summary of Regulatory Commitments Commitments
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission Commission Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Flood March 11, March 2013 11,2013 Page 4 cc: Director, Office Director, Officeof of Nuclear Nuclear Reactor Reactor Regulation Regional Administrator Administrator -- NRC NRC Region RegionIII III NRC Senior NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden DresdenNuclear NuclearPower PowerStation Station NRC Project NRC Project Manager, NRR - Dresden Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Station Station Ms. Jessica Ms. Jessica A.
A. Kratchman, Kratchman,NRR/JLD/PMB, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRCNRC Mr. Eric Mr. Eric E.
E. Bowman, NRR/DPR/PGCB, NRC NRC or or Ms.
Ms. Eileen Eileen M.
M. McKenna, McKenna, NRO/DSRAlBPTS, NRO/DSRA/BPTS, NRC NRC Illinois Emergency Illinois Emergency Management Management Agency Agency --Division Division of Nuclear Safety Safety
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.
Flood Hazard Flood Hazard Reevaluation Reevaluation Report March 11,2013 March 11, 2013 Page 11 Enclosure 11 Enclosure REGULATORY COMMITMENTS
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies following table identifiescommitments commitmentsmademade ininthis thisdocument.
document. (Any (Any other actions discussed discussed in in the the submittal submittal represent represent intended intended oror planned planned actions. They are actions. They are described described to to the the NRC NRC for for the NRC's information information and are are not not regulatory regulatory commitments.)
commitments.)
COMMITTED COMMITMENT TYPE TYPE COMMITMENT DATE OR ONE-TIME ACTION PROGRAMMATIC PROGRAMMATIC "OUTAGE" (Yes/No) (Yes/No)
Dresden Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Station, Units Units 2 and May May 10, 2013 Yes No 3 will submit the Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report, including interim action plan, requested in Item 1.d of Enclosure Enclosure 2 of NRC Letter, Request Request for Information Information Pursuant to Title 1010 of of the Code Code ofof Federal Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights Insights from the Fukushima Fukushima Dai-ichi Dai-ichi Accident, Accident, dated dated March 12, 2012.