ML15134A359: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co | | author affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co | ||
| addressee name = Regner L | | addressee name = Regner L | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1 | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1 | ||
| docket = 05000528, 05000529, 05000530 | | docket = 05000528, 05000529, 05000530 | ||
| license number = NPF-041, NPF-051, NPF-074 | | license number = NPF-041, NPF-051, NPF-074 | ||
| contact person = Regner L | | contact person = Regner L | ||
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 34 | | page count = 34 | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis May 11, 2015 | ||
Purpose | |||
* Present and discuss planned licensing changes | |||
- Update spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis | |||
- Add neutron absorbing inserts to SFP racks 2 | |||
Objectives | |||
* Updated criticality analysis will | |||
- Provide basis for replacing non-conservative Technical Specification (TS) caused by missed power uprate impact | |||
- Include Next Generation Fuel (NGF) | |||
* Account for reactivity effects of integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA) | |||
- Maintain full core offload capability 3 | |||
Borated Aluminum Inserts | |||
* Additional reactivity hold down is planned to meet 10 CFR 50.6850 68 and maintain full core offload capability | |||
- Th Thermall h hydraulic, d li seismic, i i structural, t t l and d | |||
pool cooling calculations will be updated as needed | |||
- Add a coupon surveillance program to monitor material performance 4 | |||
TS Changes | |||
* TS 3.7.17 - Spent Fuel Assembly Storage | |||
- Incorporate new burnup and enrichment curves | |||
- Display information with the polynomial explicitly stated | |||
- Include diagrams of approved arrays 5 | |||
TS Changes | |||
* TS 3.7.15 - Fuel Storage Pool Boron | |||
- Currently 2150 ppm | |||
- May increase in response to accident conditions analysis 6 | |||
TS Changes | |||
* TS 4.3 - Fuel Storage | |||
- Incorporate new arrays | |||
- Update boron concentration | |||
- Reduce radially averaged enrichment from 4.8 wt% to 4.65 wt% | |||
7 | |||
New TS | |||
* 5.5.21 - Spent Fuel Storage Rack Neutron Absorber Monitoring program | |||
- Will consider upcoming NRC Generic Letter Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Monitoring Neutron Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools | |||
- Recent Dresden OE | |||
- License extension | |||
- Plant decommissioning 8 | |||
Implementation | |||
* Prior to NGF implementation in each unit | |||
* Considering installing inserts under 10 CFR 50.59 50 59 | |||
* C Considering id i a li license condition diti ffor a specified period of time to transition between TS 9 | |||
Methodology | |||
* Based on | |||
- ISG ISG-2010-01, 2010 01 Staff Guidance Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis for Spent Fuel Pools | |||
- NEI 12-16, Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light-Water Reactor Power Plants Plants, Revision 1 | |||
- EPRI Depletion Benchmark Reports | |||
- Multiple p NUREGs 10 | |||
Recent Licensing Actions | |||
* Methodology similar to: | |||
- Comanche Peak | |||
- Prairie Island | |||
- Turkey Point | |||
* Insert material similar to: | |||
- LaSalle | |||
- Peach P h Bottom B tt | |||
- Quad Cities | |||
* Criticality code usage similar to: | |||
- Millstone 2 11 | |||
ISG Item 1 - Fuel Assembly Selection | |||
* Palo Verde will demonstrate that variations in design are adequately accounted for in a single, limiting, fuel assembly design | |||
- CE St Standard d dF Fuell | |||
- CE Value Added Pellet | |||
- Westinghouse NGF (8 LUAs) | |||
- AREVA Advanced CE CE-16 16 HTP (8 LTAs) 12 | |||
ISG Item 2 - Depletion Analysis | |||
* Depletion parameters will impact the isotopic inventory of burned fuel | |||
* Major depletion inputs | |||
- Fuel type | |||
- Axial burnup | |||
- Moderator temperature | |||
- Reactor power | |||
- Soluble boron | |||
- Burnable absorbers 13 | |||
ISG Item 2.a - Depletion Uncertainty | |||
* The EPRI methodology will be used to demonstrate the 5% depletion uncertainty is conservative for Palo Verde | |||
* Fission product uncertainty explicitly considered 14 | |||
ISG Item 2.b - Reactor Parameters | |||
* Limiting axial moderator temperature profiles derived past, past present, present and anticipated profiles | |||
- Same methodology gy employed p y at Comanche Peak | |||
* Analysis performed at 4070 MWth | |||
* Licensee controls include verification of radial power distribution di ib i anddT T-cold ld 15 | |||
ISG Item 2.c - Burnable Absorbers | |||
* Palo Verde has used the following integral burnable absorbers | |||
- B4C rods in CE STD Fuel | |||
- Erbia in CE STD Fuel and Value Added Pellet | |||
- Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) in NGF | |||
- Gadolinia in AREVA Fuel | |||
* Analysis will not credit Erbia, Erbia B4C, C or Gadolinia | |||
* NGF fuel modeled with IFBA in all 236 pins for depletion p analysis y onlyy | |||
- Pool model assumes no burnable absorbers 16 | |||
ISG Item 2.d - Rodded Operation | |||
* Palo Verde does not operate with control rods inserted | |||
- Guide tube wear program | |||
* End of cycle check will ensure that fuel assemblies experienced an insignificant amount of rodded operation at hot full p | |||
power 17 | |||
ISG Item 3 - Criticality Analysis | |||
* SCALE 6.1.2 will be used in the analysis | |||
- KENO V.a solves the eigenvalue (keff ) problem in 3D using the Monte Carlo method | |||
- 238 Group ENDF/B-VII will be used as the library | |||
- Millstone LAR used SCALE 6.0 with the KENO V.a module and 238 Group ENDF/B-VII library 18 | |||
ISG Item 3.a - Axial Burnup Profile | |||
* Bounding axial burnup profiles selected from past, past present, present and anticipated profiles | |||
-CCycle l specific ifi li licensee controls t l iinclude l d checks h k on cutback regions (blanket), fuel design, and moderator temperature | |||
- Same methodology used at Comanche Peak and Prairie Island 19 | |||
ISG Item 3.b - Rack Model | |||
* Dimensions and tolerance of racks are traceable to design documents | |||
* Borated aluminum insert B-10 B 10 areal density conservatively modeled at quantity less than minimum certified areal density 20 | |||
ISG Item 3.c - Interfaces | |||
* All interfaces are evaluated and all interfaces are an acceptable 2x2 array | |||
- Palo Verde has only one rack design | |||
- No gaps modeled between rack modules 21 | |||
ISG Item 3.d - Normal Conditions | |||
* Analysis demonstrates that keff 0.95 at less than the TS required boron concentration for: | |||
- Fuel movement | |||
- Fuel inspection and reconstitution | |||
- Foreign Object Search and Retrieval | |||
- Limiting normal condition to initiate accident identified 22 | |||
ISG Item 3.e - Accident Conditions | |||
* Analysis demonstrates that keff 0.95 at less than the TS required boron concentration for | |||
- Misloaded or dropped single fresh fuel assembly into, outside of, or on top of spent fuel racks | |||
- Multiple misloaded fuel assemblies | |||
- Loss of SFP cooling | |||
- Seismic events 23 | |||
ISG Item 3.e (contd.) | |||
* Limiting dilution event reduces pool boron from 2150 ppm to 1900 ppm | |||
* TRM requires boron concentration to be maintained at 4000 ppm 24 | |||
ISG Item 4 - Code Validation | |||
* Will perform criticality code validation in accordance with NUREG/CR-6698 | |||
- Data carefully considered to identify trends consistent with NUREG-1475 NUREG 1475 | |||
- HTC experiments will be included | |||
* Fission products will be explicitly accounted for | |||
- No lumped fission products will be used 25 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* 6 arrays will be analyzed | |||
* Palo Verde expects to submit between 3 and 6 of the following arrays for approval | |||
* Fi Finall d designs i specify if llocation ti and d orientation of borated aluminum inserts 26 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr) with two blocked locations and no inserts Fr Fr 27 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr) with two trash cans (TC) and two inserts Fr TC TC Fr 28 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 3 low reactivity fuel assemblies (Lo) and 1 high (Hi) reactivity fuel assembly with 2 inserts Lo Lo Hi Lo 29 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 2 high reactivity fuel assemblies (Hi) and one low reactivity fuel assembly (Lo) with one blocked cell and one insert Hi Lo Hi 30 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 4 low reactivity fuel assemblies (Lo) with one insert L | |||
Lo L Lo Lo Lo 31 | |||
Palo Verde Arrays | |||
* Infinite array of 4 depleted fuel assemblies (De) with no inserts De De De De 32 | |||
Margin Maintenance | |||
* Palo Verde will monitor the margin identified in the analysis | |||
* Cycle specific checks of key input parameters | |||
* 0.005 k additional margin reserved by Palo Verde | |||
- Burnup and enrichment curves will be for keff = 0.99 33 | |||
Conclusion | |||
* Palo Verde is proposing an acceptable methodology gy for performing p g SFP criticality y | |||
analysis | |||
* Permanently l installed ll d b borated d aluminum l | |||
inserts will be credited in the analysis | |||
* Submit LAR by Nov 2015 | |||
* Request NRC approval in 18 - 24 months 34}} |
Latest revision as of 12:17, 31 October 2019
ML15134A359 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Palo Verde |
Issue date: | 05/11/2015 |
From: | Arizona Public Service Co |
To: | Lisa Regner Plant Licensing Branch IV |
Regner L | |
References | |
Download: ML15134A359 (34) | |
Text
Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis May 11, 2015
Purpose
- Present and discuss planned licensing changes
- Update spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis
- Add neutron absorbing inserts to SFP racks 2
Objectives
- Updated criticality analysis will
- Provide basis for replacing non-conservative Technical Specification (TS) caused by missed power uprate impact
- Include Next Generation Fuel (NGF)
- Account for reactivity effects of integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA)
- Maintain full core offload capability 3
Borated Aluminum Inserts
- Additional reactivity hold down is planned to meet 10 CFR 50.6850 68 and maintain full core offload capability
- Th Thermall h hydraulic, d li seismic, i i structural, t t l and d
pool cooling calculations will be updated as needed
- Add a coupon surveillance program to monitor material performance 4
TS Changes
- TS 3.7.17 - Spent Fuel Assembly Storage
- Incorporate new burnup and enrichment curves
- Display information with the polynomial explicitly stated
- Include diagrams of approved arrays 5
TS Changes
- Currently 2150 ppm
- May increase in response to accident conditions analysis 6
TS Changes
- TS 4.3 - Fuel Storage
- Incorporate new arrays
- Update boron concentration
- Reduce radially averaged enrichment from 4.8 wt% to 4.65 wt%
7
New TS
- 5.5.21 - Spent Fuel Storage Rack Neutron Absorber Monitoring program
- Will consider upcoming NRC Generic Letter Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Monitoring Neutron Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools
- Recent Dresden OE
- License extension
- Plant decommissioning 8
Implementation
- Prior to NGF implementation in each unit
- Considering installing inserts under 10 CFR 50.59 50 59
- C Considering id i a li license condition diti ffor a specified period of time to transition between TS 9
Methodology
- Based on
- ISG ISG-2010-01, 2010 01 Staff Guidance Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis for Spent Fuel Pools
- NEI 12-16, Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light-Water Reactor Power Plants Plants, Revision 1
- EPRI Depletion Benchmark Reports
- Multiple p NUREGs 10
Recent Licensing Actions
- Methodology similar to:
- Comanche Peak
- Prairie Island
- Turkey Point
- Insert material similar to:
- LaSalle
- Peach P h Bottom B tt
- Quad Cities
- Criticality code usage similar to:
- Millstone 2 11
ISG Item 1 - Fuel Assembly Selection
- Palo Verde will demonstrate that variations in design are adequately accounted for in a single, limiting, fuel assembly design
- CE St Standard d dF Fuell
- CE Value Added Pellet
- Westinghouse NGF (8 LUAs)
- AREVA Advanced CE CE-16 16 HTP (8 LTAs) 12
ISG Item 2 - Depletion Analysis
- Depletion parameters will impact the isotopic inventory of burned fuel
- Major depletion inputs
- Fuel type
- Axial burnup
- Moderator temperature
- Reactor power
- Soluble boron
- Burnable absorbers 13
ISG Item 2.a - Depletion Uncertainty
- The EPRI methodology will be used to demonstrate the 5% depletion uncertainty is conservative for Palo Verde
- Fission product uncertainty explicitly considered 14
ISG Item 2.b - Reactor Parameters
- Limiting axial moderator temperature profiles derived past, past present, present and anticipated profiles
- Same methodology gy employed p y at Comanche Peak
- Analysis performed at 4070 MWth
- Licensee controls include verification of radial power distribution di ib i anddT T-cold ld 15
ISG Item 2.c - Burnable Absorbers
- Palo Verde has used the following integral burnable absorbers
- B4C rods in CE STD Fuel
- Erbia in CE STD Fuel and Value Added Pellet
- Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) in NGF
- Gadolinia in AREVA Fuel
- Analysis will not credit Erbia, Erbia B4C, C or Gadolinia
- NGF fuel modeled with IFBA in all 236 pins for depletion p analysis y onlyy
- Pool model assumes no burnable absorbers 16
ISG Item 2.d - Rodded Operation
- Palo Verde does not operate with control rods inserted
- Guide tube wear program
- End of cycle check will ensure that fuel assemblies experienced an insignificant amount of rodded operation at hot full p
power 17
ISG Item 3 - Criticality Analysis
- SCALE 6.1.2 will be used in the analysis
- KENO V.a solves the eigenvalue (keff ) problem in 3D using the Monte Carlo method
- 238 Group ENDF/B-VII will be used as the library
- Millstone LAR used SCALE 6.0 with the KENO V.a module and 238 Group ENDF/B-VII library 18
ISG Item 3.a - Axial Burnup Profile
- Bounding axial burnup profiles selected from past, past present, present and anticipated profiles
-CCycle l specific ifi li licensee controls t l iinclude l d checks h k on cutback regions (blanket), fuel design, and moderator temperature
- Same methodology used at Comanche Peak and Prairie Island 19
ISG Item 3.b - Rack Model
- Dimensions and tolerance of racks are traceable to design documents
- Borated aluminum insert B-10 B 10 areal density conservatively modeled at quantity less than minimum certified areal density 20
ISG Item 3.c - Interfaces
- All interfaces are evaluated and all interfaces are an acceptable 2x2 array
- Palo Verde has only one rack design
- No gaps modeled between rack modules 21
ISG Item 3.d - Normal Conditions
- Fuel movement
- Fuel inspection and reconstitution
- Foreign Object Search and Retrieval
- Limiting normal condition to initiate accident identified 22
ISG Item 3.e - Accident Conditions
- Misloaded or dropped single fresh fuel assembly into, outside of, or on top of spent fuel racks
- Multiple misloaded fuel assemblies
- Loss of SFP cooling
- Seismic events 23
ISG Item 3.e (contd.)
- Limiting dilution event reduces pool boron from 2150 ppm to 1900 ppm
ISG Item 4 - Code Validation
- Will perform criticality code validation in accordance with NUREG/CR-6698
- Data carefully considered to identify trends consistent with NUREG-1475 NUREG 1475
- HTC experiments will be included
- Fission products will be explicitly accounted for
- No lumped fission products will be used 25
Palo Verde Arrays
- 6 arrays will be analyzed
- Palo Verde expects to submit between 3 and 6 of the following arrays for approval
- Fi Finall d designs i specify if llocation ti and d orientation of borated aluminum inserts 26
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr) with two blocked locations and no inserts Fr Fr 27
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr) with two trash cans (TC) and two inserts Fr TC TC Fr 28
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 3 low reactivity fuel assemblies (Lo) and 1 high (Hi) reactivity fuel assembly with 2 inserts Lo Lo Hi Lo 29
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 2 high reactivity fuel assemblies (Hi) and one low reactivity fuel assembly (Lo) with one blocked cell and one insert Hi Lo Hi 30
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 4 low reactivity fuel assemblies (Lo) with one insert L
Lo L Lo Lo Lo 31
Palo Verde Arrays
- Infinite array of 4 depleted fuel assemblies (De) with no inserts De De De De 32
Margin Maintenance
- Palo Verde will monitor the margin identified in the analysis
- Cycle specific checks of key input parameters
- 0.005 k additional margin reserved by Palo Verde
- Burnup and enrichment curves will be for keff = 0.99 33
Conclusion
- Palo Verde is proposing an acceptable methodology gy for performing p g SFP criticality y
analysis
- Permanently l installed ll d b borated d aluminum l
inserts will be credited in the analysis
- Submit LAR by Nov 2015
- Request NRC approval in 18 - 24 months 34