ML17037B598: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17037B598
| number = ML17037B598
| issue date = 02/28/1978
| issue date = 02/28/1978
| title = Nine Mile Point Unit 1 - Letter Regarding Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report and a Sample Federal Register Notice
| title = Letter Regarding Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report and a Sample Federal Register Notice
| author name = Stello V
| author name = Stello V
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:8REGOg~oCyAO+~O~+*+<<IUNITEDSTATESNUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMlsslONWASHINGTON,D.C.20555February28,1978AllOperatingBWRLicensees(ExceptforHumboldt)Gentlemen:TheNRCstaffhascompleteditsreviewofthegenericMarkIContainmentShortTermProgramconductedbytheMarkIOwnersGroup'ndtheassociatedplant-uniqueinformationwhichyouprovidedwithrespecttoyourfacility'scontainmentsystem.Theresultsofourreviewaredocumentedinthestaff's"MarkIContainmentShortTermProgramSafetyEvaluationReport,"NUREG-0408,December1977.Acopy.ofthisdocumentisenclosedforyourinformation.Baseduponourreview,wehaveconcludedthatlicensedMarkIBWRfacilitiescancontinuetooperatesafely,withoutunduerisktothehealthandsafetyofthepublic,duringaninterimperiodofapproximatelytwoyearswhileamethodical,comprehensiveLonqTermProgram(LTP)isconducted.Thisconclu-sionhasbeenmadebasedonourdetermination(1)thatthemagnitudeandcharacterofeachofthehydrodynamicloadsresultingfromapostulatedde-signbasislossofcoolantaccident(LOCA)havebeenadequatelydefinedforuseintheShortTermProgram(STP)structuralassessmentoftheMarkIcontainmentsystem;and(2)that,forthemostprobableloadsinducedbyapostulateddesignbasisLOCA,asafetyfactortofailureofatleasttwoexistsfortheweakeststructuralormechanicalcomponentinthecontain-mentsystemforeachoperatingMarkIBWRfacility.AsdescribedinSectionIVofNUREG-0408,ourevaluationofthecapabilityofyourfaci'lity'sMarkIcontainmentsystemtowithstandtherecentlyidentified'OCA-relatedhydrodynamicsuppressionpoolloadsindicatesthat,althougheachofthestructuralandmechanicalcomponentsofyourcontain-mentsystemmeettheSTPstructuralacceptancecriteria(i.e.,asafetyfactortofailureofatleasttwo),thedemonstratedsafetymarginsofcertaincomponentsundertheseloadingconditionsislessthan.thatwhichisnecessarytosatisfytherequirementsofSectionIIIoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode.Consequently,wehaveconcludedthatthe
{{#Wiki_filter:Cy 8 REG Og
              ~o A
O I          UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlsslON WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
  +         ~O
    ~+*+<<                                 February 28, 1978 All Operating    BWR Licensees  (Except  for    Humboldt)
Gentlemen:
The      NRC staff has completed its review of the generic Mark I Containment Short Term Program conducted by the Mark I Owners Group'nd the associated plant-unique information which you provided with respect to your facility's containment system. The results of our review are documented in the staff's "Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report," NUREG-0408, December 1977. A copy .of this document is enclosed for your i nformati on.
Based upon our review, we have concluded that          licensed Mark I BWR facilities can continue to operate safely, without undue          risk to the health and safety of the public, during an interim period of approximately two years while a methodical, comprehensive Lonq Term Program (LTP) is conducted. This conclu-sion has been made based on our determination (1) that the magnitude and character of each of the hydrodynamic loads resulting from a postulated de-sign basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA) have been adequately defined for use in the Short Term Program (STP) structural assessment of the Mark I containment system; and (2) that, for the most probable loads induced by a postulated design basis LOCA, a safety factor to failure of at least two exists for the weakest structural or mechanical component in the contain-ment system for each operating Mark I BWR facility.
As    described in Section IV of NUREG-0408, our evaluation of the capability of your faci'lity's Mark I containment system to withstand the recently identified'OCA-related hydrodynamic suppression pool loads indicates that, although each of the structural and mechanical components of your contain-ment system meet the STP structural acceptance criteria (i.e., a safety factor to failure of at least two), the demonstrated safety margins of certain components under these loading conditions is less than .that which is necessary to satisfy the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Consequently, we have concluded that the


demonstratedsafetymarginofyourfacility'scontainmentsystemwithrespecttosuchloadingconditionsdoesnotcomplywithourcurrentinterpretationof"sufficientmargin"asprescribedinGeneralDesignCriterion(GDC)50,"ContainmentDesignBasis",ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50.Forlongtermoperationofyourfacility,wewillrequirethatthestructuralandmechanicalcomponents-ofyourfacility'scon-tainmentsystemmeettheacceptancecriteriaoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodetothemaximumextentpracticablefortheloadsandloadingcombinationsidentifiegjntheMarkIContainmentLongTermProgramandapprovedbytheNRCstaff.However,wefindthat:(1)yourfacility'scontainmentsystemdesignstillretainssufficientmarginunderpresentconditionstoprecludefailureandthusprovidesreasonableassuranceofnounduerisktothehealthandsafetyofthepublic,(2)theobjectiveoftheHarkICon-tainmentLTP,i.e.,torestoretheoriginallyintendeddesignsafetymarginsforeachHarkIcontainmentsystem,isacceptable,and(3)theHarkIOwner'sProgramActionPlanfortheLTPisreasonablydesignedtosatisfytheLTPobjectives.Therefore,wefindthatoperationofyourfacility,inconformancewiththeconditionsspecifiedinNUREG-0408,willnotendangerlifeorpropertyorthecommondefenseandsecurity.IntheabsenceofanysafetyproblemassociatedwithoperationofyourfacilityuntiltheLTPiscompleted,thereappearstobenopublicinterestconsiderationfavoringrestrictionoftheoperationofyourfacility.Accordingly,pursuantto10CFRPart50,Section50.12,you'rehereby.grantedanexemptionfromGDC-50,withrespecttoLOCA-relatedhydrodynamicsuppressionpoolloads,foraninterimperioduntilcompletionoftheLTP(approximatelytwoyears),providedthattheconditionsspecifiedinNUREG-0408andanyresultingTechnicalSpecificationrequirementsaremaintained.Tothisextent,thisexemp-tionencompassesanyrelatedrequirementsof10CFRPart50,Section50.55(a),andGDC-l.AsampleFEDERALREGISTERNoticerelatedtothisactionisalsoenclosedTheNoticethatisfiledwiththeOfficeoftheFederalRegisterforeachindividualplantwillbeprovidedatalaterdate.AsdiscussedinSectionIII.C.ofNUREG-0408,operatingandsurveillancerequirementsondrywe11/wetwelldiffere'ntialpressureandtoruswaterlevelswillbeincorporated,bylicenseamendment,intoyourfacilityTechnicalSpecificationsinthenearfuture
demonstrated    safety margin of your facility's containment system with respect  to  such  loading conditions does not comply with our current interpretation of "sufficient margin" as prescribed in General Design Criterion (GDC) 50, "Containment Design Basis", of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. For long term operation of your facility, we will require that the structural and mechanical components -of your facility's con-tainment system meet the acceptance criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code to the maximum extent practicable for the loads and loading combinations identifieg jn the Mark I Containment Long Term Program and approved by the NRC staff.
However, we    find that: (1) your facility's containment system design still retains sufficient margin under present conditions          to preclude risk to the failure and thus    provides  reasonable  assurance  of  no  undue health and safety    of  the public, (2) the  objective  of  the  Hark I Con-tainment LTP,     i.e., to restore the originally intended design safety margins for each Hark I containment system, is acceptable, and (3) the Hark I Owner's Program Action Plan for the LTP is reasonably designed to satisfy the LTP objectives. Therefore, we find that operation of your facility, in conformance with the conditions specified in NUREG-0408, will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.
In the absence of any safety problem associated with operation of your facility until the LTP is completed, there appears to be no public interest consi deration favoring restriction of the operation of your facility. Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.12, you hereby. granted an exemption from GDC-50, with respect to LOCA-
                                                                                're related hydrodynamic suppression pool loads, for an interim period until completion of the LTP (approximately two years), provided that the conditions specified in NUREG-0408 and any resulting Technical Specification requirements are maintained. To this extent, this exemp-tion encompasses any related requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.55(a),   and GDC-l.
A  sample FEDERAL REGISTER Notice related to this action          is also enclosed The Notice that is filed with the Office of the Federal          Register for each individual plant will be provided at a later date.
As  discussed in Section III.C. of NUREG-0408, operating and surveillance requirements on drywe11/wetwell differe'ntial pressure and torus water levels will be incorporated, by license amendment, into your facility Technical Specifications in the near future V  or Stell , Jr.,       rector Division o pe        n Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
SeePage3VorStell,Jr.,rectorDivisionopenReactorsOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation
 
See Page  3


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
l.NUREG-0408,"NarkIContainmentShortTermProgramSafetyEvaluationReport"2.FederalReisterNotice
: l. NUREG-0408, "Nark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report"
+C SAMPLEFEDERALREGISTERNOTICEUNITEDSTATESNUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIONDOCKETNO.LICENSEENOTICEOFGRANTINGANEXEMPTIONFROMTHEREUIREMENTSOFENERALDESIGNCRIER050CONTAINMENTDESIGNBASISOFAPPENDIATO1CFRPART5TheU.S.Nuclear.RegulatoryCommission(TheCommission)hasgrantedanexemptionfromtherequirementsofGeneralDesiqnCriterion50,"Contain-mentDesignBasis",ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50to(Licensee)(theLicensee).ThisexemptionrelatestothedemonstratedsafetymarginoftheMarkIcontainmentsystemfor(FacilitName)forrecentlyidentifiedhydrodynamicsupppressionpoolloadsassociatedwithapostulateddesignbasislossofcoolantacci.dentandprovidesforoperationundertheconditionsspecifiedintheNRCstaff's"MarkICon-tainmentShortTermProgramSafetyEvaluationReport"andunderanyresultingTechnicalSpecificationrequirements.Tothisextent,thisexemptionencompassesanyrelatedrequirementsof10CFRPart50,Sec-tion50.55(a),andGeneralDesignCriterion1.Thisexemptioniseffectiveasofthedateofitsissuance.TheCommissionhasevaluatedthedemonstratedsafetymarginofthecontainmentsystemfor(FacilitName)underpresent
: 2. Federal Re ister Notice
 
+C SAMPLE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NO.
LICENSEE NOTICE OF GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE RE UIREMENTS OF      ENERAL DESIGN CRI ER 0 50 CONTAINMENT DESIGN BASIS        OF APPENDI    A TO 1    CFR PART 5 The U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission (The Commission) has granted an exemption from the requirements of General Desiqn        Criterion 50, "Contain-ment Design Basis",   of Appendix    A to 10 CFR  Part  50  to    (Licensee)
(the Licensee). This exemption relates to the demonstrated        safety margin of the  Mark I containment system for          (Facilit    Name) for recently identified      hydrodynamic supppression    pool loads associated with  a postulated design basis loss of coolant acci.dent        and provides for operation under the conditions specified in the        NRC  staff's "Mark I Con-tainment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report" and under any resulting Technical Specification requirements.         To  this extent, this exemption encompasses    any  related requirements of    10 CFR  Part 50, Sec-tion 50.55(a),   and General    Design  Criterion 1. This exemption is effective as  of the date of  its  issuance.
The Commission has evaluated      the demonstrated  safety margin of the containment system    for        (Facilit  Name)          under present
 
conditions  and has concluded    that sufficient margin exists to preclude  undue  risk to the health  and  safety of the public. This evalua-tion is  documented  in the staff's "Hark I Containment Short      Term Program.
Safety Evaluation Report,"    NUREG-0408, Pecember    1977.
This exemption is granted for    an interim period of approximately      two years while  a more  detailed review i's conducted.      At the conclusion of this re-view, the design safety margin of the containment system          for    (Facilit  Name will be restored to that which was originally intended at the time (Facilit Name)      was licensed for operation.      The basis for this exemption is set forth in the letter to the licensee granting the exemption, dated  February,      1978.
The Commission has determined    that the granting of this exemption will not result in  any  significant environmental impact      and that pursuant to  10 CFR Section 51.5(d)(4)    an environmental  impact statement or negative declara-tion  and environmental    impact appraisal  need  not be prepared in connection with this action.
For further  details with respect to this action,      see  (1) the Commission's letter  to the licensee dated February        ,  1978, and (2) the Commission'
 
)~
H, ~
  "1 I
ll II
 
                                        "Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report,"        NUREG-0408, December 1977.
These items are  available for public inspection at the Commission's Public  Document Room, 1717  H  Street, N.W., Washington,    D. C. and at the (LPDR)                      A  copy of item (1)  may be obtained upon request addressed    to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washinq-ton, D.C. 20555,, Attention:    Director, Division of Operating Reactors.
A copy  of item (2) may be  obtained upon request addressed    to the National Technical Information Service, Sprinqfield, Virginia 22161.
Dated at Bethesda,  Maryland  this FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                          ,  Chief Operatinq Reactors Branch Division of Operating Reactors


conditionsandhasconcludedthatsufficientmarginexiststoprecludeunduerisktothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.Thisevalua-tionisdocumentedinthestaff's"HarkIContainmentShortTermProgram.SafetyEvaluationReport,"NUREG-0408,Pecember1977.Thisexemptionisgrantedforaninterimperiodofapproximatelytwoyearswhileamoredetailedreviewi'sconducted.Attheconclusionofthisre-view,thedesignsafetymarginofthecontainmentsystemfor(FacilitNamewillberestoredtothatwhichwasoriginallyintendedatthetime(FacilitName)waslicensedforoperation.Thebasisforthisexemptionissetforthinthelettertothelicenseegrantingtheexemption,datedFebruary,1978.TheCommissionhasdeterminedthatthegrantingofthisexemptionwillnotresultinanysignificantenvironmentalimpactandthatpursuantto10CFRSection51.5(d)(4)anenvironmentalimpactstatementornegativedeclara-tionandenvironmentalimpactappraisalneednotbepreparedinconnectionwiththisaction.Forfurtherdetailswithrespecttothisaction,see(1)theCommission'slettertothelicenseedatedFebruary,1978,and(2)theCommission'
Cl Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation cc: Eugene  B. Thomas, Jr., Esquire LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 5 MacRae 1757  N Street, N. W.
)~H,~"1IllII  "MarkIContainmentShortTermProgramSafetyEvaluationReport,"NUREG-0408,December1977.TheseitemsareavailableforpublicinspectionattheCommission'sPublicDocumentRoom,1717HStreet,N.W.,Washington,D.C.andatthe(LPDR)Acopyofitem(1)maybeobtaineduponrequestaddressedtotheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission,Washinq-ton,D.C.20555,,Attention:Director,DivisionofOperatingReactors.Acopyofitem(2)maybeobtaineduponrequestaddressedtotheNationalTechnicalInformationService,Sprinqfield,Virginia22161.DatedatBethesda,MarylandthisFORTHENUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSION,ChiefOperatinqReactorsBranchDivisionofOperatingReactors Cl NiagaraMohawkPowerCorporationcc:EugeneB.Thomas,Jr.,EsquireLeBoeuf,Lamb,Leiby5MacRae1757NStreet,N.W.Washington,D.C.20036AnthonyZ.RoismanNaturalResourcesDefenseCouncil91715thStreet,N.W.Washington,D.C.20005OswegoCountyOfficeBuilding46E.BridgeStreetOswego,NewYork13126}}
Washington, D. C. 20036 Anthony Z. Roisman Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20005 Oswego County  Office Building 46 E. Bridge Street Oswego, New York 13126}}

Latest revision as of 09:24, 30 October 2019

Letter Regarding Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report and a Sample Federal Register Notice
ML17037B598
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1978
From: Stello V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
References
NUREG-0408
Download: ML17037B598 (14)
v • d • e


Text

Cy 8 REG Og

~o A

O I UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlsslON WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

+ ~O

~+*+<< February 28, 1978 All Operating BWR Licensees (Except for Humboldt)

Gentlemen:

The NRC staff has completed its review of the generic Mark I Containment Short Term Program conducted by the Mark I Owners Group'nd the associated plant-unique information which you provided with respect to your facility's containment system. The results of our review are documented in the staff's "Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report," NUREG-0408, December 1977. A copy .of this document is enclosed for your i nformati on.

Based upon our review, we have concluded that licensed Mark I BWR facilities can continue to operate safely, without undue risk to the health and safety of the public, during an interim period of approximately two years while a methodical, comprehensive Lonq Term Program (LTP) is conducted. This conclu-sion has been made based on our determination (1) that the magnitude and character of each of the hydrodynamic loads resulting from a postulated de-sign basis loss of coolant accident (LOCA) have been adequately defined for use in the Short Term Program (STP) structural assessment of the Mark I containment system; and (2) that, for the most probable loads induced by a postulated design basis LOCA, a safety factor to failure of at least two exists for the weakest structural or mechanical component in the contain-ment system for each operating Mark I BWR facility.

As described in Section IV of NUREG-0408, our evaluation of the capability of your faci'lity's Mark I containment system to withstand the recently identified'OCA-related hydrodynamic suppression pool loads indicates that, although each of the structural and mechanical components of your contain-ment system meet the STP structural acceptance criteria (i.e., a safety factor to failure of at least two), the demonstrated safety margins of certain components under these loading conditions is less than .that which is necessary to satisfy the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Consequently, we have concluded that the

demonstrated safety margin of your facility's containment system with respect to such loading conditions does not comply with our current interpretation of "sufficient margin" as prescribed in General Design Criterion (GDC) 50, "Containment Design Basis", of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. For long term operation of your facility, we will require that the structural and mechanical components -of your facility's con-tainment system meet the acceptance criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code to the maximum extent practicable for the loads and loading combinations identifieg jn the Mark I Containment Long Term Program and approved by the NRC staff.

However, we find that: (1) your facility's containment system design still retains sufficient margin under present conditions to preclude risk to the failure and thus provides reasonable assurance of no undue health and safety of the public, (2) the objective of the Hark I Con-tainment LTP, i.e., to restore the originally intended design safety margins for each Hark I containment system, is acceptable, and (3) the Hark I Owner's Program Action Plan for the LTP is reasonably designed to satisfy the LTP objectives. Therefore, we find that operation of your facility, in conformance with the conditions specified in NUREG-0408, will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.

In the absence of any safety problem associated with operation of your facility until the LTP is completed, there appears to be no public interest consi deration favoring restriction of the operation of your facility. Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.12, you hereby. granted an exemption from GDC-50, with respect to LOCA-

're related hydrodynamic suppression pool loads, for an interim period until completion of the LTP (approximately two years), provided that the conditions specified in NUREG-0408 and any resulting Technical Specification requirements are maintained. To this extent, this exemp-tion encompasses any related requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.55(a), and GDC-l.

A sample FEDERAL REGISTER Notice related to this action is also enclosed The Notice that is filed with the Office of the Federal Register for each individual plant will be provided at a later date.

As discussed in Section III.C. of NUREG-0408, operating and surveillance requirements on drywe11/wetwell differe'ntial pressure and torus water levels will be incorporated, by license amendment, into your facility Technical Specifications in the near future V or Stell , Jr., rector Division o pe n Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

See Page 3

Enclosures:

l. NUREG-0408, "Nark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report"
2. Federal Re ister Notice

+C SAMPLE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NO.

LICENSEE NOTICE OF GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE RE UIREMENTS OF ENERAL DESIGN CRI ER 0 50 CONTAINMENT DESIGN BASIS OF APPENDI A TO 1 CFR PART 5 The U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission (The Commission) has granted an exemption from the requirements of General Desiqn Criterion 50, "Contain-ment Design Basis", of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 to (Licensee)

(the Licensee). This exemption relates to the demonstrated safety margin of the Mark I containment system for (Facilit Name) for recently identified hydrodynamic supppression pool loads associated with a postulated design basis loss of coolant acci.dent and provides for operation under the conditions specified in the NRC staff's "Mark I Con-tainment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report" and under any resulting Technical Specification requirements. To this extent, this exemption encompasses any related requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Sec-tion 50.55(a), and General Design Criterion 1. This exemption is effective as of the date of its issuance.

The Commission has evaluated the demonstrated safety margin of the containment system for (Facilit Name) under present

conditions and has concluded that sufficient margin exists to preclude undue risk to the health and safety of the public. This evalua-tion is documented in the staff's "Hark I Containment Short Term Program.

Safety Evaluation Report," NUREG-0408, Pecember 1977.

This exemption is granted for an interim period of approximately two years while a more detailed review i's conducted. At the conclusion of this re-view, the design safety margin of the containment system for (Facilit Name will be restored to that which was originally intended at the time (Facilit Name) was licensed for operation. The basis for this exemption is set forth in the letter to the licensee granting the exemption, dated February, 1978.

The Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not result in any significant environmental impact and that pursuant to 10 CFR Section 51.5(d)(4) an environmental impact statement or negative declara-tion and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with this action.

For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the Commission's letter to the licensee dated February , 1978, and (2) the Commission'

)~

H, ~

"1 I

ll II

"Mark I Containment Short Term Program Safety Evaluation Report," NUREG-0408, December 1977.

These items are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D. C. and at the (LPDR) A copy of item (1) may be obtained upon request addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washinq-ton, D.C. 20555,, Attention: Director, Division of Operating Reactors.

A copy of item (2) may be obtained upon request addressed to the National Technical Information Service, Sprinqfield, Virginia 22161.

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, Chief Operatinq Reactors Branch Division of Operating Reactors

Cl Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation cc: Eugene B. Thomas, Jr., Esquire LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 5 MacRae 1757 N Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 Anthony Z. Roisman Natural Resources Defense Council 917 15th Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20005 Oswego County Office Building 46 E. Bridge Street Oswego, New York 13126

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17037B598&oldid=2012728"