ML18017A524: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, INC. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION MEAG POWER SPVM, LLC MEAG POWER SPVJ, LLC MEAG POWER SPVP, LLC CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 4 DOCKET NO. 52-026 EXEMPTION FROM REGULATIONS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX D OF 10 CFR PART 52 Exemption License No. NPF-92  
{{#Wiki_filter:SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, INC.
: 1. In a letter dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company requested from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) an exemption to allow departures from Tier 1 information in the certified Design Control Document (DCD) incorporated by reference in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52, Appendix D, "Design Certification Rule for the AP1000 Design," as part of license amendment request 17-010, "Request for License Amendment and Exemption: Pipe Rupture Hazard and Flooding  
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION MEAG POWER SPVM, LLC MEAG POWER SPVJ, LLC MEAG POWER SPVP, LLC CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 4 DOCKET NO. 52-026 EXEMPTION FROM REGULATIONS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX D OF 10 CFR PART 52 Exemption License No. NPF-92
: 1. In a letter dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company requested from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) an exemption to allow departures from Tier 1 information in the certified Design Control Document (DCD) incorporated by reference in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52, Appendix D, Design Certification Rule for the AP1000 Design, as part of license amendment request 17-010, Request for License Amendment and Exemption: Pipe Rupture Hazard and Flooding Analyses.
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1 of the NRC staffs safety evaluation, which can be found at Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession Number ML18017A261, the Commission finds that:
A.      the exemption is authorized by law; B.      the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C.      the exemption is consistent with the common defense and security;


Analyses."
D.     special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E.     the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F.     the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1 of the NRC staff's safety evaluation, which can be found at Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML18017A261, the Commission finds that:
: 2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption from the certified AP1000 DCD Tier 1 information, with corresponding changes to Appendix C of the Facility Combined License as described in the request dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018. This exemption is related to, and necessary for, the granting of License Amendment No. 106, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption.
 
: 3. As explained in Section 6.0 of the NRC staffs Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession Number ML18017A261), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
A. the exemption is authorized by law; B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and security;
: 4. This exemption is effective as of the date of its issuance.
 
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION:
D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to se rve the underlying purpose of the rule; E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and  
                                      /RA Michael McCoppin for/
 
Francis M. Akstulewicz, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors Date of Issuance: February 1, 2018}}
F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.  
: 2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption from the certified AP1000 DCD Tier 1 information, with corresponding changes to Appendix C of the Facility Combined License as described in the request dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018. This exemption is related to, and necessary for, the granting of License Amendment No. 106, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption.  
: 3. As explained in Section 6.0 of the NRC staff's Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession Number ML18017A261), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.  
: 4. This exemption is effective as of the date of its issuance.  
 
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION:  
/RA Michael McCoppin for/
Francis M. Akstulewicz, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors  
 
Date of Issuance: February 1, 2018}}

Latest revision as of 04:15, 22 October 2019

LAR-17-010 Exemption Unit 4
ML18017A524
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/2018
From:
Office of New Reactors
To:
City of Dalton, GA, Georgia Power Co, MEAG Power, Oglethorpe Power Corp, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML18017A721 List:
References
EPID No. L 2017-LLA-0143, LAR-17-010
Download: ML18017A524 (2)
v • d • e


Text

SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, INC.

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION MEAG POWER SPVM, LLC MEAG POWER SPVJ, LLC MEAG POWER SPVP, LLC CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 4 DOCKET NO.52-026 EXEMPTION FROM REGULATIONS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX D OF 10 CFR PART 52 Exemption License No. NPF-92

1. In a letter dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company requested from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) an exemption to allow departures from Tier 1 information in the certified Design Control Document (DCD) incorporated by reference in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52, Appendix D, Design Certification Rule for the AP1000 Design, as part of license amendment request 17-010, Request for License Amendment and Exemption: Pipe Rupture Hazard and Flooding Analyses.

For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1 of the NRC staffs safety evaluation, which can be found at Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession Number ML18017A261, the Commission finds that:

A. the exemption is authorized by law; B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and security;

D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.

2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption from the certified AP1000 DCD Tier 1 information, with corresponding changes to Appendix C of the Facility Combined License as described in the request dated March 31, 2017, as supplemented and revised by letters dated August 21, October 9, November 1, December 1 and December 15, 2017, and January 3, 2018. This exemption is related to, and necessary for, the granting of License Amendment No. 106, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 6.0 of the NRC staffs Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession Number ML18017A261), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of the date of its issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION:

/RA Michael McCoppin for/

Francis M. Akstulewicz, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors Date of Issuance: February 1, 2018

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18017A524&oldid=1958760"