ML18340A176: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC Special Inspection following August 3 Canister Downloading IncidentSONGS Community Engagement PanelNovember 29, 2018Scott MorrisDeputy Regional AdministratorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRegion IV NRCInspection ActivitiesAugust 6: NRC informally notified of incident and initiates daily oversight communications August 7: Southern California Edison commits to NRC review before resuming operationsAugust 17: NRC decides to conduct Special Inspection September 10-14: NRC Special Inspection Team onsite November 1: NRC Special Inspection CompleteNovember 28: NRC Special Inspection Report ssuedNRC to perform inspection prior to resumption of fuel loading2 Special Inspection -Findings2 Escalated Findings (Apparent Violations)Failure to provide redundant drop protectionFailure to report 3 Severity Level IV Violations ProceduresCorrective actionsTrainingManagement Oversight Weaknesses3 Root CausesSan Onofre management failed to provideAdequate proceduresAdequate training to support procedureAdequate oversight4 Corrective ActionsTraining RequirementsProcedure EnhancementsEquipment EnhancementsOversight Improvements5 Safety SignificanceNo Actual Drop of CanisterNoDamagedSpent FuelNo Radiological ReleaseLoad Drop Analysis (if canister fell)5 Next StepsNRC Inspection of Causal AnalysesNRC Inspection of Corrective ActionsPredecisionalEnforcement Conference or Alternative Dispute ResolutionSCEDecision required by December 85}}
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC Special Inspection following August 3 Canister Downloading Incident SONGS Community Engagement Panel November 29, 2018 Scott Morris Deputy Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV
 
NRC Inspection Activities
* August 6: NRC informally notified of incident and initiates daily oversight communications
* August 7: Southern California Edison commits to NRC review before resuming operations
* August 17: NRC decides to conduct Special Inspection
* September 10-14: NRC Special Inspection Team onsite
* November 1: NRC Special Inspection Complete
* November 28: NRC Special Inspection Report ssued NRC to perform inspection prior to resumption of fuel loading 2
 
Special Inspection - Findings
* 2 Escalated Findings (Apparent Violations)
  - Failure to provide redundant drop protection
  - Failure to report
* 3 Severity Level IV Violations
  - Procedures
  - Corrective actions
  - Training
* Management Oversight Weaknesses 3
 
Root Causes
* San Onofre management failed to provide
  - Adequate procedures
  - Adequate training to support procedure
  - Adequate oversight 4
 
Corrective Actions
* Training Requirements
* Procedure Enhancements
* Equipment Enhancements
* Oversight Improvements 5
 
Safety Significance
* No Actual Drop of Canister
* No Damaged Spent Fuel
* No Radiological Release
* Load Drop Analysis (if canister fell) 5
 
Next Steps
* NRC Inspection of Causal Analyses
* NRC Inspection of Corrective Actions
* Predecisional Enforcement Conference or Alternative Dispute Resolution
  - SCE Decision required by December 8 5}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 20 October 2019

Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; SONGS Community Engagement Panel, November 29, 2018
ML18340A176
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 11/29/2018
From:
Region 4 Administrator
To:
References
Download: ML18340A176 (7)


Text

NRC Special Inspection following August 3 Canister Downloading Incident SONGS Community Engagement Panel November 29, 2018 Scott Morris Deputy Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV

NRC Inspection Activities

  • August 6: NRC informally notified of incident and initiates daily oversight communications
  • August 7: Southern California Edison commits to NRC review before resuming operations
  • August 17: NRC decides to conduct Special Inspection
  • September 10-14: NRC Special Inspection Team onsite
  • November 1: NRC Special Inspection Complete
  • November 28: NRC Special Inspection Report ssued NRC to perform inspection prior to resumption of fuel loading 2

Special Inspection - Findings

  • 2 Escalated Findings (Apparent Violations)

- Failure to provide redundant drop protection

- Failure to report

- Procedures

- Corrective actions

- Training

  • Management Oversight Weaknesses 3

Root Causes

  • San Onofre management failed to provide

- Adequate procedures

- Adequate training to support procedure

- Adequate oversight 4

Corrective Actions

  • Training Requirements
  • Procedure Enhancements
  • Equipment Enhancements
  • Oversight Improvements 5

Safety Significance

  • No Actual Drop of Canister
  • No Damaged Spent Fuel
  • No Radiological Release
  • Load Drop Analysis (if canister fell) 5

Next Steps

  • NRC Inspection of Causal Analyses
  • NRC Inspection of Corrective Actions
  • Predecisional Enforcement Conference or Alternative Dispute Resolution

- SCE Decision required by December 8 5