TSTF-17-18, Transmittal of TSTF-566, Revision 0, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems.: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/19/2018
| issue date = 01/19/2018
| title = Transmittal of TSTF-566, Revision 0, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems.
| title = Transmittal of TSTF-566, Revision 0, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems.
| author name = Gullott D M, Miksa J P, Sparkman W, Vaughan J L, Williams L L
| author name = Gullott D, Miksa J, Sparkman W, Vaughan J, Williams L
| author affiliation = Technical Specifications Task Force
| author affiliation = Technical Specifications Task Force
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  

Revision as of 04:59, 18 June 2019

Transmittal of TSTF-566, Revision 0, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR Shutdown Cooling Subsystems.
ML18019B187
Person / Time
Site: Technical Specifications Task Force
Issue date: 01/19/2018
From: Gullott D, Miksa J, Sparkman W, Vaughan J, Linda Williams
Technical Specifications Task Force
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TSTF-17-18 BWROG-134, Rev 0, TSTF-566, Rev 0
Download: ML18019B187 (43)


Text

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TASK FORCE A JOINT OWNERS GROUP ACTIVIT Y TSTF

19-Jan-18 19-Jan-18 19-Jan-18

B. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A not met.

B.1 Initiate action to restore RHR shutdown cooling subsystem(s) to OPERABLE status.

Immediately C

C

C

sufficient

, or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem

B.1 If the required alternate method(s) of decay heat removal cannot be verified within one hour, immediate action must be taken to restore the inoperable RHR shutdown cooling subsystem(s) to operable status. The Required Action will restore redundant decay heat removal paths. The immediate Completion Time reflects the importance of maintaining the availability of two paths for heat removal.

C C

The required cooling capacity of the alternate method should be sufficient to maintain or reduce temperature. Decay heat removal by ambient losses can be considered as, or contributing to, the alternate method capability.

Alternate methods that can be used include (but are not limited to) the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, the Reactor Water Cleanup System, or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem.

The required cooling capacity of the alternate method should be sufficient to maintain or reduce temperature. Decay heat removal by ambient losses can be considered as, or contributing to, the alternate method capability. Alternate methods that can be used include (but are not limited to) the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, the Reactor Water Cleanup System, or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem.

B. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A not met.

B.1 Initiate action to restore RHR shutdown cooling subsystem(s) to OPERABLE status.

Immediately C

C

C

sufficient ,

, , or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem

B.1 If the required alternate method(s) of decay heat removal cannot be verified within one hour, immediate action must be taken to restore the inoperable RHR shutdown cooling subsystem(s) to operable status. The Required Action will restore redundant decay heat removal paths. The immediate Completion Time reflects the importance of maintaining the availability of two paths for heat removal.

C C

The required cooling capacity of the alternate method should be sufficient to maintain or reduce temperature. Decay heat removal by ambient losses can be considered as, or contributing to, the alternate method capability.

Alternate methods that can be used include (but are not limited to) the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, the Reactor Water Cleanup System, or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem.

The required cooling capacity of the alternate method should be sufficient to maintain or reduce temperature. Decay heat removal by ambient losses can be considered as, or contributing to, the alternate method capability.

Alternate methods that can be used include (but are not limited to) the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, the Reactor Water Cleanup System, or an inoperable but functional RHR shutdown cooling subsystem.