ML18079B055: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:: 1 \
{{#Wiki_filter:: 1 \
* STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF ESSEX ) ) SS. ) e AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT P. DOUGLAS ROBERT P. DOUGLAS, being first duly sworn accord-ing to law, deposes and states: l. I am employed by Public Service Electric & Gas Company as Licensing Manager* and Acting Environment Manager. My professional qualifications which I incorporate by reference herein are contained in the transcript of this proceeding following Tr. 402. v* 2. I have supervised the calculation of the es-timated dose associated with moving and storing spent fuel from the unenlarged (264 spaces) Salem Unit 1 to the enlarged (1170 spaces) spent fuel pool of Salem.Unit  
* STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF ESSEX ) ) SS. ) e AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT P. DOUGLAS ROBERT P. DOUGLAS, being first duly sworn accord-ing to law, deposes and states: l. I am employed by Public Service Electric & Gas Company as Licensing Manager* and Acting Environment Manager. My professional qualifications which I incorporate by reference herein are contained in the transcript of this proceeding following Tr. 402. v* 2. I have supervised the calculation of the es-timated dose associated with moving and storing spent fuel from the unenlarged (264 spaces) Salem Unit 1 to the enlarged (1170 spaces) spent fuel pool of Salem.Unit
: 2. As shown in Attachment 1, hereto which is also incorporated herein, the dose resulting from moving one cask containing two fuel assemblies is approximately 0.4 man This dose does not include the additional .dose associated with the transfer of fuel from Unit 2 to Unit l if disposal is not available offsite and the Unit l pool must then be enlarged.  
: 2. As shown in Attachment 1, hereto which is also incorporated herein, the dose resulting from moving one cask containing two fuel assemblies is approximately 0.4 man This dose does not include the additional .dose associated with the transfer of fuel from Unit 2 to Unit l if disposal is not available offsite and the Unit l pool must then be enlarged.
: 3. I have also established the nu.'llber of spent fuel elements which will have to be transferred from Unit 1 to Unit 2 if the above described scheme is to be carried out in accordance with the latest information concerning schedule and number of spent fuel elements to be discharged after -Z.. '191000*0 I r.   
: 3. I have also established the nu.'llber of spent fuel elements which will have to be transferred from Unit 1 to Unit 2 if the above described scheme is to be carried out in accordance with the latest information concerning schedule and number of spent fuel elements to be discharged after -Z.. '191000*0 I r.   
,.
,.

Revision as of 18:18, 25 April 2019

Affidavit of RP Douglas Re Calculation of Estimated Dose Associated W/Moving & Storing Spent Fuel from Unit 1
ML18079B055
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/1979
From: DOUGLAS R P
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML18079B054 List:
References
NUDOCS 7910050772
Download: ML18079B055 (6)


Text

1 \
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNTY OF ESSEX ) ) SS. ) e AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT P. DOUGLAS ROBERT P. DOUGLAS, being first duly sworn accord-ing to law, deposes and states: l. I am employed by Public Service Electric & Gas Company as Licensing Manager* and Acting Environment Manager. My professional qualifications which I incorporate by reference herein are contained in the transcript of this proceeding following Tr. 402. v* 2. I have supervised the calculation of the es-timated dose associated with moving and storing spent fuel from the unenlarged (264 spaces) Salem Unit 1 to the enlarged (1170 spaces) spent fuel pool of Salem.Unit
2. As shown in Attachment 1, hereto which is also incorporated herein, the dose resulting from moving one cask containing two fuel assemblies is approximately 0.4 man This dose does not include the additional .dose associated with the transfer of fuel from Unit 2 to Unit l if disposal is not available offsite and the Unit l pool must then be enlarged.
3. I have also established the nu.'llber of spent fuel elements which will have to be transferred from Unit 1 to Unit 2 if the above described scheme is to be carried out in accordance with the latest information concerning schedule and number of spent fuel elements to be discharged after -Z.. '191000*0 I r.

,.

  • each cycle. As shown in Attachment 2, which is incorporated by reference herein, the number of spent fuel elements to be transferred is 500. Thus the total man rem exposure as-sociated with such a transfer is 0.4 x 250 = 100, considerably greater than the 2-5 man rem associated with changing the racks in Unit I with sp.ent fuel elements in the pool. 4. I thus conclude that, among other reasons, it is preferable to expand the*tJnit 1 spent fuel pool rather than shipping the spent fuel to an enlarged Unit 2 spent fuel pool. Sworn. and subscribed to before me this day of. t 1979 NOTARY PUBLIC J __ / V*RONICA I.. ADAMS My Commission exp*ires . A Hotary Public ot Hew Jersey
  • 111, e.imnisslan Up"es Oct. 23, 198 z I I ** I . I

"""' '-'-""'\...1..U.LLCJ.J.

I.. ..I. SALEM NO. 1 UNIT Estimated dose from moving and storing spent fuel from Unit No. 1 in the Unit No. 2 spent fuel pool. STEP* l.) 6 operators to unload spent fuel cask, place in decon pit and wash down, place in transfer pool and remove head. 6 people x 3 hrs. x 3.5 mr/hr. 2) 6 operators to load 2 fuel assemblies in a (one to operate bridge, one to operate crane, one to operate fuel handling tools, 1 health physics and 2 to record assemblies moved. 6: people x 10 minutes/assembly x 2 assemblies.

x mr/hr. 3) 6 people for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> to set cask head. 6 people x l hr. x 3.5 mr/hr. 4) 6 operators for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> to decon cask, 1. hour to load cask on truck) on average 10 mr/hr field. 6 people x 2 hrs *. x 10 mr/hr. 5) Truck driver and assistant approximately 15 minutes to drive from Unit l to Unit 2 fuel handling building (approx. 5 mr/hr. in cab. 2 people x 15 hrs. x 5.0 mr/hr. E>O 6) 6 operators to unload, rinse down, and place cask irr fuel transfer pool ( 2 hrs)

  • 6 people x 2 hrs. x 10 mr/hr. 7) 6 people to remove cask head at transfer pool. (approx. 1 hr.). 6 people x 1 hr. x 3.5 mr/hr. 8) 6 operators to move 2 fuel assemblies from cask to racks (approx. 10 minutes/ assembly).

6 people x 20 hrs. x 3.5 mr/hr. E>O DOSE (man-mrem/yr)

= 63 = 7 .. o . = 21 = 120 = 2.s = 120 = 21 = 7.0

.. . STEP* 9) . 6 operators for l hour to set cask head. DOSE (man-mrem/hr) 6 people x 3.5 mr/hr. x l hr. = 21 10) 6 operators for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> to decon cask and load on truck to return to Unit No. l (cask empty, approx. l mr/hr.). 6 people _x 2 hrs. x l mr/hr. = 12 11) Truck driver and assistant for approxi-* mately 15 minutes to return to Unit No. l at .s mr/hr. 2 people x 15 hrs. x .5 mr/hr. = . 15 ""GO Total man-rem for moving one cask (2 fuel assemblies) from Unit No. l spent fuel tool to Unit No. 2 spent fuel pool. 395 man-mrem or approx. O. 4 man-rem

--.

  • l) The 3.5 mrem/hr dose rate used in several steps of the estimate is based on the dose rate at the fuel pool and transfer pool water surface due to one spent fuel assembly being moved and the dose rate contribution from radionuclides expected to be in the water. 2) The fuel shipping cask dose rates are based on 49 CFR 173 limits of 10 mrem/hr at six feet from shipping cask. It is feet that this is tive of average radiation field operators will be exposed to. RAZ :cm 8/21/79 5Ll 50-A Year 1979 1980 1981 1982 1903 1984 1985 1906 1987 1908 1909 1990 1991 1992 .. ,. _!_I FUEL ELEMENTS SHIPPED FROM SALEM UNI'f l 'l'O SAJJEM UNIT 2 IF ONLY 'l'HE UNIT 2 SPENT FUEL POOL IS EXPl\NDED

_!_I Discharged From Unit 1 40 52 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 Stored In Unit 1 Spent Fuel Pool 40 52 56 56 56 4 264 Shipped to Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool 52 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 500 + Discharged From Unit 2 52 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 660 = 1168 in Unit 2 spent fuel pool 'l'he purpose of this table is only to calculate the total number of spent fuel semblies to be transferred and does not represent any final specific scheme for .f: ** 1 ,_ v -.r-*-