ML071230602: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# | {{Adams | ||
| number = ML071230602 | |||
| issue date = 04/26/2007 | |||
| title = Hope Creek and Salem, Units 1 and 2, Transmittal of Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2006 | |||
| author name = Fricker C J, Perry J F | |||
| author affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR/ADRO | |||
| docket = 05000272, 05000311, 05000354 | |||
| license number = DPR-070, DPR-075, NPF-057 | |||
| contact person = | |||
| case reference number = FOIA/PA-2010-0209, LR-N07-0092 | |||
| document type = Environmental Monitoring Report, Letter | |||
| page count = 499 | |||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 a PSEG APR 26 2007 Nuclear LLC LR-N07-0092 United States Nuclea-r Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 Docket No. 50-354 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 And 2 Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 And DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 | |||
==Subject:== | |||
2006 Radioactive Effluent Release Report In accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to the Operating License for Hope Creek Generating Station, and Section 6.9.1.8 of Appendix A to the Operating License for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. This report is RERR-28 for Hope Creek and RERR-54 for Salem Unit Nos. 1 and 2. This report summarizes liquid and gaseous releases and solid waste shipments from the Hope Creek Generating Station and the Salem Generating Station for the period of January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2006.If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact James Clancy at (856) 339-3144.Sincerely, John F. Perry arJ. Fricker Plant Manager- Hope Creek Plant Manager -Salem Attachment | |||
-' 2168 REV. 7/99 Page 2 LR-N07-0092 C Mr. S. Collins, Administrator-Region 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. R. Ennis, Project Manager Salem & Hope Creek U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector | |||
-Hope Creek (X24)USNRC Senior Resident Inspector | |||
-Salem (X24)Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering PO Box 415 Trenton, New Jersey 086 Mr. K. Kille Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC 2006 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT FOR THE SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS SGS RERR-55 DOCKET NO. 50-272 DOCKET NO. 50-311 OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-070 OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-075 HCGS RERR-29 DOCKET NO. 50-354 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-057 May 2007 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE -EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT I 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JANUARY- DECEMBER 2006 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 PART A. PRELIMINARY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 1.0 REGULATORY LIMITS 5 1.1 Fission and Activation Gas Release Limits 5 1.2 Iodines, Particulates, and Tritium 5 1.3 Liquid Effluents Release Limits 6 1.4 Total Dose Limit 6 2.0 MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS (MPC) 6 3.0 AVERAGE ENERGY 7 4.0 MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY 7 4.1 Liquid Effluents 7 4.2 Gaseous Effu Ients 8 4.3 Estimated Total Error 9 5.0 BATCH RELEASES 10 6.0 UNPLANNED RELEASES 10 7.0 ELEVATED RADIATION MONITOR RESPONSES 10 8,0 MODIFICATION 1TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS 10 PART B. GASPOUS EFFLUENTS 10 PA9T C. LIQUID. EFFLUENTS t0 2 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART D. SOLID WASTE 10 PART E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN 11 Liquid Pathways 11 Air Pathways -12 Direct Radiation 12 Total Dose 13 Assessment 15 Trends 16 PART F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA 18 PART G. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGES 18 PART H. INOPERABLE MONITORS 19 PART I. PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) CHANGES 20 PART J. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATION CHANGES 21 TABLE 1B -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-ELEVATED RELEASES 28 TABLE 1C GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES 29 TABLE 2B -LIQUID EFFLUENTS 41 TABLE 3A -SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED SHIPMENTS | |||
-SALEM 48 TABLE 3B -SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS | |||
-HC 51.TABLE 4A - | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE -GASEOUS 53 TABLE 4B - | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN BATCH MODE -LIQUID 59 APPENDIX A -METEOROLOGICAL DATA APPENDIX B -MPC DATA APPENDIX C -Salem ODCM 3 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT: JANUARY -DECEMBER 2006 INTRODUCTION This report, SGS-RERR-55/HCGS-RERR-29 summarizes information pertaining to the releases of radioactive materials in liquid, gaseous and solid form from the Salem (SGS)and Hope Creek Generating (HCGS) Stations for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31,2006.Salem Unit 1 is a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor that has a licensed core thermal power of 3459 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1169 MWe.Salem Unit 1 achieved initial criticality on December 11, 1976 and went into commercial operation on June 30, 1977.Salem Unit 2 is a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor that has a licensed core thermal power of 3459 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1155 MWe.Salem Unit 2 achieved initial criticality on August 2, 1980 and went into commercial operation on October 13, 1981.The Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) is a General Electric (GE) Boiling Water Reactor designed to operate at a rated core thermal power of 3339 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1139 MWe. The HCGS achieved initial criticality on* June 28, 1986 and went into commercial operation on December 20, 1986.This report is prepared in the format of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B, as required by Control 6.9.1.8 of the Salem Units 1 and 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)and Control 6.9.1.7 of the Hope Creek ODCM. Our responses to parts A-F of the"Supplemental Information" section of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B, are included in the following pages.As required by Regulatory Guide 1.21, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual limits are described in detail within this report along with a summary description of how total radioactivity measurements and their approximations were developed. | |||
To facilitate determination of compliance with 40CFR1 90 requirements, the following information on electrical output is provided.Salem Unit 1 generated 10228090.5 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.Salem Unit 2 generated 9147375 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.Hope Creek generated 8586329 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.4 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART A. PRELIMINARY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION | |||
===1.0 REGULATORY=== | |||
LIMITS 1.1 Fission and Activation Gas Release Limits The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site (i.e.Salem Units 1 & 2, and Hope Creek) to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: | |||
For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin.In addition, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each reactor unit (i.e. Salem Unit 1, Unit 2, or Hope Creek) to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: | |||
During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation. | |||
1.2 Iodines, Particulates, and Tritium The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: | |||
For iodine-1 31, iodine-133, tritium and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.In addition, the dose to a member of the public from iodine- 131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: | |||
During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrern to any organ and, During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.5 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 1.3 Liquid Effluents Release Limits The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 1 OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-04 microcuries per milliliter. | |||
In addition, the dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to: During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body, and less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body, and less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.1.4 Total Dose Limit The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any member of the public, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).2.0 MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS (MPC)Regulatory Guide 1.21 requires that the licensee provide the MPC's used in determining allowable release rates or concentrations for radioactive releases.a. MPC values are not used for gaseous releases. | |||
Determination of maximum release rates for noble gases, Iodine- 131, Iodine- 133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form (with half-lives | |||
> 8 days), are based on dose rate calculations as specified in the ODCM.b. According to current Technical Specifications, MPC values as stated in 1OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 are to be used for liquid effluents. | |||
Since the MPC values were removed from 1OCFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are now contained in the ODCM. These MPC values are added as Appendix B of this report.c. The MPC value used for dissolved or entrained noble gases in liquid effluents is 2E-04 microcuries per milliliter. | |||
6 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 3.0 AV ERAGE ENERGY Regulatory Guide 1.21 requires that the licensee provide the average energy of the radion _uclide mixture in releases of fission and activation gases, if applicable. | |||
Release limits for SGS or HCGS are not based upon average energy. Therefore this section is not applic able to SGS or HCGS.4.0 MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY | |||
===4.1 Liquid=== | |||
Effluents Liquid effluents are monitored in accordance with Table 4.11-1 of the Salem ODCM and Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 of the Hope Creek ODCM.During the period of record, all batch liquid wastes were routed to the sampling tanks for monitoring prior to release. The ODCM requires these tanks to be uniformly mixed for sampling and analysis before being released.Batch releases are defined as: " FoIr Hope Creek, releases from the Equipment Sample Tanks, Floor Drain Sample tanks, Detergent Drain Tanks, and the Condensate Storage Tank.* For Salem, FRAC Tank releases from the Groundwater Remediation Project, releases from the Service Water Drums which are collected and disposed via the Chemical Waste Basin, Waste Monitor Holdup Tanks and the Chemical Volume Control System (CVCS) Monitor Tanks. During the period of record, all batch liquid wastes from the Chemical Drain Tank and Laundry and Hot Shower Tanks were routed to Waste Monitor Holdup Tanks for monitoring prior to release. For process flexibility of liquid effluents, the Salem Unit 1 and 2 Liquid Radwaste System is cross-connected. | |||
Continuous releases are defined as: " For Hope Creek,. a continuous liquid effluent release path exists through the Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge. | |||
* FoI Salem, continuous liquid release pathways include condensate releases for intermittent blow-down of the Steam Generators, and through the Chemical Waste Basin.Representative samples were obtained in accordance with Table 4.11-1 of the Salem ODCM for the Salem Generating Stations and Table 4A11.1.1.1-1 of the Hope Creek ODCM for Hope Creek Generating Station. Specific activities from 'the analyses were multiplied by the volume of effluent discharged to the environment in order to determirie the total liquid activity discharged. | |||
The detection requirements of Table 4.11-1 (SGS) and Table 4.11,.1.1.1-1 (HCGS) of the ODCM are achieved. | |||
Ra~tionuclides measured at concentrations below the ODCM detection limit (LLD) are treated as being present. Radionuclides for which no activity was &tetected while meeting the required LLD's are treated as absent, 7 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 4.2 Gaseous Effluents Salem Units 1 and 2: Gaseous effluent streams at SGS are monitored and sampled in accordance with Table 4.11-2 of the ODCM. The Plant Vent is the final release point for planned gaseous effluent releases and is continuously monitored by installed radiation monitors. | |||
The vent is also continuously sampled for iodine and particulates with a charcoal cartridge and filter paper. The filter and charcoal are normally changed weekly, and analyzed on a multi-channel analyzer.Sampling is also performed on all gas decay tanks and the containment atmosphere prior to release to the environment. | |||
The plant vent is normally sampled weekly for noble gases, particulates, iodines and tritium.The detection requirements of Table 4.11-2 of the ODCM are achieved or exceeded.Radionuclides detected at concentrations below the ODCM LLD are treated as being present. Radionuclides for which no activity was detected while meeting the required LLDs are treated as absent.Continuous Mode gaseous releases are quantified by routine sampling and isotopic analyses of the plant vent, as required by the ODCM. Specific activities for each isotope detected are multiplied by the total vent flow volume for the entire sampling period in order to determine the normal continuous release of radioactivity through the plant vent.Batch Mode noble gas releases are quantified by sampling each decay tank or containment atmosphere prior to release. Specific activities for each isotope are multiplied by the total volume of gas discharged for that batch to determine the total activity released.Elevated plant vent radiation monitoring system readings while the channel is in an alarm state are treated as batch mode releases. | |||
If specific activity data from grab samples are not available, then the release is quantified by the use of the plant vent radiation monitors. | |||
The monitor response is converted to "specific activity" using historical efficiency factors. The "specific activity" is multiplied by the volume of effluent discharged while the channel was in an alarm state in order to determine the total activity discharged. | |||
8 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Hope Creek: Gaseous effluent streams at HCGS are monitored and sampled in accordance with Table 4.11.2.1.2-1 of the ODCM. The North Plant Vent (NPV) and South Plant Vent (SPV)are the final release points for most planned gaseous effluent releases. | |||
The NPV and SPV are continuously monitored for iodine, particulates and noble gases. These monitors have moving particulate and fixed charcoal filters. The particulate filters and charcoal cartridges are normally replaced and analyzed weekly. These analyses are performed on a multi-channel analyzer. | |||
The NPV and SPV are also normally sampled weekly for noble gases and tritium.A small quantity of gaseous effluent is released via the Filtration, Recirculation, and Ventilation System (FRVS) vent during FRVS testing periods. The FRVS is continuously monitored for noble gases when in service, and has fixed particulate and charcoal filters. When the system is in vent mode for greater than two hours, samples are collected at the end of the release period. During periods of extended runs, samples are normally taken weekly.The detection requirements of Tables 4.11.2.1.2-1 of the ODCM are achieved or exceeded. | |||
Radionuclides detected at concentrations below the ODCM detection limit (LLD) are treated as being present. Radionuclides for-which no activity was detected while meeting the required LLDs are treated as absent.Batch Mode noble gas releases (i.e. primary containment purge) are quantified by pre-release sampling and isotopic analysis. | |||
In order to estimate the total radioactivity released, specific activities for each isotope are multiplied by the containment volume.4.3 Estimated Total Error The estimated total error of reported liquid and solid releases is within 25%.The estimated total error of the reported continuous gaseous releases is within 50%when concentrations exceed detectable levels. This error is primarily due to variability of waste stream flow rates and changes in isotopic distributions of waste streams between sampling periods. The estimated total error of the reported batch gaseous releases is within 10%.Error estimates for releases where sample activity is below the detectable concentration levels are not included since error estimates at the LLD are not defined.9 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 5.0 BATCH RELEASES Summaries of batch releases of gaseous and liquid effluents are provided in Tables 4A and 4B.6.0 UNPLANNED RELEASES During this reporting period, the following gaseous releases occurred from Salem: Salem Unit 1 While the unit tripped on March 8, 2006, Atmospheric Releases from the # 11 thru#14 Steam Generators occurred. | |||
During this period 1.16E-01 curies of tritium were released.Salem Unit 2 Due to the manual reactor trip performed on September 26, 2006, Atmospheric Releases from the #21, #22 and #24 Steam Generators occurred. | |||
During this period 9.60E-02 curies of tritium were released.These unplanned releases resulted in less than 1 percent of the Technical Specification offsite dose release limits.7.0 ELEVATED RADIATION MONITOR RESPONSES During this reporting period no liquid or gaseous effluent releases occurred that resulted in elevated Effluent Radiation Monitor responses. | |||
===8.0 MODIFICATION=== | |||
TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS There were no modifications to the previous Radioactive Effluent Release Reports.PART B. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS See Summary Tables 1A through 1C.PART C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS See Summary Tables 2A through 2B.PART D. SOLID WASTE See Summary in Table 3.10 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN The calculated individual doses in this section are based on the controlling dose pathways and age groups as described below. The estimated dose represents the maximum radiation dose that could be received by a member of the general public.The population dose impact is based on the evaluation year site-specific data (i.e., food production, milk production, feed for milk animals and seafood production). | |||
The doses were calculated using methods described in Regulatory Guide 1.109 and represent calculations for the 12-month reporting interval. | |||
Individual doses from batch and continuous releases were calculated using the annual average historic meteorological dispersion factors as described in the respective Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. Population doses were calculated using the meteorological dispersion coefficients for the twelve month reporting interval.Liquid Pathways TYPe Total Body Organ Salem Unit 1 Type Total Body Organ Dose (GILLI)Salem Unit 2 Total Body Organ Dose (GILLI)Hope Creek Type Total Body Organ Dose (Bone)Site Population (Total)Population (Average)Age Group Adult Adult Dose 4.65E-02 4.97E-02 Dose 4.16E-02 4.23E-02 Dose 5.67E-02 3.18E-02 Dose 9.38E-02 2.08E-07 Location Site Boundary Site Boundary Pathway Seafood Ingestion Seafood Ingestion mrem rmrem mrem mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem mrem mrem person-rem mrem Limit N/A N/A 11 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Air Pathways Type Total Body Skin Organ Salem Units 1 &2 Type Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)Hope Creek Tyme Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)Site.Population (Total)Population (Average)Age Group All All Infant Dose 6.82E-04 3.83E-04 8.43E-04 Dose 1.11E-03 1.24E-04 2.75E-02 Dose 1.79E-03 3.98E-09 Location Site Boundary Site Boundary 4.9 mi. W.Pathway Direct Exposure Direct Exposure Milk, Ground Plane, Inhalation mrem mrem mrem mrem mrem mrem Limit 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem Limit 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem Limit N/A N/A person-rem mrem Direct Radiation Direct radiation may be estimated by thermoluminescent dosimetric (TLD)measurements. | |||
One method for comparing TLD measurements is by comparison with pre-operational data. It should be noted that the TLDs measure direct radiation from both the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations at Artificial Island, and natural background radiation. | |||
TLD data for the twelve-month reporting period is given below: TLD iS-1 5S-1 Location 0.55 miles N of Vent 1.0 mile E of Vent Measurement 4.58 mrad/std. | |||
month 3.70 mrad/std. | |||
month These values are interpreted to represent natural backgrouhd, since the values are within the statistical variation associated with the pre-operational program results which are 3.7 mrad/standard month for TLD IS-I and 4.2 mrad/standard month for TLD 5S-1.12 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI)The ISFSI is a closed system and the only exposure is direct radiation. | |||
The spent fuel is stored in a sealed unit and no radioactive materials were released. | |||
This includes iodines, particulates and noble gases. Therefore, there is no dose from effluents from the facility.The direct radiation component from the ISFSI will be measured and assessed as the normal methodology in the ODCM using that data gathered from TLD 5S- 1. No credible effluents from the ISFSI negate the necessity of having a direct downwind pathway.TLD 5S-1 has significant historical data and provides a conservative surrogate for compliance with IOCFR72.104's requirement for a dose assessment to any "real person".Total Dose 40CFR190 limits the total dose to members of the public due to radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources (including the ISFSI facility) to:<25 mrem total body or any organ and;<75 mrem thyroid for a calendar year.For Artificial Island, the major sources of dose are from liquid and gaseous effluents from the Hope Creek and Salem plants.The following doses to a "hypothetical maximum exposed individual" have been calculated for the twelve-month reporting period. They are the sum of gaseous and liquid pathway doses for the Salem 1 and 2 and Hope Creek plants: 9.56E-02 mrem Total Body 1.24E-01 mrem Maximum Organ Dose 8.68E-02 mrem Thyroid 13 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Dose to members of the public due to activities inside the site boundary Dose to members of the public is limited to 100 mrem total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) in a year in accordance with 10CFR20.1301. | |||
The definition of members of the public changed on September 11, 2001. The various food vendors that have previously comprised the maximally exposed group are no longer allowed on site.For this reporting period, the definition of the members of the public are the members of the New Jersey National Guard to augment the security force at the site. Their typical patrol spans the site, and the following locations 16S 1; CA8 and CA1 5 (Hope Creek Barge Slip, Dredge Spoils and Baseball Field) are averaged to estimate their dose. In accordance with the requirements of ODCM 6.9.1.8 (SGS) and 6.9.1.7 (HCGS), the dose to members of the public inside the site boundary has been calculated based on the following assumptions: | |||
: a. The National Guard works a 40-hour week, therefore all doses are multiplied by 0.25 to assess their dose.For the 12-month reporting period, January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 the calculated doses are: 1.13E+00 mrem TEDE Total Body 7.09E-03 mrem TEDE Maximum Organ Dose 7.09E-03 mrem TEDE Thyroid 14 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Assessment | |||
: 1. Liquids: Liquid effluents released from the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations resulted in a minimal dose to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual and were well within all applicable limits (Salem Unit 1 -1.55E+00 % of Total Body Limit, Salem Unit 2 -1.39E+00 % of Total Body Limit, and Hope Creek -1.90E-01 % of Total Body Limit).When compared to releases in the previous reporting period, the Salem and Hope Creek Fission & Activation Products activity in the liquid effluents slightly increased. | |||
Liquid effluent releases continue to remain well within Federal limits and compare favorably to other nuclear utilities. | |||
: 2. Gaseous: Gaseous effluents released from the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations resulted in a minimal dose to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual. | |||
The dose for the 12-month period was a small fraction of all applicable limits (Salem Unit 1 & 2 -4.72E-05 % of Total Body Limit and Hope Creek -1.13E-05 % of Total Body Limit).When compared to releases in the previous reporting period, the Salem and Hope Creek noble gas effluents activity decreased. | |||
Gaseous effluent releases for the Site continue to remain well within Federal limits and are comparable to other nuclear utilities. | |||
Fuel integrity and gaseous effluent processing equipment continue to be maintained in order to ensure that all releases of gaseous radioactivity are As-Low-As-Reasonably-Achievable (ALARA).15 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Trends The following two trend graphs show the total curies of liquid and gaseous effluents released for Salem from 2001 through 2006. Calculated doses in the graphs are to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual. | |||
Liquid Releases (SGS) Fission & Activation Products Curies Released and Calculated Doses E 2.E 1.OOE+00 1. OE-01 1.OOE-02 -1.00E-03 I 1.OOE-04 I 1,00E-05 -2001 1.OOE-02 1.00E-03 0-Total B-U--Organ A Curies 1.OOE+O0 1.OOE-01 I 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 2006 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Gaseous Releases (SGS) Curies of Noble Gases Released and Calculated Doses E E 1.00E+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.00E+01 1.OOE+00 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.OOE-03 1.OOE-04.. ............ ........... | |||
............... | |||
.............. | |||
................ | |||
.......... | |||
....... ..... ........ ....... ..... .. ....... .. .. ........................ | |||
......... | |||
.... ... ... .......... | |||
T 1.OOE+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.OOE+01 1.00E+00 1.00E-01* 1.OQE-02 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year 2006 | |||
* Total Body-- Skin A Curies 16 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT The following two trend graphs show the total curies of liquid and gaseous effluents released for Hope Creek from 2001 through 2006. Calculated doses in the graphs are to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual. | |||
Liquid Releases (HCGS) Fission & Activation Products Curies Released and Calculated Doses E E 1.00E+O0 0 1.OOE-01 1.OOE-02 I 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 -2001........... | |||
I -..................... | |||
....... .............. | |||
1.00E+00 1.O0E-01 1.OOE-02 1.OOE-03 1.00E-04 0 (D 2002 20 1- 1.OOE-05 03 2004 2005 2006* Total Body-U- Organ-A- Curies Year Gaseous Releases Curies of Noble Gases Released and Calculated E E 1.OOE+03 .1.OOE+02 1.00E+01 1.00E+00 1.OOE-01 .1.OOE-02 /1.00E-03 1.OOE-04 .1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.OOE-07 1.OOE-08 .2001 alculated Doses 1.OOE+02 1.OOE+01 1.00E+00 1.OOE-01 1.OOE-02 1.OOE-03-1.OOE-04 1.OOE-05 1.OOE-06 1.OOE-07 1.OOE-08 2006 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year-Total Body U Skin-Curies 17 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA Cumulative joint wind frequency distributions by atmospheric stability class at the 33 feet elevation are provided for the reporting period at the end of this report in Appendix A.PART G. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGES Salem The Salem ODCM was revised during the reporting period. A copy of the Salem ODCM revision 20 is included in Appendix C.Salem ODCM Revision 20 This revision became effective May 16, 2006, accomplishing the following: | |||
: 1. Definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 (pg. 10) is revised, From: 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENTI-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Table III of TID-1 4844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites." To: 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture ofi-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion." Justification: | |||
ODCM Revision 20 incorporates the definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 in accordance with issuance of Licensing Amendment Nos. 271 and 252 for the Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. | |||
These Amendments revise the Technical Specifications to incorporate alternate source term methodology in accordance with 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Section. 50.67.2. Section 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Qaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations (bottom of pg. 89), replaced the wording "collected at the R46 sample locations" with "secondary samples ", and "steam" with "scondarr system ".18 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Justification: | |||
This revision is based on the Design Change Packages (DCPs) 80057520 and 80057587 for 1R46 and 2R46 Radiation Monitors respectively. | |||
The DCPs will modify these monitors from off-line sampling system monitors to adjacent-to-line monitors, resulting in removal of the R46 sampling locations. | |||
Further, this change provides a means of safely obtaining the required secondary system samples, in order to quantify release rates and cumulative releases of pre-event or post event atmospheric steam releases. | |||
This removes the unnecessary specific direction on where to obtain radionuclide samples when characterizing a release.Hope Creek The Hope Creek ODCM was revised during the reporting period. A copy of the Hope Creek ODCM revision 22 is included in Appendix D.Hope Creek ODCM Revision 22 This revision became effective September 29, 2006, accomplishing the following: | |||
: 1. DEFINITIONS | |||
-Section 1.0 -Reportable Event -added "or 10 CFR 72.75" to the definition. | |||
10 CFR 72.75 establishes the reporting requirements for specific events and conditions for Independent.Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations (Pg. 11).2. CONTROLS -Section 3/4.11.4 -Action (a) -added "or 10 CFR 72.104", and subsequently added "and 10 CFR 72.104", in addition to 40 CFR 190 which requires, when estimated dose limits have been exceeded a Special Report to the NRC is required (Pg. 43).3. BASES -Section 3/4.11.4 Total Dose -Revised the section to include the dose limitations specific to the ISFSI in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104 which parallel the limits of 40 CFR 90 (Pg. 64).4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.9.1.7 -Radioactive Effluent Release Report -revised the scope of the requirement to generate the RERR annually is to show conformance with 40 CFR 90 and 10 CFR 72.104 (Pg. 71).5. PART II -Section 3.2 -Total dose to Members Of The Public -Added 10 CFR 72.104 to be included in the title of the section and added the ISFSI to the HCGS as a source of exposure (Pg. 89).6. Section 3.2.2 -Direct Exposure Dose Determination | |||
-Revised section for non-typical conditions that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 to include 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 complianme (Pg. 90).19 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Justification: | |||
The proposed HC ODCM revision incorporates the Dry Cask Storage regulatory reporting requirements of IOCFR 72.104 and IOCFR 72.75. Design Change Package (DCP) 8008845.9 and associated 50.59 provides the required analyses and basis for the installation and implementation of the Dry Cask Storage Facility at the Hope Creek and Salem Generating Station Site. The HC ODCM is revised to include the reporting requirements of the dose to the Public as a result of the Dry Cask Storage Operations. | |||
The HC ODCM currently includes the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 20, 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 50 dose to the public due to effluents released from Hope Creek Plant Operations. | |||
This HC ODCM revision requires that the Annual Effluent Release Report also include the dose to the Public due to the Dry Cask Storage Operations. | |||
: 7. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.1 -Revised "Station" to "Plant" and "SORC" to "PORC" (Pg. 73).Justification: | |||
As part of the reorganization, Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) was recently changed to Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC).PART H. INOPERABLE MONITORS During this reporting period the following effluent radiation monitors were inoperable for greater than 30 days: SALEM UNIT 2 Steam Generator Blowdown (SGBD) Radiation Monitor (2R19D) was declared inoperable as repairs to the low flow condition of this monitor were unsuccessful. | |||
The monitor was tested and returned to service following completion of required maintenance. | |||
All required compensatory sampling was performed during the above inoperable conditions. | |||
PART I. PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) CHANGES During the reporting period, there were no PCP changes.20 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART J. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATION CHANGES There were no game (muskrat) samples available for analysis during this reporting period. The Delaware contact moved and the New Jersey contact is no longer trapping, an alternative trapper was not identified. | |||
These samples are not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications | |||
/ ODCM. The muskrats were collected once a year as management audit samples because of their inhabiting the marshlands surrounding the Site. If an alternative trapper can be identified, these management samples will resume.The.obj ectives and effectiveness of the Radioactive Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) were maintained during this reporting period.21 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 6.77E-2. Average Release Rate For Period p.Ci/sec 8.71E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 3.5 1E-(ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 0.00E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 0.00E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE-(ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
C. Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days Ci 0.OOE-2. Average Release Rate For Period [ICi/sec 0.OOE 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.00-(ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E-D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.20E-2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 1.55E.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 8.30E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose 22-02-03-04 8.40E-02 50%1.07E-02 5.30E-04 00G 9.64E-07 50%F00 1.10E-07 FOG 1.02E-03-00 0.00E+00 50%F00 0.00E+00 FOG 0.00E+00 FOG 0.00E+00+01 1.34E+01 50%-00 1.71E+00-04 1.02E-03 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Units 1It Quarter 2 nd Quarter Error A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 1.26E-01 1.54E-01 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period iiCi/sec 1.62E-02 1.96E-02 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 4.63E-04 5.89E-04 (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
C. Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half- Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate pCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 For Period 3. Percent of Technical | |||
% 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 3.34E+00 8.28E+00 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period pCi/sec 4.30E-01 1.05E+00 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.3 1E-04 5.72E-04 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose 23 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION.EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units Ist Quarter 2 nd Quarter A.B.C.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 | |||
: 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
Ci 2.59E-04ýtCi/sec 3.34E-05% 6.76E-07 Ci 1.15E-03 4.31E-04 5.49E-05 7.25E-07 5.51E-04 50%50%ptCi/sec 1.48E-04 7.OOE-05% 2.59E-01 7.80E-02 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%ýLCi/sec 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00% 0.OOE+/-00 0.OOE+/-00 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.54E 2. Average Release Rate For Period gCi/sec 1.98E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit2 % 2.59E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Jodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose+00 0.00E+00+02 0.OOE+00 50%+01 O.OOE+00-01 0.OOE+00 24 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 6.78E 2. Average Release Rate For Period VtCi/sec 8.53E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 4.72E (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 1.69E 2. Average Release Rate For Period ýICi/sec 2.12E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 1.31E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
C. Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days Ci 0.00E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ptCi/sec 0.OOE 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.62E 2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 2.04E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 1.31E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose-02 8.29E-02-03 1.04E-02-04 5.18E-04-06 2.62E-06-07 3.29E-07-03 2.94E-03+00 1.85E-06+00 2.33E-07+00 2.94E-03+00 0.OOE+00+01 3.89E+01+00 4.89E+002.94E-03 50%50%50%50%25 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF Units 3 rd Quarter ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error 4th Quarter A.B.C.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 | |||
: 2. Average Release Rate For Period.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate For Period.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
Ci 2.66E-01 1.18E+00 50%pCi/sec 3.35E-02 1.49E-01% 9.19E-04 1.20E-03 Ci 7.10E-07 1.63E-05 50%.tCi/sec 8.94E-08 2.05E-06% 7.92E-04 3.54E-03 Ci O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%ýtCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00% 0.OOE+00 0,OOE+00 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E-D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.05E-2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 1.32E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 7.92E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. lodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ. dose+00 0.OOE+00+01 2.91E+01+00 3.66E+00-04 3.54E-03 50% | |||
2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 4.61E 2. Average Release Rate For Period pCi/sec 5.80E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 7.69E (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) | |||
B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 2.09E 2. Average Release Rate For Period jtCi/sec 2.63E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.71E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
C. Particulates | |||
: 1. Particulates With Half-lives> 8 days Ci 0.OOE-2. Average Release Rate For Period MtCi/sec 0.00E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.00E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.08E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 1.35E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.71E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) | |||
: 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. lodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose-01 5.29E-06 50%-02 6.65E-07-04-04-05-02 3.77E-09 1.28E-05 1.61E-06 1.63E-03 50%+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 1.20E-03 50%50%-01-02 1.51E-04 1.63E-03 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1B SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-ELEVATED RELEASES Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations have no elevated release points.28 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE iC-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode I" Quarter 2 nd Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon-133 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine- 133 Totals Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.64E-07 1.06E-05 1.15E-05 2.55E-02 4.22E-02 6.77E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 3.51E-01 3.92E-02 4.48E-02 8.40E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.54E-01 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)4. Tritium Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.17E+01 O.OOE+00 1.26E+01 29 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter Batch Mode IS" Quarter 2 nd Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon- 135 Xenon-133 Totals 2. Iodine 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+O0 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 3.18E-02 1.61E-03 9.25E-02 1.26E-01 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 3.16E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.04E+00 1.77E-01 4.11E-02 0.OOE+00 1.13E-01 1.54E-01 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.38E-01 30 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 1 st Quarter 2 Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter* Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Xenon-133 Xenon-135 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine- 133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 2.59E-04 2.59E-04 1.15E-03 7.55E-02 7.67E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 5.51E-04 5.87E-03 6.42E-03 Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.87E-04 2.44E-04 4.31E-04 0.OOE+00 3.82E-06 3.82E-06 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.54E+02 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 31 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3 r Quarter 4th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon- 13 3 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine, 133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)Cobalt-58 Totals Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.69E-06 3,.63E-05 3.80E-05 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.62E-06 1.32E-05 1.58E-05 1.85E-06 1.85E-06 3.52E-02 3.27E-02 6.78E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 1.82E+00 3.83E-02 4.46E-02 8.29E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.58E-01 4.Tritium Ci 1.43E+01 3.84E+01 I 32 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 3 rd Quarter 4th Quarter Batch Mode 3rd Quarter 4" Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Krypton-88 Krypton-85m Xenon-133m Xenon- 135 Argon-41 Xenon- 133 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine- 133 Iodine-131 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 7.1OE-07 7.10E-07 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.68E-06 1.63E-05 1.90E-05 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.66E-03 6.29E-02 2.01E-01 2.66E-01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.34E-01 5.91E-04 9.92E-04 1.24E-02 6.44E-02 3.75E-02 1.07E+00 1.18E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.38E-01 Ci Ci Ci Ci O.OOE+O0 Ci 1.O1E+O1 O.OOE+00 2.89E+01 33 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
-GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Xenon- 133 Xenon- 135 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131! | |||
Iodine-133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life | |||
>8 days)4. Tritium Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 4.61E-01 4.61E-01 2.09E-04 2.32E-04 4.40E-04 5.29E-06 O.OOE+00 5.29E-06 1.28E-05 0.OOE+00 1.28E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 2.05E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.08E+00 O.OOE+00 1.20E-03 34 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1st Quarter 2 d Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1. 1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 2.26E-03ýtCi/ml 5.13E-12% 1.73E-04 Ci 4.72E+01ýiCi/ml 1.07E-07% 3.57E-03 Ci 0.OOE+00 PtCi/ml 0.00E+00% 0.00E+00 Ci 0.OOE+00 Liters 6.27E+07 Liters 4.41E+11 7.47E-04 25%1.72E-12 5.45E-04 2.30E+02 25%5.27E-07 1.76E-02 9.59E-05 2.20E-13 25%1.1OE-07 0.OOE+00 25%5.77E+07 25%4.36E+11 25%35 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration A. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 1.62E-04 3.03E-04 25%ýtCi/ml 3.86E-13 7.09E-13% 1.82E-04 4.75E-04 Ci 5.64E+01 2.43E+02 25%ýtCi/mr 1.35E-07 5.69E-07% 4.49E-03 1.90E-02 Ci 1.05E-05 9.32E-05 25%atCi/ml 2.50E-14 2.18E-13% 1.25E-08 1.09E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 4.92E+07 5.01E+07 25%Liters 4.19E+11 4.27E+11 25%36 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units Is' Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products ,1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 16.1 1E-05 4.44E-12% 8.50E-05 Ci 7.38E-01ýtCi/ml 5.36E-08% 1.79E-03 Ci 2.47E-05ýtCi/ml 1.79E-12% 8.96E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 Liters 4.91E+07 Liters 1.38E+10 5.33E-02 25%2.92E-09 3.34E-03 3.51E+00 25%1.92E-07 6.41E-03 9.45E-04 25%5.18E-11 2.59E-05 0.OOE+00 25%3.95E+07 25%1.82E+10 25%37 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration 3.. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 4.30E-03 5.32E-03 25%ýLCi/ml 9.32E-12 1.22E- 11% 9.32E-04 5.49E-04 Ci 2.66E+02 1.62E+02 25%ýtCi/ml 5.77E-07 3.69E-07% 1.92E-02 1.23E-02 Ci 6.47E-05 1.16E-03 25%ýLCi/ml 1.40E- 13 2.65E-12% 7.01E-08 1.32E-06 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.73E+07 5.69E+07 25%Liters 4.61E+11 4.38E+11 25%38 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentratiofi | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 4.82E-04 1.36E-03ýtCi/ml 1.09E-12 4.01E-12% 9.79E-04 7.65E-04 Ci 2.49E+02 9.71E+01ýtCi/ml 5.66E-07 2.87E-07% 1.89E-02 9.58E-03 25%25%Ci 1.03E-04 9.08E-04 25%ýtCi/ml 2.34E-13 2.69E-12% 1.17E-07 1.34E-06 Ci 5.73E-06 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.09E+07 5.05E+07 Liters 4.40E+11 3.38E+11 25%25%3M 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3 Quarter 4th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) | |||
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1. 1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration | |||
: 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 3.96E-02 6.43E-03 25%ýICi/ml 1.89E-09 4.26E-10% 6.15E-04 2.09E-04 Ci 1.93E+00 3.01E+00 25%pCi/ml 9.21E-08 1.99E-07% 3.07E-03 6.64E-03 Ci , 3.66E-05 5.28E-06 25%[tCi/ml 1.75E-12 3.50E-13% 8.76E-07 1.75E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.07E+07 5.06E+07 25%Liters 2.09E+10 1.51E+10 25%40 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Nuclides Released Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 d Quarter 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium- 137 Antimony-125 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.07E-04 4.89E-04 8.77E-05 7.39E-04 6.39E-04 2.26E-03 1.61E-04 3.12E-04 2.09E-05 2.54E-04 0.OOE+00 7.47E-04 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci 1.09E+00 1.08+00 4.61E+01 2.29E+02 0.OOE+00 9.59E-05 O.OOE+00 9.59E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 41 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released Continuous Mode Units 1 St Quarter 2nd Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium- 137 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+/-00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE-I00 0.OOE+/-00 O.OOE+OO 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci 9.98E-01 9.01E-01 8.78E-05 5.99E-05 3.39E-06 1.04E-05 1.61E-04 5.54E+01 1.05E-05 1.05E-05 1.38E-04 1.33E-04 0.OOE+00 3.2 1E-05 3.03E-04 2.42E+02 9.31E-05 9.31E-05 Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.0OE+00 O.OOE+00 42 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released Fission and Activation Products Cerium-141 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Chromium-51 Cesium-137 Iron-55 Iodine-131 Lanthinum-140 Manganese-54 Strontium-89 Zinc-65 Totals 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Xenon-133m Xenon- 135 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Continuous Mode Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0'.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.49E-06 0.OOE+00 1.88E-07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.26E-07 5.91E-05 0.OOE+00 6.11E-05 4.65E-07 2.28E-04 4.56E-04 2.98E-04 2.80E-05 5.18E-02 9.31E-06 1.73E-07 2.20E-04 1.44E-04 6.42E-05 5.32E-02 Ci 5.77E-01 8.37E-02 1.61E-01 3.42E+00 Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 5.84E-06 0.OOE+00 1.89E-05 2.47E-05 6.22E-04 1.55E-05 3.08E-04 9.45E-04 Ci O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 43 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 3 Quarter 4t" Quarter Batch Mode 3 d Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released Fission and Activation Products Cerium- 143 Cobalt-57 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Antimony-125 Tellurium-132 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+/-OO 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.62E-06 7.22E-06 4.15E-04 1.79E-03 1.23E-04 1.01E-03 9.48E-04 0.OOE+00 4.30E-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.25E-03 9.63E-04 4.56E-05 5.74E-04 4.84E-04 7.17E-06 5.32E-03 2. Tritium Ci 1.04E+00 6.91E-01 2.65E+02 1.61E+02 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 6.47E-05 6.47E-05 O.OOE+00 1.16E-03 1.16E-03 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 44 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Iodine-133 Antimony-125 Totals Continuous Mode Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+-00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 6.93E-05 2.90E-04 4.68E-06 9.79E-05 6.52E-06 1.39E-05 4.82E-04 1.06E-03 1.72E-04 5.55E-06 1.15E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.35E-03 2. Tritium Ci 4.23E-01 6.64E-01 2.49E+02 9.64E+01 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Xenon- 13 5-Totals Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 9.90E-05 4.04E-06 1.03E-04 5.73E-06 9.02E-04 5.80E-06 9.08E-04 O.OOE+00 4. Gross Alpha Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 45 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 3 Quarter 4th Quarter Batch Mode 3 yd Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission and Activation Products Silver-I 1O1n Cerium-141 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium-137 Iron-55 Iron- 58 Manganese-54 Niobium-97 Strontium-89 Zinc-65 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.89E-05 1.29E-07 3.95E-02 0.OOE+00 1.20E-06 0.OOE+00 9.16E-05 0.OOE+00 3.96E-02 9.90E-06 6.33E-06 1.73E-04 2.72E-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 9.93E-05 3.27E-03 7.36E-06 0.OOE+00 1.41E-04 6.43E-03 2.30E+00 2. Tritium Ci 8.06E-01 7.10E-01 I 1.12E+00 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Xenon- 135 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci Ci Ci.0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.99E-05 1.67E-05 3.66E-05 0.OOE+00 5.28E-06 5.28E-06 Ci O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 46 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS IA. Type of Waste (Class A)Units 1 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Resins, Filters, m 3 1.47E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 1.76E+01 b. Dry Active Waste mi 1.41E+02 25%Ci 1.55E+00 c. Irradiated Components mI 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others -Dewatered Soil /Sediment M. 2.06E+01 25%Flux Thimble Cleaner Ci 2.07E-01 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottoms Nuclides % I Ci A) -SGS Dry Active Waste 0/Ci Tritium Carbon-14 Iron-55 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Antimony-125 Cesium-134 Cesuim-137 Cerium- 144 4.52 3.90 6.56 1.25 13.33 20.99 2.15 11.53 33.63 1.38 7.97E-01 6.87E-01 1.16E+00 2.20E-01 2.35E+00 3.70E+00 3.79E-01 2.03E+00 5.93E+00 2.43E-01 7.66 0.00 32.15 8.37 5.80 22.18 0.00 0.00 5.34 17.03 1.18E-01 0.OOE+00 4.97E-01 1.29E-01 8.97E-02 3.43E-01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.26E-02 2.63E-01 Irradiated Components Others -Dewatered Soil / Sediment% Ci Nuclides Tritium Iron-55 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesuim-137 0%Ci 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 4.33 43.18 4.63 38.22 9.54 8.94E-03 8.92E-02 9.56E-03 7.89E-02 1.97E-02 47 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination 3 1 2 5 Truck Truck Truck Truck Barnwell, SC Richland, WA Memphis, TN Memphis, TN Type of Containers HIC SeaVan and Box Box Sea Van 48 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS lB. Type of Waste (Class B)Units'6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Resins, Filters, m 1.14E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 3.54E+02 b. Dry Active Waste m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3.0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2B. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class B) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottoms Nuclides Iron- 55 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesium- 134 Cesuim- 137 Ci 11.21 8.39 45.45 8.26 24.83 3.97E+01 2.97E+01 1.61E+02 2.93E+01 8.79E+01 3B. Solid Waste Disposal (Class B or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Des tination Type of Containers HIC 4 Truck Barnwell, SC 49 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS 1A. Type of Waste (Class A)Units'6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, Sludge, m 3 1.42E-04 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 5.21E-03 b. Dry Active Waste m 2.04E+02 25%Ci 4.87E-01 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others -Dewatered Soil/Sediment m 3 7.65E+00 25%Ci 4.81E-05 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom Nuclides % I Ci A) -SGS Irradiated Components | |||
%I Ci Manganese-54 Iron-55 Cobalt-60 3.05 1.59E-04 0.00 0.OOE+00 89.25 4.65E-03 0.00 0.OOE+00 6.00 3.13E-04 0.00 0.OOE+00 Dry Active Waste Others -Dewatered Soil / Sediment% Ci % I Ci Nuclides Tritium Potassium-40 Iron-55 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesium-134 Cesuim-137 2.69 0.00 47.29 15.93 3.55 20.57 2.59 5.36 1.31E-02 0.OOE+00 2.30E-01 7.76E-02 1.73E-02 1.00E-01 1.26E-02 2.61E-02 0.00 66.94 19.77 0.00 14.49 8.71 0.00 1.46 0.-00E+00 3.22E-05 9.5 1E-06 0.OOE+00 7.19E-07 4.19E-06 0.OOE+00 7.01E-07 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Des 4 Truck Mem 50 tination phis, TN Type of Containers Sea Van 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-2 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS 6-Month Est. Total lB. Type of Waste (Class B) Units' Period Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, m 3 2.66E+00 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 8.46E+01 b. Dry Active Waste m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.00E+00 d. Others mi 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2B. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class B) -SGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom Nuclides % Ci Iron-55 4.49 3.80E+00 Cobalt-60 5.14 4.35E+00 Nickel-63 31.11 2.63E+01 Cesium-134 17.23 1.46E+01 Cesium-137 40.99 3.47E+01 3B. Solid Waste Disposal (Class B) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination Type of Containers 1 Truck Barnwell, SC HIC 51 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3B-1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)HCGS 1A. Type of Waste (Class A)Units 1 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, Sludge, m 3 3.49E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 4.15E+01 b. Dry Active Waste m n 4.54E+02 25%Ci 1.58E+00 c. Irradiated Components m1 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class A) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom% Ci Dry Active Waste Nuclides Chromium-51 Manganese-54 Iron-55 Iron-59 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Zinc-65 Ci 0/0.00 1.96 84.87 0.00 0.00 11.58 0.00 0.OOE+00 8.14E-01 3.52E+01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.80E+00 0.OOE+00 15.09 10.82 32.08 7.64 13.70 16.90 2.16 2.38E-01 1.71E-01 5.06E-01 1.21E-01 2.16E-01 2.67E-01 3.4 1E-02 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A) -HCGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination 4 Truck Bamwell, SC Type of Containers HIC Steel Cask HIC and Sea Van 1 Truck Truck Bamwell, SC Memphis, TN 10 52 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3B-2 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)HCGS IA. Type of Waste (Class A)Units, 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, m 3 4.81E+00 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 7.40E-01 b. Dry Compressible Waste m 3 1.59E+02 25%Ci 6.89E-01 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition | |||
(>1%) (Class A) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom% I Ci Dry Active Waste Nuclides Tritium Carbon- 14 Chromium-51 Manganese-54 Iron-55 Iron-59 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Zinc-65 Antimony-125 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Ci I 4 I.2.70 6.09 0.00 1.39 9.43 0.00 19.97 32.73 0.00 1.65 4.76 20.29 2.OOE-02 4.50E-02 0.OOE+00 1.03E-02 6.98E-02 0.OOE+00 1.48E-01 2.42E-01 0.OOE+00 1.22E-02 3.52E-02 1.50E-01 0.00 0.00 14.74 1.69 64.09 10.06 4.65 1.14 2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.02E-01 1.16E-02 4.41E-01 6.93E-02 3.21E-02 7.85E-03 1.94E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A) -HCGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination Type of Containers Sea Van and Box 4 Truck Memphis, TN 53 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006 -Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: March 31, 2006 Gaseous 182 1.53E+04 1.8 1E+02 8.40E+01 4.1OE+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006 -June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 148 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.1 OE+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.37E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.41E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 54 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-1 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 174 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.33E+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.88E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.63E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 4.60E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 193 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.54E+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.16E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.95E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.50E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 55, 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006-.Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: March 31, 2006 Gaseous 104 7.03E+03 1.06E+02 6.76E+01 2.50E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006 -June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 106 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.15E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.90E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.74E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 56 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-2 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 106 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 6.82E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.40E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.44E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.50E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: October 1, 2006 -Decemb Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above:* Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 'er 31, 2006 Gaseous 71 6.08E+03 7.80E+02 8.57E+01 3.50E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.57 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 0 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 0.00E+00 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 0.00E+00 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006- June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 2 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 8.28E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 6.20E+03 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 4.14E+03 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.08E+03 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 58 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-3 (Continued) | |||
HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006- Se 2. Type of release: 3. Number of releases during quarter: 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: ptember 30, 2006 Gaseous 2 1.21E+02 7.30E+01 6.05E+01 4.80E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 0 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 59 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 8 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.90E+03 Min 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.19E+02 Min 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.37E+02 Min 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1,00E+00 Min 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.98E+05 GPM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: April 1, 2006 Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release:-June 30, 2006 Liquid 9 2.08E+03 3.60E+02 2.3 1E+02 1.00E+00 8.88E+05 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM 60 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-1 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS ANT) WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 20 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 4.03E+/-03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.3 6E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.0 1E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 8.03E-01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 9.4 1 E+05 GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006 -December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 22 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 4.30OE+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.90E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 1 .96E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.50E-01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.93E+05 GPM 61 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31,2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 4 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.03E+02 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 2.66E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 1.76E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.54E+05 GPM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: April 1, 2006 Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release:-June 30, 2006 Liquid 8 1.73E+03 2.92E+02 2.17E+02 1.69E+02 8.70E+05 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM 62 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-2 (Continued) | |||
SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 12 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 3.55E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.99E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.96E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.20E+02 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.98E+05 GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 10 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 2.OOE+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.57E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: *2.OOE+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.00E+00 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 6.88E+05 GPM 63 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006- 1V Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above:* Maximum duration for release of type listed above:* Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: larch 31, 2006 Liquid 4 2.03E+02 8.20E+01 5.08E+01 2.80E+01 2.8 1E+04 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006- June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 45 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 2.79E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 8.71E+01 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.19E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.98E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 3.72E+04 GPM 64 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B3-3 (Continued) | |||
HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: July 1, 2006- Septe Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: mber 30, 2006 Liquid 17 1.07E+03 8.12E+01 6.27E+01 3.20E+01 4.26E+04 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006-December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 11 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.43E+02 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 8.30E+01 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.76E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.27E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 3.08E+04 GPM 65 APPENDIX A METEOROLOGICAL DATA 1.300-33-ft Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 1/06 -3/06 m = m m = = m = = m = m m = m = m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.2 3 0.1 0 0.0 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.8 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 10 0.5 0.3 0 0.0 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 16.3 0 m m m mm -I m Imm mIII .Im -m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m = = m =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 8 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 8 21 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 7 0.3 18 0.8 13 0.6 0 0.0 41 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 5 2 2 0 1 5 1 2 5 0 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 16 11 11 5 6 3 4 7 8 7 23 22 11 18 10 9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 1. 1 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 18 14 7 2 0 1 7 5 7 4 8 26 37 32 79 34 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.7 1.5 3.7 1.6 1 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 9 28 27 52 16 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.3 2.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 17 18 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 35 32 19 12 8 6 12 14 20 13 33 60 87 95 169 64 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.6 1.5 2.8 4.1 4.4 7.9 3.0 0 0.0 30 1.4 171 8.0 281 13.1 144 6.7 45 2.1 8 0.4 679 31.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.6 MISSING: 0 m m m m = m m m m -m -m m m m m m m m m m mmm m m =-- mm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: f300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 6 0.3 29 1.4 23 1.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 26 1.2 15 0.7 1 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 12 0.6 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 16 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 16 0.7 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 24 1.1 37 1.7 2 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 26 1.2 19 0.9 2 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 25 1.2 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 17 0.8 11 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.2 27 1.3 21 1.0 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 16 0.7 39 1.8 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 12 0.6 34 1.6 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 29 1.4 28 1.3 12 0.6 0 0.0 4 0.2 49 2.3 114 5.3 42 2.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 33 1.5 44 2.1 22 1.0 0 0.0 71 3.3 366 17.1 409 19.1 100 4.7 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 58 2.7 44 2.1 27 1.3 17 0.8 29 1.4 23 1.1 68 3.2 49 2.3 40 1.9 41 1.9 65 3.0 64 3.0 54 2.5 71 3.3 220 10.3 109 5.1 979 45.8 33 1.5 0 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 MISSING: 6 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 0 1 0.0 7 0.3 0 2 0.1 6 0.3 0 8 0.4 6 0.3 0 5 0.2 3 0.1 4 3 0.1 17 0.8 4 6 0.3 19 0.9 38 4 0.2 13 0.6 12 3 0.1 7 0.3 7 4 0.2 8 0.4 8 1 0.0 5 0.2 6 1 0.0 7 0.3 0 0 0.0 3 0.1 2 2 0.1 4 0.2 3 0 0.0 5 0.2 0 0 0.0 7 0.3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.8 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 13 0.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 6 0.3 8 0.4 8 0.4 14 0.7 12 0.6 25 1.2 80 3.7 29 1.4 20 0.9 30 1.4 13 0.6 8 0.4 5 0.2 10 0.5 5 0.2 10 0.5 283 13.2 0 0.0 41 1.9 122 5.7 87 4.1 27 1.3 5 0.2 1 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 MISSING: 15 m m m m m m m m m -m m m m m | |||
-m -m m-- -- m m-- -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 5 7 28 5 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 6 9 84 20 4 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 3.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 49 2.3 41 1.9 23 1.1 6 0.3 2 0.1 128 6.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 4 11 21 17 10 13 8 12 8 7 5 7 4 7 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 50 44 29 20 30 43 76 52 42 32 55 47 26 52 64 49 2.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 3.6 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.6 2.2 1.2 2.4 3.0 2.3 41 29 13 2 8 8 108 49 27 23 35 65 74 67 198 82 1.9 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 5.0 2.3 1.3 1.1 1.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 9.3 3.8 1 7 1 0 0 2 36 4 4 13 7 15 39 48 ill 39 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.2 5.2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 7 3 8 27 39 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99 84 54 43 55 63 245 113 85 86 ill 135 154 199 426 187 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.9 11.5 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.2 6.3 7.2 9.3 19.9 8.7 0 0.0 149 7.0 711 33.2 829 38.8 327 15.3 112 5.2 11 0.5 2139 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 21 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.4 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m m m m M- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 4 11 21 17 10 13 8 12 8 7 5 7 4 7 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 50 44 29 20 30 43 76 52 42 32 55 47 26 52 64 49 2.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 3.6 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.6 2.2 1.2 2.4 3.0 2.3 41 29 13 2 8 8 108 49 27 23 35 65 74 67 198 82 1.9 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 5.0 2.3 1.3 1.1 1.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 9.3 3.8 1 7 1 0 0 2 36 4 4 13 7 15 39 48 i11 39 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.2 5.2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 7 3 8 27 39 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99 84 54 43 55 63 245 113 85 86 ill 135 154 199 426 187 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.9 11.5 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.2 6.3 7.2 9.3 19.9 8.7 0.0 149 7.0 711 33.2 829 38.8 327 15.3 112 5.2 11 0.5 2139 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 21 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.4 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 1 0.0 3 0.1 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 21.1 0 m m m m m m m -m m m --m -m m m m | |||
--m --m m --=- m mmm -m =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 6 0.3 8 0.4 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 21.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 9 19 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 11 0.5 11 0.5 12 0.6 39 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 20.0 2 m m m m m -m m n m m m -m m m m mm m m m mm -m m m-m- m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/lOOM CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 3 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6-7 6 3 2 4 3 5 5 11 18 6 9 8 5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 19 9 5 2 0 1 0 6 6 4 13 27 17 21 24 16 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.6 1.3 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.8 7 9 5 2 0 1 9 1 2 2 4 13 26 32 67 22 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 1.6 3.3 1. 1 0 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 12 18 35 11 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.7 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 20 22 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 1 .1 0.2 33 32 20 11 3 5 14 10 14 15 31 67 67 100 157 59 1.6 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.5 3.3 3.3 5.0 7.8 2.9 0 0.0 14 0.7 105 5.2 170 8.5 202 10.1 94 4.7 53 2.6 638 31.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.0 MISSING: 41 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 10 10 7 5 7 9 4 8 17 5 7 14 5 5 5 7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 19 9 9 13 4 9 9 19 22 13 25 24 11 37 42 24 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.9 1. 1 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.8 2.1 1.2 19 14 8 1 0 5 23 13 9 9 15 22 25 27 108 46 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.3 5.4 2.3 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 9 7 5 9 31 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.5 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 3 1 1 9 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 49 36 26 21 13 24 41 40 52 35 64 72 49 82 195 105 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.6 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.6 1.7 3.2 3.6 2.4 4.1 9.7 5.2 0.0 24 1.2 125 6.2 289 14.4 344 17.1 90 4.5 32 1.6 904 45.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13.1 81= m m -m m = = = = m = = = = = = = m | |||
= m m m = = m = = m m m m m m m m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 6 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 2 3 2 1 8 5 7 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 5 2 4 15 7 13 9 9 2 8 4 2 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 2 3 0 0 1 1 19 16 7 7 9 1 1 0 6 9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 7 5 8 5 13 65 36 29 33 24 7 11 4 10 16 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 3.2 1.8 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.8 0 0.0 18 0.9 40 2.0 88 4.4 82 4.1 32 1.6 18 0.9 278 13.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.0 MISSING: 20 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 3 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 11 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 1 2 28 41 27 13 1 2 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.4 2.0 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 22 1.1 26 1.3 25 1.2 32 1.6 12 0.6 119 5.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.2 MISSING: 9 m m m m m = m m m = -m m -m m m m m | |||
= m mm M m m = m m m = m n = = = m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 2 7 1 6 6 6 3 2 7 3 2 4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 16 20 16 16 13 12 21 19 35 18 20 36 12 14 14 12 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 39 19 17 20 6 15 26 41 52 28 47 54 37 63 69 43 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 2.6 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 3.1 3.4 2.1 28 26 13 3 1 7 54 45 22 20 28 37 56 68 188 79 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.4 9.4 3.9 0 8 2 0 0 3 28 16 8 12 13 14 19 30 79 34 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 3.9 1.7 3 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 12 9 6 5 31 40 12 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.5 2.0 0.6 87 75 51 42 22 44 150 127 123 96 120 149 136 209 392 184 4.3 3.7 2.5 2.1 1.1 2.2 7.5 6.3 6.1 4.8 6.0 7.4 6.8 10.4 19.5 9.2 0 0.0 58 2.9 294 14.6 576 28.7 675 33.6 266 13.3 138 6.9 2007 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 153 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 2 7 1 6 6 6 3 2 7 3 2 4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0. 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 16 20 16 16 13 12 21 19 35 18 20 36 12 14 14 12 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 39 19 17 20 6 15 26 41 52 28 47 54 37 63 69 43 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 2.6 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 3.1 3.4 2.1 28 26 13 3 1 7 54 45 22 20 28 37 56 68 188 79 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.4 9.4 3.9 0 8 2 0 0 3 28 16 8 12 13 14 19 30 79 34 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 3.9 1.7 3 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 12 9 6 5 31 40 12 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.5 2.0 0.6 87 75 51 42 22 44 150 127 123 96 120 149 136 209 392 184 4.3 3.7 2.5 2.1 1.1 2.2 7.5 6.3 6.1 4.8 6.0 7.4 6.8 10.4 19.5 9.2 0 0.0 58 2.9 294 14.6 576 28.7 675 33.6 266 13.3 138 6.9 2007 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 153 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.7-m -m -m -m -m -m m -mm mm mm -m nm mmmmmmmmmmmmm mm mm mmm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 4 0.2 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 23.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 10 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 0.3 9 0.4 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 23.5 0 m m m m m m -m m --= m m = m = = = | |||
MMMM MMMM Mmi=MMMMM MM ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 12 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 9 21 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 10 0.5 8 0.4 19 0.9 41 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 23.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/!00M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 7 3 5 9 3 4 1 4 3 9 17 10 8 5 4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 16 13 2 1 2 0 0 3 6 7 9 22 15 19 15 15 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 9 4 2 1 1 0 5 4 5 2 6 15 22 27 60 15 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 2.8 0.7 3 8 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 6 28 14 43 20 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.7 2.0 0.9 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 15 30 42 17 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 1.4 2.0 0.8 34 37 13 9 13 3 13 9 15 15 28 64 91 98 166 71 1.6 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.3 3.0 4.2 4.6 7.7 3.3 0 0.0 10 0.5 97 4.5 145 6.7 178 8.3 136 6.3 113 5.3 679 31.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 16.4 0 m m m m m m m -= -m m m m = = m m m mmm mmmimmmm = m =M ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 4 0.2 14 0.7 31 1.4 6 0.3 12 0.6 12 0.6 2 0.1 9 0.4 11 0.5 6 0.3 5 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 11 0.5 9 0.4 5 0.2 6 0.3 5 0.2 4 0.2 9 0.4 12 0.6 3 0.1 14 0.7 12 0.6 6 0.3 14 0.7 25 1.2 7 0.3 15 0.7 17 0.8 4 0.2 15 0.7 32 1.5 6 0.3 17 0.8 39 1.8 3 0.1 9 0.4 24 1.1 6 0.3 15 0.7 31 1.4 4 0.2 16 0.7 86 4.0 3 0.1 12 0.6 44 2.0 73 3.4 193 9.0 392 18.2 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT 12 0.6 4 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 8 0.4 4 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 16 0.7 11 0.5 17 0.8 18 0.8 75 3.5 33 1.5 212 9.9 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 9 0.4 6 0.3 4 0.2 7 0.3 33 1.5 23 1.1 99 4.6 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 62 2.9 35 1.6 26 1.2 16 0.7 24 1.1 22 1.0 37 1.7 37 1.7 47 2.2 53 2.5 76 3.5 81 3.8 58 2.7 77 3.6 215 10.0 115 5.3 981 45.6 0 0.0 12 0.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.2 MISSING: 4 | |||
---x ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 2 1 0 4 8 1 5 4 0 1 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 5 1 3 8 9 10 7 6 2 5 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 2 3 1 0 2 12 13 13 7 8 4 6 5 4 8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0 0 1 0 1 4 5 6 8 10 10 0 0 1 3 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 4 1 0 0 1 14 5 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 6 8 8 10 3 12 44 41 34 43 32 7 12 7 8 18 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 2.0 1.9 1.6 2.0 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.8 0 0.0 13 0.6 29 1.3 58 2.7 94 4.4 55 2.6 44 2.0 293 13.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.1 MISSING: 5 m mmm m m m m m m m --m m m m m | |||
= m m m m m m m -m m m m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 5 3 5 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 17 12 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 42 42 22 8 3 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 26 1.2 38 1.8 33 1.5 25 1.2 128 6.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 19.1 MISSING: 0 | |||
]ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 5 1 2 2 4 2 1 3 4 2 0 3 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 9 13 6 13 15 8 14 12 12 17 19 23 14 15 9 8 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 30 26 11 12 15 9 18 35 35 32 35 42 30 34 32 28 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.3 46 18 16 4 11 7 29 33 60 38 47 60 58 72 154 68 2.1 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.3 1.3 1.5 2.8 1.8 2.2 2.8 2.7 3.3 7.2 3.2 15 12 9 2 1 9 17 23 27 19 27 17 46 36 131 60 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.8 1. 1 1.3 0.9 1.3 0.8 2.1 1.7 6.1 2.8 1 9 2 0 0 2 21 22 3 26 13 10 22 47 92 43 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.3 2.0 102 80 47 36 43 37 101 129 139 133 144 156 172 204 421 207 4.7 3.7 2.2 1.7 2.0 1.7 4.7 6.0 6.5 6.2 6.7 7.3 8.0 9.5 19.6 9.6 0 0.0 35 1.6 207 9.6 424 19.7 721 33.5 451 21.0 313 14.6 2151 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 mmmmm m -m mm m m m m - | |||
-~ --m m m m m -------N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0. 6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 1 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 5 0.2 1 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 9 0.4 30 1.4 46 2.1 15 0.7 1 0.0 13 0.6 26 1.2 18 0.8 12 0.6 9 0.4 6 0.3 11 0.5 16 0.7 9 0.4 2 0.1 13 0.6 12 0.6 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 15 0.7 15 0.7 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 9 0.4 7 0.3 9 0.4 2 0.1 14 0.7 18 0.8 29 1.3 17 0.8 21 1.0 12 0.6 35 1.6 33 1.5 23 1.1 22 1.0 12 0.6 35 1.6 60 2.8 27 1.3 3 0.1 17 0.8 32 1.5 38 1.8 19 0.9 26 1.2 19 0.9 35 1.6 47 2.2 27 1.3 13 0.6 23 1.1 42 2.0 60 2.8 17 0.8 10 0.5 14 0.7 30 1.4 58 2.7 46 2.1 22 1.0 15 0.7 34 1.6 72 3.3 36 1.7 47 2.2 9 0.4 32 1.5 154 7.2 131 6.1 92 4.3 8 0.4 28 1.3 68 3.2 60 2.8 43 2.0 207 9.6 424 19.7 721 33.5 451 21.0 313 14.6 SUM PERCENT 102 4.7 80 3.7 47 2.2 36 1.7 43 2.0 37 1.7 101 4.7 129 6.0 139 6.5 133 6.2 144 6.7 156 7.3 172 8.0 204 9.5 421 19.6 207 9.6 2151 100.0 0 0.0 35 1.6 MISSING HOURS: 9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 2.300-33-ft Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 4/06 -6/06 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m =m- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 2 0 1 8 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 0 4 2 3 11 8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0 0.0 1 0.0 18 0.8 25 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 2 2 1 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 2 11 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 4 1 2 0 7 9 4 15 8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.5 21 1.0 24 1.1 4 0.2 0 0.0 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.0 MISSING: 0 m- m m m m m m m m =- -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3 .6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 4 0.2 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 1 0.0 0.0 3 0.1 9 0.4 7 0.3 0.0 4 0.2 12 0.6 1 0.0 n_0 23 1.1 42 1.9 25 1.1 18.6-24 .5 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 4 0.2 1 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 5 0.2 1 0.0 2 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 13 0.6 10 0.5 20 0.9 17 0.8 94 4.3 0.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 MISSING: 0 N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 8 11 21 10 15 2 4 33 20 34 33 40 19 12 20 17 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2 1.5 0.9 1.6 1.5 1.8 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.8 20 20 22 16 11 7 20 19 19 12 23 13 37 41 35 32 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.S 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.5 3 5 9 1 0 6 35 17 6 1 2 5 8 12 20 7 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31 36 52 28 27 16 84 73 46 48 58 58 66 67 78 56 1.4 1.7 2.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 3.9 3.4 2.1 2.2 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.6 2.6 0 0.0 8 0.4 299 13.7 347 15.9 137 6.3 30 1.4 3 0.1 824 37.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 9.6 2 m mm m m m m m m m m m m m mm mm m m = mmm mm m m_ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE ENE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 3 3 7 8 1 0 3 3 7 1 1 2 1 6 3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 41 39 23 10 9 19 15 21 26 23 37 29 28 27 33 17 1.9 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.8 27 10 15 2 4 12 34 25 14 27 12 24 22 33 43 20 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.6 1.1 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.1 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.9 3 5 0 0 0 4 20 3 0 3 2 2 1 5 10 2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76 57 41 19 21 36 71 52 43 60 52 56 53 66 92 42 3.5 2.6 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.7 3.3 2.4 2.0 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.4 3.0 4.2 1.9 0 0.0 54 2.5 397 18.2 324 14.9 60 2.8 2 0.1 0 0.0 837 38.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNIE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 3 1 2 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 9 4 3 2 13 20 10 3 4 18 13 7 2 15 19 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.9 0 2 1 0 0 5 41 9 3 1 1 1 0 0 3 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 11 7 5 4 20 77 26 7 8 20 16 7 3 19 23 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.9 3.5 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.9 1.1 0.0 18 0.8 155 7.1 71 3.3 22 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 266 12.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.4 MISSING: 0---m --n m mm m mm | |||
-m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 1 2 1 8 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 1 2 3 32 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 19 0.9 0.4 15 0.7 49 2.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 64 2.9 51 2.3 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 62 2.8 33 1.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 53 2,4 39 1.8 9 0.4 0 0.0 10 0.5 26 1.2 23 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 28 1.3 16 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 35 1.6 25 1.1 16 0.7 0 0.0 5 0.2 47 2.2 105 4.8 88 4.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 69 3.2 56 2.6 39 1.8 0 0.0 6 0.3 50 2.3 37 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 11 0.5 65 3.0 41 1.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 92 4.2 36 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 84 3.9 45 2.1 11 0.5 0 0.0 3 0.1 57 2.6 70 3.2 17 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.1 43 2.0 83 3.8 21 1.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 72 3.3 93 4.3 56 2.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 58 2.7 78 3.6 15 0.7 0 0.0 86 4.0 905 41.6 831 38.2 308 14.1 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0,0 28 1.3 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 4 0.2 0 0.0 44 2.0 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 126 5.8 109 5.0 106 4.9 62 2.8 55 2.5 80 3.7 276 12.7 171 7.9 99 4.5 121 5.6 137 6.3 143 6.6 150 6.9 153 7.0 235 10.8 154 7.1 0.1 2177 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 m m m mmm m -( m m -m m m m mm m m m-m m m mm m m m mm -- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 64 2.9 51 2.3 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 62 2.8 33 1.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 53 2.4 39 1.8 9 0.4 0 0.0 10 0.5 26 1.2 23 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 28 1.3 16 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 35 1.6 25 1.1 16 0.7 0 0.0 5 0.2 47 2.2 106 4.9 88 4.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 69 3.2 56 2.6 39 1.8 0 0.0 6 0.3 51 2.3 37 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 11 0.5 66 3.0 41 1.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 92 4.2 36 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 84 3.9 45 2.1 11 0.5 0 0.0 3 0.1 57 2.6 70 3.2 17 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.1 43 2.0 83 3.8 21 1.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 72 3.3 93 4.3 56 2.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 58 2.7 78 3.6 15 0.7 0 0.0 86 3.9 907 41.6 832 38.2 308 14.1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 28 1.3 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 4 0.2 0 0.0 44 2.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 126 5.8 109 5.0 106 4.9 62 2.8 55 2.5 80 3.7 277 12.7 171 7.8 o00 4.6 122 5.6 137 6.3 143 6.6 150 6.9 153 7.0 235 10.8 154 7.1 0.1 2180 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 1 4 1 3 11 9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 24 1.1 12 0.6 2 0.1 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.4 MISSING: 0 mmmmmmiu n n mHmIl i m m m mm m m --m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 8 3 2 7 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 2 0 1 3 3 1 2 0 8 7 5 15 8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 5 0.2 13 0.6 29 1.4 10 0.5 3 0.1 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NCE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2 3 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 7 11 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 5 6 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 4 2 3 0 2 8 4 1 1 5 4 12 11 19 15 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 0.0 0.0 11 0.5 39 1.8 25 1.2 15 0.7 4 0.2 94 4.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13 .8 0 mmmmwmm m mm mmmminmm | |||
= m m m- m mm = w = m -m m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.2 12 0.6 7 0.3 18 0.8 11 0.5 18 0.8 6 0.3 17 0.8 3 0.1 13 0.6 0 0.0 4 0.2 6 0.3 9 0.4 22 1.0 12 0.6 20 0.9 20 0.9 20 0.9 19 0.9 21 1.0 21 1.0 24 1.1 33 1.5 7 0.3 31 1.4 10 0.5 18 0.8 17 0.8 22 1.0 11 0.5 32 1.5 5 12 10 5 s 25 21 10 6 10 5 18 29 21 13 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 1 0 7 0 0 3 9 6 1 1 4 2 7 7 12 6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 3 1 0 0 1 2 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 22 36 48 33 21 16 90 64 53 46 56 65 65 68 75 62 1.0 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.7 4.2 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.5 2.9 0 0.0 4 0.2 189 8.8 299 13.9 206 9.6 66 3.1 56 2.6 820 38.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.5 MISSING: 6 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 9 19 13 15 6 7 13 16 21 17 12 13 16 11 7 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.3 19 20 13 7 7 13 24 20 15 25 35 29 24 26 30 13 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 0.6 16 9 11 1 3 8 19 14 4 12 11 11 13 25 38 20 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.8 0.9 0 0 0 0 1 6 9 5 0 6 3 3 1 5 4 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 50 39 44 21 28 34 63 54 37 64 67 55 55 74 85 41 2.3 1.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.9 2.5 1.7 3.0 3.1 2.6 2.6 3.5 4.0 1.9 0 0.0 16 0.7 208 9.7 320 14.9 215 10.0 44 2.1 8 0.4 811 37.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.0 MISSING: 26--m -m -l- m m m | |||
-mm --m m m m mm -m lm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 5 3 6 3 5 1 3 2 5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 5 5 3 2 1 11 14 10 2 7 12 4 3 4 5 16 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 3 1 3 0 0 1 37 16 1 4 9 3 2 0 7 10 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 8 8 3 6 15 65 31 6 17 24 13 6 7 14 31 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.7 3.0 1.4 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.4 0 0.0 2 0.1 45 2.1 104 4.9 97 4.5 13 0.6 2 0.1 263 12.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.9 MISSING: 3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 2 1 17 12 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 17 0.8 5 0.2 11 0.5 8 0.4 49 2.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.1 MISSING: 0-m---m m mm m mm m -m m m -m- m | |||
= M mm m n m = m = -m m mm =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 2 0.1 19 0.9 41 1.9 24 1.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 18 0.8 47 2.2 22 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 33 1.5 37 1.7 27 1.3 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 20 0.9 33 1.5 13 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 22 1.0 24 1.1 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 28 1.3 16 0.7 16 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 16 0.7 50 2.3 87 4.1 38 1.8 56 2.6 0 0.0 1 0.0 41 1.9 50 2.3 60 2.8 19 0.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 4 0.2 43 2.0 42 2.0 16 0.7 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 51 2.4 55 2.6 22 1.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 44 2.1 69 3.2 31 1.4 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 41 1.9 68 3.2 32 1.5 6 0.3 1 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 23 1.1 61 2.8 41 1.9 12 0.6 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 31 1.4 54 2.5 62 2.9 15 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 32 1.5 66 3.1 81 3.8 32 1.5 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 24 1.1 76 3.5 59 2.8 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 23 1.1 465 21.7 801 37.4 601 28.0 171 8.0 83 3.9 SUM PERCENT 87 4.1 88 4.1 106 4.9 66 3.1 58 2.7 72 3.4 248 11.6 175 8.2 107 5.0 135 6.3 154 7.2 149 6.9 146 6.8 168 7.8 219 10.2 166 7.7 2144 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 40 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 2 1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 19 18 33 20 22 7 16 41 43 52 45 41 23 31 32 24 0.9 0.8 1.5 0.9 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 41 47 37 33 24 28 50 50 42 55 69 68 61 54 66 76 1.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.8 2.5 3.1 3.5 24 22 27 13 8 16 88 60 16 22 31 32 41 62 81 59 1.1 1.0 1.3 0.6 0.4 0.7 4.1 2.8 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.9 3.8 2.7 1 0 8 0 1 16 38 19 1 7 8 6 12 15 32 7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 4 56 4 1 0 1 5 4 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 87 88 106 66 58 72 249 175 107 136 155 149 146 168 219 166 4.1 4.1 4.9 3.1 2.7 3.4 11.6 8.2 5.0 6.3 7.2 6.9 6.8 7.8 10.2 7.7 0.0 23 1.1 467 21.8 801 37.3 602 28.0 171 8.0 83 3.9 2147 100.0 MISSING HOURS: MEAN WIND SPEED: 37 12.1 m m m m m m mm m m m --m m m m-m ml mm mum m m m m --m m -mu m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 1 4 1 2 12 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 20 0.9 15 0.7 5 0.2 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 17.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 6 4 3 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 2 1 3 2 0 1 3 3 1 1 2 6 8 6 14 7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.3 0_0 1 0.0 0.0 15 0.7 26 1.2 8 0.4 9 0.4 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.3 MISSING: 0 Imm1 m II 1 mmIImmI1 ._nIm /i m = mm m mmm = = mnm mmm = mm n ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 4 2 5 11 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 5 7 5 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3 4 2 3 0 1 9 4 1 1 4 4 13 10 20 15 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 37 1.7 27 1.3 14 0.6 8 0.4 94 4.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0,6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 5 10 5 0 1 5 11 17 12 17 20 10 9 5 10 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 19 16 16 16 8 2 4 7 18 18 24 35 34 17 24 17 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.1 0.8 11 16 13 11 9 2 18 25 8 15 18 8 19 36 19 16 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.7 2 3 7 0 5 1 9 8 1 2 5 1 4 6 16 11 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 5 39 10 1 0 0 2 5 6 6 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 36 40 46 32 22 11 75 62 46 47 65 66 72 75 71 55 1.7 1.9 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.5 3.5 2.9 2.1 2.2 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 140 6.5 275 12.7 244 11.3 81 3.8 76 3.5 821 38.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13.7 5-- -m -m m m --m m -m m -- | |||
= m m = m -m m m -m = --= m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 8 3 12 11 2 4 7 10 12 8 9 7 7 1 8 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 19 9 7 3 9 8 13 14 19 14 30 21 21 16 14 14 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 37 27 22 1 2 6 14 16 8 23 26 30 24 30 38 18 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.8 0.8 15 7 3 0 0 4 5 7 1 11 5 6 5 6 33 10 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 1.5 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 4 16 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 3 1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 74 56 36 17 23 24 54 45 40 63 69 68 57 63 89 51 3.4 2.6 1.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.9 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.9 4.1 2.4 0.0 11 0.5 i11 5.1 231 10.7 322 14.9 118 5.5 36 1.7 829 38.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.8 MISSING: 8 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 4 4 2 1 1 2 6 5 9 7 10 5 2 3 0 6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 17 3 4 0 0 1 19 31 2 3 13 6 2 3 3 17 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 3 2 3 0 0 2 13 4 0 1 7 3 1 0 1 6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 9 10 1 3 6 42 41 12 13 34 14 7 6 8 29 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.9 1.9 0.6 0.6 1.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.3 0 0.0 2 0.1 16 0.7 67 3.1 124 5.7 46 2.1 4 0.2 259 12.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.5 MISSING: 7-m -m- -mmm- -m-m m- m- -m m | |||
= = m = m m -m -= --m m -m m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 18 6 10 5 3 1 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 6 0.3 13 0.6 9 0.4 12 0.6 6 0.3 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.9 MISSING: 1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0*0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6 0.3 45 13 0.6 33 13 0.6 29 17 0.8 26 13 0.6 20 4 0.2 12 10 0.5 23 21 1.0 28 29 1.3 49 28 1.3 47 30 1.4 70 31 1.4 64 21 1.0 61 17 0.8 40 10 0.5 46 19 0.9 52 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 66 3.1 20 46 2.1 13 40 1.9 14 14 0.6 0 11 0.5 5 10 0.5 12 56 2.6 32 83 3.8 31 20 0.9 3 42 1.9 15 60 2.8 17 53 2.5 13 54 2.5 12 79 3.7 12 72 3.3 65 66 3.1 30 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0 .6 3.0 1.4 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 63 2.9 15 0.7 1 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.1 10 0.5 13 0.6 19 0.9 2 0.1 SUM PERCENT 139 6.4 110 5.1 98 4.5 58 2.7 50 2.3 47 2.2 186 8.6 180 8.3 106 4.9 135 6.3 180 8.3 165 7.6 159 7.4 162 7.5 214 9.9 169 7.8 2158 100.0 0 0_0 21 1.0 282 13.1 645 29.9 772 35.8 294 13.6 144 6.7 MISSING HOURS: 26 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.1-rn-rn------ | |||
------ -- | |||
m = n = m = m = = = m m m = mm = m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6 13 13 17 13 4 10 21 29 28 30 31 21 17 10 19 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.9 45 33 29 26 20 12 23 28 49 47 70 65 61 40 46 52 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 66 46 40 14 11 10 56 84 20 42 60 53 54 79 72 66 3.1 2.1 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 2.6 3.9 0.9 1.9 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.3 3.1 20 13 14 0 5 12 32 31 3 15 17 13 12 12 65 30 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 3.0 1.4 2 3 0 0 0 9 63 15 1 2 2 3 10 13 19 2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.1 139 110 98 58 5o 47 186 181 106 135 180 166 159 162 214 169 6.4 5.1 4.5 2.7 2.3 2.2 8.6 8.4 4.9 6.2 8.3 7.7 7.4 7.5 9.9 7.8 0 0.0 21 1.0 282 13.1 646 29.9 773 35.8 294 13.6 144 6.7 2160 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 24 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.1 Section 1 300-33-ft. | |||
Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 7/06- 9/06 | |||
-------- m m m m m -m m m m~~1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.2 6 0.3 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 4 1 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 11 0.5 10 0.5 0 0.0 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.8 MISSING: 0-m m --m m -m m m --m m m -, | |||
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 0 4 1 2 2 12 9 4 11 4 2 2 1 6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 1 0 4 1 1 2 5 1 0 0 1 2 2 4 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 2 4 5 2 4 12 15 9 4 14 6 4 8 7 6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 1 0.0 65 2.9 28 1.3 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 106 4.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 6 2 4 3 0 2 1 4 7 5 2 2 1 5 11 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 37 18 19 13 8 3 14 28 19 25 27 24 17 17 18 44 1.7 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 2.0 16 30 44 8 0 10 33 45 45 46 57 40 36 15 18 24 0.7 1.4 2.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.6 1.8 1.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 0 0 4 3 3 2 46 50 23 16 7 3 4 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.1 2.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 61 54 75 31 14 15 102 129 92 95 96 69 59 33 45 79 2.8 2.4 3.4 1.4 0.6 0.7 4.6 5.9 4.2 4.3 4.4 3.1 2.7 1.5 2.0 3.6 0.0 63 2.9 331 15.0 467 21.2 165 7.5 22 1.0 1 0.0 1049 47.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.0 MISSING: 1 m m m m m mn ---m --- n- m -mm mm -m | |||
= m m m m m m m -= m m -mmm m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW Ssw SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 5 10 6 14 8 3 2 2 3 8 9 7 11 9 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 25 28 22 18 8 14 11 9 9 28 so 50 40 21 41 31 1.1 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.0 1.9 1.4 9 2 18 0 0 9 21 9 24 42 38 27 8 11 18 10 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.5 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 S 3 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41 35 52 27 22 31 35 24 40 76 101 86 55 43 70 50 1.9 1.6 2.4 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.8 3.4 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 3.2 2.3 0 0.0 112 5.1 405 18.4 246 11.2 22 1.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 788 35.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 6.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 6 5 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 3 4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 36 17 18 12 6 9 2 1 0 6 7 8 4 2 11 15 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.7 6 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45 23 24 19 13 13 4 4 0 7 9 10 8 3 14 21 2.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.0 0 0.0 43 2.0 154 7.0 20 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 5.3 MISSING: 0 mmmmmmmmmm m mmmmm mm mm m m m m =m m mm mm mm m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 4.8 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 18 17 17 24 9 6 3 6 10 14 11 13 14 17 23 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 103 65 61 47 23 28 30 54 39 64 95 88 63 42 71 97 4.7 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 2.4 1.8 2.9 4.3 4.0 2.9 1.9 3.2 4.4 32 32 67 9 1 24 64 64 71 90 101 71 46 30 40 36 1.5 1.5 3.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.9 2.9 3.2 4.1 4.6 3.2 2.1 1.4 1.8 1.6 0 0 6 4 3 2 58 55 28 19 15 3 4 3 9 1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.6 2-5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 6 4 0 0 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 153 115 157 82 51 63 166 182 145 184 225 173 126 89 137 157 6.9 5.2 7.1 3.7 2.3 2.9 7.5 8.3 6.6 8.3 10.2 7.8 5.7 4.0 6.2 7.1 0.0 220 10.0 970 44.0 778 35.3 210 9.5 26 1.2 1 0.0 2205 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 m m m m m m -m -m m mn m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 18 17 17 24 9 6 3 6 10 14 11 13 14 17 23 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 103 65 61 47 23 28 30 54 39 64 95 88 63 42 71 97 4.7 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 2.4 1.8 2.9 4.3 4.0 2.9 1.9 3.2 4.4 32 32 67 9 1 24 64 64 71 92 101 71 46 30 40 36 1.4 1.4 3.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.9 2.9 3.2 4.2 4.6 3.2 2.1 1.4 1.8 1.6 0 0 6 4 3 2 58 55 28 19 15 3 4 3 9 1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.6 2.5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 6 4 0 0 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 153 115 157 82 51 63 166 182 145 186 225 173 126 89 137 157 6.9 5.2 7.1 3.7 2.3 2.9 7.5 8.2 6.6 8-4 10-2 7.8 5.7 4-0 6.2 7.1 0 0.0 220 10.0 970 44.0 780 35.3 210 9.5 26 1.2 1 0.0 2207 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.3 3 0.1 1 0.0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.3 MISSING: 0 m nm mmm m- m -m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m -m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 5 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 10 0.5 12 0.5 2 0.1 1 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.8 MISSING: 0 7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.S 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 1 1 0 3 1 2 6 8 5 3 7 3 1 3 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 2 0.1 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 2 0.1 2 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 2 0.1 4 0.2 0 0 2 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 5 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 18 0.8 11 0.5 7 0.3 5 0.2 13 0.6 6 0.3 4 0.2 9 0.4 6 0.3 7 0.3 106 4.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 47 2.1 34 1.5 20 0.9 0.2 1 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.8 MISSING: 0 m = m m m = -= -m m m m m -- | |||
m ---m -m m --m m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 4 0.2 16 0.7 25 1.1 5 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 9 0.4 30 1.4 20 0.9 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 38 1.7 21 1.0 1 0.0 4 0.2 10 0.5 2 0.1 1 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 5 0.2 3 0.1 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 7 0.3 2 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.3 24 1.1 36 1.6 32 1.5 2 0.1 23 1.0 22 1.0 62 2.8 20 0.9 1 0.0 15 0.7 23 1.0 40 1.8 9 0.4 6 0.3 14 0.6 31 1.4 35 1.6 10 0.5 2 0.1 18 0.8 33 1.5 34 1.5 5 0.2 1 0.0 13 0.6 43 1.9 12 0.5 1 0.0 3 0.1 13 0.6 32 1.5 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 14 0.6 9 0.4 6 0.3 0 0.0 4 0.2 14 0.6 18 0.8 14 0.6 0 0.0 2 0.1 40 1.8 38 1.7 5 0.2 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 25 1.1 SUM PERCENT 50 2.3 62 2.8 78 3.5 22 1.0 13 0.6 14 0.6 109 4.9 131 5.9 88 4.0 97 4.4 92 4.2 70 3.2 60 2.7 29 1.3 50 2.3 85 3.9 1050 47.6 0 0.0 35 1.6 219 9.9 374 17.0 312 14.1 85 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 7 0.3 16 0 0.0 9 0.4 23 1.0 2 1 0.0 5 0.2 22 1.0 14 1 0.0 7 0.3 13 0.6 4 2 0.1 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 2 0.1 7 0.3 13 0.6 8 0 0.0 2 0.1 13 0.6 14 0 0.0 8 0.4 11 0.5 9 3 0.1 3 0.1 14 0.6 32 3 0.1 8 0.4 29 1.3 36 6 0.3 18 0.8 45 2.0 26 2 0.1 21 1.0 52 2.4 8 3 0.1 24 1.1 23 1.0 5 5 0.2 25 1.1 15 0.7 10 1 0.0 24 1.1 23 1.0 19 3 0.1 19 0.9 22 1.0 9 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 SUM PERCENT 32 1.5 34 1.5 44 2.0 28 1.3 17 0.8 30 1.4 29 1.3 29 1.3 52 2.4 76 3.4 102 4.6 83 3.8 55 2.5 55 2.5 68 3.1 54 2.4 788 35.7 0 0.0 33 1.5 200 9.1 328 14.9 212 9.6 11 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.1 MISSING: 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m | |||
-m m m -m -m m m --m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 4 7 4 6 6 3 1 5 1 0 1 5 4 6 4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 15 0.7 23 1.0 0 11 0.5 3 0.1 0 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 6 0.3 5 0.2 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 3 0.1 2 0.1 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 7 0.3 1 0.0 0 8 0.4 2 0.1 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 6 0.3 6 0.3 0 12 0.5 7 0.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43 18 16 14 8 18 5 7 6 7 8 11 7 6 19 24 1.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 0.0 7 0.3 62 2.8 96 4.4 52 2.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m | |||
-m --m m m m m ----- m m m m -N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 5 0.2 31 1.4 50 2.3 44 2.0 3 0.1 24 1.1 67 3.0 25 1.1 2 0.1 19 0.9 69 3.1 38 1.7 7 0.3 25 1.1 25 1.1 6 0.3 3 0.1 24 1.1 8 0.4 5 0.2 3 0.1 17 0.8 22 1.0 22 1.0 2 0.1 17 0.8 45 2.0 60 2.7 3 0.1 41 1.9 46 2.1 74 3.4 4 0.2 29 1.3 42 1.9 73 3.3 9 0.4 26 1.2 68 3.1 73 3.3 8 0.4 43 1.9 90 4.1 68 3.1 3 0.1 38 1.7 107 4.9 22 1.0 6 0.3 43 1.9 60 2.7 15 0.7 5 0.2 46 2.1 29 1.3 21 1.0 6 0.3 44 2.0 49 2.2 44 2.0 6 0.3 66 3.0 76 3.4 21 1.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 38 1.7 21 1.0 9 0.4 10 0.5 12 0.5 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 103 4.7 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 31 1.4 SUM PERCENT 130 5.9 119 5.4 141 6.4 71 3.2 40 1.8 66 3.0 174 7.9 188 8.5 157 7.1 187 8.5 221 10.0 171 7.8 126 5.7 101 4.6 144 6.5 170 7.7 2206 100.0 0.0 75 3.4 533 24.2 853 38.7 611 27.7 MISSING HOURS: 2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 I ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 5 0.2 31 1.4 3 0.1 24 1.1 2 0.1 19 0.9 7 0.3 25 1.1 3 0.1 24 1.1 3 0.1 17 0.8 2 0.1 17 0.8 3 0.1 41 1.9 4 0.2 29 1.3 9 0.4 26 1.2 8 0.4 43 1.9 3 0.1 38 1.7 6 0.3 43 1.9 5 0.2 46 2.1 6 0.3 44 2.0 6 0.3 66 3.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 50 2.3 44 2.0 67 3.0 25 1.1 69 3.1 38 1.7 25 1.1 6 0.3 8 0.4 5 0.2 22 1.0 22 1.0 45 2.0 60 2.7 46 2.1 74 3.4 42 1.9 73 3.3 68 3.1 75 3.4 90 4.1 68 3.1 107 4.8 22 1.0 60 2.7 is 0.7 29 1.3 21 1.0 49 2.2 44 2.0 76 3.4 21 1.0 853 38.6 613 27.8 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 38 1.7 21 1.0 9 0.4 10 0.5 12 0.5 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 103 4.7 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 130 5.9 119 5.4 141 6.4 71 3.2 40 1.8 66 3.0 174 7.9 188 8.5 157 7.1 189 8.6 221 10.0 171 7.7 126 5.7 101 4.6 144 6.5 170 7.7 0 0.0 75 3.4 533 24.1 31 1.4 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 m -m m mm- ---- mmm- -mm~ | |||
-m -----mm ----ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 4 1 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 9 0.4 0.4 5 0.2 1 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.3 MISSING: 0 m- m m -m --m--mm m m -m n m -m m m m ----m m -m ---- ---- ml_ Nl ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 3 1 2 3 8 6 4 3 3 3 1 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 1 2 1 0 0 4 2 3 1 4 6 2 4 2 5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 4 5 2 4 15 11 9 S 10 9 5 10 5 7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 41 1.9 39 1.8 15 0.7 10 0.5 1 0.0 106 4.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.3 MISSING: 0 "I._J ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 1 1 3 1 1 0 2 2 2 4 3 1 1 0 2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 17 8 5 9 4 1 5 18 12 10 12 7 13 15 16 31 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.4 23 22 31 6 3 2 15 24 22 29 24 40 30 16 18 35 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.6 8 22 31 0 2 8 24 62 40 33 36 21 16 9 15 9 0.4 1.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 2.8 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 1 5 4 3 1 3 33 25 13 23 15 2 4 0 3 0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.5 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 11 2 1 1 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53 58 83 23 12 16 86 134 89 98 91 73 64 41 52 77 2.4 2.6 3.8 1.0 0.5 0.7 3.9 6.1 4.0 4.4 4.1 3.3 2.9 1.9 2.4 3.5 0 0.0 28 1.3 183 8.3 340 15.4 336 15.2 135 6.1 28 1.3 1050 47.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.7 MISSING: 0 m mmmm m mm m m -m -m- m m m -m m | |||
-m ----- --- ------ ---ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 1 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 6 2 5 6 1 2 7 7 3 7 20 20 16 19 11 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0-5 12 13 10 15 10 7 5 17 14 13 27 20 18 22 24 21 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 15 16 19 9 2 9 11 8 15 45 38 37 25 15 16 17 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 2.0 1.7 1.7 1. 1 0.7 0.7 0.8 1 2 7 1 0 2 1 1 11 16 26 3 2 1 9 4 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 38 38 32 18 19 20 34 48 77 101 84 66 54 69 55 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.5 2.2 3.5 4.6 3.8 3.0 2.4 3.1 2.5 0 0.0 14 0.6 138 6.3 248 11.2 297 13.5 87 3.9 4 0.2 788 35.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 2 4 2 1 7 1 8 3 2 2 0 1 3 4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 12 6 4 8 5 1 4 2 3 0 2 2 4 2 8 6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 19 18 3 0 1 3 4 0 1 2 10 4 5 0 7 13 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 31 9 13 9 5 15 4 12 5 15 9 10 3 20 23 1.5 1.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.9 1.0 0.0 4 0.2 46 2.1 69 3.1 90 4.1 8 0.4 0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.6 MISSING: 0-m-m mm-u- mmmnrmmn mm mm - | |||
= = m = = m = m = m m m m m = = m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 0.1 3 0.1 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.3 MISSING: 0 | |||
)ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 2 1 4 2 1 1 3 3 2 7 7 3 1 1 3 0.2 27 1.2 49 2.2 0.1 19 0.9 42 1.9 0.0 9 0.4 48 2.2 0.2 22 1.0 31 1.4 0.1 13 0.6 18 0.8 0.0 5 0.2 10 0.5 0.0 17 0.8 31 1.4 0.1 36 1.6 52 2.4 0.1 34 1.5 44 2.0 0.1 20 0.9 45 2.0 0.3 24 1.1 58 2.6 0.3 32 1.5 69 3.1 0.1 36 1.6 54 2.4 0.0 33 1.5 44 2.0 0.0 38 1.7 52 2.4 0.1 48 2.2 67 3.0 43 1.9 2 57 2.6 11 55 2.5 11 10 0.5 4 6 0.3 1 22 1.0 5 47 2.1 42 71 3.2 27 57 2.6 24 80 3.6 39 89 4.0 44 62 2.8 6 47 2.1 6 28 1.3 4 40 1.8 16 39 1.8 4 753 34.1 246 0.1 0 0.0 0.5 0 0.0 0.5 11 0.5 0.2 4 0.2 0.0 1 0.0 0.2 1 0.0 1.9 11 0.5 1.2 4 0.2 1. 1 0 0.0 1.8 1 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.3 0 0.0 0.3 0 0.0 0.2 0 0.0 0.7 0 0.0 0.2 1 0.0 11.2 34 1.5 126 131 135 75 41 44 149 193 162 187 222 176 146 110 147 162 5.7 5.9 6.1 3.4 1.9 2.0 6.8 8.7 7.3 8.5 10.1 8.0 6.6 5.0 6.7 7.3 0 0.0 46 2.1 413 18.7 714 32.4 2206 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4-m n -= -m --= m m m m m m m | |||
-m~mmmm~mmm~mmm~ | |||
m -/l ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 27 1.2 49 2.2 43 1.9 0 0.0 2 0.1 19 0.9 42 1.9 57 2.6 0 0.0 1 0.0 9 0.4 48 2.2 55 2.5 0 0.0 4 0.2 22 1.0 31 1.4 10 0.5 0 0.0 2 0.1 13 0.6 18 0.8 6 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 10 0.5 22 1.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 17 0.8 31 1.4 47 2.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 36 1.6 52 2.4 71 3.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 34 1.5 44 2.0 57 2.6 0 0.0 2 0.1 20 0.9 45 2.0 82 3.7 0 0.0 7 0.3 24 1.1 58 2.6 89 4.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 32 1.4 69 3.1 62 2.8 0 0.0 3 0.1 36 1.6 54 2.4 47 2.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 33 1.5 44 2.0 28 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 38 1.7 52 2.4 40 1.8 0 0.0 3 0.1 48 2.2 67 3.0 39 1.8 0 0.0 46 2.1 413 18.7 714 32.3 755 34.2 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 11 0.5 11 0.5 4 0.2 4 0.2 1 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 1 0.0 42 1.9 11 0.5 27 1.2 4 0.2 24 1.1 0 0.0 39 1.8 1 0.0 44 2.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 16 0.7 0 0.0 4 0.2 1 0.0 246 11.1 34 1.5 SUM PERCENT 126 5.7 131 5.9 135 6.1 75 3.4 41 1.9 44 2.0 149 6.7 193 8.7 162 7.3 189 8.6 222 10.1 176 8.0 146 6.6 110 5.0 147 6.7 162 7.3 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4 Section 2 300-33-ft. | |||
Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 10/06 -12/06 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 5 6 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 12 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 6 6 22 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 23 1.1 18 0.8 4 0.2 0 0.0 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.8 0 m m m m m m m m m -m m -m m m m | |||
= m m m -m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 3 3 2 5 3 3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 0 9 16 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 4 7 13 10 19 20 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.0 26 1.2 42 1.9 14 0.6 4 0.2 0 0.0 86 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 1 2 2 2 1 5 10 5 2 2 4 2 1 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 5 11 9 11 9 9 17 17 16 14 14 19 22 4 13 9 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0-9 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.4 12 14 14 2 1 2 14 11 11 12 10 30 35 27 42 32 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.9 1.5 9 49 19 0 0 1 3 6 8 5 0 7 17 30 39 5 0.4 2.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.8 0.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 15 1 10 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 80 43 15 12 14 37 39 45 36 26 63 94 64 105 48 1.2 3.7 2.0 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 1.6 1.2 2.9 4.3 2.9 4.8 2.2 0.0 45 2.1 199 9.1 269 12.3 198 9.0 35 1.6 1 0.0 747 34.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.2 MISSING: 5 m m m m m -mm m m m m m m m | |||
= m m m = m m m= m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 7 9 11 II 6 6 4 8 8 10 8 9 4 11 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 20 23 15 13 19 34 44 24 22 15 35 33 22 28 45 34 0.9 1. 1 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.6 2.0 1. 1 1.0 0.7 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.3 2.1 1.6 10 8 1 6 1 14 18 S 19 19 23 9 16 37 56 33 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.4 0.7 1.7 2.6 1.5 1 4 1 0 0 1 2 5 6 3 2 1 3 8 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32 42 26 30 31 54 86 37 53 51 70 S4 47 77 113 80 1.5 1.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 2.5 3.9 1.7 2.4 2.3 3.2 2.5 2.1 3.5 5.2 3.7 0 0.0 118 5.4 426 19.5 275 12.6 50 2.3 0.2 9 0.4 883 40.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.3 MISSING: 9 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 5 11 10 13 5 6 7 6 3 5 5 6 4 7 3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 ii 8 5 5 23 31 11 13 14 12 13 8 3 7 5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 1. 1 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 1 4 0 0 0 1 6 0 9 4 5 5 1 4 5 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 20 19 15 18 29 54 19 33 21 22 23 15 11 19 10 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.3 2.5 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 1. 1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0 5 0.0 103 4.7 180 8.2 47 2.1 12 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 347 15.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 5.5 MISSING: 0 mmmmm m m -mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 4 3 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 8 5 0 0 4 5 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 2 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 ii 3 3 4 17 6 6 0 3 4 0 0 2 0 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 27 1.2 33 1.5 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 72 3.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 4.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 8 0.4 39 1.8 27 1.2 10 0 0.0 19 0.9 53 2.4 31 1.4 53 0 0.0 25 1.1 37 1.7 18 0.8 20 0 0.0 26 1.2 30 1.4 8 0.4 0 0 0.0 29 1.3 33 1.5 2 0.1 0 0 0.0 12 0.5 71 3.2 17 0.8 2 0 0.0 18 0.8 98 4.5 46 2.1 22 0 0.0 18 0.8 58 2.6 19 0.9 9 0 0.0 24 1.1 53 2.4 39 1.8 17 0 0.0 16 0.7 44 2.0 35 1.6 11 0 0.0 16 0.7 66 3.0 40 1.8 3 0 0.0 20 0.9 71 3.2 48 2.2 13 0 0.0 18 0.8 54 2.5 63 2.9 23 0 0.0 15 0.7 40 1.8 73 3.3 38 0 0.0 13 0.6 69 3.2 118 5.4 67 0 0.0 16 0.7 51 2.3 87 4.0 8 0 0.0 293 13.4 867 39.6 671 30.6 296 0.5 2.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.6 1. 1 1.7 3 .1 0.4 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 6 0.3 17 0.8 2 0.1 14 0.6 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 84 3.8 158 7,2 100 4.6 64 2.9 64 2.9 102 4.7 197 9.0 104 4.7 137 6.3 109 5.0 126 5.8 158 7.2 176 8.0 168 7.7 281 12.8 162 7.4 13.5 53 2.4 10 0.5 2190 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 18 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.2 m mimI m -H m m um m m n m m m m m | |||
= m m = m m m m m m m m m = m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N 0 0.0 8 0.4 39 1.8 27 1.2 10 0.5 0 0.0 NNE 0 0.0 19 0.9 53 2.4 31 1.4 53 2.4 2 0.1 NE 0 0.0 25 1.1 37 1.7 18 0.8 20 0.9 0 0.0 ENE 0 0.0 26 1.2 30 1.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 E 0 0.0 29 1.3 33 1.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 ESE 0 0.0 12 0.5 71 3.2 17 0.8 2 0.1 0 0.0 SE 0 0.0 18 0.8 98 4.5 46 2.1 22 1.0 10 0.5 SSE 0 0.0 18 0.8 58 2.6 19 0.9 9 0.4 0 0.0 S 0 0.0 24 1.1 53 2.4 39 1.8 17 0.8 1 0.0 SSW 0 0.0 16 0.7 44 2.0 35 1.6 11 0.5 0 0.0 SW 0 0.0 16 0.7 66 3.0 40 1.8 3 0.1 1 0.0 WSW 0 0.0 20 0.9 71 3.2 48 2.2 13 0.6 6 0.3 W 0 0.0 18 0.8 54 2.5 63 2.9 23 1.0 17 0.8 WNW 0 0.0 15 0.7 40 1.8 73 3.3 38 1.7 2 0.1 NW 0 0.0 13 0.6 69 3.1 118 5.4 68 3.1 14 0.6 NNW 0 0.0 16 0.7 51 2.3 89 4.1 9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 293 13.4 867 39.5 673 30.7 298 13.6 53 2.4 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 SUM PERCENT 84 3.8 158 7.2 100 4.6 64 2.9 64 2.9 102 4.6 197 9.0 104 4.7 137 6.2 109 5.0 126 5.7 158 7.2 176 8.0 168 7.7 282 12.9 165 7.5 2194 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 14 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.2 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/'06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3 .6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 1 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.5 MISSING: 0 m m m-m m -m -m m m m _.m - | |||
m m -m m -m m m m m,~ m ~/ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FR) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 10 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 6 6 23 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0.4 22 1.0 11 0.5 0.2 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 MISSING: 0 N.ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 3 9 9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 7 13 8 22 20 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 19 0.9 24 1.1 32 1.5 8 0.4 3 0.1 86 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.7 0 m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m Sm mn m m mn m m m m m m mi m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 6 4 2 1 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1 5 5 10 9 8 9 13 12 12 7 10 12 7 5 7 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 5 10 9 3 3 4 11 10 9 11 9 25 20 5 17 16 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.8 0.7 11 11 13 2 0 2 13 6 8 10 7 15 40 34 32 22 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.0 9 50 8 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 10 10 22 33 4 0.4 2.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.2 0 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 8 2 11 0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.0 27 86 35 15 13 15 39 39 38 41 27 67 91 72 98 49 1.2 3.9 1.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.2 3.0 4.1 3.3 4.4 2.2 0 0.0 26 1.2 132 6.0 167 7.6 226 10.3 161 7.3 40 1.8 752 34.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24 .6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 5 4 0 4 4 5 1 2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 5 5 3 14 20 11 11 9 16 7 17 16 12 17 9 5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 11 16 10 9 8 13 22 29 23 22 28 27 23 22 42 22 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.0 15 13 2 5 0 20 22 3 13 11 12 7 18 30 61 31 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.4 2.8 1.4 1 6 0 0 0 3 4 0 2 8 3 2 0 2 12 3 0.0 0 .3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 6 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 42 18 29 31 49 85 47 64 52 66 56 58 73 126 61 1.6 1.9 0.8 1.3 1.4 2.2 3.9 2.1 2.9 2.4 3.0 2.5 2.6 3.3 5.7 2.8 0.0 43 2.0 .177 8.0 327 14.8 263 11.9 46 2.1 36 1.6 892 40.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.9 MISSING: 0-m m -m m-m m m m mm m m ~ ---- ----m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 2 1 4 4 3 4 5 5 0 3 5 2 4 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 9 7 11 15 5 10 5 3 4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 2 3 5 8 5 11 22 13 6 12 18 8 9 5 4 3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 2 6 3 0 0 1 8 2 4 10 4 2 6 4 7 3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0..0 0.0 0-4 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 S 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 10 12 9 12 17 49 30 29 40 37 18 30 16 18 11 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 2.2 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.7 0.8 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.5 0 0.0 45 2.0 81 3.7 134 6.1 62 2.8 10 0.5 15 0.7 347 15.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0,0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 2 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 2 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 5 5 5 1 3 10 5 9 S 5 4 1 i 1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.4 22 1.0 22 1.0 15 0.7 3 0.1 1 0.0 72 3.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 9.2 0------- m m m m m m m m m -m -m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 9 0.4 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 15 0.7 0 0.0 12 0.5 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 10 0.5 0 0.0 9 0.4 0 0.0 13 0.6 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 123 5.6 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 10 0.5 20 0.9 30 1.4 12 0.5 33 1.5 36 1.6 10 0.5 27 1.2 20 0.9 25 1.1 23 1.0 8 0.4 33 1.5 16 0.7 0 0.0 22 1.0 29 1.3 23 1.0 27 1.2 57 2.6 46 2.1 34 1.5 53 2.4 14 0.6 36 1.6 41 1.9 29 1.3 35 1.6 48 2.2 31 1.4 46 2.1 59 2.7 24 1.1 37 1.7 63 2.9 31 1.4 37 1.7 58 2.6 74 3.4 32 1.5 37 1.7 73 3.3 19 0.9 68 3.1 119 5.4 18 0.8 52 2.4 67 3.0 433 19.6 684 31.0 625 28.4 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 10 0.S 0 0.0 56 2.5 9 0.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 12 0.5 38 1.7 4 0.2 3 0.1 14 0.6 8 0.4 12 0.5 4 0.2 3 0.1 2 0.1 14 0.6 6 0.3 13 0.6 8 0.4 25 1.1 4 0.2 59 2.7 16 0.7 7 0.3 0 0.0 240 10.9 99 4.5 SUM PERCENT 76 3.4 149 6.8 70 3.2 59 2.7 58 2.6 84 3.8 187 8.5 123 5.6 140 6.4 141 6.4 144 6.5 160 7.3 203 9.2 177 8.0 288 13.1 145 6.6 2204 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC WIND: DELTA T: STABILITY CLASS 150 FT (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 3 5 3 9 6 7 15 12 11 10 9 13 6 7 1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 10 12 10 25 33 22 27 34 36 35 46 37 37 32 19 18 0.5 0.5 0.5 1. 1 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.1 1.7 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.8 20 33 27 23 16 29 57 53 41 48 59 63 58 37 68 52 0.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.7 1.3 2.6 2.4 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.9 2.6 1.7 3.1 2.4 30 36 20 8 0 23 46 14 29 31 24 31 74 73 121 69 1.4 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 3.4 3.3 5.5 3.1 10 56 8 0 0 3 12 4 14 12 3 14 13 25 59 7 0.5 2.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 1. 1 2.7 0.3 0 9 0 0 0 1 38 3 8 4 2 6 8 4 16 0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.0 76 149 70 59 58 84 187 123 140 141 144 160 203 177 290 147 3.4 6.7 3.2 2.7 2.6 3.8 8.5 5.6 6.3 6.4 6.5 7.2 9.2 8.0 13. 1 6.7 0.0 123 5.6 433 19.6 684 31.0 629 28.5 240 10.9 99 4.5 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.3--- m m ---m m m ----- | |||
m m mm mmm m m- m m m m MAW ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 4 9 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 7 6 23 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.3 25 1.2 8 0.4 9 0.4 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 18.3 MISSING: 0-u ----! -r! -m m -m -am m t_ | |||
m m R M m -- m m m m I -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 6 0.3 1 0.0 7 0.3 14 0.6 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 8 12 10 20 23 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 1 1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.6 23 1.1 33 1.5 12 0.6 6 0.3 86 4.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12,6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 2 4 5 7 3 7 11 5 6 8 2 12 13 8 6 3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0,3 0,5 0.2 0.3 0,4 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0 2 10 4 9 6 9 11 10 3 9 19 19 3 11 13 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.6 4 11 8 2 1 0 12 7 9 11 12 20 29 25 25 18 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.8 8 15 17 0 1 1 1 4 7 3 0 4 16 34 30 15 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.6 1.4 0.7 2 29 6 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 9 18 9 25 1 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.0 16 61 46 13 15 15 37 33 37 29 25 65 95 82 98 50 0.7 2.8 2.1 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.2 3.0 4.4 3.8 4.5 2.3 0.0 20 0.9 102 4.7 138 6.4 194 9.0 156 7.2 107 S.0 717 33.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.9 MISSING: 35 m- m mmm, R m -o m ---m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 4 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2 1 0 4 2 10 5 7 9 12 8 14 10 8 4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 7 4 6 12 23 7 16 22 15 21 16 16 9 16 23 18 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7 1. 1 0.8 13 16 10 3 12 12 23 13 9 32 25 18 24 30 58 22 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.7 1.0 5 4 0 2 12 13 4 7 11 7 5 9 11 33 27 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.5 1.3 0 2 0 0 0 0 19 5 8 6 2 0 1 2 5 2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 30 36 23 18 45 34 82 49 47 81 62 49 61 70 127 73 1.4 1.7 1.1 0.8 2.1 1.6 3.8 2.3 2.2 3.8 2.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 5.9 3.4 0 0.0 22 1.0 101 4.7 231 10.7 320 14.8 161 7.5 52 2.4 887 41.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 MISSING: 5 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 2 3 4 1 2 3 7 8 10 7 6 4 7 4 2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 1 0 s 3 2 2 6 8 7 19 15 7 9 5 4 1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 2 5 5 4 1 11 10 8 S 10 9 13 7 1 8 6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 3 12 3 1 11 3 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 8 17 14 4 17 26 28 29 52 34 31 32 17 19 9 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.3 2.4 1.6 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.4 0 0.0 13 0.6 74 3.4 94 4.4 105 4.9 45 2.1 13 0.6 344 15.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.8 3-ll m mlmmam m m m m m m m m mm m m -m -m mm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 2 0 1 6 2 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 3 3 7 1 1 8 9 7 3 9 7 4 1 1 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3-0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 20 0.9 13 0.6 17 0.8 11 0.5 1 0.0 69 3.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.2 MISSING: 3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
ALL STABgILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24. 6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 12 1 0.0 8 2 0.1 9 7 0.3 13 6 0.3 9 3 0.1 12 3 0.1 31 4 0.2 20 8 0.4 23 6 0.3 28 2 0.1 22 7 0.3 30 5 0.2 33 5 0.2 28 1 0.0 21 0 0.0 10 0.6 9 0.4 21 1.0 13 0.6 0.4 9 0.4 36 1.7 28 1.3 0.4 22 1.0 24 1.1 27 1.3 0.6 20 0.9 12 0.6 0 0.0 0.4 34 1.6 14 0.6 3 0.1 0.6 16 0.7 23 1.1 14 0.6 1.4 32 1.5 47 2.2 16 0.7 0.9 42 1.9 32 1.5 11 0.5 1.1 32 1.5 23 1.1 21 1.0 1.3 45 2.1 54 2.5 26 1.2 1.0 47 2.2 50 2.3 11 0.5 1.4 47 2.2 58 2.7 12 0.6 1.5 41 1.9 73 3.4 39 1.8 1.3 29 1.3 61 2.8 52 2.4 1.0 41 1.9 107 5.0 79 3.7 0.5 40 1.9 63 2.9 43 2.0 14.3 506 23.4 698 32.3 395 18.3 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 31 1.4 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 28 1.3 12 0.6 13 0.6 7 0.3 2 0.1 12 0.6 21 1.0 12 0.6 39 1.8 3 0.1 188 8.7 59 113 90 52 66 68 157 121 120 166 134 166 212 187 288 159 2.7 5.2 4.2 2.4 3.1 3.2 7.3 5.6 5.6 7.7 6.2 7.7 9.8 8.7 13 .3 7.4 0 0.0 62 2.9 309 2158 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 50 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 | |||
= m= M -m M w m -m M ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) | |||
DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.S SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUN PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 2 7 6 3 3 4 8 6 2 7 5 5 1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 12 8 9 13 9 12 31 20 23 28 22 30 33 28 21 10 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.5 9 9 22 20 34 16 32 42 32 45 47 47 41 29 41 40 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.5 1.9 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.9 1.9 21 36 24 12 14 23 47 32 23 54 so 58 73 61 109 63 1.0 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 2.2 1.5 1.1 2.5 2.3 2.7 3.4 2.8 5.0 2.9 13 28 27 0 3 14 16 11 21 26 11 12 39 52 79 45 0.6 1.3 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.6 1.8 2.4 3.7 2.1 2 31 6 0 0 0 28 12 13 7 2 12 21 12 39 3 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.8 0.1 59 113 90 52 66 68 157 121 120 166 134 166 212 187 290 161 2.7 5.2 4.2 2.4 3.1 3.1 7.3 5.6 5.6 7.7 6.2 7.7 9.8 8.6 13.4 7.4 0 0.0 62 2.9 309 14.3 S06 23.4 700 32.4 397 18.4 188 8.7 2162 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 46 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 APPENDIX B MPC DATA The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc._(FCi/ml) | |||
(.4Ci/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1 E-4 I E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-1 24 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 1E-4 1E-4 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-21 1 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-I15m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd-1 15 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 I E-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(l__Ci/ml) (liCi/ml)Californium (98) Cf-253 1 E-4 1 E-4 Cf-254 1 E-7 1 E-7 Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce-141 9E-5 9E-5 Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1 E-5 1 E-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-1 34m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-1 37 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) CI-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1 E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1 E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy-166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1 E-5 1 E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er-169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 IE-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-1 52(9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-1 52 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(ýLCi/mnl) | |||
(ýtCi/mnl) | |||
Europium (63) Eu-154 2E-5 2E-5 Eu-1 55 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Fluorine (9) F-1 8 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-1 59 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au-196 2E-4 1E-4 Au-1 98 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho-166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-113m 1E-3 1E-3 In-114m 2E-5 2E-5 In-115m 4E-4 4E-4 In-115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir-192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-210 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu-1 77 1E-4 1E-4 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(jCi/ml) (ýjCi/ml)Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5 Mn-54 1E-4 1E-4 Mn-56 1 E-4 1 E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1 E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 1 E-4 1 E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 1E-4 1E-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 1E-4 IE-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt-191 1E-4 1E-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 Pt-1 93 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 1E-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4. 1 E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(liCi/ml)Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium (59) Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm-147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 Protactinium (91) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4 Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1 E-4 1 E-4 Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-1 83 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m 1E-2 1E-2 Rh-105 1E-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1 E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru-1 03 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 1E-5 1E-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm-1 51 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-1 53 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 I E-4 I E-4 Ag-110m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-1 11 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(RCi/ml) (RCi/ml)Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 1 E-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta-182 4E-5 4E-5 Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1 E-2 1 E-2 Tc-96 1 E-4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-1 60 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1 E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1 E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1 E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-1 70 5E-5 5E-5 Tm-171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(PCi/ml) (ttCi/ml)Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 U-235 3E-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-1 75 1 E-4 1 E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1 E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours I Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(lLCi/ml) (pCi/ml)Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 itCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity"). | |||
APPENDIX C SALEM ODCM OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC SALEM GENERATING STATION Revision 20 Prepared By: Reviewed by: Accepted by: 05/10/2006 Date 05/11/2006 Date Date Meeting #: S2006-008 Approved b?Plant Mang2er Date Page 1 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Revision Summary 3 1. Definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 (pg. 10) is revised, From: 3 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation I shall be those listed in Table III of TID-14844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites." To: 3 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of I-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of I-131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation I shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion. " I Justification: | |||
ODCM Revision 20 incorporates the definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 in accordance with issuance of Licensing Amendment Nos. 271 and 252 for the Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. | |||
These Amendments revise the Technical Specifications to incorporate alternate source I term methodology in accordance with 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.67.I 2. Section 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations (bottom of pg. 89), replaced the wording "collected at the R46 sample locations" with "secondary samples ", and "steam " with "secondary system".Justification: | |||
3 This revision is based on the Design Change Packages (DCPs) 80057520 and 80057587 for 1R46 and 2R46 Radiation Monitors respectively. | |||
The DCPs will modify these monitors from off-line sampling system monitors to adjacent-to-line monitors, resulting in removal of the R46 sampling locations. | |||
Further, this change provides a means of safely obtaining the required secondary system samples, in order to quantify release rates and cumulative releases of pre-event or post event atmospheric steam releases. | |||
This removes the unnecessary specific direction on where to obtain radionuclide samples when characterizing a release.I Page 2 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRO DUCTIO N ................................................................................................................................... | |||
7 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS ............................................................... | |||
8 1.0 D E F IN IT IO N S .............................................................................................................................. | |||
10 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
................................................... | |||
16 3/4.0 A P P L IC A B ILIT Y .................................................................................................................. | |||
16 3/4.3 INSTR UM EN TA TION ...................................................................................................... | |||
18 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION | |||
... 18 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 24 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS | |||
......................................................................................... | |||
29 3/4.11.1 LIQ UID EFFL UEN TS ................................................................................................. | |||
29 3/4.11.1.1 CON CEN TRA TION ......................................................................................... | |||
29 3/ 4 .11.1.2 D O S E ........................................................................................................................ | |||
33 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT | |||
................................................................. | |||
34 3/4.11.2 GASEO US EFFLUEN TS ............................................................................................. | |||
35 3/4.11.2 .1 D O SE R A T E .............................................................................................................. | |||
35 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES ........................................ | |||
38 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE F O R M ........................................................................ | |||
............................................... | |||
3 9 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT | |||
...................................... | |||
I .......................... | |||
40 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ................................................................................................................... | |||
41 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | |||
............................................... | |||
42 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ........................................................................................ | |||
42 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CEN SUS ................................................................................................... | |||
55 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORA TORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ................................................. | |||
57 B A S E S ................................................................................................................................................ | |||
5 8 3/4.3 INSTR UM EN TATION ............................................................................................... | |||
.... 59 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION | |||
.... 59 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 60 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS | |||
........................................................................................ | |||
62 3/4.11.1 LIQU ID EFFLU EN TS ............................................................................................ | |||
62 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
........................................................................................ | |||
63 3/4.11.4 TO TA L D O SE ........................................................................................................ | |||
65 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | |||
............................................... | |||
66 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM .................................................................................. | |||
66 3/4.12.2 LAND U SE CEN SU S ............................................................................................ | |||
66 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM .......................................... | |||
66 5.0 D E SIG N FE A TU R E S .................................................................................................................. | |||
68 5.1 SITE ............ | |||
................................................... | |||
68 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID E F F L U E N T S ..................................................................................................................... | |||
68 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS .......................................................................................... | |||
70 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ...... 70 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ................................................. | |||
70 Page 3 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATM ENT SYSTEM S ........................................................................................... | |||
72 3 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES | |||
.............................................................. | |||
73 1.0 LIQ U ID E FFLU E N T S ................................................................................................................... | |||
74 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................................... | |||
74 I 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
................................................................ | |||
74 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service W ater: ....................................................................................................... | |||
75 1.2.2 Conservative D efault V alues ......................................................................................... | |||
76 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 .............................. | |||
77 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
-10 CFR 50 .............. | |||
............. | |||
.... 77 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents | |||
................................................ | |||
77 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
.............................................................. | |||
793 1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary L eakag e ........................... | |||
....................................................................................... | |||
79 1.6 Liquid Effl uent D ose Projections | |||
.......................................................................................... | |||
80 2.0 GA SEO U S EFFLU EN TS ....................................................................................................... | |||
81 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................................... | |||
81 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
............................................................... | |||
82 3 2.2.1 Containm ent and Plant Vent M onitor ........................................................................... | |||
82 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values ......................................... | |||
83 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 20 ................................ | |||
83 3 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ....................................................................... | |||
83 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates | |||
............................................ | |||
85 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 ............................................................ | |||
85 I 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ............................................................ | |||
85 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .............................................................. | |||
86 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 ............................................ | |||
87 I 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates | |||
................................... | |||
87 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates | |||
................................... | |||
87 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations | |||
............................ | |||
88 I 2.7 Gaseous Effluent D ose Projection | |||
...................................................................................... | |||
90 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE AN ALYSES ................................................................................................ | |||
91 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ....................................................... | |||
91 I 3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC- 40 CFR 190 ................................................ | |||
91 3.2.1 Effluent D ose Calculations | |||
........................................................................................... | |||
91 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination | |||
......................................................................... | |||
91 I 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................ | |||
93 4.1 Sam p ling P rogram .................................................................................................................... | |||
93 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ................................................................................ | |||
93 I Page 4 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLES TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES ................................................................................... | |||
13 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION ................................................................................ | |||
14 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION | |||
........................................................................................................................................................ | |||
19 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
.................................................................................... | |||
22 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING IN STR U M EN TA TIO N ................................................................................................................ | |||
25 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
............................................ | |||
27 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM....................................................................................................................................................... | |||
3 0 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P R O G R A M ................................................................................................................................... | |||
36 TABLE 3.12.1-1: | |||
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM * ..... 44 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES .............................................................................................. | |||
51 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(]), (2) 5............................................ | |||
................................... | |||
52 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 .............. | |||
97 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 2..: ........................ | |||
98 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Ai .................... | |||
.................... 99 Table 1-3: B ioaccum ulation Factors ........................................................................................... | |||
101 Table 2-1: D ose Factors For N oble G ases .................................................................................. | |||
104 Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 1 .......................... | |||
105 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 2 ......................... | |||
106 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathw ays .............................................................................. | |||
107 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases ........................................................ | |||
108 Table A-i: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 1 ..................................................................... | |||
123 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 2 ..................................................................... | |||
124 Table B-i: Adult Dose Contributions | |||
-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 1 ...................... | |||
128 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions | |||
-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 ...................... | |||
129 Table C- 1: Effective D ose Factors .............................................................................................. | |||
134 Table D -i: Infant D ose Contributions | |||
........................................................................................ | |||
138 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations | |||
...................................................................................... | |||
141 Table F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations | |||
..................................................................... | |||
150 FIGURES Figure 5.1-3: A rea Plot Plan O f Site ...................................................................................... | |||
69 Figure 1-1: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 1 ......................................................................... | |||
94 Figure 1-2: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 2 ......................................................................... | |||
95 Figure 1-3: Liquid Radioactive Waste System ....................................................................... | |||
96 Figure 2-1: Salem Ventilation Exhaust Systems And Effluent Monitor Interfaces | |||
.................. | |||
102 Figure 2-2: Gaseous Radioactive Waste Disposal System ....................................................... | |||
102 Page 5 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3 Figure 2-2: Gaseous Radioactive W aste Disposal System ....................................................... | |||
103 Figure E-1: Onsite Sam pling Locations | |||
.................................................................................... | |||
147 Figure E-2: Offsite Sam pling Locations | |||
................................................................................... | |||
148 APPENDICES 3 APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF DEFAULT PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
............................. | |||
121 APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATIONS | |||
-LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
......... | |||
126 APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL BASES FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 131 APPENDIX D: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATION | |||
-GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
....... 136 APPENDIX E: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ......................................... | |||
140 3 APPENDIX F: MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION (MPC) VALUES -LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
........ 150 P I I I I I I I I I I Page 6 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. | |||
The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I -Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II -Calculational Methodologies. | |||
Part I includes the following: " The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4" Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively. | |||
Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for:* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and" the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.Part II also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.Revisions to the ODCM shall be made in accordance with the Technical Specifications Section 6.14.The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation related to Amendment Nos. 234 and 215, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 1OCFR20 and the "new" 1OCFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs).The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part 20. The letter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the "new" Part 20.Page 7 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS -U I I I Page 8 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS Page 9 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3 1.0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS i 1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS. | |||
3 ACTION 1.2 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions. | |||
CHANNEL CALIBRATION I 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. | |||
The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an inplace qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an inplace cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL i CALIBRATION may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated. | |||
CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. | |||
This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter. | |||
CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the primary sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip I functions. | |||
CONTROL i 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) and were renamed CONTROLS. | |||
This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1- 131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion". | |||
Page 10 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.13 The FREQUE&CY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.2.GAS-EOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.14 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. | |||
MEMBER(S) | |||
OF THE PUBLIC 1.16 MEMBER(S) | |||
OF THE PUBLIC shall be all those persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of PSE&G, its contractors, or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. | |||
This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)1.17 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the environmental radiological monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1)the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and the Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively. | |||
OPERABLE -OPERABILITY 1.18 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, a normal and an emergency electrical power source, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s). | |||
OPERATIONAL MODE -MODE 1.19 An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e., MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1.PURGE -PURGING 1.23 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement. | |||
Page 11 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RATED THERMAL POWER 1.25 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3459 MWt.REPORTABLE EVENT i 1.27 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 1OCFR Part 50. 3 SITE BOUNDARY 1.29 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is not owned, leased, or3 otherwise controlled by the licensee, as shown in Figure 5.1-3.SOURCE CHECK I 1.31 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity. | |||
THERMAL POWER 1.33 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.35 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to i radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.36 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by 3 passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents). | |||
n Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components. | |||
3 VENTING 1.37 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process. 3 WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM 1.41 A WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting Reactor Coolant System offgases from the Reactor Coolant System and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. | |||
3 Page 12 of 156 i Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES MODE 1. POWER OPERATION 2. STARTUP 3. HOT STANDBY 4. HOT SHUTDOWN 5. COLD SHUTDOWN 6. REFUELING** | |||
REACTIVITY CONDITION, Keff THERMAL POWER*> 0.99 > 5%> 0.99< 0.99< 0.99< 0.99< 0.95<5%0 AVERAGE COOLANT TEMPERATURE | |||
> 350°F> 350°F> 350°F 350°F > Tavg> 200°F< 200°F< 1400F 0 0 0* Excluding decay heat.** Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.Page 13 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION S D w M Q SA R S/U P FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours.At least once per 24 hours.At least once per 7 days.At least once per 31 days.At least once per 92 days.At least once per 6 months.At least once per 18 months.Prior to each reactor startup.Prior to each release.Not applicable. | |||
N.A.Page 14 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 15 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY 3 CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROL, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met. I 3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROLS and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. | |||
If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in: 3 1. At least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours, 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours, and 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours. 3 Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.This CONTROL is not applicable in MODE 5 or 6. 3 3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition: (a) shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROL are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval. | |||
3 (b) may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time. 3 This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply with ACTION requirements. | |||
Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS. | |||
3 I Page 16 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPLICABILITY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
====4.0.1 Surveillance==== | |||
Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement. | |||
4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL. The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. | |||
The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment. | |||
====4.0.4 Entry==== | |||
into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROL has been performed within the stated surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. | |||
This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply with ACTION requirements. | |||
Page 17 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3 3.3.3.8 In accordance with Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-12 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).APPLICABILITY: | |||
During all liquid releases via these pathways.ACTION: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative. | |||
: b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.8 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-12.Page 18 of.156 mM -low M m M m M -m -Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE TNSTRT TMFNT ACTION INSTRUMENT | |||
: 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1 (1R18, 2R18)4 (1R19A-D, 2R19A-D)26 27 2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge b. Chemical Waste Basin 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES 5 (Unit 1) (1R13A-E)3 (Unit 2) (2R13A-C)1 (R37)28 31 a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1 (1FR1064, 2FR1064)29 29 4 (1FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184, 2FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184)Page 19 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION ACTION 26 -ACTION 27 -ACTION 28 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that prior to initiating a release: a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.1, and b. At least two technically qualified members of.the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1- 131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed: | |||
: a. At least once per 8 hours when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is greater than 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131, or b. At least once per 24 hours when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is less than or equal to 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that: a. At least once per 8 hours, local monitor readouts for the affected channels are verified to be below their alarm setpoints, or (Unit 2)b. With a Service Water System leak on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor either: 1. At least once per 8 hours, grab samples are to be collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed, or 2. Isolate the release pathway.c. With no identified service water leakage on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor, at least once per 24 hours, collect grab samples and analyze for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed. | |||
Page 20 of 156 I U I I I i I I I I I I U I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION ACTION 29 -ACTION 31 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases.Pump performance curves may be used to estimate flow.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that sampling is conducted in accordance with the following table: Frequency 1 per week 1 per day Condition During normal operation (all MODES)During operation with an identified primary to secondary leak on either Salem Unit The samples shall be analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 shall be performed. | |||
Page 21 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK SOURCE CHANNEL CHECK CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D D P#M R(3)R(3)Q(l)Q(l)2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge D D M M R(3)R(3)Q(2)Q(2)b. Chemical Waste Basin Line 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D(4)D(4)N.A.N.A.R R N.A.N.A.Page 22 of 156 m-mMIm -m m -=- m o -m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-12 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Indication on instrument drawer in Control Equipment Room only)(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Indication on instrument drawer in Control Equipment Room only {Unit 1})4. Instrument controls not set in operate mode. (On instruments equipped with operate mode switches only {Unit 1})(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. | |||
The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards. | |||
(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.# The 1 R1 8 channel is an in-line channel which requires periodic decontamination. | |||
Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.# The 2R1 8 channel is an off-line channel which requires periodic decontamination. | |||
Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.Page 23 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION i 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS i 3.3.3.9 In accordance with Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the 3 radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance 3 with the ODCM.APPLICABILITY: | |||
As shown in Table 3.3-13 ACTION: a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected I channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative. | |||
: b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13. 1 Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I 4.3.3.9 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-13.I Page 24 of 1563 m ! ----i -mm m -m i- -m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE A PPT TI A 1:IT .TT AC(TTON APPLICABILITY ACTION 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 3. CONTAINMENT PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 4. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM##a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D, 2R12A or 2R41A&D) #1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D 2R12A or 2R41A & D) #1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)*****31 34 37 33 36 36 32 32*b. Iodine Sampler 1 (1RME4, 5 or 1XT8911, *2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)c. Particulate Sampler 1 (lRME4, 5 or 1XT8911, *2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) 1 (1RM-1FA8603, 2RM-2FA8603) | |||
: e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1 (lRM-1FA17079 or S1PAS-1FA6863Z, 2RM-2FA17079 or S2PAS-2FA6863Z) | |||
## The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 25 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 ACTION 31 -ACTION 32 -ACTION 33 -ACTION 34 -ACTION 36 -ACTION 37 -TABLE 3.3-13 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving lineup;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 8 hours and these samples are analyzed for gaseous principal gamma emitters at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL TABLE 4.11-2.A, B, or C within 24 hours. Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately suspend PURGING of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 4 hours samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11-2.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, Containment Pressure Reliefs may be performed provided that prior to initiating the release: I I I I I I I I I I I a. At least two independent samples of containment are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations. | |||
Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.* At all times, other than when the line is valved out and locked.** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief APPLICABILITY: | |||
Modes 1-6, R4 1A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Modes 1-5, R12A Monitor providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Mode 6, R12A Monitor providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required). | |||
During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.# During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.I I I I U I I Page 26 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing P P R(3) Q(1)Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE AND PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor P P R(3) Q(1) **3. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM#a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(3) Q(2) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) D N.A. R N.A. *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor W N.A. R N.A. *# The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 27 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-13 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation if this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power) n 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Alarm Only)(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: U 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. | |||
The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards. | |||
* At all times** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief I Surveillance requirement | |||
-Modes 1-6, R4 1 A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release Modes 1-5, R1 2A Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release I Mode 6, R12A Monitors providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required). | |||
During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE. | |||
I I Page 28 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10-4 microcuries/ml. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analyses program in Table 4.11-1.4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.Page 29 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)a Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (tCi/ml)A. Batch Waste P P Release Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma Tanksb Emittersc 5x 107 1-131 1xl0-6 P M Dissolve and One Batch/M Entrained Gases 1x10 (Gamma Emitters)P M H-3 Each Batch Composite lx 1-Gross Alpha 1x10.7 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Each Batch Composite Fe-55 lxl0-6 B. Continuous Principal Gamma 7 Releasese W W EmittersC 5x10 1. Steam Grab Sample Generator Blowdown 1-131 1xl0-6 M M Dissolved and lx10-5 Grab Sample Entrained Gases W M H-3 1xl0 5 Grab Sample Composited Gross Alpha 1x10-7 W Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Grab Sample Composite 5x_10-_Fe-55 1x10 6 I il I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I Page 30 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation): | |||
LLD= 4.66*Sb E | |||
* V | |||
* 2.22E6 | |||
* Y | |||
* exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), k is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting.Typical values of E, V, 4, and At should be used in the calculation. | |||
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a piori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. | |||
Page 31 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed to assure representative sampling.c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: | |||
Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144*. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. | |||
Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.* The LLD for Ce-144 shall be 2x10 6 p[Ci/ml.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 32 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited: a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 33 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the i liquid radwaste treatment system shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected cumulative doses due to the liquid effluent from each reactor to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) exceed 0.375 mrem to the total body or 1.25 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times. i ACTION: 3 a. With the radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: | |||
: 1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, i identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability. | |||
: 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence. | |||
I b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.3 Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM.Page 34 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following: | |||
: a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mremryr to the skin, and b. For iodine-131, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine- 131, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11-2.Page 35 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (ýiCi/ml)A. Waste Gas P P Storage Each Tank Each Tank Principal Gamma lx i0-4 Tank Grab Sample Emittersb B. Containment P P Principal Gamma xi 0-4 PURGE Each PURGE Each PURGE Emittersb Grab Sample H-3 lx10 6 C. Plant Vent Mcde Principal Gamma I x 0-4 Grab Sample Mc Emittersb H-3 1x10-6 D. All Release Continuous Wg 1-131 1xIO-1 2 Types as Charcoal Listed in A, Sample B, and C Above Continuousf Wg Principal Gamma 1x10"11 Particulate Emittersb Sample (1- 131, Others)Continuousf M Gross Alpha 1xl10 1 1 Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1xO1-11 Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1xl0.6 Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 36 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-2 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1 b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: | |||
Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, Xe-138 for gaseous emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 for particulate emissions. | |||
This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. | |||
Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER unless: 1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2. The noble gas activity monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.d. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 24 hours when the refueling canal is flooded.e. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the ventilation exhaust from the spent fuel pool area whenever spent fuel is in the spent fuel pool.f. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.g. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing (or after removal from sampler). | |||
Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. | |||
When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.Page 37 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the I air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, from the site areas and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following: | |||
I a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation. | |||
3 APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: I a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been 3 taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS U 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar 3 year shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.I I Page 38 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine- 131, from tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following: | |||
: a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated air dose from the release of iodine-131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 39 of 156 U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.4 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the i GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3), exceed 0.625 mrad for gamma radiation and 1.25 mrad for beta radiation in any calendar quarter. The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) would exceed 1.875 mrem to any organ in any calendar quarter.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times. 3 ACTION: a. With gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: | |||
3 1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the I inoperability. | |||
: 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence. | |||
i b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.11.2.4 Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM. 3 Page 40 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g.11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times ACTION: a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks to determine whether the limits of this CONTROL have been exceeded. | |||
If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. | |||
If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units and from radwaste storage shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM.Page 41 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.1, the i radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times. I ACTION: 3 a. With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence. | |||
3 b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium. at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table .3.12-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the 3 corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. | |||
When more than one of the 3 radionuclides in Table 3.12-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if: concentration (1) concentration (2) 1.0 reporting level (1) reporting level (2)When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. | |||
This report is 3 not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.*The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.Page 42 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS ACTION: (Cont'd)c. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program.Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report. Include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
: d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12-1.Page 43 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1: | |||
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS (1) FREQUENCY 1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows: An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 1 1-km range from the site (not bounded by or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.*The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. | |||
Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.Page 44 of 156 M M M M MM M M M M m M MMm m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1 -1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: | |||
Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.Radioiodine Canister 1-131 analysis weekly.4 Samples -One sample from close to the SITE BOUNDARY location and Three samples in different land based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground level D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a community having a high calculated annual average ground- level D/Q;and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction. | |||
Particulate Sampler Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change (3);Gamma isotopic analysis(4) of composites (by location)quarterly. | |||
Page 45 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY.OF.ANALYSIS | |||
: 3. WATERBORNE | |||
: a. Surface(5) | |||
One sample upstream.One sample downstream One sample outfall One sample cross-stream Grab sample monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly. | |||
: b. Ground c. Drinking (10)d. Sediment Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected(7).One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge One sample from downstream area One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area Monthly Composite sample over two-week period(6) when 1- 131 analysis is performed; monthly composite otherwise. | |||
Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly and tritium analysis quarterly. | |||
1-131 analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the water is greater than 1 mrem per year 8). Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) semiannually One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown Page 46 of 156 M M M M M m m M M m M M m m M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS | |||
()SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF-ANALYSIS | |||
: 4. INGESTION a. Milk Samples from milking animals in three locations within 5 km distance having the highest dose potential. | |||
If there are none, then, one sample from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per yr).One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge. | |||
Semimonthly when animals are on pasture, monthly at other time Gamma isotopic (4) and 1- 131 analysis semi-monthly when animals are on pasture; monthly at other times b. Fish and Invertebrates Sample in season, or semiannually if they are not seasonal Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on edible portions.Page 47 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS | |||
()SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS c. Food Products One sample of each principal class of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged At time of harvest (9)Gamma isotopic analysis (4) on edible portion.Page 48 of 156------- i l m m -.m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133,"Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time.In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report : documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.(2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters. | |||
For the purposes of this table, a Dosimeter of Legal Record (DLR) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. | |||
Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation. | |||
The frequency of analysis or readout will depend upon the characteristics of the specific dosimetry system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. No direct radiation monitoring stations are located in the inner ring sectors 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 and the outer ring sector 8 as originally determined during plant licensing and as permitted by Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by The Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979.(3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.(4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.Page 49 of 156 I!Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
I TABLE NOTATION 3 (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. | |||
The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. | |||
Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized for recreational activities. | |||
3 (6) A composite sample is one which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results 3 in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for 3 contamination. | |||
(8) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the 3 methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk collections. | |||
3 (9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be m paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. | |||
The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid I plant wastes have been discharged. | |||
However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. | |||
3 (10) No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest I unaffected water supply is required.I I I Page 50 of 156 1 M M M M M M M m U M M M M m M M M M M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)H-3 3 x 10 4 Mn-54 1 x 103 3 x 104 Fe-59 4 x 10 2 1 x 104 Co-58 1 x 10 3 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 104 Zn-65 3 x 10 2 2 x 10 4 Zr-Nb-95 4x 102 1-131 20 0.9 3 1 x 10 2 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 3 60 1 x 10 3 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2 x 10 3 Ba-La-140 2x 102 3 x 102 Page 51 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(')'(2) | |||
LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)gross 4 1 x 10-2 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58,60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 10 7 x 10-2 1 60 Cs-134 15 5 x 10-2 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 10.2 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 Page 52 of 156-~~~~ m M M -M M--- | |||
Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. | |||
Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: | |||
4.660 Sb LLD =E 9 V | |||
* 2.22E6 | |||
* Y e exp(-AAt)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picocuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), k is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting.Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation. | |||
Page 53 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued) | |||
I TABLE NOTATION I It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a prori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. | |||
Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. | |||
Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs 1 unachievable. | |||
In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.I I I I I I I I I I I Page 54 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2) producing broad leaf vegetation. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8.b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted. | |||
Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
: c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. | |||
*Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12-1.4c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.Page 55 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS (Cont'd) 3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months I using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. | |||
The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.P I I I I 3 I I I I U I I Page 56 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.3 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a, With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4. are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 57 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.Page 58 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE | |||
-TABLES 3.3-12 and 4.3-12 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 1R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1R19A, B, C, and D(1)Gross Activity 2a Containment Fan Coolers Service 1R13 A, B, C, D and E(1)Water Line Discharge Gross Activity Unit 2: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 2R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 2R19A,B,C, Gross Activity and D(1)2a Containment Fan Coolers -Service 2R13A, B and C0l)Water Line Discharge Gross Activity 2b Chemical Waste Basin Line Gross R37 Activity (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. | |||
Page 59 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE | |||
-TABLES 3.3-13 and 4.3-13 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Waste Gas Holdup System 1R41A and D (1)(2)Noble Gas Activity 2a Containment Purge and 1R12A Pressure -Vacuum Relief Noble Gas Activity 1R41A and D (1)(2)3a Plant Vent Header System 1R41A and D (1)(2)Noble Gas Activity 3b Plant Vent Header System 1RME 4, 5 (1R41)Iodine Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)3c Plant Vent Header System 1RME 4, 5 (1R41)Particulate Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. | |||
(2) 1R41D is the setpoint channel. 1R41A is the measurement channel.(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. | |||
Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components. | |||
Page 60 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES Unit 2: T/S Table Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Item No. Channels I a Waste Gas Holdup System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(1)(')2a Containment Purge and Pressure -Vacuum Relief 2R12A or 2R41A Noble Gas Activity and D(1)(2)3a Plant Vent Header System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(')(').3b Plant Vent Header System Iodine Sampler (3) RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)3c Plant Vent Header System Particulate Sampler (3) 2RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's "Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. | |||
(2) 2R41D is the setpoint channel. 2R41A is the measurement channel.(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. | |||
Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components. | |||
I Page 61 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION The CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. | |||
The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2..The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).3/4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I. 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculations in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. | |||
The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.The CONTROL applies to the release of liquid effluents from each reactor at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system.Page 62 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". | |||
This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste l treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents. | |||
3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE 3 This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY 3 from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20.The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in i gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)]. | |||
For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be I sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. | |||
Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the whole body and 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year. | |||
This CONTROL applies to the release of gaseous effluents from all reactors at the site.3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES 3 This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The 3 ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the 3 requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be i Page 63 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES substantially underestimated. | |||
The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. | |||
3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. | |||
The ODCM calculational methods for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109,"Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual dose based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. | |||
The release rate controls for iodine- 131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. | |||
The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1)individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objectives given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents. | |||
Page 64 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS S BASES 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 to 46 Fr 18525. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant radioactive effluents exceed twice the design objective doses of Appendix I. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within the reporting requirement level. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. | |||
If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 until NRC staff action is completed. | |||
The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1 and 3.11.2. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE:PUBLIC during any-period in which he/she N is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.1 I I Page 65 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. | |||
This monitoring program implements Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. | |||
The initial specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. | |||
Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience. | |||
The LLDs required by Table 4.12-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. | |||
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a pro (before the fact)limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. | |||
3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, aerial survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) yield of 2 kg/m 2.3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM This requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.Page 66 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Page 67 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1 SITE 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1-3. (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.) | |||
Page 68 of 156 UNRESTRICTED AREA (PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVERNMENT) t NlI i COOLING TOWER NUCLEAR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1 N/\\' SECURITY FENCE 1.........- | |||
SWITCH YARD 0i HOPE CREEK L, r1 [SECURITY H.CENTER*II, SALEM.1II NO.2 SWITCH YARD tNO I\" FEED WATER &i' CIRC. WATER.,T INTAKE ,,.,STRUCTURE.,"/i PROCESSING CENTER\SITE BOUNDARY---)> | |||
I I I I I METEOROLOGICAL TOWER 0'0 0 DELAWARE RIVER--............. | |||
0 CD 0-m¸ m nm. ,- m -m m ---- - | |||
Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. | |||
The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all measurements taken during the period pursuant to the Table and Figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM; as well as summarized and tabulated results of locations specified in these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.The reports shall also include the following: | |||
a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by CONTROL 3.12.1; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable. | |||
6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.8 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.8, The Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a. | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21."Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.Page 70 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) | |||
I Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B I thereof.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour I listing of magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. | |||
The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents toi MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1-3) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments (i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location) shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for I the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. | |||
The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for I Nuclear Power Operation. | |||
Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period: a. Container volume, i b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), 3 c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), d. Source of waste and processing employed (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, 5 evaporator bottoms), e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and 3 f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde). | |||
3 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.Page 71 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring. | |||
6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID. GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid): 1. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Station Operations Review Committee (SORC). The discussion of each change shall contain: a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 1 OCFR50.59; | |||
: b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information; | |||
: c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the SORC.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the SORC.Page 72 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES Page 73 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Salem Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) R18 (Unit 1) and 2-Ri 8 (Unit 2) provide the alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive material releases as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.l-R19 A, B, C, and D provide the alarm and isolation function for the Unit 1 steam generator blowdown lines. 2-R19 A, B, C, and D provide this function for Unit 2.2) Alarm (only) -The alarm functions for the Service Water System are provided by the radiation monitors on the Containment Fan Cooler discharges (IR 13 A,B,C,D and E for Unit 1 and 2R 13 A, B, and C for Unit 2).Releases from the secondary system are routed through the Chemical Waste Basin where the effluent is monitored (with an alarm function) by R37 prior to release to the environment. | |||
Liquid radioactive release flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented as Figures 1-1 and 1-2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. | |||
The Liquid Radioactive Waste System is presented in Figure 1-3.1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 ýtCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases).The following equation* | |||
must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions: | |||
C(F + f)f Where: C = the effluent concentration limit of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in ptCi/ml c = the setpoint, in [Ci/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, Page 74 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 (Appendix F) in the UNRESTRICTED AREA f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F+ f) = F.]* Adapted from NUREG-0133 | |||
====1.2.1 Liquid==== | |||
Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service Water.The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station are determined by I the following equations: | |||
SP < [MPCe *SEN | |||
* CW | |||
* CF | |||
* AF+bkg (1.2)RR !with: I Ci (gamma only)MPCe = i(1.3) n P i (gamma only )M-P-C i Where: I SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides in the effluent n stream (ptCi/mil) | |||
Ci = the concentration of radionuclide i in the undiluted liquid effluents (iiCi/ml)MPCi = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (ptCi/ml)SEN = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated (cpm per ptCi/ml)CW = the circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of release (gal/min)RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)bkg = the background of the monitor (cpm) I CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides in setpoint calculations. | |||
AF = an allocation factor applicable for steam generator blowdown The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the circulating water dilution is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria. | |||
However, in order to maximize the available plant discharge dilution and thereby minimize the potential offsite doses, batch releases from either Unit-I or.Page 75 of 1 .56.... ... .... ..I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Unit-2 may be routed to either the Unit-I or Unit-2 Circulating Water System discharge. | |||
Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch releases from either a single unit or both units into a single Circulating Water System discharge. | |||
====1.2.2 Conservative==== | |||
Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints may be determined through the use of default parameters. | |||
Tables 1-1.1 and 1-1.2 summarize all current default values in use for Salem Unit-1 and Unit-2, respectively. | |||
They are based upon the following: | |||
a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 6.05E-06 l.Ci/ml (Unit 1) and 4.81E-06 ptCi/ml (Unit 2). (refer to Appendix A for justification); | |||
b) for additional conservatism*, substitution of the 1-131 MPC value of 3E-07 ýtCi/ml for the R19 Steam Generator Blowdown monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R- 13 Service Water monitors;c) for conservatism, use of an allocation factor of 0.5 for the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors to limit consequences of potential simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks in two steam generators.** | |||
The allocation factor equals 1.0 for all other liquid effluent setpoints; d) substitutions of the operational circulating water flow with the lowest flow, in gal/min;*** | |||
e) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min; and, f) substitution of a Correction factor of 0.75 to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides.For batch liquid releases a fixed alarm setpoint is established for the 1, 2 RI 8 monitors and the release rate is controlled to ensure the inequality of equation 1.1 is maintained. | |||
With this approach, values selected for the parameters in the setpoint calculation (e.g., Table 1-1.1 and Table 1-1.2) should be any set of reasonable values that provide a setpoint value reasonably above anticipated monitor response, plus background, so as not to yield spurious alarms. The release rate is controlled to ensure compliance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.Calculations, as performed by Engineering, to establish the actual fixed setpoints for use in the plant, incorporate uncertainties and instrument drift. These factors will cause the actual installed instrument setpoint to be at a lower (conservative) value. However, for batch releases, when the rate is controlled, these uncertainties and drift should not be included in the evaluation of acceptable release rate, since this could cause a non-conservative correction, i.e., a higher allowable release rate. Therefore, for 1, 2 RI8 monitors, the setpoint value used for calculating the allowable release rate should be that value prior to correction for uncertainty and drift.Based upon the potential for 1-131 to be present in the secondary and service water systems, the use of the default effective MPC (MPCC) value as derived in Appendix A may be non-conservative for the 1, 2 R-19 SGBD monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R-13 Service Water monitors.**Setpoints using the Allocation Factor of 0.5 become invalid if primary-to-secondary leaks are identified in more than two steam generators simultaneously. | |||
***The Containment Fan Coil Unit Discharge to Service Water Line is routed to the opposite Unit's Circulating Water System discharge. | |||
Therefore, during periods when circulating water Page 76 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 pumps are out of service, such as during refueling outages, the default setpoints of the other Unit's R13 radiation monitors are not valid.1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Circulating Water System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 ýtCi/ml.Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. | |||
However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11. 1.1 may be performed using the following equation: i (MPG CW+RR(1.4) | |||
Where: Ci = actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (flCi/ml) | |||
I: MPC = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (ýtCi/ml) | |||
[ODCM Appendix F]= 2E-04 j+/-Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases RR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)CW = the actual circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of the release (gal/min)1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
-10 CFR 50 3 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents. | |||
ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from I radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station to:-during any calendar quarter; I< 1.5 mrem to total body per unit< 5.0 mrem to any organ per unit-during any calendar year;< 3.0 mrem to total body per unit< 10.0 mrem to any organ per unit.Per the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculational methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Salem: Page 77 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Do- '.67E-02*VOL | |||
*Y(Ci*AAio) | |||
CW i (1.5)Where: Do = dose or dose commitment to organ o (mrem). Total body dose can also be calculated using site-related total body dose commitment factor.Ajo = site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (!iCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aio) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0133 by the equation: Aio= 1.14E +05 * [(UI | |||
* BI)+(UF* BF 1)]* DF io (1.6)Where: Ao= composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per [tCi/ml)UI = adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr)BIi = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/l)UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr)BF 1 = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1)DFio = dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in pre-selected organ, o, from Table E-1 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi) 1.14E+05 = conversion factor (pCi/pCi | |||
* ml/kg per hr/yr)The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11-1.Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.Page 78 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation. | |||
In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)Total Body Dtb = 1.21E + 03 | |||
* VOL ci (1.7)CW Maximum Organ~2.52E + 04,* VOL I Dmax -2 | |||
* Ci (1.8)Where: Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL ([tCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem) I Dmax = conservatively evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem)1.21E+03 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the total body dose conversion factor (Fe-59, total body --7.27E+04 mrem/hr per VtCi/ml) I 2.52E+04 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative maximum organ dose conversion factor (Nb-95, GI-LLI -- 1.5 1E+06 mrem/hr per XCi/ml)1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary Leakage During periods of primary to secondary leakage (i.e., steam generator tube leaks), radioactive material will be transmitted from the primary system to the secondary system. The potential exists for the release of radioactive material to the off-site environment (Delaware River) via secondary system discharges. | |||
Potential releases are controlled/monitored by the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors (R19) and the Chemical Waste Basin monitor (R37).However to ensure compliance with the regulatory limits on radioactive material releases, it may be desirable to account for potential releases from the secondary system during periods of primary to I secondary leakage. Any potentially significant releases will be via the Chemical Waste Basin with the major source of activity being the Steam Generator Blowdown.With identified radioactive material levels in the secondary system, appropriate samples should be collected and analyzed for the principal gamma emitting radionuclides. | |||
Based on the identified 3 Page 79 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5).Because the release rate from the secondary system is indirect (e.g., SG blowdown is normally routed to condenser where the condensate clean-up system will remove much of the radioactive material), samples should be collected from the release point (i.e., Chemical Waste Basin) for quantifying the radioactive material releases. | |||
However, for conservatism and ease of controlling and quantifying all potential release paths, it is prudent to sample the SG blowdown and to assume all radioactive material is released directly to the environment via the Chemical Waste Basin. This approach while not exact is conservative and ensures timely analysis for regulatory compliance. | |||
Accounting for radioactive material retention of the condensate clean-up system ion exchange resins may be needed to more accurately account for actual releases.In addition to the secondary releases described in this section, the Salem Ground Water Remediation System also can potentially discharge radioactive material to the Chemical Waste Basin. To ensure regulatory compliance, the releases are monitored by Radiation Monitor R-37. Samples are also collected, and analyzed for radionuclides. | |||
Based on the identified radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5).1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the quarterly projected doses exceed:-0.375 mrem to the total body, or-1.25 mrem to any organ.The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA is the ion exchange system as delineated in Figure 1-3. Alternately, the waste evaporator as presented in the Salem FSAR has processing capabilities meeting the NRC ALARA design requirements and may be used in conjunction or in lieu of the ion exchange system for waste processing requirements in accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3. | |||
These processing requirements are applicable to each unit individually. | |||
Exceeding the projected dose requiring processing prior to release for one unit does not in itself dictate processing requirements for the other unit.Dose projections are made at least once per 31 days by the following equations: | |||
D tbp = D b (919 d ) (1.9)D maxp = D max (91Vd (1.10)Where: Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Page 80_of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Dtb = the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 i (mrem)Dmaxp = the maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Dmax = the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 (mrerm)d = the number of days to date for current calendar quarter 91 = the number of days in a calendar quarter 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring I normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Waste Gas Holdup System -The vent header gases are collected by the waste gas holdup system.Gases may be recycled to provide cover gas for the CVCS hold-up tank or held in the waste gas tanks for decay prior to release. Waste gas decay tanks are batch released after sampling and analysis. | |||
The tanks are discharged via the Plant Vent. 1-R41D provides noble gas monitoring and automatic isolation of waste gas decay tank releases for Unit-1. This function is provided by 2-R41D for Unit-2.2) Containment Purge and Pressure/Vacuum Relief -containment purges and pressure/vacuum reliefs are released to the atmosphere via the respective unit Plant Vent. Noble gas monitoring and auto isolation function are provided by 1-R41D for Unit-I and 2-R41D for Unit-2. Additionally, in accordance with -ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, Table 3.3-13, 1-R12A and 2-R12A may be used to provide the containment monitoring and automatic isolation function during purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs (*). 1 3) Plant Vent -The Plant Vent for each respective unit receives discharges from the waste gas hold-up system, condenser evacuation system, containment purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs, and the Auxiliary Building ventilation. | |||
Effluents are monitored by R41D, a flow through gross activity monitor (for noble gas monitoring). | |||
Radioiodine and particulate sampling capabilities are provided by charcoal cartridge and filter medium samplers. | |||
Additionally, back-up sampling capability for radioiodine and particulates is i provided at the 1-R45 and 2-R45 sampling skids. Plant Vent flow rate is measured and as a back-up may be determined empirically as a function of fan operation (fan curves). Sampler flow rates are determined by flow rate instrumentation (e.g., venturi rotameter). | |||
Gaseous radioactive effluent flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figures 2-1. A simplified diagram of the Gaseous radioactive waste disposal system is provided in Figure 2-2.* The R12A in Mode 6 provides containment monitoring and alarm functions without automatic isolation'Page 81 of,156 . | |||
Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
====2.2.1 Containment==== | |||
and Plant Vent Monitor Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., grab sample of the Containment atmosphere, waste gas decay tank, or Plant Vent), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by Specification 3.11.2.1, by the equation: FRAC = 4.72E +02* *VF 500 *(2.1)L ~i]FRA4C =[4.72 E +02* ' | |||
* VF*Z(Ci *(Li +1.1MI))]13000 (2.2)Where: FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide concentrations and the release flow rate%Q = annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location (sec/m 3)VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft 3/min)Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as determined by radioanalysis of grab sample (ýtCi/cm 3)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per jiCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ptCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr)3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr)4.72 E+02 = conversion factor (cm 3/ft 3 | |||
* min/sec)Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the applicable monitors (R41D, and/or R12A) may be calculated by the equation: Page 82 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SP=LAF FRAC j+bkg (2.3)5 Where: I SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)SEN = monitor sensitivity (cpm per pCi/cm 3)bkg = background of the monitor (cpm)AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor and type release, which corresponds to the fraction of the total allowable release rate that is administratively allocated to the release.The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from I Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1). | |||
Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is equal to 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder | |||
===0.5 allocated=== | |||
to Hope Creek. Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station will be coordinated with the Hope Creek Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint i may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2-2.1 and 2-2.2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. | |||
These values are based upon:-the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate;-a radionuclide distributiona comprised of 95% Xe-133, 2% Xe-135, 1% Xe-133m, 1% Kr-88 and 1% Kr-85; and-an administrative allocation factor of 0.25 to conservatively ensure that any simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate. For this radionuclide distribution, the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the 3 corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate.a) Adopted from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, Source Term Specifications, Table 6 I 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases to I<500 mrem/yr, total body and <3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. | |||
In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting 3 from the release shall be performed using the following equations: | |||
Page 83 of 156 6 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 D tb = *IQ. (Ki Q) (2.4)and D= ZQ* Z((Li + 1.1M)* Q) (2.5)Where: Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr)D, = skin dose rate (mrem/yr)/ =atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m 3)Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (jiCi/sec) | |||
Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) | |||
As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a, following any release exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. | |||
Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity. | |||
The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases. | |||
As identified, any electronic spiking monitor responses may be excluded from the analysis.NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above may be imposed. However, conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. | |||
Provided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. | |||
Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.Page 84 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 .b limits the dose rate to <1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-13 1, tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation: | |||
3 DO~ (Ro**i (2.6)Where: Do = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr) i Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation Q pathway (sec/m 3)Rio = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4 i Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis frequency for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (ýtCi/sec) 3 By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for Do and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. | |||
Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (see Table 2-3) and the most limiting: potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid --*Rio = 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per[tCi/m 3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 42 ptCi/sec. | |||
Reducing this release rate by a factor of 4 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release I points (e.g., Hope Creek), the corresponding release rate allocated to each of the Salem units is 10.5 pCi/sec. 3 For a 7 day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1- 131, the cumulative release is 6.3 Ci. Therefore, as long as the 1-131 releases in any 7 day period do not exceed 6.3 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b limits on I allowable release rate.2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 i 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of<5 mrad, gamma-air and <10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits <10 mrad, gamma-air and <20 mrad, beta-air. | |||
The limits are applicable, separately to each unit I and are not combined site limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses: Dy= 3.17E-O8*Z | |||
*Q) (2.7)and Page 85 of"1.56 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Df= 3.17E- 08 %ZQ -(N | |||
* Q,) (2.8)Where: Dr = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)D,6 = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m 3)Qi = cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest (ptCi) whereýtCi = (iCi/cc)*(cc released) or ([tCi/sec)*(sec released)Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per ptCi/mr 3 , from Table 2-1)Ni = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per PCi/m 3 , Table 2-1)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2. (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification for this simplified method and for values of Meff, and Neff..)Dy = 3.1 7 E-0 8 *Meff* Qi (2.9)0.50 iQ (and D,6 =3.17E- 08 *(Do= % *N(2.10)0.50 iQ e ZQI Where: Meff = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3)Neff = 1.1 E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per pCi/i 3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (pCi), where pCi = (pCi/cc) * (cc released) or (IiCi/sec) | |||
* (sec released)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for potential variability in the radionuclide distribution Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and beta-air doses.Page 86 of 156 U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 1 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit of<7.5 mrem and calendar year limit <15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to 3 releases of 1-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days: Daop : 3.17E-08 *W* SFP* Z (Riop*Qi) | |||
(2.11) 1 i Where: 3 Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and controlling age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3= atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m 3)D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m 3 2)Riop = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m 3) or (M 2 -mrem/yr per ýLCi/sec)andorgan o from Table 2-4 for each age group and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riop were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0 133.Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (1 iCi).SFp = annual seasonal correction factor to account for the fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways: A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October) = 0.5 2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways: | |||
= 1.0 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, only the controlling pathways and age group as identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3.2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates. | |||
3 In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, tritium, and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method).Dmax = 3.17E- 08* W* SFp | |||
* Ri-131*. (2.12)iI Page 87 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)RI-131 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling (M 2 -mrem/yr per tCi/sec)W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.1E-10 1/M2 Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i 13 1, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate from with half life greater than 8 days (gCi)The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations During periods of primary to secondary leakage, minor levels of radioactive material may be released via the secondary system to the atmosphere. | |||
Non-condensables (e.g., noble gases) will be predominately released via the condenser evacuation system and will be monitored and quantified by the routine plant vent monitoring and sampling system and procedures (e.g., R15 on condenser evacuation, R41D on plant vent, and the plant vent particulate and charcoal samplers). | |||
However, if the Steam Generator blowdown is routed directly to the Chemical Waste Basin (via the SG blowdown flash tank) instead of being recycled through the condenser, it may be desirable to account for the potential atmospheric releases of radioiodines and particulates from the flash tank vent (i.e., releases due to moisture carry over). Since this pathway is not sampled or monitored, it is necessary to calculate potential releases.Based on the guidance in NRC NUREG-0133, the releases of the radioiodines and particulates shall be calculated by the equation: Qi = ci* Rsgb* Fft *(1-SQftv) | |||
(2.13)Where: Qi = the release rate of radionuclide, i, from the steam generator flash tank vent (gtCi/sec) | |||
Ci = the concentration of radionuclide, i, in the secondary coolant water averaged over not more than one week (ýtCi/ml)Rsgb = the steam generator blowdown rate to the flash tank (ml/sec)Fft = the fraction of blowdown flashed in the tank determined from a heat balance taken around the flash tank at the applicable reactor power level SQftv= the measured steam quality in the flash tank vent; or an assumed value of 0.85, based on NUREG-0017. | |||
Tritium releases via the steam flashing may also be quantified using the above equation with the assumption of a steam quality (SQftv) equal to 0. Since the H-3 will be associated with the water Page 88 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 molecules, it is not necessary to account for the moisture carry-over which is the transport media for the I radioiodines and particulates. | |||
Based on the design and operating conditions at Salem, the fraction of blowdown converted to steam (Fft) I is approximately 0.48. The equation simplifies to the following: | |||
Qi = 0.072 | |||
* C Rgb (2.14) m For H-3, the simplified equation is: Qi = 0.48 | |||
* Ci | |||
* gb (2.15) I Also during reactor shutdown operations with a radioactively contaminated secondary system, radioactive material may be released to the atmosphere via the atmospheric reliefs (PORV) and the safety reliefs on the main steam lines and via the steam driven auxiliary feed pump exhaust. The evaluation of the radioactive material concentration in the steam relative to that in the steam generator water is based on the guidance of NUREG-0017, Revision 1. The partitioning factors for the radioiodines is 0.01 and is 0.005 for all other particulate radioactive material. | |||
The resulting equation for quantifying releases via the atmospheric steam releases is: QY = 0.13 * (CY | |||
* SFo)* PFi (2.16)Where: I Qj= release rate of radionuclide i via pathway j,(ýtCi/sec) | |||
C = concentration of radionuclide i, in pathway j,(ýtCi/ml) | |||
SFj = steam flow for release pathway j= 400,000 lb/hr per PORV 850,000 lb/hr per safety relief valve= 62,500 lb/hr for auxiliary feed pump exhaust PFj = partitioning factor, ratio of concentration in steam to that in the water in the steam generator= 0.01 for radioiodines 0.005 for all other particulates3 | |||
= 1.0 for H-3 0.13 = conversion factor -[(hr*ml) / (sec*lb)]Any significant releases of noble gases via the atmospheric steam releases can be quantified in accordance with the calculation methods of the Salem Emergency Plan Implementation Procedure. | |||
Alternately, the quantification of the release rate and cumulative releases may be based on secondary samples. The measured radionuclide concentration in the secondary system may be used for quantifying the noble gases, radioiodine and particulate releases.Page 89 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Note: The expected mode of operation would be to isolate the effected steam generator, thereby reducing the potential releases during the shutdown/cooldown process. Use-of the above calculation methods should consider actual operating conditions and release mechanisms. | |||
The calculated quantities of radioactive materials may be used as inputs to the equation (2.11) or (2.12) to calculate offsite doses for demonstrating compliance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and the ODCM CONTROLS.2.7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses exceed one-half the annual design objective rate in any calendar quarter, i.e., exceeding: | |||
-0.625 mrad/quarter, gamma air;-1.25 mrad/quarter, beta air; or-1.875 mrem/quarter, maximum organ.The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Auxiliary Building normal ventilation system (filtration systems # 1, 2 and 3) and the Waste Gas Decay Tanks as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2. Dose projections are performed at least once per 31 days by the following equations: | |||
Dyp= D * (91Yd) (2.17)D pp =D8* (91Vd) (2.18)D maxp = D max* (91d) (2.19)Where: Dyp = gamma air dose projection for current calendar quarter(mrad) | |||
Dy = gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.7 or 2.9 (mrem)Do~p = beta air dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrad)Dp = beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.8 or 2.10 (mrem)Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Dmax = maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.11 or 2.12 (mrem)d = number of days to date in current calendar quarter 91 = number of days in a calendar quarter ,Page.9O'of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES 3 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.8, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall I include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY. | |||
3 The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC based on the parameters from Table 2-3 and 2-hours per visit per year. The default value for the meteorological dispersion data as presented in Table 2-3 may be used if current year meteorology is unavailable at the time of NRC reporting. | |||
However, a follow-up evaluation shall be performed when the data becomes available. | |||
3 3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 n The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium .fuel cycle sources (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). | |||
I For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Nuclear Generating Station and the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station: No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.The dose contribution from the operation of Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station will be estimated I based on the methods as presented in the Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (HCGS ODCM).As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 1 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure. | |||
3 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the reporting requirements of 6.9.1.8 (RERR), dose calculations for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station should be performed using the controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-3 and the calculation methods contained within this ODCM. If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2. n Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used. m 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination. | |||
Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., DLR, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.Page 91 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at Salem that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190.However, should a situation exist where the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculation techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 compliance. | |||
Page 92 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1'Sampling Program The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:-To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;-To determine if the operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Stations has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment; | |||
-To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and-To verify that SNGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment. | |||
The sampling requirements (type of samples*, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.*NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Salem Generating Station.4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ODCM CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program provides a check on the precision and accuracy of measurements of radioactive materials in environmental samples.A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 93 of 156 I1 I I I I I I I I I I I | |||
-MM M M M M M --MMM M M M M M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 1 Page 94 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-2: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 2 Page 95 of 156 m m m --m -MM m --m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-3: LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE SYSTEM Page 96 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liouid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 Parameter Actual Default Comments Value Value Units MPCe Calculated 6.05E-06 | |||
* 1 tCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.0E-07 N/A LtCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown and Service Water monitor setpoints. | |||
Ci Measured N/A jtCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A ýiCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Col 2 (Appendix F).Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 1-R18 piCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint I-R19 (A,B,C,D) | |||
Document (PSBP) 315733 l-R13 (A,B,C,D,E) | |||
CW as determined 1.00E+05 gpm Circulating water system -single CW pump ***RR as determined gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 1-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL compliance l-R19 250 Steam Generator blowdown rate per Generator I-Ri3 2500 Service Water flow rate for Containment fan coolers Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 1-Ri8 Public Service Blueprint Document l-R19 (A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315733 l-R13 (A,B,C,D,E)** | |||
Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude I-Ri9 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation | |||
** The MPC value of 1-131 (3E-07 pCi/ml) has been used for derivation of R19 Steam Generator Blowdown and R13 Service Water monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2* ** During periods when Unit 2 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for certain l-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I Page 97 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments MPCe Calculated 4.81E-06 | |||
* Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A liCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown, Service Water and Chemical Waste Basin monitor setpoints. | |||
C, Measured N/A JICi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A jiCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Col. 2 (Appendix F)Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 2-Ri8 !iCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint Document 2R19(A,B,C,D) 315734 2-R13(A,B,C) | |||
R37 CW as determined 1.OE+05 gpm Circulating Water System, single CW pump ***RR as determined gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 2-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL Compliance 2-R19 250 Steam Generator Blowdown rate per Generator 2-R13 2500 Service Water flow rate for Containment fan coolers R37 1200 Chemical Waste Basin discharge Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 2-R18 Public Service Blueprint Document 2-RI9(A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315734 2-R13(A,B,C)** | |||
R37 **Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude 2-R1 9 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation | |||
** The MPC value of 1-131 (3.OE-7 pICi/ml) has been used for derivation of the R13, R19 and R37 monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2 During periods when Unit 1 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for certain 2-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.Page 98 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, A 1 o (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)H-3 -2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1' 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 I C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.39E+3 +3 2.90E+3 +3 2.90E+3 P-32 4.69E+6 2.91E+5 1.81E+5 -5.27E+5 Cr-51 5.58E+0 3.34E+0 1.23E+0 7.40E+0 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 -2. 10E+3 2.16E+4 a Mn-56 1.78E+2 3.15E+1 -2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 -1.97E+4 2.03E+4 Fe-59 8.06E+4 1.90E+5 7.27E+4 -5.30E+4 6.32E+5.... .. .. ..... .... ........ ...... .. ...... .................... | |||
I........................................... | |||
... ................ | |||
..... .. .......................... | |||
.................. | |||
.... .................................... | |||
......... | |||
....... ....................................... | |||
.......... | |||
........................................ | |||
................. | |||
.................................................................. | |||
......... | |||
.................................... | |||
......... | |||
..o-7 Co-57 1 I.42E+2 2.36E+2 --3.59E+3-Co-58 -6.03E+2 1.35E+3 -- 1.22E+4 Co-60 1.73E+3 3.82E+3 3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 7.18E+2 Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 1.20E+1 -6.65E+2 Cu-64 2.14E+2 1.O1E+2 5.40E+2 1.83E+4.... Z n -6 5 .................................. | |||
1 .5 .....! .................................... | |||
Zn-69 3.43E+2 6.56E+2 4.56E+1 4.26E+2 9.85E+1 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 --3.42E+2 1.39E+3 .3.58E+2 4.30E+4.............. | |||
.......................................... | |||
.......................... | |||
........................ | |||
........................................................... | |||
............................. | |||
......... | |||
.................... | |||
........... | |||
................... | |||
............... | |||
.......................................................... | |||
.................................................................................... | |||
....................... | |||
... ......... | |||
............................... | |||
Br-82 4.07E+O ,- , -4.67E+O Br-83 7.25E-2 --1.04E-1 Br-84 9.39E-2 7.37E-7 Br-85 -3.86E-3 ---Rb-86 -6.24E+2 2.91E+2 ---1.23E+2 Rb-88 -1.79E+O 9.49E-1 ---2.47E- 11 Rb-89 -1..19E+O 8.34E-1 ---6.89E-14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 8.OOE+2 Sr-90 1.23E+5 3.01E+4 3.55E+3 Sr-91 9.18E+l -3.71E+O ---4.37E+2 Sr-92 3.48E+1 -1.51E+O ---6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+O -1.63E-1 ---6.42E+4 Y-91m 5.73E-2 -2.22E-3 ---1.68E-1 Y-91 8.88E+1 2.37E+O ... -4.89E+4 Y-92 5.32E-1 1.56E-2 -9.32E+3 Y-93 1.69E+O 4.66E-2 --5.35E+4 Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.l1E+0 3.46E+O -8.02E+O -1.62E+4 Zr-97 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 -2.68E-1 -5.51E+4 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 -2.46E+2 -1.51E+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.49E-1 3.46E-1 -1.11E+O -3.50E+3 Mo-99 .1.28E+2 2.43E+1 -2.89E+2 -2.96E+2 I Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 -5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 Tc-101 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 -3.46E-1 9.81E-3 5.77E-14 I Page 99 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Ai.(Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)Rtii-03 1.07E+2 4.60E+1 -4.07E+2 1.25Eq-4-Ru-105 8.89E+0 -3.51E+0 1. 15E+2 5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 2.01E+2 -3.06E+3 1.03E+5.. -.1 ..3 .-... ......... | |||
........... | |||
.............. | |||
.. ....... ... ................. | |||
.......... | |||
... ............... | |||
...... .... .... ... ... ..... ........... | |||
...... ........ ... ...... _ .--........ | |||
.... ..... ... ............ | |||
.......... | |||
........... | |||
.. .......... | |||
.............................. | |||
........... | |||
.. ......... | |||
.......... | |||
Rh-106 ---FAg-11m 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 -2.85E+3 -5.91E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 1.19E+l 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.1OE+2 6.71E-1 -2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+0 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+0 4.10E+l 6.96E-1 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+0 1.93E+0 6.60E+O 3.63E+1 7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.3 1 E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 -4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+0 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+1 1.92E+O............ | |||
............. | |||
................ | |||
.. ............... | |||
......... | |||
....... .. .............. | |||
................ | |||
.............. | |||
................. | |||
..... ......... | |||
........ .. .... .............. | |||
...... .... ...... .............. | |||
........... | |||
........ ..- 1 l m..4 0 E 2.6 ...+1.5..g .1.0 8 ........ ... .. .................................. | |||
6.9 E + 2. ...................... | |||
............... | |||
....... ....................... | |||
....... .... ...- 6.-E+3 Te-131m 1.40E+2 6.85E+l. 5.571E+1 1.08E+I2 6.94E+2 -6.80E+3 Tfe -131f 1. 5 9E+O0 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+O -2.26E-1 Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 .6.24E+3 1.1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 -1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 -8.23E+1 1-132 1.06E+1 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 5.35E+0 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4 2.26E+2 1 .16E+2 1-134 5.56E+0 1.51E+l 5.40E+O 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 1.32E-2 1 1-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+1 2.24E+1 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 -5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 -1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 -4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+1 5.94E+O -8.81E+O 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 -5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+l Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+0 1.08E+2 -7.02E-1 1.18E+O 3.38E+3 Ba-141 3.81E+O 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 -2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 -1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+0 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 --5.83E+4 La-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 --2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+0 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 -1.08E+0 -8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 -1.97E-1 1.67E+4 C e-1-44 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+0 -4.43E+l 6.04E+4 Pr-143 5.79E+0 2.32E+O 2.87E-1 -1.34E+O -2.54E+4 Pr-144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 -4. 44E-3 -2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+0 4.58E+O 2.74E-1 -2.68E+0 -2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+O 7.66E+O 2.68E+0 --2.51E+3 N__239 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 -1.08E-2 -7.11E+2 SPage 100 of 115,6 | |||
!I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-3: Bioaccumulation Factors (pCi/kg per pCi/liter)* | |||
3 H 9.9E-01 9.3E-01 C 1.8E+03 1.4E+03I Na 6.7E-02 1.9E-01 P 3.OE+03 3.OE+04 Cr 4.OE+02 2.OE+03 i Mn 5.5E+02 4.OE+02 Fe 3.OE+03 2.OE+04 ICo 1.OE+02 1 OE+03 Ni 1 .0E+02 2.5E+02 Cu 6.7E+02 1.7E+03 *Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 Br 1.5E-02 3.1 E+00 Rb 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01......... ... ................. | |||
.......................................... | |||
...... ........ ... ............ | |||
............... | |||
................... | |||
.... 2 5 + ................ | |||
... .... .... ............... | |||
.... ............ | |||
... ....... .................... | |||
.... .. ... ................ | |||
! .0 + 3 ....... .. .... .... .... .......... .Zr 2.OE+02 8.OE+01 3 Nb 3.OE+04 1.OE+02 Mo L.OE+01 1.OE+01 _Tc L.OE+01 .5.OE+01 Ru 3.OE+00 1.OE+03 __i Rh 1.0E+01 2.OE+03_Ag 3.3E+03 3.3E+03, Sb 4.OE+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.OE+01 1.OE+02...... ..... ...... ...................................... | |||
...... ... ... ........ ........................................ | |||
.......... | |||
............................................................ | |||
....... ....... ................ | |||
............................................................. | |||
......... | |||
...... .......... | |||
..................................................... | |||
............................. | |||
...... ............................................. | |||
................ | |||
... i I 1.OE+01 5.OE+01 Cs 4.OE+01 2.5E+01 Ba 1.OE+01 1.OE+02 La 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Ce 1.0E+01 6.0E+02/.... ..... ...................... | |||
....... ................. | |||
........... | |||
.... ........ ............................... | |||
.......... | |||
........................ | |||
........ ..... .................................................. | |||
............................................................................................................................... | |||
0E + 0..........E+ | |||
0... ... .I Pr 2.5E+01 1 OE+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 3.OE+/-O1 3.OE+/-01 Np 1.+0 OE+0l* Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is I adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.Page 101 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev;. 20 FIGURE 2-1: SALEM VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTEMS AND EFFLUENT MONITOR INTERFACES Simplified One Line TO ATMOSPHERE Page 102 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev.:20l3 FIGuRE 2-2: GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Simplified One Line VOLUME CONTROL TANK SPENT RESIN STORAGE TANK RECYCLE EVAPS I I, U I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 103 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-1: Dose Factors For Noble Gases Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li MiN Radionuclide LCi/m3) R.Ci/m3) Ci/m3) __i/m3_Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.O1E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 Page 104 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 1 I Parameter Actual Default Units Comments Value Value X/Q calculated 2.2E-06 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 1 VF as measured or (Plant Vent) fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -normal operation (Cont Purge) 3.50E+04 Containment Purge AF coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate limit for site.Ci measured N/A jLCi/cm 3 Taken from gamma spectral I analysis of gaseous effluent Ki nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 1 tCi /m 3 in Li nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 3 gtCi/m 3 Mi nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 ptCi/m 3 Sensitivities as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are 1 -R41 pCi/m 3 or controlled under Public 1-R12A cpm per Service Blueprint DocumentýtCi/cc (PSBP) 315733 Setpoint calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are 5 l-R41D controlled under Public 1-R12A ** jCi/sec Service Blueprint Document (PSBP) 315733 3**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 Page 105 of 156 I I I U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations | |||
-Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments X/Q Calculated 2.2E-6 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 VF as measured or Plant Vent fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -normal operation Cont. Purge 3.50E+04 Containment Purge AF Coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate for site.C, Measured N/A tCi/cm 3 Taken from gamma spectral analysis of gaseous effluent K, Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific ýtCi/m 3 Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific VtCi/m 3 M, Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific pCi/m 3 Sensitivities as N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are 2-R41 determined pCi/m 3 or controlled under Public Service 2-R12A cpm per Blueprint Document (PSBP)RCi/cc 315734 Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are controlled 2-R41D pCi/sec under Public Service Blueprint 2-R12A | |||
* Document (PSBP) 315734**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6*P~agg- 106 9of 1 5 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for Dose Calculations | |||
*ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s) | |||
Controlling Age Group Atmospheric Dispersion X/Q D/Q (sec/m3) (1/m2)3.11.2.1 a site boundary (0.83 mile, N)3,11.2.1b site boundary (0.83 mile, N)noble gases direct exposure inhalation gamma-air beta-air N/A child N/A infant 2.2E-06 2.2E-06 2.2E-06 N/A N/A N/A 3,11.2.2 3,11.2.3 site boundary (0.83 mile, N)residence/dairy** | |||
(4.9 miles, W)milk, ground plane and inhalation 5.4E-08 2.1E-10* The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Safety Evaluation Report, Supplement No. 3 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 (NUREG-0517, December 1978).** Location and distance are determined from the performance of the annual land use census as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.I I I I U I I I I ,I Page 107 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per laCi/m3)-3 1 I ._. !6E 6-3 .6E+3" .26E+3 1.726E+ .1ýE+_3 C-14 1.82E+4, 3.41E+3 3.1E3t 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 [3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1.32E+6 ]7.7 1E+4 i- ]-8.64E+4 5.01E+4 Cr-51 1 -5.95E+1 i2.28E+1 11.44E+4 ...3.32E+3 1.00E+2 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1 1.70E+4 -1_- 7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 -i [1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 -i6.92E+2 __- I- 3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 1_- -9.28E+/-5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 -1 5E+4 _5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 1- .78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1. 03E+5 _...._- 6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Rb-86 -_ 1.35E+5 1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Sr-89 I 3.04E+5 -6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 I 9.92E+7 I 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 -6.10E+6 Y-91 1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 Zr-95 T 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 -5.42E+4 1.77E+6 1.50E+5 2.33E+4 Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 .7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 ---5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.1OE+5 6.58E+2 Ru-106 6.91E+4 --1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Ag-ll0m 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 1- .97E+4 4.63E+6 3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 I 7.55E+1 2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4 Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 1.74E+6 1.01E+5 1.26E+4 Te-125m 3.42E+3 I 1.58E÷3 I1.05E+3 1.24E+4-3.14E+5 7.06E+4 4.67E+2............ | |||
..... ............... | |||
.~i + --5 ; i + ... ............ | |||
... ....... ........ .5g + ........ ...... ......... | |||
....j..314-.E.i | |||
+ .5 ......... | |||
.......... | |||
........... | |||
....... ...... ......+ -.....Te-127m 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 -4.5 8E+4 9.0+ -.50E+ 1.7+Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1. .19E+7 6.13E+4 6.28E+3 2.05E+4 1-13 1. 1 6~E+3 j3.26E+3 1. 14E+5 ~5.18E+3 f-4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 8.88E+3 4.52E+3 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 -1.O1E+0 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 f4.48E+5 1.11E+4 -5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 -2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 -8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.1OE+5 Cs37 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 [__- 2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 -4.28E*5 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 -1.67E+l 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 -6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 -8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 -2.16E+3 2.81E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 Nd-147 5.27E+3 I 6.10E+3 -3.56E+3 2.21E+5 1.73E+5 3.65E+2 Page 108 of 156 | |||
.I, Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per jiCi/m3)Mn-3 ' 5./1E+4 1.7+".8+ .8+ .0+F5 3.34E+4 2.38E+41.27E+3 1.27E+3 6.39E+3-5.27E+3"c--i- C ...... -.6g -...... ..... ....I8 E -.......... .i g+ -..--.8-7.....P-32 1.89E+4 1.10E+4 --9.28E+/-4 7.46E+4 Cr-51 -7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.10E+4 3.59E+3 1.35E+2 n-54 5.11 E++/-4 -1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 _1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 6.92E+2 --- 5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 C-0-518 2.07E+3 -1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 -1.5 1 E+4__ -8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Zi-63 _ 5.40E+5 4.34E+4 -3.4+ .07E+5 1.42E+/-4 31.9E+4 6n-95 3.86E+4 1.34E+4 -8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 1.90E+5 --1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5 2.42E+6 3.71E+5 1.25E+4 Ag-90 1.08E+8 -+1.65E+75E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-91 6.61E+5 --2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Zr-95 1.46E+5: 4.58E+4 6.74E+4 2.69E+6 Te-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 .38EE+4 7.51E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Ru-103 2.10E+3 17.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru-106 9.84E+4 4 1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-110m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 -2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 39 3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+1 E 2.74E+6 9.92E+ 1.4E+24 Te-125m 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 4E 5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 e-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-129m 1.39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 2.25E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 6 8.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51E+5 6.92E+3 1 2.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.224E+4 2.05E+4 -3.59E+4 1.03E+4 6.22E+3 T1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 2.04E+1 8.40E+2 115 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 -6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs- 136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 -1. 10E+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5 Cs137 6.70E+5 8.48E+5 -3.04E+5 1.21E+5 8.48E+3 3.1 1E+5 Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 -2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4_- | |||
8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 -1.211+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 -3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Nd-147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 -_ 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I Page 109 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per pCi/m3)F-3 4.-E 1. 12E+2E+ E+ 1.12E+3 21.1E+3 7.77E+3 Co-7 _____ 9.3E2 12t ____3 3 E.0E3 1 I2+/- 1.0E+/-3.................. | |||
......Co-14 _3.59E+4 16_77E+3 -.....15-;5-F-53-.7-3-E+6 3-- E 6_3+--6-5E-3 | |||
...P-32 2.60E+6 1. 14E+5 -_ 7 4.22E+4 9.88E+4 Cr-51 +8.55E+1 2-43E+ 1.70E+4 1.08E+3 1.54E+2 Mn-54 4.-6E 4.29E+4 -7 1.E+4 1.58E+6 2.29E+4 9.51E+3 be-55 4.74E+4 2.52E+4 -1.11E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Fe-59 2.07E+4 3.34E+4 17 --1.E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 Co-57 -9.03E+2 +-5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 -1.77E+3 --1.11E+6 3.43E+5 3.16E+3 Co-60 -4 1.31E+4 1- -7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21E+5 4.63E+4 -+- 2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4.Z i 6 ......... | |||
... ... ... ... ........ 4 U .i .. ..........-.... | |||
..... .......... | |||
.. --.... -------- --- ....... ......... i U V I + -5 .................. | |||
.....3 .....Zn-95 4263E+4 1.13E+5 7 .14E+/-3 9.95E+/-5 1.63E+4 7.03E+4 Rb-86 -1.98E+5 1.- --.79E+3 1.14E+5 Sr-89 i 5.99E+5 -_ +_ 2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4-............ | |||
+ i 6 U ........... | |||
...... .......... | |||
............... | |||
i ......T-......... | |||
+........ | |||
..... .......... | |||
.+ 1.. ... ...4 8 + ........4 3 E +5.....4 4 E +6.Ag-ilm 1.9+/- 1.01E4E+ 1 .2+ .48E+7 3.43E+/-5 6.44E+/-6._ .... ..... ._ ___...___.___.__ | |||
Y-91 9.14E+5 i -2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 Zr-95 __1.90E+5 74.18E÷4 i --5.96E+4 j2.23E+6 6.13E+4 3.70E+4.-9 ............ | |||
... ............. ................. | |||
......... | |||
........... | |||
........ .......... | |||
... .............. | |||
...... .............. | |||
... .-i ........ .......... .... ................ | |||
....... ... 6 _ ---: --- ..... ........... | |||
Te-125r 2 .35E+4 9 .33E38E+3 8.6E 6.14 7E+5 6.8+ .55E+3 Ru-1032 2.79E+3 7.03E+3 6.62E+5 .4E+41.07E+3 Ru-106 1 1.6E+ 5 T 1.84E+54 1.43E+7 1 4.29E+5 1.69E+4 Ag-130m 1.69E+4 1.!4E+4 38E 2.12E+4 5.48E+6 1 l.0E+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 17.4E+2 1.20E+2 1.24E+6 J 1.64E+5 2.25E+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 7.59E+2 9.10E+l 2 2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4 Te12m 6.73E+ 123E3 1.92E+3 -4*77E+5 i3.38E÷4 9.1-4-E--2 | |||
...........-- m ............ | |||
... ......... ........... | |||
.................... | |||
..S ¥ | |||
.... ..-.z i- 7 ; ; .. .. ..._...- ............. | |||
............ | |||
Te-129m I1.92E+4 6.85E+3 16.33E+3 -5.03E+4 1.76E+6 J1.82E+5 13.04E+3 1-131 4.81 EE+4 +4. 2 E+4 16E 8E+4 -l 2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1e-132 677+ 2.12E+3 4.0.7E+319E5 6.25E0E+ 3.22E+3 1 .88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 5.48E+3 7.70E+3_r-134 1.1 E+ 2.16E+3 5.07E+4. 330E+3 .3 5 9._55E+2 9._95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 -8 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs-134 6.5 1E+5 1.01E+6 3.30E+5 1.21E+5 i3.85E+3 12.25E+5 Cs-136 6.5 1E+4 t1.71E+5 9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 l1. 16E+5 C s--,-1-3,7 9.07t84-5 | |||
!8.2-5E+5 2.82E÷5 1 1.-8+E¥ý5 Ba-140 ..7.40E+4-1 6.48E+1 2.11lE+l 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 8.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 12.90E+3...Ce-144 6.77E+6 12.12E+6 1. 17E+6 1.20E+7 13.89E+5 13.6 1E+5 Pr- 143 ]:8=5E=+4 5.55E+3 3.00E+3 4.33E+5 19.73E+4 i9.14E+2 Nd17 I1.8+ 8.73E+3 4.8 1E+3 13.28E+5! | |||
8.21E+4 6.8 1E+2 Page. 1 10 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per [tCi/m3)*~~~~6.742 I" -" 7E+2" ' ' i ''H-3--5 '5E6.47E-2 6.7 6.47E+2 647E+2 26 53- 1 2 +3 5. 1E+3 55.31E3 ,E+3 5.31E+3 | |||
.83-F-15 ...E+3 5.33 E+3 P-32 2.03E+6 1. 12E+5 --l 1.61E+4 -7.74E+4 C-51 -5.75E+1.32E+l i1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1.... n : i ..... .... .......... | |||
i..... .. ....................... | |||
......... ........... | |||
.................. | |||
...... .. .............. | |||
... i ; -F i{ i 7 ....... .... ....... ............. | |||
... 9........ | |||
..... .Fe-55 1 97E+4 81.17E+4 -8. 469E+4 I 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 --1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-58 -l.22E+3 --37.77E+5 1.1lE+4 1.82Z+4 Co-60 i-8.02E+3 | |||
-{4.51 E+6 i3.19E+4 i1. 18E+4 NI-63 i3.39E+5 2.04E+4 [- i-2.09E+5 12.42E+3 1. 16E+4..... ...... .......... | |||
................. | |||
..-... 9 .. .... ....... ... ............... | |||
......... | |||
..... ...... ................. | |||
{ 5 g ] -i + .............. i i~-"i i --.......------ | |||
--Rb-86 1- .90E+5 --3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 -2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 L~ 4.09E+/-7 1. --l12E+7 1.31lE+/-5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 [ -2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+/-4 Zr-95 1. 1 5E+/-5 2.79E+4 -3.11lE+4 1.75E+6 2.17E+4 2.03E+4,.......... .r 9.. 5 .................................................. | |||
...1 5 E .5 ...... ........... | |||
...... .. .7. 9 + 4 .............. | |||
......................... | |||
... ..... : ............................................ | |||
...... !.......... | |||
E ............... | |||
.......................... | |||
.................. | |||
1.: E J 6 ........ ....... .... :I.7 E ....... ..... ...2. 0E .4 ........ ............. | |||
Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 -4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+3 Ru-103 2.02E+3 -I -4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 i -1.07E+5 1.16E+7 T 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-ll0m 9.98E+3 i7.22E+3 .- l09E+4 3.67E+6 i3.30E+4 5.00E+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 i5.56E+2 1.01E+2 I 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 I 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 T 6.23E+1 -1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m [4.76E+3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 I -4.47E+5 1.29E+4 i6.58E+2.... T e -i 2 ; m ................... | |||
.......................... | |||
.................................... | |||
............ | |||
........................ | |||
................ | |||
...... ..................... | |||
............ | |||
E+. ..7.+4. ........... | |||
.............................................. | |||
Te-127m 1 0.7+ 69E+ I487E+3 3.75E+4 I1.31E+6 [2 E+4 [2.07E+3 Te-129m 1.41E+4 6.09E+3 { 5.47E+3 I 3.18E+4 1.68E+6 I 6.90E+4 2.23E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5.18E+4 -I 1.06E+/-3 1.96E+4 3--3 3.....1 9 .. ............. | |||
3... ....... .. ......... | |||
......... | |||
i 4E 4- 1.26E+3 1-133 T 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 -2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21E+2 I188E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 ....29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 3.86E+31111 | |||
...6..+ .6..-96E+5 J8.47E+31 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-134 3.96E+5 7.03E+5 -I 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-136 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 -I 5.64E+4 1.18E+4 1.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.1_2E+5 -I ..72-.E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 4.55E+4 Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 -I 1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 -I 5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 -1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 F6.99E+2 Nd-147 7.94E+3 8.13E+3 -.3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4 5.OOE+2 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I Page 111 of 156....i I .... -% *.. ..* * ...I Table 2.4 (cont'd) Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per ýLCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14* (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others AILI", H-3 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 1 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 i 1.71E+10 I 1.06E+/-9 1- .92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 -1.71E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 Mn-54 I8.40E+6 -_ 2-50E+/-6 -2.57E+/-7 1.60E+/-6__M -5 .. .. ...... i --... .. ........ .......... | |||
....... ...5 .! -..... ...... .......... | |||
....... .. ...... ......-......... | |||
........ ....... .......... | |||
....2 .. ----.... ....... ... .......... | |||
-....... ........ ...... ......-.- ...- -E........ | |||
........... | |||
.........-- | |||
E -6 ...Fe-55 2.51E+7 i 1.73E+7 -9.67E+6 9.95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.OOE+7 1- .95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 1_- __ 1.28E+6 -3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 __- _- 4.72E+6 -9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 1- .64E+7 -3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 __ 6.73E+9 i4.66E+8 -- -9.73E+/-7 2.26E+8 Zn-65 1.37E+9 -I4.36E+9 | |||
-2.92E+9 -2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 2- .59E+9 -5.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 ---2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 ---1.35E+9 1.15E+10 Y-91 8.60E+3 1 --4.73E+6 2.30E+2 Zr-95 9.46E+2 1 3.03E+2 4.76E+2 -9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 I 4.59E+4 4.54E+4 2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Ru-103 1.02E+3 -3.89E+3 -1.19E+5 4.39E+2 Ru-106 2.04E+4 -3.94E+4 1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-ll0m i 5.83E+7 j5.39E+7 1.06E+8 2.20E+10 3.20E+7 Sb-124 2.57E+7 i 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 -2.OOE+7 7.31E+8 1.02E+7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 T 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 -1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 Te-125m 1.63E+7 5.90E+6 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 -6.50E+7 2.18E+6 Te-127m i 4.58E+7 i 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 -1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 -3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 -1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+l 6.97E-1 -8.22E-2 1.53E-1 1-133 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 l.OE+9 1.20E+7 -6.20E+6 2.1OE+6 I 1-134 I .....1-135 {1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 4.0OE+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 -4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 L.lOE+10 Cs-136 2.61E+8 1.03E+9 -5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-137 7.38E+9 L;0I-E÷1I0 | |||
-3.43E÷9 L1_4E+9 1.95E+8 6.61E+9 Ba-140 2.69E+7 3.38E+4 -1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 1.52E+3 -1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 8.87E+4 -1.21E+8 1.92E+4 Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 3.68E+l -6.96E+5 7:88E+0 Nd-147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 -6.37E+1 5.23E+/-5 6.52E+0_Page 112 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per j.Ci/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per jtCi/sec) for others I I I H-3 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 13.15E+10 i 1.95E+9 -2.65E+9 1.22E+9 C512.78E+4 | |||
: 1. 10E+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5-00E+4 Fe-55 4.45E+7 I 3.16E+7 -2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 I 5.20E+7 1.21E+8 -3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 -2.25E+6 -.- 4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 j 7'95E+6 -1.1OE+8 1.83E+7 Co-60 -2.78E+7 -3.62E+8 6.26E+7 Ni-63 ! 1.18E+10 i28.35E+8 | |||
-1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11 E+9 .. 7.31E+9 -4.68E+9 3.1OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 -4.73E+9 -7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89 2.67E+9 --....3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 9.92E+7 --9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6 Y-91 i1.58E+4 -----6.48E+6 4.24E+2 Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+ý2 -7.67E+/-2' | |||
-1.20E+6 3.59E+2..r........ | |||
........................................... | |||
...................................... | |||
.......... | |||
.. ...............................-. | |||
..................................................................................................................................................... | |||
0E.... ......................... | |||
....9I ................. | |||
Nb-95 1.41E+5 I 7.80E+4 -7.57E+4 3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 --6.40E+3 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 --7.23E+4 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-li0m 9.63E+7 19.11E+7 -1.74E+8 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 4.O1E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 3.65E+7 1 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 3.21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m 3.OOE+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 8.86E+7 4.02E+6 Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.O1E+7 3.42E+8 2.1OE+8 1.OOE+7 Te-129m 1.11E+8 4.10E+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 -4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+/-8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 -1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+0 -3.31E-1 2.72E-1 1-133 1 7.24E+6 T 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 -9.30E+6 3.75E+6 1-134 I --.........1-135 2.47E+4 .. 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81E+9 2.31E+10 -7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 -9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1. 34E+ 10 1.78E+10 -6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 Ba-140 4.85E+7 .5.95E+4 -2.02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 Ce-141 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 -2.79E+3 1.69E+7 6.81E+2 Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 -1.63E+5 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 -6.77E+1 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 -1.16E+2 7.11E+5 1.18E+1 I I I U I I!I I I I I I I Page 113 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others'A H-3 __- __1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 .3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 --2.15E+9 3.OOE+9 Cr-51 -5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 -2.09E+7 -5.87E+6 -1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Fe-55" ----- -".-I 2lE+8 I 5.93E+7 --3.35E+7 1.10OE+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 { 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 --5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 -3.84E+6 --3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 1- .21E+7 --7.08E+7 3.72E+7 Co-60 -4.32E+7 --2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 .2.96E+ 10 1-59E+9 1.07E+8....1E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 I1.10E+0 -6.94E+9 1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 I 8.77E+9 --5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89. 6.62E+9 ---.2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 -1.12E+l --1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 --- -.5.21E+6 ji1.04E+3 Zr-95 i 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -1.21E+3 5881E+5 7.52E+/-2 Nb-95 3.18E+5 l.24E+5 -,.!6E+5 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Ru-103 i 4.29E+3 1- .08E+4 1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru-106 9.24E+4 -.25E+5 -1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-110m r 2.09E+8 1 l.41E+8 -2.63E+8 -1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 i 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 -6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb- 125 8.70E+7 i 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 -4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7..-.... ........................... | |||
.3 8 E +7... ........... | |||
+I ................. | |||
+ ................. | |||
..................................................... | |||
I........................................... | |||
.-........... | |||
,.................................................. | |||
...... ........ .7.................. | |||
............. | |||
.... .. 4.+.............. | |||
TeI125m I7.38E3+7 I2.OOE+/-7 2.07E+/-7 --7.12E+7 9.84E+/-6 Te-127m i 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 -1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 -3.32E+8 4.23E+7 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 -1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O 1.48E+0 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 -8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 .....1-135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10 3.71E+10 -1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1.OOE+9 2.76E+9 -1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 -1.01E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Ba- 140 1.17E4-8 1.03E+5 -3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 .84E+6 Ce- 141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 -4.78E+3 -1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 -2.82E+5 -1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 2.17E+2 -1.17E+2 -7.80E+5 3.59E+1 Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 -1.98E+2 -5.71E+5 2.79E+1 Page 114 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per iCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others I I I I 40 CA H-3_ _ _ 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 I 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 P-32 I 1.60E+1l I 9.42E+9 --2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 ___ 1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54 3.89E+7 -8.63E+6 -1.43E+7 8.83E+6 M n -5 4 ~ ~- ...... .3... .... ...89........ | |||
.... ........ .... ...... .. ................. | |||
.......... | |||
........8 6..3.. E_+6. " .. .. .... ....... .... .. _ _. + .. .._ E -6 ...Fe-55 135E+8 8.72E+7 --4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 --.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 _ __ 8.95E+6 --3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 ___ 2.43E+7 ---6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 8.81E+7 J- -_- 2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 3.49E+10 2.16E+9 ---1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 -9.23E+9 1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 -2.22E+10 ---5.69E+8 1.LOE+10 Sr-89 1.26E+10 I -_ --2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+1l1 | |||
.... .1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 .'7.33E+4 | |||
-.5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Zr-95 6.83E+3 1.66E+3 -1.79E+3 -8.28E+5 1.18E+3 Nb-95 5.93E+5 2.44E+5 -1.75E+5 -2.06E+8 1.41E+5 Ru-103 8.69E+3 i_- -1.81E+4 -1.06E+5 2.91E+3 Ru-106 1.90E+5 --2.25E+5 -1.44E+6 2.38E+4 Ag-lIOm i 3.86E+8 12.82E+8 -4.03E+8 -1.46E+l0 1.86E+8 Sb-124 2.09E+8 i 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 -1.31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 i 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 -9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7............. | |||
...... ... ... .... ... " ' " , ..................... | |||
**......... | |||
.................. | |||
......... | |||
........... | |||
................... | |||
.... *....... .... .... .... .... * ........ .. ..... .... ..... .................. | |||
............... | |||
.* .......... | |||
...... ... ......... .......... | |||
--............... | |||
.........* ................. | |||
...... .. ............ | |||
...... ... ... .Te-125mn 1 .51E+8 I 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 -- 7.18E+7 2.04E+I7 Te-127m 4.21E E+8 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 -1.70E+8 5.1OE+7 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 -3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 2.72E+9 i 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 -1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+O 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+0 -2.34E+O 1.03E+0 1-133 1 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 -9.16E+6 1.58E+7.- 3 .- .-................ | |||
1-134 -1.01E-9 1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 -8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 -1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 -2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-137 5,15E+10 6.02E+10 -1.62E+10 6.55E+9 -k88E+8 4-27E+9 Ba-140 2.41E+8 2.41E+5 -5.73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+7 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 -8.15E+3 -1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 -3.85E+5 -1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E1+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 -7.89E+5 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 I 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 -5.74E+5 5.55E+1 i I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 115 of 156-I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others H-3 -_ _ 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 8.97E+5 I 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 P-32 1.40E+9 8.73E+7 1 -.5- 8.5E+8 5.42E+7 Cr-51 2.79E+4 1.03E-4 6.19E+4 1. 1 7E+7 4.66E+4-....................... ... ... ... ..... ..... .... ............... | |||
-... ............ | |||
...... ............ | |||
... ....... .. ... .... ............ | |||
.... .....92 E 7 I ..................... | |||
...... ---------...... | |||
... ..... .... ...... ......... .4 +Fe-55 -2.09E+8 1.45E+8 -8.06E+7 I 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 -68.35E+7 -9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Sr89 996+ .17E+7160+9 286+Co-57 -1i --2.97E+8 1.95E+7 Co-58 5 E -3.09E+7 6.2 --6.2E+8 6.92E+/-7 Co-60 11- 31.67E+8 -3. -3.14E+9 3.69E+8-N ---3 ....... ... ------ --_2 E 8 ...... .. ... ......................---- | |||
------ -......5 0 ------ -9 8 ... .... .......... | |||
Zn-65 i3.17E+8 1.01E+9 -6.75E+8 -6.36E+8 4.56E+8 Rb-86 i ..19E+8 4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 9 9.96E+9 --3 1.60E+9 2.86E+8 Sr-90 i6.05E+1 ---1.75E+10 1.48E+10 Y-91 5.13E+6 -- .5- 8.-E+ 2.82E+9 I-37E+5 Zb-125 1. 1 9E36E+/-8 81.5E6E+5 5.97E05E5 1.21E+9 2.58+Nb-915 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 + 7.8 1E+4 I -4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 i 4.80E+6 12- 1.83E+- -5.61E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 16- 3.72E+8 -1.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-ll0m 1 1.06E+7 1 9.76E+6 1.92E+7 l 3.98E+9 5.80E÷6 Sb-124 1.04E+8 I 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 2 8.08E+74 2 2.95E+9 4.131E+7 Te-125m 9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 -j 3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+--9 | |||
.1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 T 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 E 1.28E+9 4.03E+7 1-131 8.09E+7 1.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.E98E+8 3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 5+ 2.89E+1 5.38E+1 Ce14 196+5 ] .3E+6 6.44E+6 3. 1.0E+6 1.512E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.00E-3 4.59E-4 2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1.-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 1.11E+10 -3.59E+9 1. 19E+9 ...1.94E+8 9.07E+9 Cs- 136 4.20E+7 1.66E+8 -9.24E+7 1.27E+7 1.89E+7 1. 19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 -2.95E+9 9.81E+8 1.6,8E_+8 5.70E_+9 Ba-14 1.2E+ 1.62E+ 5.4-9E+ .5+ 2.6 5 E+8 8.43E+6...Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 -6.17E+ 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 -8.16E+6 -1.11E+10 1.77E+6 Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 -1.47E+4 -2.78E+8 3.14E+3 Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 -2.25E+4 -1.85E+8 2.3 1E+3 Page 116 of 156 i , "Z I:;Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per jaCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2'* m'em/yr per itCi/sec) for others I I I H-3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 I 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 1 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 -__- 1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 --J 3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 Mn-54 -4.52E+8 1.35E+8 -9.27E+8 8.97E+7............ | |||
.... ......... | |||
... .- .-... 8 -..... ... ............. | |||
..2............ | |||
.... ....... ........... | |||
..... .......... .... ... ... ! ~ ; ........ -.i ........ ...-E -7.....Fe-55 3.25E+8 1 2.31E+8 1 .46E+8 9.98E+7 5.3 8E+7 Fe-59 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 1 -1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 -1.79E+7 I _ -3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 {4.38E+7 1 -6.04E+8 1.01E+8 Co-60 2.49E+8 -3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1 .61E+10 i1.13E+9 --.- 1.81E+8 5.45E+8.... ..................... | |||
...................... | |||
n 6 E8.............. | |||
-.. ...................... | |||
............. | |||
-- ............... | |||
......... | |||
............. | |||
... .. ........... | |||
14 E 9 [ ...... ............................. | |||
..... ..... ...... .... ....... ............ | |||
...4.E+. ... .......... | |||
.-..........----------------..... | |||
............ | |||
...... .......... | |||
.................................... | |||
.3+Zn-65 4.24E+8 I1.47E+9 I_____9.4 1E+8 -6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Rb-86 -2.73E+8 ---4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 l.51E+10 --.- -1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51 E+1 -2.11E+10 1.85E+l1 Y-91 7.87E+6 T- -- -3.23E+9 2.11E+5 Zr-95 1.74E+6 5.49E+5 -.807E+5 -1.27E+9 3.78E+5 Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 I 1.03E+5 -4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 T --2.42E+7 -5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-106 j3.09E+8 i -._________ | |||
5.97E+8 -1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-110m I 1.52E+7 1 1.44E+/-7 2.74E+7 -4.04E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124 1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 -1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 2.04E+5 -1.88E+/-8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 T'e-125m 1.48E+8 53E7 ... .... 4.14E+7 -~-I-4.37E+8 1.'9'8E+7 Te-127m i 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te-129m j 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 1.54E+9 1- ..38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 1 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+10 1.85E+8 I_- 2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 -5.91E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 -2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 ... .9.59E -5 2.54E-4 | |||
-3 4.O.E -4 .. ..... 3........... | |||
...........- | |||
_35E -6 9.1.. ...1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.1OE+6 1.50E+5 1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 7.09E+9 1.67E+10 -5.30E+9 I 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 -9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8 Cs--1-37 1-.01E+10 1.35E+10 -4,59E+9 T 1.78E+9 1.92E+8.. | |||
4.69E+9 Ba-140 1.38E+8 1.69E+5 -5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 -8.86E+4 5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 -1.65E+4 2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 -2.32E+4 1.42E+8 2.36E+3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 117 of 1.56 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose.-Factors | |||
-Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per .tCi/m3) for H-3 and C- 14 (m2 | |||
* m.reýniyrper iCi/sec) for others H-3 *4-0 6 3E+8 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 -4.01E+3 54.6iE13 -I-'4, 8E÷3 C-14 3.50E+6 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 701E+5 7.401E+5 7.01E+/-5 7.01E+5 P-32 3.3 7E+9 1.58E+8 --i- 9.30E+7 1.30E+8 Cr-51 t-6.54E+4 1.79Eý+4 1. 19E+5 6.25E+6 1. 18E+5 Mn-54 -6.61 E+8 -1.85E+8 -5.55E+8 1.76E+8........... | |||
........ ...... .................. | |||
........ .... .. ... ................... | |||
....... .......... | |||
....... .8 ................................. | |||
.. ... ......... | |||
... ............ | |||
............... | |||
..... ........ -........................................... | |||
.. .... 6 .... ... .................. | |||
... ...... ......... ..................... | |||
......... .i........ | |||
8 ............... | |||
Fe-55 8.OI __ _[___[424E+/-8 2.0- 7.6- .1+Fe-59 4.01E+8 [6.49E+8 --1. l.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 2.99E+7 ---2.45E+8 6.04E+7 Co-58 ___ 6.47E+7 --- 3.77E+8 1.98E+8 Co-60 -3.78E+8 --- 2.1OE+9 1.12E+9 Ni-63 I3.95E+10 2.11E+9 1 1.42E+8 1.34E+9......... ...................... | |||
... .. ...... .................. | |||
....... I............... | |||
.... .... .. ........... | |||
.. ..... .................... | |||
.. .......... | |||
........ ........ ... ..... ............... | |||
.... .... .. .................... | |||
............ | |||
... .... .... ... .. ....... ........Zn-65 8.12E+8 I 2.16E+9 -1.36E+9 -3.80E+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 -4.52E+8 -2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Sr-89 3.59E+10 T --1.39E+9 1.03E+9 Sr-90 I1.24E+12 | |||
-1.67E+10 3.15E+l1 Y-91 1.87E+7 1 -_"___ .- ._ 2.49E+9 5.01E+5 Zr-95 3.90E+6 8.58E+5 1.23E+6 .-8.95E+8 7.64E+5........... | |||
......... | |||
.... ... ...-..... .. ......... .............. | |||
....-- .... ...... ........ ............. | |||
.......... ....... .... ..... ... ------------. | |||
.... ... ..: ... ....... ...... .. .. ...Nb-95 4. OE+5 1.59E+5 1.50E+5 -2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 1.55E+7 -3.89E+7 -3.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-106 7.45E+8 1. -0.01E+9 1 l.16E+10 9.30E+7 Ag-ill0mi 3.22E+7 T 2.17E+7 4.05E+7 i 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 Sb-124 3.52E+8 14.57E+6 7.78E+5 [ 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8.... .S ..b.-.2..5.. | |||
................. | |||
...... i..... 4 .9 !+. ........... | |||
!...3 -8 5 _ + ....... ............ | |||
4 .-.+5.. ................. | |||
.. .......... | |||
.......................... | |||
.................. | |||
._.... ..2.-.7..8...E.. | |||
..... ........ ..... .1.......9.. | |||
.. + .......... | |||
.. ......S-1 54 9 E 83 5 E 6. 2 E 5.7 E 8.1 E9 1.:0_5 + 8 .....Te-125m 1 3.51E+8 I 9.50E+7 9.84E+7 -.3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te-127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 I 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m T 8.54E+8 2.39E+8 75E+8 2.5 1E+9 -1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 -1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 j 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 3.59E+6 4.44E+6 8.25E+8 7.40E+6 -1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1- 134 1.70E-4 3.16E-4 7.28E-3 4.84E-4 -2. 10E-4 1.46E-4 1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81E+5 -8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs-134 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 -8.14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 -1.18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 -7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 B-f1... 2_728- 2_43E-5 -.77OE-4 1 .45E+5 '1i_40Eý8 | |||
.16E-7 Ce-141 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 -1.43E+5 -4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-144 1.27E+8 3.98E+7 -2.21E+7 -1.04E+10 6.78E+6 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 -2.41E+4 -1.60E+8 7.37E+3 Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 -3.18E+4 E_- 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 Page 118 of 1.56 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd) S Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per jtCi/sec)Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+l 0 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 l Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Ru-103 1.09E+8 Ru-106 4.21E+8 Ag-110m 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 I Te-129m 2.OOE+7 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 i 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr-143 Nd-147 8.40E+6 I Page 119 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX A Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents Page 120 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents A. Effective Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPCe)In accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8 the radioactive liquid effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, I Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual radionuclide distribution and corresponding MPC values.In order to limit the need for routinely having to reestablish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established. | |||
This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution of the liquid effluents from Salem and the effective MPC value for this distribution. | |||
The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation: Z Ci (gamma)MPGe i (gamma)z1 where: M MPCe = an effective MPC value for a mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides (PCi/ml)Ci = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture MPCi = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 MPC value for radionuclide i (Appendix F) (p.Ci/ml)The equation for determining the liquid effluent setpoints (Section 1.2.1, equation 1.2) is based on a multiplication of the effective MPC times the monitor sensitivity. | |||
Considering the average effective MPC value for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998, it is reasonable to select an MPCe value of 6.05E-06 ýtCi/ml for Unit 1 and 4.8 1E-06 [tCi/ml for Unit 2 as typical of liquid radwaste discharges. | |||
Page 121 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 B. Correction Factor The type of radiation detector used to monitor radioactive releases is not capable of detecting non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Fe-55, and Sr-89, 90, as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1. | |||
A conservative default safety factor can be determined to account for non-gamma emitting radionuclides. | |||
Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed at Salem station on a monthly basis from a composite sample of liquid releases.Nuclide MPC (ptCi/ml) | |||
Activity (pCi/ml) Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 5.2E-1 173.3 Fe-55 8E-4 2.5E-3 3.1 Sr-89 3E-6 2.OE-5 6.7 Sr-90 3E-7 7.2E-7 2.4 Total 185.5 The values in the table above represent the maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides in 1994 for Unit 1 and 2. Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting nuclides that could be released from Salem Station. The activity values in the table will be diluted by a minimum factor of 800 prior to release. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum circulating water flowrate of 100,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 120 gpm.A conservative non-gamma factor for non-gamma emitting nuclides can be obtained using the highest Activity/MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows: Non-Gamma Factor =Correction Factor =185.5/800 | |||
=1-0.25 =0.23 (Rounded up to 0.25)0.75 C. Default setpoint determination: | |||
Using the information and parameters described above a default setpoint can be calculated for Unit 1 and 2 liquid radwaste disposal process radiation monitors (R18).Using these values to calculate the default RI 8 alarm setpoint value, results in a setpoint that: 1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and 2) Will provide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (refer to Tables 1-1.1 and 1-1.2).Page 122 of 156 N Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table A-i: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 1 I Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (RCi/ml) CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 8'88E-04 ND ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 6.68E-04 1.62E-04 1.OOE-04 I CR-51 2.OOE-03 5.38E-03 2.02E-03 ND MN-54 L.OOE-04 3.52E-02 1.37E-02 7.16E-04 MN-56 1.OOE-04 ND ND O.OOE+00 3 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.76E-04 4.84E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.03E-02 3.1OE-03 1.78E-05 CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.71E+00 6.47E-01 3.39E-02 3 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.04E-01 1.1OE-01 2.42E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 3.29E-03 7.13E-04 ND NB-95 L.OOE-04 5.78E-03 1.28E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.27E-03 1.07E-03 4.90E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 2.66E-04 ND ND SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.18E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 7.32E-06 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 1.76E-04 1.76E-04 ND AG-110m 3.OOE-05 1.19E-02 L.1OE-02 6.58E-05 SN-113 8.OOE-05 7.88E-05 4.91E-05 ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.21E-03 5.35E-04 1. 12E-03 SB-124 2.OOE-05 2.08E-02 1.75E-02 1.73E-02 i SB-125 L.OOE-04 9.04E-02 8.23E-02 3,56E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 ND 6.18E-05 2.23E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.27E-01 1.82E-02 2.32E-03 1-133 L.OOE-06 2.16E-03 1.88E-04 8.32E-06 1-134 2.OOE-05 ND 3.63E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 4.24E-05 ND CE-143 4.OOE-05 5.42E-05 ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 3.54E-01 6.46E-01 2.49E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 3.61E-03 1.59E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 4.53E-01 8.54E-01 7.51E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 4.15E-06 1.35E-04 ND BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND 8.62E-05 ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.12E-04 1.86E-04 ND RU-105 L.OOE-04 2.21E-04 1.35E-04 ND RU-106 L.OOE-05 ND 1.03E-03 ND ZN-65 1.OOE-04 6.72E-04 ND ND Total Ci Gamma 3.14E+00 2.42E+00 2.16E-01 3 MPCe (ýICi/ml) 6.05E-06 1.28E-05 1.28E-05 MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. 1** ND -not detected P Page 123 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 2 Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (p.Ci/ml) | |||
CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 1.59E-03 2.88E-04 ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 1.05E-03 5.77E-05 7.39E-05 CR-51 2.OOE-03 4.39E-03 1.55E-03 1.14E-04 MN-54 1.OOE-04 3.73E-02 1.37E-02 7.54E-04 MN-56 L.OOE-04 ND ND 4.66E-05 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.83E-04 3.25E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.17E-02 3.24E-03 ND CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.75E+00 6.60E-01 4.52E-02 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.47E-01 1.03E-01 2.12E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 2.34E-03 3.22E-04 ND NB-95 1.OOE-04 3.97E-03 1.11E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.46E-03 1.1OE-03 4.22E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 3.77E-04 ND 2.35E-06 SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.71E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 1.43E-05 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND3.OOE-05 1.03E-02 1.34E-02 ND SN- 113 8.OOE-05 7.45E-05 ND ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.20E-03 ND 6.37E-04*SB-124 2.OOE-05 3.77E-02 9.82E-03 1.44E-02 SB-125 L.OOE-04 1.35E-01 6.03E-02 1.88E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 3.5 1E-04 ND 1.97E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.87E-01 7.98E-03 3.14E-03 1-132 8.OOE-06 8.72E-05 ND 1.68E-04 1-134 2.OOE-05 2.39E-04 1.85E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 2.87E-05 ND CE-143 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 4.57E-01 6.44E-01 2.64E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 4.82E-03 1.51E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 5.70E-01 8.54E-01 7.97E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 ND ND 4.90E-05 BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND ND ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.03E-03 1.11E-04 ND RU-105 L.OOE-04 4.07E-05 ND ND RU-106 L.OOE-05 ND 4.38E-04 ND ZN-65 l.OOE-04 1.59E-04 ND ND W-187 6.OOE-05 ND 7.98E-05 ND Total Ci Gamma 3.57E+00 2.38E+00 2.31E-01 MPCe (ýtCi/ml) 4.81E-06 1.55E-05 1.12E-05* MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.** ND = not detected Page 124 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I I APPENDIX B Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations Liquid Radioactive Effluent Page 125 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations | |||
-Liquid Effluents U The radioactive liquid effluents for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998 were evaluated to determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. | |||
These were the most recent years of full power I operation for both Units. This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2.I For the radionuclide distribution of effluents from Salem, the controlling organ is typically the GI-LLI.The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Fe-59 and I Ag-1 10m releases. | |||
The radionuclides, Cs-134 and Cs-137 contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results of the evaluation for 1993, 1994, and 1998 are presented in Table B-1 and Table B-2.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculational process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. | |||
For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Nb-95 dose conversion i factor (1.51 E+06 mrem/hr per ptCi/ml, GI-LLI). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose factor of all the radionuclides evaluated. | |||
For the total body calculation, the Fe-59 dose factor (2.32 E+05 mremi/hr per jiCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides. | |||
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Total Body Dtb-- 1.67E- 02. VOL | |||
* AFe-59,TB*XCi (B.i)CW (B1 I Where: I Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)A Fe-59,TB = 7.27E+04, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 (mrem/hr per pCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides | |||
([tCi/ml)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period(gal/min) 1 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)Page 126 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Substituting the value for the Fe-59 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplifies to: 1.21E+03*VOL 3-C.CW I (B.2)Maximum Organ Dmax- *Aub -95,GI- LIIVI* Ci (B.3)CW Where: U Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem) 3 ANb-95,GI-LLI 1.5 1E+06, Gi-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Nb-95 (mrem/hr per pICi/ml)Substituting the value for ANb-95,GI-LLI the equation simplifies to: Dmax-2.52E+04*VOL 1 l*maC; (B.4)CW:,, Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible. | |||
The average annual tritium release from each Salem Unit is approximately 350 curies. The calculated total body dose from such a release I is 2.4E-03 mrem/yr via the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways. | |||
This amounts to 0.08% of the design limit dose of 3 mrem/yr. Furthermore, the release of tritium is a function of operating time and power level and is essentially unrelated to radwaste system operation. | |||
Page 127 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table B-i: Adult Dose Contributions | |||
-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 1 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.32E-2 3.51E-2 7.16E-4 * * | |||
* 0.03 0.02 * | |||
* 0.02 *Fe-55 1.49E-1 6.40E-2 8.39E-2 0.07 0.04 0.37 0.12 0.03 0.52 0.19 0.14 0.67 Fe-59 4.84E-3 4.77E-4 N/D 0.02 * | |||
* 0.12 0.01 | |||
* 0.03 0.01 *Co-58 6.47E-1 1.71E+0 3.39E-2 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.31 0.51 0.13 0.01 0.07 *Co-60 1.10E-1 3.04E-1 2.42E-2 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.24 | |||
* 0.03 0.01 Zn-65 N/D 6.72E-4 N/D | |||
* 0.01 * | |||
* 0.01 * | |||
* 0.02 *Nb-95 1.28E-3 5.78E-3 N/D * * * | |||
* 0.01 * * * *Ag-ll0m 1.1OE-2 1.19E-2 6.58E-5 * * | |||
* 0.26 0.17 0.01 * * *Sb-124 1.75E-2 2.58E-2 1.73E-2 * * * * | |||
* 0.04 * * *Sb-125 8.23E-2 9.04E-2 3.56E-2 * * * * | |||
* 0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.46E-1 3.54E-1 2.49E-2 0.47 0.38 0.18 * * | |||
* 0.38 0.37 0.09 Cs-137 8.54E-1 4.53E-1 7.51E-2 0.37 0.28 0.32 * * | |||
* 0.37 0.35 0.20 Total 2.53E+0 3.21E+0 3.31E-1* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 128 of 156-m m m mm m -m m m m m m m m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions | |||
-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.37E-2 3.73E-2 7.54E-4 * * | |||
* 0.01 0.02 * | |||
* 0.01 *Fe-55 1.38E-1 6.61E-2 1.64E-2 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.27 Fe-59 3.25E-3 4.82E-4 N/D 0.01 * | |||
* 0.08 0.01 | |||
* 0.02 * *Co-58 6.60E-1 1.75E+0 4.52E-2 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.29 0.51 0.29 0.01 0.06 0.01 Co-60 1.03E-1 3.47E-1 2.12E-2 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.02 Zn-65 N/D 1.59E-4 N/D * * * * * * * * *Nb-95 1.11E-3 3.97E-3 N/D * * | |||
* 0.06 0.01 * * * *Ag-ll0m 1.34E-2 1.03E-2 N/D * * | |||
* 0.31 0.14 * * * *Sb-124 9.82E-3 3.77E-2 1.44E-2 * * * | |||
* 0.01 0.06 , , , Sb-125 6.03E-2 1.35E-1 1.88E-2 * * * | |||
* 0.01 0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.44E-1 4.58E-1 2.64E-2 0.48 0.41 0.26 0.01 * | |||
* 0.39 0.40 0.20 y3 Cs-137 8.54E-1 5.70E-1 7.97E-2 0.37 0.30 0.46 * * | |||
* 0.38 0.36 0.45 ¶T Total 2.48E+0 3.65E+0 2.23E-1 ,j* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 129 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I I I I APPENDIX C Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Page 130 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX C: Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific.These effective factors, which can be based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity released to approximate the dose in the environment (i.e., instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analyses only a single multiplication (Keff, Meff or Neff)times the total quantity of radioactive material released would be needed).This approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculational technique. | |||
Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations: | |||
Keff- Y (Ki* fi)(C)i Where: Keff = the effective total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released Ki = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released fi = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas activity (LA. )eff--[Z 'l~M)f (C.2)i Where: (L + 1.1 M)eff = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released (Li + 1.1 Mi) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Page 131 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 MeffZ(Mif (C.3)iI Where: Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released I Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Neff j(Ni*f) (C.4)' I Where: Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released I Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination I of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Salem have been maintained to such negligible quantities that the inherent variability in the data makes any meaningful evaluations difficult. | |||
Therefore, in order to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the primary coolant source term from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications," has been used as representing a typical distribution. | |||
The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table C-1.Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose I calculational process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment. | |||
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified equations may be used: D=3 3.1 7 EoO 8*Q* M *Qi (C.5) I 0.50 Y and I Dfl=3.17E-O8 | |||
* Neff*zQi (C.6)0.50 Qi Where: I Page 132 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 DY = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)Dp = air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m3)Meff = 5.3E+02, effecitive -gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3)Neff = 1. 1E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (gCi)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculational equations simplify to: Dr=3.5E-O5*y Q*ZQL and Dfi=7.OE-05*Q | |||
* ZQi!(C.7)(C.8)The effective dose factors are used on a very limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable. | |||
Page 133 of 156 | |||
-i Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table C-1: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases -Total Body and Skin Total Body Effective Dose Factor Keff (mrem/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135 fi0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 2.5E+00 2.8E+02 3.6E+01 4.7E+02 Skin Effective Dose Factor (L+ 1.1 M)eff (mrem/yr per ý.Ci/m 3)1.4E+01 1.9E+02 1.4E+01 6.6E+02 7.9E+01 9.6E+02 Total Noble Gases -Air Gamma Air Effective Dose Factor Meff (mrad/yr per jiCi/m 3)Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135 f00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 3.3E+00 3.4E+02 3.8E+01 5.3E+02 Beta Air Effective Dose Factor Neff (mrad/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)2.0E+01 2.9E+01 1.5E+01 1.OE+03 4.9E+01 1.1E+03 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total* Based on Noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANSI-18.1, "Source Term Specifications." Page 134 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX D Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Page 135 of 156 SI Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation | |||
-Gaseous Effluents The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. | |||
This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass-cow-milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this g/c/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results for this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. | |||
Multiplication of the total release (i.e.cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. | |||
For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.05E12 m i mrem/yr per pCi/sec). | |||
By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since 1-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated. | |||
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used: Dmnax= 3.17E -08* W | |||
* Ri -131* ZQi i Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameters to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 3.2-4.X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m 3) M D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (nz)Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates 3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)RI-131 = 1-13 1 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E+12 (M 2 mrem/yr per pLCi/sec), infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need notbe considered when the above simplified calculation method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these pathways to the total thyroid dose.It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway.Page 136 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 However, use of the 1-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclide has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the milk pathway (see Table D-1).The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. if more limiting pathways in the surrounding environment of Salem are identified by the annual land use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.Page 137 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 i i Table D-1: Infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose I I PATHWAYS Target Organs Total Body Grass-Cow-Milk 0.02 Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 0.23 0.59 0.02 0.01 0.02 Ground Plane 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway f Grass-Cow-Milk 0.92 Ground Plane 0.08 Inhalation N/A Page 138 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sample Type, Location and Analysis Page 139 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX E: Radiological EnvironmiOtal onfitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulates ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = SedimentSWA | |||
= Surface Water WWA = Well Water IDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)MLK = Milk PWR = Potable Water (Raw)PWT = Potable Water (Treated)The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site.Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENG, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant: S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E = 4-5 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site I I I I I I I I I I II I The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90'(due east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D). The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E- 1.Maps E-1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.Page 140 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE E-1:_ REMP Sample Locations A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 1S1 0.55 mi. N of vent 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent 2S4 0.59 .5 i. NNE of vent 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 4S1 0.60 mi ENE of vent 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 6S2 0.21 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 7S1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate 1OS1 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; circ water bldg.liSi 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water bldg.15S1 0.57 mi. NW of vent 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, DE 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm 3El 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm 11E2 5.0 mi. SW of vent 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW of vent; Thomas Landing 13E1 4.2 mi. W of vent; Diehl House Lab 16EI 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE of vent; Salem High School 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ 3F2 5.1 mi. NE of vent; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton, NJ Page 141 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (IDM) (Cont'd)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 6F 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 3 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S of vent off Route #9, DE 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 I 11F1 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F 1 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, DE I 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Comer I 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 1G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm lOG1 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, DE I 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 16G1 15 mi. NNW of vent; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, NJ I B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road I 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 16E 1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Page 142 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table E-1 (Cont'd)C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) -Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11AI 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem Outfall Area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; Delaware River 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 3El 4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT)STATION CODE .STATION LOCATION 2F3 8.0 mi NNE of vent, Salem Water Works No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations. | |||
However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION IlA1 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 15A1 0.3 mi. NW of vent; Hope Creek outfall area 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; South Storm Drain outfall 12C 1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2G3 12.0 mi. NNE of vent, local farm 13E3 4.9 mi W of vent, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm Page 143 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table E-1 (Cont'd)H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION I I I I lAl 12C1 7E1 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. | |||
However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. | |||
Contact ODCM coordinator for sampling locations. | |||
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 144 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Sample Collection Method Analysis Air Particulate Air Iodine Crab and Fish Continuous low volume air sampler. Sample collected every week along with the filter change.A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly at filter change.Two batch samples are sealed in a plastic bag or jar and frozen semi-annually or when in season.A sediment sample is taken semi-annually. | |||
2 DLR's will be collected from each location quarterly. | |||
Gross Beta analysis on each weekly sample. Gamma spectrometry shall be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites. | |||
Iodine 131 analysis are performed on each weekly sample.Gamma isotopic analysis of edible portion on collection. | |||
Sediment Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually. | |||
Gamma dose quarterly. | |||
Direct Page 145 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)Sample Collection Method Analysis Milk Sample of fresh milk is collected for each farm semi-monthly when cows are in pasture, monthly at other times.Sample to be collected monthly providing winter icing conditions allow.Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis on each sample on collection. | |||
Gamma isotopic monthly H-3 on quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.Water (Potable, Surface)I I I I I U I U I I I I I I I I I Page 146 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1 13 5 9 PI.t.d -WOV04 11.33.4 UM FiI-nn d~%.Page 147 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev.FIGURE E-2: OFFSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 20 I I I I I i I I i Page 148 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 149 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values -Liquid Effluents The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.Table F- 1: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc.(tiCi/ml) (qiCi/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 1E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 lE-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-211 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 3Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Br-83 3E-6 3E-6 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-115m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd- 115 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 1E-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Cf-253 1E-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 150 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope :Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(4Ci/ml) (.Ci/ml)Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4.,Cenrin (58) Ce-.4141 79E5 9E-5 ,Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1E-5 iE-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-134m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) CI-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy-166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1E-5 1E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er-169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 1E-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-152 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5.Eil454 .2E- 2E5 Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Page 151 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(4tCi/ml) | |||
([tCi/ml)Fluorine (9) F-18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd- 153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au-196 2E-4 1E-4 Au-198 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho-166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-i 13m 1E-3 IE-3 In-i 14m 2E-5 2E-5 In-I 15m 4E-4 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-130 3E-6 3E-6 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir-192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-2 10 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu-177 1E-4 1E-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5 Mn-54 1E-4 1E-4 Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 152 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble'Conc.(jiCi/ml) | |||
(4iCi/ml)Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5_ _-_ Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 lE-4 1E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 lE-4 lE-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 1E-4 lE-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt-191 1E-4 1E-4: Pt-193m lE-3 1E-3 Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 lE-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium(59) | |||
Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm-147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 Protactinium(9 | |||
: 1) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4_Pa-231- 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 1E-4 Page 153 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc..(Ci/ml) ( Ci/ml)Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 -12E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m iE-2 1E-2 Rh-105 IE-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru-103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-103m 3E-6 3E-6 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 lE-5 lE-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5, Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-1-53 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ag-l10m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-111 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 "_3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 lE-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta- 182 4E-5 4E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 154 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Cone. Insoluble Cone.(PCi/ml) (jiCi/ml)Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1E-2 1E-2....Tc Te-96 iE--4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te- 131 m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) T1-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 T1-202 1E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2EM-5 Th-228 7E-6 iE-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm- 171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn- 113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 U235 3E*-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 Page 155 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ptCi/ml) (jtCi/ml)Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-175 1E-4 1E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and 'with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission. I Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 gCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I Page 156 of 156 APPENDIX D HOPE CREEK ODCM OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Revision 22 Prepared by: Accepted by: Accepted by: Approved by: Ho e Creek ODCM ioordinator Holi-yreek Chemistry Man er Hop reek PORC Chairman Date Date Date Date Meeting #: )~ c lAope Creek Plant i69ager Page 1 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Revision Summary 1. DEFINITIONS | |||
-Section 1.0 -Reportable Event -added "or 10 CFR 72.75" to the definition. | |||
10 I CFR 72.75 establishes the reporting requirements for specific events and conditions for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations (Pg. 11).2. CONTROLS -Section 3/4.11.4 -Action (a) -added "or 10 CFR 72.104", and subsequently added"and 10 CFR 72.104", in addition to 40 CFR 190 which requires, when estimated dose limits have been exceeded a Special Report to the NRC is required (Pg. 43).3. BASES -Section 3/4.11.4 Total Dose -Revised the section to include the dose limitations specific to the ISFSI in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104 which parallel the limits of 40 CFR 90 (Pg. 64).4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.9.1.7 -Radioactive Effluent Release Report -revised the scope of the requirement to generate the RERR annually is to show conformance with 40 CFR 90 and 10 CFR 72.104 (Pg. 71).5. PART II -Section 3.2 -Total dose to Members Of The Public -Added 10 CFR 72.104 to be included in the title of the section and added the ISFSI to the HCGS as a source of exposure (Pg.89).6. Section 3.2.2 -Direct Exposure Dose Determination | |||
-Revised section for non-typical conditions that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 to include 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance (Pg. 3 90).Justification: | |||
The proposed HC ODCM revision incorporates the Dry Cask Storage regulatory reporting requirements of 10CFR 72.104 and 10CFR 72.75. Design Change Package (DCP) 80088459 and 3 associated 50.59 provides the required analyses and basis for the installation and implementation of the Dry Cask Storage Facility at the Hope Creek and Salem Generating Station Site. The HC ODCM is revised to include the reporting requirements of the dose to the Public as a result of the Dry Cask i Storage Operations. | |||
The HC ODCM currently includes the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 20, 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 50 dose to the public due to effluents released from Hope Creek Plant Operations. | |||
This HC ODCM revision requires that the Annual Effluent Release Report also include the dose to the Public due to the Dry Cask Storage Operations. | |||
I 7. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.1 -Revised "Station" to Plant and "SORC" to"PORC" (Pg. 73).Justification: | |||
As part of the reorganization, Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) was recently changed to Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC).Page 2 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TR O D U CTION ......................................................................... | |||
.................. | |||
6 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS .......................................................... | |||
7 1.0 D E FIN IT IO N S ................................................................................................................................ | |||
9 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
................................................... | |||
15 3/4.0 A P P LICA B ILITY .................................................................................................................. | |||
15 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION | |||
.................................................................................................... | |||
17 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. | |||
17 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS | |||
.......................................... | |||
29 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
................................................................................................. | |||
29 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION | |||
............................................................................................ | |||
29 3/ 4 .11.1.2 D O S E ........................................................................................................................ | |||
33 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM ........................................................ | |||
34 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
............................................................................................ | |||
35 3/4.11.2.1 D O SE R A T E .............................................................................................................. | |||
35 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES ........................................................................................ | |||
38 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PA R TIC U LA TE FO R M ............................................................................................................. | |||
39 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT | |||
............................................................. | |||
40 3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT | |||
........................................................ | |||
41 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING ................................................................................... | |||
42 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ................................................................................................................... | |||
43 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | |||
....................... | |||
44 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ........................................................................................ | |||
44 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ................................................................................................... | |||
57 3/4.12.3 INTERLAB ORA TORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ................................................... | |||
58 B A S E S ................................................................................................................................................. | |||
5 9 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION | |||
........................................................................................... | |||
..... 60 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. | |||
60 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION60 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS | |||
........................................................................................ | |||
61 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS | |||
............................................................................................ | |||
61 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS | |||
........................................................................................ | |||
62 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ............................................................................................................. | |||
64 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | |||
............................................... | |||
65 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................... | |||
65 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ........................................................................................... | |||
65 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM .......................................... | |||
66 5.0 D ESIG N FEA TU R ES ........................................................................................................ | |||
68 5 .1 SIT E .................................................................................................................................... | |||
6 8 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ......................................................................................... | |||
70 6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ...... 70 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ................................................. | |||
71 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................... | |||
73 Page 3 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES | |||
.............................................................. | |||
74 i 1.0 LIQ U ID EFFLU EN TS ....................................................................................................... | |||
75 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................................................ | |||
75 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
.......................... | |||
75 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors ............................ | |||
...................................................... | |||
76 1.2.2 Conservative D efault Values .............................................................................. | |||
77 3 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 ................................................... | |||
77 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
-10 CFR 50 ......................................................... | |||
78 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents | |||
..................................... | |||
78 1 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
.................................................. | |||
79 1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections | |||
.............................................................................. | |||
80 1.6 R epresentative Sam ples .............................................................................................. | |||
81 2.0 G A SEOU S EFFLU EN TS .................................................................................................. | |||
81 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................................................ | |||
81 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
.................................................. | |||
82 I 2.2.1 Plant V ent, FR V S .............................................................................................. | |||
82 2.2.2 Conservative D efault V alues .............................................................................. | |||
83 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 20 ..................... | |||
83 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ........................................................... | |||
83 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates | |||
.................................. | |||
85 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 ................................................ | |||
85 I 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ................................................ | |||
85 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .......................................................... | |||
86 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 .................................... | |||
87 I 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates | |||
....................... | |||
87 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates | |||
........................ | |||
87 2.6 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection | |||
............................................................................ | |||
88 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... | |||
89 3.1 Doses Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ............................................ | |||
89 3.2 Total Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 .................................... | |||
89 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations | |||
................................................................................ | |||
89 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination | |||
................................................................ | |||
90 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM .......................... | |||
90 4.1 Sam pling Program .................................................................................................... | |||
90 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ....................................................................... | |||
90 5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................ | |||
90 I I Page 4of 151 i Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLES TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY NOTATION ............................................................................. | |||
12 TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS | |||
...................................................................................................... | |||
13 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION | |||
................ | |||
18 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLAN CE REQU IREM ENTS ...................................................................................................................... | |||
20 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION | |||
........... | |||
23 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURV EILLAN CE REQU IREM EN TS ....................................................................................................................... | |||
26 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ............ | |||
30 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ..... 36 TABLE 3.12.1-1 : RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM * ................................... | |||
46 TABLE 3.12.1-2: | |||
REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENV IR ONM EN TAL SAM PLES ............................................................................................................................... | |||
53 TABLE 4.12.1-1: | |||
DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS""' | |||
(2) ............ | |||
54 TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION | |||
................................... | |||
93 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Aio ..................... | |||
..................... 94 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS ............................................................................................... | |||
96 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES ........................................................................................ | |||
99 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION | |||
................................... | |||
100 TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE C A L C U L A T IO N S * .................................................................................................................................................. | |||
10 1 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases, R(io) ............................................................................ | |||
102 TABLE A-1: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC -HOPE CREEK ............................................................... | |||
120 TABLE B-i: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways ................................................................ | |||
124 TABLE C-i: Effective D ose Factors N oble Gases ................................................................................................... | |||
129 TAB LE D -1: Infant D ose Contributions | |||
................................................................................................................... | |||
133 TAB LE E-l: R EM P Sam ple Locations | |||
.................................................................................................................... | |||
136 TABLE F-i: M axim um Perm issible Concentrations | |||
................................................................................................ | |||
145 FIGURES Figure 5.1.1-1 A rea Plot Plan O f Site ........................................................................................................... | |||
69 Figure 1-1: Liquid Radwaste Treatment And Monitoring System ........................................................... | |||
91 Figure 1-2: Solid Radwaste Processing System ...................................................................................... | |||
91 Figure 2-1: Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System ................................................................................. | |||
97 Figure 2-2: Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System ................................................................................ | |||
98 Figure E- 1: O nsite Sam pling Locations | |||
...................................................................................................... | |||
142 Figure E-2: O ff-Site Sam pling Locations | |||
................................................................................................... | |||
143 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors ..................................... | |||
115 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Liquid Effluent .......................................... | |||
122 APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents | |||
...................................... | |||
126 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters | |||
-Gaseous Effluent ................................. | |||
131 APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ............................................................ | |||
135 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents | |||
..................... | |||
145 Page 5 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Hope Creek Technical Specifications. | |||
The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I -Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II -Calculational Methodologies. | |||
Part I includes the following: " The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs n required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4" Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical I Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, respectively. | |||
Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for: I* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and" the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.Part ii also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation By The Office Of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to Amendment No. 121, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 1OCFR20 and the "new" lOCFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs). The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part 20. The letter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the"new" Part 20.I Pg6of151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS Page 7 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS I!I I I Page 8 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 DEFINITIONS The following terms are defined so that uniform interpretation of these CONTROLS may be achieved.The defined terms appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS.ACTION 1.1 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions. | |||
CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. | |||
The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an in place qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an in place cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated. | |||
CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. | |||
This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter. | |||
CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be: a. Analog channels -the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions and channel failure trips.b. Bistable channels -the injection of a simulated signal into the sensor to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions. | |||
The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST may be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping or total channel steps such that the entire channel is tested.CONTROL 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)and were renamed CONTROLS. | |||
This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.Page 9 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) | |||
DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Table III of TID-14844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites."m FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.17 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.1.MEMBER(S) | |||
OF THE PUBLIC 1.24 MEMBER(S) | |||
OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the utility, its contractors, or vendors.Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make m deliveries. | |||
This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM)1.26 An OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM) is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the main condenser evacuation system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. | |||
OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) I 1.27 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the radiological environmental monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1) the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, respectively. | |||
OPERABLE -OPERABILITY 1.28 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s). | |||
I Page 10 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) | |||
OPERATIONAL CONDITION | |||
-CONDITION 1.29 An OPERATIONAL CONDITION (i.e., CONDITION) shall be any one inclusive combination of mode switch position and average reactor coolant temperature as specified in Table 1.2.PURGE -PURGING 1.34 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement. | |||
RATED THERMAL POWER 1.35 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3339 MWT.REPORTABLE EVENT 1.37 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 1 OCFR Part 50 or 10CFR 72.75.SITE BOUNDARY 1.41 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is neither owned, nor leased, nor otherwise controlled by the licensee.SOURCE CHECK 1.43 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity. | |||
THERMAL POWER 1.47 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.50 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.51 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment. | |||
Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents. | |||
Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components. | |||
Page 11 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) | |||
VENTING 1.52 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process.TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION S D W M Q SA A R S/U P z FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours.At least once per 24 hours.At least once per 7 days.At least once per 31 days.At least once per 92 days.At least once per 184 days.At least once per 366 days.At least once per 18 months (550 days).Prior to each reactor startup.Prior to each radioactive release.During startup, prior to exceeding 30% of RATED THERMAL POWER, if not performed within the previous 7 days.Not applicable. | |||
N.A.Page 12 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) | |||
TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS MODE SWITCH POSITION AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT TEMPERATURE CONDITION 1. POWER OPERATION Run Any temperature Any temperature | |||
: 2. STARTUP 3. HOT SHUTDOWN 4. COLD SHUTDOWN 5. REFUELING* | |||
Startup/Hot Standby Shutdown#, ***Shutdown#, ##, Shutdown or Refuel **' #> 200°F< 200 0 F+< 140°F# The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Run, Startup/Hot Standby, or Refuel position to test the switch interlock functions and related instrumentation provided that the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted by a second licensed operator or other technically qualified member of the unit technical staff. If the reactor mode switch is placed in the Refuel position, the one-rod-out interlock shall be OPERABLE.## The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod drive is being removed from the reactor pressure vessel per Technical Specification 3.9.10.1.* Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.** See Special Test Exceptions Technical Specification sections 3.10.1 and 3.10.3.*** The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod is being recoupled or withdrawn provided that the one-rod-out interlock is OPERABLE.+ See Special Test Exception Technical Specification 3.10.8.Page 13 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 14 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROLS, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROL and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. | |||
If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met, except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in an OPERATIONAL CONDITION in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in: 1. At least STARTUP within the next 6 hours, 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours, and 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours.Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.This CONTROL is not applicable in OPERATIONAL CONDITION 4 or 5.3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other specified condition shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROLS are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval. | |||
Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified condition may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. | |||
Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.3.0.5 Equipment removed from service or declared inoperable to comply with ACTIONS may be returned to service under administrative control solely to perform testing to demonstrate its OPERABILITY or the OPERABILITY of other equipment. | |||
This is an exception to CONTROL 3.0.2 for the system returned to service under administrative control to perform the testing required to demonstrate OPERABILITY. | |||
Page 15 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 APPLICABILITY (Continued) | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS | |||
====4.0.1 Surveillance==== | |||
Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other 3 conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement. | |||
4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL.The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. | |||
The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment. | |||
====4.0.4 Entry==== | |||
into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified applicable condition shall not be I made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROLS have been performed within the applicable surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. | |||
This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. | |||
I I I I I I I I Page 16 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.10 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. | |||
The Alarm/Trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).APPLICABILITY: | |||
During all liquid releases via these pathways.ACTION: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative. | |||
: b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1. | |||
Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.7.10 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.10-1. | |||
Page 17 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE INSTRUMENT ACTION 1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower*2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir c. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line**1 1 110 110 1 111 1 N/A 112 112 N/A Page 18 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION ACTION 110 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that prior to initiating a release: a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.2, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 111 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1- 131, and dissolved and entrained noble gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 .B, and the Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed. | |||
Otherwise, suspend the release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 112 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases. | |||
Pump performance curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow.* See Appendix A for setpoint determination for the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump (TBCWDWS). | |||
Different setpoints are established for this monitor based on its use for batch release or continuous release. Automatic termination of releases from the TBCWDWS is by trip of the sump pump(s). ACTION 110 only applies to batch releases for the TBCWDWS. Continuous releases are not authorized with the TBCWDWS radiation monitor inoperable. | |||
** There are no discharge process flow rate measurement devices for this pathway. Conservative assumptions are made for release rates. The maximum release rate from the sump is 100 gpm.This value should be used for setpoint calculations to determine compliance with CONTROL 3.11.1.1. | |||
More realistic values may be used to calculate total activity released and dose consequences. | |||
Actual values should be used if process flow measurement devices are installed. | |||
Page 19 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK SOURCE CHANNEL CHECK CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower D D(5)P R(3)R(3)Q(l)Q(1)(6)M 2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to Cooling Tower Blowdown Line D M R(3)Q(2)D(4)D(4)N.A.N.A.R R Q Q b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir Page 20 of 151 m m m -m m mm m m m -m m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATIONS (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of release from this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or 2. Circuit failure, or 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or 2. Circuit failure, or 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in assurance activities with NBS/NIST. | |||
These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used.(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.(5) In addition to performing channel check on rad monitor, PERFORM: CHANNEL CHECK -daily, including verification of sample flow through the radiation monitor during sump pump operation. | |||
(6) Isolation is demonstrated by securing the discharge pump during the functional check Page 21 of 151 | |||
!Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.11 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the radioactive I gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.APPLICABILITY: | |||
As shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 1 ACTION: 3 a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative. | |||
3 b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3 3.3.7.11-1. | |||
Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7 why this inoperability was not 3 corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.3.7.11 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be I demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.11-1. | |||
I I I Page 22 of 151 | |||
= M m m = M M M = = = M M = M M M Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT | |||
: 1. DELETED 2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 3. SOUTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION 1 1 1 1 1*****123 125 125 122 122 123 125 125 122 122 1 1 1 1 1*****Page 23 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11 -1 (Continued) | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT | |||
: 4. NORTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor OPERABLE APPLICABILIT" Y ACTION OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION 1 1 1 1 1*****123 125 125 122 122 Page 24 of 151 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11-i (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION* At all times ACTION 122 -ACTION 123 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours.Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and these samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters (noble gases) at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11.2.1.2-1.A or B within 24 hours. Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 124 -DELETED ACTION 125 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 8 hours samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1. | |||
Page 25 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED 1. DELETED 2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(2) Q(1) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *3. SOUTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(2) Q(1) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *Page 26 of 151 mmm m mm i m m m m -m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.1 1-1 (Continued) | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHECK CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL CHECK CALIBRATION TEST MODES IN WHICH SURVIELLANCE REOIIJIRED INSTRI TMFNT INSTRUMENT | |||
: 4. NORTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D W W D D M N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.R(2)N.A.N.A.Q(1)N.A.N.A.*****R R Q Q Page 27 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION* At all times 3 (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that the control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint. | |||
3 2. Circuit failure.3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. I (2) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NBS/NIST. | |||
These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used. 3 I I I I I I I I I I*Page 28 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1.1.1-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 1 0.4 microcuries/ml. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the concentration to within the above limits.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program in Table 4.11 .1 .1 .1-1.4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.Page 29 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM , Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (ýCi/ml)A. Batch Waste P P 1) Release(b) | |||
Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma Sample Emitters(c) 5x 10-7 Tanks 1-131 1x10-6 2) Turbine Building P M Dissolved and Circulating Water One Entrained Gases 1x 10-Dewatering Sump Batch/M (Gamma Emitters)when released in p M H-3 lx -5 Batch Mode* Each Batch Composite(d) lx Gross Alpha 1x1 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Each Batch Composite(d) | |||
Fe-55 1x10 6 B. Continuous M Principal Gamma Releases(e) | |||
N/A Composite Emitters(c) 5x 107 1) Station Service Water System (SSWS) (If contaminated as indicated by SACS 1-131 or RACS system) lx 106 2) Turbine Building W** M Dissolved and Circulating Water Grab Entrained Gases lx 10.Dewatering Sump* Sample NA M H-3 Composite (d) lx 10 Gross Alpha 1x1 NA Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Composite (d)Fe-55 X1O-6 I I 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I Page 30 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: | |||
LLD= 4.66o Sb E | |||
* V | |||
* 2.22E6 | |||
* Y | |||
* exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as microcuries per unit mass or volume, 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, X is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1), and At for plant effluents is the elapsed time between midpoint of sample collection and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation. | |||
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. | |||
Page 31 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1 (Continued) 3 TABLE NOTATION g b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in I the ODCM to assure representative sampling.C. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are: Mn- I 54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ce-141. Ce-144 shall also be measured, but with an LLD of 5 x 10-6. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. | |||
Other peaks that are identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. 3 d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume; e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.*The Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump is a normal radwaste discharge i pathway and is monitored as such because of possible contamination from the Turbine Building Ventilation drains. Securing the sump pump provides discharge termination. | |||
Siphoning does not 3 occur do to the differential height between the sump and the discharge point. Releases from the TBCWDS below the setpoint of 2X background are considered continuous releases. | |||
Sampling of continuous releases is performed using a continuous composite sampler. Samples for analyses 3 required in Table 4.11 .1 .1 .1-1 for continuous releases are obtained from the composite sampler.Releases from the sump at levels at or above 2x background may be performed as batch releases.Samples for analyses required in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 for batch releases are obtained from the sump. 3** The grab sample from the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump for dissolved and entrained noble gases is required Monthly from the composite sampler.I I I Page 32 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited: a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 33 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSSTEM CONTROLS 3 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1)would exceed 0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in any 31-day period.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times. I ACTION: a. With radioactive liquid waste being discharged and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the liquid Radwaste treatment system not in operation, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: | |||
: 1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, 3 identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence. | |||
i b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases from each reactor unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.1.3.2 The installed liquid Radwaste treatment system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.1.2.Page 34 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following: | |||
: a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and b. For iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1. | |||
Page 35 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: | |||
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis ([tCi/ml)A. Containment P P Principal Gamma 1x 10 4 PURGE Each PURGE(c) Each PURGE(c) Emitters(b) | |||
Grab Sample P H-3 (oxide) 1x10-6 B. North Plant Vent M(c), (d) Principal Gamma 1x10-4 South Plant Vent Grab Sample M(C) Emitters(b) | |||
FRVS (g)H-3 (oxide) 1x10" 6 C. All Release Continuous(e) | |||
W(0 Types as Charcoal 1-131 lx10-1 2 listed in A Sample and B above (e) W( Principal Gamma 11 Continuous Particulate Emitters(b) 1x10 Sample Continuous(e) | |||
Q Gross Alpha 1x 10 1'Composite Particulate Sample Continuous(e) | |||
Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1x10-1 1 Composite Particulate Sample Continuous(e) | |||
Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1x10-6 Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma U I I I U I I!I I I I I I I Page 36 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 | |||
: b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: | |||
Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 for noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate emissions. | |||
This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. | |||
Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER within a 1-hour period.This requirement does not apply if: 1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2. The noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.d, Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the spent fuel pool area, whenever fuel is in the spent fuel pool.e. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.f. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing, or after removal from sampler. Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER in 1 hour and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. | |||
When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.g. Table 4.11.2.1.2-1, Notations "c", and "f' do not apply. Monthly samples for principle gamma emitters and tritium are required only if the FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service greater than 8 hours. For noble gas and tritium, representative samples of Reactor Building may be obtained for compliance in lieu of skid samples. FRVS continuous samples required when FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service for greater than 2 hours.Page 37 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 n 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the i SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following: | |||
: a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less i than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less I than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times. m ACTION: i a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent i releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the I ODCM at least once per 31 days.I I Page 38 ofl 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following: | |||
: a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine- 131, iodine- 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 39 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3 3.11.2.4 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be in operation. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
Whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector is in operation. | |||
3 ACTION: a. With gaseous radwaste from the main condenser air ejector system being discharged I without treatment for more than 7 days, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: | |||
: 1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence. | |||
: b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
N I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4 The readings of the relevant instruments shall be checked every 12 hours when the main condenser air ejector is in use to ensure that the gaseous radwaste treatment system is functioning. | |||
I I I I Page 40of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.5 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM for the Reactor Building and the Service and Radwaste Building shall be OPERABLE and the appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce release of radioactivity when the projected dose in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1 -1), would exceed: a. 0.2 mrad to air for gamma radiation, or b. 0.4 mrad to air for beta radiation, or c. 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With radioactive ventilation exhaust being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: | |||
: 1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence. | |||
: b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5.1 Doses due to gaseous releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM, when the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM is not being fully utilized.4.11.2.5.2 The installed VENTILATION EXAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3.Page 41 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING CONTROLS 3.11.2.8 VENTING or PURGING of the Mark I containment drywell shall be through either the reactor building ventilation system or the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system.*APPLICABILITY: | |||
whenever the containment is vented or purged.ACTION: a. With the requirements of the above CONTROL not satisfied, suspend all VENTING and PURGING of the drywell.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLAINCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.8 The containment shall be determined to be aligned for VENTING or PURGING through either the reactor building ventilation system, the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system, or the hardened torus vent within 4 hours prior to the start of and at least once per 12 hours during VENTING or PURGING of the drywell.* Following Type A Integrated Leakage Rate Testing, the Mark I containment drywell may be vented through the hardened torus vent.I I I I I I I I i I I I i I I I I Page 42 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g. 11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times ACTION: a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the units and including outside storage tanks, etc. to determine whether the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 have been exceeded. | |||
If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. | |||
If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR 72.104. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This requirement is applicable only under conditions set forth in CONTROL 3.11.4, ACTION a.Page 43 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 i 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM'CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h. 1, the radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification l 6.9.1.6, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence. | |||
i b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12.1-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to I a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. | |||
When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if: concentration (1) 1. concentration (2) +... > 1.0 i reporting level (1) reporting level (2)When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the I calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. | |||
This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.*The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.i Page 44 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS (Continued) | |||
ACTION: (Continued) | |||
C. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12.1-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7 and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
: d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12.1-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12.1-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12.1-1.Page 45 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1: | |||
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS | |||
() FREQUENCY 1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows: An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 1 1-km range from the site (not bounded by or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.*The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. | |||
Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.Page 46 of 151 | |||
==m===m m mm=== = -Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: | |||
Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.Radioiodine Canister 1- 131 analysis weekly.Four(4) Samples -One sample from close to the SITE BOUNDARY location and Three (3) samples in land based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a community having a high calculated annual average ground- level D/Q;and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction. | |||
Particulate Sampler Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change (3);Gamma isotopic analysis(4) of composites (by location)quarterly. | |||
Page 47 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 3. WATERBORNE | |||
: a. Surface(5) | |||
One sample upstream.One sample downstream One sample outfall One sample cross-stream Grab sample monthly b. Ground c. Drinking (10)d. Sediment Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected(7).One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge One sample from downstream area One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown Monthly Composite sample over two-week period(6) when I-131 analysis is performed; monthly composite otherwise. | |||
Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly. | |||
Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly and tritium analysis quarterly. | |||
1- 131 analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the water is greater than 1 mrem per year(8). Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) semiannually Page 48 of 151 | |||
=- = M = = M mm = = = M m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 4. INGESTION a. Milk Samples from milking animals in three locations within 5 km distance having the highest dose potential. | |||
If there are none, then, one sample from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per yr(.One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge. | |||
Semimonthly when animals are on pasture, monthly at other time Gamma isotopic (4) and 1-131 analysis semi-monthly when animals are on pasture; monthly at other times b. Fish and Invertebrates Sample in season, or semiannually if they are not seasonal Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on edible portions.Page 49 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS c. Food Products One sample of each principal class of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged At time of harvest (9)Gamma isotopic analysis (4) on edible portion.Page 50 of 151--1-- ---/ 1 -1 1--1-I 1m 1-/- I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATIONS (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12.1-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133,"Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time.In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.(2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters. | |||
For the purposes of this table, a Dosimeter of Legal Record (DLR) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. | |||
Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation. | |||
The frequency of analysis or readout for dosimetry systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. No direct radiation monitoring stations are located in the inner ring sectors 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 and the outer ring sector 8 as originally determined during plant licensing and as permitted by Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by The Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979.(3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.(4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.Page 51 of 151 | |||
.Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATIONS (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. | |||
The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. | |||
Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized for recreational activities. | |||
(6) A composite sample is one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination. | |||
(8) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the I methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk collections. | |||
(9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. | |||
The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. | |||
However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. | |||
(10) No groundwater samples-are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest unaffected water supply is required.I I I Page 52 of 151 mm -m m m -m m -m ---m m -m m -Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-2: | |||
REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)H-3 3j X10 4 Mn-54 1 X 10 3 3 x 104 Fe-59 4 x 10 2 1 X 104 Co-58 1 x 103 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 10 4 Zn-65 3 x 102 2 x 10 4 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 1-131 2* 0.9 3 1 x 10 2 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 3 60 1 x 10 3 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2 x 10 3 Ba-La-140 2 x 10 2 3 x 102* For drinking water samples. This is a 40 CFR Part 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/1 may be used.Page 53 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.12.1-1: | |||
DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(')' | |||
(2)LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/!) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)gross 4 0.01 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 1* 0.07 1 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 LLD for drinking water samples. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 10 pCi/l may be used.Page 54 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATIONS (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. | |||
Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: | |||
LLD= 4.66 9 Sb E | |||
* V | |||
* 2.22E6 | |||
* Y | |||
* exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as picocuries per unit mass or volume, 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-'), and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation. | |||
Page 55 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued) | |||
TABLE NOTATIONS I It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact)limit for a particular measurement. | |||
Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. | |||
Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. | |||
In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.I I I I I i i i I I I Page 56 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2) producing broad leaf vegetation. | |||
APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted. | |||
Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
: c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. | |||
The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.*Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q's in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12.1-1, Part 4.c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.Page 57 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS I I I I I I 3.12.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.APPLICABILITY: | |||
At all times.ACTION: a. With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. | |||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.U I I U I I I I I I I I Page 58 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.Page 59 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION I BASES 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the I requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. | |||
The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This will ensure the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.I U I I I I I I I Page 60 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. | |||
The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: | |||
Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually). | |||
3/4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. | |||
The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology-provided-in-Regulatory Guide 1.109,Y"Calculation-of Annual-Doses .to Man-from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.Page 61 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of the liquid Radwaste treatment system ensures that this system will be available I for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to their release to the environment. | |||
The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". | |||
This CONTROL implements the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents. | |||
3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 to UNRESTRICTED AREAS. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)]. | |||
For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. | |||
Examples of calculations for such I MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal I to 500 mrem/year to the total body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year. | |||
The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: | |||
Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL-Procedures Manual; HASL-300 -(revised annually). | |||
Page 62 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. | |||
The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. | |||
3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROLS are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRERSTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. | |||
The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric-conditions. | |||
The release rate-controls for iodine-i3-1, iodine-t33, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. | |||
The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.Page 63 of 151 | |||
----------- | |||
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.2.4 AND 3/4.11.2.5 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT AND VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT I The OPERABILITY of the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREAMENT SYSTEM ensures that the system will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. | |||
The requirement that the appropriate portions I of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents. | |||
3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING This CONTROL provides reasonable assurance that releases from drywell venting or purging operations will U not exceed the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for UNRESTRICTED AREAS.3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE I This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525 as well as the dose limitations specific to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104. Over the long term, as more storage casks are placed on the ISFSI pads, it is expected that ISFSI operations will become the prominent contributor to the dose limits in this section. ISFSI dose contribution is in the form of direct radiation as no liquid or gas releases I are expected to occur. The PSEG 10 CFR 72.212 Report prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 72 requirements assumes a certain array of casks exists on the pads. The dose contribution from this array of casks in combination with historical uranium fuel cycle operations prior to ISFSI operations was analyzed to be within the 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 limits. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant including the ISFSI radioactive effluents exceed 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from I other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. | |||
If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, the Special Report with a request for a var iance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation I of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 until NRC staff action is completed. | |||
The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.2.1. | |||
An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in 3 carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.Page 64 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. | |||
This monitoring program implements Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, and November 1979. The initially specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. | |||
Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience. | |||
The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 4.12.1-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. | |||
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. | |||
Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: | |||
Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually). | |||
3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, from aerial survey, from visual survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/im 2.Page 65 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES I 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 66 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Page 67 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.) | |||
5.1 SITE MAP DEFINING UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND SITE BOUNDARY FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS 5.1.1 Information regarding radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents which will allow identification of structures and release points as well as definition of UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1.1-1.I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 68 ofl151 UNRESTRICTED AREA (PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVERNMENT) | |||
----------------------------------i N I I (~. 1 NUCLEAR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING d COOLING TOWER N SECURITY FENCE I CE, 0*1 1 SWITCH YARD E l l SITE BOUNDARY--->I HOPE CREEK L SCRTPROCESSING | |||
:S CENTERS R CENTER C SALEM.1II N0.2"I'SWITCH YARD METEOROLOGICAL NO.1 TOWER', FEED WATER & 0E i' CIRC. WATER INTAKE A.ESTRUCTURE,,R | |||
*DELAWARE RIVER Oil t,'0"ll 0 CDI Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.6 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year, shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. | |||
The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to alleviate the problem.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summarized and tabulated results in the format of Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical I Position, Revision 1, November 1979, for all of the radiological environmental samples taken during the report period pursuant to the table and figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM.Deviations from the sampling program identified in CONTROL 3.12.1 shall be reported. | |||
In the event that I some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.The reports shall also include the following: | |||
a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE I BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, as required by CONTROL 3.12.3 and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12.1-1 was not achieved.The report shall also include the results of specific activity analysis in which the primary coolant I exceeded the limits of Technical Specification 3.4.5. The following information shall be included: | |||
(1)Reactor power history starting 48 hours prior to the first sample in which the limit was exceeded; (2)Results of the last isotopic analysis for radioiodine performed prior to exceeding the limit, results of analysis while limit was exceeded and results of one analysis after the radioiodine activity was reduced to less than the limit. Each result should include date and time of sampling and the radioiodine concentrations; (3) Clean-up system flow history starting 48 hours prior to the first sample in which the limit was exceeded; (4) Graph of the 1-131 per gram as a function of time for the duration of the specific activity of the steady-state level; and (5) The time duration when the specific activity of the primary coolant exceeded the liinit.A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit site. The submittal should combine those U sections that are common to all units at the site.Page 70 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit, shall be submitted by May 1 of each year and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a. | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21."Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured) on magnetic tape, or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. | |||
The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1.1 -1) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. | |||
The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation and 10 CFR 72.104 Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period: a. Container volume, b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), d. Type of waste (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms), e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde). | |||
Page 71 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) | |||
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report | |||
* shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to I the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring. | |||
I A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.I I I I I I I I I I Page 72 of 15*1 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid): I1. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC). The discussion of each change shall contain: a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 1OCFR50.59; | |||
: b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information; | |||
: c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the PORC.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PORC.Page 73 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I I I PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES I I I Page 74 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Hope Creek Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications are summarized as follows: (1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) | |||
-Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line Monitor provides the alarm and automatic termination of liquid (RE4861) radioactive material releases from the liquid waste management system as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Monitor (RE4557) provides alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the circulating dewatering sump as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10. | |||
Condensation drains from certain supply ventilation units and liquids from the fill and venting of the circulating water side of the condenser waterboxes are directed to this sump. Automatic termination is performed by trip of the sump pumps on high gamma radiation signal.(2) Alarm (Only) -The Cooling-Tower Blowdown Effluent Monitor (RE8817) provides an Alarm function only for releases into the environment as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.Liquid radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figure 1-1.1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20 Appendix B. Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 jiCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases). The following equation (adopted from NUREG-0133) must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions: | |||
C(F+f)c < --(1.1)f where: C = the effluent concentration limit of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in ýiCi/ml.c = the setpoint, in [tCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 in the UNRESTRICTED AREA.Page 75 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but the same units as F, below.F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time.[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F + f) = F.]1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors 3 The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Hope Creek Generating Station are determined by the following equation: | |||
3 SP<_ MPC CTBD*[1-CF]-bkg (1.2) I RR with: I C C(gamma)MPCe = £ (1.3)Ci(gamma)where: SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (p.Ci/ml). | |||
I MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of radionuclides in the effluent stream, ([ICi/ml). | |||
Ci = the concentration of radionuclide in the liquid effluent (ýCi/ml).MPCQ = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from (Appendix F) 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (ptCi/ml). | |||
I CTBD= the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge rate at the time of release (gal/min). | |||
RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min) at the monitor location (i.e., at the liquid radwaste monitor, at the TBCW monitor, or at the CTBD monitor). | |||
I bkg = the background of the monitor (pCi/ml).CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides and radiation monitor inaccuracies. | |||
The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the Cooling-Tower-Blowdown discharge is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria.Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch liquid releases. | |||
The setpoints should be reduced to allow for potential or actual concurrent continuous releases such that the limits of I ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded.I Page 76 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints for liquid radwaste radiation monitors may be determined through the use of default parameters. | |||
Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. They are based upon the following: (a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 4.09E-05 ýtCi/ml for radwaste releases (Refer to Appendix A for justification);(b) substitutions of the Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate with the minimum average flow, in gal/min; and, (c) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min.(d) substitution of a 0.8 correction factor (CF) to account for monitor inaccuracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides. | |||
The use of the conservative alarm setpoint, or a setpoint below the conservative value, is acceptable provided that the value used is at least as conservative as the release specific setpoint calculated in accordance with Equation 1.2 above. Procedural controls exist to verify the setpoint utilized is at or below what is required.1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 jiCi/ml.Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. | |||
However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 may be performed using the following equation: Ci | |||
* RR <1 (1.4)MPCi CTBD + RR where: Ci actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (ýtCi/ml). | |||
MPCi the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (pCi/ml).2E-04 [tCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases.RR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)CTBD the actual Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge at the time of release (gal/min). | |||
Page 77 of 151 | |||
* 7- 7,7. "'7 7. 7 r. 7 -M, 7, -ý' 7 7 ;= 7 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation | |||
-10 CFR 50 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from Hope Creek Generating Station to:-during any calendar quarter:< 1.5 mrem to total body< 5.0 mrem to any organ-during any calendar year:< 3.0 mrem to total body< 10.0 mrem to any organ 1 I U I I I Per the surveillance requirements to CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculation methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Hope Creek.D, -C 8.35E-04*VOL | |||
-* A CTBD i (1.5)where: DO, Aio Ci VOL CTBD 8.35E-(= dose or dose commitment to organ o, including total body (mrem).-site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per [tCi/ml).= average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of volume VOL (ýtCi/ml). | |||
= volume of liquid effluent released (gal).= Average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min). | |||
04 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and a near field dilution factor of 0.05 (refer to Appendix B for definition). | |||
I I I I I I I I I I Page 78 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aio) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with NUREG-0133 by the equation: Ai. = 1.14E+05 [(UI | |||
* BID) + (UF | |||
* BFi)] Df 1 o (1.6)where: Ai = composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per jiCi/ml).1. 14E+05= conversion factor (pCi/[tCi | |||
* ml/kg per hr/yr).UI = adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr).Bii = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1).UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr).Bf, = bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1).Df 1 o = dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in preselected organ, o, from Table E-1l of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi). | |||
The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11.1.1.1-1. | |||
Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of CONTROL Table 4.11.1.1.1-1. | |||
====1.4.2 Simplified==== | |||
Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)Total Body Dtb = 1.94E + 02 | |||
* VOL , Ci CTBD i (1.7)Maximum Organ 5.28E + 02 | |||
* VOL , ci D max o i (1.8)Page 79 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 where: I Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem).Dmax o = evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem).Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (ptCi/ml). | |||
3 VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal).CTBD = average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min). | |||
1.94E+02 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative total body ingestion dose 3 commitment factor (Zn-65 = 2.32E+5 mrem/hr per [tCi/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05. (See Appendix B)5.28E+02 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative maximum organ ingestion 3 dose commitment factor (Fe-59, GI-LLI -6.32E+5 mrem/hr per [tCi/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05 (See Appendix B).1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the 31-day projected doses exceed:-0.06 mrem to the total body, or-0.2 mrem to any organ. I The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the drain filters and demineralizers as delineated in Figure 1-1. U Dose projections are made at least once per 31-days by the following equations: | |||
3 Dtbp -(Dtb / d) | |||
* 31d (1.9)Dmaxp = (Dmax / d) | |||
* 31d (1.10) I where: 3 Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current 31-day period (mrem).Dtb = the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.5) or (1.7).Dmaxp the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.5 or (1.8) (mrem).d = the number of 'days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.31 d = the number of days of concern.I Pae80 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.6 Representative Samples A sample should be representative of the bulk stream or volume of effluent from which it is taken. Prior to sampling, large volumes of liquid waste should be mixed in as short a time interval as practicable to assure that any sediments or particulate solids are distributed uniformly in the waste mixture. Recirculation pumps for liquid waste tanks (collection or sample test tanks) should be capable of recirculating at a rate of not less than two tank volumes in eight hours. Minimum recirculation times and methods of recirculation are controlled by specific plant procedures. | |||
E 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls I The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Radiological Effluent CONTROLS are summarized as follows: (1) Filtration, Recirculation, and Ventilation System -The FRVS is maintained in a standby condition. | |||
Upon reactor building isolation, the FRVS recirculation system recirculates the reactor building air through HEPA and charcoal filters. Releases are made to the atmosphere via a reactor building vent or the South Plant Vent depending on mode of operation. | |||
Noble gas monitoring is provided by RE-481 IA.(2) South Plant Vent -The SPV receives discharge from the radwaste evaporator, reactor building purge, auxiliary building radwaste area, condensate demineralizer, pipe chase, feedwater heater, and untreated ventilation sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gas) by the RE-4875B monitor.(3) North Plant Vent -The NPV receives discharge from the gaseous radwaste treatment system (Offgas system) and untreated ventilation air sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gases) by the RE-4573B monitor.Gaseous radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation controls are presented in Figures 2-1 and 2-2.Page 81 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination | |||
====2.2.1 Plant==== | |||
Vent, FRVS Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.11, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., of FRVS, pipe chase, gaseous i radwaste treatment system air, etc.), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by l CONTROL 3.11.2.1, by the equation: FRAC [4.72E +02* ýI | |||
* VFE W * (*Ki)]1500 (2.1)FRAC= 4.72E +02* Z | |||
* VF | |||
* Z (Ci "(L 1 +/-+l.lM 1))]13000 (2.2)L Q where: FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide I concentrations and the release flow rate.X/Q = annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location 3 (sec/m3).VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft3/min). | |||
Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as determined by radioanalysis of grab 3 sample (uCi/cm3)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per jtCi/m3), from Table 2-1 1 Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per AiCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per 1 ptCi/m3), from Table 2-1 1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 4.72E+02 = conversion factor (cm3/ft3 | |||
* min/sec) I 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr)3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr) m Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the applicable monitors may be calculated by the equation: | |||
n SP [AF | |||
* Ci /FR/IC ]+ bkg (2.3)Page 82 of 151 3 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 where: 3 SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate ([tCi/cc). | |||
FRAC = highest fraction of the allowable release rate as determined in equation (2.2).bkg = background of the monitor (!iCi/cc). | |||
AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor (0.2 NPV, 0.2 SPV, 0.1 FRVS).3 The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1). | |||
Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder | |||
===0.5 allocated=== | |||
to Hope Creek. Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Hope Creek Generating Station will be coordinated with the Salem Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.I 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint may be conservatively determined by the 3 default values presented in Table 2-2.These values are based upon: I -the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate;-a radionuclide distribution adopted from ANSI N237- 1976/ANS 18.1 "Source Term Specifications", Table 5 and;-an administrative allocation factor of 0.5 to conservatively ensure that any releases from Hope Creek do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate.For the noble gas radionuclide distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS 18.1 (Note Table C-1), the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate. The resulting conservative, default setpoints are presented in Table 2-2.I 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases CONTROL 3.11.21la limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases to < 500 mrem/yr, total body and < 3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. | |||
In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint (as determined in Section 2.2.1) being exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting from the release shall be performed using the following equations: | |||
Page 83 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Dib = * (K,* Q) (2.4)D, %z ((Li + .IM,)* Q,) (2.5)where: Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr). | |||
3 Ds = skin dose rate (mrem/yr). | |||
X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m3). | |||
I Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (Kt Ci/sec).Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per jiCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Mi gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per gtCi/m3, from Table 2-1.1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) | |||
As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be 3 considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1a, following any releases exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. | |||
Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity. | |||
The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases. | |||
As identified, any electronic spiking monitor responses may be excluded from the analysis.NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above may be imposed. However, conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the I dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1a. | |||
Provided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a.Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average-- | |||
dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.Page 84 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates CONTROL 3.11.2.1b limits the dose rate to < 1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation: | |||
DI' *O= EQ(Rio,* Q) (2.6)3 where: D = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr). | |||
X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation pathway (sec/m3).Rio = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mremlyr per jCi/m3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4.Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis 3 frequency for radionuclide i --1-131, 1-133, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half- life greater than 8 days (p[Ci/sec). | |||
By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for D, and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. | |||
Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (See Table 2-3)and the most limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid -- Ri= 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per ýiCi/m3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 34.7 pCi/sec.Reducing this release rate by a factor of 2 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release points (e.g., Salem), the 3 corresponding release rate allocated to Hope Creek is 17.4 tCi/sec. For a 7-day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1-131, the cumulative release is 10.5 Ci.Therefore, as long as the 1-131 release in any 7-day period do not exceed 10.5 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b 3 limits on allowable release rate.i 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases 3 CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic. | |||
assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of < 5 mrad, gamma-air and < 10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits < 10 mrad, gamma-air and < 20 mrad, beta-air.The limits are applicable separately to each generating station and are not combined site* limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses: Page 85 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D 7=3.17E-O8* | |||
%I | |||
* IW ).(2.7)D --=3.17E-08* (Ni*Q) (2.8)where: Dy = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad). I D, = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad).X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location i (sec/m3).Qi cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest ([tCi).!Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emission from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3, from Table 2-1.Ni = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m3, Table 2-1).3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec).2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the 3 following simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2 (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification of this simplified method).D 317E-8*z *Mf*"Qi (2.9)0.50 %Q elf Z1*N 3.17E-8 Nq*_ Qi (2.10)0.50 QQ where: Meff = 8.1E+03, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýiCi/m3). | |||
i Neff = 8.5E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýiCi/m3).Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi).0.50 = cofiservatism-facttor taiccouht for potential Variability in the radionuclide distribution. | |||
Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual i average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and beta-air doses. i Page 86 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations | |||
-10 CFR 50 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit < 15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to release of 1-131, 1- 133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days: DR 0 p= 3.17E-08*W*St | |||
* (aopQ) (2.11)where: Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem).W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3.X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m3).D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (1/m2).Riaop = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ýaCi/m3 or m2 -mrem/yr per ýaCi/sec)and organ o from Table 2-4 for each age group a and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riaop were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0133. | |||
Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, 1-133, H-3 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (pCi).Sfp = annual seasonal correction factor to account for fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.(1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways:= A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October)= | |||
0.5 (2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways:= 1.0 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, the infant age group is controlling for the milk pathway. Only the controlling age group as identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3.2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, 1-133 and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (Refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method): Page 87 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D..,= 3.17E-O8*W*SPp*R | |||
-13I*XQl (2.12)where: Dmax o = maximum organ dose (mrem).RI-1 3 1 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the cow-milk pathway controlling (m2 -mrem/yr per ptCi/sec). | |||
I W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.87E-10 1/m2.Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (ýiCi). I The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. 3 2.6 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be 1 used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses in 31-days exceed: --0.2 mrad to air from gamma radiation, or-0.4 mrad to air from beta radiation, or-0.3 mrad to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and Exhaust Treatment System as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2.Dose projection are performed at least once per 31-days by the following equations: | |||
Dgp = (Dg/d) | |||
* 31d (2.13)Ddp = (Dd/d) | |||
* 31d (2.14) U Dmaxp = (Dmax / d) | |||
* 31d (2.15) 3 where: DgP = gamma air dose projection for current 31-day period (mrad).Dg = gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.7)or (2.9) (mrad).Dbp = beta air dose projection for current 31-day period (mrad).Ob = beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.8) or (2.10) (mrad).Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current 31-day period (mrem).Page 88 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Dmax = maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.11) or (2.12) (mrem).d = number of days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.31d = the number of days of concern.3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS 3.1 Doses Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1 st of each year shall include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY.The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC based on the parameters from Table 2-3 and 2-hours per visit per year. The default value for the meteorological dispersion data as presented in Table 2-3 may be used if current year meteorology is unavailable at the time of NRC reporting. | |||
However, a follow-up evaluation shall be performed when the data becomes available. | |||
===3.2 Total=== | |||
Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1st of each year shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle courses (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). | |||
For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Generating station and the Hope Creek Generating Station which includes the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI): No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.The dose contribution from the operation of Salem Generating Stations will be estimated based on the methods as presented in the Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (SGS ODCM).As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure.3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the reporting-requirementsof6;9-.1.7 (RERR),;dose calculations for the-Hope-Creek-Genierating Station may be performed using the calculation methods contained within the ODCM; the conservation controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-4 or the actual pathways and locations as identified by the land use census (CONTROL 3/4.12.,1) may be used. Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used.Page 89 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination IR Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., dosimetry, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at Hope Creek that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, I off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance. | |||
I 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Sampling Program 3 The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:-To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;-To determine if the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment; | |||
-To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and I-To verify that HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment. | |||
The sampling requirements (type of samples, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are taken as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek Generating Station.4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison. | |||
Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program provides a check on the preciseness of measurements of radioactive materials in environmental samples. A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROLS 6.9.1.7.5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE"GAS MONITORING PROGRAM The Hope Creek Explosive Gas Monitoring program was moved within the Hope Creek Technical Specifications to section 6.8.4.d. This was performed in Technical Specification Amendment 91.Details of the Hope Creek Explosive Gas Monitoring program are maintained in station implementing procedures and are controlled by the 50.59 safety evaluation and procedure processes. | |||
3 Page 90 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT AND MONITORING SYSTEM Circ Water Dewatering (TBCWDS)RE 4557 Cooling Tower Basin Page 91 of 151 1 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 1-2: SOLID RADWASTE PROCESSING SYSTEM See Note 1 Note 1: Specified equipment is installed but not in use.Equipment is pending abandonment per DCP 4EC-3634.I I I II I I I I I I I I I U I I Page 92 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION Parameter Actual Default Value Value Units Comments MPCe Calc 4.09E-05* | |||
[tCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A [pCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)Ci Measured N/A pLCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent MPCi Measured N/A ptCi/ml Taken from 1OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)CTBD Measured 12000 gpm Cooling tower blowdown discharge RR Measured 176 gpm or Determined prior to release, release rate can be adjusted for CONTROL 1300 gpm(CST) compliance gpm Maximum flow rate with both pumps Estimated 100 (TBCW) running (50 gpm each)SP (Setpoints) | |||
A) RE4861 Calc 5.58E-04 ptCi/ml Default alarm setpoints; more conservative values may be used as appropriate and desirable for ensuring regulatory compliance and for maintaining releases ALARA RE8817 Calc 8.18E-06 jtCi/ml Maximum alarm setpoint continuous RE4557 Calc 2.40E-06 [1Ci/ml release; more conservative value may be established by plant procedure B)RE4861 Calc 7.55E-05 [tCi/ml These set0oints ae- for cofdenasate storage tank releases RE8817 Calc 8.18E-06 ptCi/ml* See Appendix A for basis Page 93 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Aio (FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)(mrem/hr per tCi/rnl).... ....... .. ..... .............. | |||
.... ......H-3 -2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1' 2.82E-1 C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 n-52 4.5E-1 4.57E+5 4.51E+-1 -4.5E- -5.27E+5 Cr-51 5.58E+0 3.34E+0 1.23E+0 7.40E+0 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 -2. 10E+3 2.16E+4 Mn-56 1.78E+2 3.15E+1 2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 -1.97E+4 2.03E+4..... 9 ..... ....-- ... ... ............... | |||
.- t .......... | |||
...... ........... | |||
.. .......... | |||
._ 0 + .......... | |||
..... ....... ..................... | |||
.......... | |||
.............. | |||
.................. | |||
.......... | |||
........... | |||
............... | |||
I. .......... | |||
..... ........ ..... ... ............................... | |||
.................... | |||
._ ... ............... | |||
........ I.. .............. | |||
Co-57 1.42E+2 2.36E+2 3.59E+3 f Co-58 -6.03E+. 2 1.35E+3 ..1.22E+4 f.Co-60 -1.73E+3 3.82E+3 3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 7.18E+2_Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 .1.20E+ .. ............................. | |||
..656.655E+2 I Cu-64 -2.14E+2 1.01E+2 5.40E+2 1.83E+4 Zn-65 1.61E+5 5.13E+5 2.32E+5 3.43E+5 3.23E+5 Zn-69m 5.66E+3 1.36E+4 1.24E+3 8.22E+3 8.29E+5 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 3.42E+2 1.39E+3 3.58E+2 4.30E+4 I Br-82 -4.07E+O 4.67E+O[Br-83 --7.25E-2 --- 1.04E-1 Br-84 --9.39E-2 --- 7.37E-7 Br-85 -3.86E-3 ---Rb-86 -6.24E+2 2.91E+2 --1.23E+2 Rb-88 -1.79E+O 9.49E-1 --2.47E-11 Rb-89 -1.19E+0 8.34E-1 --- 6.89E-14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 8.OOE+2 Sr-90 1.23E+5 -3.01E+4 -3.55E+3 Sr-91 9.18E+l -3.71E+O --4.37E+2 Sr-92 3.48E+1 -1.51E+O --6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+O -1.63E-1 ---6.42E+4 Y-91m 5.73E-2 -2.22E-3 --1.68E-1 Y-91 8.88E+1 -2.37E+O --4.89E+4 Y-92 5.32E-1 -1.56E-2 --9.32E+3 Y-93 1.69E+0 -4.66E-2 ---5.35E+4..Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.11E+O 3.46E+O -8.02E+O -1.62E+4 Zr-97 _ 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 -2.68E-1 -5.51E+4 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 -2.46E+2 -_ _1.51E-+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.49E-1 3.46E-1 -1.11E+0 -3.50E+3 Mo-99 -1.28E+2 2.43E+1 -2.89E+2 -2.96E+2 Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 -5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 Tc-1O1 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 -3.46E-1 9.8 1E-3 5.77E-14 i...T -.1 0 1 ....... ............ | |||
1 .3 E 2 .... ........ ...... ....... ....... .... ............ | |||
.......... | |||
......... | |||
... 1 : 8 .... ...................... | |||
-..................... | |||
.34 6 E ........ ............... | |||
..: 1 -.............. | |||
.. ._ _ E 1 4 ..I Page 94 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Ai.(FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)(mrem/hr per ýiCi/ml)Ru-103 1.07E+2 -4.60E+1 -4.07E+2 -1.25E+4 Ru-lOS 8.89E+O -3.5 1E+O -1.15E+2 -5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 2.01E+2 -3.06E+3 -1.03E+5........ I............ | |||
................ | |||
.. 5.......................................................- | |||
.................................................................. | |||
....... .. .... ......... | |||
........- | |||
.... ....................... | |||
..... ............................................ | |||
..................... | |||
............ | |||
5...... ............................. | |||
A-i lOin 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 -2.85E+3 5.91 E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 1.19E+1 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.1OE+2 6.71E-1 2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+O 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+O 4.10E+l 6.96E-1 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+O 1.93E+O 6.60E+O 3.63E+1 -7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.31E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 -4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+O 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+l 1.92E+O Te-131m 1.40E+2 6.85E+1 5.71E+1 1.08E+2 6.94E+2 6.80E+3 Te-131 1.59E+O 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+O -2.26E-1.. ... .e 1.. 3.. _1. ........ .... ...... .... .. 1 _ _9 .. .... ..0 .... .... .............. | |||
.. ....... 6.. 6. 6 E... .. .. .................... | |||
..... .. 5 ... ...0 _ ..... .... ....... ......... | |||
._3 _ + ..... .. ................ | |||
.6 ..9 .E. + 0. ................. | |||
...... ............ | |||
..... ... .. .. ............... | |||
2 .( E-1 --- --.. ..Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 6.24E+3 1 1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 -1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 -8.23E+1 S1-132 1.06E+l 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 -5.35E+0O......... | |||
.................................................. | |||
.. ._ -..... ....... ..... ................. | |||
.................. | |||
............... | |||
................................ | |||
.................. | |||
............. | |||
......... | |||
.. ..-E .. ........... | |||
.. ............ | |||
£z I ......... | |||
....................... | |||
.......... | |||
.................. | |||
................... | |||
1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4- 2.26E+2_ -1. 16E+2 134 5.56E+O 1.51E+l 5.40E+O 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 1.32E-2 1-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+. 2.24E+l 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+l 5.94E+O -8.81E+O 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+1 Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+O 1.08E+2 7.02E-1 1.18E+O 3.38E+3 Ba-141 3.81E+0 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 -2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 -1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+O 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 ---5.83E+4 La-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 ---2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+O 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 -1.08E+O -8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 -1.97E-1 1.67E+4 Ce-144 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+0 -4.43E+1 -6.04E+4 Pr-143 5.79E+O 2.32E+O 2.87E-1 -1.34E+O ___ -2.54E+I4 Pr-144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 -4.44E-3 2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+O 4.58E+O 2.74E-1 -2.68E+0 2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+O 7.66E+O 2.68E+O -2.5 1E+3 p- ................ | |||
3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 -1.08E-2 -7.11E+2 Page 95 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS (pCi/kg per pCi/liter)* | |||
I____ 3 1OE+04 12.OE+U04-nwmI H' 9.0E-0'1 9.3E-01 C 1.8E+03 1.4E+03 P 3.OE+03 3.0E+04 Cu 4.0E+02 2 1.0E+03 Br 5.5E+02 4.0E+02 Fe 3.OE+03 2.OE+04 Co 6.E+02 1.OE+03 Nb 3.OE+/-04 2.5E+02 Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 Ru 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 Zr 2.0E+02 8.0E+01, Nb 3.OE+04 1.4E+02 Teo_ 1.0E+01 __1 .0E+01 Tc 1.0E+01 5.OE+01 Cs 3.0E+00 1.0E+03............... | |||
................................. | |||
......._......A. | |||
.........g_...... ..................................... | |||
.................... | |||
..................0 S............................................... | |||
.................................. | |||
.3....................... | |||
............... | |||
........................................ | |||
Sb 4.0E+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.OE+01 1.OE+02 I 1.0E+01 5.OE+01 Ba 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 Ce 1.OE+01 6.OE+02 Pr 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 W 3.OE+01 3.OE+01..E_+ ...E+0.As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 1 I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I* Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.Page 96 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 2-1: GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SPV (Fig. 2-2)Main Condenser--------------------------------------------- | |||
rn ux. Boiler Main System Steam L ------------------- | |||
Typical of 2 Recombiner Packages Offgas Pretreatment RMS and Sampling Hnldtm Pi I I Condser Reheater Guard Bed Amhicxnf .hort-nIl -f(Zctm To North Plant Vent (Fig. 2-2)Absorber Train Page 97 of 151 tVV~~~~~ -1r- ..trr~Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 2-2: VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System (from Figure 2-1)Untreated Ventilation Air Sources 4RE83 h N aNorth Plant Vent , o r ISee Note 1 I I I I I I I I I South Plant Vent FRVS System Vent R = Roughing Filter H = HEPA Filter C = Charcoal Filter RE = Radiation Effluent Monitor Note 1: Specified equipment Is installed but not in use.Equipment pending abandonment per-DCP 4EC-3634.I I I I I I Page 98 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li Mi Ni..... d.. o n.c.iI.... | |||
..................... | |||
.... .. ....... .........e .. ..... ......... | |||
........................ | |||
............. .t i .m3.. ........ ...... ........ .. .. ................................... | |||
C .m 3 ..... ............... | |||
.................................................... | |||
.. .4/ 3 ................................ | |||
........................... | |||
.. .. C.!3................................... | |||
.......Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23 E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.5 1E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8. 84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 Page 99 of 151 Ij Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION Actual Value Parameter X/Q VF (NPV)VF (SPV)VF (FRVS)AF (NPV)AF (SPV)AF (FRVS)Calculated Measured Measured Measured Coordinated with SGS Default Value 2.14E-6 41900 440,180 Units Comments 9000 0.2 0.2 0.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A sec/m3 ft 3/min ft 3/min ft 3/min Unitless Unitless Unitless itCi/cm 3 From FSAR Table 2.3-3 1, 0.5 mile, N Maximum Operation Maximum Operation Maximum Operation Administrative allocation factor to ensure releases do not exceed release rate limit Ci Ki LM Measured Nuclide Specific Nuclide Specific Nuclide Specific Calculated Calculated Calculated mrem/yr per VtCi/m3 mrem/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I SP: NPV SPV FRVS 2.43E-4 2.31E-5 5.65E-4ýtCi/cc ptCi/ccýCi/cc Default alarm Setpoints; more conservative values may be used as deemed appropriate for ensuring ALARA & regulatory compliance Page 100 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE CALCULATIONS* | |||
ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s) | |||
Age Group 3.11.2.1a Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N 3.11.2.lb Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N Noble Gases direct exposure Inhalation Gamma-Air Beta-Air Milk, ground plane and inhalation N/A Child N/A Infant (sec/m3) (1/m2)2.14E-06 N/A 2. 14E-06 N/A 2.14E-06 N/A 7.2E-08 2.87E-10 3.11.2.2 3.11.2.3 Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N Residence/ | |||
Dairy -4.9 Miles, W*The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Artificial Island Radiological Monitoring Program and the Hope Creek FSAR.Page 101 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases, R(io)Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per piCi/m3)I ..I H-3_ _ -l.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 `1.26E+3 1. .26E+3 126E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1l.32E+6 7.71 -8.64E+4 5.01E+4 C-i--5.95E+1 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.OOE+2 Mn-54 -3.96E+4 -9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4 6.30E+3 Fe-55 2.46E+4 I1.70E+4 --7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 --1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 --3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 -1.58E+3 -9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3....~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.... ...... .................. | |||
..... .; .-.:~ ; ..... .................. | |||
...... .... ................ | |||
... ....... i........... | |||
... .q ..... .... .i .4 -... .............. | |||
......5E + 4 .....C-0-1. 15E+4 --5.97E+/-6 2.85E+/-5 1.48E+/-4........... | |||
......... | |||
................... 6 + ...... .......-.......... | |||
..................... | |||
i .. ............ | |||
: .... ..................... | |||
.........-............................ | |||
.. ............. | |||
.......... | |||
-........................................ | |||
..... ................... ........................... | |||
Ni-63 4.32E+/-5 3.14E+4 --1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 ..3+ .0+ 64E+5 _5.34E+4_ | |||
4.66E+4 R 6 1.35E+5 ---1.66E+4 I5.90E+4 Sr-89 3.04E+5 ----1.40E+/-6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 9.92E7 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.0OE+6 Y-91 4.62E+5 --1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4......... | |||
..r ... ................. | |||
........ .............. | |||
...................... | |||
...... ............ | |||
................ | |||
............................. | |||
........... | |||
.4.. +... .................. | |||
....... ................................. | |||
.:7 / + .......... | |||
..... ............ | |||
-+ ..................... | |||
3I + ......................... | |||
Zr-95 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 -5.42E+4 .7E6 10+5 2.33E+4 Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 -7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 _ -5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.10E+5 6.58E+2.......... | |||
........ ---i : i + ........ ...... .. .. .: .6 ..-. ............ | |||
...... ..... .. ....... ..... ............ | |||
........ ....... ..../ --g g [ :6 ............ | |||
... ..... ...E + ............ | |||
..RU-106 6.91E+/-4 --1.34E+5 9. 36E+6 {9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Ag-iorn 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 -1.97E+4 4.63E+6 j3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 -2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4... i i -.... ... ......------........- | |||
-.............. | |||
.- ........-: 3 2 t i ....... .-............ | |||
...... ......... | |||
.... ...... .......... | |||
-- 1 .a i .i i _ .. ........ .i _ ........... | |||
Sb-125 5.34E+/-4 5.95E+/-2 5.40E+/-1 -1.74E+6 I1.O1E+5 I.26+Te-125m 3.42E+3 1.58E+3 1.05E+3 1.24E+4 314E+5 I7.06E+4 4.67E+2 Te-127m 5 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 4.58E+4 9.60E+5 1.50E+5 1.57E+3 Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1. 19E+/-7 ............ | |||
E+4..* ._ 6...28 + ............... | |||
5E+/-...4 ........ .. .. .....1-132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 -4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 i1.48E+4 {2.15E+6 i2.58E+4 i- 8.88E+3 4.52E+3....... .......... | |||
...... .................. | |||
..i -~ .................... | |||
................... ..+ ...-... .. ........ .8................... | |||
......... | |||
............... | |||
: 5. .+. -....... ................ | |||
........ .......................................................... | |||
........... | |||
....... ..... ............... | |||
..... .....1-134 -6.44E+2 1.3+ .8+ .75E+3 -1.O1E+/-0 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11 E+4 -5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 -2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 -8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.10E+5 Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 -2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Ba440 3.90E+4 490E÷ --.67E+1 L27E+6 2,18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 .. 6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 -8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3...N..d-.................I4........ | |||
.5................ | |||
.... ............. | |||
O............+/-3..... | |||
.-2.16E+3 2.8 1E+5-.... ....... ...... ... -- 5 2.OOE+5 1.73E+5 4.64E+2 3-.65E+2 Page 102 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Facltrs -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per [tCi/m3)H- -1.7E3 .7Ei- t`7+ 1 .2E+ ý1.7E+3 12E+............ | |||
............................................ | |||
... ............. | |||
............................. | |||
.......... | |||
...... ..... .... .2 7 ' .......... | |||
........... | |||
... ..: .......... | |||
..... .............. | |||
."~ 2 7 ..... .............. | |||
.. .. .. ..... ;. ........ ....... ..... ..... .... ............... | |||
.................. | |||
'C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E.3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 P-32 1.89E+6 1.1OE+5 ---9.28E+4 7.16E+4 Cr-51 .--7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.10E+4 3.00E+3 _1.35E+2 Mn-54 -5.11E+4 -1.27E+4 1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 --1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 --1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 -{_- 5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 Co-58 2.07E+3 -1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 1.51E+4 -8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Ni-63 5.80E+5 4.34E+4 -3.07E+5 1.42E+4 1.98E+4 Zn-65 3.86E+4 1.34E+5 -] 8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 -. 1.90E+5 ---1.77E+4 J 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5 -2.42E+6 3.71E+5 I 1.25E+4 Sr-90 1.08E+8 -...1.65E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-91 6.61E+5 --2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Zr-95 1.46E+5 4.58E+4 -6.74E+4 2.69E+6 1.49E+5 ý3.15E+4 Nb-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 -1.OOE+4 7.5 1E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Ru-103 2.1OE+3 -7.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru-106 9.84E+4 -1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-1 10m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 -2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 -3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+l -2.74E+6 9.92E+4 _ 1.72E+4 Te-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-129m 1..39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 l2.25E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 -6.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51E+5 6.92E+3 -1.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.22E+4 2.05E+4 2.92E+6 3.59E+4 -1.03E+4 6.22E+3 1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 2.04E+1 8.40E+2 1-135 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 -3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs-136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 -1.1OE+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5-Cs-13-.7. | |||
-6.,7QE+/-5 | |||
--,8.48E+/-5 -.3..04E+/-5,.-,1.21E+/-5 | |||
-8.48E+/-3-- | |||
-3.1E+/-5--- | |||
Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 1.21E+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Nd-14 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 J 5.13E+2 Page 103 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per iiCi/m3)V-rr ý ]n Itm ~ry-~.. m i tAI i IU ~uiIa~' I I -1~~U -, 1 1 -nuf ' -: .j ~r T' J[H-3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 I 1.12E+3 1.12EI 3 I .2E+3 1.12E+3..... i...... ......... | |||
.. ....... ................................... | |||
+ ......................... | |||
...... ............ | |||
.. ................... | |||
.................... | |||
.16 ......... | |||
........ ..i 8 + I .......... | |||
................ | |||
............ | |||
.....I. ................................... | |||
Ce-5 3.574E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 Co-571 -9.03E+2 5.07E+5 1.32E94 l.07E+3 Co-58 i- , 1.77E+3 -___-_ _____1.11E+6 i3.44E+4 !3.16E+3 Co-60 32 1.31E+4 -7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4....R b .. ..... ........... | |||
... i ...... .... ............... | |||
... .............. | |||
._ .1.- 8 .... ............ | |||
... .... ..... ................................................. | |||
...... ...... ......... | |||
..... ....... ................................. | |||
....... .7. 9 9 .............. | |||
... ........... | |||
.......C18 5 E12 4 E11 7 E41 0 E31 .5 4 E + 2 _ ...MN-6 4 .1E5 4.29E+4 -OE+ 1 .58E+6 2 .29E+4 9.51E+3 Zn-65 4.26E+/-4 2.1E52-71E+4 1.911E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Sr-89 5.99E+5 4- E 4- -2.16E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 S.E+ 1.E+5 1.7E+Cr-58 1.77E+3 --1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.44E+3 Y-91 9.14E+5 1 E -7.7E+6 9.E+ 2.44E+4 Zr-95 1.90E+5 4.18E+4 -5.96E+4 2.23E+6 6.11E+4 3.70E+4....... ......................... | |||
............ ...... ............ | |||
............... | |||
.................. | |||
11 ... ....................... | |||
................ | |||
............. | |||
....... .......... | |||
......................................... | |||
... .................... | |||
.................. | |||
........................ | |||
........ ....... ................. | |||
...... ........... | |||
............. | |||
....... ........................ | |||
... .....Nb-95 2.35E+4 9.18E+3 -8.62E+3 6.14E+5 3.70E+4 6.55E+3 Ru-103 2.79E+3 -, -7.03E+3 6.62E+5 4.48E+4 1 .07E+3 Ru-106 1.36E+5 19- 1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4.......... | |||
....... .. ..................... | |||
-...................... | |||
... ................... | |||
." ....... ............ | |||
.... ............ | |||
.. ......... | |||
............................................ | |||
... -"............................................... | |||
.. .................................... | |||
.............. | |||
.......... | |||
......................... | |||
....................... | |||
........Ag-l0m 1.69E+4 8 .14E+4 -2.12E+4 5.48E+6 31.4E+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 261.26E+2 3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.44E+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 47.59E+2 9.1E+1 5 2.32E+6 64.03E+/-4 2.07E+4 Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9.14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 78.55E3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3 Te-129m 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 50E4 1.76E+/-6 i1.82E+5 --3.04E+3 1-131 4.81E+4 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4 -2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1-132 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3 -_____ 3.22E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+/-4 3.85E+6 i3.38E+4 -i5.48E+/-3 7.70E+3 1-134 .1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 2 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 -_14.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs-134 6.51E+5 1.01E+6 3.30E+5 .21E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 Cs-136 6.514E+4 7.59E+2 1 -95+4 1 2.45E+4 4.18E+3 1.16E+5 Cs-137 9.%07E+5 8.25E-+5 i 2.82E+5 ]1.04E+5 ]3.62E+3 1.28E+5 Ba-140 67.40E+4 6.48E+1 -2.11E+1 1 74E+/-6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 6 68.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-144 6.77E+6 2.12E+6 -1.17E+6 1.20E+7 3.89E+5 3.61E+5 Pr-143 1.85E+4 5.55E+3 63E 3.50E+3 4 33E+/-5 9.73E+4 9.14E+2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 Page 104 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per j.+/-Ci/m3)H.3~~~~~ ~~ * .... .7¢ 64E2i64E2i64E-2 | |||
..... .... 6.4E- ......47E+2...C__14__J 2.65E+4 5.3 1E+3 I5.3 1E+3 5.3 1E+3 15.3 1 E'+3 5.. 3-I .E..+ -3 15.3 1E+3 P-32 2.03E+/-6 1.12E+5 ---1.61E+4 7.74E+4 Cr-51 -5.75E+1 1.32E+1 1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1 Mn-54 i -2.53E+4 -4.98E+3 1.OOE+6 7.06E+3 4.98E+3 Fe-55 1.97E+4 1.17E+4 j -8.69E+4 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 I -1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 ...- 6.5 1E+2 -3.79E+5 -4.86E+3 6.41E+2 Co-58 -1.22E+3 -7.77E+5 1.11E+4 1.82E+3 Co-60 8.02E+3 j. 4.51 E+6 3.19E+4 1. 1_8E+4 Ni-63 3.39E+5 2.04E+4 I --2.09E+5 2.42E+3 1.16E+4............. | |||
.. .... .......... | |||
................. | |||
......+... ..+ .............. | |||
:......................................... | |||
.5 4 T 6 : ; + ...................................... | |||
................................................. | |||
Zn65 1-93E+/-4 6.26E+/-4 1 .5+ .7+ 5.14E+4-3.1+ | |||
Rb-86 1.90E+5 ---3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 -I -2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 Sr-90 4.09E+7 ---1. 12E+7 1.31E+5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 ---2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 Zr-95 1. 15E+5 2.79E+4 -3.11 E+/-4 175E+6 I2.17E+4 2.03E+4~ ............. | |||
...U 5 i ... ...... ..... ; ...............5 --S £ [ S g .... ...... .......Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 -4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+/-3 Ru-103 2.02E+3 -i 4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79........ ._ _ _ ...__ ....... ._.._.._._.... | |||
5.52 + 1. 1 + 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 -1.07E+5 1.16E+7 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-110m 9.98E+3 1.09E+4 3.67E+6 3.30E+4 5.OOE+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.01E+2 -_ 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 I6.23E+1 -1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m 4.76E+/-3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 -4.47E+5 11.29E+4 6.58E+2 Te-127m 1 67E+4 6.90E+3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31E+6 i2.73E+4 2.07E+3 Te-129m 1.41E+4 6.09E+3 5.47E+3 3.18E+4 1.68E+6 16.90E+4 2.23E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5 1.96E+4....... ......... ................ | |||
..... .............. | |||
I -. ..... .... ... ............. | |||
........... | |||
......... .... ................... | |||
..1-132 1.69E+/-3 3.354E+3 ..69E+5--T3.95E+5- | |||
: 1. 90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21E+2 1.88E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 1.29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 1 3.86E+3 7.60E+3 6.96E+5 8.47E+3 _ 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-134 3.96E+5 I7.03E+5 I 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-136 1 4.83E+4 11.35E+5 -5.64E+4 1.18E+4 l.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E5 6.12E5I -.172E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 .4.55E+4 Ba-:140 5-49E-+45 | |||
: 6. + ~____ 7.13E+4_ j___Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 1 1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 t i5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 I 1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 i6.99E+2 1.7+ 4.3+ .2+INU-1-' //. , .5i. 1 .)I .1~.1JtA~) | |||
j.LLIZ-t-J | |||
~.LL~1~+ XUU~1L... .. .... ...... , Page 105 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per ,tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per p[Ci/sec) for others I I I I I H-3 _______+ 7.63E__ __ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ __2_ _37.63E+2 763E+2 7.63E+2 7.63EE+2 C-14 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 1.71E+10 1.06E+9 - 1.92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 .-.Mn-54 -8.40E+6 Fe-55 2.51E+7 1.73E+7 1.711E+4 6.30E+3 2.50E+6 3.80E+4 9.67E+6 7.20E+6 2.57E+7 9.95E+6 2.86E+4 1.60E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.00E+7 -1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 -1.28E+6 -3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 -- 4.72E+6 9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 -1.64E+7 -3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 -9.73E+7 2.26E+8................. | |||
............ | |||
.. ............. | |||
...... .......................... | |||
................... .................. | |||
................................................. | |||
.......... | |||
......... | |||
...................... | |||
............................................................................................... | |||
......................... | |||
.......... | |||
... .... ................................................... | |||
Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 2.92E+9 2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 -2.59E+9 -5.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 --2.33E+8 j4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 -1.35E+9 l.15E+10 Y-9 860E+3 -4.73E+6 [2.30E+2_J_1 Zr-95 -9.46E+2 i3.03E+2 4.76E+2 9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 i4.59E+4 4.54E+4 2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Ru-103 1.02E+3 -..3.89E+3 1.19E+5 4.39E+2 i Ru-106 2.04E+4 -3.94E+4 -1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-ll0m 5.83E+7 539E+7 -1.06E+8 3.20E+7 I Sb-124 2.57E+7 I4.86E+5 6.24E+4 -2.OOE+7 7.31E+/-8 1.02E+/-7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 7 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 TeI2-25-m', 1.63E+7 5.9013+6 4.9013+6 6.63E+7 -6.50E+/-7 2.18E+6 Te-127m 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 -1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 -3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 -1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 -8.22E-2 1.53E-1'1-133 3.97E+6 i6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+7 -6.20E+6 2.1OE+6 i 1-134-- ----1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 -4.1OE+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 -4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 I.1OE+10 Cs-136 i2.61E+8 i 1.03E+9 -5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-_137 7.38E+9 -1.01E÷10 | |||
-3.43E+/-9 1.14E+9 1.95E88 6.61E+/-9 Ba-140 2 269E+7 3.38E+4 -1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 -1.52E+3 -1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 -8.87E+4 -1.21E+8 1.92E+4 I Pr-143 1.59E+2 T 6.37E+1 -3.68E+1 -6.96E+5 7.88E+0 I I I I I I I I I I I I Nd- 147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 6.37E+1 5.23E+5 6.52E+0 Page 106 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per jiCi/sec) for others OW, H 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 3.15E+10 1.95E+9 ---2.65E+9 1.22E+9 I Cr-51 ---2.78E+4 1 1OE+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5.OOE+4 Mn-54 -1.40E+7 -4.17E+6 2.87E+7 2.78E+6..... -------- --- ---- --------------.-...................-------.---. | |||
: 2. 7 E.7.27 8 E.6 ...... F 5 ...... -------..... | |||
.... ...45 + .......... | |||
......... | |||
.3 6 + 7-............. | |||
.-.. ............................................. | |||
.......... | |||
...... ..... ..... .......... | |||
.....E + .. ...... ......... ........................... | |||
: 7. 3 6 + .. .....Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 -2.OOE+/-7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 5.20E+7 I 1.21E+8 -3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 -2.25E+6 ---4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 -7.95E+6 --. 1. 1OE+8 _1.83E+7....... .... ......+ ............... | |||
-............. | |||
...... ............ | |||
.... .. [.. .............. | |||
................... | |||
........... 7 _Co-60 2.78E+7 3.62E+8 6.26E+/-7 Ni-63 1.18E+10 8.35E+8 --.-1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11E+9 7.31E+9 -4.68E+9 j_- 3.1OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 -4.73E+9 --7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89 2.67E+9 ---3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 9.92E+7 ---9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6.Y-. 91. ... ......... | |||
.5 8 + ... ... ----- ... ........ ... ............. | |||
.. ....... .. ......... .. ..... ...... ... ......-_...... ..... .... .. ... ..4 2 4 ++Y-91 I 1 .58E+/-4 --6.48E+6 4.24E+2_Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 -7.67E+2 .-.. 1.20E+6 3.59E+2 Nb-95 1.41E+5 i7.80E+4 -7.57E+4 -3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 --6.40E+3 T_- 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 -7.23E+4 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-ll0m 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 -1.74E+8 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124 i 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 -4.01E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 .3.65E+7 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 --- ............. | |||
3._21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m .3.OOE+7 I .08E+7 8.39E+6 --8.'86E*+7' 4.02E+6 -Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.01E+7 3.42E+8 -2.1OE+8 L.OOE+7 Te-129m 1. .11E+8 4.1OE+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 j 4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 1 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 I 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+O 3.31E-1 2.72E-1i 1-133 7.24E+6 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 9.30E+6 3.75E+6................. | |||
..... ....... ........ ...... ........... | |||
................. | |||
......... ..... ............... | |||
..... ......... ............... | |||
...................... | |||
.............. | |||
... ........ .... ....... .............. | |||
.... .... .. ............ | |||
.. .... ......... ....... .............. | |||
........ ..................... | |||
.......... | |||
......... | |||
... .............. | |||
1-134 1-135 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81E+9 i 2.31E+10 -7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 I Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 -9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+10 -6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6-20E+9 I Ba-140 i 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 -2.02E+4.. | |||
4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+61 Ce-141 i 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 -2.79E+3 .....69E+7 6.8. 1E+2j Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 -1.63E+5 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 -6.77E+1 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 -1. 16E+2 -7.11E+5 1.18E+l Page 107 of 151 j Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per jiCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others IMMlMmm H-3 -,1.57E+/-3 1.57E-7+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 i 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 --2.15E+9 3.00E+9 Cr-5i- 5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1 .03E+5 5.41 E+6 I1.02E+5..................................................... | |||
-............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ | |||
Mn-54 -- -i2.09E+7 -5.8 7E+6 [- 1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Fe-55 1. 12E+8 15.93E+7 --3.35E+7 1. 1OE+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 1 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 -5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 -3.84E+6 -3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 --1.21E+7 -7.08E+7 3.72E+7..6 ..... ... ....... .......... | |||
..................-- -........ ...................... | |||
... ...: ................. | |||
...2 -9 1+ ........... | |||
i _7 + 8 .....Co-60 -.....-. .4.32E+7 ---2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 2.96E+10 1.59E+9 --1.07E+8 1.O1E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 1.10E+10 -6.94E+9.- | |||
1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 8 8.77E+9 --5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89 6.62E+9 ---2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+11 -1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 ---- 5.21E+6 1.04E+3 Zr-95 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -E+3 8.81E+5 7.52E+2......... | |||
..... .... ............ | |||
.. ... .... .. .. ...... ...... ....... ............................. | |||
.................................................................. | |||
........... | |||
...... ............................ | |||
.................. | |||
....... ...... ............. | |||
..... .. ....... ................... | |||
............. | |||
Nb-95 i 3.18E+5 1.24E+5 -1.16E+5 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Ru-103 4.29E+3 i- -.08E+4 1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru- 106 9.24E+4 --1.25E+5 1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-lr0m 2.09E+8 1.41E+8 -2.63E+8 1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb- 125 8.70E+/-7 1.41 E+6 8.06E+4_ -4 85E+/-7 __2.08E+8 1.82E+7.-................. | |||
....... i -E.......... | |||
' .....i ....... ... -- ............... | |||
........ ............ | |||
: 4. ¥ ........... | |||
.................. | |||
...0 8 + ...--....... | |||
_8.....-2........7 | |||
-- ..._ -125 7.1E+ 9.84E+6 Te-125m 7.38E+7 2.OOE+7 2.07E+7 7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 -1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 -3.32E+8 4.23E+7 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O 1.48E+O 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 I2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+/-7 -8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 --.O+ 4.97E+4 1-135 i 5.84E+4 I 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 8.00E+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10] | |||
3.71E+10 -1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1 OOE+9 2.76E+9 -1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 -I-.OIE+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Ba-140 1. 17E+8 -1.03E+5 -3.34E+4 _6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 Ce-141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 -4.78E+3 -1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 -2.82E+5 -1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 j 2.17E+2 -1.17E+2 7.80E+5 3.59E+1*1 _I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 1.98E+2 5.71 E+5 2.79E+1 Page 108 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per PCi/sec) for others........... | |||
M Fro, T TM n H-3 -2.38E+/-3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 I P-32 1i .60E+11 9.42E+9-- | |||
2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 --1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54 .3.89E+7 -8.63E+6 1- -.43E+7 8.83E+6 Fe-55 1.35E+8 8.72E+7 -4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 -1.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 -8.95E+6 -3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 -2.43E+7 -6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 8.81E+7 ---2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 .3.49E+10 2.16E+9 ---1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 I5.55E+/-9 Il.90E+10 9.23E+9 -1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 -2.22E+10 ---5.69E+8 1.10E+10 Sr-89 1.26E+10 .... 2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+11 .... 1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 7.33E+4 ----5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Zr-95 __6.83E+3 1_ .66E+3 -1.79E+3 -8.28E+5 1. 18E+3.................... | |||
..... ... .. ... .... ... .. .- ..... ...... ... ........ ... .......Nb-95 1.3+ .4+/- .75E+5 -2.06E+8 1.41E+5 Ru-103 8.69E+3 1- -.81E+4 -1.06E+5 2.91E+3 .Ru-106 1.90E+5 --2.25E+5 -11.44E+6 2.38E+4 Ag-l 10mI 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 -4.03E+8 -1.46E+10 1.86E+8 Sb-_124 .2.09E+8 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 1- .31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 -9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7 Te-125m 1.51E+8 .5.04E+7 5.07E+7 --7.18E+7 2.04E+7 Te-127m I4.21E+8 I 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 -1.70E+8 5.1OE+7 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 -3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 i 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 -1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+0 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+0 -2.34E+0 1.03E+0 1-133 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 -9.16E+6 1.58E+7 1-134 -10E-9 1-135 ' 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 -8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-1-37 5..1-5E+10 6;02E+10 --.62E+10 6.55E+9 88E+8 4.-2-7E+9 Ba-140 !2.41E+8 2.41E+5 --5. 73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+71 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 8.15E+3 -1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 3.85E+5 -1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 -7.89E+5 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 5.74E+5 5.55E+1 Page 109 of 151 | |||
-I--Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per jtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per .Ci/sec) for others H-3 -" .26E+/-3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 18.97E+5 l.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 I1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5-...46I -8.7--7 ...--.4- E 1.58E+8 5.42E+7--Cr-5-....... | |||
.-..- .2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-4 -3.i11E+8 | |||
-9.27E+i7 | |||
-9.54E+/-8 --5.94E+7 Fe-55 2.09E+8 1.45E+8 --8.06E+7 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 --8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 -1.17E+7 -- -2.97E+8 1.95E+7 C058 -3.09E+7 ----6.26E+8 j6.2+'-( o -6 3 ......... | |||
... .. ....... ..- ..... .... ...... ................. | |||
.. .-7E ... ..... .----3 14 + 9 ...-.6 E +-1.67E+8 -3.14E+9 3.69E+8 Ni-..6..3 | |||
.... 1. 04E+ 10 7.2 1E+8 -____ -1.50E+8 3.49E+8 Zn-65 3.17E+8 1.01E+9 -6.75E8 -6.36E+ 4.56E+8 Rb-86 __ _2.19E+8 -T- -4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 -9.96E+9 -----i 1.60E+9 2.86E+8.........~ ~~~~.. ...... ......I..- .---~ ...-- ........ ........... | |||
... ............... | |||
............. | |||
....1 .......... | |||
:....... .- -- --.. ...... :..... ... ......i ....:.... ........ -.....-1 -E -O -Sr9 --6.05E+1i 1.75E+10_ | |||
[1.48E+/-1O Y915.13E+6 -I2.82E+9 j1.37E+5.v .... ............... | |||
..... ....... ................... | |||
........ ..---....... | |||
I-............................ | |||
....... .......................... | |||
--........... | |||
----------.. | |||
................ | |||
i- -* -------..... | |||
: 5. y-E- 5 ............ | |||
Zr-95 -1.19E+6 3.81E+5 5.97E+5 -1 21E2 2.58E+5 Nb-95 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 T7.81E+4 -4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 4.80E+6 -!1.83E+7 -5.61E+8 ]2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 --3.72E+8 1 l.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-1Or 1.06E+7 9.76E+6 -1.92E+7 ....3.98E+9 5.80E+6 Sb-124 1.04E+8, 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 8.08E+7 2.95E+9 4.11E+7...... ... ..................... | |||
.......f .... .. .............................. | |||
........ .......... ... ...................... | |||
.. ..... .......................................... | |||
.........I ................. | |||
....... .......... | |||
.. .................... | |||
............... | |||
..... ............ | |||
.......................... | |||
............... | |||
............................................................ | |||
..Sb-125 1.36E+8 1.52E+6 1.39E+5 -1.05E+8 1.50E+9 3.25E+7 Te-125m .9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 .3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+9 -1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 -1.28E+9 4.03E+7 131 8.09E+7 .l.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.98E+8 -3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-3 -5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 -2.89E+1 5.38E+1...I f ................. | |||
i-~ | |||
.....i 2 ¥ .... ............ | |||
s I4 2 ............. | |||
... ..... .U .. ....... -... .......... | |||
3_ i ¥ ..... .......... | |||
.]2 6 .............. --2.12E+6 3.69E+6 5.42E+9 AE+ 3.3 1E+6 1. 12E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.OOE-3 4.59E-4 .-2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 I 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 I 1.11E+10 3.59E+9 1.19E+9 l.94E+/-8 9.07E+9 Ts-136 i4.20E+7 l.66E+8 9.24E+7 11.27E+7 1l.89E+7 1.19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 -2.95E+9 9.81E+8 1 1.68E+8 5.70E+9 Ba-140 i 29E+8 1.62E+5 -5.49E+4 I9.25E+4 2.65E+8 -8.43E+6 Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 6.17E+4 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 8.16E+6 -1.11E+10 1.77E+6 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 Nd-147 3.34E+4 i 3.86E+4 1.47E+4 2.25E+4 2.78E+8 3.14E+3 1.85E+8 12.31E+3 I Page 110 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per pLCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others H-3 __2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 _ 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 -.35Et8 623E+7 Cr-51 -_-3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 n-54 ..-... 52E+8-- .l.35E+8 -9.27E+8 8.97E+7.... e 5 ................... | |||
..... ... ..T1 5 + .. .......... | |||
.... i -. 13 i + 8 ... ......... | |||
..... ....................... | |||
.............................. | |||
...... ...... ....1. 6 E +.................. | |||
............................................................ | |||
........................ | |||
9.9 E + 75 .3 E +Fe-55...3.25E+8 1.1+ .46E+8 9.98E+7 5.3 8E+/-7 Fe-59 I 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 1 -1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 1 l.79E+7 ---3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 -4.38E+7 --6.04E+8 L.O1E+8 Co-60 --2.49E+8 --_--_ 3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1.61E+10 1. 13E+/-9 1 ~ .81E+/-8 5.45E+/-8-.-.-6 ... ... ............. | |||
.~ i ~ b -i i S -¥ ) ........ ...... ... .... .......... | |||
...... ......... | |||
.--. ... ........ ... ........... | |||
.. ....... ..... .. 1 .E +5 4 E 8 Zn-65 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 -9.41E+/-8 -6.23E8 6.86E+/-8 Rb-86 -2.73E+8 --4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 1.51E+10 ----1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51E+11 i -2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Y -91~ ... 87 + i -......... | |||
-- -- ................. | |||
.- .... ... ...........................-t -9 .......2 1 E+ ....Y-91 7.87E+6 ----3.23E+9 2.11 lE+5 Zr-95 .1.74E+6 .5.49E+5 -..... 8.- 07E+5 l....... ----- ............. | |||
27E+9 3.78E+5 ......................... | |||
....; ............... | |||
........ ..... i ... ; ...... .... ......... | |||
i ..................... | |||
............................ | |||
............. | |||
... ............... .......... | |||
........... | |||
............ | |||
....I 4 ............ | |||
.....8 6..... E +.....4.... | |||
.......Nb-95 1 .92E+5 1.06E+5 -1.03E+5 -I4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 --2.42E+7 5- 5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-106 3.09E+8 -5.97E+8 -1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-l0m n 1.52E+7 _ 1.44E+7 I 2.74E+7 -4E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124 -1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 1- 1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 I 2.04E+5 -1.88E+8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 --4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m i 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 -1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te-129m 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 l.54E+9 -1.38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 7.70E+7 .1.08E+8 i3.14E+10 1.85E+8 -2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 -5.91E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 .1.97E+6 .3.34E6 i 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 .-2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01E-4 -3.35E-6 9.13E-5.. ... ... ......... | |||
.. ....... .... ........... | |||
.... ... ...1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.l10OE+6 1.50E+5 -1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 5 7.09E+9 I 1.67E+10 5.30E+9 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 -9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8-Cs-1-37 1 OI0E+10 1.35E+10 I 4.59E+9 1;78E+9 1-.92E+8-4.69E+9 Ba-140 1.38E+8 i 1.69E+5 -5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce- 141 12.82E+5 1.88E+5 -8.86E+4 -5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 -1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 -1.65E+4 -2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 -2.32E+4 -1.42E+8 2.36E+3I Page 111 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others FH-35 8 OOE+8 4.01E+ 3 4.01E+3 4.01E4 3 41E 13 1E+8 C-14 3.5E+6 .E+7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 Po-32 3.7+ 3.58E+8 9-_ -- .30E+7 1.30E+8'... .- ....... ............. | |||
.......... | |||
._...3y .. ......... | |||
..9 ....... .........-..... | |||
....... .... ........ ... ..... ......... ..... ........ .... .. -............. | |||
.. .......... | |||
... ... ................. | |||
.... .....? _3 _S f ..... ... .L+ 8 ....Cr-51 8.16.54E+4 1.79E+4 +/- 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 i ....... --...... ........ .......... ... .i .............. | |||
.... .1....85 + .. .5 .5 5 + 1..7 6 E +8...................................... | |||
-....................................... | |||
1 ....... ............. | |||
............. | |||
....................... | |||
....................... | |||
.... .... ..... ............... | |||
............... | |||
...... ........ ....... ............... | |||
......................... | |||
..... ..-5 .E+8 4.24E+8 2.0+8 7.86E+7 1.31E+8 Fe-59 4.01E+8 6.49E+8 --1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 -2.99E+7 ---2 2.45E+8 6.04E+7_Co .1.5- 6 ---3.77E+8 1.98E+8 R --3.78E+8 --2.1 9 1 .1E+/-1. 12E+9 Ni-63 l 3.95E+10 2.17E+- -4.5+ 1.42E+8 1.34E+9-iff :i............... | |||
.-f i : .. ......... | |||
..... ......... | |||
... ........................... | |||
.. .......................... -................ | |||
.............. | |||
...... ...... .......I.................... | |||
3 I ------------- | |||
.... .............. | |||
... I- ..- ............ | |||
S-654 8.12138 4.16E+/-679 8+/- 1.6- 3.6Ei 82.013+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 4.99 E+8 3.85E+6+7.. | |||
2.78E+8 2.1E+/-7 2.78E8 Sr-89 m 3.59E+ 10+- 1.39E+9 1.03E+8 SS-9031 1.243E8 14E84E+12O | |||
-.6+ -1.67E+10 3.18E+11......................... | |||
.............. | |||
*. ......................... | |||
.................................................... | |||
............................ | |||
......... | |||
............................. | |||
..... ............. | |||
.... ...... .......... | |||
....... .................... | |||
........... | |||
..9 ................. | |||
-................ | |||
........ ............. | |||
........... | |||
........... | |||
.... ....... .... .....I............................... | |||
.. ......................... | |||
........................ | |||
-25 4.9 0E+51 1.59E+5 -2.59E+2 L 2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 i 1.55E+7 3.89E+7 3 8.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-106 7.451E8 1.18E+9 1.16E+10 9.30E+7 AC-l-I3I 2 3.22E+7 2.17E+7 4.028E + 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 3b-14 .52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8 Sb-125 i 4.99E+8 i3.8513+6 4.62E+5 i27E8 19+9 1.05E+8 Ce-14m 3. 6 E+8 9.5E+/--------73+ | |||
9.4- 3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te-127m i1.32E+9 i35E8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m i8.54E+8 2.39E+8 2.75E+8 2.5 1E+9 1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 f-- 3.59E+6 14.44E+6 8.25E+8' 7.40E+6 i-1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1-135 i6.54E+4 i1. 18E+5 1.04E+7 "1.81E+5 i-8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs,134 i1.60E+10 i2.63E+10 | |||
-8.14E+9 i2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 i2.22E+8 -1. 18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8-Cý-s1-T-3 | |||
--.2-.-39E+-10 i2.29E+1-0 | |||
-7.46E+9 i2.68E+9 43E+8. 3.3 8E+9-Ba-140 I 2.77E+8 i2.43E+5 7.90E+4 i1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 C -141 i6.35E+5 i32 E 51.43E+5 [ -4.07E+8 ....4.84E+4 Ce- 144 !1.27E+8 !3.98E+7 2.2 1E+7 i1.04E+10' 6.78E+6 Pr- 143 i.1.48E+5 i4.46E+4 2.411E+4 -1.60E+8 7.37E+3 I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 3.18E+4 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 Page 112 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2 | |||
* mrem/yr per ltCi/sec)Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+ 10 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Ru-103 1.09E+8 Ru-106 4.21E+8 Ag-110m 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr- 143 Nd-147 8.40E+6 Page 113 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I APPENDIX A EVALUATION OF DEFAULT MPC VALUES FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 114 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10 the radioactive effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual monitor.In order to limit the need for routinely having to re-establish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established. | |||
This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution from the 1997 to 1999 release data of the liquid effluents from Hope Creek and the effective MPC value for this distribution. | |||
The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation: SCi(gamma) | |||
MPCe = i (A.1)mCi M-Pi(gamma) where: MPCe = an effective MPC value for a mixture of radionuclides (jtCi/ml)Ci = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture MPCQ = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column II MPC value for radionuclide i ([tCi/ml) | |||
Appendix F Considering the average effective MPC values from 1997 thru 1999 releases it is reasonable to select an MPC value of 4.09E-5 itCi/ml as typical of liquid radwaste discharges. | |||
This value will be reviewed and adjusted as necessary based on the distribution history of effluents from Hope Creek.Using the value of 4.09E-5 ýtCi/ml to calculate the default alarm setpoint, results in a setpoint that: (1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and;(2) Will pr o-vide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (Refer to Table 1-1).Page 115 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 Default Setpoint Determination: | |||
Conservative alarm setpoints can be determined through the use of default parameters. | |||
Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. I A. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)SP< MPG CTBD [I -CF] + bkg (1.2) U RR I Default values from Table 1-1: MPCe = 4.09E-5 g.tCi/ml CTBD = 12000 gpm RR = 176 gpm (LRW)Bkg 0 ýCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5 | |||
* 12000 | |||
* 0.2 SP <--------------------------- | |||
+ 0 176 SP < 5.58E-4 uCi/ml Correction Factor: A correction factor must be applied to the default setpoint calculation in order to account for I radiation monitor uncertainties and the contribution of non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Sr, and Fe.a. Radiation Monitor Inaccuracies: | |||
Hope Creek PSBP 311649 lists a total loop accuracy of 30% for the liquid radwaste radiation I monitors. | |||
A factor of 0.30 is applied to the default setpoint to ensure the trip setpoint is reached before the analytical limit is obtained. | |||
3 Page 116 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 b. Non-Gamma Emitting Radionuclides: | |||
Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed on a monthly and quarterly basis from composite samples of liquid radwaste releases.Nuclide MPC (ptCi/ml) | |||
Activity ([tCi/ml) | |||
Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 1.OE-1 33.3 Fe-55 8E-4 4.7E-4 0.59 Sr-89 3E-6 1.6E-6 0.53 Sr-90 3E-7 2.OE-8 0.07 Total 34.5 The values in the table above represent the historical maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides (H3 is an assumed maximum). | |||
Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting radionuclides that could be released from Hope Creek station in liquid effluent. | |||
The activity values in the table are further diluted by a minimum factor of 68 prior to release to the Delaware River. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum cooling tower blowdown flowrate of 12,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 176 gpm.A conservative correction factor for non-gamma emitting radionuclides can be obtained by using the highest Activity / MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows: Correction Factor (non-gamma) | |||
= 34.5 / 68 = 0.5 An overall correction factor can be obtained by adding the correction factor for radiation monitor inacouracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides as follows: Overall Correction factor = 0.3 + 0.5 = 0.8 B. Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817)The cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into the environment. | |||
The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.SP < MPC *0.2 SP < 4.09E-5 j, Ci/ml | |||
* 0.2 SP < 8.18E-6 uCi/ml (RE8817)Page 117 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I C. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor (RE4557)The Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor (RE4557) provides I automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the Circulating Water Dewatering Sump.The sump pumps discharge to the circulating water system to the cooling tower. Plant design and procedures maintain the setpoint at <2 times background radiation levels. Releases from the sump at gamma activity concentrations less than the monitor setpoint are considered continuous releases since inputs to the sump would occur during discharge. | |||
Releases of activity above the established continuous release setpoint may be performed on a batch basis following sampling and analysis of the sump contents. | |||
Hope Creek calculation SP-0004 established a setpoint for the monitor at 1.4E-02 [tCi/ml based on a postulated release of reactor steam into the sump. Using the MPCe determined for Liquid Radwaste and Cooling Tower Blowdown monitors, a more conservative maximum default value for batch releases can be determined: | |||
I SP < MPC* CTBD *[1-CF] + bkg (1.2)RR (Default values from Table 1-1: I MPCe = 4.09E-5 pCi/ml CTBD 12000 gpm RR = 100gpm Bkg = 0 gCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5 | |||
* 12000 | |||
* 0.2 SP< ------------------------- | |||
+ 0 100 SP < 9.82E-4 UCi/ml (batch releases only) I For continuous releases, the maximum setpoint should be less than 2.4E-6 pCi/ml above background to limit dose consequences from this pathway. (4HE-0241, CVF-98-0002) | |||
I I I Page 118 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D. Releases from the Condensate Storage Tank If the Condensate Storage Tank (CST) requires release to the Delaware River, the discharge path would be through installed piping connected to the liquid Radwaste discharge path such that both the Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor and the Cooling Tower Blowdown monitor could detect and isolate/alarm on unexpected activity. | |||
Default setpoints are determined for potential releases of the CST.a. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)SP < MPCe* CTBD* [I -CF] + bkg (1.2)RR Default values from Table 1-1: MPCe = 4.09E-5 ptCi/ml CTBD = 12000 gpm RR = 1300 gpm Bkg = 0 pLCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5 | |||
* 12000 | |||
* 0.2 SP< -------------------------- | |||
+ 0 1300 SP < 7.55E-5 uCi/ml (RE4861)b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817)The cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into the environment. | |||
The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.SP < MPCe | |||
* 0.2 SP < 4.09E-5 jtCi/ml | |||
* 0.2 SP < 8.18E-6 uCi/ml (RE8817)Page 119 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE A-1: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC -HOPE CREEK NUCLIDE MPC Cr-51 Mn-54 Mn-56 Co-58 Co-60 Na-24 Cs-137 Zn-65 Zn-69m Fe-59 As-76 Nb-95 Mo-99 Zr-95 Tc-99m Ru-105 Ag-il0m Sb-124 Cs-134 1-133 La-140 H-3 Fe-55 Sr-89 2.OOE-03 1.OOE-04 1.00E-04 9.OOE-05 3.OOE-05 3.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 1.00E-04 6.OOE-05 5.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 1.OOE-04 4.OOE-05 6.OOE-05 3.OOE-03 1.00E-04 3.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 9.OOE-06 1.OOE-06 2.OOE-05 3.OOE-03 8.OOE-04 3.OOE-06 1997 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)7.44E-03 1.74E-02 N/D 5.68E-04 7.05E-03 N/D 2.84E-06 1.29E-03 1.58E-05 2.65E-03 7.70E-05 N/D 9.56E-05 N/D 1.29E-04 N/D 4.85E-05 N/D N/D N/D N/D 1.24E+01 2.28E-01 8.56E-03 1998 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)2.37E-02 7.48E-03 N/D 7.67E-04 6.78E-03 7.02E-02 1.03E-06 1.39E-03 N/D 1.62E-04 N/D N/D N/D N/D 2.05E-04 N/D 1.36E-05 N/D N/D 3.11E-05 N/D 2.76E+O 1 6.40E-03 1.34E-05 1999 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)1.66E-02 6.87E-02 9.36E-06 3.30E-03 2.05E-02 1.0 1E-03 2.23E-04 3.37E-03 2.64E-04 1.72E-02 9.94E-05 1.69E-04 N/D 4.08E-05 3.35E-04 4.45E-05 3.88E-04 4.63E-05 7.13E-05 N/D 4.82E-06 2.95E+O 1 2.83E-02 3.29E-05 I I I I I I I I I Total Curies (Gamma)SUM (Ci/MPCi)(Gamma)SUM (Ci/MPCi)(Non-Gamma) | |||
MPCe (pCi/ml)3.68E-02 4.93E+02 7.27E+03 7.45E-05 1.11E-01 2.71E+03 9.2 1E+03 4.09E-05 1.32E-01 1.87E+03 9.88E+03 7.03E-05 I I I I I I I N/D=Not detected Page 120 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX B TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS Page 121 of 151 I I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Liquid Effluent The radioactive liquid effluents from Hope Creek from 1997 through 1999 were evaluated to I determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. | |||
This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. | |||
For the I expected radionuclide distribution of effluent from Hope Creek during 1997 to 1999, the controlling organ is the GI-LLI (Bone dose was controlling in 1997 due to relatively high percentage of Fe-55).The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Zn-65, Fe-55, and Fe-59 releases. | |||
I These radionuclides also contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table B-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., I cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. | |||
For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Fe-59 dose conversion factor (6.32E5 mrem/hr per [Ci/ml). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose fraction of all the radionuclides evaluated. | |||
For the total body calculation, the Zn-65 dose factor (2.32E5 mrem/hr per ptCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides.For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Total Body where:Bod Db = 8.35E- 04*VOL*Aio*G (B.1)where: CB Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)Ai,tb = 2.32E5, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Zn-65 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Zn-65, and TB is the total body (mremihr per ptCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides (pCi/ml)CTBD = average cooling tower blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min)8.35E-04 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and the near field dilution factor 0.05 Substituting the value for the Zn-65 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplified to: I Page 122 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 1.94E+02*VOL*C, Dib0 = CTD(B.2)CTBD Maximum Organ 8.35E-4* VOL* Ai, GI -LLI* ZG DCTBD (B.3)Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)Ai, GI-LLI = 6.32E5, GI-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Fe-59 and o is maximum organ which is the GI-LLI (mrem/hr per ýtCi/ml).Substituting the value for Ai, GI-LLI the equation simplifies to: 5.28E + 2 | |||
* VOL* Ci Dmax CTBD (B.4)Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible. | |||
Near Field Dilution Factor The near field dilution factor stems from NUIREG-0133, Section 4.3. For plants with cooling towers, such as Hope Creek, a dilution factor is allowed so that the product of the average blowdown flow (in CFS) and the dilution factor is 1000 cfs or less. UFSAR Section 2.2.12 states that the dilution by river flow ranges from 14- to 40-fold in the mixing zone of effluent discharges and that existing cross currents tend to improve this overall dilution. | |||
The average minimum cooling tower blowdown for Hope Creek is 1.90E4 GPM (from FSAR 11.2). This converts to 42 CFS. Selecting a dilution factor of 20 (between 14 and 40 from the UFSAR)yields a product of 880 CFS, which is less than the 1000 cfs allowed by NUREG-0133. | |||
This near-field dilution factor-of 20 is-inverted to a multiple of 0.05, which -is used in the liquid effluent dose calculations. | |||
Page 123 of 151 | |||
:y ''-I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 TABLE B-1: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways Hope Creek Nuclide Release TB GI-LLI Bone Liver Year Dose Dose Dose Dose Fraction Fraction Fraction Fraction (Ci)Fe-55 2.28E-01 0.77 0.63 0.96 0.86 1997 Fe-55 6.40E-03 0.12 0.12 0.58 0.22 1998 Fe-55 2.83E-02 0.1 0.04 0.43 0.15 1999 Mn-54 1.74E-02 | |||
* 0.05 0 0.01 1997 Mn-54 7.48E-03 0.02 0.14 0 0.05 1998 Mn-54 6.87E-02 0.04 0.1 0 0.07 1999 Co-58 5.68E-04 * | |||
* 0 | |||
* 1997 Co-58 7.67E-04 * | |||
* 0 | |||
* 1998 Co-58 3.30E-03 * | |||
* 0 | |||
* 1999 Fe-59 2.65E-03 0.08 0.23 0.02 0.05 1997 Fe-59 1.62E-04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.03 1998 Fe-59 1.72E-02 0.51 0.7 0.4 0.5 1999 Co-60 7.05E-03 0.01 0.03 0 | |||
* 1997 Co-60 6.78E-03 0.06 0.2 0 0.01 1998 Co-60 2.05E-02 0.03 0.04 0 | |||
* 1999 Zn-65 1.29E-03 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.07 1997 Zn-65 1.39E-03 0.75 0.4 0.4 0.68 1998 Zn-65 3.37E-03 0.32 0.07 0.16 0.27 1999 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I* = Less than 0.01 Page 124 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX C TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS Page 125 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific. | |||
These effective factors, which are based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity releases to approximate the dose in the environment. | |||
Instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analysis only a single multiplication (i.e., Keff, Meff, or Neff times the total quantity of radioactive material releases) would be needed. The approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculation technique. | |||
I Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:Z (Ki (C.1)Where: I K, ff the effective total body factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.Ki =the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.fi the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas I activity.(L + 1. ff)= Z((L + 1.1M)* f) (C.2)where: N (L + 1. 1 Meff) the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released.(Li + 1.1 M 1) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.I M ff= (M*' ) (C.3)Page 126 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 where: Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.Neff Z(NiA (CA4)where: Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released.Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Hope Creek have a short history and with continued excellent fuel performance, has hampered efforts in collecting and detecting appreciable noble gas mixes of radionuclides. | |||
So, to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the source terms from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications", Table 5 has been used as representing a typical distribution. | |||
The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table C-1.Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose calculation process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment. | |||
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Dr = 3.17E- 08 Me, Qi (C.5)0.50 Y D6 = 3.1 7 E*- 08 *Nf- -Qi W-0)0.-50 (C.6)Where: Dr = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)Page 127 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 X/Q Meff Neff Qi 3.17E-08 0.50= air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/mi 3)= 8.1E3, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per /Ci/rn 3)= 8.5E3, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per jiCi/m 3)= cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi)= conversion factor (yr/sec)= conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculation equations simplify to: Dr = 5.14E -4 * /*Qi Dfl=5.39E-4*% | |||
zQi (C.7)(C.8)I, I I U I I U I I I I The effective dose factors are to be used on a limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable. | |||
Page 128 of 151 1 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE C-1: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases Total Body and Skin Dose Radionuclide Kr83m Kr85m Kr87 Kr88 Kr89 Xe133 Xe135 Xe135m Xe137 Xe138 0.0i 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.31 0.19 Total Body Effective Keff (mrem/yr per gCi/mr 3)1.OEl 2.4E2 5.9E2 4.5E3 5.9E0 9.OE1 1.9E2 4.4E2 1.7E3 Skin Effective (L+/-+ I. Meff)(mrem/yr per UCi/m 3)2.8E1 6.6E2 7.6E2 7.9E3 1.4E1 2.0E2 2.6E2 4.3E3 2.7E3 1.7E4 Total 7.8E3 Noble Gases -Air Radionuclide Kr83m Kr85m Kr87 Kr88 Kr89 Xe133 Xe135 Xel35m Xe137 Xe138 fi 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.31 0.19 Total Body Effective Keff (mrem/yr per gCi/m 3)1.2El 2.5E2 6.1E2 4.7E3 7.OEO 9.6E1 2.0E2 4.7E2 1.8E3 Skin Effective (L+ 1.1 Meff)(mrem/3r per LCi/m 3)3.OEO 2.OE1 4.1E2 1.2E2 2.9E3 2.1El 1.2E2 4.4E1 3.9E3 9.0E2 8.4E3 Total 8.1E3* Based on noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1,"Source Term Specification". | |||
Page 129 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX D TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE PARAMETERS GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I I Page 130 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters | |||
-Gaseous Effluent The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. | |||
This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3. | |||
For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass -cow -milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this gic/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. | |||
Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. | |||
For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.67E12 m 2*mrem/yr per [tCi/sec). | |||
By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since I-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated. | |||
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used: Dmax=3.17E-8*W*Rk | |||
-131*ZQi (D.1)Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location (s) as identified in Table 2-3.X/Q = Atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway (sec/m 3)D/Q = atmospheric disposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m-2)Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates (pGCi).3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)RI-1 3 1 = 1-131 dose-parameter for-the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.= 1.05E 12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass -cow -milk pathway controlling (m 2 mrem/yr per ý.Ci/sec)The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above simplified calculational method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these Page 131 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 I pathways to the total thyroid dose. It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway. However, use of the I-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclides has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the milk pathway.The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the 3 predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.P I I I I I I U I I I Page 132 ofl15l U I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Target Organs Total Body Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI TABLE D-1: Infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose PATHWAYS Grass -Cow -Milk Ground Plane 0.02 0.15 0.23 0.14 0.09 0.15 0.59 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.01 0.14 0.02 0.15 TABLE D-2 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway Grass-Cow-Milk Ground Plane Inhalation Frac 0.92 0.08 N/A Page 133 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX E RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -SAMPLE TYPE, LOCATION AND ANALYSIS Page 134 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulates ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = SedimentSWA | |||
= Surface Water WWA = Well Water IDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)MLK = Milk PWR = Potable Water (Raw)PWT = Potable Water (Treated)The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant: S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E = 4-5 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90' (due east)with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D).The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E-1.Maps E- 1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.Page 135 of 151 | |||
.,,... -.,...... ".". , Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations i A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (iDM)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION iSi 0.55 mi. N of vent 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent 2S4 0.59 mi. NNE of vent 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 4S1 0.60 mi ENE of vent 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 6S2 0.21 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 7S1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate lOSi 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; circ water bldg.11SI 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water bldg.15SI 0.57 mi. NW of vent 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, DE 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE.2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm 3 3E1 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm 1 1E2 5.0 mi. SW of vent 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW of vent; Thomas Landing 3 13E1 4.2 mi. W of vent; Diehl House Lab 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn IF1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE of vent; Salem High School U 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ 3F2 5.1 mi. NE of vent; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ I 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton, NJ i P I i Pae136 of 151 i Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM) (Cont'd)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S of vent off Route #9, DE 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 1IFI 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, DE 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Comer 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 1 G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm 10GI 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, DE 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 16G1 15 mi. NNW of vent; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, NJ B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Page 137 of 151 | |||
:. .: -, .-K Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table E-1 (Cont'd)C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) -Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem Outfall Area I 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent 1.0 mi. West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA) I STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 3El 4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT) U STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2F3 8.0 mi NNE of vent, Salem Water Works No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are 3 not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations. | |||
However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 3 15A1 0.3 mi. NW of vent; Hope Creek outfall area 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; South Storm Drain outfall 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware river I 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building Page 138 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table E-1 (Cont'd)G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2G3 12.0 mi. NNE of vent, local farm 13E3 4.9 mi W of vent, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. | |||
However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. | |||
Contact ODCM Coordinator for sampling locations. | |||
Page 139 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Sample Collection Method Analysis Air Particulate Continuous low volume air sampler. Sample collected every week along with the filter change.Gross Beta analysis on each weekly sample. Gamma spectrometry shall be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites. | |||
Iodine 131 analysis are performed on each weekly sample.Gamma isotopic analysis of edible portion on collection. | |||
I I I I I I I I I Air Iodine Crab and Fish A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly at filter change.Two batch samples are sealed in a plastic bag or jar and frozen semi-annually or when in season.A sediment sample is taken semi-annually. | |||
2 DLR's will be collected from each location quarterly. | |||
Sediment Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually. | |||
Gamma dose quarterly. | |||
i I I I Direct Page 140 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)Collection Method Analysis Sample Milk Sample of fresh milk is collected for each farm semi-monthly when cows are in pasture, monthly at other times.Sample to be collected monthly providing winter icing conditions allow.Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis on each sample on collection. | |||
Gamma isotopic monthly H-3 on quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.Water (Potable, Surface)Page 141 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1 I I II 13 5 9-D*OWN 11155% AM Aib,.1. ....3d Page 142 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 FIGURE E-2: OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS Page 143 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 144 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.TABLE F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Cone Insoluble Cone.(VtCi/ml) (jiCi/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 1E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 1E-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-211 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-115m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd- 115 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4...-C-... 4-7. -5E=5- -3Eý5 .Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 lE-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Cf-253 1E-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 Page 145 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýiCi/ml) (ptCi/ml)Carbon (6) C- 14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce-141 9E-5 9E-5 Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1E-5 1E-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-134m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) C1-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy- 166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1E-5 1E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er- 169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 1E-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5....__ _ Eu-1-.52.(13 yrs)- 8E-5 8E-5 Eu- 154 2E-5 2E-5 Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 146 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýtCi/ml) | |||
(ýLCi/ml)Fluorine (9) F- 18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au- 196 2E-4 1 E-4 Au-198 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf- 181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho- 166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-I 13m 1E-3 1E-3 In- 1i4m 2E-5 2E-5 In- 115m 4E-4 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 IE-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir- 190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir- 192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 La-141 3E-6 3E-6 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-2 10 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu- 177 1E-4 IE-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5.Mn-54 IE-4 --1-E-4 Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1 E-4_Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 Page 147 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(IýtCi/ml) | |||
(ýtCi/ml)Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 1E-4 1E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 1E-4 1E-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 IE-4 1E-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt- 191 1E-4 1E-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 1E-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium(59) | |||
Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm- 147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5-Protactinium(91-) | |||
-Pa-230- -2E-4 2E-4.Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 1E-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IB Page 148 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope So0luble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýtci/ml) | |||
([tCi/ml)Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m 1E-2 1E-2 Rh-105 1E-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru- 103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 1E-5 1E-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-153 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 1E-4 lE-4 Ag-1 10m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-111 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 lE-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur-(t-6) | |||
-...S-35 -.1 -6E-5 43E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta-182 4E-5 4E-5 Page 149 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-1 (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ptCi/ml) | |||
([LCi/ml)Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1E-2 1E-2 Tc-96 1E-4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Tc-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1 E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm- 171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5-U-234 -3E 3E-5 U-235 3E-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Page 150 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) | |||
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E'5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-175 1E,4 1E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 [tCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Detennine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not-in amixtureý The sum-of such-ratios-for all the radionuclides in the-mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").Page 151 of 151}} |
Revision as of 19:27, 19 March 2019
ML071230602 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem, Hope Creek ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/26/2007 |
From: | Fricker C J, Perry J F Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR/ADRO |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2010-0209, LR-N07-0092 | |
Download: ML071230602 (499) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 a PSEG APR 26 2007 Nuclear LLC LR-N07-0092 United States Nuclea-r Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 Docket No. 50-354 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 And 2 Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 And DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
Subject:
2006 Radioactive Effluent Release Report In accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to the Operating License for Hope Creek Generating Station, and Section 6.9.1.8 of Appendix A to the Operating License for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. This report is RERR-28 for Hope Creek and RERR-54 for Salem Unit Nos. 1 and 2. This report summarizes liquid and gaseous releases and solid waste shipments from the Hope Creek Generating Station and the Salem Generating Station for the period of January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2006.If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact James Clancy at (856) 339-3144.Sincerely, John F. Perry arJ. Fricker Plant Manager- Hope Creek Plant Manager -Salem Attachment -' 2168 REV. 7/99 Page 2 LR-N07-0092 C Mr. S. Collins, Administrator-Region 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. R. Ennis, Project Manager Salem & Hope Creek U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 08B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector -Hope Creek (X24)USNRC Senior Resident Inspector -Salem (X24)Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering PO Box 415 Trenton, New Jersey 086 Mr. K. Kille Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC 2006 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT FOR THE SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS SGS RERR-55 DOCKET NO. 50-272 DOCKET NO. 50-311 OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-070 OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-075 HCGS RERR-29 DOCKET NO. 50-354 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-057 May 2007 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE -EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT I 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JANUARY- DECEMBER 2006 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 PART A. PRELIMINARY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 1.0 REGULATORY LIMITS 5 1.1 Fission and Activation Gas Release Limits 5 1.2 Iodines, Particulates, and Tritium 5 1.3 Liquid Effluents Release Limits 6 1.4 Total Dose Limit 6 2.0 MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS (MPC) 6 3.0 AVERAGE ENERGY 7 4.0 MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY 7 4.1 Liquid Effluents 7 4.2 Gaseous Effu Ients 8 4.3 Estimated Total Error 9 5.0 BATCH RELEASES 10 6.0 UNPLANNED RELEASES 10 7.0 ELEVATED RADIATION MONITOR RESPONSES 10 8,0 MODIFICATION 1TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS 10 PART B. GASPOUS EFFLUENTS 10 PA9T C. LIQUID. EFFLUENTS t0 2 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART D. SOLID WASTE 10 PART E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN 11 Liquid Pathways 11 Air Pathways -12 Direct Radiation 12 Total Dose 13 Assessment 15 Trends 16 PART F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA 18 PART G. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGES 18 PART H. INOPERABLE MONITORS 19 PART I. PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) CHANGES 20 PART J. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATION CHANGES 21 TABLE 1B -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -ELEVATED RELEASES 28 TABLE 1C GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES 29 TABLE 2B -LIQUID EFFLUENTS 41 TABLE 3A -SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED SHIPMENTS -SALEM 48 TABLE 3B -SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS -HC 51.TABLE 4A -
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE -GASEOUS 53 TABLE 4B -
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN BATCH MODE -LIQUID 59 APPENDIX A -METEOROLOGICAL DATA APPENDIX B -MPC DATA APPENDIX C -Salem ODCM 3 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT: JANUARY -DECEMBER 2006 INTRODUCTION This report, SGS-RERR-55/HCGS-RERR-29 summarizes information pertaining to the releases of radioactive materials in liquid, gaseous and solid form from the Salem (SGS)and Hope Creek Generating (HCGS) Stations for the period January 1, 2006 to December 31,2006.Salem Unit 1 is a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor that has a licensed core thermal power of 3459 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1169 MWe.Salem Unit 1 achieved initial criticality on December 11, 1976 and went into commercial operation on June 30, 1977.Salem Unit 2 is a Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactor that has a licensed core thermal power of 3459 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1155 MWe.Salem Unit 2 achieved initial criticality on August 2, 1980 and went into commercial operation on October 13, 1981.The Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) is a General Electric (GE) Boiling Water Reactor designed to operate at a rated core thermal power of 3339 MWt and an approximate net electrical output of 1139 MWe. The HCGS achieved initial criticality on* June 28, 1986 and went into commercial operation on December 20, 1986.This report is prepared in the format of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B, as required by Control 6.9.1.8 of the Salem Units 1 and 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)and Control 6.9.1.7 of the Hope Creek ODCM. Our responses to parts A-F of the"Supplemental Information" section of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B, are included in the following pages.As required by Regulatory Guide 1.21, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual limits are described in detail within this report along with a summary description of how total radioactivity measurements and their approximations were developed. To facilitate determination of compliance with 40CFR1 90 requirements, the following information on electrical output is provided.Salem Unit 1 generated 10228090.5 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.Salem Unit 2 generated 9147375 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.Hope Creek generated 8586329 megawatt-hours of electrical energy (net) during the reporting period.4 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART A. PRELIMINARY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
1.0 REGULATORY
LIMITS 1.1 Fission and Activation Gas Release Limits The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site (i.e.Salem Units 1 & 2, and Hope Creek) to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin.In addition, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each reactor unit (i.e. Salem Unit 1, Unit 2, or Hope Creek) to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation. 1.2 Iodines, Particulates, and Tritium The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: For iodine-1 31, iodine-133, tritium and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.In addition, the dose to a member of the public from iodine- 131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the site boundary, shall be limited to the following: During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrern to any organ and, During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.5 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 1.3 Liquid Effluents Release Limits The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 1 OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-04 microcuries per milliliter. In addition, the dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to: During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body, and less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body, and less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.1.4 Total Dose Limit The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any member of the public, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).2.0 MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS (MPC)Regulatory Guide 1.21 requires that the licensee provide the MPC's used in determining allowable release rates or concentrations for radioactive releases.a. MPC values are not used for gaseous releases. Determination of maximum release rates for noble gases, Iodine- 131, Iodine- 133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form (with half-lives > 8 days), are based on dose rate calculations as specified in the ODCM.b. According to current Technical Specifications, MPC values as stated in 1OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 are to be used for liquid effluents. Since the MPC values were removed from 1OCFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are now contained in the ODCM. These MPC values are added as Appendix B of this report.c. The MPC value used for dissolved or entrained noble gases in liquid effluents is 2E-04 microcuries per milliliter. 6 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 3.0 AV ERAGE ENERGY Regulatory Guide 1.21 requires that the licensee provide the average energy of the radion _uclide mixture in releases of fission and activation gases, if applicable. Release limits for SGS or HCGS are not based upon average energy. Therefore this section is not applic able to SGS or HCGS.4.0 MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY
4.1 Liquid
Effluents Liquid effluents are monitored in accordance with Table 4.11-1 of the Salem ODCM and Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 of the Hope Creek ODCM.During the period of record, all batch liquid wastes were routed to the sampling tanks for monitoring prior to release. The ODCM requires these tanks to be uniformly mixed for sampling and analysis before being released.Batch releases are defined as: " FoIr Hope Creek, releases from the Equipment Sample Tanks, Floor Drain Sample tanks, Detergent Drain Tanks, and the Condensate Storage Tank.* For Salem, FRAC Tank releases from the Groundwater Remediation Project, releases from the Service Water Drums which are collected and disposed via the Chemical Waste Basin, Waste Monitor Holdup Tanks and the Chemical Volume Control System (CVCS) Monitor Tanks. During the period of record, all batch liquid wastes from the Chemical Drain Tank and Laundry and Hot Shower Tanks were routed to Waste Monitor Holdup Tanks for monitoring prior to release. For process flexibility of liquid effluents, the Salem Unit 1 and 2 Liquid Radwaste System is cross-connected. Continuous releases are defined as: " For Hope Creek,. a continuous liquid effluent release path exists through the Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge.
- FoI Salem, continuous liquid release pathways include condensate releases for intermittent blow-down of the Steam Generators, and through the Chemical Waste Basin.Representative samples were obtained in accordance with Table 4.11-1 of the Salem ODCM for the Salem Generating Stations and Table 4A11.1.1.1-1 of the Hope Creek ODCM for Hope Creek Generating Station. Specific activities from 'the analyses were multiplied by the volume of effluent discharged to the environment in order to determirie the total liquid activity discharged.
The detection requirements of Table 4.11-1 (SGS) and Table 4.11,.1.1.1-1 (HCGS) of the ODCM are achieved. Ra~tionuclides measured at concentrations below the ODCM detection limit (LLD) are treated as being present. Radionuclides for which no activity was &tetected while meeting the required LLD's are treated as absent, 7 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 4.2 Gaseous Effluents Salem Units 1 and 2: Gaseous effluent streams at SGS are monitored and sampled in accordance with Table 4.11-2 of the ODCM. The Plant Vent is the final release point for planned gaseous effluent releases and is continuously monitored by installed radiation monitors. The vent is also continuously sampled for iodine and particulates with a charcoal cartridge and filter paper. The filter and charcoal are normally changed weekly, and analyzed on a multi-channel analyzer.Sampling is also performed on all gas decay tanks and the containment atmosphere prior to release to the environment. The plant vent is normally sampled weekly for noble gases, particulates, iodines and tritium.The detection requirements of Table 4.11-2 of the ODCM are achieved or exceeded.Radionuclides detected at concentrations below the ODCM LLD are treated as being present. Radionuclides for which no activity was detected while meeting the required LLDs are treated as absent.Continuous Mode gaseous releases are quantified by routine sampling and isotopic analyses of the plant vent, as required by the ODCM. Specific activities for each isotope detected are multiplied by the total vent flow volume for the entire sampling period in order to determine the normal continuous release of radioactivity through the plant vent.Batch Mode noble gas releases are quantified by sampling each decay tank or containment atmosphere prior to release. Specific activities for each isotope are multiplied by the total volume of gas discharged for that batch to determine the total activity released.Elevated plant vent radiation monitoring system readings while the channel is in an alarm state are treated as batch mode releases. If specific activity data from grab samples are not available, then the release is quantified by the use of the plant vent radiation monitors. The monitor response is converted to "specific activity" using historical efficiency factors. The "specific activity" is multiplied by the volume of effluent discharged while the channel was in an alarm state in order to determine the total activity discharged. 8 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Hope Creek: Gaseous effluent streams at HCGS are monitored and sampled in accordance with Table 4.11.2.1.2-1 of the ODCM. The North Plant Vent (NPV) and South Plant Vent (SPV)are the final release points for most planned gaseous effluent releases. The NPV and SPV are continuously monitored for iodine, particulates and noble gases. These monitors have moving particulate and fixed charcoal filters. The particulate filters and charcoal cartridges are normally replaced and analyzed weekly. These analyses are performed on a multi-channel analyzer. The NPV and SPV are also normally sampled weekly for noble gases and tritium.A small quantity of gaseous effluent is released via the Filtration, Recirculation, and Ventilation System (FRVS) vent during FRVS testing periods. The FRVS is continuously monitored for noble gases when in service, and has fixed particulate and charcoal filters. When the system is in vent mode for greater than two hours, samples are collected at the end of the release period. During periods of extended runs, samples are normally taken weekly.The detection requirements of Tables 4.11.2.1.2-1 of the ODCM are achieved or exceeded. Radionuclides detected at concentrations below the ODCM detection limit (LLD) are treated as being present. Radionuclides for-which no activity was detected while meeting the required LLDs are treated as absent.Batch Mode noble gas releases (i.e. primary containment purge) are quantified by pre-release sampling and isotopic analysis. In order to estimate the total radioactivity released, specific activities for each isotope are multiplied by the containment volume.4.3 Estimated Total Error The estimated total error of reported liquid and solid releases is within 25%.The estimated total error of the reported continuous gaseous releases is within 50%when concentrations exceed detectable levels. This error is primarily due to variability of waste stream flow rates and changes in isotopic distributions of waste streams between sampling periods. The estimated total error of the reported batch gaseous releases is within 10%.Error estimates for releases where sample activity is below the detectable concentration levels are not included since error estimates at the LLD are not defined.9 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT 5.0 BATCH RELEASES Summaries of batch releases of gaseous and liquid effluents are provided in Tables 4A and 4B.6.0 UNPLANNED RELEASES During this reporting period, the following gaseous releases occurred from Salem: Salem Unit 1 While the unit tripped on March 8, 2006, Atmospheric Releases from the # 11 thru#14 Steam Generators occurred. During this period 1.16E-01 curies of tritium were released.Salem Unit 2 Due to the manual reactor trip performed on September 26, 2006, Atmospheric Releases from the #21, #22 and #24 Steam Generators occurred. During this period 9.60E-02 curies of tritium were released.These unplanned releases resulted in less than 1 percent of the Technical Specification offsite dose release limits.7.0 ELEVATED RADIATION MONITOR RESPONSES During this reporting period no liquid or gaseous effluent releases occurred that resulted in elevated Effluent Radiation Monitor responses.
8.0 MODIFICATION
TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS There were no modifications to the previous Radioactive Effluent Release Reports.PART B. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS See Summary Tables 1A through 1C.PART C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS See Summary Tables 2A through 2B.PART D. SOLID WASTE See Summary in Table 3.10 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN The calculated individual doses in this section are based on the controlling dose pathways and age groups as described below. The estimated dose represents the maximum radiation dose that could be received by a member of the general public.The population dose impact is based on the evaluation year site-specific data (i.e., food production, milk production, feed for milk animals and seafood production). The doses were calculated using methods described in Regulatory Guide 1.109 and represent calculations for the 12-month reporting interval. Individual doses from batch and continuous releases were calculated using the annual average historic meteorological dispersion factors as described in the respective Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. Population doses were calculated using the meteorological dispersion coefficients for the twelve month reporting interval.Liquid Pathways TYPe Total Body Organ Salem Unit 1 Type Total Body Organ Dose (GILLI)Salem Unit 2 Total Body Organ Dose (GILLI)Hope Creek Type Total Body Organ Dose (Bone)Site Population (Total)Population (Average)Age Group Adult Adult Dose 4.65E-02 4.97E-02 Dose 4.16E-02 4.23E-02 Dose 5.67E-02 3.18E-02 Dose 9.38E-02 2.08E-07 Location Site Boundary Site Boundary Pathway Seafood Ingestion Seafood Ingestion mrem rmrem mrem mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem mrem mrem person-rem mrem Limit N/A N/A 11 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Air Pathways Type Total Body Skin Organ Salem Units 1 &2 Type Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)Hope Creek Tyme Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)Site.Population (Total)Population (Average)Age Group All All Infant Dose 6.82E-04 3.83E-04 8.43E-04 Dose 1.11E-03 1.24E-04 2.75E-02 Dose 1.79E-03 3.98E-09 Location Site Boundary Site Boundary 4.9 mi. W.Pathway Direct Exposure Direct Exposure Milk, Ground Plane, Inhalation mrem mrem mrem mrem mrem mrem Limit 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem Limit 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem Limit N/A N/A person-rem mrem Direct Radiation Direct radiation may be estimated by thermoluminescent dosimetric (TLD)measurements. One method for comparing TLD measurements is by comparison with pre-operational data. It should be noted that the TLDs measure direct radiation from both the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations at Artificial Island, and natural background radiation. TLD data for the twelve-month reporting period is given below: TLD iS-1 5S-1 Location 0.55 miles N of Vent 1.0 mile E of Vent Measurement 4.58 mrad/std. month 3.70 mrad/std. month These values are interpreted to represent natural backgrouhd, since the values are within the statistical variation associated with the pre-operational program results which are 3.7 mrad/standard month for TLD IS-I and 4.2 mrad/standard month for TLD 5S-1.12 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI)The ISFSI is a closed system and the only exposure is direct radiation. The spent fuel is stored in a sealed unit and no radioactive materials were released. This includes iodines, particulates and noble gases. Therefore, there is no dose from effluents from the facility.The direct radiation component from the ISFSI will be measured and assessed as the normal methodology in the ODCM using that data gathered from TLD 5S- 1. No credible effluents from the ISFSI negate the necessity of having a direct downwind pathway.TLD 5S-1 has significant historical data and provides a conservative surrogate for compliance with IOCFR72.104's requirement for a dose assessment to any "real person".Total Dose 40CFR190 limits the total dose to members of the public due to radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources (including the ISFSI facility) to:<25 mrem total body or any organ and;<75 mrem thyroid for a calendar year.For Artificial Island, the major sources of dose are from liquid and gaseous effluents from the Hope Creek and Salem plants.The following doses to a "hypothetical maximum exposed individual" have been calculated for the twelve-month reporting period. They are the sum of gaseous and liquid pathway doses for the Salem 1 and 2 and Hope Creek plants: 9.56E-02 mrem Total Body 1.24E-01 mrem Maximum Organ Dose 8.68E-02 mrem Thyroid 13 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Dose to members of the public due to activities inside the site boundary Dose to members of the public is limited to 100 mrem total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) in a year in accordance with 10CFR20.1301. The definition of members of the public changed on September 11, 2001. The various food vendors that have previously comprised the maximally exposed group are no longer allowed on site.For this reporting period, the definition of the members of the public are the members of the New Jersey National Guard to augment the security force at the site. Their typical patrol spans the site, and the following locations 16S 1; CA8 and CA1 5 (Hope Creek Barge Slip, Dredge Spoils and Baseball Field) are averaged to estimate their dose. In accordance with the requirements of ODCM 6.9.1.8 (SGS) and 6.9.1.7 (HCGS), the dose to members of the public inside the site boundary has been calculated based on the following assumptions:
- a. The National Guard works a 40-hour week, therefore all doses are multiplied by 0.25 to assess their dose.For the 12-month reporting period, January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 the calculated doses are: 1.13E+00 mrem TEDE Total Body 7.09E-03 mrem TEDE Maximum Organ Dose 7.09E-03 mrem TEDE Thyroid 14 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Assessment
- 1. Liquids: Liquid effluents released from the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations resulted in a minimal dose to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual and were well within all applicable limits (Salem Unit 1 -1.55E+00 % of Total Body Limit, Salem Unit 2 -1.39E+00 % of Total Body Limit, and Hope Creek -1.90E-01 % of Total Body Limit).When compared to releases in the previous reporting period, the Salem and Hope Creek Fission & Activation Products activity in the liquid effluents slightly increased.
Liquid effluent releases continue to remain well within Federal limits and compare favorably to other nuclear utilities.
- 2. Gaseous: Gaseous effluents released from the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations resulted in a minimal dose to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual.
The dose for the 12-month period was a small fraction of all applicable limits (Salem Unit 1 & 2 -4.72E-05 % of Total Body Limit and Hope Creek -1.13E-05 % of Total Body Limit).When compared to releases in the previous reporting period, the Salem and Hope Creek noble gas effluents activity decreased. Gaseous effluent releases for the Site continue to remain well within Federal limits and are comparable to other nuclear utilities. Fuel integrity and gaseous effluent processing equipment continue to be maintained in order to ensure that all releases of gaseous radioactivity are As-Low-As-Reasonably-Achievable (ALARA).15 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Trends The following two trend graphs show the total curies of liquid and gaseous effluents released for Salem from 2001 through 2006. Calculated doses in the graphs are to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual. Liquid Releases (SGS) Fission & Activation Products Curies Released and Calculated Doses E 2.E 1.OOE+00 1. OE-01 1.OOE-02 -1.00E-03 I 1.OOE-04 I 1,00E-05 -2001 1.OOE-02 1.00E-03 0-Total B-U--Organ A Curies 1.OOE+O0 1.OOE-01 I 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 2006 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year Gaseous Releases (SGS) Curies of Noble Gases Released and Calculated Doses E E 1.00E+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.00E+01 1.OOE+00 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 1.OOE-03 1.OOE-04.. ............ ........... ............... .............. ................ .......... ....... ..... ........ ....... ..... .. ....... .. .. ........................ ......... .... ... ... .......... T 1.OOE+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.OOE+01 1.00E+00 1.00E-01* 1.OQE-02 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year 2006
- Total Body-- Skin A Curies 16 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT The following two trend graphs show the total curies of liquid and gaseous effluents released for Hope Creek from 2001 through 2006. Calculated doses in the graphs are to the hypothetical maximum exposed individual.
Liquid Releases (HCGS) Fission & Activation Products Curies Released and Calculated Doses E E 1.00E+O0 0 1.OOE-01 1.OOE-02 I 1.00E-03 1.00E-04 1.00E-05 -2001........... I -..................... ....... .............. 1.00E+00 1.O0E-01 1.OOE-02 1.OOE-03 1.00E-04 0 (D 2002 20 1- 1.OOE-05 03 2004 2005 2006* Total Body-U- Organ-A- Curies Year Gaseous Releases Curies of Noble Gases Released and Calculated E E 1.OOE+03 .1.OOE+02 1.00E+01 1.00E+00 1.OOE-01 .1.OOE-02 /1.00E-03 1.OOE-04 .1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.OOE-07 1.OOE-08 .2001 alculated Doses 1.OOE+02 1.OOE+01 1.00E+00 1.OOE-01 1.OOE-02 1.OOE-03-1.OOE-04 1.OOE-05 1.OOE-06 1.OOE-07 1.OOE-08 2006 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year-Total Body U Skin-Curies 17 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA Cumulative joint wind frequency distributions by atmospheric stability class at the 33 feet elevation are provided for the reporting period at the end of this report in Appendix A.PART G. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL CHANGES Salem The Salem ODCM was revised during the reporting period. A copy of the Salem ODCM revision 20 is included in Appendix C.Salem ODCM Revision 20 This revision became effective May 16, 2006, accomplishing the following:
- 1. Definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 (pg. 10) is revised, From: 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENTI-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Table III of TID-1 4844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites." To: 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture ofi-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion." Justification:
ODCM Revision 20 incorporates the definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 in accordance with issuance of Licensing Amendment Nos. 271 and 252 for the Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. These Amendments revise the Technical Specifications to incorporate alternate source term methodology in accordance with 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Section. 50.67.2. Section 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Qaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations (bottom of pg. 89), replaced the wording "collected at the R46 sample locations" with "secondary samples ", and "steam" with "scondarr system ".18 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Justification: This revision is based on the Design Change Packages (DCPs) 80057520 and 80057587 for 1R46 and 2R46 Radiation Monitors respectively. The DCPs will modify these monitors from off-line sampling system monitors to adjacent-to-line monitors, resulting in removal of the R46 sampling locations. Further, this change provides a means of safely obtaining the required secondary system samples, in order to quantify release rates and cumulative releases of pre-event or post event atmospheric steam releases. This removes the unnecessary specific direction on where to obtain radionuclide samples when characterizing a release.Hope Creek The Hope Creek ODCM was revised during the reporting period. A copy of the Hope Creek ODCM revision 22 is included in Appendix D.Hope Creek ODCM Revision 22 This revision became effective September 29, 2006, accomplishing the following:
- 1. DEFINITIONS
-Section 1.0 -Reportable Event -added "or 10 CFR 72.75" to the definition. 10 CFR 72.75 establishes the reporting requirements for specific events and conditions for Independent.Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations (Pg. 11).2. CONTROLS -Section 3/4.11.4 -Action (a) -added "or 10 CFR 72.104", and subsequently added "and 10 CFR 72.104", in addition to 40 CFR 190 which requires, when estimated dose limits have been exceeded a Special Report to the NRC is required (Pg. 43).3. BASES -Section 3/4.11.4 Total Dose -Revised the section to include the dose limitations specific to the ISFSI in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104 which parallel the limits of 40 CFR 90 (Pg. 64).4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.9.1.7 -Radioactive Effluent Release Report -revised the scope of the requirement to generate the RERR annually is to show conformance with 40 CFR 90 and 10 CFR 72.104 (Pg. 71).5. PART II -Section 3.2 -Total dose to Members Of The Public -Added 10 CFR 72.104 to be included in the title of the section and added the ISFSI to the HCGS as a source of exposure (Pg. 89).6. Section 3.2.2 -Direct Exposure Dose Determination -Revised section for non-typical conditions that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 to include 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 complianme (Pg. 90).19 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT Justification: The proposed HC ODCM revision incorporates the Dry Cask Storage regulatory reporting requirements of IOCFR 72.104 and IOCFR 72.75. Design Change Package (DCP) 8008845.9 and associated 50.59 provides the required analyses and basis for the installation and implementation of the Dry Cask Storage Facility at the Hope Creek and Salem Generating Station Site. The HC ODCM is revised to include the reporting requirements of the dose to the Public as a result of the Dry Cask Storage Operations. The HC ODCM currently includes the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 20, 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 50 dose to the public due to effluents released from Hope Creek Plant Operations. This HC ODCM revision requires that the Annual Effluent Release Report also include the dose to the Public due to the Dry Cask Storage Operations.
- 7. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.1 -Revised "Station" to "Plant" and "SORC" to "PORC" (Pg. 73).Justification:
As part of the reorganization, Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) was recently changed to Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC).PART H. INOPERABLE MONITORS During this reporting period the following effluent radiation monitors were inoperable for greater than 30 days: SALEM UNIT 2 Steam Generator Blowdown (SGBD) Radiation Monitor (2R19D) was declared inoperable as repairs to the low flow condition of this monitor were unsuccessful. The monitor was tested and returned to service following completion of required maintenance. All required compensatory sampling was performed during the above inoperable conditions. PART I. PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) CHANGES During the reporting period, there were no PCP changes.20 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT PART J. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATION CHANGES There were no game (muskrat) samples available for analysis during this reporting period. The Delaware contact moved and the New Jersey contact is no longer trapping, an alternative trapper was not identified. These samples are not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications / ODCM. The muskrats were collected once a year as management audit samples because of their inhabiting the marshlands surrounding the Site. If an alternative trapper can be identified, these management samples will resume.The.obj ectives and effectiveness of the Radioactive Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) were maintained during this reporting period.21 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 6.77E-2. Average Release Rate For Period p.Ci/sec 8.71E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 3.5 1E-(ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 0.00E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 0.00E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE-(ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days Ci 0.OOE-2. Average Release Rate For Period [ICi/sec 0.OOE 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.00-(ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E-D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.20E-2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 1.55E.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 8.30E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose 22-02-03-04 8.40E-02 50%1.07E-02 5.30E-04 00G 9.64E-07 50%F00 1.10E-07 FOG 1.02E-03-00 0.00E+00 50%F00 0.00E+00 FOG 0.00E+00 FOG 0.00E+00+01 1.34E+01 50%-00 1.71E+00-04 1.02E-03 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Units 1It Quarter 2 nd Quarter Error A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 1.26E-01 1.54E-01 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period iiCi/sec 1.62E-02 1.96E-02 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 4.63E-04 5.89E-04 (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half- Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate pCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 For Period 3. Percent of Technical
% 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 3.34E+00 8.28E+00 50%2. Average Release Rate For Period pCi/sec 4.30E-01 1.05E+00 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.3 1E-04 5.72E-04 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose 23 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION.EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units Ist Quarter 2 nd Quarter A.B.C.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) lodines 1. Total Iodine-131
- 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
Ci 2.59E-04ýtCi/sec 3.34E-05% 6.76E-07 Ci 1.15E-03 4.31E-04 5.49E-05 7.25E-07 5.51E-04 50%50%ptCi/sec 1.48E-04 7.OOE-05% 2.59E-01 7.80E-02 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%ýLCi/sec 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00% 0.OOE+/-00 0.OOE+/-00 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.54E 2. Average Release Rate For Period gCi/sec 1.98E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit2 % 2.59E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Jodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose+00 0.00E+00+02 0.OOE+00 50%+01 O.OOE+00-01 0.OOE+00 24 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 6.78E 2. Average Release Rate For Period VtCi/sec 8.53E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 4.72E (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 1.69E 2. Average Release Rate For Period ýICi/sec 2.12E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 1.31E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days Ci 0.00E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ptCi/sec 0.OOE 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.OOE (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.OOE D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.62E 2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 2.04E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 1.31E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. Iodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose-02 8.29E-02-03 1.04E-02-04 5.18E-04-06 2.62E-06-07 3.29E-07-03 2.94E-03+00 1.85E-06+00 2.33E-07+00 2.94E-03+00 0.OOE+00+01 3.89E+01+00 4.89E+002.94E-03 50%50%50%50%25 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF Units 3 rd Quarter ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error 4th Quarter A.B.C.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Release Rate For Period 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) lodines 1. Total Iodine-131
- 2. Average Release Rate For Period.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half-lives > 8 days 2. Average Release Rate For Period.3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
Ci 2.66E-01 1.18E+00 50%pCi/sec 3.35E-02 1.49E-01% 9.19E-04 1.20E-03 Ci 7.10E-07 1.63E-05 50%.tCi/sec 8.94E-08 2.05E-06% 7.92E-04 3.54E-03 Ci O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 50%ýtCi/sec 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00% 0.OOE+00 0,OOE+00 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E-D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.05E-2. Average Release Rate For Period [tCi/sec 1.32E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 7.92E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. lodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ. dose+00 0.OOE+00+01 2.91E+01+00 3.66E+00-04 3.54E-03 50%
2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1A-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A.Fission and Activation Gases 1. Total Release Ci 4.61E 2. Average Release Rate For Period pCi/sec 5.80E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % 7.69E (ODCM 3.11.2.2(a)) B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 2.09E 2. Average Release Rate For Period jtCi/sec 2.63E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.71E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a)) C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates With Half-lives> 8 days Ci 0.OOE-2. Average Release Rate For Period MtCi/sec 0.00E-3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 0.00E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 4. Gross Alpha Ci 0.00E D. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 1.08E-2. Average Release Rate For Period ýtCi/sec 1.35E 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit 2 % 2.71E (ODCM 3.11.2.3(a))
- 1. For batch releases, the estimated overall error is 10%.2. lodines, Tritium, and Particulates are treated as a group.The percent TS Limit is based on most limiting nuclide and Organ dose-01 5.29E-06 50%-02 6.65E-07-04-04-05-02 3.77E-09 1.28E-05 1.61E-06 1.63E-03 50%+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 0.OOE+00+00 1.20E-03 50%50%-01-02 1.51E-04 1.63E-03 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1B SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-ELEVATED RELEASES Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations have no elevated release points.28 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE iC-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode I" Quarter 2 nd Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon-133 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine- 133 Totals Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.64E-07 1.06E-05 1.15E-05 2.55E-02 4.22E-02 6.77E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 3.51E-01 3.92E-02 4.48E-02 8.40E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.54E-01 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)4. Tritium Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.17E+01 O.OOE+00 1.26E+01 29 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter Batch Mode IS" Quarter 2 nd Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon- 135 Xenon-133 Totals 2. Iodine 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+O0 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 3.18E-02 1.61E-03 9.25E-02 1.26E-01 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 3.16E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 8.04E+00 1.77E-01 4.11E-02 0.OOE+00 1.13E-01 1.54E-01 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.38E-01 30 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 1 st Quarter 2 Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter* Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Xenon-133 Xenon-135 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine- 133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 2.59E-04 2.59E-04 1.15E-03 7.55E-02 7.67E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 5.51E-04 5.87E-03 6.42E-03 Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.87E-04 2.44E-04 4.31E-04 0.OOE+00 3.82E-06 3.82E-06 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.54E+02 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 31 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3 r Quarter 4th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Argon-41 Xenon- 13 3 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131 Iodine, 133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)Cobalt-58 Totals Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.69E-06 3,.63E-05 3.80E-05 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.62E-06 1.32E-05 1.58E-05 1.85E-06 1.85E-06 3.52E-02 3.27E-02 6.78E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 1.82E+00 3.83E-02 4.46E-02 8.29E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.58E-01 4.Tritium Ci 1.43E+01 3.84E+01 I 32 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode 3 rd Quarter 4th Quarter Batch Mode 3rd Quarter 4" Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Krypton-88 Krypton-85m Xenon-133m Xenon- 135 Argon-41 Xenon- 133 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine- 133 Iodine-131 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)4. Tritium Units Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 7.1OE-07 7.10E-07 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.68E-06 1.63E-05 1.90E-05 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.66E-03 6.29E-02 2.01E-01 2.66E-01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.34E-01 5.91E-04 9.92E-04 1.24E-02 6.44E-02 3.75E-02 1.07E+00 1.18E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.38E-01 Ci Ci Ci Ci O.OOE+O0 Ci 1.O1E+O1 O.OOE+00 2.89E+01 33 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 1C-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS -GROUND LEVEL RELEASES Continuous Mode Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission Gases Xenon- 133 Xenon- 135 Totals 2. Iodine Iodine-131! Iodine-133 Totals 3. Particulates (Half-life >8 days)4. Tritium Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 4.61E-01 4.61E-01 2.09E-04 2.32E-04 4.40E-04 5.29E-06 O.OOE+00 5.29E-06 1.28E-05 0.OOE+00 1.28E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 2.05E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 Ci 1.08E+00 O.OOE+00 1.20E-03 34 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS -SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1st Quarter 2 d Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a))
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1. 1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 2.26E-03ýtCi/ml 5.13E-12% 1.73E-04 Ci 4.72E+01ýiCi/ml 1.07E-07% 3.57E-03 Ci 0.OOE+00 PtCi/ml 0.00E+00% 0.00E+00 Ci 0.OOE+00 Liters 6.27E+07 Liters 4.41E+11 7.47E-04 25%1.72E-12 5.45E-04 2.30E+02 25%5.27E-07 1.76E-02 9.59E-05 2.20E-13 25%1.1OE-07 0.OOE+00 25%5.77E+07 25%4.36E+11 25%35 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration A. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 1.62E-04 3.03E-04 25%ýtCi/ml 3.86E-13 7.09E-13% 1.82E-04 4.75E-04 Ci 5.64E+01 2.43E+02 25%ýtCi/mr 1.35E-07 5.69E-07% 4.49E-03 1.90E-02 Ci 1.05E-05 9.32E-05 25%atCi/ml 2.50E-14 2.18E-13% 1.25E-08 1.09E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 4.92E+07 5.01E+07 25%Liters 4.19E+11 4.27E+11 25%36 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units Is' Quarter 2nd Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products ,1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a))
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 16.1 1E-05 4.44E-12% 8.50E-05 Ci 7.38E-01ýtCi/ml 5.36E-08% 1.79E-03 Ci 2.47E-05ýtCi/ml 1.79E-12% 8.96E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 Liters 4.91E+07 Liters 1.38E+10 5.33E-02 25%2.92E-09 3.34E-03 3.51E+00 25%1.92E-07 6.41E-03 9.45E-04 25%5.18E-11 2.59E-05 0.OOE+00 25%3.95E+07 25%1.82E+10 25%37 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration 3.. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a)) B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 4.30E-03 5.32E-03 25%ýLCi/ml 9.32E-12 1.22E- 11% 9.32E-04 5.49E-04 Ci 2.66E+02 1.62E+02 25%ýtCi/ml 5.77E-07 3.69E-07% 1.92E-02 1.23E-02 Ci 6.47E-05 1.16E-03 25%ýLCi/ml 1.40E- 13 2.65E-12% 7.01E-08 1.32E-06 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.73E+07 5.69E+07 25%Liters 4.61E+11 4.38E+11 25%38 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3rd Quarter 4 th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a))
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentratiofi
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 4.82E-04 1.36E-03ýtCi/ml 1.09E-12 4.01E-12% 9.79E-04 7.65E-04 Ci 2.49E+02 9.71E+01ýtCi/ml 5.66E-07 2.87E-07% 1.89E-02 9.58E-03 25%25%Ci 1.03E-04 9.08E-04 25%ýtCi/ml 2.34E-13 2.69E-12% 1.17E-07 1.34E-06 Ci 5.73E-06 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.09E+07 5.05E+07 Liters 4.40E+11 3.38E+11 25%25%3M 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2A-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Est.Total Error Units 3 Quarter 4th Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.2(a))
B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1. 1)C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases 1. Total Release 2. Average Diluted Concentration
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit (ODCM 3.11.1.1)D. Gross Alpha Total Release E. Volume of Waste Release (Prior to Dilution)F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Entire Period Ci 3.96E-02 6.43E-03 25%ýICi/ml 1.89E-09 4.26E-10% 6.15E-04 2.09E-04 Ci 1.93E+00 3.01E+00 25%pCi/ml 9.21E-08 1.99E-07% 3.07E-03 6.64E-03 Ci , 3.66E-05 5.28E-06 25%[tCi/ml 1.75E-12 3.50E-13% 8.76E-07 1.75E-07 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 25%Liters 5.07E+07 5.06E+07 25%Liters 2.09E+10 1.51E+10 25%40 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Nuclides Released Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 d Quarter 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium- 137 Antimony-125 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.07E-04 4.89E-04 8.77E-05 7.39E-04 6.39E-04 2.26E-03 1.61E-04 3.12E-04 2.09E-05 2.54E-04 0.OOE+00 7.47E-04 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci 1.09E+00 1.08+00 4.61E+01 2.29E+02 0.OOE+00 9.59E-05 O.OOE+00 9.59E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 41 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released Continuous Mode Units 1 St Quarter 2nd Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium- 137 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+/-00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE-I00 0.OOE+/-00 O.OOE+OO 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci 9.98E-01 9.01E-01 8.78E-05 5.99E-05 3.39E-06 1.04E-05 1.61E-04 5.54E+01 1.05E-05 1.05E-05 1.38E-04 1.33E-04 0.OOE+00 3.2 1E-05 3.03E-04 2.42E+02 9.31E-05 9.31E-05 Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.0OE+00 O.OOE+00 42 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released Fission and Activation Products Cerium-141 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Chromium-51 Cesium-137 Iron-55 Iodine-131 Lanthinum-140 Manganese-54 Strontium-89 Zinc-65 Totals 2. Tritium 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Xenon-133m Xenon- 135 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Continuous Mode Units 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Batch Mode 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0'.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.49E-06 0.OOE+00 1.88E-07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.26E-07 5.91E-05 0.OOE+00 6.11E-05 4.65E-07 2.28E-04 4.56E-04 2.98E-04 2.80E-05 5.18E-02 9.31E-06 1.73E-07 2.20E-04 1.44E-04 6.42E-05 5.32E-02 Ci 5.77E-01 8.37E-02 1.61E-01 3.42E+00 Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 5.84E-06 0.OOE+00 1.89E-05 2.47E-05 6.22E-04 1.55E-05 3.08E-04 9.45E-04 Ci O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 43 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-4 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 3 Quarter 4t" Quarter Batch Mode 3 d Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released Fission and Activation Products Cerium- 143 Cobalt-57 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Antimony-125 Tellurium-132 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+/-OO 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.62E-06 7.22E-06 4.15E-04 1.79E-03 1.23E-04 1.01E-03 9.48E-04 0.OOE+00 4.30E-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.25E-03 9.63E-04 4.56E-05 5.74E-04 4.84E-04 7.17E-06 5.32E-03 2. Tritium Ci 1.04E+00 6.91E-01 2.65E+02 1.61E+02 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 6.47E-05 6.47E-05 O.OOE+00 1.16E-03 1.16E-03 O.OOE+00 Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 44 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-5 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Nuclides Released 1. Fission and Activation Products Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Iodine-133 Antimony-125 Totals Continuous Mode Units 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Batch Mode 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+-00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 6.93E-05 2.90E-04 4.68E-06 9.79E-05 6.52E-06 1.39E-05 4.82E-04 1.06E-03 1.72E-04 5.55E-06 1.15E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.35E-03 2. Tritium Ci 4.23E-01 6.64E-01 2.49E+02 9.64E+01 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon- 133 Xenon- 13 5-Totals Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 9.90E-05 4.04E-06 1.03E-04 5.73E-06 9.02E-04 5.80E-06 9.08E-04 O.OOE+00 4. Gross Alpha Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 45 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 2B-6 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Continuous Mode Units 3 Quarter 4th Quarter Batch Mode 3 yd Quarter 4 th Quarter Nuclides Released 1. Fission and Activation Products Silver-I 1O1n Cerium-141 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Cesium-137 Iron-55 Iron- 58 Manganese-54 Niobium-97 Strontium-89 Zinc-65 Totals Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.89E-05 1.29E-07 3.95E-02 0.OOE+00 1.20E-06 0.OOE+00 9.16E-05 0.OOE+00 3.96E-02 9.90E-06 6.33E-06 1.73E-04 2.72E-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 9.93E-05 3.27E-03 7.36E-06 0.OOE+00 1.41E-04 6.43E-03 2.30E+00 2. Tritium Ci 8.06E-01 7.10E-01 I 1.12E+00 3. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Xenon-133 Xenon- 135 Totals 4. Gross Alpha Ci Ci Ci.0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.99E-05 1.67E-05 3.66E-05 0.OOE+00 5.28E-06 5.28E-06 Ci O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 46 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS IA. Type of Waste (Class A)Units 1 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Resins, Filters, m 3 1.47E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 1.76E+01 b. Dry Active Waste mi 1.41E+02 25%Ci 1.55E+00 c. Irradiated Components mI 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others -Dewatered Soil /Sediment M. 2.06E+01 25%Flux Thimble Cleaner Ci 2.07E-01 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition
(>1%) (Class Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottoms Nuclides % I Ci A) -SGS Dry Active Waste 0/Ci Tritium Carbon-14 Iron-55 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Antimony-125 Cesium-134 Cesuim-137 Cerium- 144 4.52 3.90 6.56 1.25 13.33 20.99 2.15 11.53 33.63 1.38 7.97E-01 6.87E-01 1.16E+00 2.20E-01 2.35E+00 3.70E+00 3.79E-01 2.03E+00 5.93E+00 2.43E-01 7.66 0.00 32.15 8.37 5.80 22.18 0.00 0.00 5.34 17.03 1.18E-01 0.OOE+00 4.97E-01 1.29E-01 8.97E-02 3.43E-01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.26E-02 2.63E-01 Irradiated Components Others -Dewatered Soil / Sediment% Ci Nuclides Tritium Iron-55 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesuim-137 0%Ci 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 4.33 43.18 4.63 38.22 9.54 8.94E-03 8.92E-02 9.56E-03 7.89E-02 1.97E-02 47 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination 3 1 2 5 Truck Truck Truck Truck Barnwell, SC Richland, WA Memphis, TN Memphis, TN Type of Containers HIC SeaVan and Box Box Sea Van 48 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-1 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS lB. Type of Waste (Class B)Units'6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Resins, Filters, m 1.14E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 3.54E+02 b. Dry Active Waste m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3.0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2B. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (>1%) (Class B) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottoms Nuclides Iron- 55 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesium- 134 Cesuim- 137 Ci 11.21 8.39 45.45 8.26 24.83 3.97E+01 2.97E+01 1.61E+02 2.93E+01 8.79E+01 3B. Solid Waste Disposal (Class B or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Des tination Type of Containers HIC 4 Truck Barnwell, SC 49 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS 1A. Type of Waste (Class A)Units'6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, Sludge, m 3 1.42E-04 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 5.21E-03 b. Dry Active Waste m 2.04E+02 25%Ci 4.87E-01 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others -Dewatered Soil/Sediment m 3 7.65E+00 25%Ci 4.81E-05 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (>1%) (Class Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom Nuclides % I Ci A) -SGS Irradiated Components %I Ci Manganese-54 Iron-55 Cobalt-60 3.05 1.59E-04 0.00 0.OOE+00 89.25 4.65E-03 0.00 0.OOE+00 6.00 3.13E-04 0.00 0.OOE+00 Dry Active Waste Others -Dewatered Soil / Sediment% Ci % I Ci Nuclides Tritium Potassium-40 Iron-55 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Cesium-134 Cesuim-137 2.69 0.00 47.29 15.93 3.55 20.57 2.59 5.36 1.31E-02 0.OOE+00 2.30E-01 7.76E-02 1.73E-02 1.00E-01 1.26E-02 2.61E-02 0.00 66.94 19.77 0.00 14.49 8.71 0.00 1.46 0.-00E+00 3.22E-05 9.5 1E-06 0.OOE+00 7.19E-07 4.19E-06 0.OOE+00 7.01E-07 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A or less) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Des 4 Truck Mem 50 tination phis, TN Type of Containers Sea Van 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3A-2 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNITS 1 AND 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)SGS 6-Month Est. Total lB. Type of Waste (Class B) Units' Period Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, m 3 2.66E+00 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 8.46E+01 b. Dry Active Waste m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.00E+00 d. Others mi 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2B. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (>1%) (Class B) -SGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom Nuclides % Ci Iron-55 4.49 3.80E+00 Cobalt-60 5.14 4.35E+00 Nickel-63 31.11 2.63E+01 Cesium-134 17.23 1.46E+01 Cesium-137 40.99 3.47E+01 3B. Solid Waste Disposal (Class B) -SGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination Type of Containers 1 Truck Barnwell, SC HIC 51 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3B-1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)HCGS 1A. Type of Waste (Class A)Units 1 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, Sludge, m 3 3.49E+01 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 4.15E+01 b. Dry Active Waste m n 4.54E+02 25%Ci 1.58E+00 c. Irradiated Components m1 0.00E+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (>1%) (Class A) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom% Ci Dry Active Waste Nuclides Chromium-51 Manganese-54 Iron-55 Iron-59 Cobalt-58 Cobalt-60 Zinc-65 Ci 0/0.00 1.96 84.87 0.00 0.00 11.58 0.00 0.OOE+00 8.14E-01 3.52E+01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.80E+00 0.OOE+00 15.09 10.82 32.08 7.64 13.70 16.90 2.16 2.38E-01 1.71E-01 5.06E-01 1.21E-01 2.16E-01 2.67E-01 3.4 1E-02 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A) -HCGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination 4 Truck Bamwell, SC Type of Containers HIC Steel Cask HIC and Sea Van 1 Truck Truck Bamwell, SC Memphis, TN 10 52 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 3B-2 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS SOLID RADWASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not Irradiated Fuel)HCGS IA. Type of Waste (Class A)Units, 6-Month Period Est. Total Error a. Spent Resins, Filters, m 3 4.81E+00 25%Evaporator Bottoms Ci 7.40E-01 b. Dry Compressible Waste m 3 1.59E+02 25%Ci 6.89E-01 c. Irradiated Components m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 d. Others m 3 0.OOE+00 25%Ci 0.OOE+00 1 Volumes are measured, activities are estimated 2A. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (>1%) (Class A) -HCGS Resins, Filters, Evaporator Bottom% I Ci Dry Active Waste Nuclides Tritium Carbon- 14 Chromium-51 Manganese-54 Iron-55 Iron-59 Cobalt-60 Nickel-63 Zinc-65 Antimony-125 Cesium- 134 Cesium-137 Ci I 4 I.2.70 6.09 0.00 1.39 9.43 0.00 19.97 32.73 0.00 1.65 4.76 20.29 2.OOE-02 4.50E-02 0.OOE+00 1.03E-02 6.98E-02 0.OOE+00 1.48E-01 2.42E-01 0.OOE+00 1.22E-02 3.52E-02 1.50E-01 0.00 0.00 14.74 1.69 64.09 10.06 4.65 1.14 2.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.02E-01 1.16E-02 4.41E-01 6.93E-02 3.21E-02 7.85E-03 1.94E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3A. Solid Waste Disposal (Class A) -HCGS Number of Mode of Shipments Transportation Destination Type of Containers Sea Van and Box 4 Truck Memphis, TN 53 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006 -Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: March 31, 2006 Gaseous 182 1.53E+04 1.8 1E+02 8.40E+01 4.1OE+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006 -June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 148 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.1 OE+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.37E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.41E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 54 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-1 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 174 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.33E+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.88E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.63E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 4.60E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 193 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.54E+04 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.16E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7.95E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.50E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 55, 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006-.Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: March 31, 2006 Gaseous 104 7.03E+03 1.06E+02 6.76E+01 2.50E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006 -June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 106 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.15E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.90E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.74E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 56 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-2 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 106 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 6.82E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 1.40E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.44E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.50E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: October 1, 2006 -Decemb Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above:* Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 'er 31, 2006 Gaseous 71 6.08E+03 7.80E+02 8.57E+01 3.50E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.57 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 0 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 0.00E+00 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 0.00E+00 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006- June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 2 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 8.28E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 6.20E+03 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 4.14E+03 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.08E+03 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 58 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4A-3 (Continued) HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006- Se 2. Type of release: 3. Number of releases during quarter: 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: ptember 30, 2006 Gaseous 2 1.21E+02 7.30E+01 6.05E+01 4.80E+01 N/A Min.Min.Min.Min.BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Gaseous 3. Number of releases during quarter: 0 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 0.OOE+00 Min 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: N/A 59 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-1 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 8 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 1.90E+03 Min 5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.19E+02 Min 6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.37E+02 Min 7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1,00E+00 Min 8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.98E+05 GPM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: April 1, 2006 Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release:-June 30, 2006 Liquid 9 2.08E+03 3.60E+02 2.3 1E+02 1.00E+00 8.88E+05 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM 60 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-1 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 EFFLUENTS ANT) WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 20 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 4.03E+/-03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.3 6E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.0 1E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 8.03E-01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 9.4 1 E+05 GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006 -December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 22 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 4.30OE+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.90E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 1 .96E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.50E-01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.93E+05 GPM 61 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-2 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: January 1, 2006 -March 31,2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 4 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.03E+02 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 2.66E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 1.76E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.70E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.54E+05 GPM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: April 1, 2006 Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above: Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release:-June 30, 2006 Liquid 8 1.73E+03 2.92E+02 2.17E+02 1.69E+02 8.70E+05 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM 62 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-2 (Continued) SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 2 EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: July 1, 2006 -September 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 12 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 3.55E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 3.99E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 2.96E+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.20E+02 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 8.98E+05 GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006- December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 10 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 2.OOE+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 4.57E+02 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: *2.OOE+02 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 1.00E+00 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 6.88E+05 GPM 63 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B-3 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY -JUNE 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: January 1, 2006- 1V Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above:* Maximum duration for release of type listed above:* Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above:* Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: larch 31, 2006 Liquid 4 2.03E+02 8.20E+01 5.08E+01 2.80E+01 2.8 1E+04 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: April 1, 2006- June 30, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 45 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 2.79E+03 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 8.71E+01 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.19E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 2.98E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 3.72E+04 GPM 64 2006 SGS AND HCGS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE REPORT TABLE 4B3-3 (Continued) HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION EFFLUENTS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY -DECEMBER 2006
SUMMARY
SHEET FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASED IN A BATCH MODE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BATCH RELEASES ONLY Dates: July 1, 2006- Septe Type of release: Number of releases during quarter: Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: Maximum duration for release of type listed above: Average duration for release of type listed above:* Minimum duration for release of type listed above: Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: mber 30, 2006 Liquid 17 1.07E+03 8.12E+01 6.27E+01 3.20E+01 4.26E+04 Min.Min.Min.Min.GPM BATCH RELEASES ONLY 1. Dates: October 1, 2006-December 31, 2006 2. Type of release: Liquid 3. Number of releases during quarter: 11 4. Total time duration for all releases of type listed above: 7.43E+02 Min.5. Maximum duration for release of type listed above: 8.30E+01 Min.6. Average duration for release of type listed above: 6.76E+01 Min.7. Minimum duration for release of type listed above: 3.27E+01 Min.8. Average stream flow (dilution flow) during period of release: 3.08E+04 GPM 65 APPENDIX A METEOROLOGICAL DATA 1.300-33-ft Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 1/06 -3/06 m = m m = = m = = m = m m = m = m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.2 3 0.1 0 0.0 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.8 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 10 0.5 0.3 0 0.0 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 16.3 0 m m m mm -I m Imm mIII .Im -m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m = = m =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 8 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 8 21 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 7 0.3 18 0.8 13 0.6 0 0.0 41 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 5 2 2 0 1 5 1 2 5 0 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 16 11 11 5 6 3 4 7 8 7 23 22 11 18 10 9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 1. 1 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 18 14 7 2 0 1 7 5 7 4 8 26 37 32 79 34 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.7 1.5 3.7 1.6 1 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 9 28 27 52 16 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.3 2.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 17 18 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 35 32 19 12 8 6 12 14 20 13 33 60 87 95 169 64 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.6 1.5 2.8 4.1 4.4 7.9 3.0 0 0.0 30 1.4 171 8.0 281 13.1 144 6.7 45 2.1 8 0.4 679 31.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.6 MISSING: 0 m m m m = m m m m -m -m m m m m m m m m m mmm m m =-- mm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: f300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 6 0.3 29 1.4 23 1.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 26 1.2 15 0.7 1 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 12 0.6 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 16 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 16 0.7 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 24 1.1 37 1.7 2 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 26 1.2 19 0.9 2 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 25 1.2 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 17 0.8 11 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.2 27 1.3 21 1.0 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 16 0.7 39 1.8 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 12 0.6 34 1.6 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 29 1.4 28 1.3 12 0.6 0 0.0 4 0.2 49 2.3 114 5.3 42 2.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 33 1.5 44 2.1 22 1.0 0 0.0 71 3.3 366 17.1 409 19.1 100 4.7 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 58 2.7 44 2.1 27 1.3 17 0.8 29 1.4 23 1.1 68 3.2 49 2.3 40 1.9 41 1.9 65 3.0 64 3.0 54 2.5 71 3.3 220 10.3 109 5.1 979 45.8 33 1.5 0 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 MISSING: 6 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 0 1 0.0 7 0.3 0 2 0.1 6 0.3 0 8 0.4 6 0.3 0 5 0.2 3 0.1 4 3 0.1 17 0.8 4 6 0.3 19 0.9 38 4 0.2 13 0.6 12 3 0.1 7 0.3 7 4 0.2 8 0.4 8 1 0.0 5 0.2 6 1 0.0 7 0.3 0 0 0.0 3 0.1 2 2 0.1 4 0.2 3 0 0.0 5 0.2 0 0 0.0 7 0.3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.8 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 13 0.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 6 0.3 8 0.4 8 0.4 14 0.7 12 0.6 25 1.2 80 3.7 29 1.4 20 0.9 30 1.4 13 0.6 8 0.4 5 0.2 10 0.5 5 0.2 10 0.5 283 13.2 0 0.0 41 1.9 122 5.7 87 4.1 27 1.3 5 0.2 1 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 MISSING: 15 m m m m m m m m m -m m m m m -m -m m-- -- m m-- -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 5 7 28 5 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 6 9 84 20 4 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 3.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 49 2.3 41 1.9 23 1.1 6 0.3 2 0.1 128 6.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 4 11 21 17 10 13 8 12 8 7 5 7 4 7 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 50 44 29 20 30 43 76 52 42 32 55 47 26 52 64 49 2.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 3.6 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.6 2.2 1.2 2.4 3.0 2.3 41 29 13 2 8 8 108 49 27 23 35 65 74 67 198 82 1.9 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 5.0 2.3 1.3 1.1 1.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 9.3 3.8 1 7 1 0 0 2 36 4 4 13 7 15 39 48 ill 39 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.2 5.2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 7 3 8 27 39 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99 84 54 43 55 63 245 113 85 86 ill 135 154 199 426 187 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.9 11.5 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.2 6.3 7.2 9.3 19.9 8.7 0 0.0 149 7.0 711 33.2 829 38.8 327 15.3 112 5.2 11 0.5 2139 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 21 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.4 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m m m m M- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 4 11 21 17 10 13 8 12 8 7 5 7 4 7 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 50 44 29 20 30 43 76 52 42 32 55 47 26 52 64 49 2.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 3.6 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.6 2.2 1.2 2.4 3.0 2.3 41 29 13 2 8 8 108 49 27 23 35 65 74 67 198 82 1.9 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 5.0 2.3 1.3 1.1 1.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 9.3 3.8 1 7 1 0 0 2 36 4 4 13 7 15 39 48 i11 39 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.2 5.2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 7 3 8 27 39 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4 1.3 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99 84 54 43 55 63 245 113 85 86 ill 135 154 199 426 187 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.9 11.5 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.2 6.3 7.2 9.3 19.9 8.7 0.0 149 7.0 711 33.2 829 38.8 327 15.3 112 5.2 11 0.5 2139 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 21 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.4 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 1 0.0 3 0.1 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 21.1 0 m m m m m m m -m m m --m -m m m m --m --m m --=- m mmm -m =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 10 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 6 0.3 8 0.4 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 21.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 9 19 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 11 0.5 11 0.5 12 0.6 39 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 20.0 2 m m m m m -m m n m m m -m m m m mm m m m mm -m m m-m- m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/lOOM CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 3 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6-7 6 3 2 4 3 5 5 11 18 6 9 8 5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 19 9 5 2 0 1 0 6 6 4 13 27 17 21 24 16 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.6 1.3 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.8 7 9 5 2 0 1 9 1 2 2 4 13 26 32 67 22 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 1.6 3.3 1. 1 0 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 12 18 35 11 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.7 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 20 22 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 1 .1 0.2 33 32 20 11 3 5 14 10 14 15 31 67 67 100 157 59 1.6 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.5 3.3 3.3 5.0 7.8 2.9 0 0.0 14 0.7 105 5.2 170 8.5 202 10.1 94 4.7 53 2.6 638 31.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.0 MISSING: 41 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 10 10 7 5 7 9 4 8 17 5 7 14 5 5 5 7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 19 9 9 13 4 9 9 19 22 13 25 24 11 37 42 24 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.9 1. 1 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.8 2.1 1.2 19 14 8 1 0 5 23 13 9 9 15 22 25 27 108 46 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.3 5.4 2.3 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 9 7 5 9 31 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.5 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 3 1 1 9 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 49 36 26 21 13 24 41 40 52 35 64 72 49 82 195 105 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.6 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.6 1.7 3.2 3.6 2.4 4.1 9.7 5.2 0.0 24 1.2 125 6.2 289 14.4 344 17.1 90 4.5 32 1.6 904 45.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13.1 81= m m -m m = = = = m = = = = = = = m = m m m = = m = = m m m m m m m m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 6 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 2 3 2 1 8 5 7 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 5 2 4 15 7 13 9 9 2 8 4 2 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 2 3 0 0 1 1 19 16 7 7 9 1 1 0 6 9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 7 5 8 5 13 65 36 29 33 24 7 11 4 10 16 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 3.2 1.8 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.8 0 0.0 18 0.9 40 2.0 88 4.4 82 4.1 32 1.6 18 0.9 278 13.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.0 MISSING: 20 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 3 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 11 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 1 2 28 41 27 13 1 2 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.4 2.0 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 22 1.1 26 1.3 25 1.2 32 1.6 12 0.6 119 5.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.2 MISSING: 9 m m m m m = m m m = -m m -m m m m m = m mm M m m = m m m = m n = = = m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 2 7 1 6 6 6 3 2 7 3 2 4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 16 20 16 16 13 12 21 19 35 18 20 36 12 14 14 12 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 39 19 17 20 6 15 26 41 52 28 47 54 37 63 69 43 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 2.6 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 3.1 3.4 2.1 28 26 13 3 1 7 54 45 22 20 28 37 56 68 188 79 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.4 9.4 3.9 0 8 2 0 0 3 28 16 8 12 13 14 19 30 79 34 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 3.9 1.7 3 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 12 9 6 5 31 40 12 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.5 2.0 0.6 87 75 51 42 22 44 150 127 123 96 120 149 136 209 392 184 4.3 3.7 2.5 2.1 1.1 2.2 7.5 6.3 6.1 4.8 6.0 7.4 6.8 10.4 19.5 9.2 0 0.0 58 2.9 294 14.6 576 28.7 675 33.6 266 13.3 138 6.9 2007 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 153 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 2 7 1 6 6 6 3 2 7 3 2 4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0. 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 16 20 16 16 13 12 21 19 35 18 20 36 12 14 14 12 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 39 19 17 20 6 15 26 41 52 28 47 54 37 63 69 43 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 2.6 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 3.1 3.4 2.1 28 26 13 3 1 7 54 45 22 20 28 37 56 68 188 79 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.4 9.4 3.9 0 8 2 0 0 3 28 16 8 12 13 14 19 30 79 34 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 3.9 1.7 3 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 12 9 6 5 31 40 12 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.5 2.0 0.6 87 75 51 42 22 44 150 127 123 96 120 149 136 209 392 184 4.3 3.7 2.5 2.1 1.1 2.2 7.5 6.3 6.1 4.8 6.0 7.4 6.8 10.4 19.5 9.2 0 0.0 58 2.9 294 14.6 576 28.7 675 33.6 266 13.3 138 6.9 2007 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 153 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.7-m -m -m -m -m -m m -mm mm mm -m nm mmmmmmmmmmmmm mm mm mmm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 4 0.2 8 0.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 23.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 10 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 0.3 9 0.4 21 1.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 23.5 0 m m m m m m -m m --= m m = m = = = MMMM MMMM Mmi=MMMMM MM ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 12 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 9 21 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 10 0.5 8 0.4 19 0.9 41 1.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 23.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/!00M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 7 3 5 9 3 4 1 4 3 9 17 10 8 5 4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 16 13 2 1 2 0 0 3 6 7 9 22 15 19 15 15 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 9 4 2 1 1 0 5 4 5 2 6 15 22 27 60 15 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 2.8 0.7 3 8 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 6 28 14 43 20 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.7 2.0 0.9 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 15 30 42 17 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 1.4 2.0 0.8 34 37 13 9 13 3 13 9 15 15 28 64 91 98 166 71 1.6 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.3 3.0 4.2 4.6 7.7 3.3 0 0.0 10 0.5 97 4.5 145 6.7 178 8.3 136 6.3 113 5.3 679 31.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 16.4 0 m m m m m m m -= -m m m m = = m m m mmm mmmimmmm = m =M ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 4 0.2 14 0.7 31 1.4 6 0.3 12 0.6 12 0.6 2 0.1 9 0.4 11 0.5 6 0.3 5 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 11 0.5 9 0.4 5 0.2 6 0.3 5 0.2 4 0.2 9 0.4 12 0.6 3 0.1 14 0.7 12 0.6 6 0.3 14 0.7 25 1.2 7 0.3 15 0.7 17 0.8 4 0.2 15 0.7 32 1.5 6 0.3 17 0.8 39 1.8 3 0.1 9 0.4 24 1.1 6 0.3 15 0.7 31 1.4 4 0.2 16 0.7 86 4.0 3 0.1 12 0.6 44 2.0 73 3.4 193 9.0 392 18.2 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT 12 0.6 4 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 8 0.4 4 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 16 0.7 11 0.5 17 0.8 18 0.8 75 3.5 33 1.5 212 9.9 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 9 0.4 6 0.3 4 0.2 7 0.3 33 1.5 23 1.1 99 4.6 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 62 2.9 35 1.6 26 1.2 16 0.7 24 1.1 22 1.0 37 1.7 37 1.7 47 2.2 53 2.5 76 3.5 81 3.8 58 2.7 77 3.6 215 10.0 115 5.3 981 45.6 0 0.0 12 0.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.2 MISSING: 4 ---x ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 2 1 0 4 8 1 5 4 0 1 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 5 1 3 8 9 10 7 6 2 5 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 2 3 1 0 2 12 13 13 7 8 4 6 5 4 8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0 0 1 0 1 4 5 6 8 10 10 0 0 1 3 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 4 1 0 0 1 14 5 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 6 8 8 10 3 12 44 41 34 43 32 7 12 7 8 18 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 2.0 1.9 1.6 2.0 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.8 0 0.0 13 0.6 29 1.3 58 2.7 94 4.4 55 2.6 44 2.0 293 13.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.1 MISSING: 5 m mmm m m m m m m m --m m m m m = m m m m m m m -m m m m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 5 3 5 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 17 12 1 2 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 42 42 22 8 3 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 26 1.2 38 1.8 33 1.5 25 1.2 128 6.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 19.1 MISSING: 0 ]ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 5 1 2 2 4 2 1 3 4 2 0 3 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 9 13 6 13 15 8 14 12 12 17 19 23 14 15 9 8 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 30 26 11 12 15 9 18 35 35 32 35 42 30 34 32 28 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.3 46 18 16 4 11 7 29 33 60 38 47 60 58 72 154 68 2.1 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.3 1.3 1.5 2.8 1.8 2.2 2.8 2.7 3.3 7.2 3.2 15 12 9 2 1 9 17 23 27 19 27 17 46 36 131 60 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.8 1. 1 1.3 0.9 1.3 0.8 2.1 1.7 6.1 2.8 1 9 2 0 0 2 21 22 3 26 13 10 22 47 92 43 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.3 2.0 102 80 47 36 43 37 101 129 139 133 144 156 172 204 421 207 4.7 3.7 2.2 1.7 2.0 1.7 4.7 6.0 6.5 6.2 6.7 7.3 8.0 9.5 19.6 9.6 0 0.0 35 1.6 207 9.6 424 19.7 721 33.5 451 21.0 313 14.6 2151 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 mmmmm m -m mm m m m m - -~ --m m m m m -------N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 01/06-03/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0. 6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 1 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 5 0.2 1 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 9 0.4 30 1.4 46 2.1 15 0.7 1 0.0 13 0.6 26 1.2 18 0.8 12 0.6 9 0.4 6 0.3 11 0.5 16 0.7 9 0.4 2 0.1 13 0.6 12 0.6 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 15 0.7 15 0.7 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 9 0.4 7 0.3 9 0.4 2 0.1 14 0.7 18 0.8 29 1.3 17 0.8 21 1.0 12 0.6 35 1.6 33 1.5 23 1.1 22 1.0 12 0.6 35 1.6 60 2.8 27 1.3 3 0.1 17 0.8 32 1.5 38 1.8 19 0.9 26 1.2 19 0.9 35 1.6 47 2.2 27 1.3 13 0.6 23 1.1 42 2.0 60 2.8 17 0.8 10 0.5 14 0.7 30 1.4 58 2.7 46 2.1 22 1.0 15 0.7 34 1.6 72 3.3 36 1.7 47 2.2 9 0.4 32 1.5 154 7.2 131 6.1 92 4.3 8 0.4 28 1.3 68 3.2 60 2.8 43 2.0 207 9.6 424 19.7 721 33.5 451 21.0 313 14.6 SUM PERCENT 102 4.7 80 3.7 47 2.2 36 1.7 43 2.0 37 1.7 101 4.7 129 6.0 139 6.5 133 6.2 144 6.7 156 7.3 172 8.0 204 9.5 421 19.6 207 9.6 2151 100.0 0 0.0 35 1.6 MISSING HOURS: 9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 2.300-33-ft Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 4/06 -6/06 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m =m- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 2 0 1 8 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 0 4 2 3 11 8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0 0.0 1 0.0 18 0.8 25 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 2 2 1 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 2 11 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 4 1 2 0 7 9 4 15 8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.5 21 1.0 24 1.1 4 0.2 0 0.0 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.0 MISSING: 0 m- m m m m m m m m =- -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3 .6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 3 0.1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 4 0.2 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 1 0.0 0.0 3 0.1 9 0.4 7 0.3 0.0 4 0.2 12 0.6 1 0.0 n_0 23 1.1 42 1.9 25 1.1 18.6-24 .5 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 4 0.2 1 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 5 0.2 1 0.0 2 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 13 0.6 10 0.5 20 0.9 17 0.8 94 4.3 0.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 MISSING: 0 N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 8 11 21 10 15 2 4 33 20 34 33 40 19 12 20 17 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2 1.5 0.9 1.6 1.5 1.8 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.8 20 20 22 16 11 7 20 19 19 12 23 13 37 41 35 32 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.S 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.5 3 5 9 1 0 6 35 17 6 1 2 5 8 12 20 7 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31 36 52 28 27 16 84 73 46 48 58 58 66 67 78 56 1.4 1.7 2.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 3.9 3.4 2.1 2.2 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.6 2.6 0 0.0 8 0.4 299 13.7 347 15.9 137 6.3 30 1.4 3 0.1 824 37.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 9.6 2 m mm m m m m m m m m m m m mm mm m m = mmm mm m m_ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE ENE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 3 3 7 8 1 0 3 3 7 1 1 2 1 6 3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 41 39 23 10 9 19 15 21 26 23 37 29 28 27 33 17 1.9 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.8 27 10 15 2 4 12 34 25 14 27 12 24 22 33 43 20 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.6 1.1 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.1 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.9 3 5 0 0 0 4 20 3 0 3 2 2 1 5 10 2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76 57 41 19 21 36 71 52 43 60 52 56 53 66 92 42 3.5 2.6 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.7 3.3 2.4 2.0 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.4 3.0 4.2 1.9 0 0.0 54 2.5 397 18.2 324 14.9 60 2.8 2 0.1 0 0.0 837 38.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.6 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNIE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 3 1 2 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 9 4 3 2 13 20 10 3 4 18 13 7 2 15 19 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.9 0 2 1 0 0 5 41 9 3 1 1 1 0 0 3 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 11 7 5 4 20 77 26 7 8 20 16 7 3 19 23 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.9 3.5 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.9 1.1 0.0 18 0.8 155 7.1 71 3.3 22 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 266 12.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.4 MISSING: 0---m --n m mm m mm -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 1 2 1 8 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 1 2 3 32 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 19 0.9 0.4 15 0.7 49 2.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 64 2.9 51 2.3 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 62 2.8 33 1.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 53 2,4 39 1.8 9 0.4 0 0.0 10 0.5 26 1.2 23 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 28 1.3 16 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 35 1.6 25 1.1 16 0.7 0 0.0 5 0.2 47 2.2 105 4.8 88 4.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 69 3.2 56 2.6 39 1.8 0 0.0 6 0.3 50 2.3 37 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 11 0.5 65 3.0 41 1.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 92 4.2 36 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 84 3.9 45 2.1 11 0.5 0 0.0 3 0.1 57 2.6 70 3.2 17 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.1 43 2.0 83 3.8 21 1.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 72 3.3 93 4.3 56 2.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 58 2.7 78 3.6 15 0.7 0 0.0 86 4.0 905 41.6 831 38.2 308 14.1 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0,0 28 1.3 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 4 0.2 0 0.0 44 2.0 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 126 5.8 109 5.0 106 4.9 62 2.8 55 2.5 80 3.7 276 12.7 171 7.9 99 4.5 121 5.6 137 6.3 143 6.6 150 6.9 153 7.0 235 10.8 154 7.1 0.1 2177 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 m m m mmm m -( m m -m m m m mm m m m-m m m mm m m m mm -- m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 64 2.9 51 2.3 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 62 2.8 33 1.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 53 2.4 39 1.8 9 0.4 0 0.0 10 0.5 26 1.2 23 1.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 28 1.3 16 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 35 1.6 25 1.1 16 0.7 0 0.0 5 0.2 47 2.2 106 4.9 88 4.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 69 3.2 56 2.6 39 1.8 0 0.0 6 0.3 51 2.3 37 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 11 0.5 66 3.0 41 1.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 92 4.2 36 1.7 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 84 3.9 45 2.1 11 0.5 0 0.0 3 0.1 57 2.6 70 3.2 17 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.1 43 2.0 83 3.8 21 1.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 72 3.3 93 4.3 56 2.6 0 0.0 3 0.1 58 2.7 78 3.6 15 0.7 0 0.0 86 3.9 907 41.6 832 38.2 308 14.1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 28 1.3 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.2 4 0.2 0 0.0 44 2.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 126 5.8 109 5.0 106 4.9 62 2.8 55 2.5 80 3.7 277 12.7 171 7.8 o00 4.6 122 5.6 137 6.3 143 6.6 150 6.9 153 7.0 235 10.8 154 7.1 0.1 2180 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 1 4 1 3 11 9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 24 1.1 12 0.6 2 0.1 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.4 MISSING: 0 mmmmmmiu n n mHmIl i m m m mm m m --m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 8 3 2 7 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 2 0 1 3 3 1 2 0 8 7 5 15 8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 5 0.2 13 0.6 29 1.4 10 0.5 3 0.1 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.1 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NCE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2 3 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 7 11 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 5 6 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 4 2 3 0 2 8 4 1 1 5 4 12 11 19 15 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 0.0 0.0 11 0.5 39 1.8 25 1.2 15 0.7 4 0.2 94 4.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13 .8 0 mmmmwmm m mm mmmminmm = m m m- m mm = w = m -m m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.2 12 0.6 7 0.3 18 0.8 11 0.5 18 0.8 6 0.3 17 0.8 3 0.1 13 0.6 0 0.0 4 0.2 6 0.3 9 0.4 22 1.0 12 0.6 20 0.9 20 0.9 20 0.9 19 0.9 21 1.0 21 1.0 24 1.1 33 1.5 7 0.3 31 1.4 10 0.5 18 0.8 17 0.8 22 1.0 11 0.5 32 1.5 5 12 10 5 s 25 21 10 6 10 5 18 29 21 13 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 1 0 7 0 0 3 9 6 1 1 4 2 7 7 12 6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 3 1 0 0 1 2 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 22 36 48 33 21 16 90 64 53 46 56 65 65 68 75 62 1.0 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.7 4.2 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.5 2.9 0 0.0 4 0.2 189 8.8 299 13.9 206 9.6 66 3.1 56 2.6 820 38.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.5 MISSING: 6 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 9 19 13 15 6 7 13 16 21 17 12 13 16 11 7 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.3 19 20 13 7 7 13 24 20 15 25 35 29 24 26 30 13 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 0.6 16 9 11 1 3 8 19 14 4 12 11 11 13 25 38 20 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.8 0.9 0 0 0 0 1 6 9 5 0 6 3 3 1 5 4 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 50 39 44 21 28 34 63 54 37 64 67 55 55 74 85 41 2.3 1.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.9 2.5 1.7 3.0 3.1 2.6 2.6 3.5 4.0 1.9 0 0.0 16 0.7 208 9.7 320 14.9 215 10.0 44 2.1 8 0.4 811 37.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.0 MISSING: 26--m -m -l- m m m -mm --m m m m mm -m lm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 5 3 6 3 5 1 3 2 5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 5 5 3 2 1 11 14 10 2 7 12 4 3 4 5 16 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 3 1 3 0 0 1 37 16 1 4 9 3 2 0 7 10 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 8 8 3 6 15 65 31 6 17 24 13 6 7 14 31 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.7 3.0 1.4 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.4 0 0.0 2 0.1 45 2.1 104 4.9 97 4.5 13 0.6 2 0.1 263 12.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.9 MISSING: 3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 2 1 17 12 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 17 0.8 5 0.2 11 0.5 8 0.4 49 2.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.1 MISSING: 0-m---m m mm m mm m -m m m -m- m = M mm m n m = m = -m m mm =ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 2 0.1 19 0.9 41 1.9 24 1.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 18 0.8 47 2.2 22 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 33 1.5 37 1.7 27 1.3 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 20 0.9 33 1.5 13 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 22 1.0 24 1.1 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 28 1.3 16 0.7 16 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 16 0.7 50 2.3 87 4.1 38 1.8 56 2.6 0 0.0 1 0.0 41 1.9 50 2.3 60 2.8 19 0.9 4 0.2 0 0.0 4 0.2 43 2.0 42 2.0 16 0.7 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 51 2.4 55 2.6 22 1.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 44 2.1 69 3.2 31 1.4 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 41 1.9 68 3.2 32 1.5 6 0.3 1 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 23 1.1 61 2.8 41 1.9 12 0.6 5 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1 31 1.4 54 2.5 62 2.9 15 0.7 4 0.2 0 0.0 1 0.0 32 1.5 66 3.1 81 3.8 32 1.5 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 24 1.1 76 3.5 59 2.8 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 23 1.1 465 21.7 801 37.4 601 28.0 171 8.0 83 3.9 SUM PERCENT 87 4.1 88 4.1 106 4.9 66 3.1 58 2.7 72 3.4 248 11.6 175 8.2 107 5.0 135 6.3 154 7.2 149 6.9 146 6.8 168 7.8 219 10.2 166 7.7 2144 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 40 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 2 1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 19 18 33 20 22 7 16 41 43 52 45 41 23 31 32 24 0.9 0.8 1.5 0.9 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 41 47 37 33 24 28 50 50 42 55 69 68 61 54 66 76 1.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.2 2.8 2.5 3.1 3.5 24 22 27 13 8 16 88 60 16 22 31 32 41 62 81 59 1.1 1.0 1.3 0.6 0.4 0.7 4.1 2.8 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.9 3.8 2.7 1 0 8 0 1 16 38 19 1 7 8 6 12 15 32 7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 4 56 4 1 0 1 5 4 7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 87 88 106 66 58 72 249 175 107 136 155 149 146 168 219 166 4.1 4.1 4.9 3.1 2.7 3.4 11.6 8.2 5.0 6.3 7.2 6.9 6.8 7.8 10.2 7.7 0.0 23 1.1 467 21.8 801 37.3 602 28.0 171 8.0 83 3.9 2147 100.0 MISSING HOURS: MEAN WIND SPEED: 37 12.1 m m m m m m mm m m m --m m m m-m ml mm mum m m m m --m m -mu m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 7 0 0 1 4 1 2 12 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 20 0.9 15 0.7 5 0.2 47 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 17.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 6 4 3 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 2 1 3 2 0 1 3 3 1 1 2 6 8 6 14 7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.3 0_0 1 0.0 0.0 15 0.7 26 1.2 8 0.4 9 0.4 60 2.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.3 MISSING: 0 Imm1 m II 1 mmIImmI1 ._nIm /i m = mm m mmm = = mnm mmm = mm n ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 4 2 5 11 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 5 7 5 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3 4 2 3 0 1 9 4 1 1 4 4 13 10 20 15 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.0 0 0.0 8 0.4 37 1.7 27 1.3 14 0.6 8 0.4 94 4.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0,6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 5 10 5 0 1 5 11 17 12 17 20 10 9 5 10 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 19 16 16 16 8 2 4 7 18 18 24 35 34 17 24 17 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.1 0.8 11 16 13 11 9 2 18 25 8 15 18 8 19 36 19 16 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.7 2 3 7 0 5 1 9 8 1 2 5 1 4 6 16 11 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.5 1 0 0 0 0 5 39 10 1 0 0 2 5 6 6 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 36 40 46 32 22 11 75 62 46 47 65 66 72 75 71 55 1.7 1.9 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.5 3.5 2.9 2.1 2.2 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.5 0 0.0 5 0.2 140 6.5 275 12.7 244 11.3 81 3.8 76 3.5 821 38.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 13.7 5-- -m -m m m --m m -m m -- = m m = m -m m m -m = --= m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 8 3 12 11 2 4 7 10 12 8 9 7 7 1 8 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 19 9 7 3 9 8 13 14 19 14 30 21 21 16 14 14 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 37 27 22 1 2 6 14 16 8 23 26 30 24 30 38 18 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.8 0.8 15 7 3 0 0 4 5 7 1 11 5 6 5 6 33 10 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 1.5 0.5 1 3 0 0 0 4 16 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 3 1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 74 56 36 17 23 24 54 45 40 63 69 68 57 63 89 51 3.4 2.6 1.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.9 3.2 3.2 2.6 2.9 4.1 2.4 0.0 11 0.5 i11 5.1 231 10.7 322 14.9 118 5.5 36 1.7 829 38.4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.8 MISSING: 8 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 4 4 2 1 1 2 6 5 9 7 10 5 2 3 0 6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 17 3 4 0 0 1 19 31 2 3 13 6 2 3 3 17 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 3 2 3 0 0 2 13 4 0 1 7 3 1 0 1 6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 9 10 1 3 6 42 41 12 13 34 14 7 6 8 29 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.9 1.9 0.6 0.6 1.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.3 0 0.0 2 0.1 16 0.7 67 3.1 124 5.7 46 2.1 4 0.2 259 12.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.5 MISSING: 7-m -m- -mmm- -m-m m- m- -m m = = m = m m -m -= --m m -m m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 18 6 10 5 3 1 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 6 0.3 13 0.6 9 0.4 12 0.6 6 0.3 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.9 MISSING: 1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0*0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6 0.3 45 13 0.6 33 13 0.6 29 17 0.8 26 13 0.6 20 4 0.2 12 10 0.5 23 21 1.0 28 29 1.3 49 28 1.3 47 30 1.4 70 31 1.4 64 21 1.0 61 17 0.8 40 10 0.5 46 19 0.9 52 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 66 3.1 20 46 2.1 13 40 1.9 14 14 0.6 0 11 0.5 5 10 0.5 12 56 2.6 32 83 3.8 31 20 0.9 3 42 1.9 15 60 2.8 17 53 2.5 13 54 2.5 12 79 3.7 12 72 3.3 65 66 3.1 30 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0 .6 3.0 1.4 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.4 63 2.9 15 0.7 1 0.0 2 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.1 10 0.5 13 0.6 19 0.9 2 0.1 SUM PERCENT 139 6.4 110 5.1 98 4.5 58 2.7 50 2.3 47 2.2 186 8.6 180 8.3 106 4.9 135 6.3 180 8.3 165 7.6 159 7.4 162 7.5 214 9.9 169 7.8 2158 100.0 0 0_0 21 1.0 282 13.1 645 29.9 772 35.8 294 13.6 144 6.7 MISSING HOURS: 26 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.1-rn-rn------
--
m = n = m = m = = = m m m = mm = m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 04/06-06/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 2 1 1 0 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6 13 13 17 13 4 10 21 29 28 30 31 21 17 10 19 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.9 45 33 29 26 20 12 23 28 49 47 70 65 61 40 46 52 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 66 46 40 14 11 10 56 84 20 42 60 53 54 79 72 66 3.1 2.1 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 2.6 3.9 0.9 1.9 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.3 3.1 20 13 14 0 5 12 32 31 3 15 17 13 12 12 65 30 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 3.0 1.4 2 3 0 0 0 9 63 15 1 2 2 3 10 13 19 2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.1 139 110 98 58 5o 47 186 181 106 135 180 166 159 162 214 169 6.4 5.1 4.5 2.7 2.3 2.2 8.6 8.4 4.9 6.2 8.3 7.7 7.4 7.5 9.9 7.8 0 0.0 21 1.0 282 13.1 646 29.9 773 35.8 294 13.6 144 6.7 2160 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 24 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.1 Section 1 300-33-ft. Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 7/06- 9/06
m m m m m -m m m m~~1 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT)
LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.2 6 0.3 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 4 1 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.2 11 0.5 10 0.5 0 0.0 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.8 MISSING: 0-m m --m m -m m m --m m m -, m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 0 4 1 2 2 12 9 4 11 4 2 2 1 6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 1 0 4 1 1 2 5 1 0 0 1 2 2 4 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 2 4 5 2 4 12 15 9 4 14 6 4 8 7 6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 1 0.0 65 2.9 28 1.3 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 106 4.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 6 2 4 3 0 2 1 4 7 5 2 2 1 5 11 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 37 18 19 13 8 3 14 28 19 25 27 24 17 17 18 44 1.7 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 2.0 16 30 44 8 0 10 33 45 45 46 57 40 36 15 18 24 0.7 1.4 2.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.6 1.8 1.6 0.7 0.8 1.1 0 0 4 3 3 2 46 50 23 16 7 3 4 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.1 2.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 61 54 75 31 14 15 102 129 92 95 96 69 59 33 45 79 2.8 2.4 3.4 1.4 0.6 0.7 4.6 5.9 4.2 4.3 4.4 3.1 2.7 1.5 2.0 3.6 0.0 63 2.9 331 15.0 467 21.2 165 7.5 22 1.0 1 0.0 1049 47.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.0 MISSING: 1 m m m m m mn ---m --- n- m -mm mm -m = m m m m m m m -= m m -mmm m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW Ssw SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 5 10 6 14 8 3 2 2 3 8 9 7 11 9 8 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 25 28 22 18 8 14 11 9 9 28 so 50 40 21 41 31 1.1 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.0 1.9 1.4 9 2 18 0 0 9 21 9 24 42 38 27 8 11 18 10 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.5 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 S 3 5 0 0 0 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41 35 52 27 22 31 35 24 40 76 101 86 55 43 70 50 1.9 1.6 2.4 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.8 3.4 4.6 3.9 2.5 2.0 3.2 2.3 0 0.0 112 5.1 405 18.4 246 11.2 22 1.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 788 35.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 6.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 6 5 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 3 4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 36 17 18 12 6 9 2 1 0 6 7 8 4 2 11 15 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.7 6 0 1 0 0 3 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45 23 24 19 13 13 4 4 0 7 9 10 8 3 14 21 2.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.0 0 0.0 43 2.0 154 7.0 20 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 5.3 MISSING: 0 mmmmmmmmmm m mmmmm mm mm m m m m =m m mm mm mm m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 4.8 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 18 17 17 24 9 6 3 6 10 14 11 13 14 17 23 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 103 65 61 47 23 28 30 54 39 64 95 88 63 42 71 97 4.7 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 2.4 1.8 2.9 4.3 4.0 2.9 1.9 3.2 4.4 32 32 67 9 1 24 64 64 71 90 101 71 46 30 40 36 1.5 1.5 3.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.9 2.9 3.2 4.1 4.6 3.2 2.1 1.4 1.8 1.6 0 0 6 4 3 2 58 55 28 19 15 3 4 3 9 1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.6 2-5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 6 4 0 0 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 153 115 157 82 51 63 166 182 145 184 225 173 126 89 137 157 6.9 5.2 7.1 3.7 2.3 2.9 7.5 8.3 6.6 8.3 10.2 7.8 5.7 4.0 6.2 7.1 0.0 220 10.0 970 44.0 778 35.3 210 9.5 26 1.2 1 0.0 2205 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 m m m m m m -m -m m mn m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m -m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 18 17 17 24 9 6 3 6 10 14 11 13 14 17 23 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 103 65 61 47 23 28 30 54 39 64 95 88 63 42 71 97 4.7 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 2.4 1.8 2.9 4.3 4.0 2.9 1.9 3.2 4.4 32 32 67 9 1 24 64 64 71 92 101 71 46 30 40 36 1.4 1.4 3.0 0.4 0.0 1.1 2.9 2.9 3.2 4.2 4.6 3.2 2.1 1.4 1.8 1.6 0 0 6 4 3 2 58 55 28 19 15 3 4 3 9 1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.6 2.5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 0 6 4 0 0 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 153 115 157 82 51 63 166 182 145 186 225 173 126 89 137 157 6.9 5.2 7.1 3.7 2.3 2.9 7.5 8.2 6.6 8-4 10-2 7.8 5.7 4-0 6.2 7.1 0 0.0 220 10.0 970 44.0 780 35.3 210 9.5 26 1.2 1 0.0 2207 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.8 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.3 3 0.1 1 0.0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.3 MISSING: 0 m nm mmm m- m -m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m -m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 5 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 10 0.5 12 0.5 2 0.1 1 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.8 MISSING: 0 7 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.S 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 1 1 0 3 1 2 6 8 5 3 7 3 1 3 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 2 0.1 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 2 0.1 2 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 2 0.1 4 0.2 0 0 2 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 3 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.1 5 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 18 0.8 11 0.5 7 0.3 5 0.2 13 0.6 6 0.3 4 0.2 9 0.4 6 0.3 7 0.3 106 4.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 47 2.1 34 1.5 20 0.9 0.2 1 0.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.8 MISSING: 0 m = m m m = -= -m m m m m -- m ---m -m m --m m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 4 0.2 16 0.7 25 1.1 5 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 9 0.4 30 1.4 20 0.9 0 0.0 1 0.0 7 0.3 38 1.7 21 1.0 1 0.0 4 0.2 10 0.5 2 0.1 1 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 5 0.2 3 0.1 4 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 3 0.1 7 0.3 2 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.3 24 1.1 36 1.6 32 1.5 2 0.1 23 1.0 22 1.0 62 2.8 20 0.9 1 0.0 15 0.7 23 1.0 40 1.8 9 0.4 6 0.3 14 0.6 31 1.4 35 1.6 10 0.5 2 0.1 18 0.8 33 1.5 34 1.5 5 0.2 1 0.0 13 0.6 43 1.9 12 0.5 1 0.0 3 0.1 13 0.6 32 1.5 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 14 0.6 9 0.4 6 0.3 0 0.0 4 0.2 14 0.6 18 0.8 14 0.6 0 0.0 2 0.1 40 1.8 38 1.7 5 0.2 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 25 1.1 SUM PERCENT 50 2.3 62 2.8 78 3.5 22 1.0 13 0.6 14 0.6 109 4.9 131 5.9 88 4.0 97 4.4 92 4.2 70 3.2 60 2.7 29 1.3 50 2.3 85 3.9 1050 47.6 0 0.0 35 1.6 219 9.9 374 17.0 312 14.1 85 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.4 7 0.3 16 0 0.0 9 0.4 23 1.0 2 1 0.0 5 0.2 22 1.0 14 1 0.0 7 0.3 13 0.6 4 2 0.1 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 2 0.1 7 0.3 13 0.6 8 0 0.0 2 0.1 13 0.6 14 0 0.0 8 0.4 11 0.5 9 3 0.1 3 0.1 14 0.6 32 3 0.1 8 0.4 29 1.3 36 6 0.3 18 0.8 45 2.0 26 2 0.1 21 1.0 52 2.4 8 3 0.1 24 1.1 23 1.0 5 5 0.2 25 1.1 15 0.7 10 1 0.0 24 1.1 23 1.0 19 3 0.1 19 0.9 22 1.0 9 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 SUM PERCENT 32 1.5 34 1.5 44 2.0 28 1.3 17 0.8 30 1.4 29 1.3 29 1.3 52 2.4 76 3.4 102 4.6 83 3.8 55 2.5 55 2.5 68 3.1 54 2.4 788 35.7 0 0.0 33 1.5 200 9.1 328 14.9 212 9.6 11 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.1 MISSING: 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m m m -m -m m m --m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 4 7 4 6 6 3 1 5 1 0 1 5 4 6 4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 15 0.7 23 1.0 0 11 0.5 3 0.1 0 8 0.4 1 0.0 0 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 6 0.3 5 0.2 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 3 0.1 2 0.1 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 7 0.3 1 0.0 0 8 0.4 2 0.1 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 6 0.3 6 0.3 0 12 0.5 7 0.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43 18 16 14 8 18 5 7 6 7 8 11 7 6 19 24 1.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 0.0 7 0.3 62 2.8 96 4.4 52 2.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -m --m m m m m ----- m m m m -N ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 5 0.2 31 1.4 50 2.3 44 2.0 3 0.1 24 1.1 67 3.0 25 1.1 2 0.1 19 0.9 69 3.1 38 1.7 7 0.3 25 1.1 25 1.1 6 0.3 3 0.1 24 1.1 8 0.4 5 0.2 3 0.1 17 0.8 22 1.0 22 1.0 2 0.1 17 0.8 45 2.0 60 2.7 3 0.1 41 1.9 46 2.1 74 3.4 4 0.2 29 1.3 42 1.9 73 3.3 9 0.4 26 1.2 68 3.1 73 3.3 8 0.4 43 1.9 90 4.1 68 3.1 3 0.1 38 1.7 107 4.9 22 1.0 6 0.3 43 1.9 60 2.7 15 0.7 5 0.2 46 2.1 29 1.3 21 1.0 6 0.3 44 2.0 49 2.2 44 2.0 6 0.3 66 3.0 76 3.4 21 1.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 38 1.7 21 1.0 9 0.4 10 0.5 12 0.5 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 103 4.7 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 31 1.4 SUM PERCENT 130 5.9 119 5.4 141 6.4 71 3.2 40 1.8 66 3.0 174 7.9 188 8.5 157 7.1 187 8.5 221 10.0 171 7.8 126 5.7 101 4.6 144 6.5 170 7.7 2206 100.0 0.0 75 3.4 533 24.2 853 38.7 611 27.7 MISSING HOURS: 2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 I ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 5 0.2 31 1.4 3 0.1 24 1.1 2 0.1 19 0.9 7 0.3 25 1.1 3 0.1 24 1.1 3 0.1 17 0.8 2 0.1 17 0.8 3 0.1 41 1.9 4 0.2 29 1.3 9 0.4 26 1.2 8 0.4 43 1.9 3 0.1 38 1.7 6 0.3 43 1.9 5 0.2 46 2.1 6 0.3 44 2.0 6 0.3 66 3.0 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 50 2.3 44 2.0 67 3.0 25 1.1 69 3.1 38 1.7 25 1.1 6 0.3 8 0.4 5 0.2 22 1.0 22 1.0 45 2.0 60 2.7 46 2.1 74 3.4 42 1.9 73 3.3 68 3.1 75 3.4 90 4.1 68 3.1 107 4.8 22 1.0 60 2.7 is 0.7 29 1.3 21 1.0 49 2.2 44 2.0 76 3.4 21 1.0 853 38.6 613 27.8 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 2 0.1 38 1.7 21 1.0 9 0.4 10 0.5 12 0.5 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 103 4.7 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 3 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 130 5.9 119 5.4 141 6.4 71 3.2 40 1.8 66 3.0 174 7.9 188 8.5 157 7.1 189 8.6 221 10.0 171 7.7 126 5.7 101 4.6 144 6.5 170 7.7 0 0.0 75 3.4 533 24.1 31 1.4 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.9 m -m m mm- ---- mmm- -mm~ -m -----mm ----ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.5 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 2 4 1 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 9 0.4 0.4 5 0.2 1 0.0 26 1.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.3 MISSING: 0 m- m m -m --m--mm m m -m n m -m m m m ----m m -m ---- ---- ml_ Nl ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 3 1 2 3 8 6 4 3 3 3 1 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 1 2 1 0 0 4 2 3 1 4 6 2 4 2 5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 4 5 2 4 15 11 9 S 10 9 5 10 5 7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 41 1.9 39 1.8 15 0.7 10 0.5 1 0.0 106 4.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.3 MISSING: 0 "I._J ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 1 1 3 1 1 0 2 2 2 4 3 1 1 0 2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 17 8 5 9 4 1 5 18 12 10 12 7 13 15 16 31 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.4 23 22 31 6 3 2 15 24 22 29 24 40 30 16 18 35 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.6 8 22 31 0 2 8 24 62 40 33 36 21 16 9 15 9 0.4 1.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 2.8 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 1 5 4 3 1 3 33 25 13 23 15 2 4 0 3 0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.5 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 11 2 1 1 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53 58 83 23 12 16 86 134 89 98 91 73 64 41 52 77 2.4 2.6 3.8 1.0 0.5 0.7 3.9 6.1 4.0 4.4 4.1 3.3 2.9 1.9 2.4 3.5 0 0.0 28 1.3 183 8.3 340 15.4 336 15.2 135 6.1 28 1.3 1050 47.6 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.7 MISSING: 0 m mmmm m mm m m -m -m- m m m -m m -m ----- --- ------ ---ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 1 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 6 2 5 6 1 2 7 7 3 7 20 20 16 19 11 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0-5 12 13 10 15 10 7 5 17 14 13 27 20 18 22 24 21 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 15 16 19 9 2 9 11 8 15 45 38 37 25 15 16 17 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 2.0 1.7 1.7 1. 1 0.7 0.7 0.8 1 2 7 1 0 2 1 1 11 16 26 3 2 1 9 4 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 38 38 32 18 19 20 34 48 77 101 84 66 54 69 55 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.5 2.2 3.5 4.6 3.8 3.0 2.4 3.1 2.5 0 0.0 14 0.6 138 6.3 248 11.2 297 13.5 87 3.9 4 0.2 788 35.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 2 4 2 1 7 1 8 3 2 2 0 1 3 4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 12 6 4 8 5 1 4 2 3 0 2 2 4 2 8 6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 19 18 3 0 1 3 4 0 1 2 10 4 5 0 7 13 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 31 9 13 9 5 15 4 12 5 15 9 10 3 20 23 1.5 1.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.9 1.0 0.0 4 0.2 46 2.1 69 3.1 90 4.1 8 0.4 0 0.0 217 9.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.6 MISSING: 0-m-m mm-u- mmmnrmmn mm mm - = = m = = m = m = m m m m m = = m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.1 0.1 3 0.1 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.3 MISSING: 0 )ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 2 1 4 2 1 1 3 3 2 7 7 3 1 1 3 0.2 27 1.2 49 2.2 0.1 19 0.9 42 1.9 0.0 9 0.4 48 2.2 0.2 22 1.0 31 1.4 0.1 13 0.6 18 0.8 0.0 5 0.2 10 0.5 0.0 17 0.8 31 1.4 0.1 36 1.6 52 2.4 0.1 34 1.5 44 2.0 0.1 20 0.9 45 2.0 0.3 24 1.1 58 2.6 0.3 32 1.5 69 3.1 0.1 36 1.6 54 2.4 0.0 33 1.5 44 2.0 0.0 38 1.7 52 2.4 0.1 48 2.2 67 3.0 43 1.9 2 57 2.6 11 55 2.5 11 10 0.5 4 6 0.3 1 22 1.0 5 47 2.1 42 71 3.2 27 57 2.6 24 80 3.6 39 89 4.0 44 62 2.8 6 47 2.1 6 28 1.3 4 40 1.8 16 39 1.8 4 753 34.1 246 0.1 0 0.0 0.5 0 0.0 0.5 11 0.5 0.2 4 0.2 0.0 1 0.0 0.2 1 0.0 1.9 11 0.5 1.2 4 0.2 1. 1 0 0.0 1.8 1 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.3 0 0.0 0.3 0 0.0 0.2 0 0.0 0.7 0 0.0 0.2 1 0.0 11.2 34 1.5 126 131 135 75 41 44 149 193 162 187 222 176 146 110 147 162 5.7 5.9 6.1 3.4 1.9 2.0 6.8 8.7 7.3 8.5 10.1 8.0 6.6 5.0 6.7 7.3 0 0.0 46 2.1 413 18.7 714 32.4 2206 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4-m n -= -m --= m m m m m m m -m~mmmm~mmm~mmm~ m -/l ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 07/06-09/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 5 0.2 27 1.2 49 2.2 43 1.9 0 0.0 2 0.1 19 0.9 42 1.9 57 2.6 0 0.0 1 0.0 9 0.4 48 2.2 55 2.5 0 0.0 4 0.2 22 1.0 31 1.4 10 0.5 0 0.0 2 0.1 13 0.6 18 0.8 6 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 10 0.5 22 1.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 17 0.8 31 1.4 47 2.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 36 1.6 52 2.4 71 3.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 34 1.5 44 2.0 57 2.6 0 0.0 2 0.1 20 0.9 45 2.0 82 3.7 0 0.0 7 0.3 24 1.1 58 2.6 89 4.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 32 1.4 69 3.1 62 2.8 0 0.0 3 0.1 36 1.6 54 2.4 47 2.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 33 1.5 44 2.0 28 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 38 1.7 52 2.4 40 1.8 0 0.0 3 0.1 48 2.2 67 3.0 39 1.8 0 0.0 46 2.1 413 18.7 714 32.3 755 34.2 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 11 0.5 11 0.5 4 0.2 4 0.2 1 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 1 0.0 42 1.9 11 0.5 27 1.2 4 0.2 24 1.1 0 0.0 39 1.8 1 0.0 44 2.0 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 4 0.2 0 0.0 16 0.7 0 0.0 4 0.2 1 0.0 246 11.1 34 1.5 SUM PERCENT 126 5.7 131 5.9 135 6.1 75 3.4 41 1.9 44 2.0 149 6.7 193 8.7 162 7.3 189 8.6 222 10.1 176 8.0 146 6.6 110 5.0 147 6.7 162 7.3 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.4 Section 2 300-33-ft. Lapse Rate Wind Distributions 10/06 -12/06 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.2 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 5 6 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 12 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 6 6 22 4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 23 1.1 18 0.8 4 0.2 0 0.0 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.8 0 m m m m m m m m m -m m -m m m m = m m m -m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 3 3 2 5 3 3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 0 9 16 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 4 7 13 10 19 20 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.0 26 1.2 42 1.9 14 0.6 4 0.2 0 0.0 86 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 1 2 2 2 1 5 10 5 2 2 4 2 1 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 5 11 9 11 9 9 17 17 16 14 14 19 22 4 13 9 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0-9 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.4 12 14 14 2 1 2 14 11 11 12 10 30 35 27 42 32 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.9 1.5 9 49 19 0 0 1 3 6 8 5 0 7 17 30 39 5 0.4 2.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.8 0.2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 15 1 10 0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 80 43 15 12 14 37 39 45 36 26 63 94 64 105 48 1.2 3.7 2.0 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 1.6 1.2 2.9 4.3 2.9 4.8 2.2 0.0 45 2.1 199 9.1 269 12.3 198 9.0 35 1.6 1 0.0 747 34.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 10.2 MISSING: 5 m m m m m -mm m m m m m m m = m m m = m m m= m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 7 9 11 II 6 6 4 8 8 10 8 9 4 11 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 20 23 15 13 19 34 44 24 22 15 35 33 22 28 45 34 0.9 1. 1 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.6 2.0 1. 1 1.0 0.7 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.3 2.1 1.6 10 8 1 6 1 14 18 S 19 19 23 9 16 37 56 33 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.4 0.7 1.7 2.6 1.5 1 4 1 0 0 1 2 5 6 3 2 1 3 8 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32 42 26 30 31 54 86 37 53 51 70 S4 47 77 113 80 1.5 1.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 2.5 3.9 1.7 2.4 2.3 3.2 2.5 2.1 3.5 5.2 3.7 0 0.0 118 5.4 426 19.5 275 12.6 50 2.3 0.2 9 0.4 883 40.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 7.3 MISSING: 9 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 5 11 10 13 5 6 7 6 3 5 5 6 4 7 3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 ii 8 5 5 23 31 11 13 14 12 13 8 3 7 5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 1. 1 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 1 4 0 0 0 1 6 0 9 4 5 5 1 4 5 2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 20 19 15 18 29 54 19 33 21 22 23 15 11 19 10 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.3 2.5 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 1. 1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0 5 0.0 103 4.7 180 8.2 47 2.1 12 0.5 5 0.2 0 0.0 347 15.8 MEAN WIND SPEED: 5.5 MISSING: 0 mmmmm m m -mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 4 3 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 8 5 0 0 4 5 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 2 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 ii 3 3 4 17 6 6 0 3 4 0 0 2 0 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 27 1.2 33 1.5 11 0.5 1 0.0 0 0.0 72 3.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 4.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 8 0.4 39 1.8 27 1.2 10 0 0.0 19 0.9 53 2.4 31 1.4 53 0 0.0 25 1.1 37 1.7 18 0.8 20 0 0.0 26 1.2 30 1.4 8 0.4 0 0 0.0 29 1.3 33 1.5 2 0.1 0 0 0.0 12 0.5 71 3.2 17 0.8 2 0 0.0 18 0.8 98 4.5 46 2.1 22 0 0.0 18 0.8 58 2.6 19 0.9 9 0 0.0 24 1.1 53 2.4 39 1.8 17 0 0.0 16 0.7 44 2.0 35 1.6 11 0 0.0 16 0.7 66 3.0 40 1.8 3 0 0.0 20 0.9 71 3.2 48 2.2 13 0 0.0 18 0.8 54 2.5 63 2.9 23 0 0.0 15 0.7 40 1.8 73 3.3 38 0 0.0 13 0.6 69 3.2 118 5.4 67 0 0.0 16 0.7 51 2.3 87 4.0 8 0 0.0 293 13.4 867 39.6 671 30.6 296 0.5 2.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.6 1. 1 1.7 3 .1 0.4 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 6 0.3 17 0.8 2 0.1 14 0.6 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 SUM PERCENT 84 3.8 158 7,2 100 4.6 64 2.9 64 2.9 102 4.7 197 9.0 104 4.7 137 6.3 109 5.0 126 5.8 158 7.2 176 8.0 168 7.7 281 12.8 162 7.4 13.5 53 2.4 10 0.5 2190 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 18 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.2 m mimI m -H m m um m m n m m m m m = m m = m m m m m m m m m = m = m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 30 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N 0 0.0 8 0.4 39 1.8 27 1.2 10 0.5 0 0.0 NNE 0 0.0 19 0.9 53 2.4 31 1.4 53 2.4 2 0.1 NE 0 0.0 25 1.1 37 1.7 18 0.8 20 0.9 0 0.0 ENE 0 0.0 26 1.2 30 1.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 E 0 0.0 29 1.3 33 1.5 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 ESE 0 0.0 12 0.5 71 3.2 17 0.8 2 0.1 0 0.0 SE 0 0.0 18 0.8 98 4.5 46 2.1 22 1.0 10 0.5 SSE 0 0.0 18 0.8 58 2.6 19 0.9 9 0.4 0 0.0 S 0 0.0 24 1.1 53 2.4 39 1.8 17 0.8 1 0.0 SSW 0 0.0 16 0.7 44 2.0 35 1.6 11 0.5 0 0.0 SW 0 0.0 16 0.7 66 3.0 40 1.8 3 0.1 1 0.0 WSW 0 0.0 20 0.9 71 3.2 48 2.2 13 0.6 6 0.3 W 0 0.0 18 0.8 54 2.5 63 2.9 23 1.0 17 0.8 WNW 0 0.0 15 0.7 40 1.8 73 3.3 38 1.7 2 0.1 NW 0 0.0 13 0.6 69 3.1 118 5.4 68 3.1 14 0.6 NNW 0 0.0 16 0.7 51 2.3 89 4.1 9 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 293 13.4 867 39.5 673 30.7 298 13.6 53 2.4 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 3 0.1 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0.5 SUM PERCENT 84 3.8 158 7.2 100 4.6 64 2.9 64 2.9 102 4.6 197 9.0 104 4.7 137 6.2 109 5.0 126 5.7 158 7.2 176 8.0 168 7.7 282 12.9 165 7.5 2194 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 14 MEAN WIND SPEED: 8.2 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/'06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3 .6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 5 0.2 1 0.0 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.5 MISSING: 0 m m m-m m -m -m m m m _.m - m m -m m -m m m m m,~ m ~/ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FR) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 10 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 6 6 23 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0.4 22 1.0 11 0.5 0.2 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.6 MISSING: 0 N.ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 3 9 9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 7 13 8 22 20 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 19 0.9 24 1.1 32 1.5 8 0.4 3 0.1 86 3.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.7 0 m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m Sm mn m m mn m m m m m m mi m m m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 6 4 2 1 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1 5 5 10 9 8 9 13 12 12 7 10 12 7 5 7 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 5 10 9 3 3 4 11 10 9 11 9 25 20 5 17 16 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.8 0.7 11 11 13 2 0 2 13 6 8 10 7 15 40 34 32 22 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.0 9 50 8 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 10 10 22 33 4 0.4 2.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.2 0 9 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 8 2 11 0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.0 27 86 35 15 13 15 39 39 38 41 27 67 91 72 98 49 1.2 3.9 1.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.2 3.0 4.1 3.3 4.4 2.2 0 0.0 26 1.2 132 6.0 167 7.6 226 10.3 161 7.3 40 1.8 752 34.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.0 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24 .6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 5 4 0 4 4 5 1 2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 5 5 3 14 20 11 11 9 16 7 17 16 12 17 9 5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 11 16 10 9 8 13 22 29 23 22 28 27 23 22 42 22 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.0 15 13 2 5 0 20 22 3 13 11 12 7 18 30 61 31 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.4 2.8 1.4 1 6 0 0 0 3 4 0 2 8 3 2 0 2 12 3 0.0 0 .3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 6 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 42 18 29 31 49 85 47 64 52 66 56 58 73 126 61 1.6 1.9 0.8 1.3 1.4 2.2 3.9 2.1 2.9 2.4 3.0 2.5 2.6 3.3 5.7 2.8 0.0 43 2.0 .177 8.0 327 14.8 263 11.9 46 2.1 36 1.6 892 40.5 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.9 MISSING: 0-m m -m m-m m m m mm m m ~ ---- ----m -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 2 1 4 4 3 4 5 5 0 3 5 2 4 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 9 7 11 15 5 10 5 3 4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 2 3 5 8 5 11 22 13 6 12 18 8 9 5 4 3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 2 6 3 0 0 1 8 2 4 10 4 2 6 4 7 3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0..0 0.0 0-4 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 S 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 10 12 9 12 17 49 30 29 40 37 18 30 16 18 11 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 2.2 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.7 0.8 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.5 0 0.0 45 2.0 81 3.7 134 6.1 62 2.8 10 0.5 15 0.7 347 15.7 MEAN WIND SPEED: 9.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0,0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 2 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 2 0 0 0 1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 5 5 5 1 3 10 5 9 S 5 4 1 i 1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.4 22 1.0 22 1.0 15 0.7 3 0.1 1 0.0 72 3.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 9.2 0------- m m m m m m m m m -m -m m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 150 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.2 0 0.0 3 0.1 0 0.0 9 0.4 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 15 0.7 0 0.0 12 0.5 0 0.0 11 0.5 0 0.0 10 0.5 0 0.0 9 0.4 0 0.0 13 0.6 0 0.0 6 0.3 0 0.0 7 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 123 5.6 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 10 0.5 20 0.9 30 1.4 12 0.5 33 1.5 36 1.6 10 0.5 27 1.2 20 0.9 25 1.1 23 1.0 8 0.4 33 1.5 16 0.7 0 0.0 22 1.0 29 1.3 23 1.0 27 1.2 57 2.6 46 2.1 34 1.5 53 2.4 14 0.6 36 1.6 41 1.9 29 1.3 35 1.6 48 2.2 31 1.4 46 2.1 59 2.7 24 1.1 37 1.7 63 2.9 31 1.4 37 1.7 58 2.6 74 3.4 32 1.5 37 1.7 73 3.3 19 0.9 68 3.1 119 5.4 18 0.8 52 2.4 67 3.0 433 19.6 684 31.0 625 28.4 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 10 0.S 0 0.0 56 2.5 9 0.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.1 1 0.0 12 0.5 38 1.7 4 0.2 3 0.1 14 0.6 8 0.4 12 0.5 4 0.2 3 0.1 2 0.1 14 0.6 6 0.3 13 0.6 8 0.4 25 1.1 4 0.2 59 2.7 16 0.7 7 0.3 0 0.0 240 10.9 99 4.5 SUM PERCENT 76 3.4 149 6.8 70 3.2 59 2.7 58 2.6 84 3.8 187 8.5 123 5.6 140 6.4 141 6.4 144 6.5 160 7.3 203 9.2 177 8.0 288 13.1 145 6.6 2204 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 4 MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC WIND: DELTA T: STABILITY CLASS 150 FT (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 3 5 3 9 6 7 15 12 11 10 9 13 6 7 1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 10 12 10 25 33 22 27 34 36 35 46 37 37 32 19 18 0.5 0.5 0.5 1. 1 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.1 1.7 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.8 20 33 27 23 16 29 57 53 41 48 59 63 58 37 68 52 0.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.7 1.3 2.6 2.4 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.9 2.6 1.7 3.1 2.4 30 36 20 8 0 23 46 14 29 31 24 31 74 73 121 69 1.4 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.0 1.0 2.1 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 3.4 3.3 5.5 3.1 10 56 8 0 0 3 12 4 14 12 3 14 13 25 59 7 0.5 2.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 1. 1 2.7 0.3 0 9 0 0 0 1 38 3 8 4 2 6 8 4 16 0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.0 76 149 70 59 58 84 187 123 140 141 144 160 203 177 290 147 3.4 6.7 3.2 2.7 2.6 3.8 8.5 5.6 6.3 6.4 6.5 7.2 9.2 8.0 13. 1 6.7 0.0 123 5.6 433 19.6 684 31.0 629 28.5 240 10.9 99 4.5 2208 100.0 MISSING HOURS: MEAN WIND SPEED: 12.3--- m m ---m m m ----- m m mm mmm m m- m m m m MAW ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: LE -1.9 DEG C/100M CLASS A WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 4 0.2 2 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.3 MEAN WIND SPEED: 16.7 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.8 TO -1.7 DEG C/100M CLASS B WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 4 9 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 7 6 23 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.3 25 1.2 8 0.4 9 0.4 48 2.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 18.3 MISSING: 0-u ----! -r! -m m -m -am m t_ m m R M m -- m m m m I -ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.6 TO -1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS C WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 6 0.3 1 0.0 7 0.3 14 0.6 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 8 12 10 20 23 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 1 1 SUM PERCENT 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0.6 23 1.1 33 1.5 12 0.6 6 0.3 86 4.0 MEAN WIND SPEED: 13.9 MISSING: 0 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -1.4 TO -0.5 DEG C/100M CLASS D WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12,6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 3 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 2 4 5 7 3 7 11 5 6 8 2 12 13 8 6 3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0,3 0,5 0.2 0.3 0,4 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0 2 10 4 9 6 9 11 10 3 9 19 19 3 11 13 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.6 4 11 8 2 1 0 12 7 9 11 12 20 29 25 25 18 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.8 8 15 17 0 1 1 1 4 7 3 0 4 16 34 30 15 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.6 1.4 0.7 2 29 6 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 9 18 9 25 1 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.0 16 61 46 13 15 15 37 33 37 29 25 65 95 82 98 50 0.7 2.8 2.1 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.2 3.0 4.4 3.8 4.5 2.3 0.0 20 0.9 102 4.7 138 6.4 194 9.0 156 7.2 107 S.0 717 33.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 15.9 MISSING: 35 m- m mmm, R m -o m ---m ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: -0.4 TO 1.5 DEG C/100M CLASS E WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 4 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2 1 0 4 2 10 5 7 9 12 8 14 10 8 4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 7 4 6 12 23 7 16 22 15 21 16 16 9 16 23 18 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7 1. 1 0.8 13 16 10 3 12 12 23 13 9 32 25 18 24 30 58 22 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.7 1.0 5 4 0 2 12 13 4 7 11 7 5 9 11 33 27 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.5 1.3 0 2 0 0 0 0 19 5 8 6 2 0 1 2 5 2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 30 36 23 18 45 34 82 49 47 81 62 49 61 70 127 73 1.4 1.7 1.1 0.8 2.1 1.6 3.8 2.3 2.2 3.8 2.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 5.9 3.4 0 0.0 22 1.0 101 4.7 231 10.7 320 14.8 161 7.5 52 2.4 887 41.1 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 MISSING: 5 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: 1.6 TO 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS F WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 2 3 4 1 2 3 7 8 10 7 6 4 7 4 2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 1 0 s 3 2 2 6 8 7 19 15 7 9 5 4 1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 2 5 5 4 1 11 10 8 S 10 9 13 7 1 8 6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 3 12 3 1 11 3 3 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 8 17 14 4 17 26 28 29 52 34 31 32 17 19 9 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.3 2.4 1.6 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.4 0 0.0 13 0.6 74 3.4 94 4.4 105 4.9 45 2.1 13 0.6 344 15.9 MEAN WIND SPEED: MISSING: 12.8 3-ll m mlmmam m m m m m m m m mm m m -m -m mm ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) LAPSE RATE: GT 4.0 DEG C/100M CLASS G WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 2 0 1 6 2 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 3 3 7 1 1 8 9 7 3 9 7 4 1 1 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3-0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 0.3 20 0.9 13 0.6 17 0.8 11 0.5 1 0.0 69 3.2 MEAN WIND SPEED: 11.2 MISSING: 3 ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) ALL STABgILITY CLASSES WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3.5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.5 18.6-24.5 GE 24. 6 SUM PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 12 1 0.0 8 2 0.1 9 7 0.3 13 6 0.3 9 3 0.1 12 3 0.1 31 4 0.2 20 8 0.4 23 6 0.3 28 2 0.1 22 7 0.3 30 5 0.2 33 5 0.2 28 1 0.0 21 0 0.0 10 0.6 9 0.4 21 1.0 13 0.6 0.4 9 0.4 36 1.7 28 1.3 0.4 22 1.0 24 1.1 27 1.3 0.6 20 0.9 12 0.6 0 0.0 0.4 34 1.6 14 0.6 3 0.1 0.6 16 0.7 23 1.1 14 0.6 1.4 32 1.5 47 2.2 16 0.7 0.9 42 1.9 32 1.5 11 0.5 1.1 32 1.5 23 1.1 21 1.0 1.3 45 2.1 54 2.5 26 1.2 1.0 47 2.2 50 2.3 11 0.5 1.4 47 2.2 58 2.7 12 0.6 1.5 41 1.9 73 3.4 39 1.8 1.3 29 1.3 61 2.8 52 2.4 1.0 41 1.9 107 5.0 79 3.7 0.5 40 1.9 63 2.9 43 2.0 14.3 506 23.4 698 32.3 395 18.3 SUM PERCENT 2 0.1 31 1.4 6 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 28 1.3 12 0.6 13 0.6 7 0.3 2 0.1 12 0.6 21 1.0 12 0.6 39 1.8 3 0.1 188 8.7 59 113 90 52 66 68 157 121 120 166 134 166 212 187 288 159 2.7 5.2 4.2 2.4 3.1 3.2 7.3 5.6 5.6 7.7 6.2 7.7 9.8 8.7 13 .3 7.4 0 0.0 62 2.9 309 2158 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 50 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 = m= M -m M w m -m M ARTIFICIAL ISLAND 10/06-12/06 JOINT DISTRIBUTION OF WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED BY ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS WIND: 300 FT DELTA T: (300-33FT) DIRECTION VS SPEED ONLY WIND SPEED GROUPS (MPH)0.0-0.5 0.6-3 .5 3.6-7.5 7.6-12.5 12.6-18.S SUM PERCENT 18.6-24.5 SUM PERCENT GE 24.6 SUN PERCENT DIRECTION SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT SUM PERCENT N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1 2 7 6 3 3 4 8 6 2 7 5 5 1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 12 8 9 13 9 12 31 20 23 28 22 30 33 28 21 10 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.5 9 9 22 20 34 16 32 42 32 45 47 47 41 29 41 40 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.5 1.9 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.9 1.9 21 36 24 12 14 23 47 32 23 54 so 58 73 61 109 63 1.0 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 2.2 1.5 1.1 2.5 2.3 2.7 3.4 2.8 5.0 2.9 13 28 27 0 3 14 16 11 21 26 11 12 39 52 79 45 0.6 1.3 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.6 1.8 2.4 3.7 2.1 2 31 6 0 0 0 28 12 13 7 2 12 21 12 39 3 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.8 0.1 59 113 90 52 66 68 157 121 120 166 134 166 212 187 290 161 2.7 5.2 4.2 2.4 3.1 3.1 7.3 5.6 5.6 7.7 6.2 7.7 9.8 8.6 13.4 7.4 0 0.0 62 2.9 309 14.3 S06 23.4 700 32.4 397 18.4 188 8.7 2162 100.0 MISSING HOURS: 46 MEAN WIND SPEED: 14.7 APPENDIX B MPC DATA The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc._(FCi/ml) (.4Ci/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1 E-4 I E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-1 24 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 1E-4 1E-4 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-21 1 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-I15m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd-1 15 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 I E-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(l__Ci/ml) (liCi/ml)Californium (98) Cf-253 1 E-4 1 E-4 Cf-254 1 E-7 1 E-7 Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce-141 9E-5 9E-5 Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1 E-5 1 E-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-1 34m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-1 37 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) CI-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1 E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1 E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy-166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1 E-5 1 E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er-169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 IE-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-1 52(9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-1 52 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(ýLCi/mnl) (ýtCi/mnl) Europium (63) Eu-154 2E-5 2E-5 Eu-1 55 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Fluorine (9) F-1 8 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-1 59 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au-196 2E-4 1E-4 Au-1 98 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho-166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-113m 1E-3 1E-3 In-114m 2E-5 2E-5 In-115m 4E-4 4E-4 In-115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir-192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-210 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu-1 77 1E-4 1E-4 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(jCi/ml) (ýjCi/ml)Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5 Mn-54 1E-4 1E-4 Mn-56 1 E-4 1 E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1 E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 1 E-4 1 E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 1E-4 1E-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 1E-4 IE-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt-191 1E-4 1E-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 Pt-1 93 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 1E-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4. 1 E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Insoluble Conc. Conc.(liCi/ml)Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium (59) Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm-147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 Protactinium (91) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4 Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1 E-4 1 E-4 Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-1 83 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m 1E-2 1E-2 Rh-105 1E-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1 E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru-1 03 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 1E-5 1E-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm-1 51 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-1 53 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 I E-4 I E-4 Ag-110m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-1 11 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(RCi/ml) (RCi/ml)Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 1 E-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta-182 4E-5 4E-5 Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1 E-2 1 E-2 Tc-96 1 E-4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-1 60 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1 E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1 E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1 E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-1 70 5E-5 5E-5 Tm-171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(PCi/ml) (ttCi/ml)Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 U-235 3E-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-1 75 1 E-4 1 E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1 E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours I Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(lLCi/ml) (pCi/ml)Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 itCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity"). APPENDIX C SALEM ODCM OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC SALEM GENERATING STATION Revision 20 Prepared By: Reviewed by: Accepted by: 05/10/2006 Date 05/11/2006 Date Date Meeting #: S2006-008 Approved b?Plant Mang2er Date Page 1 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Revision Summary 3 1. Definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 (pg. 10) is revised, From: 3 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation I shall be those listed in Table III of TID-14844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites." To: 3 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of I-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of I-131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation I shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion. " I Justification: ODCM Revision 20 incorporates the definition of DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 in accordance with issuance of Licensing Amendment Nos. 271 and 252 for the Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2, respectively. These Amendments revise the Technical Specifications to incorporate alternate source I term methodology in accordance with 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.67.I 2. Section 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations (bottom of pg. 89), replaced the wording "collected at the R46 sample locations" with "secondary samples ", and "steam " with "secondary system".Justification: 3 This revision is based on the Design Change Packages (DCPs) 80057520 and 80057587 for 1R46 and 2R46 Radiation Monitors respectively. The DCPs will modify these monitors from off-line sampling system monitors to adjacent-to-line monitors, resulting in removal of the R46 sampling locations. Further, this change provides a means of safely obtaining the required secondary system samples, in order to quantify release rates and cumulative releases of pre-event or post event atmospheric steam releases. This removes the unnecessary specific direction on where to obtain radionuclide samples when characterizing a release.I Page 2 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRO DUCTIO N ................................................................................................................................... 7 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS ............................................................... 8 1.0 D E F IN IT IO N S .............................................................................................................................. 10 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ................................................... 16 3/4.0 A P P L IC A B ILIT Y .................................................................................................................. 16 3/4.3 INSTR UM EN TA TION ...................................................................................................... 18 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ... 18 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 24 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS ......................................................................................... 29 3/4.11.1 LIQ UID EFFL UEN TS ................................................................................................. 29 3/4.11.1.1 CON CEN TRA TION ......................................................................................... 29 3/ 4 .11.1.2 D O S E ........................................................................................................................ 33 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT ................................................................. 34 3/4.11.2 GASEO US EFFLUEN TS ............................................................................................. 35 3/4.11.2 .1 D O SE R A T E .............................................................................................................. 35 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES ........................................ 38 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE F O R M ........................................................................ ............................................... 3 9 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT ...................................... I .......................... 40 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ................................................................................................................... 41 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................................... 42 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 42 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CEN SUS ................................................................................................... 55 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORA TORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ................................................. 57 B A S E S ................................................................................................................................................ 5 8 3/4.3 INSTR UM EN TATION ............................................................................................... .... 59 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION .... 59 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 60 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS ........................................................................................ 62 3/4.11.1 LIQU ID EFFLU EN TS ............................................................................................ 62 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ........................................................................................ 63 3/4.11.4 TO TA L D O SE ........................................................................................................ 65 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................................... 66 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM .................................................................................. 66 3/4.12.2 LAND U SE CEN SU S ............................................................................................ 66 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM .......................................... 66 5.0 D E SIG N FE A TU R E S .................................................................................................................. 68 5.1 SITE ............ ................................................... 68 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID E F F L U E N T S ..................................................................................................................... 68 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS .......................................................................................... 70 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ...... 70 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ................................................. 70 Page 3 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATM ENT SYSTEM S ........................................................................................... 72 3 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES .............................................................. 73 1.0 LIQ U ID E FFLU E N T S ................................................................................................................... 74 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................................... 74 I 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination ................................................................ 74 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service W ater: ....................................................................................................... 75 1.2.2 Conservative D efault V alues ......................................................................................... 76 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 .............................. 77 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation -10 CFR 50 .............. ............. .... 77 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents ................................................ 77 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation .............................................................. 793 1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary L eakag e ........................... ....................................................................................... 79 1.6 Liquid Effl uent D ose Projections .......................................................................................... 80 2.0 GA SEO U S EFFLU EN TS ....................................................................................................... 81 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................................... 81 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination ............................................................... 82 3 2.2.1 Containm ent and Plant Vent M onitor ........................................................................... 82 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values ......................................... 83 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations -10 CFR 20 ................................ 83 3 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ....................................................................... 83 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates ............................................ 85 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 ............................................................ 85 I 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ............................................................ 85 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .............................................................. 86 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 ............................................ 87 I 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates ................................... 87 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates ................................... 87 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations ............................ 88 I 2.7 Gaseous Effluent D ose Projection ...................................................................................... 90 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE AN ALYSES ................................................................................................ 91 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ....................................................... 91 I 3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC- 40 CFR 190 ................................................ 91 3.2.1 Effluent D ose Calculations ........................................................................................... 91 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination ......................................................................... 91 I 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................ 93 4.1 Sam p ling P rogram .................................................................................................................... 93 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ................................................................................ 93 I Page 4 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLES TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES ................................................................................... 13 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION ................................................................................ 14 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 22 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING IN STR U M EN TA TIO N ................................................................................................................ 25 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ............................................ 27 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM....................................................................................................................................................... 3 0 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P R O G R A M ................................................................................................................................... 36 TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM * ..... 44 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES .............................................................................................. 51 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(]), (2) 5............................................ ................................... 52 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 .............. 97 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations -Unit 2..: ........................ 98 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Ai .................... .................... 99 Table 1-3: B ioaccum ulation Factors ........................................................................................... 101 Table 2-1: D ose Factors For N oble G ases .................................................................................. 104 Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations -Unit 1 .......................... 105 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations -Unit 2 ......................... 106 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathw ays .............................................................................. 107 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases ........................................................ 108 Table A-i: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 1 ..................................................................... 123 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 2 ..................................................................... 124 Table B-i: Adult Dose Contributions -Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 1 ...................... 128 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions -Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 ...................... 129 Table C- 1: Effective D ose Factors .............................................................................................. 134 Table D -i: Infant D ose Contributions ........................................................................................ 138 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations ...................................................................................... 141 Table F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations ..................................................................... 150 FIGURES Figure 5.1-3: A rea Plot Plan O f Site ...................................................................................... 69 Figure 1-1: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 1 ......................................................................... 94 Figure 1-2: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 2 ......................................................................... 95 Figure 1-3: Liquid Radioactive Waste System ....................................................................... 96 Figure 2-1: Salem Ventilation Exhaust Systems And Effluent Monitor Interfaces .................. 102 Figure 2-2: Gaseous Radioactive Waste Disposal System ....................................................... 102 Page 5 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3 Figure 2-2: Gaseous Radioactive W aste Disposal System ....................................................... 103 Figure E-1: Onsite Sam pling Locations .................................................................................... 147 Figure E-2: Offsite Sam pling Locations ................................................................................... 148 APPENDICES 3 APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF DEFAULT PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS ............................. 121 APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATIONS -LIQUID EFFLUENTS ......... 126 APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL BASES FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 131 APPENDIX D: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATION -GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ....... 136 APPENDIX E: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ......................................... 140 3 APPENDIX F: MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION (MPC) VALUES -LIQUID EFFLUENTS ........ 150 P I I I I I I I I I I Page 6 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I -Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II -Calculational Methodologies. Part I includes the following: " The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4" Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively. Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for:* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and" the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.Part II also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.Revisions to the ODCM shall be made in accordance with the Technical Specifications Section 6.14.The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation related to Amendment Nos. 234 and 215, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 1OCFR20 and the "new" 1OCFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs).The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part 20. The letter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the "new" Part 20.Page 7 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS -U I I I Page 8 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS Page 9 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3 1.0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS i 1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS. 3 ACTION 1.2 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions. CHANNEL CALIBRATION I 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an inplace qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an inplace cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL i CALIBRATION may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated. CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter. CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the primary sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip I functions. CONTROL i 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) and were renamed CONTROLS. This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of 1- 131, 1-132, I-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (FGR 11), "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion". Page 10 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.13 The FREQUE&CY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.2.GAS-EOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.14 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC 1.16 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall be all those persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of PSE&G, its contractors, or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)1.17 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the environmental radiological monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1)the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and the Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively. OPERABLE -OPERABILITY 1.18 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, a normal and an emergency electrical power source, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s). OPERATIONAL MODE -MODE 1.19 An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e., MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1.PURGE -PURGING 1.23 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement. Page 11 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RATED THERMAL POWER 1.25 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3459 MWt.REPORTABLE EVENT i 1.27 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 1OCFR Part 50. 3 SITE BOUNDARY 1.29 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is not owned, leased, or3 otherwise controlled by the licensee, as shown in Figure 5.1-3.SOURCE CHECK I 1.31 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity. THERMAL POWER 1.33 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.35 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to i radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.36 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by 3 passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents). n Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components. 3 VENTING 1.37 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process. 3 WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM 1.41 A WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting Reactor Coolant System offgases from the Reactor Coolant System and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. 3 Page 12 of 156 i Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES MODE 1. POWER OPERATION 2. STARTUP 3. HOT STANDBY 4. HOT SHUTDOWN 5. COLD SHUTDOWN 6. REFUELING** REACTIVITY CONDITION, Keff THERMAL POWER*> 0.99 > 5%> 0.99< 0.99< 0.99< 0.99< 0.95<5%0 AVERAGE COOLANT TEMPERATURE > 350°F> 350°F> 350°F 350°F > Tavg> 200°F< 200°F< 1400F 0 0 0* Excluding decay heat.** Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.Page 13 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION S D w M Q SA R S/U P FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours.At least once per 24 hours.At least once per 7 days.At least once per 31 days.At least once per 92 days.At least once per 6 months.At least once per 18 months.Prior to each reactor startup.Prior to each release.Not applicable. N.A.Page 14 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 15 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY 3 CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROL, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met. I 3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROLS and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in: 3 1. At least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours, 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours, and 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours. 3 Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.This CONTROL is not applicable in MODE 5 or 6. 3 3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition: (a) shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROL are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval. 3 (b) may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time. 3 This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply with ACTION requirements. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS. 3 I Page 16 of 1563 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPLICABILITY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
4.0.1 Surveillance
Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement. 4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL. The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.
4.0.4 Entry
into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROL has been performed within the stated surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply with ACTION requirements. Page 17 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3 3.3.3.8 In accordance with Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-12 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).APPLICABILITY: During all liquid releases via these pathways.ACTION: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.
- b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.8 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-12.Page 18 of.156 mM -low M m M m M -m -Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE TNSTRT TMFNT ACTION INSTRUMENT
- 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1 (1R18, 2R18)4 (1R19A-D, 2R19A-D)26 27 2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge b. Chemical Waste Basin 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES 5 (Unit 1) (1R13A-E)3 (Unit 2) (2R13A-C)1 (R37)28 31 a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1 (1FR1064, 2FR1064)29 29 4 (1FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184, 2FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184)Page 19 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATION ACTION 26 -ACTION 27 -ACTION 28 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that prior to initiating a release: a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.1, and b. At least two technically qualified members of.the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1- 131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed:
- a. At least once per 8 hours when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is greater than 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131, or b. At least once per 24 hours when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is less than or equal to 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that: a. At least once per 8 hours, local monitor readouts for the affected channels are verified to be below their alarm setpoints, or (Unit 2)b. With a Service Water System leak on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor either: 1. At least once per 8 hours, grab samples are to be collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed, or 2. Isolate the release pathway.c. With no identified service water leakage on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated with the inoperable monitor, at least once per 24 hours, collect grab samples and analyze for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed.
Page 20 of 156 I U I I I i I I I I I I U I I I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION ACTION 29 -ACTION 31 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases.Pump performance curves may be used to estimate flow.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that sampling is conducted in accordance with the following table: Frequency 1 per week 1 per day Condition During normal operation (all MODES)During operation with an identified primary to secondary leak on either Salem Unit The samples shall be analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 shall be performed. Page 21 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK SOURCE CHANNEL CHECK CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D D P#M R(3)R(3)Q(l)Q(l)2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Containment Fan Coolers -Service Water Line Discharge D D M M R(3)R(3)Q(2)Q(2)b. Chemical Waste Basin Line 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D(4)D(4)N.A.N.A.R R N.A.N.A.Page 22 of 156 m-mMIm -m m -=- m o -m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-12 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Indication on instrument drawer in Control Equipment Room only)(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Indication on instrument drawer in Control Equipment Room only {Unit 1})4. Instrument controls not set in operate mode. (On instruments equipped with operate mode switches only {Unit 1})(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards. (4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.# The 1 R1 8 channel is an in-line channel which requires periodic decontamination. Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.# The 2R1 8 channel is an off-line channel which requires periodic decontamination. Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.Page 23 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION i 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS i 3.3.3.9 In accordance with Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the 3 radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance 3 with the ODCM.APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3-13 ACTION: a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected I channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.
- b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13. 1 Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I 4.3.3.9 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-13.I Page 24 of 1563 m ! ----i -mm m -m i- -m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE A PPT TI A 1:IT .TT AC(TTON APPLICABILITY ACTION 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 3. CONTAINMENT PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 4. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM##a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D, 2R12A or 2R41A&D) #1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D 2R12A or 2R41A & D) #1 (1R41A&D, 2R41A&D)*****31 34 37 33 36 36 32 32*b. Iodine Sampler 1 (1RME4, 5 or 1XT8911, *2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)c. Particulate Sampler 1 (lRME4, 5 or 1XT8911, *2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) 1 (1RM-1FA8603, 2RM-2FA8603)
- e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1 (lRM-1FA17079 or S1PAS-1FA6863Z, 2RM-2FA17079 or S2PAS-2FA6863Z)
- The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 25 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 ACTION 31 -ACTION 32 -ACTION 33 -ACTION 34 -ACTION 36 -ACTION 37 -TABLE 3.3-13 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATION With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release: a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving lineup;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 8 hours and these samples are analyzed for gaseous principal gamma emitters at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL TABLE 4.11-2.A, B, or C within 24 hours. Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately suspend PURGING of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 4 hours samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11-2.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, Containment Pressure Reliefs may be performed provided that prior to initiating the release: I I I I I I I I I I I a. At least two independent samples of containment are analyzed, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations. Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.* At all times, other than when the line is valved out and locked.** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief APPLICABILITY: Modes 1-6, R4 1A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Modes 1-5, R12A Monitor providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Mode 6, R12A Monitor providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required). During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.# During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.I I I I U I I Page 26 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED 1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor -Providing P P R(3) Q(1)Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 2. CONTAINMENT PURGE AND PRESSURE -VACUUM RELIEF a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor P P R(3) Q(1) **3. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM#a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(3) Q(2) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) D N.A. R N.A. *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor W N.A. R N.A. *# The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described: (a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 27 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.3-13 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation if this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power) n 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Alarm Only)(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: U 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. The activity of the calibration sources were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now NIST) standards.
- At all times** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure -Vacuum Relief I Surveillance requirement
-Modes 1-6, R4 1 A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release Modes 1-5, R1 2A Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release I Mode 6, R12A Monitors providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required). During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R41A/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE. I I Page 28 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10-4 microcuries/ml. APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analyses program in Table 4.11-1.4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.Page 29 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)a Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (tCi/ml)A. Batch Waste P P Release Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma Tanksb Emittersc 5x 107 1-131 1xl0-6 P M Dissolve and One Batch/M Entrained Gases 1x10 (Gamma Emitters)P M H-3 Each Batch Composite lx 1-Gross Alpha 1x10.7 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Each Batch Composite Fe-55 lxl0-6 B. Continuous Principal Gamma 7 Releasese W W EmittersC 5x10 1. Steam Grab Sample Generator Blowdown 1-131 1xl0-6 M M Dissolved and lx10-5 Grab Sample Entrained Gases W M H-3 1xl0 5 Grab Sample Composited Gross Alpha 1x10-7 W Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Grab Sample Composite 5x_10-_Fe-55 1x10 6 I il I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I Page 30 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation): LLD= 4.66*Sb E
- V
- 2.22E6
- Y
- exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), k is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting.Typical values of E, V, 4, and At should be used in the calculation.
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a piori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Page 31 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed to assure representative sampling.c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144*. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.* The LLD for Ce-144 shall be 2x10 6 p[Ci/ml.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 32 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited: a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 33 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Salem Units l and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the i liquid radwaste treatment system shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected cumulative doses due to the liquid effluent from each reactor to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) exceed 0.375 mrem to the total body or 1.25 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter.APPLICABILITY: At all times. i ACTION: 3 a. With the radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:
- 1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, i identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.
- 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
I b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.3 Doses due to liquid releases shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM.Page 34 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:
- a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mremryr to the skin, and b. For iodine-131, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.APPLICABILITY:
At all times.ACTION: With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine- 131, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11-2.Page 35 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (ýiCi/ml)A. Waste Gas P P Storage Each Tank Each Tank Principal Gamma lx i0-4 Tank Grab Sample Emittersb B. Containment P P Principal Gamma xi 0-4 PURGE Each PURGE Each PURGE Emittersb Grab Sample H-3 lx10 6 C. Plant Vent Mcde Principal Gamma I x 0-4 Grab Sample Mc Emittersb H-3 1x10-6 D. All Release Continuous Wg 1-131 1xIO-1 2 Types as Charcoal Listed in A, Sample B, and C Above Continuousf Wg Principal Gamma 1x10"11 Particulate Emittersb Sample (1- 131, Others)Continuousf M Gross Alpha 1xl10 1 1 Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1xO1-11 Composite Particulate Sample Continuousf Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1xl0.6 Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 36 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.11-2 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1 b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, Xe-138 for gaseous emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER unless: 1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2. The noble gas activity monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.d. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 24 hours when the refueling canal is flooded.e. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the ventilation exhaust from the spent fuel pool area whenever spent fuel is in the spent fuel pool.f. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.g. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing (or after removal from sampler). Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.Page 37 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the I air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, from the site areas and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following: I a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation. 3 APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: I a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been 3 taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS U 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar 3 year shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.I I Page 38 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine- 131, from tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:
- a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY:
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated air dose from the release of iodine-131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 39 of 156 U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.4 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the i GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3), exceed 0.625 mrad for gamma radiation and 1.25 mrad for beta radiation in any calendar quarter. The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) would exceed 1.875 mrem to any organ in any calendar quarter.APPLICABILITY: At all times. 3 ACTION: a. With gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: 3 1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the I inoperability.
- 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
i b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.11.2.4 Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the ODCM. 3 Page 40 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g.11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION: a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks to determine whether the limits of this CONTROL have been exceeded. If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the ODCM.4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units and from radwaste storage shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM.Page 41 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.1, the i radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1.APPLICABILITY: At all times. I ACTION: 3 a. With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence. 3 b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium. at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table .3.12-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the 3 corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. When more than one of the 3 radionuclides in Table 3.12-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if: concentration (1) concentration (2) 1.0 reporting level (1) reporting level (2)When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. This report is 3 not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.*The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.Page 42 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS ACTION: (Cont'd)c. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program.Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report. Include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
- d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12-1.Page 43 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS (1) FREQUENCY 1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows: An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 1 1-km range from the site (not bounded by or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.*The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.Page 44 of 156 M M M M MM M M M M m M MMm m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1 -1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.Radioiodine Canister 1-131 analysis weekly.4 Samples -One sample from close to the SITE BOUNDARY location and Three samples in different land based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground level D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a community having a high calculated annual average ground- level D/Q;and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction. Particulate Sampler Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change (3);Gamma isotopic analysis(4) of composites (by location)quarterly. Page 45 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY.OF.ANALYSIS
- 3. WATERBORNE
- a. Surface(5)
One sample upstream.One sample downstream One sample outfall One sample cross-stream Grab sample monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly.
- b. Ground c. Drinking (10)d. Sediment Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected(7).One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge One sample from downstream area One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area Monthly Composite sample over two-week period(6) when 1- 131 analysis is performed; monthly composite otherwise.
Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly and tritium analysis quarterly. 1-131 analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the water is greater than 1 mrem per year 8). Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) semiannually One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown Page 46 of 156 M M M M M m m M M m M M m m M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS ()SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF-ANALYSIS
- 4. INGESTION a. Milk Samples from milking animals in three locations within 5 km distance having the highest dose potential.
If there are none, then, one sample from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per yr).One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge. Semimonthly when animals are on pasture, monthly at other time Gamma isotopic (4) and 1- 131 analysis semi-monthly when animals are on pasture; monthly at other times b. Fish and Invertebrates Sample in season, or semiannually if they are not seasonal Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on edible portions.Page 47 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS ()SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS c. Food Products One sample of each principal class of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged At time of harvest (9)Gamma isotopic analysis (4) on edible portion.Page 48 of 156------- i l m m -.m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133,"Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time.In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report : documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.(2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters. For the purposes of this table, a Dosimeter of Legal Record (DLR) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation. The frequency of analysis or readout will depend upon the characteristics of the specific dosimetry system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. No direct radiation monitoring stations are located in the inner ring sectors 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 and the outer ring sector 8 as originally determined during plant licensing and as permitted by Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by The Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979.(3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.(4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.Page 49 of 156 I!Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) I TABLE NOTATION 3 (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized for recreational activities. 3 (6) A composite sample is one which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results 3 in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for 3 contamination. (8) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the 3 methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk collections. 3 (9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be m paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid I plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. 3 (10) No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest I unaffected water supply is required.I I I Page 50 of 156 1 M M M M M M M m U M M M M m M M M M M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)H-3 3 x 10 4 Mn-54 1 x 103 3 x 104 Fe-59 4 x 10 2 1 x 104 Co-58 1 x 10 3 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 104 Zn-65 3 x 10 2 2 x 10 4 Zr-Nb-95 4x 102 1-131 20 0.9 3 1 x 10 2 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 3 60 1 x 10 3 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2 x 10 3 Ba-La-140 2x 102 3 x 102 Page 51 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(')'(2) LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)gross 4 1 x 10-2 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58,60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 10 7 x 10-2 1 60 Cs-134 15 5 x 10-2 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 10.2 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 Page 52 of 156-~~~~ m M M -M M--- Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: 4.660 Sb LLD =E 9 V
- 2.22E6
- Y e exp(-AAt)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picocuries per unit mass or volume), 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute), E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration), V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume), 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable), k is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting.Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.
Page 53 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued) I TABLE NOTATION I It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a prori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs 1 unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.I I I I I I I I I I I Page 54 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2) producing broad leaf vegetation. APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8.b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
- c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
- Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12-1.4c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.Page 55 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS (Cont'd) 3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months I using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities.
The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.P I I I I 3 I I I I U I I Page 56 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.3 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a, With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4. are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 57 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.Page 58 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE -TABLES 3.3-12 and 4.3-12 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 1R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 1R19A, B, C, and D(1)Gross Activity 2a Containment Fan Coolers Service 1R13 A, B, C, D and E(1)Water Line Discharge Gross Activity Unit 2: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 2R18 Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 2R19A,B,C, Gross Activity and D(1)2a Containment Fan Coolers -Service 2R13A, B and C0l)Water Line Discharge Gross Activity 2b Chemical Waste Basin Line Gross R37 Activity (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. Page 59 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.CROSS REFERENCE -TABLES 3.3-13 and 4.3-13 Unit 1: T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels la Waste Gas Holdup System 1R41A and D (1)(2)Noble Gas Activity 2a Containment Purge and 1R12A Pressure -Vacuum Relief Noble Gas Activity 1R41A and D (1)(2)3a Plant Vent Header System 1R41A and D (1)(2)Noble Gas Activity 3b Plant Vent Header System 1RME 4, 5 (1R41)Iodine Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)3c Plant Vent Header System 1RME 4, 5 (1R41)Particulate Sampler (3) or 1XT8911 (1R45)(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's"Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. (2) 1R41D is the setpoint channel. 1R41A is the measurement channel.(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components. Page 60 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES Unit 2: T/S Table Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Item No. Channels I a Waste Gas Holdup System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(1)(')2a Containment Purge and Pressure -Vacuum Relief 2R12A or 2R41A Noble Gas Activity and D(1)(2)3a Plant Vent Header System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(')(').3b Plant Vent Header System Iodine Sampler (3) RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)3c Plant Vent Header System Particulate Sampler (3) 2RME 4, 5 (2R41)or 2XT8911 (2R45)(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's "Minimum Channels Operable" requirement. (2) 2R41D is the setpoint channel. 2R41A is the measurement channel.(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components. I Page 61 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION The CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2..The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).3/4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I. 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculations in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.The CONTROL applies to the release of liquid effluents from each reactor at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system.Page 62 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste l treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents. 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE 3 This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY 3 from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20.The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in i gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)]. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be I sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the whole body and 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year. This CONTROL applies to the release of gaseous effluents from all reactors at the site.3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES 3 This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The 3 ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the 3 requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be i Page 63 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES substantially underestimated. The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methods for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109,"Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual dose based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate controls for iodine- 131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1)individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objectives given in Section 11.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents. Page 64 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS S BASES 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 to 46 Fr 18525. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant radioactive effluents exceed twice the design objective doses of Appendix I. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within the reporting requirement level. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1 and 3.11.2. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE:PUBLIC during any-period in which he/she N is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.1 I I Page 65 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. This monitoring program implements Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. The initial specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience. The LLDs required by Table 4.12-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a pro (before the fact)limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, aerial survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) yield of 2 kg/m 2.3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM This requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.Page 66 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Page 67 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1 SITE 5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1-3. (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.) Page 68 of 156 UNRESTRICTED AREA (PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVERNMENT) t NlI i COOLING TOWER NUCLEAR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1 N/\\' SECURITY FENCE 1.........- SWITCH YARD 0i HOPE CREEK L, r1 [SECURITY H.CENTER*II, SALEM.1II NO.2 SWITCH YARD tNO I\" FEED WATER &i' CIRC. WATER.,T INTAKE ,,.,STRUCTURE.,"/i PROCESSING CENTER\SITE BOUNDARY---)> I I I I I METEOROLOGICAL TOWER 0'0 0 DELAWARE RIVER--............. 0 CD 0-m¸ m nm. ,- m -m m ---- - Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all measurements taken during the period pursuant to the Table and Figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM; as well as summarized and tabulated results of locations specified in these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by CONTROL 3.12.1; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable. 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.8 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.8, The Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21."Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.Page 70 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) I Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B I thereof.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour I listing of magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents toi MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1-3) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments (i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location) shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for I the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for I Nuclear Power Operation. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period: a. Container volume, i b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), 3 c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), d. Source of waste and processing employed (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, 5 evaporator bottoms), e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and 3 f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde). 3 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.Page 71 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring. 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID. GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid): 1. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Station Operations Review Committee (SORC). The discussion of each change shall contain: a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 1 OCFR50.59;
- b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;
- c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the SORC.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the SORC.Page 72 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES Page 73 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Salem Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) R18 (Unit 1) and 2-Ri 8 (Unit 2) provide the alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive material releases as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.l-R19 A, B, C, and D provide the alarm and isolation function for the Unit 1 steam generator blowdown lines. 2-R19 A, B, C, and D provide this function for Unit 2.2) Alarm (only) -The alarm functions for the Service Water System are provided by the radiation monitors on the Containment Fan Cooler discharges (IR 13 A,B,C,D and E for Unit 1 and 2R 13 A, B, and C for Unit 2).Releases from the secondary system are routed through the Chemical Waste Basin where the effluent is monitored (with an alarm function) by R37 prior to release to the environment.
Liquid radioactive release flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented as Figures 1-1 and 1-2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The Liquid Radioactive Waste System is presented in Figure 1-3.1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 ýtCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases).The following equation* must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions: C(F + f)f Where: C = the effluent concentration limit of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in ptCi/ml c = the setpoint, in [Ci/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, Page 74 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 (Appendix F) in the UNRESTRICTED AREA f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F+ f) = F.]* Adapted from NUREG-0133
1.2.1 Liquid
Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service Water.The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station are determined by I the following equations: SP < [MPCe *SEN
- CW
- CF
- AF+bkg (1.2)RR !with: I Ci (gamma only)MPCe = i(1.3) n P i (gamma only )M-P-C i Where: I SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides in the effluent n stream (ptCi/mil)
Ci = the concentration of radionuclide i in the undiluted liquid effluents (iiCi/ml)MPCi = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (ptCi/ml)SEN = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated (cpm per ptCi/ml)CW = the circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of release (gal/min)RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)bkg = the background of the monitor (cpm) I CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides in setpoint calculations. AF = an allocation factor applicable for steam generator blowdown The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the circulating water dilution is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria. However, in order to maximize the available plant discharge dilution and thereby minimize the potential offsite doses, batch releases from either Unit-I or.Page 75 of 1 .56.... ... .... ..I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Unit-2 may be routed to either the Unit-I or Unit-2 Circulating Water System discharge. Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch releases from either a single unit or both units into a single Circulating Water System discharge.
1.2.2 Conservative
Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints may be determined through the use of default parameters. Tables 1-1.1 and 1-1.2 summarize all current default values in use for Salem Unit-1 and Unit-2, respectively. They are based upon the following: a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 6.05E-06 l.Ci/ml (Unit 1) and 4.81E-06 ptCi/ml (Unit 2). (refer to Appendix A for justification); b) for additional conservatism*, substitution of the 1-131 MPC value of 3E-07 ýtCi/ml for the R19 Steam Generator Blowdown monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R- 13 Service Water monitors;c) for conservatism, use of an allocation factor of 0.5 for the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors to limit consequences of potential simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks in two steam generators.** The allocation factor equals 1.0 for all other liquid effluent setpoints; d) substitutions of the operational circulating water flow with the lowest flow, in gal/min;*** e) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min; and, f) substitution of a Correction factor of 0.75 to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides.For batch liquid releases a fixed alarm setpoint is established for the 1, 2 RI 8 monitors and the release rate is controlled to ensure the inequality of equation 1.1 is maintained. With this approach, values selected for the parameters in the setpoint calculation (e.g., Table 1-1.1 and Table 1-1.2) should be any set of reasonable values that provide a setpoint value reasonably above anticipated monitor response, plus background, so as not to yield spurious alarms. The release rate is controlled to ensure compliance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.Calculations, as performed by Engineering, to establish the actual fixed setpoints for use in the plant, incorporate uncertainties and instrument drift. These factors will cause the actual installed instrument setpoint to be at a lower (conservative) value. However, for batch releases, when the rate is controlled, these uncertainties and drift should not be included in the evaluation of acceptable release rate, since this could cause a non-conservative correction, i.e., a higher allowable release rate. Therefore, for 1, 2 RI8 monitors, the setpoint value used for calculating the allowable release rate should be that value prior to correction for uncertainty and drift.Based upon the potential for 1-131 to be present in the secondary and service water systems, the use of the default effective MPC (MPCC) value as derived in Appendix A may be non-conservative for the 1, 2 R-19 SGBD monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R-13 Service Water monitors.**Setpoints using the Allocation Factor of 0.5 become invalid if primary-to-secondary leaks are identified in more than two steam generators simultaneously.
- The Containment Fan Coil Unit Discharge to Service Water Line is routed to the opposite Unit's Circulating Water System discharge.
Therefore, during periods when circulating water Page 76 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 pumps are out of service, such as during refueling outages, the default setpoints of the other Unit's R13 radiation monitors are not valid.1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Circulating Water System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 ýtCi/ml.Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11. 1.1 may be performed using the following equation: i (MPG CW+RR(1.4) Where: Ci = actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (flCi/ml) I: MPC = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (ýtCi/ml) [ODCM Appendix F]= 2E-04 j+/-Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases RR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)CW = the actual circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of the release (gal/min)1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation -10 CFR 50 3 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents. ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from I radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station to:-during any calendar quarter; I< 1.5 mrem to total body per unit< 5.0 mrem to any organ per unit-during any calendar year;< 3.0 mrem to total body per unit< 10.0 mrem to any organ per unit.Per the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculational methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Salem: Page 77 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Do- '.67E-02*VOL
- Y(Ci*AAio)
CW i (1.5)Where: Do = dose or dose commitment to organ o (mrem). Total body dose can also be calculated using site-related total body dose commitment factor.Ajo = site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (!iCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aio) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0133 by the equation: Aio= 1.14E +05 * [(UI
- BI)+(UF* BF 1)]* DF io (1.6)Where: Ao= composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per [tCi/ml)UI = adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr)BIi = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/l)UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr)BF 1 = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1)DFio = dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in pre-selected organ, o, from Table E-1 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi) 1.14E+05 = conversion factor (pCi/pCi
- ml/kg per hr/yr)The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11-1.Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.Page 78 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation.
In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)Total Body Dtb = 1.21E + 03
- VOL ci (1.7)CW Maximum Organ~2.52E + 04,* VOL I Dmax -2
- Ci (1.8)Where: Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL ([tCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem) I Dmax = conservatively evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem)1.21E+03 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the total body dose conversion factor (Fe-59, total body --7.27E+04 mrem/hr per VtCi/ml) I 2.52E+04 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative maximum organ dose conversion factor (Nb-95, GI-LLI -- 1.5 1E+06 mrem/hr per XCi/ml)1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to Secondary Leakage During periods of primary to secondary leakage (i.e., steam generator tube leaks), radioactive material will be transmitted from the primary system to the secondary system. The potential exists for the release of radioactive material to the off-site environment (Delaware River) via secondary system discharges.
Potential releases are controlled/monitored by the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors (R19) and the Chemical Waste Basin monitor (R37).However to ensure compliance with the regulatory limits on radioactive material releases, it may be desirable to account for potential releases from the secondary system during periods of primary to I secondary leakage. Any potentially significant releases will be via the Chemical Waste Basin with the major source of activity being the Steam Generator Blowdown.With identified radioactive material levels in the secondary system, appropriate samples should be collected and analyzed for the principal gamma emitting radionuclides. Based on the identified 3 Page 79 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5).Because the release rate from the secondary system is indirect (e.g., SG blowdown is normally routed to condenser where the condensate clean-up system will remove much of the radioactive material), samples should be collected from the release point (i.e., Chemical Waste Basin) for quantifying the radioactive material releases. However, for conservatism and ease of controlling and quantifying all potential release paths, it is prudent to sample the SG blowdown and to assume all radioactive material is released directly to the environment via the Chemical Waste Basin. This approach while not exact is conservative and ensures timely analysis for regulatory compliance. Accounting for radioactive material retention of the condensate clean-up system ion exchange resins may be needed to more accurately account for actual releases.In addition to the secondary releases described in this section, the Salem Ground Water Remediation System also can potentially discharge radioactive material to the Chemical Waste Basin. To ensure regulatory compliance, the releases are monitored by Radiation Monitor R-37. Samples are also collected, and analyzed for radionuclides. Based on the identified radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1.5).1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the quarterly projected doses exceed:-0.375 mrem to the total body, or-1.25 mrem to any organ.The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA is the ion exchange system as delineated in Figure 1-3. Alternately, the waste evaporator as presented in the Salem FSAR has processing capabilities meeting the NRC ALARA design requirements and may be used in conjunction or in lieu of the ion exchange system for waste processing requirements in accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3. These processing requirements are applicable to each unit individually. Exceeding the projected dose requiring processing prior to release for one unit does not in itself dictate processing requirements for the other unit.Dose projections are made at least once per 31 days by the following equations: D tbp = D b (919 d ) (1.9)D maxp = D max (91Vd (1.10)Where: Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Page 80_of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Dtb = the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 i (mrem)Dmaxp = the maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Dmax = the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 (mrerm)d = the number of days to date for current calendar quarter 91 = the number of days in a calendar quarter 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring I normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and ODCM CONTROLS are summarized as follows: 1) Waste Gas Holdup System -The vent header gases are collected by the waste gas holdup system.Gases may be recycled to provide cover gas for the CVCS hold-up tank or held in the waste gas tanks for decay prior to release. Waste gas decay tanks are batch released after sampling and analysis. The tanks are discharged via the Plant Vent. 1-R41D provides noble gas monitoring and automatic isolation of waste gas decay tank releases for Unit-1. This function is provided by 2-R41D for Unit-2.2) Containment Purge and Pressure/Vacuum Relief -containment purges and pressure/vacuum reliefs are released to the atmosphere via the respective unit Plant Vent. Noble gas monitoring and auto isolation function are provided by 1-R41D for Unit-I and 2-R41D for Unit-2. Additionally, in accordance with -ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, Table 3.3-13, 1-R12A and 2-R12A may be used to provide the containment monitoring and automatic isolation function during purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs (*). 1 3) Plant Vent -The Plant Vent for each respective unit receives discharges from the waste gas hold-up system, condenser evacuation system, containment purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs, and the Auxiliary Building ventilation. Effluents are monitored by R41D, a flow through gross activity monitor (for noble gas monitoring). Radioiodine and particulate sampling capabilities are provided by charcoal cartridge and filter medium samplers. Additionally, back-up sampling capability for radioiodine and particulates is i provided at the 1-R45 and 2-R45 sampling skids. Plant Vent flow rate is measured and as a back-up may be determined empirically as a function of fan operation (fan curves). Sampler flow rates are determined by flow rate instrumentation (e.g., venturi rotameter). Gaseous radioactive effluent flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figures 2-1. A simplified diagram of the Gaseous radioactive waste disposal system is provided in Figure 2-2.* The R12A in Mode 6 provides containment monitoring and alarm functions without automatic isolation'Page 81 of,156 . Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination
2.2.1 Containment
and Plant Vent Monitor Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., grab sample of the Containment atmosphere, waste gas decay tank, or Plant Vent), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by Specification 3.11.2.1, by the equation: FRAC = 4.72E +02* *VF 500 *(2.1)L ~i]FRA4C =[4.72 E +02* '
- VF*Z(Ci *(Li +1.1MI))]13000 (2.2)Where: FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide concentrations and the release flow rate%Q = annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location (sec/m 3)VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft 3/min)Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as determined by radioanalysis of grab sample (ýtCi/cm 3)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per jiCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ptCi/m 3 from Table 2-1)1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr)3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr)4.72 E+02 = conversion factor (cm 3/ft 3
- min/sec)Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the applicable monitors (R41D, and/or R12A) may be calculated by the equation: Page 82 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SP=LAF FRAC j+bkg (2.3)5 Where: I SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)SEN = monitor sensitivity (cpm per pCi/cm 3)bkg = background of the monitor (cpm)AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor and type release, which corresponds to the fraction of the total allowable release rate that is administratively allocated to the release.The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from I Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1).
Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is equal to 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder
0.5 allocated
to Hope Creek. Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station will be coordinated with the Hope Creek Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint i may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2-2.1 and 2-2.2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. These values are based upon:-the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate;-a radionuclide distributiona comprised of 95% Xe-133, 2% Xe-135, 1% Xe-133m, 1% Kr-88 and 1% Kr-85; and-an administrative allocation factor of 0.25 to conservatively ensure that any simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate. For this radionuclide distribution, the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the 3 corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate.a) Adopted from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, Source Term Specifications, Table 6 I 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations -10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases to I<500 mrem/yr, total body and <3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting 3 from the release shall be performed using the following equations: Page 83 of 156 6 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 D tb = *IQ. (Ki Q) (2.4)and D= ZQ* Z((Li + 1.1M)* Q) (2.5)Where: Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr)D, = skin dose rate (mrem/yr)/ =atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m 3)Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (jiCi/sec) Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m 3 , from Table 2-1)1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a, following any release exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity. The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases. As identified, any electronic spiking monitor responses may be excluded from the analysis.NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above may be imposed. However, conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. Provided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.Page 84 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 .b limits the dose rate to <1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-13 1, tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation: 3 DO~ (Ro**i (2.6)Where: Do = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr) i Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation Q pathway (sec/m 3)Rio = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per [tCi/m 3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4 i Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis frequency for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (ýtCi/sec) 3 By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for Do and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (see Table 2-3) and the most limiting: potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid --*Rio = 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per[tCi/m 3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 42 ptCi/sec. Reducing this release rate by a factor of 4 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release I points (e.g., Hope Creek), the corresponding release rate allocated to each of the Salem units is 10.5 pCi/sec. 3 For a 7 day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1- 131, the cumulative release is 6.3 Ci. Therefore, as long as the 1-131 releases in any 7 day period do not exceed 6.3 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b limits on I allowable release rate.2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 i 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of<5 mrad, gamma-air and <10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits <10 mrad, gamma-air and <20 mrad, beta-air. The limits are applicable, separately to each unit I and are not combined site limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses: Dy= 3.17E-O8*Z
- Q) (2.7)and Page 85 of"1.56 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Df= 3.17E- 08 %ZQ -(N
- Q,) (2.8)Where: Dr = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)D,6 = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m 3)Qi = cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest (ptCi) whereýtCi = (iCi/cc)*(cc released) or ([tCi/sec)*(sec released)Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per ptCi/mr 3 , from Table 2-1)Ni = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per PCi/m 3 , Table 2-1)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2. (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification for this simplified method and for values of Meff, and Neff..)Dy = 3.1 7 E-0 8 *Meff* Qi (2.9)0.50 iQ (and D,6 =3.17E- 08 *(Do= % *N(2.10)0.50 iQ e ZQI Where: Meff = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3)Neff = 1.1 E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per pCi/i 3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (pCi), where pCi = (pCi/cc) * (cc released) or (IiCi/sec)
- (sec released)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for potential variability in the radionuclide distribution Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and beta-air doses.Page 86 of 156 U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations
-10 CFR 50 1 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit of<7.5 mrem and calendar year limit <15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to 3 releases of 1-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days: Daop : 3.17E-08 *W* SFP* Z (Riop*Qi) (2.11) 1 i Where: 3 Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and controlling age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3= atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m 3)D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m 3 2)Riop = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m 3) or (M 2 -mrem/yr per ýLCi/sec)andorgan o from Table 2-4 for each age group and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riop were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0 133.Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (1 iCi).SFp = annual seasonal correction factor to account for the fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways: A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October) = 0.5 2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways: = 1.0 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, only the controlling pathways and age group as identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3.2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates. 3 In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, tritium, and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method).Dmax = 3.17E- 08* W* SFp
- Ri-131*. (2.12)iI Page 87 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)RI-131 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling (M 2 -mrem/yr per tCi/sec)W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.1E-10 1/M2 Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i 13 1, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate from with half life greater than 8 days (gCi)The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations During periods of primary to secondary leakage, minor levels of radioactive material may be released via the secondary system to the atmosphere.
Non-condensables (e.g., noble gases) will be predominately released via the condenser evacuation system and will be monitored and quantified by the routine plant vent monitoring and sampling system and procedures (e.g., R15 on condenser evacuation, R41D on plant vent, and the plant vent particulate and charcoal samplers). However, if the Steam Generator blowdown is routed directly to the Chemical Waste Basin (via the SG blowdown flash tank) instead of being recycled through the condenser, it may be desirable to account for the potential atmospheric releases of radioiodines and particulates from the flash tank vent (i.e., releases due to moisture carry over). Since this pathway is not sampled or monitored, it is necessary to calculate potential releases.Based on the guidance in NRC NUREG-0133, the releases of the radioiodines and particulates shall be calculated by the equation: Qi = ci* Rsgb* Fft *(1-SQftv) (2.13)Where: Qi = the release rate of radionuclide, i, from the steam generator flash tank vent (gtCi/sec) Ci = the concentration of radionuclide, i, in the secondary coolant water averaged over not more than one week (ýtCi/ml)Rsgb = the steam generator blowdown rate to the flash tank (ml/sec)Fft = the fraction of blowdown flashed in the tank determined from a heat balance taken around the flash tank at the applicable reactor power level SQftv= the measured steam quality in the flash tank vent; or an assumed value of 0.85, based on NUREG-0017. Tritium releases via the steam flashing may also be quantified using the above equation with the assumption of a steam quality (SQftv) equal to 0. Since the H-3 will be associated with the water Page 88 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 molecules, it is not necessary to account for the moisture carry-over which is the transport media for the I radioiodines and particulates. Based on the design and operating conditions at Salem, the fraction of blowdown converted to steam (Fft) I is approximately 0.48. The equation simplifies to the following: Qi = 0.072
- C Rgb (2.14) m For H-3, the simplified equation is: Qi = 0.48
- Ci
- gb (2.15) I Also during reactor shutdown operations with a radioactively contaminated secondary system, radioactive material may be released to the atmosphere via the atmospheric reliefs (PORV) and the safety reliefs on the main steam lines and via the steam driven auxiliary feed pump exhaust. The evaluation of the radioactive material concentration in the steam relative to that in the steam generator water is based on the guidance of NUREG-0017, Revision 1. The partitioning factors for the radioiodines is 0.01 and is 0.005 for all other particulate radioactive material.
The resulting equation for quantifying releases via the atmospheric steam releases is: QY = 0.13 * (CY
- SFo)* PFi (2.16)Where: I Qj= release rate of radionuclide i via pathway j,(ýtCi/sec)
C = concentration of radionuclide i, in pathway j,(ýtCi/ml) SFj = steam flow for release pathway j= 400,000 lb/hr per PORV 850,000 lb/hr per safety relief valve= 62,500 lb/hr for auxiliary feed pump exhaust PFj = partitioning factor, ratio of concentration in steam to that in the water in the steam generator= 0.01 for radioiodines 0.005 for all other particulates3 = 1.0 for H-3 0.13 = conversion factor -[(hr*ml) / (sec*lb)]Any significant releases of noble gases via the atmospheric steam releases can be quantified in accordance with the calculation methods of the Salem Emergency Plan Implementation Procedure. Alternately, the quantification of the release rate and cumulative releases may be based on secondary samples. The measured radionuclide concentration in the secondary system may be used for quantifying the noble gases, radioiodine and particulate releases.Page 89 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Note: The expected mode of operation would be to isolate the effected steam generator, thereby reducing the potential releases during the shutdown/cooldown process. Use-of the above calculation methods should consider actual operating conditions and release mechanisms. The calculated quantities of radioactive materials may be used as inputs to the equation (2.11) or (2.12) to calculate offsite doses for demonstrating compliance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and the ODCM CONTROLS.2.7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses exceed one-half the annual design objective rate in any calendar quarter, i.e., exceeding: -0.625 mrad/quarter, gamma air;-1.25 mrad/quarter, beta air; or-1.875 mrem/quarter, maximum organ.The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Auxiliary Building normal ventilation system (filtration systems # 1, 2 and 3) and the Waste Gas Decay Tanks as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2. Dose projections are performed at least once per 31 days by the following equations: Dyp= D * (91Yd) (2.17)D pp =D8* (91Vd) (2.18)D maxp = D max* (91d) (2.19)Where: Dyp = gamma air dose projection for current calendar quarter(mrad) Dy = gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.7 or 2.9 (mrem)Do~p = beta air dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrad)Dp = beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.8 or 2.10 (mrem)Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)Dmax = maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.11 or 2.12 (mrem)d = number of days to date in current calendar quarter 91 = number of days in a calendar quarter ,Page.9O'of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES 3 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.8, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall I include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY. 3 The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC based on the parameters from Table 2-3 and 2-hours per visit per year. The default value for the meteorological dispersion data as presented in Table 2-3 may be used if current year meteorology is unavailable at the time of NRC reporting. However, a follow-up evaluation shall be performed when the data becomes available. 3 3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 n The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium .fuel cycle sources (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). I For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Nuclear Generating Station and the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station: No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.The dose contribution from the operation of Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station will be estimated I based on the methods as presented in the Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (HCGS ODCM).As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 1 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure. 3 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the reporting requirements of 6.9.1.8 (RERR), dose calculations for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station should be performed using the controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-3 and the calculation methods contained within this ODCM. If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2. n Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used. m 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination. Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., DLR, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.Page 91 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at Salem that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190.However, should a situation exist where the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculation techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 compliance. Page 92 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1'Sampling Program The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:-To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;-To determine if the operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Stations has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment; -To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and-To verify that SNGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment. The sampling requirements (type of samples*, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.*NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Salem Generating Station.4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ODCM CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program provides a check on the precision and accuracy of measurements of radioactive materials in environmental samples.A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.7.Page 93 of 156 I1 I I I I I I I I I I I -MM M M M M M --MMM M M M M M Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 1 Page 94 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-2: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 2 Page 95 of 156 m m m --m -MM m --m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE 1-3: LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE SYSTEM Page 96 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liouid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 Parameter Actual Default Comments Value Value Units MPCe Calculated 6.05E-06
- 1 tCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.0E-07 N/A LtCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown and Service Water monitor setpoints.
Ci Measured N/A jtCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A ýiCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Col 2 (Appendix F).Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 1-R18 piCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint I-R19 (A,B,C,D) Document (PSBP) 315733 l-R13 (A,B,C,D,E) CW as determined 1.00E+05 gpm Circulating water system -single CW pump ***RR as determined gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 1-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL compliance l-R19 250 Steam Generator blowdown rate per Generator I-Ri3 2500 Service Water flow rate for Containment fan coolers Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 1-Ri8 Public Service Blueprint Document l-R19 (A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315733 l-R13 (A,B,C,D,E)** Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude I-Ri9 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation
- The MPC value of 1-131 (3E-07 pCi/ml) has been used for derivation of R19 Steam Generator Blowdown and R13 Service Water monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2* ** During periods when Unit 2 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for certain l-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I Page 97 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations
-Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments MPCe Calculated 4.81E-06
- Calculated for each batch to be released.MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A liCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown, Service Water and Chemical Waste Basin monitor setpoints.
C, Measured N/A JICi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.MPCi as determined N/A jiCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Col. 2 (Appendix F)Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 2-Ri8 !iCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint Document 2R19(A,B,C,D) 315734 2-R13(A,B,C) R37 CW as determined 1.OE+05 gpm Circulating Water System, single CW pump ***RR as determined gpm Determined prior to release; release rate 2-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL Compliance 2-R19 250 Steam Generator Blowdown rate per Generator 2-R13 2500 Service Water flow rate for Containment fan coolers R37 1200 Chemical Waste Basin discharge Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 2-R18 Public Service Blueprint Document 2-RI9(A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315734 2-R13(A,B,C)** R37 **Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude 2-R1 9 exceeding MPC limit in the case of simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units* Refer to Appendix A for derivation
- The MPC value of 1-131 (3.OE-7 pICi/ml) has been used for derivation of the R13, R19 and R37 monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2 During periods when Unit 1 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for certain 2-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.Page 98 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, A 1 o (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)H-3 -2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1' 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 I C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.39E+3 +3 2.90E+3 +3 2.90E+3 P-32 4.69E+6 2.91E+5 1.81E+5 -5.27E+5 Cr-51 5.58E+0 3.34E+0 1.23E+0 7.40E+0 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 -2. 10E+3 2.16E+4 a Mn-56 1.78E+2 3.15E+1 -2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 -1.97E+4 2.03E+4 Fe-59 8.06E+4 1.90E+5 7.27E+4 -5.30E+4 6.32E+5.... .. .. ..... .... ........ ...... .. ...... ....................
I........................................... ... ................ ..... .. .......................... .................. .... .................................... ......... ....... ....................................... .......... ........................................ ................. .................................................................. ......... .................................... ......... ..o-7 Co-57 1 I.42E+2 2.36E+2 --3.59E+3-Co-58 -6.03E+2 1.35E+3 -- 1.22E+4 Co-60 1.73E+3 3.82E+3 3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 7.18E+2 Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 1.20E+1 -6.65E+2 Cu-64 2.14E+2 1.O1E+2 5.40E+2 1.83E+4.... Z n -6 5 .................................. 1 .5 .....! .................................... Zn-69 3.43E+2 6.56E+2 4.56E+1 4.26E+2 9.85E+1 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 --3.42E+2 1.39E+3 .3.58E+2 4.30E+4.............. .......................................... .......................... ........................ ........................................................... ............................. ......... .................... ........... ................... ............... .......................................................... .................................................................................... ....................... ... ......... ............................... Br-82 4.07E+O ,- , -4.67E+O Br-83 7.25E-2 --1.04E-1 Br-84 9.39E-2 7.37E-7 Br-85 -3.86E-3 ---Rb-86 -6.24E+2 2.91E+2 ---1.23E+2 Rb-88 -1.79E+O 9.49E-1 ---2.47E- 11 Rb-89 -1..19E+O 8.34E-1 ---6.89E-14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 8.OOE+2 Sr-90 1.23E+5 3.01E+4 3.55E+3 Sr-91 9.18E+l -3.71E+O ---4.37E+2 Sr-92 3.48E+1 -1.51E+O ---6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+O -1.63E-1 ---6.42E+4 Y-91m 5.73E-2 -2.22E-3 ---1.68E-1 Y-91 8.88E+1 2.37E+O ... -4.89E+4 Y-92 5.32E-1 1.56E-2 -9.32E+3 Y-93 1.69E+O 4.66E-2 --5.35E+4 Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.l1E+0 3.46E+O -8.02E+O -1.62E+4 Zr-97 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 -2.68E-1 -5.51E+4 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 -2.46E+2 -1.51E+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.49E-1 3.46E-1 -1.11E+O -3.50E+3 Mo-99 .1.28E+2 2.43E+1 -2.89E+2 -2.96E+2 I Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 -5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 Tc-101 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 -3.46E-1 9.81E-3 5.77E-14 I Page 99 of 156 3 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Ai.(Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)(mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)Rtii-03 1.07E+2 4.60E+1 -4.07E+2 1.25Eq-4-Ru-105 8.89E+0 -3.51E+0 1. 15E+2 5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 2.01E+2 -3.06E+3 1.03E+5.. -.1 ..3 .-... ......... ........... .............. .. ....... ... ................. .......... ... ............... ...... .... .... ... ... ..... ........... ...... ........ ... ...... _ .--........ .... ..... ... ............ .......... ........... .. .......... .............................. ........... .. ......... .......... Rh-106 ---FAg-11m 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 -2.85E+3 -5.91E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 1.19E+l 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.1OE+2 6.71E-1 -2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+0 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+0 4.10E+l 6.96E-1 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+0 1.93E+0 6.60E+O 3.63E+1 7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.3 1 E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 -4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+0 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+1 1.92E+O............ ............. ................ .. ............... ......... ....... .. .............. ................ .............. ................. ..... ......... ........ .. .... .............. ...... .... ...... .............. ........... ........ ..- 1 l m..4 0 E 2.6 ...+1.5..g .1.0 8 ........ ... .. .................................. 6.9 E + 2. ...................... ............... ....... ....................... ....... .... ...- 6.-E+3 Te-131m 1.40E+2 6.85E+l. 5.571E+1 1.08E+I2 6.94E+2 -6.80E+3 Tfe -131f 1. 5 9E+O0 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+O -2.26E-1 Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 .6.24E+3 1.1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 -1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 -8.23E+1 1-132 1.06E+1 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 5.35E+0 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4 2.26E+2 1 .16E+2 1-134 5.56E+0 1.51E+l 5.40E+O 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 1.32E-2 1 1-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+1 2.24E+1 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 -5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 -1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 -4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+1 5.94E+O -8.81E+O 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 -5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+l Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+0 1.08E+2 -7.02E-1 1.18E+O 3.38E+3 Ba-141 3.81E+O 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 -2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 -1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+0 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 --5.83E+4 La-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 --2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+0 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 -1.08E+0 -8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 -1.97E-1 1.67E+4 C e-1-44 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+0 -4.43E+l 6.04E+4 Pr-143 5.79E+0 2.32E+O 2.87E-1 -1.34E+O -2.54E+4 Pr-144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 -4. 44E-3 -2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+0 4.58E+O 2.74E-1 -2.68E+0 -2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+O 7.66E+O 2.68E+0 --2.51E+3 N__239 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 -1.08E-2 -7.11E+2 SPage 100 of 115,6 !I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 1-3: Bioaccumulation Factors (pCi/kg per pCi/liter)* 3 H 9.9E-01 9.3E-01 C 1.8E+03 1.4E+03I Na 6.7E-02 1.9E-01 P 3.OE+03 3.OE+04 Cr 4.OE+02 2.OE+03 i Mn 5.5E+02 4.OE+02 Fe 3.OE+03 2.OE+04 ICo 1.OE+02 1 OE+03 Ni 1 .0E+02 2.5E+02 Cu 6.7E+02 1.7E+03 *Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 Br 1.5E-02 3.1 E+00 Rb 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01......... ... ................. .......................................... ...... ........ ... ............ ............... ................... .... 2 5 + ................ ... .... .... ............... .... ............ ... ....... .................... .... .. ... ................ ! .0 + 3 ....... .. .... .... .... .......... .Zr 2.OE+02 8.OE+01 3 Nb 3.OE+04 1.OE+02 Mo L.OE+01 1.OE+01 _Tc L.OE+01 .5.OE+01 Ru 3.OE+00 1.OE+03 __i Rh 1.0E+01 2.OE+03_Ag 3.3E+03 3.3E+03, Sb 4.OE+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.OE+01 1.OE+02...... ..... ...... ...................................... ...... ... ... ........ ........................................ .......... ............................................................ ....... ....... ................ ............................................................. ......... ...... .......... ..................................................... ............................. ...... ............................................. ................ ... i I 1.OE+01 5.OE+01 Cs 4.OE+01 2.5E+01 Ba 1.OE+01 1.OE+02 La 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Ce 1.0E+01 6.0E+02/.... ..... ...................... ....... ................. ........... .... ........ ............................... .......... ........................ ........ ..... .................................................. ............................................................................................................................... 0E + 0..........E+ 0... ... .I Pr 2.5E+01 1 OE+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 3.OE+/-O1 3.OE+/-01 Np 1.+0 OE+0l* Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is I adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.Page 101 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev;. 20 FIGURE 2-1: SALEM VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTEMS AND EFFLUENT MONITOR INTERFACES Simplified One Line TO ATMOSPHERE Page 102 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev.:20l3 FIGuRE 2-2: GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Simplified One Line VOLUME CONTROL TANK SPENT RESIN STORAGE TANK RECYCLE EVAPS I I, U I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 103 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-1: Dose Factors For Noble Gases Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li MiN Radionuclide LCi/m3) R.Ci/m3) Ci/m3) __i/m3_Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.O1E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 Page 104 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations -Unit 1 I Parameter Actual Default Units Comments Value Value X/Q calculated 2.2E-06 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 1 VF as measured or (Plant Vent) fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -normal operation (Cont Purge) 3.50E+04 Containment Purge AF coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate limit for site.Ci measured N/A jLCi/cm 3 Taken from gamma spectral I analysis of gaseous effluent Ki nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 1 tCi /m 3 in Li nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 3 gtCi/m 3 Mi nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 ptCi/m 3 Sensitivities as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are 1 -R41 pCi/m 3 or controlled under Public 1-R12A cpm per Service Blueprint DocumentýtCi/cc (PSBP) 315733 Setpoint calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are 5 l-R41D controlled under Public 1-R12A ** jCi/sec Service Blueprint Document (PSBP) 315733 3**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 Page 105 of 156 I I I U Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations -Unit 2 Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments X/Q Calculated 2.2E-6 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 VF as measured or Plant Vent fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent -normal operation Cont. Purge 3.50E+04 Containment Purge AF Coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate for site.C, Measured N/A tCi/cm 3 Taken from gamma spectral analysis of gaseous effluent K, Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific ýtCi/m 3 Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific VtCi/m 3 M, Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 specific pCi/m 3 Sensitivities as N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are 2-R41 determined pCi/m 3 or controlled under Public Service 2-R12A cpm per Blueprint Document (PSBP)RCi/cc 315734 Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are controlled 2-R41D pCi/sec under Public Service Blueprint 2-R12A
- Document (PSBP) 315734**Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6*P~agg- 106 9of 1 5 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for Dose Calculations
- ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s)
Controlling Age Group Atmospheric Dispersion X/Q D/Q (sec/m3) (1/m2)3.11.2.1 a site boundary (0.83 mile, N)3,11.2.1b site boundary (0.83 mile, N)noble gases direct exposure inhalation gamma-air beta-air N/A child N/A infant 2.2E-06 2.2E-06 2.2E-06 N/A N/A N/A 3,11.2.2 3,11.2.3 site boundary (0.83 mile, N)residence/dairy** (4.9 miles, W)milk, ground plane and inhalation 5.4E-08 2.1E-10* The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Safety Evaluation Report, Supplement No. 3 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 (NUREG-0517, December 1978).** Location and distance are determined from the performance of the annual land use census as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.I I I I U I I I I ,I Page 107 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per laCi/m3)-3 1 I ._. !6E 6-3 .6E+3" .26E+3 1.726E+ .1ýE+_3 C-14 1.82E+4, 3.41E+3 3.1E3t 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 [3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1.32E+6 ]7.7 1E+4 i- ]-8.64E+4 5.01E+4 Cr-51 1 -5.95E+1 i2.28E+1 11.44E+4 ...3.32E+3 1.00E+2 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1 1.70E+4 -1_- 7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 -i [1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 -i6.92E+2 __- I- 3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 1_- -9.28E+/-5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 -1 5E+4 _5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 1- .78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1. 03E+5 _...._- 6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Rb-86 -_ 1.35E+5 1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Sr-89 I 3.04E+5 -6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 I 9.92E+7 I 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 -6.10E+6 Y-91 1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 Zr-95 T 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 -5.42E+4 1.77E+6 1.50E+5 2.33E+4 Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 .7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 ---5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.1OE+5 6.58E+2 Ru-106 6.91E+4 --1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Ag-ll0m 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 1- .97E+4 4.63E+6 3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 I 7.55E+1 2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4 Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 1.74E+6 1.01E+5 1.26E+4 Te-125m 3.42E+3 I 1.58E÷3 I1.05E+3 1.24E+4-3.14E+5 7.06E+4 4.67E+2............ ..... ............... .~i + --5 ; i + ... ............ ... ....... ........ .5g + ........ ...... ......... ....j..314-.E.i + .5 ......... .......... ........... ....... ...... ......+ -.....Te-127m 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 -4.5 8E+4 9.0+ -.50E+ 1.7+Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1. .19E+7 6.13E+4 6.28E+3 2.05E+4 1-13 1. 1 6~E+3 j3.26E+3 1. 14E+5 ~5.18E+3 f-4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 8.88E+3 4.52E+3 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 -1.O1E+0 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 f4.48E+5 1.11E+4 -5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 -2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 -8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.1OE+5 Cs37 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 [__- 2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 -4.28E*5 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 -1.67E+l 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 -6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 -8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 -2.16E+3 2.81E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 Nd-147 5.27E+3 I 6.10E+3 -3.56E+3 2.21E+5 1.73E+5 3.65E+2 Page 108 of 156 .I, Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per jiCi/m3)Mn-3 ' 5./1E+4 1.7+".8+ .8+ .0+F5 3.34E+4 2.38E+41.27E+3 1.27E+3 6.39E+3-5.27E+3"c--i- C ...... -.6g -...... ..... ....I8 E -.......... .i g+ -..--.8-7.....P-32 1.89E+4 1.10E+4 --9.28E+/-4 7.46E+4 Cr-51 -7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.10E+4 3.59E+3 1.35E+2 n-54 5.11 E++/-4 -1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 _1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 6.92E+2 --- 5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 C-0-518 2.07E+3 -1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 -1.5 1 E+4__ -8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Zi-63 _ 5.40E+5 4.34E+4 -3.4+ .07E+5 1.42E+/-4 31.9E+4 6n-95 3.86E+4 1.34E+4 -8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 1.90E+5 --1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5 2.42E+6 3.71E+5 1.25E+4 Ag-90 1.08E+8 -+1.65E+75E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-91 6.61E+5 --2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Zr-95 1.46E+5: 4.58E+4 6.74E+4 2.69E+6 Te-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 .38EE+4 7.51E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Ru-103 2.10E+3 17.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru-106 9.84E+4 4 1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-110m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 -2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 39 3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+1 E 2.74E+6 9.92E+ 1.4E+24 Te-125m 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 4E 5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 e-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-129m 1.39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 2.25E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 6 8.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51E+5 6.92E+3 1 2.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.224E+4 2.05E+4 -3.59E+4 1.03E+4 6.22E+3 T1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 2.04E+1 8.40E+2 115 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 -6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs- 136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 -1. 10E+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5 Cs137 6.70E+5 8.48E+5 -3.04E+5 1.21E+5 8.48E+3 3.1 1E+5 Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 -2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4_- 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 -1.211+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 -3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Nd-147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 -_ 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I Page 109 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per pCi/m3)F-3 4.-E 1. 12E+2E+ E+ 1.12E+3 21.1E+3 7.77E+3 Co-7 _____ 9.3E2 12t ____3 3 E.0E3 1 I2+/- 1.0E+/-3.................. ......Co-14 _3.59E+4 16_77E+3 -.....15-;5-F-53-.7-3-E+6 3-- E 6_3+--6-5E-3 ...P-32 2.60E+6 1. 14E+5 -_ 7 4.22E+4 9.88E+4 Cr-51 +8.55E+1 2-43E+ 1.70E+4 1.08E+3 1.54E+2 Mn-54 4.-6E 4.29E+4 -7 1.E+4 1.58E+6 2.29E+4 9.51E+3 be-55 4.74E+4 2.52E+4 -1.11E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Fe-59 2.07E+4 3.34E+4 17 --1.E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 Co-57 -9.03E+2 +-5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 -1.77E+3 --1.11E+6 3.43E+5 3.16E+3 Co-60 -4 1.31E+4 1- -7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21E+5 4.63E+4 -+- 2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4.Z i 6 ......... ... ... ... ... ........ 4 U .i .. ..........-.... ..... .......... .. --.... -------- --- ....... ......... i U V I + -5 .................. .....3 .....Zn-95 4263E+4 1.13E+5 7 .14E+/-3 9.95E+/-5 1.63E+4 7.03E+4 Rb-86 -1.98E+5 1.- --.79E+3 1.14E+5 Sr-89 i 5.99E+5 -_ +_ 2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4-............ + i 6 U ........... ...... .......... ............... i ......T-......... +........ ..... .......... .+ 1.. ... ...4 8 + ........4 3 E +5.....4 4 E +6.Ag-ilm 1.9+/- 1.01E4E+ 1 .2+ .48E+7 3.43E+/-5 6.44E+/-6._ .... ..... ._ ___...___.___.__ Y-91 9.14E+5 i -2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 Zr-95 __1.90E+5 74.18E÷4 i --5.96E+4 j2.23E+6 6.13E+4 3.70E+4.-9 ............ ... ............. ................. ......... ........... ........ .......... ... .............. ...... .............. ... .-i ........ .......... .... ................ ....... ... 6 _ ---: --- ..... ........... Te-125r 2 .35E+4 9 .33E38E+3 8.6E 6.14 7E+5 6.8+ .55E+3 Ru-1032 2.79E+3 7.03E+3 6.62E+5 .4E+41.07E+3 Ru-106 1 1.6E+ 5 T 1.84E+54 1.43E+7 1 4.29E+5 1.69E+4 Ag-130m 1.69E+4 1.!4E+4 38E 2.12E+4 5.48E+6 1 l.0E+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 17.4E+2 1.20E+2 1.24E+6 J 1.64E+5 2.25E+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 7.59E+2 9.10E+l 2 2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4 Te12m 6.73E+ 123E3 1.92E+3 -4*77E+5 i3.38E÷4 9.1-4-E--2 ...........-- m ............ ... ......... ........... .................... ..S ¥ .... ..-.z i- 7 ; ; .. .. ..._...- ............. ............ Te-129m I1.92E+4 6.85E+3 16.33E+3 -5.03E+4 1.76E+6 J1.82E+5 13.04E+3 1-131 4.81 EE+4 +4. 2 E+4 16E 8E+4 -l 2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1e-132 677+ 2.12E+3 4.0.7E+319E5 6.25E0E+ 3.22E+3 1 .88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 5.48E+3 7.70E+3_r-134 1.1 E+ 2.16E+3 5.07E+4. 330E+3 .3 5 9._55E+2 9._95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 -8 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs-134 6.5 1E+5 1.01E+6 3.30E+5 1.21E+5 i3.85E+3 12.25E+5 Cs-136 6.5 1E+4 t1.71E+5 9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 l1. 16E+5 C s--,-1-3,7 9.07t84-5 !8.2-5E+5 2.82E÷5 1 1.-8+E¥ý5 Ba-140 ..7.40E+4-1 6.48E+1 2.11lE+l 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 8.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 12.90E+3...Ce-144 6.77E+6 12.12E+6 1. 17E+6 1.20E+7 13.89E+5 13.6 1E+5 Pr- 143 ]:8=5E=+4 5.55E+3 3.00E+3 4.33E+5 19.73E+4 i9.14E+2 Nd17 I1.8+ 8.73E+3 4.8 1E+3 13.28E+5! 8.21E+4 6.8 1E+2 Page. 1 10 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per [tCi/m3)*~~~~6.742 I" -" 7E+2" ' ' i H-3--5 '5E6.47E-2 6.7 6.47E+2 647E+2 26 53- 1 2 +3 5. 1E+3 55.31E3 ,E+3 5.31E+3 .83-F-15 ...E+3 5.33 E+3 P-32 2.03E+6 1. 12E+5 --l 1.61E+4 -7.74E+4 C-51 -5.75E+1.32E+l i1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1.... n : i ..... .... .......... i..... .. ....................... ......... ........... .................. ...... .. .............. ... i ; -F i{ i 7 ....... .... ....... ............. ... 9........ ..... .Fe-55 1 97E+4 81.17E+4 -8. 469E+4 I 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 --1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-58 -l.22E+3 --37.77E+5 1.1lE+4 1.82Z+4 Co-60 i-8.02E+3 -{4.51 E+6 i3.19E+4 i1. 18E+4 NI-63 i3.39E+5 2.04E+4 [- i-2.09E+5 12.42E+3 1. 16E+4..... ...... .......... ................. ..-... 9 .. .... ....... ... ............... ......... ..... ...... ................. { 5 g ] -i + .............. i i~-"i i --.......------ --Rb-86 1- .90E+5 --3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 -2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 L~ 4.09E+/-7 1. --l12E+7 1.31lE+/-5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 [ -2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+/-4 Zr-95 1. 1 5E+/-5 2.79E+4 -3.11lE+4 1.75E+6 2.17E+4 2.03E+4,.......... .r 9.. 5 .................................................. ...1 5 E .5 ...... ........... ...... .. .7. 9 + 4 .............. ......................... ... ..... : ............................................ ...... !.......... E ............... .......................... .................. 1.: E J 6 ........ ....... .... :I.7 E ....... ..... ...2. 0E .4 ........ ............. Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 -4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+3 Ru-103 2.02E+3 -I -4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 i -1.07E+5 1.16E+7 T 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-ll0m 9.98E+3 i7.22E+3 .- l09E+4 3.67E+6 i3.30E+4 5.00E+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 i5.56E+2 1.01E+2 I 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 I 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 T 6.23E+1 -1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m [4.76E+3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 I -4.47E+5 1.29E+4 i6.58E+2.... T e -i 2 ; m ................... .......................... .................................... ............ ........................ ................ ...... ..................... ............ E+. ..7.+4. ........... .............................................. Te-127m 1 0.7+ 69E+ I487E+3 3.75E+4 I1.31E+6 [2 E+4 [2.07E+3 Te-129m 1.41E+4 6.09E+3 { 5.47E+3 I 3.18E+4 1.68E+6 I 6.90E+4 2.23E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5.18E+4 -I 1.06E+/-3 1.96E+4 3--3 3.....1 9 .. ............. 3... ....... .. ......... ......... i 4E 4- 1.26E+3 1-133 T 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 -2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21E+2 I188E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 ....29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 3.86E+31111 ...6..+ .6..-96E+5 J8.47E+31 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-134 3.96E+5 7.03E+5 -I 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-136 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 -I 5.64E+4 1.18E+4 1.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.1_2E+5 -I ..72-.E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 4.55E+4 Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 -I 1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 -I 5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 -1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 F6.99E+2 Nd-147 7.94E+3 8.13E+3 -.3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4 5.OOE+2 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I Page 111 of 156....i I .... -% *.. ..* * ...I Table 2.4 (cont'd) Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per ýLCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14* (m2
- mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others AILI", H-3 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 1 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 i 1.71E+10 I 1.06E+/-9 1- .92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 -1.71E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 Mn-54 I8.40E+6 -_ 2-50E+/-6 -2.57E+/-7 1.60E+/-6__M -5 .. .. ...... i --... .. ........ ..........
....... ...5 .! -..... ...... .......... ....... .. ...... ......-......... ........ ....... .......... ....2 .. ----.... ....... ... .......... -....... ........ ...... ......-.- ...- -E........ ........... .........-- E -6 ...Fe-55 2.51E+7 i 1.73E+7 -9.67E+6 9.95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.OOE+7 1- .95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 1_- __ 1.28E+6 -3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 __- _- 4.72E+6 -9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 1- .64E+7 -3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 __ 6.73E+9 i4.66E+8 -- -9.73E+/-7 2.26E+8 Zn-65 1.37E+9 -I4.36E+9 -2.92E+9 -2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 2- .59E+9 -5.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 ---2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 ---1.35E+9 1.15E+10 Y-91 8.60E+3 1 --4.73E+6 2.30E+2 Zr-95 9.46E+2 1 3.03E+2 4.76E+2 -9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 I 4.59E+4 4.54E+4 2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Ru-103 1.02E+3 -3.89E+3 -1.19E+5 4.39E+2 Ru-106 2.04E+4 -3.94E+4 1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-ll0m i 5.83E+7 j5.39E+7 1.06E+8 2.20E+10 3.20E+7 Sb-124 2.57E+7 i 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 -2.OOE+7 7.31E+8 1.02E+7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 T 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 -1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 Te-125m 1.63E+7 5.90E+6 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 -6.50E+7 2.18E+6 Te-127m i 4.58E+7 i 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 -1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 -3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 -1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+l 6.97E-1 -8.22E-2 1.53E-1 1-133 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 l.OE+9 1.20E+7 -6.20E+6 2.1OE+6 I 1-134 I .....1-135 {1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 4.0OE+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 -4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 L.lOE+10 Cs-136 2.61E+8 1.03E+9 -5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-137 7.38E+9 L;0I-E÷1I0 -3.43E÷9 L1_4E+9 1.95E+8 6.61E+9 Ba-140 2.69E+7 3.38E+4 -1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 1.52E+3 -1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 8.87E+4 -1.21E+8 1.92E+4 Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 3.68E+l -6.96E+5 7:88E+0 Nd-147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 -6.37E+1 5.23E+/-5 6.52E+0_Page 112 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per j.Ci/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per jtCi/sec) for others I I I H-3 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 13.15E+10 i 1.95E+9 -2.65E+9 1.22E+9 C512.78E+4
- 1. 10E+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5-00E+4 Fe-55 4.45E+7 I 3.16E+7 -2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 I 5.20E+7 1.21E+8 -3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 -2.25E+6 -.- 4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 j 7'95E+6 -1.1OE+8 1.83E+7 Co-60 -2.78E+7 -3.62E+8 6.26E+7 Ni-63 ! 1.18E+10 i28.35E+8
-1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11 E+9 .. 7.31E+9 -4.68E+9 3.1OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 -4.73E+9 -7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89 2.67E+9 --....3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 9.92E+7 --9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6 Y-91 i1.58E+4 -----6.48E+6 4.24E+2 Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+ý2 -7.67E+/-2' -1.20E+6 3.59E+2..r........ ........................................... ...................................... .......... .. ...............................-. ..................................................................................................................................................... 0E.... ......................... ....9I ................. Nb-95 1.41E+5 I 7.80E+4 -7.57E+4 3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 --6.40E+3 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 --7.23E+4 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-li0m 9.63E+7 19.11E+7 -1.74E+8 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 4.O1E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 3.65E+7 1 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 3.21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m 3.OOE+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 8.86E+7 4.02E+6 Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.O1E+7 3.42E+8 2.1OE+8 1.OOE+7 Te-129m 1.11E+8 4.10E+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 -4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+/-8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 -1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+0 -3.31E-1 2.72E-1 1-133 1 7.24E+6 T 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 -9.30E+6 3.75E+6 1-134 I --.........1-135 2.47E+4 .. 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81E+9 2.31E+10 -7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 -9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1. 34E+ 10 1.78E+10 -6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 Ba-140 4.85E+7 .5.95E+4 -2.02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 Ce-141 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 -2.79E+3 1.69E+7 6.81E+2 Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 -1.63E+5 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 -6.77E+1 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 -1.16E+2 7.11E+5 1.18E+1 I I I U I I!I I I I I I I Page 113 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others'A H-3 __- __1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 .3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 --2.15E+9 3.OOE+9 Cr-51 -5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 -2.09E+7 -5.87E+6 -1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Fe-55" ----- -".-I 2lE+8 I 5.93E+7 --3.35E+7 1.10OE+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 { 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 --5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 -3.84E+6 --3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 1- .21E+7 --7.08E+7 3.72E+7 Co-60 -4.32E+7 --2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 .2.96E+ 10 1-59E+9 1.07E+8....1E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 I1.10E+0 -6.94E+9 1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 I 8.77E+9 --5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89. 6.62E+9 ---.2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 -1.12E+l --1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 --- -.5.21E+6 ji1.04E+3 Zr-95 i 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -1.21E+3 5881E+5 7.52E+/-2 Nb-95 3.18E+5 l.24E+5 -,.!6E+5 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Ru-103 i 4.29E+3 1- .08E+4 1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru-106 9.24E+4 -.25E+5 -1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-110m r 2.09E+8 1 l.41E+8 -2.63E+8 -1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 i 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 -6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb- 125 8.70E+7 i 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 -4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7..-.... ...........................
.3 8 E +7... ........... +I ................. + ................. ..................................................... I........................................... .-........... ,.................................................. ...... ........ .7.................. ............. .... .. 4.+.............. TeI125m I7.38E3+7 I2.OOE+/-7 2.07E+/-7 --7.12E+7 9.84E+/-6 Te-127m i 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 -1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 -3.32E+8 4.23E+7 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 -1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O 1.48E+0 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 -8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 .....1-135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10 3.71E+10 -1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1.OOE+9 2.76E+9 -1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 -1.01E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Ba- 140 1.17E4-8 1.03E+5 -3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 .84E+6 Ce- 141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 -4.78E+3 -1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 -2.82E+5 -1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 2.17E+2 -1.17E+2 -7.80E+5 3.59E+1 Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 -1.98E+2 -5.71E+5 2.79E+1 Page 114 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per iCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others I I I I 40 CA H-3_ _ _ 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 I 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 P-32 I 1.60E+1l I 9.42E+9 --2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 ___ 1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54 3.89E+7 -8.63E+6 -1.43E+7 8.83E+6 M n -5 4 ~ ~- ...... .3... .... ...89........
.... ........ .... ...... .. ................. .......... ........8 6..3.. E_+6. " .. .. .... ....... .... .. _ _. + .. .._ E -6 ...Fe-55 135E+8 8.72E+7 --4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 --.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 _ __ 8.95E+6 --3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 ___ 2.43E+7 ---6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 8.81E+7 J- -_- 2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 3.49E+10 2.16E+9 ---1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 -9.23E+9 1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 -2.22E+10 ---5.69E+8 1.LOE+10 Sr-89 1.26E+10 I -_ --2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+1l1 .... .1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 .'7.33E+4 -.5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Zr-95 6.83E+3 1.66E+3 -1.79E+3 -8.28E+5 1.18E+3 Nb-95 5.93E+5 2.44E+5 -1.75E+5 -2.06E+8 1.41E+5 Ru-103 8.69E+3 i_- -1.81E+4 -1.06E+5 2.91E+3 Ru-106 1.90E+5 --2.25E+5 -1.44E+6 2.38E+4 Ag-lIOm i 3.86E+8 12.82E+8 -4.03E+8 -1.46E+l0 1.86E+8 Sb-124 2.09E+8 i 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 -1.31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 i 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 -9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7............. ...... ... ... .... ... " ' " , .....................
- .........
.................. ......... ........... ................... .... *....... .... .... .... .... * ........ .. ..... .... ..... .................. ............... .* .......... ...... ... ......... .......... --............... .........* ................. ...... .. ............ ...... ... ... .Te-125mn 1 .51E+8 I 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 -- 7.18E+7 2.04E+I7 Te-127m 4.21E E+8 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 -1.70E+8 5.1OE+7 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 -3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 2.72E+9 i 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 -1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+O 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+0 -2.34E+O 1.03E+0 1-133 1 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 -9.16E+6 1.58E+7.- 3 .- .-................ 1-134 -1.01E-9 1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 -8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 -1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 -2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-137 5,15E+10 6.02E+10 -1.62E+10 6.55E+9 -k88E+8 4-27E+9 Ba-140 2.41E+8 2.41E+5 -5.73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+7 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 -8.15E+3 -1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 -3.85E+5 -1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E1+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 -7.89E+5 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 I 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 -5.74E+5 5.55E+1 i I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 115 of 156-I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others H-3 -_ _ 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 8.97E+5 I 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 P-32 1.40E+9 8.73E+7 1 -.5- 8.5E+8 5.42E+7 Cr-51 2.79E+4 1.03E-4 6.19E+4 1. 1 7E+7 4.66E+4-....................... ... ... ... ..... ..... .... ...............
-... ............ ...... ............ ... ....... .. ... .... ............ .... .....92 E 7 I ..................... ...... ---------...... ... ..... .... ...... ......... .4 +Fe-55 -2.09E+8 1.45E+8 -8.06E+7 I 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 -68.35E+7 -9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Sr89 996+ .17E+7160+9 286+Co-57 -1i --2.97E+8 1.95E+7 Co-58 5 E -3.09E+7 6.2 --6.2E+8 6.92E+/-7 Co-60 11- 31.67E+8 -3. -3.14E+9 3.69E+8-N ---3 ....... ... ------ --_2 E 8 ...... .. ... ......................----
-......5 0 ------ -9 8 ... .... ..........
Zn-65 i3.17E+8 1.01E+9 -6.75E+8 -6.36E+8 4.56E+8 Rb-86 i ..19E+8 4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 9 9.96E+9 --3 1.60E+9 2.86E+8 Sr-90 i6.05E+1 ---1.75E+10 1.48E+10 Y-91 5.13E+6 -- .5- 8.-E+ 2.82E+9 I-37E+5 Zb-125 1. 1 9E36E+/-8 81.5E6E+5 5.97E05E5 1.21E+9 2.58+Nb-915 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 + 7.8 1E+4 I -4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 i 4.80E+6 12- 1.83E+- -5.61E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 16- 3.72E+8 -1.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-ll0m 1 1.06E+7 1 9.76E+6 1.92E+7 l 3.98E+9 5.80E÷6 Sb-124 1.04E+8 I 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 2 8.08E+74 2 2.95E+9 4.131E+7 Te-125m 9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 -j 3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+--9 .1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 T 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 E 1.28E+9 4.03E+7 1-131 8.09E+7 1.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.E98E+8 3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 5+ 2.89E+1 5.38E+1 Ce14 196+5 ] .3E+6 6.44E+6 3. 1.0E+6 1.512E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.00E-3 4.59E-4 2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1.-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 1.11E+10 -3.59E+9 1. 19E+9 ...1.94E+8 9.07E+9 Cs- 136 4.20E+7 1.66E+8 -9.24E+7 1.27E+7 1.89E+7 1. 19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 -2.95E+9 9.81E+8 1.6,8E_+8 5.70E_+9 Ba-14 1.2E+ 1.62E+ 5.4-9E+ .5+ 2.6 5 E+8 8.43E+6...Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 -6.17E+ 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 -8.16E+6 -1.11E+10 1.77E+6 Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 -1.47E+4 -2.78E+8 3.14E+3 Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 -2.25E+4 -1.85E+8 2.3 1E+3 Page 116 of 156 i , "Z I:;Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per jaCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2'* m'em/yr per itCi/sec) for others I I I H-3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 I 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 1 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 -__- 1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 --J 3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 Mn-54 -4.52E+8 1.35E+8 -9.27E+8 8.97E+7............ .... ......... ... .- .-... 8 -..... ... ............. ..2............ .... ....... ........... ..... .......... .... ... ... ! ~ ; ........ -.i ........ ...-E -7.....Fe-55 3.25E+8 1 2.31E+8 1 .46E+8 9.98E+7 5.3 8E+7 Fe-59 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 1 -1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 -1.79E+7 I _ -3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 {4.38E+7 1 -6.04E+8 1.01E+8 Co-60 2.49E+8 -3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1 .61E+10 i1.13E+9 --.- 1.81E+8 5.45E+8.... ..................... ...................... n 6 E8.............. -.. ...................... ............. -- ............... ......... ............. ... .. ........... 14 E 9 [ ...... ............................. ..... ..... ...... .... ....... ............ ...4.E+. ... .......... .-..........----------------..... ............ ...... .......... .................................... .3+Zn-65 4.24E+8 I1.47E+9 I_____9.4 1E+8 -6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Rb-86 -2.73E+8 ---4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 l.51E+10 --.- -1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51 E+1 -2.11E+10 1.85E+l1 Y-91 7.87E+6 T- -- -3.23E+9 2.11E+5 Zr-95 1.74E+6 5.49E+5 -.807E+5 -1.27E+9 3.78E+5 Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 I 1.03E+5 -4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 T --2.42E+7 -5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-106 j3.09E+8 i -._________ 5.97E+8 -1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-110m I 1.52E+7 1 1.44E+/-7 2.74E+7 -4.04E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124 1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 -1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 2.04E+5 -1.88E+/-8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 T'e-125m 1.48E+8 53E7 ... .... 4.14E+7 -~-I-4.37E+8 1.'9'8E+7 Te-127m i 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te-129m j 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 1.54E+9 1- ..38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 1 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+10 1.85E+8 I_- 2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 -5.91E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 -2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 ... .9.59E -5 2.54E-4 -3 4.O.E -4 .. ..... 3........... ...........- _35E -6 9.1.. ...1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.1OE+6 1.50E+5 1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 7.09E+9 1.67E+10 -5.30E+9 I 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 -9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8 Cs--1-37 1-.01E+10 1.35E+10 -4,59E+9 T 1.78E+9 1.92E+8.. 4.69E+9 Ba-140 1.38E+8 1.69E+5 -5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 -8.86E+4 5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 -1.65E+4 2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 -2.32E+4 1.42E+8 2.36E+3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 117 of 1.56 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose.-Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per .tCi/m3) for H-3 and C- 14 (m2
- m.reýniyrper iCi/sec) for others H-3 *4-0 6 3E+8 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 -4.01E+3 54.6iE13 -I-'4, 8E÷3 C-14 3.50E+6 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 701E+5 7.401E+5 7.01E+/-5 7.01E+5 P-32 3.3 7E+9 1.58E+8 --i- 9.30E+7 1.30E+8 Cr-51 t-6.54E+4 1.79Eý+4 1. 19E+5 6.25E+6 1. 18E+5 Mn-54 -6.61 E+8 -1.85E+8 -5.55E+8 1.76E+8...........
........ ...... .................. ........ .... .. ... ................... ....... .......... ....... .8 ................................. .. ... ......... ... ............ ............... ..... ........ -........................................... .. .... 6 .... ... .................. ... ...... ......... ..................... ......... .i........ 8 ............... Fe-55 8.OI __ _[___[424E+/-8 2.0- 7.6- .1+Fe-59 4.01E+8 [6.49E+8 --1. l.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 2.99E+7 ---2.45E+8 6.04E+7 Co-58 ___ 6.47E+7 --- 3.77E+8 1.98E+8 Co-60 -3.78E+8 --- 2.1OE+9 1.12E+9 Ni-63 I3.95E+10 2.11E+9 1 1.42E+8 1.34E+9......... ...................... ... .. ...... .................. ....... I............... .... .... .. ........... .. ..... .................... .. .......... ........ ........ ... ..... ............... .... .... .. .................... ............ ... .... .... ... .. ....... ........Zn-65 8.12E+8 I 2.16E+9 -1.36E+9 -3.80E+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 -4.52E+8 -2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Sr-89 3.59E+10 T --1.39E+9 1.03E+9 Sr-90 I1.24E+12 -1.67E+10 3.15E+l1 Y-91 1.87E+7 1 -_"___ .- ._ 2.49E+9 5.01E+5 Zr-95 3.90E+6 8.58E+5 1.23E+6 .-8.95E+8 7.64E+5........... ......... .... ... ...-..... .. ......... .............. ....-- .... ...... ........ ............. .......... ....... .... ..... ... ------------. .... ... ..: ... ....... ...... .. .. ...Nb-95 4. OE+5 1.59E+5 1.50E+5 -2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 1.55E+7 -3.89E+7 -3.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-106 7.45E+8 1. -0.01E+9 1 l.16E+10 9.30E+7 Ag-ill0mi 3.22E+7 T 2.17E+7 4.05E+7 i 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 Sb-124 3.52E+8 14.57E+6 7.78E+5 [ 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8.... .S ..b.-.2..5.. ................. ...... i..... 4 .9 !+. ........... !...3 -8 5 _ + ....... ............ 4 .-.+5.. ................. .. .......... .......................... .................. ._.... ..2.-.7..8...E.. ..... ........ ..... .1.......9.. .. + .......... .. ......S-1 54 9 E 83 5 E 6. 2 E 5.7 E 8.1 E9 1.:0_5 + 8 .....Te-125m 1 3.51E+8 I 9.50E+7 9.84E+7 -.3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te-127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 I 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m T 8.54E+8 2.39E+8 75E+8 2.5 1E+9 -1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 -1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 j 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 3.59E+6 4.44E+6 8.25E+8 7.40E+6 -1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1- 134 1.70E-4 3.16E-4 7.28E-3 4.84E-4 -2. 10E-4 1.46E-4 1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81E+5 -8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs-134 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 -8.14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 -1.18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 -7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 B-f1... 2_728- 2_43E-5 -.77OE-4 1 .45E+5 '1i_40Eý8 .16E-7 Ce-141 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 -1.43E+5 -4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-144 1.27E+8 3.98E+7 -2.21E+7 -1.04E+10 6.78E+6 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 -2.41E+4 -1.60E+8 7.37E+3 Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 -3.18E+4 E_- 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 Page 118 of 1.56 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table 2-4 (cont'd) S Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2
- mrem/yr per jtCi/sec)Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+l 0 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 l Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Ru-103 1.09E+8 Ru-106 4.21E+8 Ag-110m 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 I Te-129m 2.OOE+7 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 i 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr-143 Nd-147 8.40E+6 I Page 119 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX A Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents Page 120 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents A. Effective Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPCe)In accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8 the radioactive liquid effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, I Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual radionuclide distribution and corresponding MPC values.In order to limit the need for routinely having to reestablish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established.
This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution of the liquid effluents from Salem and the effective MPC value for this distribution. The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation: Z Ci (gamma)MPGe i (gamma)z1 where: M MPCe = an effective MPC value for a mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides (PCi/ml)Ci = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture MPCi = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 MPC value for radionuclide i (Appendix F) (p.Ci/ml)The equation for determining the liquid effluent setpoints (Section 1.2.1, equation 1.2) is based on a multiplication of the effective MPC times the monitor sensitivity. Considering the average effective MPC value for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998, it is reasonable to select an MPCe value of 6.05E-06 ýtCi/ml for Unit 1 and 4.8 1E-06 [tCi/ml for Unit 2 as typical of liquid radwaste discharges. Page 121 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 B. Correction Factor The type of radiation detector used to monitor radioactive releases is not capable of detecting non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Fe-55, and Sr-89, 90, as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1. A conservative default safety factor can be determined to account for non-gamma emitting radionuclides. Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed at Salem station on a monthly basis from a composite sample of liquid releases.Nuclide MPC (ptCi/ml) Activity (pCi/ml) Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 5.2E-1 173.3 Fe-55 8E-4 2.5E-3 3.1 Sr-89 3E-6 2.OE-5 6.7 Sr-90 3E-7 7.2E-7 2.4 Total 185.5 The values in the table above represent the maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides in 1994 for Unit 1 and 2. Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting nuclides that could be released from Salem Station. The activity values in the table will be diluted by a minimum factor of 800 prior to release. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum circulating water flowrate of 100,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 120 gpm.A conservative non-gamma factor for non-gamma emitting nuclides can be obtained using the highest Activity/MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows: Non-Gamma Factor =Correction Factor =185.5/800 =1-0.25 =0.23 (Rounded up to 0.25)0.75 C. Default setpoint determination: Using the information and parameters described above a default setpoint can be calculated for Unit 1 and 2 liquid radwaste disposal process radiation monitors (R18).Using these values to calculate the default RI 8 alarm setpoint value, results in a setpoint that: 1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and 2) Will provide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (refer to Tables 1-1.1 and 1-1.2).Page 122 of 156 N Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table A-i: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 1 I Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (RCi/ml) CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 8'88E-04 ND ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 6.68E-04 1.62E-04 1.OOE-04 I CR-51 2.OOE-03 5.38E-03 2.02E-03 ND MN-54 L.OOE-04 3.52E-02 1.37E-02 7.16E-04 MN-56 1.OOE-04 ND ND O.OOE+00 3 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.76E-04 4.84E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.03E-02 3.1OE-03 1.78E-05 CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.71E+00 6.47E-01 3.39E-02 3 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.04E-01 1.1OE-01 2.42E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 3.29E-03 7.13E-04 ND NB-95 L.OOE-04 5.78E-03 1.28E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.27E-03 1.07E-03 4.90E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 2.66E-04 ND ND SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.18E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 7.32E-06 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 1.76E-04 1.76E-04 ND AG-110m 3.OOE-05 1.19E-02 L.1OE-02 6.58E-05 SN-113 8.OOE-05 7.88E-05 4.91E-05 ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.21E-03 5.35E-04 1. 12E-03 SB-124 2.OOE-05 2.08E-02 1.75E-02 1.73E-02 i SB-125 L.OOE-04 9.04E-02 8.23E-02 3,56E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 ND 6.18E-05 2.23E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.27E-01 1.82E-02 2.32E-03 1-133 L.OOE-06 2.16E-03 1.88E-04 8.32E-06 1-134 2.OOE-05 ND 3.63E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 4.24E-05 ND CE-143 4.OOE-05 5.42E-05 ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 3.54E-01 6.46E-01 2.49E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 3.61E-03 1.59E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 4.53E-01 8.54E-01 7.51E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 4.15E-06 1.35E-04 ND BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND 8.62E-05 ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.12E-04 1.86E-04 ND RU-105 L.OOE-04 2.21E-04 1.35E-04 ND RU-106 L.OOE-05 ND 1.03E-03 ND ZN-65 1.OOE-04 6.72E-04 ND ND Total Ci Gamma 3.14E+00 2.42E+00 2.16E-01 3 MPCe (ýICi/ml) 6.05E-06 1.28E-05 1.28E-05 MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. 1** ND -not detected P Page 123 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC -Unit 2 Activity Released (Ci)Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998 (p.Ci/ml) CURIES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 1.59E-03 2.88E-04 ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 1.05E-03 5.77E-05 7.39E-05 CR-51 2.OOE-03 4.39E-03 1.55E-03 1.14E-04 MN-54 1.OOE-04 3.73E-02 1.37E-02 7.54E-04 MN-56 L.OOE-04 ND ND 4.66E-05 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.83E-04 3.25E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.17E-02 3.24E-03 ND CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.75E+00 6.60E-01 4.52E-02 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.47E-01 1.03E-01 2.12E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 2.34E-03 3.22E-04 ND NB-95 1.OOE-04 3.97E-03 1.11E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.46E-03 1.1OE-03 4.22E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 3.77E-04 ND 2.35E-06 SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.71E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 1.43E-05 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND3.OOE-05 1.03E-02 1.34E-02 ND SN- 113 8.OOE-05 7.45E-05 ND ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.20E-03 ND 6.37E-04*SB-124 2.OOE-05 3.77E-02 9.82E-03 1.44E-02 SB-125 L.OOE-04 1.35E-01 6.03E-02 1.88E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 3.5 1E-04 ND 1.97E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.87E-01 7.98E-03 3.14E-03 1-132 8.OOE-06 8.72E-05 ND 1.68E-04 1-134 2.OOE-05 2.39E-04 1.85E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 2.87E-05 ND CE-143 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND CS-134 9.OOE-06 4.57E-01 6.44E-01 2.64E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 4.82E-03 1.51E-03 ND CS-137 2.OOE-05 5.70E-01 8.54E-01 7.97E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 ND ND 4.90E-05 BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND ND ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.03E-03 1.11E-04 ND RU-105 L.OOE-04 4.07E-05 ND ND RU-106 L.OOE-05 ND 4.38E-04 ND ZN-65 l.OOE-04 1.59E-04 ND ND W-187 6.OOE-05 ND 7.98E-05 ND Total Ci Gamma 3.57E+00 2.38E+00 2.31E-01 MPCe (ýtCi/ml) 4.81E-06 1.55E-05 1.12E-05* MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.** ND = not detected Page 124 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I I APPENDIX B Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations Liquid Radioactive Effluent Page 125 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations -Liquid Effluents U The radioactive liquid effluents for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998 were evaluated to determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. These were the most recent years of full power I operation for both Units. This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2.I For the radionuclide distribution of effluents from Salem, the controlling organ is typically the GI-LLI.The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Fe-59 and I Ag-1 10m releases. The radionuclides, Cs-134 and Cs-137 contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results of the evaluation for 1993, 1994, and 1998 are presented in Table B-1 and Table B-2.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculational process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Nb-95 dose conversion i factor (1.51 E+06 mrem/hr per ptCi/ml, GI-LLI). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose factor of all the radionuclides evaluated. For the total body calculation, the Fe-59 dose factor (2.32 E+05 mremi/hr per jiCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Total Body Dtb-- 1.67E- 02. VOL
- AFe-59,TB*XCi (B.i)CW (B1 I Where: I Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)A Fe-59,TB = 7.27E+04, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 (mrem/hr per pCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides
([tCi/ml)CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period(gal/min) 1 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)Page 126 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Substituting the value for the Fe-59 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplifies to: 1.21E+03*VOL 3-C.CW I (B.2)Maximum Organ Dmax- *Aub -95,GI- LIIVI* Ci (B.3)CW Where: U Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem) 3 ANb-95,GI-LLI 1.5 1E+06, Gi-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Nb-95 (mrem/hr per pICi/ml)Substituting the value for ANb-95,GI-LLI the equation simplifies to: Dmax-2.52E+04*VOL 1 l*maC; (B.4)CW:,, Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible. The average annual tritium release from each Salem Unit is approximately 350 curies. The calculated total body dose from such a release I is 2.4E-03 mrem/yr via the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways. This amounts to 0.08% of the design limit dose of 3 mrem/yr. Furthermore, the release of tritium is a function of operating time and power level and is essentially unrelated to radwaste system operation. Page 127 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table B-i: Adult Dose Contributions -Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 1 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.32E-2 3.51E-2 7.16E-4 * *
- 0.03 0.02 *
- 0.02 *Fe-55 1.49E-1 6.40E-2 8.39E-2 0.07 0.04 0.37 0.12 0.03 0.52 0.19 0.14 0.67 Fe-59 4.84E-3 4.77E-4 N/D 0.02 *
- 0.12 0.01
- 0.03 0.01 *Co-58 6.47E-1 1.71E+0 3.39E-2 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.31 0.51 0.13 0.01 0.07 *Co-60 1.10E-1 3.04E-1 2.42E-2 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.24
- 0.03 0.01 Zn-65 N/D 6.72E-4 N/D
- 0.01 *
- 0.01 *
- 0.02 *Nb-95 1.28E-3 5.78E-3 N/D * * *
- 0.01 * * * *Ag-ll0m 1.1OE-2 1.19E-2 6.58E-5 * *
- 0.26 0.17 0.01 * * *Sb-124 1.75E-2 2.58E-2 1.73E-2 * * * *
- 0.04 * * *Sb-125 8.23E-2 9.04E-2 3.56E-2 * * * *
- 0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.46E-1 3.54E-1 2.49E-2 0.47 0.38 0.18 * *
- 0.38 0.37 0.09 Cs-137 8.54E-1 4.53E-1 7.51E-2 0.37 0.28 0.32 * *
- 0.37 0.35 0.20 Total 2.53E+0 3.21E+0 3.31E-1* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 128 of 156-m m m mm m -m m m m m m m m m Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions
-Fish and Invertebrate Pathways -Unit 2 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.37E-2 3.73E-2 7.54E-4 * *
- 0.01 0.02 *
- 0.01 *Fe-55 1.38E-1 6.61E-2 1.64E-2 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.27 Fe-59 3.25E-3 4.82E-4 N/D 0.01 *
- 0.08 0.01
- 0.02 * *Co-58 6.60E-1 1.75E+0 4.52E-2 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.29 0.51 0.29 0.01 0.06 0.01 Co-60 1.03E-1 3.47E-1 2.12E-2 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.02 Zn-65 N/D 1.59E-4 N/D * * * * * * * * *Nb-95 1.11E-3 3.97E-3 N/D * *
- 0.06 0.01 * * * *Ag-ll0m 1.34E-2 1.03E-2 N/D * *
- 0.31 0.14 * * * *Sb-124 9.82E-3 3.77E-2 1.44E-2 * * *
- 0.01 0.06 , , , Sb-125 6.03E-2 1.35E-1 1.88E-2 * * *
- 0.01 0.02 * * *Cs-134 6.44E-1 4.58E-1 2.64E-2 0.48 0.41 0.26 0.01 *
- 0.39 0.40 0.20 y3 Cs-137 8.54E-1 5.70E-1 7.97E-2 0.37 0.30 0.46 * *
- 0.38 0.36 0.45 ¶T Total 2.48E+0 3.65E+0 2.23E-1 ,j* Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 129 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 I I I I APPENDIX C Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Page 130 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX C: Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific.These effective factors, which can be based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity released to approximate the dose in the environment (i.e., instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analyses only a single multiplication (Keff, Meff or Neff)times the total quantity of radioactive material released would be needed).This approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculational technique.
Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations: Keff- Y (Ki* fi)(C)i Where: Keff = the effective total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released Ki = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released fi = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas activity (LA. )eff--[Z 'l~M)f (C.2)i Where: (L + 1.1 M)eff = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released (Li + 1.1 Mi) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Page 131 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 MeffZ(Mif (C.3)iI Where: Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released I Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Neff j(Ni*f) (C.4)' I Where: Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released I Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination I of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Salem have been maintained to such negligible quantities that the inherent variability in the data makes any meaningful evaluations difficult. Therefore, in order to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the primary coolant source term from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications," has been used as representing a typical distribution. The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table C-1.Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose I calculational process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified equations may be used: D=3 3.1 7 EoO 8*Q* M *Qi (C.5) I 0.50 Y and I Dfl=3.17E-O8
- Neff*zQi (C.6)0.50 Qi Where: I Page 132 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 DY = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)Dp = air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m3)Meff = 5.3E+02, effecitive -gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3)Neff = 1. 1E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3)Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (gCi)3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)0.50 = conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculational equations simplify to: Dr=3.5E-O5*y Q*ZQL and Dfi=7.OE-05*Q
- ZQi!(C.7)(C.8)The effective dose factors are used on a very limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable.
Page 133 of 156 -i Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table C-1: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases -Total Body and Skin Total Body Effective Dose Factor Keff (mrem/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135 fi0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 2.5E+00 2.8E+02 3.6E+01 4.7E+02 Skin Effective Dose Factor (L+ 1.1 M)eff (mrem/yr per ý.Ci/m 3)1.4E+01 1.9E+02 1.4E+01 6.6E+02 7.9E+01 9.6E+02 Total Noble Gases -Air Gamma Air Effective Dose Factor Meff (mrad/yr per jiCi/m 3)Radionuclide Kr-85 Kr-88 Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135 f00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 0.02 1.5E+02 3.3E+00 3.4E+02 3.8E+01 5.3E+02 Beta Air Effective Dose Factor Neff (mrad/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)2.0E+01 2.9E+01 1.5E+01 1.OE+03 4.9E+01 1.1E+03 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total* Based on Noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANSI-18.1, "Source Term Specifications." Page 134 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX D Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Page 135 of 156 SI Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation -Gaseous Effluents The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass-cow-milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this g/c/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results for this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e.cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.05E12 m i mrem/yr per pCi/sec). By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since 1-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used: Dmnax= 3.17E -08* W
- Ri -131* ZQi i Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameters to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 3.2-4.X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m 3) M D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (nz)Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates 3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)RI-131 = 1-13 1 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway= 1.05E+12 (M 2 mrem/yr per pLCi/sec), infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need notbe considered when the above simplified calculation method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these pathways to the total thyroid dose.It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway.Page 136 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 However, use of the 1-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclide has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the milk pathway (see Table D-1).The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. if more limiting pathways in the surrounding environment of Salem are identified by the annual land use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.Page 137 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 i i Table D-1: Infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose I I PATHWAYS Target Organs Total Body Grass-Cow-Milk 0.02 Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 0.23 0.59 0.02 0.01 0.02 Ground Plane 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway f Grass-Cow-Milk 0.92 Ground Plane 0.08 Inhalation N/A Page 138 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sample Type, Location and Analysis Page 139 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX E: Radiological EnvironmiOtal onfitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulates ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = SedimentSWA
= Surface Water WWA = Well Water IDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)MLK = Milk PWR = Potable Water (Raw)PWT = Potable Water (Treated)The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site.Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENG, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant: S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E = 4-5 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site I I I I I I I I I I II I The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90'(due east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D). The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E- 1.Maps E-1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.Page 140 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE E-1:_ REMP Sample Locations A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 1S1 0.55 mi. N of vent 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent 2S4 0.59 .5 i. NNE of vent 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 4S1 0.60 mi ENE of vent 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 6S2 0.21 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 7S1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate 1OS1 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; circ water bldg.liSi 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water bldg.15S1 0.57 mi. NW of vent 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, DE 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm 3El 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm 11E2 5.0 mi. SW of vent 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW of vent; Thomas Landing 13E1 4.2 mi. W of vent; Diehl House Lab 16EI 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE of vent; Salem High School 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ 3F2 5.1 mi. NE of vent; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton, NJ Page 141 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (IDM) (Cont'd)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 6F 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 3 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S of vent off Route #9, DE 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 I 11F1 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F 1 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, DE I 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Comer I 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 1G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm lOG1 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, DE I 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 16G1 15 mi. NNW of vent; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, NJ I B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road I 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 16E 1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Page 142 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table E-1 (Cont'd)C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) -Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11AI 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem Outfall Area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; Delaware River 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 3El 4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT)STATION CODE .STATION LOCATION 2F3 8.0 mi NNE of vent, Salem Water Works No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations. However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION IlA1 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 15A1 0.3 mi. NW of vent; Hope Creek outfall area 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; South Storm Drain outfall 12C 1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2G3 12.0 mi. NNE of vent, local farm 13E3 4.9 mi W of vent, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm Page 143 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table E-1 (Cont'd)H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION I I I I lAl 12C1 7E1 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. Contact ODCM coordinator for sampling locations. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 144 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Sample Collection Method Analysis Air Particulate Air Iodine Crab and Fish Continuous low volume air sampler. Sample collected every week along with the filter change.A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly at filter change.Two batch samples are sealed in a plastic bag or jar and frozen semi-annually or when in season.A sediment sample is taken semi-annually. 2 DLR's will be collected from each location quarterly. Gross Beta analysis on each weekly sample. Gamma spectrometry shall be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites. Iodine 131 analysis are performed on each weekly sample.Gamma isotopic analysis of edible portion on collection. Sediment Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually. Gamma dose quarterly. Direct Page 145 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)Sample Collection Method Analysis Milk Sample of fresh milk is collected for each farm semi-monthly when cows are in pasture, monthly at other times.Sample to be collected monthly providing winter icing conditions allow.Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis on each sample on collection. Gamma isotopic monthly H-3 on quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.Water (Potable, Surface)I I I I I U I U I I I I I I I I I Page 146 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1 13 5 9 PI.t.d -WOV04 11.33.4 UM FiI-nn d~%.Page 147 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev.FIGURE E-2: OFFSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 20 I I I I I i I I i Page 148 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 149 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values -Liquid Effluents The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.Table F- 1: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc.(tiCi/ml) (qiCi/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 1E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 lE-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-211 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 3Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Br-83 3E-6 3E-6 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-115m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd- 115 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 1E-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Cf-253 1E-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 150 of 156 1 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) Element Isotope :Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(4Ci/ml) (.Ci/ml)Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4.,Cenrin (58) Ce-.4141 79E5 9E-5 ,Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1E-5 iE-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-134m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) CI-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy-166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1E-5 1E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er-169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 1E-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-152 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5.Eil454 .2E- 2E5 Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Page 151 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(4tCi/ml) ([tCi/ml)Fluorine (9) F-18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd- 153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au-196 2E-4 1E-4 Au-198 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho-166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-i 13m 1E-3 IE-3 In-i 14m 2E-5 2E-5 In-I 15m 4E-4 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-130 3E-6 3E-6 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir-192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-2 10 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu-177 1E-4 1E-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5 Mn-54 1E-4 1E-4 Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 152 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble'Conc.(jiCi/ml) (4iCi/ml)Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5_ _-_ Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 lE-4 1E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 lE-4 lE-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 1E-4 lE-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt-191 1E-4 1E-4: Pt-193m lE-3 1E-3 Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 lE-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium(59) Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm-147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 Protactinium(9
- 1) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4_Pa-231- 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 1E-4 Page 153 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued)
Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc..(Ci/ml) ( Ci/ml)Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 -12E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m iE-2 1E-2 Rh-105 IE-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru-103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-103m 3E-6 3E-6 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 lE-5 lE-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5, Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-1-53 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ag-l10m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-111 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 "_3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 lE-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta- 182 4E-5 4E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 154 of 156 Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Cone. Insoluble Cone.(PCi/ml) (jiCi/ml)Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1E-2 1E-2....Tc Te-96 iE--4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te- 131 m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) T1-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 T1-202 1E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2EM-5 Th-228 7E-6 iE-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm- 171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn- 113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 U235 3E*-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 Page 155 of 156 I Salem ODCM Rev. 20 Table F-1 (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ptCi/ml) (jtCi/ml)Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-175 1E-4 1E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and 'with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission. I Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 gCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I Page 156 of 156 APPENDIX D HOPE CREEK ODCM OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Revision 22 Prepared by: Accepted by: Accepted by: Approved by: Ho e Creek ODCM ioordinator Holi-yreek Chemistry Man er Hop reek PORC Chairman Date Date Date Date Meeting #: )~ c lAope Creek Plant i69ager Page 1 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Revision Summary 1. DEFINITIONS -Section 1.0 -Reportable Event -added "or 10 CFR 72.75" to the definition. 10 I CFR 72.75 establishes the reporting requirements for specific events and conditions for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations (Pg. 11).2. CONTROLS -Section 3/4.11.4 -Action (a) -added "or 10 CFR 72.104", and subsequently added"and 10 CFR 72.104", in addition to 40 CFR 190 which requires, when estimated dose limits have been exceeded a Special Report to the NRC is required (Pg. 43).3. BASES -Section 3/4.11.4 Total Dose -Revised the section to include the dose limitations specific to the ISFSI in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104 which parallel the limits of 40 CFR 90 (Pg. 64).4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.9.1.7 -Radioactive Effluent Release Report -revised the scope of the requirement to generate the RERR annually is to show conformance with 40 CFR 90 and 10 CFR 72.104 (Pg. 71).5. PART II -Section 3.2 -Total dose to Members Of The Public -Added 10 CFR 72.104 to be included in the title of the section and added the ISFSI to the HCGS as a source of exposure (Pg.89).6. Section 3.2.2 -Direct Exposure Dose Determination -Revised section for non-typical conditions that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 to include 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance (Pg. 3 90).Justification: The proposed HC ODCM revision incorporates the Dry Cask Storage regulatory reporting requirements of 10CFR 72.104 and 10CFR 72.75. Design Change Package (DCP) 80088459 and 3 associated 50.59 provides the required analyses and basis for the installation and implementation of the Dry Cask Storage Facility at the Hope Creek and Salem Generating Station Site. The HC ODCM is revised to include the reporting requirements of the dose to the Public as a result of the Dry Cask i Storage Operations. The HC ODCM currently includes the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 20, 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 50 dose to the public due to effluents released from Hope Creek Plant Operations. This HC ODCM revision requires that the Annual Effluent Release Report also include the dose to the Public due to the Dry Cask Storage Operations. I 7. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS -Section 6.1 -Revised "Station" to Plant and "SORC" to"PORC" (Pg. 73).Justification: As part of the reorganization, Station Operations Review Committee (SORC) was recently changed to Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC).Page 2 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TR O D U CTION ......................................................................... .................. 6 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS .......................................................... 7 1.0 D E FIN IT IO N S ................................................................................................................................ 9 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ................................................... 15 3/4.0 A P P LICA B ILITY .................................................................................................................. 15 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION .................................................................................................... 17 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. 17 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS .......................................... 29 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS ................................................................................................. 29 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION ............................................................................................ 29 3/ 4 .11.1.2 D O S E ........................................................................................................................ 33 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM ........................................................ 34 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ............................................................................................ 35 3/4.11.2.1 D O SE R A T E .............................................................................................................. 35 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES ........................................................................................ 38 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PA R TIC U LA TE FO R M ............................................................................................................. 39 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT ............................................................. 40 3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT ........................................................ 41 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING ................................................................................... 42 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ................................................................................................................... 43 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ....................... 44 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 44 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ................................................................................................... 57 3/4.12.3 INTERLAB ORA TORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ................................................... 58 B A S E S ................................................................................................................................................. 5 9 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................................................... ..... 60 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. 60 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION60 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS ........................................................................................ 61 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS ............................................................................................ 61 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ........................................................................................ 62 3/4.11.4 T O TA L D O SE ............................................................................................................. 64 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................................... 65 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................... 65 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ........................................................................................... 65 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM .......................................... 66 5.0 D ESIG N FEA TU R ES ........................................................................................................ 68 5 .1 SIT E .................................................................................................................................... 6 8 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ......................................................................................... 70 6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ...... 70 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ................................................. 71 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................... 73 Page 3 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES .............................................................. 74 i 1.0 LIQ U ID EFFLU EN TS ....................................................................................................... 75 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................................................ 75 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination .......................... 75 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors ............................ ...................................................... 76 1.2.2 Conservative D efault Values .............................................................................. 77 3 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 ................................................... 77 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation -10 CFR 50 ......................................................... 78 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents ..................................... 78 1 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation .................................................. 79 1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections .............................................................................. 80 1.6 R epresentative Sam ples .............................................................................................. 81 2.0 G A SEOU S EFFLU EN TS .................................................................................................. 81 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................................................ 81 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination .................................................. 82 I 2.2.1 Plant V ent, FR V S .............................................................................................. 82 2.2.2 Conservative D efault V alues .............................................................................. 83 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations -10 CFR 20 ..................... 83 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases ........................................................... 83 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates .................................. 85 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 ................................................ 85 I 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases ................................................ 85 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .......................................................... 86 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 .................................... 87 I 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates ....................... 87 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates ........................ 87 2.6 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ............................................................................ 88 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 89 3.1 Doses Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ............................................ 89 3.2 Total Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 .................................... 89 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations ................................................................................ 89 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination ................................................................ 90 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM .......................... 90 4.1 Sam pling Program .................................................................................................... 90 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program ....................................................................... 90 5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................ 90 I I Page 4of 151 i Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLES TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY NOTATION ............................................................................. 12 TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 13 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ................ 18 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLAN CE REQU IREM ENTS ...................................................................................................................... 20 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ........... 23 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURV EILLAN CE REQU IREM EN TS ....................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ............ 30 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ..... 36 TABLE 3.12.1-1 : RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM * ................................... 46 TABLE 3.12.1-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENV IR ONM EN TAL SAM PLES ............................................................................................................................... 53 TABLE 4.12.1-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS""' (2) ............ 54 TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION ................................... 93 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Aio ..................... ..................... 94 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS ............................................................................................... 96 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES ........................................................................................ 99 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION ................................... 100 TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE C A L C U L A T IO N S * .................................................................................................................................................. 10 1 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases, R(io) ............................................................................ 102 TABLE A-1: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC -HOPE CREEK ............................................................... 120 TABLE B-i: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways ................................................................ 124 TABLE C-i: Effective D ose Factors N oble Gases ................................................................................................... 129 TAB LE D -1: Infant D ose Contributions ................................................................................................................... 133 TAB LE E-l: R EM P Sam ple Locations .................................................................................................................... 136 TABLE F-i: M axim um Perm issible Concentrations ................................................................................................ 145 FIGURES Figure 5.1.1-1 A rea Plot Plan O f Site ........................................................................................................... 69 Figure 1-1: Liquid Radwaste Treatment And Monitoring System ........................................................... 91 Figure 1-2: Solid Radwaste Processing System ...................................................................................... 91 Figure 2-1: Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System ................................................................................. 97 Figure 2-2: Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System ................................................................................ 98 Figure E- 1: O nsite Sam pling Locations ...................................................................................................... 142 Figure E-2: O ff-Site Sam pling Locations ................................................................................................... 143 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors ..................................... 115 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Liquid Effluent .......................................... 122 APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents ...................................... 126 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters -Gaseous Effluent ................................. 131 APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ............................................................ 135 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents ..................... 145 Page 5 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Hope Creek Technical Specifications. The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I -Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II -Calculational Methodologies. Part I includes the following: " The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs n required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4" Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical I Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, respectively. Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for: I* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and" the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.Part ii also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation By The Office Of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to Amendment No. 121, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 1OCFR20 and the "new" lOCFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs). The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part 20. The letter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the"new" Part 20.I Pg6of151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART I -RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS Page 7 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS I!I I I Page 8 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 DEFINITIONS The following terms are defined so that uniform interpretation of these CONTROLS may be achieved.The defined terms appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS.ACTION 1.1 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions. CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an in place qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an in place cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated. CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter. CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be: a. Analog channels -the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions and channel failure trips.b. Bistable channels -the injection of a simulated signal into the sensor to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions. The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST may be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping or total channel steps such that the entire channel is tested.CONTROL 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)and were renamed CONTROLS. This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.Page 9 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Table III of TID-14844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites."m FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.17 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.1.MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC 1.24 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the utility, its contractors, or vendors.Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make m deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM)1.26 An OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM) is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the main condenser evacuation system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) I 1.27 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the radiological environmental monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1) the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, respectively. OPERABLE -OPERABILITY 1.28 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s). I Page 10 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) OPERATIONAL CONDITION -CONDITION 1.29 An OPERATIONAL CONDITION (i.e., CONDITION) shall be any one inclusive combination of mode switch position and average reactor coolant temperature as specified in Table 1.2.PURGE -PURGING 1.34 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement. RATED THERMAL POWER 1.35 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3339 MWT.REPORTABLE EVENT 1.37 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 1 OCFR Part 50 or 10CFR 72.75.SITE BOUNDARY 1.41 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is neither owned, nor leased, nor otherwise controlled by the licensee.SOURCE CHECK 1.43 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity. THERMAL POWER 1.47 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.50 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.51 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment. Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents. Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components. Page 11 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) VENTING 1.52 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process.TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION S D W M Q SA A R S/U P z FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours.At least once per 24 hours.At least once per 7 days.At least once per 31 days.At least once per 92 days.At least once per 184 days.At least once per 366 days.At least once per 18 months (550 days).Prior to each reactor startup.Prior to each radioactive release.During startup, prior to exceeding 30% of RATED THERMAL POWER, if not performed within the previous 7 days.Not applicable. N.A.Page 12 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 DEFINITIONS (Continued) TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS MODE SWITCH POSITION AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT TEMPERATURE CONDITION 1. POWER OPERATION Run Any temperature Any temperature
- 2. STARTUP 3. HOT SHUTDOWN 4. COLD SHUTDOWN 5. REFUELING*
Startup/Hot Standby Shutdown#, ***Shutdown#, ##, Shutdown or Refuel **' #> 200°F< 200 0 F+< 140°F# The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Run, Startup/Hot Standby, or Refuel position to test the switch interlock functions and related instrumentation provided that the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted by a second licensed operator or other technically qualified member of the unit technical staff. If the reactor mode switch is placed in the Refuel position, the one-rod-out interlock shall be OPERABLE.## The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod drive is being removed from the reactor pressure vessel per Technical Specification 3.9.10.1.* Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.** See Special Test Exceptions Technical Specification sections 3.10.1 and 3.10.3.*** The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod is being recoupled or withdrawn provided that the one-rod-out interlock is OPERABLE.+ See Special Test Exception Technical Specification 3.10.8.Page 13 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 14 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROLS, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROL and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met, except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in an OPERATIONAL CONDITION in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in: 1. At least STARTUP within the next 6 hours, 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours, and 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours.Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.This CONTROL is not applicable in OPERATIONAL CONDITION 4 or 5.3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other specified condition shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROLS are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval. Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified condition may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.3.0.5 Equipment removed from service or declared inoperable to comply with ACTIONS may be returned to service under administrative control solely to perform testing to demonstrate its OPERABILITY or the OPERABILITY of other equipment. This is an exception to CONTROL 3.0.2 for the system returned to service under administrative control to perform the testing required to demonstrate OPERABILITY. Page 15 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 APPLICABILITY (Continued) SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
4.0.1 Surveillance
Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other 3 conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement. 4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL.The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.
4.0.4 Entry
into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified applicable condition shall not be I made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROLS have been performed within the applicable surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. I I I I I I I I Page 16 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.10 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).APPLICABILITY: During all liquid releases via these pathways.ACTION: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.
- b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1.
Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.7.10 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.10-1. Page 17 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE INSTRUMENT ACTION 1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower*2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir c. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line**1 1 110 110 1 111 1 N/A 112 112 N/A Page 18 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION ACTION 110 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that prior to initiating a release: a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.2, and b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving;Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 111 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1- 131, and dissolved and entrained noble gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 .B, and the Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed. Otherwise, suspend the release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 112 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases. Pump performance curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow.* See Appendix A for setpoint determination for the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump (TBCWDWS). Different setpoints are established for this monitor based on its use for batch release or continuous release. Automatic termination of releases from the TBCWDWS is by trip of the sump pump(s). ACTION 110 only applies to batch releases for the TBCWDWS. Continuous releases are not authorized with the TBCWDWS radiation monitor inoperable.
- There are no discharge process flow rate measurement devices for this pathway. Conservative assumptions are made for release rates. The maximum release rate from the sump is 100 gpm.This value should be used for setpoint calculations to determine compliance with CONTROL 3.11.1.1.
More realistic values may be used to calculate total activity released and dose consequences. Actual values should be used if process flow measurement devices are installed. Page 19 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK SOURCE CHANNEL CHECK CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line b. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower D D(5)P R(3)R(3)Q(l)Q(1)(6)M 2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent 3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to Cooling Tower Blowdown Line D M R(3)Q(2)D(4)D(4)N.A.N.A.R R Q Q b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir Page 20 of 151 m m m -m m mm m m m -m m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of release from this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or 2. Circuit failure, or 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or 2. Circuit failure, or 3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in assurance activities with NBS/NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used.(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.(5) In addition to performing channel check on rad monitor, PERFORM: CHANNEL CHECK -daily, including verification of sample flow through the radiation monitor during sump pump operation. (6) Isolation is demonstrated by securing the discharge pump during the functional check Page 21 of 151 !Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.11 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the radioactive I gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 1 ACTION: 3 a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative. 3 b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3 3.3.7.11-1. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7 why this inoperability was not 3 corrected in a timely manner.c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. 3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.3.7.11 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be I demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.11-1. I I I Page 22 of 151 = M m m = M M M = = = M M = M M M Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT
- 1. DELETED 2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 3. SOUTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION 1 1 1 1 1*****123 125 125 122 122 123 125 125 122 122 1 1 1 1 1*****Page 23 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11 -1 (Continued)
RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT
- 4. NORTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor OPERABLE APPLICABILIT" Y ACTION OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION 1 1 1 1 1*****123 125 125 122 122 Page 24 of 151 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11-i (Continued)
TABLE NOTATION* At all times ACTION 122 -ACTION 123 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours.Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours and these samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters (noble gases) at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11.2.1.2-1.A or B within 24 hours. Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.ACTION 124 -DELETED ACTION 125 -With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 8 hours samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1. Page 25 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED 1. DELETED 2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(2) Q(1) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *3. SOUTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(2) Q(1) *b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *d. Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *Page 26 of 151 mmm m mm i m m m m -m m m m m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3.7.1 1-1 (Continued) RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHECK CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL CHECK CALIBRATION TEST MODES IN WHICH SURVIELLANCE REOIIJIRED INSTRI TMFNT INSTRUMENT
- 4. NORTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor b. Iodine Sampler c. Particulate Sampler d. Flow Rate Monitor e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D W W D D M N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.R(2)N.A.N.A.Q(1)N.A.N.A.*****R R Q Q Page 27 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATION* At all times 3 (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that the control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: 1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint. 3 2. Circuit failure.3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure. I (2) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NBS/NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used. 3 I I I I I I I I I I*Page 28 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1.1.1-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 1 0.4 microcuries/ml. APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the concentration to within the above limits.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program in Table 4.11 .1 .1 .1-1.4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.Page 29 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM , Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (ýCi/ml)A. Batch Waste P P 1) Release(b) Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma Sample Emitters(c) 5x 10-7 Tanks 1-131 1x10-6 2) Turbine Building P M Dissolved and Circulating Water One Entrained Gases 1x 10-Dewatering Sump Batch/M (Gamma Emitters)when released in p M H-3 lx -5 Batch Mode* Each Batch Composite(d) lx Gross Alpha 1x1 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Each Batch Composite(d) Fe-55 1x10 6 B. Continuous M Principal Gamma Releases(e) N/A Composite Emitters(c) 5x 107 1) Station Service Water System (SSWS) (If contaminated as indicated by SACS 1-131 or RACS system) lx 106 2) Turbine Building W** M Dissolved and Circulating Water Grab Entrained Gases lx 10.Dewatering Sump* Sample NA M H-3 Composite (d) lx 10 Gross Alpha 1x1 NA Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 8 Composite (d)Fe-55 X1O-6 I I 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I Page 30 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: LLD= 4.66o Sb E
- V
- 2.22E6
- Y
- exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as microcuries per unit mass or volume, 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, X is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1), and At for plant effluents is the elapsed time between midpoint of sample collection and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Page 31 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1 (Continued) 3 TABLE NOTATION g b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in I the ODCM to assure representative sampling.C. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are: Mn- I 54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ce-141. Ce-144 shall also be measured, but with an LLD of 5 x 10-6. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. 3 d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume; e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.*The Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump is a normal radwaste discharge i pathway and is monitored as such because of possible contamination from the Turbine Building Ventilation drains. Securing the sump pump provides discharge termination. Siphoning does not 3 occur do to the differential height between the sump and the discharge point. Releases from the TBCWDS below the setpoint of 2X background are considered continuous releases. Sampling of continuous releases is performed using a continuous composite sampler. Samples for analyses 3 required in Table 4.11 .1 .1 .1-1 for continuous releases are obtained from the composite sampler.Releases from the sump at levels at or above 2x background may be performed as batch releases.Samples for analyses required in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 for batch releases are obtained from the sump. 3** The grab sample from the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump for dissolved and entrained noble gases is required Monthly from the composite sampler.I I I Page 32 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited: a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 33 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSSTEM CONTROLS 3 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1)would exceed 0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in any 31-day period.APPLICABILITY: At all times. I ACTION: a. With radioactive liquid waste being discharged and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the liquid Radwaste treatment system not in operation, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:
- 1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, 3 identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
i b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases from each reactor unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.1.3.2 The installed liquid Radwaste treatment system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.1.2.Page 34 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following:
- a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and b. For iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.APPLICABILITY:
At all times.ACTION: With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1. Page 35 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)Type Frequency Frequency Analysis ([tCi/ml)A. Containment P P Principal Gamma 1x 10 4 PURGE Each PURGE(c) Each PURGE(c) Emitters(b) Grab Sample P H-3 (oxide) 1x10-6 B. North Plant Vent M(c), (d) Principal Gamma 1x10-4 South Plant Vent Grab Sample M(C) Emitters(b) FRVS (g)H-3 (oxide) 1x10" 6 C. All Release Continuous(e) W(0 Types as Charcoal 1-131 lx10-1 2 listed in A Sample and B above (e) W( Principal Gamma 11 Continuous Particulate Emitters(b) 1x10 Sample Continuous(e) Q Gross Alpha 1x 10 1'Composite Particulate Sample Continuous(e) Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1x10-1 1 Composite Particulate Sample Continuous(e) Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1x10-6 Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma U I I I U I I!I I I I I I I Page 36 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATION a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1
- b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides:
Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 for noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER within a 1-hour period.This requirement does not apply if: 1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2. The noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.d, Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the spent fuel pool area, whenever fuel is in the spent fuel pool.e. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.f. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing, or after removal from sampler. Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER in 1 hour and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.g. Table 4.11.2.1.2-1, Notations "c", and "f' do not apply. Monthly samples for principle gamma emitters and tritium are required only if the FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service greater than 8 hours. For noble gas and tritium, representative samples of Reactor Building may be obtained for compliance in lieu of skid samples. FRVS continuous samples required when FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service for greater than 2 hours.Page 37 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 n 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the i SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following:
- a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less i than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less I than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.
APPLICABILITY: At all times. m ACTION: i a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent i releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. 5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the I ODCM at least once per 31 days.I I Page 38 ofl 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following:
- a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and, b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.APPLICABILITY:
At all times.ACTION: a. With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine- 131, iodine- 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.Page 39 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3 3.11.2.4 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be in operation. APPLICABILITY: Whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector is in operation. 3 ACTION: a. With gaseous radwaste from the main condenser air ejector system being discharged I without treatment for more than 7 days, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:
- 1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
- b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable.
N I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4 The readings of the relevant instruments shall be checked every 12 hours when the main condenser air ejector is in use to ensure that the gaseous radwaste treatment system is functioning. I I I I Page 40of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.5 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM for the Reactor Building and the Service and Radwaste Building shall be OPERABLE and the appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce release of radioactivity when the projected dose in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1 -1), would exceed: a. 0.2 mrad to air for gamma radiation, or b. 0.4 mrad to air for beta radiation, or c. 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With radioactive ventilation exhaust being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:
- 1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
- b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5.1 Doses due to gaseous releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM, when the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM is not being fully utilized.4.11.2.5.2 The installed VENTILATION EXAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3.Page 41 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING CONTROLS 3.11.2.8 VENTING or PURGING of the Mark I containment drywell shall be through either the reactor building ventilation system or the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system.*APPLICABILITY: whenever the containment is vented or purged.ACTION: a. With the requirements of the above CONTROL not satisfied, suspend all VENTING and PURGING of the drywell.b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLAINCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.8 The containment shall be determined to be aligned for VENTING or PURGING through either the reactor building ventilation system, the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system, or the hardened torus vent within 4 hours prior to the start of and at least once per 12 hours during VENTING or PURGING of the drywell.* Following Type A Integrated Leakage Rate Testing, the Mark I containment drywell may be vented through the hardened torus vent.I I I I I I I I i I I I i I I I I Page 42 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g. 11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem.APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION: a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the units and including outside storage tanks, etc. to determine whether the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 have been exceeded. If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR 72.104. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This requirement is applicable only under conditions set forth in CONTROL 3.11.4, ACTION a.Page 43 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 i 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM'CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h. 1, the radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1.APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification l 6.9.1.6, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence. i b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12.1-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to I a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if: concentration (1) 1. concentration (2) +... > 1.0 i reporting level (1) reporting level (2)When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the I calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.*The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.i Page 44 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS (Continued) ACTION: (Continued) C. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12.1-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7 and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
- d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12.1-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12.1-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12.1-1.Page 45 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS () FREQUENCY 1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows: An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 1 1-km range from the site (not bounded by or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.*The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.Page 46 of 151 ==m===m m mm=== = -Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.Radioiodine Canister 1- 131 analysis weekly.Four(4) Samples -One sample from close to the SITE BOUNDARY location and Three (3) samples in land based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a community having a high calculated annual average ground- level D/Q;and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction. Particulate Sampler Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change (3);Gamma isotopic analysis(4) of composites (by location)quarterly. Page 47 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 3. WATERBORNE
- a. Surface(5)
One sample upstream.One sample downstream One sample outfall One sample cross-stream Grab sample monthly b. Ground c. Drinking (10)d. Sediment Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected(7).One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge One sample from downstream area One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown Monthly Composite sample over two-week period(6) when I-131 analysis is performed; monthly composite otherwise. Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly. Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly and tritium analysis quarterly. 1- 131 analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the water is greater than 1 mrem per year(8). Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) semiannually Page 48 of 151 =- = M = = M mm = = = M m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 4. INGESTION a. Milk Samples from milking animals in three locations within 5 km distance having the highest dose potential. If there are none, then, one sample from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per yr(.One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge. Semimonthly when animals are on pasture, monthly at other time Gamma isotopic (4) and 1-131 analysis semi-monthly when animals are on pasture; monthly at other times b. Fish and Invertebrates Sample in season, or semiannually if they are not seasonal Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on edible portions.Page 49 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS c. Food Products One sample of each principal class of food products from any area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged At time of harvest (9)Gamma isotopic analysis (4) on edible portion.Page 50 of 151--1-- ---/ 1 -1 1--1-I 1m 1-/- I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12.1-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133,"Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time.In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.(2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters. For the purposes of this table, a Dosimeter of Legal Record (DLR) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation. The frequency of analysis or readout for dosimetry systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading. No direct radiation monitoring stations are located in the inner ring sectors 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 and the outer ring sector 8 as originally determined during plant licensing and as permitted by Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by The Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979.(3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.(4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.Page 51 of 151 .Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized for recreational activities. (6) A composite sample is one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination. (8) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the I methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk collections. (9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. (10) No groundwater samples-are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest unaffected water supply is required.I I I Page 52 of 151 mm -m m m -m m -m ---m m -m m -Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)H-3 3j X10 4 Mn-54 1 X 10 3 3 x 104 Fe-59 4 x 10 2 1 X 104 Co-58 1 x 103 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 10 4 Zn-65 3 x 102 2 x 10 4 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 1-131 2* 0.9 3 1 x 10 2 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 3 60 1 x 10 3 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2 x 10 3 Ba-La-140 2 x 10 2 3 x 102* For drinking water samples. This is a 40 CFR Part 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/1 may be used.Page 53 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.12.1-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(')' (2)LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/!) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)gross 4 0.01 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 1* 0.07 1 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 LLD for drinking water samples. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 10 pCi/l may be used.Page 54 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: LLD= 4.66 9 Sb E
- V
- 2.22E6
- Y
- exp(-2At)Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as picocuries per unit mass or volume, 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-'), and At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.
Page 55 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS I It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact)limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.I I I I I i i i I I I Page 56 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2) producing broad leaf vegetation. APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
- c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.*Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q's in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12.1-1, Part 4.c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.Page 57 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS I I I I I I 3.12.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.APPLICABILITY: At all times.ACTION: a. With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.U I I U I I I I I I I I Page 58 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.Page 59 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION I BASES 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the I requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This will ensure the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.I U I I I I I I I Page 60 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually). 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology-provided-in-Regulatory Guide 1.109,Y"Calculation-of Annual-Doses .to Man-from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.Page 61 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of the liquid Radwaste treatment system ensures that this system will be available I for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to their release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This CONTROL implements the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents. 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 to UNRESTRICTED AREAS. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)]. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such I MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal I to 500 mrem/year to the total body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year. The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL-Procedures Manual; HASL-300 -(revised annually). Page 62 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE -NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE -IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROLS are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRERSTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric-conditions. The release rate-controls for iodine-i3-1, iodine-t33, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.Page 63 of 151
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.2.4 AND 3/4.11.2.5 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT AND VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT I The OPERABILITY of the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREAMENT SYSTEM ensures that the system will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions I of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents. 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING This CONTROL provides reasonable assurance that releases from drywell venting or purging operations will U not exceed the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for UNRESTRICTED AREAS.3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE I This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525 as well as the dose limitations specific to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104. Over the long term, as more storage casks are placed on the ISFSI pads, it is expected that ISFSI operations will become the prominent contributor to the dose limits in this section. ISFSI dose contribution is in the form of direct radiation as no liquid or gas releases I are expected to occur. The PSEG 10 CFR 72.212 Report prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 72 requirements assumes a certain array of casks exists on the pads. The dose contribution from this array of casks in combination with historical uranium fuel cycle operations prior to ISFSI operations was analyzed to be within the 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 limits. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant including the ISFSI radioactive effluents exceed 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from I other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, the Special Report with a request for a var iance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation I of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.2.1. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in 3 carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.Page 64 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. This monitoring program implements Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, and November 1979. The initially specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience. The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 4.12.1-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually). 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, from aerial survey, from visual survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/im 2.Page 65 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES I 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 66 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Page 67 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.) 5.1 SITE MAP DEFINING UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND SITE BOUNDARY FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS 5.1.1 Information regarding radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents which will allow identification of structures and release points as well as definition of UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1.1-1.I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 68 ofl151 UNRESTRICTED AREA (PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVERNMENT)
i N I I (~. 1 NUCLEAR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING d COOLING TOWER N SECURITY FENCE I CE, 0*1 1 SWITCH YARD E l l SITE BOUNDARY--->I HOPE CREEK L SCRTPROCESSING
- S CENTERS R CENTER C SALEM.1II N0.2"I'SWITCH YARD METEOROLOGICAL NO.1 TOWER', FEED WATER & 0E i' CIRC. WATER INTAKE A.ESTRUCTURE,,R
- DELAWARE RIVER Oil t,'0"ll 0 CDI Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.6 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year, shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.
The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to alleviate the problem.The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summarized and tabulated results in the format of Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical I Position, Revision 1, November 1979, for all of the radiological environmental samples taken during the report period pursuant to the table and figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM.Deviations from the sampling program identified in CONTROL 3.12.1 shall be reported. In the event that I some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE I BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, as required by CONTROL 3.12.3 and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12.1-1 was not achieved.The report shall also include the results of specific activity analysis in which the primary coolant I exceeded the limits of Technical Specification 3.4.5. The following information shall be included: (1)Reactor power history starting 48 hours prior to the first sample in which the limit was exceeded; (2)Results of the last isotopic analysis for radioiodine performed prior to exceeding the limit, results of analysis while limit was exceeded and results of one analysis after the radioiodine activity was reduced to less than the limit. Each result should include date and time of sampling and the radioiodine concentrations; (3) Clean-up system flow history starting 48 hours prior to the first sample in which the limit was exceeded; (4) Graph of the 1-131 per gram as a function of time for the duration of the specific activity of the steady-state level; and (5) The time duration when the specific activity of the primary coolant exceeded the liinit.A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit site. The submittal should combine those U sections that are common to all units at the site.Page 70 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit, shall be submitted by May 1 of each year and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21."Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured) on magnetic tape, or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1.1 -1) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s). The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation and 10 CFR 72.104 Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period: a. Container volume, b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate), d. Type of waste (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms), e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde). Page 71 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) The Radioactive Effluent Release Report
- shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to I the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring.
I A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.I I I I I I I I I I Page 72 of 15*1 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid): I1. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC). The discussion of each change shall contain: a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 1OCFR50.59;
- b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;
- c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the PORC.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PORC.Page 73 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I I I PART II -CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES I I I Page 74 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Hope Creek Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications are summarized as follows: (1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination)
-Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line Monitor provides the alarm and automatic termination of liquid (RE4861) radioactive material releases from the liquid waste management system as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Monitor (RE4557) provides alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the circulating dewatering sump as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10. Condensation drains from certain supply ventilation units and liquids from the fill and venting of the circulating water side of the condenser waterboxes are directed to this sump. Automatic termination is performed by trip of the sump pumps on high gamma radiation signal.(2) Alarm (Only) -The Cooling-Tower Blowdown Effluent Monitor (RE8817) provides an Alarm function only for releases into the environment as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.Liquid radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figure 1-1.1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20 Appendix B. Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 jiCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases). The following equation (adopted from NUREG-0133) must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions: C(F+f)c < --(1.1)f where: C = the effluent concentration limit of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in ýiCi/ml.c = the setpoint, in [tCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 in the UNRESTRICTED AREA.Page 75 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but the same units as F, below.F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time.[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F + f) = F.]1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors 3 The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Hope Creek Generating Station are determined by the following equation: 3 SP<_ MPC CTBD*[1-CF]-bkg (1.2) I RR with: I C C(gamma)MPCe = £ (1.3)Ci(gamma)where: SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (p.Ci/ml). I MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of radionuclides in the effluent stream, ([ICi/ml). Ci = the concentration of radionuclide in the liquid effluent (ýCi/ml).MPCQ = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from (Appendix F) 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (ptCi/ml). I CTBD= the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge rate at the time of release (gal/min). RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min) at the monitor location (i.e., at the liquid radwaste monitor, at the TBCW monitor, or at the CTBD monitor). I bkg = the background of the monitor (pCi/ml).CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides and radiation monitor inaccuracies. The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the Cooling-Tower-Blowdown discharge is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria.Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch liquid releases. The setpoints should be reduced to allow for potential or actual concurrent continuous releases such that the limits of I ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded.I Page 76 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints for liquid radwaste radiation monitors may be determined through the use of default parameters. Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. They are based upon the following: (a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 4.09E-05 ýtCi/ml for radwaste releases (Refer to Appendix A for justification);(b) substitutions of the Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate with the minimum average flow, in gal/min; and, (c) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min.(d) substitution of a 0.8 correction factor (CF) to account for monitor inaccuracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides. The use of the conservative alarm setpoint, or a setpoint below the conservative value, is acceptable provided that the value used is at least as conservative as the release specific setpoint calculated in accordance with Equation 1.2 above. Procedural controls exist to verify the setpoint utilized is at or below what is required.1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits -10 CFR 20 CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 jiCi/ml.Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 may be performed using the following equation: Ci
- RR <1 (1.4)MPCi CTBD + RR where: Ci actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (ýtCi/ml).
MPCi the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (pCi/ml).2E-04 [tCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases.RR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)CTBD the actual Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge at the time of release (gal/min). Page 77 of 151
- 7- 7,7. "'7 7. 7 r. 7 -M, 7, -ý' 7 7 ;= 7 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation
-10 CFR 50 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose -Liquid Effluents CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from Hope Creek Generating Station to:-during any calendar quarter:< 1.5 mrem to total body< 5.0 mrem to any organ-during any calendar year:< 3.0 mrem to total body< 10.0 mrem to any organ 1 I U I I I Per the surveillance requirements to CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculation methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Hope Creek.D, -C 8.35E-04*VOL -* A CTBD i (1.5)where: DO, Aio Ci VOL CTBD 8.35E-(= dose or dose commitment to organ o, including total body (mrem).-site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per [tCi/ml).= average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of volume VOL (ýtCi/ml). = volume of liquid effluent released (gal).= Average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min). 04 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and a near field dilution factor of 0.05 (refer to Appendix B for definition). I I I I I I I I I I Page 78 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aio) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with NUREG-0133 by the equation: Ai. = 1.14E+05 [(UI
- BID) + (UF
- BFi)] Df 1 o (1.6)where: Ai = composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per jiCi/ml).1. 14E+05= conversion factor (pCi/[tCi
- ml/kg per hr/yr).UI = adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr).Bii = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1).UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr).Bf, = bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1).Df 1 o = dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in preselected organ, o, from Table E-1l of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi).
The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11.1.1.1-1. Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of CONTROL Table 4.11.1.1.1-1.
1.4.2 Simplified
Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)Total Body Dtb = 1.94E + 02
- VOL , Ci CTBD i (1.7)Maximum Organ 5.28E + 02
- VOL , ci D max o i (1.8)Page 79 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 where: I Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem).Dmax o = evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem).Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (ptCi/ml).
3 VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal).CTBD = average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min). 1.94E+02 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative total body ingestion dose 3 commitment factor (Zn-65 = 2.32E+5 mrem/hr per [tCi/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05. (See Appendix B)5.28E+02 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative maximum organ ingestion 3 dose commitment factor (Fe-59, GI-LLI -6.32E+5 mrem/hr per [tCi/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05 (See Appendix B).1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the 31-day projected doses exceed:-0.06 mrem to the total body, or-0.2 mrem to any organ. I The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the drain filters and demineralizers as delineated in Figure 1-1. U Dose projections are made at least once per 31-days by the following equations: 3 Dtbp -(Dtb / d)
- 31d (1.9)Dmaxp = (Dmax / d)
- 31d (1.10) I where: 3 Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current 31-day period (mrem).Dtb = the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.5) or (1.7).Dmaxp the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.5 or (1.8) (mrem).d = the number of 'days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.31 d = the number of days of concern.I Pae80 of 151 3 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.6 Representative Samples A sample should be representative of the bulk stream or volume of effluent from which it is taken. Prior to sampling, large volumes of liquid waste should be mixed in as short a time interval as practicable to assure that any sediments or particulate solids are distributed uniformly in the waste mixture. Recirculation pumps for liquid waste tanks (collection or sample test tanks) should be capable of recirculating at a rate of not less than two tank volumes in eight hours. Minimum recirculation times and methods of recirculation are controlled by specific plant procedures.
E 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls I The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Radiological Effluent CONTROLS are summarized as follows: (1) Filtration, Recirculation, and Ventilation System -The FRVS is maintained in a standby condition. Upon reactor building isolation, the FRVS recirculation system recirculates the reactor building air through HEPA and charcoal filters. Releases are made to the atmosphere via a reactor building vent or the South Plant Vent depending on mode of operation. Noble gas monitoring is provided by RE-481 IA.(2) South Plant Vent -The SPV receives discharge from the radwaste evaporator, reactor building purge, auxiliary building radwaste area, condensate demineralizer, pipe chase, feedwater heater, and untreated ventilation sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gas) by the RE-4875B monitor.(3) North Plant Vent -The NPV receives discharge from the gaseous radwaste treatment system (Offgas system) and untreated ventilation air sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gases) by the RE-4573B monitor.Gaseous radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation controls are presented in Figures 2-1 and 2-2.Page 81 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination
2.2.1 Plant
Vent, FRVS Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.11, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., of FRVS, pipe chase, gaseous i radwaste treatment system air, etc.), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by l CONTROL 3.11.2.1, by the equation: FRAC [4.72E +02* ýI
- VFE W * (*Ki)]1500 (2.1)FRAC= 4.72E +02* Z
- VF
- Z (Ci "(L 1 +/-+l.lM 1))]13000 (2.2)L Q where: FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide I concentrations and the release flow rate.X/Q = annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location 3 (sec/m3).VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft3/min).
Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as determined by radioanalysis of grab 3 sample (uCi/cm3)Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per jtCi/m3), from Table 2-1 1 Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per AiCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per 1 ptCi/m3), from Table 2-1 1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 4.72E+02 = conversion factor (cm3/ft3
- min/sec) I 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr)3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr) m Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the applicable monitors may be calculated by the equation:
n SP [AF
- Ci /FR/IC ]+ bkg (2.3)Page 82 of 151 3 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 where: 3 SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate ([tCi/cc).
FRAC = highest fraction of the allowable release rate as determined in equation (2.2).bkg = background of the monitor (!iCi/cc). AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor (0.2 NPV, 0.2 SPV, 0.1 FRVS).3 The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1). Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder
0.5 allocated
to Hope Creek. Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Hope Creek Generating Station will be coordinated with the Salem Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.I 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint may be conservatively determined by the 3 default values presented in Table 2-2.These values are based upon: I -the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate;-a radionuclide distribution adopted from ANSI N237- 1976/ANS 18.1 "Source Term Specifications", Table 5 and;-an administrative allocation factor of 0.5 to conservatively ensure that any releases from Hope Creek do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate.For the noble gas radionuclide distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS 18.1 (Note Table C-1), the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate. The resulting conservative, default setpoints are presented in Table 2-2.I 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations -10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Noble Gases CONTROL 3.11.21la limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases to < 500 mrem/yr, total body and < 3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint (as determined in Section 2.2.1) being exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting from the release shall be performed using the following equations: Page 83 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Dib = * (K,* Q) (2.4)D, %z ((Li + .IM,)* Q,) (2.5)where: Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr). 3 Ds = skin dose rate (mrem/yr). X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m3). I Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (Kt Ci/sec).Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per jiCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Mi gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per gtCi/m3, from Table 2-1.1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be 3 considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1a, following any releases exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity. The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases. As identified, any electronic spiking monitor responses may be excluded from the analysis.NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above may be imposed. However, conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the I dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1a. Provided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a.Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average-- dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.Page 84 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate -Radioiodine and Particulates CONTROL 3.11.2.1b limits the dose rate to < 1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation: DI' *O= EQ(Rio,* Q) (2.6)3 where: D = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr). X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation pathway (sec/m3).Rio = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mremlyr per jCi/m3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4.Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis 3 frequency for radionuclide i --1-131, 1-133, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half- life greater than 8 days (p[Ci/sec). By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for D, and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (See Table 2-3)and the most limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid -- Ri= 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per ýiCi/m3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 34.7 pCi/sec.Reducing this release rate by a factor of 2 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release points (e.g., Salem), the 3 corresponding release rate allocated to Hope Creek is 17.4 tCi/sec. For a 7-day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1-131, the cumulative release is 10.5 Ci.Therefore, as long as the 1-131 release in any 7-day period do not exceed 10.5 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b 3 limits on allowable release rate.i 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Noble Gases 3 CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic. assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of < 5 mrad, gamma-air and < 10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits < 10 mrad, gamma-air and < 20 mrad, beta-air.The limits are applicable separately to each generating station and are not combined site* limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses: Page 85 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D 7=3.17E-O8* %I
- IW ).(2.7)D --=3.17E-08* (Ni*Q) (2.8)where: Dy = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad). I D, = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad).X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location i (sec/m3).Qi cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest ([tCi).!Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emission from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per [tCi/m3, from Table 2-1.Ni = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m3, Table 2-1).3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec).2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the 3 following simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2 (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification of this simplified method).D 317E-8*z *Mf*"Qi (2.9)0.50 %Q elf Z1*N 3.17E-8 Nq*_ Qi (2.10)0.50 QQ where: Meff = 8.1E+03, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýiCi/m3).
i Neff = 8.5E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýiCi/m3).Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi).0.50 = cofiservatism-facttor taiccouht for potential Variability in the radionuclide distribution. Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual i average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and beta-air doses. i Page 86 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose -Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit < 15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to release of 1-131, 1- 133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days: DR 0 p= 3.17E-08*W*St
- (aopQ) (2.11)where: Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem).W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3.X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m3).D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (1/m2).Riaop = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ýaCi/m3 or m2 -mrem/yr per ýaCi/sec)and organ o from Table 2-4 for each age group a and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riaop were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0133.
Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, 1-133, H-3 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (pCi).Sfp = annual seasonal correction factor to account for fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.(1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways:= A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October)= 0.5 (2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways:= 1.0 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, the infant age group is controlling for the milk pathway. Only the controlling age group as identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3.2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, 1-133 and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (Refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method): Page 87 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D..,= 3.17E-O8*W*SPp*R -13I*XQl (2.12)where: Dmax o = maximum organ dose (mrem).RI-1 3 1 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the cow-milk pathway controlling (m2 -mrem/yr per ptCi/sec). I W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.87E-10 1/m2.Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (ýiCi). I The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. 3 2.6 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be 1 used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses in 31-days exceed: --0.2 mrad to air from gamma radiation, or-0.4 mrad to air from beta radiation, or-0.3 mrad to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and Exhaust Treatment System as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2.Dose projection are performed at least once per 31-days by the following equations: Dgp = (Dg/d)
- 31d (2.13)Ddp = (Dd/d)
- 31d (2.14) U Dmaxp = (Dmax / d)
- 31d (2.15) 3 where: DgP = gamma air dose projection for current 31-day period (mrad).Dg = gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.7)or (2.9) (mrad).Dbp = beta air dose projection for current 31-day period (mrad).Ob = beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.8) or (2.10) (mrad).Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current 31-day period (mrem).Page 88 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Dmax = maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.11) or (2.12) (mrem).d = number of days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.31d = the number of days of concern.3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS 3.1 Doses Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1 st of each year shall include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY.The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC based on the parameters from Table 2-3 and 2-hours per visit per year. The default value for the meteorological dispersion data as presented in Table 2-3 may be used if current year meteorology is unavailable at the time of NRC reporting.
However, a follow-up evaluation shall be performed when the data becomes available.
3.2 Total
Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC -40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1st of each year shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle courses (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Generating station and the Hope Creek Generating Station which includes the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI): No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.The dose contribution from the operation of Salem Generating Stations will be estimated based on the methods as presented in the Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (SGS ODCM).As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure.3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the reporting-requirementsof6;9-.1.7 (RERR),;dose calculations for the-Hope-Creek-Genierating Station may be performed using the calculation methods contained within the ODCM; the conservation controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-4 or the actual pathways and locations as identified by the land use census (CONTROL 3/4.12.,1) may be used. Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used.Page 89 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination IR Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., dosimetry, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at Hope Creek that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, I off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance. I 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Sampling Program 3 The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:-To determine whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;-To determine if the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment; -To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and I-To verify that HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment. The sampling requirements (type of samples, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are taken as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek Generating Station.4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program provides a check on the preciseness of measurements of radioactive materials in environmental samples. A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROLS 6.9.1.7.5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE"GAS MONITORING PROGRAM The Hope Creek Explosive Gas Monitoring program was moved within the Hope Creek Technical Specifications to section 6.8.4.d. This was performed in Technical Specification Amendment 91.Details of the Hope Creek Explosive Gas Monitoring program are maintained in station implementing procedures and are controlled by the 50.59 safety evaluation and procedure processes. 3 Page 90 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT AND MONITORING SYSTEM Circ Water Dewatering (TBCWDS)RE 4557 Cooling Tower Basin Page 91 of 151 1 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 1-2: SOLID RADWASTE PROCESSING SYSTEM See Note 1 Note 1: Specified equipment is installed but not in use.Equipment is pending abandonment per DCP 4EC-3634.I I I II I I I I I I I I I U I I Page 92 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION Parameter Actual Default Value Value Units Comments MPCe Calc 4.09E-05* [tCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A [pCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)Ci Measured N/A pLCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent MPCi Measured N/A ptCi/ml Taken from 1OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)CTBD Measured 12000 gpm Cooling tower blowdown discharge RR Measured 176 gpm or Determined prior to release, release rate can be adjusted for CONTROL 1300 gpm(CST) compliance gpm Maximum flow rate with both pumps Estimated 100 (TBCW) running (50 gpm each)SP (Setpoints) A) RE4861 Calc 5.58E-04 ptCi/ml Default alarm setpoints; more conservative values may be used as appropriate and desirable for ensuring regulatory compliance and for maintaining releases ALARA RE8817 Calc 8.18E-06 jtCi/ml Maximum alarm setpoint continuous RE4557 Calc 2.40E-06 [1Ci/ml release; more conservative value may be established by plant procedure B)RE4861 Calc 7.55E-05 [tCi/ml These set0oints ae- for cofdenasate storage tank releases RE8817 Calc 8.18E-06 ptCi/ml* See Appendix A for basis Page 93 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Aio (FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)(mrem/hr per tCi/rnl).... ....... .. ..... .............. .... ......H-3 -2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1' 2.82E-1 C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 n-52 4.5E-1 4.57E+5 4.51E+-1 -4.5E- -5.27E+5 Cr-51 5.58E+0 3.34E+0 1.23E+0 7.40E+0 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 -2. 10E+3 2.16E+4 Mn-56 1.78E+2 3.15E+1 2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 -1.97E+4 2.03E+4..... 9 ..... ....-- ... ... ............... .- t .......... ...... ........... .. .......... ._ 0 + .......... ..... ....... ..................... .......... .............. .................. .......... ........... ............... I. .......... ..... ........ ..... ... ............................... .................... ._ ... ............... ........ I.. .............. Co-57 1.42E+2 2.36E+2 3.59E+3 f Co-58 -6.03E+. 2 1.35E+3 ..1.22E+4 f.Co-60 -1.73E+3 3.82E+3 3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 7.18E+2_Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 .1.20E+ .. ............................. ..656.655E+2 I Cu-64 -2.14E+2 1.01E+2 5.40E+2 1.83E+4 Zn-65 1.61E+5 5.13E+5 2.32E+5 3.43E+5 3.23E+5 Zn-69m 5.66E+3 1.36E+4 1.24E+3 8.22E+3 8.29E+5 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 3.42E+2 1.39E+3 3.58E+2 4.30E+4 I Br-82 -4.07E+O 4.67E+O[Br-83 --7.25E-2 --- 1.04E-1 Br-84 --9.39E-2 --- 7.37E-7 Br-85 -3.86E-3 ---Rb-86 -6.24E+2 2.91E+2 --1.23E+2 Rb-88 -1.79E+O 9.49E-1 --2.47E-11 Rb-89 -1.19E+0 8.34E-1 --- 6.89E-14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 8.OOE+2 Sr-90 1.23E+5 -3.01E+4 -3.55E+3 Sr-91 9.18E+l -3.71E+O --4.37E+2 Sr-92 3.48E+1 -1.51E+O --6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+O -1.63E-1 ---6.42E+4 Y-91m 5.73E-2 -2.22E-3 --1.68E-1 Y-91 8.88E+1 -2.37E+O --4.89E+4 Y-92 5.32E-1 -1.56E-2 --9.32E+3 Y-93 1.69E+0 -4.66E-2 ---5.35E+4..Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.11E+O 3.46E+O -8.02E+O -1.62E+4 Zr-97 _ 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 -2.68E-1 -5.51E+4 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 -2.46E+2 -_ _1.51E-+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.49E-1 3.46E-1 -1.11E+0 -3.50E+3 Mo-99 -1.28E+2 2.43E+1 -2.89E+2 -2.96E+2 Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 -5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 Tc-1O1 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 -3.46E-1 9.8 1E-3 5.77E-14 i...T -.1 0 1 ....... ............ 1 .3 E 2 .... ........ ...... ....... ....... .... ............ .......... ......... ... 1 : 8 .... ...................... -..................... .34 6 E ........ ............... ..: 1 -.............. .. ._ _ E 1 4 ..I Page 94 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Ai.(FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)(mrem/hr per ýiCi/ml)Ru-103 1.07E+2 -4.60E+1 -4.07E+2 -1.25E+4 Ru-lOS 8.89E+O -3.5 1E+O -1.15E+2 -5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 2.01E+2 -3.06E+3 -1.03E+5........ I............ ................ .. 5.......................................................- .................................................................. ....... .. .... ......... ........- .... ....................... ..... ............................................ ..................... ............ 5...... ............................. A-i lOin 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 -2.85E+3 5.91 E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 1.19E+1 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.1OE+2 6.71E-1 2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+O 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+O 4.10E+l 6.96E-1 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+O 1.93E+O 6.60E+O 3.63E+1 -7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.31E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 -4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+O 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+l 1.92E+O Te-131m 1.40E+2 6.85E+1 5.71E+1 1.08E+2 6.94E+2 6.80E+3 Te-131 1.59E+O 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+O -2.26E-1.. ... .e 1.. 3.. _1. ........ .... ...... .... .. 1 _ _9 .. .... ..0 .... .... .............. .. ....... 6.. 6. 6 E... .. .. .................... ..... .. 5 ... ...0 _ ..... .... ....... ......... ._3 _ + ..... .. ................ .6 ..9 .E. + 0. ................. ...... ............ ..... ... .. .. ............... 2 .( E-1 --- --.. ..Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 6.24E+3 1 1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 -1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 -8.23E+1 S1-132 1.06E+l 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 -5.35E+0O......... .................................................. .. ._ -..... ....... ..... ................. .................. ............... ................................ .................. ............. ......... .. ..-E .. ........... .. ............ £z I ......... ....................... .......... .................. ................... 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4- 2.26E+2_ -1. 16E+2 134 5.56E+O 1.51E+l 5.40E+O 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 1.32E-2 1-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+. 2.24E+l 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+l 5.94E+O -8.81E+O 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+1 Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+O 1.08E+2 7.02E-1 1.18E+O 3.38E+3 Ba-141 3.81E+0 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 -2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 -1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+O 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 ---5.83E+4 La-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 ---2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+O 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 -1.08E+O -8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 -1.97E-1 1.67E+4 Ce-144 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+0 -4.43E+1 -6.04E+4 Pr-143 5.79E+O 2.32E+O 2.87E-1 -1.34E+O ___ -2.54E+I4 Pr-144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 -4.44E-3 2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+O 4.58E+O 2.74E-1 -2.68E+0 2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+O 7.66E+O 2.68E+O -2.5 1E+3 p- ................ 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 -1.08E-2 -7.11E+2 Page 95 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS (pCi/kg per pCi/liter)* I____ 3 1OE+04 12.OE+U04-nwmI H' 9.0E-0'1 9.3E-01 C 1.8E+03 1.4E+03 P 3.OE+03 3.0E+04 Cu 4.0E+02 2 1.0E+03 Br 5.5E+02 4.0E+02 Fe 3.OE+03 2.OE+04 Co 6.E+02 1.OE+03 Nb 3.OE+/-04 2.5E+02 Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 Ru 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 Zr 2.0E+02 8.0E+01, Nb 3.OE+04 1.4E+02 Teo_ 1.0E+01 __1 .0E+01 Tc 1.0E+01 5.OE+01 Cs 3.0E+00 1.0E+03............... ................................. ......._......A. .........g_...... ..................................... .................... ..................0 S............................................... .................................. .3....................... ............... ........................................ Sb 4.0E+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.OE+01 1.OE+02 I 1.0E+01 5.OE+01 Ba 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 Ce 1.OE+01 6.OE+02 Pr 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 W 3.OE+01 3.OE+01..E_+ ...E+0.As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 1 I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I* Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.Page 96 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 2-1: GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SPV (Fig. 2-2)Main Condenser--------------------------------------------- rn ux. Boiler Main System Steam L ------------------- Typical of 2 Recombiner Packages Offgas Pretreatment RMS and Sampling Hnldtm Pi I I Condser Reheater Guard Bed Amhicxnf .hort-nIl -f(Zctm To North Plant Vent (Fig. 2-2)Absorber Train Page 97 of 151 tVV~~~~~ -1r- ..trr~Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 2-2: VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System (from Figure 2-1)Untreated Ventilation Air Sources 4RE83 h N aNorth Plant Vent , o r ISee Note 1 I I I I I I I I I South Plant Vent FRVS System Vent R = Roughing Filter H = HEPA Filter C = Charcoal Filter RE = Radiation Effluent Monitor Note 1: Specified equipment Is installed but not in use.Equipment pending abandonment per-DCP 4EC-3634.I I I I I I Page 98 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li Mi Ni..... d.. o n.c.iI.... ..................... .... .. ....... .........e .. ..... ......... ........................ ............. .t i .m3.. ........ ...... ........ .. .. ................................... C .m 3 ..... ............... .................................................... .. .4/ 3 ................................ ........................... .. .. C.!3................................... .......Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23 E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.5 1E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8. 84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 Page 99 of 151 Ij Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION Actual Value Parameter X/Q VF (NPV)VF (SPV)VF (FRVS)AF (NPV)AF (SPV)AF (FRVS)Calculated Measured Measured Measured Coordinated with SGS Default Value 2.14E-6 41900 440,180 Units Comments 9000 0.2 0.2 0.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A sec/m3 ft 3/min ft 3/min ft 3/min Unitless Unitless Unitless itCi/cm 3 From FSAR Table 2.3-3 1, 0.5 mile, N Maximum Operation Maximum Operation Maximum Operation Administrative allocation factor to ensure releases do not exceed release rate limit Ci Ki LM Measured Nuclide Specific Nuclide Specific Nuclide Specific Calculated Calculated Calculated mrem/yr per VtCi/m3 mrem/yr per ý,Ci/m 3)mrad/yr per [tCi/m 3 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I SP: NPV SPV FRVS 2.43E-4 2.31E-5 5.65E-4ýtCi/cc ptCi/ccýCi/cc Default alarm Setpoints; more conservative values may be used as deemed appropriate for ensuring ALARA & regulatory compliance Page 100 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE CALCULATIONS* ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s) Age Group 3.11.2.1a Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N 3.11.2.lb Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N Noble Gases direct exposure Inhalation Gamma-Air Beta-Air Milk, ground plane and inhalation N/A Child N/A Infant (sec/m3) (1/m2)2.14E-06 N/A 2. 14E-06 N/A 2.14E-06 N/A 7.2E-08 2.87E-10 3.11.2.2 3.11.2.3 Site Boundary 0.5 Mile, N Residence/ Dairy -4.9 Miles, W*The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Artificial Island Radiological Monitoring Program and the Hope Creek FSAR.Page 101 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases, R(io)Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per piCi/m3)I ..I H-3_ _ -l.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 `1.26E+3 1. .26E+3 126E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1l.32E+6 7.71 -8.64E+4 5.01E+4 C-i--5.95E+1 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.OOE+2 Mn-54 -3.96E+4 -9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4 6.30E+3 Fe-55 2.46E+4 I1.70E+4 --7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 --1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 --3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 -1.58E+3 -9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3....~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.... ...... .................. ..... .; .-.:~ ; ..... .................. ...... .... ................ ... ....... i........... ... .q ..... .... .i .4 -... .............. ......5E + 4 .....C-0-1. 15E+4 --5.97E+/-6 2.85E+/-5 1.48E+/-4........... ......... ................... 6 + ...... .......-.......... ..................... i .. ............
- .... .....................
.........-............................ .. ............. .......... -........................................ ..... ................... ........................... Ni-63 4.32E+/-5 3.14E+4 --1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 ..3+ .0+ 64E+5 _5.34E+4_ 4.66E+4 R 6 1.35E+5 ---1.66E+4 I5.90E+4 Sr-89 3.04E+5 ----1.40E+/-6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 9.92E7 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.0OE+6 Y-91 4.62E+5 --1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4......... ..r ... ................. ........ .............. ...................... ...... ............ ................ ............................. ........... .4.. +... .................. ....... ................................. .:7 / + .......... ..... ............ -+ ..................... 3I + ......................... Zr-95 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 -5.42E+4 .7E6 10+5 2.33E+4 Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 -7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 _ -5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.10E+5 6.58E+2.......... ........ ---i : i + ........ ...... .. .. .: .6 ..-. ............ ...... ..... .. ....... ..... ............ ........ ....... ..../ --g g [ :6 ............ ... ..... ...E + ............ ..RU-106 6.91E+/-4 --1.34E+5 9. 36E+6 {9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Ag-iorn 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 -1.97E+4 4.63E+6 j3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 -2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4... i i -.... ... ......------........- -.............. .- ........-: 3 2 t i ....... .-............ ...... ......... .... ...... .......... -- 1 .a i .i i _ .. ........ .i _ ........... Sb-125 5.34E+/-4 5.95E+/-2 5.40E+/-1 -1.74E+6 I1.O1E+5 I.26+Te-125m 3.42E+3 1.58E+3 1.05E+3 1.24E+4 314E+5 I7.06E+4 4.67E+2 Te-127m 5 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 4.58E+4 9.60E+5 1.50E+5 1.57E+3 Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1. 19E+/-7 ............ E+4..* ._ 6...28 + ............... 5E+/-...4 ........ .. .. .....1-132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 -4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 i1.48E+4 {2.15E+6 i2.58E+4 i- 8.88E+3 4.52E+3....... .......... ...... .................. ..i -~ .................... ................... ..+ ...-... .. ........ .8................... ......... ...............
- 5. .+. -....... ................
........ .......................................................... ........... ....... ..... ............... ..... .....1-134 -6.44E+2 1.3+ .8+ .75E+3 -1.O1E+/-0 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11 E+4 -5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 -2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 -8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.10E+5 Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 -2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Ba440 3.90E+4 490E÷ --.67E+1 L27E+6 2,18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 .. 6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 -8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3...N..d-.................I4........ .5................ .... ............. O............+/-3..... .-2.16E+3 2.8 1E+5-.... ....... ...... ... -- 5 2.OOE+5 1.73E+5 4.64E+2 3-.65E+2 Page 102 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Facltrs -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per [tCi/m3)H- -1.7E3 .7Ei- t`7+ 1 .2E+ ý1.7E+3 12E+............ ............................................ ... ............. ............................. .......... ...... ..... .... .2 7 ' .......... ........... ... ..: .......... ..... .............. ."~ 2 7 ..... .............. .. .. .. ..... ;. ........ ....... ..... ..... .... ............... .................. 'C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E.3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 P-32 1.89E+6 1.1OE+5 ---9.28E+4 7.16E+4 Cr-51 .--7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.10E+4 3.00E+3 _1.35E+2 Mn-54 -5.11E+4 -1.27E+4 1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 --1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 --1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 -6.92E+2 -{_- 5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 Co-58 2.07E+3 -1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 1.51E+4 -8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Ni-63 5.80E+5 4.34E+4 -3.07E+5 1.42E+4 1.98E+4 Zn-65 3.86E+4 1.34E+5 -] 8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 -. 1.90E+5 ---1.77E+4 J 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5 -2.42E+6 3.71E+5 I 1.25E+4 Sr-90 1.08E+8 -...1.65E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-91 6.61E+5 --2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Zr-95 1.46E+5 4.58E+4 -6.74E+4 2.69E+6 1.49E+5 ý3.15E+4 Nb-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 -1.OOE+4 7.5 1E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Ru-103 2.1OE+3 -7.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru-106 9.84E+4 -1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-1 10m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 -2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 -3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+l -2.74E+6 9.92E+4 _ 1.72E+4 Te-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-129m 1..39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 l2.25E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 -6.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51E+5 6.92E+3 -1.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.22E+4 2.05E+4 2.92E+6 3.59E+4 -1.03E+4 6.22E+3 1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 2.04E+1 8.40E+2 1-135 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 -3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs-136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 -1.1OE+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5-Cs-13-.7. -6.,7QE+/-5 --,8.48E+/-5 -.3..04E+/-5,.-,1.21E+/-5 -8.48E+/-3-- -3.1E+/-5--- Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 1.21E+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Nd-14 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 J 5.13E+2 Page 103 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per iiCi/m3)V-rr ý ]n Itm ~ry-~.. m i tAI i IU ~uiIa~' I I -1~~U -, 1 1 -nuf ' -: .j ~r T' J[H-3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 I 1.12E+3 1.12EI 3 I .2E+3 1.12E+3..... i...... ......... .. ....... ................................... + ......................... ...... ............ .. ................... .................... .16 ......... ........ ..i 8 + I .......... ................ ............ .....I. ................................... Ce-5 3.574E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 Co-571 -9.03E+2 5.07E+5 1.32E94 l.07E+3 Co-58 i- , 1.77E+3 -___-_ _____1.11E+6 i3.44E+4 !3.16E+3 Co-60 32 1.31E+4 -7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4....R b .. ..... ........... ... i ...... .... ............... ... .............. ._ .1.- 8 .... ............ ... .... ..... ................................................. ...... ...... ......... ..... ....... ................................. ....... .7. 9 9 .............. ... ........... .......C18 5 E12 4 E11 7 E41 0 E31 .5 4 E + 2 _ ...MN-6 4 .1E5 4.29E+4 -OE+ 1 .58E+6 2 .29E+4 9.51E+3 Zn-65 4.26E+/-4 2.1E52-71E+4 1.911E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Sr-89 5.99E+5 4- E 4- -2.16E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 S.E+ 1.E+5 1.7E+Cr-58 1.77E+3 --1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.44E+3 Y-91 9.14E+5 1 E -7.7E+6 9.E+ 2.44E+4 Zr-95 1.90E+5 4.18E+4 -5.96E+4 2.23E+6 6.11E+4 3.70E+4....... ......................... ............ ...... ............ ............... .................. 11 ... ....................... ................ ............. ....... .......... ......................................... ... .................... .................. ........................ ........ ....... ................. ...... ........... ............. ....... ........................ ... .....Nb-95 2.35E+4 9.18E+3 -8.62E+3 6.14E+5 3.70E+4 6.55E+3 Ru-103 2.79E+3 -, -7.03E+3 6.62E+5 4.48E+4 1 .07E+3 Ru-106 1.36E+5 19- 1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4.......... ....... .. ..................... -...................... ... ................... ." ....... ............ .... ............ .. ......... ............................................ ... -"............................................... .. .................................... .............. .......... ......................... ....................... ........Ag-l0m 1.69E+4 8 .14E+4 -2.12E+4 5.48E+6 31.4E+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 261.26E+2 3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.44E+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 47.59E+2 9.1E+1 5 2.32E+6 64.03E+/-4 2.07E+4 Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9.14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 78.55E3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3 Te-129m 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 50E4 1.76E+/-6 i1.82E+5 --3.04E+3 1-131 4.81E+4 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4 -2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1-132 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3 -_____ 3.22E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+/-4 3.85E+6 i3.38E+4 -i5.48E+/-3 7.70E+3 1-134 .1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 2 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 -_14.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs-134 6.51E+5 1.01E+6 3.30E+5 .21E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 Cs-136 6.514E+4 7.59E+2 1 -95+4 1 2.45E+4 4.18E+3 1.16E+5 Cs-137 9.%07E+5 8.25E-+5 i 2.82E+5 ]1.04E+5 ]3.62E+3 1.28E+5 Ba-140 67.40E+4 6.48E+1 -2.11E+1 1 74E+/-6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 6 68.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-144 6.77E+6 2.12E+6 -1.17E+6 1.20E+7 3.89E+5 3.61E+5 Pr-143 1.85E+4 5.55E+3 63E 3.50E+3 4 33E+/-5 9.73E+4 9.14E+2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 Page 104 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per j.+/-Ci/m3)H.3~~~~~ ~~ * .... .7¢ 64E2i64E2i64E-2 ..... .... 6.4E- ......47E+2...C__14__J 2.65E+4 5.3 1E+3 I5.3 1E+3 5.3 1E+3 15.3 1 E'+3 5.. 3-I .E..+ -3 15.3 1E+3 P-32 2.03E+/-6 1.12E+5 ---1.61E+4 7.74E+4 Cr-51 -5.75E+1 1.32E+1 1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1 Mn-54 i -2.53E+4 -4.98E+3 1.OOE+6 7.06E+3 4.98E+3 Fe-55 1.97E+4 1.17E+4 j -8.69E+4 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 I -1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 ...- 6.5 1E+2 -3.79E+5 -4.86E+3 6.41E+2 Co-58 -1.22E+3 -7.77E+5 1.11E+4 1.82E+3 Co-60 8.02E+3 j. 4.51 E+6 3.19E+4 1. 1_8E+4 Ni-63 3.39E+5 2.04E+4 I --2.09E+5 2.42E+3 1.16E+4............. .. .... .......... ................. ......+... ..+ ..............
- .........................................
.5 4 T 6 : ; + ...................................... ................................................. Zn65 1-93E+/-4 6.26E+/-4 1 .5+ .7+ 5.14E+4-3.1+ Rb-86 1.90E+5 ---3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 -I -2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 Sr-90 4.09E+7 ---1. 12E+7 1.31E+5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 ---2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 Zr-95 1. 15E+5 2.79E+4 -3.11 E+/-4 175E+6 I2.17E+4 2.03E+4~ ............. ...U 5 i ... ...... ..... ; ...............5 --S £ [ S g .... ...... .......Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 -4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+/-3 Ru-103 2.02E+3 -i 4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79........ ._ _ _ ...__ ....... ._.._.._._.... 5.52 + 1. 1 + 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 -1.07E+5 1.16E+7 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-110m 9.98E+3 1.09E+4 3.67E+6 3.30E+4 5.OOE+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.01E+2 -_ 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 I6.23E+1 -1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m 4.76E+/-3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 -4.47E+5 11.29E+4 6.58E+2 Te-127m 1 67E+4 6.90E+3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31E+6 i2.73E+4 2.07E+3 Te-129m 1.41E+4 6.09E+3 5.47E+3 3.18E+4 1.68E+6 16.90E+4 2.23E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5 1.96E+4....... ......... ................ ..... .............. I -. ..... .... ... ............. ........... ......... .... ................... ..1-132 1.69E+/-3 3.354E+3 ..69E+5--T3.95E+5-
- 1. 90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21E+2 1.88E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 1.29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 1 3.86E+3 7.60E+3 6.96E+5 8.47E+3 _ 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-134 3.96E+5 I7.03E+5 I 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-136 1 4.83E+4 11.35E+5 -5.64E+4 1.18E+4 l.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E5 6.12E5I -.172E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 .4.55E+4 Ba-:140 5-49E-+45
- 6. + ~____ 7.13E+4_ j___Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 1 1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 t i5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 I 1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 i6.99E+2 1.7+ 4.3+ .2+INU-1-' //. , .5i. 1 .)I .1~.1JtA~)
j.LLIZ-t-J ~.LL~1~+ XUU~1L... .. .... ...... , Page 105 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per ,tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per p[Ci/sec) for others I I I I I H-3 _______+ 7.63E__ __ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ __2_ _37.63E+2 763E+2 7.63E+2 7.63EE+2 C-14 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 1.71E+10 1.06E+9 - 1.92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 .-.Mn-54 -8.40E+6 Fe-55 2.51E+7 1.73E+7 1.711E+4 6.30E+3 2.50E+6 3.80E+4 9.67E+6 7.20E+6 2.57E+7 9.95E+6 2.86E+4 1.60E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.00E+7 -1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 -1.28E+6 -3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 -- 4.72E+6 9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 -1.64E+7 -3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 -9.73E+7 2.26E+8.................
............ .. ............. ...... .......................... ................... .................. ................................................. .......... ......... ...................... ............................................................................................... ......................... .......... ... .... ................................................... Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 2.92E+9 2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 -2.59E+9 -5.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 --2.33E+8 j4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 -1.35E+9 l.15E+10 Y-9 860E+3 -4.73E+6 [2.30E+2_J_1 Zr-95 -9.46E+2 i3.03E+2 4.76E+2 9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 i4.59E+4 4.54E+4 2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Ru-103 1.02E+3 -..3.89E+3 1.19E+5 4.39E+2 i Ru-106 2.04E+4 -3.94E+4 -1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-ll0m 5.83E+7 539E+7 -1.06E+8 3.20E+7 I Sb-124 2.57E+7 I4.86E+5 6.24E+4 -2.OOE+7 7.31E+/-8 1.02E+/-7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 7 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 TeI2-25-m', 1.63E+7 5.9013+6 4.9013+6 6.63E+7 -6.50E+/-7 2.18E+6 Te-127m 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 -1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 -3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 -1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 -8.22E-2 1.53E-1'1-133 3.97E+6 i6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+7 -6.20E+6 2.1OE+6 i 1-134-- ----1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 -4.1OE+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 -4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 I.1OE+10 Cs-136 i2.61E+8 i 1.03E+9 -5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-_137 7.38E+9 -1.01E÷10 -3.43E+/-9 1.14E+9 1.95E88 6.61E+/-9 Ba-140 2 269E+7 3.38E+4 -1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 -1.52E+3 -1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 -8.87E+4 -1.21E+8 1.92E+4 I Pr-143 1.59E+2 T 6.37E+1 -3.68E+1 -6.96E+5 7.88E+0 I I I I I I I I I I I I Nd- 147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 6.37E+1 5.23E+5 6.52E+0 Page 106 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per jiCi/sec) for others OW, H 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 3.15E+10 1.95E+9 ---2.65E+9 1.22E+9 I Cr-51 ---2.78E+4 1 1OE+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5.OOE+4 Mn-54 -1.40E+7 -4.17E+6 2.87E+7 2.78E+6..... -------- --- ---- --------------.-...................-------.---.
- 2. 7 E.7.27 8 E.6 ...... F 5 ...... -------.....
.... ...45 + .......... ......... .3 6 + 7-............. .-.. ............................................. .......... ...... ..... ..... .......... .....E + .. ...... ......... ...........................
- 7. 3 6 + .. .....Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 -2.OOE+/-7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 5.20E+7 I 1.21E+8 -3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 -2.25E+6 ---4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 -7.95E+6 --. 1. 1OE+8 _1.83E+7....... .... ......+ ...............
-............. ...... ............ .... .. [.. .............. ................... ........... 7 _Co-60 2.78E+7 3.62E+8 6.26E+/-7 Ni-63 1.18E+10 8.35E+8 --.-1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11E+9 7.31E+9 -4.68E+9 j_- 3.1OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 -4.73E+9 --7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89 2.67E+9 ---3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 9.92E+7 ---9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6.Y-. 91. ... ......... .5 8 + ... ... ----- ... ........ ... ............. .. ....... .. ......... .. ..... ...... ... ......-_...... ..... .... .. ... ..4 2 4 ++Y-91 I 1 .58E+/-4 --6.48E+6 4.24E+2_Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 -7.67E+2 .-.. 1.20E+6 3.59E+2 Nb-95 1.41E+5 i7.80E+4 -7.57E+4 -3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 --6.40E+3 T_- 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 -7.23E+4 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-ll0m 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 -1.74E+8 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124 i 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 -4.01E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 .3.65E+7 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 --- ............. 3._21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m .3.OOE+7 I .08E+7 8.39E+6 --8.'86E*+7' 4.02E+6 -Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.01E+7 3.42E+8 -2.1OE+8 L.OOE+7 Te-129m 1. .11E+8 4.1OE+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 j 4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 1 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 I 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+O 3.31E-1 2.72E-1i 1-133 7.24E+6 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 9.30E+6 3.75E+6................. ..... ....... ........ ...... ........... ................. ......... ..... ............... ..... ......... ............... ...................... .............. ... ........ .... ....... .............. .... .... .. ............ .. .... ......... ....... .............. ........ ..................... .......... ......... ... .............. 1-134 1-135 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81E+9 i 2.31E+10 -7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 I Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 -9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+10 -6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6-20E+9 I Ba-140 i 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 -2.02E+4.. 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+61 Ce-141 i 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 -2.79E+3 .....69E+7 6.8. 1E+2j Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 -1.63E+5 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 -6.77E+1 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 -1. 16E+2 -7.11E+5 1.18E+l Page 107 of 151 j Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per jiCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others IMMlMmm H-3 -,1.57E+/-3 1.57E-7+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 i 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 --2.15E+9 3.00E+9 Cr-5i- 5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1 .03E+5 5.41 E+6 I1.02E+5.....................................................
-............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Mn-54 -- -i2.09E+7 -5.8 7E+6 [- 1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Fe-55 1. 12E+8 15.93E+7 --3.35E+7 1. 1OE+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 1 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 -5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 -3.84E+6 -3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 --1.21E+7 -7.08E+7 3.72E+7..6 ..... ... ....... .......... ..................-- -........ ...................... ... ...: ................. ...2 -9 1+ ........... i _7 + 8 .....Co-60 -.....-. .4.32E+7 ---2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 2.96E+10 1.59E+9 --1.07E+8 1.O1E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 1.10E+10 -6.94E+9.- 1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 8 8.77E+9 --5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89 6.62E+9 ---2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+11 -1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 ---- 5.21E+6 1.04E+3 Zr-95 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -E+3 8.81E+5 7.52E+2......... ..... .... ............ .. ... .... .. .. ...... ...... ....... ............................. .................................................................. ........... ...... ............................ .................. ....... ...... ............. ..... .. ....... ................... ............. Nb-95 i 3.18E+5 1.24E+5 -1.16E+5 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Ru-103 4.29E+3 i- -.08E+4 1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru- 106 9.24E+4 --1.25E+5 1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-lr0m 2.09E+8 1.41E+8 -2.63E+8 1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb- 125 8.70E+/-7 1.41 E+6 8.06E+4_ -4 85E+/-7 __2.08E+8 1.82E+7.-................. ....... i -E.......... ' .....i ....... ... -- ............... ........ ............
- 4. ¥ ...........
.................. ...0 8 + ...--....... _8.....-2........7 -- ..._ -125 7.1E+ 9.84E+6 Te-125m 7.38E+7 2.OOE+7 2.07E+7 7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 -1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 -3.32E+8 4.23E+7 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O 1.48E+O 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 I2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+/-7 -8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 --.O+ 4.97E+4 1-135 i 5.84E+4 I 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 8.00E+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10] 3.71E+10 -1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1 OOE+9 2.76E+9 -1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 -I-.OIE+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Ba-140 1. 17E+8 -1.03E+5 -3.34E+4 _6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 Ce-141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 -4.78E+3 -1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 -2.82E+5 -1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 j 2.17E+2 -1.17E+2 7.80E+5 3.59E+1*1 _I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 1.98E+2 5.71 E+5 2.79E+1 Page 108 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors -INFANT (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per PCi/sec) for others...........
M Fro, T TM n H-3 -2.38E+/-3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 I P-32 1i .60E+11 9.42E+9-- 2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 --1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54 .3.89E+7 -8.63E+6 1- -.43E+7 8.83E+6 Fe-55 1.35E+8 8.72E+7 -4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 -1.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 -8.95E+6 -3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 -2.43E+7 -6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 8.81E+7 ---2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 .3.49E+10 2.16E+9 ---1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 I5.55E+/-9 Il.90E+10 9.23E+9 -1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 -2.22E+10 ---5.69E+8 1.10E+10 Sr-89 1.26E+10 .... 2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+11 .... 1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 7.33E+4 ----5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Zr-95 __6.83E+3 1_ .66E+3 -1.79E+3 -8.28E+5 1. 18E+3.................... ..... ... .. ... .... ... .. .- ..... ...... ... ........ ... .......Nb-95 1.3+ .4+/- .75E+5 -2.06E+8 1.41E+5 Ru-103 8.69E+3 1- -.81E+4 -1.06E+5 2.91E+3 .Ru-106 1.90E+5 --2.25E+5 -11.44E+6 2.38E+4 Ag-l 10mI 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 -4.03E+8 -1.46E+10 1.86E+8 Sb-_124 .2.09E+8 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 1- .31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 -9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7 Te-125m 1.51E+8 .5.04E+7 5.07E+7 --7.18E+7 2.04E+7 Te-127m I4.21E+8 I 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 -1.70E+8 5.1OE+7 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 -3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 i 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 -1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+0 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+0 -2.34E+0 1.03E+0 1-133 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 -9.16E+6 1.58E+7 1-134 -10E-9 1-135 ' 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 -8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-1-37 5..1-5E+10 6;02E+10 --.62E+10 6.55E+9 88E+8 4.-2-7E+9 Ba-140 !2.41E+8 2.41E+5 --5. 73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+71 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 8.15E+3 -1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 3.85E+5 -1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 -7.89E+5 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 5.74E+5 5.55E+1 Page 109 of 151 -I--Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -ADULT (mrem/yr per jtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per .Ci/sec) for others H-3 -" .26E+/-3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 18.97E+5 l.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 I1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5-...46I -8.7--7 ...--.4- E 1.58E+8 5.42E+7--Cr-5-.......
.-..- .2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-4 -3.i11E+8 -9.27E+i7 -9.54E+/-8 --5.94E+7 Fe-55 2.09E+8 1.45E+8 --8.06E+7 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 --8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 -1.17E+7 -- -2.97E+8 1.95E+7 C058 -3.09E+7 ----6.26E+8 j6.2+'-( o -6 3 ......... ... .. ....... ..- ..... .... ...... ................. .. .-7E ... ..... .----3 14 + 9 ...-.6 E +-1.67E+8 -3.14E+9 3.69E+8 Ni-..6..3 .... 1. 04E+ 10 7.2 1E+8 -____ -1.50E+8 3.49E+8 Zn-65 3.17E+8 1.01E+9 -6.75E8 -6.36E+ 4.56E+8 Rb-86 __ _2.19E+8 -T- -4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 -9.96E+9 -----i 1.60E+9 2.86E+8.........~ ~~~~.. ...... ......I..- .---~ ...-- ........ ........... ... ............... ............. ....1 ..........
- ....... .- -- --.. ...... :..... ... ......i ....:.... ........ -.....-1 -E -O -Sr9 --6.05E+1i 1.75E+10_
[1.48E+/-1O Y915.13E+6 -I2.82E+9 j1.37E+5.v .... ............... ..... ....... ................... ........ ..---....... I-............................ ....... .......................... --...........
..
................ i- -* -------.....
- 5. y-E- 5 ............
Zr-95 -1.19E+6 3.81E+5 5.97E+5 -1 21E2 2.58E+5 Nb-95 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 T7.81E+4 -4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 4.80E+6 -!1.83E+7 -5.61E+8 ]2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 --3.72E+8 1 l.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-1Or 1.06E+7 9.76E+6 -1.92E+7 ....3.98E+9 5.80E+6 Sb-124 1.04E+8, 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 8.08E+7 2.95E+9 4.11E+7...... ... ..................... .......f .... .. .............................. ........ .......... ... ...................... .. ..... .......................................... .........I ................. ....... .......... .. .................... ............... ..... ............ .......................... ............... ............................................................ ..Sb-125 1.36E+8 1.52E+6 1.39E+5 -1.05E+8 1.50E+9 3.25E+7 Te-125m .9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 .3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+9 -1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 -1.28E+9 4.03E+7 131 8.09E+7 .l.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.98E+8 -3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-3 -5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 -2.89E+1 5.38E+1...I f ................. i-~ .....i 2 ¥ .... ............ s I4 2 ............. ... ..... .U .. ....... -... .......... 3_ i ¥ ..... .......... .]2 6 .............. --2.12E+6 3.69E+6 5.42E+9 AE+ 3.3 1E+6 1. 12E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.OOE-3 4.59E-4 .-2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 I 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 I 1.11E+10 3.59E+9 1.19E+9 l.94E+/-8 9.07E+9 Ts-136 i4.20E+7 l.66E+8 9.24E+7 11.27E+7 1l.89E+7 1.19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 -2.95E+9 9.81E+8 1 1.68E+8 5.70E+9 Ba-140 i 29E+8 1.62E+5 -5.49E+4 I9.25E+4 2.65E+8 -8.43E+6 Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 6.17E+4 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 8.16E+6 -1.11E+10 1.77E+6 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 Nd-147 3.34E+4 i 3.86E+4 1.47E+4 2.25E+4 2.78E+8 3.14E+3 1.85E+8 12.31E+3 I Page 110 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -TEENAGER (mrem/yr per pLCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per [tCi/sec) for others H-3 __2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 _ 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 -.35Et8 623E+7 Cr-51 -_-3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 n-54 ..-... 52E+8-- .l.35E+8 -9.27E+8 8.97E+7.... e 5 ...................
..... ... ..T1 5 + .. .......... .... i -. 13 i + 8 ... ......... ..... ....................... .............................. ...... ...... ....1. 6 E +.................. ............................................................ ........................ 9.9 E + 75 .3 E +Fe-55...3.25E+8 1.1+ .46E+8 9.98E+7 5.3 8E+/-7 Fe-59 I 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 1 -1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 1 l.79E+7 ---3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 -4.38E+7 --6.04E+8 L.O1E+8 Co-60 --2.49E+8 --_--_ 3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1.61E+10 1. 13E+/-9 1 ~ .81E+/-8 5.45E+/-8-.-.-6 ... ... ............. .~ i ~ b -i i S -¥ ) ........ ...... ... .... .......... ...... ......... .--. ... ........ ... ........... .. ....... ..... .. 1 .E +5 4 E 8 Zn-65 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 -9.41E+/-8 -6.23E8 6.86E+/-8 Rb-86 -2.73E+8 --4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 1.51E+10 ----1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51E+11 i -2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Y -91~ ... 87 + i -......... -- -- ................. .- .... ... ...........................-t -9 .......2 1 E+ ....Y-91 7.87E+6 ----3.23E+9 2.11 lE+5 Zr-95 .1.74E+6 .5.49E+5 -..... 8.- 07E+5 l....... ----- ............. 27E+9 3.78E+5 ......................... ....; ............... ........ ..... i ... ; ...... .... ......... i ..................... ............................ ............. ... ............... .......... ........... ............ ....I 4 ............ .....8 6..... E +.....4.... .......Nb-95 1 .92E+5 1.06E+5 -1.03E+5 -I4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 --2.42E+7 5- 5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-106 3.09E+8 -5.97E+8 -1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-l0m n 1.52E+7 _ 1.44E+7 I 2.74E+7 -4E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124 -1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 1- 1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 I 2.04E+5 -1.88E+8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 --4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m i 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 -1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te-129m 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 l.54E+9 -1.38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 7.70E+7 .1.08E+8 i3.14E+10 1.85E+8 -2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 -5.91E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 .1.97E+6 .3.34E6 i 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 .-2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01E-4 -3.35E-6 9.13E-5.. ... ... ......... .. ....... .... ........... .... ... ...1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.l10OE+6 1.50E+5 -1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 5 7.09E+9 I 1.67E+10 5.30E+9 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 -9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8-Cs-1-37 1 OI0E+10 1.35E+10 I 4.59E+9 1;78E+9 1-.92E+8-4.69E+9 Ba-140 1.38E+8 i 1.69E+5 -5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce- 141 12.82E+5 1.88E+5 -8.86E+4 -5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 -1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 -1.65E+4 -2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 -2.32E+4 -1.42E+8 2.36E+3I Page 111 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors -CHILD (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
- mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others FH-35 8 OOE+8 4.01E+ 3 4.01E+3 4.01E4 3 41E 13 1E+8 C-14 3.5E+6 .E+7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 Po-32 3.7+ 3.58E+8 9-_ -- .30E+7 1.30E+8'... .- ....... .............
.......... ._...3y .. ......... ..9 ....... .........-..... ....... .... ........ ... ..... ......... ..... ........ .... .. -............. .. .......... ... ... ................. .... .....? _3 _S f ..... ... .L+ 8 ....Cr-51 8.16.54E+4 1.79E+4 +/- 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 i ....... --...... ........ .......... ... .i .............. .... .1....85 + .. .5 .5 5 + 1..7 6 E +8...................................... -....................................... 1 ....... ............. ............. ....................... ....................... .... .... ..... ............... ............... ...... ........ ....... ............... ......................... ..... ..-5 .E+8 4.24E+8 2.0+8 7.86E+7 1.31E+8 Fe-59 4.01E+8 6.49E+8 --1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 -2.99E+7 ---2 2.45E+8 6.04E+7_Co .1.5- 6 ---3.77E+8 1.98E+8 R --3.78E+8 --2.1 9 1 .1E+/-1. 12E+9 Ni-63 l 3.95E+10 2.17E+- -4.5+ 1.42E+8 1.34E+9-iff :i............... .-f i : .. ......... ..... ......... ... ........................... .. .......................... -................ .............. ...... ...... .......I.................... 3 I ------------- .... .............. ... I- ..- ............ S-654 8.12138 4.16E+/-679 8+/- 1.6- 3.6Ei 82.013+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 4.99 E+8 3.85E+6+7.. 2.78E+8 2.1E+/-7 2.78E8 Sr-89 m 3.59E+ 10+- 1.39E+9 1.03E+8 SS-9031 1.243E8 14E84E+12O -.6+ -1.67E+10 3.18E+11......................... ..............
- . .........................
.................................................... ............................ ......... ............................. ..... ............. .... ...... .......... ....... .................... ........... ..9 ................. -................ ........ ............. ........... ........... .... ....... .... .....I............................... .. ......................... ........................ -25 4.9 0E+51 1.59E+5 -2.59E+2 L 2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 i 1.55E+7 3.89E+7 3 8.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-106 7.451E8 1.18E+9 1.16E+10 9.30E+7 AC-l-I3I 2 3.22E+7 2.17E+7 4.028E + 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 3b-14 .52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8 Sb-125 i 4.99E+8 i3.8513+6 4.62E+5 i27E8 19+9 1.05E+8 Ce-14m 3. 6 E+8 9.5E+/--------73+ 9.4- 3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te-127m i1.32E+9 i35E8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m i8.54E+8 2.39E+8 2.75E+8 2.5 1E+9 1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 f-- 3.59E+6 14.44E+6 8.25E+8' 7.40E+6 i-1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1-135 i6.54E+4 i1. 18E+5 1.04E+7 "1.81E+5 i-8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs,134 i1.60E+10 i2.63E+10 -8.14E+9 i2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 i2.22E+8 -1. 18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8-Cý-s1-T-3 --.2-.-39E+-10 i2.29E+1-0 -7.46E+9 i2.68E+9 43E+8. 3.3 8E+9-Ba-140 I 2.77E+8 i2.43E+5 7.90E+4 i1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 C -141 i6.35E+5 i32 E 51.43E+5 [ -4.07E+8 ....4.84E+4 Ce- 144 !1.27E+8 !3.98E+7 2.2 1E+7 i1.04E+10' 6.78E+6 Pr- 143 i.1.48E+5 i4.46E+4 2.411E+4 -1.60E+8 7.37E+3 I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 3.18E+4 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 Page 112 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)Pathway Dose Factors -Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2
- mrem/yr per ltCi/sec)Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+ 10 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Ru-103 1.09E+8 Ru-106 4.21E+8 Ag-110m 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr- 143 Nd-147 8.40E+6 Page 113 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I APPENDIX A EVALUATION OF DEFAULT MPC VALUES FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 114 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10 the radioactive effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual monitor.In order to limit the need for routinely having to re-establish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established.
This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution from the 1997 to 1999 release data of the liquid effluents from Hope Creek and the effective MPC value for this distribution. The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation: SCi(gamma) MPCe = i (A.1)mCi M-Pi(gamma) where: MPCe = an effective MPC value for a mixture of radionuclides (jtCi/ml)Ci = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture MPCQ = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column II MPC value for radionuclide i ([tCi/ml) Appendix F Considering the average effective MPC values from 1997 thru 1999 releases it is reasonable to select an MPC value of 4.09E-5 itCi/ml as typical of liquid radwaste discharges. This value will be reviewed and adjusted as necessary based on the distribution history of effluents from Hope Creek.Using the value of 4.09E-5 ýtCi/ml to calculate the default alarm setpoint, results in a setpoint that: (1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and;(2) Will pr o-vide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (Refer to Table 1-1).Page 115 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 1.0 Default Setpoint Determination: Conservative alarm setpoints can be determined through the use of default parameters. Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. I A. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)SP< MPG CTBD [I -CF] + bkg (1.2) U RR I Default values from Table 1-1: MPCe = 4.09E-5 g.tCi/ml CTBD = 12000 gpm RR = 176 gpm (LRW)Bkg 0 ýCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5
- 12000
- 0.2 SP <---------------------------
+ 0 176 SP < 5.58E-4 uCi/ml Correction Factor: A correction factor must be applied to the default setpoint calculation in order to account for I radiation monitor uncertainties and the contribution of non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Sr, and Fe.a. Radiation Monitor Inaccuracies: Hope Creek PSBP 311649 lists a total loop accuracy of 30% for the liquid radwaste radiation I monitors. A factor of 0.30 is applied to the default setpoint to ensure the trip setpoint is reached before the analytical limit is obtained. 3 Page 116 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 b. Non-Gamma Emitting Radionuclides: Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed on a monthly and quarterly basis from composite samples of liquid radwaste releases.Nuclide MPC (ptCi/ml) Activity ([tCi/ml) Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 1.OE-1 33.3 Fe-55 8E-4 4.7E-4 0.59 Sr-89 3E-6 1.6E-6 0.53 Sr-90 3E-7 2.OE-8 0.07 Total 34.5 The values in the table above represent the historical maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides (H3 is an assumed maximum). Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting radionuclides that could be released from Hope Creek station in liquid effluent. The activity values in the table are further diluted by a minimum factor of 68 prior to release to the Delaware River. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum cooling tower blowdown flowrate of 12,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 176 gpm.A conservative correction factor for non-gamma emitting radionuclides can be obtained by using the highest Activity / MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows: Correction Factor (non-gamma) = 34.5 / 68 = 0.5 An overall correction factor can be obtained by adding the correction factor for radiation monitor inacouracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides as follows: Overall Correction factor = 0.3 + 0.5 = 0.8 B. Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817)The cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into the environment. The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.SP < MPC *0.2 SP < 4.09E-5 j, Ci/ml
- 0.2 SP < 8.18E-6 uCi/ml (RE8817)Page 117 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 I C. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor (RE4557)The Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor (RE4557) provides I automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the Circulating Water Dewatering Sump.The sump pumps discharge to the circulating water system to the cooling tower. Plant design and procedures maintain the setpoint at <2 times background radiation levels. Releases from the sump at gamma activity concentrations less than the monitor setpoint are considered continuous releases since inputs to the sump would occur during discharge.
Releases of activity above the established continuous release setpoint may be performed on a batch basis following sampling and analysis of the sump contents. Hope Creek calculation SP-0004 established a setpoint for the monitor at 1.4E-02 [tCi/ml based on a postulated release of reactor steam into the sump. Using the MPCe determined for Liquid Radwaste and Cooling Tower Blowdown monitors, a more conservative maximum default value for batch releases can be determined: I SP < MPC* CTBD *[1-CF] + bkg (1.2)RR (Default values from Table 1-1: I MPCe = 4.09E-5 pCi/ml CTBD 12000 gpm RR = 100gpm Bkg = 0 gCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5
- 12000
- 0.2 SP< -------------------------
+ 0 100 SP < 9.82E-4 UCi/ml (batch releases only) I For continuous releases, the maximum setpoint should be less than 2.4E-6 pCi/ml above background to limit dose consequences from this pathway. (4HE-0241, CVF-98-0002) I I I Page 118 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 D. Releases from the Condensate Storage Tank If the Condensate Storage Tank (CST) requires release to the Delaware River, the discharge path would be through installed piping connected to the liquid Radwaste discharge path such that both the Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor and the Cooling Tower Blowdown monitor could detect and isolate/alarm on unexpected activity. Default setpoints are determined for potential releases of the CST.a. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)SP < MPCe* CTBD* [I -CF] + bkg (1.2)RR Default values from Table 1-1: MPCe = 4.09E-5 ptCi/ml CTBD = 12000 gpm RR = 1300 gpm Bkg = 0 pLCi/ml CF = 0.8 4.09E-5
- 12000
- 0.2 SP< --------------------------
+ 0 1300 SP < 7.55E-5 uCi/ml (RE4861)b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817)The cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into the environment. The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.SP < MPCe
- 0.2 SP < 4.09E-5 jtCi/ml
- 0.2 SP < 8.18E-6 uCi/ml (RE8817)Page 119 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE A-1: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC -HOPE CREEK NUCLIDE MPC Cr-51 Mn-54 Mn-56 Co-58 Co-60 Na-24 Cs-137 Zn-65 Zn-69m Fe-59 As-76 Nb-95 Mo-99 Zr-95 Tc-99m Ru-105 Ag-il0m Sb-124 Cs-134 1-133 La-140 H-3 Fe-55 Sr-89 2.OOE-03 1.OOE-04 1.00E-04 9.OOE-05 3.OOE-05 3.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 1.00E-04 6.OOE-05 5.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 1.OOE-04 4.OOE-05 6.OOE-05 3.OOE-03 1.00E-04 3.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 9.OOE-06 1.OOE-06 2.OOE-05 3.OOE-03 8.OOE-04 3.OOE-06 1997 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)7.44E-03 1.74E-02 N/D 5.68E-04 7.05E-03 N/D 2.84E-06 1.29E-03 1.58E-05 2.65E-03 7.70E-05 N/D 9.56E-05 N/D 1.29E-04 N/D 4.85E-05 N/D N/D N/D N/D 1.24E+01 2.28E-01 8.56E-03 1998 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)2.37E-02 7.48E-03 N/D 7.67E-04 6.78E-03 7.02E-02 1.03E-06 1.39E-03 N/D 1.62E-04 N/D N/D N/D N/D 2.05E-04 N/D 1.36E-05 N/D N/D 3.11E-05 N/D 2.76E+O 1 6.40E-03 1.34E-05 1999 ACTIVITY RELEASED (Ci)1.66E-02 6.87E-02 9.36E-06 3.30E-03 2.05E-02 1.0 1E-03 2.23E-04 3.37E-03 2.64E-04 1.72E-02 9.94E-05 1.69E-04 N/D 4.08E-05 3.35E-04 4.45E-05 3.88E-04 4.63E-05 7.13E-05 N/D 4.82E-06 2.95E+O 1 2.83E-02 3.29E-05 I I I I I I I I I Total Curies (Gamma)SUM (Ci/MPCi)(Gamma)SUM (Ci/MPCi)(Non-Gamma)
MPCe (pCi/ml)3.68E-02 4.93E+02 7.27E+03 7.45E-05 1.11E-01 2.71E+03 9.2 1E+03 4.09E-05 1.32E-01 1.87E+03 9.88E+03 7.03E-05 I I I I I I I N/D=Not detected Page 120 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX B TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS Page 121 of 151 I I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Liquid Effluent The radioactive liquid effluents from Hope Creek from 1997 through 1999 were evaluated to I determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. For the I expected radionuclide distribution of effluent from Hope Creek during 1997 to 1999, the controlling organ is the GI-LLI (Bone dose was controlling in 1997 due to relatively high percentage of Fe-55).The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Zn-65, Fe-55, and Fe-59 releases. I These radionuclides also contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table B-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., I cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Fe-59 dose conversion factor (6.32E5 mrem/hr per [Ci/ml). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose fraction of all the radionuclides evaluated. For the total body calculation, the Zn-65 dose factor (2.32E5 mrem/hr per ptCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides.For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Total Body where:Bod Db = 8.35E- 04*VOL*Aio*G (B.1)where: CB Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)Ai,tb = 2.32E5, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Zn-65 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Zn-65, and TB is the total body (mremihr per ptCi/ml)VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides (pCi/ml)CTBD = average cooling tower blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min)8.35E-04 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and the near field dilution factor 0.05 Substituting the value for the Zn-65 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplified to: I Page 122 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 1.94E+02*VOL*C, Dib0 = CTD(B.2)CTBD Maximum Organ 8.35E-4* VOL* Ai, GI -LLI* ZG DCTBD (B.3)Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)Ai, GI-LLI = 6.32E5, GI-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Fe-59 and o is maximum organ which is the GI-LLI (mrem/hr per ýtCi/ml).Substituting the value for Ai, GI-LLI the equation simplifies to: 5.28E + 2
- VOL* Ci Dmax CTBD (B.4)Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible.
Near Field Dilution Factor The near field dilution factor stems from NUIREG-0133, Section 4.3. For plants with cooling towers, such as Hope Creek, a dilution factor is allowed so that the product of the average blowdown flow (in CFS) and the dilution factor is 1000 cfs or less. UFSAR Section 2.2.12 states that the dilution by river flow ranges from 14- to 40-fold in the mixing zone of effluent discharges and that existing cross currents tend to improve this overall dilution. The average minimum cooling tower blowdown for Hope Creek is 1.90E4 GPM (from FSAR 11.2). This converts to 42 CFS. Selecting a dilution factor of 20 (between 14 and 40 from the UFSAR)yields a product of 880 CFS, which is less than the 1000 cfs allowed by NUREG-0133. This near-field dilution factor-of 20 is-inverted to a multiple of 0.05, which -is used in the liquid effluent dose calculations. Page 123 of 151
- y -I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 TABLE B-1: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways Hope Creek Nuclide Release TB GI-LLI Bone Liver Year Dose Dose Dose Dose Fraction Fraction Fraction Fraction (Ci)Fe-55 2.28E-01 0.77 0.63 0.96 0.86 1997 Fe-55 6.40E-03 0.12 0.12 0.58 0.22 1998 Fe-55 2.83E-02 0.1 0.04 0.43 0.15 1999 Mn-54 1.74E-02
- 0.05 0 0.01 1997 Mn-54 7.48E-03 0.02 0.14 0 0.05 1998 Mn-54 6.87E-02 0.04 0.1 0 0.07 1999 Co-58 5.68E-04 *
- 0
- 1997 Co-58 7.67E-04 *
- 0
- 1998 Co-58 3.30E-03 *
- 0
- 1999 Fe-59 2.65E-03 0.08 0.23 0.02 0.05 1997 Fe-59 1.62E-04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.03 1998 Fe-59 1.72E-02 0.51 0.7 0.4 0.5 1999 Co-60 7.05E-03 0.01 0.03 0
- 1997 Co-60 6.78E-03 0.06 0.2 0 0.01 1998 Co-60 2.05E-02 0.03 0.04 0
- 1999 Zn-65 1.29E-03 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.07 1997 Zn-65 1.39E-03 0.75 0.4 0.4 0.68 1998 Zn-65 3.37E-03 0.32 0.07 0.16 0.27 1999 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I* = Less than 0.01 Page 124 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 21 APPENDIX C TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS Page 125 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -Gaseous Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific.
These effective factors, which are based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity releases to approximate the dose in the environment. Instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analysis only a single multiplication (i.e., Keff, Meff, or Neff times the total quantity of radioactive material releases) would be needed. The approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculation technique. I Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:Z (Ki (C.1)Where: I K, ff the effective total body factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.Ki =the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.fi the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas I activity.(L + 1. ff)= Z((L + 1.1M)* f) (C.2)where: N (L + 1. 1 Meff) the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released.(Li + 1.1 M 1) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.I M ff= (M*' ) (C.3)Page 126 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 where: Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.Neff Z(NiA (CA4)where: Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released.Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Hope Creek have a short history and with continued excellent fuel performance, has hampered efforts in collecting and detecting appreciable noble gas mixes of radionuclides. So, to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the source terms from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications", Table 5 has been used as representing a typical distribution. The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table C-1.Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose calculation process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified equations may be used: Dr = 3.17E- 08 Me, Qi (C.5)0.50 Y D6 = 3.1 7 E*- 08 *Nf- -Qi W-0)0.-50 (C.6)Where: Dr = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)Page 127 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 X/Q Meff Neff Qi 3.17E-08 0.50= air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/mi 3)= 8.1E3, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per /Ci/rn 3)= 8.5E3, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per jiCi/m 3)= cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi)= conversion factor (yr/sec)= conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculation equations simplify to: Dr = 5.14E -4 * /*Qi Dfl=5.39E-4*% zQi (C.7)(C.8)I, I I U I I U I I I I The effective dose factors are to be used on a limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable. Page 128 of 151 1 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE C-1: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases Total Body and Skin Dose Radionuclide Kr83m Kr85m Kr87 Kr88 Kr89 Xe133 Xe135 Xe135m Xe137 Xe138 0.0i 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.31 0.19 Total Body Effective Keff (mrem/yr per gCi/mr 3)1.OEl 2.4E2 5.9E2 4.5E3 5.9E0 9.OE1 1.9E2 4.4E2 1.7E3 Skin Effective (L+/-+ I. Meff)(mrem/yr per UCi/m 3)2.8E1 6.6E2 7.6E2 7.9E3 1.4E1 2.0E2 2.6E2 4.3E3 2.7E3 1.7E4 Total 7.8E3 Noble Gases -Air Radionuclide Kr83m Kr85m Kr87 Kr88 Kr89 Xe133 Xe135 Xel35m Xe137 Xe138 fi 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.31 0.19 Total Body Effective Keff (mrem/yr per gCi/m 3)1.2El 2.5E2 6.1E2 4.7E3 7.OEO 9.6E1 2.0E2 4.7E2 1.8E3 Skin Effective (L+ 1.1 Meff)(mrem/3r per LCi/m 3)3.OEO 2.OE1 4.1E2 1.2E2 2.9E3 2.1El 1.2E2 4.4E1 3.9E3 9.0E2 8.4E3 Total 8.1E3* Based on noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1,"Source Term Specification". Page 129 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX D TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE PARAMETERS GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I I Page 130 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters -Gaseous Effluent The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3. For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass -cow -milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this gic/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative. For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.67E12 m 2*mrem/yr per [tCi/sec). By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since I-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used: Dmax=3.17E-8*W*Rk -131*ZQi (D.1)Where: Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location (s) as identified in Table 2-3.X/Q = Atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway (sec/m 3)D/Q = atmospheric disposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m-2)Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates (pGCi).3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)RI-1 3 1 = 1-131 dose-parameter for-the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.= 1.05E 12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass -cow -milk pathway controlling (m 2 mrem/yr per ý.Ci/sec)The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above simplified calculational method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these Page 131 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 I pathways to the total thyroid dose. It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway. However, use of the I-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclides has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the milk pathway.The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the 3 predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.P I I I I I I U I I I Page 132 ofl15l U I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Target Organs Total Body Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI TABLE D-1: Infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose PATHWAYS Grass -Cow -Milk Ground Plane 0.02 0.15 0.23 0.14 0.09 0.15 0.59 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.01 0.14 0.02 0.15 TABLE D-2 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway Grass-Cow-Milk Ground Plane Inhalation Frac 0.92 0.08 N/A Page 133 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX E RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -SAMPLE TYPE, LOCATION AND ANALYSIS Page 134 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulates ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = SedimentSWA = Surface Water WWA = Well Water IDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)MLK = Milk PWR = Potable Water (Raw)PWT = Potable Water (Treated)The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant: S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E = 4-5 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90' (due east)with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D).The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E-1.Maps E- 1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.Page 135 of 151 .,,... -.,...... ".". , Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations i A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (iDM)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION iSi 0.55 mi. N of vent 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent 2S4 0.59 mi. NNE of vent 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 4S1 0.60 mi ENE of vent 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 6S2 0.21 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 7S1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate lOSi 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; circ water bldg.11SI 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water bldg.15SI 0.57 mi. NW of vent 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 10D1 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, DE 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE.2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm 3 3E1 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm 1 1E2 5.0 mi. SW of vent 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW of vent; Thomas Landing 3 13E1 4.2 mi. W of vent; Diehl House Lab 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn IF1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE of vent; Salem High School U 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ 3F2 5.1 mi. NE of vent; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ I 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton, NJ i P I i Pae136 of 151 i Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM) (Cont'd)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S of vent off Route #9, DE 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 1IFI 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, DE 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Comer 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 1 G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm 10GI 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, DE 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 16G1 15 mi. NNW of vent; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, NJ B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Page 137 of 151
- . .: -, .-K Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table E-1 (Cont'd)C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) -Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem Outfall Area I 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent 1.0 mi. West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA) I STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 3El 4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT) U STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2F3 8.0 mi NNE of vent, Salem Water Works No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are 3 not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations.
However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 3 15A1 0.3 mi. NW of vent; Hope Creek outfall area 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; South Storm Drain outfall 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware river I 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building Page 138 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table E-1 (Cont'd)G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2G3 12.0 mi. NNE of vent, local farm 13E3 4.9 mi W of vent, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE of vent; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. Contact ODCM Coordinator for sampling locations. Page 139 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Sample Collection Method Analysis Air Particulate Continuous low volume air sampler. Sample collected every week along with the filter change.Gross Beta analysis on each weekly sample. Gamma spectrometry shall be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites. Iodine 131 analysis are performed on each weekly sample.Gamma isotopic analysis of edible portion on collection. I I I I I I I I I Air Iodine Crab and Fish A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly at filter change.Two batch samples are sealed in a plastic bag or jar and frozen semi-annually or when in season.A sediment sample is taken semi-annually. 2 DLR's will be collected from each location quarterly. Sediment Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually. Gamma dose quarterly. i I I I Direct Page 140 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)Collection Method Analysis Sample Milk Sample of fresh milk is collected for each farm semi-monthly when cows are in pasture, monthly at other times.Sample to be collected monthly providing winter icing conditions allow.Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis on each sample on collection. Gamma isotopic monthly H-3 on quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.Water (Potable, Surface)Page 141 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1 I I II 13 5 9-D*OWN 11155% AM Aib,.1. ....3d Page 142 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 FIGURE E-2: OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS Page 143 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS Page 144 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.TABLE F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Cone Insoluble Cone.(VtCi/ml) (jiCi/ml)Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 1E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 1E-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-211 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-131 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 Bromine (35) Br-82 3E-4 4E-5 Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-115m 3E-5 3E-5 Cd- 115 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4...-C-... 4-7. -5E=5- -3Eý5 .Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 lE-5 3E-5 Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Cf-253 1E-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 Page 145 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýiCi/ml) (ptCi/ml)Carbon (6) C- 14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce-141 9E-5 9E-5 Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1E-5 1E-5 Cesium (55) Cs-131 2E-3 9E-4 Cs-134m 6E-3 1E-3 Cs-134 9E-6 4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4 Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5 4E-5 Chlorine (17) C1-36 8E-5 6E-5 CI-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24) Cr-51 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4 Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-5 Co-60 5E-5 3E-5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 Cm-248 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 Dy- 166 4E-5 4E-5 Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 1E-5 1E-5 Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 Erbium (68) Er- 169 9E-5 9E-5 Er-171 1E-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5....__ _ Eu-1-.52.(13 yrs)- 8E-5 8E-5 Eu- 154 2E-5 2E-5 Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5 Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 146 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýtCi/ml) (ýLCi/ml)Fluorine (9) F- 18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 2E-4 2E-4 Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79) Au- 196 2E-4 1 E-4 Au-198 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf- 181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho- 166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-I 13m 1E-3 1E-3 In- 1i4m 2E-5 2E-5 In- 115m 4E-4 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53) 1-125 2E-7 2E-4 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 IE-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir- 190 2E-4 2E-4 Ir- 192 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 La-141 3E-6 3E-6 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-2 10 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu- 177 1E-4 IE-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5.Mn-54 IE-4 --1-E-4 Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 Mercury (80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4 Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 Hg-203 2E-5 1 E-4_Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 Page 147 of 151 I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-1 (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(IýtCi/ml) (ýtCi/ml)Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 6E-5 6E-5 Nd-149 3E-4 3E-4 Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Np-239 1E-4 1E-4 Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Ni-65 1E-4 1E-4 Niobium (41) Nb-93m 4E-4 4E-4 Nb-95 IE-4 1E-4 Nb-97 9E-4 9E-4 Osmium (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 Phosphorus (15) P-32 2E-5 2E-5 Platinum (78) Pt- 191 1E-4 1E-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 Pt-197m 1E-3 9E-4 Pt-197 1E-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 Pu-242 5E-6 3E-5 Pu-243 3E-4 3E-4 Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4 2E-5 Praseodymium(59) Pr-142 3E-5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 Promethium (61) Pm- 147 2E-4 2E-4 Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5-Protactinium(91-) -Pa-230- -2E-4 2E-4.Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 1E-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IB Page 148 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope So0luble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ýtci/ml) ([tCi/ml)Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m 1E-2 1E-2 Rh-105 1E-4 1E-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb-87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru- 103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ru-106 1E-5 1E-5 Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-153 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 1E-4 lE-4 Ag-1 10m 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-111 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Sr-85 lE-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur-(t-6) -...S-35 -.1 -6E-5 43E-4 Tantalum (73) Ta-182 4E-5 4E-5 Page 149 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-1 (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.(ptCi/ml) ([LCi/ml)Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1E-2 1E-2 Tc-96 1E-4 5E-5 Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4 Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Tc-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 TI-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1 E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4 Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 Thulium (69) Tm-170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm- 171 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E-4 W-185 1E-4 1E-4 W-187 7E-5 6E-5 Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5-U-234 -3E 3E-5 U-235 3E-5 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Page 150 of 151 Hope Creek ODCM Rev 22 Table F-I (Continued) Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E'5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-175 1E,4 1E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 Zinc (30) Zn-65 1E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 Any single radio- 3E-6 3E-6 nuclide not listed above with decay mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission and with radio -active half-life greater than 2 hours Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.Notes: 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 [tCi/ml.2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Detennine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not-in amixtureý The sum-of such-ratios-for all the radionuclides in the-mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").Page 151 of 151}}