ML14260A035: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14260A035
| number = ML14260A035
| issue date = 09/10/2014
| issue date = 09/10/2014
| title = Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr
| title = Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Moss Landing Marine Labs, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
| author affiliation = Moss Landing Marine Labs, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
Line 23: Line 23:
I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration   
I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration   


GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF REPORT Report GEO.DCPP.
GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIF I CAT I ON OF REPOR T Report GEO.DCPP.TR.l2.0 1, Rev. 1 P AGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION  
TR.l2.01, Rev. 1 PAGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION SUMMARY Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose.
 
2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.
==SUMMARY==
3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied.
Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose. 2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.
X 4 Assumptions are reasonable
3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied. X 4 Assumptions are reasonable , adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical p rinciples and practices.
, adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical principles and practices.
5 Software is identified and properly applied. Validatio n X is referenced or included , and is acceptable.
5 Software is identified and properly applied.
Input files are correct. 6 Interpretation and/or Analy s is is complete , accurate , X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclu s ions are accurate , acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data , interpretation and/o r analysis , and Assump t ions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has b een X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.
Validatio n X is referenced or included, and is acceptable.
10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete, accurate, and support te x t. X
Input files are correct.
* Explain "No" or " N/ A" entries. (For example , Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):
6 Interpretation and/or Analysis is complete, accurate, X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclusions are accurate, acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data, interpretation and/or analysis, and Assumptions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has been X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.
Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Re v. 0 of t hi s report. This IT R of Re v. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Re cord of Revisions on page 2 of this report. Thi s ITR also included review of th e tex t and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comment s have bee n discu s sed w ith t he authors and subsequ en tly resol v ed. Comment 2: The appe n dix was prepared by F ugro Con s ultin g, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately re v ie w ed in this I TR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------}}
10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete,  
: accurate, and support text. X
* Explain "No" or "N/ A" entries.  
(For example, Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):
Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Rev. 0 of this report. This ITR of Rev. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Record of Revisions on page 2 of this report. This ITR also included review of the text and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comments have been discussed with the authors and subsequently resolved. Comment 2: The appendix was prepared by Fugro Consulting, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately reviewed in this ITR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 17 March 2019

Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr
ML14260A035
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2014
From:
Moss Landing Marine Labs, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14260A106 List: ... further results
References
DCL-14-081
Download: ML14260A035 (54)
v • d • e


Text

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CEOSCIENCES DRPARTMENT TE<;HNICAL REPORT IG A ORIES PREP /\RED R Y: H. Ga_ry_ Greene __ Printed Name VERIFIEDBY: Rictman Printed Name APPROVED BY: Report Number: GEO. DCPP.TR.12.01 Report Revision:

1 Report Dnte:09/02/20 14 Quality Relatctl:

Y Page 1 of 53 Moss Landing Mm ine Laboratories Organi7ation DATE* 5:rl-Z; 20/'f Consulting Geophysicist Organization

££J R, 'c_/({

I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration

GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIF I CAT I ON OF REPOR T Report GEO.DCPP.TR.l2.0 1, Rev. 1 P AGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose. 2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.

3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied. X 4 Assumptions are reasonable , adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical p rinciples and practices.

5 Software is identified and properly applied. Validatio n X is referenced or included , and is acceptable.

Input files are correct. 6 Interpretation and/or Analy s is is complete , accurate , X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclu s ions are accurate , acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data , interpretation and/o r analysis , and Assump t ions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has b een X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.

10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete, accurate, and support te x t. X

  • Explain "No" or " N/ A" entries. (For example , Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):

Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Re v. 0 of t hi s report. This IT R of Re v. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Re cord of Revisions on page 2 of this report. Thi s ITR also included review of th e tex t and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comment s have bee n discu s sed w ith t he authors and subsequ en tly resol v ed. Comment 2: The appe n dix was prepared by F ugro Con s ultin g, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately re v ie w ed in this I TR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14260A035&oldid=1357970"